PRIVACY PAPERS for POLICYMAKERS 2018 February 6, 2019

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

PRIVACY PAPERS FOR POLICYMAKERS 2018 February 6, 2019 We are pleased to introduce FPF’s ninth annual Privacy Papers for Policymakers. Each year, we invite privacy scholars and authors to submit scholarship for consideration by a committee of reviewers and judges from the FPF Advisory Board. The selected papers are those judged to contain practical analyses of emerging issues that policymakers in Congress, in federal agencies, at the state level and internationally should find useful. This year’s winning papers examine a variety of topical privacy issues: • One paper focuses on sexual privacy abuses (Citron). The paper argues for the removal of some platform immunity and implementation of federal and state penalties to combat sexual privacy violations. This material is based upon work supported • Another paper grapples with how privacy is implemented during the design stage of technology by the National Science Foundation under and introduces a framework for incentivizing companies to bring privacy to the forefront of their Grant No. 1837413. business (Waldman). • A third paper suggests filling gaps in federal and state privacy laws regarding government surveillance and fair information practices by looking to local statutes, while arguing that certain local laws should prevail against federal and state preemption (Rubinstein). • Other papers focus on European privacy law and data subject rights. One paper investigates the results of an empirical study of data access requests, and finds that while access rights usually are not adequately accommodated, there are other potential solutions for controllers to improve the efficacy of access rights requests (Ausloos & Dewitte). • Another paper argues that the right to an explanation under GDPR is unlikely to remedy harms stemming from machine learning algorithms (Edwards & Veale). Instead, the authors suggest that other elements of GDPR, including the right to erasure, the right to portability, and privacy by design principles, could better address these concerns. For the third year in a row, we are proud to continue highlighting student work by honoring another excellent article. The winning paper (Bashir & Wilson) offers a novel approach to understanding the advertising and analytics landscape. We thank the scholars, advocates, and Advisory Board members who are engaged with us to explore the future of privacy. Sincerely, Christopher Wolf Jules Polonetsky Senior Counsel, Hogan Lovells LLP CEO Chairman, FPF Board of Directors Privacy Papers for Policymakers 2018 1 Future of Privacy Forum Advisory Board Alessandro Acquisti John Breyault Alyssa Harvey Dawson Meredith Grauer Cameron Kerry Michael McCullough Associate Professor of Information Technology Vice President, Public Policy, Telecommunications General Counsel Chief Privacy Officer Senior Counsel Chief Privacy Officer & Vice President Enterprise & Public Policy and Fraud Sidewalk Labs, LLC The Nielsen Company Sidley Austin LLP Information Management National Consumers League Carnegie Mellon University's Heinz College Laurie Dechery Kimberly Gray Damien Kieran Macy's Inc. Nicholas Ahrens Jill Bronfman Associate General Counsel Deputy General Counsel, Chief Privacy Officer Data Protection Officer, Legal William McGeveran Vice President, Privacy and Cybersecurity Privacy Counsel Lifetouch, Inc. IQVIA Twitter Associate Professor Common Sense Media Retail Industry Leaders Association Michelle Dennedy Woodrow Hartzog Stephen Kline University of Minnesota Law School Sharon Anolik Stuart Brotman Vice President, Chief Privacy Officer Professor of Law and Computer Science Vice President - Independent Privacy Risk and Christin McMeley President Howard Distinguished Endowed Professor of Media Cisco Systems Inc. Northeastern University School of Law Chief Privacy Officer Senior Vice President , Chief Privacy and Legal Management and Law and Beaman Professor of American Express National Bank Privacy Panacea Carol DiBattiste Information Security Officer Communication and Information Eric Heath Annie Antón General Counsel & Chief Privacy and People Officer Anne Klinefelter Comcast Cable University of Tennessee, Knoxville Chief Privacy Officer Associate Professor of Law, Law Library Director Professor of Computer Science comscore Ancestry David Medine Bill Brown University of North Carolina Georgia Institute of Technology Erin Egan Consultant Senior Vice President and Chief Information Rita Heimes Senior Policy Advisor and DIrector, Privacy Fernando Laguarda Consultative Group to Assist the Poor Justin Antonipillai Security Officer Research Director, Data Protection Officer Facebook, Inc. Faculty Director, Program on Law and Government Chief Executive Officer Houghton Mifflin Harcourt IAPP - International Association of Privacy Carlos Melvin American University Washington College of Law WireWheel Keith Enright Professionals Managing Director, Global Privacy J. Beckwith Burr Member, FPF Education & Innovation Foundation Director, Global Privacy Legal Starbucks Jocelyn Aqua Deputy General Counsel and Chief Privacy Officer Eileen Hershenov Board of Directors Google Principal, Regulatory Privacy & Cybersecurity Neustar General Counsel Douglas Miller Michael Lamb PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Patrice Ettinger Wikimedia Foundation Vice President, Global Privacy Leader Andrew Burt Global Chief Privacy Officer Chief Privacy Officer Vivienne Artz Chief Privacy Officer & Legal Engineer Beth Hill RELX Group Verizon Media Chief Privacy Officer Immuta Pfizer, Inc. General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer Barbara Lawler Tom Moore Refinitiv Joshua Fairfield Ford Direct Ryan Calo Vice President, Chief Privacy and Data Ethics Chief Privacy Officer Professor of Law Jonathan Avila Associate Professor of Law Dennis Hirsch Officer AT&T Services, Inc. Washington & Lee University Vice President, Chief Privacy Officer University of Washington School of Law Professor of Law, Faculty Director, Program on Data Looker Data Services Keith Murphy Wal-Mart Stores Inc. Debra Farber and Governance Sam Castic Peter Lefkowitz Senior Vice President Government Relations Senior Director, Privacy Strategy Ohio State University Stephen Balkam Senior Director Privacy & Associate General Counsel Chief Privacy & Digital Risk Officer & Regulatory Counsel BigID Chief Executive Officer Nordstrom Inc. David Hoffman Citrix Systems Viacom Family Online Safety Institute Ann Fealey Associate General Counsel and Global Privacy Officer Ann Cavoukian Yafit Lev-Aretz Alma Murray Global Head of Privacy Compliance Kenneth Bamberger Executive Director, Privacy and Big Data Institute Intel Corporation Assistant Professor of Law, Zicklin Business School, Senior Counsel, Privacy Citigroup The Rosalinde and Arthur Gilbert Foundation Ryerson University Lara Kehoe Hoffman Baruch College Hyundai Motor America Professor of Law Lindsey Finch Mary Chapin Global Director, Data Privacy and Security City University of New York Kirsten Mycroft University of California Berkeley School of Law Senior Vice President, Global Privacy & Product Vice President & Chief Legal Officer Netflix, Inc. Ari Levenfeld Global Chief Privacy Officer Salesforce Kabir Barday National Student Clearinghouse Chris Hoofnagle Chief Privacy Officer BNY Mellon Chief Executive Officer Dona Fraser Adjunct Professor of Law, Faculty Director, Sizmek Kerry Childe Vivek Narayanadas OneTrust Senior Corporate Counsel Director Berkeley Center for Law & Technology Harry Lightsey Associate General Counsel, Privacy Best Buy Children's Advertising Review Unit University of California Berkeley School of Law Inna Barmash Executive Director, Global Connected Customer, Shopify General Counsel Danielle Keats Citron Leigh Parsons Freund Jane Horvath Public Policy Ashley Narsutis Amplify Education, Inc. Morton & Sophia Macht Professor of Law President & CEO Senior Director, Global Privacy General Motors Company Head of Legal University of Maryland Network Advertising Initiative Apple, Inc. Alisa Bergman David Longford AdRoll, Inc. FPF Senior Fellow Vice President, Chief Privacy Officer Christine Frye Margaret Hu Chief Executive Officer Member, FPF Education & Innovation Foundation Jill Nissen Adobe Systems Inc. Senior Vice President, Chief Privacy Officer Assistant Professor of Law DataGuidance Board of Directors Bank of America Founder Elise Berkower (1957-2017) Washington & Lee University Caroline Louveaux Sheila Colclasure Nissen Consulting Associate General Counsel Deborah Gertsen Sandra Hughes Chief Privacy Officer Global Privacy and Public Policy Executive Tiffany Morris Palazzo The Nielsen Company Lead Policy Counsel CEO and President MasterCard LiveRamp, Inc. Ford Motor Company General Counsel and Vice President Debra Berlyn Sandra Hughes Strategies Brendon Lynch Maureen Cooney of Global Privacy President John Gevertz Secretary, FPF Board of Directors, Chief Privacy Officer Head of Privacy Lotame Solutions, Inc. Consumer Policy Solutions Chief Privacy Officer Secretary, FPF Education & Innovation Foundation Microsoft Corporation Sprint Eleonore Pauwels Treasurer, FPF Board of Directors, Visa Inc. Board of Directors Mark MacCarthy Barbara Cosgrove Director of the AI Lab Treasurer, FPF Education & Innovation Foundation John Godfrey Trevor Hughes Senior Vice President, Public Policy Vice President, Chief Privacy Officer Wilson Center Board of Directors Senior Vice President, Public Policy President & Chief Executive Officer Software & Information Industry Association Workday Andrew Bloom Samsung Electronics America IAPP - International Association of Privacy
Recommended publications
  • Enhancing Child Safety & Online Technologies

    Enhancing Child Safety & Online Technologies

    Enhancing Child Safety & Online Technologies: FINAL REPORT OF THE INTERNET SAFETY TECHNICAL TASK FORCE To the Multi-State Working Group on Social Networking of State Attorneys General of the United States DECEMBER 31, 2008 �� ������� ���������� ENHANCING CHILD SAFETY AND ONLINE TECHNOLOGIES: FINAL REPORT OF THE INTERNET SAFETY TECHNICAL TASK FORCE TO THE MULTI-STATE WORKING GROUP ON SOCIAL NETWORKING OF STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES December 31, 2008 Directed by the Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University Chair: Professor John Palfrey Co-Director: Dena T. Sacco Co-Director and Chair, Research Advisory Board: danah boyd Chair, Technology Advisory Board: Laura DeBonis Coordinator: Jessica Tatlock Task Force Members: AOL/Bebo Aristotle AT&T Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University (Directors) Center for Democracy & Technology Comcast Community Connect Inc. ConnectSafely.org Enough Is Enough Facebook Family Online Safety Institute Google Inc. IAC ikeepsafe IDology, Inc. Institute for Policy Innovation Linden Lab Loopt Microsoft Corp MTV Networks/Viacom. MySpace and Fox Interactive Media National Center for Missing & Exploited Children The Progress & Freedom Foundation Sentinel Tech Holding Corp. Symantec Verizon Communications, Inc. Xanga Yahoo!, Inc. Wiredsafety.org 1 December 31, 2008 To the Multi-State Working Group on Social Networking of State Attorneys General of the United States: On behalf of the Internet Safety Technical Task Force, I am pleased to transmit to the 52 Attorneys General on the Multi-State Working Group the Task Force’s Final Report on the role and the promise of technologies to reduce the risk to minors of harmful contact and content on the Internet.
  • 336 Infotech Text

    336 Infotech Text

    Media and Values: Issues of Content, Community and Intellectual Property A Report of the 2007 Aspen Institute Forum on Communications and Society Richard P. Adler Drew Clark Kathleen Wallman Rapporteurs Communications and Society Program Charles M. Firestone Executive Director Washington, DC 2008 To purchase additional copies of this report, please contact: The Aspen Institute Publications Office P.O. Box 222 109 Houghton Lab Lane Queenstown, Maryland 21658 Phone: (410) 820-5326 Fax: (410) 827-9174 E-mail: [email protected] For all other inquiries, please contact: The Aspen Institute Communications and Society Program One Dupont Circle, NW Suite 700 Washington, DC 20036 Phone: (202) 736-5818 Fax: (202) 467-0790 Charles M. Firestone Patricia K. Kelly Executive Director Assistant Director Copyright © 2008 by The Aspen Institute The Aspen Institute One Dupont Circle, NW Suite 700 Washington, DC 20036 Published in the United States of America in 2008 by The Aspen Institute All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 0-89843-488-2 08-008 1666CSP/08-BK Contents INTRODUCTION , Charles M. Firestone ........................................................ 3 CONTENT ISSUES FOR OLD AND NEW MEDIA , Drew Clark ..................... 9 Offensive Speech: “Indecency” on TV ................................................ 12 New Approaches to Offensive Content ............................................... 18 Beyond the V-Chip: Filtering, Labeling, and Rating Internet Content ..............................................................
  • Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology

    Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology

    MINNESOTA JOURNAL OF LAW, SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY VOLUME 14 WINTER 2013 ISSUE 1 Technopanics, Threat Inflation, and the Danger of an Information Technology Precautionary Principle by Adam Thierer This article originally appeared in Issue 14.1 of the Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology (Winter 2013) and should be cited as: 14 Minn. J. L. Sci. & Tech. 309 (2013) It can be found online at: http://purl.umn.edu/144225 Visit http://mjlst.umn.edu to view the issue in which this article appears or for more information about the Minnesota Journal of Law, Science and Technology THIERER_PROOF (DO NOT DELETE) 2/11/2013 10:53 AM Technopanics, Threat Inflation, and the Danger of an Information Technology Precautionary Principle Adam Thierer* I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................. 311 II. ARGUMENTUM IN CYBER-TERROREM: A FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING FEAR APPEALS ........................................................................ 312 A. Appeals to Fear as an Argumentation Device .......... 312 B. Deconstructing Fear Appeal Arguments: The Violent Media Case Study ....................................... 313 C. Technopanics .............................................................. 315 D. Threat Inflation ......................................................... 317 1. Cybersecurity Threat Inflation ........................... 318 2. Online Safety Threat Inflation ............................ 320 3. Online Privacy Threat Inflation .......................... 325 4. EconoMic- and Business-Related Threat
  • ED441402.Pdf

    ED441402.Pdf

    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 441 402 IR 020 434 TITLE Commission on Child Online Protection (COPA) Report to Congress. Appendices. PUB DATE 2000-10-20 NOTE 1085p.; For the Commission on Child Online Protection (COPA) Report to Congress, see IR 020 433. AVAILABLE FROM For full text: http://www.copacommission.org. PUB TYPE Reports Descriptive (141) EDRS PRICE MF08/PC44 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Access to Information; *Child Safety; *Children; Federal Legislation; Federal Regulation; Freedom of Speech; *Information Policy; Information Technology; *Internet; Policy Formation; Pornography; Privacy IDENTIFIERS Acceptable Use Policy; Commission on Online Child Protection; Filters; First Amendment ABSTRACT The appendices for the Commission on Child Online Protection (COPA) Report to Congress, October 20, 2000, include the following: Commission overview, which includes scope and timeline, original statute, amended statute, technologies and methods, and biographies of the commissioners; Commission finances; Commission meetings for the year 2000; materials submitted to the Commission, including materials for hearings as well as research papers, reports, and correspondence; compilation of matrices on filtering, labeling, and rating technologies; Commission responses to questionnaire; and catalog of drawer files, which includes a detailed index of all materials submitted to the Commission in nonelectronic format such as books, software programs, handouts, and VHS tape recordings of hearings and transcripts. (AA) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. Commission on Child Online Protection (COPA) Report to Congress October 20, 2000 Appendices BEST COPYAVAILABLE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION CSA 011ice of Educational Research fins Improvement PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS CENTER (ERIC) BEEN GRAN TED BY 0 This document has been reproduced as received from the person or organization originating it.
  • Working Paper

    No. 12-09 February 2012 WORKING PAPER TECHNOPANICS, THREAT INFLATION, AND THE DANGER OF AN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE By Adam Thierer The ideas presented in this research are the author’s and do not represent official positions of the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. TECHNOPANICS, THREAT INFLATION, AND THE DANGER OF AN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE Adam Thierer* CONTENTS I. Introduction ..................................................................................................... 3 II. Argumentum in Cyber-Terrorem: A Framework for Evaluating Fear Appeals ..................................................................................................... 4 A. Appeals to Fear as an Argumentational Device .......................................... 4 B. Deconstructing Fear Appeal Arguments: The Violent Media Case Study ................................................................................................. 5 C. Technopanics ............................................................................................... 6 D. Threat Inflation ............................................................................................ 9 1. Cybersecurity Threat Inflation ........................................................... 9 2. Online Safety Threat Inflation ........................................................... 12 3. Online Privacy Threat Inflation .......................................................... 16 4. Economic and Business-Related Threat Inflation .............................
  • PRIVACY PAPERS for POLICYMAKERS 2015 This Publication of Privacy Papers for Policymakers Is Supported by AT&T, Microsoft, and TUNE

    PRIVACY PAPERS for POLICYMAKERS 2015 This Publication of Privacy Papers for Policymakers Is Supported by AT&T, Microsoft, and TUNE

    PRIVACY PAPERS FOR POLICYMAKERS 2015 This publication of Privacy Papers for Policymakers is supported by AT&T, Microsoft, and TUNE. 2 | Future of Privacy Forum January 13th, 2016 We are pleased to introduce FPF’s sixth annual Privacy Papers for Policymakers. Each year, we invite privacy scholars and authors with an interest in privacy issues to submit papers to be considered by members of our Advisory Board. The Board then selects the scholarship they feel best analyzes emerging privacy issues and is most useful for policymakers in Congress and at government agencies, as well as for data protection authorities abroad. In a year in which privacy made headlines across a variety of contexts, from international data transfers to internet- connected consumer appliances, it isn’t a surprise that the papers selected this year examine a broad spectrum of privacy issues. The authors have explored wide-ranging topics, including the design of effective privacy notices, data release policies in light of the challenges of anonymization and re-identification, the relationship between privacy and markets, and the role of trust in data transfers. We hope this collection of scholarship can help to inform policymakers in Congress, at the FTC, and in other federal and state agencies as they work to explore new privacy issues. We want to thank AT&T, Microsoft, and TUNE for their special support of this project. And as always, we thank the scholars, advocates, and Advisory Board members that are engaged with us to explore the future of privacy. Sincerely,
  • Cyberporn and Children: the Scope of the Problem, the State of the Technology, and the Need for Congressional Action

    Cyberporn and Children: the Scope of the Problem, the State of the Technology, and the Need for Congressional Action

    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 400 779 IR 018 119 TITLE Cyberporn and Children: The Scope of the Problem, the State of the Technology, and the Need for Congressional Action. Hearing on S.892, a Bill To Amend Section 1464 of Title 18, United States Code, To Punish Transmission by Computer of Indecent Material to Minors, before the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate. One Hundred Fourth Congress, First Session. INSTITUTION Congress of the U.S., Washington, D.C. Senate Committee on the Judiciary. REPORT NO ISBN-0-16-052623-X; Senate-Hrg-104-438 PUB DATE 24 Jul 95 NOTE 197p.; Serial No. J-104-36. AVAILABLE FROMU.S. Government Printing Office, Superintendent of Documents, Congressional Sales Office, Washington, DC 20402. PUB TYPE Legal/Legislative/Regulatory Materials (090) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC08 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Access to Information; Censorship; *Child Welfare; Computer Software; Content Analysis; *Federal Legislation; Freedom of Information; Freedom of Speech; *Government Role; Hearings; *Internet; Law Enforcement; Obscenity; Online Vendors; *Pornography; Sexual Abuse IDENTIFIERS Congress 104th; Cyberspace ABSTRACT This document presents witness testiuony and supplemental materials from a Congressional hearing called to address pornography in cyberspace. It features opening statements by Senator Charles E. Grassley and Senator Patrick J. Leahy; and statements by Senators Strom Thurmond, Russell D. Feingold, Orrin G. Hatch, Chairman of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Paul Simon, and Herbert Kohl. Testimony is included from three panels of witnesses. The first includes: Donelle Gruff; Patricia W. Shao; and Susan Tillman Elliott, M.D.; all of whom describe experiences with pornography on the Internet. The second panel includes: Barry F.
  • Privacy Papers for Policy Makers 2012 Inside Front Cover

    Privacy Papers for Policy Makers 2012 Inside Front Cover

    Cover Privacy Papers for Policy Makers 2012 Inside front cover The publication of “Privacy Papers for Policy Makers” was supported by AT&T, Microsoft, and GMAC. November 7, 2012 We are delighted to provide you with FPF’s third annual “Privacy Papers for Policy Makers,” representing cutting-edge research and analysis on a variety of important privacy issues. The featured works were selected by members of the Future of Privacy Forum Advisory Board (scholars, privacy advocates, and Chief Privacy Officers) based on criteria emphasizing clarity, practicality and overall utility. Given the excellent submissions we received, choosing was a difficult task. But we believe our Advisory Board has chosen well, and has put together a diverse and thought-provoking collection. Two of the papers were recipients of the IAPP award for best papers presented at the 2012 Privacy Law Scholars Conference. We hope this relevant and timely scholarship helps inform and stimulate thinking among policy makers and policy influentials in the US and around the world, with whom we are sharing this compilation. We are delighted to share new ways of thinking about privacy. We want to thank AT&T, Microsoft, and GMAC for their special support of the “Privacy Papers” project. Sincerely yours, Christopher Wolf Jules Polonetsky Founder and Co-chair Director and Co-chair Future of Privacy Forum Advisory Board Alessandro Acquisti Simon Davies Jeff Jarvis Associate Professor of Information Technology Founder, Privacy International Associate Professor; Director of the Interactive
  • Learner at the Center of a Networked World

    Learner at the Center of a Networked World

    AAspenReportPrint.inddspenReportPrint.indd 0101 66/5/14/5/14 77:58:58 AAMM AAspenReportPrint.inddspenReportPrint.indd 0202 66/5/14/5/14 77:58:58 AAMM LEARNER AT THE CENTER OF A NETWORKED WORLD THE REPORT OF AAspenReportPrint.inddspenReportPrint.indd 0303 66/5/14/5/14 77:58:58 AAMM The Aspen Institute Task Force on Learning and the Internet invites you to view the digital version of this report at www.aspentaskforce.org. Copyright ©2014 by The Aspen Institute The Aspen Institute One Dupont Circle, NW Suite 700 Washington, DC 20036 Published in the United States of America in 2014 by The Aspen Institute All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America: ISBN: 0-89843-604-4 Pub#: 14/008 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license visit, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, 94104, USA. Individuals are encouraged to cite this report and its contents. In doing so, please include the following attribution: Aspen Institute Task Force on Learning and the Internet, Learner at the Center of a Networked World, Washington, D.C.: The Aspen Institute, June 2014. For more information, contact: To purchase additional copies of this report, please contact: The Aspen Institute The Aspen Institute Communications and Society Program Publications Office One Dupont Circle, NW P.O. Box 222 Suite 700 109 Houghton Lab Lane Washington, DC 20036 Queenstown, Maryland 21658 Phone: (202)-736-5818 Phone: (410)-820-5326 Fax: (202)-467-0790 www.aspeninstitute.org/c&s A project of the Aspen Institute Communications and Society Program and the John D.
  • Biographies-06282011.Pdf

    Biographies-06282011.Pdf

    OVERVIEW OF LOCATION BASED SERVICES AND TECHNOLOGIES Matt Blaze Matt Blaze directs the Distributed Systems Laboratory at the University of Pennsylvania. Before joining the Penn faculty in 2004, he was a member of the research staff at AT&T Laboratories (formerly AT&T Bell Labs) in New Jersey. His research focuses on security, privacy, cryptography, and surveillance in computing and communications systems. PANEL 1 Alan Chapell Chapell began his career at a boutique direct marketing agency in Stamford, Connecticut in the early 1990’s; generating business with several top tier advertisers as their director of sales and marketing. After several years at the agency, Chapell moved to New York and to Jupiter Research, an Internet research firm focusing on the consumer Internet economy. During his 4-1/2 years at Jupiter, Chapell directed Jupiter's marketing, sales and compliance operations while also attending Fordham University School of Law. After his tenure at Jupiter, Chapell helped productize DoubleClick's research product suite. He focused on DoubleClick's Advertising Effectiveness products, which measured the brand impact of online advertising. Chapell later worked with email marketing firms Yesmail, a division of infoUSA and Cheetahmail, now a division of Experian, where he worked as an evangelist of email marketing, and helped clients with issues of privacy and deliverability. Chapell founded Chapell & Associates in October of 2003. Since then, his firm has helped over 50 media and technology companies craft their privacy and data strategy. Chapell & Associates has also been instrumental in the development of emerging best practice standards for interactive marketing and media – including several projects developing and evaluating compliance programs in the affiliate marketing and behavioral industries.