DOCSLIB.ORG

Resolution No. 1153

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

RESOLUTION NO. 1153 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 2010 NATURAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN FOR CROOK COUNTY INCLUDING THE CITY OF PRINEVILLE ADDENDUM WHEREAS, the City of Prineville ("City") approved the 2005 Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan ("NHMP") which covers the City, as well as Crook County; and WHEREAS, without a current NHMP, neither Crook County nor the City will be eligible for FEMA grants; and WHEREAS , FEMA requires the NHMP be reviewed and updated every five years to be cunent; and WHEREAS, the 2010 NHMP includes an addendum addressing issues of particular concern to the City of Prineville; and WHEREAS, the 2010 NHMP has been reviewed and updated by a steering committee of City and Crook County residents and professionals; and WHEREAS, the City Council is required to approve the updated NHMP, including the City of Prineville Addendum to meet FEMA requirements; NOW, THEREFORE, The City of Prineville Resolves that the 20 10 Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan, including the City of Prineville Addendum to the 2010 Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan is hereby approved. th Passed by the City Council this 8l; day of March 8 , 20 11. ATTEST: ~ . G:\ WP6 [ICIIR] SICOP\OrdinancclResoluliQlIslNH '-IP-Res_doc Executive Summary Crook County Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan 2010 Update Crook County Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan 2010 Update CDA Consulting Group Inc. Executive Summary Page 1 Executive Summary What is in this Plan? The Crook County Natural Hazards Mitigation (NHMP) Plan 2010 Update includes resources and information to assist county residents, public and private sector organizations, and others interested in participating in planning for natural hazards. This Plan represents a mitigation plan for “All Natural Hazards” that may impact Crook County. The plan represents a collection of information and decision that is based on the data available at the time it was created. This Plan will be reviewed annually by the Crook County Office of Emergency Management to consider changes that may impact the performance of the Plan, and to monitor implementation of the Mitigation Action Items (see Section 4). The Plan will receive a complete review and update at least every five years. During the complete reviews, the Plan will be evaluated with respect to new requirements and action items. The Plan provides a list of activities that may assist Crook County in reducing risk and preventing loss from future natural hazard events. The action items address multi-hazard issues, as well as activities for flood, fire, severe winter storm, windstorm, earthquake, landslide and volcanic eruption hazards. What is the Plan Mission? Through the implementation of the NHMP, Crook County will promote sound public policy designed to protect citizens, critical facilities, infrastructure, private property, and the environment from natural hazards. This can be achieved by increasing public awareness, documenting the resources for risk reduction and loss prevention, and identifying activities to guide the county towards building a safer, more sustainable community. The Mission of the Crook County/Crook County Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan is: To reduce risk, prevent loss and protect life, property and the environment from natural hazard events through coordination and cooperation among public and private partners. What are Plan Goals? The NHMP Goals describe emergency management preparedness objectives and directions that Crook County governments, agencies, associations and citizens should strive to implement. These goals were evaluated and reprioritized through the Plan’s 2010 update to be aligned more closely to the desire of the 2010 NHMP Steering Committee’s interests in expanding natural hazard mitigation efforts throughout the County. The NHMP Goals approved through the 2010 Update are as follows: 1. Partnership and Coordination a. Identify mitigation of risk reduction measures that address multiple areas (i.e. environment, transportation, and telecommunications). b. Coordinate public/private sector participation in planning and implementing mitigation projects throughout the county. c. Seek partnerships in funding and resources and resources for future mitigation efforts. 2. Emergency Services Crook County Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan 2010 Update CDA Consulting Group Inc. Executive Summary Page 2 a. Minimize life safety issues. b. Promote, strengthen, and coordinate emergency response plans. c. Evaluate the performance of critical facilities during a natural hazard event. 3. Education and Outreach a. Further the public’s awareness and understanding of natural hazards, potential risk, including economic vulnerability, and options available when natural hazard events occur. b. Provide public information and education to all residents of the county concerning natural hazard areas and mitigation efforts. 4. Prevention a. Reduce the threat of loss of life and property from natural hazards. b. Incorporate information on known hazards and provide incentives to make hazard mitigation planning in land use policies and decisions, which include plan implementation. 5. Property Protection a. Lesson impact from natural disaster on individual properties, businesses and public facilities. b. Increase awareness at the individual level and encourage activities that can prevent damage and loss of life from natural hazards. 6. Natural Resource Protection a. Preserve and rehabilitate natural systems to serve natural hazard mitigation functions (i.e. floodplains, wetlands, watersheds, and urban interface areas). 7. Structural Projects a. When applicable utilize structural mitigation activities to minimize risks associated with natural hazards. Who Participated in Developing the Plan? The Crook County Natural Hazards Mitigation Action Plan was first approved in 2005. The development of the Plan was completed through a collaborative effort between Crook County citizens, public agencies, non-profit organizations, the private sector, and regional and state organizations. Public participation played a key role in development of goals and action items. Interviews were conducted with stake holders throughout the county, and all of our workshops were open to the public to include our Sheriff’s Town Hall Meetings. Several citizens were actively involved in our plan’s development. The steering committee was comprised of representatives from: Crook County Citizens Crook County Sheriff’s Office Crook County Court Crook County Fire and Rescue Crook County GIS Crook County Emergency Management Crook County Road Department Crook County Planning Department Ochoco Irrigation District Bureau of Reclamation Bureau of Land Management United States Forest Service Crook County Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan 2010 Update CDA Consulting Group Inc. Executive Summary Page 3 Prineville City Administrators Prineville Public Works Prineville Police Department Oregon Department of Transportation Oregon Department of Forestry CDA Consulting Group Inc. Singe Tree Consulting Group In 2010 Crook County and Prineville set out to update the 2005 Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan. FEMA requires that all local jurisdictions update their mitigation plans every five years to incorporate new hazard and risk information and to continue the ongoing public process to review and update the action items the NHMP. Crook County contracted with CDA Consulting Group Inc to assist in completing the 2010 update process. The update of the plan was managed through the Crook County Emergency Management Office. This process focused on identifying new data (since 2005) that would improve or refine the County’s understanding of risks and impacts associated with natural hazard disasters. The Crook County Emergency Planning Committee (CCEPC), which is a multi-disciplinary emergency management standing committee within the county, served as the Steering Committee for the 2010 update effort. The membership of the CCEPC was expanded to include additional disciplines and stakeholders to assist in the update effort. In total there were nearly 40 people, representing eleven discipline groups listed on the steering committee roster. Public involvement was designed to be a cornerstone in the update process. In addition to targeted notices to state and federal departments and agencies, five public townhall meetings were scheduled to take input on the NHMP update. Crook County believes that an open public process is essential to the development of an effective NHMP. This 2010 update of the Plan is the result of these efforts. What are Mitigation Action Items and how are they Organized? The mitigation action items are a listing of activities in which county governments, agencies, associations and citizens can work on to reduce the risks associated with Natural Hazards. Each action item includes an estimate of the timeline for implementation. The action items include the following information for each action item: Action Item Identifier. Each identifier includes information on whether the action is considered to be a Short-Term action items (ST) or a Long-Term action items (LT). Short-term action items are activities that city or county agencies may implement with existing resources and authorities within one or two years. Long-term action items may require new or additional resources or authorities, and may take between one and five years to implement. Each action item identifier is also is numbered and categorized by type of hazard including; multi-hazard (MH), flood (FL), wildland fire (WF), sever winter storm (SWS), landslide (LS), earthquake
Recommended publications
  • 4-3. Oregon Climate Lab Exercise

    4-3. Oregon Climate Lab Exercise

    7.1 FYS207 WOU Earth Corps OREGON CLIMATE LAB Introduction Climate is the measure and description of average weather conditions for a place on Earth’s surface over time. Earth’s climate system is very complex. The atmosphere, hydrosphere (mostly oceans), lithosphere, cryosphere (ice), and biosphere all contribute to Earth’s climate. Understanding how all of these subsystems work is what helps scientists determine how subsystems respond to change. Oregon is a diverse place with regards to climate. The purpose of this lab is study the climate of Oregon and to focus on the major influences on Oregon’s varied climate. Goals and Objectives • Interpret climatic data from maps, tables, and graphs • Describe Oregon’s climate based on climatic data • Develop an understanding of the major factors influencing Oregon’s climate Useful Websites • http://weather.noaa.gov/weather/OR_cc_us.html • http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/CLIMATEDATA.html • http://www.oregonphotos.com/pagetwentyone-Q.html • http://www.worldbook.com/wb/Students?content_spotlight/ climates/north_american_climate_oregon • http://www.musc.edu/cando/geocam/atacama/atacama.html • http://www.esa.int/esaEO/SEM3PIWJD1E_index_0.html • http://www.wou.edu/las/physci/taylor/gs106/OregonRoadTrip.htm 7.2 Name________________________ Lab Day/Time_________________ Pre-lab Questions – Complete these questions working on lab. 1. Using internet search tools, define the following terms and answer the questions below: A. Orographic lifting (draw a sketch and describe) B. Rain shadow (draw a sketch and describe) C. Jet Stream (draw a sketch and describe) 2. What is the effect of proximity to a major body of water (like the Pacific Ocean) on climate? How does this relate to the amount of heat that water must absorb to change its temperature? 3.
  • Santiam Wagon Road Is a Valued Treasure Listed on the National Register of Historic Places

    Santiam Wagon Road Is a Valued Treasure Listed on the National Register of Historic Places

    The Santiam Wagon Road is a valued treasure listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Along the route you can explore what early travelers Linking Landscapes and Livelihoods experienced on their journey through the central United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Cascades. Many access points can be found along Pacific Northwest Region The Santiam Wagon Road The surveyors reasoned the Indian trails would lead Highways 20 and 126, which follow the original Deschutes and Willamette National Forests holds an interesting and them east. When the party returned and proclaimed route of the wagon road through the Willamette unique place in Oregon's success, they joined with local ranchers to form the and Deschutes National Forests. Today you can Willamette Valley and Cascade Mountain Wagon hike or ride along the route; allowable modes of Your Guide to Exploring history. Unlike other wagon travel are identified on the map. Visitors should be roads that were built to Road Company. The new wagon road served as a aware that conditions and access on the wagon bring settlers to the dominant route across the Cascades from 1865 to Willamette Valley, this road 1939. Use of the wagon road declined with the road vary throughout the year. For more WAGO information contact one of the Forest Service N was designed to lead completion of US Highway 20 in 1939. offices listed below. Enjoy your visit! M settlers and their livestock Henry Wolthuis Dr. Photo credit: IA R eastward to the rich O pasture lands of Central T Oregon and to markets Albany Andrew Wiley A Lebanon N throughout eastern Oregon Sisters Ontario D and Idaho.
  • River Canyon Country – Rural Tourism Studio

    River Canyon Country – Rural Tourism Studio

    RIVER CANYON COUNTRY – RURAL TOURISM STUDIO WORKSHOP #1, COMMUNITY TOURISM VISIONING EVENT November 6, 2012 Inn at the Cross Keys, Madras, Oregon PARTICIPANTS Cristie Amaral, Maupin Chamber Sarah Ashley, Imperial River Company Joe Becker, Prineville‐Crook County Chamber of Commerce Amy Belasen, Brasada Ranch Brenda Comini, Crook County Seth Crawford, Crook County Russell Deboodt, EDCO Billie Estridge, Timber Creek Farms Serenia Groth, Creative Groth Pam Hardy, 1000 Friends of Oregon Alana Hughson, Central Oregon Visitors Association Kahseuss Jackson, Confederated Tribe of Warm Springs Lonnie James, Warm Springs CAT Beth Jay, Resident Joe Krenowicz, Madras Chamber of Commerce Tory Kurtz, Forest Service Brenda Nathan, N8TV Adventures Randy Nathan, N8TV Adventures Stan Nowakowski, Bicycle Rides Northwest Dean Noyes, Crooked River Roundup Jeff Rasmussen, Jefferson County Rachael Ress, Bend Bulletin Kristi Richter, Central Oregon Visitors Association Aliza Rosenstein, The Well‐Traveled Fork Maura Schwartz, Resident Aurolyn Stwyer‐Pinkham, Red Skye, LLC Bill Vollmer, Mountain Photo and Graphics Don Wood, Resident TRAVEL OREGON STAFF: Todd Davidson, Chief Executive Officer Kristin Dahl, Senior Manager, Destination Development Harry Dalgaard III, Specialist, Destination Development David Blair, Community Projects, Destination Development Linda Andrews, Destination Development Coordinator Jamie Parra, Destination Development Coordinator River Canyon Country Rural Tourism Studio Notes, Community Tourism Planning/Visioning, Nov 6 & 7, 2012 1 Background Summary The scenarios developed during this Scenario Planning Process and outlined in these notes are important to provide a ‘vehicle’ to be used in the process of building a shared tourism vision for the future of the Canyon River Country Region. In addition, these deliberations assist in identifying key actions and approaches to how various stakeholders might best contribute to future developments; in part by identifying possibilities for collaboration.
  • Jefferson County

    Jefferson County

    Jefferson County Prepared for: Culver, Madras, and Metolius Photos: Gary Halvorson, Oregon State Archives Jefferson County Multi-Jurisdictional Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Report for: Jefferson County, Oregon And the Cities of Culver, Madras, and Metolius Prepared by: Oregon Partnership for Disaster Resilience 1209 University of Oregon Eugene, OR 97403 September, 2008 Special Thanks & Acknowledgements This Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan was developed through a regional partnership funded by the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Pre- Disaster Mitigation Competitive Grant Program. The Southeast Oregon Region grant was awarded to support the development of natural hazard mitigation plans for the region. The region’s planning process utilized a four-phased planning process, plan templates and plan development support provided by the Partnership for Disaster Resilience at the University of Oregon. Regional partners include: • Oregon Partnership for Disaster Resilience at the University of Oregon’s Community Service Center • Oregon Emergency Management • Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region X • Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Project Steering Committee: • Jefferson County Community Development Department • Jefferson County Public Works Department • Crooked River Ranch Homeowners Association • Central Electric Cooperative • Warm Springs Tribe • Federal Grasslands • 509J School District • US Forest Service • Fire Department Agencies from Crooked River Ranch, Three Rivers, and the County • City of Culver • City of Metolius
  • Final Environmental Impact Statement Ochoco Summit Trail System Project Chapter 3 – Environmental Consequences – Wildlife

    Final Environmental Impact Statement Ochoco Summit Trail System Project Chapter 3 – Environmental Consequences – Wildlife

    Final Environmental Impact Statement Ochoco Summit Trail System Project Chapter 3 – Environmental Consequences – Wildlife Wildlife _________________________________________ This section includes a summary of the Wildlife specialist’s report and Biological Evaluation; the entire report is in the Ochoco Summit Trail System project record, located at the Ochoco National Forest, Prineville, Oregon. General Effects to Wildlife With all management activities, there are negative effects to some species and benefits to others that must be considered and balanced along with the need for those human activities. Negative effects of recreational OHV use on wildlife may include wildlife mortality, direct and indirect loss of habitat, displacement, and reduced connectivity. Factors that influence the vulnerability of different wildlife species include behavior and ecology. For example, animals that tend to stay closer to shelter, such as gray squirrel and woodchuck, can tolerate closer encounters with humans because they can quickly escape (Frid and Dill 2002; Gill et al. 1996). Other species tend to forage less and spend less time in quality habitat near human activity (Gill et al. 1996). Still other species may respond positively to human development and use of OHV trails and roads; potential benefits are related to habitat, mobility, and food resources. Openings, shrubs and grasses may develop alongside roads, providing additional foraging habitats. Cleared roads and trails are utilized as travel corridors for some species. No road construction is proposed for the Ochoco Summit project; however, there are ongoing effects of existing roads, and the effects of existing roads and proposed OHV trails are similar. Road widths vary from 14 to 35 feet depending on single or double lane and maintenance of right of way.
  • Descendants of John Jacob Michael Beeler

    Descendants of John Jacob Michael Beeler

    Descendants of John Jacob Michael Beeler Courtesy of Frazier Farmstead Museum Our goal is to research the pioneers that came into the Walla Walla Valley Area, as a starter for those doing their family genealogy; we are not related. Head Researcher: Sarah Olsen, Researcher: Linda Kracke September 18, 2006 Generation No. 1 1. JOHN JACOB MICHAEL 1 BEELER was born 21 Feb 1736/37 in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. He married MARY ANN TURNEY Abt. 1757 in Franklin, Virginia. She was born Abt. 1740 in Union, Tennessee. More About JOHN BEELER and MARY TURNEY: Marriage: Abt. 1757, Franklin, Virginia Child of JOHN BEELER and MARY TURNEY is: 2. i. PETER 2 BEELER, b. 16 Sep 1767, Millers Town, Shenandoah Co, VA; d. 17 Aug 1836, Speedwell, Claiborne County, Tennessee. Generation No. 2 2. PETER 2 BEELER (JOHN JACOB MICHAEL 1) was born 16 Sep 1767 in Millers Town, Shenandoah Co, VA, and died 17 Aug 1836 in Speedwell, Claiborne County, Tennessee. He married BARBARY ELIZABETH PETREY Mar 1794 in Speedwell, Claiborne County, Tennessee. She was born 29 Mar 1772 in West Donegal, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, and died Jun 1828 in Speedwell, Claiborne County, Tennessee. More About PETER BEELER: Burial: Beeler Cemetery, Speedwell, Tennessee1 More About BARBARY ELIZABETH PETREY: Burial: Beeler Cemetery, Clairborne County,Tennessee 2 More About PETER BEELER and BARBARY PETREY: Marriage: Mar 1794, Speedwell, Claiborne County, Tennessee Children of PETER BEELER and BARBARY PETREY are: 3. i. ESTHER JASON 3 BEELER, b. 09 Jan 1795, Sullivan County, Tennessee; d. Abt. 1853, Jackson County, Missouri. 4. ii. MARY BEELER, b. 16 Jul 1796, Sullivan County, Tennessee; d.
  • Comprehensive Plan

    Comprehensive Plan

    Deschutes County Transportation System Plan 2010 - 2030 Adopted by Ordinance 2012-005 August 6, 2012 By The Deschutes County Board of Commissioners EXHIBIT C ORDINANCE 2012-005 Page 1 of 268 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... 10 Chapter One Introduction ...................................................................................................................................30 1.1 Geographic Setting .......................................................................................................30 1.2 Transportation Planning ..............................................................................................31 Goal 12 .....................................................................................................................31 Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) ..................................................................31 TPR Requirements for Deschutes County ......................................................33 1.3 Major Changes Since the Adoption of the 1998 Plan ...........................................35 Regional Growth and Destination Resorts ......................................................35 Urban Growth and County Coordination .......................................................36 Public Transportation ...........................................................................................36 Financial Impacts ....................................................................................................37
  • OREGON LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION Page 1 of 683 Licensed Businesses As of 8/12/2018 4:10A.M

    OREGON LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION Page 1 of 683 Licensed Businesses As of 8/12/2018 4:10A.M

    OREGON LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION Page 1 of 683 Licensed Businesses As of 8/12/2018 4:10A.M. License License Secondary Location Tradename Licensee Name Type Mailing Address Premises Address Premises No. License No. Expires County To License # #1 FOOD 4 MART FUN 4 U INC O PO BOX 5026 729 SW 185TH 28426 271408 03/31/2019 WASHINGTON BEAVERTON, OR 97006 ALOHA, OR 97006 Phone: 503-502-9271 00 WINES 00 OREGON LLC WY 937 NW GLISAN ST #1037 801 N SCOTT ST 58406 272542 03/31/2019 YAMHILL PORTLAND, OR 97209 CARLTON, OR 97111 Phone: 503-852-6100 1 800 WINESHOP.COM 1 800 WINESHOP.COM INC DS 525 AIRPARK RD 51973 267742 12/31/2018 OUTSIDE OR NAPA, CA 94558 Phone: 800-946-3746 1 AM MARKET 1 AM MARKET INC O PO BOX 46 320 N MAIN ST 4346 275587 06/30/2019 DOUGLAS RIDDLE, OR 97469 RIDDLE, OR 97469 Phone: 541-874-2722 1 AM MARKET 1 AM MARKET INC O PO BOX 46 1931 NE STEPHENS 4379 275588 06/30/2019 DOUGLAS RIDDLE, OR 97469 ROSEBURG, OR 97470 Phone: 541-673-0554 10 BARREL BREWING COMPANY 10 BARREL BREWING LLC WY ONE BUSCH PLACE / 202-1 1135 NW GALVESTON AVE SUITE A 46579 260298 09/30/2018 DESCHUTES 260297 ST LOUIS, MO 63118 BEND, OR 97703 Phone: 541-678-5228 10 BARREL BREWING COMPANY 10 BARREL BREWING LLC F-COM ONE BUSCH PLACE / 202-1 62950 & 62970 NE 18TH ST 49506 259722 09/30/2018 DESCHUTES ST LOUIS, MO 63118 BEND, OR 97701 Phone: 541-585-1007 10 BARREL BREWING COMPANY 10 BARREL BREWING LLC F-COM ONE BUSCH PLACE / 202-1 1135 NW GALVESTON AVE SUITE A 57088 259724 09/30/2018 DESCHUTES ST LOUIS, MO 63118 BEND, OR 97703 Phone: 541-678-5228 10 BARREL BREWING COMPANY
  • Historical Snowdepth Comparison Along the Cascade Range This Compilation Is ©2002-2005 Amar Andalkar

    Historical Snowdepth Comparison Along the Cascade Range This Compilation Is ©2002-2005 Amar Andalkar

    Page 1 of 5 Historical Snowdepth Comparison along the Cascade Range This compilation is ©2002-2005 Amar Andalkar www.skimountaineer.com Snowdepths in inches for the listed period of record, measured at snow courses, snow stakes, and automated gauges Data provided by: throughout the length of the Cascade Range. Note that snowfall data is available for only a few of these sites. BCRFC British Columbia River Forecast Centre NWAC Northwest Weather & Avalanche Center NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service WRCC Western Regional Climate Center Updated through the 2003-2004 season. Italicized numbers are estimated based on limited available data. CCSS California Cooperative Snow Surveys NPS National Park Service See the end of the chart for an explanation of the Depth and Variability classification codes. WBSR Whistler Blackcomb Ski Resort ECNCA Environment Canada National Climate Archive BRITISH COLUMBIA Jan 1 Feb 1 Mar 1 Apr 1 May 1 Depth Variab 350 Bridge Glacier, N of Mt Meager (4600 ft) 350 Tenquille Lake, E of Mt Meager (5500 ft) Bridge Glacier (Lower) Average 47 61 65 69 61 Avg Snowfall — L LV 300 300 4600 ft (15 miles north of Mt Meager) Minimum 32 48 40 47 43 Max Snowfall — 250 250 BCRFC, monthly, 1995–present Maximum 63 88 117 108 87 Max Depth 117 (1999) 200 200 This fairly new measurement site is located at the eastern end of the Lillooet Icefield, in the next drainage north of the Mount Meager 171 150 150 Volcanic Complex. Snowdepths are relatively low but quite consistent due to its northerly location and icefield margin microclimate.
  • City Council Meeting Agenda

    City Council Meeting Agenda

    Location: City Hall – Council Chambers Date: January 26, 2021 Time: 6:30 PM City Council Meeting Agenda Mayor Jason Beebe, Council Members Steve Uffelman, Janet Hutchison, Patricia Jungmann, Gail Merritt, Jeff Papke, Raymond Law and City Manager Steve Forrester This meeting will be open to the public by telephonic communications due to commitment to eliminate the exposure and spread of COVID-19. This meeting can be attended by calling 346-248-7799 Meeting ID 947 5839 2608. Please visit our website for additional meeting information. Call to Order Flag Salute Additions to Agenda Consent Agenda 1. Regular Meeting Brief 1-12-2021 2. Special Meeting Brief 1-15-2021 Visitors, Appearances and Requests Council Business 3. Staff Reports and Requests 4. Manager's Report - Steve Forrester 5. Pavement Condition Index (PCI) - Scott Smith / Eric Klann Committee Reports Ordinances Resolutions 6. Resolution No. 1471 - Authorizing the Oregon Public Works Emergency Response Cooperative Assistance Agreement - Eric Klann 7. Resolution No. 1472 - Adopting Barnes Butte Concept Plan "Echo of the Butte" - Eric Klann / Casey Kaiser 8. Resolution No. 1473 - Authorization to Efficiently Minimize or Mitigate the Effects of COVID-19 - Steve Forrester / Jered Reid Page 1 of 2 1 9. Resolution No. 1474 - A Resolution Declaring Reasonable Precautions to Minimize the Spread and Exposure of the Coronavirus- Jered Reid Visitors, Appearances and Requests Adjourn 10. Adjourn to Executive Session Pursuant to ORS 192.660 (2)(i) & 192.660 (8) - Evaluate the performance of an officer, employee or staff member & ORS 192.660 (2)(j) - Negotiations under ORS Chapter 293 with private persons or businesses regarding proposed acquisition, exchange or liquidation of public investments.
  • NEPA--Environmental Assessment

    NEPA--Environmental Assessment

    United States Department of Environmental Agriculture Forest Assessment Service December 2007 Santiam Pass Summer Motorized Recreation Project Non-Significant Forest Plan Amendment #49 McKenzie River Ranger District Willamette National Forest Linn County, Oregon Legal Location: T.13S, R.7E, T.13S, R.7 1/2E, T.14S, R.7 1/2E, and T.14S, R.7 1/2E; W.M. For Information Contact: Mary Allison, District Ranger McKenzie River Ranger District 57600 McKenzie Highway McKenzie Bridge, Oregon 97413 541-822-3381 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720- 6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Figure 1 Willamette National Forest McKenzie River District Santiam Pass Summer Motorized Recreation Project To Salem N N N NN N N N N N N N NN NN N N N N N N NN N N N NN N N N To Bend N Vicinity Map Project N N N N N N N N Area NN N N N N N N N N N N Clear N N N N N N Lake N N N N N N N N H N Big w Lake y 1 2 6 Smith Res Trail Bridge Res.
  • REMINISCENCES of a PIONEER WOMAN* My Father Was John Fenn, an Englishman, the Son of Thomas and Nancy Fenn

    REMINISCENCES of a PIONEER WOMAN* My Father Was John Fenn, an Englishman, the Son of Thomas and Nancy Fenn

    REMINISCENCES OF A PIONEER WOMAN* My father was John Fenn, an Englishman, the son of Thomas and Nancy Fenn. He was born at Alesworth, North Hampshire, England, on November 26, 1810 or 1812, and in his youth learned the trade of plasterer and brick mason. In 1828, with an older brother, William Fenn/ he came over on a sailing vessel. I have heard my {ather say that he was only sixteen years old when he left England. In Canada my father took up his trade of plasterer, and later, with his brother William moved to Pike County, Illinois, where both brothers married. My mother was Mary Jory, an Englishwoman, the daughter of James Jory and Mary Stevens, who were married in St. Clear parish, England, in 1812. James Jory's father (also named James Jory) was a game keeper and gardener on an English estate, and the son learned the trade of carpenter and mechanic. My grandfather's fam­ ily consisted of two daughters, Mary (my mother), Elizabeth, who later became my stepmother, and six sons, John, J ames/ Henry Thom­ as, William, and H. S. All, except H. S. Jory, were born in England. My grandfather, James Jory, with his family emigrated from Eng­ land to St. John, New Brunswick, where he took up a farm and worked in the ship yards. Later he moved with his family to New York, then to New Orleans, and from there to St. Louis, Missouri. The slave-holding system then prevailing in Missouri was obnoxious to his liberty-loving English spirit, and my grandfather moved, with his family, to Pike County, Illinois, in the fall of 1837.