DOCSLIB.ORG

SLATE of EQUALITY Take This to the Polls with You! the Following Candidates and Ballot Measures Are Endorsed by Equality California

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SLATE of EQUALITY Take This to the Polls with You! the Following Candidates and Ballot Measures Are Endorsed by Equality California EQUALITY CALIFORNIA IS PROUD TO ENDORSE General Election TUESDAY NOVEMBER OF th SLATE EQUALITY Hillary Clinton Kamala Harris 8 Take this to the polls with you! PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES U.S. SENATE Prop 60: Lawsuits Against Adult Prop 52: The Medi-Cal Prop 56: CA Healthcare, Film Performers/Distributors - NO Funding and Accountability Research & Prevention Proposition 60 ignores current advances Act - YES Tobacco Tax Act of 2016 - YES in HIV prevention, such as PrEP, and would Proposition 52 would generate over $3 Proposition 56 would help save lives, be harmful to public health by driving film billion annually for Medi-Cal to increase reduce smoking and improve health care production underground or out of state. access to health care, hospital services, for members of the LGBT community and Also opposed by: California Democratic and emergency rooms for those receiving for all Californians. Also supported by: Party, California Republican Party, LA LGBT Medi-Cal services, including the estimated California Democratic Party, California Center, SF AIDS Foundation, AIDS Project Los 250,000 beneficiaries identifying as gay, Medical Association, American Lung lesbian, bisexual, and transgender. Also Angeles, along with many other health and Association, American Heart Association, supported by: California Democratic civil rights organizations. and SF AIDS Foundation. Party, California Medical Association, and California Teachers Association. Equality California’s rigorous endorsement process requires candidates to have a 100% pro-equality rating to be endorsed! PRSRT STD US POSTAGE This advertisement PAID was not authorized or TCMG paid for by a candidate for this ofce or a Paid for by Equality committee controlled California PAC by a candidate for this 202 W 1st St., Suite 3-0130 ofce. Los Angeles, CA 90012 NELA THIS ELECTION YEAR, THE STAKES HAVE NEVER BEEN HIGHER. NOW MORE THAN EVER IT IS INCREDIBLY IMPORTANT FOR YOU TO COME OUT AND VOTE! SLATE OF EQUALITY Take this to the polls with you! The following candidates and ballot measures are endorsed by Equality California: U.S. CONGRESS STATE ASSEMBLY Congressional District 25 Bryan Caforio Assembly District 41 Chris Holden Congressional District 27 Judy Chu Assembly District 43 Laura Friedman Congressional District 28 Adam Schif Assembly District 48 Blanca Rubio Congressional District 30 Brad Sherman Assembly District 49 Ed Chau Congressional District 32 Grace Napolitano Assembly District 51 Jimmy Gomez Congressional District 34 Xavier Becerra Congressional District 38 Linda Sánchez Congressional District 40 Lucille Roybal-Allard STATE SENATE Senate District 21 Johnathon Ervin KEYS: Openly LGBT candidate Incumbent Senate District 25 Anthony Portantino Anthony Portantino Laura Friedman SENATE DISTRICT 25 ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 43 Equality California’s rigorous endorsement process requires candidates to have a 100% pro-equality rating to be endorsed! BALLOT MEASURES Proposition 52: Proposition 57: Proposition 63: The Medi-Cal Funding and The Public Safety and Safety for All Act of 2016 (Gun Accountability Act – YES Rehabilitation Act of 2016 – YES Safety) – YES Proposition 55: Proposition 58: Proposition 64: California Children’s Education LEARN Initiative (Amend & Control, Regulate and Tax Adult and Healthcare Protection Act Repeal Prop 227) – YES Use of Marijuana Act – YES of 2016 – YES Proposition 60: Proposition 66: Proposition 56: Lawsuits Against Adult Film Death Penalty Reform and CA Healthcare, Research & Performers/Distributors – NO Savings Act of 2016 (Pro-Death Prevention Tobacco Tax Act of Penalty) – NO Proposition 62: 2016 – YES The Justice that Works Act of 2016 (Death Penalty Repeal) – YES Paid for by Equality California (eqca.org) Offcial LGBT Voter Guide and not authorized by any candidate or No candidate or ballot measure candidate’s committee. paid to be included. NELA.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Qtnugrrss Uf Tir Unitcb Iatr% Maalpugtrnz, 3Qt Fl515
    Qtnugrrss uf tIr Unitcb Iatr% maalpugtrnz, 3Qt fl515 October 14, 2020 Mike Pompeo Alex Azar II Secretary of State Secretary of Health and Human Services Department of State Department of Health and Human Services 2201 C Street NW 301 7th St. SE Washington, D.C. 20520 Washington, D.C. 20229 Dear Secretary Pompeo and Secretary Azar: We write to express our serious concern over the Trump administration’s reckless approach to U.S.—international health cooperation that reversed long-standing successful policies advocated on a bipartisan basis by previous administrations. Your actions limited American cooperation with the European Union and removed American experts from the ground in China, where the outbreak began. This impeded the ability of American public health officials to receive timely and accurate information about the pandemic, delaying our response and likely costing American lives. We urge you to immediately reestablish common-sense cooperation with the global community and to explore additional measures that could further strengthen our domestic and international capacity to control the virus and save lives. The initial response to the COVID-19 outbreak by the Chinese government was demonstrably flawed and seriously problematic. However, prior to this outbreak, your Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) dramatically downsized the U.S.’ global epidemic prevention activities. This led to both the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the National Institutes of Health reducing U.S. personnel in China as well as the closure of the National Science Foundation office there. This deprived the U.S. of early and accurate information on the novel coronavirus outbreak and impeded our ability to prepare and respond.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to New Legislators
    Guide to New Legislators 2017 Edition Contents Locating Your Senate and Assembly Districts 1. Go to http://www.legislature.ca.gov/ 2. Look for the Blue Box on the right side of the screen titled “Find My District” 3. Click on Search by Address. (This web page will be updated on December 3, 2012 to reflect new Districts. If you have this tool saved in your web browser it will have a new URL after this date.) 4. Enter your Street, City and Zip into the fields and click Find. New Senator Biographies .. 3 District 3, Senator Bill Dodd………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….… 3 District 9, Senator Nancy Skinner…………………………...……………………………………………………………………………….3 District 11, Senator Scott Wiener…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….4 District 21 - Senator Scott Wilk……………………………..………………………………………………………………………………..4 District 25, Senator Anthony Portantino…………………………….…………………………………………………………………..5 District 27, Senator Henry Stern.…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….5 District 29, Senator Josh Newman……………………………………………………………………………………………….…….……5 District 35, Senator Steven Bradford……………………………………………………………………………………………………….6 District 39, Senator Toni Atkins….……………………………………………………………………………………………………………6 New Assembly member Biographies District 4, Assembly member Cecila Aguiar-Curry….……………………………………………………………………………….7 District 6, Assembly member Kevin Kiley……….……………………………………………………………………………………….7 District 12, Assembly member Heath Flora…..………………………….……………………………………………………….…….8 District 14, Assembly member Tim Grayson……………………………………………………………………………………..…....8
    [Show full text]
  • Calling on the Census Bureau
    September 3, 2020 Dr. Steven Dillingham Director United States Census Bureau 4600 Silver Hill Road Washington, DC 20233 Dear Dr. Dillingham: This letter is to inquire about the U.S. Census Bureau’s plans for accurately counting our country’s population in the 2020 Census. In California, nearly 15 percent of our residents remain uncounted, many in historically undercounted communities at risk of losing federal funding and resources. In light of the challenges created by COVID-19, the fires burning across California, and the recent decision to end counting operations early, we ask that you provide additional detail about how a complete count will be achieved. It is our understanding that with the shortened counting timeline, Census Bureau workers will need to visit 8 million more homes nationwide than in 2010, in just seven weeks instead of ten weeks. Data accuracy and review procedures for processing apportionment counts have also been reduced from six months to three months. Additional obstacles caused by COVID-19 include a higher number of people experiencing homelessness—an historically undercounted population—as well as difficulties with hiring and retention of census workers. Given these significant barriers to a fair and accurate census, we would appreciate answers to the following questions. With in-person counting operations cut short, the Census Bureau will likely need to utilize administrative records and statistical techniques to complete the enumeration. Do you now anticipate any changes in the number of households that will
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Political Contributions (January 1 – June 30)
    2017 Political Contributions (January 1 – June 30) Amgen is committed to serving patients by transforming the promise of science and biotechnology into therapies that have the power to restore health or even save lives. Amgen recognizes the importance of sound public policy in achieving this goal, and, accordingly, participates in the political process and supports those candidates, committees, and other organizations who work to advance healthcare innovation and improve patient access. Amgen participates in the political process by making direct corporate contributions as well as contributions through its employee-funded Political Action Committee (“Amgen PAC”). In some states, corporate contributions to candidates for state or local elected offices are permissible, while in other states and at the federal level, political contributions are only made through the Amgen PAC. Under certain circumstances, Amgen may lawfully contribute to other political committees and political organizations, including political party committees, industry PACs, leadership PACs, and Section 527 organizations. Amgen also participates in ballot initiatives and referenda at the state and local level. Amgen is committed to complying with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations that govern such contributions. The list below contains information about political contributions for the first half of 2017 by Amgen and the Amgen PAC. It includes contributions to candidate committees, political party committees, industry PACs, leadership PACs, Section 527 organizations, and state and local ballot initiatives and referenda. These contributions are categorized by state, political party (if applicable), political office (where applicable), recipient, contributor (Amgen Inc. or Amgen PAC) and amount. Office Candidate State Party Office Committee/PAC Name Candidate Name Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • Over 350 Endorsers of AB 249, The
    Over 350 Endorsers of AB 249, the California DISCLOSE Act (Mullin-Levine)* More than 160,000 Californians have signed petitions urging the legislature to pass the California DISCLOSE Act, with 100,000 signing petitions specifically for AB 249 or this year’s original version AB 14. SPONSOR Authors California Clean Money Campaign Assembly Speaker pro Tem Kevin Mullin Assemblymember Marc Levine EDITORIAL ENDORSEMENTS San Francisco Chronicle Principal Coauthors Senate President pro Tem Kevin de León CONGRESSIONAL & OTHER ENDORSERS Senator Ben Allen Senator Jerry Hill House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi Senator Henry Stern Congressmember Anna Eshoo Assemblymember Marc Berman Congressmember Jimmy Gomez Assemblymember Matthew Dababneh Congressmember Ro Khanna Assemblymember Adrin Nazarian Congressmember Zoe Lofgren Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones Coauthors Board of Equalization Member Fiona Ma Senator Jim Beall Secretary of State Alex Padilla Senator Bill Dodd Assembly Majority Floor Leader Ian Calderon Senator Cathleen Galgiani Eric Bauman, Chair of the California Democratic Party Senator Connie Leyva Senator Josh Newman Kimberly Ellis, Former Executive Director of Emerge California Senator Anthony Portantino Senator Scott Wiener CONSTITUTIONAL EXPERTS Assemblymember Cecilia Aguiar-Curry Judge Quentin Kopp, San Francisco Ethics Commission Assemblymember Rob Bonta Bob Stern, Principal co-author of 1974 Political Reform Act Assemblymember David Chiu Assemblymember Kansen Chu REFORM ORGANIZATIONS Assemblymember Laura Friedman Assemblymember Todd
    [Show full text]
  • The Women Who Lead the San Gabriel Valley Support Mike Eng for State
    The women who lead the San Gabriel Valley support Mike Eng for State Senate EL MONTE, CA — There are two candidates for State Senate in our district, a man and a woman. But only Mike Eng is endorsed by California NOW Pac, the California Democratic Party and our Democratic leaders. Why are women uniting for Mike when he is running against a woman? Because Mike Eng is the only candidate with a proven record on the issues we care about most: • Mike fought to strengthen and renew the Violence Against Women Act, and co-authored Senate Joint Resolution 20 to demand the continuation of support for victims and awareness of Domestic Violence. • Mike worked to increase prevention efforts and legal protections for victims of domestic violence, sexual assault and stalking. • Mike has the courage to stand up to Donald Trump and expand access to affordable health care in California. He’s supported by the United Nurses Associations of California, SEIU Nurses 121RN and the California Nurses Association. • Mike — a college teacher and former community college board vice- president — is an effective champion for education and affordable college for all. “Mike Eng has proven that he stands up for school funding, access to healthcare for all, increased childcare and early education, and equality for women.” -Kolieka Seigle, President of California National Organization for Women The women who lead our community unite for Mike Eng for Senate: Congressmember Judy Chu Congressmember Grace Napolitano State Senator Connie Leyva County Supervisor Hilda Solis Congressmember
    [Show full text]
  • Political Contributions
    Darden Restaurants, Inc. Annual Darden Political Contribution Disclosure (2017) Listed Alphabetically by Organization / Political Candidate Darden is committed to transparency and accountability. In accordance with our "Civic Engagement and Disclosure of Political and Advocacy Expenditures Policy," below are our disclosures of expenditures for calendar year 2017. Political Contributions All direct and in-kind political spending to candidates, politcal parties, political organizations and independent expenditures at the federal, state and local levels. Committee Name Candidate Amount Anthony Rendon for Assembly 2018 Anthony Rendon D $3,000.00 Atkins for Senate 2020 Toni Atkins D $2,000.00 Autumn Burke for Assembly 2018 Autumn Burke D $1,000.00 Bill Dodd for Senate 2020 Bill Dodd D $1,500.00 Blanca Rubio for Assembly 2018 Blanca Rubio D $1,000.00 Bob Cortes for State House Bob Cortes R $1,000.00 Bocanegra for Assembly 2018 Raul Bocanegra D $1,500.00 California Republican Party R $10,000.00 California Retailers Association Good Government Council $7,300.00 Californians for Jobs and a Strong Economy $10,000.00 Catharine Baker for Assembly 2018 Catharine Baker R $2,000.00 Cathy Young for Senate Catharine Young R $1,000.00 Cecilia Aguiar-Curry for Assembly 2018 Cecilia Aguiar-Curry D $1,000.00 Cristina Garcia for Assembly 2018 Cristina Garcia D $1,000.00 Daly for Assembly 2018 Tom Daly D $1,500.00 Democratic Governors Association D $100,000.00 Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee D $42,000.00 Evan Low for Assembly 2018 Evan Low D $1,500.00 Fecteau for Leadership PAC Ryan Fecteau D $500.00 Florida Grown PAC Adam Putman R $50,000.00 Florida Jobs PAC (Florida Chamber) $10,000.00 Florida Republican Senate Committee $7,500.00 Florida Restaurant Association PAC $10,000.00 Floridians for Economic Freedom Chris Sprowls R $2,500.00 Floridians for Opportunities Mike LaRosa R $2,500.00 Fredrick C.
    [Show full text]
  • Is All Descriptive Representation Equal?: a Closer Look at Latino Representation in the U.S
    Is All Descriptive Representation Equal?: A Closer Look at Latino Representation in the U.S. House of Representatives Jennifer Garcia Graduate Student Department of Political Science University of California, Irvine [email protected] 1 Across the country, the ranks of Latinos are increasing in the Republican Party. The 2010 Midterm elections witnessed a record number of Latino Republicans elected to statewide and national office.1 Latino Republicans more than doubled in size in the U.S. House of Representatives, making up eight out of 27 Latino members in the 112th Congress. Yet, it is unknown whether their presence benefits Latinos. Although there is a general consensus among scholars that descriptive representation benefits racial and ethnic communities, it is also acknowledged that political parties significantly influence representation, at least for Blacks. Further, scholars have shown that political parties have become even more important in Congress. However, Blacks benefit from descriptive representation because Black representatives place racial and symbolic issues on the political agenda that are otherwise given little to no attention by non-Black representatives. This paper will take a closer look at the symbolic representation provided by Latino Republicans in the 112th Congress by examining bill sponsorship/co-sponsorship and floor speeches in the U.S. House of Representatives. A considerable amount of work has examined minority representation and its benefits. Some have emphasized the substantive benefits of descriptive representation by examining roll call votes, bills sponsorship/co-sponsorship, participation during committee hearings, and constituent services. Others have focused on the effect that descriptive representatives have on minority political behavior, showing that Latinos, like Blacks, are mobilized by co-ethnic candidates.2 Still others have focused on the symbolic benefits provided by descriptive representatives, finding that Black representatives provide the greatest amount of symbolic representation to Blacks (Tate 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Retirement Policy Representative Update
    Agenda Item 4d, Attachment 1 Page 1 of 6 Federal Retirement Report for CalPERS Board May 2016 I. PROTECTING DEFINED BENEFIT PLANS A. Oppose H.R. 4822 (Nunes) 1. H.R. 4822 – The Public Employee Pension Transparency Act (PEPTA) – would for the first time impose an unfunded federal reporting requirement on the funding of state and local pension plans. According to Rep. Nunes, the bill is designed to “prevent the federal government from bailing out distressed U.S. state and municipal pension funds, and to rectify serious shortcomings in the financial accounting and transparency of these funds.” The proposal does not protect benefits, save taxpayer money, or improve retirement plan funding. In addition, since failure to comply with the reporting requirement would result in the loss of the plan sponsor’s ability to issue bonds, it threatens to eliminate the tax-exempt bonding authority of state and local governments. 2. Specific changes/developments since last report: . New House legislation on Puerto Rico has been introduced – H.R. 5278. The legislation does not contain any new federal reporting requirements on state and local plans’ funding status (PEPTA). The only pension-related provision relates to an optional study of materially underfunded pensions in Puerto Rico. H.R. 5278 was approved by the House Natural Resources Committee on May 25th and is likely to see action on the House floor in June. It is unclear at this time what amendments will be offered on the floor. 3. Implications for CalPERS: PEPTA would impose new and unprecedented federal reporting requirement on CalPERS and all other public pension plans that would require plan liabilities to be reported in a manner that would overstate the under-funding of plans.
    [Show full text]
  • January 6, 2021 the Honorable Cecilia Aguiar-Curry California
    January 6, 2021 The Honorable Cecilia Aguiar-Curry California State Assembly State Capitol, Room 5144 Sacramento, California 95814 Re: AB 14 (Aguiar-Curry) – Communications: broadband services: California Advanced Services Fund. Support – As Introduced December 7, 2020 Dear Assembly Member Aguiar-Curry: On behalf of the California State Association of Counties (CSAC), representing all 58 counties in the state, I am pleased to support your AB 14, related to broadband and the infrastructure subsidies needed to deploy it more broadly. Inequitable access to broadband is a longstanding issue, but the COVID-19 pandemic’s effects on students, workers, small businesses, and everyday life has highlighted just how severe and urgent the disparity is. Bringing our infrastructure into the modern era is critical for all communities, whether or not providers consider them profitable. Addressing these issues will undoubtedly require additional resources to be available as soon as possible, so the additional funding AB 14 would authorize—as well as the authority to issue a revenue bond of up to $1 billion—is critically important. Counties also appreciate the explicit authority for Boards of Supervisors to approve the construction and operation of broadband infrastructure and services. For the aforementioned reasons, we support AB 14 and appreciate your efforts on this important issue. We would like to work with you and your co-authors as this bill moves forward to ensure it contains the reforms necessary to achieve the greatest good for the greatest number
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Political Disbursements Federal Candidates Disbursement Ratio
    2019 Political Disbursements Federal Candidates Disbursement Ratio Name Amount Democrat Alabama Sen. Doug Jones (D) $2,500 41% California Rep. Amerish Bera (D) $2,000 59% Rep. Devin Nunes (R) $2,000 Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D) $1,000 Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R) $5,000 Republican Rep. Linda Sanchez (D) $2,000 Rep. Mark Takano (D) $1,000 Rep. Raul Ruiz (D) $2,500 Name Amount Rep. Scott Peters (D) $1,000 Sen. Joyce Krawsiec (R) $1,000 Rep. Ted Lieu (D) $500 Rep. Graig Meyer (D) $500 Delaware Sen. Jim Perry (D) $500 Sen. Christopher Coons (D) $1,000 Rep. Larry Potts (R) $500 Rep. Robert Reives (D) $500 Florida Sen. Gladys Robinson (D) $500 Rep. Greg Steube (R) $1,000 Rep. Wayne Sasser (R) $500 Rep. Stephanie Murphy (D) $2,000 Sen. Mike Woodard (D) $500 Georgia Rep. Mark Meadows (R) $1,000 Rep. Douglas Collins (R) $2,500 Rep. Richard Hudson (R) $5,000 Sen. Thom Tillis (R) $4,000 Hawaii Sen. Mazie Hirono (D) $500 North Dakota Rep. Kelly Armstrong (R) $500 Illinois Rep. Brad Schneider (D) $4,000 Nebraska Rep. Cheri Bustos (D) $2,500 Rep. Adrian Smith (R) $2,500 Rep. Darin LaHood (R) $2,500 Nevada Rep. Mike Bost (R) $2,000 Sen. Jacky Rosen (D) $1,000 Rep. Mike Quigley (D) $1,000 Rep. Robin Kelly (D) $1,000 New Hampshire Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R) $1,000 Rep. Ann McClane Kuster (D) $2,000 Rep. S. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D) $1,000 New York Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D) $1,000 Rep. Elise Stefanik (R) $2,000 Sen.
    [Show full text]
  • Official List of Members
    OFFICIAL LIST OF MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES of the UNITED STATES AND THEIR PLACES OF RESIDENCE ONE HUNDRED SIXTEENTH CONGRESS • DECEMBER 15, 2020 Compiled by CHERYL L. JOHNSON, Clerk of the House of Representatives http://clerk.house.gov Democrats in roman (233); Republicans in italic (195); Independents and Libertarians underlined (2); vacancies (5) CA08, CA50, GA14, NC11, TX04; total 435. The number preceding the name is the Member's district. ALABAMA 1 Bradley Byrne .............................................. Fairhope 2 Martha Roby ................................................ Montgomery 3 Mike Rogers ................................................. Anniston 4 Robert B. Aderholt ....................................... Haleyville 5 Mo Brooks .................................................... Huntsville 6 Gary J. Palmer ............................................ Hoover 7 Terri A. Sewell ............................................. Birmingham ALASKA AT LARGE Don Young .................................................... Fort Yukon ARIZONA 1 Tom O'Halleran ........................................... Sedona 2 Ann Kirkpatrick .......................................... Tucson 3 Raúl M. Grijalva .......................................... Tucson 4 Paul A. Gosar ............................................... Prescott 5 Andy Biggs ................................................... Gilbert 6 David Schweikert ........................................ Fountain Hills 7 Ruben Gallego ............................................
    [Show full text]