DOCSLIB.ORG

Fulton Terminals Fulton, New York

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fulton Terminals Fulton, New York TECHNICAL ENFORCEMENT SUPPORT AT HAZARDOUS WASTE SITES r x U.S. EPA CONTRACT NO. 68-01-7331 a 17 o o -J N) I—1 U1 71 CDM Federal Programs Corporation i 410325 REVISED FINAL REPORT REVISED ENDANGERMENT ASSESSMENT FULTON TERMINALS FULTON, NEW YORK Prepared for U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Office of Vaste Programs Enforcement Washington, D.C. 20460 EPA Work Assignment No. 615 EPA Region II Site No. ,2P75 Contract No. 68-01-7331 CDM Federal Programs Corporation Document No. T615-C02-FR-DKJB-1 Prepared By Versar Inc. Work Assignment Project Manager Tom Willard Telephone Number (703) 750-3000 Primary Contact Nicoletta DiForte Telephone Number (212) 264-0970 Date Prepared June 27, 1989 (VP14/29) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 1.1 Site Desc?:iption and History 1-1 1.2 Contaminants Found Onsite 1-4 1.3 Selection of Indicator Chemicals 1-25 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND TRANSPORT • 2-1 2.1 Site Characteristics 2-1 2.1.1 Geology and Soils 2-1 2.1.2 Topography and Drainage .. 2-7 2.1.3 Hydrogeology 2-9 2.1.4 CI .matology 2-10 2.2 Site Contaminants and Migratory Pathways 2-11 2.2.1 Benzene 2-16 2.2.2 Ch'.orobenzene 2-18 2.2.3 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 2-19 2.2.4 1,:'.-dichloroethene 2-19 2.2.5 Tri.chloroethene 2-20 2.2.6 Vinyl chloride 2-21 2.2.7 Pyrene 2-22 2.2.8 Arsenic 2-23 2.2.9 Nickel 2-24 2.2.10 Barium 2-25 3.0 EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 3-1 3.1 Contaminant Release Information 3-1 3.2 Routes of Exposure 3.3 3.3 Populations Exposed 3-18 3.4 Extent of Exposure 3-25 4.0 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT ; 4.1 4.1 Benzene 4.9 4.2 Chlorobenzene (monochlorobenzene) 4-12 4.3 4-Methyl-II-Pentanone (MIBK) 4-13 4.4 1,2-Dichloroethene 4-14 4.5 Trichlorocthene (TCE) 4-16 4.6 Vinyl Chloride 4-18 4.7 Pyrene 4-22 4.8 Arsenic 4-25 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Page 5.0 RISK CHARACTERIZATION 5-1 5.1 Human Health 5-1 5.2 Environmental Impacts 5-10 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS • 6-1 REFERENCES ' R-l FIGURES 1-1. Area Location Map of the Fulton Terminals Site, Fulton, Oswego County, New York 1-2 1-2. Fulton Terminals Site Map 1-3 ' 1-3. Fulton Termiiials Site Layout Map 1-6 2-1. Location of Oswego County and Physiographic Provinces of New York 2-2 2-2. Generalized Cross Section of Bedrock Formations, Oswego County, New York 2-4 2-3. Origin of Selected Types of Glacial Deposits 2-5 2-4. Fulton Quadrangle Showing Glacial Deposits 2-6 2-5. Detailed Topographic Site Map Showing Storh Grate Inlet and Outfall to Oswego River 2-8 2-6. Wind Frequency Distribution 2-13 4-1. Diagram of Dose-Response Relationship 4-7 4-2. Health Effects from Ingesting Nickel 4-32 TABLES 1-1. List of Chemicals Analyzed for at Fulton Terminals Site 1-7 1-2. Compounds Detected at the Fulton Terminals Site 1-8 1-3. Summary Statistics for Soil Samples Collected at the Fulton Terminals Site 1-21 1-4. Total Comparison of Metal Concentrations in Soil, Fulton Terminals Site 1-24 2-1. Summary of Temperature and Precipitation Data, Oswego County, New York 2-12 2-2. Potential Release Mechanisms at the Fulton Terminals Site ... 2-15 2-3. Summary of Chemical, Physical, and Biological Properties for Indicator Chemicals at Fulton Terminals Site 2-17 3-1. Calculated Atmospheric Emission Rates, Fulton Terminals Site. 3-7 3-2. Calculation of Sorbed and Dissolved Contaminant Loads to Oswego River from Surface Water Runoff 3-12 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) 3-3. Contaminant Loading to the Oswego River from the Ground Water at Fulton Terminals 3-16 3-4. Mean Indicator Chemical Concentrations (PPB) in Shallow Soil Fulton Terminals Site 3-19 3-5. Calculation of Potential Contaminant Concentrations in Oswego River at the Fulton Terminals Site 3-22 3-6. Cumulative Short-Term and Long-Term Inhalation Exposures to Each Indicator Chemical, Fulton Terminals Site 3-27 3-7. Calculation of Intakes from Dermal Absorption of Chemicals in Surface Water Via Direct Contact (Subchronic and Chronic). 3-30 3-8. Calculate Intakes from Ingestion of Contaminated Fish, Exposure Point: Nearby Oswego River 3-32 3-9. Calculation of Intakes from Soil Ingestion Via Direct Contact (Subchronic and Chronic) 3-33 4-1. Concentrations Corresponding to a 1E-06 Lifetime Cancer Risk Leve 1 4.3 4-2. Water Quality Criteria for the Protection of Aquatic Life ... 4-4 4-3. TLVS for the Selected Contaminants at the Fulton Terminals Site 4-5 4-4. Critical Toxicity Values for Indicator Chemicals at the Fulton Terminals Site 4-8 4-5. Summary of Aquatic Fate of Pyrene 4-24 4-6. Dose-Response Relationships Between Prevalence of Skin Cancer and Arsenic Consumption by Age 4-28 5-1. Subchronic Human Intake Levels, Fulton Terminals .Site 5-2 5-2. Total Chronic. Human Intake Levels 5-3 5-3. Calculation of Subchronic and Chronic Hazard Indexes for Noncarcinogens 5.5 5-4. Calculation of Chronic Hazard Index 5-6 5-5. Risk Estimates for Carcinogens 5-8 5-6. Comparison of Estimated Short- and Long-Term Contaminant Concentrations in Oswego River to Freshwater Toxicity Criteria 5-11 APPENDICES 1. Selection of Indicator Chemicals Process 2. Toxicological, Reactivity, and Personal Protection Data for Indicator Chemicals 3. Supporting Computations 4. NYS Health Advisory ERRATA Please remove the following pages from the June 23, 1989 Final Endangerraent Assessment for the Fulton Terminals Site in Fulton, New "ie.ptc*t4 4U4«V) York reportAwith the corresponding attached pages: Page 3-33 (Table 3-9) Page 5-1 Page 5-2 (Table 5-1) Page 5-3 (Table 5-2) Page 5-4 Page 5-5 (Table 5-3) Page 5-6 (Table 5-4) Page 5-7 Page 5-8 (Table 5-5) Page 5-9 Page 6-2 Page 6-3 TABLE 3-9 CALCULATION OF INTAKES FROM SOIL INGESTION VIA DIRECT CONTACT (SUBCHRONIC AND CHRONIC) Soil Subchronic Chronic Body Weight Consum./ Consum./ Subchronic Chronic CHEMICAL Concentration Consumption Consumption (Child) Event (subchron) Event (chronic) TWA Dose*** TWA Dose**** (ug/kg)* (g soil/day) (g soil/day) (kg)** (mg/event) (mg/event) (mg/kg.day) (mg/kg.day) Arsenic 4884 0.8 0.2 10 3.91E-03 9.77E-04 3.91E-04 Barium 27680 0.8 0.2 10 2.21E-02 5.54E-03 2.21E-03 Benzene 8.15 0.8 0.2 10 6.52E-06 1.63E-06 6.52E-07 Chlorobenzene 5.85 0.8 0.2 10 4.68E-06 1.17E-06 4.68E-07 1.2-DCE (tot) 6.26 0.8 0.2 10 5.01E-06 1.25E-06 5.01E-07 MIBK 12.86 0.8 0.2 10 1.03E-05 2.57E-06 1.03E-06 Nickel 12634 0.8 0.2 10 1.01E-02 2.53E-03 1.01E-03 Pyrene 202 0.8 0.2 10 1.62E-04 4.04E-05 1.62E-05 TCE 9.66 0.8 0.2 10 7.73E-06 1.93E-06 7.73E-07 Vinyl Chloride 12.2 0.8 0.2 10 9.76E-06 2.44E-06 9.76E-07 Notes: * Soil concentrations are geometric means of surface soil contaminant data ** From Exposure Factors Handbook *** Based on per event exposure **** Based on 5 events per year and 5 years of exposure over 70 year lifespan a c o o -J to OO 3-33 5.0 RISK CHARACTERIZATION 5.1 Human Health The objective of this risk characterization is to integrate information in the exposure assessment (Section 3.0) and the toxicity assessment (Section 4.0) in order to evaluate potential or actual human health risks associated with the Fulton Terminals Site. Risk refers to the probability of injury, disease, or death resulting from exposure to the chemicals identified in this study. Risk values are generally expressed in scientific notation. An individual lifetime risk of one in -4 10,000 is represented as 1 x 10 or 1E-04 (Versar, 1987). Excess cancer risks refer to the increased, probability of cancer above a "normal" rate. Impacts of noncarcinogenic chemicals on human health are evaluated by comparing projected or estimated intakes and reference levels for the chemicals of concern. A reference level represents an acceptable exposure level at which there will be no observable adverse effect or the lowest observable adverse effect on human health. The impact of carcinogenic chemicals is assessed by comparing calculated risks and target risks for known or suspected carcinogens. Target risks for carcinogens generally range from 1E-04 to 1E-07. The estimated subchronic and chronic (short- and long-term, respectively) human intake levels for each of the indicator chemicals is presented in Tables 5-1 and 5-2. Subchronic intake levels, representing short-term intake levels were computed for oral and inhalation routes. Supporting calculations used to determine SDIs and CDIs are found in Chapter 3 and Appendix 3 of this report. The highest oral subchronic daily intake was computed for barium at 2.22E-03 mg/kg/day. Subchronic oral intake levels for the volatile organics ranged from 4.68E-07 to 1.03E-06 mg/kg/day. Subchronic daily intakes from inhalation of volatile organics ranged from 1.57E-08 mg/kg/day for chlorobenzene to 9.59E-08 mg/kg/day for TCE.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Onondaga County Planning Board February 24, 2016 SYRACUSE-ONONDAGA COUNTY PLANNING AGENCY CONFERENCE ROOM, 1100 CIVIC CENTER 421 MONTGOMERY STREET SYRACUSE, NEW YORK
    Onondaga County Planning Board February 24, 2016 SYRACUSE-ONONDAGA COUNTY PLANNING AGENCY CONFERENCE ROOM, 1100 CIVIC CENTER 421 MONTGOMERY STREET SYRACUSE, NEW YORK I. ATTENDANCE MEMBERS PRESENT STAFF PRESENT GUESTS PRESENT Douglas Morris Don Jordan David Reed Robert Antonacci Megan Costa Brian Donnelly Gilly Cantor Chester Dudzinski, Jr. Robin Coon Will Kehoe II. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 11:00 AM on February 24, 2016. III. MINUTES Minutes from February 3, 2016 were submitted for approval. Robert Antonacci made a motion to accept the minutes. Brian Donnelly seconded the motion. The votes were recorded as follows: Douglas Morris - yes; Brian Donnelly - yes; Robert Antonacci - yes; Chester Dudzinski - yes. Public Hearing - Referral C-16-1 - Name change for part of Herman Road, in the Town of Van Buren, between Brickyard Road and a dead-end at I90, to be known as Bippus Road. No public comments were presented. The Board discussed the referral #C-16-1 from the Town of Van Buren. The motion was made Robert Antonacci to approve the name change. Chester Dudzinski seconded the motion. The votes were recorded as follows: Douglas Morris - yes; Brian Donnelly - yes; Robert Antonacci - yes; Chester Dudzinski - yes. IV. ACTIONS ON GML SECTION 239 REFERRALS Summary S-16-10 CSyrPB No Position With Comment S-16-11 TOnoPB No Position S-16-12 TVanPB Modification S-16-8 CSyrPB No Position With Comment S-16-9 CSyrPB No Position With Comment Z-16-33 VLivPB No Position With Comment Z-16-34 VLivPB No Position With Comment Z-16-35 CSyrPB
    [Show full text]
  • MINUTES Minutes from February 12, 2015 Were Submitted for Approval
    Onondaga County Planning Board March 04, 2015 SYRACUSE-ONONDAGA COUNTY PLANNING AGENCY CONFERENCE ROOM, 1100 CIVIC CENTER 421 MONTGOMERY STREET SYRACUSE, NEW YORK I. ATTENDANCE STAFF PRESENT GUESTS PRESENT MEMBERS Douglas Morris Megan Costa Robert Jokl Gilly Cantor Daniel Cupoli Robin Coon Robert Antonacci Chester Dudzinski, Jr. II. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 11:00 AM on March 04, 2015 III. MINUTES Minutes from February 12, 2015 were submitted for approval. Chester Dudzinski made a motion to accept the minutes. Douglas Morris seconded the motion. The votes were recorded as follows: Douglas Morris - yes; Robert Jokl - yes; Daniel Cupoli - yes; Robert Antonacci - yes; Chester Dudzinski - yes. IV. ACTIONS ON GML SECTION 239 REFERRALS Summary S-15-11 No Position With Comment S-15-13 Modification S-15-14 Modification S-15-15 Modification Z-15-47 No Position With Comment Z-15-48 No Position With Comment Z-15-49 Approval Z-15-50 Disapproval Z-15-51 No Position With Comment Z-15-52 No Position With Comment Z-15-53 No Position With Comment Z-15-54 No Position With Comment Z-15-55 No Position With Comment Z-15-56 No Position With Comment Z-15-57 Modification Z-15-58 No Position With Comment Z-15-59 Modification Z-15-60 Modification Z-15-61 No Position With Comment Z-15-62 Disapproval Z-15-63 Disapproval Z-15-64 No Position With Comment Z-15-65 Modification Z-15-66 Modification Z-15-67 Modification Z-15-68 Modification Z-15-70 No Position Onondaga County Planning Board RESOLUTION OF THE ONONDAGA COUNTY PLANNING BOARD JOANNE M.
    [Show full text]
  • Onondaga County Planning Board July 29, 2015 SYRACUSE-ONONDAGA COUNTY PLANNING AGENCY CONFERENCE ROOM, 1100 CIVIC CENTER 421 MONTGOMERY STREET SYRACUSE, NEW YORK
    Onondaga County Planning Board July 29, 2015 SYRACUSE-ONONDAGA COUNTY PLANNING AGENCY CONFERENCE ROOM, 1100 CIVIC CENTER 421 MONTGOMERY STREET SYRACUSE, NEW YORK I. ATTENDANCE STAFF PRESENT GUESTS PRESENT MEMBERS Douglas Moris Chester Dudzinski Megan Costa Daniel Cupoli Gilly Cantor Robert Antonacci Robin Coon Brian Donnelly James Corbett II. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 11:00 AM on July 29, 2015 III. MINUTES Minutes from July 8, 2015 were submitted for approval. Daniel Cupoli made a motion to accept the minutes. Chester Dudzinski seconded the motion. The votes were recorded as follows: Douglas Morris - yes; Brian Donnelly - yes; Daniel Cupoli - yes; Robert Antonacci - yes; Chester Dudzinski - yes; James Corbett - yes. IV. ACTIONS ON GML SECTION 239 REFERRALS Summary S-15-57 No Position S-15-58 No Position S-15-59 No Position With Comment S-15-60 No Position With Comment S-15-61 No Position With Comment S-15-62 No Position With Comment S-15-63 No Position With Comment Z-15-263 No Position With Comment Z-15-264 Modification Z-15-265 No Position Z-15-266 No Position Z-15-267 Modification Z-15-268 Modification Z-15-269 No Position With Comment Z-15-270 No Position Z-15-271 No Position With Comment Z-15-272 Modification Z-15-273 No Position With Comment Z-15-274 No Position With Comment Z-15-275 Disapproval Z-15-276 No Position With Comment Z-15-277 No Position Z-15-278 No Position With Comment Z-15-279 No Position Z-15-280 Modification Z-15-281 No Position Z-15-282 No Position Z-15-283 No Position With Comment Z-15-284 No Position With Comment Z-15-285 No Position With Comment Z-15-286 No Position With Comment Z-15-287 Modification Z-15-288 Modification Onondaga County Planning Board RESOLUTION OF THE ONONDAGA COUNTY PLANNING BOARD JOANNE M.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 83 Monday, No. 98 May 21, 2018 Pages 23349–23574
    Vol. 83 Monday, No. 98 May 21, 2018 Pages 23349–23574 OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL REGISTER VerDate Sep 11 2014 20:02 May 18, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4710 Sfmt 4710 E:\FR\FM\21MYWS.LOC 21MYWS sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with FRONT MATTER WS II Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 98 / Monday, May 21, 2018 The FEDERAL REGISTER (ISSN 0097–6326) is published daily, SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES Monday through Friday, except official holidays, by the Office PUBLIC of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC 20408, under the Federal Register Subscriptions: Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 15) and the regulations of the Administrative Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 Committee of the Federal Register (1 CFR Ch. I). The Assistance with public subscriptions 202–512–1806 Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20402 is the exclusive distributor of the official General online information 202–512–1530; 1–888–293–6498 edition. Periodicals postage is paid at Washington, DC. Single copies/back copies: The FEDERAL REGISTER provides a uniform system for making Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Assistance with public single copies 1–866–512–1800 Federal agencies. These include Presidential proclamations and (Toll-Free) Executive Orders, Federal agency documents having general FEDERAL AGENCIES applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published Subscriptions: by act of Congress, and other Federal agency documents of public interest. Assistance with Federal agency subscriptions: Documents are on file for public inspection in the Office of the Email [email protected] Federal Register the day before they are published, unless the Phone 202–741–6000 issuing agency requests earlier filing.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 80, No. 23/Wednesday, February 4, 2015
    6036 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 23 / Wednesday, February 4, 2015 / Proposed Rules revisions, see the direct final rule II. Does this action apply to me? published in a separate part of this Categories and entities potentially Federal Register. regulated by this proposed rule include: Category NAICS code 1 Examples of regulated entities Polyvinyl chloride resins manufacturing ..................................... 325211 Facilities that polymerize vinyl chloride monomer to produce polyvinyl chloride and/or copolymers products. 1 North American Industry Classification System. This table is not intended to be western property boundary to the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the exhaustive, but rather provides a guide Oswego River (approximately 50 feet). ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ Section of for readers regarding entities likely to be The Environmental Protection Agency today’s Federal Register, EPA is regulated by this proposed rule. To (EPA), Region 2, is issuing this Notice publishing a direct final Notice of determine whether your facility would of Intent for Partial Deletion (NOIPD) of Partial Deletion (NOPD) of the Site be regulated by this proposed rule, you the On-Property portion of the Site from without prior NOIPD because EPA should examine the applicability the National Priorities List (NPL) and views this as a noncontroversial criteria in 40 CFR 63.11140. If you have requests public comments on this revision and anticipates no adverse proposed action. The NPL, promulgated any questions regarding the comment. EPA has explained its reasons pursuant to Section 105 of the applicability of this action to a for this partial deletion in the preamble particular entity, consult either the air Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability to the direct final Notice of Partial permitting authority for the entity or Deletion.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 80, No. 23/Wednesday
    Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 23 / Wednesday, February 4, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 5957 Inert ingredients Limits Uses ******* Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), a-(3-carboxy-1-oxosulfopropyl)-w-hydroxy-, Not to exceed 0.125% for seed Surfactant. (C10–C12)-alkyl ethers, disodium salts, polyoxylene content aver- treatment use only. ages 4–5 moles (CAS Reg. No. 68815–56–5). Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), a-(3-carboxy-1-oxosulfopropyl)-w-hydroxy-, Not to exceed 0.125% for seed Surfactant (C10–C16)-alkyl ethers, disodium salts, polyoxyethylene content aver- treatment use only. ages 5 moles (CAS Reg. No. 68954–91–6). ******* [FR Doc. 2015–02072 Filed 2–3–15; 8:45 am] the soil on the On-Property portion of www.regulations.gov, including any BILLING CODE 6560–50–P the Site and the groundwater beneath personal information provided, unless the On-Property portion of the Site no the comment includes information longer pose a threat to public health or claimed to be Confidential Business ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION the environment. The NOPD pertains to Information (CBI) or other information AGENCY the On-Property portion of the Site. The whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Off-Property portion of the Site will Do not submit information that you 40 CFR Part 300 remain on the NPL. Because residual consider to be CBI or otherwise [EPA–HQ–SFUND–1983–0002; FRL–9922– groundwater contamination remains in protected through http:// 37–Region–2] the Off-Property portion of the Site, www.regulations.gov or via email. The groundwater monitoring and five-year http://www.regulations.gov Web site is National Oil and Hazardous reviews will still be required for this an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which Substances Pollution Contingency area.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Clay Section II. Inventory and Analysis
    Town of Clay Local Waterfront Revitalization Program SECTION II ­ INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS A. Historic Land and Water Use The area that is today the Town of Clay was first inhabited by European settlers in the 1790’s. It is often noted that the first settler was Patrick McGee, having constructed a log cabin at the juncture of the Seneca and Oneida Rivers in 1793. However, some historians have found evidence of this location having been previously settled by Simeon Barker in 1790. Regardless of who the first Clay settler was, the Town’s first European permanent residence was established at the confluence of the Oneida and Seneca Rivers where they meet to form the Oswego River, a point that has since those early days been referred to as Three Rivers or Three Rivers Point. In reality, neither Patrick McGee or Simeon Barker nor any other European setter was the first to inhabit this region. It is well documented that Native American settlements existed along the Seneca and Oneida Rivers well before Europeans inhabited North America. Historical accounts and archeological investigations have provided evidence of such settlements. Early settlers have provided accounts of a Native American settlement near Oak Orchard Reefs on the banks of the Oneida River. Evidence of a burial ground near this location was reported as late as 1878. Archeological investigations have also indicated evidence of Native American settlements and encampments along the rivers at Three Rivers Point and in the hamlet Belgium, near the Route 31 Bridge. Three Rivers Point is considered a place of historic significance to Native Americans.
    [Show full text]
  • 6560-50-P Environmental Protection Agency 40 Cfr
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 02/04/2015 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-02266, and on FDsys.gov 6560-50-P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 300 [EPA-HQ-SFUND-1983-0002; FRL-9922-37-Region-2] National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan; National Priorities List: Partial Deletion of the Fulton Terminals Superfund Site AGENCY: United States Environmental Protection Agency. ACTION: Direct final rule. SUMMARY: The Fulton Terminals Superfund site (Site), located in the City of Fulton, Oswego County, New York, consists of an “On-Property” portion, an approximately 1.5- acre parcel of land bounded on the west by First Street, on the south by Shaw Street, on the east by New York State Route 481, and on the north by a warehouse, and an “Off- Property” portion, defined by the area between the On-Property portion’s western property boundary to the Oswego River (approximately 50 feet). The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 2, is publishing this direct final Notice of Partial Deletion (NOPD) of the On-Property portion of the Site from the National Priorities List (NPL). The NPL, promulgated pursuant to Section 105 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, is an appendix of the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP). This direct final partial deletion is being published by EPA with the concurrence of the State of New York, through the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC), because EPA has determined that all appropriate response actions under CERCLA have been completed at the On- Property portion of the Site and that the soil on the On-Property portion of the Site and the groundwater beneath the On-Property portion of the Site no longer pose a threat to public health or the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Clay LWRP, As There Are No Designated Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats in the Town Waterfront Area
    Town of Clay Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Adopted: Town of Clay, Town Board, March 19, 2012 Approved: NYS Secretary of State, Cesar A. Perales, ……………………………, 2013 Prepared for: TOWN OF CLAY 4401 Route 31 Clay, New York 13041 Prepared by: This document was prepared for the New York State Department of State with funds provided under Title 11 of the Environmental Protection Fund Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................. i What is an LWRP? .......................................................................................................................................... i What are the benefits of an approved LWRP? .............................................................................................. i What are the obligations of an approved LWRP? ......................................................................................... ii SECTION I ‐ WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION AREA BOUNDARY ................................................ 1 A. Regional and Local Setting ........................................................................................................................ 1 B. Boundary Criteria ...................................................................................................................................... 1 C. Description of Waterfront Corridor .......................................................................................................... 1 Waterside Boundary ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Onondaga County Planning Board August 06, 2014 SYRACUSE-ONONDAGA COUNTY PLANNING AGENCY CONFERENCE ROOM, 1100 CIVIC CENTER 421 MONTGOMERY STREET SYRACUSE, NEW YORK
    Onondaga County Planning Board August 06, 2014 SYRACUSE-ONONDAGA COUNTY PLANNING AGENCY CONFERENCE ROOM, 1100 CIVIC CENTER 421 MONTGOMERY STREET SYRACUSE, NEW YORK I. ATTENDANCE STAFF PRESENT GUESTS PRESENT MEMBERS Douglas Morris Andrew Maxwell Robert Jokl Megan Costa Daniel Cupoli Gilly Cantor Chester Dudzinski, Jr. Robin Coon II. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 11:00 AM on August 06, 2014 III. MINUTES Minutes from July 16, 2014 were submitted for approval. Robert Jokl made a motion to accept the minutes. Daniel Cupoli seconded the motion. The votes were recorded as follows: Douglas Morris - yes; Chester Dudzinski - yes; Robert Jokl - yes; Daniel Cupoli - yes. IV. ACTIONS ON GML SECTION 239 REFERRALS Summary S-14-61 No Position With Comment S-14-62 Modification S-14-63 No Position With Comment S-14-64 No Position S-14-65 Modification Z-14-264 No Position Z-14-265 No Position Z-14-268 No Position Z-14-269 No Position Z-14-270 Disapproval Z-14-271 No Position Z-14-272 No Position Z-14-273 No Position With Comment Z-14-274 No Position With Comment Z-14-275 No Position Z-14-276 No Position Z-14-277 No Position Z-14-278 No Position Z-14-279 No Position With Comment Z-14-280 No Position With Comment Z-14-281 No Position Z-14-282 No Position Z-14-283 No Position With Comment Z-14-284 No Position With Comment Z-14-285 No Position With Comment Z-14-286 No Position Z-14-287 Modification Z-14-288 Modification Z-14-289 Disapproval Z-14-290 No Position Z-14-291 Modification Z-14-292 Modification Z-14-293 No Position With Comment Z-14-294 Modification Z-14-295 Modification Z-14-296 Modification Z-14-297 Modification Z-14-298 Modification Z-14-299 Modification Z-14-300 Modification Z-14-301 No Position With Comment Z-14-302 No Position With Comment Onondaga County Planning Board RESOLUTION OF THE ONONDAGA COUNTY PLANNING BOARD JOANNE M.
    [Show full text]
  • Onondaga County Planning Board July 20, 2016 SYRACUSE-ONONDAGA COUNTY PLANNING AGENCY CONFERENCE ROOM, 1100 CIVIC CENTER 421 MONTGOMERY STREET SYRACUSE, NEW YORK
    Onondaga County Planning Board July 20, 2016 SYRACUSE-ONONDAGA COUNTY PLANNING AGENCY CONFERENCE ROOM, 1100 CIVIC CENTER 421 MONTGOMERY STREET SYRACUSE, NEW YORK I. ATTENDANCE MEMBERS PRESENT STAFF PRESENT GUESTS PRESENT Douglas Morris Don Jordan, Jr Robert Smith Robert Antonacci Megan Costa Richard Hooper Daniel Cupoli Gilly Cantor Mark Venesky Vern Conway Chester Dudzinski, Jr. Robin Coon James Corbett Brian Donnelly II. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 11:00 AM on July 20, 2016. III. MINUTES Minutes from June 29, 2016 were submitted for approval. Daniel Cupoli made a motion to accept the minutes. Brian Donnelly seconded the motion. The votes were recorded as follows: Douglas Morris - yes; Brian Donnelly - yes; Daniel Cupoli - yes; chester Dudzinski - yes; James Corbett - yes. At the invitation of Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency staff, representatives from the Town of Cicero appeared to present the proposed zone changes to the OCPB, to offer the opportunity for dialogue, and to answer questions regarding the proposal. (see attached summary) IV. Summary S-16-47 TManPB Disapproval Z-16-236 CSyrPB No Position Z-16-237 CSyrPB No Position With Comment Z-16-238 TClaPB No Position Z-16-239 TClaTB Modification Z-16-240 TClaZBA Modification Z-16-241 VMinPB Modification Z-16-242 CSyrPB No Position Z-16-243 CSyrPB No Position With Comment Z-16-244 TCamTB No Position Z-16-245 TClaZBA No Position Z-16-246 TSalTB Disapproval Z-16-247 TOnoTB No Position With Comment Z-16-248 VBalVB No Position Z-16-249 TManPB No Position Z-16-250
    [Show full text]
  • LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PLAN for the TOWN of CLAY Onondaga County, New York
    LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PLAN for the TOWN OF CLAY Onondaga County, New York Prepared for: TOWN OF CLAY 4401 Route 31 Clay, New York 13041 Prepared by: 8232 Loop Road Baldwinsville, New York 13027 (315) 638-8587 Project No. 2006225 April 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................... 1 1.0 WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION BOUNDARY............................................ 2 1.1 Regional and Local Setting.......................................................................................... 2 1.2 Boundary Criteria ........................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Description of Waterfront Corridor ............................................................................. 3 2.0 EXISTING LAND USE INVENTORY AND ANALSYSIS .................................. 4 2.1 Historic Land and Water Use....................................................................................... 4 2.2 Existing Land and Water Use and Waterfront Access................................................. 7 2.3 Property Ownership ..................................................................................................... 10 2.4 Zoning.......................................................................................................................... 11 2.5 Natural Resources ........................................................................................................ 16 2.5.1 Site
    [Show full text]