Brisbane Congressprogram Final

International Society of City and Regional Planners Frontiers of ISOCARP BRISBANE Congress Australia Planning 2013 1-4 October Evolving and Declining Models of City Planning Practice

The International Society of City and Regional We are looking to announce the details of our Planners (ISOCARP) and the conference local exciting keynote speakers within the next few organizing Committee is incredibly excited weeks, so stay tuned. about the upcoming 2013 Congress. Early Bird Registrations end 31 July 2013. Over 250 planning professionals from around the world submitted papers for ISOCARP 2013 Congress - Local Organising our consideration, and we are desperately Committee working to finalise the congress program. This is the greatest level of interest ever expressed in the ISOCARP congress, and we trust this is an indication ofContents: the diversity of attendees that REGISTER HERE are coming to Brisbane. Information / City Map / Venue Map 2 Words of Welcome 3 Keynote Speakers 5 Congress Schedule 6 Index of Authors 8 Presentation Schedule 9 Congress Team 10 Introductory Reports: theme, topics and papers 12 The Congress is in Brisbane, “Australia’s Congress Program 18 New World City,” a fast-growing, innovative, FOR MORE INFORMATION multicultural Partner’surban region Tours of nearly + Post-Congress three Tours 33 million peoplePapers in the subtropics. not presented October EXHIBIT OR SPONSOR34 is a great time of year to visit Brisbane and Australia, ISOCARPand you can Programs find out more 36 about things toSupporters see in Brisbane from our 38 supporters. List of Delegates WEBSITE40 • Brisbane’sUseful New WorldInformation City 43 • Tourism Australia • Brisbane City Council • Queensland Government • University of Queensland Image courtesy of Brisbane Marketing • Queensland University of Technology • Royal International Convention Centre [email protected] MAPS / USEFUL INFORMATION

City Map The ISOCARP Congress Phone/IPad App This year, for the first time, you will be able to access all of the Congress information through a phone/tablet app. The application is run through Showgizmo and you will have received an invitation to download the app prior to the congress starting. In order to use the app you will need to use your email address that you registered with the Congress. It is highly recommended that you download the app prior to attending the event, however, you can download it at any time.

ShowGizmo is the official smartphone app for ISOCARP Congress 2013. Available to you at no cost as a Congress delegate, ShowGizmo puts the event in the palm of your hand! You can use the app to plan your time in advance via the web portal, decide what you want to see and do, and then use one of the smartphone apps (available for iPhone, Blackberry, Android and mobile web) to: • Have the conference program and floor plan in the palm of your hand • See profiles of all exhibitors and their staff and have access to additional documents etc. • Capture exhibitor information straight to your phone by scanning QR codes at the show • Keep up with real time alerts, news and tweets during the show • ‘Favourite’ things you like – people, documents, promotions, stands, to review later at your leisure and share with others • Exchange contact details with other attendees and exhibitors • Find the people you’re looking for • Rate conference sessions… and much more!

EMERGENCY NUMBER: Fire, Ambulance, Police…………………………………..Dial 000

If you have any questions concerning your stay in Brisbane (also in case you have or lost or left your baggage, etc.) please contact the ISOCARP Local Organising Committee on +61 407 180 576.

For more useful information concerning transportation, Venue Map currency, opening hours, etc. see page 43.

2 WORDS OF WELCOME

Welcome from the President of ISOCARP

Each year, the annual World Congress of the International Society of City and Regional Planners combines cutting edge presentations from international experts, papers from planners from all over the world, and discussions of challenging issues facing communities and governments everywhere, all in a unique atmosphere of collegiality and friendship.

And each year, we meet in a new city that offers special opportunities for learning, discovery, and the stimulation of engaging with a new and fascinating place and culture.

In 2013 the Congress addresses the neglected but critically important issue of planning practice – as outlined in General Rapporteur Jeffrey Featherstone’s introduction. As usual, the Congress will also include an International Planners’ Forum, an Education Forum, workshops, technical tours, and special events and seminars.

In 2013 the Congress is being hosted in the City of Brisbane, a city which is recognised for its support for the arts and innovation, and for its world-beating achievements in metropolitan planning and governance.

I’m looking forward to meeting you in Brisbane!

Professor Milica Bajic-Brkovic University of Belgrade, Serbia President of ISOCARP

Welcome from the Minister

It gives me great pleasure to welcome the delegates to the 49th ISOCARP World Congress to Brisbane, Queens- land. We’re proud of our state – our cities, our towns, our coastline, our rainforests, our farmlands, and our thriving economy. It is exciting to see such a diverse range of nationalities represented at this Congress, all coming together to share ideas, experiences, and knowledge about how we can better plan for our future.

The Queensland Government knows the value of planning and is dedicated to ensuring our systems, processes, and planning policies support the growth and development of our communities. With the Deputy Premier as Minister for State Development, Infrastructure and Planning, and myself as Assistant Minister for Planning Reform, we appreciate the impact good planning has on our people, our environment, and our economy.

The state’s current agenda for planning includes significant legislative reform, improved planning systems and processes, new regional plans, a new Queensland Plan, and various government offices and departments specifically focused on planning for the growth and development of our communities.

I welcome events such as the ISOCARP World Congress to our State, so that we can gain insights from the wealth of knowledge you bring from all corners of the world.

I wish you all the best for a successful Congress and trust you will enjoy Brisbane and Queensland – a great state, with great opportunity.

Robert (Rob) Molhoek Assistant Minister for Planning Reform Queensland Parliament

Welcome from the Lord Mayor of Brisbane

Brisbane is emerging as a leading city in the Asia Pacific Region, ranking among the most livable cities in the world. Distinctly different from other Australian capital cities, Brisbane offers the energy, competiveness and corporate edge so integral to its economic growth. Our city is uniquely compact and offers a safe subtropical lifestyle, excellent green credentials and significant cultural attractions.

The Planning institute of Australia awarded Brisbane City Council five planning awards in 2011, including awards for best planning ideas in large and small project categories. Four other urban planning awards were also received in 2011 for urban renewal initiatives, planning processes and individual urban planning achievements.

Brisbane City Council manages the largest local planning program in Australia and works to implement urban projects that are integral to Brisbane’s growth. With such strong credentials and trusted industry relationships, Bris- bane welcomes your delegates with the warmth and friendliness for which we are renowned.

Graham Quirk Lord Mayor

3 WORDS OF WELCOME

Welcome and Introduction from the Chair of the Local Organizing Committee

Brisbane is a great place to hold the 49th ISOCARP congress, given that the theme is Frontiers of Planning – Evolving and Declining Models of Practice. Brisbane itself is a city on the frontier in many different senses. The city is in fact a contradiction. It lies close to the edge of the Pacific and South East Asia and yet its modern history is steeped in a heritage founded in England and Europe. Its architecture and urban form demonstrate many innovative features at the frontier of sustainable design, yet it has in the past flirted with joining in the clamour to build the ‘world’s highest building’. Its older buildings reflect both nineteenth century elegance and frontier thinking in its climate-suitable ‘timber and tin’ houses on stumps; but both of these are often threatened as it tries to reduce its environmental impact through compacting its urban living areas and increasing residential densities. In addition to matters of urban design and physical planning, innovations at the frontier underpin the city’s position but are not visible to the eye. For example, Brisbane City has the largest population of any Australian local authority, because in 1925 around twenty small local councils amalgamated into the single Greater Brisbane, an innovation that happened to no other Australian capital city. Yet this metropolitan-wide authority did not have a statutory town plan until 1965.

Fascinating contradictions. Brisbane is full of them. That is what makes the place so interesting. But whilst Brisbane now styles itself as a ‘new world city’ and Australia is seen as part of the New World, both have always sought lessons from other places. Learning from international experience is particularly important for local planners. Brisbane planners pride themselves in their openness to new ideas. And in return there are many innovative things that people from outside Brisbane can learn from the local experience. So this 49th ISOCARP congress is at the frontier of planning, in terms of both its physical location and its intellectual contributions. We hope you will learn a lot from your time in Brisbane. In return, Brisbane hopes to learn a lot from you. We welcome you to the congress.

Professor John Minnery University of Queensland Chair, Brisbane Local Organizing Committee

Brisbane Local Organising Committee (BLOC) John Minnery (Chair) / Warren Batts / Michael Papageorgiou / Tathagata Chatterji / Laurel Johnson / Kaye Duggan / Severine Mayere / Laura Gannon / Glen Searle / Kerry Doss / Neil Sipe / John Brannock / Ryan Smith / Sonia Kirby

PROGRAM IN SHORT

Tuesday 1 October Wednesday 2 October Thursday 3 October Friday 4 October Sat.5 Oct. Before 9 Registration all day Start at 8.30 (Hall B) 9.00-10.30 Opening plenary (Hall B) PIA/ISOCARP: Theme: PIA and Parallel workshop sessions Parallel workshop sessions Welcome to Country Planning matters

10.30-11.00 Welcome by ISOCARP President Milica Coffee Coffee Coffee 11.00-12.30 Bajic-Brkovic PIA/ISOCARP: Theme: Planning Hassell Parallel workshop sessions: Parallel workshop sessions Opening by Rob Molhoek MP for natural hazards Knowledge Track 1: Migration as the Track 1: Meeting Room 1 Coffee break Keynote Speech Vanessa Watson: Precincts new Face of Change Track 2: Meeting Room 2 on 1 Oct: African Cities for Sale! Smart, Eco or Case Study Track 2: Valuing what Track 3: Meeting Room 3 10.45-11.00 just Profitable? Showcase. already Exists Track 4: Meeting Room 4 Keynote Speech Amos Brandeis: Registration Track 3: Community and Track 5: Meeting Room 5 Planning for people and with them: necessary. Stakeholder Engagement Practical lessons from global experience (Meeting Track 4: International Introduction by General Rapporteur Room 1) Planning Exchange Jeff Featherstone and his Congress Track 5: Forum on Planning Team Education Presentation Young Planning Professionals Brisbane Review09 Presentation 12.30-13.30 Technical tours 12.30-16.30 Lunch Lunch Lunch 13.30-15.00 Lunch boxes provided PIA/ISOCARP: Theme: Urban Parallel workshop sessions Closing Plenary (Hall B) design Presentation YPP Ulyanovsk Conclusions Congress Team Reflections ISOCARP President Congress Announcement 2014 Closing Statement John Minnery 15.00-15.30 Coffee Coffee Coffee Coffee

15.30-17.00 PIA/ISOCARP: Theme: Urban Parallel workshop sessions ISOCARP General Meeting futures and panel discussion 15.30–18.00

17.30-19.30 Civic reception by Brisbane City Council UPAT Happy Hour Seminar 19.30 Gala dinner and in Ithaca Room, City Hall (Hall A) Awards ceremony -congress tours 19.30 + ISOCARP Bureau Meeting Buses to venue and back (Meeting Room 1) 4 Exhibitions and displays Start post KEYNOTE SPEAKERS

Vanessa Watson is professor of city planning in the School of Architecture, Planning and Geomatics at the University of Cape Town (South Africa) and Deputy Dean of the faculty. She holds degrees from the Universities of Natal, Cape Town and the Archi- tectural Association of London, and a PhD from the University of Witwatersrand, and is a Fellow of the University of Cape Town. Her research over the last thirty years has focussed on urban planning in the global South and the effects of inappropriate planning practices and theories especially in Africa. Her work seeks to unsettle the geo-politics of knowledge production in planning by providing alternative theoretical perspectives from the global South.

She is the author/co-author of seven books, some fifty journal arti- cles and numerous chapters, conference papers and keynotes in the field of planning. Her book: Change and Continuity in Spatial Plan- ning: metropolitan planning in Cape Town under political transition (Routledge), won national and university book prizes. She is an editor of the journal Planning Theory, and on the editorial boards of Plan- ning Practice and Research, the Journal of Planning Education and Research and Progress in Planning. She was the lead consultant for UN Habitat’s 2009 Global Report on Planning Sustainable Cities and is on their global reports Advisory Board. She was chair and co-chair of the Global Planning Education Association Network (2007-2011). She is a founder of the Association of African Planning Schools and is a founder and on the executive of the African Centre for Cities at the University of Cape Town.

Amos Brandeis is an architect and urban planner. He has been the owner and manager of a planning practice since 1994 (www.Restorationplanning.com), Ambassador of the International Riverfoundation (Australia) and former Chairman of Israel Planners Association (2006 - 2012).

His firm is involved in planning of many urban and regional plans on the international, national, regional and local level. Among them cities, city centers, urban renewal, neighborhoods, villages, sea-shores, ports, tourism complexes, rivers, schools, agricultural projects, etc. Amos Brandeis has been awarded over fifteen prizes in the course of his professional career and academic studies including the 2011 “ISOCARP Award for Excellence” (Strategic Planning Category, for planning the Bedouin City Rahat), and the “2003 Inter- national Riverprize” (for the Alexander River Restoration Project, a unique collaboration between Israelis and Palestinians, regarding the restoration of a polluted cross-border river).

Amos did serve as an international consultant, speaker and/or workshop leader in many countries over 5 continents (Australia, New Zealand, China, USA, Russia, England, Slovenia, Germany, Italy, Burkina Faso, Turkey, Jordan, Israel, etc.). Among these he served as the team leader of the Shantou ISOCARP UPAT (March 2013), and tutor of the NYPP (First national Young Planners) workshop in Rus- sia (ISOCARP and RUPA).

5 CONGRESS SCHEDULE Tuesday 1 October Wednesday 2 October Wednesday 2 October Thursday 3 October Friday 4 October

0900 Plenary - Hall B 0830 0900 Parallel workshop sessions 0900 Parallel workshop sessions Chair: Bill Twitchett Contemporary Australian and International Planning Showcase See the ‘presentation schedule’ for detailed Session 1: PIA and Planning Matters - Hall B information about the presentations in the See the ‘presentation schedule’ for detailed Welcome to Country separate tracks. information about the presentations in the Dy Currie / PIA National President Track 1: Migration as the New Face of Change separate tracks. Milica Bajic-Brkovic / ISOCARP President Introduction - Room 1 Welcome address Kerry Doss / Brisbane City Council Track 2: Valuing What Already Exists Track 1: Migration as the New Face of Change Rob Molhoek MP / Assistant Minister for Planning Reform From Plan to Place: Urban Renewal Brisbane 20 years - Room 2 Track 2: Valuing What Already Exists Opening of the congress Toby Lodge / Hassell Track 3: Community and Stakeholder Track 3: Community and Stakeholder Engagement Vanessa Watson / University of Cape Town, South Africa Gold Coast Rapid Transit 2031/Cross River Rail Engagement - Room 3 Track 4: International Planning Exchange Keynote: African Cities for Sale! Smart, Eco or just Profitable? Chris Buckley / Meter Design Track 4: International Planning Exchange Track 5: Forum on Planning Education: Amos Brandeis / Architect and urban planner, Israel PIA’s international partnerships (Sri Lanka, East Timor, etc.) - Room 4 Are we doing it right? Keynote: Planning for people and with them: Practical lessons P. Uttarwar (India) Track 5: Forum on Planning Education: from global experience Urbanisation and an approach to conservation of built heritage – Are we doing it right? - Room 5 Delhi Master Plan Provisions 1045 coffee & tea 1030 coffee & tea 1030 coffee & tea 1030 coffee & tea 1100 Plenary 1100 Session 2: Planning for Natural Hazards 1100 Hassel Knowledge 1100 Parallel workshop sessions 1100 Parallel workshop sessions Chair: Bill Twitchett Precincts Case Study Kate Isles / PIA Qld President Showcase - Room 1 See the ‘presentation schedule’ for detailed See the ‘presentation schedule’ for detailed Jeff Featherstone / General Rapporteur Introduction prior registration was necessary information about the presentations in the information about the presentations in the Introduction of the congress topics and the congress team Katrina Burbidge (GHD) and Mike Svikiz Dave Ireland / CSIRO separate tracks. separate tracks. Piotr Lorens / VP Young Planning Professionals Tweed Shire Coastal Hazards Development Control Plan Introduction Presentation of YPP project in Brisbane together with the YPPs Kuang Hui Peng (Taiwan) Design for Knowledge / Track 1: Migration as the New Face of Change Track 1: Migration as the New Face of Change Adaptive mechanism of collaborative planning for metropolitan Malcolm Middleton, Queensland Track 2: Valuing What Already Exists Track 2: Valuing What Already Exists Presentation Review09 large-scale compound disasters in Taiwan Government Architect Track 3: Community and Stakeholder Track 3: Community and Stakeholder Engagement Brendan Nelson / MWH Global John Byrne / Urbyrne Design Engagement Track 4: International Planning Exchange Planning for stronger more resilient floodplains Kelvin Grove Urban Village Track 4: International Planning Exchange Track 5: Forum on Planning Education: Adam Davies / Hassell Track 5: Forum on Planning Education: Are we doing it right? Herston Health Precinct Are we doing it right? 1230 Technical Tours 1230 lunch 1230 lunch 1230 lunch Lunch will be provided 1330 Session 3: Urban Design 1330 Hassel Knowledge 1330 Parallel workshop sessions 1330 Plenary - Hall B Precincts Case Study Chair: John Minnery Andrew Hammonds / Placefocus Showcase - Room 1 See the ‘presentation schedule’ for detailed Introduction prior registration was necessary information about the presentations in the Piotr Lorens / VP Young Planning Professionals Cr Amanda Cooper / Brisbane City Council Dave Ireland / CSIRO separate tracks. Presentation of YPP project in Ulyanovsk, Russia Brisbane Central City Master Plan Introduction Jeff Featherstone and Congress Team / Peter Richards, Deike Richards Tony Dickson / LAT27 Princess Track 1: Migration as the New Face of Conclusions and congress statement Infill Development for Older Australians in SEQ Alexandra Health Precinct Change Milica Bajic-Brkovic / ISOCARP President Caroline Stalker, Architectus Mark Roehrs / Hassell Track 2: Valuing What Already Exists Reflections on the congress From 'Place Apart' to Place Making: The Reinvention and Boggo Road Urban Village Track 3: Community and Stakeholder Marek Karzynski / Head of City Planning Office, Gdynia, Poland Transformation of James Cook University, Townsville Ron Bridgefoot / Hassell Engagement Announcement of 50th ISOCARP Congress, September 2014 Gold Coast Health and Track 4: International Planning Exchange John Minnery / Chair Brisbane Local Organizing Committee Knowledge Precinct Track 5: Forum on Planning Education: Closing Statement Are we doing it right?

1500 coffee & tea 1500 coffee & tea 1500 coffee & tea 1530 Session 4: Urban Futures 1530 Parallel workshop sessions 1530 ISOCARP Annual General Meeting

Adam Davies See the ‘presentation schedule’ for detailed Introduction information about the presentations in the Ken Maher / Hassell separate tracks. Urban Futures Expert Panel Track 1: Migration as the New Face of Change Comprising Prof Milica Bajic-Brkovic, ISOCARP President and Track 2: Valuing What Already Exists Warren Rowe (Buckley Van International) Track 3: Community and Stakeholder Engagement Track 4: International Planning Exchange Track 5: Forum on Planning Education: 1730 Civic reception by Brisbane City Council 1730 UPAT Happy Hour Seminar - Hall A Are we doing it right? (City Hall, Ithaca Room) organized by VP Martin Dubbeling

1930 ISOCARP Bureau Meeting - Room 1 1930 Gala Dinner and Awards Ceremony

Buses will bring you to the venue and back

Exhibition and displays

6 Tuesday 1 October Wednesday 2 October Wednesday 2 October Thursday 3 October Friday 4 October

1500 coffee & tea 1500 coffee & tea 1500 coffee & tea 1530 Session 4: Urban Futures 1530 Parallel workshop sessions 1530 ISOCARP Annual General Meeting

1930 ISOCARP Bureau Meeting - Room 1 1930 Gala Dinner and Awards Ceremony

Buses will bring you to the venue and back

Exhibition and displays

7 Abiodun Friday 9:00 Adebayo Thursday 9:00 Ahmad Thursday 9:00 Allan Friday 11:00 Alwehab Thursday 13:30 Apan Thursday 13:30 Arslanli Thursday 9:00 Arthur Thursday 13:30 Ayangbile Friday 9:00 Baldwin Thursday 11:00 Baldwin Thursday 9:00 Bardhan Friday 9:00 Basson Thursday 9:00 Bazrkar Thursday 15:30 Beyazit Friday 9:00 Boca Thursday 11:00 Boca Friday 9:00 Borja Thursday 15:30 Brown Thursday 15:30 Budge Thursday 9:00 Buehler Thursday 11:00 Buitrago-Franco Friday 9:00 Burton Thursday 11:00 Chakravarty Friday 9:00 Chang Thursday 13:30 Chatterjee Friday 9:00 Chatterji Thursday 9:00 Chatterji Friday 9:00 Chen, J. Friday 11:00 Chen, T. Thursday 13:30 Chen, X. Thursday 13:30 Cheng Friday 11:00 Cillers Friday 9:00 Cilliers Friday 11:00 Cilliers Thursday 11:00 Coiacetto Thursday 9:00 Cui Friday 11:00 Darchen Friday 9:00 de Jong Friday 9:00 De Souza Friday 9:00 Dedekorkut Thursday 11:00 Della Rosa Thursday 13:30 Ding Thursday 13:30 Dong Thursday 13:30 Ede Thursday 15:30 Espada Thursday 13:30 Falco Thursday 11:00 Falco Friday 9:00 Fattahi Thursday 15:30 Featherstone Thursday 15:30 Ferretti Thursday 11:00 Ferretti Friday 9:00 Gezik Thursday 15:30 Goledzinowska Thursday 15:30

Gonçalves Garcia Friday 11:00 Grant Friday 9:00 Greenop Friday 9:00 Gu Friday 9:00 Gunay Friday 11:00 Han Friday 11:00 Harwood Thursday 9:00 He Thursday 11:00 Herron Thursday 9:00 Heyning Friday 9:00 Heyning Thursday 9:00 Heywood Thursday 11:00 Hong Thursday 15:30 Abiodun Friday 9:00 Abiodun Friday 9:00 Hou Thursday 13:30 Adebayo Thursday 9:00 Adebayo Thursday 9:00 Hu Friday 11:00 Ahmad Thursday 9:00 Ahmad Thursday 9:00 Hua Thursday 15:30 Allan Friday 11:00 Allan Friday 11:00 Huang Thursday 13:30 Alwehab Thursday 13:30 Alwehab Thursday 13:30 Jimoh Thursday 9:00 Apan Thursday 13:30 Apan Thursday 13:30 Jones Thursday 9:00 Arslanli Thursday 9:00 Arslanli Thursday 9:00 Jung Thursday 11:00 Arthur Thursday 13:30 Arthur Thursday 13:30 Kammerbauer Thursday 9:00 Ayangbile Friday 9:00 Ayangbile Friday 9:00 Kamrowska Thursday 9:00 Baldwin Thursday 11:00 Baldwin Thursday 11:00 Kamrowska Thursday 11:00 Baldwin Thursday 9:00 Baldwin Thursday 9:00 Kanki Thursday 11:00 Bardhan Friday 9:00 Bardhan Friday 9:00 Karakiewicz Thursday 9:00 Basson Thursday 9:00 Basson Thursday 9:00 Kidokoro Friday 9:00 Bazrkar Thursday 15:30 Bazrkar Thursday 15:30 Klinmalai Thursday 11:00 Beyazit Friday 9:00 Beyazit Friday 9:00 Kong Friday 11:00 Boca Thursday 11:00 Boca Thursday 11:00 Ko-Yang Thursday 13:30 Boca Friday 9:00 Boca Friday 9:00 Langley Friday 11:00 Borja Thursday 15:30 Borja Thursday 15:30 Lategan Thursday 11:00 Brown Thursday 15:30 Brown Thursday 15:30 Lategan Friday 11:00 Budge Thursday 9:00 Budge Thursday 9:00 Ledwon Friday 11:00 Buehler Thursday 11:00 Buehler Thursday 11:00 Ledwon Thursday 11:00 Buitrago-Franco Friday 9:00 Buitrago-Franco Friday 9:00 Li, F. Thursday 13:30 Burton Thursday 11:00 Burton Thursday 11:00 Li, M. Thursday 11:00 Chakravarty Friday 9:00 Chakravarty Friday 9:00 Li, X. Thursday 13:30 Chang Thursday 13:30 Chang Thursday 13:30 Lin Friday 11:00 Chatterjee Friday 9:00 Chatterjee Friday 9:00 Liu, G Thursday 15:30 Chatterji Thursday 9:00 Chatterji Thursday 9:00 Liu, K Friday 11:00 Chatterji Friday 9:00 Chatterji Friday 9:00 Liu, L Friday 11:00 Chen, J. Friday 11:00 Chen, J. Friday 11:00 Liu, T Thursday 13:30 Chen, T. Thursday 13:30 Chen, T. Thursday 13:30 Liu, Y Friday 11:00 Chen, X. Thursday 13:30 Chen, X. Thursday 13:30 Liu, Z Thursday 13:30 Cheng Friday 11:00 Cheng Friday 11:00 Lorens Thursday 9:00 Cillers Friday 9:00 Cillers Friday 9:00 Lorens Thursday 11:00 Cilliers Friday 11:00 Cilliers Friday 11:00 Lu Thursday 13:30 Cilliers Thursday 11:00 Cilliers Thursday 11:00 Lucia Maria Friday 9:00 Coiacetto Thursday 9:00 Coiacetto Thursday 9:00 Lv Friday 11:00 Cui Friday 11:00 Cui Friday 11:00 Magni Thursday 15:30 Darchen Friday 9:00 Darchen Friday 9:00 Mandarano Thursday 15:30 de Jong Friday 9:00 de Jong Friday 9:00 Mansoori Friday 9:00 De Souza Friday 9:00 De Souza Friday 9:00 Dedekorkut Thursday 11:00 Mayere-Donehue Thursday 11:00 Dedekorkut Thursday 11:00 Della Rosa Thursday 13:30 Mbinza Thursday 13:30 Della Rosa Thursday 13:30 Ding Thursday 13:30 McDougall Thursday 13:30 Ding Thursday 13:30 Dong Thursday 13:30 Mchunu Thursday 15:30 Dong Thursday 13:30 Ede Thursday 15:30 Meenar Thursday 15:30 Ede Thursday 15:30 Espada Thursday 13:30 Mitra, S Friday 9:00 Espada Thursday 13:30 Falco Thursday 11:00 Mitra, S Friday 9:00 Falco Thursday 11:00 Falco Friday 9:00 Mitra, T Friday 9:00 Falco Friday 9:00 Fattahi Thursday 15:30 Mitra, T Friday 9:00 Fattahi Thursday 15:30 Featherstone Thursday 15:30 Monardo Thursday 9:00 Featherstone Thursday 15:30 Ferretti Thursday 11:00 Monardo Friday 9:00 Ferretti Thursday 11:00 Ferretti Friday 9:00 Moreira Friday 11:00 Ferretti Friday 9:00 Gezik Thursday 15:30 Moreira Thursday 9:00 Gezik Thursday 15:30 Goledzinowska Thursday 15:30 Morgado Thursday 9:00 Goledzinowska Thursday 15:30 Morgado Thursday 11:00 Gonçalves Garcia Friday 11:00 Gonçalves Garcia Friday 11:00 Mu Friday 9:00 Grant Friday 9:00 Grant Friday 9:00 Murphy Friday 11:00 Greenop Friday 9:00 Greenop Friday 9:00 Musakwa Thursday 13:30 Gu Friday 9:00 Gu Friday 9:00 Nankai Thursday 13:30 Gunay Friday 11:00 Gunay Friday 11:00 Nankai Friday 11:00 Han Friday 11:00 Han Friday 11:00 Ng Thursday 9:00 Harwood Thursday 9:00 Harwood Thursday 9:00 Nguyen Friday 11:00 He Thursday 11:00 He Thursday 11:00 Okitasari Friday 9:00 Herron Thursday 9:00 Herron Thursday 9:00 Olajide Friday 11:00 Heyning Friday 9:00 Heyning Friday 9:00 Olszack Thursday 15:30 Heyning Thursday 9:00 Heyning Thursday 9:00 Olufemi Thursday 9:00 INDEX OF AUTHORSHeywood Thursday 11:00 Heywood Thursday 11:00 Ortiz Castaño Thursday 13:30 Hong Thursday 15:30 Hong Thursday 15:30 Osborne Thursday 11:00 Abiodun Friday 9:00 Hou Thursday 13:30 Abiodun Friday 9:00 Hou Thursday 13:30 Owei Thursday 15:30 Adebayo Thursday 9:00 Hu Friday 11:00 Adebayo Thursday 9:00 Hu Friday 11:00 Perkins Thursday 9:00 Ahmad Thursday 9:00 Hua Thursday 15:30 Ahmad Thursday 9:00 Hua Thursday 15:30 Perry Friday 11:00 Allan Friday 11:00 Huang Thursday 13:30 Allan Friday 11:00 Huang Thursday 13:30 Polizzi Thursday 11:00 Alwehab Thursday 13:30 Jimoh Thursday 9:00 Alwehab Thursday 13:30 Jimoh Thursday 9:00 Polizzi Friday 9:00 Apan Thursday 13:30 Jones Thursday 9:00 Apan Thursday 13:30 Jones Thursday 9:00 Powell Thursday 9:00 Arslanli Thursday 9:00 Jung Thursday 11:00 Arslanli Thursday 9:00 Jung Thursday 11:00 Prakash Thursday 13:30 Arthur Thursday 13:30 Kammerbauer Thursday 9:00 Arthur Thursday 13:30 Kammerbauer Thursday 9:00 Qin Thursday 15:30 Ayangbile Friday 9:00 Kamrowska Thursday 9:00 Ayangbile Friday 9:00 Kamrowska Thursday 9:00 Ren Thursday 9:00 Baldwin Thursday 11:00 Kamrowska Thursday 11:00 Baldwin Thursday 11:00 Kamrowska Thursday 11:00 Repp Thursday 15:30 Baldwin Thursday 9:00 Kanki Thursday 11:00 Baldwin Thursday 9:00 Kanki Thursday 11:00 Rie Thursday 9:00 Bardhan Friday 9:00 Karakiewicz Thursday 9:00 Bardhan Friday 9:00 Karakiewicz Thursday 9:00 Rollo Thursday 9:00 Basson Thursday 9:00 Kidokoro Friday 9:00 Basson Thursday 9:00 Kidokoro Friday 9:00 Rosier Thursday 9:00 Bazrkar Thursday 15:30 Klinmalai Thursday 11:00 Bazrkar Thursday 15:30 Klinmalai Thursday 11:00 Santos Thursday 9:00 Beyazit Friday 9:00 Kong Friday 11:00 Beyazit Friday 9:00 Kong Friday 11:00 Sarayed-Din Thursday 9:00 Boca Thursday 11:00 Ko-Yang Thursday 13:30 Boca Thursday 11:00 Ko-Yang Thursday 13:30 Sas-Bojarska Thursday 11:00 Boca Friday 9:00 Langley Friday 11:00 Boca Friday 9:00 Langley Friday 11:00 Schlebusch Thursday 9:00 Borja Thursday 15:30 Lategan Thursday 11:00 Borja Thursday 15:30 Lategan Thursday 11:00 Shang Thursday 13:30 Brown Thursday 15:30 Lategan Friday 11:00 Brown Thursday 15:30 Lategan Friday 11:00 Shao Friday 9:00 Budge Thursday 9:00 Ledwon Friday 11:00 Budge Thursday 9:00 Ledwon Friday 11:00 Shao Thursday 11:00 Buehler Thursday 11:00 Ledwon Thursday 11:00 Buehler Thursday 11:00 Ledwon Thursday 11:00 Shehadeh Friday 9:00 Buitrago-Franco Friday 9:00 Li, F. Thursday 13:30 Buitrago-Franco Friday 9:00 Li, F. Thursday 13:30 Slade Thursday 9:00 Burton Thursday 11:00 Li, M. Thursday 11:00 Burton Thursday 11:00 Li, M. Thursday 11:00 Smith Thursday 11:00 Chakravarty Friday 9:00 Li, X. Thursday 13:30 Chakravarty Friday 9:00 Li, X. Thursday 13:30 Thomas Thursday 11:00 Chang Thursday 13:30 Lin Friday 11:00 Chang Thursday 13:30 Lin Friday 11:00 Torres, Y Friday 9:00 Chatterjee Friday 9:00 Liu, G Thursday 15:30 Chatterjee Friday 9:00 Liu, G Thursday 15:30 Vaillant Thursday 15:30 Chatterji Thursday 9:00 Liu, K Friday 11:00 Chatterji Thursday 9:00 Liu, K Friday 11:00 van der Bruggen Thursday 9:00 Chatterji Friday 9:00 Liu, L Friday 11:00 Chatterji Friday 9:00 Liu, L Friday 11:00 van Niekerk Thursday 13:30 Chen, J. Friday 11:00 Liu, T Thursday 13:30 Chen, J. Friday 11:00 Liu, T Thursday 13:30 van Schalkwijk Thursday 9:00 Chen, T. Thursday 13:30 Liu, Y Friday 11:00 Chen, T. Thursday 13:30 Liu, Y Friday 11:00 van Schalkwijk Friday 9:00 Chen, X. Thursday 13:30 Liu, Z Thursday 13:30 Chen, X. Thursday 13:30 Liu, Z Thursday 13:30 Van Zyl Thursday 11:00 Cheng Friday 11:00 Lorens Thursday 9:00 Cheng Friday 11:00 Lorens Thursday 9:00 Vancutsem Friday 11:00 Cillers Friday 9:00 Lorens Thursday 11:00 Cillers Friday 9:00 Lorens Thursday 11:00 Vargas Thursday 9:00 Cilliers Friday 11:00 Lu Thursday 13:30 Vasconcellos Cilliers Friday 11:00 Lu Thursday 13:30 Cilliers Thursday 11:00 Lucia Maria Friday 9:00 Garcia Friday 11:00 Cilliers Thursday 11:00 Lucia Maria Friday 9:00 Coiacetto Thursday 9:00 Lv Friday 11:00 Vettorato Thursday 9:00 Coiacetto Thursday 9:00 Lv Friday 11:00 Cui Friday 11:00 Magni Thursday 15:30 Vloebergh Friday 11:00 Cui Friday 11:00 Magni Thursday 15:30 Darchen Friday 9:00 Mandarano Thursday 15:30 Wang, F. Thursday 11:00 Darchen Friday 9:00 Mandarano Thursday 15:30 de Jong Friday 9:00 Mansoori Friday 9:00 Wang, H Friday 11:00 de Jong Friday 9:00 Mansoori Friday 9:00 De Souza Friday 9:00 Wang, J. Thursday 13:30 De Souza Friday 9:00 Mayere-Donehue Thursday 11:00 Dedekorkut Thursday 11:00 Mayere-Donehue Thursday 11:00 Wang, T. Thursday 15:30 Dedekorkut Thursday 11:00 Mbinza Thursday 13:30 Della Rosa Thursday 13:30 Mbinza Thursday 13:30 Wei, G. Friday 9:00 Della Rosa Thursday 13:30 McDougall Thursday 13:30 Ding Thursday 13:30 McDougall Thursday 13:30 Wei, W. Thursday 11:00 Ding Thursday 13:30 Mchunu Thursday 15:30 Dong Thursday 13:30 Mchunu Thursday 15:30 Weith Thursday 15:30 Dong Thursday 13:30 Meenar Thursday 15:30 Ede Thursday 15:30 Meenar Thursday 15:30 White Friday 11:00 Ede Thursday 15:30 Mitra, S Friday 9:00 Espada Thursday 13:30 Mitra, S Friday 9:00 Williams Thursday 15:30 Espada Thursday 13:30 Mitra, S Friday 9:00 Falco Thursday 11:00 Mitra, S Friday 9:00 Xiao Thursday 13:30 Falco Thursday 11:00 Mitra, T Friday 9:00 Falco Friday 9:00 Mitra, T Friday 9:00 Yang, X. Friday 11:00 Falco Friday 9:00 Mitra, T Friday 9:00 Fattahi Thursday 15:30 Mitra, T Friday 9:00 Yang, Z. Friday 11:00 Fattahi Thursday 15:30 Monardo Thursday 9:00 Featherstone Thursday 15:30 Monardo Thursday 9:00 Yuan, L. Thursday 13:30 Featherstone Thursday 15:30 Monardo Friday 9:00 Ferretti Thursday 11:00 Monardo Friday 9:00 Yuan, L. Thursday 13:30 Ferretti Thursday 11:00 Moreira Friday 11:00 Ferretti Friday 9:00 Moreira Friday 11:00 Yuen Thursday 11:00 Ferretti Friday 9:00 Moreira Thursday 9:00 Gezik Thursday 15:30 Moreira Thursday 9:00 Zainol Thursday 9:00 Gezik Thursday 15:30 Morgado Thursday 9:00 Goledzinowska Thursday 15:30 Morgado Thursday 9:00 Zhang, D. Thursday 13:30 Goledzinowska Thursday 15:30 Morgado Thursday 11:00 Morgado Thursday 11:00 Zhang, F Friday 11:00 Gonçalves Garcia Friday 11:00 Mu Friday 9:00 Gonçalves Garcia Friday 11:00 Mu Friday 9:00 Zhao, D. Friday 11:00 Grant Friday 9:00 Murphy Friday 11:00 Grant Friday 9:00 Murphy Friday 11:00 Zhao, Y Thursday 13:30 Greenop Friday 9:00 Musakwa Thursday 13:30 Greenop Friday 9:00 Musakwa Thursday 13:30 Zhou, J Friday 11:00 Gu Friday 9:00 Nankai Thursday 13:30 Gu Friday 9:00 Nankai Thursday 13:30 Zhou, Y. Thursday 13:30 Gunay Friday 11:00 Nankai Friday 11:00 Gunay Friday 11:00 Nankai Friday 11:00 Zhou, Y. Friday 11:00 Han Friday 11:00 Ng Thursday 9:00 Han Friday 11:00 Ng Thursday 9:00 Zhu Thursday 15:30 Harwood Thursday 9:00 Nguyen Friday 11:00 Harwood Thursday 9:00 Nguyen Friday 11:00 He Thursday 11:00 Okitasari Friday 9:00 He Thursday 11:00 Okitasari Friday 9:00 Herron Thursday 9:00 Olajide Friday 11:00 Herron Thursday 9:00 Olajide Friday 11:00 Heyning Friday 9:00 Olszack Thursday 15:30 Heyning Friday 9:00 Olszack Thursday 15:30 Heyning Thursday 9:00 Olufemi Thursday 9:00 Heyning Thursday 9:00 Olufemi Thursday 9:00 Heywood Thursday 11:00 Ortiz Castaño Thursday 13:30 Heywood Thursday 11:00 Ortiz Castaño Thursday 13:30 Hong Thursday 15:30 Osborne Thursday 11:00 Hong Thursday 15:30 Osborne Thursday 11:00 Hou Thursday 13:30 Owei Thursday 15:30 Hou Thursday 13:30 Owei Thursday 15:30 Hu Friday 11:00 Perkins Thursday 9:00 Hu Friday 11:00 Perkins Thursday 9:00 8Hua Thursday 15:30 Perry Friday 11:00 Hua Thursday 15:30 Perry Friday 11:00 Huang Thursday 13:30 Polizzi Thursday 11:00 Huang Thursday 13:30 Polizzi Thursday 11:00 Jimoh Thursday 9:00 Polizzi Friday 9:00 Jimoh Thursday 9:00 Polizzi Friday 9:00 Jones Thursday 9:00 Powell Thursday 9:00 Jones Thursday 9:00 Powell Thursday 9:00 Jung Thursday 11:00 Prakash Thursday 13:30 Jung Thursday 11:00 Prakash Thursday 13:30 Kammerbauer Thursday 9:00 Qin Thursday 15:30 Kammerbauer Thursday 9:00 Qin Thursday 15:30 Kamrowska Thursday 9:00 Ren Thursday 9:00 Kamrowska Thursday 9:00 Ren Thursday 9:00 Kamrowska Thursday 11:00 Repp Thursday 15:30 Kamrowska Thursday 11:00 Repp Thursday 15:30 Kanki Thursday 11:00 Rie Thursday 9:00 Kanki Thursday 11:00 Rie Thursday 9:00 Karakiewicz Thursday 9:00 Rollo Thursday 9:00 Karakiewicz Thursday 9:00 Rollo Thursday 9:00 Kidokoro Friday 9:00 Rosier Thursday 9:00 Kidokoro Friday 9:00 Rosier Thursday 9:00 Klinmalai Thursday 11:00 Santos Thursday 9:00 Klinmalai Thursday 11:00 Santos Thursday 9:00 Kong Friday 11:00 Sarayed-Din Thursday 9:00 Kong Friday 11:00 Sarayed-Din Thursday 9:00 Ko-Yang Thursday 13:30 Sas-Bojarska Thursday 11:00 Ko-Yang Thursday 13:30 Sas-Bojarska Thursday 11:00 Langley Friday 11:00 Schlebusch Thursday 9:00 Langley Friday 11:00 Schlebusch Thursday 9:00 Lategan Thursday 11:00 Shang Thursday 13:30 Lategan Thursday 11:00 Shang Thursday 13:30 Lategan Friday 11:00 Shao Friday 9:00 Lategan Friday 11:00 Shao Friday 9:00 Ledwon Friday 11:00 Shao Thursday 11:00 Ledwon Friday 11:00 Shao Thursday 11:00 Ledwon Thursday 11:00 Shehadeh Friday 9:00 Ledwon Thursday 11:00 Shehadeh Friday 9:00 Li, F. Thursday 13:30 Slade Thursday 9:00 Li, F. Thursday 13:30 Slade Thursday 9:00 Li, M. Thursday 11:00 Smith Thursday 11:00 Li, M. Thursday 11:00 Smith Thursday 11:00 Li, X. Thursday 13:30 Thomas Thursday 11:00 Li, X. Thursday 13:30 Thomas Thursday 11:00 Lin Friday 11:00 Torres, Y Friday 9:00 Lin Friday 11:00 Torres, Y Friday 9:00 Liu, G Thursday 15:30 Vaillant Thursday 15:30 Liu, G Thursday 15:30 Vaillant Thursday 15:30 Liu, K Friday 11:00 van der Bruggen Thursday 9:00 Liu, K Friday 11:00 van der Bruggen Thursday 9:00 Liu, L Friday 11:00 van Niekerk Thursday 13:30 Liu, L Friday 11:00 van Niekerk Thursday 13:30 Liu, T Thursday 13:30 van Schalkwijk Thursday 9:00 Liu, T Thursday 13:30 van Schalkwijk Thursday 9:00 Liu, Y Friday 11:00 van Schalkwijk Friday 9:00 Liu, Y Friday 11:00 van Schalkwijk Friday 9:00 Liu, Z Thursday 13:30 Van Zyl Thursday 11:00 Liu, Z Thursday 13:30 Van Zyl Thursday 11:00 Lorens Thursday 9:00 Vancutsem Friday 11:00 Lorens Thursday 9:00 Vancutsem Friday 11:00 Lorens Thursday 11:00 Vargas Thursday 9:00 Lorens Thursday 11:00 Vargas Thursday 9:00 Lu Thursday 13:30 Vasconcellos Lu Thursday 13:30 GarciaVasconcellos Friday 11:00 Lucia Maria Friday 9:00 Garcia Friday 11:00 Lucia Maria Friday 9:00 Vettorato Thursday 9:00 Lv Friday 11:00 Vettorato Thursday 9:00 Lv Friday 11:00 Vloebergh Friday 11:00 Magni Thursday 15:30 Vloebergh Friday 11:00 Magni Thursday 15:30 Wang, F. Thursday 11:00 Mandarano Thursday 15:30 Wang, F. Thursday 11:00 Mandarano Thursday 15:30 Wang, H Friday 11:00 Mansoori Friday 9:00 Wang, H Friday 11:00 Mansoori Friday 9:00 Wang, J. Thursday 13:30 Wang, J. Thursday 13:30 Mayere-Donehue Thursday 11:00 Wang, T. Thursday 15:30 Mayere-Donehue Thursday 11:00 Wang, T. Thursday 15:30 Mbinza Thursday 13:30 Wei, G. Friday 9:00 Mbinza Thursday 13:30 Wei, G. Friday 9:00 McDougall Thursday 13:30 Wei, W. Thursday 11:00 McDougall Thursday 13:30 Wei, W. Thursday 11:00 Mchunu Thursday 15:30 Weith Thursday 15:30 Mchunu Thursday 15:30 Weith Thursday 15:30 Meenar Thursday 15:30 White Friday 11:00 Meenar Thursday 15:30 White Friday 11:00 Mitra, S Friday 9:00 Williams Thursday 15:30 Mitra, S Friday 9:00 Williams Thursday 15:30 Mitra, S Friday 9:00 Xiao Thursday 13:30 Mitra, S Friday 9:00 Xiao Thursday 13:30 Mitra, T Friday 9:00 Yang, X. Friday 11:00 Mitra, T Friday 9:00 Yang, X. Friday 11:00 Mitra, T Friday 9:00 Yang, Z. Friday 11:00 Mitra, T Friday 9:00 Yang, Z. Friday 11:00 Monardo Thursday 9:00 Yuan, L. Thursday 13:30 Monardo Thursday 9:00 Yuan, L. Thursday 13:30 Monardo Friday 9:00 Yuan, L. Thursday 13:30 Monardo Friday 9:00 Yuan, L. Thursday 13:30 Moreira Friday 11:00 Yuen Thursday 11:00 Moreira Friday 11:00 Yuen Thursday 11:00 Moreira Thursday 9:00 Zainol Thursday 9:00 Moreira Thursday 9:00 Zainol Thursday 9:00 Morgado Thursday 9:00 Zhang, D. Thursday 13:30 Morgado Thursday 9:00 Zhang, D. Thursday 13:30 Morgado Thursday 11:00 Zhang, F Friday 11:00 Morgado Thursday 11:00 Zhang, F Friday 11:00 Mu Friday 9:00 Zhao, D. Friday 11:00 Mu Friday 9:00 Zhao, D. Friday 11:00 Murphy Friday 11:00 Zhao, Y Thursday 13:30 Murphy Friday 11:00 Zhao, Y Thursday 13:30 Musakwa Thursday 13:30 Zhou, J Friday 11:00 Musakwa Thursday 13:30 Zhou, J Friday 11:00 Nankai Thursday 13:30 Zhou, Y. Thursday 13:30 Nankai Thursday 13:30 Zhou, Y. Thursday 13:30 Nankai Friday 11:00 Zhou, Y. Friday 11:00 Nankai Friday 11:00 Zhou, Y. Friday 11:00 Ng Thursday 9:00 Zhu Thursday 15:30 Ng Thursday 9:00 Zhu Thursday 15:30 Nguyen Friday 11:00 Nguyen Friday 11:00 Okitasari Friday 9:00 Okitasari Friday 9:00 Olajide Friday 11:00 Olajide Friday 11:00 Olszack Thursday 15:30 Olszack Thursday 15:30 Olufemi Thursday 9:00 Olufemi Thursday 9:00 Ortiz Castaño Thursday 13:30 Ortiz Castaño Thursday 13:30 Osborne Thursday 11:00 Osborne Thursday 11:00 Owei Thursday 15:30 Owei Thursday 15:30 Perkins Thursday 9:00 Perkins Thursday 9:00 Perry Friday 11:00 Perry Friday 11:00 Polizzi Thursday 11:00 Polizzi Thursday 11:00 Polizzi Friday 9:00 Polizzi Friday 9:00 Powell Thursday 9:00 Powell Thursday 9:00 Prakash Thursday 13:30 Prakash Thursday 13:30 Qin Thursday 15:30 Qin Thursday 15:30 Ren Thursday 9:00 Ren Thursday 9:00 Repp Thursday 15:30 Repp Thursday 15:30 Rie Thursday 9:00 Rie Thursday 9:00 Rollo Thursday 9:00 Rollo Thursday 9:00 Rosier Thursday 9:00 Rosier Thursday 9:00 Santos Thursday 9:00 Santos Thursday 9:00 Sarayed-Din Thursday 9:00 Sarayed-Din Thursday 9:00 Sas-Bojarska Thursday 11:00 Sas-Bojarska Thursday 11:00 Schlebusch Thursday 9:00 Schlebusch Thursday 9:00 Shang Thursday 13:30 Shang Thursday 13:30 Shao Friday 9:00 Shao Friday 9:00 Shao Thursday 11:00 Shao Thursday 11:00 Shehadeh Friday 9:00 Shehadeh Friday 9:00 Slade Thursday 9:00 Slade Thursday 9:00 Smith Thursday 11:00 Smith Thursday 11:00 Thomas Thursday 11:00 Thomas Thursday 11:00 Torres, Y Friday 9:00 Torres, Y Friday 9:00 Vaillant Thursday 15:30 Vaillant Thursday 15:30 van der Bruggen Thursday 9:00 van der Bruggen Thursday 9:00 van Niekerk Thursday 13:30 van Niekerk Thursday 13:30 van Schalkwijk Thursday 9:00 van Schalkwijk Thursday 9:00 van Schalkwijk Friday 9:00 van Schalkwijk Friday 9:00 Van Zyl Thursday 11:00 Van Zyl Thursday 11:00 Vancutsem Friday 11:00 Vancutsem Friday 11:00 Vargas Thursday 9:00 VasconcellosVargas Thursday 9:00 VasconcellosGarcia Friday 11:00 Garcia Friday 11:00 Vettorato Thursday 9:00 Vettorato Thursday 9:00 Vloebergh Friday 11:00 Vloebergh Friday 11:00 Wang, F. Thursday 11:00 Wang, F. Thursday 11:00 Wang, H Friday 11:00 Wang, H Friday 11:00 Wang, J. Thursday 13:30 Wang, J. Thursday 13:30 Wang, T. Thursday 15:30 Wang, T. Thursday 15:30 Wei, G. Friday 9:00 Wei, G. Friday 9:00 Wei, W. Thursday 11:00 Wei, W. Thursday 11:00 Weith Thursday 15:30 Weith Thursday 15:30 White Friday 11:00 White Friday 11:00 Williams Thursday 15:30 Williams Thursday 15:30 Xiao Thursday 13:30 Xiao Thursday 13:30 Yang, X. Friday 11:00 Yang, X. Friday 11:00 Yang, Z. Friday 11:00 Yang, Z. Friday 11:00 Yuan, L. Thursday 13:30 Yuan, L. Thursday 13:30 Yuan, L. Thursday 13:30 Yuan, L. Thursday 13:30 Yuen Thursday 11:00 Yuen Thursday 11:00 Zainol Thursday 9:00 Zainol Thursday 9:00 Zhang, D. Thursday 13:30 Zhang, D. Thursday 13:30 Zhang, F Friday 11:00 Zhang, F Friday 11:00 Zhao, D. Friday 11:00 Zhao, D. Friday 11:00 Zhao, Y Thursday 13:30 Zhao, Y Thursday 13:30 Zhou, J Friday 11:00 Zhou, J Friday 11:00 Zhou, Y. Thursday 13:30 Zhou, Y. Thursday 13:30 Zhou, Y. Friday 11:00 Zhou, Y. Friday 11:00 Zhu Thursday 15:30 Zhu Thursday 15:30 9 TRACK SCHEDULE TRACK CONGRESS TEAM

Under the leadership of the General Rapporteur, the Congress Team plays a vital role at ISOCARP Congresses, assessing paper submissions, assisting authors, organising the paper session in the various tracks, running the actual sesions and assisting the General Rapporteur with reports on the outcomes and with the Congress Statement. This is an oppertunity to acknowledge their contributions and to express warm thanks on behalf of all authors and delegates.

Jeffrey Featherstone is director of the Center for Pietro Elisei, Town and Regional Planner, is Sustainable Communities and Professor in the managing director of URBASOFIA (Rome-Bucharest), Department of Community and Regional Planning a company providing services and consultancy in (CRP) at Temple University. He served as Chair strategic planning, urban renewal/regeneration of the CRP Department from 2002 - 2006. Jeff’s and regional development. He is currently involved teaching expertise includes planning politics in URBACT projects/initiatives both as knowledge and administration, and environmental planning ambassador and national trainer. Pietro was a UPAT and politics, and water resources planning and Team Leader for the city of Perm in 2012. Pietro management. He has served on review boards for Elisei holds a doctorate in Politiche Territoriali e professional associations and he has been published Progetto Locale (Università degli Studi Roma Tre) in several conference proceedings or professional and graduated in Environmental Engineering/ journals. specialization Urban and Territorial Planning.

Warren Batts graduated from the University of Griet Geerinck is managing director of the Queensland in 1979 in regional and town planning autonomous municipality company “Stadsplanning and has worked across Australia in various roles, Antwerpen”. This company coordinates the from local government to private sector consulting. implementation of area-oriented programmes Warren’s project work ranges from environmental and strategic city projects in Antwerp, Belgium. impact assessment for developments in World The focus is on an integrated, multidisciplinary Heritage to the design and delivery of training and cross-sector approach in which projects, programs relating to new planning schemes and investments, actors and views involved are aligned processes in local communities. Recently, Warren with one another in an optimal manner. In 2007, she has worked on the preparation of the first statutory was a member of the Local Organising Committee planning schemes for Aboriginal communities in of the ISCOCARP congress in Antwerp. Griet is a Queensland as part of the Queensland Government’s member of the Flemish organization for Space and imperative for indigenous self-determination. Planning (VRP) and serves on the board of directors of two organizations of disadvantaged youth in cities. Amos Brandeis is an architect and urban planner. He owns a planning practice (www.Restorationplanning. Agatino Rizzo is a lecturer of urban planning and com), is Ambassador of the International design at The University of Auckland (New Zealand). Riverfoundation (Australia), and former Chairman He specializes in spatial, metropolitan and strategic of Israel Planners Association (2006 - 2012). Amos planning and spatial analysis. Since 2004 he has Brandeis has been awarded many prizes in the course worked in Europe as a planning consultant for both of his professional career and academic studies and the private and public sectors. He is currently the has served as an international consultant, speaker Lead Principal Investigator in a three-year research- and/or workshop leader across 5 continents. Among project on Eco-Districts planning in Doha, Qatar these he served as the team leader of the Shantou (funded by Qatar Foundation’s National Research ISOCARP UPAT, and tutor of the NYPP workshop in Fund). In 2012 he got an honorable mention for the Russia (ISOCARP and RUPA). Young Planning Professionals Award and currently coordinated the YPP Workshop in Ulyanovsk, Russia Njeri Cerere is a Planning, Development and in July 2013. Environmental Consultant based in Nairobi, Kenya. She gained experience in coordinating public-private Saskia Spijkerman, is a Dutch urbanist and self- partnership projects, and has provided advisory employed architect. After being a consultant for and technical support services to local authorities UNDP/UNESCO in Lima, Peru, she worked as through e.g. the Community Choices Program, an architect and a project manager at offices for Livable Cities Initiative. Njeri currently serves as architecture and the City of Zwolle. She designed an Urban Planning and Development Advisor to housing projects in historical urban settings and Property Development and Management Ltd (PDM) residential areas. Since 2005 Saskia has been where she is responsible for developing plans and working as an urbanist at the municipality Aa strategies for property investment, development and en Hunze. Scope of work is the redevelopment management in the greater East African region. She of historical villages in their surrounding rural is also an Executive Director and co-convenor of the landscape, which is of high cultural and historical Naipolitans Forum. value. Saskia worked as a guest tutor at several Dutch Universities and co-coordinated the YPP Workshop in Nairobi, Kenya.

10 CONGRESS TEAM

Silja Tillner is an architect and urban designer who enjoys working parallel in both these fields, e.g. on large planning projects and on careful interventions in the historic city fabric. Together with Alfred Willinger she runs Tillner & Willinger Architects in Vienna. The office has won multiple awards and is known for a holistic design approach, addressing all topics in the life-cycle of a project. Sustainable design with respect for the environment is regarded a priority. Silja has served on several prestigious planning boards in Austria and regularly works as a guest lecturer at universities and conferences.

Siniša Trkulja is spatial planner in the National Agency for Spatial Planning of the Republic of Serbia in Belgrade. Prior to the work in the National Agency he worked as assistant lecturer at the University of Belgrade, Faculty of Geography, Department of Spatial Planning. He has also worked as consultant for the Settlement and Integration of Refugees Program in Serbia for UN Habitat and currently as one of coordinators for the elaboration of the Spatial Plan for the Republika Srpska, one of two entities in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Siniša is holder of PhD degree with the focus on comparative planning, an emerging field of spatial planning which puts in comparative perspective existing planning practices and cultures.

Stanley Yip is an urban planner, land economist and urban designer with more than 25 years of professional and senior management experience in Canada, Hong Kong and Southeast Asia. He is currently the Director, Planning & Development with Arup, an internationally acclaimed planning, design and engineering consulting group. In addition, Stanley also participates in steering major research at Peking University, in the areas of climate change, low carbon city planning, economics of eco-cities and green buildings, in association with the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development and other prominent research institutes in China.

Belinda Yuen is a qualified urban planner and has extensive research and many publications in spatial planning and urban policy analysis, most recently, on planning livable, sustainable cities. She has been elected President, Singapore Institute of Planners (2005-08), and Vice-President, Commonwealth Association of Planners (Southeast Asia) (2006-08; 2010-12). Belinda has served on various Singapore urban planning committees and international advisory committees. She has been a Juror, Shaikh Khalifa Bin Salman Al Khalifa Habitat Award, 2008-2009 as well as a science reviewer of several international research programs. Belinda has worked with international development agencies, academia, public and private sectors.

Image courtesy of Brisbane Marketing 11 INTRODUCTORY REPORTS: THEME, TOPICS AND PAPERS

Introduction to the Congress by program of 120 papers. Unfortunately many good abstracts were not accepted. In evaluating the abstracts, the team members rated them the General Rapporteur according to five criteria: problem definition and planning approach; methodology; relationship to congress themes; applicability to other projects and regions; and potential findings, outcomes, and lessons. Jeffrey Featherstone, The review was conducted in a “blind” fashion, whereby the authors’ General Rapporteur names and affiliations were not revealed to the congress team. We Director and Professor, believe this improved the quality of the proposals. Center for Sustainable Communities, Temple University, The 49th Congress also added a new activity to meet the needs of Philadelphia, USA many of its members: Peer Review of Papers.

This was ISOCARP’s first foray into peer review, and it was highly successful. The ten congress team members and six other ISOCARP’s 49th World Planning Congress asks: What is effective volunteers participated in the peer-review process as members of a planning practice at the global frontiers, whether planning for review panel. Similar to the abstracts, the papers were reviewed in the local community, or mature metro, or mega-city, or vast a blind fashion. Each paper was evaluated by at least two members urbanizing region? of the review panel and their comments were forwarded by the ISOCARP Directorate to their respective authors. Over 40 papers Authors and speakers will try to answer that question in our underwent peer review. They are noted in the program as having program on October 3-4 by assessing the lessons from the past, achieved this status. both successes and failures, and future practice at the new frontiers. Track topics: An international array As noted in the Call for Papers, contemporary urbanization is different from past city development. Above all else we have now Whether peer reviewed or not, this year’s program contains an entered the urban millennium in which cities and city planning are exciting array of papers. Authors from 48 countries comprise a critical to the majority of the world’s now urbanized population. In truly international program. Papers in the first track address the this sense we have entered a “new world.” The scale and speed of issue of migration and how seismic demographic changes have change challenge the traditional plans of governments in rapidly created new urban challenges. This track is co-chaired by Amos changing urban regions. The drivers of urbanization may still be Brandeis of Israel and Njeri Cerere from Kenya. Track 2 papers what they have always been – agglomeration advantages, economic describe how planners are increasingly being called upon manage opportunity, more exciting lifestyles, and intensified interactions – change while protecting what is valuable, valued, culturally precious but their impacts are now multiplied many times over. and essential to life. It is co-chaired by Silja Tillner of Austria and Belinda Yuen from Singapore. Papers in the third track address the Congress topics in response to drivers of urbanization complicated question of whether we are fully engaging the important stakeholders in our communities through effective engagement While traditional physical planning and urban form and design are techniques and programs. This track is co-chaired by Warren Batts still critical for sustainable outcomes they may need new thinking of our host country of Australia and Pietro Elisei of Italy/Romania. and new styles of planning practice to be effective. Effective new styles of planning practice will build on past successes, if planners Track 4 papers comprise the International Planners Exchange, can find better ways of applying what they already know. Discovery which can address any relevant topic of city and regional planning and new approaches are needed as well. It’s all about that new and may include best practice cases, planning methods and frontier, improving what we know and how we practice it. strategies. This track is co-chaired by Agatino Rizzo of New Zealand and Stanley Yip from Hong Kong in China. Finally, Track 5 addresses This year’s congress offers five concurrent tracks of papers that planning education and seeks to determine whether planning cover the topics posted in the Call for Papers, namely: education and certification programs need to be retooled. It is co- chaired by Saskia Spijkerman of The Netherlands and Griet Geerinck • Migration as the new face of change from Belgium. • Valuing what already exists • Community and Stakeholder Introductory reports for the five tracks are provided by the congress Engagement team members. We trust that our program will help elucidate the • International Planners Exchange new frontiers of planning practice. • Forum on Planning Education: Are we doing it right? On behalf of the congress team, welcome to the 49th Congress.

The tracks will include four sessions on October 3 and two morning Jeffrey Featherstone, August 2013 sessions on October 4. Some tracks may run concurrent sessions due to the large volume of papers. The sessions will be hosted by co-chairs from an outstanding international congress team of ten members representing ten countries. The sessions will provide an opportunity to hear enlightening case studies and to engage colleagues about the new frontiers of planning. We have built in plenty of time for discussion and hopefully this will spur dialogue between speakers and congress participants. This is the exciting part about ISOCARP congresses, learning from each other.

A new methodology of paper review

The congress team received over 270 abstracts, a record for ISOCARP congresses. The quality of the abstracts was quite good and the congress team had the difficult task of selecting ones to fit a 12 INTRODUCTORY REPORTS: THEME, TOPICS AND PAPERS

Introductory Report Track 1: China focus on innovative strategies in shrinking and smaller urban centers. A case study from India maps the transition of housing Migration as the New Face of Change provision from public sector led solutions to private sector funded products and outlines the effect that this has on inequality in Kolkata. Interventions that enhance quality of life such as design proposals for low-fat cities in Brazil and Poland as well as resource Co-Chairs: conservation and environment-friendly interventions for cities in Amos Brandeis, China are explored. Israel Njeri Cerere, Kenya Introductory Report Track 2: Valuing What Already Exists

Massive migration to cities is the 21st Century’s defining trend and it presents significant challenges and opportunities to urban planners, Co-Chairs: managers, residents and migrants. Addressing the emergent Silja Tillner, resource constraints and resultant social issues is especially a Austria crucial question for planners. 24 papers from 12 countries explore Belinda Yuen, and discuss different aspects of these issues over 5 continents. They Singapore demonstrate why migration is today an extremely important and global aspect of “Frontiers of Planning”, and what can we learn from each other, to prepare better plans. Contributors to the discourse on Migration as the New Face of Change have addressed the issues in Urban planning is today recognised as one of the most important line with the following main themes: tools for delivering sustainable development at the local level. Planners, architects and other city design professionals are Session 1.1: Inclusion and Integration increasingly called upon to manage urban change in proactive

ways that will protect and enhance long-term quality of life and How do cities address the needs of increasingly diverse populations environment. and manage the resulting societal dynamics? This session features papers that propose solutions to a wide range of social integration Planning is not just a starting point; it is a process and a scenarios ranging from housing policy interventions in South African collaborative one at that. It is not static but evolving over time cities, participatory planning as a tool to bridge the gaps between as it adapts to new challenges even as it remains true to its various social groups in India to case studies and recommendations core principles. This brings inevitable choices among different for managing the dynamics of temporary residence in tourist and values, objectives and uses including among modern and historic student towns. Social inclusion opportunities and challenges architecture, new and old economy, etc. The negotiation of choices resulting from the provision of infrastructure, public facilities and has created both challenges and opportunities to learn from the inclusion of agriculture in the urban setting are also explored. past and the existing as planners and other city design professionals generate new functions and future growth that ‘make the difference’. Session 1.2: Managing Massive Change The Call for Papers for the 49th Congress has posed a number of Which strategies can be employed by cities and regions increasingly inter-related questions in the present discussion of valuing what faced with large scale transitional challenges that require significant already exists: investment due to large demographic shifts as opposed to gradual population increases? The papers in this session address the • How do cities protect or create their identities given rapid implications of large-scale demographic shifts on the socio- urbanization and how do they adapt to change? economic and spatial landscape in fast growing cities in China. Two papers from China address the emergence of new towns in • What strategies should be used to evaluate the trade-offs response a bid to manage population pressure in large cities. One between urban renewal, gentrification, protection of historic sites paper explores the relationship between migration and informality and neighbourhoods, and the inevitability of urban expansion? in Tanzania, and highlights opportunities that can be leveraged for How could a reorientation of values from economy-driven effective urban management. development to striving for liveability be achieved? Session 1.3: Land Use and Resource Management Strategies • How can existing assets be valued and compared with future assets? In short, what planning practices have been shown to How do cities employ spatial appropriation tools to accommodate succeed, what works, what doesn’t? How could long-term thinking migration in the face of demographic pressures? How do cities start to replace short-term profit orientation? remain competitive and work towards improved quality of life while preserving the basis of their advantages? •Are new or re-shaped models of planning and urban design practice required to protect what already exists? How can - after The papers in this session examine various land management decades of international uniformity – a respect for the “genius models that can be implemented to ensure sustainable development loci” and a more sensitive approach to the individual situation while addressing rapid urbanization. They cover topics ranging be regained, especially in light of the revived appreciation for from coastal land use management to the growth of urban centers identity? and resultant interaction with rural society. Planning models that address the transformation of environmentally sensitive or Track 2 presents a total of 31 papers, drawing from both research agricultural areas to urban economies and the resulting impact on and practice. Many of the papers are grounded in empirical and livelihoods are explored. The authors in this session make proposals case studies, explicating the policies and practices implemented by for leveraging migration trends and the accompanying economic a cross-section of large, medium and small cities in the developed opportunities to safeguard the competitiveness and sustainability and developing countries. A number of the papers are theoretical of the urban economy. Case studies from the Netherlands and expositions, expounding frameworks and models to better guide 13 INTRODUCTORY REPORTS: THEME, TOPICS AND PAPERS planners’ work in urban management and design. The 31 papers are professionals gain a better understanding of these micro scale structured around two focus areas – sub-theme 1: wider ecological issues and guide local development while enhancing liveability and impact of urbanization and sustainable communities; and sub- sense of place? theme 2: dealing with urbanization on the macro- to micro-scale, learning from existing qualities in cities and neighbourhoods. These A special focus is on cities refocusing on their identity and thereby two main themes are discussed over several sessions. The intent is the rediscovery of the importance of the public realm. Arranged to leave enough time for dialogue and discussion among speakers over two consecutive sessions, the collection of 14 papers offers a and session participants. panorama appreciation of some of the development opportunities and tensions confronting cities in balancing a city’s past and future, Session 2.1: Actualising Sustainable Communities its economics versus preservation of the built heritage in countries around the world, from Australia, Canada, Poland, Portugal, Norway Against the stark reality of climate change has come renewed to Africa, China, India and Turkey. attention on sustainable development and development programmes that achieve the economic, ecological and social objectives that define sustainable development. Introductory Report Track 3: Community and How to plan a more resilient, future-proof city has become a Stakeholder Engagement preoccupation of many planners, especially among those working with coastal cities. The discussion under this sub-theme will interrogate recent work on simulations, tools and impacts (current Co-Chairs: and future) of sustainable community development including the Warren Batts, issues of increasing population and population density, employment Australia and employment distribution, public transport coverage and shifting Pietro Elisei, Italy/Romania economic climate, water quality and building energy consumption, environment and climate change as well as possible solutions. It will highlight the values and potentials of sustainable communities through developments such as urban waterfronts and post-disaster reconstruction. Successful plans almost always involve successful community It will also reflect on the vulnerabilities and threats including those engagement. Modern planners are familiar with successful stemming from wrong planning decisions, illustrated by case strategies and realize that securing the support of important studies. Organized over two consecutive sessions, the 12 papers in stakeholders can be the critical step in making a plan a reality. this sub-theme span a broad geographical coverage, from Australia Planners are developing new techniques and strategies to address to Europe, the Caribbean and Asia. competing interests and reduce conflict.

Session 2.2: Dealing with Urbanization Of specific relevance to city and regional planning is whether we are fully engaging the important stakeholders in our communities? Urban development is here to stay. Over 50% of the world’s The Call for Papers for the 49th Congress posed this stimulating population is living in cities. This growth is expected to continue question and several others: and accelerate in the coming decades, especially in the developing countries of Africa and Asia. This will have serious development • What have we learned about community engagement? Are there implications for cities (the population growth receptacles) as well as new techniques, including digital ones, and strategies that allow rural areas (the population depletion areas). How to plan for healthy, us to better engage our stakeholders? Do these techniques and quality urbanization will challenge planners in the years ahead. strategies differ by scale, culture, and regions?

What kinds of identities, regulatory and governance structures, • Is there ever enough community engagement? When do forms and territorial approaches will be required to equilibrate we know whether our strategies have taken hold? How do we and effectively deal with the impacts of rapid urbanization? Can we measure success or failure? move towards a new kind of urbanization and a new model of city development that is low carbon and provide improved treatment and • Are “delegated power” and “citizen control” viable or reasonable access to social services? Is it possible to build on the intellectual objectives for making plans for complex, fast-changing mega agitation of urban life - its economics (e.g. informal urban economy), cities and regions? social needs (e.g. food, housing rights, poverty) and physical dimensions (e.g. green space, transport and infrastructure) - to • Are new or re-shaped models of planning practice required for bring about win-win developments for both urban and rural areas? community engagement? This sub-theme hosts two lines of inquiry. The first, comprising 5 papers, discusses macro scale issues, exploring the range of urban Track 3 presents papers according to these topics or themes: Case challenges from migration, food and housing needs, mining and Studies; Strategies and Tools; and Emerging Trends and Research. environment to urban heat island effect and water quality including The last session has two panels focusing on two different aspects of impacts on indigenous people. Urban innovations and solutions such community engagement. as green infrastructure and various other instruments of territorial management are also discussed. The role of land use and spatial Session 3.1: Creative Participatory Planning Processes as Drivers plans are addressed in the presentations. of Sustainable and Resilient Development

The second line of inquiry turns the focus to micro scale issues such This session presents four papers focusing on interactions among as the development of urban neighbourhoods, urban regeneration, citizens, stakeholders, local authorities in participatory planning cultural resources, the built environment and zoning. How to protect processes. Challenges faced by town planners and other experts to and reuse cultural and heritage resources? How to integrate new team up with urban actors in complex negotiations promoting local and old urban developments in the dynamics of urban change? How development. to ensure long-lasting quality of design? What are the approaches, A local development is built upon different topics and approaches methods and tools to help planners and other city design depending on contingent urban issues. We see as in post-socialist 14 INTRODUCTORY REPORTS: THEME, TOPICS AND PAPERS countries the main theme is to open a dialogue in order to slow down Introductory Report Track 4: the rapid and frequently disordered urbanization, which is happening in the realities of the “liberal model” of spatial development. In International Planning Exchange other milieus the participatory process is enlarging its methods, through creative effort, looking for understanding how to make it Co-Chairs: easy for people to take part in the discussion especially when they Agatino Rizzo, are usually time poor: how to get information quickly and use digital, New Zealand life innovative chances to better interact in the planning practices. (Preparation), Finally, the relation between community participation and new ideas Stanley Yip, generation is investigated: development proposed and achieved Hong Kong through participatory planning approaches is really delivering more Siniša Trkulja, sustainable and resilient solutions for our cities? Serbia

Session 3.2: Community Development Planning: Stakeholders While large and medium cities struggle to cope with increasing rates Collaboration and Civic Engagement Vital Forces for Innovation in of urban population and issues derived by this trend, there is the Practices need to discuss and learn from the multitude of innovative planning practices being carried out across the world. Session 3.2 offers four papers that put some interesting questions on efficiency and effectiveness of participatory forms of decision A number of themes have been examined by the participants to the making: What really are costs and benefit of more community International Planning Exchange track, which we have organised in involvement in town planning? four strategic questions: It is often taken for granted that participatory forms of democracy are better than representative forms and that the public has an • How can we successfully manage urban transformation in an obligation to participate, but what about real results of participation. age of rapid metropolitan urbanisation? Moreover, general access to information and use of social media is expanding the bounds of communities, bringing involved people and • In what ways the many Sustainability Agendas being planning activities into immediate interaction and possible conflicts. implemented in several countries can help develop new, Nonetheless, the improvement of the effectiveness of plans, the innovative urban planning tools? resolving of conflict by enhancing consensus between stakeholders and the building of social capital are seen as advantages linked • How do local politics, governance and public participation affect to participation, but even several limitations arise from presented management and implementation of city planning in developing practices. Lastly, reaching good results is dependent on establishing countries and beyond? complex governance (both horizontal and vertical) processes including community development, productive activities, economic • What are the new trends in spatial planning in relation to sectors, and different scales of government, making consensus issues such as polycentric development, IT, urban hazards, rural among them, or at least mutual understanding a necessity for development and so on? sustainable development. While, traditionally, planning knowledge has flowed from developed Session 3.3: Politics and Policies Generated by Community to developing countries, in the Call for Papers for the 49th ISOCARP Planning Experiences: A Set of Relevant Case Studies Congress in Brisbane there are ample evidences that planners of the Global South can be crucial to renew planning paradigms and tools. Session 3.3 presents several practices based on participatory Track 4 presents papers dealing with the above-mentioned planning approach. The practices comparison is considering strategic questions. There will be four sessions focusing on “Cities examples from China, India and Tanzania. Participation is usually at the crossroad of transformation”, “Sustainability as a driver for considered a good approach even if it is uncertain how to achieve innovations and new planning tools”, “The issue of governance a meaningful participation for planning purposes. The relation in urban planning: politics, participation, poverty”, and “Spatial between agendas, strategic plans developed through participatory strategies, innovations, technologies”. workshops not always are in line with normative, statutory planning tools. Moreover, participation is considered as a catalyzer in the Session 4.1: Cities at the Crossroad of Transformation relation between local development and territorial-social capital, likewise, papers analyze the grade of transferability of local Cities across the world today are facing different challenges of participatory experiences. Lastly, means of effective community growth, and are taking different pathways of responses. This engagement are taken into consideration especially in relation session include papers on recent studies of the experience of with the management of planning conflicts generated in achieving various cities and regions in managing growth and transformation. consensus on proposed planning measures. The session starts with two papers from Turkey and Portugal that Sessions 3.4 and 3.5: Community Design Tools for Urban analyse urbanisation trends and planning cultures in their respective Development and Requalification: A Set of Relevant Case Studies metropolitan capital regions - Istanbul and Lisbon. A third paper discusses the interesting topic of “food sovereignty” in the city-state The final two sessions focus on community design tools. Presented of Singapore, setting a technical/scientific approach to determine results are based on case studies (Brasil, South Africa, USA) and the demand of food urban farming, urban fisheries, and productive research papers. Case studies examine the methods of community landscapes in the island nation. and stakeholder engagement and put in evidence the explicit challenges that they constitute in response to current urban The session continues with three papers from Brazil/Malaysia, development and regeneration challenges. Issues connected with Germany/US, and Australia. The first paper discusses the partnership involving community, public sector organizations, transformation of Rio de Janeiro’s port to host upcoming mega- such as role of public authorities are taken into consideration. events such as the 2016 Olympics and the 2014 FIFA World Cup. Furthermore, the concept of social-collaborative creation for the In this paper the authors focus on grassroots contributions for the local identity and community commitment, and nature and types regeneration of the harbour area. of community engagement techniques, in a turning point phase of planning processes, are thoroughly explored. 15 INTRODUCTORY REPORTS: THEME, TOPICS AND PAPERS

The last two papers carried out a comparative case study analysis as reports on these important emerging planning issues. of sustainable transport policies in Germany and the US and This session starts with three papers all attempting to set macro urbanisation patterns and urban growth strategies of two “Sunshine perspectives on governance. The first paper sets an overview on States”: Queensland, Australia and Florida, US. the issues of power, politics and planning in shaping inequalities in cities while the second paper focuses on the institutional The session ends with two papers investigating the relations deficiencies in a multi-stakeholder context based on case studies between industrial-related growth and urban planning in two in Columbia. The third paper tries to conceptualize, the cases of countries of the BRIC economic block: China and India. The paper intergovernmental collaboration at a regional context in Indonesia. from China analyses the historical relationship between rail and The fourth paper turns to analyzing a public participation project in cities in China, from the age of “Insertion” (beginning of XX c.) to Abu Dhabi. In this paper, community input received are presented “Isolation”, “Marginalisation” and the recent “Incorporation” having along with insights regarding substantive and procedural aspects of as case study the city of Hangzhou and its new town around the new, participation. The fifth paper raises the issue of poverty in planning high-speed station. The last paper from India develop and suggests research, and examines the issues of poverty in Lagos’ informal the creation of a new policy framework to generate incentives settlements. It explores the interplay among location, tenure, to industries settling in undeveloped areas of India such as settlements, policies and livelihoods. The last paper looks at the Vidarbha region, thus drastically reducing migration to the already backyard rental sector in South Africa’s Western Cape Province overcrowded Indian megapolises such as Mumbai. and examines why the sector remains largely unregulated and unaddressed. Session 4.2: Sustainability as a Driver for Innovations and New Planning Tools Session 4.4: Spatial Strategies, Innovations, Technologies

The sustainability agenda has long been the key theme guiding The spatial dimensions of cities are the common focus of the the practices of urban planning in most cities. The movement planning profession. Urban spatial phenomena can be interpreted towards preparing plans and policies that support sustainable and studied from a wide variety of perspectives: scales, rural/urban use of our resources has driven the development of new planning relationships, information flow, social networks, etc. This collection methodologies, approaches and tools. This collection of papers of papers explore these diverging angles but all come under the shares this common theme and provide examples of the latest strong theme of searching for better planning solutions on a spatial thinking and innovations. dimension.

The session begins with three theoretical papers from Trinidad and The first two papers examine the morphological aspect of the spatial Tobago, Slovakia, and Germany. The first paper calls for a Green dimensions and their impacts: the first paper studies the causational Economy approach to implement resource efficient cities in the relationship between urban form vs. commuting activities, while the small Caribbean nations, these latter threatened by rapid urban second paper looks at how the size and shape of urban development growth and the impacts of climate change. The second paper from in the Saigon Basin area affect the hydrological processes. Slovakia discusses and revises the concept of urban metabolism to help drive cities towards a more sustainable path. Last paper The next two papers look at the spatial issues at regional scales: undertakes a comparative analysis of Sustainable Land Management one on the Flanders Region in Belgium and the other on the policies and practices to call for a better understanding of this new Peri-Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei cross-boundary mega-region in China. research area. The former paper highlights the use of strategic projects to effect regional spatial transformation while the latter paper points out the The next three papers, instead, develop new, innovative tools to help importance of institutional issue in regional collaboration across planners assess and manage natural hazards, lack of urban data, space. and energy demands. The first paper from Queensland, Australia deploys complex geographical methods to develop an integrated Taking the need of innovations in planning implementation, the fifth technique to assess flood risk and climate adaptation in Queensland. paper illustrates the key to low-middle income housing projects A paper from South Africa suggests the use of GIS and earth rests on innovative regulation and public-private partnership in the observation data to compensate for either outdated or expensive City of Beijing. The next paper then examines the attempt to effect data, and thus assist local planners to manage urban growth in local urbanization through the concept of village communities, and developing countries, hence illustrating the need of innovative urbanization strategy.

The last paper from China employs simulation tools to investigate Apparently spatial dimensions in cities today go beyond simple how urban morphology can affect the energy demand of buildings, tangible physical form. Intangible but important internet and mobile having as a case study the urban design scheme of Yuehai Eco-City connectivity is changing the concept of ’space’ in cities. The next in Yinchuan. paper studies the interrelationship between social network and urban spatial network in Shanghai, China. The last paper similarly The session ends with two papers from China and Singapore that points out the emergence of ICT (Information and Communication analyse the benefits of established and new urban infrastructures Technologies) and the ways this is changing our urban environment. for land use management. The first paper discusses the contribution of Greenway Planning and Construction for Dongguan city, China. Last paper proposes a new urban infrastructure called Environmental Deck to provide space for land-constrained Singapore.

Session 4.3: The Issue of Governance in Urban Planning: Politics, Participation, Poverty

Urban planning decision making ultimately is directed by the choice of governance systems. The social and economic expression of the governance systems are best reflected in local politics, public participation activities and the issue of social equity. This collection of papers looks at these issues from various perspectives and serves 16 INTRODUCTORY REPORTS: THEME, TOPICS AND PAPERS

Introductory Report Track 5: integrated planning, understanding the content and the context. Forum on Planning Education: Session 5.2: Case Studies on Planning in Europe Are we doing it right? This session presents three papers from two European Co-Chairs: countries: Poland and Portugal. The first paper provides a set Griet Geerinck, of recommendations to other institutions in need of curriculum Belgium reform and/or development, as many universities are nowadays Saskia Spijkerman, introducing planning programs. The examples discussed will include The Netherlands the Polish and Russian cases. The second paper is about a new spatial management program with a multidisciplinary approach. The third is an article which will address a systematized outlook from previous experiences in (1) urban design and planning studios within the general layout of teaching programs, (2) frontier and Today a spatial planner needs to address a complex society. applied research as ways of reasoning reality and look for alternative Planning involves climate change, urbanization, globalization, answers and (3) integration of education activities with present-day migration and social and technical changes. In recent years the topics both in theory and practice. traditional role of planners has changed dramatically and the contemporary challenges and global events have instigated a shift in Session 5.3: Is there a “Global” Planning Education System? the planning profession. (Introduction by Vanessa Watson) The papers and the discussions are focusing on the future directions for planning education that attempts to combine new and key skills, This is an interactive session on a comparative discussion of attitudes, experiences and critical fields of knowledge that future academic education on multiple continents. The goal is to compare planning demands. and contrast the planning education in the different continents. For instance: US (process-oriented), China (engineering, infrastructure), Which principles can guide the organization of a new educational Australia (the sustainability capital of the world), Europe pedagogical planning? (architecture/design), and Africa (inclusion). How do these “meta- narratives” translate down to planning school curricula? • Theory and practice are inseparable for a qualitative academic curriculum. How can this “learning by doing“ be embedded in the Questions to discuss are: education? • Are there similarities or differences in planning philosophies and planning pedagogies across the globe? • The education has to be based on an interdisciplinary approach. Is it feasible to study the social, physical and economic challenges • What are the advantages/disadvantages of such philosophies/ of cities and regions jointly? pedagogical perspectives?

• Urban design and urban development need to be linked. Is urban • Is there an overarching philosophy of planning in the continents? design a task for each stakeholder, participating in the planning process? Is spatial planning a process or a project? • Is there a substantive focus / methodological focus of planning education programs in the different continents? A lot of high schools and universities all over the world are modifying their curriculum and are looking for an answer on the question • Is there a possibility of a universal model of planning? what do spatial planners need to learn? How can we integrate this knowledge in the academic curriculum and in the accreditation of a The participants will be congress participants from Africa, Asia, planner? Australia, Europe, Latin America and North America. These six What is a good spatial planner, what kind of skills does he need? individuals will each provide an introductory comment of about 5 What role can or should he play in an urban development process? minutes each, on the questions above, and then the moderator can Is he a manager or a team player? Is he a decision-maker or a open it up to a more general discussion. communicator? Is he an engineer or an architect or a visionary person? Session 5.4: “Learning by Doing” and “Lifelong Learning”

Track 5 has two sessions with paper presentations and two This is an interactive session on the ‘Bridging Theory and Practice’ interactive sessions with discussions according to these topics initiative by Piotr Lorens. The session will start with a review or themes: 1. Various approaches to planning education; 2. Case of the workshop on Planning and education in Portugal by Sofia studies on planning in Europe; 3. Is there a “global” planning Morgado. We explore the conditions to change a planning education education system? and 4. “Learning by doing” and “lifelong curriculum and how to embed theoretical and practical training. learning”. The focus of this interactive session is to get input for the ‘Bridging Theory and Practice’ initiative, both for students and professionals. Session 5.1: Various Approaches to Planning Education

This session presents four papers from three countries: Australia, South Africa and Nigeria/Canada. These papers provide various approaches to planning education. The first is a research on defining the discipline of planners and is done by using a framework in the consultation of stakeholders. The second is a multi university project of which the outcomes are of benefit to planning schools and practitioners around the globe which endeavor to facilitate student’s continuous learning and adaptation to a rapidly changing world. The third paper is an exploration of international and local integrated planning and design approaches. The fourth paper presents ISOP (Ibadan school of Planning) as an example for a curriculum for 17 CONGRESS PROGRAM TUESDAY

Tuesday 1 October 2013 Morning

9.00 Opening Plenary Chair: Bill Twitchett

Welcome to Country

Milica Bajic-Brkovic ISOCARP President Welcome address

Rob Molhoek MP, Assistant Minister for Planning Reform Opening of the congress

Vanessa Watson, Professor of city planning, School of Architecture, Planning and Geomatics, University of Cape Town, South Africa African Cities for Sale! Smart, Eco or just Profitable? The reality in most sub-Saharan African cities today is well known: they are largely informal, their populations earn unequally but most are poor and they are growing rapidly under conditions of inadequate service provision, outdated planning systems and weak local governments. Yet in the last few years Africa has been labelled by international growth coalitions of property developers, architects and engineers as the globe’s ‘last development frontier’, awaiting urban make-overs which combine the worst architectural fantasy features of Dubai, Shanghai and Singapore, and packaged for consumption as smart cities, eco cities and life-style retreats of various kinds. These globally circulating urban models ignore place, identity, culture, histories and the needs of the majority of urban occupants. Their impact on African cities, as elsewhere, will be socially and environmentally devastating. Are there alternative visions for global South cities which can counter the hegemony of Dubai-ification and respond to the urgent imperatives of real cities?

Amos Brandeis, Architect and urban planner, restorationplanning.com, Israel Planning for people and with them: Practical lessons from global experience The most important key for successful planning is “Working with People”. The no. 1 challenge we face as planners is: “How can we do it?” In this talk practical lessons drawn from an analysis of very diverse planning work carried out in many countries, will be demonstrated and discussed. The main conclusion is the essential role of successful collaboration with 4 main groups of people, i.e. clients, stakeholders, team members and the people, who actually live in the place. The best clients demonstrate real leadership, passion and involvement. The Alexander cross border river restoration project (1995), which is the only Israeli-Palestinian environmental collaboration with “on the ground results”, proves that no wall can be an obstacle for real leadership.

The success of a project is very much dependent on collaboration with the main stakeholders. They should preferably all be involved from the beginning of the planning process. The plan should try to create a delicate balance between their needs and interests, but without losing our “professional integrity” - no “Jelly Plans”. Everybody wants to be part of a success story, and this means “let the ego go”. There is always enough credit for all. The plan for the largest Bedouin City in the world (winner of the 2013 ISOCARP Award for Excellence), demonstrates how Ministers, Prime Ministers, and even the President of State were involved. Urban and regional plans are prepared by interdisciplinary planning teams. The major challenge of the team leader is how to manage the team and integrate the enormous experience of these experts. How to use their strength and knowledge, as a passionate team, and not treat them as technicians who want to have a free ride. Planning the Dead Sea, the lowest place on earth, with a team of 19 consultants, from 3 continents, will demonstrate this approach.

The “Human Factor” is so important in any project, because the mission of the planners is “to plan for the people”. The planner receives his fee and moves on to his next project, but they will live forever with what he has planned for them. People are diverse, but all people have needs, interests, and dreams. Four lessons learned from work with some of the poorest and richest people on earth will be discussed: 1. learning, 2. trust building, 3. planning with the people, and 4. creation of sensitive plans. For each lesson the main challenges will be defined, and a set of tools proposed. Some the main issues are methods to identify common interests, overcome cultural gaps, build mutual trust, and use mediators. Planning in the modern world is complex and extremely challenging. Planners should feel privileged to work with people, and to have the opportunity to make a real difference to their lives.

10.45-11.00 Coffee and Tea

General Rapporteur Jeff Featherstone, Director of the Center for Sustainable Communities; Professor in the Department of Community and Regional Planning, Temple University, Philadelphia Introduction of the congress topics and the congress team

Piotr Lorens, Gdansk University of Technology, Poland, VP Young Planning Professionals Presentation of YPP project in Brisbane together with the YPPs

Presentation Review09

Tuesday 1 October 2013 Afternoon

12.30-16.30 Technical tours

17.30-19.30 Civic Reception by Brisbane City Council City Hall, Ithaca Room 18 CONGRESS PROGRAM TUESDAY: TECHNICAL TOURS SCHEDULE

a out out

Only plus city able

break

may

with

flat

for

get get level be

primarily the hill

in cost) to to

a a shoes.

There

near

short own required

relatively take take need

(at refreshment refreshment

opportunity reasonable

a walking a

terrain.

(sponsored) over plus plus terrain

(some A

compulsory

flat. opportunity opportunity

stop

fitness flat plus

plus

with

foot

are

bikes Delegates one one

bags.

fitness on

interest interest will

be be and

route interest.

route hire

of of relatively light undulating

Walking

paths. relatively required is

the

the may may hours

there

refreshment

3 Cycle Walking

Only a

points points ‐ over across cost). provided

2 plus fitness/capability points

route

along

There There City

cost). cost).

be fitness cost). foot foot

the own

and tour

shoes. over

view

offered

stops bus. bus. own own specific specific

stops will

using on on

bike/walking

to a a own the

at at

for for

in in

of bags.

Walking spread

will

walking hours hours hours

although

route

delegates shared delegates

time 3 3 3 time be helmets

end

light delegates delegates hours – – hours – around around

of (at the with

cost).

delegates 3 2 2 3 2

will the road

‐ the the

Only (at at walk walk will Riding

will

required

Delegates

off own take take take take take break (at (at along

tour

be delegates delegates delegates delegates delegates and and

numbers required will will will will will delegates

bike.

There

shoes. There 25 55 25 55 25 leisure is

a will offered on

bus bus = = 25 = = =

breaks

at bags. walking tour tour tour tour tour

delegates dedicated ride the the

LIMIT This terrain. (at light LIMIT This time refreshment walking LIMIT This of refreshment LIMIT This on to Queensland. short fitness LIMIT This centre. will climbs) LIMIT This of refreshment Limits

has

and as the of

of the

well city

by bank

formerly as mix events

wharf

private

water means along highly own

has of central stores,

villages

by thinking each was

Southbank premier

its

Queensland

community the

the to

otherwise naval

house

historic

Brisbane Government

initiative eclectic

spaces. in

legacy. Brisbane’s Technology

naval

climate what and

urban along

touch

the Council understanding

been close

posing example in

and

CBD.

of international executed

improve and used

Brisbane, otherwise innovative public wartime City has standing

social ‐ area

the

improvements to areas,

resulted re ‐ through

good

and an that Queensland’s

successful edge

the for

a and

Queensland as free a cultural

to into and in has

University bridges provide stores, the

the value provided

Brisbane realise

construction such

strategy

city multi ‐ by

infrastructure, Bay. establish/deliver meccas being

home

which brownfield regulator

wool

the ‐

has

can provides

focus

smallest collaboration

its

the example well recreational

to as suburbs.

sites

through where the

also inner architecture well etc of

temperate/subtropical

restoration descending The this

public joined

is River

with as about

Queensland which

former

great historic of older active

walk

sites and Moreton sector lightweight

out part

nations a program

city. site

End

later used of and

the

before

will Part and grander

the revitalised and

legacy the in Brisbane

Council

The been carry

Brisbane’s

Pass historic of and Brisbane

Hill

Expositions private of West

you identity

See to city.

Powerhouse

Bay

Beach

has generally River City Brisbane’s in being take

city.

the Council,

number

Gardens the passive

the

‘conversation’ a of loved River. places. The

‐

draining on World Spring improvement will

ride

some facilities. of City

venue,

City villages Kodak

with examples example

Cliffs

and well stock

centres residents

into Moreton area

other modern Brisbane tour Brisbane

the

your

community

visiting

current

city. a

fine

fabric

located across on

Brisbane centres Games, by a

urban

conservation. with

character

business.

Point

cultural

on of The for local local

management

is Brisbane the

Congress many

waterways

renewal/revitalisation refinery

the for

and excellent

building

tour

some ending of

and Farm

and

urban

through

of beautiful

the

its focus heart an and collaborated

protecting

points years there

street’ timber’

Olympic

unlike sugar of urban suburban assisted area see

issues

our

facilitated Valley

Kangaroo pass the

will

walk Brisbane’s

and cycling

waterway from

before community

reach

the

and to

site of

in housing wide

investment. ‘high CSR

‐ creeks

recent as

much

tour this the then

‘tin city

appreciating

blighted Renewal/revitalisation Teneriffe/New successful Brisbane, sector areas, the Legacy World such Southbank and a design entertainment Creating Over planned nodes/focal homogeneous successful failing activity. Cycling Join the beautiful and campus shops, Heritage Starting Fortitude heritage that particular as Waterways, This successful many Council, quality Theme/Outline Walking Walking Bus Cycle Walking Bus

R E D B L A C K Y E L L O W B L U E O R A N G E G R E E N

Tour Type 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.

19 CONGRESS PROGRAM - WEDNESDAY

ISOCARP CONGRESS BRISBANEWednesday 2 October 2013 Whole Day 1 - 4 OCTOBER 2013 8.30 Day-long Session in partnership with the Planning Institute of Australia The subject will be Contemporarystate-of-the-art planing Austra systems lianaround and the world. International Comparative examples Planning will be Showcase:drawn from the Australian states, all of which have their own mature planning systems that demonstrate both long and diverse traditions and frequent reform and innovation. An international panel will lead an interactive discussion and debate on planning systems - similarities and differences, local or universal, lessons to be learned. Wednesday 2 October 2013

Item No Presentation title Presenter Session 1: PIA and Planning Matters 8.30 am to 10.30 am (2 hrs)

MC Introduction/Planning Matters Dy Currie, PIA National President 1 From Plan to Place: Urban Renewal Brisbane 20 years Kerry Doss, Brisbane City Council 2 Gold Coast Rapid Transit 2031/Cross River Rail Toby Lodge, Hassell 3 PIA’s international partnerships (Sri Lanka, East Timor, Solomon Islands Chris Buckley, Meter and PNG) 4 Urbanisation and an approach to conservation of built heritage – Delhi P. Uttarwar (India) Master Plan Provisions Session 2: Planning for Natural Hazards 11.00 am to 12.30 pm (1.5 hrs)

MC Introduction Kate Isles, PIA Qld President 1 Tweed Shire Coastal Hazards Development Control Plan Katrina Burbidge (GHD) and Mike Svikiz 2 Adaptive mechanism of collaborative planning for metropolitan large- Kuang Hui Peng (Taiwan) scale compound disasters in Taiwan 3 Planning for stronger more resilient floodplains Brendan Nelson, MWH Global Session 3: Urban Design 1.30 am to 3 pm (1.5 hrs)

MC Introduction Andrew Hammonds, Placefocus 1 Brisbane Central City Master Plan Cr Amanda Cooper, Brisbane City Council 2 Infill Development for Older Australians in SEQ Peter Richards, Deicke Richards 3 From 'Place Apart' to Place Making: The Reinvention and Transformation Caroline Stalker, of James Cook University, Townsville Architectus Session 4: Urban Futures 3.30 pm to 5 pm (1.5 hrs)

MC Introduction to session Adam Davies 1 Urban Futures Ken Maher (Hassell) 2 Moderated Panel Discussion Expert Panel, comprising Prof Milica Bajic-Brkovic, ISOCARP President and Warren Rowe (Buckley Vann International) 17.30 UPAT Happy Hour Seminar Martin Dubbeling, VP Urban Planning Advisory Teams, will give an overview on the latest UPATs.

19.30 ISOCARP Bureau Meeting For ISOCARP Bureau members and representatives.

20 CONGRESS PROGRAM - WEDNESDAY

11.00-12.30 and 13.30-15.00 Hassell Knowledge Precincts Case Study Showcase - prior registration was necessary From 11.00-12.30 and 13.30-15.00 there will be a parallel event, namely the Hassell Knowledge Precincts Case Study Showcase. Public policies for science, technology and innovation have always been aimed primarily at creating and diffusing knowledge. In recent years, knowledge intensive industries have become a key driver for sustainable growth and are gaining increasing interest from the public and private sectors. We are now entering a new type of knowledge-driven economy or new form of ‘knowledge society’.

This collection of presentations will showcase some of South East Queensland’s pre-eminent Knowledge Precincts, highlighting how policy, planning and design is shaping the precincts and individual buildings to establish world class specialist areas of discovery, education and primary and tertiary health care services. This session will be delivered by planners,Knowledge architects, Precinct urban designerss Case and landscapeStudy Showcasearchitects who have been involved in the design and delivery of these significant precincts and buildings. Wednesday 2 October 2013

Item No Presentation title Presenter

Morning Session: Knowledge Precincts 11.00 am to 12.30 pm (1.5 hrs)

MC Introduction David Ireland, CSIRO 1 Malcolm Middleton, Design for Knowledge Queensland Government Architect 2 Kelvin Grove Urban Village - Brisbane ‘s first knowledge based community John Byrne, Urbayne Design 3 Herston Health Precinct – Smart Community Plan Adam Davies, Hassell

Afternoon session: High Performance Health Facilities 1.30 pm to 3 pm (1.5 hrs)

MC Introduction David Ireland, CSIRO 1 Princess Alexandra Health Precinct – Smart Community Plan Tony Dickson, Lat27 2 Boggo Road Urban Village - Ecosciences Precinct Mark Roehrs, Hassell 3 Gold Coast Health and Knowledge Precinct – Gold Coast University Hospital Ron Bridgefoot, Hassell

21 CONGRESS PROGRAM THURSDAY

Thursday 3 October 2013 Morning

Paper descriptions are responsibility of authors

Track 1: Migration as the New Face of Change Co-Chairs: Amos Brandeis, Israel; Njeri Cerere, Kenya

09:00 – 10:30 1.1 Inclusion and Integration

Adebayo, Ambrose Adeyemi, University of KwaZulu Natal, Durban, South Africa Urban built environment in an era of uncertainty: migration, urban planning and housing policy in South African Cities Cross border migration in the case of South Africa, has been met with a lot of resistance from the host country, with the poor ending up as refugees. This paper will evaluate the implications on South African cities’ built environment and of policy interventions in place to address the issues outlined above.

Chatterji, Tathagata, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia Participatory planning in the era of public-private-partnerships: complexities and contradictions in a migrant city in India (peer- reviewed) This paper explores the role of planning in bridging the gap between local rural residents and new urban middleclass and poor migrants in the context of globalisation.

Monardo, Bruno; Falco, Enzo; Polizzi di Sorrentino, Enrica; Boca, Alessandro; Ferretti, Alessia, Sapienza – Università di Roma, Rome, Italy Urban agriculture as a socially inclusive and sustainable post-growth urban regeneration strategy The experience of “New Roots Community Farm” within the distressed neighborhood of City Heights in San Diego shows how the “Urban Agriculture” approach can provide new integrated strategies for urban regeneration matching social inclusion and physical-economic redevelopment.

11:00 – 12:30 1.1 Inclusion and Integration

Wang, Fei; Wei, Wei; Li, Ming, China Academy of Urban Planning and Design, Beijing, China – presented by Shao, Dan Equalization of public service facilities for tourist cities - Case study of Sanya’s downtown public service facilities in the planning Providing countermeasures to achieve the equalization of public service facilities in Sanya from contraposing its periodic variation of a population.

Klinmalai, Siwaporn; Kanki, Kiyoko, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan Impact of different land use transformation on neighborhood relationship between newcomer and former villagers in a sprawl area of the Bangkok Metropolitan Region: the case of Nonthaburi and Pathumthani province in comparison, Thailand Nonthaburi and Pathumthani province are experiencing a dramatically high population growth among five vicinity areas of the Bangkok metropolitan region with an uncontrollable growth of population. This condition has impacted different land use transformations and also affected different neighborhood relationships between the former village inhabitant in an agricultural area and the newcomer in a new residential area.

Track 2: Valuing What Already Exists Co-Chairs: Silja Tillner, Austria; Belinda Yuen, Singapore

09:00 – 10:30 Actualising Sustainable Communities : 2.1.A The Transition to Sustainable Communities

Herron, Murray; Jones, David; Rollo, John, Deakin University, Williamstown, Australia South West Victoria 2012 – 2050: Are the settlements sustainable? (peer-reviewed) Regional sustainability in Victoria. Is it possible?

Kammerbauer, Mark, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany Adaptive strategies of urban disaster recovery planning (peer-reviewed) Contradictions between recovery planning and urban master planning emerged in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina in 2005. The Citywide Recovery Plan had to support rebuilding, while the 2030 Masterplan advocated growth and improvement. What role do existing conditions and the scale of disaster play for this process?

Ren, Jie, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China Siting green infrastructure: Synthetical solutions for leading the oasis city’s sustainable development in Wuyi New Town Owing to the particular conditions of oasis cities, the stability and security of the ecological environment seem to be quite crucial especially when dealing with urban sustainable development. This study showcases how Wuyi new town constructed its sustainable developing strategy by the solution of green infrastructure.

Vettorato, Daniele, European Research Academy, Bolzano, Italy Smart City: the energy strategy of Bolzano transforming the existing city The paper describes the opportunities, the strategies, and the synergies of the Bolzano Smart City concept.

22 CONGRESS PROGRAM THURSDAY

11:00 – 12:30 2.1.A The Transition to Sustainable Communities

Thomas, Stacey, University of the West Indies, Diego Martin, Trinidad and Tobago The Future is urban: The challenge for sustainable urban development in the Caribbean: The search for a sustainable urban form Increasing urban populations coupled with the peculiarities of the Caribbean urbanization process, leave governments and policy makers grappling with how to manage and guide future urban development in a sustainable manner. Will densification, decentralization or a mixed urban form be the way forward?

Yuen, Belinda, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore, Singapore Eco-city planning: pure hype or achievable concept This paper will interrogate the key strategies, results, lessons learned and replicability of Singapore’s eco-city planning. The analytical lens is on illuminating the strengths and weaknesses of eco-city planning – what has worked, what may work and what may fail elsewhere.

11:00 – 12:30 2.1.B Zooming in on Water and the City

Van Zyl, Pieter, Western Cape Provincial Government, Cape Town, South Africa Cape Town’s V&A waterfront project adaptive re-use as a foundation for sustainable urban renewal An overview of the V&A Waterfront Project in Cape Town, South Africa, describing how the new residential, commercial and leisure uses have been developed through adaptive re-use of harbour buildings and retaining the working harbour elements. An innovative “Package of Plans Process” facilitated the urban regeneration success story.

Sas-Bojarska, Aleksandra, University of Technology, Gdansk, Poland The green waterfront of a city – where are the limits of good planning? Gdansk case The paper presents the role of strategic planning of green areas of waterfronts in shaping the image of cities, and the threats to them caused by wrong planning decisions. The case study of Gdansk serves as an example to illustrate the potential of the sea-shore landscape and its possible degradation.

Track 3: Community and Stakeholder Engagement Co-Chairs: Warren Batts, Australia; Pietro Elisei, Italy/Romania

09:00 – 10:30 3.1 Creative Participatory Planning Processes

Lorens, Piotr; Kamrowska–Zaluska, Dorota, Gdansk University of Technology, Gdansk, Poland Spurring the community involvement in planning - lessons from post-socialist cities Community involvement in planning in case of post-socialist cities was until recently almost non-existent. But in recent years the development of demand for more public participation is dramatically increasing. This needs the creation of new types of planning tools as well as the introduction of innovative techniques of conducting the community dialogue.

Heyning, Helena Chaja, MB&A BV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; van der Bruggen, Wilma, LOGOS, Oosterbeek, the Netherlands From top down to bottom up -a somersault? Faced with the financial and economic crisis in The Netherlands and its aftermath and the ongoing decentralization process municipalities have great difficulties to cope with the demands and needs of citizens. Housing and planning are in the heart of the financial problem.

Powell, Marissa, Arup, Brisbane, Australia Online engagement – linking their digital world to ours See how bespoke e-engagement/spatial mapping tools have been used to enhance stakeholder and community engagement processes for planning projects. This approach both broadens the reach of engagement programs resulting in more representative datasets and provides this data in formats that can be easily integrated into planning processes.

Karakiewicz, Justyna, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia Societal paradigm shift and community (peer-reviewed) For years now, we have been responding to the discovery of the profoundly disturbing consequences of climate change with evolutionary responses. Collective behavioural change is needed. But how do we make dramatic changes that bring the larger public over to such change and result in a societal paradigm shift?

11:00 – 12:30 3.2 Community Development Planning

Burton, Paul, Griffith University, Southport, Australia Still climbing the stairway to heaven: public participation in planning Arnstein’s seminal conception of a ladder of participation continues to exercise the imagination of planners and to confound us by its assumption of a moral dimension whereby climbing the ladder takes us closer to participatory heaven. This paper proposes other criteria with the potential to improve the practice of participation.

Heywood, Phil, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia Collaborative Planning: an evolving model of practice As individuals, groups and activities are brought into ever-closer contact by radical developments in communication, opportunities for both conflicts and cooperation multiply. Making use of examples, this paper examines the role, scope and methods of collaborative planning as a means to build better futures in times of rapid change.

23 CONGRESS PROGRAM THURSDAY

Le Roux, Jan-Hendrik; Cilliers, Elizelle Juanee, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa – presented by Louis Latagan The participatory planning paradigm shift: Comparing disciplines and methods (peer-reviewed) Public participation has experienced a paradigm shift over time with contrasting approaches emerging from it. These approaches are visible in different professions and disciplines. By comparing different disciplines it is possible to create best-practice scenarios for effective public participation.

Baldwin, Claudia; Osborne, Caroline, University of the Sunshine Coast, Peregian Beach, Australia; Smith, Phil, Deicke Richards Architects, Brisbane, Australia Planning for age-friendly neighbourhoods This paper provides insight into two research projects: a desktop exercise investigating trends in international aged care provision and a participatory research project using PhotoVoice and design charrettes to ask seniors in South East Queensland about their preferences for neighbourhoods and housing.

Track 4: International Planning Exchange Co-Chairs: Siniša Trkulja, Serbia; Stanley Yip, Hong Kong

09:00 – 10:30 4.1 Cities at the Crossroad of Transformation

Arslanli, Kerem Yavuz, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey Istanbul’s changing skyline: The effects of landmark projects After the 2002 economic crisis in Turkey the real estate market has evolved with respect to international globalization agenda. Istanbul, the biggest city of Turkey has been affected with many severe planning problems within last decade. This paper investigates the possible outcomes of the changing skyline of Istanbul with respect to planning future of the city.

Ng, Waikeen, National University of Singapore, Singapore Towards a food sovereignty strategy for Singapore This paper summarizes the proposals for island-wide multi-disciplinary spatial planning and design strategies that could help Singapore achieve a “total defence” approach towards a measure of food sovereignty during a crisis situation.

Morgado, Sofia; Santos, João Rafael; Moreira, Inês; Vargas, José, CIAUD, Technical University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal Lisbon at a turning point: metropolitan patterns, trends and cultures The paper presents the overall structure and preliminary findings of the research project Forms of metropolitan spatial production in Lisbon aimed at discussing recent metropolitan development, adding to previous research on its morphogenesis and comparative studies with other metropolises.

Sarayed-Din, Luiza Farnese Lana; Ahmad, Faizah Binti; Zainol, Rosilawati Binti, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Rio de Janeiro’s port area transformations for mega-events: history, urban regeneration and grassroots creative experiences (peer- reviewed) Presenting Rio de Janeiro’s port area urban regeneration for mega-events and how grassroots creative experiences have been handled and coped with. This paper advances in the urban regeneration discussion and potential of learning from creative urban experiences in inhabited historical land within ‘Global South’ cities.

11:00 – 12:30 4.1 Cities at the Crossroad of Transformation

Jung, Wolfgang, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany; Buehler, Ralph, Virginia Tech., Alexandria, U.S.A Sustainable transport in Germany and the US: A comparison of the Washington, DC and Stuttgart regions (peer-reviewed) The Washington, DC and Stuttgart regions serve as examples for differences and similarities of the German and US systems of land-use and transport planning. We highlight best practice examples for sustainable planning in both countries using case studies of Scharnhauser Park and Arlington County.

Mayere-Donehue, Severine, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin, Griffith University, Southport, Australia Managing growth in the sunshine states: Urbanization and planning in Queensland and Florida (peer-reviewed) This paper compares the urbanization and planning in the two sunshine states of Florida and Queensland highlighting the similarities and differences, evaluates how effective the growth management programs have been, and examines the recent changes and the challenges they bring to the respective states.

He, Shan, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia From “insertion” to “incorporation”: the Hangzhou example of the transformation of the railway in Chinese urban life (peer-reviewed) This paper takes Hangzhou City as case study to review the relationship between rail and urban life in contemporary China. The conclusions illuminate today’s practice of planning and design of new towns around station nodes of high-speed rail infrastructure.

Track 5: Forum on Planning Education: Are we doing it right? Co-Chairs: Griet Geerinck, Belgium; Saskia Spijkerman, The Netherlands

09:00-10:30 5.1 Various Approaches to Planning Education

Basson, Marita, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia What do planners do? Define your discipline to drive undergraduate curriculum renewal (peer-reviewed) What should planning schools teach? To answer this question they require a good understanding of the roles that current and future 24 CONGRESS PROGRAM THURSDAY graduates will undertake in an ever-changing world. This paper describes how the Define Your Discipline Stakeholder Consultation Process was used to develop a Graduate Capability Framework for planning programs.

Baldwin, Claudia, University of the Sunshine Coast, Peregian Beach, Australia; Rosier, Johanna, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Australia; Slade, Christine; Budge, Trevor, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Australia; Coiacetto, Eddo, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia; Perkins, Tim, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia; Harwood, Andrew, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia Expanding experiential learning in Australian planning schools A multi-university project aims to improve experiential learning in Australian planning schools through development, testing and provision of an online toolkit of resources. The benefits of EL need to be recognised in the accreditation process, in order to deliver graduates able to continuously learn and adapt to an ever-changing world.

Schlebusch, Sanmarie, North West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa – presented by Bernice van Schalkwyk Planning for sustainable communities: Layout and design approaches (peer-reviewed) Policies and strategies should not merely endeavour to eradicate poverty, create jobs or deliver houses, but embrace decisive lively and sustainable initiatives that will effectively transform an area in a liveable and lively community where noticeable changes are observed to aspire and to stimulate active community participation.

Olufemi, Olusola; Jimoh, Umar, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria ‘From pedagogy to paideia’: Physical planning education in Nigeria (peer-reviewed) Moving from pedagogy to paideia in planning entails practical civic engagement and authentic dialogue with the community through collaborative rationality in planning education in Nigeria. Paideia empowers the whole person in producing new knowledge, skills and imaginaries that prepare practitioners to inform, influence and integrate new frontiers of planning.

11:00 – 12:30 5.2 Case Studies on Planning in Europe

Lorens, Piotr; Kamrowska–Zaluska, Dorota, Gdansk University of Technology, Gdansk, Poland Shaping the new planning curricula in the post-socialistic context – lessons from Poland and Russia Planning education was to a large extent non-existent in the formerly socialistic countries. Therefore, after successful political and economic transformation, the need arose for developing the new planning curricula, focused on the situation and problems that have to be dealt with in the context of post-socialist countries.

Ledwon, Slawomir, Gdansk University of Technology, Gdansk, Poland Planning education, certification and deregulation in Poland The article describes the issues of planning education in Poland, how reforms are made, what are the main obstacles to teach spatial planners and what new skills are needed, as well as argues on the governmental plans to deregulate planning profession in Poland.

Morgado, Sofia, CIAUD, Technical University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal Shared and learnt lessons from Lisbon: Designing the city and the territory from an urbanistic viewpoint The article addresses a systematised outlook from previous experiences in teaching programmes, research, active integration with theory and practice. The roles of Education, Research and Practice will be explored.

ESRI, Australia GIS Software Paper on GIS-software related to planning education.

Thursday 3 October 2013 Afternoon

Track 1: Migration as the New Face of Change Co-Chairs: Amos Brandeis, Israel; Njeri Cerere, Kenya

13:30 – 15:00 1.2 Managing Massive Change

Chen, Xiaojian; Li, X.Y; Ding, N., Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an, China The models of urbanization and their impacts on spatial evolution of built-up areas - Case studies of cities in Shaanxi in Northwest China Large-scale demographic changes driven by migration have different effects on the spatial evolution of cities with different scales and different development conditions. This paper discusses the effectiveness and lessons derived from the implementation of city planning in these three units and takes Xi’an, Yulin and Ankang separately as examples.

Zhang, Danming; Dong, Anrong,Tsinghua University, Beijing, China Estimation of water resource capacity of Chinese cities for facing the challenge of future urbanization This paper estimates the water carrying capacity of Chinese cities and major megalopolises and intends to offer future urbanization suggestions by considering issues in water aspect

Zhou, Yajie; Wang, Tinglin, China Academy of Urban Planning and Design, Beijing, China Research on the migrant personnel flow’s influence on the urban planning: Case study of Beijing and Xinyang city China’s migrant personnel flow will have a significant influence on both the migrant destination city and the home city. This paper takes Beijing with a large number of immigrants and Xinyang with a large outflow of population as the research object, to study the migrant personnel flow’s impact on urban planning.

25 CONGRESS PROGRAM THURSDAY

15:30 – 17:00 1.2 Managing Massive Change

Zhu, Jin, Tongji University, Shanghai, China Issues and solutions on the development of new towns in Shanghai from the view of migration and social structure transition The boom of suburban centers and the recession of new towns are closely related to migration. This paper discusses the issues and solutions on development of new towns in Shanghai by analyzing the migration and social structure transition process. The causes of the problems are clearly illustrated.

Qin, Meng Di; Liu, Guan Peng, Tongji University, Shanghai, China Strategies on improving the attraction of small towns in China, solving problems caused by migration This paper explores advantages and disadvantages of small towns and cities in China, with the goal to enhance the attractiveness of small towns. It suggests that small towns should be concerned with being attractive, so that they can contribute to relieving various pressures on big cities caused by migration.

Track 2: Valuing What Already Exists Co-Chairs: Silja Tillner, Austria; Belinda Yuen, Singapore

13:30 – 15:00 2.1.B Zooming in on Water and the City

Alwehab, Abdelwehab, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq Utilization analysis of Baghdad City urban waterfront Urban waterfronts are vital components of the urban landscape for cities with such areas. A survey of land uses along the waterfront of the city of Baghdad clearly indicates underutilization, which constitutes a social and economic loss to citizens.

Zhao, Ye; Wang, Jianguo, Southeast University, Nanjing, China The evaluation and improvement method of waterfront urban landscape - the case of urban landscape planning for West Lake in Hangzhou, China (peer-reviewed) This paper takes West Lake as example, tries to find out both ways of adjustment from the respects of viewer and landscape, and proposes some thoughts on the design method.

Yuan, Lin, Tsinghua University, Beijing; Yuan, Lin, North China University of Technology, Beijing Problems and countermeasures of Dujiangyan agricultural area protection during the rapid urbanization in Chengdu To protect the Dujiangyan agricultural area during rapid urbanization in Chengdu, the paper suggests reiterating the ‘traditional Dujiangyan watershed area’ in the Qing Dynasty, strictly limiting urban growth within this range, and demarcating ‘Dujiangyan Essential Agricultural Heritage Areas’ to protect the farm land, human settlements, watershed and traditional culture comprehensively.

Chang, Hsueh-Sheng; Chen, Tzu-Ling, National Cheng-Kung University, Tainan City, Taiwan Based on mitigation and adaptation viewpoint in water sensitive city - A case study in serious land subsidence area in Yunlin, Taiwan (peer-reviewed) A coupling model of urban water balance on land use change can analyze the relationship between land use development, anthropogenic activities and water cycling, and further simulate different scenarios to propose appropriate land use patterns while achieving water safety, water satisfaction, and water environment communities.

15:30 – 17:00 2.2 Dealing with Urbanization: 2.2.A Getting a Handle on Macro Scale Issues

Vaillant, Philippe, Université de Lorraine, Charleville-Mézières, France Mining, environment and society: Contribution of the thought of Whitehead to the methodology of assessing the water that can really be mobilized in the Kimberley and Canning Basin, Australia The Kimberley, one of the last pristine areas in the world, is subject to strong mining and gas pressure. The study, conducted with the Nyikina people and the International Water Centre in Brisbane, raises in a dialogic and organic way the issue of water resources that can be mobilized.

Fattahi, Sara, Apadana Institute of Art and Architecture, Shiraz, Iran; Bazrkar, Mojtaba, Freelance Translator, Shiraz, Iran From Garden City to City in a Garden (Case study: Shiraz city as a ‘Permaculture’ model in Iran) In new urbanization, some gardens and open spaces have been destroyed in Shiraz, Iran, during the development of the city. Converting Shiraz city to a model of “Permaculture” and increasing green spaces in Shiraz by roof gardening is discussed in this paper.

Goledzinowska, Anna, Gdansk University of Technology, Gdansk, Poland Development policy or palliative therapy? Investing in the quality of public spaces in the distance from large urban centers (peer- reviewed) The paper refers to two main issues: 1) the phenomenon of an extensive network of medium-sized towns in Poland 2) effectiveness of investments in the quality of public spaces as a tool stimulating social and economic development.

Magni, Peter, University of Cape Town, Johannesburg, South Africa Strategic spatial planning’s role in guiding infrastructure delivery in a metropolitan municipality context: The case of Johannesburg (peer-reviewed) Strategic spatial plans have been used with limited success to guide infrastructure provision. The paper reviews the example of the City of Johannesburg where processes and mechanisms have been implemented to this effect highlighting tensions future visions and the reality of existing infrastructure networks. 26 CONGRESS PROGRAM THURSDAY

Track 3: Community and Stakeholder Engagement Co-Chairs: Warren Batts, Australia; Pietro Elisei, Italy/Romania

13:30 – 15:00 3.3 Politics and Policies Generated by Community Planning Experiences

Prakash, Poonam, School of Planning and Architecture, Delhi, India Legitimizing politics of influence through participatory planning practices in Delhi The paper intends to explore how participatory processes are being used as a mechanism to co-opt technical expertise as well as legitimize real estate interests.

Liu, Tao; Liu, Zhian, Urban Planning Institute of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China Mobilizing social capital in low developed rural China: a case study in a village Social capital is an important concept of endogenous regional development. Currently, the difficulty of improving local governance in China has aroused a great deal of attention from academics. The contribution presents the difficulty to mobilize the social capital and the difficulty of the participation in low developed rural China.

Layson, Paulo; Nankai, Xia, Tongji University, Shanghai, China Integrating community participation in urban redevelopment projects: Comparative study of Dar es salaam, Tanzania and Tianzifang Shanghai, China Community participation in urban redevelopment projects is one of the key success factors to ensure sustainability of redevelopment projects. Here is a study on community initiated urban redevelopment projects in Tanzania and China as a Case study.

Li, Fengqing; Huang, Huang, Tongji University, Shanghai, China The ‘three-old’ policy of community renewal in China: Based on cases in the Pearl River Delta Region (peer-reviewed) This paper studies the community renewal under the “Three-old” policy since 2009 in the Pearl River Delta, which is widely considered as the origin of community engagement in China.

15:30 – 17:00 3.4/3.5 Community Design Tools for Urban Development and Requalification

Mchunu, Koyi, Town and Regional Planning, Durban, South Africa ‘Insurgent’ Spaces in Durban: An investigation on the proliferation of religious sites for the Nazareth Baptist Church Planning in the context of diversity, temporaneous nature of uses poses numerous challenges.

Owei, Opuenebo; Ede, Precious; Brown, Ibama, Rivers State University of Science And Technology, Port Harcourt, Nigeria Developing the new Port Harcourt City and community and stakeholder engagement: Lessons of experience The study focuses on the methods of stakeholder and community engagement employed by the Greater Port Harcourt City Development Authority in trying to implement its vision of creating a world class city with modern infrastructure such that will attract investment, tourists and improve the well-being of the people.

Featherstone, Jeffrey; Meenar, Mahbubur; Mandarano, Lynn; Olszack, Brian, Center for Sustainable Communities, Temple University, Ambler, U.S.A Effective community engagement tools in watershed plans: Examples from the USA (peer-reviewed) This paper will discuss the typology of various “community design” tools used in USA-based watershed plans.

Williams, Holly, University of Oregon, Eugene, U.S.A Old town revitalization through innovative streetscape design The revitalization of Portland, Oregon depends upon the addition of active streetscapes, which will shape the neighborhood into a center for prosperous community life.

Track 4: International Planning Exchange Co-Chairs: Siniša Trkulja, Serbia; Stanley Yip, Hong Kong

13:30 – 15:00 4.2 Sustainability as a Driver for Innovations and new Planning Tools

Arthur, Martha Jillyan, the University of the West Indies, Arima, Trinidad and Tobago The green economy: a strategic approach to sustainable urban development in Caribbean Small Island Developing States (SIDS) Adopting a green economy approach in the Caribbean could provide a framework whereby decisions and strategies regarding cities and urban centres can promote resource efficiency, effective environmental management and a better standard of living for urban residents.

Espada, Rodolfo Jr.; Apan, Armando; McDougall, Kevin, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia Using spatial modelling to develop flood risk and climate adaptation capacity metrics for vulnerability assessments of urban community and critical water supply infrastructure (peer-reviewed) This study developed a new spatially-explicit analytical approach, identified as flood risk-adaptation capacity index/metrics-adaptation strategies (FRACIAS) linkage model, for urban flood risk assessment and generation of climate adaptation capacity metrics for assessing critical water supply network vulnerability.

Shang, Chuan, Southeast University, Nanjing, China; Ko-Yang, Lin; Hou, Guoying, Welsh School of Architecture, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK Simulate the impact of urban morphology on energy demand - A Case study of Yuehai, China This study attempts to simulate the impacts of urban morphology to the energy demand of buildings, using an urban design scheme in Yinchuan, China, as a case. The process of simulation is applied to the one proposed project with three different scenarios, each of which is verified by four variables. 27 CONGRESS PROGRAM THURSDAY

Musakwa, Walter, University of Johannesburg, South Africa; van Niekerk, Adriaan; Center for Geographical Analysis, Stellenbosch University, South Africa; Mbinza, Zenzile, Department of Town and Regional Planning, University of Johannesburg, South Africa Developing an urban sustainability toolbox using earth observation data and GIS for monitoring rapid urbanisation in developing countries Cities in most developing countries often lack data to manage rapid urbanisataion. The US earth Observation (EO) data and GIS are a proposed solution which can assist local authorities in managing rapid urbanization.

15:30 – 17:00 4.2 Sustainability as a Driver for Innovations and new Planning Tools

Gezik, Peter, Slovak University of Technology, Bratislava, Slovakia The role of social innovations in a revised urban metabolism concept framed by sustainable development paradigms This paper presents the outputs of the research focused on a revision of urban metabolism conceptual framework, and a suggestion for a new approach considering social innovations as a key component shaping and redirecting metabolic processes and determining a city’s sustainability.

Weith, Thomas; Repp, Annegret, Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research, Müncheberg, Germany The concept of sustainable land management: a comparative discussion (at a global scale) The abstract seeks to initiate a discussion about the concept of Sustainable Land Management in an internationally comparative perspective. To enable mutual learning, it will focus on comparing governance approaches with regard to main drivers for land use demands and to different multi-level governance frameworks.

Hua, Xiang; Hong, Liangping; Huazhong, University of Science and Technology, Huazhong, China Greenway as a new path for the exploration of urban-rural coordinate based on a low-carbon model (peer-reviewed) Based on the case study of Dongguan city in Guangdong province of China, this paper analyzes and concludes the specific role and contributions of Greenway Planning and Construction to coordinate the development of urban and rural differentiation with a new path of low-carbon model, and discusses its limitations further.

Borja, Bij, JTC Corporation, Singapore, Singapore 2West Masterplan: A new paradigm in urban planning The 2west Masterplan, an integrated mixed-use development, was conceptualized in response to the issue of land scarcity in the small island state of Singapore. One key feature of this development is the Integrated e-deck (Environmental Deck), an innovative system of multiple functions that redefines the concept of urban infrastructure.

Track 5: Forum on Planning Education: Are we doing it right? Co-Chairs: Griet Geerinck, Belgium; Saskia Spijkerman, The Netherlands

13:30-15:00 Interactive Session 5.3: Is there a “Global” Planning Education System? (Introduction by Vanessa Watson)

This is an interactive session on a comparative discussion of academic education on multiple continents. The goal is to compare and contrast the planning education in the different continents. For instance: US (process-oriented), China (engineering, infrastructure), Australia (the sustainability capital of the world), Europe (architecture/design), and Africa (inclusion). How do these “meta-narratives” translate down to planning school curricula? Questions to discuss are: • Are there similarities or differences in planning philosophies and planning pedagogies across the globe? • What are the advantages/disadvantages of such philosophies/pedagogical perspectives? • Is there an overarching philosophy of planning in the continents? • Is there a substantive focus / methodological focus of planning education programs in the different continents? • Is there a possibility of a universal model of planning?

The participants will be congress participants from Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, Latin America and North America. These six individuals will each provide an introductory comment of about 5 minutes each, on the questions above, and then the moderator can open it up to a more general discussion.

15:30-17:00 Interactive Session 5.4: “Learning by Doing” and “Lifelong Learning”

This is an interactive session on the ‘Bridging Theory and Practice’ initiative by Piotr Lorens. The session will start with a review of the workshop on Planning and education in Portugal by Sofia Morgado. We explore the conditions to change a planning education curriculum and how to embed theoretical and practical training. The focus of this interactive session is to get input for the ‘Bridging Theory and Practice’ initiative, both for students and professionals.

19:30 Gala Dinner and Awards ceremony. Buses to venue and back

28 CONGRESS PROGRAM FRIDAY

Friday 4 October 2013 Morning

Track 1: Migration as the New Face of Change Co-Chairs: Amos Brandeis, Israel; Njeri Cerere, Kenya

09:00 – 10:30 1.3 Land Use and Resource Management Strategies

Heyning, Helena Chaya, MB&A BV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands Design for shrinkage – Generating new opportunities and wealth Shrinkage accompanied by economic, social and spatial decline also offers new possibilities. Identifying ones opportunities is incredibly important as is sustained and multi-annual community and stakeholder engagement.

Mitra, Sheuli; Mitra, Tapas, School of Planning and Architecture, Bhopal, India; Chatterjee, M., Bardhan, S., Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India Conflicts in land and housing markets in Kolkata: Emergence of a divided city This research investigates reasons of conflicts between social sustenance and economic viability of urban housing projects in Kolkata, India. It traces the transition of housing from social sector to private sector, and its impact on urban land markets, which has consequently resulted in the emergence of a divided city.

Shao, Dan; Mu, Ye, China Academy of Urban Planning and Design, Beijing, China Planning practices coping with migration in a backward area in Western China: A case study of Liupanshui City, Guizhou Province The rise of cities in western China is usually based on mineral resources under government intervention. The population migration shifts from net inflow to a concurring situation of aggregation of city and net outflow of region. Planning practices face challenges from expanding the scale of the city to blending into the region.

11:00 – 12:30 1.3 Land Use and Resource Management Strategies

Perry, Guy, IN-VI, Warsaw, Poland Planning for health and sustainability (or low fat cities) The way in which our cities expand impact, not only on environmental sustainability, but on human health. Increasingly, current physical living patterns in transition economies make it challenging for humans to lead healthy and balanced lifestyles. Brazilian and Polish developments strive to keep their cities and their inhabitants lean.

Lv, Yuan; Liu, Kewei; Liu, Lin; Zhao, Dan; Zhang, Fujuan, Northwest University, Xi’an, China Problems and strategies of urbanization development in Western China from the perspective of urban-based society - A case study of Shaanxi Province (peer-reviewed) Serious problems in the urbanization process of western China are raised from the perspective of the urban-based society, taking Shaanxi, a well-developing and typical province in natural geographical features in western China as a case. Strategies to solve these problems are put forward.

Gonçalves Garcia, Marina; Vasconcellos Garcia, Antônio Jorge, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos, Porto Alegre, Brazil Sustainable urbanism in coastal environment: an applied project to expanding urbanized zone of Aracaju City, Sergipe, Brazil (peer- reviewed) This paper presents partial results of geo-science multidisciplinary studies applied to coastal environments and its usefulness in terms of a proposal for sustainable urban development in the expansion of the city of Aracaju, capital of the State of Sergipe, in the northeast of Brazil.

Track 2: Valuing What Already Exists Co-Chairs: Silja Tillner, Austria; Belinda Yuen, Singapore

09:00 – 10:30 2.2.B.1 Harnessing the City’s Heritage

Ayangbile, Oluwabukola; Abiodun, Oluwafisayo, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria Cultural heritage planning and preservation in Yoruba cities: Case study of Ile Ife, Nigeria This paper examines how heritage places and spaces are protected and managed to enhance historical artifacts in Ile Ife, the ‘Cradle of Humankind’. It suggests traditional historical planning tools as a re-vitalization planning strategy to preserve, manage and protect the sacred groves, monuments, traditional and religious landmarks that already exists.

Gu, Zongpei, China Academy of Urban Planning and Design, Beijing, China – presented by Wei, Gang The understanding of Beijing cultural spaces Protecting and re-using cultural spaces is one of the most important issues during Beijing’s development. A comprehensive understanding of the present situation of cultural spaces in Beijing is examined by mapping the spatial distribution of Beijing’s cultural resources. More importantly, downfalls behind the current situation in Beijing are analyzed.

Wei, Gang; Jiang, Zhaohui, China Academy of Urban Planning and Design, Beijing, China Analysis of the spatial characteristics of commercial streets in China’s Southern cities: A case of three commercial streets in SuZhou Characteristic commercial streets are an important way to physically display the characteristics of cities. Based on a factual investigation on three characteristic commercial streets in SuZhou, this paper analyzes the space attributes and positive effects of the characteristic commercial streets, and aims to provide recommendations on building characteristic urban spaces.

29 CONGRESS PROGRAM FRIDAY

Mitra, Tapas; Mitra, Sheuli, School of Planning and Architecture, Bhopal, India Delineation, transformation assessment and intervention initiatives for ‘Grey zones’ of Kolkata, India (peer-reviewed) This paper focuses on the aspects of dynamics of change in older residential areas of Kolkata, India, which do not necessarily qualify as ‘heritage districts’ and presents a rapid appraisal tool to initiate processes of developing design intervention strategies.

Cillers, Elizelle Juanee; de Jong, Nicolene, North West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa – presented by Bernice van Schalkwijk Planning for lively spaces: adding value to old spaces (peer-reviewed) Lively planning concept implemented in two case studies in an attempt to enhance the value and function of the old spaces.

11:00 – 12:30 2.2.B.1 Harnessing the City’s Heritage

Greenop, Kelly; Darchen, Sebastien, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia Brisbane’s urbanism: looking for an identity. Case study of Inala (peer-reviewed) The objective of this paper is to create avenues of reflection on how to enhance the identity of urban spaces in Brisbane. We base our analysis on the Inala case study.

Grant, Paula, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia Old neighbourhoods showcasing new urbanist principles to promote walking for transport (peer-reviewed) The built environment shapes our transport choices and has a significant impact on the environmental, economic and social wellness of communities. This paper shows that older urban neighbourhoods have displayed the compactness, connectivity, density, lot layout and land- use mix to be walkable long before the term new urbanism was coined.

11:00 – 12:30 (Room #3) 2.2.B.2 Riding the Dynamics of Urban Regeneration

Liu, Yang, Tongji University, Shanghai, China The dynamics of historic districts and the effectiveness of the historic conservation plan - Case study of Shanghai (peer-reviewed) This research is about the effectiveness of the Historic District Conservation Plan in Shanghai. By focusing on the changes that happen before and after the implementation of those conservation plans, this paper reveals the advantage and disadvantage of those plans and the causes of the problems.

Ledwon, Slawomir, Gdansk University of Technology, Gdansk, Poland Valuing service and retail structures in core areas of cities The paper describes the methodology to evaluate service and retail structures in cities in relation to their spatial form and possible future changes.

Moreira, Inês, CIAUD – FAUTL, Lisbon, Portugal Expansion and abandonment: The urban duality in planning metropolitan Lisbon (peer-reviewed) The paper approaches the expansion and abandonment of urban areas related to the presence of economic activities in metropolitan Lisbon, generated by the growth of the tertiary/quaternary sector and by the process of deindustrialization, by discussing their determinant factors, the policies and plans that have shaped them.

Langley, Joseph, SKM, St. Leonards, Australia New funding options for urban regeneration The traditional means of funding urban regeneration are proving to be inadequate as cities struggle to rebuild obsolete infrastructure while responding to changing demographic, housing and employment trends. New funding options are needed which share the value created by the public’s investment in urban infrastructure.

11:00 – 12:30 2.2.B.2 Riding the Dynamics of Urban Regeneration

Murphy, Melissa, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Oslo, Norway Reading conflicts and congruencies in the built environment (peer-reviewed) The results of urban planning and management are difficult to assess due to complexity and external factors after projects are built. The built environment can be read as a mitigation between past plans and current life. Tracing resident behavior through physicality can illuminate local conflicts and intention vs. implementation data.

Yang, Zhi; Hu, Haibo; Wang, Haiyong, Jiangsu Institute of Urban Planning and Design, Nanjing, China Coordinating strategy of preserving the local identity during the rapid urbanization in China: Case study of three towns in the South of Kunshan (peer-reviewed) This paper is aimed at exploring how to preserve the local identity as well as achieve the economic development during rapid urbanization. By the method of comparative analysis and evaluation, the coordinating strategy in historical conservation redevelopment, integrating space and policymaking has been proved to be effective.

Gunay, Zeynep, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey Renewal agenda in Istanbul: Urbanisation vs. urbicide The paper intends to discuss how the large-scale property-led renewal schemes, which have been employed as an evolving model in resolving the “urbanisation” problem, are turned into the instruments of “urbicide” in Istanbul as a political evolving model of urban destruction.

30 CONGRESS PROGRAM FRIDAY

Track 3: Community and Stakeholder Engagement Co-Chairs: Warren Batts, Australia; Pietro Elisei, Italy/Romania

09:00 – 10:30 3.4/3.5 Community Design Tools for Urban Development and Requalification

Monardo, Bruno; Ferretti, Alessia; Boca, Alessandro; Falco, Enzo; Polizzi di Sorrentino, Enrica, Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy Innovative PPP tools supporting urban regeneration: the role of non-profit organizations in USA Reflections are focused on innovation in PPP tools within urban regeneration policies in US through the flexible geometry of non-profit organizations and the changing role of municipal governments. How partnership models can work within the rising lack of public resources? To which extent and effectiveness?

De Souza Tenorio, Gabriela, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil The danger of community engagement as an exclusion tool - four case studies in four different scales in Brasilia, Brazil The necessary community engagement must be put into perspective. Most individuals have difficult to think in a systemic, global way, while contributing to their cities’ planning processes. In all intervention scales, it is very hard to have inclusive contributions without previous education on the global implications of their local desires.

Torres, Yuri; Lucia Maria Sá Antunes, Costa, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Geo-social networks and the understanding of the dynamics of the city: the case of Rio de Janeiro’s boundaries of formal and informal neighborhoods Geo-social networking reflects how cities are dynamic, while empowering the concept of social and collaborative involuntary creation drawn in the digital space. The overlapping of formal and informal boundaries within Rio de Janeiro can be mapped by that, raising discussions on how this data can become fruitful for planning practices.

Track 4: International Planning Exchange Co-Chairs: Siniša Trkulja, Serbia; Stanley Yip, Hong Kong

09:00 – 10:30 4.3 The Issue of Governance in Urban Planning

Beyazit, Eda, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey The trilogy of power, politics and planning (peer-reviewed) This paper understands socio-spatial inequalities in cities with reference to the trilogy of power, politics and planning.

Buitrago-Franco, Isabel; Chatterji, Tathagata, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Australia Planning for mining regions: building local government’s capacity in a multi-stakeholder collaboration scenario (peer-reviewed) The research draws attention to specific institutional deficiencies, in political and technological terms, which come in the way of the local agencies playing stronger role in a multi-stakeholder scenario in planning for mining regions, through case studies in Colombia.

Okitasari, Mahesti; Kidokoro, Tetsuo, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Planning beyond the boundaries: Perspectives on the challenging intergovernmental collaboration towards a sustainable regional governance in Indonesia This paper discusses the collaborative activity to regional scale based on Indonesian experiences. The study is to conceptualize, measure and compare cases of intergovernmental collaboration using a dimensional approach and comprehensive analysis of institutional structure transformation, fiscal power diffusion and policy review. A proposal to achieve sustainable governance is discussed.

Chakravarty, Surajit; Mansoori, Meera; Shehadeh, Meera, Alhosn University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates What’s Arabic for ‘Charette’? Public participation in the Baniyas neighborhood of Abu Dhabi The paper reports findings from the Baniyas Park public participation project in Abu Dhabi, UAE, conducted by the authors between August 2012 and May 2013. Recommendations based on the community input received are presented along with insights regarding substantive and procedural aspects of participation in contexts such as Abu Dhabi.

11:00 – 12:30 4.3 The Issue of Governance in Urban Planning

Olajide, Oluwafemi, Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom Poverty alleviation in Lagos urban informal settlements: A sustainable livelihood approach (peer-reviewed) Through the lens of sustainable livelihood framework, this paper examines the issues of poverty in Lagos’ informal settlements. It explores the interplay among location, tenure, settlements, policies and livelihoods, and how they interplay with livelihood vulnerability and access to assets, and the implications for poverty alleviation strategies.

Lategan, Louis; Cilliers, Juaneè, North West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa An exploration of the informal backyard rental sector in South Africa’s Western Cape Province (peer-reviewed) This paper examines the backyard sector in South Africa’s Western Cape Province and examines why the sector remains largely unregulated and unaddressed whilst being recognised as a major component of SA’s stock.

11:00 – 12:30 4.4 Spatial Strategies, Innovations, Technologies

Lin, Dong; Allan, Andrew; Cui, Jianqiang, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia Does polycentric urban spatial development lead to less commuting This paper revisits the study of how employment’s decentralization in metropolitan areas based on polycentric spatial structure development affects workers’ commuting patterns and job accessibility. 31 CONGRESS PROGRAM FRIDAY

Nguyen, Dzung, CPG Consultants, Singapore Size, shape and dispersion: Urban form evolution in Saigon River Basin and its impact on hydrologic performance from 1990 to 2000 This paper provides an empirical study of urban form evolution in term of size, shape, and dispersion within 2540 square kilometers of Saigon River Basin and its hydrologic consequences during a 20-year period of rapid urbanization.

Vloebergh, Guy, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium New spatial strategies for the densely built-up Flanders region (Belgium) Working with ‘strategic projects’ has developed into a new spatial strategy in densely built-up and spread out settlement structure Flanders. In this paper (1) the success factors of this approach are defined and (2) two strategic projects are explained more comprehensively.

11:00 – 12:30 (Room 5) 4.4 Spatial Strategies, Innovations, Technologies

Zhou, Jingnan; White, Tamara, China Academy of Urban Planning and Design, Beijing, China – presented by Zhou, Yajie Proposed low-middle income housing innovations for Chunguancun redevelopment sites, Beijing, China This paper explores potential low-middle income housing solutions, proposed for trial application in the dynamic and rapidly developing Haidian District, Beijing. Proposed solutions include forms of development regulation and public-private partnership that are new to the Chinese planning context, as well as leveraging existing programs and funds.

Cheng, Shang; Nankai, Xia, Tongji University, Shanghai, China Village community: A planning practice of local-urbanization in countryside areas in Southwestern China “Village community” aims to realize local urbanization, by constructing the new-style village in the countryside, which still locals in the countryside areas, but has fulfilled the same functions of the urban communities. As a result, villagers who live in the village communities are able to lead an urbanized life.

Han, Jing; Kong, Lingyu, Tongji University, Shanghai, China Interrelation between micro-blog hotspots and urban spatial network: An empirical analysis of Tongji-Rim intellectual-economic-zone, Shanghai, based on Sina Weibo (peer-reviewed) This paper discusses the interrelationship between social network and urban spatial network. It takes creative people as target group and SINA micro-blog as platform. The basic concepts include projecting social network onto spatial network, testing spatial traits for explanatory power of social networks, and ranking levels of similarity.

Vancutsem, Didier, Free University of Brussels, Belgium/Germany Challenges of spatial planning in the context of ICT: lessons from actual research projects – new frontiers for spatial planners and cities The emergence of ICT (Information and Communication Technologies) since the 90’s has profoundly modified our urban environment and the way spatial planning was proceded in the past. This case study aims to demonstrate the state-of-the-art of the relationship “ICT - Spatial Planning”, connected to future frontiers of spatial planning.

Friday 4 October 2013 Afternoon

13.30 Closing Plenary Chair: John Minnery

Piotr Lorens Gdansk University of Technology, Poland, VP Young Planning Professionals Presentation of YPP project in Ulyanovsk, Russia

General Rapporteur Jeff Featherstone and Congress Team Conclusions and congress statement

Milica Bajic-Brkovic ISOCARP President Reflections on the congress

Marek Karzynski Head of City Planning Office, Gdynia, Poland Announcement of 50th ISOCARP Congress, Gydnia, September 2014

John Minnery Chair Brisbane Local Organizing Committee Closing Statement

15.00-15.30 Coffee and Tea

15.30-18.00 ISOCARP Annual General Meeting for ISOCARP members

32 PARTNERS’ TOURS + POST-CONGRESS TOURS

On 2 and 3 October two tours will be organized for Accompanying Partners.

2 October: River Cruise

Partners can join a River Cruise to the Lone Pine Koala Sanctuary. The cruise boat departs from the heart of the city at 10 a.m. taking you up river along Brisbane’s riverfront, where you can enjoy views of breathtaking modern mansions and historic Queenslander homes. Along the way, you will also come face to face with a unique inner-city colony of fruit bats hidden among the mangroves. You will spend 2,5 hours at the Lone Pine Koala Sanctuary where you can hand feed kangaroos and emus, experience an authentic Australian sheep dog and sheep shearing show, spy on a shy platypus swimming, see the amazing birds of prey… and have photos taken cuddling a koala! By 3 p.m., the cruise boat will arrive back in the City, where you can enjoy the rest of the afternoon. Price: 68 AUD or 52 EURO.

3 October: City Sights

Partners can choose to explore the city by taking the Brisbane City Sights Tour. This two hour tour will take you to all the historical and cultural sights of Image courtesy of Brisbane Marketing Brisbane, with commentary from the local tour driver. The City Sights hop on hop off tour lets you set your own pace as you can leave and rejoin the tour at any one of the strategically placed stops around Brisbane. Stop a while and visit one of the many parks or the Botanical Gardens, enjoy the views of the City from one of the lookout points, or simply relax in one of the many cafes or restaurants. The tour operates from 9 am to 5 pm. Price: 35 AUD or 30 EURO.

We would like to mention the possibility to extend the City Sights Tour with a City Cat Ferry Ride along the River. For about 6 AUD you can spend nearly two hours travelling up and down the river enjoying views of the city. The ferry can be accessed at several terminals on the City Sights Tour route OR on completion of the whole tour. Tickets are payable directly on board.

Two Post-Congress tours are being offered to give delegates insight into Australian planning.

A. Gold Coast - 5 October 2013

All-day bus tour to the Gold Coast south of Brisbane looking at recent planning initiatives (a new monorail, planning for the Commonwealth Games, tourist developments, etc.). More information can be found on the Congress website.

B. Sydney and Canberra - 6-10 October 2013

Delegates will be presented with a rare tour offering at the conclusion of the Congress – combining a chance to experience the unique ambiance and vitality of Australia’s largest city with a visit to the nation’s handsome capital at its spring- time best. Over four days and four nights, the visits will be led by colleagues whose planning credentials will guarantee maximum professional benefits, whilst the itineraries will offer exposure to some great country scenery, fine architecture and much more.

Highlights for Sydney – October 6-7: The world’s finest harbour and its famous bridge; the Sydney Opera House; technical briefings with city planning officials; colonial heritage architecture dating back to first settlement days; lunch with the Lord Mayor’s planning team; and a world-class array of restaurants and bars to stimulate on the gastric juices.

Highlights for Canberra - October 8-9: In 1900, a new nation was born – and an international design competition produced a great plan for the nation’s new capital ; set amongst rolling hills in the Australian countryside, Canberra is like no other world capital, with its splendid public buildings, its new (and old) Parliament Houses – its gem of a lake – snow-capped mountains on the southern horizon; all this, PLUS an Embassy reception; briefings by the Territory planners; and an opportunity to experience at first hand the design genius of Walter Burley Griffin and his wife Marion Mahony Griffin. 33 PAPERS NOT PRESENTED

Papers accepted for the Congress and included in the Proceedings but not being presented

The authors of the following papers were unable to deliver their paper.

Billig, Miriam, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel Effects of drastic changes in living environment: a displaced community (peer-reviewed) The objectives of this study were to understand the implications of forced transfer of a community to a different ecological environment, and assess the effects of such an environmental change on the community’s sociological structure and on restructuring people’s cultural identity.

Brkovic, Matija; Sretovic Brkovic, Visnja, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia Harnessing social media for urban planning - an overview The widespread adoption of the Internet dramatically altered whole segments of our society. Considering the increasing demand for participation in planning practice and new communication possibilities offered by the Web 2.0 and social media, this paper asks how these two add up. How can planners make use of social web?

Carrington, Niron; Griffith-Charles, Charisse, University of the West Indies, Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago Community engagement in Trinidad and Tobago: Theory or practice? Case study of neighbourhood upgrading programme, Waterhole, Cocorite (peer-reviewed) Community Engagement in Trinidad and Tobago is affected by many factors. Factors such as attitudes of the state, violence and power distances etc. affect the process of community engagement.

Chen, Xu, Tianjin Urban Planning and Design Institute, Tianjin, China Whether a supply side housing assistance program is efficient in helping overcome spatial mismatch (peer-reviewed) A comparison of the low income housing tax credit program with overall rental housing.

Contin, Antonella; Della Rosa, Massimo, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy; Ortiz Castaño, P.B., WB Consultant, Milan, Italy New model of planning practice required addressing the increase in migrations. How to integrate informal mechanisms into the urban management of the African culture. (The uncontrolled independence of Peter Pan’s shadow) (peer-reviewed) The abstract will present a point of view on the complementarity between formality and informality, showing the importance of informality as a source of resilience and adaptability. Dar es Salaam and Cairo Ard al-Liwa New Centrality, Ado Ekiti case studies.

Cvetinovic, Marija; Bolay, Jean-Claude, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland; Kucina, Ivan, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia An engine for bottom-up urban development in action: A case study of Savamala civic district This paper aims to investigate a model of bottom-up urban transformation implemented through the social participation of proactive people who are ready to commit to converting their deprived environment into a series of economically self-sustainable common places, fighting against big businesses and the possible threat of gentrification.

Derbile, Emmanuel, University for Development Studies, Wa, Ghana Social integration outcomes of temporary university student immigrants under urbanization in the Wa Municipality, Ghana This paper underscores that both positive and negative social outcomes are associated with the social integration of temporary university student immigrants in the Wa Municipality of north western Ghana and this requires a holistic approach to planning for dealing with the emerging issues.

Dutta, Bikram Kumar; Bandyopadhyay, Sanhita, School of Planning and Architecture, New Delhi, India Development versus displacement: cornerstone of India’s economy; appraisal on road development in India India is a developing country and it requires fast space quality infrastructure development. Road network is vital to the economic development, trade and social integration. For this development land is required and the land belongs to the people. The result of this is displacement which is the cornerstone of India’s boom economy.

Gomez Piovano, Jimena; Mesa, Alejandro, Conicet CCT Mendoza, Mendoza, Argentina Planning tool for the transformation to low density cities in more sustainable urban models The main objective in this paper is to design a simple tool for simulation of urban growth. This instrument can display the urbanization levels of sustainability. Besides this, we simulate and evaluate different models of urban growth for the Metropolitan area of Mendoza, Argentina.

Gong, Yuan; Xiao, Yu; Lu, Li, Tianjin Urban Planning & Design Institute, Tianjin, China Study on Tianjin public housing residential district planning to meet the needs of migration in rapid urbanization This paper has chosen Tianjin, the third pole of China development as the example for analysis. Tianjin public housing residential district planning explored a mode of “large-scale mix and small-scale pure” for the whole homeland development. It confirms that regional coordination, ecological concepts, index system, space characteristics and appropriate technology are important in planning.

Khairnar, Amruta; Vidya Pratishthan, Dhule, India Planning for balanced industrial development in Maharashtra state, India: Cluster development approach (peer-reviewed) There is a wide spread regional disparity within the state of Maharashtra in terms of industrial development. Hence the paper not only attempts to study the prospects of industrial development but also gives the potential industrial cluster through ‘location quotient- employment growth matrix’ and mainly focuses on micro-economic (firm level) development.

Krishnamurthy, Sukanya, Neptis Foundation, Toronto, Canada Space and narratives: Interdisciplinary approaches to reading socio-spatial interplays in rapidly urbanizing environments Spaces of local importance or sites of memory form the basis of identity construction for inhabitants of urban regions. Using innovative 34 PAPERS NOT PRESENTED approaches to identify these spaces in rapidly urbanizing environments is beneficial to long term urban renewal plans and are value added spaces to transformative regional plans.

Ram, Kana, National Institute of Urban Affairs, New Delhi, India Affordable housing opportunities in small Indian cities - A case study of industrial migrant What can be done to make housing affordable?

Liu, Weiqi; Chen, Xie, Jiangsu institute of Urban Planning and Design, Nanjing, China The research of farming and livestock development in the area of Ili River Valley of Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region This article analyses local agriculture development methods in the urban system planning of the area of Ili River Valley in spatial, economic and social context. It claims that this planning promotes a sustainable relationship between town and village in a traditional agricultural area via renewal of the local agricultural industry.

Malcata Rebelo, Emília, CITTA – Research Centre for Territory, Transports and Environment, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal System of incentives to urban municipal-interest operations The research reported in this article presents a proposal to develop a system of incentives to urban municipal-interest operations intended to improve the use of already existing buildings and sites that meet municipal strategic urban goals (despite these buildings and sites are valueless for real estate promoters).

Tang, Lei, Jiangsu Institute of Urban Planning and Design, Nanjing, China; Qiu, Jianjun, Xiaoshi Street Agency, Nanjing, China ‘Golden pheasants flying out of the depths of the mountains’ - Strategy planning of urban space development under the background of ecological migration, Danzhai, Guizhou, China Danzhai, a poor county in southwest China has an ethnic minority Miao, whose totem is a “golden pheasant”. ‘Strategy Planning of Urban Space Development’ promoted coordinated development of urban and rural areas, implemented poverty alleviation and ecological migration, proved that ecological migration can have a win-win effect of economy and people’s livelihood.

Torres, Nilton, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil Urban governmentality and public participation: Autonomy or legitimation? The case of public planning in Sao Paulo The research focuses on the experience with participatory planning in Sao Paulo. It seeks to evaluate to what extent public participation on government policies can be an effective mechanism for inclusion or, if it is only the governmentalization of these power relations in hands of the neoliberal state.

Wright, Ian, Herbert Geer, Brisbane, Australia Are we all neoliberals now? Urban planning in a neoliberal era This paper argues that planners can reassert their professional status, rebuild the trust of the public and politicians and lift the planning profession out of its current malaise by the adoption of collaborative planning processes and evidence based strategic management

Xu, Yibo, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy To alleviate spatial and social divisions by modifying grids: Cases from ancient migratory Chinese cities (peer-reviewed) This paper is part of research into the relationship between grid and social orders. It aims to argue that the modification of grids may alleviate social divisions between migrants and locals by increasing accessibility and centrality. Cases are based on ancient migratory cities in China.

Yazgi, Burcin, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey Multi-directional flows of people in one city: the case of Istanbul Sensing the city of Istanbul with respect to the contradictions, similarities and complexness of the flows of people to understand ‘the city’ or what forms ‘the city’ by the help of some spatial representatives.

Yin, Huiliang; Yi, Fangxin, China Academy of Urban Planning and Design, Beijing, China Peri-Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei cross-boundary mega-region planning towards sustainability in urbanizing China The article analyses Peri-Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (PBTH) cross-boundary mega-region planning to probe into the significances and difficulties of cross-boundary planning and institution in public governance towards sustainability in urbanizing China.

Yu, Cheng; Chen, Jinfu; Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; Yang, Xi, Cardiff University, UK From rate growth to quality improvement: promoting a policy system for new-urbanization in China This paper will discuss, in the context of China’s strategy of resource-conserving and environment-friendly society, which style of urbanization should be appropriate in China; which policy problems are restricting the quality of urbanization; and how to promote the new- urbanization through a reform of the relevant policy system.

Zhang, Li, China Academy of Urban Planning and Design, Beijing, China Increasing cities and shrinking regions: Migration in China’s urbanization - Cases from Sichuan and Henan provinces After decades of massive migration in China’s rapid urbanization, a phenomenon of increasing cities and shrinking regions came into being in the economically lesser developed provinces. Based on two plan projects in Sichuan and Henan Province, this paper will study the new spatial phenomenon and forward some suggestions.

image courtesy of Brisbane Marketing 35 36 ISOCARP PROGRAMS

About ISOCARP

The International Society of City and Regional Planners (ISOCARP) is a global association of experienced professional planners. It was founded in 1965 in a bid to bring together recognised and highly-qualified planners in an international network.

ISOCARP Awards Program

The ISOCARP Awards for Excellence are conferred in recognition of exceptionally innovative urban and regional initiatives. With the help of the Awards ISOCARP intends to stimulate and promote innovative spatial projects (urban and/or regional), successfully elaborated and/or implemented by local, regional , national authorities or other institutions – thus improving the natural and built environment, quality of life and cultural development. ISOCARP has awarded projects from different continents from the local to the regional scale.

ISOCARP’s Urban Advisory Teams

ISOCARP organizes two to four Urban Planning Advisory Teams (UPATs) each year. The objective of a UPAT is to offer the extensive planning experience and expertise of ISOCARP members for international planning projects, programs and policies. ISOCARP selects an international expert team visiting a city or a region for a week. Together with the participants in the city this team develops simple, practical and original solutions that can improve the quality of life of people and communities in cities. Do you want to know more? Visit our website at www.isocarp.org or contact Martin Dubbeling, VP UPATs, at dubbeling@ isocarp.org.

YPP – Young Planning Professionals

Ask any young planner who has participated in a YPP project, and they will tell you about discovering an exciting new place, experiencing a different planning context, joining a team drawn from around the world, learning from senior practitioners, and working on real-world problems. ISOCARP’s long-standing YPP program is recognized as offering outstanding opportunities for young planners. It includes a number of activities such as the annual YPP workshop (associated with the congress), YPP national or regional workshops (co-organized by partner organizations, such as local or regional governments or national planning organizations) and YPP awards. WANTED: Enthusiastic young planning professionals of =<35 years interested in contemporary planning issues and looking for hands-on experience on actual planning issues, working with an international team of young and senior planners. Join ISOCARP, and watch out for the next call for expressions of interest. WANTED: Partner organizations who wish to host a YPP workshop, and benefit from the contributions of a skilled, enthusiastic and creative team of young planning professionals, working on issues ranging from urban design of key urban spaces to strategic decisions regarding the future of cities and regions. Contact Piotr Lorens, Vice President YPP at [email protected]

ISOCARP@WUF

ISOCARP has developed a strong partnership with UN-Habitat over the years. We are an active member of the World Urban Campaign and the Habitat Professionals Forum. For more information see www.isocarp. org and www.unhabitat.org/WUF. ISOCARP | REVIEW 09

The International Society of City and Regional President Planners (ISOCARP) is a global association of Milica Bajić-Brković, Serbia experienced professional planners. It was founded (Past President– 2009-2012) in 1965 in a bid to bring together recognised and ISOCARP Ismael Fernández Mejía, Mexico highly-qualified planners in an international network. REVIEW 09 About ISOCARP The ISOCARP network brings together individual and Secretary General institutional members from more than 70 countries Alexander Macgregor, United Kingdom worldwide. As a non-governmental organisation Treasurer ISOCARP is recognized by the UN, UNHCS and the Manfred Schrenk, Austria Council of Europe. The Society also has a formal consultative status with UNESCO. Vice-Presidents Although ISOCARP members work in many different Members – National Delegations: fields they share a common interest in the spatial ISOCARP Executive Committee 2013 Khalid El Adli, Egypt and environmental dimensions of urbanisation. They Awards and Communication: advise key decision-makers, proposing and supporting Dirk Engelke, Germany Frontiers of Planning: Visionary futures for human settlements projects for intervention in a spatial context through general or specific actions. Congresses and Events (2011-May 2013): AVAILABLE NOW AT ISOCARP.0RG The objectives of ISOCARP include the improvement Jeremy Dawkins, Australia of planning practice through the creation of a Urban Planning Advisory Teams: global and active network of practitioners. ISOCARP Martin Dubbeling, the Netherlands encourages the exchange of professional knowledge Young Planning Professionals: between planners, promotes the planning profession Piotr Lorens, Poland in all its forms, stimulates and improves planning research, training and education and enhances public Publications: awareness and understanding of major planning Shi Nan, China issues at a global level. Academic Development – ISOCARP Institute: The association‘s main event is the annual World David Prosperi, United States Congress, which focuses on a globally-significant planning theme and which takes place in a different Technical Assistance – Projects: country each year. Prior to the congress Young Shipra Narang Suri, India Planning Professional Workshops are organized. This YPP programme seeks to bring together emerging Frontiers of Planning: young planning professionals from all over the world to tackle ‘real-world’ planning projects. Smaller-scale events such as seminars and working groups are also organised. International Society of City Visionary futures All ISOCARP activities are covered in publications such and Regional Planners as the ISOCARP Review, the International Manual of Gaby Kurth, Programme Manager Planning Practice (IMPP), Congress proceedings and Monica Ornek, Office Manager special project reports. for human settlements ISOCARP recognises excellence through the Society’s P.O. Box 983 Award programme. 2501 CZ The Hague ISOCARP Urban Planning Advisory teams (UPATs) The Netherlands ISOCARP Headquarters assists sponsor organizations by offering the extensive Tel: + 31-70 346-2654 experience and expertise of ISOCARP members to Fax: + 31-70 361-7909 37 work on important local or international planning [email protected] projects, programs and policy initiatives. www.isocarp.org Editors: Jim Colman and Chris Gossop SPONSORS/SUPPORTERS

Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning

The Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning is driving economic development, reforming the state’s planning and development assessment system and improving community outcomes across Queensland.

We recently launched the State Assessment and Referral Agency, are delivering a new generation of statutory regional plans, and are developing a new Act for planning and development assessment.

The department is working to get the balance right between economic opportunities, the impacts of development on the environment and improving the Queensland way of life.

Brisbane City Council

Brisbane City Council is the largest local government in Australia. Our responsibility is to provide leadership and good governance for the people of Brisbane. We work in partnership with other governments and a variety of peak bodies, industries and community organisations to build a better Brisbane. Our goal is to ensure that Brisbane remains Australia’s most liveable city.

University of Queensland

The School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management (GPEM) at The University of Queensland has a unique integrated and collaborative approach to research and teaching in fields including climate change, urbanisation and sustainable development.

Our flexible programs, led by world-class academics, offer hands-on student fieldwork and access to excellent facilities and resources. Find out more at www.gpem.uq.edu.au

Brisbane Marketing

The Brisbane Marketing Convention Bureau is a part of Brisbane’s economic development board Brisbane Marketing. The Convention Bureau provides an effortless one-stop-shop with free independent advice and support services to help you plan, promote and stage your most successful conference. Partner with us to develop your bid strategy, budget and proposal ? we will assist to obtain support and activate your winning bid. The perfect partnership.

Wendy Chadwick Memorial Trust

The Wendy Chadwick Memorial Trust was established shortly after the untimely death of Wendy Chadwick following her courageous, personal battle with cancer. Wendy’s career with Brisbane City Council over 25 years saw her rise from a graduate to a Senior Executive, leading Council’s Development Assessment functions. In her final year’s, Wendy also represented Council in regional planning for South East Queensland.

The Trust’s charter is specifically to support initiatives and activities for planners at the beginning of their professional careers. Currently the Trust supports the activities of the Queensland Young Planner Group (PIA QLD Division) on an annual basis, as well as providing a bursary prize for the Planning Institute of Australia QLD Young Planner of the Year.

The Trust’s logo, is a tribute to Wendy’s personal trademark and exemplifies her passion and commitment to her profession, planning generally, and Brisbane, the city she loved.

Griffith University

The Griffith Planning Discipline seeks to promote excellence in teaching, research and community service through coordinated processes involving planning and environmental disciplines in an integrated, innovative and scholarly approach to current and emerging urban, environmental and landscape planning, design and management practices.

38 Queensland University of Technology (QUT)

“Queensland University of Technology (QUT) is a leading Australian university with a global outlook. It has a strong professional emphasis in its course profile and a rapidly developing research reputation.

QUT provides quality undergraduate and postgraduate courses to some 44,000 students, and is recognised for the ‘real-world’ relevance of its teaching and research to industry, the professions, and the broader community.”

Buckley Vann Town Planning Consultants

Based in Brisbane, Buckley Vann Town Planning Consultants provides town planning services to clients throughout Queensland.

We’re focused on delivering better outcomes for people and places by applying our diverse experience; focusing on quality; valuing relationships; and demonstrating our values of being open, ethical and affable.

Hassell

Hassell is an international design practice with 14 studios in Australia, China, South East Asia and the United Kingdom. An interdisciplinary practice, combining expertise in architecture, interior design, landscape architecture and planning with integrated sustainability and urban design capabilities.

Royal International Convention Centre

Image courtesy of Brisbane Marketing

39 LIST OF DELEGATES AS OF 24-9-2013

N FAMILY NAME GIVEN NAME AFFILIATION COUNTRY E-MAIL 1 Abiodun 0luwafisayo Deborah University of Ibadan Nigeria [email protected] 2 Aburawi Mohamed University of Tripoli Libya [email protected] 3 Adebayo Ambrose Adeyemi University of KwaZulu Natal South Africa [email protected] 4 Adejimi Olafuyi University of Agriculture Abeokuta Nigeria [email protected] 5 Adeshina Salau Saheed Lagos State Government Nigeria [email protected] 6 Adeyemi Hammed Ade Concept Nigeria Limited Nigeria [email protected] 7 Al Mansoori Yousef Ahmed Abu Dhabi Planning Council United Arab Emirates [email protected] 8 Alwehab Abdelwehab University of Baghdad Iraq [email protected] 9 Ambwere Solomon Ministry of Local Government Kenya [email protected] 10 Arslanli Kerem Yavuz Istanbul Technical University Turkey [email protected] 11 Arthur Martha Jillyan The University of the West Indies Trinidad and Tobago [email protected] 12 Atano Japhet Linx Corporation Nigeria [email protected] 13 Ayangbile Oluwabukola University of Ibadan Nigeria [email protected] 14 Bademosi Fiyinfoluwa Boldform Consults Limited Nigeria [email protected] 15 Bajic-Brkovic Milica University of Belgrade Serbia [email protected] 16 Baldwin Claudia University of the Sunshine Coast Australia [email protected] 17 Basson Margaretha University of Southern Queensland Australia [email protected] 18 Batts Warren Independent Australia [email protected] 19 Batunova Elena Centre of Urban Education Russian Federation [email protected] 20 Bazrkar Mojtaba Fars Hyper star mall Iran [email protected] 21 Beyazit Eda Istanbul Technical University Turkey [email protected] 22 Bij Borja JTC Corporation Singapore [email protected] 23 Brandeis Amos Architecture, Town & Regional Planning Ltd. Israel [email protected] 24 Budale Abraham Kolawole Urband Land Institute Nigeria [email protected] 25 Burton Paul Griffith University Australia [email protected] 26 Byrnes Terence Byrnes & Associates Pty Ltd Australia [email protected] 27 Cerere Njeri Cerulean Development Consulting Kenya [email protected] 28 Chakravarty Surajit ALHOSN University United Arab Emirates [email protected] 29 Chang Hsueh-Sheng National Cheng-Kung University, Taiwan Taiwan [email protected] 30 Chatterji Tathagata Manipal University India [email protected] 31 Chen Xiaojian Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology China [email protected] 32 Chen Xiaohui Jiangsu Institute of Urban Planning and Design China [email protected] 33 Chohan Arif Yasin Institute of Planners Australia [email protected] 34 Coiacetto Eddo Griffith University Australia [email protected] 35 Colman James Consultant Australia [email protected] 36 Contin Antonella Politecnico di Milano Italy [email protected] 37 Darchen Sebastien School of GPEM Australia [email protected] 38 David-West Jubiline University of Port Harcourt Nigeria [email protected] 39 Dawkins Jeremy Planning and Research Australia [email protected] 40 Dickson Tony Lat27 Australia [email protected] 41 Ding Ning Xi’an University of Technology China [email protected] 42 Downes Wendy Tech Tour Australia [email protected] 43 Du Yan Urban Planning and design Institute of Shenzhen China [email protected] 44 Dubbeling Martin Vice President ISOCARP Netherlands [email protected] 45 Dubuis Aurélie Hochschule für Technik Raperswil Switzerland [email protected] 46 Ede Precious Institute of Geosciences & Space Technology Nigeria [email protected] 47 Elisei Pietro Urbasofia - Bucharest/University of Rome Tor Vergata Romania [email protected] 48 Elmoudi Abdulhafid Urban planning agency Libya [email protected] 49 Espada Rodolfo Jr. University of Southern Queensland Australia [email protected] 50 Featherstone Jeffrey Temple University United States of America [email protected] 51 Fischer Karl UNSW Australia [email protected] 52 Fuss Sabella RPS Australia East Pty Ltd Australia [email protected] 53 Gannon Laura Jensen Bowers Group Australia [email protected] 54 Garrido Luis Rodolfo Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico Mexico [email protected] 55 Geerinck Griet Stad Antwerpen Belgium [email protected] 56 Getangita Peter Ministry of Local Government Kenya [email protected] 57 Gezik Peter Slovak University of Technology Slovakia [email protected] 58 Ginderen, van Rolf retired Netherlands [email protected] 59 Goledzinowska Anna Faculty of Architecture, Gdansk University of Technology Poland [email protected] 60 Gonçalves Garcia Marina Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos Brazil [email protected] 61 Gossop Chris MKParksTrust United Kingdom [email protected] 62 Grant Paula University of Southern Queensland Australia [email protected] 63 Greenop Kelly The University of Queensland Australia [email protected] 64 Gu Xue Urban Planning & Design Institute of Shenzhen China [email protected] 65 Gunay Zeynep Istanbul Technical University Turkey [email protected] 66 Hammonds Andrew Placefocus Australia [email protected] 67 Han Jing Tongji University China [email protected] 68 Harrison James JBA Australia [email protected] 69 He Shan University of Western Australia Australia [email protected] 70 Herron Murray Deakin University Australia [email protected] 71 Heywood Phil Queensland University of Technology Australia [email protected] 72 Hua Xiang Huazhong University of Science and Technology China [email protected] 73 Huang Huan Wuhan Land Use and Spatial Planning Research Center China [email protected] 74 Irvine Andrew RNL Design United Kingdom [email protected] 75 Jabu Salim Minstry of Lands Kenya [email protected] 76 Jimoh Umar University of Ibadan Nigeria [email protected] 77 Jorge Vasconcellos GaAntonio Universidade Federal de Sergipe Brazil [email protected] 78 Jung Wolfgang Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Germany [email protected] 79 Kammerbauer Mark Technische Universität München Germany [email protected] 80 Kamrowska-Zaluska Dorota MIT/ Gdansk University of Technology Poland [email protected] 81 Kanyaura Ndereba County Government of Nakuru Kenya [email protected] 4082 Karakiewicz Justyna The University of Melbourne Australia [email protected] 83 Karzynski Marek Kazimierz City of Gdynia City Planning Office Poland [email protected] 84 Kassa Tina Alemu Addis Ababa University Ethiopia [email protected] 85 Kazungu Raphael Nairobi city county Kenya [email protected] 86 Kerr Ursula Australia [email protected] 87 Kirby Sonia Establish Consulting Australia [email protected] 88 Kjærsdam Finn Aalborg University Denmark [email protected] 89 Klinmalai Siwaporn Kyoto University Japan [email protected] 90 Kolesova Evgenia Institute of Spatial Planning “Urbanica” Russian Federation [email protected] 91 Kutoyi Daniel Government Kenya [email protected] 92 Lambert Charles Strategic Planning Advisor France [email protected] 93 Langley Joe Sinclair Knight Merz Australia [email protected] 94 Lategan Louis North West University South Africa [email protected] 95 Layson Joseph University Urban Planning and Design China [email protected] 96 Ledwon Slawomir Gdansk University of Technology Poland [email protected] 97 Li Xinyuan Planning and Instruction Management Bureau of Xi’an China [email protected] 98 Lin Dong University of South Australia Australia [email protected] 99 Litiku Festus Mukunda Archtectural Association of Kenya Kenya [email protected] 100 Liu Tao Urban Planning Institute of Yunnan Province China [email protected] 101 Liu Yang Tongji University China [email protected] 102 Liu Qizhi Wuhan Land Resources and City Planning Bureau China [email protected] 103 Lorens Piotr Gdansk University of Technology Poland [email protected] 104 Low Choy Darryl Griffith University Australia [email protected] 105 Lv Yuan Northwest University China [email protected] 106 Magni Peter University of Cape Town South Africa [email protected] 107 Maha Muhandiramge Kumara Dhammika Galle Municipal Council Sri Lanka [email protected] 108 Majda Tomasz Society of Polish Town Planners SGGW Poland [email protected] 109 Maksimova Svetlana Perm National Resarch Politechnical University Russian Federation [email protected] 110 Marwa Samuel Mugo Mysticah Designs Kenya [email protected] 111 Matoq Ali Alfatah University Libya [email protected] 112 Matough Ali Salem University Engineering Consulting Office Libya [email protected] 113 Matthews Tony Queensland University of Technology Australia [email protected] 114 Mayere Severine Queensland University of Technology Australia [email protected] 115 Mchunu Koyi University of KwaZulu Natal South Africa [email protected] 116 Meltcova Ekaterina Perm National Research Polytechnic University Russian Federation [email protected] 117 Minnery John University of Queensland Australia [email protected] 118 Mitra Tapas School of Planning and Architecture, Bhopal India [email protected] 119 Mitra Sheuli School of Planning and Architecture Bhopal India [email protected] 120 Momanyi Enosh Ministry of Local Government Kenya [email protected] 121 Monardo Bruno Sapienza" Università di Roma" Italy [email protected] 122 Monga Lisangi Floribert Youth Coalition Plus on MDGs Achievement Zaire [email protected] 123 Moreira Inês CIAUD - FAUTL - Portugal Portugal [email protected] 124 Morgado Sofia CIAUD, Faculty of Architecture, Technical University of Lisbon Portugal [email protected] 125 Mugita Rose Ministry of Lands,Housing&Urban Development Kenya [email protected] 126 Murphy Melissa Norwegian University of Life Sciences Norway [email protected] 127 Musakwa Walter University of Johannesburg South Africa [email protected] 128 Mwangi Jacob Architectural Association of Kenya Kenya [email protected] 129 Naeem Khan Muhammad Muhammad Akram & Sons Org Pakistan [email protected] 130 Neville Tanya Queensland University of Technology Australia [email protected] 131 Ng Waikeen National University of Singapore Singapore [email protected] 132 Nguyen Dzung CPG Consultants Singapore [email protected] 133 Nyambuya Tinashe Nyambuya & Associates Zimbabwe [email protected] 134 Nyambuya Stephen Nyambuya & Associates Zimbabwe [email protected] 135 Nyaseda Kenneth Ministry of Local Government Kenya [email protected] 136 Odesanya Afeez Olumide Lagos State Government Nigeria [email protected] 137 Okitasari Mahesti The University of Tokyo Japan [email protected] 138 Olajide Oluwafemi Newcastle University United Kingdom [email protected] 139 Olufemi Olusola University of Ibadan Canada [email protected] 140 Omwenga Mairura Architectural Association of Kenya Kenya [email protected] 141 Owei Opuenebo Dept. of Urban And Regional Planning Nigeria [email protected] 142 Papageorgiou Michael Queensland University of Technology Australia [email protected] 143 Peng Kuang-Hui National Taipei University of Technology Taiwan [email protected] 144 Perry Guy IN-VI Poland [email protected] 145 Pleshkova Elena Fund of cultural and natural heritage Obvinskya roza"" Russian Federation [email protected] 146 Powell Marissa Arup Australia [email protected] 147 Prakash Poonam School of Planning and Architecture India [email protected] 148 Qin Mengdi Tongji University China [email protected] 149 Ravella Olga Universidad Nacional de La Plata Argentina [email protected] 150 Ren Lianzhi Urban Planning&Design Institute of Shenzhen China [email protected] 151 Roitman Sonia PGEM - UQ Australia [email protected] 152 Salgado Manuel Vice-Mayor, Lisbon City Council Portugal [email protected] 153 Sangare Ahmed ARCOFOR Ivory Coast [email protected] 154 Sanwoola Akeem Tokunbo Lagos State Government Nigeria Nigeria [email protected] 155 Sarayed-Din Luiza Farnese Lana University of Malaya Malaysia [email protected] 156 Sas-Bojarska Aleksandra Gdansk University of Technology Poland [email protected] 157 Searle Glen University of Queensland Australia [email protected] 158 Sergi Giovanni Università Politecnica Marche and Scuola Politecnica Genova Italy [email protected] 159 Shang Chuan School of Architecture, Southeast University, China China [email protected] 160 Shao Dan China Academy of Urban Planning & Design China [email protected] 161 Shelton Harriet Porirua City Council New Zealand [email protected] 162 Shi Nan Urban Planning Society of China, UPSC China [email protected] 163 Spijkerman Saskia Ir. S.C. Spijkerman Architect and municipality Aa en Hunze Netherlands [email protected] 164 Starodubtseva Ekaterina Perm National Research Polytechnical University Russian Federation [email protected] 165 Svikis Mike MikeSvikisPlanning Australia [email protected] 166 Tang John John Tang & Associates China [email protected] 167 Tenorio Gabriela De Souza University of Brasília Brazil [email protected] 168 Thapa Madhu Forum for Nature Protection (NGO) Nepal [email protected] 169 Theckanath Varghese Montfort Social Institute India [email protected] 170 Thomas Stacey University of the West Indies Trinidad and Tobago [email protected] 171 Tigere Innocencia CB Richard Ellis P/L Zimbabwe [email protected] 172 Tillner Silja Architects Tillner & Willinger Austria [email protected] 173 Torres Yuri Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Brazil [email protected] 174 Trkulja Siniša Republic Agency for Spatial Planning Serbia [email protected] 175 Trukhachev Sergey Southern Urban Centre Russian Federation [email protected] 176 Twitchett Bill Association le Pavillon-Terre et Cité"" France [email protected] 177 Uttarwar Purushottam Delhi Development Authority India [email protected] 178 Vaillant Philippe Université de Lorraine France [email protected] 179 Van Schalkwyk Bernice North West University South Africa [email protected] 180 Van Zyl Pieter Western Cape Provincial Government, South Africa South Africa [email protected] 181 Vancutsem Didier Free University of Brussels Germany [email protected] 182 Vann Greg Buckley Vann Australia [email protected] 183 Vettorato Daniele EURAC - European Research Academy Italy [email protected] 184 Vhutuza Wadzanai Annie City of Harare Zimbabwe [email protected] 185 Vladimirova Anna Oleg Vladimirov Architectural Studio Russian Federation [email protected] 186 Vloebergh Guy Omgeving cvba Belgium [email protected] 187 WANG Peng Urban Planning & Design Institute of Shenzhen China [email protected] 188 Wanjiru James michael ndungu Ministry of local government Kenya [email protected] 189 Watson Vanessa University of Cape Town South Africa [email protected] 190 Wei Gang China Academy of Urban Planning and Design China [email protected] 191 Weith Thomas ZALF Leibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Reserach Germany [email protected] 192 Wijnbergen Willem KuiperCompagnons Netherlands [email protected] 193 Williams Holly University of Oregon United States of America [email protected] 194 Willinger Alfred Architekten Tillner & Willinger Austria [email protected] 195 Yang Zhi South East University Jiangsu Institute of Urban Planning and DeChina [email protected] 196 Yip Stanley Arup Hongkong [email protected] 197 Yuen Belinda Singapore University of Technology and Design Singapore [email protected] 198 Zhang Danming Tsinghua University China [email protected] 199 Zhao Ye Southeast University China [email protected] 200 Zhou Yajie China Academy of Urban Planning and Design China [email protected] 201 Zhu Jin Tongji University China [email protected] N FAMILY NAME GIVEN NAME AFFILIATION COUNTRY E-MAIL 1 Abiodun 0luwafisayo Deborah University of Ibadan Nigeria [email protected] 2 Aburawi Mohamed University of Tripoli Libya [email protected] 3 Adebayo Ambrose Adeyemi University of KwaZulu Natal South Africa [email protected] 4 Adejimi Olafuyi University of Agriculture Abeokuta Nigeria [email protected] 5 Adeshina Salau Saheed Lagos State Government Nigeria [email protected] 6 Adeyemi Hammed Ade Concept Nigeria Limited Nigeria [email protected] 7 Al Mansoori Yousef Ahmed Abu Dhabi Planning Council United Arab Emirates [email protected] 8 Alwehab Abdelwehab University of Baghdad Iraq [email protected] 9 Ambwere Solomon Ministry of Local Government Kenya [email protected] 10 Arslanli Kerem Yavuz Istanbul Technical University Turkey [email protected] 11 Arthur Martha Jillyan The University of the West Indies Trinidad and Tobago [email protected] 12 Atano Japhet Linx Corporation Nigeria [email protected] 13 Ayangbile Oluwabukola University of Ibadan Nigeria [email protected] 14 Bademosi Fiyinfoluwa Boldform Consults Limited Nigeria [email protected] 15 Bajic-Brkovic Milica University of Belgrade Serbia [email protected] 16 Baldwin Claudia University of the Sunshine Coast Australia [email protected] 17 Basson Margaretha University of Southern Queensland Australia [email protected] 18 Batts Warren Independent Australia [email protected] 19 Batunova Elena Centre of Urban Education Russian Federation [email protected] 20 Bazrkar Mojtaba Fars Hyper star mall Iran [email protected] 21 Beyazit Eda Istanbul Technical University Turkey [email protected] 22 Bij Borja JTC Corporation Singapore [email protected] 23 Brandeis Amos Architecture, Town & Regional Planning Ltd. Israel [email protected] 24 Budale Abraham Kolawole Urband Land Institute Nigeria [email protected] 25 Burton Paul Griffith University Australia [email protected] 26 Byrnes Terence Byrnes & Associates Pty Ltd Australia [email protected] 27 Cerere Njeri Cerulean Development Consulting Kenya [email protected] 28 Chakravarty Surajit ALHOSN University United Arab Emirates [email protected] 29 Chang Hsueh-Sheng National Cheng-Kung University, Taiwan Taiwan [email protected] 30 Chatterji Tathagata Manipal University India [email protected] 31 Chen Xiaojian Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology China [email protected] 32 Chen Xiaohui Jiangsu Institute of Urban Planning and Design China [email protected] 33 Chohan Arif Yasin Institute of Planners Australia [email protected] 34 Coiacetto Eddo Griffith University Australia [email protected] 35 Colman James Consultant Australia [email protected] 36 Contin Antonella Politecnico di Milano Italy [email protected] 37 Darchen Sebastien School of GPEM Australia [email protected] 38 David-West Jubiline University of Port Harcourt Nigeria [email protected] 39 Dawkins Jeremy Planning and Research Australia [email protected] 40 Dickson Tony Lat27 Australia [email protected] 41 Ding Ning Xi’an University of Technology China [email protected] 42 Downes Wendy Tech Tour Australia [email protected] 43 Du Yan Urban Planning and design Institute of Shenzhen China [email protected] 44 Dubbeling Martin Vice President ISOCARP Netherlands [email protected] 45 Dubuis Aurélie Hochschule für Technik Raperswil Switzerland [email protected] 46 Ede Precious Institute of Geosciences & Space Technology Nigeria [email protected] 47 Elisei Pietro Urbasofia - Bucharest/University of Rome Tor Vergata Romania [email protected] 48 Elmoudi Abdulhafid Urban planning agency Libya [email protected] 49 Espada Rodolfo Jr. University of Southern Queensland Australia [email protected] 50 Featherstone Jeffrey Temple University United States of America [email protected] 51 Fischer Karl UNSW Australia [email protected] 52 Fuss Sabella RPS Australia East Pty Ltd Australia [email protected] 53 Gannon Laura Jensen Bowers Group Australia [email protected] 54 Garrido Luis Rodolfo Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico Mexico [email protected] 55 Geerinck Griet Stad Antwerpen Belgium [email protected] 56 Getangita Peter Ministry of Local Government Kenya [email protected] 57 Gezik Peter Slovak University of Technology Slovakia [email protected] 58 Ginderen, van Rolf retired Netherlands [email protected] 59 Goledzinowska Anna Faculty of Architecture, Gdansk University of Technology Poland [email protected] 60 Gonçalves Garcia Marina Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos Brazil [email protected] 61 Gossop Chris MKParksTrust United Kingdom [email protected] 62 Grant Paula University of Southern Queensland Australia [email protected] 63 Greenop Kelly The University of Queensland Australia [email protected] 64 Gu Xue Urban Planning & Design Institute of Shenzhen China [email protected] 65 Gunay Zeynep Istanbul Technical University Turkey [email protected] 66 Hammonds Andrew Placefocus Australia [email protected] 67 Han Jing Tongji University China [email protected] 68 Harrison James JBA Australia [email protected] 69 He Shan University of Western Australia Australia [email protected] 70 Herron Murray Deakin University Australia [email protected] 71 Heywood Phil Queensland University of Technology Australia [email protected] 72 Hua Xiang Huazhong University of Science and Technology China [email protected] 73 Huang Huan Wuhan Land Use and Spatial Planning Research Center China [email protected] 74 Irvine Andrew RNL Design United Kingdom [email protected] 75 Jabu Salim Minstry of Lands Kenya [email protected] 76 Jimoh Umar University of Ibadan Nigeria [email protected] 77LIST Jorge Vasconcellos OF GDELEGATESaAntonio Universidade AS OF 24-9-2013 Federal de Sergipe Brazil [email protected] 78 Jung Wolfgang Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Germany [email protected] 79 Kammerbauer Mark Technische Universität München Germany [email protected] 80 Kamrowska-Zaluska Dorota MIT/ Gdansk University of Technology Poland [email protected] 81 Kanyaura Ndereba County Government of Nakuru Kenya [email protected] 82 Karakiewicz Justyna The University of Melbourne Australia [email protected] 83 Karzynski Marek Kazimierz City of Gdynia City Planning Office Poland [email protected] 84 Kassa Tina Alemu Addis Ababa University Ethiopia [email protected] 85 Kazungu Raphael Nairobi city county Kenya [email protected] 86 Kerr Ursula Australia [email protected] 87 Kirby Sonia Establish Consulting Australia [email protected] 88 Kjærsdam Finn Aalborg University Denmark [email protected] 89 Klinmalai Siwaporn Kyoto University Japan [email protected] 90 Kolesova Evgenia Institute of Spatial Planning “Urbanica” Russian Federation [email protected] 91 Kutoyi Daniel Government Kenya [email protected] 92 Lambert Charles Strategic Planning Advisor France [email protected] 93 Langley Joe Sinclair Knight Merz Australia [email protected] 94 Lategan Louis North West University South Africa [email protected] 95 Layson Joseph University Urban Planning and Design China [email protected] 96 Ledwon Slawomir Gdansk University of Technology Poland [email protected] 97 Li Xinyuan Planning and Instruction Management Bureau of Xi’an China [email protected] 98 Lin Dong University of South Australia Australia [email protected] 99 Litiku Festus Mukunda Archtectural Association of Kenya Kenya [email protected] 100 Liu Tao Urban Planning Institute of Yunnan Province China [email protected] 101 Liu Yang Tongji University China [email protected] 102 Liu Qizhi Wuhan Land Resources and City Planning Bureau China [email protected] 103 Lorens Piotr Gdansk University of Technology Poland [email protected] 104 Low Choy Darryl Griffith University Australia [email protected] 105 Lv Yuan Northwest University China [email protected] 106 Magni Peter University of Cape Town South Africa [email protected] 107 Maha Muhandiramge Kumara Dhammika Galle Municipal Council Sri Lanka [email protected] 108 Majda Tomasz Society of Polish Town Planners SGGW Poland [email protected] 109 Maksimova Svetlana Perm National Resarch Politechnical University Russian Federation [email protected] 110 Marwa Samuel Mugo Mysticah Designs Kenya [email protected] 111 Matoq Ali Alfatah University Libya [email protected] 112 Matough Ali Salem University Engineering Consulting Office Libya [email protected] 113 Matthews Tony Queensland University of Technology Australia [email protected] 114 Mayere Severine Queensland University of Technology Australia [email protected] 115 Mchunu Koyi University of KwaZulu Natal South Africa [email protected] 116 Meltcova Ekaterina Perm National Research Polytechnic University Russian Federation [email protected] 117 Minnery John University of Queensland Australia [email protected] 118 Mitra Tapas School of Planning and Architecture, Bhopal India [email protected] 119 Mitra Sheuli School of Planning and Architecture Bhopal India [email protected] 120 Momanyi Enosh Ministry of Local Government Kenya [email protected] 121 Monardo Bruno Sapienza" Università di Roma" Italy [email protected] 122 Monga Lisangi Floribert Youth Coalition Plus on MDGs Achievement Zaire [email protected] 123 Moreira Inês CIAUD - FAUTL - Portugal Portugal [email protected] 124 Morgado Sofia CIAUD, Faculty of Architecture, Technical University of Lisbon Portugal [email protected] 125 Mugita Rose Ministry of Lands,Housing&Urban Development Kenya [email protected] 126 Murphy Melissa Norwegian University of Life Sciences Norway [email protected] 127 Musakwa Walter University of Johannesburg South Africa [email protected] 128 Mwangi Jacob Architectural Association of Kenya Kenya [email protected] 129 Naeem Khan Muhammad Muhammad Akram & Sons Org Pakistan [email protected] 130 Neville Tanya Queensland University of Technology Australia [email protected] 131 Ng Waikeen National University of Singapore Singapore [email protected] 132 Nguyen Dzung CPG Consultants Singapore [email protected] 133 Nyambuya Tinashe Nyambuya & Associates Zimbabwe [email protected] 134 Nyambuya Stephen Nyambuya & Associates Zimbabwe [email protected] 135 Nyaseda Kenneth Ministry of Local Government Kenya [email protected] 136 Odesanya Afeez Olumide Lagos State Government Nigeria [email protected] 137 Okitasari Mahesti The University of Tokyo Japan [email protected] 138 Olajide Oluwafemi Newcastle University United Kingdom [email protected] 139 Olufemi Olusola University of Ibadan Canada [email protected] 140 Omwenga Mairura Architectural Association of Kenya Kenya [email protected] 141 Owei Opuenebo Dept. of Urban And Regional Planning Nigeria [email protected] 142 Papageorgiou Michael Queensland University of Technology Australia [email protected] 143 Peng Kuang-Hui National Taipei University of Technology Taiwan [email protected] 144 Perry Guy IN-VI Poland [email protected] 145 Pleshkova Elena Fund of cultural and natural heritage Obvinskya roza"" Russian Federation [email protected] 146 Powell Marissa Arup Australia [email protected] 147 Prakash Poonam School of Planning and Architecture India [email protected] 148 Qin Mengdi Tongji University China [email protected] 149 Ravella Olga Universidad Nacional de La Plata Argentina [email protected] 150 Ren Lianzhi Urban Planning&Design Institute of Shenzhen China [email protected] 151 Roitman Sonia PGEM - UQ Australia [email protected] 152 Salgado Manuel Vice-Mayor, Lisbon City Council Portugal [email protected] 153 Sangare Ahmed ARCOFOR Ivory Coast [email protected] 154 Sanwoola Akeem Tokunbo Lagos State Government Nigeria Nigeria [email protected] 155 Sarayed-Din Luiza Farnese Lana University of Malaya Malaysia [email protected] 156 Sas-Bojarska Aleksandra Gdansk University of Technology Poland [email protected] 157 Searle Glen University of Queensland Australia [email protected] 158 Sergi Giovanni Università Politecnica Marche and Scuola Politecnica Genova Italy [email protected] 159 Shang Chuan School of Architecture, Southeast University, China China [email protected] 160 Shao Dan China Academy of Urban Planning & Design China [email protected] 161 Shelton Harriet Porirua City Council New Zealand [email protected] 162 Shi Nan Urban Planning Society of China, UPSC China [email protected] 163 Spijkerman Saskia Ir. S.C. Spijkerman Architect and municipality Aa en Hunze Netherlands [email protected] 41 164 Starodubtseva Ekaterina Perm National Research Polytechnical University Russian Federation [email protected] 165 Svikis Mike MikeSvikisPlanning Australia [email protected] 166 Tang John John Tang & Associates China [email protected] 167 Tenorio Gabriela De Souza University of Brasília Brazil [email protected] 168 Thapa Madhu Forum for Nature Protection (NGO) Nepal [email protected] 169 Theckanath Varghese Montfort Social Institute India [email protected] 170 Thomas Stacey University of the West Indies Trinidad and Tobago [email protected] 171 Tigere Innocencia CB Richard Ellis P/L Zimbabwe [email protected] 172 Tillner Silja Architects Tillner & Willinger Austria [email protected] 173 Torres Yuri Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Brazil [email protected] 174 Trkulja Siniša Republic Agency for Spatial Planning Serbia [email protected] 175 Trukhachev Sergey Southern Urban Centre Russian Federation [email protected] 176 Twitchett Bill Association le Pavillon-Terre et Cité"" France [email protected] 177 Uttarwar Purushottam Delhi Development Authority India [email protected] 178 Vaillant Philippe Université de Lorraine France [email protected] 179 Van Schalkwyk Bernice North West University South Africa [email protected] 180 Van Zyl Pieter Western Cape Provincial Government, South Africa South Africa [email protected] 181 Vancutsem Didier Free University of Brussels Germany [email protected] 182 Vann Greg Buckley Vann Australia [email protected] 183 Vettorato Daniele EURAC - European Research Academy Italy [email protected] 184 Vhutuza Wadzanai Annie City of Harare Zimbabwe [email protected] 185 Vladimirova Anna Oleg Vladimirov Architectural Studio Russian Federation [email protected] 186 Vloebergh Guy Omgeving cvba Belgium [email protected] 187 WANG Peng Urban Planning & Design Institute of Shenzhen China [email protected] 188 Wanjiru James michael ndungu Ministry of local government Kenya [email protected] 189 Watson Vanessa University of Cape Town South Africa [email protected] 190 Wei Gang China Academy of Urban Planning and Design China [email protected] 191 Weith Thomas ZALF Leibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Reserach Germany [email protected] 192 Wijnbergen Willem KuiperCompagnons Netherlands [email protected] 193 Williams Holly University of Oregon United States of America [email protected] 194 Willinger Alfred Architekten Tillner & Willinger Austria [email protected] 195 Yang Zhi South East University Jiangsu Institute of Urban Planning and DeChina [email protected] 196 Yip Stanley Arup Hongkong [email protected] 197 Yuen Belinda Singapore University of Technology and Design Singapore [email protected] 198 Zhang Danming Tsinghua University China [email protected] 199 Zhao Ye Southeast University China [email protected] 200 Zhou Yajie China Academy of Urban Planning and Design China [email protected] 201 Zhu Jin Tongji University China [email protected] N FAMILY NAME GIVEN NAME AFFILIATION COUNTRY E-MAIL 1 Abiodun 0luwafisayo Deborah University of Ibadan Nigeria [email protected] 2 Aburawi Mohamed University of Tripoli Libya [email protected] 3 Adebayo Ambrose Adeyemi University of KwaZulu Natal South Africa [email protected] 4 Adejimi Olafuyi University of Agriculture Abeokuta Nigeria [email protected] 5 Adeshina Salau Saheed Lagos State Government Nigeria [email protected] 6 Adeyemi Hammed Ade Concept Nigeria Limited Nigeria [email protected] 7 Al Mansoori Yousef Ahmed Abu Dhabi Planning Council United Arab Emirates [email protected] 8 Alwehab Abdelwehab University of Baghdad Iraq [email protected] 9 Ambwere Solomon Ministry of Local Government Kenya [email protected] 10 Arslanli Kerem Yavuz Istanbul Technical University Turkey [email protected] 11 Arthur Martha Jillyan The University of the West Indies Trinidad and Tobago [email protected] 12 Atano Japhet Linx Corporation Nigeria [email protected] 13 Ayangbile Oluwabukola University of Ibadan Nigeria [email protected] 14 Bademosi Fiyinfoluwa Boldform Consults Limited Nigeria [email protected] 15 Bajic-Brkovic Milica University of Belgrade Serbia [email protected] 16 Baldwin Claudia University of the Sunshine Coast Australia [email protected] 17 Basson Margaretha University of Southern Queensland Australia [email protected] 18 Batts Warren Independent Australia [email protected] 19 Batunova Elena Centre of Urban Education Russian Federation [email protected] 20 Bazrkar Mojtaba Fars Hyper star mall Iran [email protected] 21 Beyazit Eda Istanbul Technical University Turkey [email protected] 22 Bij Borja JTC Corporation Singapore [email protected] 23 Brandeis Amos Architecture, Town & Regional Planning Ltd. Israel [email protected] 24 Budale Abraham Kolawole Urband Land Institute Nigeria [email protected] 25 Burton Paul Griffith University Australia [email protected] 26 Byrnes Terence Byrnes & Associates Pty Ltd Australia [email protected] 27 Cerere Njeri Cerulean Development Consulting Kenya [email protected] 28 Chakravarty Surajit ALHOSN University United Arab Emirates [email protected] 29 Chang Hsueh-Sheng National Cheng-Kung University, Taiwan Taiwan [email protected] 30 Chatterji Tathagata Manipal University India [email protected] 31 Chen Xiaojian Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology China [email protected] 32 Chen Xiaohui Jiangsu Institute of Urban Planning and Design China [email protected] 33 Chohan Arif Yasin Institute of Planners Australia [email protected] 34 Coiacetto Eddo Griffith University Australia [email protected] 35 Colman James Consultant Australia [email protected] 36 Contin Antonella Politecnico di Milano Italy [email protected] 37 Darchen Sebastien School of GPEM Australia [email protected] 38 David-West Jubiline University of Port Harcourt Nigeria [email protected] 39 Dawkins Jeremy Planning and Research Australia [email protected] 40 Dickson Tony Lat27 Australia [email protected] 41 Ding Ning Xi’an University of Technology China [email protected] 42 Downes Wendy Tech Tour Australia [email protected] 43 Du Yan Urban Planning and design Institute of Shenzhen China [email protected] 44 Dubbeling Martin Vice President ISOCARP Netherlands [email protected] 45 Dubuis Aurélie Hochschule für Technik Raperswil Switzerland [email protected] 46 Ede Precious Institute of Geosciences & Space Technology Nigeria [email protected] 47 Elisei Pietro Urbasofia - Bucharest/University of Rome Tor Vergata Romania [email protected] 48 Elmoudi Abdulhafid Urban planning agency Libya [email protected] 49 Espada Rodolfo Jr. University of Southern Queensland Australia [email protected] 50 Featherstone Jeffrey Temple University United States of America [email protected] 51 Fischer Karl UNSW Australia [email protected] 52 Fuss Sabella RPS Australia East Pty Ltd Australia [email protected] 53 Gannon Laura Jensen Bowers Group Australia [email protected] 54 Garrido Luis Rodolfo Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico Mexico [email protected] 55 Geerinck Griet Stad Antwerpen Belgium [email protected] 56 Getangita Peter Ministry of Local Government Kenya [email protected] 57 Gezik Peter Slovak University of Technology Slovakia [email protected] 58 Ginderen, van Rolf retired Netherlands [email protected] 59 Goledzinowska Anna Faculty of Architecture, Gdansk University of Technology Poland [email protected] 60 Gonçalves Garcia Marina Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos Brazil [email protected] 61 Gossop Chris MKParksTrust United Kingdom [email protected] 62 Grant Paula University of Southern Queensland Australia [email protected] 63 Greenop Kelly The University of Queensland Australia [email protected] 64 Gu Xue Urban Planning & Design Institute of Shenzhen China [email protected] 65 Gunay Zeynep Istanbul Technical University Turkey [email protected] 66 Hammonds Andrew Placefocus Australia [email protected] 67 Han Jing Tongji University China [email protected] 68 Harrison James JBA Australia [email protected] 69 He Shan University of Western Australia Australia [email protected] 70 Herron Murray Deakin University Australia [email protected] 71 Heywood Phil Queensland University of Technology Australia [email protected] 72 Hua Xiang Huazhong University of Science and Technology China [email protected] 73 Huang Huan Wuhan Land Use and Spatial Planning Research Center China [email protected] 74 Irvine Andrew RNL Design United Kingdom [email protected] 75 Jabu Salim Minstry of Lands Kenya [email protected] 76 Jimoh Umar University of Ibadan Nigeria [email protected] 77 Jorge Vasconcellos GaAntonio Universidade Federal de Sergipe Brazil [email protected] 78 Jung Wolfgang Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Germany [email protected] 79 Kammerbauer Mark Technische Universität München Germany [email protected] 80 Kamrowska-Zaluska Dorota MIT/ Gdansk University of Technology Poland [email protected] 81 Kanyaura Ndereba County Government of Nakuru Kenya [email protected] 82 Karakiewicz Justyna The University of Melbourne Australia [email protected] 83 Karzynski Marek Kazimierz City of Gdynia City Planning Office Poland [email protected] 84 Kassa Tina Alemu Addis Ababa University Ethiopia [email protected] 85 Kazungu Raphael Nairobi city county Kenya [email protected] 86 Kerr Ursula Australia [email protected] 87 Kirby Sonia Establish Consulting Australia [email protected] 88 Kjærsdam Finn Aalborg University Denmark [email protected] 89 Klinmalai Siwaporn Kyoto University Japan [email protected] 90 Kolesova Evgenia Institute of Spatial Planning “Urbanica” Russian Federation [email protected] 91 Kutoyi Daniel Government Kenya [email protected] 92 Lambert Charles Strategic Planning Advisor France [email protected] 93 Langley Joe Sinclair Knight Merz Australia [email protected] 94 Lategan Louis North West University South Africa [email protected] 95 Layson Joseph University Urban Planning and Design China [email protected] 96 Ledwon Slawomir Gdansk University of Technology Poland [email protected] 97 Li Xinyuan Planning and Instruction Management Bureau of Xi’an China [email protected] 98 Lin Dong University of South Australia Australia [email protected] 99 Litiku Festus Mukunda Archtectural Association of Kenya Kenya [email protected] 100 Liu Tao Urban Planning Institute of Yunnan Province China [email protected] 101 Liu Yang Tongji University China [email protected] 102 Liu Qizhi Wuhan Land Resources and City Planning Bureau China [email protected] 103 Lorens Piotr Gdansk University of Technology Poland [email protected] 104 Low Choy Darryl Griffith University Australia [email protected] 105 Lv Yuan Northwest University China [email protected] 106 Magni Peter University of Cape Town South Africa [email protected] 107 Maha Muhandiramge Kumara Dhammika Galle Municipal Council Sri Lanka [email protected] 108 Majda Tomasz Society of Polish Town Planners SGGW Poland [email protected] 109 Maksimova Svetlana Perm National Resarch Politechnical University Russian Federation [email protected] 110 Marwa Samuel Mugo Mysticah Designs Kenya [email protected] 111 Matoq Ali Alfatah University Libya [email protected] 112 Matough Ali Salem University Engineering Consulting Office Libya [email protected] 113 Matthews Tony Queensland University of Technology Australia [email protected] 114 Mayere Severine Queensland University of Technology Australia [email protected] 115 Mchunu Koyi University of KwaZulu Natal South Africa [email protected] 116 Meltcova Ekaterina Perm National Research Polytechnic University Russian Federation [email protected] 117 Minnery John University of Queensland Australia [email protected] 118 Mitra Tapas School of Planning and Architecture, Bhopal India [email protected] 119 Mitra Sheuli School of Planning and Architecture Bhopal India [email protected] 120 Momanyi Enosh Ministry of Local Government Kenya [email protected] 121 Monardo Bruno Sapienza" Università di Roma" Italy [email protected] 122 Monga Lisangi Floribert Youth Coalition Plus on MDGs Achievement Zaire [email protected] 123 Moreira Inês CIAUD - FAUTL - Portugal Portugal [email protected] 124 Morgado Sofia CIAUD, Faculty of Architecture, Technical University of Lisbon Portugal [email protected] 125 Mugita Rose Ministry of Lands,Housing&Urban Development Kenya [email protected] 126 Murphy Melissa Norwegian University of Life Sciences Norway [email protected] 127 Musakwa Walter University of Johannesburg South Africa [email protected] 128 Mwangi Jacob Architectural Association of Kenya Kenya [email protected] 129 Naeem Khan Muhammad Muhammad Akram & Sons Org Pakistan [email protected] 130 Neville Tanya Queensland University of Technology Australia [email protected] 131 Ng Waikeen National University of Singapore Singapore [email protected] 132 Nguyen Dzung CPG Consultants Singapore [email protected] 133 Nyambuya Tinashe Nyambuya & Associates Zimbabwe [email protected] 134 Nyambuya Stephen Nyambuya & Associates Zimbabwe [email protected] 135 Nyaseda Kenneth Ministry of Local Government Kenya [email protected] 136 Odesanya Afeez Olumide Lagos State Government Nigeria [email protected] 137 Okitasari Mahesti The University of Tokyo Japan [email protected] 138 Olajide Oluwafemi Newcastle University United Kingdom [email protected] 139 Olufemi Olusola University of Ibadan Canada [email protected] 140 Omwenga Mairura Architectural Association of Kenya Kenya [email protected] 141 Owei Opuenebo Dept. of Urban And Regional Planning Nigeria [email protected] 142 Papageorgiou Michael Queensland University of Technology Australia [email protected] 143 Peng Kuang-Hui National Taipei University of Technology Taiwan [email protected] 144 Perry Guy IN-VI Poland [email protected] 145 Pleshkova Elena Fund of cultural and natural heritage Obvinskya roza"" Russian Federation [email protected] 146 Powell Marissa Arup Australia [email protected] 147 Prakash Poonam School of Planning and Architecture India [email protected] 148 Qin Mengdi Tongji University China [email protected] 149 Ravella Olga Universidad Nacional de La Plata Argentina [email protected] 150 Ren Lianzhi Urban Planning&Design Institute of Shenzhen China [email protected] 151 Roitman Sonia PGEM - UQ Australia [email protected] 152 Salgado Manuel Vice-Mayor, Lisbon City Council Portugal [email protected] 153 Sangare Ahmed ARCOFOR Ivory Coast [email protected] 154 Sanwoola Akeem Tokunbo Lagos State Government Nigeria Nigeria [email protected] 155 Sarayed-Din Luiza Farnese Lana University of Malaya Malaysia [email protected] 156 Sas-Bojarska Aleksandra Gdansk University of Technology Poland [email protected] 157 Searle Glen University of Queensland Australia [email protected] 158LIST Sergi OF DELEGATESGiovanni Università AS OF Politecnica 24-9-2013 Marche and Scuola Politecnica Genova Italy [email protected] 159 Shang Chuan School of Architecture, Southeast University, China China [email protected] 160 Shao Dan China Academy of Urban Planning & Design China [email protected] 161 Shelton Harriet Porirua City Council New Zealand [email protected] 162 Shi Nan Urban Planning Society of China, UPSC China [email protected] 163 Spijkerman Saskia Ir. S.C. Spijkerman Architect and municipality Aa en Hunze Netherlands [email protected] 164 Starodubtseva Ekaterina Perm National Research Polytechnical University Russian Federation [email protected] 165 Svikis Mike MikeSvikisPlanning Australia [email protected] 166 Tang John John Tang & Associates China [email protected] 167 Tenorio Gabriela De Souza University of Brasília Brazil [email protected] 168 Thapa Madhu Forum for Nature Protection (NGO) Nepal [email protected] 169 Theckanath Varghese Montfort Social Institute India [email protected] 170 Thomas Stacey University of the West Indies Trinidad and Tobago [email protected] 171 Tigere Innocencia CB Richard Ellis P/L Zimbabwe [email protected] 172 Tillner Silja Architects Tillner & Willinger Austria [email protected] 173 Torres Yuri Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Brazil [email protected] 174 Trkulja Siniša Republic Agency for Spatial Planning Serbia [email protected] 175 Trukhachev Sergey Southern Urban Centre Russian Federation [email protected] 176 Twitchett Bill Association le Pavillon-Terre et Cité"" France [email protected] 177 Uttarwar Purushottam Delhi Development Authority India [email protected] 178 Vaillant Philippe Université de Lorraine France [email protected] 179 Van Schalkwyk Bernice North West University South Africa [email protected] 180 Van Zyl Pieter Western Cape Provincial Government, South Africa South Africa [email protected] 181 Vancutsem Didier Free University of Brussels Germany [email protected] 182 Vann Greg Buckley Vann Australia [email protected] 183 Vettorato Daniele EURAC - European Research Academy Italy [email protected] 184 Vhutuza Wadzanai Annie City of Harare Zimbabwe [email protected] 185 Vladimirova Anna Oleg Vladimirov Architectural Studio Russian Federation [email protected] 186 Vloebergh Guy Omgeving cvba Belgium [email protected] 187 WANG Peng Urban Planning & Design Institute of Shenzhen China [email protected] 188 Wanjiru James michael ndungu Ministry of local government Kenya [email protected] 189 Watson Vanessa University of Cape Town South Africa [email protected] 190 Wei Gang China Academy of Urban Planning and Design China [email protected] 191 Weith Thomas ZALF Leibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Reserach Germany [email protected] 192 Wijnbergen Willem KuiperCompagnons Netherlands [email protected] 193 Williams Holly University of Oregon United States of America [email protected] 194 Willinger Alfred Architekten Tillner & Willinger Austria [email protected] 195 Yang Zhi South East University Jiangsu Institute of Urban Planning and DeChina [email protected] 196 Yip Stanley Arup Hongkong [email protected] 197 Yuen Belinda Singapore University of Technology and Design Singapore [email protected] 198 Zhang Danming Tsinghua University China [email protected] 199 Zhao Ye Southeast University China [email protected] 200 Zhou Yajie China Academy of Urban Planning and Design China [email protected] 201 Zhu Jin Tongji University China [email protected]

Image courtesy of Brisbane Marketing

42 USEFUL INFORMATION

Emergency Fire, Ambulance, Police………………………………………...... …………..Dial 000

If you have any questions concerning your stay in Brisbane (also in case you have or lost or left your baggage, etc.) please contact the ISOCARP Local Organising Committee...... +61 407 180 576

Remember: Avoid leaving valuable items and large amounts of cash in hotel rooms or cloak rooms (in cafés, restaurants, museums, etc).

Opening Hours Shops: 9am-5pm Banks: 9am – 5pm Cafes: 7:30am – 4pm Restaurants: 12pm – 9pm

Transportation Air Train: departs from both airports (International and Domestic) approximately every 15min between 6am-10pm and travel time is between 20-30min depending on destination. All trains stop at Fortitude Valley, Central and Roma Street Stations, which are nearest to the majority of hotels. Tickets can be purchased at the stations at the airports, at the Airtrain desk in the airports, or online. Please show the letter issued by ISOCARP for the reduced rate fare. For more information visit website - http://www.airtrain.com.au

Public transport: buses, trains, ferries, and City Cats Recommend Purchase of a ‘Go Card’ (available at the airport, train stations, newsagencies, and 7Eleven stores). These cards can be used on all transport and must be tapped when entering the vehicle and when exiting the vehicle. Suggest to add $20-30 to the card to enable travel for travel between the venue and accommodation in the CBD. A full ‘journey planner’ is available on the website (http://translink.com.au)

Taxis: are available. Estimated costs $50 Airport-City, $10 CBD-Venue. The two taxi companies Black and White Cabs (133 222 and Yellow Cabs 13 1924).

City Cycle: there are bicycles available for hire in the Brisbane CBD and Inner Suburbs. You do need to subscribe to this service over the internet first, but bikes are ‘free’ for the first 30min. It is a legal requirement to wear a helmet in Brisbane, and these are available for hire. Check out the website (http://www.citycycle.com.au)

SIM-Cards These can be purchased at any 7Eleven, some newsagencies, supermarkets, and phone stores. Major mobile service providers in Australia are Telstra, Optus, Vodaphone, and Virgin.

Wi-Fi Most hotels, cafes, restaurants, shopping malls and park in the city centre provide free Wireless Internet access. You can also get Wi-Fi service on the trains.

Currency The official currency in Australia is the Australian dollar. The approximate exchange rates are:

1 Euro – $1.43AUD 1 Pound - $1.70AUD 1 Yuan - $0.17AUD 1 US$ - $0.93AUD

You will need a passport to exchange foreign currency. Most hotels, restaurants, supermarkets, and shops accept credit cards (Visa and Mastercard).

Image courtesy of Brisbane Marketing