John Hick, the Axial Age, and the Academic Study of Religion

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

John Hick, the Axial Age, and the Academic Study of Religion Don’t Say All Religions Are Equal Unless You Really Mean It: John Hick, the Axial Age, and the Academic Study of Religion A Dissertation Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy To the Department of Ancient History In the Faculty of Arts at Macquarie University Sydney by Jack Tsonis Primary Supervisor: Dr Stephen Llewelyn July 2013 Synopsis Don’t Say All Religions Are Equal Unless You Really Mean It: John Hick, the Axial Age, and the Academic Study of Religion Jack Tsonis 2013 This dissertation undertakes a critical analysis of the “pluralist” view of religious diversity, which holds that all religions are responses to the same transcendent reality. Although the pluralist ideal has a long history in western thought, primary focus is placed on recent articulations of the argument as represented by figures such as John Hick, Huston Smith, and Wilfred Cantwell Smith. Particular focus is placed upon the philosophical theory of religion offered by Hick in 1989. The aim of this work is to show that despite the intention of pluralist thinkers to move beyond the Eurocentric categories that have traditionally pervaded the western study of religion, their arguments invariably remain predicated on the problematic “world religions” paradigm, as well as a number of other discourses that have their root in the cultural hierarchies of the nineteenth century. I therefore suggest that in spite of their egalitarian ideals, the pluralist theory of religions ultimately reifies and reinforces many of the Eurocentric assumptions about “religion” that it seeks to overcome. This argument is made by employing a discourse-analytical reading of Hick’s theory, building upon numerous critical works in religious studies that have addressed the problematic history of the world religions paradigm. After providing a detailed introduction to the pluralist perspective and its place in contemporary debate, attention turns to the various criticisms that have been levelled at the world religions paradigm, focusing particularly on the cultural hierarchies that are implied by the seemingly benign rhetoric of “great” traditions and “world” religions. Focus then returns to Hick’s argument with these problems in view, paying attention primarily to his use of the “Axial Age” metanarrative, which serves as the historical backbone of his argument. As will become clear, by following Karl Jaspers’ division of religions into “pre-axial” and “post-axial”, Hick reproduces a form of civilizational exceptionalism that stems directly from nineteenth-century race theory and other paradigms of cultural difference by which European imperialism was justified. I show that Hick’s argument replicates at least six standard tropes of colonial discourse with regard to the non-urban (i.e. “primitive”) other, and claim that this undermines his clearly stated methodological and ethical goals. This dissertation therefore also begins to outline a much needed critique of the Axial Age construct, something so far missing from critical literature in the field. The final chapter provides a detailed survey of recent historiographical trends that render the key assumptions of the Axial Age narrative empirically untenable; but in the interests of constructive critique, this discussion is also used to sketch out some alternative approaches to emplotting long-term religious history that are more in line with current historiographical standards. The Conclusion looks at how these issues impact on the pluralist theory, as well as the larger question of how they relate to contemporary debates about the place of pluralism and theological essentialism in the academic study of religion. Although I suggest that it seems impossible to reconcile traditional theological pluralism with contemporary critical standards, my ultimate contention is that if these issues continue to be addressed, then opportunities will be presented to develop an increasingly sophisticated vocabulary for the treatment of long-term religious history that could bring together many strands of recent scholarship and move the academic study of religion in exciting new directions. For Vicki, Con, and Toby Preface I, James George McLean Tsonis, hereby declare that I am the sole author of this work, which is being submitted under my preferred name of Jack. No part of this dissertation has been published or submitted to any other university or institution. All sources of information have been duly cited. Whilst the body of the work can be read entirely on its own, the footnotes provide substantiation for all relevant claims, and often gesture towards topics that are beyond the scope of the main discussion. In general, works are cited in full the first time they appear in a chapter, in shorthand thereafter. In addition to the main bibliography, a supplementary bibliography has been provided for reasons that are explained within. It primarily includes works that are not discussed in the body of the text, but which are relevant to one of the central methodological concerns of the analysis and informed much of the research. Jack Tsonis Sydney July 2013 Acknowledgements I firstly wish to thank my family for their love and support. This work is dedicated to them with gratitude and affection. I also express sincere thanks to the Department of Ancient History at Macquarie University for giving me the space to pursue this somewhat idiosyncratic project, and for trusting that it would come together. Thanks also go to Trevor Evans for his facilitation of the Department’s weekly seminars, at which early versions of chapters 4 and 5 were presented and profitably critiqued. My supervisorial team has been outstanding. Stephen Llewelyn, as primary supervisor, has been an invaluable mentor and dialogue partner for five years now, and his unfailing patience allowed me to follow my nose and find my own way to the argument. I also wish to acknowledge Stephen’s tireless support of all his students, which stands as a model of engaged and responsible pedagogy. I have had the privilege of working with three exceptional associate supervisors over the last four years. Brent Nongbri read all of the chapters in draft, and his feedback always helped to sharpen my thinking. Cavan Concannon provided important guidance in the early stages of my candidature, when the plan for this dissertation resembled little more than a plate of dropped spaghetti. I also acknowledge the support of Professor Larry Welborn, who set me upon many fruitful paths in the early stages, and whose enthusiasm was infectious. Further thanks go to Professor Edwin Judge, who took the time on several occasions to provide detailed feedback on a number of my proposals. Yet while I am deeply indebted to each of them, it goes without saying that all conclusions offered in this work are mine alone. I have also been fortunate to receive advice and guidance from a host of generous scholars over the past four years. I particularly wish to thank Ward Blanton for his kind hospitality on a visit to Glasgow in 2011, during which trip (and our many conversations) the foundations of this dissertation snapped into place. Another person who has given me a good deal of her time is Carole Cusack of Sydney University, who regularly suggested readings that kept me moving in fresh directions, and whose eagerness to help has been little short of heroic. I further thank Professor Dale Martin for making time to chat in New Haven whenever I have been in the neighbourhood, and for helping to facilitate a number of useful connections with other scholars. Amongst my student colleagues, I give special mention to Bernard Doherty, whose willingness to share ideas and books made all the difference at the start, and whose diabolical sense of humour always kept me laughing. Similar thanks go to Sean Durbin for his facilitation of the Religion Reading Group at Macquarie, which put me in touch with many works that ultimately played an important role in my argument. Sean also provided helpful feedback on a section of the draft. I also enjoyed regular conversations with Brad Bitner, whose warmth and erudition have been greatly appreciated by all students in HDR3, as well as David Baker, who was ever ready to share his expertise on big history. In my wider life, I am lucky to have a funny, intelligent, and vivacious set of friends. I single out for particular mention the Esteemed Esquires of the Atterton Academy – Jimbo, Weebs, Nicko and Dravid – who enrich my life immeasurably, and who inspire me always with their own passions and insights. In the game of not taking life too seriously, these are co-conspirators of the highest order. Finally I thank Sofia Eriksson, the sweetest of Swedes, who has the remarkable capacity of being relentlessly critical while constantly supportive. Not only did she read everything that I put in front of her, but her incessant concern with the nature of discourse has been an unwavering source of stimulation. Without her, the successful completion of this work is unthinkable to me. Table of Contents Synopsis …………………………………………………………………………………. iii Preface …………………………………………………………………………………… vii Acknowledgements ……………………………………………………………………… ix CHAPTER 1 Theological Pluralism and the “World Religions”: Sketching Out the Issues ……… 1 Pluralism and the Inescapable Presence of the Other 10 Pluralism in the Shadow of Colonialism 20 The Critical Shape of this Work 36 CHAPTER 2 John Hick and the Pluralist Theory of Religions ……………………………………… 51 The Modern Enterprise of Theories of Religion 54 The Pluralistic Hypothesis
Recommended publications
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses The Christian Message in a Postmodern World: a critical re-appropriation of Hendrik Kraemer's theology of religions Perry, T.S. How to cite: Perry, T.S. (1996) The Christian Message in a Postmodern World: a critical re-appropriation of Hendrik Kraemer's theology of religions, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/5351/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 T.S. Perry The Christian Message in a Postmodern World: A Critical Re-Appropriation of Hendrik Kraemer's Theology of Religions Doctor of Philosophy 1996 Abstract This thesis is a critical re-appropriation of Hendrik Kraemer's theology of religions. Part I introduces theology of religions through the now familiar threefold typology: Kari Barth represents 'exclusivism,' Kari Rahner, 'inclusivism,' and John Hick, 'pluralism' (Chapter 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Should the Axial Age Be Renamed? Benjamin Schewel University of Virginia [email protected]
    Volume 13, No 2, Fall 2018 ISSN 1932-1066 Should the Axial Age be Renamed? Benjamin Schewel University of Virginia [email protected] Abstract: The recent popularization of the term "axial age" has stimulated a debate about whether scholars should develop a more precise, way of describing the socio-spiritual parallelisms of the first millennium BCE. This essay evaluates Eugene Halton and John Torpey's recent contributions to this debate. Both authors agree on the basic problem with the term "axial age"—it falsely suggests that history displays one spiritual pivot—yet they reach quite different conclusions regarding terminological alternatives. Halton suggests abandoning the term "axial age" and speaking instead of a "moral revolution." Torpey recommends keeping it but simply applying it to several other periods of transformation. This essay ultimately rejects both suggestions and recommends instead that scholars continue using the term "axial age" in the same, heuristically vague way that they tend to employ other world-historical periodizing terms such as "antiquity," "medieval," or "modernity." Keywords: Halton, Eugene; Jaspers, Karl; Torpey, John; Axial Age; social theory; philosophy of history; historiography. The middle centuries of the first millennium BCE The recent popularization of the term "axial witnessed the emergence of the classical religious and age" has stimulated new lines of critical inquiry. A philosophical lineages—Greek, Hebrew, Persian, Indic, growing literature charts the pre- and post-Jaspersian and Chinese—that still orient the lives of most people development of the idea of an axial age. There is today. Given the centrality of these developments to all also a burgeoning, albeit still flawed, attempt to use subsequent history, Karl Jaspers described this period algorithmic tools for testing the empirical validity of as Achsenzeit (axial age).1 A wide range of distinguished the axial age thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • All and Nothing: Reflections on Experience and Transcendence in the Eurasian Axial Age, C. 800-200
    All and Nothing: Reflections on Experience and Transcendence in the Eurasian Axial Age, c. 800-200 BCE Copyright 2006 Peter von Sivers Salt Lake City , the place where my wife and I and our cats live, is roughly equidistant from the three states of Nevada , Idaho , and Wyoming . Ignoring the admonitions of local church authorities, every weekend thousands of Salt Lakers travel by car, bus, or plane to these neighboring states to gamble in casinos, buy lottery tickets, or (during the summer) bet on horse races. For better or worse, even some of my University of Utah colleagues cannot refrain from practicing a little mundane magic, by visiting their favorite slot machines or betting windows. Secularism has arrived in Zion . With this rather quotidian example, I want to draw your attention to the fact that experience followed by transcendence pops up in the strangest places (no double entendre intended with my reference to Salt Lake City ). In the Voegelin Society we normally expect to hear only about peak occurrences of experience and transcendence in noetic and revelatory thought. For the moment, however, bear with me and reflect, if you will, on the gambler's peak moment: When the dice are rolled, the lottery drum is turned, or the horses break from the starting gate, he or she experiences the thrill of All and Nothing, that is, of being at the brink where winning and losing are still indistinguishably intertwined and only moments before the two separate into either luck or loss. Once les jeux sont faits the two move so far apart that the gambler wonders how he/she could ever have experienced them as a continuum.
    [Show full text]
  • The Modern Tripartition, the Axial Age Thesis, and East-West Philosophical Communication Rajesh C
    Volume 6, No 2, Fall 2011 ISSN 1932-1066 The Modern Tripartition, the Axial Age Thesis, and East-West Philosophical Communication Rajesh C. Shukla Saint Paul University, Canada [email protected] Abstract: In this essay I examine the relationship of religion, philosophy, and science. I argue that despite their apparent epistemological and methodological differences, these three modes of human enquiry can be aligned together in thought as well as in experience. I contend that science provides us with contingent cognitions and that all such cognitions stand in an acute need of an ontological principle that can support them. Furthermore, following Karl Jaspers I suggest that the knowledge of Being necessitates a transcendence of the natural world and scientific framework associated with it. I conclude that Jaspers notion of "encompassing" and Buddhist theory of emptiness can be useful not only in resolving the conflict between religion, philosophy, and science, but also in fostering philosophical communication between East and West. At the outset one may say that an individual's religion, science and philosophy has occurred, which intellectual enquiry and imagination take various forms leaves these disciples to their more or less tightly and expresses themselves in various ways. Some of demarcated space. But the above separation, Jaspers these enquiries fall in the realm of science, others in the rightly points out, carries its own risk and contradiction. realm of religion and some in the realm of philosophy; The main risk lies in the thinness of epistemic content but common to all these realms is a shared cognitive of the scientific pursuits;1 and moreover it can also current that runs through all of them and binds them undermine scientific goals and projects by turning them together in their pursuit of truth, understanding of the into a pseudo-science or dishonesty.2 More clearly, the world and existential situation of humankind.
    [Show full text]
  • A Systematic Assessment of the Axial Age Thesis for the Emergence of Moralizing Religious Thought
    University of Oxford Oxford, Oxfordshire OX1 2JD United Kingdom Tele: +44 1865 270000 Fax: +44 1865 270708 Web: www.ox.ac.uk A Systematic Assessment of the Axial Age Thesis for the Emergence of Moralizing Religious Thought Daniel Austin Mullins*1, Daniel Hoyer*2,6, Christina Collins3, Thomas Currie3, Kevin Feeney4, Pieter François1, Patrick Savage1, Harvey Whitehouse1, Peter Turchin5,6 1 University of Oxford 2 University of Toronto 3 University of Exeter 4 Trinity College Dublin 5 University of Connecticut 6 Evolution Institute Did universalizing moralizing ideologies and universal egalitarian ethics first emerge only in the complex social formations in what is today China, Greece, India, Iran, and Israel and Palestine between 800 BCE and 200 BCE, as proponents of the Axial Age thesis contend? Sociocultural transformations during this period remain poorly understood because of a lack of systematic historical-sociological analysis. Seshat: Global History Databank provides us with new tools for examining this topic in a large sample of social formations across Afro-Eurasia during the first two millennia BCE and first millennium CE, allowing us to evaluate the Axial Age thesis against alternative explanations. Pioneering analysis of this massive collection of historical information reveals that universalizing morality and egalitarian ethics did not first emerge only in the five regions identified by proponents of the Axial Age thesis between 800 BCE and 200 BCE but appeared across Afro-Eurasia hundreds and in some cases thousands of years prior to the proposed Axial Age before fluctuating dynamically for millennia. This result raises key questions for future empirically-led evaluations of the moral foundations of complex societies.
    [Show full text]
  • The World of the Axial Sages
    The World of the Axial Sages The World of the Axial Sages: The Age of Awakening By John C. Stephens The World of the Axial Sages: The Age of Awakening By John C. Stephens This book first published 2021 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2021 by John C. Stephens All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-6081-3 ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-6081-9 To Denise For the highest images in every religion there is an analogue in a state of the soul… —Frederick Nietzsche, Notes, 1875 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface ....................................................................................................... ix Introduction ................................................................................................ 1 Chapter One .............................................................................................. 15 A Day in the Life of Religion Chapter Two ............................................................................................. 27 Akhenaten’s Countermyth Chapter Three ........................................................................................... 37 The Visions of Zoroaster Chapter Four ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mcgilchrist and the Axial Age
    Article In Search of the Origins of the Western Mind: McGilchrist and the Axial Age Susanna Rizzo 1 and Greg Melleuish 2,* 1 School of Arts & Sciences, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Cnr Broadway and Abercrombie St, P.O. Box 944, Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia; [email protected] 2 School of Humanities and Social Inquiry, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2525, Australia * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 26 November 2020; Accepted: 12 January 2021; Published: 25 January 2021 Abstract: This paper considers and analyses the idea propounded by Iain McGilchrist that the foundation of Western rationalism is the dominance of the left side of the brain and that this occurred first in ancient Greece. It argues that the transformation that occurred in Greece, as part of a more widespread transformation that is sometimes termed the Axial Age, was, at least in part, connected to the emergence of literacy which transformed the workings of the human brain. This transformation was not uniform and took different forms in different civilisations, including China and India. The emergence of what Donald terms a “theoretic” culture or what can also be called “rationalism” is best understood in terms of transformations in language, including the transition from poetry to prose and the separation of word and thing. Hence, the development of theoretic culture in Greece is best understood in terms of the particularity of Greek cultural development. This transition both created aporias, as exemplified by the opposition between the ontologies of “being” and “becoming”, and led to the eventual victory of theoretic culture that established the hegemony of the left side of the brain.
    [Show full text]
  • Axial Age Religious Commitment in Theoretical Perspective (Doi: 10.2383/73711)
    Il Mulino - Rivisteweb Mark Gould Axial Age Religious Commitment in Theoretical Perspective (doi: 10.2383/73711) Sociologica (ISSN 1971-8853) Fascicolo 1, gennaio-aprile 2013 Ente di afferenza: () Copyright c by Societ`aeditrice il Mulino, Bologna. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Per altre informazioni si veda https://www.rivisteweb.it Licenza d’uso L’articolo `emesso a disposizione dell’utente in licenza per uso esclusivamente privato e personale, senza scopo di lucro e senza fini direttamente o indirettamente commerciali. Salvo quanto espressamente previsto dalla licenza d’uso Rivisteweb, `efatto divieto di riprodurre, trasmettere, distribuire o altrimenti utilizzare l’articolo, per qualsiasi scopo o fine. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Symposium / Ritual and Religion in Human Evolution Axial Age Religious Commitment in Theoretical Perspective by Mark Gould doi: 10.2383/73711 While this paper aims to construct theoretical arguments, it might properly be viewed as a narrative, relating a story instead of making analytical contentions and evaluating them empirically. It is, however, “theoretic,” a second-order reflection on the logic of argument in Bellah’s Religion in Human Evolution (RHE). I want to convey my conviction that RHE should be taken seriously, and that, both regarding its form of argumentation and the content of its arguments, taking it seriously requires a critical perspective on it. The focus of my concern is on “religion,” on what Bellah neglects in his characterization of “religion.” I contend that Bellah should reconsider certain lessons from our shared teach- er, Talcott Parsons: Parsons [1949] argued that Weber and Durkheim transcended the dichotomy between positivist and idealist theories, the former scientific and the latter humanistic.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy of Religion Pdf John Hick
    Philosophy of religion pdf john hick Continue Saints 13 Two Grounds for Faith in God 15 Ontological Argument 15 First Cause and Cosmological Arguments 20 Design (or Teleological) Argument 23 Theism and Probability 26 Moral Argument 28 Argument from Special Events and Experience 29 Three Grounds for Disbelief in God 20 31 Sociological Theory of Religion 31 Freudian Theory of Religion 34 Challenge of Modern Science 36 Four Problem of Evil 40 Problem 40 Augustian Theododicy 42 Irenaean Theodicy 45 Process Theodicy 49 FIVE Revelation and Faith 57 Limits Of Evidence 57 Offer Kind of Revelation and Faith 60 Voluntary Theories of Faith 63 Tillich Concept of Faith, as Ultimate Concern 66 A Non-positional View on Revelation and Faith 68 Appropriate View on the Bible and Theological Thinking 72 SIX Problems of Religious Language 76 Speciality of religious language 76 Doctrine Analogy (Aquin) 77 Religious statements as symbolic (Tillich) 79 Incarnation and problem meaning 82 Religious language, as non-cognitive 83 Braithwaite in non-cognitive theory 87 Language-theory game 90 SEVEN Problem Check 94 Issue verifiability 94 Two proposed solutions 97 The idea of eschatological verification 100 Some difficulties and complications 102 There is, Fact, and Real 105 EIGHT Conflicting Claims of Truth Of Various Religious Religion 107 Many Faiths , All Claiming that truth 107 VA Christian Analysis 108 Criticism of the concept of Religion 112 To a possible solution 113 Philosophical basis for religious pluralism 118 NINE human destiny: Immortality andChange
    [Show full text]
  • Great Britain's Cotton Textile Industry, 1900-1913
    The Myth of the CorporateEconomy: Great Britain's Cotton Textile Industry, 1900-1913 Timothy Leunig1 DepartmentofEconomics, Nuffeld College UniversityofOxy½rd It is never difficult to defend an interest in the Lancashire cotton industry,for it has a uniqueplace in the historyof England'sindusthai revolution.Rostow gives it the ultimateaccolade: "the original leading sector in the first take-off," and to Crafts and Harley, "the really big issue [in determiningthe rate of growthduring the industrial revolution] is undoubtedly the weightingof cottonrather than the correctdistribution of value added weightsamong the other sectors"[Rostow, 1990, p. 53; Craftsand Harley, 1992, p. 706]. Cotton overtook wool to become Britain's single most importantsource of incomeby 1810,and retained this position until the end of the nineteenthcentury. At its 1913peak, the industryemployed over half a millionpeople and consumed over 2.1 billionpounds of raw cotton[Robson, 1957,pp. 331, 333; Deaneand Cole, 1969,p. 163;Sandberg, 1981, p. 114; Mitchelland Deane, 1962, p. 186-8]. The industry'sexport performance was more remarkable still. It became the nation'sbiggest exporter during the NapoleonicWars, a positionit wasto retainfor 125 years;in 1830 it even exceededall other exportscombined [Deaneand Cole, 1969, p. 31].In 1880over 80% of theworld's cotton exports camefrom Britain,and mill ownersboasted that theymet the needsof the home marketbefore breakfast and devotedthe rest of the day to exports [Robson,1957, p. 4; Aspin,1981, p. 3]. At its peakin 1913,Britain exported over7 billionyards of cloth,approximately equivalent to a shirtand pair of trousersfor everyman, woman, and child in theworld [Sandberg, 1974, p. 4].
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article
    Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 124 International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Humanities (ICCESSH 2017) Concept of the “Axial Age” in Modern Philosophy in Russia Sergei Nizhnikov Department History of Philosophy Peoples‟ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) 6 Miklukho-Maklaya Street, Moscow, 117198, Russian Federation E-mail: [email protected] Abstract—The article shows the principles of K. Jaspers’s Jaspers criticized the existing concepts of historical concept of “axial age” that were stressed and developed in development: “…in his dispute with Spengler, Jaspers insists modern philosophy in Russia. It analyzes ideas expressed from on the cohesion of the world‟s historical process, and in his philosophers and historians including M.K. Mamardashvili dispute with Marxism – on its “spiritual component”. This is (universalism of “axial age”), A.V. Semushkin (the ruin of due to Jaspers‟ comprehension that “… a genuine connection myth and the birth of reflection), P.P. Gaidenko (break to the among the peoples is a spiritual one, not hereditary or transcendent reality), A. Men' (Bible prophetism as an integral natural”. This cohesion, according to P. Gaidenko, the part of the “axial age”), P.K. Grechko (infinite thinker sees in a “transcendent source” [1. P. 310-311, 314]. communication). This piece of work opens a certain generality For Jaspers “Social conditions clarify the fact, but not give it in positions of the mentioned thinkers, universalism of their the causal explanation. For a certain social state belongs to thought and openness to other cultures, readiness for dialogue. the aggregated spiritual phenomenon of the axial age” [2.
    [Show full text]
  • Portland Daily Press: December 30, 1875
    PORTLAND DAILY PRESS. ESTABLISHED JUNE 23, 1863 --VOL. 13. PORTLAND THURSDAY MORNING, DECEMBER 30, 1875. TERMS $8.00 PER IN _ ANNUM, ADVANCE THE PORTLAND DAILY PRESS, BUSINESS CARDS. REMOVAL. “dead the MISCELLANEOUS. issue,” Louisiana muddle. It [From our Regular Correspondent.] Published by the THE PRESS. every day (Sundays excepted) would be gratifying to know the position of Our Washington Letter. J. H. PORTLAND PUBLISHING CO., IIOOPEE, REMOVED. the Democracy on the “questions of THURSDAY MORMYG, DEC. 1875 to-day.” At 109 Exchange Portland. JOHN 30, Sr., < P H O SMITH’S Counting Room, to 3H EX- TIHIIE a-IR-A-HsTH) Ceremonial LSTEREK ST.CHANGE STREET. dec2dlm JPlSsrXlj The Springlield Union rushes Society aud Social Ceremony Terms : Eight Dollars a Year in advance. To chivalrously Nial<* Temperance Coiivniiioii. —A on mail subscribers Seven Dollars a Year ii paid in ad- Nos. 81 kh«! 33 Free St, to the defense of the Democrats, and refutes Chapter Call* anil Callers—Some- vance. The temperance men and women of Maine, of all KANUFACTCRES OF REMOVAL." the statement no thing about Card FOR 1875. religious, political and temperance organizations, and that they have principles. Etiquette—What Fash- Piirlov Suits, those not connected with are invited to meet It iou Dnunnila 1HE MAINE STATE Lounges, Spring either, says they have five: First—an undying in that Cine—How a .Tlrra- PRESS Beds, BUTLER & at Meonian Hail, in on Janu- Mattresses, LIBBY, Augusta, Wednesday, b. arv 19th, at 11 o’clock A. for the of hostility to the idea that the United States rof was Taken Is published Thursday Morning at $2.50 a Rc3<mgagli Patent Bed Lounge., Bn, 1876, M., purpose Congress in--Btc., etc.
    [Show full text]