ENVIRONMENT AGENCY North East Region

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ENVIRONMENT AGENCY North East Region ENVIRONMENT AGENCY North East Region SECOND INTERIM REPORT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THE DROUGHT ON YORKSHIRE’S RIVERS 1995-1996 December 1997 Frontispiece The Drought in Yorkshire River Wharfe in Langstrothdale, summer 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................................................................................. 4 1.0 CATCHMENT SUMMARIES................................ ........................................................ 7 1.1 RiverAire................................................................................................................7 1.2 River Calder........................................................................................................... 9 1.3 River Don..............................................................................................................11 1.4 RiverHull..............................................................................................................14 1.5 RiverOuse.............................................................................................................16 1.6 RiverUre...............................................................................................................18 1.7 River Wharfe........................................................................................................20 2.0 PURPOSE....................................................................................................................... 23 3.0 BACKGROUND AND ISSUES....................................................................................24 4.0 METHODS AND ANALYSIS.......................................................................................30 4.1 General.................................................................................................................30 4.2 Hydrology and water resources........................................................................ 30 4.3 Water quality....................................................................................................... 31 4.4 River habitat surveys..........................................................................................32 4.5 Aquatic macro-invertebrates............................ .................................................32 4.6 Fisheries................................................................................ .....................:.......34 5.0 RIVER AIRE CATCHMENT........................................................................................36 5.1 Background and issues.......................................................................................36 5.2 Purpose.................................................................................................................36 5.3 Hydrology and water resources........................................................................37 5.4 Water quality.......................................................................................................38 5.5 Ecology................................................................................................................. 39 5.5.1 Aquatic macro-invertebrates................................................................39 5.5.2 Fisheries...................................................................................................40 6.0 RIVER CALDER CATCHMENT......... ...................................................................... 41 6.1 Background and issues.......................................................................................41 6.2 Purpose.................................................................................................................42 6.3 Hydrology and water resources........................................................................42 6.4 Water quality.......................................................................................................43 6.5 Ecology................................................................................................................. 46 6.5.1 Aquatic macro-invertebrates................................................................47 6.5.2 Fisheries...................................................................................................49 6.5.3 Agency fisheries actions.........................................................................51 f 1 7.0 RIVER DON CATCHMENT........................................................................................53 7.1 Background and issues.......................................................................................53 7.2 Purpose.................................................................................................................. 53 7.3 Hydrology and water resources........................................................................53 7.4 . Water quality........................................................................................................54 7.4.1 Changes and state of water quality........................................................ 54 7.4.2 Other water quality actions......................................................................55 7.5 Ecology.................................................................................................................. 57 7.5.1 Aquatic macro-invertebrates...............................................................58 7.5.2 Fisheries................................................................................................... 60 8.0 RIVERHULL CATCHMENT....................................................................................... 64 8.1 Background and issues.......................................................................................64 8.2 Purpose.................................................................................................................. 65 8.3 Hydrology and water resources........................................................................65 8.4 Water quality........................................................................................................66 8.5 Ecology...................................................................................................................68 8.5.1 Aquatic macro-invertebrates...............................................................68 8.5.2 Fisheries................................................................................................... 70 9.0 RIVER OUSE CATCHMENT.......................................................................................71 9.1 Background and issues.......................................................................................71 9.2 Purpose.................................................................................................................. 71 9.3 Hydrology and water resources........................................................................71 9.4 Water quality.................................................................... ...................................73 9.5 Ecology.................................................................................................................. 74 9.5.1 Macrophytes................................................................................................74 9.5.2 Aquatic macro-invertebrates...............................................................74 9.5.3 Fisheries................................................................................................... 79 10.0 RIVER URE CATCHMENT.........................................................................................82 10.1 Background and issues.......................................................................................82 10.2 Purpose.................................................................................................................. 82 10.3 Hydrology and water resources........................................................................83 10.4 Water quality....................................................................................................... 84 10.5 River habitat survey............................................................................................85 10.6 Ecology.................................................................................................................. 86 10.6.1 Macrophytes...............................................................................v...........86 10.6.2 Aquatic macro-invertebrates.............................................................. 87 10.6.3 Fisheries................................................................................................... 89 10.6.4 Birds......................................................................................................... 94 10.6.5 Mammals..................................................................................................96 2 RIVER WHARFE CATCHMENT................. ...98 11.1 Background and issues........................ .98 11.2 Purpose.................................................. ...98 11.3 Hydrology and water resources......... .99 11.4 Water quality:....................................... 101 11.5 Ecology................................................... 103 11.5.1 River habitat survey................ 103 11.5.2 Macrophytes............................. 103 11.5.3 Aquatic macro-invertebrates.. 105 11.5.4 Fisheries.................................... 110 10.6.5 Mammals................................... 119 KEY ISSUES & IMPACTS............................
Recommended publications
  • Yorkshire GREEN Corridor and Preliminary Routeing and Siting Study
    Yorkshire GREEN Project – Corridor and Preliminary Routeing and Siting Study Report Yorkshire GREEN Project Corridor and Preliminary Routeing and Siting Study (YG-NSC-00001) National Grid National Grid House Warwick Technology Park Gallows Hill Warwick CV34 6DA Final - March 2021 Yorkshire GREEN Project – Corridor and Preliminary Routeing and Siting Study Report Page intentionally blank Yorkshire GREEN Project – Corridor and Preliminary Routeing and Siting Study Report Document Control Document Properties Organisation AECOM Ltd Author Alison Williams Approved by Michael Williams Title Yorkshire GREEN Project – Corridor and Preliminary Routeing and Siting Study Report Document Reference YG-NSC-00001 Version History Date Version Status Description/Changes 02 March 2021 V8 Final version Yorkshire GREEN Project – Corridor and Preliminary Routeing and Siting Study Report Page intentionally blank Yorkshire GREEN Project – Corridor and Preliminary Routeing and Siting Study Report Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Overview and Purpose 1 1.2 Background and Need 3 1.3 Description of the Project 3 1.4 Structure of this Report 7 1.5 The Project Team 7 2. APPROACH TO ROUTEING AND SITING 8 2.1 Overview of National Grid’s Approach 8 2.2 Route and Site Selection Process 11 2.3 Overview of Stages of Development 11 3. THE STUDY AREA 16 3.1 Introduction 16 3.2 York North Study Area 16 3.3 Tadcaster Study Area 17 3.4 Monk Fryston Study Area 17 4. YORK NORTH OPTIONS APPRAISAL 19 4.1 Approach to Appraisal 19 4.2 CSEC Siting Area Identification 19 4.3 Substation Siting Area Identification 19 4.4 Overhead Line Routeing Identification 20 4.5 Combination Options 20 4.6 Screening of York North Options 24 4.7 Options Appraisal Summary of Remaining York North Options 28 4.8 The Holford Rules and Horlock Rules 76 4.9 York North Preferred Option 76 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Sedimentation in Storage Reservoirs Final Report February 2001
    Department of the Environment Transport and the Regions Sedimentation in Storage Reservoirs Final Report February 2001 Halcrow Water Halcrow Water Burderop Park Swindon Wiltshire SN4 0QD Tel +44 (0)1793 812479 Fax +44 (0)1793 812089 www.halcrow.com Halcrow Water has prepared this report in accordance with the instructions of their client, Department of the Environment Transport and the Regions, for their sole and specific use. Any other persons who use any information contained herein do so at their own risk. © Halcrow Group Limited 2001 Acknowledgements The work described in this report was carried out by Halcrow at Burderop Park under contract to Department of the Environment, Transport and Regions. The Department’s Nominated Officer was Richard Vincent whose support is gratefully acknowledged. Professor David Butcher and Dr Jill Labatz from Nottingham Trent University carried out work under subcontract to Halcrow. Halcrow’s Project Manager was Tony Green and work was carried out by Damian Debski, Alan Warren and Guy Green with Direction from David Birch. Halcrow’s chief engineer for Dams, Jonathan Hinks provided valuable comment and contacts with Reservoir owners. We are grateful to the water companies and British Waterways who provided much valuable information and acknowledge the use of the Register of British Dams compiled by the Building Research Establishment. The web version of the report was assembled by Tony Green, links have been included for Figures and bookmarks to enable better navigation. To keep file size to a minimum figures have been saved in a low resolution, please contact [email protected] if a clearer version is needed or you have further comments.
    [Show full text]
  • River Basin Management Plan Humber River Basin District Annex C
    River Basin Management Plan Humber River Basin District Annex C: Actions to deliver objectives Contents C.1 Introduction 2 C. 2 Actions we can all take 8 C.3 All sectors 10 C.4 Agriculture and rural land management 16 C.5 Angling and conservation 39 C.6 Central government 50 C.7 Environment Agency 60 C.8 Industry, manufacturing and other business 83 C.9 Local and regional government 83 C.10 Mining and quarrying 98 C.11 Navigation 103 C.12 Urban and transport 110 C.13 Water industry 116 C.1 Introduction This annex sets out tables of the actions (the programmes of measures) that are proposed for each sector. Actions are the on the ground activities that will implemented to manage the pressures on the water environment and achieve the objectives of this plan. Further information relating to these actions and how they have been developed is given in: • Annex B Objectives for waters in the Humber River Basin District This gives information on the current status and environmental objectives that have been set and when it is planned to achieve these • Annex D Protected area objectives (including programmes for Natura 2000) This gives details of the location of protected areas, the monitoring networks for these, the environmental objectives and additional information on programmes of work for Natura 2000 sites. • Annex E Actions appraisal This gives information about how we have set the water body objectives for this plan and how we have selected the actions • Annex F Mechanisms for action This sets out the mechanisms - that is, the policy, legal, financial and voluntary arrangements - that allow actions to be put in place The actions are set out in tables for each sector.
    [Show full text]
  • App1. Clotherholme Urban Village Vision Document-Low
    LAND AT DEVERELL BARRACKS, CLARO BARRACKS AND LAVER BANKS, RIPON VISION DOCUMENT FOR CLOTHERHOLME URBAN VILLAGE TO SUPPORT REPRESENTATIONS TO THE DRAFT HARROGATE LOCAL PLAN ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENCE INFRASTRUCTURE ORGANISATION March 2018 TEAM Planning and Property Advisors MasterPlanning Technical PRP Job Reference Revision: AA6969 Draft for Team Review Issuing Date / Office XX/02/2018/ London Project Lead Kevin Radford CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 04 2 SITE CONTEXT 10 3 PLANNING CONTEXT 16 4 ANALYSIS OF RIPON AND THE SITE 26 5 TECHNICAL STUDIES AND CONSTRAINTS 58 6 A VISION FOR CLOTHERHOLME URBAN VILLAGE 68 7 MASTERPLAN FRAMEWORK: CLOTHERHOLME URBAN VILLAGE 76 1 INTRODUCTION This chapter provides an introduction to the site and describes the purpose of this Vision document. Design aspirations for the proposed Clotherholme Urban Village are presented which have informed the emerging masterplan for the site. CONTENTS + PURPOSE OF THE DOCUMENT + DIO BACKGROUND + BACKGROUND TO THE SITE AND REPRESENTATIONS CLOTHERHOLME URBAN VILLAGE VISION DOCUMENT NORTH Claro Barracks Deverell Barracks Laver Banks RIPON Site location plan 6 CLOTHERHOLME URBAN VILLAGE VISION DOCUMENT PURPOSE OF THE DOCUMENT This Vision Document has been prepared by the Clotherholme Urban Village project team to support representations, on behalf of the Defence Infrastructure Organisation to Harrogate Borough Council (HBC) as part of the emerging Local Plan process. These representations which have been prepared on behalf of the Defence Infrastructure Organisation, in respect of the Draft Harrogate Local Plan, concentrate on land owned by the Defence Infrastructure Organisation situated to the north west of Ripon, North Yorkshire, which has been declared surplus to requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Reservoir Released Waves As a Transient Riverine Pollution Mitigation Tool
    Reservoir Released Waves as a Transient Riverine Pollution Mitigation Tool An examination of the feasibility of using waves of water released from a reservoir as a response to pollution spills. Simon DeSmet Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds School of Geography December 2014 - ii - The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his/her own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. © 2014 The University of Leeds and Simon DeSmet - iii - Acknowledgements I have depended on God and faith to carry me though the preparation of this Thesis. A number of individuals have been of great assistance over the past few years. Firstly my two primary supervisors Dr Paul Kay and Dr Jonathan Carrivick have been immensely patient, taught me to write properly, vetted my ideas and have provided great wisdom and experience. Technical assistance with the Fluent software was provided by Dr Andy Sleigh and Dr Carl Gikeson. Access to the SORBY flume facility and input on ideas for the flume study were given by Dr Daniel Parsons and Dr Gareth Keevil. For help in designing the field study and collecting the data I would like to thank David Ashley, Rachel Gasior, Dr Pengfei Li, Dr Ben Gillespie and numerous individuals a the Environment Agency. Additionally I owe a thanks to Rachel Homer for assistance with statistics.
    [Show full text]
  • A Deterministic Method for Evaluating Block Stability on Masonry Spillways
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU International Symposium on Hydraulic Structures May 16th, 12:10 PM A Deterministic Method for Evaluating Block Stability on Masonry Spillways Owen John Chesterton Mott MacDonald, [email protected] John G. Heald Mott MacDonald John P. Wilson Mott MacDonald Bently John R. Foster Mott MacDonald Bently Charlie Shaw Mott MacDonald See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/ishs Recommended Citation Chesterton, Owen (2018). A Deterministic Method for Evaluating Block Stability on Masonry Spillways. Daniel Bung, Blake Tullis, 7th IAHR International Symposium on Hydraulic Structures, Aachen, Germany, 15-18 May. doi: 10.15142/T3N64T (978-0-692-13277-7). This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences and Events at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Symposium on Hydraulic Structures by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Author Information Owen John Chesterton, John G. Heald, John P. Wilson, John R. Foster, Charlie Shaw, and David E. Rebollo This event is available at DigitalCommons@USU: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/ishs/2018/session2-2018/2 7th International Symposium on Hydraulic Structures Aachen, Germany, 15-18 May 2018 ISBN: 978-0-692-13277-7 DOI: 10.15142/T3N64T A Deterministic Method for Evaluating Block Stability on Masonry Spillways O.J. Chesterton1, J.G. Heald1, J.P. Wilson2, J.R. Foster2, C. Shaw2 & D.E Rebollo2 1Mott MacDonald, Cambridge, United Kingdom 2Mott MacDonald Bentley, Leeds, United Kingdom E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Many early spillways and weirs in the United Kingdom were constructed or faced with masonry.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Routes - November 2015 Finkle Street Old Denaby Bromley Hoober Bank
    Langsett Reservoir Newhill Bow Broom Hingcliff Hill Pilley Green Tankersley Elsecar Roman Terrace Upper Midhope Upper Tankersley SWINTON Underbank Reservoir Midhopestones Green Moor Wortley Lea Brook Swinton Bridge Midhope Reservoir Hunshelf Bank Smithy Moor Green Routes - November 2015 Finkle Street Old Denaby Bromley Hoober Bank Gosling Spring Street Horner House Low Harley Barrow Midhope Moors Piccadilly Barnside Moor Wood Willows Howbrook Harley Knoll Top Cortworth Fenny Common Ings Stocksbridge Hoober Kilnhurst Thorncliffe Park Sugden Clough Spink Hall Wood Royd Wentworth Warren Hood Hill High Green Bracken Moor Howbrook Reservoir Potter Hill East Whitwell Carr Head Whitwell Moor Hollin Busk Sandhill Royd Hooton Roberts Nether Haugh ¯ River Don Calf Carr Allman Well Hill Lane End Bolsterstone Ryecroft Charltonbrook Hesley Wood Dog Kennel Pond Bitholmes Wood B Ewden Village Morley Pond Burncross CHAPELTOWN White Carr la Broomhead Reservoir More Hall Reservoir U c Thorpe Hesley Wharncliffe Chase k p Thrybergh Wigtwizzle b Scholes p Thorpe Common Greasbrough Oaken Clough Wood Seats u e Wingfield Smithy Wood r Brighthorlmlee Wharncliffe Side n Greno Wood Whitley Keppel's Column Parkgate Aldwarke Grenoside V D Redmires Wood a Kimberworth Park Smallfield l o The Wheel l Dropping Well Northfield Dalton Foldrings e n Ecclesfield y Grange Lane Dalton Parva Oughtibridge St Ann's Eastwood Ockley Bottom Oughtibridg e Kimberworth Onesacr e Thorn Hill East Dene Agden Dalton Magna Coldwell Masbrough V Bradgate East Herringthorpe Nether Hey Shiregreen
    [Show full text]
  • Part 1 Rea Ch Classifica Tion
    RIVER QUALITY SURVEY NATIONAL RIVERS AUTHORITY NORTHUMBRIA & YORKSHIRE REGION GQA ASSESSMENT 1994 PART 1 REA CH CLASSIFICA TION FRESHWATER RIVERS AND CANALS VERSION 1: AUGUST 1995 GQA ASSESSMENT 1994 \ NORTHUMBRIA & YORKSHIRE REGION To allow the development of a National method of evaluating water quality, the rivers in all the NRA regions of England and Wales have been divided into reaches, which are numbered using a coding system based on the hydrological reference for each river basin. Each classified reach then has a chemistry sample point assigned to it and these sample points are regularly monitored for Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), Dissolved oxygen (DO) and Total Ammonia. The summary statistics calculated from the results of this sampling are sent to a National Centre where the GQA Grades are calculated. A National report is produced and each region can then produce more detailed reports on the quality of their own rivers. For Northumbria and Yorkshire Region, this Regional Report has been divided into two parts. PARTI: REACH CLASSIFICATION This report contains a listing of the river reaches within the region, with their start and finish grid reference, approximate length, and the 1990 and 1994 GQA class for each reach. The reference code of the chemistry sample point used to classify the reach is also included. A sample point may classify several reaches if there are no major discharges or tributaries dividing those reaches. The sample point used to classify a reach may change and the classification is therefore calculated using the summary statistics for each sample point that has been used over the past three years.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Framework Directive) (England and Wales) Directions 2009
    The River Basin Districts Typology, Standards and Groundwater threshold values (Water Framework Directive) (England and Wales) Directions 2009 The Secretary of State and the Welsh Ministers, with the agreement of the Secretary of State to the extent that there is any effect in England or those parts of Wales that are within the catchment areas of the rivers Dee, Wye and Severn, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 40(2) of the Environment Act 1995(a) and now vested in them(b), and having consulted the Environment Agency, hereby give the following Directions to the Environment Agency for the implementation of Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy(c): Citation and commencement and extent 1.—(1) These Directions may be cited as the River Basin Districts Typology, Standards and Groundwater threshold values (Water Framework Directive) (England and Wales) Direction 2009 and shall come into force on 22nd December 2009. Interpretation 2.—(1) In these Directions— ―the Agency‖ means the Environment Agency; ―the Groundwater Directive‖ means Directive 2006/118/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of groundwater against pollution and deterioration(d); ―the Priority Substances Directive‖ means Directive 2008/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on environmental quality standards in the field of water policy(e); ―threshold value‖ has the same meaning as in the Groundwater Directive; and ―the Directive‖ means Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23rd October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy.
    [Show full text]
  • River Wharfe at Lobwood
    YORKSHIRE WATER SERVICES LIMITED NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR DROUGHT PERMIT River Wharfe Catchment TAKE NOTICE that due to the threat of a serious water shortage in the Yorkshire area caused by an exceptional shortage of rain, YORKSHIRE WATER SERVICES LIMITED (company number 02366682) whose registered office is at Western House, Halifax Road, Bradford, BD6 2SZ is applying to the Environment Agency for a drought permit under section 79A of the Water Resources Act 1991 in the River Wharfe catchment. The drought permit is intended to apply until 31 March 2019 inclusive and proposes to increase the annual abstraction limit at Lobwood abstraction point on the River Wharfe and amend the Grimwith Reservoir releases during low flows. Lobwood abstraction (grid reference SE 07 51) and Grimwith Reservoir releases (grid reference SE 06 64) Yorkshire Water is authorised to abstract water from the River Wharfe at Lobwood, North Yorkshire for supply to customers under abstraction licence number 2/27/19/129/R01 (“the Lobwood Licence”). Yorkshire Water is entitled to abstract a maximum of 5,060 cubic metres per hour, 93,200 cubic metres per day and 23,742,000 cubic metres per year, at an instantaneous rate not exceeding 1,406 litres per second. The daily abstraction limit varies depending on flow conditions (‘bands’) in the River Wharfe and upstream releases from Grimwith Reservoir. Under the conditions of the Lobwood Licence, during periods of low flow in the River Wharfe, Yorkshire Water is required to support its abstraction at Lobwood by releasing water from Grimwith Reservoir. When river flows are above 389 megalitres per day (Ml/d) (Bands A and B in the licence), Yorkshire Water does not have to provide any support.
    [Show full text]
  • Flying Times the Newsletter of Nidderdale Birdwatchers
    Flying Times The Newsletter of Nidderdale Birdwatchers Issue Spring 2016 Welcome to the Spring Newsletter…. Contents Pag Mistle Thrushes are singing, Green Woodpeckers are yaffling and e Robins have switched to their spring song. It really is getting lighter and Spring is not too far away. Bird watching never has an ‘off’ season but the anticipation of a Chairman’s Welcome 1 whole new year filled with returning Lapwing, Curlew, Sand Martins and Cuckoos is Chirps heart lifting. Recently, still in the depths of January, sixteen intrepid souls joined a bird Spring events 2/3 outing led by Sue Harrison from Pateley Bridge towards Wath along the river. It Your events pin-up 4 rained and rained and then it stopped. We had a great time thanks to Sue, in part, Reports on Club 5/6 for tea/coffee and mince pies of course, but mostly because of the social side of our events Club. Sue quickly put pictures on the blog with a commentary. If you haven’t seen Outreach 7/8 them yet the address for the blog is: niddbirders.wordpress.com. We have news of a new sub group with some cracking ideas to help raise Award to Audrey 9 money for research into the declining populations of Gouthwaite 10 Curlews. Also, great news of Wildlife Centre progress with Gouthwaite Wildlife Centre. Plus many Volunteering 11 other reports of events and OBituraries 12 news from around and about. Happy birdwatching. Pete’s Corner 13 Ros Wade Bird Club Details 4th November Attenborough adds even more power to the Bird Hide for the benefit of school groups ! Angus Gosman 10th December There are plenty of Red kites near us, but this was taken at a Red kite feeding station in Dumfries and Galloway where there were 130 kites in the air at the same time.
    [Show full text]
  • 04111 Geologypanelfinala/W
    Although the rock at the far This site is unique. The Permian Magnesian Limestone left of the cliff face looks rocks here are seen nowhere else in Britain. 255 million the geology of ‘new’, this is due to years ago, where you are standing was the shoreline of a mechanical quarrying. shallow tropical sea surrounded by desert, much like the The brown earth deposits above the limestone are present day Arabian Gulf. The sea, called the Zechstein glacial drift deposited in the Sea, covered low-lying areas of last Ice Age some 20,000 what later became northern years ago, and are 255 Europe. At the time 'Britain' Quarry Moor million years younger than the limestone beneath! was on the eastern edge of a been dissolved by water movement through the rock, super-continent and lay just leaving underground hollows that cause the land above to north of the equator. It's hard collapse creating subsidence holes in and around Ripon. to imagine, standing here Lewis Carroll may well have seen these holes and possibly surrounded by vegetation, that used them for his ideas in Alice in Wonderland. during this time Europe was On the River Ure at Ripon Parks, gypsum in the Permian marls hot and dry, much like the has been exposed and can be seen in the spectacular banks. Sahara today. The shore was very flat with algal mats covering much of the area between low and high water. The high temperatures Keep a look out for wrens. evaporated the water leaving gypsum deposits, especially (above) Cross The Magnesian Limestone, which forms a The limestone cliff face and nearest to the high water mark, to create a 'gypsum marsh'.
    [Show full text]