DOCSLIB.ORG

Quantum Field Theory Lecture Notes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Quantum Field Theory Lecture Notes Quantum Field Theory Lecture Notes Joachim Kopp September 16, 2016 Contents 1 Introduction and Motivation 7 1.1 Do you recognize the following equations? . .7 1.2 A Note on Notation . .7 2 The Klein{Gordon Field 9 2.1 Necessity of the Field Viewpoint . .9 2.2 Elements of Classical Field Theory . 10 2.2.1 The Euler{Lagrange Equations . 10 2.2.2 The Hamiltonian . 11 2.2.3 Noether's Theorem . 12 2.3 Quantization of the Klein{Gordon Field . 13 2.3.1 Commutation Relations . 13 2.3.2 The Quantized Hamiltonian . 15 2.3.3 Time-Dependence of the Klein{Gordon Field Operator . 16 2.4 The Feynman Propagator for the Klein{Gordon Field . 17 2.4.1 Green's Functions of the Klein{Gordon Operator . 17 2.4.2 The Feynman Propagator . 19 2.4.3 Relation to Correlation Functions . 19 3 The Dirac Field 21 3.1 The Dirac Equation and its Solutions . 21 3.1.1 The Equation and the Corresponding Lagrangian . 21 3.1.2 Solutions of the Dirac Equation . 22 3.1.3 Spin Sums . 24 3.2 Quantization of the Dirac Field . 25 3.2.1 How Not to Quantize the Dirac Field . 25 3.2.2 Quantizing the Dirac Field with Anticommutators . 26 3.2.3 Physical Significance of the Quantized Dirac Field . 28 3.3 The Feynman Propagator for the Dirac Field . 28 3.4 Symmetries of the Dirac Theory . 30 3.4.1 Lorentz Invariance . 30 3.4.2 Parity (P )................................ 37 3.4.3 Time Reversal (T )........................... 38 3.4.4 Charge Conjugation (C)........................ 40 4 Interacting Fields and Feynman Diagrams 43 3 Contents 4.1 Time-Dependent Perturbation Theory for Correlation Functions . 43 4.1.1 φ4 Theory . 43 4.1.2 The Vacuum State of the Interacting Theory . 44 4.1.3 Correlation Functions . 44 4.1.4 Perturbation Theory . 45 4.2 Wick's Theorem . 50 4.3 Feynman Diagrams . 53 4.3.1 Basic Idea and Application to a Simple 4-Point Function . 54 4.3.2 An Example in φ4 Theory . 54 4.3.3 A More Advanced Example . 55 4.3.4 More Examples for Diagrams with Non-Trivial Symmetry Factors 56 4.3.5 Position Space Feynman Rules . 57 4.3.6 Momentum Space Feynman Rules . 58 4.3.7 Disconnected Feynman Diagrams . 59 4.3.8 The Denominator of the Correlation Function . 61 4.4 The LSZ Reduction Formula . 61 4.5 Computing S-Matrix Elements from Feynman Diagrams . 65 4.6 Feynman Rules for Fermions . 68 4.6.1 The Master Formula for Correlation Functions Involving Fermions 68 4.6.2 Wick's Theorem for Fermions . 69 4.6.3 The LSZ Formula for Fermions . 70 4.6.4 Yukawa Theory . 71 4.6.5 The Yukawa Potential . 78 5 Quantum Electrodynamics 81 5.1 The QED Lagrangian from Symmetry Arguments . 81 5.2 The Feynman Rules for QED . 83 5.3 e+e− ! µ+µ− .................................. 86 5.3.1 Feynman Diagram and Squared Matrix Element . 86 5.3.2 Trace Technology . 87 5.3.3 The Squared Matrix Element for e+e− ! µ+µ− (Part II) . 89 5.3.4 The Cross Section | General Results . 90 5.3.5 The Cross Section for e+e− ! µ+µ− ................. 91 5.3.6 e+e− ! µ+µ−: Summary . 92 5.4 More Technology for Evaluating QED Feynman Diagrams . 93 5.4.1 Scattering of Polarized Particles . 93 5.4.2 External Photons . 93 6 Path Integrals 95 6.1 Path Integrals in Quantum Mechanics . 95 6.2 The Path Integral for a Free Scalar Field . 97 6.3 The Feynman Propagator from the Path Integral . 100 6.4 Wick's Theorem from the Path Integral . 101 4 Contents 6.5 Interacting Field Theories in the Path Integral Formalism . 102 6.6 Quantization of the Photon Field . 103 6.7 Path Integrals for Fermions . 104 6.7.1 Grassmann Numbers . 105 6.7.2 Partition Function, Functional Derivative and Correlation Func- tions for Fermions . 107 6.8 The Quantum Equations of Motion: Schwinger{Dyson Equations . 109 6.9 The Ward{Takahashi Identity . 110 7 Weyl and Majorana Fermions 115 7.1 Spinor Indices . 116 7.1.1 Left-handed spinors . 116 7.1.2 Raising and lowering spinor indices . 117 7.1.3 Right-handed spinors . 118 7.1.4 Conjugate spinors . 119 7.1.5 Lorentz invariance of the Pauli matrices . 119 7.1.6 One more example: the vector current . 120 7.2 The QED Lagrangian in 2-Component Notation . 121 7.3 Majorana Fermions . 123 7.4 Application: Majorana Neutrinos and the Seesaw Mechanism . 124 7.4.1 Neutrino mass terms . 124 7.4.2 The seesaw mechanism . 125 7.4.3 Interlude: measuring neutrino masses . 127 7.5 Twistors . 131 7.5.1 Unifying spinors and momentum 4-vectors . 131 7.5.2 Twistor notation . 133 7.5.3 Examples . 135 8 Radiative Corrections 137 8.1 The Electron Vertex Function . 139 8.1.1 Preliminary Considerations . 139 8.1.2 Physical Interpretation . 141 8.1.3 Simplifying the Integrand . 143 8.1.4 The 4-Momentum Integral . 148 8.1.5 Lepton magnetic moments . 151 8.1.6 Renormalization: a First Glimpse . 154 8.1.7 Regularization of the Divergence . 156 8.1.8 Renormalization: The Counterterm . 159 8.1.9 Summary of our First 1-Loop Calculation . 160 8.2 Renormalization . 161 8.2.1 The renormalized QED Lagrangian . 161 8.2.2 1-Loop Corrections to the Fermion Propagator . 162 8.2.3 1-Loop Corrections to the Photon Propagator . 163 5 Contents 8.2.4 On-Shell Renormalization . 164 8.2.5 Renormalizability . 165 8.2.6 Renormalization of the Electric Charge . 169 8.2.7 Renormalization group evolution and the Callan{Symanzik equation173 8.2.8 The β function . 174 8.3 Infrared Divergences . 176 8.3.1 IR behavior of virtual (1-loop) corrections . 176 8.3.2 IR behavior of real corrections . 178 9 Non-Abelian Gauge Theories 183 9.1 Gauge Interactions from Symmetry . 183 9.2 Non-Abelian Gauge Transformations . 186 9.3 Lie Algebras and Lie Groups . 190 9.3.1 Special Representations . 192 9.3.2 The Casimir Operator . 193 9.3.3 Product Representations . 194 9.3.4 The SU(N) Groups . 195 9.4 Quantization of Non-Abelian Gauge Fields . 196 9.5 The Feynman Rules for Non-Abelian Gauge Theories . 200 9.5.1 The Gauge Boson Propagator . 200 9.5.2 Gauge Boson Self-Interactions . 200 9.5.3 Ghost Interactions . 201 9.5.4 Coupling to Fermions . 201 9.6 The Beta Function for Non-Abelian Gauge Theories . 202 9.7 Phenomenology of Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) . 204 9.7.1 Deep-Inelastic Scattering . 205 9.7.2 Proton{Proton Interactions at the LHC . 207 9.7.3 Infrared divergences in QCD . 208 9.7.4 Multiple Splittings . 211 9.7.5 The DGLAP Equations . 212 10 Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking 217 10.1 The Abelian Higgs Mechanism . 217 10.2 Goldstone's Theorem . 219 10.3 The Glashow{Salam{Weinberg Theory of Electroweak Interactions . 221 10.3.1 Higgs Mechanism . ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Path Integrals in Quantum Mechanics
    Path Integrals in Quantum Mechanics Dennis V. Perepelitsa MIT Department of Physics 70 Amherst Ave. Cambridge, MA 02142 Abstract We present the path integral formulation of quantum mechanics and demon- strate its equivalence to the Schr¨odinger picture. We apply the method to the free particle and quantum harmonic oscillator, investigate the Euclidean path integral, and discuss other applications. 1 Introduction A fundamental question in quantum mechanics is how does the state of a particle evolve with time? That is, the determination the time-evolution ψ(t) of some initial | i state ψ(t ) . Quantum mechanics is fully predictive [3] in the sense that initial | 0 i conditions and knowledge of the potential occupied by the particle is enough to fully specify the state of the particle for all future times.1 In the early twentieth century, Erwin Schr¨odinger derived an equation specifies how the instantaneous change in the wavefunction d ψ(t) depends on the system dt | i inhabited by the state in the form of the Hamiltonian. In this formulation, the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian play an important role, since their time-evolution is easy to calculate (i.e. they are stationary). A well-established method of solution, after the entire eigenspectrum of Hˆ is known, is to decompose the initial state into this eigenbasis, apply time evolution to each and then reassemble the eigenstates. That is, 1In the analysis below, we consider only the position of a particle, and not any other quantum property such as spin. 2 D.V. Perepelitsa n=∞ ψ(t) = exp [ iE t/~] n ψ(t ) n (1) | i − n h | 0 i| i n=0 X This (Hamiltonian) formulation works in many cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Effective Quantum Field Theories Thomas Mannel Theoretical Physics I (Particle Physics) University of Siegen, Siegen, Germany
    Generating Functionals Functional Integration Renormalization Introduction to Effective Quantum Field Theories Thomas Mannel Theoretical Physics I (Particle Physics) University of Siegen, Siegen, Germany 2nd Autumn School on High Energy Physics and Quantum Field Theory Yerevan, Armenia, 6-10 October, 2014 T. Mannel, Siegen University Effective Quantum Field Theories: Lecture 1 Generating Functionals Functional Integration Renormalization Overview Lecture 1: Basics of Quantum Field Theory Generating Functionals Functional Integration Perturbation Theory Renormalization Lecture 2: Effective Field Thoeries Effective Actions Effective Lagrangians Identifying relevant degrees of freedom Renormalization and Renormalization Group T. Mannel, Siegen University Effective Quantum Field Theories: Lecture 1 Generating Functionals Functional Integration Renormalization Lecture 3: Examples @ work From Standard Model to Fermi Theory From QCD to Heavy Quark Effective Theory From QCD to Chiral Perturbation Theory From New Physics to the Standard Model Lecture 4: Limitations: When Effective Field Theories become ineffective Dispersion theory and effective field theory Bound Systems of Quarks and anomalous thresholds When quarks are needed in QCD É. T. Mannel, Siegen University Effective Quantum Field Theories: Lecture 1 Generating Functionals Functional Integration Renormalization Lecture 1: Basics of Quantum Field Theory Thomas Mannel Theoretische Physik I, Universität Siegen f q f et Yerevan, October 2014 T. Mannel, Siegen University Effective Quantum
    [Show full text]
  • 5 the Dirac Equation and Spinors
    5 The Dirac Equation and Spinors In this section we develop the appropriate wavefunctions for fundamental fermions and bosons. 5.1 Notation Review The three dimension differential operator is : ∂ ∂ ∂ = , , (5.1) ∂x ∂y ∂z We can generalise this to four dimensions ∂µ: 1 ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ = , , , (5.2) µ c ∂t ∂x ∂y ∂z 5.2 The Schr¨odinger Equation First consider a classical non-relativistic particle of mass m in a potential U. The energy-momentum relationship is: p2 E = + U (5.3) 2m we can substitute the differential operators: ∂ Eˆ i pˆ i (5.4) → ∂t →− to obtain the non-relativistic Schr¨odinger Equation (with = 1): ∂ψ 1 i = 2 + U ψ (5.5) ∂t −2m For U = 0, the free particle solutions are: iEt ψ(x, t) e− ψ(x) (5.6) ∝ and the probability density ρ and current j are given by: 2 i ρ = ψ(x) j = ψ∗ ψ ψ ψ∗ (5.7) | | −2m − with conservation of probability giving the continuity equation: ∂ρ + j =0, (5.8) ∂t · Or in Covariant notation: µ µ ∂µj = 0 with j =(ρ,j) (5.9) The Schr¨odinger equation is 1st order in ∂/∂t but second order in ∂/∂x. However, as we are going to be dealing with relativistic particles, space and time should be treated equally. 25 5.3 The Klein-Gordon Equation For a relativistic particle the energy-momentum relationship is: p p = p pµ = E2 p 2 = m2 (5.10) · µ − | | Substituting the equation (5.4), leads to the relativistic Klein-Gordon equation: ∂2 + 2 ψ = m2ψ (5.11) −∂t2 The free particle solutions are plane waves: ip x i(Et p x) ψ e− · = e− − · (5.12) ∝ The Klein-Gordon equation successfully describes spin 0 particles in relativistic quan- tum field theory.
    [Show full text]
  • On Topological Vertex Formalism for 5-Brane Webs with O5-Plane
    DIAS-STP-20-10 More on topological vertex formalism for 5-brane webs with O5-plane Hirotaka Hayashi,a Rui-Dong Zhub;c aDepartment of Physics, School of Science, Tokai University, 4-1-1 Kitakaname, Hiratsuka-shi, Kanagawa 259-1292, Japan bInstitute for Advanced Study & School of Physical Science and Technology, Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China cSchool of Theoretical Physics, Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies 10 Burlington Road, Dublin, Ireland E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: We propose a concrete form of a vertex function, which we call O-vertex, for the intersection between an O5-plane and a 5-brane in the topological vertex formalism, as an extension of the work of [1]. Using the O-vertex it is possible to compute the Nekrasov partition functions of 5d theories realized on any 5-brane web diagrams with O5-planes. We apply our proposal to 5-brane webs with an O5-plane and compute the partition functions of pure SO(N) gauge theories and the pure G2 gauge theory. The obtained results agree with the results known in the literature. We also compute the partition function of the pure SU(3) gauge theory with the Chern-Simons level 9. At the end we rewrite the O-vertex in a form of a vertex operator. arXiv:2012.13303v2 [hep-th] 12 May 2021 Contents 1 Introduction1 2 O-vertex 3 2.1 Topological vertex formalism with an O5-plane3 2.2 Proposal for O-vertex6 2.3 Higgsing and O-planee 9 3 Examples 11 3.1 SO(2N) gauge theories 11 3.1.1 Pure SO(4) gauge theory 12 3.1.2 Pure SO(6) and SO(8) Theories 15 3.2 SO(2N
    [Show full text]
  • Path Integrals in Quantum Mechanics
    Path Integrals in Quantum Mechanics Emma Wikberg Project work, 4p Department of Physics Stockholm University 23rd March 2006 Abstract The method of Path Integrals (PI’s) was developed by Richard Feynman in the 1940’s. It offers an alternate way to look at quantum mechanics (QM), which is equivalent to the Schrödinger formulation. As will be seen in this project work, many "elementary" problems are much more difficult to solve using path integrals than ordinary quantum mechanics. The benefits of path integrals tend to appear more clearly while using quantum field theory (QFT) and perturbation theory. However, one big advantage of Feynman’s formulation is a more intuitive way to interpret the basic equations than in ordinary quantum mechanics. Here we give a basic introduction to the path integral formulation, start- ing from the well known quantum mechanics as formulated by Schrödinger. We show that the two formulations are equivalent and discuss the quantum mechanical interpretations of the theory, as well as the classical limit. We also perform some explicit calculations by solving the free particle and the harmonic oscillator problems using path integrals. The energy eigenvalues of the harmonic oscillator is found by exploiting the connection between path integrals, statistical mechanics and imaginary time. Contents 1 Introduction and Outline 2 1.1 Introduction . 2 1.2 Outline . 2 2 Path Integrals from ordinary Quantum Mechanics 4 2.1 The Schrödinger equation and time evolution . 4 2.2 The propagator . 6 3 Equivalence to the Schrödinger Equation 8 3.1 From the Schrödinger equation to PI’s . 8 3.2 From PI’s to the Schrödinger equation .
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Electrodynamics in Strong Magnetic Fields. 111* Electron-Photon Interactions
    Aust. J. Phys., 1983, 36, 799-824 Quantum Electrodynamics in Strong Magnetic Fields. 111* Electron-Photon Interactions D. B. Melrose and A. J. Parle School of Physics, University of Sydney. Sydney, N.S.W. 2006. Abstract A version of QED is developed which allows one to treat electron-photon interactions in the magnetized vacuum exactly and which allows one to calculate the responses of a relativistic quantum electron gas and include these responses in QED. Gyromagnetic emission and related crossed processes, and Compton scattering and related processes are discussed in some detail. Existing results are corrected or generalized for nonrelativistic (quantum) gyroemission, one-photon pair creation, Compton scattering by electrons in the ground state and two-photon excitation to the first Landau level from the ground state. We also comment on maser action in one-photon pair annihilation. 1. Introduction A full synthesis of quantum electrodynamics (QED) and the classical theory of plasmas requires that the responses of the medium (plasma + vacuum) be included in the photon properties and interactions in QED and that QED be used to calculate the responses of the medium. It was shown by Melrose (1974) how this synthesis could be achieved in the unmagnetized case. In the present paper we extend the synthesized theory to include the magnetized case. Such a synthesized theory is desirable even when the effects of a material medium are negligible. The magnetized vacuum is birefringent with a full hierarchy of nonlinear response tensors, and for many purposes it is convenient to treat the magnetized vacuum as though it were a material medium.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Diagramology' Types of Feynman Diagram
    `Diagramology' Types of Feynman Diagram Tim Evans (2nd January 2018) 1. Pieces of Diagrams Feynman diagrams1 have four types of element:- • Internal Vertices represented by a dot with some legs coming out. Each type of vertex represents one term in Hint. • Internal Edges (or legs) represented by lines between two internal vertices. Each line represents a non-zero contraction of two fields, a Feynman propagator. • External Vertices. An external vertex represents a coordinate/momentum variable which is not integrated out. Whatever the diagram represents (matrix element M, Green function G or sometimes some other mathematical object) the diagram is a function of the values linked to external vertices. Sometimes external vertices are represented by a dot or a cross. However often no explicit notation is used for an external vertex so an edge ending in space and not at a vertex with one or more other legs will normally represent an external vertex. • External Legs are ones which have at least one end at an external vertex. Note that external vertices may not have an explicit symbol so these are then legs which just end in the middle of no where. Still represents a Feynman propagator. 2. Subdiagrams A subdiagram is a subset of vertices V and all the edges between them. You may also want to include the edges connected at one end to a vertex in our chosen subset, V, but at the other end connected to another vertex or an external leg. Sometimes these edges connecting the subdiagram to the rest of the diagram are not included, in which case we have \amputated the legs" and we are working with a \truncated diagram".
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Quantized Free Dirac Fields
    7 Quantized Free Dirac Fields 7.1 The Dirac Equation and Quantum Field Theory The Dirac equation is a relativistic wave equation which describes the quantum dynamics of spinors. We will see in this section that a consistent description of this theory cannot be done outside the framework of (local) relativistic Quantum Field Theory. The Dirac Equation (i∂/ m)ψ =0 ψ¯(i∂/ + m) = 0 (1) − can be regarded as the equations of motion of a complex field ψ. Much as in the case of the scalar field, and also in close analogy to the theory of non-relativistic many particle systems discussed in the last chapter, the Dirac field is an operator which acts on a Fock space. We have already discussed that the Dirac equation also follows from a least-action-principle. Indeed the Lagrangian i µ = [ψ¯∂ψ/ (∂µψ¯)γ ψ] mψψ¯ ψ¯(i∂/ m)ψ (2) L 2 − − ≡ − has the Dirac equation for its equation of motion. Also, the momentum Πα(x) canonically conjugate to ψα(x) is ψ δ † Πα(x)= L = iψα (3) δ∂0ψα(x) Thus, they obey the equal-time Poisson Brackets ψ 3 ψα(~x), Π (~y) P B = iδαβδ (~x ~y) (4) { β } − Thus † 3 ψα(~x), ψ (~y) P B = δαβδ (~x ~y) (5) { β } − † In other words the field ψα and its adjoint ψα are a canonical pair. This result follows from the fact that the Dirac Lagrangian is first order in time derivatives. Notice that the field theory of non-relativistic many-particle systems (for both fermions on bosons) also has a Lagrangian which is first order in time derivatives.
    [Show full text]
  • A Supersymmetry Primer
    hep-ph/9709356 version 7, January 2016 A Supersymmetry Primer Stephen P. Martin Department of Physics, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb IL 60115 I provide a pedagogical introduction to supersymmetry. The level of discussion is aimed at readers who are familiar with the Standard Model and quantum field theory, but who have had little or no prior exposure to supersymmetry. Topics covered include: motiva- tions for supersymmetry, the construction of supersymmetric Lagrangians, superspace and superfields, soft supersymmetry-breaking interactions, the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM), R-parity and its consequences, the origins of supersymmetry breaking, the mass spectrum of the MSSM, decays of supersymmetric particles, experi- mental signals for supersymmetry, and some extensions of the minimal framework. Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Interlude: Notations and Conventions 13 3 Supersymmetric Lagrangians 17 3.1 The simplest supersymmetric model: a free chiral supermultiplet ............. 18 3.2 Interactions of chiral supermultiplets . ................ 22 3.3 Lagrangians for gauge supermultiplets . .............. 25 3.4 Supersymmetric gauge interactions . ............. 26 3.5 Summary: How to build a supersymmetricmodel . ............ 28 4 Superspace and superfields 30 4.1 Supercoordinates, general superfields, and superspace differentiation and integration . 31 4.2 Supersymmetry transformations the superspace way . ................ 33 4.3 Chiral covariant derivatives . ............ 35 4.4 Chiralsuperfields................................ ........ 37 arXiv:hep-ph/9709356v7 27 Jan 2016 4.5 Vectorsuperfields................................ ........ 38 4.6 How to make a Lagrangian in superspace . .......... 40 4.7 Superspace Lagrangians for chiral supermultiplets . ................... 41 4.8 Superspace Lagrangians for Abelian gauge theory . ................ 43 4.9 Superspace Lagrangians for general gauge theories . ................. 46 4.10 Non-renormalizable supersymmetric Lagrangians . .................. 49 4.11 R symmetries........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Mechanics Propagator
    Quantum Mechanics_propagator This article is about Quantum field theory. For plant propagation, see Plant propagation. In Quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, the propagator gives the probability amplitude for a particle to travel from one place to another in a given time, or to travel with a certain energy and momentum. In Feynman diagrams, which calculate the rate of collisions in quantum field theory, virtual particles contribute their propagator to the rate of the scattering event described by the diagram. They also can be viewed as the inverse of the wave operator appropriate to the particle, and are therefore often called Green's functions. Non-relativistic propagators In non-relativistic quantum mechanics the propagator gives the probability amplitude for a particle to travel from one spatial point at one time to another spatial point at a later time. It is the Green's function (fundamental solution) for the Schrödinger equation. This means that, if a system has Hamiltonian H, then the appropriate propagator is a function satisfying where Hx denotes the Hamiltonian written in terms of the x coordinates, δ(x)denotes the Dirac delta-function, Θ(x) is the Heaviside step function and K(x,t;x',t')is the kernel of the differential operator in question, often referred to as the propagator instead of G in this context, and henceforth in this article. This propagator can also be written as where Û(t,t' ) is the unitary time-evolution operator for the system taking states at time t to states at time t'. The quantum mechanical propagator may also be found by using a path integral, where the boundary conditions of the path integral include q(t)=x, q(t')=x' .
    [Show full text]
  • Propagators and Path Integrals
    NAT10NAAI. WSTITUUT VOOR KERNFYSICA EN NIKHEF-H/95-050 Propagators and Path Integrals J.W. van Holten NIKHEF-H, P.O. Box 41882 1009 DB Amsterdam NI, August 22, 1995 Abstract Path-integral expressions for one-particle propagators in scalar and ferinioaic field theories are derived, for arbitrary mass. This establishes a direct connection between field theory and specific classical point-particle models. The role of world-line rep&rametroation invaiiance of the classical action avnd the implementation of the corresponding BB5T-symmetry in the qutntuin theory are discussed. The presence of classical world-line supersymrnetry is shown to lead t/> an unwanted doubling of states for massive spin-1/2 particles. The origin of this phenomenon is traced to a 'hidden' topologies! fermionic excitation. A different formulation of the pseudo-classical mechan- ics using a bosonic representation of 71 is shown to remove those extra states at the expense of losing manifest supersymmetry. PilKHEf SECTIE - H POSTBUS 4188',!, 1009 DB A^STERDfW •UL ? 0 NJ 0 1 KS002045549 R: FI NL96FG754 DEOOSS87924 1 Introduction Because of their conceptual simplicity, path-integral methods [1, 2] often provide convenient procedures to obtain insight in field theoretical problems. In recent work by Strassler, McKeon, Schmidt, Schubert and others [3]-[7] world-line path integrals have been applied to a reformulation of standard Feynman perturbation theory from which useful information on the structure of perturbative Green's functions is extracted. Some of these results were actually first derived in the particle-limit of string theory [8]. A basic question in this context is the representation of propagators in quantum field theory by path integrals for relativistic particles of various kind.
    [Show full text]
  • Feynman Diagrams Particle and Nuclear Physics
    5. Feynman Diagrams Particle and Nuclear Physics Dr. Tina Potter Dr. Tina Potter 5. Feynman Diagrams 1 In this section... Introduction to Feynman diagrams. Anatomy of Feynman diagrams. Allowed vertices. General rules Dr. Tina Potter 5. Feynman Diagrams 2 Feynman Diagrams The results of calculations based on a single process in Time-Ordered Perturbation Theory (sometimes called old-fashioned, OFPT) depend on the reference frame. Richard Feynman 1965 Nobel Prize The sum of all time orderings is frame independent and provides the basis for our relativistic theory of Quantum Mechanics. A Feynman diagram represents the sum of all time orderings + = −−!time −−!time −−!time Dr. Tina Potter 5. Feynman Diagrams 3 Feynman Diagrams Each Feynman diagram represents a term in the perturbation theory expansion of the matrix element for an interaction. Normally, a full matrix element contains an infinite number of Feynman diagrams. Total amplitude Mfi = M1 + M2 + M3 + ::: 2 Total rateΓ fi = 2πjM1 + M2 + M3 + :::j ρ(E) Fermi's Golden Rule But each vertex gives a factor of g, so if g is small (i.e. the perturbation is small) only need the first few. (Lowest order = fewest vertices possible) 2 4 g g g 6 p e2 1 Example: QED g = e = 4πα ∼ 0:30, α = 4π ∼ 137 Dr. Tina Potter 5. Feynman Diagrams 4 Feynman Diagrams Perturbation Theory Calculating Matrix Elements from Perturbation Theory from first principles is cumbersome { so we dont usually use it. Need to do time-ordered sums of (on mass shell) particles whose production and decay does not conserve energy and momentum. Feynman Diagrams Represent the maths of Perturbation Theory with Feynman Diagrams in a very simple way (to arbitrary order, if couplings are small enough).
    [Show full text]