Salem-Swampscott
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2020 Coastal Massachusetts COASTSWEEP Results (People
COASTSWEEP 2020 - Cleanup Results Town Location Group Name People Pounds Miles TOTALS 703 9016.2 151.64 Arlington Mystic River near River Street 1 2 Arlington Mystic River 1 2.12 1.20 Barnstable Sandy Neck Beach Take Care Cape Cod 4 27.5 3.95 Barnstable Jublilation Way, Osterville 1 0.03 Barnstable Sandy Neck Beach Take Care Cape Cod 2 10.13 0.53 Barnstable Sandy Neck Beach Take Care Cape Cod 1 8 Barnstable Sandy Neck Beach Take Care Cape Cod 2 8.25 1.07 Barnstable Sandy Neck Beach Take Care Cape Cod 3 14.25 1.16 Barnstable Oregon Beach, Cotuit 6 30 Barnstable KalMus Park Beach 2 23.63 0.05 Barnstable Dowes Beach, East Bay Cape Cod Anti-Litter Coalition 4 25.03 0.29 Barnstable Osterville Point, Osterville Cape Cod Anti-Litter Coalition 1 3.78 0.09 Barnstable Louisburg Square, Centerville 2 Barnstable Hathaway's Ponds 2 4.1 0.52 Barnstable Hathaway's Ponds 2 5.37 0.52 Barnstable Eagle Pond, Cotuit Lily & Grace Walker 2 23.75 3.26 Beverly Corning Street SaleM Sound Coastwatch 2 0.02 Beverly Corning Street SaleM Sound Coastwatch 1 0.07 0.02 Beverly Corning Street SaleM Sound Coastwatch 1 0.03 0.02 Beverly Corning Street SaleM Sound Coastwatch 1 0.11 0.02 Beverly Corning Street SaleM Sound Coastwatch 1 0.18 0.01 Beverly Dane Street Beach SaleM Sound Coastwatch 1 0.36 0.04 Beverly Clifford Ave 2 11.46 0.03 Beverly Near David Lynch Park 1 0.43 0.03 Beverly Rice's Beach SaleM Sound Coastwatch 3 28.61 0.03 Beverly Rice's Beach SaleM Sound Coastwatch 3 1.61 Beverly Rice's Beach SaleM Sound Coastwatch 1 0.07 COASTSWEEP 2020 - Cleanup Results Town -
National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska Final Integrated Activity Plan/Environmental Impact Statement Errata
United States Department of the Interior BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Alaska State Office 222 West Seventh Avenue, #13 Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7504 www.blrn .gov/alaska Dear Reader: The enclosed Errata Sheet documents minor corrections to the text of the Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska Integrated Activity Plan (TAP) that was publicly released on June 26. 2020. These corrections reflect errors that were discovered after the release of the Final EIS. We have utilized “tracked changes” (red text additions and green text crossed-out deletions) for the changes where we felt it would assist the reader to more easily identify the corrections. There are no changes or significant new circumstances or information identified in this Errata Sheet that affect the impact conclusions in the final EIS. In the Final EIS, an error was identified in Table 2-1 for the acreage available for leasing and infrastructure under Alternative E. Correcting this error required updates throughout the text of the EIS wherever acreage available for leasing and infrastructure under Alternative E was referenced. These changes are denoted with an asterisk (*) in the errata sheet. This Errata Sheet is part of the administrative record for the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska lAP Final EIS. These corrections will be posted on the BLM-Alaska website at www.blm.gov/alaska. For additional information or clarification regarding the attached Errata Sheet, please contact Stephanie Rice, Project Lead, at (907) 271-3202. Chad B. Padge t State Director Attachment: Errata Sheet ATTACHMENT: ERRATA SHEET In the Final EIS, an error was identified in Table 2-1 for the acreage available for leasing and infrastructure under Alternative E. -
D Classification Review in Seven Locations Across Io
Alaska LANDFIRE Application Project: Map and Classification Review in Seven Locations across Alaska Tina Boucher, Keith Boggs Lindsey Flagstad, Mike Duffy Alaska Natural Heritage Program CAS, University of Alaska Anchorage 707 A Street, Anchorage, AK 99515 907-257-2784 [email protected] 1 4°¢¨• ض #ØÆ¥•Æ¥≥ aa!wò hC CLb5LbD{ LbÇwh5Ü/ÇLhb a9ÇIh5{!//Üw!/ò !{{9{a9bÇ {ÇÜ5ò !w9! a9ÇIh5{ a9ÇIh5{v Ü
Final 2012 Monitoring and Evaluation Report Full Document
United States Department Tongass National Forest of Agriculture Forest Service 2012 Annual & Five Year Monitoring and Alaska Region Evaluation Report R10-MB-757 July 2013 Monitoring Overview INSIDE THIS The 2012 Annual Monitoring and Evaluation The monitoring report can be found on the Tongass web REPORT Report summarizes specific monitoring site under Projects and Plans. A full reference report for completed during fiscal year 2012 in ac- each question is available by hyperlink. cordance with the Tongass Land and Re- If you have questions or comments about this report, source Management Plan (Forest Plan). please contact Carol Seitz-Warmuth at the Ketchikan Physical & Biologi- 2–20 Chapter 6 of the Forest Plan specifies an Forest Supervisor’s Office, 907-228-6341. cal Environment annual written summary of forest wide mon- itoring programs. As a result of the 2008 Forest Plan Amend- Human Uses and 20–28 ment, some monitoring protocols and ques- Land Manage- tions were updated to better ment define and focus the monitoring work. This report serves as both Economic and 29 the annual written summary of Social Environ- forest wide monitoring programs, and also the five year review of ment all monitoring done since the Forest Plan Amendment. The five year review is a compre- hensive description of results for each monitoring question, and an evaluation of the last five years of data. Monitoring efforts are currently underway for most of the ques- tions in this report. In some cases, monitoring protocols are still being developed or under review. Monitoring and Evaluation Program Monitoring and evaluation is a ment of plans and budgets, or gathered during the year and quality control process for im- both, to facilitate feasible and identification of issues requiring plementation of the Tongass meaningful action on the immediate attention, while a Forest Plan. -
Native Orchids in Southeast Alaska Marlin Bowles & Bob Armstrong Juneau, Alaska 2019
Native Orchids in Southeast Alaska Marlin Bowles & Bob Armstrong Juneau, Alaska 2019 Preface Southeast Alaska's rainforests, peatlands and alpine habitats support a wide variety of plant life. The composition of this vegetation is strongly influenced by surrounding biogeographical factors. For example, the ranges of some Asian plant species extend into Southeast Alaska by way of the Aleutian Islands; other species extend northward into this region along the Pacific coast or southward from central Alaska. Included in Southeast Alaska's vegetation are at least 27 native orchid species and varieties whose collective ranges extend from Mexico north to beyond the Arctic Circle, and from North America to northern Europe and Asia. These orchids survive in a delicate ecological balance, requiring specific insect pollinators for seed production, and mycorrhizal fungi that provide nutrients essential for seedling growth and survival of adult plants. These complex relationships can lead to vulnerability to human impacts. Orchids also tend to transplant poorly and typically perish without their fungal partners. They are best left to survive as important components of biodiversity as well as resources for our enjoyment. Our goal is to provide a useful description of Southeast Alaska's native orchids for readers who share enthusiasm for the natural environment and desire to learn more about our native orchids. This book addresses each of the native orchids found in the area of southeast Alaska extending from Yakutat and the Yukon border south to Ketchikan and the British Columbia border. For each species, we include a brief description of its distribution, habitat, size, mode of reproduction, and pollination biology. -
Marblehead Reconnaissance Report
MARBLEHEAD RECONNAISSANCE REPORT ESSEX COUNTY LANDSCAPE INVENTORY MASSACHUSETTS HERITAGE LANDSCAPE INVENTORY PROGRAM Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation Essex National Heritage Commission PROJECT TEAM Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation Jessica Rowcroft, Preservation Planner Division of Planning and Engineering Essex National Heritage Commission Bill Steelman, Director of Heritage Preservation Project Consultants Shary Page Berg Gretchen G. Schuler Virginia Adams, PAL Local Project Coordinator Rebecca Curran, Town Planner Local Heritage Landscape Participants Wayne Butler Rebecca Curran Bill Conly Charlie Dalferro Joseph Homan Bette Hunt Judy Jacobi John Liming Frank McIver Ed Nilsson Miller Shropshire William Woodfin May 2005 INTRODUCTION Essex County is known for its unusually rich and varied landscapes, which are represented in each of its 34 municipalities. Heritage landscapes are places that are created by human interaction with the natural environment. They are dynamic and evolving; they reflect the history of the community and provide a sense of place; they show the natural ecology that influenced land use patterns; and they often have scenic qualities. This wealth of landscapes is central to each community’s character; yet heritage landscapes are vulnerable and ever changing. For this reason it is important to take the first steps towards their preservation by identifying those landscapes that are particularly valued by the community – a favorite local farm, a distinctive neighborhood or mill village, a unique natural feature, an inland river corridor or the rocky coast. To this end, the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) and the Essex National Heritage Commission (ENHC) have collaborated to bring the Heritage Landscape Inventory program (HLI) to communities in Essex County. -
Fort Sewall History and Research Project
Grants Fund Historical Research in 2020 th for 375 Anniversary of Fort Sewall in 2019 Established in 1644, 375 years ago, Marblehead’s Fort Sewall is beloved for its spectacular views over Marblehead Harbor and beyond. But, it is also rare and important as one of only a very few early coastal defensive earthwork forts from the 1600s still existing on the North American continent. This summer, preservation and site renovations to improve visitor accessibility are well underway. Approved by town-wide vote last year, the work is managed by McGinley Kalsow & Associates Inc., and is overseen by the Town’s Fort Sewall Oversight Committee. In addition to the voter-approved funding for the improvements, the preservation work is supported by $210,000 in grant awards from state agencies (the Massachusetts Cultural Council through its Cultural Facilities Fund and MassDevelopment, as well as the Massachusetts Historical Commission through its Preservation Projects Fund) as well as by generous individual donations. The donations will also support a summer Fort Ranger docent program and an endowment for ongoing fort maintenance. The Fort Sewall Oversight Committee is also pleased to announce that three grants totaling nearly $10,000 for historical research and education about the fort were awarded this year by two phil- anthropic historical organizations: the Massachusetts Society of the Cincinnati and the Massachusetts Society of Colonial Wars (with a match from the parent organization, the General Society of C. Wars). The research will result in a comprehensive report about the fort’s evolution over nearly three centuries, from its establishment in 1644 until 1922, when national U.S. -
Alternative Methods’ of Carrying out the Undertaking
Draft Environmental Assessment Lakeview Waterfront Connection 5.0 DESCRIPTION, EVALUATION AND RATIONALE FOR ‘ALTERNATIVE METHODS’ OF CARRYING OUT THE UNDERTAKING ‘Alternative Methods’ are different ways of doing the same activity. In the context of the LWC Project, ‘Alternative Methods’ are similar ways of designing a new natural waterfront park on created land with ecological habitat and public linkages within the LWC Project Study Area. For the purpose of the EA, different ‘Alternative Methods’ were identified by modelling different fill volumes and alternative shoreline treatments in relation to the coastal processes that will ultimately dictate their configuration. The initial identification of ‘Alternative Methods’ considered the amount of fill required to establish a footprint upon which other LWC Project objectives could be achieved. Different combinations of hard and soft shorelines (i.e. revetment vs. beach) and the incorporation of different fill volumes produced a series of alternative footprints upon which the various LWC Project objectives could be achieved. LWC Project objectives were addressed as subsequent layers applied to the alternative footprints. The identification and evaluation of ‘Alternative Methods’ was carried out in a four-step process depicted in Figure 5.1. 5.1 STEP 1: DETERMINE FOOTPRINT FOR ALTERNATIVES The first step in defining the Alternative LWC Project Configurations was to develop a range of footprints12 up to a maximum spatial extent. This range of footprints was determined through consideration of coastal processes, effects on water quality and the economical use of fill. The LWC Project footprint can be affected by and/or can affect coastal processes to the detriment of the broader LWC Regional Study Area or to the detriment of the LWC Project footprint itself. -
Massachusetts Coastal Infrastructure Inventory and Assessment Project Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation Office of Waterways
Massachusetts Coastal Infrastructure Inventory and Assessment Project Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation Office of Waterways Massachusetts Coastal Communities October, 2009 Massachusetts Coastal Infrastructure Inventory and Assessment Project Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation Office of Waterways TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN WORKING GROUP MEMBERS 8 INTRODUCTION 9 STUDY PURPOSE 13 LIMIT OF STUDY 14 DEVELOPMENT OF MassGIS DATABASE ATTRIBUTES 15 DEVELOPMENT OF REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION COSTS 18 DEVELOPMENT OF THE 20-YEAR MAINTENANCE/REPAIR PROGRAM 20 RECOMMENDATIONS 22 INDEX OF APPEDIXES A: COASTAL REGIONS MAP 25 B: STRUCTURE CONDITION TABLE 26 C: PRIORITY RATING SYSTEM 27 D: 2006 REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION COSTING DATA SHEET 28 E: SAMPLE COMMUNITY DATA SHEET 29 F: INFRASTRUCTURE PRIORITY LISTING 32 2 G: BREAKDOWN OF STRUCUTRE TYPE BY CONDITION RATING 34 H: MAINTENANCE AND MONITORING REPORT FORM 35 I: 20 YEAR SPENDING PLAN 36-87 YEAR ONE 36 YEAR TWO 37 YEAR THREE 38 YEAR FOUR 39 YEAR FIVE 40 YEAR SIX 42 YEAR SEVEN 43 YEAR EIGHT 44 YEAR NINE 46 YEAR TEN 48 YEAR ELEVEN 49 YEAR TWELVE 50 YEAR THIRTEEN 51 YEAR FOURTEEN 52 YEAR FIFTEEN 54 YEAR SIXTEEN 67 YEAR SEVENTEEN 61 YEAR EIGHTEEN 66 YEAR NINETEEN 68 YEAR TWENTY 72 3 Massachusetts Coastal Infrastructure Inventory and Assessment Project Coastal Hazards Commission Infrastructure Plan Working Group Summary Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Infrastructure Plan Working Group of the Coastal Hazards Commission (CHC) was tasked with prioritizing coastal protection structures maintenance and repairs. In the report Preparing for the Storm: Recommendations for Management of Risk from Coastal Hazards in Massachusetts; May 2007, Chapter 3 - Infrastructure Inventory discussed the South Shore Pilot Project, since the time of the project, the remaining coastline inventory has been completed. -
An Inventory of Rare Plants of Misty Fiords National Monument, Usda Forest Service, Region Ten
AN INVENTORY OF RARE PLANTS OF MISTY FIORDS NATIONAL MONUMENT, USDA FOREST SERVICE, REGION TEN A Report by John DeLapp Alaska Natural Heritage Program ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES INSTITUTE University of Alaska Anchorage 707 A Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501 February 8, 1994 ALASKA NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES INSTITUTE UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA ANCHORAGE 707 A Street • Anchorage, Alaska 99501 • (907) 279-4523 • Fax (907) 276-6847 Dr. Douglas A. Segar, Director Dr. David C. Duffy, Program Manager (UAA IS AN EO/AA EMPLOYER AND EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION) 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This cooperative project was the result of many hours of work by people within the Misty Fiords National Monument and the Ketchikan Area of the U.S. Forest Service who were dedicated to our common objectives and we are grateful to them all. Misty Fiords personnel who were key to the initiation and realization of this project include Jackie Canterbury and Don Fisher. Becky Nourse, Mark Jaqua, and Jan Peloskey all provided essential support during the field surveys. Also, Ketchikan Area staff Cole Crocker-Bedford, Michael Brown, and Richard Guhl provided indispensable support. Others outside of the Forest Service have provided assistance, without which this report would not be possible. Of particular note are Dr. David Murray, Dr. Barbara Murray, Carolyn Parker, and Al Batten of the University of Alaska Fairbanks Museum Herbarium. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.......................................................................................................... -
Marblehead Open Space Final-1
Marblehead Open Space & Recreation Plan 1999 Contents Contents.................................................................................................. 2 Section 1. Plan Summary....................................................................... 3 Section 2. Introduction........................................................................... 4 Section 3. Community Setting............................................................... 6 Section 4. Environmental Inventory and Analysis............................ 11 Section 5. Inventory of Lands ............................................................. 31 Section 6. Community Goals............................................................... 55 Section 7. Analysis of Needs............................................................... 56 Section 8. Goals and Objectives......................................................... 66 Section 9. Five-year Action Plan......................................................... 68 Section 10. Public Comments............................................................. 76 Section 11. References......................................................................... 80 Appendices........................................................................................... 81 Most Used Open Spaces...................................................................... 82 Things To Do......................................................................................... 85 Section 1. Plan Summary 2 The Open Space and Recreation Plan ("The -
Visit Trailsandsails.Org for Updated Information and Additional Events. 1 WELCOME to TRAILS & SAILS 10 DAYS of FREE HERITAGE EVENTS in ESSEX COUNTY
Visit TrailsAndSails.org for updated information and additional events. 1 WELCOME TO TRAILS & SAILS 10 DAYS OF FREE HERITAGE EVENTS IN ESSEX COUNTY Entering into its 18th year, Trails & Sails is an event series that brings awareness and appreciation for heritage resources around the county. Historically, Trails & Sails has focused on outdoor activities such as guided hikes and excursions on the water (hence the “trails” and the “sails”) but over the years the event series has grown to include tours of historic houses, lectures on Essex County history, and demonstrations of cultural activities. This year, our partners have organized some of the most unique & exciting events yet. These events celebrate the best of historic, cultural, and natural resource that form the Essex National Heritage Area. Throughtout the 34 cities and towns of Essex County, we hope that you have an amazing Trails & Sails experience! TRAILS & SAILS IS MADE POSSIBLE BY: A special thank you our sponsors who make Trails & Sails possible: Presenting Sponsor Eastern Bank, Highlighting Sponsor Salem Five Charitable Foundation, and Supporting Sponsor People’s United Bank. Their financial contributions helped produce the printed guide and online guide, tools that make discovering special places in Essex County possible. Additional thanks to Discover Gloucester for promotional support & assistance. 2 Visit TrailsAndSails.org for updated information and additional events. Since 1855, Salem Five has been listening to the needs of our communities. In keeping with that commitment, we are pleased to sponsor Trails & Sails. TWO LOCATIONS IN SALEM 71 Washington St. 424 Essex St. 978.744.5450 978.745.5247 salemfive.com | 800.4SALEM5 Member FDIC.