Name Option Comments Ken Collings Option 2 I think that you are doing this exactly the right way. More power to your elbow In my opinion the whole amount should be distributed among the consumers but because you don't give that as an option I have to go Phil Harris Option 1 with option 1. I just don't see why consumers who do the paying are being forced to be providers to all sorts of projects most of which we don't know anything or little about. TECT need to make these organisations more accountable as to what they spend the money on and they should be made to fundraise Melissa Hodgson Option 1 first not just get a hand out. Many consumers could use this money just to live. In reality you are just paying directors of these charities huge wages they do not deserve.

I choose Option 2 for the special distribution. I would like to ask why the funds cant be split evenly across the three though, why cant it be Emma Fray Option 2 divided into equal thirds across Consumer Rebates, Transformational Grants and Top Up Current Grant Funds? Margaret Murray-Benge Option 1 Our power bills are high, and I am a loyal customer.

Please be aware that the Ombudsman,Human Rights and Consumer Affairs have been mailed your unlawful proposal and asked to investigate.You took peoples rights away saying they have to donate part of their rebate to YOUR charity of choice when they can not afford to do that nor wish to do that.Also making people give out their bank details is also not legal or ethical.Taking away peoples choices is straight out bullying and an abuse of power.There does not seem to be any decency or concern for the set up of the Trust by any of the Trustee's and some consumers have had enough after last years debacle.As to your excuse that old people can't get to the bank to cash a Trish Stewart cheque so you could do this is rubbish.As a pensioner and a carer in the past of the aged it does not wash.If they can't get out to cash a cheque then they can't get out to pay their bills,go shopping or to the doctor and would be in a rest home or have a live in carer. So in view of these facts I would like my full rebate sent to me by cheque as per usual without having part of it taken out for charity which I can not afford and which you have no right to take off me as it is my rebate for what I pay to Trust Power and no I do not want the amount on my Power Account which will not help me at all and leave me with no Christmas like so many others.

Thank you for this information and exciting to hear of the extra dividend received. Our feedback in regards to the extra 21million would be that we would support option three, we would love to see any funds go back into the community and we know first hand the incredible difference that TECT funding makes to the community and its families and anything that would cost only a small individual cost Rod Bell Option 3 of $295 would be worth ten fold in the future for those that benefited from the distribution back into local projects which will make a difference we believe well beyond the injection of the dividend amount back to us as. Thanks you again for all doing in the community. Kind regards, Rod Bell, ONZM

$295 to be paid to consumers in the middle of the year will make a huge difference for a lot of families. This could be food in the Annastacia Barclay & Nick Baty Option 1 cupboard or the power bill paid or the car fixed.....all things that make a difference. We should be getting the whole amount, Nothing to transformational grant initiatives or to top up current grant fund. They get enough of Rosemary Ross Option 1 our money anyway.

We particularly support for the Emergency Services sector to benefit from a portion of the $7.35m special distribution. We also feel the Tw & Fj Poulgrain Option 3 existing 80%/20% split for annual distribution is sufficient for Current Grant Funds, without further top-up from this Special Distribution. Grants given on a "Race Basis" are not acceptable. The Division caused by the race based decorations at the Kollective are the sort that Ken. Evans Option 1 motivate hate by extremists. Trust does a wonderful job of supporting the community, but after some research it is one of the more expensive power companies. Elinor Rawlings Option 1 Lower charges especially for superannuates and low income earners would make people less inclined to think of changing providers and encourage people to enroll. Gordon Wakefield Option 1 Trustpower rates are high. they are only giving back what has been over charged in the first place Think this would be a good opportunity for TECT to put good amount of funds into some worthwhile projects in the communtiy, both Ann Patrick Option 3 social needs & facilities Why would we even consider giving this massive amount of money away to a group who wouldn't know what to do with it and waste it. Alan Mathews Option 1 thanks Option 2 assists with compensating Trustpower customers for the premium price they pay through Trustpowers uncompetitive rates, Stephen Boyle Option 2 while also providing a good contribution to worthwhile community projects. Well done! It would be better if you gave the whole lot back to the consumer instead of some worthless project. This would make Trustpower more John Kint Option 1 attractive for consumers. It would get more customers for you. I recognise some would really benefit by the extra payment. However it is a one off windfall that should support the whole community needs with significant investment, not just those who happen to be Trustpower customersthis year. Even this extra is not enough to make a measurable difference to those in real poverty. Please take this opportunity to think of our big picture strategic investment J Gravit Option 3 possibilities. Make a bold decision and then examine options that will have lasting benefit. Eg half way house accommodation, a museum, first year student hostel, a housing partnership shared equity funding structure, community health and support centres in new suburbs- just to name a few current.

Dear Trustees, We appreciate the special distribution that is allocated to us by Trustpower. The proposals however as proposed is not acceptable and I would like to see a 4th option to be included in your proposals. This option is to be one where this special distribution is paid out in full to the shareholders. This view towards having a total payout is shared not only by myself, but in general when looking at the fb posts on your page and responses on a post I had on my FB page. We as shareholders do not like to be held at ransom with limited options and we would go as far to say that the payment should not be limited to just one option throughout when this dividend is paid out. It should give options and then according to what the shareholder chose, the payouts is processed. The reason for having a full payout to myself is that already as a standard you have a significant proportion that is allocated to community grants and paid towards projects which we might not even want to support. With that said, by having a payout in full to me we have a choice of our own to Marianne Pretorius contribute towards a charity of our own choice and be able to through the tax credit get the benefit to the smaller charities and community projects too. This will be a better spread and much more acceptable than having to once again add to the grant funds where the smaller initiatives do not get funding and many a time not have sufficient funding to broaden their services. In other cases it may be a welcome bonus to help some of our customers to fill the gap or be able to spend it on things they seem to need but not had the funds for. Thinking about people that need to pay off medical expenses, get the dentistry done or be able to afford to get a new pair of tyres or perhaps enjoy a few days on holiday. Something that sometimes getting overlooked by the Trustees in their decision-making since they fall into another income group and these things are not a worry to them, rather the next new model of some fancy car or overseas holiday. As said a large portion of the "standard" dividends are already allocated to community projects or grant funds. This special distribution should be paid out in full to the shareholders.

What a great windfall. Please use the funds for some long term sustainable benefit in our communities. Not sure why you are asking us. Mary Dillon Option 3 Just do it and create a legacy of long lasting well-being in the process. Good luck. I think this option will appeal to most Consumers. They will all get a reasonable rebate and at the same time show some compassion for Peter Butterworth Option 2 others by contributing to some essential Community Services Why are you making decisions on behalf of Trust power customers. Just like the last time you tried to make decisions. Have you not listened since the last time. We really will be looking at a different power supplier and will be asking Trust power why they are letting you Kim Aldrich Option 1 make these options and decision making and if we dont get the $295 we will be walking after 21 years and so will a lot of their consumers. So sick off you lot Rg & Sm Olson Option 1 I hope people will vote on this. I think it is a silly way of doing this. Too complicated Adele Barber Option 2 We like to help different groups out and this would allow us to help more I strongly support option 3. Option 3 would be truly transformative for Tauranga. And because its funded fully by a special dividend it Paul Tustin Option 3 doesnt detract from the usual distributions that are to be made to consumers. And yet consumers will benefit indirectly from many of the grant fund projects. Option 3 is truly a win win for all Without your loyal consumers contributions no community grants would be possible. Therefore option 2 is fair to both parties. Also Judith & Alois Denie Option 2 agree with supporting the four specific areas listed. Laxton Smith Option 1 Stop giving our money away Awesome job guys. Pleased to contribute as we are volunteers in Greerton and realise that many people need a little income and D Howie & P R Davison-Howie Option 1 crowdfunding is proving to be very beneficial. There are wonderful projects going on in Tauranga and we would be pleased if we could of help to you in any way. Scott Reid Option 2 I like this option, something extra for the community and something extra for me! I am passionate about some of these funds being directed to support the four significant areas as outlined. All are pivotal areas and if some sort of significant change can be made, it is a change for the betterment of our community and those who live in it. Our M D Rahiri Option 2 environmental sustainability determines our future and we need to do something now. Our Emergency Services are vital and helping to provide safe and healthy homes for those less fortunate is our duty. Good job TECT. Knowles Option 1 Our power is very expensive so as a consumer I deserve to receive the larger amount. Rob Terry Option 2 The four areas for transformational grants are all well chosen and consumer also benefit. Elizabeth Holm Option 3 Ideally we would prefer a 4th option - namely that the full $21m be used to top up the current grant funds. all profits must be given back to the owners of the trust, which is all of us comsumers. Charity begins at home. Arogance of the trustees is Bruce Mcdougall Option 1 not an option. There are plenty of competitiors out there providing a lot cheaper rates. The support TECT gives the community is wonderful and I value extending that contribution more than receiving a further distribution Nigel Mcconnochie Option 3 myself. Good work TECT - keep it up. I am horrified that you are taking this to vote AGAIN! Obviously all of the trustees are all VERY RICH. Stop and think how many of your Lynette Colman Option 1 consumers are poor and only with you for the "Tect Checque." I will leave your company if this stops and I strongly believe you will loose 50-75% of your customers for the same reason as you will looses me. Lynette. Our household is not cash wealthy nor considered poor. ( both superannuated ) we feel the benefit for this one off windfall would have a E Ann Allen-Lett Option 3 more lasting useful outcome given option 3. Both the other alternatives would buy groceries for 2weeks and maybe a cinema ticket! And so be forgotten..... The rebate to individual customers is a trivial amount, with no real effect. By putting the full amount to community causes some real good John Coster Option 3 can be done. It is my opinion that it should all go back to the consumers. After all it is the consumers that have paid for the supply of the services that Raelene Flay Option 1 has allowed this surplus to exist. We ought to have it back. Just like ACC....has overcharged policyholders and is now paying it back....with interest! Debbie & Richard Hallam Option 3 Because this is a one-off, we think it's a great opportunity to support the community. Really - $0 to eligible consumers - this is very reminiscent of recent events - do you not listen to the consumers!!!! Seriously - all the Julianne Parkinson Option 1 wasted money to try and see if you can slither in another fast one and confuse people YET AGAIN!!!! Will you also use the percentage of people voting against the actual number of eligible consumers as a reason to not conform with the consensus you get. Vic Mailman Option 1 Trustpower Rates are higher than other companies so if I don't get the rebates .I would leave Trustpower Pauline Bailey Option 2 the four categories would certainly benefit from the $7,350,000 distributed and I think this option is exellent Pl And Nd Ott Option 2 Trust power charges are higher than other suppliers so I would want some sort of rebate to compensate Lots of power companies out there, why would you "NOT" pass it on in full to Trust power consumers? Or: is you have that much money Jill Armstrong Option 1 to spare from profits, lower our prices please! Moira Trickey Option 1 I think the charities do very well from Trust power as it is.Thanks for the opportunity to vote. Owen Cooney Option 3 Time for community interests to take precedence over individual interests Can choose individually to give to other entities. We pay too much for our electricity through Trustpower so all of special distribution Mrs A J Scott Option 1 should go to consumers. Judy Mccartain Option 2 As this is a one off payment it would be nice to share it with new initiatives locally Once again our trustees have shown their lack of interest in their consumers by omitting the very important fourth option.....All of the R. Anderson 21m to consumers and nothing to the community.This is not a good situation coming hard on the heels of the disastrous 2018 proposal, it is but another example of our trustees unaccountability to the creators of wealth '''THE CONSUMERS''' Jacqueline Stovold Option 3 These community organisations deserve our support- and are worth more than the money in my bank. As much as I need the money, I am not going to be greedy, I would be happy to get $240 and our emergency services plus others listed Rachael King Option 2 can have the rest. They do a fantastic job and deserve something extra also. To whom it may concern - greetings. With regard to your above enquiry may we recommend Option 2 as a pleasant compromise and T R & J P Burton Option 2 make us all a bit more cheerful in a gloomy world? Regards to all.

I don't know why you even ask this moronic question, anything that comes to the trust gets treated as income, so the trust policy applies! I seriously think you have a hidden agenda to manipulate the consumer into passing all rights to the trust to do as they wish. Re: how you decide to no longer to pay out the rebate by cheque .... and now when you do decide to consult with the consumer you dream up a R Frew Option 1 cockamainy 3 tiered option scheme i ...and to add insult to injury, your being paid for it There should also be a forth option, and it involves you lot ! your DH trustees seem to be trying real hard to sell their idea to give OUR money away ....this propaganda has got to STOP.! The sooner these prats are are booted out ...the better .... or have the buggers already made up their minds ? 'm not the only one discussted with this new trust board efforts

Matthew Moynihan Option 2 I would like to see this distributed by option 2, the transformational grant initiatives look great. the main reason i stay with trust power is because of its grants to the community there are cheaper power and internet companies out Susan Smith Option 3 there but I like the idea of the profits going back to the communit Kevin And Lorraine Wearne Option 3 A great opportunity to make a real difference in our community This option gives a little windfall to consumers who can either pay it against their next invoice or use it for something else as well as Joanna Lilley Option 2 supporting transformatiomal grant initiatives which are well selected Distribute to the consumers/payers and let them decide who to donate to - it is the consumer's money! The 20% impost you propose to C A Yandle Option 1 deduct should be removed and the whole amount distributed to consumers. I have chosen Option 1 for two reasons .1. I have minimal confidence in the ability of community agencies and even charities to spend the L Kirkham Option 1 money appropriately. 2. The funds be returned to consumers who then have the option to donate to whatever charity they chose. Ultimately it's about providing choice to consumers. Option 2 is my preference because the beneficiaries of the community funds are named so I can see exactly where the $50 I'm Jo Makgill Option 2 contributing from my share of the special distribution fund is going, These are areas I am very willing to support with this portion of my share. Natasha Williams Option 3 Resist the inevitable "we want the money" respondents :) Do you have short memories? Not too long ago the suggestion of changing the distribution to other than consumers was soundly Bill & Maureen Jacob Option 1 defeated. Listen up! Janet Buckton Option 3 Ill get more value from community contributions than I will from a cash payment. Stuart Old Option 2 I like the sound of some going to the options listed. These initiatives should be given more.

This extra is timely for me as I'm struggling at the moment with changes in my circumstances. However if we can make a real difference by sharing a small portion I think that's great. All 4 causes are worthwhile but I would be cautious about how much good we can do in the first 1000 days of life. Good cause but the money could just be absorbed without achieving. There needs to be better standards set for the many fractions having a go at this at the moment. I have witnessed this and it must be confusing for some parents. Many people give Joyce Adams Option 2 opinions . I believe a New Zealand phychologist Dr Natalie Flynn has written a very good book "Smart Mothering" to help parents as she noticed a lack of researched guidance when she had her family. She has spent 5 years researching because young Mums including herself at the time, don't have the time or energy when they're going through it. Apparently Nigel Latta has celebrated its arrival. Perhaps it could be put to good use to co-ordinate and support what's out there

K & C Tempest Option 3 Like to see the whole sum held for a significant community project like the proposed Tauranga CBD Leisure centre at Memorial Park Anthony Rabbidge Option 2 I like that grants will go to emergency services in option 2 + as a consumer we get something as well Trying to play God again??? Your consumers can decide personally where theywant the funds to go. GIVE IT ALL BACK TO THE L.Kelvin O'Hara Option 1 CONSUMERS! Paul Wiseman Option 3 top up Papamoa Surf Club Build fund I thought we had already had a decision on rebates and that they would remain with Trust Power customers,But the rebate figure was much higher than the figure currently stated.The profit made by TECT must be returned to its customers ,that is what it was set up for Denis.Henderson Option 1 from its inception.The giving of Profit Funds to Charities as decided ,by a small group ,Does and will always be open to Criticism as to which charities and why, I certainly do not wish to throw my money away on some of the ideas and organisations suggested ,That I would not cross the road to support . Bev Oakley Option 2 This would help fantastic community services. The $21M would do so much good for our community. The $240-295 is not an expected or budgeted amount for consumers, so noone is Marcus Niles Option 3 relying on it. By giving it to the community it would have a far greater impact for all of us. We are deeply concerned about this proposal. We have selected Option 1 because TECT has consistently returned to consumers less than the 80% which consumers agreed to in previous consultation rounds, and the document supplied this time is again deficient in terms of explaining how TECT arrived at its three options. Sadly the three options demonstrate a strong element of predetermination in terms of where any money allocated to grant funds will be spent. We ask that more effort be put into correcting this errant behaviour, as any money spent on grants should be determined as part of each grant application and decision making cycle, not as based on the allocations previously consulted upon. This in our view is unacceptable. Jenny And Graeme Purches Option 1 We do not recall any consultation that permitted Trustees to predetermine the allocation of funds outside of that put to Eligible Consumers in the annual consultation cycle. It is not up to TECT Trustees tpo decide about how money should be spent transforming "our" community. That is up to consumers. Once again the TECT Trustees appear to have broken faith with the beneficiaries of the Consumer Trust they represent, by effectively issuing themselves a predetermined licence to allocated funds in a manner not agreed to by Consumers in the annual consultation cycle. It appears that Option 1 is the closest to what Consumers agreed to, and that forms the basis our out choosing that option.

Lorraine Taylor Option 2 Option 2. Will help to pay for my car to be serviced and give some to the community. My husband and I are philanthropists. We agree with giving our share of this special distribution away to charity. Well done for suggesting Lis Sharp Option 3 it. We hope you get support for this option. Fiona Williams Option 2 Very good causes who deserve this payment in option 2 Maureen And Spencer Bailey Option 1 We don't mind giving to charity but we like to chose our own charities. Holly Moore Option 1 I have my own charities that I donate to. Christa George Option 2 Great initiative. Particularly like the First 1000 Days. I feel this is the most reasonable option as a pensioner who is finding it harder to make ends meet. I applaud Tect's motivation and feel Trish Coates Option 2 the Board of Directors are moving in a responsible and humanitarian manner. Great work. Thank you.

I don't wish to see what the trustees call transformational grants being undertaken. The trustees could end up purchasing the Mills Reef vineyard following the fine example set by Marlborough Lines. The fact that this special distribution has come as a surprise suggests Ray Lobb Option 1 somebody/everybody is asleep at the wheel? Stick to your knitting as you have been informed to do very strongly on previous occasions and distribute the funds to eligible shareholders. No white elephants thanks.

Thank you for giving us an opportunity to air our views of your proposals. Here you go again..... to take more off the Funds due to Trust Power consumers. Did not we recently voted a Trustee off the board of Trustees when he wanted to change the "Status QUO". We then voted for people we understood would vote for the "Status Quo". It appears that is not so ... how distressing and I hope that us mere mortals .. can again encourage another two trustee`s to replace two of the encumbents at the next election.There are enough funds already released for other things .... and it appears that you lot have not any empathy towards us and have ignored the financial Brian Simonsen Option 1 difficulties of a lot of lower income consumers struggling to make ends meet ...and this also applies to a large number of pensioners. They would enjoy a little treat with these additional funds. I vote for Option 1 ..... why was there not an Option for all the funds to be given to the Consumers? And I do not think that your present "secret" office is friendly to consumers ... it took me ages to when I called at a downstairs desk who sat me in a BASIC cubicle pending the appearance of one of your staff members to come downstairs. I would have enjoyed being in your office. I may be a bit grumpy but I think it is in order.

Jeff Peet Option 2 Thank you all for your fine work on the TECT None of the above. Give all to a single major project eg the Museum where the TCC is not in a position to provide full funding. This will make a significant difference to the city. I am not involved in any pro - museum group. To provide funding to Emergency Services, First Simon Ellis Option 3 1000 days of life etc should come from central Govt, and any contribution of funds will be lost, and subsequently have little impact overall, even though the groups are worthy recipients, Go for a single major project that will leave a lasting legacy. I believe individual eligible consumers should decide for themselves how they want to spend what they are entitled to. As for us, we make sure our charity donations go directly to the persons who need them, not to the charity groups that spent most of their proceeds on Shack Fong Kennedy Option 1 administration cost. Also, we tend to focus and prioritize on human needs, rather than things such as art, sport, museum and other wishy- washy stuff. As a TECT consumer, I feel any additional funds should be returned to customers as a thank you for loyalty and continued custom. In my Kim Braid Option 1 own personal circumstances, any special distributions paid out to me as a customer of Trustpower helps to make things just a little easier. Thank you for the opportunity to give feedback. Greg Option 1 Option 1 please if I want to donate it my choice to decide who is to receive it I appreciate this special distribution and feel believe the community will benefit from the additional funds especially in the areas outlined. Philippa Lewis Option 2 Being a pensioner on a limited income I know I will appreciate the extra money while also feeling I have given back to the community. As this is a one-off windfall, it would be best to utilise it all for the long term benefit of the widestcommunity of Tauranga. Having already Brian Pointon Option 3 received the usual annual rebate, individual consumers are not really disadvantaged, although I realise that some of the poorest people would see greater benefit in receiving the extra cash in hand. If anything Id drop the payment to customers to $200 and then put $9,625,000 towards transformational grants. This gives a bigger leg Warwick Lampp Option 2 up to those initiatives, that may well make a critical difference. In would like to make my own donations. After last year when you tried to rip everyone of I dont't trust you folk to do the best thing for Kay Whittaker Option 1 the consumer. The money should be given to the consumer only. Trustpower consumers provide a masses amount of money already to the community. Melanie Zajkowski Option 1 Trustpower is a very expensive power company so these payments help give us something back Tapene Mika Option 2 It would be nice to see some of the money spent on the transformational grant intiatives Option two in our families opinion gives us a return, but also benefits the organisations in the Community that we strongly believe will Wr Birch And Jm Scheuber Option 2 make it work for not only themselves but the whole community will benefit, from the hard work and dedication these organisations put into their fields. Option two is a positive step forward in rewarding loyal customers whilst still donating to worthy causes. K F Reeves Option 1 As per current longstanding distribution policy. Suzanne Lines Option 1 I think that the councils get enough money to be doing things for our community, we struggle weekly and any bit helps us. Kf & Br Sutherland Option 2 Option 2 appeals to us as consumers as it gives benefits to consumers as well as donations to charity Krystal Gamman Option 1 Option one sounds like a great choice Brent Ericksen Option 1 will help with bill payments over winter months You have already had feedback on the distribution method in the last fiasco which was unanimous in Option 1. You should desist in this Brett Wilton Option 1 constant rhetoric of changing the distribution method. Option 1 is how the Trust was always intended! Aramoana Andrews Option 1 Have you thought about scholarships? As I have recently found out, emergency services need more funding and more administrative support as the continuation and efficiency Ms K L Landsman Option 2 of their service to the public is vital While charity is great, and I do do a lot in my community to help others, this extra help would be so helpful in my current situation where Suzanne Farrow Option 1 things are very tight. Also, as a banker, I see peoples accounts and financial situations every day, and I know first hand how much this small extra amount would really help so many families. I vote option 2. I can't see if there is a check box next to the options as it is cut off in my screen, so I would appreciate that this comment Colleen Puhara Option 2 will be suffice. Felicity Morgan Option 1 People should have a free choice to make donations to whatever organisation they choose Stuart W Duff Option 1 With power price continuing to go up, up, up every possible benefit for power consummers helps. Not selfish - just practical!! Timothy Hickey Option 1 There are already enough community projects and grants. Tracy Haar Option 1 There should be another option saying the money all goes to the consumer . If there was I would tick that option. Helen Heath Option 3 This is extra to what we would normally receive in November so I think we should use it for grant initiatives/funds. Robert Craig Scott Option 1 I am 80 years old and my only income is the ol age pension Colin Olesen Option 2 It would be good to see out Community benefit W A & S J Jost Option 2 Option 2 is good distribution! Fiona Mckenzie Option 1 we already give to lots of charities, so would like the refund for ourselves to give to our charity choice Olesen Accountaants Option 2 It would be good to see the Community share in this windfall I don't support option 1 (or 3) because of a lack of transparency over what the iconic projects are. I don't think this should be back door Morgan Hardy Option 2 funding for a museum but I am happy to support the community this would make up for the extra power cost we pay in our area., which places outside the trust area do not pay.this was never the Norman Mayo Option 1 intention of the original trust,which i was on. Gj Westlke Option 1 Option 4 should be all funds allocated to eligible consumers my vote John Mcleod Option 2 This is the most reasonable approach A. Vermeulen Option 1 i need the money. i live on only Super An Sharen Watson Option 1 100$ distribution to the consumers of Trust Power should have been one of the options Why wasn't it? Tect continues to alter the policy laid out and is syphoning funds away from consumers, irrelevant of the wants of those that these funds Donna Pearce Option 1 are meant to go to. I fail to see how you can continue to be allowed to ignore the basic structure of Tect and suit yourselves. John Megahy Russell Option 1 living on a pension this windfall will help Rebate already been reduced this year for those people who have power gas and telephone with you so this will help make up the Linda Williams Option 1 difference Derek Smith Option 1 Consumers as customers must have preference over donations Gerald Greig Option 1 I believe all funds should be distributed to consumers and they can decide individually how to deal with the funds Lucy Mccullough Option 2 or option 1 :) Wa & A E Garrett Option 2 Thankyou most appreciated Christine Fair Option 1 Option 1 would be fair for all concerned. Sue Jayes Option 1 Why is something as sensitive as this on a Non Secure website??? Barry Scott And Jean Sayles Option 1 We're pensioners. We need the money. Peter Myson Option 1 Enough money goes to good causes already and were having a tough year here and need it in our account Samson Nand Option 1 i prefer to decision choose where my share of donation goes. William Jones Option 1 Option 4...100% to eligible consumers is not offered. Why? Mark Odwyer Option 1 Dont Need a committee telling me how I should make donations. I am on the mininum hourly rate working 35 hours per week, supporting two children in rental accomodation. This added payment means Storm Alexander Option 1 we could pay for winter heating instead of or as well as putting many layers of warm clothing on. I didn't have any heating at all last winter because I just couldn't afford it. It's a struggle to pay the power bill each month as it is. Val Kivell Option 1 An extra windfall would be much appreciated. Graeme & Sue Millow Option 1 Its our Money, we can now give to our own projects we support. Julie Sheehan Option 2 I would like to see the payout for option 2 That's a long time customer I think that all rebates especially special rebates should be paid to the consumers I think this is fair I do have John Foster Option 1 the chairs and trust power and it's a good company and I think the community gets plenty of money from their income

R & H Bryson Option 1 We need to have some positive reason to stay with Trustpower as we are pensioners and there are cheaper options around. Raewyn Rishton Option 1 Option 1 to the consumer Russell Lockhart Option 2 I prefer option 2 as it gives me a one off $240 as well as $7.35m in grants to worthy causes. Thanks. Sr & L Bielby Option 1 Special dividend should be distributed as per the usual dividend to benefit and consumers as well as a some top up to grant funds. Anthony Mckenna Option 1 As a university student I need all the money i can get. :) Karen Brodie Option 2 I believe that option 2 provides greater benefits to the wider community. Mr L J Pepper Option 1 For pensioners this is the logical option Try relating to the majorityof Trustpower clients who are not, or do not wish to be, tech savy for openers. Some cannot even afford to be! Kelvin O'Hara Real Estate Option 1 Where do the OLDER a/c users get appropriate recognition? Emergency services--we all use them. First 1000 days of life What about the last 1000? Safe and healthy homes we all need them. Environmemental Sustainability nice thought depends on what you do or promote R.Roa Supported option 1 and 2 The rebate to consumers is very poor. What happened to the internet rebate to the consumers. This doesn't look good for Trustpower Clarry Goble Option 1 clients. Could be time to move on to another provider. There doesn't seem to be any loyalty to long serving customers. It's a struggle for the low income earners.The consumer should be able to decide if and when to make donations to the community. Dave Muir Option 1 ALL of the money should be paid out to customers!! Cant wait for the next election. Raewyn Bennett Option 2 I am not confident about how transformational agencies will be chosen otherwise I would have chosen Option 3. Trustpower account holders, or consumers, are the ones who generate the bottom line. They should therefore be given first W. A. Patchett Option 1 consideration, regarding any financial rebate Martin Newnham Option 1 I feel that option 1 should be the option used if consumers wish to donate they can do that themselves. Sally Ramshaw Option 1 This would be much appreciated in winter for a pensioner like myself..thank you By this request the Trust is ignoring the overwhelming vote of Trustpower consumers and Trust beneficiaries last year to keep the status quo. Trustees surely have the obligation to work in the best interests of its beneficiaries and allocate all income on a status quo basis. It N J Cull Option 1 would appear to me that the Trustees are acting more like a community trust by trying to build a case for the special dividend to be put into community projects. We actually think you should keep 50% in your long-term fund to build capital and future-proof your abiity to provide transformational Maketu Ongatoro Wetland Society Inc Option 3 funding throughout the bay. Tauranga is such an expensive place to live now. Rates are going up and up and it's a fact that Trustpower customers pay more for our Julie Tito Option 1 power here in Tga than their customers in another town. Consumers should get the full amount. i would like to see the Emergency services share the total of $7.35M so we can all benefit as a community from their dedication and the Warren Karlsson Option 2 need we have for them when unexpected. Mr D B & Mrs M Muirhead Option 1 I believe that Option 1 provides the right balance in terms of funding. Jon Gebert Distribute $10M to consumers and split the rest between options 2 and 3. Bruce Woolley Option 1 Well Done Tect I have always been concerned that the St John's Ambulance Service is funded only from donations and would love to see them get a boost Lois Isaacs Option 2 that would enable them to keep their equipment up to date Dale Douglas Option 1 There are a lot of people struggling with feeding there children and clothing them. This payment could go a way towards helping them. M L Youens Option 1 suits us more Julie Nicholson Option 2 Prefer more to the emergency services, and to ALL under 2y olds (not just the 'lower socio economic' groups) M R Weaver Option 1 As a pensioner any rebate is welcome Ken Option 1 In my case it would help my financial situation as I'm on a fixed income Kieran Chesbrough Option 2 Option2 is a great compromise option. it will be much appreciated...as i am paying $420 a week rent...which is more than one week's pension...and cannot get an interview for a Trisha Cameron Option 1 job= ageism i think... Yvonne Gupwell Option 2 I would also be happy for the distribution to be 50% customer and 50% split between the grants. Jamie Kahn Genet Option 2 While my first preference is option 2, my second preference is option 1 and I would like that to be noted. Sg And Ea English Option 2 We think sporting events get too much already We strongly believe that the bulk of this dividend should be paid to eligible consumers as we chose Trustpower for these types of Bj & Ja Catchpole Option 1 benefits. While we are happy to see Community charities receive some benefit, the Consumers should receive priority. Jackie Mckeown Option 2 I think this offers a good balance between value to consumers and value to the community. Lena Wihapi-Paul Option 2 Option 2 13.65M to eligible consumers ($240 each) Suzanne Hart Option 1 I think every kiwi family needs the extra funds these days David Mcdonnell Option 1 We need to maximise returns to shareholders and some to community as per Trust Deed George Eric Armitage Option 1 This keeps the 80/20 split consistent on all income received as already agreed upon. Howard Wood Option 1 This maintains the 80/20 split that currently is the accepted and consulted balance between consumer and community benefit. Regarding the special distribution, you only gave 3 options. You must offer the option of ‘all the distribution to be given to consumers’. By Mark Clayson Option 1 omitting this option, you are being deceitful, unfair and arrogant. Please offer this option to get a fair reflection on what the owners of this distribution want. We have a daughter who is a solo Mum and a beneficiary and is struggling with high cost of living. We would love to see her get this little Mrs Judy Neilson Option 1 boost. Robyn White Option 1 OPTION NUMBER 1 THE FIRST ONE . . . .. OPTION ONE. James P Williamson Option 1 There should have been another option to have ALL the money, $21M, refunded to the consumer. Paul Mccarroll Option 1 Give me the money and I'll decide what charities I will support!!! Dallis Hopkinson Option 1 Our heating bill is high over winter. Any extra will help us stay out of debt. Eddy Gies Option 1 current split is fair Simon Mcshane Option 1 Would love option 1..... please please please Hemi Te Area Paki Option 1 AWESOME NEWS Alesha Kale Option 1 I would prefer the bulk of the money went back to the consumers. Naomi Mcdonald Option 2 Option 2 would be my preference. Bernadine Roodt Option 2 Option 2 followed by option 1. We do not like option 3. Kerry Burke Option 1 I believe we should get the full amount not just the $295.00. The city or govt should pay for your initiatives Ij & Ma Webber Option 1 Suggestion that an Outdoor Fitness Park be built in Tauranga for adults. Memorial Park or overlooking the sea Omanu end of the Mount. Martin Bisset Option 3 Great ideas Mr D L Stratton Option 1 well done David Mends Option 1 another option should be $21M to eligible consumers to be balanced Not enough info on what the charities would actually be doing with the special transformational grant money. I'd rather get the money Richard F Newson Option 1 and give it to a charity that I am fully in support of. I would prefer to see ALL of the one-off payment get distributed to eligible consumers but you have not given me that option to tick. Stella Hamilton-Baker Option 1 Then I can choose who to donate. Money to Peter Kerry Guy Option 1 Given the present economic climate and people's attitude today, I think this will be the preferred option for the bulk of clients. Rangi Kopua Option 2 good to share with customer and community services This would be nice to get that little bit extra on top of our tect chq, as some of us that have been with trust power since day one and could Robyn King Option 1 have gone to other power companies for cheaper power but stay with you because this money is like a little bit of composary savings. R J Salmons Option 2 A bit for everyone. Malcolm Wadsworth Option 1 Best option Lynn Forde Option 1 As a pensioner, I am reliant on this top up for those little extras. Da Leigh Option 1 This is the account payers money paid by way of higher electricity prices. It needs to be returned to the account holders. Andrea Chapman Option 1 Perhaps it would have been better to add to the end of the years payment to save extra admin costs. Toni Palmer Option 1 Wow, this was an arduous process to have a vote! Why wasnt account no on the docs? We prefer to make charitable donations to charities that we personally support, and are confident with their prudent usage of these Harry Crowe Option 1 donations. Anthony Cranston Option 1 I wasn't happy with your choice of donees so opt for a full pay out. We would love to see these funds go to building a museum for Tauranga! We recognise that there are those in our community that could Jeremy And Rebekah Opie Option 3 do with a bit of extra cash so option 2 is second choice. Glenn Campbell Option 2 My family agrees with the transformational grants in option 2. H M Mills Option 1 Need the money. B & S Burger Option 1 TECT is a CONSUMER Trust, therefore we feel that the consumers should have the main profit out of the windfall too. J D Hicks Option 1 Poorly set out. The segregation lines should be between the voting options not as is. Confusing to some people especially if in a hurry. K & Byrnes Option 1 Money desperately needed Lyn Allison Option 2 I prefer option 2 as it gives a little to all. I prefer to give donations to emergency services, than many other 'charities' S Gradon Option 2 this is confusing. the line seperating the different options is located in the wrong box.cheers S Bagnall Option 1 tough times at the moment CONFLICT OF INTEREST. Your suggestion that shareholders donate their rebates to Acorn smacks of a Confict of Interest. Your chair Bill Murray Crowther Option 1 Holland has more that a passing interest in both organisations. How about listing a number of options of Charities. A legal challenge to this Conflict of Interest might well not go well for TECT. Anton Labuschagne Option 1 I have my own charities that I prefer to donate to Mr L H Fake Option 2 Option 2 does not have ambiguous statements of places to give the money. Doug And Rosslyn Hosking Option 3 A great opportunity to make a real difference Claire Stock Option 2 Yes, we agree to Option 2. Jenny Jackson Option 2 This seems the fairest way. Cheryl Dohnt Option 1 Being a Goldcard holder we need any cash that becomes available from any source!!! Our turn for charity!!!!!!!!! Option 1 allows me to decide what community initiatives to support ... apart from Emergency Services, the recipients of the proposed Bryan Christiansen Option 1 transformational initiatives are not named, so TECT would be deciding that ... TECT should have named all the recipients to be completely transparent Hinerau Janet Doherty Option 1 As much as the community projects are awesome amd important $295 will make a lot of difference for many of us. Avon & Bev Dickson Option 2 Like to share with consumers and charity. Brian Blackstock Option 2 Seems fair for everyone. We like the 'four significant areas that will make transformational difference' a lot more than something a little more esoteric as Randal And Michelle Thomson Option 2 supporting innovative projects and inter-generational benefit. Elisha A Roest Option 1 I am living on superanuation, so it would be great to have a little extra money over winter Power is exoensive enough as it is. I would prefer to choose myself what organisations need financial assistance. The majority if the one Linley Slater Option 1 off payment should go to eligible consumers. John Bielby Option 1 the distribution should be to the benefit of the consumer, who could use that money. I do a lot of community work and volunteer work so I feel as though enough community and would like to keep this money. People are Narissa Siemonek Option 1 more important than money (not that its not helpful) Christine Beauchamp Option 1 Thank you very much for this extra bonus It is certainly welcome! TECT was a by-product of privatisation, established to protect the interest of the city power consumers; not the wider interests of J E Shearman Option 1 residents across the district. Leave charity to charities set up for that purpose. I prefer to receive the full amount which I can then decide how to use which will be either off my power account or back into the local Selwyn Joseph Burborough Option 1 community Hayley Mccready Option 1 customers deserve the biggest reward Ryan & Claire Piddington Option 1 Option one please, because the benefit spreads to many. I actually think you should retain 50% and add it top your free capital to enable you to provide higher levels of transformational funding in Julian Fitter Option 3 the future. I believe recent history shows that people want maximum of the return on their shareholding returned to themselves. We are Jacques Van Selm Option 1 contributing to Trustpower's profit through relatively high power prices. TECT you are again trying to fiddle Trustpower consumers out of what is rightfully theirs. Alan Colquhoun Option 1 We give all our rebate to charity and believe we have the right to choose which charities. I am sure they agree. Julien Huteau Option 1 Best option would be 100% to consumers. As a home owning pensioner every little bit of cash helps especially in light of the huge 47% rise in valuation of Maungatapu. This is going Jr Busby Option 1 to significantly increase our rates. The reference to the beneficiary receiving $295 rather looks as if it is associated with option 2. A careless reader might well select option Alan Liddell Option 1 2 by mistake. Charlene Bardebes Option 2 Option 2. We pay dearly for our loyalty and we do so deserve a little something back. Like to know where funds are going. Anita Foley Option 2 I think this one seems fairer Consumers before charity, not everyone can afford to be terribly charitable with the funds they are due from ther Trust. Contributing Alison Adams Option 1 consumers have needs, too. Keith Glass Option 2 We believe that the emergency services should be government funded so this option would greatly assist them. Ray Goldfinch Option 1 need all the income can get in view of the rapidly rising costs of living under this Government Patrick Donohue Option 1 I have ticked option 1 but i think all of it should go to the Consumers The clue is in the name of the Trust. "CONSUMER". Consumers should get maximum benefit and be free to distribute funds as they see J M Simons Option 1 fit. Malcolm & Margaret Garthwaite Option 2 We would like an Option 4 which is $13.65M to eligible consumers and $7.35M tto Transformational Grants Option 1 ensures that most the money goes to where it really belongs. Pete Morris Option 1 Individuals can then decide if some of the money they rightfully own is to go to charities of their choosing. Melany Brown Option 2 Option 2 is a nice balance for all. Meagan Mcilroy-Hoff Option 1 I would like to see option 2, in particular because it supports emergency services. Julie Mccormack Option 1 i would like to be able to choose the organisations i give my money to. Not everybody benefits from money put into the community. This money should wholly go back to the consumer. If it wasnt for the Margaret Somers Option 1 consumer this money would not have happened. Robert Searle Supported option 1 and 2 Believe the existing process of distributing rebates and the one reaffirmed during the recent consumer consultation process should be Paul Collins Option 1 followed by the Trust I think Trustpower users/members should get the bulk of the funds. Does not seem fair that non-Trustpower members can get benefits Peter Harnett Option 1 while using other Power Co's.? Wayne Keith Option 1 Pensioners, need financial help. Power bill is a big chunk of our budget. Denise Bartlam Option 2 I think this would accommodate a wide range of people and their needs I was unable to get into your website to say I would like my rebate paid into my bank account which you already have as I pay by direct Marjorie Groote Veldman Option 1 debit. Please confirm.

Option 2, from a limited range, provides an extra 35% of the special dividend to new recipients. This is largely possible because of the Craig Griffin Option 2 continued market support of Trustpower consumers, who should be rewarded for their loyalty to local business. Jennifer Myhill Option 1 The details as to where funds would go is too general e.g. emergency services As a new Widow and a retired person I find that the support given through the Trustpower account gives me security that I am being Isobel Huggard Option 1 looked after.Many thanks Trustpower. Toni Cranston Option 2 Dont know of the other 2 funds and havent seen them actually in action so option 2 feels better for us Linda Askin Option 1 I found this whole thing utterly confusing and the option website very hard to find online If someone could give me some examples of Iconic Projects to clarify where funds directed to them would be spent, I may change my Grant Vincent Option 2 option to option 3 but would like that clarification. Mj & Cl Tailby Option 2 Option 2 is preferred Have the Trustees not yet grasped that consumers expect the current distribution of TECT income to continue as in the past. In view of local demographics and the result of the recent consultation on same, the decision to cease use of the traditional annual cheque indicates the Trustees are seriously out of step! Further - perhaps the Trustees might inform their consumer base as to why those Ann & Robert Davidson Option 1 consumers should gift funds due to them to 'transformational' community projects (and the Acorn Foundation in particular?) selected by the Trustees - without any regard to the fact that non Trust Power customers in the community would get a 'free ride' at TECT consumers expense. TECT Trustee requirements are basic and simple - it is not the Bill Gates Foundation - please just get on with the job!

Instead of a 'one size fits all' solution why not allow each eligible consumer decide which option they wish to have - different people have Nigel Byron Option 2 different needs and desires of where grants should be applied. It would be great to see some money go towards emergency services (Rescue Helicopter, Volunteer Fire Brigade, Ambulance). But the Brent And Dianne Sanford Option 2 consumers that pay and use the power should also benefit. Ivan Small Option 1 Consumers should get 100% We have a young family and a difficult decision, but we could do with the extra money. We work hard but money doesnt go far with Laurel Hitchcock Option 1 mortgages and living costs in NZ

You could have a 4th option that everyone gets a piece of the pie. Not all of power account holders are rich they just scape by with the high cost of power, so it would be good to get a little bit for power bill.None of your options are good for all, and the figures do not add up properly .Heres my option 4. $7000000.00 for all 3 parties that is fair Im ok ok with this and it some consumers what to give up their Lindsay Aplin Option 2 share they can. You people are to much like dictators and think we should do what you want, why do you make it look complicated when it doesn't have to be and everybody could be happy and get something out of it. Because of you people I am going option 2.So I suggest you start rethinking how you make decissions from now on. Have you forgotten what people said when you tried to give us a one off payment and then we miss out after five years. Stop being lazy and wasting time and money and spread it evenly between all 3 parties.

I see NO funds going to individuals or organisations that merely plead poverty or hard done by. The funds MUST be for the good of all at Trevor Mildon Option 1 any level in our community . eg Safe and healthy homes is not my responsibility it is the land lord or home owner to respond to that standard that is now set. For me I already donate where I wish. As this is a one off from Trustpower and they have said it is for consumers then that is where it should be going. There are many people in our community who could do with this and charity begins at home so all to consumers is Hilary Colls Option 1 where it should be going but you do not give this option. Once again choosing where our money should go. I hope you rethink this model and give 4 options with number four being all to consumers. Colleen Kirkwood Option 1 Winter power cost help would be appreciated. Vale Redden Option 1 I vote option 2 by using this option (refund to me) it reduces my monthly account to the same prices as cheaper provider options and saves me changing J P Bermingham Option 1 providers.

Happy with the groups chosen in Option 2 to provide additional support to. The cost of our power in general is more than other power Jeni Fountain Option 2 companies so my preference is to still receive the extra rebate for customers heading into winter when power is even more expensive.

You should have sent a reply envelope so all people have a chance to reply to the options not everyone has a computer. Also the whole Gary Prendergast Option 1 amount should be distrubted to all consumers after all it is the consumers money.There is far to much money already going out in grants Bj And De Tregoweth Option 1 Please have more regard for the consumers who have generated this dividend Things are pretty tough out there for a lot of people so an extra $295 will go a long way with Xmas just around the corner..An extra $295 Gary Jefferson Option 1 should be paid back to the account holders, after all this money came from them in the first place & a lot of people struggle around Xmas time so will be a huge help for them.. Neil Abbot Option 1 More should be distributed to customers as everything going up but wages arnt. I believe that eligible consumers should be entitled to a full share of this extraordinary payment and can chose, if they wish, to contribute Judith Chatterley Option 1 or donate to any organisation that is relevant to them. As eligible consumers are in fact shareholders the choice should be left to them. Sheryl Ann Wilson Option 1 Option one thanks B. Cassie Option 1 chose option 1 as we pay enough and its nice to get something back. We donate to charity's of our choice. Wayne Wairin Option 1 All money should go to eligible consumers. By purchasing power from Trustpower,(one of the most expensive suppliers of power in New Zealand), consumers are contributing to K.V. Lay Option 1 Trustpower's profit, some of which is now available to consumers through TECT. The principals of the distribution policy must be maintained. Lessons must be learned from last years fiasco. Trustees must consider providing eligible consumers input into any proposed allocation of Capital from the Iconic Projects Fund. It is M H & C Cole Option 1 imperative that there is consumer/ ratepayer oversight to ensure the fund is not channeled into another Council white elephant. Scrap Iconic projects fund Simon Meredith Option 1 would be happier to get 100% of my share . Kaye Hurn Option 2 I think option 2 is a fair split...... Heather Ramage Option 2 As a superannuitant any extra money assists with home maintenance so my choice is purely selfish. Caroline Willis Option 2 My preferred option is Option 2 - second choice would be option 1. Mr J. E. Pratt Option 1 As a pensioner, this one-off payment will be very useful. Gg Hamilton Option 1 Do not understand what these trust are up too. I think by giving it back to consumers it helps the community as the money is generally spent locally, people can spend it how they like D Ohalloran Option 1 without having to belong to a group or apply for money through an organisation. Also a lot of chartible groups use the money for admin or wages of overpaid ceos.

I believe the funds should be distributed in line with the current policy, that has been put forward to TECT consumers on numerous occasions and that the Board are expected to act in accordance with. While it is laudable of the Trustees to wish to assist the community Mel Clark Option 1 with extra special projects, the funding should come back to consumers in line with TECT policy and provide assistance for all the families and consumers in the Bay many of whom will be facing higher costs across a variety of areas this year. John Rowley Option 1 As a pensioner this is the only option I could support Andrew Robertson Option 1 $295 paid into bank please Julie Green Option 2 I think it is fair to share between the consumers and the wider community I must admit it would be nice to get something from this rebate and I would like to see the transformational grant initiatives get Tracey Annear Option 3 something too.. Mcdonald Family Trust Option 3 we would like the money to go as grants N G & C A Mckay Option 2 With current living costs it will be a big help on the pension . Colin Halliday Option 2 I'd prefer a 3 way split option Colin Howie Option 1 sounds good. when to happen As a consumer I would like all possible refunds returned to individuals customers and then they can make individual donations to John Hayes Option 1 organisations of their choice or choice how they spend the funds. Murray & Faye Falloon Option 1 This is the way that the beneficiaries voted for and we still agree with the 80/20 rule Mr John Daniel Clark Option 2 We are blessed to be a blessing to others so it is good to share when possible. John Mark Elliott Option 1 As a retired couple the extra money is appreciated and we already voluntarily support several charities Mary Capamagian Option 1 Consumers can choose their own charities to benefit, if they so wish. Michael Wayne Matthews Option 1 WE ARE PENSIONERS AND SUPERANNUATION IS OUR ONLY INCOME WE WOULD APPRECIATE A CHEQUE. THANKYOU Leslie Goodliffe Supported option 1 and 3 Either option one or option two. However; why the change in amounts, why could you not give the consumers $295 each and $4.2m to Helen Anderson the charities mentioned in option two. Mdm And G Batchelor Option 1 We prefer to make our own decisions about charitable donations. John Henderson Option 3 Make a bigger difference sooner Heather Bernau Option 2 Option 2. Some reward for customers and a third of the amount will go to charity. Carolyn Murphy Option 2 I am very strongly opposed to option 3. Duncan Counsell Option 1 This way all parties receive some benefit from the monies available, not just handed out to grants and initiatives. Now that Trustpower no longer rewards me for giving them my internet costs, and has higher charges than other providers, I want this Forsyth, Alastair John. Option 1 money before I change both my ISP and power elsewhere. Tm & Fd Walker Option 1 Thank you for the opportunity to make a recommendation Their is a further option that you have not provided for and that is to return the total amount to the Beneficiaries and allow them the right to choose if they wish to donate to charity. of their own choosing . John & Glenda Elmsly Option 1 please advise what is happening to the payment received from the sale of Tilt Shares . This money should also be returned to beneficiaries .We have no choice but to accept option 1 , we do not agree with the options provided William Falzone Option 1 Would like to see all funds go to consumer. Sandra Davies Option 1 Eligible consumers receive the full grant and make their own decision. My reason for choosing "middle-of-the-road" is because many of your customers are on benefits or are national superannuitants. Barbara Murray Option 2 Managing budgets on these payments has become harder and harder and I feel your loyal customers would welcome a payment in the middle of winter when food and power bills are higher. As I would. Bruce Mclachlan Option 1 The money belongs to us. once paid out, we can decide for ourselves how we support local groups & our comunity. Andrew Mackay Option 1 I would like to see the carefully selected current grantees enhanced. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Eleanor Mcfarlane Option 2 I would vote for option 2 and would be pleased to see the Ambulance Service benefit from it. Option 1. If I want to donate to any charity I will do it myself so I can claim it in my tax return. I will give to the charities that I choose P A Walsdorf Option 1 worthy. Not what you choose is worthy. Pam Fegan Option 3 Put towards new bike lanes to reduce traffic congestion Therese Obrien Option 1 Look after your consumers before you give more away to community groups. Francesca And Tom Berntsen Option 2 Fair enough. Natascha Diggelmann Option 2 We need more money to go into transformational grants. Option 1 was too vague for me. Put money into arts as well as recreation facilities - we desperately need a museum. This growing city needs to have more than a beach Brandon Adams Option 3 and sports venues. Igna Meyer Option 1 I will choose who I would like to gift my money to. Kelly Hill Option 1 The charities I support are not supported by TECT - I would like to have this choice and not have it taken away and made for me trust power is more expensive , for the consumer, so a full rebate is expected Ggregory Gamman Option 1 Experience tells me ,(its not how much you donate, but what you do with it.)Living on a wage is expensive, there has all ready been feedback on the distribution policy.(WHAT PART DOES THE TECT TRUSTEES not understand . Jillian Jarvis Option 1 I would want to get the $295 cheque as this would help me with some bills. For families on a lower income this option will make a big difference. Those who can then afford to donate to charity can do so by their Cindi Feder Option 1 own accord. Or if you can make it work that each payment is distributed by what ever option the consumer has chosen then everyone would be happy. Thanks Neil Shore Option 1 would prefer 100% to consumers but you haven't provided that option Rayna Stephens Option 2 Much money going to environmental issues. No accountability Alan Spiers Option 1 I would like to receive the full amount as I have my own charities that I would donate to. Thanks. Grant Potts Option 2 I like the idea of funds going to emergency services etc, Gj &Sm Oakley Option 1 I question why the current TECT trustees are not prepared to follow through with the policy that is in place. Coralie Gardiner Option 2 I think it is a good idea for consumers to get something and also the transformation grant initiatives Clive And Jeandominy Option 1 We would actually like to see the full amount distributed directly to eligible consumers. Pjwatt Option 1 what about an option to distribute all the money to eligible consumers. you should have offered that option thank you peter Chris Fitzgerald Option 1 Option 1. Sounds like a fair option to us. I prefer Option 1... power is expensive, life in general is becoming far too expensive, this extra money could really be the difference in P M Erueti Option 1 some dire situations to many families that struggle with day to day living. L & M Purton Option 2 I like to choose to which charities I donate to P.Hamilton Option 1 I need the money Kate Lovell Option 1 Really need the money ourselves! P J Magnussen Option 1 Maintain the status quo. Mrs J M Humphrey Option 2 Seems a worthwhile mix. Your biggest issue is that you didnt give people the option to pay it all out to the eligible consumers. If you did then you may find that it Cameron Anderson Option 1 wasnt the majority option but by not giving the option you have rubbed a lot of people the wrong way and get negative feedback. The board of trustees are distrusted after you last attempt to give away money without all possible options being given to vote on. Jannette Hardham Option 2 thanks for asking As the amount we pay for power is already among the highest to allow for TECT to pay grants I feel this should be split in the usual Terry Hawker Option 1 manner. Big thanks to trust power giving this opportunity. Faruk Option 1 All the best in the future. Although I certainly encourage funds to go back into our community, I have my own prefered charities which I donate to when I can. Hubertine Maria Jantine Rolls-Pierhagen Option 1 Thank you! Dw&Jm Carter Option 2 Prefer Option 2 but would also be quite happy with Option 1 Option one allows us to choose what we wish to do with our funds, should we chose a charity, the funds will be donated in our name and not the TECT entity. Please note, that as the email address field cannot be bypassed, a non reply email address has been provided so that Sa And Cl Hodgson Option 1 we can select our preferred option. It should be noted that to demand/force for an email address, that this action is in breach of the Electronics Act/NZ Law.

While I apreciate money going to charity I never agreed to my rebate from Trustpower going to charity. If I was given the full amount I Vanessa Tait Option 1 would be able to submit a portion of this money to a charity of my own choosing, rather one that I have to give to. Mark Orchard Option 3 This money is better used in the community than in Trustpower consumers' pockets. Kim Muiti Option 1 The extra $55 will assist with the winter power bill when on a pension. Jane Dell Option 1 Enough goes to charities, make Trustpower customers happy by giving them extra rebate directly to them. Sue Jardine Option 2 Have selected this option as it helps both community & consumers. Thankyou. Jose And Michael Mellelieu Option 2 Thank you for sending the information regarding the one off special dividend.We prefer option 2. Of the 3 options - I want Option1 - the total distribution coming back to those who have earned and paid for it over the years.I want to be Rex Newcastle Option 1 able to decide which charities I wish to support with my $. Martine And Clinton Bowyer Option 1 Option 1 and get the $295 Graham Dixon Option 1 I choose Option 1, to receive the maximum $295 consumer rebate choose option 1 to assist with keeping customer base which is at risk from competition.overcharging and giving back is not a long term Ross & Jannette Parkin Option 1 option As a pensioner, I find I need any extra money available. Christopher Johnsen Option 1 For someone working, and on a large salary it may be different, so please think of those needy Trustpower customers, before you give the money away. Is feedback needed when the Trustees are required to distribute this dividend as set out in the trust document, as is their legal obligation? Sandra Braks Option 1 I seem to recall a similar discussion taking place when the Trustees were considering moving away from what was stated in the trust document regarding distribution of funds. Mervyn Taylor Option 1 Thanks team, excellent work. cheers Rm &Sa Hhollands Option 1 could you tell me why consumers only get 80% of the funds not the full 100% of the one off payment.Kinds Regards Susan & Rob While I'm community minded and think it's great to help with this extra payment.... I feel that because it's a one off payment why can't Derryn G Torrance Option 1 the consumers get all the distributions this time. Glen Harris Option 1 Prefer all paid out to eligible consumers Why are you ignoring the previous result regarding this? If you wish to give away your personal money, that is your decision. If I wish to Lance Helem Option 1 give my money away I do not need you do it for me. A B & H J Waldegrave Option 1 Most of the Charities named will still be funded Graham Macgregor Option 1 Reducing power costs to beneficiaries should be a priority to encourage consumers to stay with TrustPower. The Tect trust deed places a general obligation on Trustees to distribute the net annual income for the benefit Gary Scholfield Option 1 of the Consumers. If the trustees have philanthropic desires they should use their own money. Of the three options given, none give the full 100% as consumer rebates. Why not? Surely this would benefit consumers the most? 100% should be paid as consumer rebates. Pa & Kl Garaway Option 1 The Trust's name is ". . . Consumer" Trust, so distributions should go only to eligible consumers. Ross Sheerin Option 1 The rebate should go to consumers, most of whom could do with the rebate to off set TrustPower's higher charges Sandy Radford Option 2 I hope emergency services includes St John ambulance. Caitlin Barr-Smith Option 1 Would be good to get a breakdown of what option 2 goes towards. Current community distributions have been great. We should be able to choice an Option to have the total distribution to eligible consumers. I would greatly like to donate money to Telessa Nahi Option 1 different charities and be given the choice of the charity. We are the eligible shareholders, but with limited options. Carol Malone Option 2 $240 each $7.35m to grant funds Anthony And Jennifer Rogers Option 2 There needs to be some distribution to consumers as after all they created this opportunity. I would want the option of the entire amount distributed to eligible consumers only included. I believe it is high handed to not include this Irene Ewens Option 1 option. Kirstan Alderton Option 1 Option 1. It is up to us if we want to then give to our own chosen charity Environmental Sustainability ACTION and positive community support and devoplement projects key priorities and concerns. Thanks for Felicity Robershawe Option 2 the option to comment. Karen Wilson Option 2 I have chosen Option 2 as I feel that these four areas are crucial for the wellbeing of all Tauranga residents. Philip Allen Option 1 For a Consumer Trust this should be a consumer distribution. Kathleen Sellars Option 1 We are the ones paying extra every month so you have the funds so it would be great to get any rebates back thanks! like the funds to go towards community projects, Jonathan Hope Wentworth Gregg Option 1 for the city as a whole, not individuals. I feel the full amount should go to eligible consumers,(anyone who wants to donate their share could then do so to a place of their own J E Buckthought Option 1 choice) however as this option has not been given I have chosen option 1. I do not like the way that you are removing the freedom of individual consumers to make their own choice in each individual case. Every Chris Malcolm Option 1 bodies situation and willingness to donate is different and it should be their choice, not yours. Accordingly I am opting for the choice to receive all the payment and people can donate what they want from that. Harry Freed Option 1 I would like to see the distribution of funds kept as is ,i have my own preferred charities which i support with some of my tect funds Kathleen Wallace Option 1 Give the consumer a break Raueka & James Lionel Bates Option 1 Thankyou Wonderful news. Choosing option 1 because some people need every last cent and some like to choose their own charity. Option 2 would Teresa C Booth Option 1 be second choice. Sheryl A Jameson Option 1 Using Daughters email to vote as I am not online. Thankyou. As pensioners we already give to some charities. It will be very helpful to give to the other charities, also to have some extra money for Mr N & Mrs Bignell Option 2 ourselves. Christina Guzzo Option 1 Option one because there are many poor people in Tauranga and this option will help them, thereby helping the community.

Kr & Sm Hampshire Option 1 The shares belong to the Trustpower customers therefore we believe the distribution should be on the same basis as usual. Emily Munro Option 1 Option 1 please. This would really help us out at the moment. J.K. Granger Option 1 Trust Power customers should be able to enjoy all benefits. Any windfall should be distributed to consumers. Peter Mcadie Option 1 Personally I would like to see the total $21M distributed Marie Brown Option 2 As a pensioner the additional funds would be helpful to me. Lloyd Dando Option 1 I would like to make my own choice as to what charities, and how much, I give. Diane Vpond Option 1 We would like this money direct credited to our bank account, but you don't have options for this? We dont imagine all consumers will have the luxury of choosing this option, so perhaps each individual customer could choose whichever Luke Meys And Julie Andrews Option 3 of the 3 options best suit them. Nicholas Sanderson Option 1 80/20 B Jupp Option 1 I would appreciate as much as possible be allocated to those in need in Tauranga. We consider that option 1 is a very generous contribution to top up current grant funds. Energy costs are always on the increase and D & M Frederickson Option 1 there are many customers including ourselves that the $295 will find useful over the winter period. Hi I am retired and I also know a lot of poor families, like me, appreciate the refunds and often that is why they joined Trustpower. Simon Bridges has put a Member's Bill in for hoping for consideration. This morning on TV 1. they interviewed, him and he spoke about inflation James Hood Option 1 has caused problems as wages go up so does their Tax. I think the people generate these windfalls by using power, which has also gone up. Wealthy People love spending other peoples money and may say spend it all. But give back to them and let them chose the charity they wish to support. Kerri Friar Option 2 It would have been good to know more about the 4 options that were part of Option 2 People are struggling to pay their power bills and I'm sure some extra money to potentially aid with this would be greatly appreciated by Owen And Leanne Lucas Option 1 many. Happy to receive 'regular' rebate and for this one-off to improve Tauranga community facilities, environmental sustainability, innovative Cecily Horne Option 3 projects, cycle and walk ways. Hope there will be annual one-offs. Im one of those customers of limited means. In other words every little bit extra helps, so I am supporting the option that gives me this Anna Rogers Option 1 while also giving a portion to the community. Bill Anderson Option 1 will help to pay for coming rate increase This special one off payment will make a huge difference to those who are struggling with rising rents, food costs and barely managing to C.Polwarth Option 1 meet day to day bills.

2nd choice is Option 2. Miss J D Webster Option 1 I have a community Service card so any additional money that comes my way is a true gift and will help towards my living costs. I really appreciate the clear correspondence you send us. Thank you for making it straightforward, and thank you also for having a good Penny Merton Option 2 proof-reader! M. Clayton And H. Jackson Option 2 Good options, thank you Sarah And Steve Aldridge Option 1 We feel this should go back to the consumers that support Trust Power. S Vanos Option 1 Many of the charities I strongly support are not included in the significant areas. I prefer to choose myself where I donate Judy Pullar Option 1 Option 1 please, which is for the people, people, people. Option 2 - I may have agreed to this option but I do not agree with money distributed to First 1000 days of life and Safe and healthy Martyn Neil Option 1 homes, for numerous reasons too long to go into here. Option 3 - a no no for the same reasons as above and also beneficiaries in the third column are not specific enough to make a call. Mrs J S Van Dyk Option 1 A big surprise and very welcome. Also good to add to the current grant funds. Thank you TECT Sue Price Option 1 Find it hard to make ends meet being pensioners any little extra is a bonus to us Emergency services should be funded by our taxes via central government but happy to contribute to this. As consumers, we are also Barry And Julie Webb Option 2 happy to receive some benefit on additional profit earned. Thanks :) Gary Yaxley Option 1 "Transformational Grants" is not specific enough to justify giving away money to, could be to some minority splinter group. Stop trying to change the distribution of these funds. There should be an option for a 100% option to distribute all to consumers. I would Lynn Marra Option 2 have voted for that one. I'd prefer all the funds go to Emergency Services. The grant would have a much better impact if given to one area. Emergency Services are surely deserving of the contribution and we would all see a benefit from it. Tracey Oliver-Marshall Option 2 Spreading the grant thinly over the other areas (First 1000 days, Safe Healthy Homes and ES) achieves questionable, less real results. It sounds more like trying to tick boxes on the "objectives and goals" sheet. I will state again, but I would wouldn't I. The bulk of this funding should go to improving our environment and making behavioural Bruce Trask Option 3 changes re Climate Change. Alois Luttenberger Option 1 I want the TECT TRUST to be dissolved and support the proposal that came out last year, for a lump sum pay out. Gjp & Ja Brown Option 1 Many Thanks Barry Fletcher Option 2 seems the fairest way There is no need for this,the status quo should remain.I would have thought the Trustees would have learnt their lesson after the debacle last year. If people wish to give some of their share towards the transformational grants let them do it on a voluntary basis. What,s going Ivan Hamilton Option 1 to be the factors on the trustees decision ,Is it based on a small % say in favor of Option2 but equates to only say 15% of the total eligible voters.I sincerely hope not . We would like the295 please as we need all the financial help we can get.the 1 big payout mentioned last year would be great for Mr Girard Option 1 us.David Girard Wayne Strange Option 1 Many people, including retirees, are struggling to make ends meet. Dale Henderson Option 3 Option 3 is our first choice. Option 1 is second choice, and Option 2 is least preferred option. Lindsay Cave Option 1 There should be a third option - all money distributed to eligible consumers and nothing to any other organisations. Vicki Coe Option 1 100% should go to eligible consumers for them to determine how the money should be used. You don't list this option. David Mackay Option 2 Option 2 seems fairer to all parties Dannette Lovell Option 2 Love the 'towards transformational grant initiatives' idea :) David Marshall Option 2 Great initiative targeting key priority community needs. Ashara Option 2 I would love to receive some money back but also love to see something in the community transform with this money If one option has to be applied to all consumers then I prefer option 1. However I think it would be better to give each consumer their Denniston & Associates Ltd Option 1 own choice as to what happens to their individual distribution (as is the case with the normal TECT cheques) - some will have a use for the money themselves and others will want to support the community projects. Linda Milroy Option 2 As a struggling one income family I would appreciate some of the funds but also like to see some go to the grants initiatives Brian Brown Option 3 Make a difference Jr & Ca Schwarz Option 2 all good The way you have formatted the above form is misleading.

Cherie Option 2 I think there should have been an option where all community projects got a distribution and consumers received around 100-150 dollars, this doesnt seem that hard to me? Kaye Besley Option 2 All consumers should received some of this unexpected amount, Rosemary Treloar Option 1 Option 2 is second preference Ryan Mcleod Option 2 happy for some to be shared wth effective community groups. We consider that Option 1 is the best option. Janet And Wayne Eaton Option 1 We are concerned that either of the other two options would require considerable time, effort and money establishing the worthy recipients, whereas you already have a pool of worth recipients that apply through the present grant funds system. Karen Mcdonald Option 3 Do we receive tax receipt Chris Kenny Option 2 As a golden oldie any extra income we receive is most welcome. Angela Liddell Option 1 Definitely option 1. Thank you I feel that you as a group are more interested in the community than you customers. You seem to be trying to be the great dogooders of William Friend Option 2 the bay when in fact you should be the guardians of your customers well being. Bill Friend We would have voted differently if funds were not going to Safe and Healthy Homes. It is the responsibility of the owner to ensure the Charmaine Kendrick & Dean Barton Option 1 homes are Safe and Healthy. I would have liked more specifics about who was getting the extra funds. Please do not supply my personal info to marketing companies. Richard Eldring Option 1 I would prefer the $4.2M in option 1 given to emergency services only.

There should have been an option for all funds to go to customers. Given recent history, this omission will undoubtedly cause more mistrust. It looks as though you are trying to be clever again. If i had to pick of the options, it would be option 2 because option 1 sounds too wishywashy and vague and like Blink PR may win lots of work off the back of it ala jazz festival. It is additionally gaulling because the Anna Woolfrey Option 2 reason we are filling in gaps is because of the cuts and agenda under the Blink PR owner's husband's political party. The cost of posting all this info out is also concerning. You should have just nicely surprised us with a cheque for full amount. At the very least the option of paying all the money to consumers should be on there.

Dear co-ordinator, I wish to present our feedback on the above but first; Please note the linkages to respond appear very poor and inadequate .There need to be more direct /specific linkages that are obvious or intuitive in order to get a full response. It appears that simply getting to the two on line contact points is the only guide and then do your own response. I think you need to have an electronic step by step guide around option choices. To answer the request; We are adamant that the selection can only be Option 1[ONE] which is Ron And Ngaire Pearson Option 1 aligned to the existing distribution methodology. These are the returns ,special or otherwise , that are due to the consumers of TECT . To propose option two or three is to suggest consumers ,who are already under increasing financial pressures ,should suddenly concede all or much additional income to non specific grants . The consumers should NOT be asked to do so regardless of special rebate circumstances . The rebate is not special to grants ;it is special to the existing consumers.

Consumers made it plain before that they are OK with 20% Anyone who wants to give more to charity are quite capable of doing so Graeme Faulkner Option 1 themselves Stop wasting funds persueing this agenda I believe all 21.0M should be returned to customers but this is not an option, is the trust now trying to implement what you were trying to David Hall Option 1 last year? You should be rewarding your individual loyal customers directly, without having to navigate confusing and potentially difficult websites. Jonathan Shaw Option 1 The decision to give to charity is a personal one to be made by each customer and not by a blanket corporate decision. It's not rocket science, hardworking people want the money in their own account and then they can prioritize their own spending. David Lees Option 1 I need the money Keith Hart Option 1 Remember this is not your $ to be giving away !! Mp & Rm Welsh Option 2 Priority to funding for the emergency services. Dennis Farquhar Option 1 Eligible customers should receive the bulk of the grant as they are the ones paying for the services. Karl Stevenson Option 3 Thanks guys! Keep smashing it! David Lear Option 2 I struggled not to pick option 1. Kenneth Herbert Johnson Option 1 Without the yearly TECT rebate, I would change power companies as some are cheaper so I prefer to receive the special distribution funds The TOTAL refund should go to consumers. Harald Staude Option 1 Charity is up to individual consumers and individual need and ability. Christine Lee Higgins Option 1 Option 2 is a close second choice and we would be quite happy if Option 2 is selected instead of Option 1. We don't agree with Option 3. Colleen Street Option 2 I'd like you to support NZ Coastguard, Bird & Forest, Rescue Helicopter and St John. Nadine Smart Option 1 Option One please Annabell Downes Option 2 I would like to see that St John gets a really good size grant Pauline Tribe Option 2 good idea! In this day and age with the terrible wages paid by employers, sorry but we need anything extra that comes our way. I wish it was P A & P E Oellermann Option 1 different, but TECT already makes generous donations, and we need to live. Paul Smith Option 2 It's a lovely idea sharing grants like this with groups we can help Stewart Henderson Option 3 A great opportunity to help fund projects around Tauranga, from which we all benefit Neil C.Munro Option 1 Being a superannuitant means the option which gives me the most directly makes sense, Marie Rhodes Option 2 I want to support the emergency services. Also babies and healthy homes are very important for those on lower incomes. If this is a extra little sum of money for the customer that would be great as I know people are in hard times and this extra cash could Sonya Option 2 come in handy but also to give back to the community as well the our emergency services which need a lot of help because they do a awesome job and always need the funding to do so. John Forrest Option 1 A larger amount of 2nd part of Option 1 plus the 1st part of option 2 would be better. Catherine Haerewa Option 2 With the bulk of the $7350.00 going to Emergency Services L. Peter Due Option 1 As a Trustpower customer i feel we should benefit the most as its really our money or are we just being charged to much John Mcclure Option 1 Prefer to make our own charity decisions. Ca Heaton Option 1 We need the money to keep up the inflation, let alone cash rich people do the charity voluntarily. John Jaggard Option 1 Give out the full amount to customers to allow them to decide if and to which charities they wish to support themselves. Peter Musk Option 2 Option 2, appeals to us thanks Ms & Bj Jeffery Option 1 Extra money would be nice Kitty Saunders Option 1 Happy to top up currant funds as there is always a need for them In response to the information sent requesting feedback on how we would like the special payment to be made, I would prefer option 1, thank you. I donate to several organisations and would like to make my own decisions for my donations. I am concerned that the decision Claire Sligh Option 1 has been made to no longer make a cheque payment for the annual distribution; i will not give my bank account number via the internet i.e. the bank account details third option. Dear Trustees. I thought you would have learn't from previous experience that most people do not like to be told how to spend their Peter Campbell Option 3 money. So where is option 4 to pay out all of the bonus? Option 4 Pay out all of the bonus to consumers- Yes. FYI- I am not a Scrooge, I contribute to financially charity organisations. Laurel Betson & Rob Henson Option 1 WE prefer to give our own donations. Keith Sievwright Option 1 We have our own organizations we like to support and will. Karen Long Option 1 As we are the consumers of Trustpower the funds should be redirected back to us. We have been seriously thinking about leaving Trust due to the hugely expensive power compared to other companies but this would give Christina Kelemete Option 2 me incentive to stay on. This also now has me considering taking on the fibre deal. I do believe money should go back to the customers. Karen-Anne Hoather & Robert Farron Option 1 Maintains long term distribution approach which has worked well As I support a dozen charities of my choosing, several on a weekly or monthly basis, and my sole income is National Super, I can do with a F.A.Bridle Option 1 bit extra myself. Rosina Davis Option 1 I think this money should go back to the people. Catherine Fletcher Option 2 The funds paid to consumers is spent in the community too Julie Pryor Option 2 Very good community group choices Anna Beck Option 3 Option 3. No dividend to consumers. Use all funds for grants We support option 1 (the status quo) and are opposed to the other two options. If the TECT Directors believe that they should be getting into more “feel good† “charities” then they should look at reallocation of part of the 20% that they already have a mandate to W J & Me Richardson Option 1 make decisions about. Further, if they believe that Trust Power consumers should be supporting more local “charities”, then they should first be trying to convince the other Power companies to contribute proportional value, based on the numbers of their customers, to those local charities. J Rodda Option 2 Emergency services could also include Surf Life Saving Valois Option 1 Option 1 is fair. Thank You. Glenys Hamilton Option 1 Thanks. C Ronaki Option 1 why do grants have to get a top up, this windfall is part of Trust power over charging consumers so consumers should get it all Neil Parkinson Option 1 I would like to see the distribution rule apply to this also. Leon Minty Option 2 I'm happy to go with option 2. Dorothy Mcgough Option 2 Am all for funding emerdency services Kyle English Option 1 The extra money would really make a difference for our family this year. Veren Bartley Option 1 Happy with option 2 as well. Majority of this money should go back to the consumer Jacqui Mclean Option 1 I give enough to charities that I choose. W.V.Canton Option 1 this is my rebate not yours and my choice as to a donation Why doesnt all of it get distributed amongst the consumers. Doesnt part of the annual cheque already get distributed amongst the Nyree Hawkes Option 2 community organisations that apply? It's money that I can use for payments or to give to whom I think should receive it. Lower the cost of electricity and internet, then your Ludi Jacobs Option 1 starting to show what a win, win really is. I would like this to go to the eligible consumers so many people, the older folk ,families really do need this top up myself included it would Sherald Williams Option 1 go a long way for myself and Im sure other people would agree. Regards Sherald Craig Wymer Option 1 the last referendum was very clear that 80% was to be returned to the consumer as they support trustpower and this needs to continue. Julian Reid Option 1 The same ratio of 80:20 should be applied as usual i.e. 80% for rebate and 20% for grants David Duncanson Option 1 Some of us are renting and every dollar counts. Rebate will be a blessing And help In view of the financial situation of many in the area and their lack of discretionary income/spending this is the very best option for many Sheryl Atkins Option 1 who are struggling to survive through the winter months and help cover living costs. John Pottinger Option 1 need help with $$$ Mike Cade Option 1 stop trying to change everything.leave well alone. Ady Van Der Beek Option 3 Surf Lifesaving Clubs should be considered. Marc Bonney Option 2 We would love to see NZ Surf Lifesaving involved in a major portion of the annual distribution plan. Jenny Spence Supported option 2 and 3 R. Hayward Option 2 Under no circumstances can I support option 3. Couples with young families budget on trustpower rebates for christmas presents & pensioners also wait & buy something extra with Pm & Cj Moriarty Option 1 their refunds. People also donate directly to chosen charities. We were disappointed by the outcome of the proposal to sell some of TECT's investment in TrustPower and TrustPower's part in this outcome.We are not in Trustpower's metering businesses' current plan to install smart meters at our property which means we are Malcolm Gibb Option 1 unable to change supplier. The TECT distributions are only bringing us closer to the dollars we would pay for electricity over the year to another supplier. Tracey Ronaki Option 1 I only stay with trustpower for the cheque. 1) The funds belong to the eligible consumer members and there should be an option for 100% of the funds to go to those eligible consumers. 2) All the current trustees should retire at the next election as they continue to see the fund as a charity and not a method of returning S T Mckinstry & M F Keane Option 1 profits back to the rightful eligible consumers. 3) It is up to each individual consumer to decide, according to their own needs, how much of their annual rebate they elect to give to charity, not the trustees. Alan Kenny Option 2 Spend the 7.35 m well. 2 or 3 hundred dollars don't really affect us and as much as we think this is an opportunity to give it all to the community we're aware David Robinson Option 2 that this amount can make a difference to some individuals so there should be some consideration there. Naomi Carson Option 2 Nice to help community. Noel Stevens Option 1 Strongly recommend Option 1 Alix Mcgregor Option 1 Living on the pension only this would be a tremendous help thank you L M O'Callaghan Option 2 We think Emergency Services and Surf Life Saving should get a good proportion of the grants. Thank you. Alan Marks Option 2 I would think that in the middle of Winter a lot of families would appreciate a little extra in the purse. We are heavily taxed in this country and to have a utility company playing god by overcharging for an (nowadays) essential service is R L Waren Option 1 dishonest and only puts a heavier load on the poorer people so that the richer can play games with their money. I have trustpower shares and am comfortably off but I have a conscience. Tect policy only raises elect. costs across the country. Greg And Wendy Scott Option 1 there is alot of families in our community who could use the extra money at that time of the year. I think helping the community is a wonderful idea. However my insilation is well over due for an update & would find the extra money a Edna Seerup Option 2 great help in doing this. Would help to make my cold house warmer. Nathan Bradley Option 2 I like the new initiatives and balance with consumer rebate Peter And Jean Craven Option 2 Fair to all, given Trustpower customers have enabled this additional payout. Regardless of what comes from Trust power this is regarded as a rebate for higher power pricing their consumers. R.V.Hodgson Option 1 If I and others did not receive these cheques there w ould be more consumers chasing cheaper power prices. Anne Lawrence Option 2 I think it would be great for the emergency service to get some extra funding. Rob Wynands Option 1 Cash for me is good This way seems fair, consumer gets something back but everyone helping donate extra funds to important areas such as emergency Carolyn Melrose Option 2 services etc Thank you for offering consumers a choice. I have recently had an operation and unable to work so have chosen option 1 as the extra Valerie Donaldson Option 1 money would help me greatly. thank you. Reginald Melrose Option 1 For loyal customers of trust power.this is a must as the charges are among the highest of supliers. Nm & H Wilde Option 2 Seems a reasonable compromise between options 1 and 3 - fair to all parties. Peter Ross North Option 2 Emergency services could do with the boost. Great oppertunity to make a better Tauranga. But maybe $240.00 extra distributed to consumers may make a helpful difference to Stephen Collins Option 3 people. Alan Mckenna Option 1 Well done. This will give a boost to the Tauranga economy. Isobel. Tume Option 1 Sorry, but being on one pension these days, every little bit helps. The first option is too airy-fairy and the funds will be not really get to where they should. There is less chance of this happening with the Mr T G Price & Mrs R P Van Welie Option 2 second option, which is why we preferred that. Also we believe in those projects. Surely, you are not serious with Option 3!

I have selected Option 2 because I consider that the price of power is going to increase in the next 12 months and this payment would David J R Bennett Option 2 help those on fixed incomes (pensioners,beneficiaries). The extra funds to emergency services etc. would be of great assistance to them because of a deficiency in government funding and this special distribution deserves to be shared around. Tim Shellis Option 2 stop trying to give all of OUR money away. The option for all the money to go to eligible consumers was not offered.Why not. M Lally Option 1 There needs to be more transparency why this option was not offered.It allows consumers to have a say. M J Firth Option 1 I prefer to see the funds used for extra special or even one-off projects Brian Crook Option 1 Being Seniors anything like this will help our budgeting..Tks Mike Huymans Option 1 we are old people struggling to make ends meet, so any help is beneficial to us. I would love to see our community vote for option 3 but sadly many people just want what's best for their own back-pocket. Please make Kelvin Clout Option 3 the brave decision! Cheers. M D Frost Option 1 status quo why change now? Consumers should received this fund as the area salaries are not keeping up with inflation and general cost of living. Thanks for the Kim And Andrew Saunders Option 1 information regarding the special distribution. We would like to feedback that the distribution takes the consumer rebate back to the consumer ie Option One. Most of us as struggling to make ends meet so the extra $295 will assist. Julie Carvell Option 2 Option 2 or 3. Because of funds specifically going to environmental sustainability - desperately needed in the BOP Thanks for soliciting feedback. Your community work is appreciated, but you also need to keep cadence with consumer wishes. There was Glen Option 1 a clear preference last year for the funds to be directed to the consumers; Id challenge the need to do it again here. I would have preferred a fourth option of the TOTAL amount distributed to eligible consumers and am wondering why this option was not Robyn Parker Option 1 available. I would like to see the total $21 million given to eligible consumers. Julie Nyhoff Option 2 I choose Option 2 ; it seems a fair solution to me, both parties benefit. Tony Strange Option 1 It is essential this is paid to eligible consumers. Tect already gives the community more than enough. Kind of starting to untrust TECT now....after last year you guys threatening to wind it up...so because of that I will take the option that Theresa Robson Option 1 provides the best for me. Sad really but you brought it on yourselves by this threat...you reap the seeds you sow! and by the way the day you pay the last dividend to us is the day I leave trustpower..No faith in you guys whatsoever anymore... Ewan Robertson Option 2 that way we all get a benefit from this windfall thank you :) Preference would actually be full distribution to eligible consumers. I dont know why the trustees continue to not consider this to be an Jonny Boom Option 1 option! consumers pay more for trustpower and have "earnt" the distribution. Those so minded may donate to causes of their choosing. No need P Thwaite & J Ansell Option 1 for an intermediary tect trust.

Normal distribution rules should apply. If you want to change it, I suggest you distribute ALL the money to account holders who paid the Br & Ma Procter Option 1 orginal funds to Trust Power. Next time please include account number in your letter with the options. Leveridge Option 1 Tick to the first option. Option One Don Scurr Option 1 Please let me decide who I give my money to. L Switzer Option 1 Option 1 is by far the best option. This helps with my pension. Thank you. David & Glennis Holifield Option 1 I would like cunsumers to receive the rebates Stick to your distribution policy even though this is a one-off. Its there for a reason. I would rather have the opportunity to donate my Debbie Cunningham Option 1 rebate to local organisations as I see fit, rather than having it decided by TECT. Matthew Snookes Option 1 This would really help our family out. thanks There are a lot of people in the community feeling the pinch at the moment due to financial hardship. The fairest solution is to go with Steve Wiles Option 1 option A and they can choose how to use that small windfall for themselves. Judy Ware Option 1 5hank you for the choice Denis Meredith Option 2 I feel option 2 would be the fairest for all. Option 3 definitely not. This seems the best option as it gives back to the customers but also gives to some really important needs in our community - emergency Catherine Option 2 services being the most important! Kristy Sherwen Option 1 Would prefer to choose where to donate money to Kate Bladen Option 1 Option 1 please!!! If people who receive this payout want to give it to a club or whoever then that is for them to do.The excessive fee for power is ripping off Royce Penning Option 1 users. TECT SHOULD BE DISBANDED and the power price adjusted accordingly. Cyril Hughes Option 1 I would change power coy but for cheque due to high trustpower charges Reid Calvert Option 2 Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback. Stop trying to change the current distribution policy. The money should go to the consumers who support Trustpower, which has made Stephen Lawrence Option 1 possible the investments in the 1st place. Roland Dumble Option 3 very sensible option Ray And Michele Dumble Option 3 Great idea Rawinia Taki Option 2 Option 2 makes perfect sense to me and my family The alternative uses in 'Transformational ' and 'Top-up' are too vague to be seriously considered. Besides, Shane Jones currently has a John Rothera Option 1 monopoly on confetti money...... We really cant understand why it has been made so hard to vote onthis unless you dont want consumers to have this payment.We are W E & V M Thomson Option 1 not all computer savvy you know The special distribution is from dividends from Trustpower ie excess profits. As our power payments have resulted in those excess profits Malcolm Southwick Option 1 the distribution should all be paid to consumers. I would like option 1. But it seems like there should be another option: $7,350,000 Transformational, $4,200,000 Top up instead of of just Michael Wright Option 1 the $13,650,000 to top up in option 3 Jamie Smith Option 2 Option 2, then everyone gets something. Sylvia Guy Option 1 We like to choose our own charities to donate to. The extra $ will really help some families. Robert Shelton Option 1 Others can donate more to the charity of their choice. We need to think about the future. It is especially important when Government's all around the world are not heeding the climate change Mr & Mrs J R Greenfield Option 3 issues as explained by Sir David Attenborough for one. John Alexandre Option 1 its fair.and we can spend our 295 as we see fit, part of which could benifit our personal charities. Ailsa Margaret Smith Option 2 This would seem to fair to all Volunteer emergency services such as Coastguard, Surf Lifesaving, and Land Search & Rescue deserve support. I would not support Craig Morris Option 2 funding going to Agencies who bolster their workforce with volunteers (e.g., Fire & Emergency NZ, St John, Civil Defence) as they are already funded from rates, taxes or levies. Annabelle Thom Option 2 I think the 2nd option is a fair way of distribution given the number of households who struggle with high power costs. I am living on 30,000 a year with a hefty mortgage due to permanent sudden in health. If I was still earning as in the past I would pass on Elizabeth Garbutt Option 1 to charities. I am grateful for the opportunity to have me say. When user pay is operational surely morally any refund must be rightfully returned to the user. It is users who I've sustainably and save B & D Cheshire Option 1 power by using solar etc, lets reward citizens who in area. Rates and S H 2 are a high impact for citizens in this area, good to believe in TECT staying commercially viable! Melva & Mike Keightley Option 2 We would be happy with this option. Steve Nigro Option 2 prefer the recipients in option 2 I feel that the current distributions to charities, sports clubs and the like is more than generous, especially bearing in mind the stories that Ray Moore Option 1 emanate from some of these institutions regarding fraud and theft. You should also bear in mind that many of your customers (including us) also donate privately to their selected causes. M M Sandlant Option 2 Dont want government to have any thing to do with the distribution or to benefit Tom Bicker Option 1 Doesn't even balance out with rate increase, just swimming against the tide Please advise me why there is not an Option 4: $21M to eligible consumers ($368 each). This would be my preferred option, then I can Paul O'Connor decide what to do with my benefits from being a consumer. Please revert back to me by email. I believe it should be the decision of all consumers when all 4 options are offered for how "we would like to see the one-off distribution" Personally I think all the money should be returned to the consumers. The directors think they are god allocating funds to various Richard Bates Option 1 organisations. OK for them they have plenty of money. G F & B Walker Option 2 A balanced approach that still achieves something significant for the community. Happy to include current grant funds in special dividend payment. Don't understand where the mandate to alter distribution has come M Burt & Suzanne Te Kani Option 1 from. Appears more of the same grant fund money grab from trustees. Looking forward to new election of trustees. I'm not impressed with your choice of options to donate to, give people their funds and let them choose what to do with it.Why didn't you Dave Edwards Option 1 make this form easier to find typical hide it away and people might not bother to comment J Almond Option 1 Prefer funds go to community groups that are not government entities/funded. Erni Family Trust Option 1 Consumers should receive this before any charity. Option 2. But would like more precision regarding the 'four significant areas' as the nebulous details given could cover many Christine Giddens Option 2 organisations, some more robust than others. Nicky Drury Supported option 1 and 2 Ik Payne Option 1 As a long term customer of Trustpower I would like the rebate paid to us. Scott Mckenzie Option 3 Put the funds back into the community per the Trust's mandate. Adrienne Pulham Option 1 I would like to give to my things I support not what you give to. Chris And Tanya Steiner Option 1 Option 1 please Robert Westenbroek Option 2 Best choice. Tim Conder Option 2 I prefer the purposes to which the grant is being paid on this option. Jennifer Slade Option 2 so long as the money goes to good causes. And is accounted for. Lance Philip Ruffell Option 1 Option 1 - one-off $295.00 special consumer rebate to be paid in July 2019 Did you not learn from last year, I like to decide myself how and when, what I do with my money without being told what will happen to it K A Pym Option 1 just as the Trust Deed said. Charity begins at Home is worth thinking about. James Pilgrim Option 2 Agree with option 2 Receiving the full amount and then giving to charity would mean a tax donation receipt so would get 33% rebate. If TECT give on our Tracy Te Whaiti Option 1 behalf there is no rebate. Deborah Lake Option 2 I vote 'Option 2'. Why only 3 options? How about consumers automatically receive their nominated $295 --- And the balance of $4,200,000 be distributed Diana Kitson Option 1 between the Transformational Grants and Top up Current Grant funds? Murray & Jane Hay Option 3 We like the idea of investing into transformational change, and future generations. Na & Pm Martin Option 1 We prefer to choose our own charities Good morning. I am excited to see your tect special distribution, and am very grateful to have the opportunity as an 81 year old living on Iris Curtis Option 1 just the pension, to say how much I would appreciate the payment coming to me. Thank you so much. Glad I am with tect!! N.Paynter Option 1 I have reservations with options 2 or 3 as they tend to take away personal responsibility. Emily Belbin Option 2 I"m keen to support the transformational grants but also to receive a bonus too. Our family advocate for most distribution for eligible consumers ($240 amount indicated), with allocation of remainder to 'Transformational Grants' outlined. In particular we would advocate preference for Emergency Services and Environmental Sustainability Tim Lander Option 2 categories, on the basis the 'initiatives' meant the community providers of such services received actual money granted, not just spent on administration of grant moneys. Thank you for the opportunity to input. Warren Fitzsimmons Option 1 We are broke and need the money Blaise Williams Option 1 100% of the special distribution should be distributed to eligible consumers. They can decide how to use the funds. Willie Jarvis Supported option 1 and 2 I favour Option 2 for this one-off Distribution.It would be helpful to me, to receive some further rebate. I think the Transformational Grants proposals are excellent and I support them, but I dont feel that the Current Grant Funds need to be increased. However the Alison Grey Option 2 explanations of the Transformational Grants mention only the Western Bay. Id like to see the Grants also be applied to assist those same initiatives in the Tauranga area as I would think that the same issues apply in the Tauranga area, and there are probably many Trustpower customers in the Tauranga area. Ron James Option 2 Option 2 is my choice of distributin of special funds. Thanks Ticked option 3 so funds can grow for iconic city projects such as regional parks, civic heart, museum/cultural centre, heritage and also Richard Hart Option 3 Environmental sustainability throughout the TECT rohe.

Hi there, Im emailing as I would like to suggest some additional options as shown below, of which Option 4 is my favoured option.

Option 4 $NIL Consumer Rebate; and all the $21mill granted to iconic projects in the local community (ideally to a new Tauranga Museum).

On the other hand, my instinctive guess is that the majority of TECT consumers will want to receive some rebate, so I would therefore vote for: Andrew Knowles Option 3 Option 5 $250 Consumer Rebate; $NIL for transformational grants; and therefore the remaining balance to top up existing grants for iconic projects for the local community.

Reasons: I dont support funding for the transformational grants because:- (a) I believe central govt should be providing more to these, and, (b) there are added layers of admin in each of the 4 projects mentioned that will unnecessarily chew up some of the funds.

Irene Horsburgh Option 2 no comment Hi, We would like to give our feedback regarding the TECT special distribution. Option 1 is our 1st choice. Option 2 is our 2nd choice. Many Judith And Steve Kilgour Option 1 thanks. Trevor Prince Supported option 1 and 2 Hi, my name is Derek Richards. On receiving this notification, we have come to the following opinion :- We would gratefully accept Derek Richards Option 2 OPTION 2. We like option 1 but the extra cash goes to the normal current grants [tennis clubs etc]. So have picked option 2 so that emergency services [etc] get the rest. My preference would have been for a greater payout to consumers with a smaller amount distributed to emergency services. Many John Morriss Option 2 families would certainly appreciate an additional payment - $240 almost feels like an insult, but then I guess the decision makers are not in touch with the reality that most of us are faced with. Stop messing with how the distribution payments are allocated. If I want to donate money from my share, I will donate it to whoever I Maurice P Keane Option 1 think is worthy. We are just as needie as the the grants as a pensioner it is very hard to survive so some should be coming to us as we support your Doreen Powell Option 1 company so now you need to support us S & R Darmody Option 1 You will need other choices if you want people to donate money to charity as Acorn does not have a very good reputation. Cm Potter Option 1 The customer is the beneficiary. It can decide to whom it wishes to donate to, thank you. Marje Young Option 2 In response to your request for feedbsck, I support only OPTION 2. Thank You. For the TECT special distribution I prefer Option 1. I am already receiving nearly $3,000 Income Tax return for the 2018-2019 year, for Wilson Orange Option 1 charity/community distribution of funds, of which I prefer to continue to make my own choices thankyou. Regarding distribution of the one-off special dividend of $21M thatTECT has received from it's Trustpower shareholding, I favour Option 1. I am an 85 year old pensioner, living at home who struggles with ill health and whose wife is, at 82, my chief carer. The rebate would John Hodges Option 1 be a great help, especially during the Winter months and I will let you have my nominated bank account by post if/when it is necessary. Trusting you understand my decision and thanking you.

Karen Herd Option 2 Option two would be my pick These options are limited and we do not really support any of them. We would like to once again remind the trustees that TECT is a consumer trust, not a community charitable trust (no matter how worthy the causes are). The current policy of 20% of income to charitable purposes has been mandated by the consumers, ie $4.2M of this special distribution to charity. We would have voted for $4.2M to go to the transformational grant initiative - but not $7.35M as proposed. Mj & Bl Norton Option 1 The TECT trust deed allows for funds to be spent on upgrading electricity infrastructure for the benefit of the consumers - we would like to, once again, remind trustees of this option. This special dividend, in part, would be an excellent opportunity to negotiate financial input to stop the visually intrusive new Maungatapu pylons going ahead and instead have the lines go beneath the bridge, which is said to be the more expensive option. I don't need the Trustees to distribute money on my behalf I will donate to who i want. Murray Stuart Option 1 We should be paid 100% of all monies this includes the November Cheque Neil Redshaw Option 1 Option 1 is the most reasonable and my preferred option Dale Mallett Option 1 To whom it may concern, I am in favour of OPTION ONE. Ron And Sue Wilkinson Option 2 My husband and I choose Option 2. We want to make a difference in our community, but we also feel it is fair for us to receive $240. Marama Wansbrough Option 2 I choose option 2 . I would support a vote. Christie Loveday Option 1 I would like to opt for Option 1. Ken Speer Option 1 I would prefer option 1 of $295.00 paid to me. Catherine Geeves Option 1 We would prefer Option 1, the full consumer rebate. Louise Elphick Option 1 Murray and l prefer Option 1 for the special distribution of funds. Graham & Thelma Jack Option 1 Option 1 is our approved choice.We do not approve of all chosen options in 2 & 3 It would be excellent to assist with the expensive winter power accounts. There will also be the normal distribution funds available Kim Rahiri Option 1 charities. I prefer to give to charities, which I do do from my own funds to the charities I choose - hence selecting this option. thank you for the opportunity to comment. Gail Knott Option 2 Nice to share money between consumers and the grants programme. you should be sticking to the current distribution percentage. not trying to give away the consumer distribution. If consumers want to Michelle Wood Option 1 donate their amount they can do themselves. I feel like you are trying to go down the track of getting rid of the consumer distribution again Naarah Simpson Option 3 Our communities need the benefit of the input of this large amount of money more than consumers do Rod Gouldson Option 2 My choice would be either option 1 or 2. Ian Williams Option 1 This option allows me to donate the windfall to a recently widowed friend with 3 children in need of financial support. Dave & Nicky Hurst Option 3 We would like to vote for option 3 please. DP & NE Hurst Tony Hurford Option 1 I would like my full payment of $ 295 ,as a 83 year it will help me pay my bills , so dont give my money away thank you Roy Robinson Option 2 I suggest Option 2 Judi Brown Option 1 We shall choose option 1 thank you. Graham and judi brown Sadly all options are too broad and leave others to decide who gets what and what they spend it on. I would prefer the bulk to go to Michael & Valerie Evans Option 2 Emergency Services as then 100% of the consumers of Trust power benefit. It is not our task to support Safe and Healthy Homes or Enviromental Sustainability - they are both responsibilities of Government of the day. Jh & Ec Mccarthy Option 1 We make donations to emergency services on an annual basis Carole Long Option 2 I support the grant initiatives offered by Trustpower but would find the $240 payment offered very helpful However, while fully supportive of your expressed sentiments behind the application of both the Transformational and Top-Up Grants, I Alan Shirley Option 3 suspect the funds will just get gobbled up with little to show in terms of "transformational difference" and "inter-generational iconic projects". And if that happens I'll never vote in this way again. Gail Wills Option 1 Who has paid the $16.8 million dollars? Mark Mckinney Option 2 Option 2 better provides a better balance for fund distribution Mike Ward Option 3 the right places for the grant to go! M & R Tucker Option 1 We'll make our own decision on donations thanks! Brian & Linda Mccready Option 1 Without the dividend payments coming to us we wouldnt stay with Trustpower, because of the power prices. The Tect trust deed clearly states that 80% of income is to be distributed to the consumers. Mg Deal Option 1 There is no other option.

80% of this special dividend is intended to be paid to the beneficiaries.Just do what the trust deed implies. Forgive me if I sound frustrated, but the trust deed is quite specific on how to distribute funds. Your last attempt to divert funds from the consumers met with M Deal Option 1 a dismal response at the polls. Many consumers are struggling to make ends meet and any dividend is going to help them. By all means give consumers the option to let their dividend go to TECT, but those that want the dividend for themselves should receive it. M.Mcavoy Option 1 I would like to see the results of this request for submissions published Janet Thomas Option 1 A lot of people are in need of this money to help pay their bills though the winter. Here you go again trying to be generous with other peoples money. You seem to have been captured by the charities and forgot who you Kevin Port Option 1 are supposed to be representing. You should have made it easier to give feedback so you got a truer response and why do you get to decide. A referendum of consumers should be done. Megan Dromgool Option 1 Would be nice if this contributed to the walkway along the Tauranga City Waterfront to QE2 Park. Rosalind Burton Option 1 OUR MONEY BACK TO US, PLEASE Jennifer Smith Option 1 I regard the four significant areas identified by TECT as the responsibility of central government and should be funded by government. Bruce Malpas Option 1 I'm not sure that its TECT's role to be "transformational". Norma Beck Option 1 As I already give to several emergency services and volunteer in various areas, I feel this is a fair choice. Maxine C Bastable Option 2 Emergency Services , First 1000 Days of Life, Safe and Healthy Homes, Environmental Sustainability Tracy And Nicky Gowland Supported option 1 and 2 At the end of the day many of us are only remaining with Trustpower BECAUSE of the TECT cheque (and that is marginal). Anything that Karen Angland Option 2 continues to make that worth it keeps the customer. In this case I think it would be nice to give back a portion but to receive some of it too. Pa Coleman Option 1 seems fairest especially for long term Trust Power customers who like me already support others in the community Gj & Sm Horsley Option 3 Or in descending order 3,2, 1 Bay Of Plenty Rugby Union Option 3 Bay of Plenty Rugby support the distribution of the one-off payment to Option 3. Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback.

1. 'Transformational' is a nice fancy name that has some appeal but WHAT exactly does it mean? 2. I would like to know WHO the beneficiaries of the transformational grants are and how much will be allocated to each of them. Also M A Selvadurai On Behalf Of The Selvadurai Family Trust Option 1 HOW the beneficiaries will utilise the funds and how will that 'transform' whatever it is that will be transformed. 3. TECT needs to be specific on how the funds will be used

Emergency services are high-cost organisations and need adequate funds to cope with existing and future needs. They are trusted. Margaret Douglas Option 1 "Potential" transformational grants do not have enough detail for me to be confident of the results of future grants .And I am 80 and would posibly be able to top up current donations to St John and the rescue helicopter - (or buy steak for a change!)

We choose option 1. This will be an "incredible opportunity" to make a transformational difference to our bank account. Have any of you Mr T & Mrs N Golden Option 1 had to worry where your money will come from to pay You Trustpower account?

We the undersigned TECT eligible consumers, select Option 2 for the distribution of the $21,000,000 special dividend from TECT's Trustpower shareholding. It seems reasonable that some of this unexpected windfall" as you refer to it, should also benefit some worthwhile community causes, but certainly not all of it, for two reasons:

1. We Trustpower consumers pay more for our electricity than most other electricity consumers in New Zealand

2. If it were not for the fact that we continued to be Trustpower consumers in spite of attractive offers from other electricity providers, Max C And Robin R Avery Option 2 TECT would not be receiving this "unexpected windfall".

Therefore, TECT eligible consumers should be by far the principal beneficiaries. PS. It is to be greatly regretted that you made absolutely no provision in your correspondence detailing 2019 TECT Rebate Payment Options for Trustpower consumers who, like ourselves, are not on line, to nominate their preferred option. It is to be similarly regretted that you made no provision for TECT eligible consumers who are not on line to advise you of which of the three TECT Special Distribution Options they preferred apart from listing your postal address. Given that most of those consumers who are not on line are superannuitants without a great deal of surplus money, the inclusion of a post-paid reply envelope would no doubt have got you a great many more responses.

Just having returned for visiting south I rush this reply to your circular RE "TECT Special Distribution" and now offer our reply. We offer Mr G W & Mrs P A Matheson Option 2 Option 2 as our preferred option of the 3 set out in your 'TECT Special Distribution" and thank you sincerely for the opportunity to "Have a Say". Thank you for the opportunity to be involved! We pay enough for power so the distribution rebate helps to offset the high prices. As far as helping the community goes we should be Denys Tomaselli Option 1 allowed to donate to those we choose not those chosen for us. I am really surprised that the trustees are pushing out the payout option boat again - given the recent caining they got when they tried the same thing recently. If they are so hell bent on giving money away for community projects then maybe they should set an example Trevor Gleave Option 1 and donate their annual "honorarium' to the cause instead of taking off of Trustpower costomers. The idea might be a goer if you got the other power companies to donate an equal amount off their profits to charity works in Tauranga. Then it would be truely all for Tauranga - Tauranga for all Why is there no option for all money to consumers, since the opposite has been put in (all monies to organisations that are undeclared)? Craig Haskell Option 1 Also, what are these other initiatives? Seems a bit like trustees are trying to syphon funds for their own pet projects (again!)

I would prefer to see grants distributed to those who are within the Tect/Trustpower region ie BOP and not Nationally as the contribution Gavin Meadows Option 2 would be diluted. eg. you mention "Coastguard NZ" this should be Coastguard Units within the Tect/Trustpower region (BOP).

Paul Hickson Option 1 Use the method you use for other distributions. Not fair to consumers to rock the boat and bring in options 2 or 3 in this case. H & P J Sauter Option 1 no, other than to repeat that I (we) are for option one HS , P J S Carolyn Gander Option 1 I would use this towards the excessively high City Council rates All dividends should be returned to the consumer. The individual can then make their own decision as to where donations are to be Kevin List Option 1 made. Devoy Squash & Fitness Centre Option 3 we strongly support the ability for these funds to be applied to community projects Why is there not a 4th option to distribute the entire amount to eligible consumers? You have a zero option and so it only seems Joanne Ririnui Option 1 reasonable to have one at the other end of the scale Lorraine Dobson Option 1 Thanks its my money I'll donate it to an organisation of my own choosing Roy Tallon Option 1 I'd rather have my share of the Special Distribution and decide myself which charities etc to give to. Bruce Horsfall Option 2 Distribute the same as the regular distributions Ron Sinclair Option 1 As we are a retired couple & living on the pension every bit of money helps,So it is with sadness we go with option one. Glenys Chauval Option 1 being on a pension this would help a lot. The funds being distributed belong to the consumer and the distribution reflects that people are paying more for their utilities than it Cj Harrison And Sfm Leung Option 1 costs the provider. Hence the maximum should be returned. In principle we see a problem with utilities which are central to everyones' lives, being sold at a significant profit such as allows distributions like the one proposed. Peter And Judith Malcolm Option 3 We are rather tired of TECT funds masking the relatively high prices we pay for power through Trustpower We have supported Option 3, but it is qualified support. We would prefer to see better balance, say 50:50, between "Transformational" and "Current Grant Funds". Tect has a one off opportunity to put $21m to good effect and we do not support this money going to "more of the Same" which is implied in the "top up" category. Having said this I have spoken with Paula who assures me that current thinking is Murray And Raewyn Mcalonan Option 3 to put the funds to Iconic projects and to Catalyst for Change projects and not to "business as usual". She has also given me a good understanding of the nature of projects that would be considered. Notwithstanding the above we still support better balance between the two fund concepts. We do not favour frittering away $21m by way of very modest consumer rebates from this one-off opportunity.

Tjspitz Option 2 Option 2 Dipak Dayal Option 2 I would like to see the $21m split 3 ways ( $7m each between option 1,2,3) so everyone gets the a slice of the pie. I am recently retired. I have been a loyal Trust Power customer for many years. As I now rely on the pension I would prefer the first Elsie Mary Reynolds Option 1 option. Dorothy Symonds Option 1 What was the feedback results on the last one when you were going give us a payout and wind up the yearly payouts Colin Maunder Option 1 Community is getting enough. Give to the consumers, many of whom are struggling under massive electricity charges. Mike Lane Option 1 A very nice timely payout to us older ones. Judiann Tapiata-Tokona Option 2 I'd love to see option 2 come to fruition. it shows exactly what organisations will recieve funding. D & E Walpole Option 2 TECT should not be involved in constructing buildings, e.g. the building taking up " the green"at the Historic Village. Bs & Tk Winch Option 2 Second preference would be Option 1 My main concern is where does all this extra money come from and why aren't the power charges reduced. It seems as tho its the Frances Monica Ransley Option 2 Trustpower customers who are actually paying for everything even the excess that will be given to above grants.??? Richard Walker Option 1 Where is Option 4, return $370 of funds to consumers, I prefer to invest in other charities not listed. Maxine Costar Option 2 As we have been loyal customers for nearly 48 years and have not changed we have been a part of trustpower i think option 2 is for us A.B And C.A Loveday Option 1 We need these discounts as a consumer We already have an established distribution policy. Would like to see the trust stick to it until a formal policy change. Barry Guo Option 1 Please act for you beneficiaries. They can make their own decisions and contributions to the society. 1.The rebate in our pocket is the only reason Trustpower is a competitive supplier to our house. This is under review in our house and I suspect TP will either have to sharpen the pencil or be our ex supplier. 2. The notion that the Tect earnings are for Trustpower consumers is the only notion I support. I think the entire $21m 1 off special Brian Coates Option 1 dividend should go to the Tect consumers. 3. The Tect proposal in 2018 that rebates should be terminated with a buy out to consumers was dumped for good reason.Long live the full rebate and stop proposing to give it to non Trustpower consumers. Super profits from Trustpower comes from captive excessive charges over and above other suppliers. If it wasnt the tect distribution I Andrew Gawlik Option 1 would not be with Trustpower. Therefore the distribution is only possible due to their ability to overcharge, yet retain captive customers.

Robyn Julie Hacche Option 1 I would like the one-off payment to 100% to be paid to me so I can spend this money helping my family and my chosen charities. Jill Austin Option 1 Option one, I have charities I like to give to. I don't want you to choose where my share goes to. Margaret Miers Option 1 If the funds available are from profit made from charging us for power, it should be up to us to decide how to spend it. I wish to express my serious concerns re the trustees request for feedback on the $21m special distribution. When the trustees previously sought submissions on their proposal to wind up the trust and settle the trust fund on the charitable trust, I made a submission and advised them that such a decision was illegal ( Beyond their powers as trustees) and a breach of their fiduciary duty to the beneficiaries. I attach my submission for your information. The trustees new request re the $21m distribution is again of the same nature and anything Phillip Trappitt Option 1 other than option one in my strong opinion would be illegal.Not only would the trustees be liable for a breach of trust but I read in your job description the you are bound to "effectively manage operations in accordance with the trust deed " placing you in a similar position. My opinion is based upon my experience as a chartered accountant and previous auditor of a similar Consumer Power Trust . The trustees are bound by the trust deed to distribute a full 80% to account holders. Anything else would be a breach of their fiduciary duty and render them personally liable for such breach. John&Helenbindon Option 1 we do already donate to several charities of our own chojce, and prefer to keep it that way. Shannon Burns Option 2 Emergency Services are well deserving of this funding. Graeme Beaver Option 1 Stop trying to change the 80/20 split Jacqui Stephens Option 3 Happy to share :-) R & I Humphrey Option 1 The money has come from power consumers, and should be returned to them. Transformational projects should be funded from taxes. Watts Option 2 Iconic project funds and catalyst for change fund sound airy fairy and could mean anything. at least option 2 is clear. L.Morris Option 1 Other options very lose and uncommitted as to where and when the funds would end up - smacks of vanity projects of the trustees

If I had to choose - Opt 1. It would be nice to see a better compromise. Consumers would often like to see rebate and those in hardship will always choose this. Could the 21m not be split 3 ways?? I want to support Iconic projects, I love the difference funds have made in the community. It's either 4.2mil or 13,650mil?? I'd like to see some shared with Emergency services - they are essential and in Need! Others Danni Connell Option 1 under transformational grants I feel are Govt responsibility and there are already initiatives around for these. Opt 1 or Opt 3. Ideally it would be better to split 21mil and see 7mil for each of the 3 categories - Consumer Rebate - Transformational Grants - Top up Current Grants Fund S J Howe Option 1 the money belongs to the customers thankyou very much The distribution percentages should be maintained both in good times and bad. Unclear as to what would be achieved from transformational grants. As an architect I see many misconceptions about healthy homes and Brian Sharp Option 1 what is required to achieve one.Throwing band aids on existing houses without a comprehensive solution can make them worse. I have seen this happen with many schemes to date. More insulation, decreased ventilation through better sealing increases humidity and fungal growth causing health issues. What is environmental Sustainability but an individuals responsibility.

Jillian Margaret Irvin Option 2 Seems a fairer option. This way everyone gets something All the money should be allocated back to Trust Power consumers as the money belongs to them. Users need this money for their living We & K Rickerby Option 1 costs. Neil Parker Option 1 Best to leave the TECT consumers to decide how to allocate their funds. Option 1.... believe it or not there are a lot whanau who could use this money, technically it is "our" money so credit it back to us. We pay an absolute premium for power with trustpower so we deserve "our" money as opposed to distributing it to other organizations all the P.Palmer-Matthews Option 1 time. There should be individual letter sent to every customer for November rebate to individually decide "which" organization we want to pur our portion too, if I was given a list of 10 organizations, I could decide where my portion went??? If any. I mean honestly look what trustpower charges us for power?? We deserve "our" money back.

Paul And Sue Barnard Option 2 I believe that we should have the option to do what we wish with this money. Alan Knight Option 1 As this is a one off, would be nice for consumers to benefit Not sure why the choices made us choose between the 2 uses if we thought we should get some of the money. Really can the money only Rosemary Roper Option 2 go 2 ways? Your customers deserve to get the rebate as we are paying a high rate for power in the first place helping to create surplus funds. $2M is Cindy Foster Option 1 still being shared to the community. The main reason we stay with Trustpower is for the TECT dividend. We donate money to charities but prefer to choose ones that Lloyd And Heather Parnell Option 1 resonate with us. Thank you Jodi Tod Either option one or option 2 Im sure this money would be most helpful to Trustpower customers with their heating costs this winter. 20% still goes to other causes of C. Walker Option 1 which I think Emergency Services would be a very good one. The Trustees are probably not in a situation where they cant afford heat in the winter but many are. The options are very limited with 1 & 2 being similar (but different) distribution alternatives. Also my guess is that there will be very few Ronald White Option 1 reply's that choose "Option 3" (less than 5% of reply's.). They must then choose between 1 & 2. Such would confirm that the 3 Options have not been thought out.Hence do not give your consumers an opportunity to choose between completely different alternatives. James Butler Option 2 I fell perhaps grants should have been shared in all 3 options. S.J. & A Flintoff Option 1 Option 1. Reason its actually our money and we feel that, thats how it should be distributed. Lynda & Frank Parker Option 1 As a pensioners would prefer cash to consumer Enhance and enrich initiatives already underway before expanding to new initiatives. Important to simultaneously return a little to us Martin And Viv Elliott Option 2 "shareholders" As I already subscribe to Emergency services and have myself and witfe to keep on just a pension I believe those who decie to have more Mr.S.A.Wells Option 1 children should look after them as I did mine/

Although I would like to see more money go to the community, reality is prices of living keep going up, wheres my income has stayed the Stephanie Cole Option 1 same, so any, and every, dollar I can gain back would be if real benefit just to cover the basic living cost. Thank you Neil Stuart-Menzies Supported option 1 and 2 Although I am the manager of a registered charity, I am not in favour of an energy supply company overcharging for its product, only to D.V.Jack Option 1 donate funds to an organization of its choice. Ian Mathews Option 1 so we can manage our own finances and give to our prefered charities Mirjam Van De Klundert Option 2 The class Iconic pojects fund is not descriptive enough, more detail is needed before i would consider that option. Paula Phillips And Bryan Harvey Supported option 1 and 2 Emergency services constantly struggle with not enough funding - they are expected to fundraise for money they require to operate which Darryl Mackay Option 2 should be funded jointly by central & local government. Sadly it isn't. In our ever growing city with evermore constant demands on our emergency services,I feel we should be funding these before Iconic projects and Catalyst for change (who are they???) !!! Trustpower is not the cheapest option for services and we always incorporated any rebates into our subscription calculations. But Martijn Haitsma Option 2 sometimes community organisations need larger cash contributions to be really able to buy or upgrade services. So we tick therefore Option 2. Heather Loughlin Option 1 Thank you. I really enjoy being a Trustpower Friends member and in particular a great way to save for the Christmas cheque. Stephen Bunce Option 1 This feels very much like an underhand way of trying to get consumers to give up their rebate that you failed on last year Ruth Woodward Option 1 Thankyou for the opportunity to have a say. Mrs K A Clayton Option 1 I prefer Option one and be able to make own choices as to what community services to support we do regulary support charities Ray Reynolds Option 2 Please distribute the one off payment using Option 2. Thank you. Pip Palmer Option 2 It is great to be able to see money going into our community to help make a difference Maria Holden Option 2 I like the recipients chosen in Option 2 and wish to support them. Caleb Grant Option 1 Definitely option one please Vibe Home Styling Ltd Option 1 Definitely Option 1 thanks!! :) Stephen Tetley-Jones Option 1 Id rather see funds going to long term projects Steve Dyer Option 2 There should have been an option where all columns received a level of funding... Anderley Middleton Option 2 Very cool. Neil Cudby Option 3 Great initiative Lucy Strawbridge Option 1 We are not a high income family and would find the $295 very helpful. Plus funding still goes to the community Sharne Option 2 Option 1, since iv paid so much in power Hi there my family and I would like to see option one where consumers get $295 and $4200000 goes to top up current grant funds. This Sara Madsen Option 1 way we can individually choose where to make donations or to keep the funds ourselves if we are in need of them. John Settle Option 1 We would like option 1 for the distribution Odette Bustard Supported option 1 and 2 My choice: with difficulty - Option 2 (but with a bit of explanation which follows below) My comments are not intended to offend only to offer my truth I wonder whether they'll be read.

I'm an ex-teacher (English included), but your Iconic Projects Fund and Catalyst for Change Fund” titles plus brief explanations mean next to nothing to me. I wonder how much less they mean to other consumers who have even less linguistic command in understanding Gary Behrend Option 2 technical terminology? It's the kind of terminology Councils baffle residents with.

Why, in Option 3 could the Amount for Iconic Projects Fund and Catalyst for Change Fund not be $4,200,000 (the same as it is in Option 1) rather than the full $13,650,000 making it a more balanced spread across the board? That would have made a far more reasonable Option to more consumers I'd have thought.

Thank you for your letter regarding the Tect special distribution opportunity. I think this would be a great chance to provide more funding Glen Richards Option 3 to areas of need in our community. I would not hesitate to vote for option 3. Kind regards, Glen & Minja. Janice Todd Thank you for your information on the TECT special distribution. My preference would be Option 1 or Option 2. Bill And June Sobye Option 1 I prefer Option 1. Consumers can then choose to keep the total sum for their own use or to donate some to charities of their choice. T & R.Blanks Option 3 We agree to Option 3 for the special distribution of funds. My Feed back is as follows - option 1 is the only fair way - its my money after all Jill Stackhouse Option 1 Trust Power account holder for 20 years John Jordan Lorna Jordan. Option 1 We are more than comfortable that the current status remains. It appears we are only getting back what we have been overcharged in the first place. At least you havent given it ALL to the board, John Wratt Option 1 directors and executives! The option still remains for those do-gooder consumers to give their distribution to whatever charity they like.Thanks for being honest! ? Luke Perrott Option 1 We are struggling to pay bills so the more back to us the better. Robert Turnbull Option 2 TECT is marvellous. Keep up the good work in helping the Tauranga Community Kennedy Pehi-Neho Supported option 1 and 2 We've been through all this before. Which part of your previous referendum did you not understand? This money belongs to your Mj&Wl Spence Option 1 consumers to do with as they wish! It's important the payment goes back to the consumers as there are some many people struggling and are in need especially over the E Douglas Option 1 winter months Roseanne Mccormack Option 2 Emergency services have a horrendous job to do, often their funding from govt isn't enough. They are heroes. Tanya Gilchrist Option 1 Want to give it to the charity of my choosing. Mr M Cooney Option 1 Thinks consumers should be able to choose their preferred option and TECT action it rather than Trustees deciding. Evelynn Trust Option 1 Not happy that the only option was to use a computer to make their choice known. Rob Tait Option 3 Great Idea. Look at the big picture projects When ever I have considered changing Power Companies and got quotes from Trustpower competitors Trustpower have always reminded me not to forget the TECT CHQ in the comparison and its no surprise that the difference has always been close to that amount which means that around 100% of the TECT CHQ amount is actually my money not yours to throw around .The more you pay out the more Trust Power will pad their charges . The whole thing is a rip off and Trust Power should be held to account or the money should be distributed to the TECT Consumers . I always thought that over time the number of original TECT Consumers would be falling as people Stuart Baker Option 1 got disgruntled with TrustPower and changed companies therefore the amount available for distribution would be increasing per consumer. I have two Questions 1) Is the number of TECT Consumers falling and are these numbers available to the public 2) Was there a legal document created by the TECT Trustees at the time of its creation which clearly states how the income is to be distributed and is this available to the public

As we benefit from Trustpower funds as a not-for-profit charity we would like to see as much as possible from this opportunity go to the Robyn Curreen Option 3 community directly. Thank you. Alison R Mcpike Supported option 1 and 2 I would actually like to see the whole amount distributed to consumers - and this should be one of the options - so in reality option 1 is my Stuart Whitaker Option 1 second preference Aw & Lr Reid Option 2 We think it's fair that consumers get part of the extra distribution. Murray Hopson Option 2 Consider this the fairest option for both consumers and the community. Paul Byrne Option 2 Please do not phone me. W A Mills Option 3 This is a one off opportunity to provide some meaningful funding for the benefit of the wider community Geoff Andrews Option 1 The original intent of the Trust should be adhered to. Maintain policy consistency. Don't like the concept of using TECT to funnel funds into Acorn - nothing against Acorn but it is not the Ian Turner Option 1 purpose for which TECT was set up, and removes the the ability of TECT to determine where the Trusts funds go. Smacks a bit of cronyism.... Syd Thompson Option 1 Normal 80/20 spit on all income TECT receives, as per our previously voted on agreement. I would prefer option 4 were I get ALL MY MONEY and give to a project in MY area not ClaytonsCity called Tauranga . BUT that will never Ian Macdermott Option 1 happen SO ITS PIE IN THE SKY TIME David Ogilvy Supported option 1 and 2 Desmond Godfrey Option 1 Looks like another trustees on the railway again!! R N & C A Tye Option 1 Please DO NOT hand our email address on to anyone else N.I.Merriman Option 1 we are not all rich do gooders .I need the money Regal Automotive Option 2 We would like to choose option 2 for the special distribution. I would like option 2. I would like to revive the money for ourselves please. (Sorry but I give, and have given) in my own way). Oh, happy Christine Prout Option 2 days! Jocelyn Winwood Option 1 Definitely option 1 !! Pensioners need every cent we can get these days! To whom it may concern . We recently received a letter and pamphlet regarding a TECT Special Distribution. I went on to your website to Belinda And Warren Douglas Option 2 give feed back but it said "site not secure", so we are sending you an email. We would like to go ahead with Option 2, whereby there is a consumer rebate of $240 and a transformational Grant in the amount of $7,350,000. Many thanks for the opportunity of a share in the bonus Consumer Rebate! Wow, that's wonderful and we would like to accept the offer Sandra And Sandy Zaloumis Option 1 of Option 1. Alfred Buckton Option 1 I would like this one off payment distributed as in Option 1 Richard Procter Option 1 We make donations to a number of recipients, and would prefer that we control who we donate to Gc & Jh Ward Option 2 hard to make a decision when one does not know some of the intended recipients Lynn Rees Option 1 Should be an option for all to go to consumers. $4.2 million is a good contribution to an ongoing fund for the community. If I knew it would be used for the benefit of the majority and Murray Bailey Option 1 not for an over the top monument of a museum I would have voted differently. Definitely back to the consumers. The reason why you have such a big return is because of the customers. So we should be given the Ruth Mather Option 1 majority of it. D Morgan Option 1 We should have the right to distribute our funds as we see fit. Duncan & Glenys Mcvicar Option 1 If you want to change the “distribution plan” you should provide consumers with a more obvious mechanism to comment! It would be good if you defined emergency services, i.e. St John, Coast Guard, Surf Life Saving, Emergency Helicopter, rural volunteer fire Burns Option 2 service Don't understand your terminology as you have not defined what is meant by transformational grant initiatives but agree with more to Tim Johnston Option 3 top up current grant funds, as have said before. As this is a special dividend we think it all should go to community projects as so many largely volunteer groups are in dire need of funds e.g. Papamoa Surf Life Saving Building Project. Warwick Copeland Option 1 I do not support some of the groups/organisations in the Transformational grants group We have chosen to stay with Trustpower because the Tect rebates keep it on a par with other Power companies. As it is the community Heather Brown Option 1 benefits greatly from the Tect charity so this one off payment should go to the eligible consumers. Sarah Walker Option 2 This is a great idea! Frances Anne Pouwels Option 1 We can make our own donations with our money if we want to. Id like to see all the money distributed to eligible consumers. T&C Swart Option 1 keep current distribution policy Kim Van Raalte Option 1 I feel a substantial amount should go towards emergency services in our area! Colin Morley Option 2 Option 2 is fair for both. Kyle Michel either option 1 or 2, it seems i can vote for both Virginia Lee Wigley Supported option 1 and 2 The transformational grants were too limited and didn't benefit our family directly. We already donate to emergency services so I would Melanie Lowe Option 1 rather have the extra to me so I can donate to something that benefits my 12 year old son. I have the freedom to donate to where it can help our family in a more direct way. Rodney Bosher Option 3 St John Ambulance I feel that the beneficiaries of the transformational grants are all vitally important organisations that should be supported and fully Jill Glenn Option 1 funded by central government. H & E Groothuis Option 1 Need it to pay our winter power bills Ana Jordan Option 1 giving to charities is a personal choice and should not be forced on us. Finances are so tight for nz'ers that every penny helps. We felt that the 2nd option should have included some payment to top up current grant funds as well as the transformational grants. ie Carole-Ann Mountfort Option 3 split the $7,350000 between the two I would have like to see an option where the split was $xx eligible consumer $xx transformational grant initiatives AND $xx top up current Colleen Pye Option 2 grant funds. This way everyone is happy. And if you reduced your power prices people wouldn't feel as if they were missing out when they didn't get as much Tect chq at the end of the year. But someone needs to stand up to make a difference so good on you TECT. Mrs A Deacon Option 1 Conforms to the already agreed 80/20 split. 20% to charitable purposes. 80% to the consumers. Keith Owens Option 2 Support shared between consumers and the community Alan Milford Option 1 Option 1.Help out customers during winter Andrew Stuart Option 2 Only emergency services are really used by everyone. Social engineering is not something that would have universal support. H J Huizer Option 3 I feel this is the way to spend this money,for the greater good of the communitee Sandra Osborne Option 1 There are a lot of people struggling to pay power bills. I think we need all the help we can get, this would be a big help. Thank You Sandra. Chris & Carol Waterhouse Option 1 We would like to see a better selection of recipients that the public can vote on to receive extra funds. Maxine Watts Option 2 1&3 were too unspecific. Jo Wills Option 2 I would prefer an option where the total amount goes to the transformational initiatives. Kylie Gracie Option 2 Option 2 Stephen King Option 2 As topping up the current grant fund which is already in surplus doesn't make sense to me I support option 2. I would like to know why you are not distributing the funds as per our annual distribution. Were you not elected to ensure this is how our Robert Mclaughlan Option 1 funds are distributed. You are confusing the issue by going through this three option way of distributing funds that belong to the people of Tauranga. I have chosen one option above even although I disagree with this policy. Mr J K & Mrs D J Fitzgerald Option 1 To help cover the increasing cost of power Alan Bush Option 2 thanks for the opportunity to provide feedback Karen Option 1 option 1 is the only option we want ...thanks Conrad C K D Hawira Option 1 I'd like to go with option 1 Money saved by a company owned by it's shareholders should go back directly to the shareholder and any charity offering can then be Stephen Hassall Option 1 decided by them - Not the company Option 1. People are struggling more and more with everyday living costs so it would be nice for it to go back to the consumers who are Krystal Cowley Option 1 paying for the power. Bradley Kyle Watson Supported option 1 and 2 Special distribution feedback Option 1. I see no other way to cast my vote than this. Why isn't there an option 4 all monies paid back to Tracey-Ann Option 1 consumers? Many are struggling financially and unable to access funding from other sources and could do with as much of their money returned as possible. Shame on you for not having the courage to give a fourth option. Eleanor Esther Mackenzie Option 1 I am a pensioner and the maximum rebate credited to my Trustpower account would be much appreciated. Pam Ferguson Option 2 Option 2 gives a fairer distribution of the funds. We think this is the most fair option as it helps those of us on a fixed income to cover the ever increasing cost for rates, insurance and Rhonda Harrington Option 2 general cost of living rises that are occurring weekly. Mrs Street Option 2 Would also like to see funds go towards Greenpeace Tony Ansell Option 1 I would prefer that the full $21m be paid to consumers. Why not? Gary Gempton Option 2 I would have chosen option 3 but this site differs from the brochure re destination of the fundz Margaret Leydon Option 2 I wish to vote option 2 Allow the individual to decide what organizations,if any, to direct a donation to. There are many worthy causes outside of the Tauranga Christine Penfold Option 1 Community. Christine Dunster Option 1 Be nice thank you very much We choose option one with reluctance! As the saying goes "charity begins at home" and we need the money. However, it appears to us that your choices are geared to obtain the outcomes that you want. We believe that If we had a true choice we would choose the option one Consumer Rebate together with the option two Martin & Macown Option 1 Transformational Grants. This is because we (the consumer) get the maximum rebate in option one and the option two Transformation Grant names four specific, much needed, community services that you are accountable to and for, ... unlike the option one Top up Current Grant Funds where there does not appear to be any transparency nor specifics. Why is there no option four where the outcome is win-win-win, for all three beneficiaries?! There should of been an option for us consumers to have it evenly divided between all eligible consumers. And make it one large lump sum payment and do not have the Tect cheque any more. Karen Halsey Option 2 after all we have been paying for the power, internet etc. It would be nice to have some more benefits When we get offers from competing power companies, Trustpower tell us don't forget the distributions you will get and take this into Hitesh Patel Option 1 account. This might be a special dividend but should be handled in the same way as other dividends in terms of distribution- otherwise … who knows how we might look at future offers to change power supplier. It should be up to the consumer to decide if they wish to donate to charities and which charties they wish to support, other consumers need this money to help with their day to day living, paying power, food etc so those that can afford to give up their share should not be Bd & Lm Guise Option 1 making decisions for them> THosse that can afford it can make their decisions to donate personally but thisdoes not impact on those that can't afford for it to be donated. Sarah-Jane Odgers Option 2 Option one or option two Roger Parry Option 1 Want to choose Option One but it won't let me I love the grants that help our community but just love the chequebwe receive it makes Xmas so much better for our family thank you Michelle Nolan Option 1 trust power Not polite to say what I really think about TECT gifting MY money to projects that are the responsibility of central government (am I being Gary Liddington Option 1 taxed twice here?) Mau Arahanga Option 1 Will were notidied about decision via email or will the process just be decided? Ellen Storrie Option 1 I want to receive the $295 payment into my bank account. Would like to see all of the Transformational grant go to St Johns Ambulance service as they are desperately short of funds and they do a Kelvin Roach Option 2 great service for the community Debbie Whittle Option 1 Thanks. Kerry & Kathy Snowden Option 1 Should be another option were all money is returned to the consumer and they can decide on what to do with it Maureen Argyle Option 2 I am happy to see money going towards transformational grants Jeannie Mcnaughton Option 2 Need more clarification on what "top up grant funds" means. Option 1 would be second choice. John C Smith Option 1 Give dividends back to investors. Jo Veale Option 1 Kia ora . Thank-you for the options. I prefer to donate myself to organisations that I support. Thanks. Olive & Graham Caddie Option 2 Option 2 gives something to consumers as well as providing for some community support. Lorelle Clark Option 1 Look forward to payment this will help the household. Kind regards Lorelle Victor Williams Option 1 you give enough in funding organizations already. help your customers We need more information about the very broad areas to which TECT is going to allocate the $7.35 million. I look forward to seeing Graeme Wilson Option 2 what is proposed- in detail. Graeme Wilson I choose option 1 as I plan to leave the area by the end of June. This way I get a payment to almost compensate for not getting the Tina Richards Option 1 November Trustpower cheque.

These rebates should go to the Trustpower customers. We all have the option to donate all this money. I don't mind a small percentage going to community. Note that for some poorer families $240/$295 will make a huge difference in their weekly budget. TRUSTEES - look at them. Why make them pay for your iconic Museum etc. They won't even be able to afford visiting them. As trustees you should be looking after the interests of all beneficiaries, especially the poorer families. I note - your option 1 gives 20 % to Iconic Projects etc. Why does Jon Mapp Option 2 option 2 give 35% to Emergency Services etc and not 20% also? - not a level playing field! You are picking most will vote for the cheaper option 1. Where is the option to pay out the rebate to customers at 100% ? It seems that some or all of the Trustees have an agenda to fund iconic projects that the average resident in Tauranga doesn't want and the council won't fund. It shouldn't be up to the Trustpower customers to fund these projects.

I believe that this is the best way to distribute the extra funds which have become available thank you for your continued support Clint Phelps Option 2 Reagards Clint Phelps Elaine Fisher Option 3 I support these initiatives and believe they will make a difference for our communities. David O'Brien Option 1 with thanks. O'Brien Jeffery Burgess Option 1 I have no comments at this time thank you. Ms B J A Macdonald Option 2 I like the combination of a customer payout and 4 identified areas of services which will also benefit. David Harris Burnett Option 2 A good system of distribution for a one off grant. Lisa Te Wheoro Option 2 What a great idea to have an option for consumers and the communtiy

I support Option 3 and think this is a wonderful, one off opportunity to support the very important four areas mentioned with a large amount of funding which if used wisely could make a considerable difference to the operation of these four areas.In a similar way, the distribution of the $13,650.000 will greatly benefit a wide section of the Tauranga community R N & Mrs V A Somerfield Option 3 As a member of the Oropi Community we were very fortunate to receive considerable funding from TECT towards the re-development of the Oropi Hall which has seen the use of the Hall over double in the last two years since the completion of the update. This has really helped to bring the community more together with a monthly Friday evening happy Hour  bringing up to 80 people in an evening and also a monthly market day. Keep up the great work. Yours sincerely, Richard Somerfield

Shirley Smeaton Option 1 As per the distribution policy. Inga Spencer Option 1 from a humanitarian point, Option 2;, but have chosen Option 1 out of necessity to put towards power bills. Al & Dj Olsen Option 2 Many thanks. Graham Wadsworth Option 1 I would like to give this one off payment to a charity group of my choosing I see it as my prerogative to donate my TECT cheque to a charity of MY choice if I so desire rather than have the cheque taken from me by Wendy Holdom Option 1 TECT and given to which ever organisation it deems worthy. It is my money and I see it as my choice to decide what to do with it. I firmly support Option 1.

Should all go to consumers so they can choose charities or community organisations or at least have a list that consumers can choose who they feel is worthy. Choice is too prescriptive. I personally do not agree with all of Directors transformational grant initiatives. Give Lesley Mckenzie Option 1 a full list that we can tick and issue percentages according to consumer choice. So Option 1 but without top up to current grant funds, instead a list of community services and initiatives that consumers can elect to donate to. I'm a dubious about TECT still having an underlying effort to get more of the consumers money (like the failed attempt last year) and note C'Melle Gjiana Isaac Option 1 less than 80% is actually allocated to customers this year. For this reason, I choose Option 1. would be great some extra saving with young family. Ravinder Paul Option 1 thank you. Lorraine Raine Option 1 I am a pensioner and power is expensive. Every year eligible consumers provide money, through our Trustees, for grants to the wider community. As this is an unexpected special Neal Catley Option 1 distribution all of the money should be distributed to eligible consumers. Paul Washer Option 3 Provide benefit to the wider community eg Parks/Reserves for future generations Brian Allely Option 1 ive done this already, why are you asking me again. Robin Feron Option 1 I prefer to give personally to charities etc Lorraine Carew Option 1 Our power is expensive so consumers deserve some payment if not all of it. I am getting a bit sick of our do good society.

Paul Hamilton Option 1 It is not TECTs job to transform major initiatives. Current level is acceptable and more should be done by central and local government We want to make donations to 'charities' that are aligned with our own philosophy. This is not what frequently occurs with TECT Terence Dell Option 1 beneficiaries so we'll take the distribution and act accordingly. Donald & Beverley Mcinnes Option 1 look after your customers first. Helen Weston Option 2 Fairest to all. As someone who does there bit for the community and charities when I can, I would like to vote for option 1. It would be a awesome help Stacey Hatwell Option 1 towards our higher winter heating Bill's and we are trying so hard to get into our first home so every extra we could save would really help What's wrong with you. You have been told in previous surveys that customers want status quo. Jim Option 1 Why do you keep needlessly wasting trees, time and funds.! L M Raleigh Option 1 This would be a very welcome payment especially at this time of the year. The Trustees must never loose sight of the fact that the only reason there is a distribution is because of the profit generated from consumers. Trustpower is not the cheapest supplier and without us consumers supporting them and getting a small return we would seek Mark Weidenbohm Option 1 a cheaper supplier. It is my opinion that all profits should be returned to customers. Diane Goetzlof Option 1 Thankyou Alan Land Option 1 I would have gone for option 2 if it was going to emergency services only. Ron Chamberlain Option 1 Do not pay any money to Governments Responsibilities that have been done in the past Some of the money spent in the community seems to be well spent, but some just doesn't make sense, and a lot of what is spent, I have Bridget Weller Option 1 no idea about. There should be a 4th option. All $21.0M to eligible consumers. This $21.0M does initially come from monies paid by them with interest Paul Beveridge Option 1 received on it and used by Trustpower . Kevin Walters Option 2 We do not support option 3 We think that there consumers should have a greater part of this one-off distribution. You will still have the normal amount to give away Ian & Jo Dickey Option 1 + a bit extra. Phillip Gallagher Option 2 Emergency services need help, everyone wins Kevin Seddon Option 1 stop playing with our money I would select option 2 if there was more information available around what constitutes a transformational grant initiative, and the Hugh Gardiner Option 1 rationale around the selection of same. Stephen Wheeler Option 1 You need to remember what the trust was set up for. I appreciate the rebate each year, but a lot of us consumers are struggling to exist and pay our power bill, as your rates are higher than Robert Jackson Option 1 others, so any extra money is always welcome. In saying that you are good to deal with, but I do think us consumers should get the best deal. Joy Bray Option 1 As rates are due close to grant payments, it would be a great assistance for superannuitants. R Godfrey Option 1 The trustees still trying to give our money away! I lost all my savings in a scam 2.5yrs ago. Although my fault I do not wish any money due to me to go elsewhere. You already give money to projects which is not yours to give. Your desires are admirable but your actions are not. Do any of you elected officials give your John Pellett Option 1 remuneration away? You were elected to act in our best interests so plese do that. If I want to donate to an organisation I will do so but I have given a lot already including giving 10 yrs to the Fire Service. Donations may make you feel good but if the cause is worthy the money will come from other sources. Mel Carr Option 1 As a superannuitant I am not in a position to give up the opportunity of extra money to help my budget. Stay with policy and adhere to the Trust Deed. It needs to be understood why the Acorn Foundation is the option for TECT distributions. It Tracey Wilson Option 1 appears to be conflicted with the Chair. J Kernohan Option 1 I wish make my own decision as to how my money is spent, I do not want Trustpower to do it for me. If money not put in my account will leave your company. Will be sad to have to do so as been customer here and Whakatane for many Mrs M Trezona Option 1 years. Alan & Pauline Lee Option 1 TECT is a "consumer" trust set up for consumers so please don't keep pressurising consumers to change the status! Yolanda Cambridge Option 2 Would like feed back on how those grant initiatives helped the eligible consumers and in what were the out comes. Patricia Mckey Option 1 The money belongs to the consumer. If we wish to donate to wherever it should be up to the individual. With an income of $450.00 per week as a caregiver for my mentally unwell son, this money will allow me to have heating over the winter. Julie-May Pilkington Option 1 Thankyou Melanie Butt Option 1 As a solo mum this would be a massive help at this time of year Although it would be good to go to the community, at present it would probably benefit a lot more ‘average kiwi households with bills- Jason Saunders Option 1 like mine! I would like for there to have been another option.....ALL funds paid to consumers and THEY can choose if and how much they want to contribute to community groups. with their money. I would be interested to see the wording of the Tect policy, as I understood it was Glenda Gardiner Option 1 formed from the former electricity board for the benefit of its consumers, and wonder where the grants to community groups comes into it. S & J Minnell Option 2 The majority to the Emergency Services I would rather pay money to charities myself as at least that way I get to choose the charity and can claim it off my taxes then potentially Brett Steele Option 1 provide even more. If there was an option to get the lot I would take that! Cathy Donnelly Option 2 Keep up the good work guys! Russell Mckenzie Option 2 Brilliant that you can do so much with these funds! Keep up the good work, and thank you so much for the very helpful distribution! While the TECT's intentions are honourable it should remember that these funds are ultimately generated by the consumers who pay for Harry Snell Option 1 these servicesandit seems appropriate to me that majority of these funds should be returned to the consumers who can then determine how to best use them. The main reason we stay with Trustpower is to receive this payment each year. Think about people without the financial means of your Craig Dickinson Option 1 board, this "cheque" is the difference between christmas and not. While Im at it huge numbers of consumers DO NOT have access to email/computers/internet. Stop and think about your community please Dennis Pointon Option 1 Most retired folk would welcome Option 1 especially those only on National Super . Option 2 strikes a nice balance between a return to customers, many of whom would benefit from it directly and a contribution to the Rj & Vl Gillbanks Option 2 stated transformational grant initiatives - which we endorse. I appreciate that the money could make a difference to the community, but there are a lot of people who will be eligible for this who also Ann Thompson Option 1 really need the cash (especially in winter) L H De Kleijnen Option 2 We like this good news! Martin Tucker Option 1 Give me my money, please. Helps offset expensive power accounts,our rates can take care of the other council wishlists. Stay focused on core business instead of Joy Turner Option 1 warm fuzzies A M Tucker Option 1 Give me my money, please. Would prefer 100% return not 80%. Bw & Pn Christian Option 1 Costs are rising so fast charity has to begin at home for those on fixed incomes All one off funds should be distributed back to eligible consumers & none held back. Would be nice to help reduce personal debt for most Jg & Hj Heaphy Option 1 consumers living in this over priced location. R Underwood Option 2 If there was a ranking I'd choose Option 3, then 2, then 1 but have voted for 2 as this seems to be a 'First Past The Post' approach. Maree Pollard Option 3 Such an opportunity for the little bit that we would get to be a big bit for the community. Renee Broughton Option 1 You could have given more realistic options that split money across all three H J Mestrom Option 1 Be good to get some of the money back that you wasted on the last idea you came up with re:selling trustpower/tilt shares ! Gray Southon Option 2 A difficult set of options, I would have liked an option between 2 and 3. Bronwen Parry Option 2 My preference is funding to St John ambulance and the Westpac helicopter Gino Nepomuceno Option 1 Option 1... customers deserve a good payout for a change to help though wintwr months Keith Schofield Option 1 Consumers are the no1priority, their business is the lifeblood of trustpower. Jeremy Meikle Option 1 Trust Power is the most expensive but this is offset by the refund.If the refund is not available will change provider. Ms .K.J.Farac Option 1 Option 1 .some people may not need this but to some of us its a bonus Julie Bond Option 1 We would like option 1. I could not see on your website any further explanation of each of the options. All options need to be more specific on actually what this Dave Burnett Option 1 money gets spent on. The description of each option is too generic and needs to name projects that the funds will be spent on. Paris Williams Option 2 Option 2 is our preference As a pensioner I find any extra funds a great help. My husband and I do a lot of volunteer work in the community and this will help with Diane Martin Option 1 milage.

Hi there, option 2 is the only one that aligns to a certain degree with what the Bay of Plenty needs. The first option is a mix of two very different funds. We would love to support funds that support social change, but not so called iconic projects such as Baywave. Why are they packed up in one package? True iconic projects would be different if there were any. I would like to see a multiple choice version of Viktoria Ermes Option 2 selection what I want to fund, e.g. chose the amount of money I want to fund and in the second step chosing which organisations, funds and programmes I want that money to go to. This is a simple process and if set up properly you will end up with a list of the exact amount of money that can be given to chosen funds. Many thanks

Colin J. Kepple Option 1 Is Trustpower Account No. the same as "My Energy Number"? Jane Clare Option 1 As per current Trust Agreement Eddie Donnelly Option 1 Some of the transformational areas should be and in some cases are already covered in my tax . I would prefer that the money goes to the community. Phil Borrie Option 3 It makes minimal difference but a huge difference to different community groups who can provide services to those who really need them My opinion on the windfall to TECT is that we should get a bonus as well after all we are all consumers as well and should be entitled to a Janet & Robin Bramley Option 1 share. Adrian Lawrence Option 2 I like the fact they helping Emergency services, 1st thousand days of life and helping with the Environmental Sustainability. Pj And Mj Mcdonald Option 1 will make community donations from this rebate Ann Clarke Option 2 Special distribution is greatly appreciated. R A Cachatoor Option 1 most of us are the charity Fiona Mcclure Option 2 Thank you for asking for feedback. The transformational grant initiatives are much needed. Louise Peters Option 1 To help with my rates. Mr K R & Mrs B A Woods Option 2 Would like to see a grant towards home insulation. Ryan Plank Option 1 The full Amount should go to eligible consumers. Gillian Brown Option 1 TECT = CONSUMER Trust. We have recently moved to Auckland and are due to pay our final account to TrustPower on 13th May so we qualify for the distribution. R.A. & N.I.Felton Option 1 We have selected Option 1 to offset some of our moving expenses. We will set up with TrustPower for Tect to pay the rebate distribution direct in to our bank account. Thank you. Bob & Norah Felton Firstly I believe this consultation has been communicated badly and that many people will be confused with receiving two sets of Options 1,2 3 at the same time (Rebate payment methods plus Special Distribution). Secondly that to propose $7.5 million spread over perhaps 12 initiatives and 5 years doesn't seem likely to be transformational. Thirdly, to only have "potential" ideas on which organisations this might go to suggests a lack of clear plan which raises doubts.And lastly, the fact Peter Gregson Option 1 that some of the listed potential recipients are government funded organisations doesn't fit with my ideas on where this sort of funding which is essentially a voluntary donation should go. For these reasons I have selecting against the so called transformational grants and would rather make my own personal donations directly. Karen Toner Option 1 Unfortunately as a superannuant every little bit extra counts to live on. Where is option 4 where we make our own decisions on where the money goes to?! Where is the option where nothing goes to current Ngatai Kingi Option 1 grants, nothing goes to transformational grants and the money goes to the consumers. Haven't you learned anything from the last time you tried to cheat us? Bring on the elections I woulld like to see some money come back to eligible customers as a sign of thanks for our loyalty, but then the emergency servcies which Sharon Coughey Option 2 us TECT Helicopter get a healty donation. I think that trustpower consumers are in the best position to see the need in their own communities and therefore, if the full amount is Joshua Seabourne Option 1 distributed this willl allow them to do this. J.E Roadley Option 2 My Preference is Rescue Helicopter ST Johns Ambulance Stuart Morrice Option 1 Getting the extra money would be a great bonus to allow me to fix up my roof i would have selected a 4th option of: a payout to eligible consumers of $200 each and splitting the remainder between both Rachel Falconer Option 2 transformational grants and top up current grants then everyone gets less but no group is excluded. Leanne Annear Option 1 We give to Charities in another way, and being on a low income need the money for ourselves. Brent Bowman Option 1 Why is this the second time I have received this email for my feedback? What happened to the feedback I gave last time? Angela Mallard Option 1 trustpower rates are higher than other power company so any refunds should come back to the customers - no brainer Dear TECT, In regards to the one off payment. We vote for Option 2. Reasons 1.We wish to support the Charities that we want to, not the Lesley And Peter Stevenson Option 2 ones you decide for us. 2. It is not a very fair arrangement to give away our money - How come only the Trustpower consumers pay to these charities. Why not all power consumers?? D & Fk Louwrens Option 2 Thank you for giving us the choice My preference for the $21 million special distribution is option 2. This allows the rebate we receive to be given to charities or projects of Jim Barnett Option 2 our choosing. Clive Patching Option 2 Of your three options I favor number 2 .However funding into the cities roading infrastructure could be more prudent. With regard to the TECT one off special dividend distribution, I would like to see option 2 used for the method of distribution - Consumer John & Yvonne Tarrant Option 2 Rebate $240, Transformational Grants $7,350,000 Do not like your scram to down the costimers ! You are killing the goose that lays your golden egg ! So I totally am against the paying your Ross Walker thrusts a little to get more Peter Mckenzie Option 1 As we pay a premium for our power from trustpower Only those contributing to Tect's income should be eligible to receive any grants

We believe all excess monies should be share between the customers, who have been overcharged for their business. Peter And Josephine Burrell Option 1 Not given to others who don't contribute. While I would appear to be miserable,a lot of the money paid out is because of higher pricing of energy to customers.It is only fair to return it all to the customers.Not everybody agrees with all the projects supported by TECT. Accurate Weighing Ltd Option 1 This is our money that Trust Power have overcharged us to obtain,now you want to give it to someone else Hi there, I would like to vote for option 1 for the upcoming special distribution as per the recent information you sent us consumers. Wayne Mansell Option 1 Thank you for the opportunity to vote. Regards, Wayne Mansell. Ms K Latimer Option 1 TECT should have sent out paper voting papers and stamped return envelopes to ensure a better return from customers I think the total rebate should be distributed to consumers, surely the vast majority are quite capable of using money sensibly. Why Jean Sims Option 1 wasn't that an option? We are the shareholders and some of us struggle to pay our bills. Some of us don't benefit from funds shared with community groups so Debbie Walker Option 1 would prefer the cash in our pockets. Thanks. I prefer Option 2. For myself, I would be happy with Option 3 but, with the hardship so many are facing, distributing some of the extra Rosalie Smith Option 2 funds to consumers seems a better choice. B A Hennessey Option 1 The money should go to the consumer - that is why we stay with Trust power Maurice Pohatu Option 1 Thank you very much Coralie Nicholson Option 2 Sounds good. Would be lovely to receive. Kylie Option 1 there should be an option for all the money to go to consumers Keith Howie Option 1 2nd and 4th Transformational Grants Initiatives duplicate existing services and have poorly defined objectives. A dividend is a dividend. The Trustees should retain the same basis for distribution and not use this as a means of reintroducing what was Ross Milne Option 1 rejected earlier.Personally we will continue to make payments to local Charities as we support and including using funds from this dividend on the same basis. David Peters Option 3 More needs to be spent on saving the environment! R. N. Bidlake Option 2 I think the money would be wasted in option 1 as this has happened in the past A suggestion for funding would a generous financial contribution for a Museum in Tauranga as this has not got anything to do with rate Brenda Mareroa Option 2 payers but more with consumers who are not rate payers i have chosen option 1 because, in the information given, there has been no explanation of what the Iconic Projects Fund or the Catalyst Marie Abbott Option 1 for Change Funds are composed of. that is, I have no idea what organisations would be receiving funding. Therefore I am not confident in having funds allocated to those funds. Brett Wilson Option 1 As shareholders, I think money distribution is up to the individual to chose what they want to do with their own money The funds need to be distributed as per the standard agreement. There are many families in the community who are struggling and this additional payment to assist with winter power bills, warm clothing, food etc will help ease the burden. If consumers wish to donate this D & J Devine Option 1 special distribution they can choose to donate to a charity of their choice as there are many needs in the wider community and some are more personal to individuals than those suggested by TECT Trustees. Bj&Ra Chantler Option 2 We like option @ as the $240 helps toward the power bill and it supports important services Charity' list too generalised. Consumers should have been given a choice of specific projects grounded in practicality rather than Garry Fitzwilliam Option 1 aspirational vagaries. Its not your money after all ! Colin Simpson Option 1 My preferred option is Option 1, I can then give my support to who I want. In response to the TECT Special Distribution Options I would like to register my preference as Option 1 please. We support numerous local Dean & Michelle Rivers Option 1 charities and causes throughout the year and would prefer to have the option choose how we allocate our consumer rebate. Marian Young Option 1 I object to making donations to causes that I have no information on We feel that the bulk of the money should go to people who are customers of Trustpower, many people and groups who benefit from the Stewart & Ailsa Ritchie Option 2 grants are not customers therefore don't contribute towards the success of the company. However we like the idea that the four emergency services stated in the options will be helped so we are happy to take the second option. Sandra Bridgman Option 2 I particularly wanted Emergency Services to get some funding, so chose that option. Thank you. OPTION 2: Government should be supporting these groups. OPTION 1: Recognises the amount customers have contributed through Graham Woodhead Option 1 paying power bills! There is a reduced payment to consumers this year and it would be great for additional payments to be made to people when there is not Rebekah Webby Option 1 a great deal of money available during the winter.

I am in favor of funding for first 1000 days and emergency services and anything to do with making it possible to buy a home and Lisa-Marie Paretovich Option 1 sustainability however with the Cost of Living so high my family need every and any extra monies possible. nga mihi Jan Nicholson Option 1 Thank you for asking for our opinion. We support the existing method of distribution. Mrs M B Jones Option 1 with the cost of electricity going up every winter this would be a great help to lots of families Wendy Parr Option 2 A Better option would have been say $200 consumer then some to both the types of grant fund so all parties got some. sad

TRUST POWER take the tect money from the customers by stealth...Via the elevated pricing schedule....The trustees were right with their E.G. Jaine Option 1 2018 proposals to distribute....Any windfall should go to the customers / beneficiares where it belongs We and no doubt many Trustpower customers already support a number of charities, and many customers may be struggling to pay their Pb & Hm Archer Option 2 power bill despite the government winter grant. As a special dividend, i think this presents a unique opportunity to support some exceptional community outcome opportunities for our Michelle Elborn (Bay Conservation Alliance) Option 3 region. M Thompson Option 1 I believe that any and all disbursements from TECT should be as originally intended and agreed to from the inception of the trust.Thanks Mj & Tj Way Option 2 Thank you for giving us the opportunity to have our say. Full distribution should be made and should not be pandering to charities over and above present 20% allocation.I thought consumers Rob Paterson Option 1 had that clear to Truustees on last years fiasco..If people do not respond then by default the status quo in Option 1 must be allocated as their choice. The only reason we stay with you is the top up cheque each year as you sent the cheapest just that I havent done anything about Graeme Clark Option 1 changing BUT if the cheque isnt there anymore I will be looking at our options, minimum option 1. The cost of living is very high and we could all do with extra help to pay the bills and stay warm over winter. I stay with trust power only Megan Johnston Option 1 because of the rebates if this goes I will seriously look at another cheaper power company. Penny Stockwell Option 1 I am on a low income and would appreciate the extra grant to help pay essential bills. Arthur Atkins Option 1 Nice for us to be able to give our view on the options available. Well done. Barbara Patsy Walls Option 1 I think faithful customers or Trustpower should benefit as well as current grant funds. Lorraine Putze Option 2 many thanks for allowing choices The purpose of TECT is to protect consumers from high energy prices after the privatisation (theft) of the energy producing assets of NZ. TECT Trustees should be focussing on making energy in the bay affordable through the ownership of Trustpower and the representation Kyle Beetham Option 1 TECT has inside Trustpower. As shown by the failed TECT proposal most of the trustees cannot be trusted to act in the best interests of the beneficiaries they are paid to serve. If there is any spare cash you should spend it on an independent review of the TECT proposal and request recommendations to ensure that TECT is protected from future attempts to destroy the trust.

Teresa Brown Option 1 Family of 7 young children, we genuinely need this money as much as any charity does this year. We would prefer to get the whole refund back to us. We reluctantly agree with option 1. Alot of your consumers rely on that money to Pj &Ej Magill Option 1 see them through a busy time. We have paid for the power throughout the yearand are entitled to it. We support charities of our own choice. Transformational Grants need to be strictly for capital projects. I couldn't think of a better transformational grant than to grant the basis Neil Percival Option 2 of a museum for Tauranga. Tauranga Boys' College Option 3 Our view is the distribution should be used to provide the greatest possible benefit to the wider community. Vicki Wain Option 2 Option 2 Harry Bold Option 1 Thank you so much for your reply. As a superannuitant I feel we need to get some more money coming back to us as Trustpower is way dearer than any other of the Joan King Option 1 companies so if we didnt get something back then it would be time to jump ship..... Dianne Ward Option 1 If consumers receive this larger payment, they then have the CHOICE individually to donate to where they wish. Edith Rae Loveridge Option 1 Consumer input consumer gain Gaynor Hill Option 1 Ideally I would like all funds to be returned to consumers. Option 1 distribution as we have said well before 80% to consumers and 20% to grants how many more time do you need to ask this Bevin Pratt Option 1 question. I don't care who you decide to grant that share to Phillippa Cox Option 2 It would be fair to share it between consumers and grant initiatives. Jo Birtwistle Option 1 Give each consumer the option to donate themselves as they will then get the tax benefit of providing a donation Brenda De Beer Option 1 This is the best power company that thinks of his client Wendy Palmer Option 3 Particularly keen for environmental sustainability over all else. Keith Walter Option 2 AS this is just another surplus as a result of overcharging customers, distribution should follow the standard procedures David Stewart Option 3 it is fantastic to see this community benefit from initiatives such as these from TECT, thank you all! I would have preferred the option of the whole payment being distributed to TECT consumers. This option 1 is the next best for my Paul James Forster Option 1 situation. M F Rundell Option 1 Thankyou for this one off bonus Artastic Ltd Option 1 Thank you for this extra bonus. Holly Goldsworthy Option 3 Thank you for all you do. Darren Cornforth Option 1 i can make my own informed decision on organisations to support Jon & Judy Clark Option 3 Community needs this money more than us Mrs M.Wilson Option 3 2nd choice would be OPTION 2 i can only speak for myself but do believe most people i know would like to have to extra money...for a few its not alot...for most its alot & Glenn Batten Option 1 will help run the home Paul Hodson Option 2 I think this provides a good balance between the consumers and the Tga community G & Sk Fisher Option 1 Though one would like to be generous, life is touch on just the pension, hence option 1 Jan And Peter Donaldson Option 1 We prefer option 1 but would like to know precicly what you mean by Iconic and Catalyst funds. Ivan Fay Option 2 If I need to put my account number on the feedback form Trustpower should put my number on your letter . I believe that TECT customers should get the maximum permitted consumer rebate. The individual or entity receiving the rebate funds is Quentin Smith Option 1 then in a position to make a donation to a specific charity or community organisation of their choice. Trustpower consumers should be able to support their preferred community group rather than organisations selected by TECT Trustees. Monique Merrilees Supported option 1 and 2 Some customers find rebates helpful because of their own circumstances and this one may be particularly helpful going into winter. Some Mrs M Begley Option 2 customers may be involved in a community project or charity they may be able to which they may wish to donate their rebate.

Teresa Strange Option 2 This way all Trustpower consumers get a rebate plus money still goes towards projects that are important to our community. Roger Stiles Option 3 The more people benefit the better Amanda Option 1 Give it all to the consumer !! Consumers are paying higher power accounts through Trust power than through other electricity providers and deserve a large portion of Wayne Oliver Option 2 the total Special Distribution - if not all. However I like the opportunity to support the four areas noted that the transformational grants would be dedicated to and agree that would make a difference in the community over many years.

Paul Callinan Option 1 I think Tech does a great job in the community, but also feel consumers need a little help sometimes, so I have ticked option 1. Thanks Stick with your existing distribution policy and provide option for customers to make an individual choice re donation to other causes Zoe Ellett Option 1 similar to how to you are running the annual distribution process. Irene Wallmannsberger Option 1 Individuals can do their own due diligence, direct donations to projects that are beneficial and relevant to their area and activities. R H & E M Reid Option 1 We already as individuals contribute to several community groups I think option 2 seems a fairer distribution as it benefits the community directly with a consumer rebate especially coming into winter. It Anne Warren Option 2 also provides specific support to essential community services. How about stick to your duty under the Trust Deed instead of continously trying to alter the task you were given. If it doesn't suit the Donald Webster Sewell Option 1 current elected Trustees then resign and the consumers will elect a replacement. A 4th option to have the full amount distributed to eligible consumers would be great, especially going into Winter when some could Deon Johnston Option 1 benefit from the extra bonus. It is extraordinary that again the board thinks it can steal this money from beneficiaries. This is not for the wider Tauranga. Its time that the board did what the trust deed states and stops trying to take charity decisions from its beneficiaries.I'd even go as far as stating that Andrew Hollis Option 1 in the case of a special distribution the complete amount ought to be redistributed AND another account opened with the individual option for donations to be retained Natasha Option 2 Give some money to the community Don Schwass Option 2 Thanks for your generosity ! Tj Scott Option 1 Maximum benefit to eligible consumers should be priority, not playing philanthropist with extra income. Sam Marshall Option 2 Option 2 thanks. Not enough detail on option 3 and option 2 provides a good balance on reflection. Not a lot of difference per individual consumer re payout between option 1 & 2 but a lot of additional funding using option 2 for grant Sonia Hoyes Option 2 recipients.

I hope to see Surf lifesaving, Coastguard, Life Flight and St John receive a significant donation as we the community all have the potential Bruce Trust Option 2 need of their services. The many other causes and charities require money but I suggest these four charities service more of us. Fraser Benton Option 2 Keep up the great work!! you're all Awesome :-D C Bates & D Bowman Option 1 Thankyou Elizabeth Howell Option 1 Charity begins at home. Thank you. $55 might be loose change to those on good money,but to those of us on the minimum adult wage it is a significant amount and would be Steve Willams Option 1 better off being part of my budget. Ant Smith Option 1 Option 2 please a fare and even distribution of funds I could be more interested in option 3 if i understood what projects and initiatives were being considered. (inc timelines and project Nadine & Nathan Parata Option 2 owners) As I have been approached by TECT Rescue Helicopter Service to donate money I would like to see a large portion of this special Suzanne Lawson Option 2 distribution go towards this life-saving community service We think that it should be the consumers who receive the payment, as power is getting more expensive all the time, we help make the profit so why should we not get some benefit enough already goes to charties. It would help our young families & older generation as many of these people are already struggling.Not all of us have plenty of money to Karen & Hopi Tairi Option 1 not have too worry about where our next payment for our power & living costs are comming from & at times it is nice to have a little help we do not have to pay back. People are important.

Attention TECT Trustee Committee, You people are Unbelievable ! The Special Dividend of $21 million belongs entirely to the Beneficiaries of the Trust, not the Committee. While there may be an arrangement that the Annual income (earnings) are currently split 80/20%, this is not a Rule, but is tolerated as being an affordable deduction. There is no Precedent for the current 25 cents per share bonus payment, which we note was announced by Trustpower in November last Year. Nevertheless the Committee have taken all this time to come up with (only) three options for the dispursement of the windfall profits, none of which offers to pay the Trust Members the full amount of their due Dividend. It seems the Committee have not learned much from the previous uprising resulting from their devious plan to embezzle income due over the next 85 years or so, with the enticement of a relatively miniscule amount which was owed to them anyway as the derivative of R V Anderson the Sale of the TILT Shares that they already owned. Should any Trust Member, including individual Committee Members, wish to donate their own Income to any Charity, including the Acorn Foundation then this is their right. We note that the Acorn Foundation is already advertising in the BOP Times (at considerable cost) thanking the TECT Trustees for their generous Donation. There seems to be a "Cosy relationship" developing between the two entities, that have a common "reason for being" which is to. arrogantly spend "other peoples Money" in order to stop them recklessly spending their own earnings on themselves and their Families. Should the Trustees have "philanthropic" desires, they should do it with their own money and respect that the income generated by TECT does not belong to them personally. Give me my due payment in full, and let me decide how it should be dispersed.

Mr C D And Mrs J L Freeman Option 2 Good idea. Everyone wins. My option for the consumer rebate is option 1 it will then be my choice as to what organisations to donate it. My true 'Option' would be Thelma E Grant Option 1 for a reduction in the price of electricity and then everyone would benefit. I'm sure that would help to make houses warmer, reduce admissions top hospitals and helps the government reduces all costs. Just my opinion I see no impossible or hard to believe - i.e. incredible - reason why the current 80% policy for distributions should change for the one off V M King Option 1 special $21M distribution. I am sure that those consumers who want to donate to THEIR chosen charity will do so. Therefor I would choose option 1. Thank you for the information on the TECT special distribution. I support Option 1 - total distribution of the special consumer rebate to trust power customers. I an previously my husband and i have been trustpower customers for almost 50 years - i now have gas and power through trustpower, temptation to change is always around 0 however having been so loyal i consider there should be no doubt that trust Susan Lesley Clark Option 1 power customers should receive total amount of special distribution including $4.200,000 plus the $16,800,00 to increase the dividend rather than decrease the distributed amount. Customers are always generous with the annual distribution and total distribution of this special rebate would be excellent recognition of their generosity

Option 1 allows to be the most desirable of the 3 options and also the one which is the current distribution policy, which enables Ruth F Galloway Option 1 Trustpower users to distribute as they may wish, as well as 20% to being distributed to facilities and causes to benefit the community. As a trustpower user of very many year, option 1 seems to be fair and reasonable, and desirable. Rm & Cfl Stephens Option 2 The same as the as what it is now Warren & Jillean Haddrell Option 3 Our second preference would be Option 2 if there was insufficient support for Option 3 Gwyn Cumming Option 1 People are struggling to afford power especially elderly N Lroberts Option 1 Elderly need power to keep warm and often want turn heaters on Linda Peacock Option 2 thanks for the opportunity to have a say. It seems the distribution amount per customer has been almost halved! Perhaps an explanation of how & why this reduction has come Bo Stapleton Option 1 about... Clive Taylor Option 1 Iconic Progects and Catalyst For Change Funds, we consider to be the most significant benficaries. Option 1 because it's the 80/20 split that consumers have already agreed to. I would have thought we'd just be given options of where the Elsie Phare Option 1 20% went to. I'd prefer it go to the transformational grants not current grant funds. Geoff Keogh Option 3 I would like this option as a one off chance to boost resources R C Tunnicliffe Option 1 Tect does a great job as it is with its distributions. No need to go overboard Sherwood Alliance Limited Option 1 Tect is a trust the beneficiaries of which are primarily the consumers.They should reap the major share of any Trust returns Would REALLY like to see the transformational grants receive all the funding. They are all very significant areas that 21m will go a long Gavin And Carolyn Frost Option 2 way to making a HUGE difference to all. Sorry cant untick the option selected Chris Brough&Geoff Church Option 2 Went for this option because others vague as to what current grants are used for. I feel option 2 is a good compromise as I like the organisations that will receive funds, especially our emergency services. Many thanks Jane Christensen Option 2 TECT Nigel Hesford Option 1 I work hard for my money and I will deside where to spend it. All (100%) of the funds should be returned to eligible consumers.

Iv been a community volunteer for many years.. fundraising was our main source of funding.. we have found we had too much red tape Daniel Ririnui Option 1 and hoops to jump when filing applications... it become too difficult for our volunteers to complete due to handicaps an literacy issues..We understand theres only a limited funding to go around so with that in mind we pick: OPTION 1 Kelly Option 1 Tauranga has got so expensive, Cant afford to live here as it is. Amit Pathak Option4: Distribute $21M to eligible consumers Jan Booysen Option 1 Our city is being choked to death by poor or no transport planning. We need better facilities so people can walk or bike to work.

Rob Schoonderwoerd Option 1 Preferred option that fund be paid to eligible consumers who can then donate the amount of their choice to their preferred charity etc Donna Reed Option 2 Good to give something back to the community Rick Percy Option 1 A good balance. I think you may get a better response to your fund distribution plan for the special distribution if the target recipients were more clearly Bob Tubb explained. For example, Social Link reads like a bureaucratic talk fest rather than an action organisation. Plan expand on positive results of the distribution to this organisation todate. Thank you. Sheryl Mclay Option 3 A no brainer. The city needs all the help it can get with new facilities. Just make sure they are good facilities!! Wayne Wright Option 2 This looks to be the most balanced Shane Duncan Option 1 Why is this even a question? Stop trying to take our money. I would have like to see an option for the funds in Jo Bond Option 2 option 2 to go to Iconic Projects rather than the transformational grant. R. Ford Option 1 As l understand, this option still leaves some funds for distribution. Statements re Iconic Projects and Positive Change funds are far too generalised .The Trust can make a substantial impact such as what it Vic And Margot Sterling Option 1 has done to create its own building by maxamising the use of funds Current grant funds are already adequately allocated it would seem. I am not impressed that there is no option for all the funds to return to eligible consumers. This is the consumers money, we should have Gail E Henry Option 1 that choice. Mr G H & Mrs J Mckenzie Option 1 We would prefer to receive the $295 as we are eligible consumers. Many thanks G & J McKenzie John Stent Option 2 would like to see the $7.35M (option 2) to be divided between the option 1 grant funds and Option 2 frant initiatives. Thankyou Lexie Martin Option 2 I feel this is a fair option . R Cramp Option 1 Prefer to do my own extra donations. Ross Cramp Transition Developments Ltd Option 1 Prefer to do my own extra charitable donations. Ross Cramp Steel Form Option 1 Prefer to do my own extra donations. J Seymour & L O' Brien Option 1 I would like to decide what charity to donate a portion of this money to The one-off special dividend should be distributed as per the current distribution policy ie. approx 80% to eligible consumers. If eligible consumers are legally entitled to this money then they should receive it in full. Angela Connor Option 1 An option to donate back could be made available for those consumers wishing to support Grants/Projects (On an individual basis, not against consumers will). Brigid & Matt Crawford Option 2 Hi there, We would like to see the Special distribution to be via Option 2. Thanks. My name is Sally Downing. I would like to see option 2 . I would find any payment very helpful but feel the option 2 is very valuable to our Sally Downing Option 2 community. I would like to see the money distributed first to the consumers at $295.00 and have the remainder split equally to the charities you have Rhonda Bethune Option 1 stated. Debbie Young Option 2 Why couldnt the money be spread between the three options. Jo Option 1 If not opt 1 then opt 2 Bruce Dixon Option 1 We live on our super and it is always nice to receive extra cash. Chris Shadbolt Option 3 This is a one off distribution and would be better utilised for the community and Acorn foundation if the total amount is given to them. Barbara Atkins Option 2 Rebate very much appreciated-especially with Winter on its way! Funds to Emergency services a must!! Thanks why wasn't there a 4th option. 100% to consumers ? Why was this one off payment made.?. was it because Trustpower were feeling Bruce Burrows Option 1 guilty for over charging consumers !. And now you want to take some of this away from us. Sleath Option 2 My preference is for option 2 with second pref for option 1 Christine Dean Option 1 I believe you need to adhere to to original trust document allocation of distributions. Elizabeth Bristow Option 1 Pensioner and very grateful Danielle Cubis Option 3 We're a growing city and we need to invest more in projects/initiatives that will turn us into an integrated city geared towards the future. Linda Biddington Option 2 Listen to the people! Laura Wragg Option 3 Awesome initiative, let's hope people will be totally selfless in their choice and create a lasting legacy for the good of many. From discussions with friends and other family members elsewhere, its apparent Trustpower consumers pay more for power than some, M P Townsend Option 1 so any unexpected assistance is welcomed. Dennis Dobson Option 2 This option gives everybody something We have reviewed the options & consider as a loyal TECT consumer we along with other Trustpower account holders should receive the William & Beverley Lorimer Option 1 largest benefit from this distribution. Natalie Brock Supported option 1 and 2 10 years ago in April 2009 we voted to keep the 80 to 20 ratio share out and believe that should continue. Our second preference is for Mr D & Mrs C Marshall Option 1 option2.. If option 3 is carried we and many of our friends will switch to Genesis Energy. Leave well alone.. Janet Siemelink Option 2 I like it that Emergency services will receive funds. They are important to our Community. Peter Rotherham Option 3 commuity need is greater than mine The 80/20 split is your only choice.Option 1 is the only choice that does this but I am not in favour of the iconic projects or the catalyst for change funds. I would like each consumer to be able to indicate which groups in the community receive support. Then all consumer John & Andrea Wade Option 1 choices could be tabulated to give the trustees a good indication of of where the support could be targeted. Everyone then has some direct input and feels they contributed to the grants outcome. It would be good to have a better say in where my community funds go. Trish Davies Option 1 This is needed by many that I know to keep their basic accounts covered. I would like to see the grant fund.for transformational initiatives like battle of Gate Pa museum, Aquarium, and Stadium at domain to be Larry Baldock Option 3 increased. would like total amount returned to consumers so they can choose to grant their own charities. Glyn Fryett Option 1 this survey will only get the views of the white upper class.the survey is flawed. Melissa Smith Option 2 Option 2 would be amazing, emergency services could use the help and so could my family. I support option 2. Reason being: I am a Trustee of Homes of Hope and as a charitable Trust we serve babes and children who are in severe trauma when they arrive due to family breakdown and the need for OT to remove them from their brith families. We are already Andrew Warren Option 2 considering how to expand our facilities to bring more assistance to more people. This includes physical facilities as well as theraputic services of the highest order. I realise there is no guarantee that Homes of Hope would be successful, but we would love to be part of making this one off distribution truely transformational. Thank You.

Every little helps for all consumers especially for pensioners who are on a limited budget, with everything else going up all the time Laurie Coughey Option 1 including your annual increase Keith & Jenny Elliott Option 2 Happy to just be able to provide our feedback. V E & Pg Nelson Option 1 We prefer this option over the others. R.M.& P.J.Tuck Option 1 You do a great job. Mr A J Bush Option 1 Very disapointing there was no option for complete payout to consumers Diane Goldsack Option 2 I would like to see funding for emergency services and enviroment issues I do already donate to many organisations so I would like to have my special distribution grant so that. I can donate the equivalent to local V J Munn Option 2 services of my choice. if you think its possible to change the 80% distribution policy and have options 2 and 3 as a choice then you should have a fourth option where all $21m is distributed to consumers. ie $369. Can you tell me where the Tilt share proceeds have gone, and did any of the Martin Stacey Option 1 dividends from Tilt shares and now their investments dividends ever get distributed to the consumers.? this is never mentioned....please tell us . the community would not get any handouts if it wasnt for us loyal customers. I think that there is a good enough pot now that is growing Mike Harman Option 1 because of the customers that every one in the community benefits from without us customers forgoing what is really our money. all the non trustpower people still benefit from us now. this is why i say distribute the option one. Hazelton Leslie Archibald Option 1 Any rebate we get is a help against the cost of power. Tauranga Historical Society (Inc.) Option 3 The Society sees overall community benefit as being the major factor here. Jacobson & Marshall Option 1 This is a CONSUMER trust so consumers should get the most benefit. Charlotte Volschenk Option 1 I bet the Tect board members get a whole lot more than you are offering consumers! Mary Foster Option 2 We would like to think that if this option does go ahead, the emergency services would receive a large chunk of the money. Brian Walters Option 1 Return this money to the Trustpower account holders as discussed last year to reduce their power account. C Bellekom Option 1 $295.00 to my bank account Tracy Tredinnick Option 2 I think Option 2 is a fair option. Lloyd and I really appreciate the way TECT grants improve our local and wider community so that more of us can enjoy the benefits and Lee Higgins Option 3 many groups can prosper. Thanks for your good work. Lindsay Martyn Option 3 Go for it! Make a difference transforming the community with this windfall. I understand this is the age of technology, but as diplomatic as it is to be asked for input there must be a large amount of trustees who Sue Tonkin Option 2 don't have the ability to have their say through the options open to them. For alot of people in the community the phone is their only means of communication so I wonder how a fair assessment is made of how trustees want this money distributed.

We will only support option 2, IFall of your extra $7,350,000 will go to Emergency Services solely. That is not a denial that the other proposed charity objectives are not worthwhile or not needy, but are related to two opinions. One is that it is unrealistic to believe, that you can even make a small dent in the other 3 problems with the money you have now available. The second one, judgemental if you like, is that the problems in the areas of First 1000 days and Safe and Healthy Homes are too much related to chosen life styles of parents and Willem Jonkers Option 1 people suffering. Throwing any money at those will not change their life styles and therefore not solve the problems. We would not object if some support would go to credible and effective community groups, working on the environment, which indeed is a growing world problem, but you should pay that out of your normal annual distribution plan, at the expense of less needy targets. Money to Emergency Services will make a direct and lasting difference.

Sowmya Bijo Supported option 1 and 2 I strongly support option 2. Consumers are struggling to pay household bills and the money needs to go back to those families that have supported Truspower and Tect. I also support the money split with with Transformation grants, but only the Emergency services and Matt & Liz Webb Option 2 environmental sustainability. The "top ups current Grant fundings" are too vague to support and offer no guarantee where the money is going or if it will be lost into administration costs and unrealistic schemes that do not really benefit to the community. As 20% is already given to charities and grants from the annual distribution; and we are struggling to pay our day to day living costs, Mr Fc & Mrs Ml Crawshaw Option 1 (cutting back on some basics like food or heating) living on the pension we would like Option 1. Ann Mercer Option 2 This seems a good option for all. We would rather see money go to emergency services such as Air Ambulance/ St John Ambulance and the other three significant areas - Debbie Dufty Option 2 at least you have been a little more specific in naming these areas. We don't need the $240.00 that can be donated to them too. Jude Empson Option 1 It is a consumers trust not a charitable trust. Option 2...But please extend the benefit beyond Tauranga city into the western bay towns & villages. Heather Wills Option 2 Our environment needs help. Thank you, your cheque near Xmas makes a big difference to a lot of people...this extra money will be a lovely winter bonus. Kerb & Concrete Option 2 Sounds a bit like "Hobsons Choice" ? What about the option of 80% to eligible consumers and 20% to transformational grants? Rebecca Hall Option 1 Good luck much appreciated thanks Dear Sir/Madam, We thank you for your letter of 18th April 2019. We find it difficult to understand when its total millions we are stated and in next paragraph, the individual consumer figures. Are those figures paid as it is with the present payments. The colour printing is difficult to read for senior folk. Printing in Black on white is more discernible and its cheaper. You can colour the graphic to your hearts Mr T H & Mrs E Prince Option 1 content. What ever happened to the previous prior offer of a lump sum. It is a length gap in communications. To get back to the offer option. We pick to offer to bring MAXIMUM returns to the consumer. What was wrong with the original scheme, why cant you leave well alone. We notice that the original payments were over $600, surely the profit from Trustpower hasn't dropped. Yours faithfully, T H & E Prince With respect i say "Boy o boy" haven;t you TECT fellows made a feast out of this issue. Keep it simple. Simplicity and efficienty go hand in Lloyd Christie hand:- put the windfall into your main account and invvest it and then distribute the earnings annually in the usual manner. Yours sincerely, Lloyd Christie R M Donald Option 1 Option one will help struggling families Merle Bray Option 1 Would prefer to choose who we donate our portion to. Julia Sich Option 2 Greetings, I would like to offer my feedback for Option 2. Consumers receive $240 and Transformational services receive 7,350.000. We have chosen option 3 as we see this distribution of funds benefiting the community and making a real difference in our fast growing region. The Bay of Plenty is a great area with our population and economic growth the highest in New Zealand. This bonus windfall is an Tarnished Frocks And Divas Charitable Trust Option 3 amazing opportunity for TECT to address some of the problems that have arisen due to our rapid growth with innovative and carefully considered solutions. Our electricity comes from Trustpower, therefore any 'special dividend' that comes to Trustpower SHOULD reasonably be 'wholly' Gv & Mj Anderson Option 1 distributed back to the defacto shareholders of TECT(consumers). M. Steeghd Option 2 Thanks for allowing us to give feedback! Cindy Hill-Rennie Option 1 Power is far too expensive. It is a huge monthly expense for any household. Karen Schicker Supported option 1 and 2 M E Carr Option 1 My reasons are we are the power users and therefore deserve the funds generated. Mrs Heather Catherine Sheely Option 2 J. C. And N. C. Hayward Option 2 J. M. Beveridge Option 2 Josephine Wilshier Option 1 Juanita Murphy Option 3 Dave Davies Option 1 Robert Blair Option 1 Rosemarie & Stuart Cann Option 1 Kerry Solomon Option 1 Darcy Angland Option 1 Danny Cotter Option 1 D J & A M Kidd Option 1 Sonia Deering Option 1 Chris Mawson Option 1 Jenny Bentley Option 1 Edward H. Galinis Option 1 Carolyn Bennett-Ouellet Option 1 Janet Crafts Option 2 Donna Beck Option 1 Doreen Salter Option 2 Pat Walton Option 1 Smith Option 1 Jefferies Option 2 Jacqui Burne Option 1 Jo Brass Option 1 Ray W Jackson Option 1 Joan Lines Option 2 Natalie Mcbride Option 1 Ryan Elliott Option 2 Ralph Starck Option 1 Marcia Cooley Option 1 Michelle Turner Option 1 Matt Glover Option 1 Ngaere Jacobs Option 1 Rosie Rogers Option 2 Judy Option 1 Fiona Sytema Option 2 Dayna Mcmillan Option 2 Don Sorrenson Option 1 Sandra Gee Option 1 Ken And Margie Johnstone Option 1 Chris Meyer Option 1 A Page Option 2 Andrew Braid Option 2 Philip Monastra Option 1 Kathryn Wells Option 1 Glenda Hubert Option 1 Gemma Smith Option 2 Ralph Sevier Option 1 Nicholas Guy Option 2 Ra Option 1 Kathleen Pannell Option 2 J A Hayes Option 1 Peter Hutchinson Option 1 Jenny Pearson Option 1 Rowen De Vries Option 2 Heather Marjoribanks Option 1 Jim Rickard Option 1 Chris Doms Option 2 Hope Lawsen Option 2 Kirsty Option 2 Archie West Option 1 Bevan Zachan Option 1 Awhina Ririnui Option 1 Steve Haddon Option 1 Robin Naden Option 2 David D Julou Option 1 P. B. Smith Option 1 Phil Allison Option 1 Anne Freeman Option 2 Dr And Jf Parkes Option 2 Susan Option 2 Adam Robertson Option 1 Andrew Devine Option 1 Scott Dennison Option 2 Dawn Hampton Option 1 Gordon & Tracey Dickson Option 2 Clayton Scott Option 1 Michael Brinsley Option 1 Janet Peters Option 1 Charmaine Cook Option 1 Greer Groves Option 1 M Stevenson Option 1 Elizabeth Eaton Option 2 Gail Jarvis Option 1 Maureen Wright Option 2 Gillian Maccoll Option 2 Marty Emmett Option 1 Ashleigh Keller Option 2 Mellissa Tombleson Option 2 Pa Tomkins Option 1 Dave Peel Option 2 Adrian Whitehead Option 1 Gail Gadsby Option 1 Sershin Option 1 Christie Neilson Option 2 Graham And Lesley Brighting Option 2 Louise Blakemore Option 3 Clayton Waters Option 1 R M & P V Crouch Option 1 Scott Bartley Option 1 Bruce Ballard Option 1 Glenn Perry Option 1 P. B> Scott Option 1 Sumit Oza Option 1 B S Pantall Option 2 Lorraine Burdett Option 2 Amayah Grace Option 3 Ken Bassham Option 1 Peter Powley Option 1 Stacey Mence Option 1 Warwick Brew Option 1 Colin Bendall Option 1 Helma Fraser Option 1 Paul B Hickey Option 1 Tracy Haywood Option 1 Nicola Berry Option 2 Amanda Simpson Option 2 Jonelle Crone Option 2 Sue Connor Option 2 Evan Option 1 Wayne Wilson Option 1 Glenys Bourne Option 2 Bryce Campbell Option 1 Ron Scott Option 1 Roy Bennett Option 1 Donna Kirkpatrick Option 2 Heather Nelson Option 1 Cathy Taylor Option 2 M Edlinger Option 1 Paul Melmoth Option 1 Julie Kitchen Option 1 Anthony L Laird Option 2 Angela Durham Option 1 Karen Wallace Option 2 Rw Breingan Option 1 Paul Armitage Option 1 Richard Macdonald Option 1 Aw Martin Option 1 Natasha Mckinnon Option 1 Esther Option 2 Aleta Conn Option 1 Ann Findlay Option 1 Awanga Option 2 C Mochan Option 1 Kelly Henderson Option 1 Yoshio Mori Option 1 Miranda Clark Option 2 Db Moorhouse Option 1 Peter Shaw Option 1 Cash Inn Option 1 Joanne Hin Option 1 Katrina Argyle Option 1 Vicki Swann Option 1 B Currie Option 2 A Thomas Option 1 Timothy Richardson Option 2 Maureen Louden Option 1 Paige Parker Option 2 Russell Squire Option 2 Terry Batten Option 2 Christin Preston Option 1 Jenny & Nathan Cross Option 2 Sue Higgins Option 2 Suzanne Russell Option 3 Glen Holloway Option 1 Leanne Batey Option 1 Trevor Philips Option 1 Kelly Mead Option 2 Greg Barkle Option 2 Heather Waldron Option 1 Baylee Carmine Option 1 Gl&Ms Foy Option 2 Tracy Silver Option 2 John Renshaw Option 2 Chris Osborne Option 1 Colin Henry Tofts Option 1 Bruce Breetvelt Option 1 Jphn Reimers Option 1 Murray Smith Option 2 Tim Solomona Option 2 Maree Cleaver Option 2 Steve Kendall Option 1 Bronwen Option 1 Lee Option 1 Bruce & Maureen Cronin Option 2 Don Munro Option 1 Jason Kim Option 1 Janice Ross Option 1 K & D Rossiter Option 1 Stephen Robb Option 2 Anne Hopkins Option 2 Annamaria Grafas Option 1 Jr & Mi Mainland Option 1 Mary Mckenzie Option 1 John Hill Option 2 Mr D & Mrs C H Naude Option 1 Liz Brunsden Option 2 Kelly Brickell Option 1 D C & P C Janes Option 2 Lesley Books Option 2 Cl & R Van Laar Option 2 Cheryl Mercer Option 1 Cd & Lv Schmidt Option 2 Anthony Wakefield Option 1 Jo Mclachlan Option 2 Mr D J Hill Option 2 Catherine Mounsey Option 1 Rachael Heath Option 1 Robin Grigg Option 1 Andrew Berntsen Option 1 Mary Watkins Option 1 Karen Livingstone Option 2 Mr N B & Mrs Y M Lewis Option 1 Julie Howells Option 1 Carole Templeman Option 1 Quentin Leong Option 1 D & J Medley Option 1 Kim Curtis Option 1 Martin Wynn Option 1 Michael Andrews Option 1 Chantal Verleyen Option 1 D G Benseman Option 1 Roslyn Ford Option 2 Gary & Colleen Mcintosh Option 1 K & Am Woolerton Option 1 K E Griffin Option 1 Paul And Jenny Double Option 1 G & W Greenwood Option 2 Mark Argent Option 2 Graeme & Christine Meyrick Option 1 Sam Mcleod Option 1 Amy Lawson Option 1 Paul Grundy Option 1 Gary Marshall Option 1 John Nicholls Option 1 Kylie Willams Option 1 Elaine Dixon Option 2 Carole Option 1 Warwick Barrow Option 1 Allen Belsham Option 1 L.G.&E.G.Downs Option 1 Pamela Harkins Option 1 R B Lewis Option 1 Steve Dalton Option 2 Keith Garrett Option 1 Ronald Louden Option 2 Yvonne Dempsey Option 1 K Horan Option 2 Alison Perrett Option 2 Paul Sweetman Option 1 Murray Thompson Option 2 Alan Purnell Option 1 Fay Johnson Option 1 Owen Palmer Option 1 Wm And Ej Beever Option 2 A.R. & C.A. Benn Option 1 Gj + Jd Wall Option 1 Lynda Whiting And Graham Thompson Option 1 Daniel Vant Option 1 Mj Cole Option 2 Ian Baldock Option 1 Graham Armstrong Option 1 Brian Davey Option 2 W B & Mrs K Coker Option 1 Dorothy Mutton Option 1 John & Alison Linch Option 1 Graham Webb Option 1 Lynne Option 1 Mr A J Herbert Option 1 Andrea Elliot Option 1 S R Bankart Option 1 Angie Coleman Option 1 Rodger And Gail Broomhall Option 1 Brianna Longstaff Option 2 Angeline Barlow Option 1 K A James Option 1 Ml Young Option 1 Mrs Patricia Cameron Option 2 Malcolm Clive-Smith Option 2 Barry Penellum Option 1 Amy Mellor Option 2 Joan Familton Option 1 Virginia & Neil Stanwell Option 1 Ann Polglase Option 1 Sharon Tuapawa Option 1 Srj & Ha Spice Option 2 Emma And Shane Bryan Option 1 Dave Oram Option 1 Aileen Option 2 Shiralee Hohaia Option 1 Sandra Davis Option 2 Rachel O'Connor Option 2 Lynley Guy Option 1 Sheryl Petersen Option 2 Craig Dempsey Option 1 G F Warn Option 1 Kerry Wellsbury Option 1 Anthony Hepburn Option 1 Brian Harper Option 1 Cheryl Friedland Option 1 Warwick De Vere Option 3 Joyce Spooner Option 2 C M Blackford Option 1 Ea Garrett Option 1 Mokai Ronaki Option 1 Craig Skiffington Option 2 Pl Johnson Option 2 Jenny-Lynne Garrett Option 2 Deborah Garaway Option 1 Julie Cleary Option 1 Danica Bidois Option 1 Kenny Cunningham Option 2 Meire De Moraes Option 1 Theresa Blanshard Option 1 Jonathan Robbins Option 2 Mr J Hough Option 1 Roland Mcquoid Option 1 Janine Peters Option 2 Kat Chantlet Option 2 Sherilyn Horne Option 2 Emma Webb Option 1 Ellen Mullany Option 1 Brett Tobin Option 1 Michael Dewhirst Option 2 Dan Spencer Option 2 Ted Hansen Option 2 Kevin Wendt Option 1 J K & N Caetano Option 1 Karl Wright-St Clair Option 1 Andrew Dishroon Option 2 David And Virginia Bagnall Option 1 Pierre Alexandre Option 1 Daniel Option 1 Angela Kennerley Option 2 Maggi Brunsden Option 2 Julia Graham Option 1 Mark Anderson Option 2 Helen Brent-Jones Option 2 Malcolm Allan Option 1 Robyn Hemmings Option 1 Glenise Scholes Option 1 G R & P I Turner Option 1 Nicola Ssekajja Option 2 Christine Lowe Option 1 Keegan Stewart Option 1 Tania Walter Option 2 Ian And Heather Childerhouse Option 1 Marlene Mclaren Option 1 Nadia Temple Option 1 Patrick Kelly Option 1 Jenny Hartwell Option 2 Leanne Wakefield Option 2 Helen Lynam Option 2 D M Sanders Option 1 Brian Evans-Mcleod Option 2 Sharon Raine Option 1 Mr J.R. & Mrs H Warren Option 3 David Mcdermott Option 1 Paul Hancock Option 1 Russell Renton Option 1 Prsale Option 2 Glen Sutherland Option 1 K.Macown Option 2 Tanya Smith Option 1 Abigail Davie Option 2 Louise Gibbons Option 1 Hollie Waugh Option 2 Douglas Raikes Option 2 Hilton Paul Option 2 Cindy Hanlon Option 1 Betty G And Graham R Black Option 1 Adam Watts Option 2 Michelle Vedder Option 1 Christine Richardson Option 2 Michelle Matthews Option 1 Rachael Arthur Option 2 W J Paske Option 1 Ross Fletcher Option 1 Mr P N De Haan Option 1 Id & Ml Davies Option 1 Maria Kuka Option 1 Lewis Hockings Option 1 Charlene Robertson Option 2 Maureen Giles Option 2 Mrs J M Kent Option 1 Gloria Smith Option 1 E Reeves Option 2 Peter Duffy Option 2 Matthew Leighton Option 1 Heather Drinnan Option 1 Peter Harty Option 1 Rn & Pl Neilson Option 1 Hugh Gordon Cooper Option 2 H Ong Option 1 Mrs N J & Mr G J Mason Option 1 Rd &Jj Clemow Option 1 Frederick Quarrie Option 1 Neil Wallace Option 2 Carol Wade Option 1 Elodie Knaggs Option 1 Nicole Balkaran Option 2 Kaysha Goodin Option 1 Caroline Butler Option 1 Dawn Option 1 Dl & Mj Gibbs Option 1 Leslye Mooney Option 2 Maree Armstrong Option 1 Aaron Duggan Option 2 Ms P E Deane Option 1 Angel Lagerwaard Option 2 B & B Schollum Option 1 Carol Blackmore Option 1 Mcbrydie Option 1 Bridget Hayes Option 2 Alistair Black Option 1 Rochelle Option 2 Sandra C Dalzell Option 1 Mark Spencer Option 2 David Option 1 Grant Young Option 2 Mrs S Stephens Option 2 Scott Robertson Option 1 Shaun Pogan Option 2 David Sutton Option 2 G & D Meyers Option 2 G M Wane Option 1 Jonathan Brodie Option 1 Tony Emett Option 2 V M & M J Worlledge Option 1 G. Raubenheimer Option 2 Daryl Francis Option 1 Michael Parker Option 1 Gail C. Thomson Option 1 John Eden Option 2 T Turner Option 2 White Cloud Trust Fund (Darryl Jensen) Option 1 L A Bolstad Option 1 Chantelle Huggins Option 1 Terese James Option 2 E C Crook Option 1 Teena Maree Cooke Option 2 Emma Graham Option 1 Dallen Lee Option 1 Jasmine Pearson Option 1 Kevin Edkins Option 1 Jared Schumacher Option 2 Terena Bonnar Option 1 Richard Glubb Option 2 Artemio Gacoscos Option 1 Fraser Harvey Option 1 Julie Honeyfield Option 2 Phil Gregg Option 3 Miguel Angelo Cordeiro Option 2 Ross Mccallum Option 2 Alison Wilson Option 2 Greg Thompsom Option 2 Elizabeth M Rumbal Option 1 Kulwinder Singh Option 1 Jacqueline Cramer Option 2 Mrs Sc & Mr Aj Wright Option 2 Derek Vincent Option 2 Barbara And Ian Barnes Option 1 Mark Trufitt Option 1 Miranda Byford Option 1 Christopher Luxford Option 1 Alice Thomson Option 1 Eric Newman Option 1 M. E. Coppard Option 1 Phil King Option 1 Graeme Diprose Option 2 Kevin Black Option 1 Geoff Gibbs Option 2 Papamoa Sports Tennis Club Option 3 Sam Davison Option 2 Rosalie Stuart-Menzies Option 1 Emmajae Option 2 Merle Chadwick Option 1 James Taylor Option 1 Tk & Ja Underwood Option 1 Julie Secker Option 1 Jan Gyenge Option 1 Julie Gilligan Option 2 G S Wellington Option 2 Colin Mclaren Option 1 Glenn Marsh Option 1 Michele Goodin Option 2 M W Clare Option 1 Sj Frankland And Mc Yark Option 1 Mr P & Mrs S Tommas Option 1 Glen Boffa Option 1 Kj Darragh Option 1 Helen Young Option 2 L F Walker Option 2 Robert Mauger Option 1 Craig Wallis Option 2 Martin And Estelle Steinmann Option 3 Ry And Shi Ltd Option 1 Meraki Trust Option 1 Wayne Mitchell Option 1 Jg & Le Robertson Option 1 Michael Gielen Option 1 David Sharman Option 2 Murray Appleton Option 1 Bruce Davis Option 1 Nicole Mcpike Option 1 Boyd & Deirdre Harris Option 1 A.R & Cm Smith Option 1 Daren Saunders Option 1 Joanne Wiggett Option 1 John Reynolds Option 1 Ali Pomstra Option 2 Liz Reed Option 1 Gaynor Wade Option 2 Iain Neill Option 1 Trevor Hansen Option 1 Jo Madden Option 2 Keryn Hawkes Option 1 Robert Vear Option 2 Noel Wylie Option 1 Angela And Warwick Hoy Option 1 Grant Macvey Option 2 Bruce Glass Option 2 Donna Arlidge Option 2 Ayla Young Option 1 Gary Scott Option 1 Nathan Lusby Option 2 G Davenport Option 2 Kevin Fletcher Option 1 Richard And Joan Creasy Option 2 Peter Holman Option 1 Don Shaw Option 1 Margaret Higgins Option 2 Colin Francis Option 1 R I Holliday Option 1 W T And D R Bradford Option 1 William Warriner Option 1 Richard Smith Option 1 Karen Mikoz Option 2 Lincoln Tapsell Option 2 Cb & W Mcewan Option 2 A Bryenton Option 1 Sexton Option 2 Janice Graham Option 1 Andrew Finlayson Option 1 Brenton Cole Option 1 W E Haddon Option 1 Graham And Liz O'Riordan Option 3 Carol Watene Option 1 Rp Connor Option 2 Annie Fourie Option 2 Rhiarne Whittaker Option 2 Neil O'Brien Option 1 Doug Duncan Option 3 Chris Hewlett Option 1 Janine Goldthorpe Option 2 Robyn Gold Option 1 Mr B M Goodin Option 1 Stephen Healey Option 2 Linda Lawson Option 1 Wilma Demers Option 1 Micah Waltham Option 1 J Christiansen Option 1 Nb Wright Option 1 David Bridgens Option 1 David Wilson Option 1 Derek Meredith Option 2 Peter White Option 2 Paul Greaves Option 2 Dawn Cooper Option 2 Neville Pearson Option 1 Lisa Long Option 1 Pat Cooney Option 1 Michael Peters Option 3 Allison Rivers Option 2 Bronya Dean Option 3 Peter Worley Option 1 Jeffrey & Beth Martin Option 2 Sue Gread Option 1 T K G Johnson Option 1 Craig Teal Option 1 Glenn & Lynn Beaurepaire Option 1 Ian Burdis Option 1 Leonard Crofskey Option 1 Debbie Thomas Option 1 Sir Dryden Spring Option 1 Jane Covacich Option 2 Marie Mabey Option 1 Peter Cowley Option 1 N Watts Option 1 Sarah Grimes Option 1 Jason Van Der Woude Option 2 Ricky And Sandra Feutz Option 2 Greg Rieger Option 1 Tom And Mary Johnston Option 1 Stephen Nunn Option 2 Craig Mouat Option 1 Wayne Dawson Option 2 Patricia Ann Owen Option 2 Helen Lamont Option 2 Suzanne Hildebrand Option 2 Karla Revell Option 2 Ken And Sandra Walker Option 1 Justin Wilson Option 1 David And Valerie Flatt Option 1 Lynda Dixon Option 1 Deborah De Jong Option 2 Valerie Walker Option 2 Linda Hammersley Option 2 Hammond Option 1 Julia Perry Option 2 Kaaren O'Neill Option 1 Robyn Baker Option 1 Kl Wilkinson Trust Option 1 Amanda Hill Option 1 D R Mcmanus & E A Mcmanus Option 1 David Kilmister Option 1 P Gregory Option 1 Glenys Smith Option 1 Shannon Henry Option 2 Sharon Barrett Option 1 Lisa Pepper Option 1 Ross Godkin Option 1 Kerrie Roberts Option 2 M Hall Option 2 John & Debby Option 1 Fleur Walker Option 1 Kathleen Houliston Option 1 Ronald Tomsett Option 1 Md And D Watkins Option 1 K J Coghill Option 1 Jeanette Jenkins Option 1 Keith Arthur Option 1 B Watts Option 1 Colin Hill Option 1 Sarah & Steve Bolt Option 2 Margaret Gundersen Option 1 Stacey Robieson Option 1 Keryn Darroch Option 2 Alex Bedford-Rolleston Option 1 Gribben John Option 1 Kelly Farrelly Option 1 Patricia & Ted Adelman Option 1 Christine Bougen Option 2 A N & E J Bickers Option 1 Ronda Winterburn Option 1 Rebecca Hayes Option 1 Barbara Thomson Option 2 Teri Culpepper Option 3 Don Cameron Option 1 Diana Wilson Option 1 B Bowen Option 1 Ba &Ja Fordyce Option 1 Murray Wilson Option 2 Brenton Vanzwol Option 1 E. Bunn Option 1 T. Bunn Option 1 Cornelis Valentijn Option 1 Paul Chote Option 2 M&E Hammond Option 2 Debbie Hart Option 1 Scott Raymond Option 1 Terri Gregory Option 2 D J Mayer Option 1 Ag Moorhead Option 1 Heather Jackson Option 2 Stephen Nielsen Nel Option 1 Ron Moore Option 1 Jurgen Fiedler Option 2 Kathy And Shane Fisher Option 2 Bevin Bodmin Option 1 J Torrey Option 1 Harry Figgest Option 2 Whitfeld Option 2 Kerri St Clair Option 2 Ann Borgfeldt Option 2 Gail Vincent Option 2 A Von Biel Option 1 Veronica Smith Option 2 Fenwick Neil Carruthers Option 1 Ruth Dewdney Option 1 Ian Dustin Option 3 M/S E M Hart Option 1 Tracey Fleming Option 1 Blair Stimpson Option 1 Maria Claassenmccabe Option 1 Jolanda Destreel Option 1 Mary Persson Option 2 Verwey Option 1 Laura Harrison Option 1 G. S. Brake Option 1 David Hallett Option 1 Dennis Henderson Option 1 Gail Brooking Option 2 R E Mccullough Option 2 Joel Caballero Option 1 Terry Martin Option 1 Captain Gavin L Dennison Option 1 Judith Kuypers Option 3 Shirley Arabin Option 2 S Option 2 Grant Schuler Option 2 Caroline Austin Option 1 Sam Francis Option 1 L Parnell Option 1 Derek Postlewaight Option 1 Dl & Fm Smith Option 1 Fiona Sefton Option 1 G White Option 1 Samantha Wilson Option 2 Morgan Allerby Option 1 Michael Creak Option 1 Debbie Graydon Salih Akkaya Option 2 Kyle Covell Option 1 Rick & Jenny Sharp Option 1 James Dew Option 1 Rj & Re Lauder Option 1 Jw & La Knox Option 2 Ron Payne Option 2 Jacqueline Mcgill Option 1 Mrs C A & Mr B J Mason Option 1 Greg Scrivin Option 2 G Wills Option 1 Annemarie Hills Option 1 Al Wallace Option 1 Dale Williamson Option 1 Wb Holland Option 3 Bernadette Guzzo Option 1 Jen Riley Option 2 John Smit Option 1 Dianne Rampton Option 1 Graeme & Kathleen Hawkings Option 1 Nelva & Brian Neal Option 1 Gail Paskin Option 2 Maree Cooper Option 1 Peter Redward Option 1 Kevin Downs Option 1 Lance Nathan Option 1 V Hiini Option 1 Michelle Gorst Option 1 Jarod Thorpe Option 2 Shana Bainbridge Option 1 D Lane Option 2 K J Reddaway Option 1 Jennifer Dodd Option 2 Heather Osborne Option 2 Jenni Hurn Option 2 Rd & L Sampson Option 1 Elaine Short Option 2 Sue Blomeley Option 2 Muriel Barlow Option 1 Sarah Clodo Option 1 Rebecca Farr Option 3 Gail Seddon Option 2 Cliff Burmister Option 2 Lisa Fowler Option 2 Jacqueline Simcock Option 2 Eric Mcintosh & Tracy Hutchings Option 1 Glen O'Connell Option 1 Sue Richardson Option 1 Rod Reekie Option 1 Craig Jonas Option 1 L Birkholtz And N Krause Option 2 R G & F M A Briggs Option 3 Ryan Option 1 Rachael Forlong Option 1 Shelley Vincent Option 2 Hayley Option 2 De & Pj Smith Option 1 F A Newson Option 2 Kim Waide Option 2 Gregg Lester Option 1 Terry And Dallas Collett Option 3 Evie Mcleod Option 1 Talia Rorvik Option 1 Lois Ireland Option 1 Bruce Dalgety Option 1 Ian Day Option 2 Rachel Honore Option 2 Hazel & Susan Genner Option 2 Heather Ramsay Option 2 William Bernard Option 1 R G Lowe Option 2 Colin Mccormack Option 2 Tania Hanna Option 1 Sandi Van Leeuwen Option 2 Alan Timms Option 2 Alton Mcintosh Option 1 Troye Melgren Option 1 Peter & Dorothy Marks Option 2 Christina Scott Option 1 Leo Wilkinson Option 1 Jennifer Davis Option 1 Carol & Robert Torr Option 1 Ivan Option 1 John Crenfeldt Option 1 Brian Hodge Option 3 John Best Option 1 Alan Bergamini Option 1 Richard Shaw Option 1 Dalzell Option 1 Michelle Robins Option 1 C.A.L. Watson Option 2 Owen O'Connor Option 2 S J & A J Hayden Option 2 Ben Smith Option 1 Gail Simpson Option 2 Christene Saunders Option 1 Mieka Option 1 P E & G E Watson Option 1 Gary Elliot Option 2 Anna Opie Option 2 Bev Malone Option 2 Jr & Sm Looney Option 1 Richard Causer Option 1 Shirley Hughes Option 1 Gerald And Dinah O'Meara Option 1 N Finlay Option 1 Dawn & John Renwick-Veale Option 1 Paula Hardham Option 2 David Joblin Option 2 Marlene Option 3 R Keating Option 1 John Fleming Option 1 Shirley Scott Option 2 G R & Rh Fulton Option 1 Geoffrey Westwood Option 3 Gerald Lockett Option 2 Jo West Option 2 Cindy Option 2 Helen Rita Edgecombe Option 1 L M Godden-Turner Option 2 Janeve Haskins Option 1 Jan-Marie Williams Option 1 Rosamund Lee Option 1 D Johnston Option 1 Dk & Ap Armstrong Option 1 Payne Option 1 Mairi Karl Option 2 Alan Hartwell Option 2 Stephanie And Carl Evans Option 2 Richard Goldstone Option 1 Jacqui Peck Option 1 Paul Jukes Option 2 Sj Archer Option 1 Shirley & Bayne Milne Option 1 Gaylene Rickard Option 1 Peter Stone Option 2 Kihi Christine Falwasser Option 1 Jock And Barbara Bellerby Option 1 Janice Bacon Option 1 Tania Englebretsen Option 2 Anthony Calcutt Option 1 Karl And Andrea Harrison Option 2 Murray Robinson Option 2 Alison Gorton Option 2 Yvonne M Sheppard Option 1 Linda Cook Option 1 M. R. Brightwell Option 1 Wendy Option 2 Rachel Thomassen Option 1 Michelle Aitken Option 1 Raewyn Forlong Option 2 Gaylene Duncan Option 2 Claudia Klein Option 2 Toni Nuku Option 1 Petrena Thomson Option 2 Glenda Mcdell Option 2 Jo Gasteen Option 2 Kathryn Webber Option 2 Terry Chater Option 2 J L & G D Mcdonald Option 1 Lesley Watkins Option 2 Rex Chaffey Option 1 Bernice Gray Option 1 Myra Morrison Option 1 Helen Armistead Option 2 Kim Murdie Option 2 M G & L G Burch Option 1 Wilma Pretorius Option 1 Allan Williams Option 2 Shane Kensington Option 3 Rachel England Option 1 Mrs N & Mr P Gallagher Option 1 Cj & Jh Overwater Option 2 Phillip Surman Option 2 Amanda Derecourt Option 1 Richard Baldwin Option 2 Cara Davies Option 2 Robin Clegg Option 1 Margaret Gething Option 1 Rachelle Reilly Option 1 Graham Russell Option 1 R E Young Option 1 Judith Hartigan Option 2 Felicity Salter Option 2 S Gowland Option 1 Dr & Fj Douglas Option 2 Vh & Li Potter Option 2 H Razak & G Webster Option 1 Wendy Option 2 Andrew Marston Option 1 Lynette Seerup Option 2 Ken Atkinson Option 1 Lorraine Reilly Option 1 Roger Harvey Option 1 Stuart Option 1 Glenn Dougal Option 3 H W Land Option 2 Brenda Birss Option 1 Walter King Hubert Option 1 Sally Bolth Option 2 Kim Nelson Option 1 Wendy Coleman Option 1 J & Jh Whitcombe Option 2 C D & M P Garty Option 1 Mr W & Mrs S Smillie Option 1 Graeme Gower Option 1 H G Clark Option 2 Mr M C & Mrs S Kula Option 1 C J And S L Nelson Option 2 Robert Carston Option 1 Teraihei Option 2 Karen Dyer Option 2 Kate Axbey Option 2 Stephen Hayles Option 1 Corinne Griffin Option 1 Michael Okane Option 2 Julia Phillipps Option 2 Margaret Jenner Option 1 Dave Bennett Option 2 Prue Ratcliffe Option 2 Andrea Moffat Option 1 William Griffin Option 1 Verna Cooper Option 1 Sandra G Toomer Option 1 D N Mends Option 1 Bryce Strong Option 1 Mavis Plank Option 1 Grant Mclean Option 1 Peter Cutten Option 2 Kim Glanville Option 2 Alison Tamepo Option 2 Denise Hyde Option 1 Merrill Simmons -Hansen Option 1 Lydia Day Option 2 For & Gj Lochhead Option 2 Marline Osterman Option 1 Wayne & Jocelyn Holden Option 3 A R Mckoy Option 2 Stephen Cameron Option 1 Kaye Royal Option 1 Karrah Stroud Option 2 Letitia Mcfarlane Option 2 Andrew Graham Option 2 Daniel Gallaghan Option 1 Dave Kempson Option 1 P Radford Option 2 K. Vowell Option 2 Lynnette Robertson Option 1 Jules Oldham Option 1 Rawiri Bhana Option 1 Ana Matete Option 2 Veronica Moore Option 2 Gerold Meister Option 1 Janet Derbyshire Option 1 Ursula May Option 2 Jane Swale Option 1 A R V & Km Webb Option 2 Tipprapa Sattagovit Option 1 Levonne Kelly Option 2 Rogan Donaldson Option 2 Richard Davies Option 1 D M Davies Option 1 Dj & Eb Ireland Option 2 Phillippa Hall Option 1 Owen Allsop Option 1 Peter Simmons Option 3 B.Blandford Option 2 Colleen Maher Option 1 J Towers Option 1 Neil & Kaye Dixon Option 2 Bronwyn Courtney Option 2 Erin Little Option 2 Dennis And Annette Bainbridge Option 1 Kate Malcolm Option 1 Karen Robertson Option 1 Murray Armstrong Option 1 Ian Richard Reynolds Option 1 Mr I G Pennell / Mrs J M Merrick Option 1 Robert Julian Option 1 J.Hilligan Option 1 Amy Gibney Option 1 Lois Munn Option 1 Carolyn Stewart Option 2 Margaret Quinn Option 1 Andrea Coles Option 1 Peter Mellars Option 1 Rachel Donaldson Option 2 Mr G & Mrs J King Option 2 Tauranga Croquet Club Option 2 Glenda Walker Option 2 Mr Ra & Mrs Pa Poffley Option 1 G & V Baty Option 1 Karren Beazley Option 2 M. Woodhall Option 2 G S Foley & K J Johnson Option 2 Fay Gillman-Bate Option 2 Shara Berry Option 1 Kayla Fox Option 1 Rose Lorigan Option 1 W&P Denzel Option 1 Leanne Ellis Option 2 Ernest Taylor Option 2 Melville Brake Option 3 Hugh Mills Option 1 Kim Hooker Option 1 J B Loewensteijn Option 2 Marilyn Robinson Option 1 Rebecca O'Driscoll Option 2 Peter Groom Option 2 J.S & G E Montgomery Option 1 Peter Lewis Richards Option 1 David Gatland Option 1 Ian Lee Option 1 I M R Proctor Option 2 Mr Wm & Mrs Kl Hurren Option 2 Kylie Templer Option 1 G R Gray Option 1 David Mcneilly Option 1 Rebecca Mackay Option 1 Brian W Brown Option 1 Nathan Harrison Option 2 Murray And Janice Craig Option 1 Andrea Hockly Option 3 Graham Hutchins Option 1 Pamela Thorpe Option 1 Keith Campbell Option 2 Aw & Pa Scott Option 1 Hendrik Pieters Option 1 Graham Whittenham Option 1 Robyn Brooks Option 2 D & H Fisher Option 2 Cath Reid Option 2 Beverley Dowling Option 1 Julie Smyth Option 2 Mary-Joy Waterman Option 1 Hugh Howatson Option 2 Sarah O'Hagan Option 1 Colin Oomen Option 1 Colin Boggiss Option 3 Guthrie Option 2 Ronda Ingram Option 1 D.M.Aitchison Option 1 Bruce Crosby Option 3 Vicki Turner Option 2 Regina Ansorge Option 3 Alison Lusby Option 1 Annette Oconnor Option 2 Garth Morgan Option 2 Rex Woodward Option 2 Clint Henry Option 1 Marion Pope Option 2 Ann Mitchell Option 2 Solita Lincoln Option 2 Mr D F Foster Option 1 David Oram Option 2 O Connor Option 1 Dean Culhane Option 1 Karen Hooper Option 2 Wayne Heyworth Option 1 Mr S.R. Spicer Option 2 N.Henderson Option 2 Gray Option 2 Marie Ferry Option 1 G.E. Thomas Option 1 Peter Tunbridge Option 2 Paul Baker Option 2 Tim Regan Option 2 David Harris Option 1 M J Blackstock Option 1 Ann Benseman Option 1 Garry W Raynel Option 1 B C Wilkinson Option 2 Janine & Michael Maguire Option 1 David And Jillian Pilbrow Option 2 S F Malcolm Option 2 Dean Ronald Option 1 Joanne Elsom Option 1 Graeme Easton Option 2 Sylvia Iremonger Option 2 George Pardy Option 2 Juan Option 1 Shane Bumby Option 1 D & Em Turnbull Option 1 Shona Davie Option 1 Peter Gordon Option 1 Kate Mullooly Option 2 Lisa Mcarthur Option 2 Christina Morrison Option 1 Carole Bolland Option 3 Judith Davies Option 2 Julie Signal Option 2 Trish Burgess Option 1 Jo-Marie Baker Option 1 Aaron Option 1 Matthew King Option 1 Brendan Mclachlan Option 2 Tony Love Option 2 Faye Laing Option 2 J Bolton Option 1 Gareth Burgess Option 1 Lloyd Dunstan Option 1 Leah Wills Option 1 Amanda Haines Option 1 Joan Moore Option 1 Beverley Dowds Option 2 Joan & Peter Wilson Option 1 Bruce Parkin Option 1 Janice Ross Option 1 Jemma Schonhof Option 2 Keith Bundy Option 2 Ailsa Wilson Option 1 Richard Spearman Option 1 Tara Sellars Option 2 Maree Turner Option 1 June Jeffrey Option 1 Tracy Bain Option 2 Garreth Collard Option 1 Tania Joffre Option 2 Jacqui Holt Option 2 Kay Hamilton Option 2 Robert Huggins Option 2 Cynthia Horn Option 1 Dianne Shaw Option 1 Gaylene Street Option 2 Alastair Rhodes Option 2 Wendy Theobald Option 2 Vivian Burt Option 1 Eileen Option 2 Kym Shorten Option 2 Sheryl Roos Option 1 H Hofman Option 2 Linda Castle Option 1 Jaco Kapp Option 2 Trudy Ericksen Option 1 Gary Ericksen Option 1 Allen Meredith Option 1 W.R. & T.G. Janes Option 1 Ruth Fisher Option 2 Rob Pascoe Option 1 Glenn Hay Option 3 A & F De La Hunt Van Der Merwe Option 2 Dm & Pa Armstrong Option 1 Eileen Grey Option 2 Nick Aleksich Option 1 Bw & De Watson Option 2 Nd Ward Option 2 Rosemary Bourne-Webb Option 1 Mr Iw & Mrs Cm Rickard Option 2 Stephen Whitwell Option 3 C A White Option 1 Michelle Mccarthy Option 2 Nw&Edattwood Option 1 Susan Bell Option 1 A Porteous Option 2 Chris Grant Option 1 Ja & Jm Blyhe Option 1 Neil Bond Option 2 A.N. Hepburn Option 1 Sandra Nichols Option 1 Caly Pillay Option 2 Marilyn Perry Option 1 Kay Thomas Option 1 Kelly Jury Option 2 Ian S Taylor Option 1 Aldona Zieba Option 1 Diana R Jopling Option 2 Roy Poole Option 1 D.G. Small Option 2 Doug And Anne Pope Option 2 Ra & Ja Noble Option 2 N L Saywell Option 1 Bronwyn Poole Option 1 Helen Manning Option 1 R W Carter Option 1 M V Windsor-Brown Option 2 Paul Di Somma Option 1 F And J Gibbison Option 1 Ruth Hamilton Option 2 Sharon Morrissey Option 1 Hayley Brown Option 2 J W & G A Hurley Option 2 Jim Faulkner Option 1 Diane Stewart Option 1 Elyse Patchett Option 1 Michelle Fraser Option 1 Reynald Wyn Jones Option 1 Paula Wyness Option 2 Barbara R Snaith Option 2 Mr J And Mrs B Eshuis Option 1 Ailsa Griffiths Option 1 David F. Palmer Option 2 Pauline Arnold Option 3 M C Sellman Option 2 Jj Storie Option 1 Meldan Trust Option 1 Alison Stockley Option 2 Graeme Dick Option 1 He&Se Bragg Option 1 Tammy Hill Option 2 A Wilson Option 2 Dg & Hd Aldridge Option 1 J C Whalen Option 2 Francis Talboys Option 1 Ray Dwight Option 1 Carol Webb Option 2 Phil Gillanders Option 1 Mrs S M Morrison Option 2 Mr D & Mrs D Bainbridge Option 1 Mr P B & Mrs A Morris Option 1 Alexander Young Option 1 Belinda Ann Urquhart Option 1 Jim & Heather Sherlock Option 2 Sandra Tucker Option 2 Alan Hitchens Option 1 Ann Option 1 Annabelle Babbage Option 1 Jan Wood Option 1 P E Ellisdon Option 1 Michele Hartley Option 1 Shirley Hooper Option 2 Bron Healey Option 1 Jim Steere Option 2 Ryan Mccall Option 2 Colleen Goninon Option 2 D W W & K S Hodgson Option 1 Soraya Option 3 Ian Mcgregor Option 1 Raymond Perry Option 1 Jamie De La Haye Option 3 Nigel Davison Option 1 Rm & Mr Blackmore Option 1 James And Nita Cowper Option 1 Phill Harker Option 1 Garry & Ghlennis Condell Option 1 Pj&Va Anderson Option 1 Janet Parry Option 3 David Whitburn Option 1 Geoff Hodgetts Option 1 Leah Carter Option 2 Nigel Gladwin Option 1 Maria Weber Option 1 Gjm Weber Option 1 W & S Anderson Option 1 Gillian Marks Option 1 Ian Hammond Option 1 Mary Hira Option 1 Lyn Durham Option 3 Sarah Mckey Option 1 Andrea J Hitchcock Option 1 N & R Greenwood Option 1 L R Dixon Option 2 J&K Preston Option 2 V R Beauchamp-Dixon Option 1 Spray Equip Option 1 Fiona Keegan Option 1 Royston Scholes Option 1 Pam Hammond Option 1 Mr T N & Mrs M Eades Option 1 Basil & Ann Graeme Option 3 Kathleen James Option 1 C. Andrews Option 2 Maxine Brown Option 1 Greg And Janice Wells Option 1 Colin & Lyn Henstock Option 2 Ps Kennerley Option 1 Denise Green Option 1 John Christensen Option 1 Mj Lee Option 1 R A & B V Dye Option 1 R J Murray & A P Sharp Option 1 Martin Rose Option 1 Kim Hodge Option 1 Lauren Stirton Option 1 Noel Stephens Option 1 Margie Thomas Option 2 Baggenstos Farm Partnership Option 1 Dianne Mahony Option 1 S.C. & M. Garrett Option 2 Stephen Rolfe Option 2 Ross Hodgson Option 2 Robyn Campbell Option 1 Natasha Wilson Option 2 Bradley Option 1 Sabine Sharpe Option 1 Kane Burton-Brown Option 3 Sarah Sargison Option 2 Dj & De Carrington Option 2 Brian Lucas Option 1 Dj Carrington Option 2 C D Gillies Option 1 Christina Ellis Option 1 John Mead Option 1 Louise Jones Option 2 Larry Nicol Neilson Option 1 Jackie Burns Option 1 Andrew Lissington Option 1 Bm & Nm Gough Option 1 Christine Hide Option 1 Sally Price Option 2 Timothy Paul Reader Option 2 Jennifer Spencer Option 1 [email protected] Option 1 Russell Wilson Option 1 G L Jelley Option 3 Beehive Enterprises Ltd Option 1 Daniel Crawford Option 1 Pippa Woods Option 1 Victoria Duffy Option 2 Michelle Wells Option 1 Mervyn Montgomery Option 1 Frances Bennett Option 1 George Phillips Option 1 Grant Robb Option 1 Rebecca Silvester Option 1 S D Guthrie Option 2 Anne Payne Option 2 Winston Billings Option 1 Constance Betty Owen Option 2 Debra Nicolson Option 1 Karl Rooney Option 1 Bert Henkelman Option 3 Mr D K & Mrs J N Ranford Option 1 R W Johnson Option 1 Lynne Whittington Option 2 Pa & J A Mence Option 1 Aj & Dk Mccaw Option 2 J & C Anderson Option 1 Lauren Yule Option 1 Stephen Carr Option 1 J & P Rowe Option 1 R & S Sleep Option 1 Miles Bowker Option 2 Miles Bowker Option 2 R & S Hallam Option 2 Jennifer Niederer Option 2 Marie Jones Option 1 Paul Smolenski Option 1 Brian Conning Option 1 David Bonham Option 1 Jay Banner Option 2 P H & J M Magill Option 1 Doug And Helen Roper Option 2 Ann De Ville Option 1 M & D Wade Option 1 D M Craig Option 2 Robyn Keightley Option 2 Dorrie Jones Option 3 G B Mackay Option 2 Neal Fraser Option 2 Linda Pattison Option 2 Rd & Yc Cooper Option 1 Gina Espagne Option 1 E L A Francis Option 1 Versatile Products Option 1 Mr H J Marston Option 2 Ngarimu Courtney-Noel Option 1 S Carter Option 1 Anchorage Investments Ltd Option 2 Chris Waugh Option 1 Miriam Potts Option 1 Leslie Mclaren Option 1 Aruna Illangamudalige & Thushari Silva Option 1 Bonita Reihana Option 1 Gj Lamberton Option 1 Alastair Melvin Option 3 Mrs D Fiford Option 1 Bryan Webber Option 1 Julie Carlson Option 3 Alister Whale Option 2 Janine Stokes Option 2 Donna Penwarden Option 1 Penny Horton Option 2 Daniel Augustine Option 1 Brian & Sandra Percy Option 2 Nathan Harvey Option 1 Tracey Scherer Option 2 J O'Sullivan Option 1 Ar&Lh Gale Option 1 Joan Ryder Option 1 Heather Kerr Option 2 Cathryn Reid Option 1 Gail Harrison Option 1 Kathy Taylor Option 1 Owen Gabbie Option 2 Alistair Ross Option 1 Nicola Mcdonald Option 1 Mario And Elizabeth Saez Option 2 Karen Glibbery Option 2 Eric Jessie Metcalfe Option 1 Jill Mclean Option 2 Richard Mathews Option 2 Katharine Birks Option 3 Peter Johnson Option 1 Mrs G Snowden Option 3 Peter Boyes Option 1 Allan Goodhall Option 1 Helen Payne Option 2 Claire Fuller Option 2 Richard Eaton Option 1 Jackie Millar Option 2 Raewyn Whiteman Option 2 Neil & Jill Lockhart Option 2 R J Harrison Option 2 Gilda Rowland Option 1 Olive Dumbleton Option 1 Phillip And Allison Corbett Option 1 Dr. E. N. & Mrs. H. M. Baker Option 2 Williebrord Struik Option 1 Neville Scott Option 2 Gayleen Atkins Option 1 Oliver Rew Option 1 Eric Van Kempen Option 1 Carolyn Green Option 2 Keith Paterson Option 1 Mr Db&Mrsbm Taylor Option 1 Kenneth Edward Howard Option 1 Neville Harris Option 2 Perry Keyte Option 2 Brad Garner Option 1 Chris Ardern Option 1 Lisa Wheeler Option 1 Sue Leaver Option 2 Prency Ernestine Pascual Option 1 Corinne R Payne Option 2 Pam Gilliland Option 1 Hannah Mcquoid Option 2 Bay Counselling & Therapy Service Option 1 John Sefton Option 2 Joanne Finlayson Option 2 Neil & Susan Alexander Option 1 Michael Dow Option 3 Ja Simmons Option 1 Tracy Alderton Option 1 Fran Allen Option 1 Mr Pw & Mrs B J Lints Option 2 Peter Faulkner Option 1 Angela Benstead Option 1 Rod Smith Option 2 Mary Joan Brown Option 1 Glenys Kalff Option 1 K & G Street Option 3 Bronwyn Porter Option 1 Janusz Smialowski Option 1 Annette Green Option 1 Pip Olsen Option 1 Susan Furey Option 1 Krystina Attwood Option 2 Julie Hood Option 2 Diana Haycock Option 1 John Van Tiel Option 1 Jane Fawcett Option 3 Frances Palmer Option 1 Nicole Fitzgerald Option 3 Graeme Coleman Option 1 Julie Anne Marx Option 2 Judith Priest Option 1 Michael Adger Option 2 William Thomas Forrester Option 2 J. G Drake Option 2 Dianne Mankelow Option 2 Judi Buckley Option 1 James Burn Option 1 Philip Browne Option 1 Holly Doorman Option 1 Ba & La Neilson Option 2 I H & E Blackstock Option 1 Ross Henderson Option 2 Hendrik Metz Option 1 Judy Horne Option 1 Sonya Barr Option 2 J F & V J Whimster Option 2 Amanda Clark Option 1 Colin Anthony Pollitt Option 2 Kelly Saxton Option 1 Kevin Palmer Option 1 Emily Parker Option 2 James Option 2 Judy Bernasconi Option 2 Robyn And Ken Booth Option 1 Andy Dixon Option 1 Kathy Palmer Option 2 Dave Mason Option 2 J Fraundorfer Option 2 Kathleen Fraser Option 3 Sheryil Valchx Option 1 Janet Newton Option 2 Ross Lovegrove Option 2 Craig Steenson Option 1 Daniel Clark Option 1 Sheryl Holmes Option 1 Yong Lu Option 1 Wayne Dingle Option 2 Gary Coston Option 2 D J Parry Option 1 Sharon Breach Option 2 Brett Kerrisk Option 1 Kerry-Anne & Jarrod Howlett Option 1 Roy Harold Staniford Option 1 Fiona Tennant Option 1 Anna Clarke Option 2 Heather Scott Option 3 Vivienne Campbell Option 2 Alex And Nancy Bruce Option 1 Kenneth Coombes Option 1 Jeremy Nixon Option 2 Theresa Bustard Option 1 Pk & R Eastergaard Option 1 Rachel Hadley Option 2 Lynley Schofield Option 1 Jess Thompson Option 2 R.D.Semple Option 1 J H Rolley Option 2 Anne Fletcher Option 2 Nancy Harries Option 1 Russell Wenn Option 1 B J & C M Mcintyre Option 2 Efr & Rh Johnson Option 1 Ray And Dawn Rohloff Option 2 Bernard Golder Option 1 L Collicott Option 2 Philippa Gray Option 2 Anne Bradley Option 2 Mr Ma & Mrs Rci Christie Option 1 A Bowden Option 1 Karen Anne Hutchinson Option 2 Pd & Yfl Beck Option 1 Kerry Wicks Option 2 Johan Hartzuiker Option 2 J P O'Hagan Option 2 Pauline Curel Option 2 C R Saunders Option 1 John Williamson Option 1 B Swainson Option 2 Donald Mckenzie Option 1 Susan Salamonsen Option 2 Colin & Megan Webb Option 2 Sue Mallard Option 2 Marlene Unsworth Handl Option 1 Terry Estment Option 2 Jeff Davenport Option 1 Angela & Roger Dixon Option 1 William H Kay & Glenys Vickers Option 1 Karen Clarke Option 2 Bob Campbell Option 1 Stephen Wiltshier Option 1 John Ebert Option 2 Janet Stanley Option 2 Charlotte Berghofer Option 1 Melody King Option 1 Suzanne Gardner Option 2 Ivor Lock Option 1 Rex Allott Option 2 Clint And Denise Carroll Option 1 Dw And Bf Player Option 1 Ann Green Option 1 Bob Hudson Option 2 Alana Dresner Option 2 C Bramley Option 1 Leonard Lorek Option 1 Rachel Cavanagh Option 1 J Lichtwark Option 2 David Scott Option 2 G.M.Porter Option 1 Sheryll Hunt Option 1 Antony Clere Option 1 Owen Griffiths Option 2 Keith Stollery Option 1 Mr Tg Brebner & Ws Kidd & Mrs Lj Brebner & Mrs An Kidd Option 1 John Knell Option 1 Korry Ritsma Option 2 Wayne Buchanan Option 2 Christine Smith Option 1 Nicola Ward Option 2 Ann Perry Option 1 Judith Craven Option 3 R T & Mj Sollitt Option 2 Val Green Option 1 Shirley Porter Option 3 Donna Garrett Option 1 Chris French Option 1 Ncjamieson Option 1 Debbie Spalding-Smith Option 1 Faye Watkin Option 3 Andrew Josefsen Option 2 David John Lawson Option 1 Jamie Scott Option 1 Bill Myhill Option 1 Kay Holdem Option 1 Roy Just Option 1 G & G Williams Option 2 Jd & Va Bennett Option 1 Lesley Monteiro Option 2 Marion Cameron Option 1 Ian Sherwood Option 1 Liz Cook Option 2 D & J Shand Option 1 Amanda Brophy Option 2 Frazer Pengelly Option 2 J A Young Option 2 Douglas Muir Option 2 M J Donnelly Option 2 Kareen Option 2 Ross And Rewa Morgan Option 1 Carlin Hayward Option 2 Kelvern Parker Option 2 H J Ironside Option 3 D&A Crisp Option 1 Bt E Gabrielsen Option 1 Pauline Williams Option 1 Ranald Ducat Option 2 Janet Baird Option 2 Rachel Thomson Option 2 Charles Dresner Option 2 Richelle & Mike Lee Option 1 Carla Nathan Option 2 Jenny Shuttleworth Option 1 Sarah Benfell Option 1 Jessie Graves Option 2 Sue Collin Option 2 Gs & Tl Mcculloch Option 2 Karen Gibson Option 1 Andrew Elliott Option 2 Hilary Lyons Option 1 Natasha Strange Option 3 Ava Gardner Option 3 Chole Graham Option 2 Renee Duncan Option 2 Mark Swetman Option 2 Julie Rose Gower Option 1 Carena Grant Option 1 Kelly Moroney Option 2 Gary Williams Option 1 Harbour Court Flats Option 3 Kate Watts Option 2 Phil Llewellyn Option 1 Greg Hughes Option 2 Mike Mcgaughran Option 1 Beverley F O'Brien Option 1 Richard Spiers Option 2 Dawn Davenport Option 1 James Devine Option 2 Denis Linde Option 2 Andrew Ruscoe Option 3 Brian Option 1 Natasha Peacock Option 1 Lynne Gough Option 2 Mrs T & Mr S R Murray Option 1 Brian Dally Option 1 Mrs A Rogerson Option 2 Steven & Kerry Asplin Option 2 Asplin Motors Limited Option 2 Kenneth Brown Option 1 Ian Walker Option 1 Samantha Gouveia Option 1 Wp&Padunn Option 2 Lynton Holmes Option 2 Mr R A & Mrs N J Vickers Option 3 Rowena Murray Option 2 Brian Porter Option 1 A Handley Option 2 Carolynn Heppell Option 1 Nikolina Reitan Option 2 Mr J Mackenzie Option 1 Elizabeth Anne Haworth Option 2 Chris Fryer Option 2 Deborah Mason Option 1 S And J Lilly Option 2 Tristan Anderson Option 1 Kameran Dadfar Option 2 Jacky Offner Option 2 Best Start Educare Limited Option 1 Rodney Ewen Option 1 Annabelle O Cinnseala Option 2 Lisa Grant Option 1 Marianne Hindley Option 2 Keith Adair Option 3 Fredrick Morgan Option 1 Ross Stewart Option 1 Mrs L Mcneil Option 1 B. T. Harrington Option 1 Paul Wiessing Option 2 M A Shervell Option 1 Mr R J & Mrs S M Buckle Option 1 Kevin Hughes Option 1 Andy Hobman Option 1 Lagi Childs Option 1 Nicole Koers Option 1 John Bradley Option 2 Carol Bird Option 1 Dennis Hicks Option 1 Jo Wiersma Option 1 Neil Mclachlan Option 1 S K Fountain Option 1 Mrs R M & Mr K A Searle Option 2 Tony & Adrienne Gibbs Option 2 Diane Maudsley Option 1 Tarpaulin Makers (Bop) Ltd Option 1 L Burkett Option 2 Smart Environmental Ltd Option 2 Leanne Najbert Option 1 Diane Moxon Option 2 Gregg Gilder Option 2 Mr Hayden Perry Option 1 Craig Wallace Option 1 Lionel A Dale Option 2 Lynn Mayfield Option 2 F C Sweeney Option 2 Michelle Efaraimo Option 2 April Stark Option 1 Niki Option 2 Mavis Manson Option 1 Leanne Hacker Option 1 Susan Williams Option 1 Rh Leech Option 2 Glenda Mcclelland Option 2 Jacqualine Doherty Option 1 Judith & Doug Bones Option 1 Todd & Brenda Newman Option 1 George Morris Option 2 Mike And Elly Maynard Option 2 Graeme Ward Option 2 M E Lunam Option 1 Km & Th Rowe Family Trust Option 2 Ceramico Designer Tiles Ltd Option 2 Barbara Cuttance Option 2 Mrs E M Mcculloch Option 2 Mr P A & Mrs E J Jones Option 1 Ms N D Fraser Option 1 Michael Gilbert Option 1 H W Allison Option 2 Mrs B M Pearson Option 2 I Muller, S Bogaard Option 1 Robert And Marie Drury Option 1 Margaret Hickey Option 2 R G & J Thompson Option 2 Dave Rattray Option 1 Steve Option 1 Gerard Richardson Option 1 Lorraine Turner Option 1 Ben Morgan Option 1 Adrian Ford Option 1 Bob Mack Option 1 Carla Stone Option 1 Dianne Leonard Option 2 Angel Coffin Option 1 St Thomas More Catholic Church Option 2 St Patrick'S Parish Committee Option 2 Mr B A Bissell & W Srisangwan Option 1 Sara Mcqueen Option 1 Cj & Ja Graham Option 2 Ian Donald Farquhar Option 1 Susan Spencer Option 1 Tracey Mouat Option 1 Joe Hesmondhalgh Option 1 Joel Hannah Option 2 Mrs H K & Mr D B Metcalfe Option 2 W J & K Oliver Option 2 Mrs Judith Mary Bean Option 2 Russell Derecourt Option 2 Bernie Ryan Option 1 Robin Elliott Option 1 Peter Erenstrom Option 1 Dennis Radovanovich Option 1 Eden Curd Option 2 Chris Darlington Option 1 Maurice Drummond Option 1 Mathew Naden Option 2 Bl&Ld Heaton Option 1 Glenys Collumbell Option 1 John A Hossack Option 1 Claudia Holzwarth Option 2 Jp Bachellier Option 1 G Lindsay Option 1 Kim Mccarthy Option 2 Stefan Stasiewicz Option 1 Trowell Option 2 P V Wilson Option 1 Karen Steer Option 3 D & F Lawes Option 2 Tonkin & Taylor Limited Option 2 Ms B Green Option 1 Rose Richardson Option 1 R A Murrell Option 1 Bariss Bull Option 1 Cameron Hays Option 1 Ivan Perry Option 1 Mrs L J L Hill Option 1 G L & J J Odwyer Option 1 Ruth Chart Option 2 Steve Allen Option 1 Graham Carter Option 1 T&B Wills Option 1 Beverley Ann Michael Option 1 R G & M J Morris Option 2 Samuel Loudon Option 2 Sue Crawford Option 1 Patricia Woolrich Option 1 Aqlan J, Ashe Option 2 D Morgan Option 1 Diane Nicholson Option 1 Karen Musgrave Option 2 Robyn Mckellar Option 1 Crowther & Company Ltd Option 3 Susanne Hickey Option 1 Rm Hawkins Option 2 Bill Irvine Option 1 Maureen Tempero Option 1 Lloyd Walker Option 2 Peter John Baveystock Option 2 Ray Dagg Option 1 Catherine Johnson Option 2 Sherryl R Learmonth Option 1 Rosemary Killeen Option 2 Kathryn Gibson Option 1 Trevor&Gloria Stanley Option 1 Muriel Banks Option 2 Ml Bradford Option 1 Lois Broadbent Option 3 B Mora Option 1 Neville & Glynnis Wilson Option 1 Alain & Marie Laval Option 1 Paul Forkert Option 1 Steve West Option 1 L Wakelin Option 2 Miss J Walker Option 2 Justine Henderson Option 1 Peter Jones Option 1 Mark Hunter Option 2 Aimee Torrie Option 1 Andrew Waide Option 1 Donald Cable Option 1 Alec Whatmough Option 1 Mel Watts Option 1 Susan Sparrow Option 2 Megan Bailey Option 2 Michael And Adriane Taylor Option 1 Carol Spooner Option 2 Gary Smith Option 2 Kaywyn Mckenzie Option 2 Jan Caudwell Option 3 Trevor French Option 1 Amanda Gudgeon Option 2 Susan King Option 2 Mrs B A & Mr W R Faulkner Option 1 Raewyn Rosewarne Option 1 Cr & Ja Cook Option 1 Rob Stephenson Option 1 Jerry & Karen Cowper Option 2 D Charlton And R Stephenson Option 1 W I & M F Sedcole Option 1 Cheryl Munro Option 1 Glen Hall Option 1 W I & M F Sedcole Option 1 Warwick Needham Option 1 Jillian Hay Option 3 Raewyn Mcneilly Option 2 Dan Woods Option 1 P A Griffiths Option 1 Dallas Madsen Option 2 G Wickens Option 2 Mr I D & Mrs E A Hewlett Option 1 Rr & Cj Johnston Option 2 Tui Yeager Option 1 Hayley Brown Option 1 Dayna Bradley Option 1 R.J.Harnor Option 1 Mr R.Ashford-White Option 1 Ch Armstrong Option 2 Dennis Cresswell Option 1 Florence Cornwall Option 2 Julia Ansorge Option 2 Lisa Corbett Option 1 Rochelle Spillane Option 2 M K Hamilton Option 1 Mary-Ann Da Silva Option 2 Gary Helbron Option 1 Trevor Mitchell Option 1 Linda Fraser Option 2 Audrey Rasmussen Option 1 Bryan Simmonds Option 2 Rebecca Odonnell Option 2 Bronwyn Attwood Option 1 Peter Setz Option 1 Kim Griffin Option 1 Dana Martin Option 1 Rod Andrews Option 1 Ab And Ml Ching Option 2 Warren East Option 1 Lj And J Nicol Option 1 Graham Dobbs Option 1 Anthony Lusher Option 2 Simer Sandhu Option 1 Kimberly Dunham Option 2 Niki Mikkelsen Option 2 George Robinson Option 1 Jeremy Denmead Option 3 J R & J M Parker Option 1 Winn Tipping Option 1 Max Hamilton Option 2 Graham Hopping Option 1 Chris Murden Option 2 Ross Clarke Option 1 Ashlyn Renyard Option 1 Ian And Laverne Mason Option 1 Shane Mcnae Option 1 Shona Murray Option 1 Kiri Prentice Option 3 R E Heys Option 1 Theresa Paki Paki Option 1 Jenny Gibson Option 1 Wendy Smith Option 1 Arthur Hudson Option 2 Guy Malthus Option 3 C Strachan Option 2 Jen Option 1 Charlotte Over Option 2 Dave Kirk Option 3 Catherine Wilson Option 1 K. Cairns Option 2 Angela Wade Option 2 Mark Loeffen Option 1 R Taylor Option 2 Wassink Option 1 Tara Stewart Option 2 Alan Davies Option 1 David Nielsen Option 2 Peter Wright Option 2 Rob Taylor Option 1 Vicki Herdman Option 2 Andrew Hart Option 1 Ralph Allen Option 2 Fiona Hewett Option 1 Dot Grant Option 1 Kari Harvey Option 1 L Hireme Option 1 Mk & S Fisher Option 2 Lois Thrupp Option 1 Mr J Zeng Option 1 Aj'S Lotto Option 1 Linda Reynolds Option 2 Roy Foster Option 1 Mr K W Adams & Mrs P J Adams Option 3 Mark Walton Option 2 Garry Mason Option 1 Peter Laforteza Option 1 Jill Dinniss Option 2 Vicki Ruegg Option 2 Marise Burnett Option 2 Ian Option 1 Kerry Gibson Option 1 Norman Wilcox Option 2 Ann Pope Option 2 Heather Schick Option 1 A J F Perano Option 2 Linda Marie Penniket Option 2 Allan Maurice Griffin Option 1 Fay Wildermoth Option 1 Loni Featherstone Option 1 Nathan Bradshaw Option 1 John & Maureen Phizacklea Option 2 Graelee Investments Limited Option 1 Lee Owen Option 1 Christine Mary Schutt Option 1 Mr R J Cooper Option 1 Andrew Lattimore Option 1 Rose Carruthers Option 1 Trevor Boyle Option 2 Trevor Cook Option 1 Ronnie Mcallum Option 2 Juanita Dunn Option 1 Di Carter Option 2 Timothy Bell Option 1 Jennifer Cole Option 2 Maree Houston Option 2 David And Muriel Powles Option 1 Haley Engle Option 1 T & A M Julian Option 1 Henry Levy Option 2 Roger Watts Option 2 Karen M Hampton Option 1 Sj /Jl Holmes Option 2 Kath Excell Option 1 Fiona Putty Option 2 Shane Beaumanes Loader Option 1 Crystal Macdonald Option 2 Pamela Meredith Option 2 Chris Hammerich Option 2 Robert Ross Option 1 Bill Reid Option 1 Karen Williams Option 1 Greg Nicholas Option 2 Neil Bartosh Option 2 Tony Watson Option 1 Neil Brough Option 1 Mark And Faith Nuku Option 1 David Shearman Option 2 Cynthia Stokes Option 1 W. P. Anderson Option 1 Bob & Jill Keals Option 1 Grant & Kim Vermeulen Option 2 Rob Rowley Option 1 P A Smith Option 1 Michelle & Robert Hall Option 2 P Bellamy Option 2 David Nyhoff Option 1 Pauline Thomas Option 2 Colette Mackenzie Option 3 Jean Audrey Cross Option 1 Mary Huxtable Option 2 Keith Frazer Option 1 Gill Partt Option 2 S Mcconnell Option 1 Jocelyn Eichler Option 1 S A Lee Option 1 Nj & Je Turner Option 2 Bob Perry Option 2 Kl&Cm Fisher Option 2 Tania Hunt Option 2 Charles Bullock Option 2 Neville & Lee Watkins Option 1 Paul Clark Option 2 Jennifer Brown Option 2 C Clements Option 2 Derek Young Option 3 Mark & Sue Lewis Option 2 Pat Manktelow Option 2 Alick Nell Option 1 M&Sgibson Option 2 Lynne Abbot Option 1 Diane Franklin Option 2 Angela Kitson Option 1 R C Skinner Option 2 Arthur Haycock Option 1 Judy Kane Option 1 D J Mathews& R A Webber Option 2 Lesley And Len Cooper Option 2 Kylie Lee Option 1 Anne Bremner Option 2 John Tootell Option 1 Christine Christie Option 1 John &Diana Sich Option 3 Chris Tyler Option 3 Andrew Targett Option 1 Keith Owen Option 1 Eveline Redstall Option 2 Anne Gardiner Option 1 Sharyn Adnitt Option 1 Belinda Muller Option 2 Don Magnus Option 2 Bev Toms Option 1 N D & G B Mcewan Option 2 Kevin & Rochelle Searle Option 2 David N Andrews Option 2 Lyn Morland Option 2 D G S And M I Mowat Option 2 Wayne Twige Option 2 Brian Laing Option 2 Judy Colville Option 2 Mark Wyatt Option 1 Campbell Knox Option 1 Clifford Hewett Option 1 Ivy Mikaere Option 1 Lynette Carter Option 1 Michael Bennett Option 1 David Hurn Option 2 Margaret Mcgregor Option 2 W D & B Hodges Option 1 Mark Roberts Option 3 Graeme Lind Option 1 Ross Levis Option 1 Vanessa Brock Option 2 Adele Scafidi Option 1 Pat & June Hughes Option 1 B & C Neilson Option 1 Nikki South Option 1 Julie Jenkins Option 2 Linda Moody Option 2 Maurice Ritchie Option 1 Pa Ducey Option 1 S V & E Selth Option 1 Briar Tring Option 2 D Bryan Option 1 Jw Owen Option 1 Brian Lissette Option 1 Bev Option 2 Daniel August Option 1 Rochelle Jensen Option 2 Mrs G M Eastwood Option 1 Leonie Pouaka Option 1 Cr & Lm Derrick Option 2 Tania Rickard Option 2 Dorothy Anderson Option 1 Chris Brennan Option 3 Kim Murray Option 1 Steve Mccurley Option 1 Philip Monnington Option 1 Ian Diggelmann Option 2 Maureen Weeks Option 1 Pamela Foyle Option 1 Wr & Nj Spooner Option 1 Ian Craib Option 1 Peter Whittingham Option 1 Tania Hodge Option 1 Amanda Ibbitson Option 1 Renee Flavell Option 1 Roger Mcgregor Option 2 Win Kane Option 1 L G Diffin Option 1 Lionel Bruce Adams Option 1 Peggy Moncur Option 2 Raewyn Fulton Option 1 Jenny Stantiall Option 2 Zelda Patrick Option 2 Sarah Shannon Option 2 Beth Herder Option 2 Nikola Patrick Option 2 Brian Johns Option 2 Ian Olsen Option 2 Christine Knudsen Option 1 Jennie Dryden Option 1 Steve Mcmechan Option 1 Mervyn Sayers Option 2 Mr D S & Mrs H Stewart Option 1 Tr&Hm Mcfetridge Option 1 Kaye & Peter Mackenzie Option 2 Wilson Option 1 Lester Smith Option 1 Alistair Stewart Option 2 Cliff Baker Option 1 Sally Neustroski Option 2 D.J.&H.P.Titjen Option 1 Mr L & G L Harris Option 1 Phillip Larking Option 2 C J Barnes Option 1 B Blair Option 2 Bevan Waller Option 1 Mark Fidler Option 2 Bruce Callander Option 1 Geoffrey Shine Option 1 S Richardson Option 2 Stephen Lawson Option 2 Cheryl Garland Option 1 Gh And Cm Linton Option 1 Grant Mclean Option 1 Leslie Horan Option 2 Robyn Glass Option 1 Nikki Pol Option 3 Hj & Wm Baylis Option 2 Heidi Wrigley Option 1 Katherine Duncan Option 1 Kim Hall Option 2 Graham Wallace Option 1 Diane Hemingway Option 3 Jeanelle Fischer Option 3 Amanda Hays-Jones Option 2 W J Vermeulen Option 1 John Balkwill Option 2 Fiona Chadwick Option 2 Naomi Rees Option 2 Sue Fursdon Option 3 Nelson Walker Option 1 Kylie Anderson Option 2 Jenny Willoughby Option 1 Melissa Reynolds Option 1 David Lee Option 2 Janice Lake Option 1 Chris Walls Option 1 Em Eb Smith Option 1 Kylie Frappell Option 1 Jennifer Normanton Option 1 Ian And Tania Williamson Option 1 Bernice Gorringe Option 2 Mikayla Poole Option 1 David Wood Option 1 Ruth Dekker Option 1 Robert Barnes Option 2 Tony Hall Option 1 Theo Ursum Option 2 Keryn Cook Option 1 K Mercep Option 2 Carol Travis Option 2 Elizabeth Greenough Option 2 James Mccrone Option 2 Brian Dellow Option 1 Cherie Garrett Option 1 Joy Ilsley Option 2 Wayne O'Driscoll Option 1 John Patterson Option 2 Laszlo Abricossow Option 1 Craig Cleary Option 2 Ron Harris Option 2 Seenuan Stuart Option 1 Lisa Thomas Option 1 Ngakoia Edmonds Option 1 Wayne Whitaker Option 2 Joanne Harris Option 1 Bev Mckay Option 2 Shannon Verwey Option 1 R Sullivan Option 2 Sheila Little Option 2 Pauline & Edward Duley Option 2 Rj And Sj Knowles Option 1 Margaret Butler Option 1 Rj & Ml Tozer Option 1 Natalie Mckeany Option 2 R E Taylor Option 2 Suzanne Callingham Option 1 Rachael Haden Option 2 Rex & Sheryl Farrow Option 1 Andrea Atkinson Option 2 Dianne Jensen Option 1 Jon Foxon Option 1 M & S Tippett Option 2 Hayden Keyte Option 1 Q W Wu Option 1 Costas Chryssafis Option 3 Margit Rawlins Option 2 Marlia Fraser Option 1 Roanne Sutherland Option 1 Robert Nicholas Option 2 Emma Mclaren Option 1 Douglas Kirkpatrick Option 2 Jon Morrison Option 3 P Jackson Option 1 Susan Leathley Option 2 C Girard Option 1 Ida Davies Option 2 Barbara Quedley Option 2 M.A. Mcculloch Option 1 Gloria Brazendale Option 2 Jane Munro Option 1 Damian Gardiner Option 1 Gavin Bell Option 2 Maggy Buhler Option 2 Zane & Sheryl Bettley Option 2 Jill Shephard & Paul Shephard Option 1 Wendy Little Option 1 Annette Chadban Option 2 Brian Shee Option 1 Jacob Kelly Option 1 Shelley Swindells Option 1 Mark Ritchie Option 1 Rebecca Newland Option 1 Mark Divehall Option 1 Bronwyn Olsen Option 1 Neilson Anderson Option 3 Graham Woods Option 1 Mike Ross Option 1 Glennis Brown Option 2 Keith Chase Option 1 R Couling Option 1 T R & C F Chase Option 1 Manasseh Smith Option 1 Mt Lipinski Option 1 Donna Ormsby And Jim Greetham Option 2 Wayne Lawrence Option 1 Pat Day Option 3 Carole Johnston Option 1 David Barry Option 1 Graeme Menzies Option 1 Wendy Bryson Option 1 Gregory James Option 2 Kylie Alexander Option 2 Alan Meiklejohn Option 2 Christine Francombe Option 2 Hedwiga Beers Option 1 K&M Saunders Option 1 Tracy Bidois Option 2 S Nunn Option 2 Nicki Prentice Option 2 Rr Coulter & Nm Poffley Option 1 S.C. Young Option 1 M Callaghan & G Sheath Option 3 Deana Option 2 Kenneth Arthur Fox Option 2 Paul And Lois Somerville Option 2 Mr A Partington Option 2 Lesley La Riviere Option 1 S.Murray Option 1 David La Riviere Option 1 Stewart Gumbley Option 2 Mrs M & Mr J Bird Option 1 Noelette Webber Option 1 Margaret Shields Option 2 Diana Option 1 Pauline Van Den Kerkhof Option 1 Helen Hackett Option 2 A.B.& S.Gibb Option 1 Gordon Cassey Option 1 John Borchard Option 1 Dennis O'Connor Option 2 Niall King Option 1 D And S Etherington Option 1 Andrea Mcdowell Option 1 Patti Brown Option 1 Ruthann Taylor Option 1 Don Bayliss Option 1 Elizabeth Southey Option 1 Katrina Younger Option 2 Sue Mcelroy Option 1 Wayne Newson Option 1 Evan Sommerville Option 1 Lyn Way Option 1 Sue Boyne Option 1 Aylene Epsom Option 1 Frank And Ruth Wilkins Option 2 Jan Yates Option 2 G W&J Butler Option 3 Sr & Fm Delaney Option 1 Kieran Option 1 Mr N B Crawford & Mrs H Crawford Option 1 John Clark Option 2 R.G. Hume Option 1 Diana Lawrence Option 2 G L Hodgson Option 1 Brian Jackson Option 1 Kerry Machirus Option 3 Glenn Potier Option 1 Lexie Friend Option 2 Bradley Little Option 1 A Rimmer Option 1 Kelvin Walker Option 1 Michelle Chiplin Option 2 Peter Beer Option 1 Christine A Beer Option 1 J G & A M Turner Option 1 Jane Hanson Option 1 Alan & Dallas Baker Option 2 R J Vialle Option 1 A M & S D Arlidge Option 3 Ken Lewis Option 1 Diane & Ross Kearvell Option 1 Robbie Adams Option 2 C R Hynes Option 2 Maureen Green Option 2 Peter Milne Option 2 Rodney Harris Option 2 Tony Keyte Option 2 P E & S K Whitehead Option 1 Rob Adam Option 1 Glenice Soffe Option 1 Terence M Stack Option 1 Robyn Fitzsimons Option 1 Claire Earl Option 2 Trevor Farmer Option 1 C Allcott & S Williams Option 2 Wendy Tuck Option 2 Catherine Knights Option 2 Corinne Hill Option 2 John Sydney Olds Option 1 Richard Slater Option 2 John Rowlandson Option 2 Ian Baker Option 3 Raewyn Judson Option 1 Leanne Watson Option 2 Julie Renouf Option 2 Alison Frost Option 2 Dorothy Hancock Option 1 Sally Dobbie Option 2 Wendy Dance Option 2 Edna Nicholson Option 2 C And F Torr Option 2 Allan Nobilo Option 1 Angela Bryant Option 2 Penny Caley Option 2 Chris Townsend Option 2 Shona Geros Option 1 John Carter Option 1 Lategan Option 1 Greg Mccardle Option 2 Nicola Thomas Option 1 Peter Bridges Option 1 Maree Moore Option 1 Martin Jessop Option 2 John Matheson Option 1 Tracey Smith Option 1 Bruce Auld Option 1 Rodger & Sondra Bagshaw Option 2 Pauline Lee Option 2 Egidia Desroches Option 2 Debbie Chadwick Option 2 B Haymes & Mrs A Jarvis-Haymes Option 1 D.Turner Option 1 Lindsay Lowe Option 1 Sr & Dm Mercer Option 1 Jan Bradford Option 1 Adelle Caundle Option 1 Dawn Dawson Option 1 H & J Day Option 2 Lesley Alexander Option 2 Donna Mainwaring Option 2 Karyn Grindlay Option 2 Max Lynds Option 1 Shirley Frost Option 2 Sue Russell Option 2 Darryl Green Option 1 Sandra Fae Olivecrona Option 2 Anna And Adrian Harwood Option 2 Richard Moreland Option 2 Kevin Balfour Option 1 Heather Wilson Option 2 Raewyn Kildare Option 1 Noel Burns Option 3 Heather Ross Option 2 Diane Drummond Option 1 Carolyn Fleet & Craig Neustroski Option 1 Stephanie Prendergast Option 2 Cynthia Horn Option 2 Louise Dinmore Option 2 Gc & Sj Swain Option 2 Mrs N R Van Iperen Option 2 Marianne Devenoges Option 3 Stuart Kay Option 2 Howard Jones Option 1 Wendy Glover Option 1 Tina Briggs Option 2 R F Cooper Option 1 Terry Wood And D De Vries-Wood Option 1 Robyn East Option 2 Eve Willis Option 2 Terence Rowland Option 2 Carol Matehaere Option 1 Jean Houghton Option 2 Christine Gallon Option 1 Patrick Williams Option 1 Cheryl Egerton Option 3 Sheryall Old Option 1 Kaye Niccol Option 2 Tony Wright Option 1 Fenella Handley Option 2 Barry Watson Option 1 Helene Julius Option 1 Fernando Ponte Option 1 Trevor Carr Option 2 David Luxton Option 2 L R Morrow Option 1 At Campbell Option 1 Gr Cain @ Ca Milburn Option 1 Bd & La Hooper Family Trust Option 2 Rebekah Waltham Option 1 W J Philip Option 1 Hamish Scott Option 1 Kevin Thompson Option 1 Ciska Vogelzang Option 2 Colleen Lambourne Option 2 Freddie Theron Option 2 Mrs F Gee Option 1 Mrs M D Watts Option 1 Ab Coleman Option 1 Liz Riepen Option 2 David Terry Option 2 Diane Gray Option 1 Corina Genet Option 1 Cindy Joy Option 2 Allan Eddy Option 2 Robert Wayne & Berwyn Lydney Fergusson Option 1 Harm Bouman Option 2 Ian Sowden Option 2 Halse Option 1 Tg & Cj Mcaulay Option 1 Alan Hay Option 1 J Thwaites Option 1 Ag & Sa Perry Option 2 Mt Maunganui Baptist Church Option 1 Vivienne Phillips Option 1 Michael Hawker Option 1 Jan Brophy Option 2 Graham Jamieson Option 2 Mrs R Arnold Option 1 Mr Anthony John Maguire Option 1 Chelsea Keith Option 1 Wild And Fraser Option 1 Wayne Wordsworth Option 2 R Van Houtte Option 1 Ron Collingwood Option 1 Desiree Stroud Option 1 D P Taylor Option 1 Toni Skiffington Option 1 Teri Logie Option 1 Angela Lumby Option 2 Chris Bergersen Option 2 S E Allen Option 1 Jane Huston Option 1 Dax Ryan Option 2 Adrian Sleet Option 3 Olive Mcvicker Option 2 Rl & Vm Sexton Option 2 Diane Polwarth Option 1 Mrs V Nelson Option 1 Ma And Se Le Comte Option 1 Melisa Wilson Option 2 Roberta Grant Option 1 Caryn Shearer Option 1 John Shuttleworth Option 1 R.S And W E Dunphy Option 1 Warren Seddon Option 1 John And Marie Speir Option 1 Phillip Martelli Option 1 Steve Ferguson Option 2 Raewyn Batten Option 2 Sherrin & Bryce Hudson Option 1 Ian Thomas Option 3 A J Kennedy Option 2 Andrea Durie Option 2 Elaine West Option 2 Ken Pilbr0W Option 2 Susan Connell Option 3 Sandy Scarrow Option 3 Shannon Waters Option 2 Peter Hartley Option 2 Gerald Allen Option 2 Les Cresswell Option 2 Lorne Thomson Option 1 Judy Option 1 Jeffrey Paterson Option 1 Margaret And Roger Down Option 2 Warwick Voyce Option 2 Patricia Reilly Option 2 David And Elizabeth Buckley Option 2 Jean Grattan Option 2 Angela Korfage Option 2 Verity Reader Option 1 Les Oxnam Option 1 Dianne Otene Option 2 David And Leonie Pantall Option 1 Tanya Jolly Option 1 Blair And Crystel Sutton Option 2 David Bragg Option 1 Colin Ward Option 1 K & L Nightingale Option 2 Morrin Gibney Option 2 Maurine Sullivan Option 1 Tim & Marcia Denman Option 2 Alison Julian Option 1 Neil Stuart-Menzies Option 1 Jules Reilly Option 2 G & T Mcgahey Option 2 Kareen Sutcliffe Option 1 A D & Ja Corkill Option 1 Rowan White Option 1 Rex Croskery Option 2 Carel Bezuidenhout Option 1 Toni Olsen Option 1 Greg Waterhouse Option 1 Sarah Brell Option 1 Yvette Wass Option 1 Trevor Lock Option 2 Trevor Clist Option 1 Pierre Botha Option 2 S Yoon & Yk Cho Option 1 James Bachellier Option 2 Phillip Wall Option 1 Glenn Bayly Option 2 Terri Beck Option 1 I K & Y T Callesen Option 1 Natasha Forrest Option 1 Lee Simeon Option 2 Kay Marshall Option 2 Bella Option 1 K R Hoggins Option 1 Michael Maassen Option 1 J K Sutherland Option 2 Jan Robins Option 1 Deb Workman Option 2 Ryan Powell Option 3 Alex Stevenson Option 2 Ms M E Cooper Option 2 Alison Richards Option 2 Lisa Vale Option 2 Andrew Option 1 Kim Nock Option 3 Marie Stieller Option 1 Mrs N Eyeington Option 2 Mr S D Nabbs Option 1 David Milner & Sarah Macduff Option 3 Michelle O'Neill Option 1 Clare & Peter Abbiss Option 2 Janet Parkins Option 1 Lj & B Steel Option 1 Viliame Bokini Naliva Option 2 K And J Moran Option 2 Brenda Vale Option 1 Brenda Davidson Option 1 Tony Bailey Option 1 Wallace Potts Option 1 Brenda Smith Option 1 Mike Davey Option 2 Angela Mclaughlan Option 1 Diane Fox Option 1 Cherie Luxton Option 1 Ann Fosberry Option 3 Pat Ryan Option 1 Mistie Baldwin Option 1 Gavin Swney Option 3 D B & J Bain Option 1 Neil Edwards Option 1 Brendon Smith Option 2 Alison Doyle Option 2 John Cox Option 1 Jon Wisniewski Option 1 J Mayston Option 2 Carolyn Pannett Option 2 Caroline Nicholson Option 2 David & Lorraine Mercer Option 1 Glen Alexander Option 1 Michelle Fowler Option 1 Angela Werder Option 3 Panamulle Dahanayake Option 1 Anna Yarndley Option 1 Claire Lee Option 1 Jamie Stanley Option 1 Merryn Tate Option 1 Brian Geoffrey Option 2 Fiona Smith Option 1 Christopher Aldridge Option 1 B Redpath Option 2 G Garaway Option 2 Mrs J M Henry Option 1 Catherine Arrow Option 1 I.H. & Em Moody Option 2 Mariane Wray Option 2 Claire Fisher Option 2 Pania Walker Option 2 Hope Lawsen Option 2 Mrs P J Maxton Option 1 Peter E Mathers Option 2 Mr W B & K G Gush Option 1 Mrs D B Andrew Option 1 Pamela Hawkins Option 1 B & L Hatrick Option 1 Marian Fitzsimon Option 1 Iain Slight Option 1 Peter Buckmaster Option 1 Nathan Munro Option 2 Cherie Randles Option 2 Maree Newton Option 2 G Logan Option 1 Kong'S (Nz) Limited Option 1 Dianne And Dave Lowry Option 2 Sylvia Dovaston Option 1 Judy Glasgow Option 1 Mr A E & Mrs J M Halligan Option 1 Mr J C Canuel Option 1 Mr T B & T M Sutton Option 1 Patrick Neil Chapman Option 1 Alexander Stevens Option 1 Mr B R & Mrs C A L Williams Option 3 Kenrick Knowlson Option 1 P A & R D Hoit Option 1 Fay Thompson Option 1 Patricia Tomsett Option 1 Unipro Industrial Electrical Importers Option 1 David Ede Option 2 Mrs K M Finn Option 2 Cg & Pe Capill Option 2 Karen Turner Option 1 Allen Rogers Option 2 Anne T'Assell Option 1 David Anthony Wilkinson Option 1 Mr M J & Mr L G Walker Option 1 Norfolkgrace Res Option 1 Coastguard Eastern Region Option 2 G. & J. Mcnaughton Option 1 Delia French Option 2 Roydon Mcgee Option 1 Gg Warren Option 1 Gillian Pierce Option 2 Susan Main Option 1 B C&Ga Geoghan Option 2 Derek Option 2 Patricia Barton Option 2 Mr G J Plumridge Option 2 Danny Jordaan Option 2 Roy Tomsett Option 2 Gillian O'Connor Option 2 Norm West Option 2 Alan Williams Option 1 Laura Eyles Option 1 Paul Kennedy Option 1 Andrew Davis Option 1 Ivan Tanner Option 1 Valerie Brown Option 1 Monica Phillips Option 3 Dr Dave Bibby Option 1 Diane Howell Option 1 Alan Robins Option 1 Colin Wrigley Option 2 Warwick Allan Robbins Option 1 Bruce Hamblyn Option 2 David Evers Option 1 Helen Skinner Option 2 Jan Saxton Option 1 M A Stone Option 3 Colin Torstonstson Option 1 Sonya And Mark Boulton Option 1 Brudehills Option 1 Minnell Investments Ltd Option 1 Keith Rodger Pyle Option 2 Bay Financial Partners Ltd Option 2 Paul Carter Option 2 Mr G R Rae Option 2 Kw & A Minnell Option 1 Mrs J A & Mr M J Lloyd Option 1 Alison Hulme Option 2 L R Brake Option 1 Mark Bennett Option 1 Denise Dawson Option 1 Jl Perkins Option 1 Janet Naylor Option 1 Isabel Constance Clotworthy Option 1 Jan Hall Option 1 Kevin Muir Option 1 Sandra Bonney Option 2 Clive Tippins Option 1 Kingsview Body Corporate Option 1 Robin Rimmer Option 1 Margaret June Nicol Option 1 Mary Parkinson Option 2 Simon Hocking Option 1 Mark Woodham Option 1 Roger Burn Option 2 Ken & Betty Curreen Option 2 Jane Shields Option 1 Kim Blennerhassett Option 1 Mr K D & Mrs S J Bulmer Option 1 Patricia Dobos Option 1 Valerie Penny Option 1 Mr G W Sutton Option 1 S Emery Option 1 Ja Clouston Option 1 Yvonne Marie Harris Option 1 Gae Webster Option 2 N Burley & M Attwood Option 3 Susan Goddard Option 1 Danielle Ten Bokkel Huinink Option 2 Mike O'Brien Option 1 Rachel Laugesen Option 1 Ks Jenkins Option 1 Heather Burton Option 2 Maureen Scott Option 1 K W &M A Robertson Option 1 D E & P Levett Option 2 Y.De Mol Option 2 John & Sandra Hunt Option 1 Jeanette Garrett Option 1 Merv Andrews Option 1 Marion Annie Flinders Option 2 Gail Bingham Option 3 Julian Webb Option 2 A G & G R Robinson Option 1 Penelope Ashton Option 1 D P Sadd Option 1 Mr & Mrs Rsg Quedley Option 1 Sonya Pook Option 1 Mr I A R & Mrs E Torlesse Option 1 Dorothy Susan Gee Option 2 Marja Ward Option 2 B S Blair Option 1 Heather Ruth King Option 2 Tony Valder Option 1 Mr K F & Mrs K E Evans Option 2 Miss E Koopu Option 2 Brett & Rhonda Hewlett Option 3 Jan Canute Option 1 Neil Griffith Option 2 Rose Burton Option 2 Mr K E Young Option 1 Tracey Burton Option 2 Sandy Houlton Option 2 Panea Farm Ltd (Rr & L Mccosh) Option 1 Jocelyn Dowie Option 2 Merv Stephenson Option 2 Hella Riebeck Option 1 Kevin And Merrilee Reynolds Option 1 Lynn Perry Option 1 Michael And Kathy Sass Option 1 P.Camp Option 2 Alan Clements Option 2 Kirstie Cox Option 2 Leanne Taylor Option 2 Peter Brasier Option 2 Shayne & Colleen Phillips Option 1 Leighton Oats Option 2 Max Griffiths Option 1 Althorp Village Ltd Option 1 Christine Round Option 1 Gary Andrews Option 1 Barbara Young Option 1 Grant Bedford Option 1 Leanne Wright Option 2 Legacy Accountants Limited Option 2 David Hackett Option 1 Michael Allan Rhodes Option 1 Mr G And Mrs P Stillwell Option 1 Val Dillon Option 1 Marianne Huddlestone Option 1 Karin And Hamish Mcgregor Option 2 Joanne Black Option 3 John W Bradstock Option 2 Garry Richard Stanley Option 1 Allan Winnard Option 1 Jenny Falconer Option 2 Gaylene Donaldson Option 1 Lisa Murphy Option 1 James Kirk Option 3 Ms D E Lin Option 2 Bridgewater Village Club Option 1 Kelven Martin Option 1 Maureen Goodger Option 2 Kauru Creek Wholsale Option 1 Grant Efford Option 1 Annette Flyger Option 2 M & J Stevens Option 2 Lindsay Graeme Option 3 Hamish Kendal Option 2 Dh Fleming Option 1 Jacqueline Fraser Option 2 Amy Penwarden Option 1 Michelle Sinclair Option 1 Dave Forlong Option 2 Colin Reilly Option 1 Kevin Hawkes Option 1 L.R.Martin And S Harvey Option 2 R.C.And J.D. Mcclintock Option 1 Mr Jb And Mrs Ja Judson Option 2 Robert Brittain Option 1 Jesse Wharekawa Option 2 Mrs K L Murphy Option 1 Eddie Pinkerton Option 1 B Williams Option 3 Fg & Mg Taris Option 3 Mr A W Whale Option 1 Smith M J And Just M Option 1 Stella Jones Option 3 Karen Moor Option 1 Louise Christie Option 1 Mrs S M J Orme Option 2 Mrs L M Kerr Option 2 Elaine Bootten Option 2 Clive Kilgour Option 1 Mr M R Cole Option 2 Janet Harvey Option 1 Martin Finkel Option 1 Beth Trebilco Option 1 Bronwyn Mcveigh Option 2 Mrs D P Adams Option 1 Patrice Flintoff Option 1 Helen Mckenzie Option 2 D E Schokking Option 1 Tania Dovaston Option 1 Richard Pennington Option 1 Te Kura O Maketu Option 1 Lesley Baker Option 1 Mr P R & Mrs J R Haskell Option 1 Edmund Flaszynski Option 1 Erin Option 2 Judith Mcdougall Option 1 Brenda Smith Option 1 John Payne Option 1 Tonia Rogers Option 2 Gregor Lane Option 1 Mw & Am Thomas Option 1 Rosalie Pattillo Option 1 Barbara Kimber Option 1 Ian Aitken Option 2 B E Dunn Option 1 Russell Good Option 2 Tony Heath Option 1 Pauline Gibb Option 1 Andrew Richardson Option 1 Mrs E M Jones Option 2 Marianne Boyd Option 1 M E Burnett Option 2 Jill Johnson Option 1 K L Hogg Option 2 Andrew Smith Option 2 W Potze Option 2 Mrs A P Sutherland Option 3 David Option 2 Pam Lunjevich Option 2 Mr T R & Mrs R J Erxleben Option 1 Mrs L F Pearson Option 2 Lola Ann King Option 1 Kylie Jeans Option 1 Elspeth Mcaulay Option 2 Kingsley Smith Option 2 Caitlin Reid Option 1 Mr Rp & Mrs A Sellars Option 1 Bridget Daldy Option 2 Paul Hubbard Option 2 Mr M Maguire Option 1 Amy Brunsden Option 1 Alison Clark Option 3 Mrs G L Gunter Option 1 Ann Oldridge Option 2 Alison Verran Option 2 Kevin Wright Option 2 Lloyd Davies Option 2 Peta Rendall Option 1 Mrs L J O'Kane Option 1 Anne Peake Option 1 Mr Jj &Mrs B Keehan Option 1 Mrs S N Franklin-Gard'Ner Option 1 Anne Greenwood Option 2 Stefan Reuther Option 1 Tracey Chinnery Option 1 Ak Bocock Option 1 Mr M F Nottle & Mrs V A Nottle Option 1 David & Barbara Winchester Option 1 Bruce Macdonald Option 2 A H & R J Mumford Option 1 Matthew Option 1 Pip Topzand Option 1 Lorraine Plummer Option 1 Carol Paulin Option 2 Mw & Mr Le Bagge Option 1 M & J Smith Option 2 Shirley Hampton Option 2 Barry Magee Option 1 V Thomass Option 1 Randall Donne Option 2 James Brown Option 1 Louise Umbers Option 1 Irene Coulson Option 2 Emma Taylor Option 2 Steve Parry Option 2 Mr D J & Mrs L R Harrison Option 1 Wayne Todd Option 1 Lynley Whitaker Option 1 E T Teo Option 2 Mr P.D. & Mrs K.E. Dale Option 1 Diane Blackmore Option 2 Diane Blackmore Option 1 Am&Ma Mclachlan Option 1 Brian Scantlebury Option 1 Mr Nb Muir & Mrs Ja Muir Option 1 Ange Vos Option 2 Sue Walsh Option 1 Sue Walsh Option 1 M.Mccarthy Option 2 Mr P G & Mrs R Y Allan Option 1 Walker Option 2 Mrs V & Mr M Brindley-Richards Option 1 Diane Seaman Option 1 Supreme Lock & Hardware Option 1 Mr J E & Mrs K A Davis Option 1 Vh Benfell Option 2 Ian Morrison Option 1 M T Kennedy Family Trust Option 1 Trudi Kemp Option 2 Steven Option 2 Janet Young Option 2 Toni Bremner Option 2 Ja Hatrick Option 1 Dave Rayner Option 2 Katie Carter Option 1 Nikki Signal Option 1 Shirley Option 2 Mr Gr & Mrs Hj Candy Option 1 Waihi Beach Volunteer Coastguard Option 2 Jan Davies Option 2 Gc & Gr Kennedy Option 1 Diane Wilson Option 2 Brian Pattison Option 1 Tony And Lietta Erni Option 1 Irving Option 1 Pauline Cook Option 1 Todd Ritchie Option 2 M B Trumper Option 2 Basil Raynel Option 1 Stephen And Donna Edge Option 1 Glen Dunn Option 1 Donna Llewell Option 1 Anne Elizabeth Barry Option 1 Dw & Ja Taylor Option 1 Clive Tomsett Option 2 Bianca Wiebes Option 2 Jennie Murray Option 1 Lynne And Tony Keogh Option 2 Murray Fookes Option 1 Gren Higgs Option 2 Robert Veltmans Option 1 John Mcintyre Option 2 Clive Taylor Option 1 Ian Anderson Option 1 Stewart Clapham Option 1 Yvonne Jarvis Option 1 John Cromwell Option 2 Ross Chaytor Option 2 Maureen Chaytor Option 2 Michael Christenhusz Option 1 Paul Bradshaw Option 2 Robyn Rothwell Option 1 Kathleen Fox Option 1 Df Spackman Option 1 Lisa Anderson Option 2 Denise Kilgour Option 2 Mr P R Sangster Option 1 Mark Colhoun Option 2 Belinda Develter Option 1 Nico Wamsteker Option 1 K Forsman-Jamieson Option 2 Linda Southorn Option 1 Jim Creighton Option 2 L &L.F.Birks Option 1 Brad Reid Option 3 Jennifer Shead Option 1 Lisa Mangino Option 2 Kerry Johanson Option 2 Paul Manson Option 1 Donna Taylor-Erutoe Option 2 Lynda And Craig Lipinski Option 2 Philip Rogers Option 2 Nancy Van Laarhoven Option 1 Nina Haywood Option 1 Meryl Noyes Option 2 Gabrielle King Option 1 Trudy Williams Option 2 Laurie Johnson Option 1 Gavin Bell Option 2 Andrew Karl Option 1 Neil Burgess Option 1 Mr Bj And Mrs Sm Cook Option 3 David Henderson Option 1 N.G. Parr Option 1 Margaret Lloyd Option 2 Michael Warner Option 2 Joanna Linthwaite Option 2 Rosalie Newdick Option 1 Lyn Peni Option 2 Chris Olivier Option 1 Andrew Marles Option 1 Michael & Sandra Paul Option 2 Deborah Mitchell Option 1 Joanne Barnett Option 1 Angela Fabish Option 1 Sandi Clink Option 1 Painclink Orchards Option 1 Joanne Cooper Option 1 Lisa Kristensen Option 2 Tony Watson Option 2 Jonathan York Option 1 Gait Trading Company Limited Option 1 Stephen Middleton Option 2 Garry Halpin Option 1 Christina Rolleston Option 2 Margaret Anne Cooke Option 1 David And Heather Cantwell Option 1 Fay Smith Option 2 A D Campbell Option 3 Ross Harris Option 1 Michael Blattmann Option 1 Miss S Rohan Option 2 Carol Neketai Option 1 Peter Yerex Option 1 Kaye & Pieter Van Deventer Option 1 Mike Williamson Option 2 Julia Palmer-Hofland Option 2 Andrew Bruin Option 1 Pamela Spraggon Option 1 Louise Hamilton Option 2 Mrs A P Andrew Option 1 Mr H R & Mrs G N Hewlett Option 1 T Hewlett Option 1 Robert Hulme Option 2 Kim Borowicz Option 1 Ingrid Dragovich Option 2 Warren R Hughes Option 1 David Monk Option 2 Louise Emerson Option 1 Barry Kellas Option 1 John Speir Option 1 Dg & Ke Scott Option 2 Rhonda Howie Option 1 Frank & Doreen Denham Option 2 Grraham Toomer Option 1 John Spoonley Option 1 Angela Murphy Option 1 Neville Johns Option 1 Mr & Mrs Kp&Da Read Option 1 Keith Bell Option 1 Dw & Hl Crowley Option 1 Mike Luckman Option 1 Bryan Fitzpatrick Option 1 R A Kidd Option 1 James Sutherland Option 1 Vince Rowlands Option 1 Hannah Topham Option 1 Sportsworld Te Puke Ltd Option 1 Mrs L & Mr N Mcpherson Option 1 Jackie Merritt Option 2 Helen Ronayne Option 3 Bg And Kp Kelsey Option 1 Mr D B Milne Option 1 Rochelle Owen Option 1 John Downey Option 2 Mr K F & Mrs S J Walls Option 1 Clive & Rosina Wing Option 2 Tauranga Lifecare Village Ltd Option 1 E.Aitchison Option 2 Jan Costello Option 1 John Marshall Option 1 John C Bergh Option 1 Sharyn Hanna Option 1 Mrs D V M Morris Option 1 Eric Humberstone Option 1 D. Clugh Option 1 P R Mcgarva Option 2 Dianne Harkins Option 1 Michelle Roscoe Option 2 Owen $ Claire Rumble Option 2 Isla Burridge Option 1 Bruce Proudfoot Option 1 Hill Option 1 R A Herbert Option 1 Mr B E Ward Option 2 Judy Mckinnon Option 2 Charles Olds Option 2 Bevan & Alison Carlyon Option 1 Shelley Rooney Option 1 Lorraine Roigard Option 2 Alan Holst Option 1 Peter Webb Option 1 Andrew Duncan Option 2 Judith Shirley Harrison Option 1 Murray Hickey Option 2 Julie Blackwell Option 2 Earl Billington Option 2 Janice Garratt Option 1 Lance Seator Option 1 Cadine Rangi Option 1 Symon Armstrong Option 2 Lynda Belsham Option 2 W Devenport Option 1 Michelle Muller Option 1 Miss A M Mainwaring Option 2 Karen And Devon Fairhurst Option 1 Mrs & Mr Clark Option 2 Wayne Mackenzie Option 2 Mr T R Lawson Option 2 Alan & Margaret Washer Option 2 Mrs F L Graham Option 1 Miss L R Wilson Option 2 Ms G D Dyson Option 2 Colleen Killeen Option 2 Ms J M White Option 2 Brian Palmer Option 1 Robin Morgan Option 1 Andrea Stevens Option 1 Steve Patton Option 1 Dennis Turner Option 1 Kalyse Stott Option 2 Miss J E Clark Option 2 Natalie Christy Option 1 Mrs L & Mr M D Luke Option 2 Lynn Spargo Option 1 Catherine Mccracken Option 1 Rona Wheeldon (Private) Option 2 D&L Gorinski Option 1 Paula Wilson Option 1 Deb Jackson Option 2 Adam Borriello Option 1 D A & S E Lawrence Option 2 Belinda Snowden Option 1 Pauline J Blakeborough Option 1 Shane Snowden Option 1 Vaughn Meads Option 1 Lb Kemble Option 1 Marnie Wineera Option 2 Brian Wood Option 2 Jeff Landon Option 2 Mrs M & Mr Tj Vickers Option 1 Rosie Cree Option 2 Margaret Fleming Option 1 William Whitiskie Option 1 Nola Mcquoid Option 2 H G &E J Anderson Option 1 Diane Garard Option 1 Melanie Option 1 Rwr Fleet Maintenance Limited Option 1 Mr I W & Mrs J M Hannay Option 2 Grant Buchanan Option 1 Mr R F & Mrs D E Warbrooke Option 2 Mr M W & Mrs J Patten Option 1 Fay Sefton Option 1 Mrs S D Lamb Option 1 Lj & Am Lamb Option 1 Belinda Kingi Option 1 G R & J A Mclean Option 1 Mr B O Clark Option 1 Mr J C & Mrs Jm Dwight Option 2 Ms P M Webb Option 1 Mrs Janice Taia Option 1 Rob Thomson Option 2 Mr W P W Goldsmith Option 2 Ron Fyfe Option 2 Gerard Purcell Option 2 Ewen Castle Option 1 Simon Option 1 G.L Macdonald Option 2 Rod Young Option 2 John Reid Option 1 Ms C N D Jillings Option 2 Luke & Tã­A Tã­A Nicholas Whaanau Trust Option 1 Don Mckeown Option 1 Me Sidney & Mrs Colleen Leef Option 1 Tom Roper Option 3 Mr G & Mrs V Jamieson Option 2 Mrs F E Barrett Option 1 D & H E M Blanshard Option 1 Russel Allen Option 2 Katherine Hewlett Option 1 Mrs L E Eagle Option 2 Judith Absalom Option 2 Debra Fraser Option 1 Ruth Carter Option 2 S Millar Option 2 Perry Harlen Option 1 Teina Taylor Option 2 Violet Option 1 Joy Cameron Option 1 Jb & Jh Whalley Option 2 Michael Wynne Option 2 Elvina Shirley Option 2 Gaye Mctamney Option 1 M J Fittall Option 2 Mr G V & Mrs M E Mcdonald Option 1 Peter Leafe Option 2 Helen Knapton Option 2 Simone Jenkins Option 1 Susan Moore Option 1 Toine Van De Pol Option 2 Jwl & A Little Option 2 Barbara Washer Option 1 Kristine Holdaway Option 2 Lauren Option 1 Robert Joseph Banks Option 1 Jade Heerdegen Option 2 Amanda Gould Option 1 Leonard H Mooring Option 1 Catherine White Option 2 D J Chamberlain Option 2 Lyn Jarman Option 2 Shirley Olivecrona Option 1 Pf&Jb Murphy Option 3 Jim Thorpe Option 1 Mr Rj & Mrs D Holbrook Option 2 Ian Walker Option 1 Jo Taingahue Option 2 M&Z Reichelt Option 2 Mr B G & Mrs C R Wallace Option 2 Brian Hunt Option 1 Ms N F Trott Option 2 Kitrina Lendrem Option 2 Bay Learning Academy Option 2 B Berghoffer Option 1 R Flexman Option 1 S. Bailey Option 2 Milne Option 2 G W Mcveigh Option 1 J & L Childs Option 1 A Broom Option 1 Lorna Martino Option 1 Ian Cross Option 3 David Smith Option 2 Stephen Barker Option 2 Daniel Ortiz Option 2 Anna Holmberg Option 1 James And Bev Fisher Option 1 Kg & Wl Burt Option 2 Juanita Meder Option 1 F Youkgong Option 1 Alastair Pratt Option 1 Beverley Gudopp Option 1 Michael Christeller Option 1 Tania Option 1 Keith Peckett Option 1 Bryan Burch Option 2 Glenn Carr Option 2 Barb Risi Option 2 Keith Martin Option 1 Brian Rauhihi Option 1 Danielle Mason Option 1 Moana Mahima Option 1 Sharon Cockayne Option 1 M.B. & S.M. Spearman Option 1 Neil Mclaughlin Option 1 Barbara Wadsworth Option 1 Peter Mcgregor Option 1 Brian Clements Option 1 Simone Beattie Option 2 Jade Snare Option 1 C. Mcbride Option 1 Doreen Turton Option 1 W L Bird Option 2 Holly Agnew Option 1 Michael Beddell Option 1 Terry Young Option 1 Daphne Fittall Option 1 Conor Quinn Option 1 Jen Burton Option 2 Michelle White Option 2 Diane Joblin Option 2 Hamish Denize Option 1 James Coles Option 1 Jack Ryan Option 1 Ajbullock Option 1 Margaret A Boyne Option 1 Patricia Brosnahan Option 1 Mark Macdonald Option 1 Janette Clearwater Option 2 Isaac Reinsfield Option 1 Yong Zhu Option 1 Michael Burger Option 1 Neil Russell Option 1 Jonathan Hudson Option 3 Peter Boniface Option 1 Roann Watson Option 2 Ar & Jw Sellars Option 2 Gary Bodle Option 1 Karen Joy Birtles Option 1 Brad Stevens Option 2 Clint Burgess Option 1 Stuart Laing Option 1 Monique O'Reilly Option 2 Thesaupe Option 1 Cathy Zheng Option 2 Polly Rumbal Option 2 Mark Samson Option 1 Graham Leigh Option 1 Graeme Fraser Option 3 Wyn Hazlehurst Option 1 Don W Healy Option 1 Stanley Harding Option 1 Jill Smith Option 2 Mrs S G Lyttle Option 1 Lisa Shaw Option 2 Barry Watene Option 1 B J Bean Option 1 Jane Mitchell Option 1 Julie Rogers Option 1 Jm Takiari & Sj Church Option 2 Lee Griffihs Option 2 Lisa Steed Option 2 Alzheimers Tauranga/Wbop Option 3 Mike Burrett Option 1 Allan Hosking Option 1 Greg Mclarnon Option 2 Mike Loughnan Option 1 Brian Bradford Option 1 Peter Option 1 Noeline Campbell Option 1 Nigel Mcneill Option 2 Peter Monteith Option 3 A W Perry Option 1 Tony Price Option 1 Cf & Bw Payne Option 1 A G Buchanan Option 1 Alan Welch Option 1 Miss K L Bates Option 2 Linda Wood Option 1 Ken Walker Option 1 Ba & Jm Prosser Option 1 Joanne Todd Option 1 Colin Stitt Option 1 Greg Knight Option 1 Edward Bury Option 1 Mr T J Bartlett & Mrs T Cribb Option 1 Ra & Dm Douglas Option 1 Mrs S N Taylor Option 1 Tarleton Option 1 Gordon Harkness Option 2 Antonia Cramer Option 2 Susan Marshall Option 1 Mr J W & Mrs J M Tyson Option 2 H Shakespeare Option 1 Lc &Lj Kingston Option 1 S H Mathews Option 1 Shona Paterson Option 1 Danielle Gordon Option 1 Mr R A & Mrs P J Bell Option 1 Gary Winterburn Option 1 Sue Collier Option 2 Dennis Welch Option 2 Roydon Lowe Option 2 Mr M W S Catley Option 1 Dennis Taylor Option 1 Jane Webber Option 1 Linda Hodel Option 1 Iona Hutchins Option 2 Suzanne Whitley Option 2 H R Lorney Option 1 Arlene Townsend Option 2 Joanne Kiddie Option 2 Keith Walls Option 1 Keith Scott Option 2 Kerry Bowden Option 1 Peter James Dick Option 1 Jeanette Knudsen Option 3 Fiona Knarston Option 1 Sue Heard Option 1 Mr R G Keals Option 2 Nc & Lp Rollinson Option 2 Rm & Jc Ford Option 2 Jeff Taylor Option 1 Mr R H Rosenberg Option 2 D G Clarke Option 1 Jan & Mike James Option 1 Mr S Herbison & Mrs G M Herbison Option 2 John Collie Option 2 Chris Wood Option 1 Debbie & John Taylor Option 1 John Hodgson Option 1 Margaret Pickett Option 1 Huia Miles Option 1 David Brush Option 1 K Mcfarlane Option 1 Mrs V D Robinson Option 2 Mrs S M & Mr R Dunn Option 2 Lucy Taylor Option 3 Brian Dalley Option 1 Diana Spence Option 2 Mr F D Neilson Option 2 B And Kc Stovold Option 1 Kelvin Prisk Option 2 Mary Nicholls Option 2 D G Moore Option 1 Elizabeth Rose Option 1 Qbiz Nz Ltd Option 1 Sally Cooney Option 2 Mrs R C Brockliss Option 1 Sarah Pearson Option 1 Graham Archer Option 2 Colin Winch Option 2 Lance D Harker & Norma J Mcinally Option 2 Mal Shivnan Option 1 Janet Miles Option 1 Eileen Healey Option 2 Mr R Carey Option 1 Mark Davidson Option 1 Jennifer Susan Foster Option 1 Ngaire Menzies Option 1 R M Creswell Option 2 Jan Robertson Option 2 P And Mm Kroeze Option 2 Mr R & Mrs J E Linney Option 1 Hineruia Dickson Option 1 Mr P R & Mrs A M Young Option 2 Barry Christophersen Option 1 M Wilson Option 1 Vicky Howlett Option 2 Geoffrey Nicholson Option 2 Mrs M E Peterson Option 1 Megan W Kino Option 1 Richard Feaver Option 3 Vicki Leopold Option 1 Christine Flavell Option 2 Maree A Sargent Option 1 Sandy Clarke Option 1 Otumoetai College Option 2 Mrs J R Pearson Option 2 De & Me Skilton Option 1 Debbie Woolrich Option 3 Ms S L Gilligan Option 1 Mrs Mc & Mr B Shirkey Option 1 Cm Davies Option 1 Carol Wadsworth Option 2 Ms E Bradley Option 1 Lynette Gibson Option 1 H L Thurston Option 3 Sharlene Gibb Option 1 Susan Mitchell Option 1 Dennis Procter Option 1 J Batchelor Option 1 Mr B J & Mrs L M Brooks Option 1 Susan Glenn Option 1 R A And J A Prevett Option 1 Mrs J L Hodge Option 2 Mrs B A & Mr J L Watt Option 1 Helen Horner Option 1 Mrs Rayma Dixie Riach Option 1 Mr P A Raymond Option 1 Alison Bell Option 1 Farquharson Option 2 Sr & Lm Sickler Option 2 A M C Davies Option 1 Alexis Moore Option 2 Sk & Pj Baronian Option 2 Cw Gatenby Option 1 Mr Y Ko Option 1 Mrs S M Bellamy Option 2 S & M Mead Option 1 Ata Jacob Option 2 L&G Densley Option 1 Kim Williams Lodge Option 2 Bl&Pj Humm Option 1 Carol Riley Option 1 Colin Riley Option 1 Barbara Lynne Davies Option 2 Jv And Wm Turner Option 1 Mrs J E Byrne Option 1 Marama Erueti Option 1 Mrs M L Siddell Option 1 R Linstrom Option 1 Ruth Hughes Option 2 Lynne Wilson Option 2 Wendy Cherry Option 2 Mf. &Pe Cooper Option 1 Karen Sunnex Option 2 Rebecca Klein Option 2 Jo Torlesse Option 1 Lois Sanders Option 1 Don Greenbank Option 1 Kerry Option 1 Maryjane Leuch Option 1 Jo Kemp Option 2 Taya Campbell Option 1 Don Wood Option 2 Neville Johns Option 1 Jim & Dawn Roe Option 1 Mark Fletcher Option 1 Denis Kerrigan Option 1 Andrew Minkhorst Option 1 Colleen Atmore Option 2 Simon Everson Option 2 Paula Crabbe Option 1 N Wastney Option 1 Keri Erdbeer Option 1 Chul Young Chung Option 2 Leanne Benjamin Option 2 Marisa Hibbitt-Hunia Option 1 Jackie Keeble Option 1 Dl & Lr Melville Option 1 Nedra Harvey Option 1 Stuart Willats Option 2 Claire Glass Option 1 K D & G N Moore Option 1 Nicole Golding Option 2 Richard Newcombe Option 1 Keith Wisnesky Option 2 Jan Hoekstra Option 1 Jason Driver Option 1 Patricia A Pritchard Option 2 Rob Bedford Option 2 Ray Garrard Option 2 Bruce Fletcher Option 1 Anna Brookes Option 1 Maria Van De Pas Option 1 R M Scown Option 2 Robert Murray Scown Option 2 Gary Allis Option 3 C & R Roberts Option 2 Stacey Waters Option 3 Christopher Reid Option 2 Elizabeth Mohi Option 1 Rex & Patricia Homan Option 1 C Parry Option 1 Dianne Nield Option 2 Lisa Tennant Option 2 Margaret Aagaard Option 1 Nikki Coates Option 1 Jacqui Duthie Option 1 Peter Griffin Option 1 Lisa Myland Option 1 Andrew Dagger Option 1 Alma Jones Option 2 Oliver Gilles Option 1 Sharon Ocallaghan Option 2 Carole Parker Option 1 Maureen Gielen Option 1 Christine Draffin Option 2 Athalie Davey Option 1 D.J. And D.V. Moffat Option 1 Leon Sole Option 2 Lisa Brown Option 2 Bridget Oconnor Option 2 L. Osborne Option 2 Bill Capamagian Option 1 J P Ellis Option 1 Denize Anderton Option 1 Murray And Sharlene Rutherford Option 1 Ln&Ja Robertson Option 1 Ms J Ericksen Option 1 B & J Earle Option 1 Tracey Hobson Option 2 John Simpson Option 2 Adrian Gregory Delos Trinos Option 1 Marama Smith Option 2 Beverley Read Option 2 Trish Boyte Option 2 C Pollard Option 2 Jane Burtenshaw Option 1 Marilyn Harpur Option 2 Kym Nickolls Option 2 Murray Telfer Option 1 Michelle Gladwin Option 1 A M Evans Option 1 Mr B J & Mrs T R Vowles Option 1 Carol Miller Option 3 Christine Frost Option 2 Mark Pellow Option 2 Mr T J H Magee Option 1 Carole Marsden Option 2 Mr M T Wren Option 2 Christian Outreach Centre Option 2 Clare Cooper Option 2 Julie Sheddan Option 1 E Sheryl Hudson Option 1 Brian Lamb Option 1 Paul Haybittle Option 1 Classic Iron Option 2 Mr R W Fisher Option 2 Ms J C Hart Option 1 Mr B J & Mrs V Beale Option 2 Hadyn Wall Option 1 Holmes Industrial Supplies (2006) Ltd Option 1 David And Rachael Bryant Option 1 Mrs M F Sardelich Option 2 Ian Gerrard Option 2 Tarina Millar Option 1 Mr K & Mrs R M Hanara Option 2 Peter Galbraith Option 2 Mr Price Option 1 Sue Latham Option 1 Rebecca Goodall Option 1 Kay Edmunds Option 1 Precise Spouting And Roofing Ltd Option 1 Jason Thrupp Option 2 Kaye Webster Option 2 Rae Decke Option 1 Metal Man Recyclers Option 1 David Morgan Option 1 R & R Decke Family Trust Option 1 M.C& J.E.Petersen Option 1 Mrs C S Bradley Option 2 Mr Thurgood Option 2 Karen Wright Option 1 L & P O Kerr Option 1 John Lamason Option 1 Katikati Rsa & Homewood Trust Option 1 Patrick Devey Option 2 Ralph Harris Option 1 Mr Cm & Mrs De Parsons Option 2 Glenys Kerr Option 1 Mrs J E Cropp Option 2 Steve & Lynn Sinclair Option 2 Adrienne Danby Option 1 Graeme & Cynthia Johnson Option 2 Tereasa Peterson Option 2 Mark Fergus Option 1 Ms C E Bell Option 1 Mr I G & Mrs R D Richards Option 1 Theresa Mouat Option 1 Haley & Sonia Taka Option 1 Fun Incorporated Limited Option 2 T Yeatman Option 2 Susan Finlayson Option 2 Pete Dashwood Option 1 Miss M Taylor Option 1 Colin D'Ath Option 1 Kellie Smith Option 1 Mr D N & Mrs B M Dickie Option 1 Anne Taylor Option 2 Jacqueline Collins Option 1 Jo-Ann Mclaughlin Option 1 Jp Jerram Option 1 Ms A R Benner Option 1 Kelly Hughes Option 1 D R James Option 1 Greer Merrick Option 1 N A White Option 3 Mr F & Mrs V D Meredith Option 2 Stuart Smith Option 2 Geoff Mclaughlan Option 1 Stu Lowth Option 2 Bevan And Nichola Collings Option 1 Murray Bell Option 1 Jason Mcmillan Option 1 J & Cjm Bosch Option 2 Mr L H Scott Option 2 Gary Green Option 2 T Wood Option 2 Ms M E Coates Option 1 Erwin Von Kloeg Option 2 Shamal Trust Option 1 Charles Ellingford Option 1 Mr T W & Mrs J E Mahu Option 1 Bruce Warden Option 2 Bruce Buchanan Option 1 B.L.Shea Option 1 Aj Shea&Kp Mcdonald Option 1 Nolene Williams Option 2 Alan Read Option 1 Dell Shead Option 1 Patricia Crombie Option 1 Bronwyn Cameron Option 2 Simone Donaldson Option 1 Vicki Ward And Murray Humphries Option 2 Mr K W E Moore Option 1 Robert & Elaine England Option 2 Abdul Rachman Risna Option 1 Susan Harrison Option 2 Michelle Wheatley Option 1 Cheryl Tapiata Option 2 Mr I D Lornie Option 1 R&Ll Carney Option 1 Julie Saies Option 1 C & S Knight Option 2 Johannes Wiebe Herder & Ms Maria Corazon Option 1 Wendy Thompson Option 1 Robin Riches Option 1 Gwenda Elizabeth Densem Option 1 Mrs And Mrs J A Salter Option 1 Mr B A J & Mrs C A Goodwin Option 1 Mr M Pawson Option 2 Maureen Oram Option 3 Peter Sandison Option 1 Brucebruce Ingram Option 2 Mr A E & Mrs M J Peevor Option 1 Mrs K M Clements Option 1 Margaret Bromell Option 2 Penelope Joy Rowsell Option 1 Mrs B J Zimmermann Option 1 Julie Alchin Option 1 Lw & Ea Dawbin Family Trust Option 2 Mr L W & Mrs E A Dawbin Option 2 Akram Hossain Option 1 Kay Vickery Option 1 Amanda Clarke Option 2 Allan Bicker Option 2 Kath Kohi Option 1 Thelma Lindup Option 1 Maree Ginders Option 2 Dianne Kohi Option 1 Maurice Bosson Option 1 Danelle Stevens Option 2 Vl Nugent Option 1 Bruce Sutton Option 1 Bruce Sutton Option 1 Stevie Monk Option 1 W P & S L Barry Option 2 Amber Option 2 Sean Treanor Option 1 Kristel Phillips Option 2 Peter Martin Option 1 Rachel Gibson Option 2 Anita Lepper Option 1 Nikki Option 1 Richard And Sharon Lawrence Option 1 Gurdeep Singh Option 1 Sally Valois Option 1 Bevan Tanner Option 1 Greg Dryden Option 2 Jan Ozanne Option 2 Berwyn Judkins Option 1 Marion Carlson Option 1 Rebecca Dodd Option 2 Richard Option 1 Mark Lolesi Option 2 Debbie Howarth Option 1 Timothy Holmes Option 1 Andrea Boielle Option 1 C.Mccrea Option 1 Margaret Smith Option 1 Katherine Nelson Option 1 Tiara Baillie Option 1 Katherine Apelu Option 1 Kathryn Hancock Option 1 Lisa Nicol Option 2 Elaine Webster Option 1 Marilyn Searancke Option 1 Anna Mccartney Option 1 Solita Barat Option 1 Rebecca Graham Option 1 Rita Sorrenson Option 1 Theresa Rogers Option 2 Andrew Lister Option 1 Jody Lozell Norton Option 2 Shirley Hunt Option 2 Liz Simperingham Option 1 Nicki Saunders Option 1 Glenis Richards Option 1 Dorian Darby Option 2 Tracey Mcsweeney Option 1 Zane Marshall Option 1 Jody Beattie Option 2 Emma Roberts Option 1 Lunara Gmelli Pereira Option 1 Mr Rw & Mrs Me Oliver Option 1 Jill Option 3 Mr G & Mrs A Mitchell Option 1 Lorraine Samuels Option 3 Julia Ngawhika Option 1 Nicki Hohneck Option 1 Viv Buchanan Option 1 Melanie Dwane Option 1 Heather Option 2 L.P.Roberts Option 1 Edward Shearman Option 2 Debra Smale Option 1 Erika Dutting Option 2 Ben Rice Option 2 Laurie Inskeep Option 2 Roberta Mccord Option 1 Cameron Cox Option 1 Christine Mcdonald Option 1 Judy & Rex Connor Option 2 Jacinda George Option 1 G H Nikora Option 1 Mark Hamilton Option 2 Rhonda James Option 1 Janine Archbold Option 1 Heidi Nield Option 1 Annie Stanley Option 1 Toni Nickalls Option 2 Phil Holland Option 1 Alan Jones Option 2 Jennifer Carrillo Option 2 Yvette Thomas Option 2 Susan Taylor Option 1 Felipe Vidal Option 2 Lynn Cunningham Option 1 Shaun Keepa Option 1 Sue Riddington Option 1 Megan Mckenzie Option 1 Bryce Wells Option 1 Wikitoria Taite Option 2 R Wikeepa Option 2 Kayla Mackenzie Option 1 Chad Colbourne Option 1 John Morris Option 2 Jo Everett Option 2 Anna Barnes Option 1 Tracy Martin Option 1 Anne Devine Option 1 Sarah Carson Option 2 Erica & Ken Mathews Option 2 Robyn Barnsdall Option 1 Lynne Lawson Option 2 J P Hickman Option 2 Jasmine Ogle Option 1 Kathryn Debenham Option 2 Brian Blackwell Option 1 Donna Eynon Option 2 Robyn Dearlove Option 2 Kath Yule Option 3 Jess Holtom Option 2 Miss M L Williams Option 1 Doreen Patchett Option 2 Graeme Mccready Option 1 Mrs S M Clarey Option 1 Gaye Winks Option 2 Jfl&Ja Pannett Option 1 Michael Stephens Option 2 Carolina James Option 1 Gordon Payne Option 1 Lyn Clarke Option 1 Gb & Cn Harrison Option 1 Vc And Al Hill Option 2 Brian Williams Option 1 Lynley Mcgaughran Option 2 R.W.Beckman Option 3 R.W. & S.P. Farmer Option 1 W & S Hiamoe Option 1 John Settle Option 1 Mrs D Nelson Option 1 Alison Holdem Option 1 G R & M M M King Option 2 Mr H J Rhodes Option 1 Gillian Osborne Option 2 P Bullen Option 1 Sylvia Morgan Option 1 Jc & Mc Willis Option 1 Keith Mcghie Option 1 Shirley Fisher Option 1 Lynne Stanton Option 1 Mr W L & Mrs E V Smith Option 1 Sharon Cade Option 1 Bruce Townley Option 1 Abigail Robinson Option 2 Carol Gorrie Option 2 Naomi Malcolm Option 1 Mrs O'Keeffe Option 1 Frank Brown Option 2 K Thomas Option 1 Mrs S W Scott Option 1 Mrs M P Tamati Option 1 Jean L K Jones Option 3 Terry Oconnor Option 1 Hank Kleyn Option 2 Mr A L Gorrie & Miss S O Johnston Option 2 D Walklin Option 3 Denise Robin Cosmas Option 1 Gareth Cranefield Option 1 Peter Kennedy Option 2 Phillip Falconer Option 2 Keith & Robyn Judd Option 2 Philippa Powell Option 2 Mrs Goodwin Option 1 H Hudson Option 2 Lorraine Deed Option 1 Barbara Clarke Option 2 Isobel Jackson Option 1 N.F.Pope Option 3 Sue Mcdonald Option 1 Carol-Anne Samuel Option 1 Mr E J Ruegg Option 1 C A Carmichael Option 1 Melissa Blair Option 1 Lucy Edkins Option 2 Michelle Penn Option 1 Gayle Hardie Option 2 Steve Miers Option 1 Kate Pritchard Option 2 C R & C E Birchall Option 1 Mike & Harleigh Mortleman Option 1 Nev Sail Option 2 Steve Bennett Option 1 Mr K A Melbourne Option 2 Andrew Champness Option 1 Samuel Ecclestone Option 1 Advanced Telecommunications Ltd Option 1 Mr J P Le Gallais Option 3 Grant Lipinski Option 1 Glenis Jensen Option 1 Suzanne Lugton Option 1 Stacey Yorke Option 2 Mrs L V Burgess Option 2 Miranda Templer Option 1 Ross Mallon Option 1 Ryan Option 1 Alan Mabin Option 2 Katch Katikati Option 3 Deidre Kite Option 2 Carol Peters Option 2 R.W.R.& A.S.Mckinnon Option 1 Wei Wei Hew Option 1 Phillipa Bell Option 3 Mrsrj&Dhplowman Option 1 Diana Hampton Option 1 Andrew & Julia Ferguson Option 2 Allan Maddock Option 1 Richard Taylor Option 1 Tony Warren Option 1 Morgan Steel Financial Service Ltd Option 2 P C Alexandre Option 2 W O & A A J Mcgregor Option 1 M Bulloch Option 1 G Maurice Option 2 Mrs N E & Mr J A Branch Option 2 Jim Datson Option 3 Murray Grainger Option 1 D R Rassell Option 1 Dave Scarrow Option 3 Pukehina Farms Ltd Option 1 Mrs S M Allan Option 2 Ms C M Rugaas Option 1 Mr P Church Option 3 Mr D S Hill Option 1 Mrs D E Medhurst Option 1 Sandra Batt Option 1 Ip Grace & Te Delgrosso Option 1 Kelly Smart Option 1 Garth Coombes & Kirsty Charnock Option 1 Kevin And Janice Danswan Option 1 Mr G B & Mrs J E Beehre Option 2 Elizabeth Shaw Option 1 T N Brewer Option 1 Gareth Hughes Option 1 Kylie Option 1 Harwood Homes Nz Limited Option 1 Mrs M M Sampson Option 1 Kevin Reade Option 1 Bernadette Mccarten Option 1 Jacqueline Mclean Option 2 Markelle Ayala Option 1 Michael George Option 1 Vernessa Blockley Option 1 Carlo Van Der Logt Option 1 Wilson Mellow Option 1 B Bayer Option 1 Colin Bell Option 1 Catherine De Monchy Option 2 Tm & Dh Mcinness Option 2 Glennis Bell Option 2 Susan Joan Main Option 2 Susan Petersen Option 1 Dean Stewart Option 2 Merryl Tapper Option 3 N Morrison Option 1 Symon Ferguson Option 2 Jennifer Walden Option 1 Kelly Conder Option 1 Michael Option 1 Andriany & Daniel Santoso Option 2 Manaaki Kururangi Option 1 Clayton Delmarter Option 2 Bernice Quartermain Option 1 Betty Johnston Option 1 Jenna Option 1 Jo Jensen Option 3 Grahame Benvie Option 1 Catherine Farmer Option 1 Anna-Leigh Gledhill Option 2 Brian Stapleton Option 1 Diane Kilworth Option 1 Shirley Street Option 1 Brad Bellamy Option 3 David Jensen Option 3 We & A Parkinson Option 3 Rozella Borell Option 1 Carey Vaughan Option 2 Daara Parkinson Option 2 Jane Burger Option 2 Karyn Lloyd Option 1 Maurice Mckeown Option 2 John Caldwell Option 1 Robyn Chester Option 3 L D Thomson Option 2 Nancy Merriman Option 1 Stephen Lewis Option 1 Donald Wooster Option 1 Mr B &Mrs P Fielder Option 1 Paula Harpham Option 2 Sally Garner Option 2 Joy Beanland Option 1 Carolyn Jeffery Option 3 Margaret Wain Option 2 Guenther Granitzer Option 1 Elizabeth Wain Option 1 Janeen Option 1 Helena Joyce Option 2 Warwick Downing Option 1 R F & B L Pearce Option 2 Gabrielle Hyland Option 1 Kim Keaney Option 1 S Middleton Option 1 Wendy Clifton Option 1 Suzi Betteridge Option 2 Suzanne Still Option 1 Klaire Oakes Option 2 Alan Hill-Rennie Option 1 Isabel Mcilroy Option 1 Elizabeth Yates Option 2 Carolyn Schofield Option 1 Mikayla Option 1 Caroline Bugbee Option 2 Graham Brownrigg Option 1 Kane Macklow Option 1 Carole Johnston Option 2 Mr And Mrs Bs And Je Ravey Option 2 Annette Shadbolt Option 2 Wendy Showan Option 1 Denis Henderson Option 1 Eli Bengosi Option 1 Tracey Burns Option 1 William Kehoe Option 2 Megan Hoskin Option 1 M.Bain Option 1 Janet Fulljames Option 1 Mk & Cm Twist Option 1 Sally Young Option 1 G Harris H Burton Option 1 Kelvin Whalley Option 2 Jason Field Option 1 Samantha Option 2 Ivan Diprose Option 1 Lisa Craig Option 1 Debbie Brewer Option 1 Carol Hubert Option 2 Beth Gamman Option 1 Deborah Warn Option 1 Letitia Goodwin Option 1 Jennifer Stone Option 2 Lo&Jtong Option 1 Roz Salter Option 2 Rosemary Paddy Option 1 Antonia Forlong Option 2 Ian Garfitt Option 2 P & K Huxtable Option 2 Gerard Marks Option 1 Lorry Leydon Option 3 Maxine Young Option 1 Karen Option 2 Craig Bailey Option 2 Des Rastrick Option 1 Don Tapp Option 2 Darryl Mckinlay Option 1 Bj Hudson Option 1 Graham Hodson Option 1 Jone Lagibola Option 2 Shota Janashia Option 1 Joyce Paris Option 1 Andrew Option 1 Verdun Mcclelland Option 1 Paul Thomas Option 1 Sarah Option 2 Karen Dyer Option 1 Maree Cleary Option 1 Norman Quirk Option 1 Judy And Mike Carvell Option 1 Douglas Murray Option 1 Ian Webber Option 1 Neil Candy Option 1 Andrew Jenks Option 3 Paula Option 2 L.M.Vincent Option 1 Pat Buckley Option 1 Howard Evans Option 2 Dennis Walsh Option 1 Barbara-Ann Sharp Option 1 Richard Still Option 1 Roger Harry Pace Option 2 Simon Clement Option 2 K.L.Elmiger Option 1 T Preston Option 3 Colleen Bogun Option 2 Joanne Morgan Option 2 M Sandoval & A Gomez Option 2 Peter W Van Der Westhuyzen Option 2 Barry Sharp Option 1 Val Helm Option 2 Sunjoy Limited Option 1 Mr Kn Fricker Option 1 Patricia Mccoll Option 1 Lyle Richard Salmons Option 2 Amber Canuel Option 2 Trevor Kennerson Option 2 Robyn Vleeshouwer Option 1 Judith Dick Option 1 Donald Morrow Option 1 Heather Ward Option 2 Ann Carruthers Option 1 Nicolaas Mels Option 2 Moira Stevens Option 1 Gill Harris Option 1 R & J Foote Option 1 Gordon Macleod Option 2 Mt Maunganui Chiropractic Ltd Option 2 Robert Bell Option 1 Mr J B Cooper Option 2 Don Fr Mcmillan Option 1 Alan Birley Option 1 Megan Forbes Option 1 Philip Evans-Mcleod Option 1 Simon Smart Option 2 G & Ke Baker Option 2 Peter Morrison And Dorthe Soerensen Option 1 Gloria Crowhurst Option 1 Jp & Se Uden Option 1 Laurie Parnwell Option 1 Peggy Rose Tetley Option 1 Carolyn Parsons Option 2 Eileen Henderson Option 1 D & Em Shumacker Option 1 J Mcnaughton Option 1 Natalie Berkett Option 2 Rosie Thomson Option 2 Joe Tesoriero Option 1 P F & N E Gall Option 2 Annabelle Du'Gae Option 2 Grenville Alabaster Option 1 Frank Ramage Option 1 Anna Baldwin Option 1 T Dobson Option 1 Sharon Rahman Option 1 Lynnece Dowle Option 2 Graeme Wallace Option 1 C&M Gibson Option 1 Ces. Graham Option 1 Sally Benning Option 2 Brigitte Matheson Option 2 Royce Dakin Option 1 Danny Ricky Batt Option 1 Wendy Gordon Option 2 May Dodds Option 2 Carol Galway Option 1 Kayla Hughes Option 1 Ginny Taylor Option 1 Kyle Denize Option 1 Cg & M Sinclair Option 2 J And G Pheasant Option 1 G Oliver Option 2 Annette Bremner Option 1 Grant Wilmshurst Option 1 Monique Sutton Option 1 Appelman Option 2 Rachel Option 1 Glen & Ann-Marie Morris Option 3 Des Shiel Option 1 Robin Jones Option 1 H O'Connor Option 1 Larsen Option 1 Robert And Susan Harris Option 2 Maureen Forbes Option 2 Peter King Option 2 Steven Ra Option 1 Linda Option 1 T Ball Option 2 Mr G G Heaven Option 1 Kathleen West Option 2 Dennis Allen Option 1 Cheryl Rice Option 2 N R Bain Option 2 Leah Critchley Option 2 Alex & Audrey Emeny Option 1 Mr.Aj & Mrs G Berryman Option 1 Haley Ashby Option 2 Lyn Hooper Option 2 Lea Lehndorf Option 1 Kathleen Gillanders Option 2 Sue Taylor Option 2 S King Option 2 Jennae O'Donnell Option 2 Janice Westbury Option 2 Petermayor Option 1 Reginald Puckey Option 1 Vivienne Mclaughlin Option 1 John Van Der Vegte Option 1 Keehan Whakatihi Option 2 P.A.Passfield Option 2 John Cullen Option 1 Jane Edwards Option 2 George Stavreff Option 1 Diana Knowles Option 1 A.R.Oliver Option 2 Dean Option 2 Roger Clark Option 2 Douglas Bennett Option 1 John Barnes Option 1 Brian Keane Option 1 Theo Blok Option 2 Janet Dixon Option 1 Laraine Hughes Option 2 Bev Phipps Option 3 Ms A M Hurne Option 2 Elizabeth Eastman Option 1 Glennis Watson Option 1 Jan Robertson Option 2 Pj & Hj Wheeler Option 2 Peter Nicholson Option 2 Ariana Lewis Option 1 Wayne Forlong Option 1 Jennifer Archipow Option 1 If & Sf Reid Option 1 Lauren Bedford-Rolleston Option 1 Mr Jj & Mrs Vf Marshall Option 2 Sandra Hines Option 1 Yvonne Baillie Option 2 Fiona Blake Option 1 Angela Rosie Option 2 Maria Wilkinson-Smith Option 2 B.L.Jones Option 1 W.R.Mcmilan Option 2 Mr J & Mrs L Murcott Option 2 C A Storey Option 2 Wayne Ramshaw Option 1 Barry Jensen Option 1 Vanessa Millar Option 2 Carl Acton Option 1 Pauline Alexander Option 1 Andrew Taylor Option 3 A S Taylor Option 3 Mrs J & Mr D French Option 1 Amy Piper Option 1 Tracey & James Carrigan Option 1 Glenda Koch Option 1 Sandra Haugh Option 1 Zenda Watts Option 1 Christopher Yorke Option 2 Michelle Merrick Option 2 Jcameron Option 1 Erica Eddowes Option 2 Paula Stenhouse Option 1 Lisa Option 2 Bg Dawson & Mj Nieuwenbroek Option 1 Leanne Gray Option 1 B@F Madden Option 1 Karen Scott Option 3 Shona Walford Option 1 Fritha Millington And Bryan Donnelly Option 1 Margaret Elliot Option 2 Bruce Body Option 1 A Crockett Option 1 Jeffrey Crump Option 1 Jennifer Hansen Option 1 Isabel White Option 1 Wg Foster Option 1 Glenn Berridge Option 1 Tony Welten Option 1 Jennifer Hunt Option 2 T Wilson Option 1 Chris Newnham Option 1 Chris Savage Option 2 Barry Brett Option 1 Jennifer Millar Option 2 Donna Brooky Option 2 K & S Capamagian Option 2 Kelli Dolman Option 2 Andrew Howells Option 2 Diana Fibbes Option 2 J.S.Hudson Option 1 Peter Powell Option 1 Gr Tompkins Option 1 M J Torr Option 1 Maureen Ferguson Option 2 Mrs Jb & Af Long Option 1 Donna Grant Option 1 Natasha Murray Option 1 Nichola&Rossedwards Option 3 Shona Graham Option 2 Evan Cheetham Option 1 Kevin Behrens Option 2 Maria Meehan Option 2 M L Meehan & T S Wood Option 2 T Kerse Option 1 Lesley Feek Option 1 Martin Tanevski Option 1 Paul Van Der Hoeven Option 1 S E Ruscoe Option 1 Hannah Abbott Option 3 B & K Le Pine Option 1 Dean Spense Option 1 Shirley Caughey Option 1 Rache Parkes Option 1 Robyn Standish Option 1 Blair Garratt Option 1 Helen Mary Clemett Option 1 Lynda Hitchcock Option 1 Royce English Option 1 Noeline Dunlop Option 1 J L Lawrence Option 2 G & P Coley Option 2 Wj Somerville Option 2 Cl Mitchell Option 1 C Payton Option 2 Natalie Clark Option 2 Marcel Currin Option 3 Robert Duncan Option 3 A. T. Mapp Option 1 Ken And Lynne Sowerby Option 1 Dorothy Mckeown Option 2 Gloria Douch Option 1 Lorna Bewsher Option 2 Bent Jansen Option 1 Bronwyn Woodney Option 2 Kim Buckley Option 1 J. Reeves Option 2 Peter Cooke Option 2 Sonia Lynds Option 1 Sheryn Grace Option 2 Nigel & Sue Hardgrave Option 1 Dorothy Burson Option 1 Alan Reynolds Option 1 S.L & S M Hennessy Option 1 Cheryl Schofield Option 1 Julia Reynolds Option 1 Gh &Sj Cheetham Option 2 Sally Doran Option 2 F H De Fluiter Option 1 Mrs K A & Mr D I Wilson Option 1 John Dibley Option 1 Isobel Hammond Option 2 R S Burggraaf Option 2 Mike Mail Option 1 J Goding Option 2 Amanda Bolten Option 1 Pat Jones Option 1 Ray Van Beek Option 1 Martin Langdon Option 2 Linda Neill Option 1 B C & L E Bluck Option 2 Wendy Hilliar Option 2 Brenda Butler Option 1 Judith Dailey Option 2 Malcolm Drysdale Option 2 Mr G And Mrs G Knopers Option 2 Jeffrey Bensemann Option 1 Catherine Lane Option 2 Natalie Badman Option 1 E N & R Lucas Option 1 Katie Johnston Option 1 David Bartle Option 1 Michael Yep Option 2 Nj & Ml Head Option 1 Rothwell Option 1 Grant Willis Option 3 Merianne Porter Option 2 David Bellamy Option 1 Harry Webber Option 1 Jacqui Matheson Option 1 Julie Keys Option 1 Taylor Ratlidge Option 2 Monica Macintosh Option 1 Peter Bahrs Option 2 Michelle Beavan Option 2 Jr & Bh Williams Option 2 David Rolfe Option 2 Kathryn Rothwell Option 2 Thomas Fielding Option 1 Hazel Stack Option 2 Paul Gurran Option 3 Deborah Herbert Option 1 Lisa Mcrobbie Option 2 Carolyn Telford Option 1 Tony Woodman Option 1 K F Torr Option 1 J & C Button-Batty Option 1 Gerard Fellowes Option 1 Margaret Elizabeth Cairns Option 1 Grant Wagstaff Option 1 Sandy Coley Option 2 Matt Horne Option 2 Mg & Sm Dennehy Option 1 Kirsty Brown Option 3 Pauline Silvester Option 2 Terry Fabish Option 1 Kim Westerskov Option 1 Tarei Option 2 Grant Mcmillan Option 1 Julianne Mcmillan Option 1 S Clarkson Option 1 Mark Page Option 3 Brian Newland Option 1 Dianne Barlow Option 1 Dave Stace Option 2 Mrs M & Mr L G Sanders Option 1 Richard Heslop Option 1 Mh And Sm Finnegan Option 2 Mrs H Small Option 2 Wayne Johnstone Option 2 John Mayer Option 1 Andrew Crisp Option 1 Arohanui Art & Education Trust Option 2 Cole. Eac & Me Option 1 Dean Willacy Option 2 Stephen Smith Option 1 Doug Van Kolck Option 2 Mrs D M Humphries Option 2 Mr D G & Mrs N A Morgan Option 2 Raewyn Ratlidge Option 1 Mr H & Mrs P Thompson Option 1 Stacey Spry Option 1 Shirley Deadman Option 1 Helen Drabble Option 2 Mrs C I Mcintosh Option 2 Kate Morss Option 2 Brendon Taingahue Option 1 D Morgan Option 1 Alison Craig Option 1 Bob Batchelor Option 1 Tpr & P Green Option 1 Andrew Chard Option 1 Mr & Mrs P Knight Option 1 Fernando Gibson Option 2 Mr B A & Mrs M R Mccurdy Option 2 Jackie Taylor Option 1 Mrs M C Hawley Option 3 Lynette Harrison Option 1 Mr A D & Mrs P G Thomas Option 1 Wendy Rowe Option 2 C And M Binns Option 1 Lj Mcdonald Option 1 Mr T W & Mrs B A Stacey Option 1 Nicola Young Option 1 Jane Young Option 1 Arthur James Lyon Option 2 Frank & Margaret Stuart Option 2 Alan Moss Option 2 Wayne Larsen Option 1 D S C J Davis Option 1 Pamela Vercoe Option 1 A & J Priest Option 1 Brian Sheppard Option 1 Gary And Sue Lock Option 2 Diana Judge Option 2 Dm&G Pratt Option 1 Kay Mathers Option 1 Dl & Mg Powell Option 2 Aj Powell Option 2 Morse Option 1 Liz & Murray Mason Option 2 Wayne Tait Option 1 Mr A W & Mrs M T Reynolds Option 1 K & J Tabak Option 3 Glenda Jenkin Option 2 Mr D & Mrs E Schneider-Marfels Option 2 G Sisson & N Barlow Option 1 Noel Davenhill Option 2 Bop Classic Aircraft Trust Option 1 Julie Davanna Option 1 Bop Classic Aircraft Company Option 1 Simon Winter Option 1 John And Moira Wise Option 1 Bryce Thompson Option 1 Pauline Quin Option 2 Lois Knight Option 2 Helen Day Option 2 Ms A Murray-Samuels Option 2 Darrell Meehan Option 1 K G Johnson Option 1 Diane Margaret Davies Option 1 Rita Montgomery Option 2 Amanda Ronalds Option 2 Cedric L Oneill Option 1 Mr. D & Mrs J Morris Option 1 Wendy Jennings Option 1 Margaret Beckwith Option 2 Rosie Jones Option 1 Priority One Option 3 Damian Munro Option 1 Robyn Gregory Option 1 G R &G M Crow Option 1 Graeme Nicholls Option 3 Meehan Family Trust Option 2 Mr S A & Mrs L M Meehan Option 2 Mr P C Audley Option 1 Erin Horton Option 2 Mr G Egglestone Option 2 Annette Hetherington Option 1 Serge Fabre Option 2 Karyn Taylor Option 1 B Lochhead Option 1 T Jefferies Option 1 Haylee Jongenelen Option 2 Kathleen Maureen Tarrant Option 2 Geoffrey & Belinda Dobbs Option 1 Diane Bruin Option 2 Dorothy Mould Option 2 Marion Stirling Option 2 Toni Stringfield Option 2 Rebecca Linklater Option 2 Chris Harrison Option 2 James & Franchesca Spencer Option 2 Julie Bailey Option 2 Kerry And Karen Boyle Option 2 R Bedford Option 1 Marlene Wattie Option 2 Mrs C And Mr Wr Hutchinson Option 1 Deborah Taylor Option 2 James Edgar A'Bear Option 2 J W Rapson Option 1 John Mcoviney Option 1 J Smylie Option 1 Jen Hindrup Option 1 Herb Ritchie Option 3 Glenn Millar Option 1 Lh &Vm Saunders Option 2 Mr G E Mclean Option 2 Antonio Ramsbottom Option 2 David Mitchell Option 1 K M Watson Option 2 Renee Gage Option 1 Mrs D S Graham Option 2 Des Hammond Option 2 Mr K S & Mrs R M Forrest Option 1 Jaimee-Lee Broderick Option 1 Mrs J A Wiggens Option 2 Helen Ellis Option 1 Michael Dillon Option 1 Kevin Sharp Option 1 Graeme Troy Option 1 M J & S Cunningham Option 1 Adrian Creswell Option 2 B A E Hogg Option 1 Rebecca Chicken Option 1 Peter Benson Option 1 John Young Option 2 Miss T J Pountney Option 2 Mrs D I Bettelheim Option 2 Mr F N & Mrs L M Osborne Option 1 Donald Jenkins Option 1 L E Royal Option 1 Mr D C & Mrs A F Barnes Option 1 John Craig Hellner Option 3 Mr H D Mcdonald Option 1 Ian Shelton Option 2 Barbara & Ross Sayers Option 1 Mr R S King Option 1 Robert Ellis Option 1 Lindsay Campbell Option 1 Mrs T J Stone Option 2 Andrew Hawkins Option 1 Mr E & Mrs A H Mcmullan Option 1 Ian Edward Petrie Option 1 Mrs B L & Mr J Blackburn Option 1 Mrs H A Kragten Option 2 Mr P C M & Mrs R Latham Option 1 J Burgess Option 2 Fiona F Williams Option 1 Mrs M J Barker Option 2 Mr J G Blaker Option 2 R.G. Clark Option 1 Alison Townsend Option 2 Debbie Youngman Option 1 Stephanie Wilkie Option 1 Phyllis Blackie Option 1 C N Jerome Option 1 Mrs. G Hebson Option 1 W H & G B Message Option 1 Maureen Floyd Option 2 Mrs R M Macfarlane & Mr H Mcfarlane Option 1 Mr J W & Mrs I C Boyd Option 1 Mr A J Wilson Option 2 Mr G H & Mrs M Glossop Option 1 Purepine Mouldings Ltd Option 1 Pukepine Sawmills (1998) Ltd Option 1 M&G Ludbrook Option 2 Wendy Galloway Option 1 Rene De Vries Option 1 Carole Seymour Option 1 Mr Bg & Mrs Ro Deane Option 1 Carl Magazinovic Option 2 H Revfeim Option 2 Joanne Macown Option 2 K & T Stent Option 1 Kadie Clarke Option 1 Gail E Taylor Option 2 Jo E#Dlin Option 1 Ria Crawford Option 1 Je Lees Option 1 Cb & Pj Perry Option 2 Julia Smirnova Option 1 Kristi Holland Option 2 Jandhe Troughton Option 3 Nick Greener Option 1 Chris Ross Option 1 Rachel Johnstone Option 2 G Mcmillin Option 1 Dan Shea Option 2 Isaac & Patricia Stephens Option 1 Ike Stephens Option 1 Hangar 4 Ltd Option 1 Robert Loader Option 1 Dinah Payne Option 2 Margaret Millar Option 1 Jo Murray Option 2 Willie Johnstone Option 2 Jade Burch Option 2 Toni Thomas Option 2 Dale & Elaine Courtney Option 1 E J & W Waters Option 1 Helen Raos Option 1 Richard & Linda Dearsly Option 1 S.I.Purdon Option 1 Graham Kent Option 1 Julie Mackay Option 1 Liz Kent Option 2 Jennifer Maunder Option 1 Lk&Ml Hansen Option 1 Catherine & Murray Thompson Option 2 J & M Jeffs Option 3 Max Manson Option 1 Natasha Brown Option 1 Garry Ian Towler Option 2 Milton R Davies Option 1 Fiona Lavin Option 2 Greg Paton Option 1 Pamela Option 1 Terri Payne Option 1 Graeme Riddell Option 2 Russell Bennett Option 1 G&M Price Option 1 Terence Coley Option 1 Kerry Option 1 Lisa Carter Option 2 Leigh Sullivan Option 1 Rebecca Haskell Option 1 Sherryl Anderson Option 1 Ayesha Kee Option 1 Maria Wilson Option 2 Julie Ellery Option 1 K,S, &R Forsyth Option 1 Sally Paterson Option 1 M J & J L Hill Option 2 Emily Option 1 Sue Option 1 Agnes J. Janissen Option 2 Keith Herd Option 2 Ms P G Williams Option 1 Jack & Jill Best Option 3 David Mullen Option 1 Suzanne Brown Option 1 Kris Took Option 1 Mrs P J Buchan Option 2 Mike Jackson Option 1 John Noble Option 1 Joy Marks Option 3 Mary Girvin Option 1 Mrs E A Dennis Option 2 Dennis & Christine Chisnall Option 1 Margaret Smith Option 1 Mrs J L Carlson Option 1 M.J.Cooper Option 1 Mrs C A Salt Option 3 John Hopkins Option 2 Miss G O Nicol Option 1 Lee Weatherley Option 1 Kirsten Addison Option 1 M J Cooney Option 1 Opounui Holdings Option 1 Janice Jeffs Option 1 M P Williams-Grueger Option 2 John Beck Option 1 Gilmore Option 2 Shelly - Slater Ryan Ltd Option 2 Mrs E G Findsen Option 1 Mrs M I Eaton Option 1 Ms M B G Dynes Option 2 Ms E L Gore Option 1 Ls & Yr Austin Option 2 Ron Neil Option 1 Mr M W Hegarty Option 1 G W Robinson Option 2 Harry Logan Option 1 Lynda Bennett Option 1 Mr M A Dawkins Option 2 Aj & Gc Macdonald Option 2 Alma Butland Option 1 Mr W Pickering Option 1 Mr Dbw & Mrs Rd Gregg Option 2 John Rapana Option 1 Ray And Merilyn Mason Option 2 Craig Nicholson Option 1 D Jones Option 1 Ms D T O'Sullivan Option 2 Ray &Mary Nelson Option 2 Brian Valois Option 2 Brian Walls Option 2 Mr. & Mrs. R. Mitchem Option 1 Jeff Litchfield Option 2 Mr G & Mrs L R Anderson Option 1 Mr A R & Mrs A L Were Option 1 Tom Ross Option 2 Mrs M R Hills Option 2 Rona Gail Option 2 P S Mcallister Option 1 Katrina & Peter Stewart Option 2 G.F.C.Milligan Option 2 Lois Option 3 Keith Lumsden Option 1 Jill Lynette King Option 1 Ms P Reid Option 1 M.R. & J.A. Gallagher Option 1 C H & J C Gill Option 2 Kate Fullerton Option 1 Mrs C F Papesch Option 2 John And Philippa Lusby Option 1 Mr M C & Mrs C J Whitehead Option 1 Patricia Thomas Option 1 Mrs M L Phillips Option 1 Marguerite Keir Option 2 D M & L R Prime Option 2 M J Porteous Option 2 Tom Watson Option 1 H A Down Option 2 Maurice Shallue Option 1 Lorraine Forbes-Faulkner Option 2 Kirsty Racz Option 1 Janet Smith Option 2 Richard And Heather Grainger Anthony Page Option 1 Nicola Cleaver-Brown Option 2 D Ellis Option 1 Wingatui Land Co Ltd Option 1 Greg Brown Option 1 Russ Cunningham Option 1 John Huck Option 2 R L Buckingham Option 1 Mr D W & Mrs P Telford Option 1 Bruce Shewan Option 2 Fowke Option 1 Audrey Tasker Option 2 Rg & Bc Brown Option 1 M E & C M Dodd Option 1 Miss M Manley & Mr R Watson Option 1 Wb & Ij Gardiner Option 2 Judith Carver Option 1 Barry Tatton Option 2 Ms L Grimwood Option 1 Pamela Miles Option 1 Kelly Bulloch Option 1 Miss A Remuera Option 2 David Peart Option 2 Mr N T Brady Option 1 Natalie Chapple Option 1 Deborah Smith Option 1 Joanne Wadsworth Option 1 Hooper Family Trust Option 1 Kevin Max Wyatt Option 2 F.E.Woods Option 2 Andrea Morrison Option 1 Jenny And Derek Beard Option 1 John Molesworth Option 1 Basil Mills Option 1 Mrs M & Mr P Phillips Option 2 Peter Robert Dunmore Option 1 John Anderson Option 1 Aerocool Horticulture Option 1 Aerocool Trust Option 1 Aerocool Developments Option 1 Mega Pacific Nz Pty Ltd Option 2 Les Buttimore Option 3 G Davidson Option 2 Lance Ewens Option 2 Bj & Lp Hutchinson Option 1 Stephen Wood Option 1 Grant Hubert Option 1 Michelle Marston Option 2 Gloria Oliver Option 2 Cathy Haxell Option 2 Christine O'Connor Option 1 Steve Clements Option 1 Jacqui Shippey Option 1 Peter And Sippy Wieringa Option 1 Elaine Bunker Option 2 John O'Neill Option 2 D.Bellamy Option 2 Gail Scown Option 1 Ollie Knowles Option 1 Wayne Miller Option 2 R P Robinson Option 1 Janine Edgar Option 2 Jacqueline Buzowsky Option 1 Pete & Leanne Blackwell Option 3 M&C Arundel Option 3 Rex Sutton Option 2 Graham Body Option 1 Arthur Tsitsiras Option 1 Richardn Dyane Piddock Option 1 Anneli Ahlers Option 2 Julie Young Option 2 Db & Cm Munro Option 1 Linda De Langen Option 1 Beverley Option 2 J Kingett & G Ryan Option 1 J K Kingett Option 1 Stuart James Option 2 Phil Barnett Option 2 Paul Devoy Option 1 Christine Mcphee Option 2 Logan Rickit Option 1 Valerie Kurmann Option 1 Colin Kay Option 2 Jennifer Griffin Option 2 Otumoetai Methodist Church Option 2 Tauranga Methodist Church Option 2 P & E A Chapman Option 2 Lynne Winter Option 1 Marg Hesselgrave Option 1 Dave Toms Option 2 L.S.Smith Option 2 R Kingan Option 1 Maureen Cook Option 2 Mr B B Cox Option 1 James Alexander Option 1 Lauri Russell Option 2 Thomas & Natalya Garwood Option 1 Christine Mary Avard Option 2 Donald Leichel Option 2 Da Johnston Option 1 David Merriman Option 1 Derek Roger Option 1 Jane Dyke Option 1 Annette O'Brien Option 3 Melissa Cooke Option 1 Daniel Smith Option 1 Russell Beswick Option 2 W R King Option 2 Robin Grant Option 1 M&C Johnston Family Trust Option 2 Mr Johnston Option 2 Rw Johnston Ltd Option 2 Julie Silva Option 2 Mr T Bryenton Option 1 Alan Option 1 Loretta Brambley Option 2 Tauranga Primary School Option 2 Md Gill Option 2 Anna Green Option 2 Joan Knight Option 1 Trevor Rose Option 1 Mrs H M Coleman Option 2 S Wrigley Option 2 Laurence & Sharon Weenink Option 1 Gw & Vj Gunn Option 1 Diane & Sid Sorensen Option 2 Mrs Glenys Tredinnick Option 2 Jane Witney-Taylor Option 1 K G Witney Option 1 Mr J A & Mrs L Wild Option 2 Michael Salamonsen Option 1 Jackie Baxendine Option 2 Tina Reinhard Option 1 Phil Hansen Option 2 Mrs Kenny Option 1 Mrs Lornna M Hey Option 2 H.D. & M. Lawrence Option 2 Nicholas Page Option 3 Mrs T J Still Option 1 N & J Strawbridge Option 1 Ms C M Donald Option 1 Mrs M M E Scott Option 1 Mrs J A Whibley Option 2 Mrs D Dickey Option 2 Mr D W Whitworth Option 2 L J Vincent Option 1 Dr H A And Dr H M Pak Option 1 Barbara Rea Option 2 F Trout Option 1 David Bruce Option 1 Barbara Cumming Option 2 M.C & J.M Mcmillan Option 2 Coltec Family Trust Option 1 Donald Brebner Option 2 Kylie Mason Option 1 Stacey Pennell Option 2 C Mckenna Option 2 Tony Saunders Option 1 Noel Norton Option 2 S C Bethell Option 1 Nina Wade Option 1 Crispin/Shaw Option 2 Brenda Bareham Option 1 Kevin And Lorraine Powell Option 3 Raymond Thomas Option 2 Q And A Moore Option 2 Gary & Robyn Montgomerie Option 1 Berwyn Pollard Option 1 Pi&Cl Bourke Option 1 Brenda Poutawera Option 2 Allan Eccles Option 1 Andrea Callinan Option 1 Gordon And Pat Old Option 2 Holly Oconnor Option 1 Ange Annan Option 2 William J Wiki Option 1 Ian Hick Option 1 Jo Newcombe Cook Option 2 Susan And Martin Eastman Option 1 Graham Foote Option 1 Robert R Gore Option 1 Don Warner Option 2 Allan Davies Option 1 David Walker Option 1 Linda Mathers Option 2 Mrs P E Appleton Option 2 Diane Hesford Option 2 Mr M R Mountney Option 1 H.E.Bussas Option 2 Leigh Nicholas Option 2 Frank And Freda Davies Option 1 Michael Boyd Reid Option 2 Merivale Whanau Aroha Option 1 Francis William King Option 1 Kendra Sanders Option 1 Susan Bollen Option 1 Mat Synge Option 3 Linda Husband Option 1 Amanda England Option 1 Diane Hopkins Option 1 Glennis Naismith Option 2 Grief Support Services Inc. Option 1 John Burn Option 1 Earle Otway Option 2 M D & Y S Guilford Option 2 Mrs Cooper Option 2 Mr K M Douglas Option 1 Cherie Montgomery Option 2 Bruce Fraser Option 2 Jenny Meehan Option 2 Pamela F Meads Option 2 Paula Simons Option 3 M F & Mr G Cluitt Option 2 Robert And Jacky Fraser Option 1 Mr L R & Mrs S C Nicholson Option 1 R K Taylor Option 2 P R & S L Malcolm Option 1 Mr R W & Mrs S H Parry Option 2 Norman Bear Option 1 Poolcare Ltd Option 1 Angela Buck Option 1 Linda Margaret Burge Option 1 Leslie Hallam Option 1 Miss A Mcdermott Option 1 R Turner Option 1 Bradley & Fleur Main Option 2 Cliff Heayns Option 2 Ross Fippard Option 2 Patricia Bourne Option 2 Omokoroa Pre School Option 1 G C Glover Option 2 Dave Harkness Option 2 Mr B W Matthews Option 1 Frances Wilcockson Option 3 Bruce & June Crabb Option 2 Steve Nitschke Option 2 Stephen Alexander Rusbatch Option 1 Krystle Hodder Option 1 Nigel Byron Option 1 Philippa Keith Option 1 R A Wakelin Option 1 Bj & Ta Bradley Option 3 Ian Ramsay Option 2 W.C.G.Fullerton Option 2 Vicky Morrow Option 2 James Harris Option 1 Mrs S J & Mr N E Buck Option 2 Siobhan Flannagan Option 1 Brian Mccarroll Option 1 Stan Wojciechowski Option 2 Brett Bell-Booth Option 1 Andrew Forrester Option 1 Carla Russell Option 2 G Matthews Option 1 Michelle Davies Option 1 James Miller &Beverly Anne Miller Option 1 Jb Jm Wright Option 2 Craig Wilson Option 2 Nanette Higgins Option 3 Dennis Adams Option 1 Mj & A Howell Option 2 Jo Innes Option 3 Colleen Ebrey Option 2 Erin Dunne Option 1 Bruce Mccabe Option 1 Kelly Connor Option 1 Gfab Trailers Ltd Option 1 Brad Ririnui Option 2 Darryl Riddington Option 2 Karl Henderson Option 2 V Taylor Option 1 Mr Denning-Kemp Option 1 Evelyn Sneddon Option 2 C D Nichols Option 1 Judy Wainwright Option 2 Mr And Mrs G.B Bryan Option 2 Victor Cullen Option 1 Malkit Kaur Option 1 Mr J G & Mrs A L Cassidy Option 2 Inglis Option 1 Linda Mcgovern Option 1 Lee Ryan Option 1 Ashley Hayes Option 2 Raewyn Aitken Option 2 L. W. Clough Option 2 Betty Cochrane Option 1 Monique Allen Option 2 Gary Gore Option 2 Lorna Beauchamp Option 1 G E Paterson Option 2 Richard Smith Option 1 Christine Jeyes Option 1 Katy Laidlaw Option 1 Blair Family Trust Option 2 Rees Gibson Option 1 Norma Blair Option 2 Peter Taylor Option 2 Roger Harry Pace Option 2 Joanne Bryant Option 2 John Barlow Option 2 J.G.Mathieson & O.J Mathieson Option 1 Greig Covell Option 1 Pam Shennan Option 2 B Murray Option 2 Isabelle Wenman Option 1 Kathleen Joan Eynon Option 1 Mr J E & Mrs S J Richards Option 2 G T Bastin Option 1 Pauline Dowding Option 2 Douglas Noble Option 1 Jacqueline Garrett Option 1 Jan Brain Option 2 Ann Courian Option 1 L Ebalfour Option 1 Don Quarrie Option 1 Clare Percival Option 1 Mr Dj & Mrs Sk Finney Option 1 Mike Dyer Option 2 Lorenzo Gariglio Option 1 Aritmia Ltd Option 1 Melba Bird Option 1 R L James Option 2 Sharon Ferris Option 1 Mr Allen Option 1 John Thurston Option 2 Barbra Russel Option 1 Nora Allen Option 1 Mr J G Carmichael Option 1 B D & R C Schischka Option 1 June Main Option 1 Sharlene Williams Option 1 Joy Bardsley Option 2 J & B Fisher Option 1 Brian And Alayne Keam Option 2 Elaine Corbett Option 1 Mr R H & Mrs L Dunn Option 2 Joy Khairnar Option 2 R B Maitland Option 1 Paul Wilson Option 2 Mr W A & Mrs E E Harrison Option 1 Iris Stevens Option 2 Mrs R E Stewart Option 2 Mrs M C Illsley Option 2 B H & F R Aldridge Option 2 Jacob Horton Option 1 Pamela Robertson Option 2 Ann Larsen Option 1 Mrs E Hill Option 1 Mr K M & Mrs T Hollinshead Option 2 Glenys Reay Option 1 Bernice Armstrong Option 1 J Pemperton Option 2 Maria Akuhata Option 1 James Place Opportunity Shop Option 2 Mr P T & Mrs S M Curran Option 1 Mrs S M Middendorf Option 2 Mrs Arnold Option 2 Judy Berry Option 1 Mrs M Dickson Option 1 Larry Shelley Nicholson Option 1 Mrs V A Verhoeven Option 1 Jared Harper Option 2 Mrs R C Collins Option 1 C K Smith Option 1 E Y Muir Option 1 Audrie Stanton Option 1 Donna Tango Option 1 Ngaire Jackson Option 1 Susan Tetai Option 1 Jenny Duck Option 1 V Keightley Option 2 Stephanie Hume Option 1 J M Hansen & M Rehman Option 1 Lesley Melhuish Option 1 James Jones Option 2 Karen Saunders Option 1 Tony Loader Option 3 Warren Macdonald Option 2 Irmengard Deinlein Option 1 Ditto Company Ltd / Distillerie Deinlein Option 1 V. Patel Option 2 Mrs Hj Watson Option 2 Margaret Taylor Option 1 Wendy Kerr Option 2 Tg And Adf Pickford Option 2 Roy Brown Option 2 Doreen Garner Option 2 Eileen Raynel-Haine Option 2 Kathy Crow Option 2 Brent Futter Option 1 Heather Webby Option 1 Warren & Jenny Thompson Option 2 Chris Thoroughgood Option 2 D J Blackmore Option 2 Amy Bartlett Option 1 Vivienne Way Option 1 R& M Way Builders Limited Option 1 L J & E L Tubby Option 2 Elizabeth Percival Option 2 Ar Watson Option 1 Mrs G A Fowler Option 1 H.H. Wall Ltd Option 1 Wyndel Farm Ltd Option 1 Epc&Amt Mcrae Option 3 Melanie Segerstrom Option 2 St George'S Centrepoint Option 3 Christina Burgess Option 2 Frederick Winter Option 1 Kirsty Option 1 Christine Clement Option 1 Cherie Lee Scott Option 1 Raewyn Option 1 Wayne Bowick Option 2 Kt &Fc Wilton Option 1 Kevin Palmer Option 1 Matt Hodson Option 2 B Fox Option 1 Graeme Bascand Option 1 Nicky Williams Option 1 R.A.King Option 1 Amanda Schabrun Option 1 Mk & Lj Donovan Option 1 Mrs F. D. Robertson Option 1 Amanda And Daniel Moore Option 2 Neville Bevan Option 1 Claire Morrison Option 2 Rosalie Smith Option 2 Lesley Foote Option 2 Cs & J Henwood Option 2 K & D Henry Option 1 Alan Lawes Option 2 Robert Mcpherson Option 1 Jocelyn Herbison Option 1 James Option 1 Jenni Cox Option 1 Keryn J Jarvis Option 2 John Hoogstraten Option 1 David Riley Option 2 Christine Sligo Option 2 B And M Warwick Option 1 C J Merriman Option 1 W.B. Vant Option 1 Alastair Hooper Option 2 Julie Sloan Option 2 Lynne Hansen Option 1 Val Kelly Option 3 Suzanne Brinkley Option 1 Gareth Taylor Option 1 Va & Bf Yeager Option 2 Peter Donnelly Option 2 Coralee Mcclung Option 2 Maria Clark Option 2 Pamela Jones Option 2 Greg Dickie Option 1 Honor Hay Option 2 L M Hooper Option 1 Greta Boielle Option 1 Penelope White Option 1 Janice Bankhead Option 1 Terry Option 1 Trevor Jellyman Option 2 A. J Renata Option 1 H Clare & R Howitt Option 2 Juliette Brawn Option 2 David Brawn Option 2 Trudie Malone Option 2 G Taylor Option 1 Tania Davies Option 1 G N &M M Andersen Option 2 T E Slade Option 1 Renee O'Connor Option 2 Mr G V & Mrs J M Wilson Option 1 Derek Williams Option 1 Trish Graham Option 1 Mr G S & Mrs T J Cooney Option 2 L Mudgway Option 1 Dorothy Hyett Option 2 Mrs L R Watkins Option 2 Tim Barwell Option 1 Rene Evans Option 3 R & M Edwards Option 1 Kerry Gardner Option 2 Mr S & Mrs J Leach Option 2 Carolyn M Furness Option 1 Mr E G & Mrs P A Boswell Option 1 Mr R N & Mrs V J Butt Option 1 Mr.Dh & Mrs. Jt Mackay Option 2 Bruce Mcintosh Option 1 Shirley Clarke Option 2 K B & T J Sutherland Option 2 Shirley Rohan Option 1 Steve Saunders Option 2 T J Weller Option 1 Mrs I E Haggie Option 1 Natasha Cumming Option 2 Monique Option 1 Maree Garland Option 2 Jan Option 1 Paul Pearson Option 1 Ray Guild Option 1 P.C. And J.M Babbage Option 2 Fiona Jotce Option 3 Mrs S P Kahn Option 1 Dorothy Hewitt Option 1 D H Mcgee Option 2 B Yardley Option 1 Mr J A & Mrs M C Knipe Option 2 Mrs J & Mr J Lawrence Option 2 Sally Option 1 P N & C A Wakelin Option 1 Peebles Option 1 Mr R D & Mrs P Galbraith Option 2 I G & G M Johnson Option 2 David Trevena Option 2 Visual X Limited Option 2 Raylene Sommerville Option 2 Mr M D & Mrs V F Munro Option 1 Franziska Pislor Option 1 Christina Luke Option 1 Don & Lynda Moses Option 1 David Carter Option 1 Kay And Glenn Whittaker Option 1 P Thornton Option 2 S P Bottomley Option 1 Patricia Cleaver Option 2 Liz Finlayson Option 1 Suzanne Johnston Option 2 Robert Smith Option 1 J & M Palmer Option 1 Trish Godwin Option 2 Wendy Lydon Option 1 Stuart Manners Option 2 Sheryl Christoffersen Option 2 Clive Copsey Option 1 Lisa Rose Option 1 Brent Warner Option 2 The Hynes Trust Option 2 R A Ball Option 1 Piers Zajac-Wiggett Option 2 Clare Lamb Option 1 Lyn Schumacher Option 1 Bj Gifford Option 1 Jan Coley Option 1 Diane Potts Option 2 T J Barker Option 1 Gillian Payne Option 2 David Riddleston Option 2 Shelley Otto Option 1 Susan Grey Option 1 Helen Price Option 1 John Wilding Perry Option 1 Sandy Davidson Family Trust Option 1 Ann Marie Payton Option 1 Dianne Robertson Option 1 Renee Edhouse Option 1 Michele Hansen Option 2 Dion Tapper Option 1 Geoff Wheeldon Option 1 Rita Martin Option 1 Jenny Argante Option 2 Max & Mary Edwards Option 2 Mr R Taylor Option 1 Cherie & Kiley Jones Option 1 Mj & Mh Green Option 2 Kristine Phibbs Option 1 Mr J T & Mrs M A Storey Option 2 Lisa Bell Option 1 Ken Crean Option 2 Mrs E G Robinson Option 2 Andrew Read Option 1 Maria Cunliffe Option 1 Mr N K & Mrs M S Hight Option 2 Grace Community Option 2 R L Haenen Option 1 Barry Widmer Option 1 Vaughan Cullen Option 1 P S Gray Option 2 Mr T H Bracken Option 2 Christine Wilson Option 1 E W Hewett Option 2 J P Smith Option 1 Bruce Hammond Option 1 Mr M Fountain Option 1 Aroha Te Haara Option 1 Mr L G & Mrs S R Milson Option 1 Kathryn Lourens Option 2 Waihi Drainage District Society Committee Option 2 Derek & Janet Spratt Option 2 Muzzas Motors Limited Option 1 Mr M C & Mrs C M Gray Option 1 Patricia Baars Option 1 Barry Leabourn Option 1 Karen White Option 2 Helen Watson Option 1 Darryn Douglas Option 1 Graham Mauchline Option 1 Fay Anderson Option 1 Ms J Julian-Edwards Option 2 Mr G A Wootton Option 2 Valerie Hooper Option 2 Greg Fincham Option 2 Bruce Nacey Option 1 E.A.A.Simpson Option 2 Kevin Jagusch Option 2 David Brooks Option 1 Albert & Mariki Jovner Option 1 Tim Cleaver Option 3 Christine Eades Option 1 Sue Okell Option 2 Abbey Collins Option 2 Mr & Sj Silson Option 1 Fiona Robinson Option 3 Matt Elliott Option 1 Allan Mc Guinness Option 1 Craig And Patricia Souter Option 1 Rk & Am Chambers Option 2 Bmchesswas Option 2 Lydia Garner Option 1 Tanya Garner Option 1 Karen Vanstone Option 1 Jason Palmer Option 2 Kendall Dons Option 2 Julie Hales Option 2 Glenn Leask Option 1 R A King Option 1 Le & Wb Lock Option 1 Paula Arthur Option 2 Warwick Ian Tomalin Option 1 Noel Campbell Option 1 Erin Laracy Option 1 Mrs Lorraine Helen Ward Option 2 Mrs Coulton Option 1 Kate Rive Option 1 Joe Peeters Option 1 Helen Hies Option 1 Beth French Option 2 Rick Ashley Option 2 Alistair Coleman Option 2 Dionne Hardwick Option 1 Deborah Samuels Option 2 Fr & Mk Wright Option 2 Helen Roberts Option 1 Mrs J M Robinson-Smith Option 1 Errol Jefferson Option 1 Hilary J Price Option 1 Merle Mason Option 1 Ed Abel Option 1 Mr C & Mrs K Thompson Option 1 Fiona Gregor Option 1 Mr I & Mrs P Craig Option 1 Trevor Michael Thomas& Ms Joy Moore Option 1 Lj & Ll Lammas Option 1 L A Griffiths Option 1 D J Ryan Option 1 Julie Thomas Option 2 Materoa Burrell Option 1 Tom Boyd Option 2 C Magsig Option 1 Denis Catchpole Option 2 Trb & Jg Buxton Option 1 Coleen Martin Option 2 R Mackey Option 1 Tim Sinclair Option 1 Danelle Bain Option 1 R P Bernie Option 2 Sandra Wahle Option 1 Greg Stowell Option 2 Debbie Reed Option 2 Df Beveridge Option 1 Michael Sorrenson Option 2 Robyn Wells Option 2 Jacqui Ross Option 2 Isabelle Kelly Option 1 Bravesight Limited Option 3 D & T Taylor Option 1 Sheryl Thocolich Option 2 Steven Bennett Option 1 Kevin Chown Option 2 Pamela Brown Option 2 Chris Boudet Option 2 Robert Balloch Option 2 Allan Barkman Option 2 Owen Davy Option 2 Robert (Bob) De Fluiter Option 1 Sallee Roberts Option 2 Catherine Glassock Option 1 Carolyn Elling Option 1 Mrs J & Mr W Price Option 1 Lynette Trail Option 2 Pam Option 1 Mrs M B F Clarkson Option 2 Mrs S R R Ross Option 2 Mr L Stewart & Mrs J M Shaw Option 2 Mrs S C Mccallum Option 2 Mr A C & Mrs N R Mccann Option 2 Mr S J & Mrs D P Ward Option 1 Mrs L M Bramley Option 2 Mrs A Goodman Option 2 Gareth Banks Option 2 W Frazer Option 2 Mrs J Brough Option 2 Mr J M & Mrs J M Blake Option 1 Shayne Adlington & Melissa Mcneil Option 1 M J Bange Option 2 St Peters Option 3 Chris Thomas Option 2 B.P.Rawlins Option 2 Gallagher Option 2 Ian Carroll Option 2 G B Barker Option 3 Cecilia Lilley Option 2 E John Elliott Option 2 Jim Anderson Option 1 E M Palmer Option 1 St Peters Presbyterian Church Option 1 Robert Little Option 1 Janelle Mark Option 2 Mrs D E Ellis Option 2 Bronwyn Moore Option 2 K. Da Silveira Option 2 Sue Marsh Option 2 Flyger Option 1 Cmcavanagh & Wabrown Option 1 Lois Ann Spiers Option 1 Angela Marshall Option 2 Ailsa Beange Option 1 Megan Thorn Option 1 Alan Chapman Option 2 Rhonda Spence Option 1 Carol June King Option 2 Mrs D A H Turner Option 3 Joel Van Ameringen Option 1 Gd Hynes Option 2 Beachaven Family Services Option 2 Mrs D.Davidson Option 1 Pamela Shirley Smith Option 2 Mrs D J O'Dwyer Option 1 Mr M J Moroney Option 1 R J Dale Option 2 Paul Van Boven Option 1 Mr A A & Mrs B M Masemann Option 2 Robertson'S Menswear Option 2 Mr B L & Mrs P Neagle Option 1 Lorraine Silvester Option 2 Trevor Hunter Option 1 Rachae Rogan Option 1 Se & Hg Grouwstra Option 1 J Baird Option 2 Robyn Versteeg Option 2 Lisa Ebbett Option 2 B Knightly Option 2 Bruce Mcmechan Option 1 Craig Hill Option 1 Nick Fox Option 2 Roger Allen Option 2 K W Short Option 1 R & A Twist Option 1 Raewyn Campbell Option 2 Debbie Glover Option 1 Jocelyn Bennett Option 1 Jl & C Coenen Option 1 Kathy Ladkin Option 1 S P Pomare Option 1 Philip Ewens Option 1 Donella Jones Option 1 Peter Kilduff Option 3 Kristal Sharon Liddell Option 2 Mrs A H Dewdney Option 2 Harold Payne Option 2 J.H.&J.M. Brus Option 1 K I & D J Ballinger Option 1 Ms E Thomas Option 1 Colin Barker Option 2 Mr H H Strahan Option 1 Carol Hay Option 2 Joan Duncan Option 1 Mr C J Mchugh Option 1 Sarah Newcombe Option 1 Marguerita Matic Option 1 Linda Carpenter Option 1 Mr R M & Mrs D E Garnett Option 1 Mr Roger Michael & Mrs Dorothy Elaine Garnett Option 1 Heather R Shephard Option 1 Gayleen Murfitt Option 2 Miss M J Kennedy Option 2 David Wan Option 1 St James Union Parish Church Option 2 Carole Gordon Option 1 Philip Barrett Option 2 No 2 Road Hall Te Puke Committee. Option 1 Wendy Fellows Option 1 Jessie Bicker Option 1 Alma Wakelin Option 1 W L Vincent Option 1 Alex Chapman Option 1 C L F Wade Option 2 Florentines Foodservice Nz Ltd Option 1 Myles Murray Option 1 David Sykes Option 2 Nic Mangino Option 1 Robyn Cotter Option 2 Paul Mcsheffrey Option 1 P F Duncan Option 2 Neville Munro Option 3 E Mickell Option 1 Kevin Roberts Option 1 Bryan Welsh Option 1 Lance Bell Option 1 Ruth Wall Option 3 Marjorie Bain Option 1 Douglas Mccartney Option 1 Cherie Mason Option 2 Dan Taylor & Gillian Gallazzi Option 2 P. A Hawkeswood Option 1 If & Rj Mcgregor Option 1 Malcolm Stewart Option 1 Shelley Bosma Option 2 Tor Cunningham Option 1 Graham David Urry Option 1 Margaret Nieslen Option 1 J E Bowers Option 2 Helen Green Option 2 Nick & Carol Easterbrook-Smith Option 2 Shawn Cameron Option 2 Rebekah Phillips Option 2 Taylor Option 1 Hannah Fairweather Option 1 David Muspratt Option 1 Maureen Toms Option 2 L.A.Thorne Option 1 Janet Hayes Option 1 Debbie Jones Option 2 Pauline M. Lloyd Option 1 Ruth Arnold Option 2 Valerie Gray Option 1 Gray & Co Option 1 P R Luxford Option 2 Ross Lattaway Option 2 Kathryn Price Option 3 Nl & El Hay Option 1 Charles Pettit Option 1 Gail Harris Option 1 Debbie Shaw Option 2 Maria Mooney Option 1 Mr P Leger & Ms D Lepper Option 1 Amy Willoughby Option 1 Lynn Styles Option 2 M K O'Sullivan Option 1 Beverley Sinclair Option 2 Al & Rd Newton Option 2 M G Smith Option 1 Robyn Begley Option 2 Lynne Davidson Option 1 Tracey Gorst Option 1 Jeanette Mindham Option 2 Antony Gibbs Option 1 Philip Gibbs Option 1 Kathleen Margaret Friar Option 2 Me Taylor Option 1 Debbie Manning Option 1 Mr Long Option 2 Bruce Mcfarlane Option 1 Cameron Rd Vet Clinic Option 1 Phil Matheson Option 1 Catherine Mcleod Option 2 Jae & N Burles Option 1 John Scrivener Option 1 Jb Autos Ltd Option 1 Margaret Option 2 Mr Ac And Mrs Le Powell Option 1 Al&Bj Dobbs Option 1 Barry Prestney Option 1 E V Odey Option 1 Micah Crawshaw Option 1 Nic Reid Option 2 Gavin Emeny Option 1 Wayne And Bev Petford Option 1 Vicki Raynel Option 2 R Erickstad Option 2 Peter Mouldey Option 2 Doug & Liss Lloyd Option 1 C Browne Option 2 M Thompson Option 1 J D Mcnearney Option 1 Russell Smith Option 2 Murray Clancy Option 1 Raewyn Brown Option 1 Michael Smith Option 1 Lorrainechester Option 1 Timothy & Lorraine Springall Option 1 Gail Sims Option 2 Sandra Winhoven Option 3 D.M.Wheeler Option 2 Wendy Dol Option 1 J Croad Option 2 Gareth Wilkin Option 1 Mrs B D E & Mr R D Brunton Option 1 Mr K V Polley Option 2 R E Horsfall Option 2 Richard Fullerton-Smith Option 1 Mr L M & Mrs F O Candy Option 1 Mrs B A Gray Option 2 Mr D K & Mrs F C Mankelow Option 1 Miss M O Taylor Option 1 Mr K D Flood Option 1 Mr Bw & Mrs Vg Mills Option 1 Mrs P J Harnett Option 2 Mr J J Baran Option 1 Mrs J A Tait Option 2 Mrs L R & Mr B Roscoe Option 1 Peter Goad Option 2 Mrs A Mathews Option 2 Marie Clark Option 2 Prendeviie Ann Option 2 Patrick James O'Sullivan Option 2 Malcolm Gordon Option 2 James Mclean Option 1 Tanya Jones Option 2 Henry Kaniuk Option 2 Margaret Carmichael Option 2 Bruce Ingram Option 1 James Kerr Option 1 Bruce Anderson Option 1 Paul Stephens Option 1 Mrs P A Stevenson Option 2 Mm&An Wallis Option 3 Paddy Naismith Option 2 Annette Arnold Option 1 L J Inglis Option 1 Ms S Edwards Option 1 Shona Jones Option 1 Mr N A Morrison Option 2 Mrs Stuart-Menzies Option 2 Charles Leo Hayden And M.Hayden Option 1 Mike King Option 1 Adele Fuller Option 2 BOP Sexual Assault Support Services Trust Option 1 Heather Walker Option 2 Irene Williams Option 1 Mr P C & Mrs L M Oliver Option 2 Mrs R A Oliver Option 2 Maureen Joblin Option 2 Mrs D Waite Option 2 Margaret Amor Option 2 Mr M A Hollands Option 1 David Riley Option 3 Thadaivus Manickathan Variath Option 1 J Price Option 2 Julie Crane Option 1 J A C & M B Littlewood Option 1 Ian And Gerardine Robbie Option 1 Craig Jamieson Option 3 M P Dodunski Option 2 Christine Anderson-Davies Option 2 Dej Lennard Option 1 L K Taylor Option 1 Noeleen Wallace Option 2 Mr J C & Mrs E Atkinson Option 2 Graham Bradbourne Option 1 Mrs Suzanne Lorraine Hall Option 1 Mr D A & Mrs D E Kent Option 2 Mrs M M R Anderson Option 1 Miss E G Saunders Option 2 Mr N C & Mrs K E Muschamp Option 2 Robyn Catherine Option 2 B John Gordon Option 2 Mike King Option 1 Leigh Brown Option 1 Pania Rutherford Option 2 Sandra Conchie Option 2 Mr L G & Mrs K J Julian Option 2 Dennis Young Option 1 Cath Lane Option 2 Norma Hough Option 2 Mrs B J Legg Option 1 Julie Duncan Option 3 Gcn Keyte Option 1 Rodger O'Toole Option 2 K & M Morrice Option 1 Ms H Gray Option 3 J Harricks Option 2 Stu Dumbleton Option 1 W W L Cheung Option 2 Mr P J Ferris Option 1 P T Roach Option 1 Matthew Vine Option 1 Erika Van Der Meer Option 1 Peter & Mabel Hoggard Option 2 Anthony D Corbishley Option 1 Don Burton Option 1