CEU eTD Collection
NOBILITY IN THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM THE
TAKING SIDES: CROATIAN AND SLAVONIAN TO THE ANJOU DYNASTY MA Thesis in Medieval Studies Studies MA Medieval Thesis in Central European University Sanja Fritz May 2011 Budapest i
ÁRPÁD CEU eTD Collection
NOBILITY IN THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM THE Central European University, Budapest, in partial fulfillment ofCentral thefulfillment r European University, Budapest,partial in
TAKING SIDES: CROATIAN AND SLAVONIAN Thesis submitted to the Department of Medieval Studies, theStudies, Department to Thesis submitted of Medieval Accepted the standards with conformance CEU in of the of the Arts Master Studies degree Medieval in of ______TO THE ANJOU DYNASTY Chair, Examination Committee Chair, Examination Thesis Supervisor Examiner Examiner Examiner Sanja Fritz May 2011 Budapest (Croatia) (Croatia) ii
equirements equirements ÁRPÁD CEU eTD Collection
NOBILITY IN THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM THE Central European University, Budapest, in partial fulfillment ofCentral thefulfillment r European University, Budapest,partial in
TAKING SIDES: CROATIAN AND SLAVONIAN Thesis submitted to the Department of Medieval Studies, theStudies, Department to Thesis submitted of Medieval Accepted the standards with conformance CEU in of the of the Arts Master Studies degree Medieval in of ______TO THE ANJOU DYNASTY External Examiner Examiner External Sanja Fritz May 2011 Budapest (Croatia) (Croatia) iii
equirements equirements ÁRPÁD CEU eTD Collection
NOBILITY IN THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM THE Central European University, Budapest, in partial fulfillment ofCentral thefulfillment r European University, Budapest,partial in
TAKING SIDES: CROATIAN AND SLAVONIAN Thesis submitted to the Department of Medieval Studies, theStudies, Department to Thesis submitted of Medieval Accepted the standards with conformance CEU in of the of the Arts Master Studies degree Medieval in of ______TO THE ANJOU DYNASTY ______External SupervisorExternal Supervisor Sanja Fritz May 2011 Budapest (Croatia) (Croatia) iv
equirements equirements ÁRPÁD CEU eTD Collection bibliography. I declare that no unidentified and illegitimate use illegitimate and unidentified no that declare I bibliography.
y eerh n ol sc etra ifrain s rpry credi properly as information external such only and research my exclusive is thesis present the that herewith declare Studies lo elr ta n pr o te hss a be sbitd n t in submitted been has thesis of higherinstitution for education degree. an academic the of part no that declare also ins or person’s any on infringes thesis the of part no and others, of I, the undersigned, undersigned, the I, Budapest, 25 May 2011 Budapest, 2011 25May
aj Fritz Sanja , candidate for the MA degree in Medieval Medieval in degree MA the for candidate , v Signature ______ly my own work, based on based work, own my ly was made of the work work the of made was ______his form to any other other any to form his titution’s copyright. I copyright. titution’s e i nts and notes in ted CEU eTD Collection l te E saf n m flo clege fr hi advices their for colleagues fellow my and staff CEU the all not but Last, year. academic this in attended I classes whose gratitude my express to want I Also, skills. Latin my improve Gaspar Cristian to and skills English my improve to my helped Ras Judith thank to want I addition, In gratitude. utmost my have who without
First, I would like to thank my supervisors, Katalin Szende and Danie and Szende Katalin supervisors, my thank to like would I First, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS vi
the least, I want to thank to want I least, the to all those professors professors those all to , and commentaries. commentaries. and , h hle m to me helped who l Ziemann l son who son CEU eTD Collection the Slavonian Noble Kindreds the Slavonian Noble Kindreds ...... 17 t and Dynasties Anjou the and Árpád the among Relations Political 3. 2. The Development the Slavonia Nobility Croatia in and of ...... 10 Introduction: 1. Choosing Power ...... 1 OF CONTENTSTABLE
Slavonian nobility until the death of Andrew III nobilitySlavonian the(1290–1301) death until of Andrew ...... 25 C the and dynasties Anjou and Árpád the among relations The 3.2.2 Kingdom of (1290–1301) Hungary ...... 23 Rober Charles before kindreds noble Slavonian the and Croatian the Anjou the and Árpád the among relations political The – 2 Phase 3.2 Charles Martel (1260 – 1290) ...... 17 Andr of coronation the to up kindreds nobleSlavonian the and Croatian the Dy Anjou the and Árpád the among Relations Political the – 1 Phase 3.1 2.4 Croatia ...... 14 2.3 Slavonia ...... 13 2.2 The noble kindred ...... 12 2.1 The stratification Croatia in beginnings the development of of the social C) The Šubić Kindred TheC) Kindred Šubić ...... 31 B)Kőszegi The kindred ...... 29 BabonićA)Kindred The ...... 25 the Kingdom in 3.2.1 The situation of Hungary ...... 23 3.1.3 Conclusion...... 22 Babonićand Kindreds Kőszegi ...... 18 t of Example The – 1270s the and 1260s the nobilityduring Slavonian The 3.1.2 the Kingdom in 3.1.1 The situation of Hungary ...... 17 vii he Croatian and Croatian he t's arrival in the in arrival t's roatian and the the and roatian Dynasties and Dynasties nasties and nasties ew IIIand ew ...... 10 he CEU eTD Collection
Slavonian noble kindreds (1322 – 1342) (1322 –1342) nobleSlavonian kindreds ...... 47 Croati the and Robert Charles among confrontation of Period – 4 Phase 3.4. Ro Charles kindredsCroatian (1301 and –1322) noble Slavonian ...... 35 between conflict the before period The – 3 Phase 3.3.3 3.4.3 Conclusion...... 3.4.3 Conclusion...... 56 FrankapanD) The Kindred ...... 55 TheC) Kőszegi Kindred ...... 54 B) Babonić Kindred The ...... 49 A) The kindred Šubić ...... 48 reign his the(1322 endkindreds –1342) of until ...... 48 S and Croatian the and Robert Charles between relations The 3.4.2 the Kingdom in 3.4.1 The situation of Hungary ...... 47 3.3.6 Conclusions ...... 46 D) The kindred Šubić ...... 45 TheC) Franakapan kindred ...... 44 B)Kőszegi The kindred ...... 44 BabonićA) The kindred ...... 43 kindreds ...... 43 S and Croatian the and Robert Charles between relations The 3.3.5 3.3.4 Charles the Hungarian Robert’s with confrontations nobility ...... 41 3.3.3 Alliance the Habsburgs with ...... 39 Charles with Robert 3.2.2. Weak communication ...... 38 the Kingdom in 3.3.1 The situation of Hungary ...... 35 3.2.3 Conclusions ...... 33 FrankapanD) The kindred ...... 32 viii
lavonian noble lavonian noble lavonian bert and the the and bert an and an CEU eTD Collection 5. Bibiography ...... 71 4. Conclusion...... 58 5.2 Secondary Literature: ...... 71 5. 1Primary Sources: ...... 71
ix CEU eTD Collection
centuries Figure 1. Map of Slavonia and Croatia from the eleventh until until eleventh the from Croatia and Slavonia of Map 1. Figure theFigure Frankapan to 8.Donations kindred kindred theFigure Šubić to 7.Donations theFigure Kőszegi to kindred 6.Donations theFigure Babonić to kindred 5.Donations Figure of tree kindred the Kőszegi 4.Genealogical Figure of tree kindred the Šubić 3.Genealogical BabonićFigure kindred of tree the 2.Genealogical LIST OF FIGURESLIST x
the fourteenth fourteenth the CEU eTD Collection MTA Magyar Academy of Sciences] Tudományos [Hungarian Akadémia umjetnosti i [Croatian Academy znanosti HAZU of akademija Hrvatska CD
Codex diplomaticus regni Croatiae, Dalmatiae et Slavoniae Dalmatiae etCodex Slavoniae regni Croatiae, diplomaticus Art] Art] LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS LIST xi
Science and
CEU eTD Collection oe i hs oan n te oiiy s i sbet wo r benea are who subjects his as nobility the and domain his in power othe however, authority; royal the from donations the byand offices lands of these c kindreds noble view, of point legal a From held. officesthey the they property landed of amount the by conditioned mainly was kindreds T moves. political thoughtful using by and circumstances good under ab rise could kindred one time of period short relatively a in common; gene cross-cut that links patrilineal with relatives of group the of End the mine. until 4; Translation 1899), Hartmana, Period Oldest the from Croats 1 hierarchy. Could a nobleman ever be as powerful as a king? as ever ahierarchy. a king? as nobleman Could powerful be m a as seen traditionally is king A nobility. his and king the t understand to trying was I while ago years few a interest becam topic This Hungary. of Kingdom the in century fourteenth the t and thirteenth the of half second the during kindreds noble Slavonian and Vjekoslav Klaić, Klaić, Vjekoslav second part of the thirteenth centurysecondon the the leve thirteenth those part knightlykindreds of strengthened that theyItaly,that could influenceHungarianfinally, far andc history, from of south
Vjekoslav Klaić s andking between the relations the present I will work Inthis The term “kindred” in medieval studies is applied to the nobility the to applied is studies medieval in “kindred” term The “And thus feudal aristocracy came about and was developedIn“Andaristocracywas feudal Croatia. thus about in came and the Povijest Hrvata od najstarijih vremena do svršetka svršetka do vremena najstarijih od Hrvata Povijest bring French, dynasty,a originally new the and Anjou-s.” king a new 1. 1. Introduction: Choosing Power
1
Nineteenth Century] (Zagreb: Tisak i naklada L. L. naklada i Tisak (Zagreb: Century] Nineteenth he balance of power between between power of balance he XIX stoljeća XIX ration and holds property in in property holds and ration onarch who holds all the the all holds who onarch ame into the possession possession the into ame ome of the Croatian the of ome , vol 2 [History of the the of [History 2 vol , e the center of my of center the e ove other kindreds other ove e ie f noble of rise he . A kindred is, a is, kindred A . h i i the in him th owned and by by and owned he first half of half first he r ways, r ways, ould ould 1 l l
CEU eTD Collection behavior of different noble kindreds in this situation. I decided to use to I decided situation. this in kindreds noble different of behavior during century. the thirteenth the which in situation the was That nobility. the to power lost beca and land their of much over control direct lost they but allies, t and properties landed granting By land. royal of loss great a dynas ruling the that, of Because him. by stand to obliged were t to given land the taking by kindreds, noble The property. landed more wer families, noble other with confrontations military as such hoe rsodd o hs y iig ad ad ils otn h sam the often theopponents nobility. –to – titles and lands giving by this to responded throne, afrai dynasty, Árpád the However, kindreds. noble the of members lands, neither neither lands, dynast Anjou the because fictional, course, of were, donations These dynastyt Anjou the side, their to them draw to In order families. and Croatian of representatives the with contacts making started and, kindreds noble local the among allies find to needed they throne the throne the claimed also Naples of dynasty Anjou the however, III; as king crowned was II Andrew of grandson alleged The Hungary. of Kingdom or ot rmnn nbe ides rm lvna n Cota Fo t From Cr from and kindreds Kőszegi Croatia. the and Babonić the Iselected Slavonia and Slavonia from kindreds noble prominent most four fe Kn Ldsa I ws udrd n 20 a ubln pro be period turbulent a 1290, in murdered was IV Ladislas King After Te rmr ga o ti rsac i t cmae h actions, the compare to is research this of goal primary The de facto de nor nor de jure de , and they were not authorized to grant the titles to the the to titles the grant to authorized not were they and , 2 itles, royal dynasties gained gained dynasties royal itles, Árpád dynasty found itself itself found dynasty Árpád e also a means of gaining of means a also e ties were confronted with with confronted were ties hem gave land and titles. titles. and land gave hem of Hungary. To gain To Hungary. of the Slavonian noble noble Slavonian the use of this they also also they this of use the examples of the of examples the y did not own these own not did y oatia the Šubić and Šubić the oatia d of loosing the the loosing of d hem by the king, king, the by hem oe a their as ones e tiue, and attitudes, therefore, they therefore, he area of of area he a i the in gan Andrew CEU eTD Collection lyd n motn rl i ter hie. ih hs n id I wil I mind, in this With choices. their in role important an played part of my research is: Did the relations between the noble the between relations the Did is: research my of part behavior of the royal dynasties towards each other. I plan to com to plan I other. each towards dynasties royal the of behavior
2 hypothesis working My protection? or contracts trade titles, lands, eit taking from benefited they how and Robert, Charles later, family, Charles of the Anjou III the local to protagonists Andrewandto some nob the of some why is question research central My numerous. most t with deal that sources the because also but ones, powerful most kindreds.Frankapan addition to these questions that are related to the noble kindreds, I kindreds, noble the to related are that questions these to addition at dynasties both with communicate they did Furthermore, time? d the between sides change kindreds Did kindred? noble one of members discus on policyuniform a have families individual the Did are: questions kindreds the and dynasties the between relations the of view secondary of series a use will I question, research central the this in differently or similarly act kindreds noble Slavonian and basis, the on differences geographical any were there whether Charles Robert after he ascended to the throne of Hungary. The centr The Hungary. of throne the to ascended he after Robert Charles ki noble the between relations the on concentrate will part This Šubići, Frankapani. Frankapani. Šubići, one. to reacted dynasty one of members how determine to dynasties In this paper I will use the plurals of the names theof will plurals I usethe paper this In The second part of my research includes the period after the de the after period the includes research my of part second The 2 I have selected these four kindreds not only because they were the were they because only not kindreds four these selected have I
of the kindreds in Croatian language – Babonići, Kö Babonići, – language in Croatian kindreds the of 3 kindreds and Charles Robert Robert Charles and kindreds questions to gain a better better a gain to questions her side. Did they receive receive they Did side. her that is, did these Croatian these did is, that situation. In addition to to addition In situation. des n usin and question in ndreds the action of the other the of action the pare the actions of the the of actions the pare hese kindreds are the the are kindreds hese this issue between the the between issue this will also compare the compare also will ty o investigate to try l h sm tm? In time? same the s ht geography that is le families inclined families le al question of this of question al ath of Andrew III. Andrew of ath sed here. These These here. sed ynasties over over ynasties Martel, and and Martel, szegi,
CEU eTD Collection problem that I plan to address is the summary of all the ques the all of summary the is address to plan I that problem served as a medium to strengthening national pride. The kings, the no the kings, The pride. national strengthening to medium a as served the all in implanted strongly already was idea national the of spirit the with connected also was research This families. his scientific first the that logical quite is it families, d royal with connected other the or way one in were sources these those on based works write to and unpublished still then were that t started Wenzel, Gusztáv and Smičiklas Tadija as such historians, kindreds. royal how picture clearer royal and power, influenced the of power a pos be relations the of understanding better a offer will research leas the gained which and alliance(s) its from most the gained kindred countries began. hist the with engagement academic when time the was this that an be not would it and century nineteenth the of end the as early as C and Hungary In Hungary. of case the to especially and Croatia applie This done. been has research of amount great a which on area an roya the of history the that, of Because alike. public general The fi do so? why he did, did If he differently? he them did treat or the noble kindreds, the apply Robert Charles did Furthermore, period? this in change h hsoy f h nblt hs en ut “oua” mn aca among “popular” quite been has nobility the of history The s nw edny o te ae ieenh etr, ugra ad Croa and Hungarian century, nineteenth late the for tendency new a As 4 torical works were dedicated to those to dedicated were works torical l dynasties and the nobility is is nobility the and dynasties l tween the noble kindreds and kindreds noble the tween that period when the birth of birth the when period that areas of life and the history history the and life of areas ory of the nobility in these these in nobility the of ory tions listed above: Which above: listed tions roatia, this trend began trend this roatia, same policy toward all all toward policy same sources. Since most of most Since sources. overestimate to claim to overestimate o transcribe sources sources transcribe o ynasties and noble noble and ynasties t? I hope that this this that hope I t? ition of the noble of the noble ition ble families, and families, ble s to the case of of case the to s eis n the and demics tian tian nal CEU eTD Collection ines h dat ih hs oi. vn ay opld twe a compiled Nagy Iván topic. this with dealt who pioneers Idem, Šubićithe kindreds, noble Croatian prominent most that studies publishing by topic this of elaboration the to Hungary. of throne the to ascended dynasty Anjou the how dynasty. Árpád the and genealogy Hungarian of handbooks important are that works several Croats from the Oldest Period until the End of the the of End the until 1899). Hartmana, Period Oldest the from Croats 1–1 tables geneological the and armes of withcoats of the Šubić until the Year 1347 Year the until theofŠubić 1901). the middle of the fourteenth century] (Budapest: century] fourteenth theof middle the közepéig 8 7 6 5 4 9 3 century. fourteenth the to up kindreds and clans Hungarian genealo the with dealing work a wrote (Nagyvárad), Oradea of gloriousthe Hungarianand Croatian pasts. regar were and heroes national as considered were members their hist the presents that work a Blagay” von Grafen der Geschichte surpassed. been not still has opinion a period, medieval Croatian the of series overview monumental a gazetteer of the Hungarian noble families.noble Hungarian the of gazetteer Robert [ The struggle of the Anjou Dinasty for Hungarian-Cro for Dinasty Anjou the of struggle The Vjekoslav Klaić, Klaić, Vjekoslav Klaić, Vjekoslav Szentgyörgyi, Sándor Wertner, Mór Nagy, Iván Vjekoslav Klaić, Klaić, Vjekoslav János Karácsonyi, Karácsonyi, János Az Árpádok családi története családi Árpádok Az
] (Zagreb: Knjigotiskarski i litografički zavod C. A C. zavod litografički i Knjigotiskarski (Zagreb: [The Hungarian kindreds up to the middle of the fo the of middle the to up kindreds Hungarian [The oe f h ms dsigihd itras f h nntet cnuy wer century nineteenth the of historians distinguished most the of Some Magyarország családai czímerekkel és nemzékrendi tá nemzékrendi és czímerekkel családai Magyarország Geneaology und Geschichte und Geneaology Bribirski knezovi od plemena Šubić do god. 1347 god. do Šubić plemena od knezovi Bribirski Povijest Hrvata od najstarijih vremena do svršetka svršetka do vremena najstarijih od Hrvata Povijest Krčki knezovi Frankapani Frankapani knezovi Krčki mga nmesgk XV század XIV. a nemzetségek magyar A 5 Borba anžuvinaca za prijestolje ugarsko-hrvatsko do ugarsko-hrvatsko prijestolje za anžuvinaca Borba In 1893 Sándor Szentgyörgyi wrote a work that describes in detai in describes that work a wrote Szentgyörgyi Sándor 1893 In ] (Zagreb: Naklada Matice hrvatske, 1897). 1897). hrvatske, Matice Naklada (Zagreb:
[ The family history of the Árpádians the historyof family The 9 (Vienna, 1884); Idem, 1884); (Vienna, The historian Lajos Thallóczy wrote in 1898 “Die 1898 in wrote Thallóczy Lajos historian The [ The Frankapans, Counts of Krkof Counts Frankapans, The
Magyar Tudományos Akadémia, 1900). Akadémia, Tudományos Magyar 3 2] (Pest, 1857-1868). 1857-1868). (Pest, 2] 5 Then, János Karácsonyi, historian and canon and historian Karácsonyi, János Then, ieenh Century Nineteenth atian Throne until the First Coronation of Charles Charles of Coronation First the until Throne atian lbrechta, 1893). 1893). lbrechta, 7
urteenth century urteenth and the Frankapani.the and közepéig közepéig blákka blákka
A magyar nemzetségek a XIV. század XIV. a nemzetségek magyar A [ The XIX stoljeća XIX 4 6 were dedicated to two of the of two to dedicated were Mór Wertner also published published also Wertner Mór Vjekoslav Klaić contributed Klaić Vjekoslav ] (Nagybecskerek, 1892). 1892). (Nagybecskerek,
[The Hungarian kindreds up to to up kindreds Hungarian [The Counts of Bribir: from the Tribe Tribe the from Bribir: of Counts 1–12 [The families of Hungary Hungary of families [The 1–12 ] Zge: ia i ald L. naklada i Tisak (Zagreb: gy of the “most ancient” “most the of gy prve krunidbe Karla Roberta Karla krunidbe prve v-oue genealogical lve-volume ded as embodiments of embodiments as ded ] ] 2 vols. (Temesvár, 1891); 1891); (Temesvár, vols. 2 (Zagreb: Matica hrvatska, hrvatska, Matica (Zagreb: r o te Babonić the of ory , 5 vols. 5 , work that in my my in that work 8
He also wrote also He the history of of history the [ History of the the of History the e l l
CEU eTD Collection period turned its interest towards and topics period of the other history interest the turned historical its Nada Klaić, who was active between the 1960s and the 1980s. She wrote a wrote She 1980s. the and 1960s the between active was who Klaić, Nada was the series the was publi were sources archival known the of most of editions first the 12 11 10 b ideological the is nobility the with deals that literature r the period, this In Croatia. in again ignored was nobility the of Nada of period the after However, authorities. the of acknowledgement a period communist the during wrote she since negligible almost century early-twentieth the works her In forgeries. actually t of number large a that concluded and detail in sources the analyzed ge and data assembled only not she since historians, nineteenth-century different quite was nobility the of history the towards approach not and towns the of development the with connected was research the Hungary in and volumes, in “Diplomataria” eighteen of consisting Smičiklas, Tadija descended.were family Blagay the whom from kindred, Jugoslavenska akademija znanosti i umjetnosti, 1904 umjetnosti, i znanosti akademija Jugoslavenska Ages h sucs oe cesbe o itras Hwvr Cota histor Croatian However, historians. to accessible more sources the neglected half more a for than century. rain oiiy n te itr o Cota nbe kindreds. noble Croatian of history the and nobility Croatian t with detail in dealt that history medieval Croatian of overview Nada Klaić, Klaić, Nada Thallóczy Lajos oe Dpoaiu rgi raie Dlaie t Sla et Dalmatiae Croatiae, regni Diplomaticus Codex ] (Zagreb: Školska knjiga, 1965). 1965). knjiga, Školska (Zagreb: h nx iprat itra t cnrbt t ti bac o histor of branch this to contribute to historian important next The oiet raa rzieo sene vijeku srednjem razvijenom u Hrvata Povijest Codex Diplomaticus regni Croatiae, Dalmatiae et Slavoniaeet Dalmatiae Croatiae, regni Diplomaticus Codex , Die Geschichte der Grafen von Blagay von Grafen der Geschichte Die , Monumenta Hungariae HistoricaHungariae Monumenta
6 –1990). . (Vienna: Selbstverlag, 1898) 1898) .(Vienna:Selbstverlag, voniae voniae
with over forty volumes. This made made This volumes. forty over with [History of the Croats in the High Middle Middle High the in Croats the of [History 18 vols., ed. Tadija Smičiklas (Zagreb: (Zagreb: Smičiklas Tadija ed. vols., 18 ias of the communist authorities, communist the of ias 10 This was also the period when period the also was This 12 nationalistic approach is is approach nationalistic from the approach of the the of approach the from eason for the lack of the the of lack the for eason oee, ot f her of most However, nd with the support and and support the with nd he development of the of development he shed. In Croatia this this Croatia In shed. iography after this this after iography hese sources were sources hese Klaić, the history history the Klaić, the nobility. Her Her nobility. the nealogies, but but nealogies, iography was was iography monumental monumental nobility was nobility was , 11
edited by edited series CEU eTD Collection Rulers and their Subjects. Central Europe and Beyon and Central Europe Subjects. their and Rulers published studies on different topics related to medieval societ medieval to related topics different on studies published ides te Gut-Keledi the kindreds: California Press, 1990); see also the recently publ recently the also see 1990); Press, California tutr o te nei-r Hungar Angevin-era the of structure 15 14 Ban of Gut-Keled Noble Kindred Noble Gut-Keled of Ban 17 2000). University, CentralEuropean 16 13 power. of centers as cast of importance the things, other among highlighted, Fügedi, Erik structures.social and political of viewpoint the from Enge Pál period, medieval Hungarian of historians important most noblemen petty the to aristocracy courtly the from nobility, var in interest increased brought already 1980s and 1970s the fruitful, t Hungary, In forbidden. less or more was nobility the of history and regime old the of remnant a stratum social this considered who oiiy s h hsoin ai Kri, h woe i PD dise kindred. PhD his wrote who Karbić, Damir historian the is nobility researc the to generation this of contributors renowned most the of resea most the of one again become has nobility the of history customarycoronations. law and Kiadó, 1977); Idem, “The Political System of the An the of System Political “The Idem, 1977); Kiadó, in aristocracy the and power royal of relationship néee 18) Idem, 1988); Intézete, 90 (1983) 124 – – 128. 124 (1983) 90 Marija Karbić, “Joakim Pektar, slavonski ban iz pl iz ban slavonski Pektar, “Joakim Karbić, Marija Study Case A Bribir: of Šubići “The Karbić, Damir János, Bak, Fügedi, Erik Engel, Pál The situation changed once more in Croatia in contemporary times, times, contemporary in Croatia in more once changed situation The 16 nte yug itra, aia abć dat ih h hsoy o history the with dealt Karbić, Marija historian, young Another ásdlm s oiia srkúa z no-oi Mag Anjou-kori az struktúra politikai és Társadalom Castle and society in medieval Hungary (1000-1437) Hungary medieval in society and Castle ooain: eivl n Ery oen oaci Ri Monarchic Modern Early and Medieval Coronations: iáy htlm s rstkái vsoy a Zsigmon a viszonya arisztokrácia és hatalom Királyi 14 János Bak, a historian who worked overseas for several decades, several for overseas worked who historian a Bak, János 17 n te Kőszegi. the and ] , Godišnjak Njemačke narodnosne zajednice narodnosne Njemačke Godišnjak
15 ] , Bdps: ayr uoáys kdma Történettu Akadémia Tudományos Magyar (Budapest: y,
the Sigsmund period (1387-1437) period Sigsmund the ished volume of his collected studies: studies: collected his of volume ished 7 d gevin Kingdom,” Kingdom,” gevin emićkog roda Gut-Keled” [Joakim Pektar, Slavonian Slavonian Pektar, [Joakim Gut-Keled” roda emićkog (Farnham: Ashgate, 2010) Ashgate, (Farnham: 18 h Bbnć ide i i te ou of focus the in is kindred Babonić The f Cota Mdea Knrd (hD diss., (Ph.D. Kindred” Medieval Croatian a of 13 Another renowned social historian, social renowned Another (Budapest : Akadémiai Kiadó, 1986). 1986). Kiadó, Akadémiai : (Budapest yarországon in the countryside. One of the the of One countryside. the in The New Hungarian Quarterly Hungarian New The rched historical topics. One One topics. historical rched y and rulership as well as well as rulership and y tual (2000): 19–24. 19–24. (2000): -obn (1387-1437) d-korban l, deals with this topic this with deals l,
(Berkeley: University of of University (Berkeley: tto o te Šubić the on rtation his period was quite quite was period his les and their estates estates their and les ] [Society and political political and [Society topics such as the the as such topics (Budapest: Akadémiai Akadémiai (Budapest: h of the Croatian Croatian the of h ious strata of the of strata ious Studying Medieval Medieval Studying f two noble two f hn the when dományi dományi [The [The Nr. Nr. CEU eTD Collection published, as well as works dealing with legal issues of the of issues legal with dealing works as well as published, posjed Vrbasa?” [ Vrbasa?” posjed prijestolju, od 1290. do 1309. godine” [Between Two [Between godine” 1309. do 1290. od prijestolju, Hungary, 895–1526”Hungary, A Stephen. St of Realm “The are kindreds noble the and dynasties hi the with deal that Hungary and Croatia medieval of overviews Two came to posses Vrbas? posses to came 21 20 19 Period 23 2001.). 22 1290 from Throne, Hungarian-Croatian the on Change Origin German of Family Noble Hungarian-Croatian 21–26. 21–26. hist medieval Croatian and Hungarian of overviews significant some archontology of Engel Pál the work with breakthroughs significant made has historiography Hungarian future. this hopefully but it, on working currently is nobody knowledge, my time the since topic this with dealt has one no since research, ki Frankapan the of history The kindred. this to exclusively dedicated t dissertation PhD a on working currently is and history their with art two written has who Kekez, Hrvoje historian the by research 18 medieval on expert British the by Hungary” Medieval in “Nobili Service book the in discussed been has Croatia and Hungary medieval t of development the on standpoint legal A Raukar. Tomislav and Budak 89; Hrvoje Kekez, “ Kekez, Hrvoje 89; 1301
(Budapest : (Budapest Neven Budak and Tomislav Raukar, Raukar, Tomislav and Budak Neven Engel, Pál Zsoldos, Attila Engel, Pál Bab rod plemićki kralja: dva “Između Kekez, Hrvoje ve hrvatska – ugarsko – “Gisingovci Karbić, Marija ] (Budapest : História, 2011) História, : (Budapest ] (Zagreb: Školska knjiga: 2006). 2006). knjiga: Školska (Zagreb: n diin o h rsac ta das ih niiul ol knrd, re kindreds, noble individual with deals that research the to addition In
Magyar Tudományos Akadémia Történettudományi Intéze Történettudományi Akadémia Tudományos Magyar Magyarország világi archontológiája világi Magyarország The Realm of St Stephen. A History of Medieval Hung Medieval of History A Stephen. St of Realm The Magyarország világi archontológiája, 1000-1301 1000-1301 archontológiája, világi Magyarország Hinc transit fluvium Vrbaz fluvium transit Hinc Hinc transit fluvium Vrbaz fluvium transit Hinc ] , , Hrvatska misao Hrvatska 22 by Pál Engel and “Hrvatska povijest srednjeg vijeka”srednjeg povijest “Hrvatska and Engel Pál by
Hrvatska povijest srednjeg vijeka vijeka srednjeg povijest Hrvatska 4 (2007): 76–93. (2007): 4 : When and how did the Slavonian Noble Kinderd Babo Kinderd Noble Slavonian the did how and When : : kada i kako je slavonski plemićki rod Babonića do Babonića rod plemićki slavonski je kako i kada : 20 , , and Zsoldos. Attila 8 1301-1457 ] likaška obitelja njemačkog podrijetla” [The Kőszegi [The podrijetla” njemačkog obitelja likaška Kings: The Noble Kindred Babonić in the Period of Period the in Babonić Kindred Noble The Kings: , , Godišnjak Njemačke narodnosne zajednice narodnosne Njemačke Godišnjak until 1309 Year 1309 until onića u vrijeme promjene na hrvatskom-ugarskom hrvatskom-ugarskom na promjene vrijeme u onića [
Hungarian secular arhontology 1301–1457 arhontology secular Hungarian [Hungarian secular arhontology 1000– arhontology secular [Hungarian ary, 895 - 1526 - 895 ary, te, 1986) 1986) te, development of the nobility. nobility. the of development ] , , [Croatian History of the Medieval Medieval the of History [Croatian 21 Povijesni prilozi Povijesni of Vjekoslav Klaić and, to to and, Klaić Vjekoslav of
icles History of Medieval Medieval of History Hungarian history, history, Hungarian (London: I. B. Tauris, Tauris, B. I. (London: hat is going to be be to going is hat 19 will change in the in change will story of the royal royal the of story that are dealing are that de i lacking is ndred in the area of of area the in ory have been been have ory he nobility in in nobility he ty, Land and and Land ty, 35 (2008): 61 - - 61 (2008): 35 23 by Neven by (1999): (1999): cently šao u šao nić – ]
CEU eTD Collection regarding the noble Slavonian audience. kindreds an and to Anglophone the Croatian wil it that and topic this of exploration the to contribute will 25 omn a. n tep o Analysis of Attempt An Law. Common
Karbić’s research, who has written two articles on this is this on articles two written has who research, Karbić’s 24 Rady.Martyn društvene znanosti Hrvatske akademije znanosti i um i znanosti akademije Hrvatske znanosti društvene – definicija, vrste, uloga” [Nobility – Definition, – [Nobility uloga” vrste, definicija, – Damir Karbić, “Hrvatski plemićki rod i običajno pr običajno i rod plemićki “Hrvatski Karbić, Damir Rady, Martyn Nobility, Land and Service in Medieval Hungary Medieval in Service and Land Nobility, 24 h dvlpet f rain oiiy s n h mi fcs f Da of focus main the in is nobility Croatian of development The
] , , bri Osea a oien zaot Zvd z pov za Zavoda znanosti povijesne za Odsjeka Zbornik Types, Role Types, 9 jetnosti avo. Pokušaj analize” [Croatian Noble Kindred and Kindred Noble [Croatian analize” Pokušaj avo. ] 16 (1998): 73-117; Damir Karbić, “Plemstvo “Plemstvo Karbić, Damir 73-117; (1998): 16 , , Povijesni prilozi Povijesni (London: Palgrave, 2000). 2000). Palgrave, (London: sue. l introduce some of the issues issues the of some introduce l 25 I hope that my research my that hope I 31 (2006): 11–21. 11–21. (2006): 31 jse i ijesne mir CEU eTD Collection župan peasant-warriors in Croatia. This type of social organization e organization social of type This Croatia. in peasant-warriors
27 26 eivl eid a te ilg o vlae uiiaiis ( municipalities village or village the was period medieval ( adaption of the Roman population that lived in this in lived that area.adaption of the population Roman the on and organization tribal the on based was which organization, social exp the century, was seventh the In formations. social Croatia different of influences region, continental European the and the Mediterranean on position its of Because research. present my of focus main developme the of complexity the to justice do cannot but topic, the Croatian Medieval Period] (Zagreb: Filozofski fakul Filozofski (Zagreb: Period] Medieval Croatian taa mre i te ua cmuiis toe h bcm te ki the became who ( those communities; rural the in emerged strata differentiati social for basis the formed but municipalities, eleventh century.eleventh Most of them lived gathered in tribes (tribes in gathered lived them of Most villani nobiles Raukar, Budak, Tomislav Raukar, Raukar, Tomislav ( s . ilgs n h ery eivl eid i nt eoe exclusivel become not did period medieval early the in Villages ). Recent historical research has shown that the basis of Croatian of basis the that shown has research historical Recent This chapter is meant to provide a background to the social histori social the to background a provide to meant is chapter This Croatia of the the in stratification social development beginnings 2.1 The of , n toe h ls ter esnl reo ad eae on serfs bound became and freedom personal their lost who those and ), 2. 2. The Development the Nobilityof Croatiain and S iupani . led drn te n o te lvnh etr, ebr o certa of members century, eleventh the of end the during Already ). Hrvatska povijest Hrvatska 27 ejk pei hvtkg srednjovjekovlja hrvatskoga plemić i Seljak The larger territorial units were the counties (counties the were units territorial larger The
,176. ,176. parentela 10 tet u Zagrebu 2002), 36. 2002), Zagrebu u tet , genus [The Peasant and the Nobleman of the the of Nobleman the and Peasant [The , generatio 26
on. With time, two distinct distinct two time, With on. nabled a fast and efficient and fast a nabled villa županije , natio) ) with free peasants peasants free with ) Slavs brought their brought Slavs nt, which is not the not is which nt, crossroads of the the of crossroads society in the early early the in society lavonia ng’s noblemen noblemen ng’s ) headed by the by headed ) until end of the of end until cal aspects of of aspects cal sd o the to osed free, equal equal free, y territorial territorial y ( servi
in in ). ). CEU eTD Collection generationum regni Croatiae s the At principalities. their into accumulate turned they had which They property, others. the above risen had individuals some period The first level comprised the magnates ( magnates the comprised level first The compos was century fifteenth the until twelfth the from Croatia” ( 29 30 this of date the However, Croatia” of tribes twelve kno are treaty the signed who members Cro The nobility. to rights state and public Croat all of promised Coloman incorporation o after heads 1102 in the made and allegedly Coloman King Hungarian between made of noble kindreds who created their own principalities (the Cr (the principalities own their created who kindreds noble of exist strata social major two that indicate processes the and came He Croatia. medieval of area the in emerged nobility pr the and period Árpádian the in tribes Croatian the concerning 28 they held. l the of because distinctions and prestige higher aquired tribes ides n, ae te oe nblt ( nobility lower the later and, kindreds serv strata social These villages. in existed still tribes their and tribes Croatian the of existence the was one second 25. 25. Croatiae nobiles Raukar, Raukar, Cro of tribes twelve the of “nobility the term The Budak, Raukar, Raukar, Budak, h Cota hsoin Tmsa Rua, a ciial analyze critically has Raukar, Tomislav historian, Croatian The
ad h “oiiy f h tev tie o Croatia” of tribes twelve the of “nobility the and ) , mre. hrfr, h bodr oil tau o “nobili of stratum social broader the Therefore, emerged. ), Seljak i plemići Seljak 28
Hrvatska povijest Hrvatska , 37. ,
). , 177. ,
30
nobiles comes document is questionable; Raukar, Raukar, questionable; is document 11 atia” comes from comes atia” wn in Croatian historiography as “the nobility of t of nobility “the as historiography Croatian in wn atia and confirmed some privileges to the Croatian Croatian the to privileges some confirmed and atia ia into the Hungarian Kingdom. With this treaty, treaty, this With Kingdom. Hungarian the into ia ); the second included the lower nobility nobility lower the included second the ); i i oie doei gnrtou regni generationum duodecim nobiles tev tie o Cota Ti tet was treaty This Croatia. of tribes twelve f ed as a basis from which noble noble which from basis a as ed Pacta Conventa Pacta to the conclusion that the data data the that conclusion the to ed. First, was the emergence the was First, ed. members. Therefore, in this this in Therefore, members. oatian word is is word oatian m tm, h sse of system the time, ame arge amount of land that that land of amount arge 29 ed of two social levels. levels. social two of ed ocesses by which the the which by ocesses ( or or oie duodecim nobiles Seljak i plemići Seljak ty in medieval medieval in ty Qualiter kneštvo d the data data the d d landed landed d - a treaty treaty a - ); the ); , 22– , he he CEU eTD Collection parts of Europe, noble kindreds developed based on the principles principles the on based developed kindreds noble Europe, of parts later nobility which from groups the all of function primary beginning of the thirteenth century, members of the most influe most the of members century, thirteenth the of beginning were in areas outside towns, that is, the rural areas.rural the is, that towns, outside areas in were res main The role. political their on and property landed their andgroups. w Their power these to belonging for was the prerequisite kindreds, because a kindred with a large number of members cannot die cannot members of number large a with kindred a because kindreds, longer a for allows model families. This independent forming of connect in stay to the relatives of preference the and relatives co-opera the are characteristics other the of Some inheritance. 33 32 ( 31 new kindreds. new kindreds. resulted This generations. few a after them among (re)distributed propert united formerly the with branches, into divided was kindred the economic their of weakness relative the in resulted this However, ea ad cnmc character. economic and legal l biological a than more was It ancestor. same the shared which their of indication an as taken be might which feature a county, propert held kindreds few a Only line. single a in rested and county generationes Damir Karbić, “Plemstvo – definicija, uloga, vrste uloga, definicija, – “Plemstvo Karbić, Damir vrste,” uloga, “Plemstvo–definicija, Karbić, Damir Rady, Martyn According to Martyn Rady and Erik Fügedi, the kindred was a cluste a was kindred the Fügedi, Erik and Rady Martyn to According kindred noble 2.2 The n ugr, h lns f ot f hs knrd wr cnie t oe singl one to confined were kindreds these of most of lands the Hungary, In Nobility, Land and Service and Land Nobility, or genera ). This type of noble kindred is characterized by the division of division the by characterized is kindred noble of type This ).
31 n h ery eivlpro, h mltr rl ws the was role military the period, medieval early the In , , 22–23. 12 ,” 20. 20. ,” 16–17 16–17 32 Damir Karbić argues that in most in that argues Karbić Damir developed. Descent by blood blood by Descent developed. ion with each other instead other each with ion inks, because it also had a had also it because inks, tion of a large number of of number large a of tion idences of these groups groups these of idences ntial kindreds began to to began kindreds ntial foundation. With time With foundation. in the emergence of of emergence the in ies in more than one one than more in ies durability of certain certain of durability ogvt. rm the From longevity. ealth were based on were based ealth out so easily. so out f consorteria of as being also y r of families of r 33 e e
CEU eTD Collection ossin Grc. fe te aqie te sae f oia they Vodica, of estate the acquired they After Gorica. possession, d the on influence direct strong, had dynasties Anjou the and Árpád royal area,In the this proximity. its to due Hungarian kings andHungary the themselves as a themselves called first Babonići the example, For owned. they 36 35 39 38 in as early as Kingdom Hungarianinto incorporated 37 34 as themselves to refer Hungarian counties.Hungarian Sla in counties formed kings Árpádian the incorporation, the After Hungary, ancestor. the basic organizational principle of the nobility in laterprinciplethe of periods. basic the nobility in organizational (fa units smaller into decomposed kindreds Older units. territorial noble of emergence the in resulted which principle, territorial replaced gradually was system kindred this century, fifteenth thirte the From invasion. Ottoman the until nobility the of organization f dominant the as survived model this Croatia, In Croatia. and Hungary, Budak, Raukar, Raukar, Budak, 63. thepage see Croatia and map a Slavonia of For a Györffy György as such historians Hungarian Some vrste uloga, definicija, – “Plemstvo Karbić, Damir Rady, Martyn Rady, Martyn uig h eeet cnuy lvna a icroae it te igo of Kingdom the into incorporated was Slavonia century eleventh the During 2.3 Slavonia Ti fr o ognzto o te oiiy a tpcl o te a the for typical was nobility the of organization of form This 34 37 Another way of identifying noble kindreds was through the posses the through was kindreds noble identifying of way Another and at the beginning of the twelfth century Croatia shared the the shared Croatia century twelfth the of beginning the at and Nobility, Land and Service and Land Nobility, Service and Land Nobility, de Vodiča Hrvatska povijest Hrvatska 39 Slavonia, in contrast to Croatia, was always closely connected t connected closely always was Croatia, to contrast in Slavonia, . 35 e generede
, 184 184 , atr hc floe te ae f hi putative their of name the followed which after , , , 30. , 23. 13 ,” 20. 20. ,” the tenth century. century. tenth the
d tia slo cnie ta Saoi was Slavonia that consider Zsoldos Attila nd with by the system of the the of system the by with municipalities and similar similar and municipalities 36
milies) which became which milies) vonia modeled on the the on modeled vonia evelopment of the the of evelopment fter their premier premier their fter started to refer to to refer to started orm of the formal formal the of orm es f Poland, of reas nh ni the until enth power of the the of power ae fate.same sions that sions 38 o
CEU eTD Collection ewe te rsn dy on o Ssk n Kroa. led i t in Already Karlovac. and Sisak of towns day present the between aa n Daa ies A te ek f hi pwr te ond e counties. owned they power, their of peak the At rivers. Drava and Sava and Hungary, southwestern in located were kindred Kőszegi the of lands Hédervári the and Kőszegi the Köcski, the branches: three into divided centur thirteenth the of middle the In century. twelfth the of middle Lower from Kingdom Hungarian of area the to moved had that had kindred 44 43 42 41 ot o te eei Muti nihr h nbe ides nr h lwr no lower the nor kindreds, noble the neither Mountain Velebit the of South ides n Slavonia. in kindreds most the not if prominent, most the of one became they donation this the to granted was Vodica of the estate large the At century thirteenth Slovenia. day present into properties their expanded they county. kindreds that of kindred leading the be to County six the of one from rose quickly Babonići The Kőszegi. the and 40 rapidly.of royal estates decreased officials. church or noblemen to them of parts or counties entire lowernobility.the and kindreds noble Marija Karbić, “Rod Gisingovca,” 21. 21. Gisingovca,” “Rod Karbić, Marija Raukar, Budak, 64. Babonića,” “Rod Kekez, Raukar, Budak, Raukar, Raukar, Budak, The development of the nobility in Croatia followed a complet a followed Croatia in nobility the of development The 2.4 Croatia The most influential noble kindreds that developed in Slavonia were t were Slavonia in developed that kindreds noble influential most The Seljak i plemići Seljak 44
Hrvatska povijest Hrvatska Hrvatska povijest Hrvatska , 6. , 43 h Ksei ide ws n o te rnhs f h Héder the of branches the of one was kindred Kőszegi The , 184. ,
, 183. 183. , 41
40 Already during the twelfth century, kings grantedkingscentury, twelfth Alreadythe during 14 42 Their first possessions were in the area the in were possessions first Their Babonić kindred. After After kindred. Babonić Due to this, the number number the this, to Due y, the Héder kindred kindred Héder the y, states in seventeen seventeen in states he twelfth century, century, twelfth he einn o the of beginning ely different path. different ely prominent noble prominent kindreds. The The kindreds. Styria in the the in Styria ewe the between he Babonići Babonići he f Gorica of bility CEU eTD Collection ea t epn terpoete i te itrad f h Dalmati the of hinterland the in properties their expand to began possible that they had transformed the office of office the transformed had they that possible the counts of Krk. However, Croatian historiography Croatian However, Krk. of thecounts t granted 1235) – (1205 II Andrew King Modruš. of county the them granted he t in increased further power Their Krk. of island entire the over maint to them allowed which vassalage of contract a through Venice t connected Frankapani The counts. and protectors their as themselves title of counts of Bribir. During the second decade of the thirteenth the of decade second the During Bribir. of counts of title e became they token, this By 1180. after only 1196) – (1172 III Béla King a County Bribir the received they However, century. tenth the as Frankapani. the which they their turn subjects. free to taxation, used into peasants l them granted This rights. als royal Croatia, for but characteristic properties, landed large just not which kindreds certain distance,c its of influencebecause Croatianot did Árpádiankings that fact the mainlybut kindreds, individual of hands the in power local 47 46 45 it. restricted or progress their supported they whether p different pursue and process, this monitor only could dynasties Anjou powe royal The society. of development internal the of result the nobl These either. authority royal by them upon bestowed were authori royal the of stimulus or influence direct the under developed The Frankapan kindred started to use that name in in name that use to started kindred Frankapan The Raukar, Budak, Raukar, Raukar, Two of the most prominent noble kindreds in Croatia were the Šub the were Croatia in kindreds noble prominent most the of Two Seljak i plemići Seljak Hrvatska povijest Hrvatska 47 The Šubići held the area around the Krka River as their proper their as River Krka the around area the held Šubići The , 6. ,
, 177. 177. , 15 uses the name Frankapan and I will do the same her thesame do will I and Frankapan name the uses the fourteenth century< earlier they called themsel called they earlier century< fourteenth the župan into a hereditary position as early as position hereditary a into 45 h avne cnetain of concentration advanced The egal power and the power of of power the and power egal e kindreds were primarily primarily were kindreds e he time of Béla III, when when III, Béla of time he 46 s a royal grant from the the from grant royal a s ontributed to the rise of rise the to ontributed r of the Árpád and the the and Árpád the of r
n iis n imposed and cities an o, which was more more was which o, ty and no privileges no and ty century, the Šubići Šubići the century, the control of the of control the i te authority the ain hemselves with with hemselves ligible for the for ligible olicies as to to as olicies hem the the hem ty. It is is It ty. ići and and ići ves ves e.
CEU eTD Collection prominent representatives in the turbulent decades of dynastic c dynastic of decades turbulent the in representatives prominent properties properties their with one landed dominion. large into Hungary. his further the explaining and tracing when mind in kept be to need 48 thei connected Frankapans the donation that with and 1225 in Vinodol of county Budak, Raukar, Raukar, Budak, These differences in the development of the nobility in these t these in nobility the of development the in differences These Hrvatska povijest Hrvatska
, 179. 179. , 16 48 hange in the Kingdom of Kingdom the in hange
oy f hi most their of tory wo regions wo r island island r CEU eTD Collection political tactics of the Šubić, Frankapan, Babonić, and Kőszegi dur Frankapan,Babonić, tactics kindreds political of the Šubić, of strengthening a to led which Slavonia, and Croatia in situation the thirteenth and in the first half of the fourteenth century. century. halfthe thirteenth of and the the first fourteenth in of Andrew III and Charles III Andrew of Martel (1260 –1290) to the the up kindreds the Slavonian Croatiannoble and Dynasties coronat and
ae h Hnain hoe t cran point. certain a at throne Hungarian the take ha that dynasty the support to inclined were kindreds noble These f of beginning the and thirteenth the of end the at Hungary of Kingdom power dynastic the in shift the to greatly contributed had they oligar independent like almost ruled families These held. families offices the and estates their of size the upon rested nobility T Slavonia. ruled kindreds Gut-Keled and Kőszegi Babonić, The Krk. of t and Bribir, of family Šubić the were Croatia in families p most The kindreds. noble the of hands the in was power the of most and weakened, III authority the royal (1290–1301), IV and Andrew (1272–1290) Ladislas
ecito o te oiia mnues f h Ápd n te no d Anjou the and Árpád the of maneuvers political the of description 3. 3. Political Relations among the Árpád and the Anjo 49 Engel, Because of the weak royal power the last Árpádian kings did not interfere w kings interfere not did Because Árpádian power last the royal weak the of uig h rin f h ls Ápda kns nml, tpe V Stephen namely, kings, Árpádian last the of reign the During in the situation 3.1.1 The Hungary Kingdom of the Anjou 3.1 Phase Relations among and Political Árpád 1–the the The Realm, Realm, The Croatian theand Slavonian Noble Kindreds 107–111; Kekez, “Rod Babonića,” 61; Nada Klaić, Klaić, Nada 61; Babonića,” “Rod Kekez, 107–111;
17
49 hs at f h tei poie a provides thesis the of part This he Frankapan family, the counts the family, Frankapan he that some members of those those of members some that Povijest Hrvata Povijest that had taken place in the the in place taken had that u Dynasties theand the nobility. Andrew III Andrew nobility. the chs and because of that, that, of because and chs d a greater chance to to chance greater a d ourteenth century. century. ourteenth owerful magnate magnate owerful nsis n the and ynasties he power of the the of power he ,
340–342. ing the ending of the (1270–1272), (1270–1272),
ith the ith ion ion CEU eTD Collection began his reign in 1290. Although he is considered the last king of the Á the of king last the considered is he Although 1290. in reign his began 51 1270) Mary, the sister of Ladislas IV.Ladislas of sister the Mary, Charl was candidate Their throne. Hungarian the to right the claimed dynas Neapolitan The weak. quite was throne Hungarian the to claim 50 Kőszegi the Babonić and of Kindreds towards dynasties.demonstrate the and Árpád their Anjou policy Kőszegi and Babonić Frankapan, Šubić, the kindreds, noble Slavonian the members prominent communic most the of conduct the examining By dynasties. in tactics political different use to started Slavonia a nt h sn f ails V u te rnsn f nrw I (1205–1235) II Andrew of grandson the but IV, Ladislas of son the not was kindreds established and later. the Anoju dynasty were t with Contacts chapter. this in kindreds noble Slavonian only discuss tha and first kindreds noble Slavonian the with contacts c made a dynasty as described be almost can that situation a to led soon This lands acquired and themselves amongst fought S hand other the The on kindreds, purchase. by mostly lands their acquired they fig and not themselves did kindreds noble Croatian The hands. their in power economic Budak and Raukar, Raukar, and Budak Stephen son II's Andrew of son the was III Andrew oh n rain n Saoi nbe ides a ms o te oiia a political the of most had kindreds noble Slavonia and Croatian in Both Example the –The 1270s during the nobility and 1260s Slavonian 3.1.2 The Hrvatska povijest Hrvatska
51 My assumption is that the noble kindreds of Croatia andCroatia of kindreds noble the that is assumption My , 176. ,
18 who was the half-brother of King Bela IV (1235– IV Bela King of half-brother the was who tn wt tee two these with ating ivil war. The Anjou Anjou The war. ivil of the Croatian and Croatian the of he Croatian noble Croatian he es Martel, son of of son Martel, es y f no also Anjou of ty rpád dynasty, he he dynasty, rpád t is why I will will I why is t lavonian noble noble lavonian kindred, I will will I kindred, in that way. way. that in t amongst ht 50 ad his and nd CEU eTD Collection zajednice 54 53 53 57 56 68. thepage see kindred theKőszegi to Donations 55 Gut-Kel the of Ban Slavonian Pektar, [Joakim Keled” Karbić, Marija (1276–1277); Slavonia of theban and Afte Andrew. prince wit peace made he 1275 in of already however, honours, fiancée a was daughter whose captur and king the with conflict into came he 1272 67. page see kindred Babonić their allies.their Gut-Keled the from Pektar Joakim Ban Slavonian the with conflict 52 the and warringeven tried reconcile to thebecame king parties. involved damag The region. the of devastation the in resulted conflicts These kindred Kőszegi kindred. The Babonić the with fight their familyand continued bec Joakim, of brother Gut-Keled, Nicholas disappear. completely p their but kindred, Gut-Keled the weakened This Babonić. Stephen Count themselves.for wanted families Sla in hegemony political the was reason second The own. to claimed l some and forts some were conflict this of causes The siblings. h srnet otes n h Pkpj region Pokuplje the in fortress strongest the foug were battles main the that assumes Klaić Nada historian clai families both which ban, of title the and lands the were king’s younger brother Andrew. It is possible that that possible is It Andrew. brother younger king’s real the governed Slavonia, of ban the became again Ladi young of Instead crowned. was prince young the Elizab withQueen theabduction planned thatJoakim Nada Klaić Nada 23. “Joakim Pektar,” Karbić, Marija kindred Kőszegi the of tree genealogical the For 64. Babonića,” “Rod Kekez, 64. Babonića,” “Rod Kekez, dur 1270 in ban Slavonian the became Pektar Joakim s kindred Babonić the of tree genealogical the For uig h16s n te 20, h Bbnć kindred Babonić the 1270s, the and the1260s During (2000): 22–23; Attila Zsoldos,Attila 22–23; (2000): , Povijest Hrvata Povijest , 56 The reason for the conflict between the Babonić and the Kőszegi ki Kőszegi the and Babonić the between conflict the for reason The , 347. 347. ,
54 In this conflict, Ban Joakim Pektar died at the hands of hands the at died Pektar Joakim Ban conflict, this In
archontológiája, 1000-1301 archontológiája, Joakim did this in agreement with Rudolf I of Habsb of I Rudolf with agreement in this did Joakim 19 ed the prince, the future King Ladislas IV. It is p is It IV. Ladislas King future the prince, the ed see the page 66, and for a list of donations given given donations of list a for and 66, page the see m. In 1274 Joakim joined the rebels, who captured t captured who rebels, the joined Joakim 1274 In m. “Joakim Pektar, slavonski ban iz plemićkog roda Gu roda plemićkog iz ban slavonski “Joakim Pektar, eth, whose ally he was. King Stephen V soon died an died soon V Stephen was.King he allywhose eth, h the queen and became the master of treasury (1275 treasury of master the became and queen the h ed Noble Kindred] Kindred] Noble ed ee page 64, and for a list of donations given to th to given donations of list a for and 64, page ee slas, his mother, Elizabeth, and Joakim Pektar, who Pektar, Joakim and Elizabeth, mother, his slas, ing the reign of Stephen V Árpád. In the summer of of summer the In Árpád. V Stephen of reign the ing 57 n te ra rud vz Mountain. Gvozd around area the and r that incident Joakim was deprived of all his his all of deprived was Joakim incident that r , 317. , Godišnjak Njemačke narodnosne narodnosne Njemačke Godišnjak ht around Fort Steničnjak, Steničnjak, Fort around ht e fr hmevs The themselves. for med ands which both families both which ands 52 on tesle in themselves found ame the leader of the the of leader the ame e was so severe that that severe so was e vonia, which both both which vonia, kindred ower did not did ower 53 55 n his and became ndreds ossible ossible to the the to urg he he t- d d e e )
CEU eTD Collection November 1278. The members of the Babonić kindred met in Zagreb with with Zagreb in met kindred Babonić the of members The 1278. November Pet(ri)ne Naples, who was an arbiter in the name of Charles II, king king II, Charles of name the in arbiter an was who Naples, and he had to allow Stephen Babonić the peaceful and unhindered use of t of use unhindered and peaceful the Babonić Stephen allow to had he and t properties certain give to had Kőszegi, John brother, His kindred. the in already probably was which Steničnjak, Fort to claims Kőszegi, Nicholas renounce kindred, Kőszegi must the kindred of leader Kőszegi The hostilities. the that determined was It Dubica. in 1278 Babonić was the hostage that the Babonić kindred ga kindred Babonić the wasthat hostage the Babonić 60 59 61 adiuuabitt neminem et intromittet facie ad ....vt vocatum..., Stenichnak suum castrum 58 thethat respected localAnjou dynasty. noble the kindreds authorityof the we they that fact the however, arbiters, II’s Charles invited to surrendered were hostages These hostages. surrender to had sides be would contract this that guarantee further a as and marks, 2000 was bre the for penalty The Petrinja. of town the and counties, Novigrad and capitanei J[ magister dictus et nostros filios dedimus nostra G[irardi]… fratris ac Karoli, regis domini hostage.one surrender to had conflict the counties, Pset the of both giveup to hadKőszegi John addition, In ret kindred Babonić The Gut-Keled. Stephen judge royal and Paul, and … ... werethem. of two There ...similiter sine precio remittemus preter obsides obsides preter remittemus precio sine ...similiter duos comitatus de Pezeth, item comitatus de Guerce, de comitatus item Pezeth, de comitatus duos nue u px i odnt iuoaiie i perpe im inuiolabiliter ordinata sic pax ut Insuper ...... , ec bten h Bbnć n Ksei ides a cnldd n 0 Ap 20 on concluded was kindreds Kőszegi and Babonić the between Peace h pae ewe te aoi ad u-ee knrd ws ocue on concluded was kindreds Gut-Keled and Babonić the between peace The ., D I dc 27 21 Kkz “o Bbnć, 6 Babonića,” “Rod Kekez, 241; 207, doc. VI, CD ..., d diru poou vrrm t oetrm videlic honestorum et virorum proborum adbitrium ad …; CD VI, doc. 207, 240–242; Kekez, “Rod Babonića,” Babonića,” “Rod Kekez, 240–242; 207, doc. CDVI, …;
, CD. VI, doc. 207, 240–242; Nada Klaić, Klaić, Nada 240–242; 207, doc. VI, CD. , ohannes] de parte sua dedit filium suum ad manus di manus ad suum filium dedit sua parte de ohannes] m castri Ozol contra nos se nullatenus et iuxta nat iuxta et nullatenus se nos contra Ozol castri m 61 20 magistri Nicholai fratris dicti J[oachini] bani et et bani J[oachini] dicti fratris Nicholai magistri ve to the captain from Naples. fromNaples. captain the veto Primary source evidence does not say who say not does evidence source Primary de Gay, de Dressnik et de Nouo castro ac villam villam ac castro Nouo de et Dressnik de Gay, de tuum perseueret, nos et Farcasius de societate societate de Farcasius et nos perseueret, tuum 5; Hrvoje Kekez assumes that Radoslav Radoslav that assumes Kekez Hrvoje 5; re present in Slavonia shows Slavonia in present re of Naples. of et capitanei et marescalci milicie milicie marescalci et capitanei et possession of the Babonić the of possession 59 o the Babonić kindred, Babonić the o Gorica, Gaj, DrežnikGaj, Gorica, had to give up his his up give to had PovijestHrvata 60 urned the village village the urned Each kindred in kindred Each respected, both both respected, a captain from from captain a he Fort Ozalj.Fort he ach of contract contract of ach 64–65. 64–65. Ban Nicholas, Ban their their , 347. 347. , preter preter uram ril ril cti 58 6
CEU eTD Collection between Vrbas and Sana as his aspossession. his between and Vrbas Sana bishop of Zagreb, and the Babonić kindred was free to consolidate the consolidate to free was kindred Babonić the Zagreb,and of bishop rte isrm c oie Gadnm i si posse suis in G[ardinum] comitem ac ipsorum fratres h Pe rgos ad Petrinja. and regions, Pset the Kladusa with Gaj Drežnik, Gorica, Podgorje, of estates r the namely, the were that possessions the all keep to allowed be would kindred decided was It 1280. October 30 on Ozalj in re-established only was 65 64 63 67 66 65–66. 65–66. Petrina villa in et Pzet utoque in non nec P castro in scilicet aquisitis, regia donacione ex ipsorum 23.; Zsoldos, Zsoldos, 23.; of the Sava River. As early as 1285, Count Radoslav Babonić had secured secured had Babonić Radoslav Count 1285, as early As River. Sava the of agree the peace. keep to excommunicate be would Babonićkindredsand Gut-Keled the that stated which in 1279 April 1 on document a issued Várad of bishop Lodomir, continued, 62 kindred. poss the of extension the to obstacle an presented This family. invited Zagreb of bishop the if only respond to needed supporters B the peace, the of violation a of case in also agreed that was dur kindred Gut-Keled the from taken had they that Zlat of estate and Vodica] Vodica] [Historical knezova” vodičkih i goričkih plemenu o ...... Klaić, Nada 66. Babonića,” “Rod Kekez, “Joakim Karbić, Marija 252, 302–304.; doc. CDVI, 65. Babonića,” “Rod Kekez, ... ..rmtiu eim oa ie qo S[pau] b St[ephanum] quod fide, bona eciam ....Promittimus Nos Radizlaus comes de Glaas, Vrbaz et Zana et Vrbaz Glaas, de comes Radizlaus Nos terram et possessionem Zlat vocatam… Zlat possessionem et terram Glasnik Zemaljskog muzeja u Bosni i Hercegovinii Bosni u muzeja Zemaljskog Glasnik The conflicts between the Babonić and Kőszegi kindreds continued and the and continued kindreds Kőszegi and Babonić the between conflicts The
66 on fe, h Ksei ide etrd no cnlc wt Timot with conflict a into entered kindred Kőszegi the after, Soon Archontológiája. 64
65 ra ad aa eand h poet o te Kőszegi the of property the remained Sana and Vrbas Povijest Hrvata Povijest , CD. VI, doc. 224, 261–266; Marija Karbić, “Joakim Karbić, Marija 261–266; 224, doc. VI, CD. , …, CD VI, doc. 306, 362–363; Kekez, “Rod Babonića,” Babonića,” “Rod Kekez, 362–363; 306, doc. VI, CD …, ..., CD VI, doc. 461, 544; Kekez, “Rod Babonića,” 6 Babonića,” “Rod Kekez, 461, 544; CDVI, doc. ..., 67 21 odgoria in Gerce, Dresnik, Gay cum Cladosa, Nouo Nouo Cladosa, cum Gay Dresnik, Gerce, in odgoria
Research of the Tribe of the Dukes of Gorica and and Gorica of Dukes the of Tribe the of Research Pektar,” 23. 23. Pektar,” ssionibus et comitatibus secundum relacionem relacionem secundum comitatibus et ssionibus 9 (1897), 364. (1897), 9 anum, R[aduzlaum] comitem et filios Baboneg Baboneg filios et comitem R[aduzlaum] anum, , 349; Lajos Thallóczy, “Historička istraživanja istraživanja “Historička Thallóczy, Lajos 349; , abonić kindred and their their and kindred abonić essions of the Babonić Babonić the of essions them. , Novigrad, both of both Novigrad, , ing the conflict. the ing ir domination south domination ir 63 ht h Babonić the that d if they did not not theyif did d As the fighting the As oyal donations, donations, oyal h area the Pektar,” Pektar,” y the hy, peace peace 6. 62 he It CEU eTD Collection because of this more likely to become allies of the Anjou dyn Anjou the of allies become to likely more this of because traditionally less dependent on the power of the Hungarian king than in than king Hungarian the of power thi the on of dependent less traditionally nobility The hands. their in power the of most the held kindreds Frankapa and Šubić the Croatia, In 1270s. the and 1260s the during Hungary of throne was that dynastic to shifts. being subjected turni was attention Their families. noble other or other each with 68 they that They a factbecome were relevant demonstrating political had this in power its asserted dynasty Anjou the kindreds noble two t in interfering By negotiations. peace the during arbiters as thei sending by region, this in kindreds noble powerful Ba most the kindred, the with contacts made dynasty Anjou the Slavonia, in allies Hun the of power the on dependent more traditionally was nobility allie create and/or find to was dynasty Anjou the for challenge of ofthe the the members central weak Árpádgovernment last dynasty. fostere were per this during conflictsHungary of kingdom the in prevailed numerous that atmosphere These lands. new acquired they which f noble other with and them between Conflicts properties. their
Kekez, “Rod Babonića,” 68. 68. Babonića,” “Rod Kekez, The Anjou dynasty in its later advance capitalized on the situation in the Kingdom in onthe situation later capitalized its advance The Anjou dynasty in 3.1.3 Conclusion to the were desire based Babonić and kindreds Kőszegi the The of policies During the 1280s and the1290s the Babonić and Kőszegi kindreds did not collide collide not did kindreds Kőszegi and Babonić the the1290s and 1280s the During
22 68
he peace treaty between these these between treaty peace he asty. However, the greater the However, asty. amilies were the means by by means the were amilies s in Slavonia, where the the where Slavonia, in s region for the first time. time. first the for region g o h Hungarian the to ng garian king. To gain To king. garian bonić and Kőszegi Kőszegi and bonić iod and because of of because and iod or Slavonia. in
other areas and and areas other r legates to act to legates r s region was was region s d by the the by d n noble noble n expand
CEU eTD Collection 71 70 heir on 23July and 1290. crowned had him accepte magnates the of majority the later but questioned; was legiti the first, At Hungary. of throne the to claims clear-cut wi Venice not Tomasina although in Prince Morosini, raised Andrew mother was his by positi Andrew’s weakened suspicion This death. Stephen’s after was III, Andrew of son the Stephen, Prince father, His II. Andrew the supposedly was who Árpád, Anderw Prince heir to an passed inheritance without died Ladislas because successor a find to had nobles (1290–1301)KingdomRobert's Hungary the arrival of in the before kindreds the Slavonian Croatiannoble and Dynasties and Char 69 III.Andrew of coronation the after months 1290, September 8 on Hungary of king as proclamed Martel, Anjou Charles the of Naples of II Charles of wife and IV Ladislas of Mary Queen Hungary. of Kingdom the of throne the gain to IV Ladislas 1292 again proclaimed king of Hungary by his mother Mary, queen of N of queen Mary, mother his by Hungary of king proclaimed again 1292 Ma Charles dynasties. Árpád the and Anjou the both for oscillated Szentgyörgyi, Szentgyörgyi, CD VI, doc. 59, 67–68; Kekez, “Rod Babonića,” 71; 71; Babonića,” “Rod Kekez, 67–68; 59, doc. VI, CD Klaić, 72;Vjekoslav Babonića,” “Rod Kekez, Engel, The Cumans suddenly murdered King Ladislas IV, their ally, on 10 July 10 on ally,their IV, Ladislas suddenly King murderedCumans The in the situation 3.2.1 The Hungary Kingdom of t h sm tm, h Aju yat as wne t poi fr profit to wanted also dynasty Anjou the time, same the At 3.2 Phase 2 – The political relations among the Árpád and the Anjou and Árpád 3.2 Phase relations the among political 2–The The Realm The Borba , 110. 110. , , 19. 19. ,
Povijest Hrvata Povijest 23 69 70
During this period, the political situation political the period, this During
, Vol 1, 270; Szentgyörgyi, Szentgyörgyi, 1,270; Vol , Vjekoslav Klaić, Klaić, Vjekoslav macy of Andrew’s descent descent Andrew’s of macy d Andrew as the rightful rightful the as Andrew d on as heir to the throne. the to heir as on yat, a hr son, her had dynasty, born to hist third wife third hist to born rtel was on 6 January 6 on was rtel oiet Hrvata Povijest om the death of of death the om rnsno of grandsonson of Naples, sister Naples, of . The right of of right The . aples. es hn two than less Borba les 1290; the 1290; 71 , 12. , At the At , 270; 270; , th th CEU eTD Collection einn o 19 Cals I f als a pann t big Char bring to planning was Naples of II Charles 1293 of beginning thedifferent allies ofreasons the they tha Anjou dynasty, had doing but quite for the at and period this during sides shifted question in kindreds noble all Although, – lands and titles. as the Anjou dynasty did assets the same of kinds Sla and Croatian to granting by dynasty Anjou the with compete titles and lands them granting by side their to over kindreds noble AndrewIII elected office. been who had that previously to Sp of archbishop new the as Mary, Queen of chaplain royal Fran a named he influence; and strength its increase to dynasty 1295. August in plague of died who Martel, Charles 1292 dynast Anjou the of ally an Zagreb, of bishop John, reasons. several 76 75 74 73 80 79 78 77 no dnsy died. dynasty, Anjou Sicily with conflict the in was Naples of Kingdom 72 1297. January 25 on Hungary of king the as Martel, dynasty. Anjou the of ally an was by replaced was and died soon he but dynasty Anjou the to hostile Hungary. CD VII, doc. 239, 277–278; Vjekoslav Klaić, Klaić, Vjekoslav 277–278; 239, doc. CDVII, Klaić, Vjekoslav Szentgyörgyi, Szentgyörgy, McBrien P. Richard Klaić, Vjekoslav 73; Babonića,” “Rod Kekez, Szentgyörgyi, 217–218; 198, doc. CDVII, Szentgyörgyi, 211; 190, doc. CDVII, 73. Babonića,” “Rod Kekez, 73 and was replaced by Bishop Michael, who was an ally of Andr of ally an was who Michael, Bishop by replaced was and uig hs eid te no dnsy tre t da Cota and Croatian draw to started dynasty Anjou the period, this During 72 t ht ie hwvr te iuto wree fr h Aju dynast Anjou the for worsened situation the however, time, that At Borba Borba Povijest Hrvata Povijest , The Pocket Guide to the Popes the to Guide Pocket The , , 28. 28. , , 26. 26. , 76 nte eet ht ho te no dnsy a te et of death the was dynasty Anjou the shook that event Another , Vol 1,308. Vol ,
Borba 78 Borba e elrd hre Rbr, o o lt Charles late of son Robert, Charles declared He , 28. 28. , Povijest Hrvata Povijest Povijest Hrvata Povijest 24 , 28. 28. , (HarperCollins e-books, 2006). 2006). e-books, (HarperCollins 75 , Vol 1, 309; Szentgyörgyi, Szentgyörgyi, 1,309; Vol , , Vol 1, 272. 1,272. Vol , 77 and Pope Nicholas IV, ally of the of ally IV, Nicholas Pope and 79 The new Pope, Celestine V, was V, Celestine Pope, new The Boniface VIII helped the Anjou the helped VIII Boniface 80 lit instead of Jacob, an ally of ally an Jacob, of instead lit
ciscan, Peter, who was a was who Peter, ciscan, . Andrew III started to to started III Andrew . vonian noble kindreds kindreds noble vonian end they all became all they end Boniface VIII, who who VIII, Boniface ew III.ew , id n April in died y, les Martel to to Martel les Borba 74 Slavonian Slavonian Also, the Also, t. t. the four the four , 30. , for y CEU eTD Collection between the brothers was a question of the leadership of the f the of leadership the of question a was brothers the between broke out. The enmity probably started in the early 1280s. My ass My 1280s. early the in started probably enmity The out. broke the control over some unidentified forts, because this is mentioned in in mentioned is this because forts, unidentified some over control the of cause the that presume can One 1294. August 21 on Zagreb in them 83 82 86 85 84 doc. 163, 181; Kekez, “Rod Babonića,” 68. 68. Babonića,” “Rod Kekez, 163, 181; doc. and the Slavonian nobility until the death of Andrew (1290–1301) III the nobility of death the Slavonian until and 81 A the of ally an was Radoslav whereas dynasty, Árpád the with commitme political different brothers' the was conflict the of thir Theenemies. help their not would and towns other’s occupyeach not ban. called are brothers both treaty peace the themselves.for ban of office the wanted estates. own their had brothers both which near es were conflict this for reason the that contends Kekez Hrvoje in Dubica in 1280. in Dubica in wi treaty peace the of signing the during was together mentioned tog acted always brothers the earlier although that fact the Kekez, “Rod Babonića,” 69; Nada Klaić, Klaić, Nada 69; Babonića,” “Rod Kekez, ... Klaić, Nada 68–69., Babonića,” “Rod Kekez, 82. ” “Vrbas, Kekez, Hrvoje Babonića,” “Rod Kekez, 181–182; 163, doc. CDVII, 68. Babonića,” “Rod Kekez, magnifici viri Stephanus banus ab una parte, et Rad et parte, una ab banus Stephanus viri magnifici uig h 20, ofitbtentebohr tpe and Radoslav Ba Stephen brothers betweenconflict the a the 1280s, During Kindred A) Babonić The 3.2.2 The relations among the Árpád and Anjou and the relations the among dynasties and Croatian3.2.2 The Árpád 81 This conflict ended with the brothers signing a peace treaty peace a signing brothers the with ended conflict This
Povijest Hrvata Povijest PovijestHrvata 84 25 This is attested by the fact that in the text of text the in that fact the by attested is This 85 68, Nada Klaić, Klaić, Nada 68, It was also agreed that the brothers would brothers the that agreed also was It ozlaus banus frater eiusdem ab altera ab eiusdem frater banus ozlaus 83 , 369. 369. , Another possible cause of the conflict the of cause possible Another , 349. , ether, the last time they were were they time last the ether, Povijest Hrvata Povijest amily policy. Both brothers brothers Both policy. amily tates near the Vrbas River, River, Vrbas the near tates t. tpe sod firmly stood Stephen nts. th the Kőszegi kindred Kőszegi the th ju dynasty. njou umption is based on on based is umption the peace treaty.peace the their discord was was discord their , 349. 349. , d possible cause possible d ..., CD VII, VII, CD ..., between 86 After bonić 82
CEU eTD Collection Hrvata Okić, Podgorje, and Samobor to Radoslav Babonić on 27 October 1293.October 27 on Babonić Radoslav to Samobor and Podgorje, Okić, rlesv i on u I stoljeću XIV u Bosna i kraljevstvo 92 91 90 89 88 128, 146–147; Kekez, “Rod Babonića,” 72; Nada Klaić Nada 72; Babonića,” “Rod Kekez, 146–147; 128, Thallóczy, 73; Babonića,” 87 brother and his Radoslav Babonić of property which were lands the apply to not did he Dragutin, Stephen king, Serbian the of son the Vladislas, Stephen gre a of possession the confirmed Naples of king II, Charles when sent was who legate his to dynasty Anjou the of supporters other Babonić Radoslav recommended IV Nicholas Pope 1290 July 23 On Radoslav support. on relied dynasty Anjou the that see can one source one than agains ally an as Stephen keep to desire the Andrew’s and Slavonia of position the of strengthening general the probably was this certain not is there.traveled it what but he Naples, to did dynas Anjou the with contacts more established Babonić Radoslav 1290, nuncupatas cum castris cum nuncupatas dyna Anjou the which in situation the probably was action this County.Zagreb a estate the with Radoslav awarded III Toma Andrew this, of mother, Because III’s Andrew for coast Dalmatian the to sent was who he well; as III Andrew with contacts some established Radoslav 1293, Kekez, “Rod Babonića,” 73; Nada Klaić, Klaić, Nada 73; Babonića,” “Rod Kekez, za Zavod (Zadar: century] fourteenth the in Bosnia Geschichte ...... 72. Babonića,” “Rod 1–2;Kekez, 1, doc. CDVII, ... Szentgyörgyi, 72; Babonića,” “Rod Kekez, ut quandam terram seu possessionem castri seu comit seu castri possessionem seu terram quandam ut ossins e tra Vbs Gls Ptia Vyno Petrina, Galas, Vrbas, terras seu possessiones terram Dresnek vocatam Dresnek terram us osdt ailu bns u farbs suis fratribus cum banus Radislaus possedit quas Vol 1, 268; Thallóczy, 268; Thallóczy, 1, Vol Andrew III donated the estate of Drežnik to Stephen Babonić.Stephen to Drežnik of estate the donated III Andrew , 75. 75. , 91 Andrew III donated the estates of Vrbas, Glaž, Petrinja, Vi Petrinja, Glaž, Vrbas, of estates the donated IIIAndrew ..., CD VII, doc. 133, 151–152; Mladen Ančić, Ančić, Mladen 151–152; 133, doc. VII, CD ..., Die Geschichte Die ..., CD VII, doc. 64, 74–77.; Kekez, “Rod Babonića “Rod Kekez, 74–77.; 64, doc. VII, CD ..., Die Geschi Die Taetr o te edlm Te Hungarian-Croatia The Pendulum: the of [Trajectory
Povijest Hrvata Povijest chte, 74. 74. chte, , 75. , Borba
26 , 18. 18. , povijesne znanosti HAZU; Mostar: Ziral, 1997), 84; 1997), Ziral, Mostar: HAZU; znanosti povijesne , 349. 349. , , , atus Zagrabiensis Selyn vocatam Selyn Zagrabiensis atus Povijest Hrvata Povijest C VI dc 8, 0–0; ee, “Rod Kekez, 103–104; 85, doc. VII, CD … dol, Selen, Oclich, Podgoria et Zamobor Zamobor et Podgoria Oclich, Selen, dol, 87
Putanja klatna: Ugarsko-hrvatsko Ugarsko-hrvatsko klatna: Putanja , 350; Vjekoslav Klaić, Klaić, Vjekoslav 350; , nd the town of Želin in in Želin of town the nd sty found itself in that that in itself found sty the Anjou dynasty in in dynasty Anjou the at part of Slavonia to to Slavonia of part at to Bosnia. to emphasized that this that emphasized t them. From more more From them. t ,” 70.; Thallóczy, Thallóczy, 70.; ,” 88 92 saved a person person a saved The reason for reason The The reason for reason The ty. In 1291, he 1291, In ty. sina Morosini. Morosini. sina n Kingdom and and Kingdom n ..., CD VII, doc. doc. CDVII, ..., nodol, Želin, nodol, Babonić for for Babonić 89 and some and In 1292, In Povijest Povijest s. 90 Die Die In CEU eTD Collection presumption, I have developed another presumption about the conflict the about presumption another developed have I presumption, b he later that logical is it and dynasty Anjou the of policy brothers would not attack each others’ towns. Thus, one conflict each can the that Thus, towns. brothers presume others’ attack would not age.young a of then was who Babonić, Radoslav probably period – adjusting to repercussions from the death of the Pope Nic Pope the of death the from repercussions to adjusting – period als oe rm ah family. each from one Naples, S the to lands confirming was II Charles when However, conflict. bee have would he Naples, In dynasty. Anjou the for support later hs to rtes n ta i te ec treaty. peace the is that and brothers two these c the about speaks that source one only is There Babonić. Radoslav and were in Naples. in were Ra 1295 September 1 on because run, long the in support Radoslav’s ma not did apparently he However, Babonić. Radoslav of support the gain the found dynasty Anjou the of members the which in situation the used Ančić, Ančić, 94 98 97 96 95 93 Babonićcontinuedand relationship the between Anjou dynasty. Radoslav III.Andrew to unfaithful was he because Babonić traveling to Naples, Naples, to traveling conf alleged this During policies. different their with connected not eoitos ewe te aoi ad h Ksei ides h to to hoost two took he kindreds, Kőszegi the and Babonić the between negotiations Kekez, “Rod Babonića,” 72. 72. Babonića,” “Rod Kekez, Babonića, “Rod 182; Kekez, – 181 163, doc. CDVII, –64 65. Babonića,” “Rod Kekez, 242 – 207, 240 doc. CDVI, Ančić, 214–215; 195, doc. CDVII, ... Pontius sacerdos et Ladislaus de Ossel nuncii Radis nuncii Ossel de Ladislaus et sacerdos Pontius Putanja hn Naoia cpan a sn t at s n rie durin arbiter an as act to sent was captain Neapolitan a When , 84; Kekez, “Rod Babonića,” 74. 74. Babonića,” “Rod Kekez, 84; , 93 The same year Tomasina Morosini took the Vrbas fort from Radosl from fort Vrbas the took Morosini Tomasina year same The 98 o n cn rsm ta i Npe te wud nw bu the about know would they Naples in that presume can one so
Putanja 95 roe ee ad peue ht hs otg was hostage this that presume I and Kekez Hrvoje , 84–85; Kekez, “Rod Babonića,” 74. 74. Kekez, Babonića,” “Rod 84–85; , 27 ”. ”. lai bani de Sclauoniade bani lai 97 94 h pae ray el ol ta the that only tells treaty peace The The reason for this was probably a probably was this for reason The ecame their ally. Based on this on Based ally. their ecame 96 This could have affected his affected have could This n aquaintanted with the with aquaintanted n ...; CD VII, doc. 167, 186; 186; 167, doc. VII, CD ...; erbian prince, Stephen Stephen prince, erbian holas IV. Andrew III III Andrew IV. holas doslav’s emissaries emissaries doslav’s it Rdsa was Radoslav lict, between Stephen between mselves to try to to try to mselves onflict between onflict nage to retain to nage g the peace peace the g ages to to ages was was av CEU eTD Collection brothers. ari ou, ata vla, ers u ctrs ut ceteris cum terras villas, castra, eorum, patrui banus totius Sclavonie Sclavonie totius banus and John.and of politi their kindred’s of the former protagonists cousins Radoslav, and Otto, aoi knrd ok vr h pltcl decisions. political the over took kindred Babonić the dynasty the throne. took brothe kindre the of power otherthe preserve to wanted they because dynasty, the and dynasty, one by stood brother one game;” “double a br the that is conclusion My significant. very not was brothers the t that presume I III. Andrew with firmly stood who someone to land the nature, political a of was conflict the if opinion, my In Anjous The Stephen. to also not and Radolsav, to just land the given have brothers” his Radoslav and Stephen. and “Radoslav said II Charles when that conclude can 100 102 101 99 Sla of office the Stephen, brothers, the of oldest the to granted V Susedgrad, of castles the for except Babonić Radoslav late the them grant did he 1299, in However, past. the in him to disloyal been had these grant to afraid probably was III Andrew Babonić. Radoslav them give to want not did he because III Andrew with conflict into Radosl by owned lands the include not did this that said he Vladislas, .... Kekez, “Rod Babonića,” 74–75. Babonića,” “Rod Kekez, . ti csr nsr Zme, ra, t aa voca Galas et Vrbas, Zumzed, nostra castra tria ... 76–77. Babonića,” “Rod Kekez, quas possedit Radislaus banus cum fratribus suis fratribus banuscum Radislaus possedit quas oh tpe ad aolv id on fe 19 ad nw eeain f the of generation new a and 1295 after soon died Radoslav and Stephen Both 99 101 Radoslav and Stepehen had one more brother, Otto, who died young, one thus, died who Otto, brother, more one Stepehen Radoslav had and After the death of their cousin Radoslav Babonić, the Babonićbr the Babonić, Radoslav cousin their of death the After ..., CD VII, doc. 305, 351–353; Kekez, “Rod Babonić “Rod Kekez, 351–353; 305, doc. CDVII, ...,
lttbs t tieti .. nbls ii Stephan viri nobiles ..., attinentiis et ilitatibus 28 … CD VII, doc. 85, 103 – – 104; 103 85, doc. VII, CD … a., me psesoe Rdza cna bani, condam Raduzlai possessiones omnes ta..., 100 hs wr Sehn John, Stephen, were These vonian ban.vonian a,” 78. 78. a,” d regardless of which of of which of regardless d others may have played played have mayothers lands to a kindred that that kindred a to lands rbas and Glaž. He also He Glaž. and rbas Anjou dynasty would would dynasty Anjou the lands of the late late the of lands the he conflict between between conflict he av Babonić and his his and Babonić av he considered considered he would not give not would all the lands of of lands the all 102 His actions His others cameothers cs, Stephen r by other other by r us nunc us CEU eTD Collection possessions and goods that to hold them in the same way that they have they that way same the in them hold to that goods and possessions possessions of the late Radoslav Babonić. of thepossessions late Radoslav pretenuit et possedit et pretenuit restore to them help would this that hoped they because III Andrew 104 108 107 106 105 103 “a them to confirmed dynasty Anjou the 1299, September 7 dated document the that estates andrights the all brothers Babonić thegranted dynasty.Anjou the of ally an Stjepanić, Hrvatin the on bordered that estates the Glaž, and Vrbas Susedgrad, himself a dynasty, Anjou the of allies become not would brothers Babonić granted He considerations. careful of result the probably are dynastic struggles between the Árpád and Anjou dynasties.Anjou and Árpád the between struggles dynastic actively were Kőszegi, Henry and John, Nicholas, brothers, The century. la the in influence political their of most kept members its estates wererightfully which they said theirs. that confirme dynasty Anjou the and them, from taken had III Andrew a Glaž Vrbas, of forts the them to confirm to dynasty Anjou the all of donation the confirmed dynasty Anjou the Andrew 1299, November 26 as on Moreover, just ban Slavonian of office the them granted he addition, In . “ Klaić, Vjekoslav 78; Babonića,” “Rod Kekez, Vjekoslav Klaić, Klaić, Vjekoslav Babonića,” “Rod Kekez, 357–358; 311, doc. CDVII, 357–358. 311, doc. CDVII, Babonića,” “Rod Kekez, 355–356; 305, doc. CDVII, ... possessiones et bona, cum iuribus, iuridictioni iuribus, cum bona, et possessiones ... The Kőszegi kindred was weakened in the conflicts with the Babonić the with conflicts the in weakened was kindred Kőszegi The Kőszegi The B) kindred ..., CD VII, doc. 308, 355–356; Kekez, “Rod Baboni Kekez, “Rod 355–356; 308, doc. CDVII, ..., Povijest Hrvata Povijest
vol 1, 268. 1, vol 106 Bribirski knezovi Bribirski 29 The Babonić brothers probably expected that brothers The probably Babonić bus et pertinenciis suis, que tenent et possident, possident, et tenent que suis, pertinenciis et bus 79. 78. 103 107
At the same time, the Anjou dynasty Anjou the time, same the At
,” 70; Szentgyörgyi, Szentgyörgyi, 70; ,” 108 ća,” 78. ća,” st decades of the thirteenth thirteenth the of decades st y had possessed before. In a Ina before. ypossessed had At first they were allies of allies were they first At hm ad s ta the that so lands them nd Susedgrad, which which Susedgrad, nd the towns that they that towns the nd he retained for for retained he nd d them just those those just them d estates of Count Count of estates done before.” done Borba engaged in the in engaged kindred but but kindred , 35–36. , I had.III l the ll sicut sicut the 105 104
CEU eTD Collection Povijest Hrvata Hrvata Povijest open conflict with Andrew III. Andrew with conflict open of the them gave they is, that dynasty, Árpád the of III Andrew s the of “right the kindred Kőszegi the gave Mary, wife, his and II, 110 111 Karbić, “Rod Gisingovaca,” 24.; Vjekoslav Klaić, Klaić, Vjekoslav 24.; Gisingovaca,” “Rod Karbić, Soprunii et Castri ferreiCastri et Soprunii p he after only captivity this from released was III Andrew captur as move drastic a such on decided have not would certainly kindred dynasti two the between “dancing” on focused been policy their Had captufrom the this conclude can force; one brute dynastiesAnjou beside w dealing in tactics sophisticated any use not did kindred Kőszegi c to managed even Kőszegi John and III Andrew with clashed Kőszegi Tha fief. a as given been have not could they and units administrative fic actually were dynasty Anjou the of donations the that se can 109 fief.a as court Neapolitan the from counties Sopron and Vas Naples. of allies became and dynasty Anjou the to turned dissati the this, of Because locations. these from Austria of duchy t because kindred Kőszegi the to belonged that castles to refers be should king the to directlybelong not did that castles the all i determined was it because kindred Kőszegi the unfavorable for unacceptable highly be to proved conclusions these However, towns. Hungarian forc was he and defeated was I.Albert Albert Duke Austrian the InLadiLadislasIV. aof between war was during 1291there hadreign lost the ...... 24. Gisingovaca,” “Rod Karbić, Marija ... oii io aito oan flo erc bn … i … bani Henrici filio Johanni magistro viro nobili liberum belli ius et ferri licentiam ferri et ius belli liberum vol. 1, 270; Szentgyörgyi, 270; 1, vol. …, CD VII, doc. 67, 80; Marija Karbić, “Rod Gisingov “Rod Karbić, Marija 80; 67, doc. VII, CD …,
110 In addition, John Kőszegi and his son, George, receivedGeorge, son, his andKőszegi John In addition, ..., CD VII, doc. 58, 66–67; Kekez, “Rod Babonića, “Rod Kekez, 66–67; 58, doc. VII, CD ..., Borba , 19. 19. , Povijest Hrvata Povijest 30 n perpetuum in pheudum nobile de comitatibus comitatibus de nobile pheudum in perpetuum n vol. 1, 270; Szentgyörgyi, 270; 1, vol. 109 aid a large ransom, and given and ransom, large a aid The king of Naples, Charles Naples, of king The 111 destroyed. This paragraph This destroyed. ed to return the occupied the return to ed From this example one example this From ficial right to enter into into enter to right ficial tive. The counties were counties The tive. e otn takd the attacked often hey word and war” against war” and word n the peace treaty that that treaty peace the n sfied Kőszegi kindred kindred Kőszegi sfied aca,” 24; Vjekoslav Klaić, Klaić, Vjekoslav 24; aca,” ith the Árpád and and Árpád the ith re of Andrew III. of Andrewre apture him. The him. apture sm ya the year same t s te Kőszeg the es, ing the king. king. the ing Borba, Borba, slas IV and slas ” 70; Marija Marija 70; ” 19. and and
CEU eTD Collection povijesne i društvene znanosti Hrvatske akademije z akademije Hrvatske znanosti društvene i povijesne of the Šubić kindred see page 65, and for a donatio a for and 65, page see kindred theofŠubić 105; Damir Karbić, “Šubići Bribirski,” 14; Nada Kla Nada 14; Bribirski,” “Šubići Karbić, Damir 105; que dicitur Bosna...cum omnibus baronibus, vasallis baronibus, omnibus Bosna...cum dicitur que territo iuxta est que Pset, et Suczunuy vocatur que 114 113 116 115 112 ban maritime of office hereditary the donated III Andrew King 1293, Anj and Árpád the with communicating while maneuvers tactical used possessed.kindred Frankapan the excep the with villages,” and forts cities, vassals, “barons, the heredi a as kindred Šubić the to Kingdom Croatian the of territory confirme are Mary Queen and Naples of II Charles King 1292, August Ši Trogir, Split, included that ports and coastline Croatian entire becauseestates theby dyna Árpád the measures they taken that had of lost T territorial. was dynasty Anjou the of allies became kindred rea main the that concluded be can It III. Andrew with agreeing 1298. 1296 in Andrew against rebelled kindred Kőszegi the However, hostages. similar certificate was issued to the Šubić kindred two days two kindred Šubić the to issued was certificate usualsimilar the paying without Sicily from oats of salms 100 and wheat export the allowed and Naples of Kingdom the in kindred Šubić the of the Loss of the Hereditery Office of Ban (1322)], (1322)], Ban of Office Hereditery the of Loss the Karbić, Damir 24. Gisingovaca,” “Rod Karbić, Marija CD VI, doc. 48, 57; Kekez, “Rod Babonića,” 70. Babonića,” “Rod Kekez, 57; 48, doc. CDVI, “Šubići Bribirs Damir Karbić, 57; 47, doc. CDVII, ...tenimento seu territorio, quod Dyesnich vugarite Dyesnich quod territorio, seu ...tenimento 112 In the late thirteenth century, Ban Paul Šubić and his brothers his and Šubić Paul Ban century, thirteenth late the In KindredC) Šubić The Their conduct was logical, since they realized that they would not not would they that realized they since logical, was conduct Their
“Šubići Bribirski do gubitka nasljedne banske časti banske nasljedne gubitka do Bribirski “Šubići
114 In addition, the Anjou dynasty protected the subjectsthe protected dynasty Anjou the addition, In n given to the Šubić kindred see page 69. 69. page see kindred theŠubić to ngiven rium predictum, et ab inde usque ad confinia provin confinia ad usque inde ab et predictum, rium 31 nanosti i umjetnosti umjetnosti i nanosti ić, Povijest Hrvata, 417–418; For the genealogical genealogical the For 417–418; Hrvata, Povijest ić, , civitatibus, castris et villis et castris civitatibus, , r [appel]latur, nec non progeniem seu generationem, seu progeniem non nec [appel]latur, r ki,” 14–15; Nada Klaić, Klaić, Nada 14–15; ki,” bri Osea a oien zaot Zvd za Zavoda znanosti povijesne za Odsjeka Zbornik (1322)” [The Šubići of Bribir until Bribir of Šubići [The (1322)” 22 (2004): 14. (2004): 22 later. hey wanted to recover the the recover to wanted hey tion of the territories that that territories the of tion son why that the Kőszegi the that why son Povijest Hrvata Povijest tary possession with all with possession tary benik, and Omiš.and benik, 116 ..., CD VII, doc. 86, 104– 86, doc. VII, CD ..., The Šubić kindred Šubić The taxes. d almost the entire the almost d
o al n his and Paul to ruled almost the almost ruled u yate. In dynasties. ou of 200 salms of salms 200 of sty. sty. and again in again and benefit from benefit 115 , 417. , Another 113 tree tree In cie,
CEU eTD Collection persuaded by Queen Mary of Naples to found a new bishopric in Šibenik, a t a Šibenik, abishopric in new found to Naples of persuaded Mary Queen by brothers. the Frankapan kindred I was not able to makegene to a able was I not kindred theFrankapan over to Paul Šubić, who took him to Zagreb. to over who him Šubić, took Paul to w Split to went they Šubić; George of company the in Manfredonia 121 120 119 118 123 122 39. 39. in possession of the Šubić kindred.Šubić the of possession in 117 Dujam FrankapanII 1291together Count addition, Naples King June visited in Charles in 1290. July 23 on legates his A to Frankapan the Leonard and of John counts supporter recommended a IV, Nicholas Pope dynasties. Anjou and Árpád protection. Charles’ acti George's in interfere to not Venice of doge the asked II Hungary. of Kingdom the to Robert Charles bringing of goal the 1300.January in again possessions his all C intensified. dynasty Anjou the and Šubić George between contacts 1292. in kindred Šubić the to given had he that grant the confirmed Pope 1298, In time. same the at dynasty Árpád the with relations Babonića,” 75. 75. Babonića,” CD VII, doc. 316, 361–362; Damir Karbić, “The Šubi “The Karbić, Damir 361–362; 316, doc. CDVII, Šubići “The Karbić: Damir 361; 314, doc. CDVII, “Šubići Bribi Karbić, Damir 313; 271, doc. CDVII, Klaić, Vjekoslav 304–305; 263, doc. CDVII, ... For a list of donation to the Frankapan kindred se kindred Frankapan the to donation of list a For Kl Vjekoslav 16; Bribirski,” “Šubići Karbić, Damir Pauli bani maritimi bani Pauli The Frankapan kindredFrankapan The kindredD) Frankapan The 117 h Šbć ide ws n ly f h Aju aiy bt hy mai they but family, Anjou the of ally an was kindred Šubić The 121 ..., CD VII, doc 144, 163-164; Damir Karbić, “Šubi Karbić, Damir 144, 163-164; doc VII, CD ..., n uy 30 te wleya-l Cals oet rie in arrived Robert Charles twelve-year-old the 1300, July In
123 was also involved in the dynastic struggle between the between struggle dynastic the in involved also was 118 At the end of August 1299, Charles II of Naples of II Charles 1299, August of end the At Povijest Hrvata Povijest 120 32 ological tree of the Frnkapan kindred. kindred. theofFrnkapan tree ological e the page 70. Due to the lack of research dedicate research of lack the to Due 70. page the e 122 After that, George traveled to Naples with Naples to traveled George that, After rski,” 15. 15. rski,” of Bribir,” 63. 63. Bribir,” of
aić, aić, ći of Bribir,” 63.Bribir,” of ći Šubići Bribirski Šubići Vol 1, 309; Szentgyörgyi, 1, 309; Vol
ons because he was under under was he because ons , 74–75; Szentgyörgyi, 74–75; , ći Bribirski,” 15; Kekez, “Rod Kekez, 15; Bribirski,” ći Because of this, Charles Charles this, of Because 119 here he was handed handed was he here harles II confirmed confirmed II harles Boniface VIII was was VIII Boniface In this period, the period, this In njou dynasty, dynasty, njou Borba own that was own was that , 31. , ntained Borba d to d In , ,
CEU eTD Collection Nada Klaić, Klaić, Nada possible.” atii a da pre Saoie Sgi e potes et Segnie Stagovine, partes duas ac Lastrizi) as and IIIAndrew against fought he because Leonard Count praised Povijest Hrvata Povijest rpris f ioo, orš Gca n ohr possessions. other and Gacka Modruš, Vinodol, of properties resistentie ac rigoris… ac resistentie Frankapan, the heads of the Frankapan family were Dujam and Leonar and Dujam were family Frankapan the of heads the Frankapan, Radovi Jugoslavenske Akademije vol. 18, 224, which 224, 18, vol. Akademije Jugoslavenske Radovi 129 128 127 126 125 130 terras Odozez, Obriz, Doyanum et Tincz de Lafrazi, Lafrazi, ipsus de Tincz et Doyanum Obriz, Odozez, terras with compared when differences some and similarities some showed eitn t Ade II a isln ivdr f h Hnain throne, Hungarian the of invader insolent an III, Andrew to resisting grain. of salms 500 export to throneHungarian the to come to grandson Count praised II Charles King Croatia, to came Robert Charles 124 confirm receive would he Hungary to Robert, Charles grandson, his took and Vinodol. and Modruš Krk, of counts Frankapan, Dujam owne those and kindred Babonić the by owned estates those exceptions Šubi the of properties the confirmed II Charles King which in Babonić.Radoslav with ...... Klaić, Vjekoslav 7 Babonića,” “Rod Kekez, 103–104; 85, doc. CDVII, Klaić, Vjekoslav … contra Andreacium, regni Ungarie illicitum invas illicitum Ungarie regni Andreacium, contra … ..., CD VII, doc. 340, 386–387; Vjekoslav Klaić tra Klaić Vjekoslav 386–387; 340, doc. VII, CD ..., comitatum Medurse (!) et Vinodoli, ac comitatum Gez comitatum ac Vinodoli, et (!) Medurse comitatum salmas frumenti quingentas pro munitione castrorum castrorum munitione pro quingentas frumenti salmas comitis Duymi de Veglia de Duymi comitis h atos f h nbe aiis n rai, h Šbćad Fra and Šubić the Croatia, in families noble the of actions The 3.2.3 Conclusions 130 Povijest Hrvata Povijest
, 385-386;Vjekoslav Klaić, Klaić, 385-386;Vjekoslav , Knezovi Frankapani Knezovi Knezovi Frankapani Knezovi Vjekoslav Klaić, Klaić, Vjekoslav , 385 , 124 ..., CD VII, doc. 320, 367; Nada Klaić, Nada 367; 320, doc. ...,CDVII, In the document mentioned above, issued on 19 August 1292, August 19 on issued above, mentioned document the In
129 , 116. , n diin h epaie ta Cut enr “is Leonard Count that emphasized he addition, In Knezovi Franapani Knezovi , 116. , Knezovi Frankapani Knezovi 127 33 tariam and promised him that if he came to Naples to came he if that him promised and was not available to me. to available not was orem, exercere ac expendere satagit quicquid potest quicquid satagit expendere ac exercere orem, ac duas partes Exagonnie, Segiem et potestariam potestariam et Segiem Exagonnie, partes duas ac nscribes tha last part as .. as part last tha nscribes 3; Vjekoslav Klaić, Vjekoslav Klaić, 3; … Vjekoslav Klaić, Klaić, Vjekoslav … ipsius , 117.; Vjekoslav Klaić takes this quote from from quote this takes Klaić Vjekoslav 117.; , ecge (!), quem tunc tenet, vt dicitur, videlicet videlicet dicitur, vt tenet, tunc quem (!), ecge , 117. , ., D I, o. 5, 9; aa Klaić, Nada 395; 351, doc. VII, CD ..., Povijest Hrvata Povijest 125 fe te et o John of death the After Knezovi Frankapani Knezovi 128 Dujam for helping his his helping for Dujam ig hre I also II Charles King knrd h lss as lists he kindred, ć nzv Frankapain Knezovi a reward, he allowed allowed he reward, a et terram Delazmiziz (de (de Delazmiziz terram et the noble kindreds noble the , 385. 385. , kpn kindreds nkapan d. d by John and and John by d 126 in any way way any in Just before Just ation of the of ation ,
116. , 315; 315; ,
CEU eTD Collection ports on the Adriatic Sea. In contrast, the Slavonian noble kindreds, kindreds, noble Slavonian the Incontrast, Sea. Adriatic the on ports famil noble Croatian the However, lands. especially property, possession. The noble kindreds of Croatia were more determined in t in determined more were Croatia of kindreds noble terr The possession. huge a granted was family Šubić The dynasty. Neapolitan the Anjou dynasty was the weaker the Serenissima will be. will weakerthe Anjou dynastywas the the Serenissima fact the on counted kindreds noble Croatian The coast. Dalmatian whole intention the had and kindreds noble Croatian the of power the threatened act their influenced also Venice dynasty. Anjou the and kindreds noble betwe connections close for reason more one was There dynasty. Anjou eager so were Croatia of families noble the why reason another esta to position trade profitable opinion, my In dynasty. Anjou the a with relations in not were therefore and inland land owned Kőszegi, had lost because of Andrew III. The Babonić kindred was a speci a was kindred Babonić The III. Andrew of because lost had to wanted they reasons; territorial for dynasty Anjou the with the Anjou with party kindred Kőszegi were a noble different. kindreds The sides took rea the dynasty, Anjou the of allies becoming for reasons same closer to the lands of the Anjou dynasty and could trade with them b them with trade could and dynasty Anjou the of lands the to closer kindreds Frankapan and Šubić the of possessions The dynasty. Anjou the t order in dynasty Anjou the with connected kindreds Frankapan and Šubić kindr noble the Like counterparts. Slavonian their than dynasty Anjou ta paying without wheat of amount certain a of export the and lands Anj The Anjous. and Árpáds the with relations their in Slavonia in While the Croatian noble kindreds, the Šubići and the Frankapani, both both Frankapani, the and Šubići the kindreds, noble Croatian the While 34 ies were also trading with with trading also were ies regain the lands that they that lands the regain to make an alliance with with alliance an make to was, in addition to land, to addition in was, sons why the Slavonian Slavonian the why sons itory as a hereditary hereditary a as itory al case because there there because case al xes if they helped the the helped they if xes the Babonići and the the and Babonići the ou dynasty promised promised dynasty ou eds in Slavonia, the the Slavonia, in eds ecause they owned owned they ecause heir support of the the of support heir that the stronger stronger the that en the Croatian the en ions because it it because ions were located located were to control the control to o gain more more gain o ls trade blish had the had llied llied CEU eTD Collection problem of semi-independent noble kindreds, he was confronted with a with confronted was he kindreds, noble semi-independent of problem provinces.
131 noble (1301 kindreds Slavonian –1322)the Croatian and the won throne. side which matter no power their keep would kindred the that so the Babonić brothers also speculate that may detail. One were planned in of result the been also have could they but opinions, individual their could Babonić Radoslav and Stephen of stances political different side Anjou the because surely almost is end the at side Anjou the Bab the why reason The kindred. Babonić of example the on visible Anj the and Árpád the of tactics political The beginning. the at tw the between choice the concerning policy family unique no was het ht h Hnain igo wud e iie it svrl independe several into divided be would Kingdom Hungarian the that threat cea practically power central death his after king; a as nominally kindreds noble Most territories. semi-independent formed v of possession into came kindreds noble certain and weak very was l the of reign the During crisis. deep in was power royal Engel, When Charles Robert arrived to the Hungarian Kingdom, in addition to to addition in Kingdom, Hungarian the to arrived Robert Charles When A change of the dynasties in Hungarian Kingdom happened in a period period a in happened Kingdom Hungarian in dynasties the of change A in the Kingdom situation 3.3.1 The Hungarian between beforeand the conflict 3.3.3 Phase Charles Robert period 3– The The Realm The 131
, 128. 128. ,
35 sed to exist. It was even a realistic realistic a even was It exist. to sed ast Árpádian kings, central power power central kings, Árpádian ast have been the result of of result the been have u yate ae most are dynasties ou o competing dynasties dynasties competing o accepted Andrew III III Andrew accepted ast areas where they where areas ast political moves that moves political was winning. The The winning. was onić kindred chose chose kindred onić nother threat – the – threat nother chose both sides sides both chose ate for battle in which which in the nt nt CEU eTD Collection ea. h Ksei ide, h hd upre Cals oet eoe 1301, before Robert Charles supported had who kindred, Kőszegi The began. 134 133 arrested Otto, returned him to Bavaria and took possession of the the of possession took and Bavaria to him returned Otto, arrested Ladi nobleman the 1307 of spring the In Saxons. Transilvanian the and kindred the stood side Otto’s On Bavaria. of Duke Otto, cousin, his to conceded 132 throne.Hungarian the for claims his abandoned Václav side. noblemen of number great a 1304 of beginning the by and war this in Habsburg Rudolf and Albert uncles his and bishops, pope, the of help Char counties. Komárno and Bars Hont, conquered also posses Matthew afterwards permanent as counties Nitra and Trenčin him give to Václav counties northwestern the from oligarch an Csák, Matthew Transdanubia. t theyconquered almost In addition, support Václav. to changed and started sides Rob Charles between war a Soon Székesfehérvár. in Crown Holy the nam the under crowned was Václav daughter. III’s Andrew of fiancé of daughter the Anna, of descendant a was who II, Václav King Bohemian son (Wenceslas), Václav suggested They throne. vacant the fill should would they whom king new a that insisted them of Some king. a as him noblem of number great a used, not was Crown Holy the and Esztergom colleg Virgin Holly the Crown.Holy of the with church Székesfehérvár the in crowned was king the if Hunga of king a of Coronation throne. Hungarian the for candidates other crushing to himself dedicate could Robert Charles events, these Engel, Engel, Engel, The Realm The Realm The Realm The , 129 – – 130. 129 , Klaić, Vjekoslav 128–129, , 128. ,
132 Povijest Hrvata Povijest Since in 1301 Charles Robert was crowned in crowned was Robert Charles 1301 in Since 36 Vol 2, 8–10. 2,8–10. Vol 133 These rights were then were rights These Holy Crown.Holy the power of those those of power the , gained dominance gained , e of Ladislas with with Ladislas of e en did not accept not did en sions, and soon soon and sions, stood on the his the on stood iate chapter in in chapter iate r ad Václav and ert and heir of the the of heir and ry is valid only only valid is ry Kőszegi noble noble Kőszegi Béla IV and a a and IV Béla have selected selected have les, with the with les, convinced , 134 slav Kán Kán slav he entire Aftere now now CEU eTD Collection between more than one candidate for the Hungarian throne. A decade ea decade A throne. Hungarian the for candidate one than more between n Saoin oneprs a be a eae eoe ta i, hy fou they is, that before, decade a been had counterparts Slavonian and sit same the in were kindreds noble Hungarian the period this In othe support to started they and him against rebelled magnates candidate gainHungarian Hungarian the support of and most throne noble kindreds. other defeat to managed confrontations, wit military and Robert, maneuvers Charles Robert, Charles profit. personal their on chose they earlier, decade a kindreds noble Slavonian and Croatian the i located were estates whose allies new gained noblemen Hungarian Ot and Václav emerged, throne Hungarian the for candidates new when Ár the towards geographically gravitated always Hungary Inland t of those and dynasty Anjou the of estates the between distances w this for reasons the of one opinion my In ones. Hungarian the with much kindr noble Slavonian and Croatian the with contact in been had dynasty 135 August1310. thi the (for crowned was Robert Charles suit. followed legates, help the with Csák Matthew and kindred Kőszegi the year next the and Ro Charles accepted Csák Ugrin and Borsa Jacob Aba, Amdeus die a At Buda. captured he later, year a and Esztergom, conquered as early As ruler. lawful a as him accept not did who noblemen crown consecrated by some cardinals, however, this this however, cardinals, some by consecrated crown used. not Engels, Engels, fe Cals oet ae o h Kndm f ugr, get nu great a Hungary, of Kingdom the to came Robert Charles After The Realm The 135
, 130; the second coronation of Charles Robert took Robert Charles of coronation second the 130; ,
37 coronation was not legal because the Holy Crown was Crown Holy the because legal not was coronation r candidates for the throne. throne. the for candidates r rd time) as Charles I on 27 Ion Charles as time) rd place in 1309 in Buda with a a with Buda in 1309 in place pád dynasty. After 1301, After dynasty. pád bert as their lawful king king lawful their as bert uation as their Croatian Croatian their as uation he Hungarian nobility. Hungarian he h calculated political political calculated h 1306, Charles Robert Robert Charles 1306, n their vicinity. Like vicinity. their n t in 1307, magnates 1307, in t sides depending sides eds, but not that not but eds, rlier the Anjou the rlier d themselves nd o f Bavaria, of to f h papal the of as the great the as s for the the for s br of mber
CEU eTD Collection but in that case all the expenses were to be paid b paid werebe to expenses the all case inbut that place far from the estates of Slavonian and Croatian noble kindreds noble Croatian and Slavonian of estates the from far place document was dated incorrectly when it was published in in published was it when incorrectly dated was document 1291, which mentions the same situation and the same persons is publi is persons same the and situation same the mentions which 1291, the military forces were needed north of the Drava Drava the of north needed were forces military the a if only but expence own their at forces military 139 138 137 s ie t Cut ua o Kk n Rdsa Babonić. Radoslav and Krk of Dujam Count to given is t in ban of office whic in 1306 July 6 on Naples in issued document a with this the demonstrates leave not did he because Robert Charles of 136 Croatia of some them, in interest of lack Robert’s Charles by died. already had Babonić Radoslav and old quite was Dujam Count time, time Charles Robert was already in Kingdom of Hungary and not and Hungary of Kingdom in already was Robert Charles time 1306 in Naples to traveling been have would Babonić Radoslav and Krk l not is it because1291 to dated one the is document original the that the of compilers the that propose I and Kekez Hrvoje Historian with Charles Robert. It seems to me that the reason for this this for reason the that me to seems It Robert. Charles with ha well, as Kingdom the of parts other in properties extensive whi kindred, Kőszegi the for except kindreds, noble Slavonian and Croatian Hunga rebellious the with deal to trying and throne the for fighting not neednot help at their that particular service or time. In addition, according to an old law Croatian and and Croatian law old an to according addition, In Kekez, “Rod Babonića,” 81. Babonića,” “Rod Kekez, 34. 28, doc. CD6, Klaić, Nada 123; 109, doc. CD8, Nada Klaić has argued that the Babonić kindred was dissatisfied w dissatisfied was kindred Babonić the that argued has Klaić Nada uig h frt eae f h futet cnuy we Cals Rob Charles when century, fourteenth the of decade first the During Charles3.2.2. Weak communication with Robert
Povijest Hrvata Povijest y the king yking the military forces were needed in Croatia and Slavonia and Croatia in needed were forces military 38 Slavonian nobility had to help the king by sending sending by king the help to had nobility Slavonian , 352. 352. , River, the nobility was still required to send an a an send to required still was nobility the River, 136
CD CD 137 was that these conflicts took took conflicts these that was oee, tik ht this that think I However, d almost no communication no almost d 8. A document dated 6 July July 6 dated document A 8. CD made a mistake and mistake a made CD n and Slavonian noble noble Slavonian and n in Naples. in . Charles Robert did did Robert Charles . ogical that Dujam of Dujam that ogical in oiiy the nobility, rian shed in in shed er ad. She hands. heir because at that that at because ith the politics the ith h free passage passage free h Disappointed ch had an an had ch 139 CD CD ert was was ert In that In 6. rmy, rmy, him him . If If . 138
CEU eTD Collection and the Tyrol recieved these estates as a sign of g of sign a as estates these recieved Tyrol the and 141 140 deve they that logical is it and kindreds noble Slavonian and Croatian threat. powerful from them decided the Venetian enough find defend protectors to to unprotected. felt they time, the at throne Hungarian for candidates the swear to Venice to fidelity. go to them forced even Serenissima the and pa to obliged were They Venice. of Republic the by endangered Frankapan The protectors. new for searching for reasons different these However, allies. powerful new for out seek to kindreds Babonić Habsburg powerful westernThey the their to neighbors, turning started fi to trying were kindreds, Babonić and Frankapan the kindreds, kindreds anoa ih h Wni Mrh n es fo Hl Rmn Emper Roman Holy from Habsburg. lease in March Windic the with Carniola be can Carint of Duchy the 1278 in gained who Tirol, and Gorica These of count IV, Meinhard connections. marital by kindred backed Babonić also the was between Habsburgs connection The Slavonia. of Ban of office Rober Charles by betrayed felt they because Habsburgs the in his battles with Otto II, the Bohemian king king theBohemian II, withOtto battles in his Kekez, “Rod Babonića”, 82; Meinhard IV, the founde the IV, Meinhard 82; Babonića”, “Rod Kekez, Klaić, Vjekoslav h asne f omncto wt Cals oet ocd h Fra the forced Robert Charles with communication of absence The the with 3.3.3 Alliance Habsburgs According to Nada Klaić, the Babonić kindred decided to make an a an make to decided kindred Babonić the Klaić, Nada to According 140 141 ihu Cals oet n hi sd, h ws n ofit ih ot with conflict in was who side, their on Robert Charles Without n ht a te ons f oia n Trl eae egbr of neighbors became Tyrol and Gorica of counts the way that In Knezovi Frankapani Knezovi
, 118–119. 118–119. , ratitude because he helped Emperor Rudolf of Habsbu of Rudolf Emperor helped he because ratitude 39 r of the Meinhard branch of the counts of Gorica Gorica of counts the of branch Meinhard the of r t who did not give them the the them give not did who t y taxes and tolls to them, to tolls and taxes y kindred was constantly was kindred Because of this, they this, of Because s. s. two families had had families two traced back to to back traced a ot of oath an m nd new allies. new nd r uof of Rudolf or loped direct direct loped lliance with with lliance nkapan and and nkapan and the the and hia, and hia, some
her rg rg CEU eTD Collection between him and the Habsburgs were created when Frederick I Frederick when created were Habsburgs the and him between between Counts of Gorica and Croatian Nobility in M in Nobility Croatian and Gorica of Counts between Zgodovinski časopis Zgodovinski the Fair) needed to find allies from thetheeastern area Fair) find needed allies of to the Alps. Babonić married Clara Eufemia, sister of Henry II, count of Gori of count II, Henryof sister Eufemia, Clara Babonić married ( “Rod Babonića, ” 83. ” Babonića, “Rod Dush Chroniken Deutsche : See in: “Ottokars Österreichische Reimchronik,” vol Reimchronik,” Österreichische “Ottokars in: See genant.... Doym grâve der in daz lant kom ouch den mit si dâ; man nant Wabanic die 1Radizlâ, grâf bruoder sîn und Agrim von herzog der imze kom ouch dar reit. Marchpurge gegen 146 145 144 143 Oberleitenberg, forum in Cromau, et nobiles seu cli seu nobiles et Cromau, in forum Oberleitenberg, 147
142 Orehovica. incomes market the Ž Oberleitenberg, of from village amount whole the and Kostanjevica from taxes the of half one towe a over them handed he which for exchange in marks silver Viennese Frederic gave brothers Babonić the that testifies it and 1308 March Chronicle. Rhyming Styrian Ottokar’s andFrankapan. Radoslav Babonić andStephen, John Dujam ne his with met he where Maribor, to proceeded he that after and 1308 them. with connections ; ee Ši, Grši rfve n eisi gospod Devinski in grofovje “Goriški Štih, Peter 4; http://www.dmgh.de/ - 5 4 ” “Odnošaji, Kos, Milko 82. Babonića,” “Rod Kekez, hr i grofovima goričkim medju “Odnošaji Kos, Milko 82. Babonića,” “Rod Kekez, . tri i Geci, eim roa i Landstros in vrboram mediam Grezchin, in turrim ...... mit im der furste univerzeit univerzeit furste der im mit ... rdrc etrd no line ih h Cut er I o Gorica of II Henry Count the with alliance into entered Frederick 147 It is also stated that this loan will be returned to the Baboni the to returned be will loan this that stated also is It 3 (1992): 312. 312. 3 (1992): ) (last accessed 25 November 2010.) 2010.) November 25 accessed (last ) e. oeh emle (anvr 19) 1213–1214, 1893), (Hannover, Seemüller Joseph ed. ,
142 hy rae mrtl od wt te aoi knrd John kindred. Babonić the with bonds marital created They
146 h dcmn ws sud n aio o 6 on Maribor in issued was document The 40 . 2, 2, . entes in Orchiniz. in entes je,”[The Counts of Gorica and the Lords of Devin] Devin] of Lords the and Gorica of Counts je,”[The edieval Period] edieval Monumenta Germaniae Historica. Scriptores. VIII. VIII. Scriptores. Historica. Germaniae Monumenta
vatskim plemstvom u srednjem vijeku,”[Relations vijeku,”[Relations srednjem u plemstvom vatskim from Krmavo and the unfree knights in in knights unfree the and Krmavo from t, vrboram integram in Sicherberg, villam in in villam Sicherberg, in integram vrboram t, Vjesnik zemaljskog arhiva zemaljskog Vjesnik .., CD VIII, doc. 141, 153; Kekez, Kekez, 153; 141, doc. VIII, CD .., 145 This event This confirmed is in 144 ca.
of Habsburg (Frederick (Frederick Habsburg of 143 k II a loan of 300 of loan a II k Direct connectionsDirect lines 93473–93480 93473–93480 lines w allies, brothers allies, w ć brothera after brothera ć , on 5 March March 5 on , mea, the umberak, r in Gradčan, Gradčan, in r 19 (1917): (1917): 19 CEU eTD Collection beginning of his reign he was determined to use his royal rig royal his use to determined was he reign his of beginning etoe ( mentioned 151 150 149 Hungarian nobility that lasted until 1322.Hungarian until nobility lasted that led actions His state. former their to returned be to have Church from expropriated illegally been had that revenues and estates w kingdom the office govern them gave He realm. to the of magnates the of tried cooperation Robert Charles throne, Hungarian the for w confrontations the After king. the of power the increase to doing so no the of power the suppress to efforts made He Kingdom. Hungarian the change to decided he Therefore, ruling. of way their inherit 148 orders. his perform to refused he later however, nominally, authority for him. town the conquered they and crown the for side Frederick’s on fighting t In Habsburgs. the to support military also gave kindred Babonić him. to given money the back pay will he that wa probably document, same the confirmed again Frederick 1308, March marks. silver Viennese 300 of debt the returns II Frederick ails nta o Rdsa. toa' Syin Chr Styrian Ottokar's Radoslav. Radoslav. of instead Ladislas D II dc 11 13 i ti dcmn te Babon the document this in 153; 141, doc. VIII, CD Engel, 5–6 “Odnošaji,” Kos, 83–84; Babonića,” “Rod Kekez, 5. “Odnošaji,” Kos, Charles Robert did acquire the throne of the Árpád kings, but he did not did he but kings, Árpád the of throne the acquire did Robert Charles the nobility Hungarian 3.3.4 Charles Robert’s confrontations with Charles Robert first came conflict with Matthew Csák, who ea who Csák, Matthew with conflict came first Robert Charles 150 The Realm The Nos
tpau, oans t Ladislaus... et Johannes Stephanus, , 130–131. ,
151 41
) One can presume that the scribe mistakenly wrote wrote mistakenly scribe the that presume can One ) onicle mentions the brothers Stephen, John and and John Stephen, brothers the mentions onicle . 149 ić brothers Stephen, John and Ladislas are are Ladislas and John Stephen, brothers ić n diin o iaca spot the support, financial to addition In 148 hts. He insisted that all the all that insisted He hts. fw as ae, n 15 on later, days few A s and titles, but from the the from but titles, and s to a long war against the the against war long a to balance of power in the the in power of balance he same year, they were were year, they same he royal estates and the the and estates royal ith other candidates other ith ble kindreds and in in and kindreds ble rly on accepted his his accepted on rly n 31 Charles 1311 In nting to confirm confirm to nting Slovenj-Gradec Slovenj-Gradec want to to want t the ith CEU eTD Collection be excommunicated, and then Charles started a military conflic military a started Charles then and excommunicated, be
152 of office the took Robert that lasted until 1322. lastedthat until t defeat to managed he that of because and time, the at army one Char armies, their unite not did magnates rebelling the king, the son. underage left and 1311 in died who Csák, Ugrinus late the supporter, a Bačka, Slavonija, of part Srem, were held he that areas only a united magnates the all Almost retainers. personal his were whose government new a created he addition, In earlier. them given had he them removed and rebels them declared he that, of Because Robert. Bohemia new the rejec directly magnates the 1314, in diet regional a At Luxemburg. with and Habsburg of I Frederick with alliance Charl allies. his of those with enemies his of estates the surround mag the of power the reducing of plan his for nobility the from not could he that realized Robert Charles troops. their defeated wher (Rozgony), Rozhanovce of village the at 1312 in king the against foug and Csák Matthew of that with armies their united Aba Amadeus how lands; Aba’s take to moment this use to wanted Robert Charles rul lawful his as Robert Charles accept not did past the in who Engel,
The Realm The , 131. 131. , 152
magister tavernicorummagister
42 away from him, ordered that he should should he that ordered him, from away gainst Charles Robert, the Robert, Charles gainst nd the estates of his only only his of estates the nd t. Magnate Amadeus Aba Aba Amadeus Magnate t. er, died in the same year. same the in died er, les Robert fought against against fought Robert les hem in a series of battles battles of series a in hem gain sufficient support support sufficient gain nates so he intended to to intended he so nates ted support for Charles Charles for support ted es Robert renewed his his renewed Robert es from the offices that that offices the from ht a decisive battle battle decisive a ht ever, the sons of of sons the ever, e Charles Robert Charles e kn Jh of John king n Fortunately for for Fortunately members members CEU eTD Collection brother of Stephen. John fought against the rebellious Hungarian magn Hungarian rebellious the against fought John Stephen. of brother brothers, Stephen. He probably selected Stephen Babonić for thi for Babonić Stephen selected probably He Stephen. brothers, Borsonouch cum possessionibus et pertinentiis suis suis pertinentiis et possessionibus cum Borsonouch ossins eeycy vcts u csr similit castro cum vocatas similite Megeryuchye possessiones castro cum vocatas Polosnycha possessiones
granted to him. to granted whic Međurječje, of estate and castle the and Položnica estate Garešnica Lower and Upper with Bršljanovo Moslavina, of castles the C asked he kindred, Kőszegi the defeated John After Kindred. Kőszegi oncin o te aoi knrd ih hi wsen neighbors. western their with kindred Babonić the of connections Ro Charles favor, his into them taking By Habsburgs. the with had connections the of because also but estates large his and wealth oldes the to ban of office the give to decided he therefore and him to a would John, and Peter Kőszegi, Henry of sons the that feared Charles di king a as Charles accept not did who Kőszegi, Henry ban former 155 154 noble kindredsnoble 153 i fr him. for did t of because kindred Babonić to debt of kind some release Habsburg that declares 1316 February 18 to dated document A Habsburgs. the with re Kindred Babonić However, Babonić. Stephen to missions important Klaić, Klaić, ...... 418. 342, doc. CDVIII, 85–86. Babonića,” “Rod Kekez, primo videlicet portionem possessionum Petri de Mon de Petri possessionum portionem videlicet primo Povijest Hrvata Povijest After 1309, Charles Robert renewed his contacts with the Babonić ki Babonić the with contacts his renewed Robert Charles 1309, After kindred A) Babonić The 3.3.5 The relations between Charles Robert and the Croatian and Slavonian relations between3.3.5 The Slavonian the Croatian Charles and and Robert 154 hre Rbr ltr rnfre te fie f a t Jh Ba John to ban of office the transferred later Robert Charles 155 One can see that the king entrusted John with more important missio important more with John entrusted king the that see can One , 354. 354. ,
43 t u vli Sproi t neir Gruce ite Gersunche; Inferiori et Superiori villis cum et r oao .. vocato er r vocato, in comitatu de Garyg existentes; item item existentes; Garyg de comitatu in vocato, r ozlou cum castrum similiter vocato, castrum vocato, similiter castrum cum ozlou , D II dc 31 439–440; 361, doc. VIII, CD ., that the Babonić kindred kindred Babonić the that s position because of his his of because position s Cals oet then Robert Charles h 153 he favors that they they that favors he dta ae year. same that ed bert weakened the the weakened bert e i nt give not did He mained in contact contact in mained ates including the including ates harles Robert for Robert harles t of the Babonić Babonić the of t lso be unfaithful be lso , the castle and and castle the , Frederick I of I Frederick ndred. The The ndred. oi, the bonić,
Nada ns m m CEU eTD Collection F met brothers Babonić the with together Dujam, Count that says confirm is This Habsburgs. the with contacts making started they Robe Charles with contacts any have not did they century fourteenth However, particular. in Robert Charles and general in dynasty closer stronger for the Babonićaccounts estates to kindred engage John’s of which magnates with fighting was Robert Charles office, the held John of estates the from away far were estates whose magnates war engagedin was Charles when ban of office the held Stephen 157 them. confront to Babonić John Ban sent He Hungary. in also they because them of one was kindred Kőszegi Hungary. in kindreds noble into magnates the of power the reduce to plan his put to started until a temporaryuntil was peace made 1321. in towards resistance with continued kindred Kőszegi The U Srem. attacked king, Serbian the because and kindreds magnate other of rebellion b stopped were lands their into inroads Further counties. Tolna and Somogy 156 this for reason The Babonić. Stephen to entrusted he that ones the than Marija Karbić, “Rod Gisingovaca,” 25. 25. Gisingovaca,” “Rod Karbić, Marija Klaić, Nada The Kőszegi Kindred was the one of the rebellious families. When Charles Rober Charles families. When rebellious the the one was of The Kindred Kőszegi Kőszegi The B) kindred The Frankapan kindred, as mentioned above, were great supporters of supporters great were above, mentioned as kindred, Frankapan The kindredC) Franakapan The Povijest Hrvata Povijest , 354. 354. ,
157 44
the Babonić kindred. When When kindred. Babonić the 156 in the first decade of the of decade first the in against those Hungarian those against He conquered Baranya, conquered He rederick I of Habsburg. of I rederick ed in a document that that document a in ed action he started with with started he action whose estates were were estates whose rt. Because of this, this, of Because rt. is probablyis Charles Robert Robert Charles roš II Milutin, Milutin, II roš owned lands owned ecause of the the of ecause the Anjou Anjou the ment. ment.
that that t t CEU eTD Collection ban as a hereditary position. hereditary a as ban rbby atd o ekn h cnetos ewe te rnaa kindre Frankapan the between connections the weaken to wanted probably Hrvata kindred. of estate the and Otočac of castle the Lazinčići, and Doljani 159 161 160 Charles Robert confirmed his donation again in 1323 in again donation his confirmed Robert Charles ... uocata Obriz terra ac Othochacio conquered Bosnia, and in 1308 Charles Robert confirmed him in the office the in Ve him confirmed from Robert Charles 1308 Zadar in and of Bosnia, conquered city the take to and Bosnia dominate to goals: Šu the of politics the period this During them. with contact in not fourteent the of decade first the in but however, Hungary of Kingdom Habsburgs. 158 Zadar.of count the II,became Mladen son, Paul’s doing In Dujam. Count to County Požega donated alliance, this of scared Charle but alliance, of kind any made have they that sure not is It Mladen II stopped the rebellions again but this time even more v more even time this but again rebellions the stopped II Mladen Rep the of support the with 1321/1322 of winter the during were resumed very rebellions these stopped He II. Mladen of rule under were a year Trogi of towns the in started rebellion a 1320s following Inthe him. succeeded the died Paul Count rule. Venetian under again was
Klaić, Nada CD VIII, doc. 95, 105–106; Damir Karbić, “Šubići B “Šubići Karbić, Damir 105–106; 95, doc. CDVIII, 17. Bribirski,” “Šubići Karbić, Damir .. b oainm ota d cmtt Gck, (ter Gechke, comitatu de nostram donacionem db .... , 386; Vjekoslav Klaić, Vjekoslav Klaić, 386; , Šubić kindred, led by Count Paul, helped Charles Robert to gain the gain to Robert Charles helped Paul, Count by led kindred, Šubić kindredD) Šubić The 159
158 Povijest Hrvata Povijest n diin i 11 h aan ofre Gca ony te sae of estates the County, Gacka confirmed again he 1316 in addition, In Knezovi Frankapani Knezovi , 386. 386. , 160
, CD VIII, doc. 355, 432–433; The document is heavi is document The 432–433; 355, doc. VIII, CD , n 31 te ui knrd civd hi scn goal; second their achieved kindred Šubić the 1311, In ,130. 45 (CD IX, doc 122, 142–143); Nada Klaić, Klaić, Nada 142–143); 122, doc IX, (CD ribirski,” 18. ribirski,” a oao ie) e er Lzyhc, castro Laznychich, terra de item) Dolano, ra 161 However, just two years later, Zadarlater,years two just However,
violently. The rebellions rebellions The violently. bi t te Frankapan the to Obriž iolently. That iolently. bić kindred had two two had kindred bić r and Šibenik, which Šibenik, and r Rbr, probably Robert, s nice. Count Paul Paul Count nice. h century he was was he century h ublic of Venice. ofublic d ldn II Mladen nd ly damaged, but damaged, ly throne of the of throne of Bosnian Bosnian of
d and the the and d motivated hs he this, Povijest Povijest CEU eTD Collection eid a qie rifl o te ui knrd woe oe hd si had power whose kindred, Šubić the for fruitful quite was period hre’ pa o rgiig oe sne hy ae ot hi l their lost have they since power regaining of plan Charles’s wer they and Slavonia in and Hungary in both land owned Kindred Kőszegi in lands owned who ones the were attacked he that noblemen first The candi the between confrontation plan for his Hungarian Robert put the starts to reducing pow Charles throne. the in win not did Robert Charles if t secure to wanted It they that possible is known. not is Habsburgs turned the to w reason the However, Venice. against protection the needed they communicate to Habsburg the to started turned Frankapans the that fact The Habsburgs. they since kindreds Babonić and Frankapan the communications of lack This Hungary. of throne the candidatesfor other with occupied ws he because Croatia and Slavonia of kindreds noble Croatia plan in started and his implement Slavonia. to tha of because and powerful too becoming were They period. this during 162 II,II’sII turn against to MladenKurjaković Mladen family, and brother, Paul Mihovil the family, Nelipčić the families, noble Croatian some Damir Karbić, “Šubići Bribirski,” 21–23. 21–23. Bribirski,” “Šubići Karbić, Damir t h bgnig f hs eid Cals oet i nt communicate not did Robert Charles period, this of beginning the At 3.3.6 Conclusions
46 s is quite logical because because logical quite is s ands in Hungary. This This Hungary. in ands hy the Babonić kindred kindred Babonić the hy vć aiy ad the and family, ović confrontations with confrontations nfcnl grown gnificantly clearly bothered clearlybothered t Charles Robert Charles t Hungary. The The Hungary. er into action. er action. into dates for the the for dates e affected by by affected e . 162 hemselves hemselves ih the with
with the the with CEU eTD Collection Croatian and Slavonian noble kindreds (1322 kindreds Slavonian –1342) noble Croatian and
results in Slavonia and Croatia. and Slavonia results in Croatia. a to wanted Robert Charles kindreds, noble Hungarian the on plan his i in succeeded had he After River. Sava the of north Hungary, in kindreds pow the with confronted he century, thirteenth the of decade second the In power thereducing of plan his implement to began Robert Charles secure had he After Hungary. of Kingdom the of throne the for candidates confront with the Šubić kindred first, probably due to their to immense first, confrontpower. probably kindred due the Šubić with be have would Charl first, it kindreds noble Slavonian Although the attack later. to geographically list will I that reasons the for Šubi b Robert, Charles for powerful danger a represented also Frankapans more and more the of power the crush to was Robert m the Incentury.Croatia, thirteenth the of partsecond the in Hungary lost already had which kindred, Kőszegi the and Slavonia, in allies In first decade of the thirteenth century Charles Robert fought a fought Robert Charles century thirteenth the of decade first In in the situation 3.4.1 The Hungary Kingdom of 3.4. Phase 4 – Period of confrontation among Robert the confrontation Charles and Period3.4. Phase of 4– In Slavonia his main obstacles were the Babonić kindred, until then until Babonićkindred, the were obstacles main his In Slavonia
47 ut he did not go against them them against go not did he ut of the noble kindreds. noble the of es Robert decided to to decided Robert es their possessions in in possessions their ain goal for Charles Charles for goal ain en more logical logical more en chieve the same same the chieve gainst the other other the gainst ć kindred. The The kindred. ć his most loyal loyal most his mplementing d the throne, the d ru noble erful CEU eTD Collection power of the Croatian the noble kindreds. His primary goal was t was goal primary His kindreds. noble the Croatian the of power Hrvatski hercezi i bani za Karla Roberta I Ljudevit I Roberta Karla za bani i hercezi Hrvatski Charles Robert.Charles of order the by sent 1316, in II Mladen confronted Babonić John Ban Klaić, ide ad mrv hs oiin n rai ad Dalmatia. and Croatia in position his improve and kindred supress this doing by and benefit own his into situation Mladen’s Robe Charles above. mentioned Trogir and Šibenik of towns the in violently the of because him against turned II Paul brother his and a Mihovilović, Nelipčić, the when situation difficult a in himself Mladen Zadar. of counts the and Bosnia of lords the wi became members powerful more and more become had kindred Šubić The Šubić-s. the intende Robert Charles kindreds, noble Hungarian with situation the A kindreds. noble the of power the reducing of plan his with continued 164 noble kindreds until the end of his reign (1322 until of kindreds the – 1342) end noble 163 won allies his and Robert Charles of army The 1322. of summer the Bli at battle the in II Mladen of army the confronted troops unit These Trogir. and of Šibenik of the towns the militia with Kurjaković and kindreds Nelipč the of armies the with joined Babonić John Ban of army The of Charles Robert and Louis I] (Zagreb: Naklada Mat Naklada (Zagreb: I] Louis and Robert Charles of li de nt ut te rmr suc fo which from source primary the quote not does Klaić Klaić, Nada fe hvn cnoiae hs ue vr ot f ugr, hre R Charles Hungary, of most over rule his consolidated having After kindredA) Šubić The 3.4.2 The relations between Charles Robert and the Croatian and Slavonian relations between3.4.2 The Slavonian the Croatian Charles and and Robert Povijest Hrvata Povijest 164 Charles Robert sent Ban John Babonić to confront Mladen II in 1322. in II Mladen confront to Babonić John Ban sent Robert Charles , 355. 355. ,
a I. : (1301-1382) (1301-1382) : I. a 48 ice hrvatske, 1900), 165. 1900), hrvatske, ice he extracted this information; Vjekoslav Klaić, Klaić, Vjekoslav information; this extracted he [Croatian princes and bans in the time time the in bans and princes [Croatian ska near the town of Knin in in Knin of town the near ska 163 codn t Vjekoslav to According
nd Kurjaković kindreds kindreds Kurjaković nd the power of the Šubić Šubić the of power the o reduce the power of power the reduce o suppressed rebellions rebellions suppressed d to set limits on the on limits set to d ić, Mihovilović, and Mihovilović, ić, t nedd o turn to intended rt fter he stabilized he fter the battle and and battle the II Šubić found found Šubić II h ie Its time. th the king king the obert ed
CEU eTD Collection rsm ta ti tte a gvn o on aoi atr ldn I Mladen after Babonić John to given was title this that presume ate gis te ui knrd Te rain ol knrd dd not did kindreds noble Croatian The kindred. Šubić the against battle Hercezi i banii Hercezi seized some of the counties.the of some seized as struggles internal and disintegration of period a entered dominion Part Robert. Charles against rebelled Frankapans, the except Cr the of all Almost worse.” to bad from “went Karbić Damir power.from a Croatia, Slavonia, all of ban a Slavonia, of ban already was who rul his to kindred the Šubić He totally,s. subject want annihilate to them not to did but 168 167 166 165 Mlade son (1329–1348). his and (1322–1328) II George under especially Croatia, in most kindred the remained they Croatia, of bans longer no were members of their properttheirand powersignificant the reduction weakening of Croati in reign their achieved had they which on foundation legal the circumstances. died soon he where Hungary, to taken and imprisoned was II Mladen Damir Karbić, “Šubići Bribirski,” 24. 24. Bribirski,” “Šubići Karbić, Damir ... 25. Bribirski,” “Šubići Karbić, Damir 92. kindred,” Šubić “The Karbić, Damir oanm au tcu Slvne Coce t Dalmaci et Croacie Sclavonie, tocius banum Johannem In a document issued in 16 October 1322, Charles Robert called John Ba John called Robert Charles 1322, October 16 in issued document a In Babonić Kindred The B) fe Mae I Šbć a dfae, h stain n Croatia in situation the defeated, was Šubić II Mladen After Although the Šubić kindred was considerably weakened by these eve these by weakened considerably was kindred Šubić the Although , 166. 166. , 168 167 165 t s osbe ht on o ti tte eas h hle the helped he because title this got John that possible is It Charles Robert achieved his goal of suppressing the power of power the suppressing of goal his achieved Robert Charles
166
Because of the defeat of Mladen II, the Šubić kindred lost kindred Šubić the II, Mladen of defeat the of Because
49 e ..., CD IX, doc. 76, 90; Vjekoslav Klaić, Klaić, Vjekoslav 90; 76, doc. IX, CD ..., o te ui’ former Šubić’s the of s oatian noble kindreds, kindreds, noble oatian nd Dalmatia. One can can One Dalmatia. nd I Šubić was removed removed was Šubić I other noble families noble other ies. ies. a and this led to a to led this and a significant noble noble significant ne unknown under accept John John accept nts and their and nts ig n the in king the Šubić- the t quote to , bonić, bonić, III n e. CEU eTD Collection possessions were confirmed in January, before the fall of Mlade of fall the before January, in confirmed were possessions because he was a “foreigner” in Croatia, because he did not own an own not did he because Croatia, in “foreigner” a was he because Hrvata was Croatia in situation the because but Babonić, John to grateful not possessions these confirmed Robert Charles that presume I 1322. How kindred. Babonić the of generation younger the to possessions the Rob Charles is arguments main her of One ban. of office the from Stephen.brother his B John ban former the of nephew the Babonić, John to Želin and Samobor 172 171 170 169 C disturbing was he that future of his implementation plans. fact the was ban of office the from king. the gave assista the of because happened confirmation the that claims She Janua 27 on Radoslav, brother his of sons Babonić, John of nephews the Dujam, poss Babonić the all of confirmation Robert’s Charles is theory sup that claims reasons Klaić Nada the ban. of of office the one from him also removing was age advanced John’s that considers she addition, Croa and Slavonia, Dalmatia. of ban of office the from Babonić John removed Robert t After king. the and him against rebelled they and ban as Babonić Nada Klaić, Klaić, Nada Nada Klaić, Klaić, Nada Klaić, Nada 48–49; 38, doc. CDIX., . psesoe e csr, aau e Sln vocata Selyn et Zamabur castra, et possessiones ... , 356. 356. , Nada Klaić suggests that the Croatian noble kindreds did not want not did kindreds noble Croatian the that suggests Klaić Nada In my opinion, Nada Klaić gave contradictory reasons for removing John John removing for reasons contradictory gave Klaić Nada opinion, In my 169
Povijest Hrvata Povijest Povijest Hrvata Povijest 170 n diin oe a ltr Cals oet ofre te castles the confirmed Robert Charles later, day one addition, In 171 Nada Klaić also states that the reason for removing John Baboni John removing for reason the that states also Klaić Nada , 355. 355. , , 514. ,
Povijest Hrvata Povijest 172
50 , 355–356. 355–356. ,
..., CD IX, doc. 39, 49–50; Nada Klaić, Klaić, Nada 49–50; 39, doc. IX, CD ..., n II Šubić in summer of of summer in Šubić II n essions to Nicholas and Nicholas to essions nce that John Babonić John that nce als oet n the in Robert harles still not resolved; the resolved; not still y lands in Croatia. In Croatia. in lands y ert’s confirmation of confirmation ert’s hese events, Charles events, hese port in favor of her her of favor in port because he was was he because to accept John John accept to abonić, son of of son abonić, ever, these these ever, ry 1322. 1322. ry Babonić Babonić i and tia Povijest Povijest for for of ć CEU eTD Collection ihls ol nt eet h rblig rain ol knrd and kindreds noble Croatian rebelling the defeat not could Nicholas 174 177 176 175 173 Mikcs.Ban by led army the fought they defe he whom nephews, his and Babonić John ban Cr former the entering by attacked was Nicholas Ban as However, kindreds. noble Croatian ofSárospatak Újhely.castle and the namel Hungary, northeastern in estates granted later was he addition, unt lived Babonić John however, old; too was he because ban of office was John that claims Klaić Nada addition, In itself. kindred Babonić Ro Charles when examining Šubić, II Mladen of fall the by after soon happened supported be can assumption This Šubić-s. the with Croat the of rebellion the with deals he until side his on Babonić-s R Charles that is presumption My certain. yet not was Šubić Robert Charles against rebelling were kindreds noble Croatian the powerBabonići. confront noble Slavonian to decided kindreds. He of the the Croati defeat not could he that realized probably He strategy. T defeated. also was he but nobility, Croatian rebelling the Ban Mikcs sent Robert had Ákos. Charles ban, Mikcs a new Robert appointed re no were there but battle, this in defeated were Babonić-s 3, ed. Kristó Gyula, )Szeged: Szegedi Középkorász M Középkorász Szegedi Gyula, )Szeged: Kristó ed. 3, .Anjou-kori oklevéltár: .Anjou-kori Klaić, Nada Marija Karbić, “Rod Gisingovaca,” 25. 25. Gisingovaca,” “Rod Karbić, Marija Klaić, Nada Klaić, Vjekoslav Charles Robert ordered the new ban, Nicholas Gut-Keled, to defea to Gut-Keled, Nicholas ban, new the ordered Robert Charles In 1327 the Babonić kindred joined forces with the Kőszegi kindred and togeth and kindred Kőszegi the with forces joined kindred Babonić the 1327 In Povijest Hrvata Povijest Povijest Hrvata Povijest Hercezi i banii Hercezi Documenta res Hungaricas tempore Regum Andegavensi Regum tempore resHungaricas Documenta , 356. 356. , , 517. , , 168; Nada Klaić, Klaić, Nada 168; ,
174
177 The king’s army won in that conflict and Ban and conflict that in won army king’s The 51 Povijest Hrvata Povijest űhely, 1990), 92. 1990), űhely, , 514–515. 514–515. , an nobility until he reduced reduced he until nobility an ecsin fr hm Ban them. for percussions he king then changed his his changed then king he obert wanted to keep the the keep to wanted obert and the fall of Mladen II Mladen of fall the and ian noble kindreds and and kindreds noble ian bert turned against the against turned bert um illustrantia illustrantia um removed from the the from removed therefore Charles Charles therefore the events that that events the y, the estate of of estate the y, oatia, he was was he oatia, t the rebelling rebelling the t l 1334. il ated. to confront confront to 176 vol. vol. 175
173 The In er er CEU eTD Collection ecyh Slutz Rk, uca, eruh videl Debrouch, Gurcham, Reka, Sclauetiz, Belchych, b kindred, Babonić the of power the destroy fully to want not did king situation the to Similarly order. king’s the without operate not authority to take all of their estates, which he did not do. not did he which estates, their of all take authorityto the king, the against rebelled truly had Babonići the if that is Rober Charles on operating was Mikcs Ban that indicate not does issue document the that states also She that. retaliate to needed king the against outbursts Babonić’s to reaction a was kindred Babonić confront the that states ban the because knowledge king’s the without 180 179 doc. 296., 358–360; Nada Klaić, Nada 358–360; 296., doc. Brezou – possessiones pertinen non nec ... primitus existentem Culpam castrum ipsum ad que relinquimus, ht i eeis a prudd h Bbnć ide t b unfaithful be to kindred Babonić the persuaded had enemies his that September 16 from document the confirmed Robert Charles year 178 T in Petrovina and Brezovica as well as River, Kupa the on Gradec wa the and castle the to belonged formerly that lands the Debrovec, Bel Dvorjan, belongings, its all with castle Lipovec the were na the in them to confirmed Mikcs Ban that possession their in brothers Babonić The Steničnjak. fort lost the replace to Babonić, sons Babonić, Paul and Dionysius, John, George, to Moslavina of estate Mikcs Ban suggested to kindreds noble other Klaić, Nada Accordingto Septem 16 on Steničnjak, kindred, Babonić the of fort main the took Mikcs enemies, Charles Robert probably meant the Kőszegi kindred. enemies, probably Charles kindred. the Robert Kőszegi meant
Nada Klaić, Klaić, Nada Klaić, Nada 318, 386–388; doc. CDIX, ... castrum Lypowch cum tenutis, possessionibus et et possessionibus tenutis, cum Lypowch castrum ... aa li peue ta Bn ic cnrne wt te Babonić the with confronted Mikcs Ban that presumes Klaić Nada Povijest Hrvata Povijest , 517–518. 517–518. , Povijest Hrvata Povijest
Povijest Hrvata Povijest , 517 - 518. 517 , 52 icha et sancti Petri in campo Zagrabiensi campo in Petri sancti et icha bat; insuper possessionem Grech vocatam iuxta iuxta vocatam Grech possessionem insuper bat; icet castrensibus de comitatu Podkoria eisdem eisdem Podkoria comitatu de castrensibus icet partinentiis suis universis specialiter Duorian, Duorian, specialiter universis suis partinentiis , 518. ,
180 In my opinion, Ban Mikcs did Mikcs Ban Inopinion, my čić, Slavetić, Reka, Krško, Reka, Slavetić, čić, with the Šubić kindred, the the kindred, Šubić the with d on 16 September 1327 1327 September 16 on d ban would have had the had have would ban t’s orders. Her opinion Her orders. t’s me of the king. These These king. the of me still had many estates estates many had still 1327 and emphasized and 1327 uropolje. ros n Podgorje, in rriors ut just to reduce it it reduce to just ut that he donate the donate he that and that the ban the that and o him. to to wt the with ation 178 f Stephen of ber 1327. 1327. ber The next The kindred ..., CD IX, IX, CD ..., 179 By CEU eTD Collection previous titles to properties and estates and allowed them to b to them allowed and estates and properties to titles previous the of donation the is this supports that point Another properties. rkuca Zhrwa, eih Wrhmrc, Mehoz Werchimorich, Menich, Ztharowsam, Brekouicza, eeains t ils mra vdlct t Werchoi et videlicet Omersal villas et generationes u erm uci uiiaiu e prieti, ser pertinentiis, et serviretenebantu hjactenus utilitatibus cunctis earum cum 182 Klaić, Povijest Hrvata, 519. 519. Hrvata, Povijest Klaić, 183 Babonić, Nicholas and Dujam, stayed on Charles Robert’s side. He side. Robert’s Charles on stayed Dujam, and Nicholas Babonić, However, Habsburgs. the i.e., masters their of approval or orders wit Habsburgs the of opponents the with or allies and successors wi treaties peace or contracts make not would they that stated Ot and Albert dukes Austrian the of service the into entered Paul, Dion George, Babonić, Stephen of sons the 1336 January 7 On Habsburgs. the 181 king.the given that taxes and services the all Ver with Jamovec and Menić, Stina, Mehostrah, Starošan, Brekovica, Podbabja, Juraj, Sveti Medvedje, Vrutak, Vrhovi Omeršal,and boroughs: the king’s villages some of with of Ostrožac poss the them to confirmed he addition, In Ostrožac. of castle the and Hungary Babonić. the former to mentioned above, John ban, and them from fort main their took he why reason the was that and death and later joined the servicedeath the and joined of son. later his ...... 92 3, Okmánytár Anjou-kori Members of this branch of the Babonić kindred late kindred Babonić the of branch this of Members terram Dobrenica et locum castri Ostrosecz vocatum vocatum Ostrosecz castri locum et Dobrenica terram Unsatisfied with the politics of Charles Robert, theBabonić.sRobert, Charlespolitics of the with Unsatisfied
182 Nicholas and Dujam stayed in the service of Charles Rober Charles of service the in stayed Dujam and Nicholas r ..., CD IX, doc. 435, 534–536; Nada Klaić, Povije Klaić, Nada 534–536; 435, doc. ..., r CDIX,
53 183 a Rsno, Wrutak, Rusindol, na, iisu e ovninbs qiu nsr maiestati nostre quibus obventionibus, et vitiisque r got the name Blagay by the town of Blagaj; Nada Nada Blagaj; of town the by Blagay name the got r
trah, Zthina impopulosa et Yamowech vocatas vocatas Yamowech et impopulosa Zthina trah, ...... circa quod certas nostras regales regales nostras certas quod circa ...... 181
uy the estate of Dobrenica of estate the uy
Meduegiazentgurg, Podbabya, Podbabya, Meduegiazentgurg, th Charles Robert or his his or Robert Charles th st Hrvata, 519. stHrvata, estates in northeastern in estates to of Habsburg. They They Habsburg. of to the sons of Radoslav of sons the hout the knowledge, knowledge, the hout once again turned to to turned againonce they had previously had they ession of the castle castle the of ession confirmed all their all confirmed na, Ružindol, o al their all not
ysius, and ysius, t until his until t himorić, himorić,
CEU eTD Collection powerful Habsburgs, but failed because of the military skills of Bafailed ofpowerful military because of skills but the Habsburgs, and probably the estates Belec, Lobor, Vinica and Lepoglava. and Vinica Lobor, Belec, estates the probably and Kopri of estates and towns the lost Kőszegis the confrontation, this life of the Hungarian Kingdom. amajor play not did kindred Kőszegi the events, these After counties. 185 188 187 186 ht h Ksei ide wud o b al t hv ay oncin wit connections any have to able be Habsburgs. not would kindred Kőszegi the that the of border the on t castles their of away took independence Robert Charles kindred. and power the in break Mikc final Ban the to by led defeated confrontation again were They 1339. until lasted rebellion the Ott and Albert dukes Austrian the of support the with time this 1336, 184 powe its preserve to kindred, Babonić the like tried, kindred Kőszegi the and Hungary in kindreds noble the defeating by power royal his kindr noble the of power the reduce to plan his implemented Robert n Vrbovec. and those of the Babonić kindred and confronted Ban Mikcs.Ban confronted and kindred Babonić the of those their united kindred Kőszegi the 1327 in mentioned, already As Hungary. in were of that the loca estates Kőszegis whenHungarian the he over took noble kindreds (Eisenstadt: Amt der Burgenländischen Landesregieru Burgenländischen Amtder (Eisenstadt:
Pál Engel, “The Güssinger im Kampf gegen die ungar die gegen Kampf im Güssinger “The Engel, Pál 25. Gisingovaca,” “Rod Karbić, Marija Marija Karbić, “Rod Gisingovaca,” 25. 25. Gisingovaca,” “Rod Karbić, Marija 100–102. Güssinger,” Engel,“The Pál 25. Gisingovaca,” “Rod Karbić, Marija The Kőszegi kindred offers perhaps the most spectacular exam spectacular most the perhaps offers kindred Kőszegi The Charles Robert confronted the Kőszegi kindred during his campaign his during kindred Kőszegi the confronted Robert Charles C) Kőszegi Kindred The 186 These were the castles of Lockenhaus, Bernstein, Kostel, Krap Kostel, Bernstein, Lockenhaus, of castles the were These 187 n xhne te rcie lns n aay, org ad Tolna and Bodrog, Baranya, in lands received they exchange, In
188
54 n, 1989) 101–103. 101–103. 1989) n, ishe Krone,” in Krone,” ishe 184 After they were defeated in defeated were they After Die Güssinger Die 185 They rebelled again in again rebelled They n Mikcs. n Mikcs. vnica, Sárvár, Kőszeg Kőszeg Sárvár, vnica, eds. First he restored he First eds. r by allying with the the with allying by r o of Habsburg, and and Habsburg, of o role in the political the in role n in Slavonia. The Slavonia. in n ple of how Charles Charles how of ple Austrian lands so so lands Austrian , ed. Heide Dienst Dienst Heide ed. , e Kőszegi he ina, Osterc, ina, forces with with forces against the against s and this this and s the h ted CEU eTD Collection but they were not as strong as the Šubići. The Frankapans did not not did Frankapans The Šubići. the as strong as not were they but gestis Romanorum imperatorum et summorum pontificat summorum et imperatorum Romanorum gestis 192 191 190 undoubtedly were power Frankapans The other Croatia. and the Slavonia, Hungary, all in kindreds almost with done had he as kindred Frankapan the of 189 the throne. his when 1342, in died Robert Charles after even dynasty Anjou the troops. their with king the joined IV, John successor his later and nobl Croatian rebelling the against armies his sent Robert Frederick.Count to Slunj of estate the and Drežnik and Gacka, counties the confirmed again Robert Charles 1323, November 6 on year, noble kindreds of Kurjaković and Nelipić.and Kurjaković of kindreds noble b the in forces royal the with sided also they Mi that and Babonići Ban helped Frankapans the that claims chronicler, contemporary Charles Robert subsequently granted him, together with the esta the with together him, grantedsubsequently Robert Charles Dre the request to king the to Dujam, son, his sent Frederick Count Oc 8 on him to confirmation the granted Robert Charles defeated; after estates his of confirmation the for Robert Charles asked Charles by stayed kindred, Frankapan the of head the was Šubić II tim the at who Krk, of III Frederick Count Robert. Charles against Vjekoslav Klaić, Klaić, Vjekoslav Vjekoslav Klaić, Klaić, Vjekoslav Klaić, Vjekoslav Klaić, Vjekoslav The main question here is why Charles Robert did not want to reduc to want not did Robert Charles why is here question main The The Frankapan kindred was the only noble kindred in Croatia that did not did that Croatia in kindred noble only the was kindred Frankapan The KindredD) Frankapan The 192
Knezovi Frankapani Knezovi Knezovi Frankapani Knezovi Frankapani Knezovi nzv Frankapani Knezovi
, 132. , , 136. , 134. , 14 Veolv li qoe Mh Mdjv n his and Madijev Miha quotes Klaić Vjekoslav 134; ,
55 191 The Frankapan kindred remained loyal to loyal remained kindred Frankapan The um , which was unavailable to me. to unavailable was , which knrd, on Frederick, Count kindreds, e 189 te of Slunj.of te Every time that Charles that Every time attles with the Croatian Croatian the with attles Mladen II Šubić was was Šubić II Mladen tober 1322. In addition, addition, In 1322. tober e of the fall of Mladen of fall the of e Robert’s side. He had He side. Robert’s 190 žnik County, which County, žnik son Louis came to to came Louis son present such a big big a such present ia aie, a Madijev, Miha kcs defeat the the defeat kcs
The following following The of Vinodol, Vinodol, of e the power power the e u noble ful strong, strong, work rebel rebel De De CEU eTD Collection en oe oia fo a egahc tnpit f e a first had he if standpoint geographic a from logical more been my In Venice. to tolls and taxes pay and vassals their become The Frankapan kindred stands as an exception. They did not turn against turn not did They exception. an as stands kindred Frankapan The e these of most planned crown, the to power restore to was ambition Charle that believe I kindred. Babonić the against turned he end the agai Babonići used he then and nobility, Hungarian the confronting was t against fight to Babonići the used He kindreds. noble other fight cert used He later. until attacked not was kindred Babonić the that Šubić the against fight to allies needed Robert Charles addition, thei of because threat dangerous most the presented kindred Šubić a Croatia of all in However, ones. Croatian the then and kindreds noble Sl and Croatia in River, Drava the of south areas the in same the forces join not did the rebelling with reason CroatianFrankapans nobl why the t that so power their to coast the on land the owned that kindreds Th Venice. overwantedandDalmatian subject the to entire the achieve coast to the domination of Republic the from protection needed hand other the on The Frankapankindred. the attack not did Robert Charles whyreason o my in side; his on Croatia in kindred needed noble strong relatively king The Robert. Charles against rebelled kindred, Frankapan kin noble Croatian the of all addition, In did. Šubići the as threat fe h dfae te ugra nbe ides Cals Robert Charles kindreds, noble Hungarian the defeated he After 3.4.3 Conclusion 56 opinion that was the main main the was that opinion pinion that was the main main the was that pinion kindred and because of of because and kindred attacked the Slavonian Slavonian the attacked avonia. It would have have would It avonia. he Kőszegis when he he when Kőszegis he ain noble kindreds to kindreds noble ain rd, xet o the for except dreds, hose kindreds would kindreds hose Frankapan kindred, kindred, Frankapan get oe. In power. great r et i advance. in vents nst the Šubići. In Šubići. the nst Rbr, whose Robert, s the king nor did did nor king the nd Slavonia the the Slavonia nd intended to do to intended e Serenissima Serenissima e t es one least at e kindreds. e kindreds. noble noble CEU eTD Collection u te eelo o te rain ol knrd poe t b almost be to proved kindreds noble Croatian the of rebellion the but an ally. kindred noble powerful one least at keep to had Robert Charles other the as fate same the experienced have probably have would V of power the of fear their definitely most was Robert tur not did Frankapani the why reason The them. against turn king the
57 enice. The Frankapan kindred kindred Frankapan The enice. in Croatia to serve him as him serve to Croatia in of the noble families, noble the of n against Charles Charles against n unbeatable and and unbeatable CEU eTD Collection osbe t n cs. eas o ti, ifrn nbe famili noble different this, of Because cost. any at possible possessions of the Anjou dynasty and whose lands had an exit to the s the to exit an had lands whose and dynasty Anjou the of possessions o te ugra trn apae, h nblt wne t rti as retain to wanted nobility the appeared, throne Hungarian the for whe IV, Ladislas of death the after period the accum In power. of amount authority, royal weak the of because kindreds, noble Croatian t century, thirteenth the of end the At story. whole the of account t which in situation the from themselves. possible as much as gain to maneuvers fe. t a te yate ta ue tcia mnues Ever maneuvers. tactical used that dynasties the was It often. s maneuvers tactical use not did dynasties, Šubići the of both with contact the opinion, my In made. had dynasty Anjou the that donations dynasty, Árpád the with contacts maintained also they However, contracts trade and ban, of title the properties, land granted t of powerful more the kindred, Šubić the of loyalty the gaining III Andrew because is This III. Andrew with contact in were that source no is there addition, In dynasty. Anjou the from contracts land granted were Frankapani The Šubići. the than later dynasty wi communicating started kindred Frankapan The stronger. was dynasty l their and did kindreds noble Slavonian the than earlier dynasty Anjou After having discussed the details in four periods, it is tim is it periods, four in details the discussed having After Te rain ol knrd, hs lne poet ws oae cl located was property landed whose kindreds, noble Croatian The 4. 4. Conclusion 58 rm h Aju dynasty. Anjou the from probably concentrated on concentrated probably es used different tactical tactical different used es he two. The Šubići were Šubići The two. he y time when the Anjou Anjou the when time y which confirmed all the the all confirmed which e to give a continuous continuous a give to e uch as changing sides changing as uch properties and trade trade and properties he Slavonian and the the and Slavonian he n the new candidates candidates new the n confirms that they that confirms ea sided with the the with sided ea much power as as power much ulated a great great a ulated oyalty to this this to oyalty , although in in although , h h Anjou the th sr o the to oser hey found found hey CEU eTD Collection eid bt te nos n Ade II nw t ad eas o ti the this of because and it, knew III Andrew and Anjous the both period, by the Anjou party. The Kőszegi kindred did not communicate with the with communicate not did kindred Kőszegi The party. Anjou the by Howeve cost. the on land own not did kindreds noble Slavonian the because Croati the protect to Italy in power their used have could Naples pow immense had kindred Šubić the that demonstates This kindred. Šubić dynasties the between donations” of “battle biggest The opponent. power a dynasty Anjou the considered he that III Andrew of actions fictiti actually were dynasty Anjou the from grants the all the did soon IIIAndrew kindred, Šubić the to something granted dynasty Šubić kindred as their ally. kindredŠubić as their ally. either, like the Frankapani. The reason for this was probably th probably was this for reason The Frankapani. the like either, them grant not could it lands, them granted dynasty Anjou the Although their than often more policy” “double the used dynasty, Árpád noble kindredsenjoyed siding therefore the direct Anjou d with from benefits granary “the Sicily, of possession the in was that Naples with tra the were These kindreds. noble Slavonian the to offer not could they offer to able was dynasty Anjou the that see can one Frankapani exam the From rule. its to kindreds noble Croatian the subject to Da the on domination its secure to wanted which Venice, of ambitions Se the Venice, of fear the was dynasty; this Anjou the support Slavonian noble kindreds in question, the Babonići and the Kőszegi, lat Kőszegi, the and Babonići the question, in kindreds noble Slavonian Te lvna nbe ides wih egahcly rvttd towa gravitated geographically which kindreds, noble Slavonian The wh reason powerful one had question in kindreds noble Croatian the of Both 59 ous, one can conclude from the from conclude can one ous, renissima. The Kingdom of of Kingdom The renissima. of Europe”. The Croatian The Europe”. of Croatian counterparts did. did. counterparts Croatian ple of the Šubići and the and Šubići the of ple eir disappointment with with disappointment eir an families against the the against families an them something that that something them was fought for the the for fought was u ad dangerous and ful lmatian coast and and coast lmatian er chose to stand stand to chose er trading contracts contracts trading same. Although same. Árpád dynasty Árpád ding contracts contracts ding nee the needed y r, both of the the of both r, ynasty. er in this this in er d the rds y to to y CEU eTD Collection oiia mvs f h Bbnć rtes ol hv be snhoie. T a was dynasties the towards synchronized. behavior their that possibility been have could brothers Babonić the of moves political uihd n niiul o sdn wt te no dnsy H dd this did He dynasty. Anjou the with siding for individual an punished won the throne of Hungary. kindred, their of hands the in power more preserve to wanted they t granted previously had he which Radoslav from properties land some I Andrew where question in kindreds the of members the among example Rados land. him granting by side his to Radoslav lure to tried he and diffe hadbrothers the that clearlyaware III was Andrew kindred. t secured had they Babonići, the of members the of one of support assumed probably dynasty Anjou The dynasties. the of both with dyna Anjou the communicating Radoslav Babonić wascontactsStephen Babonić the Anjous, had with no with himself aligned Radoslav, brother, other the while support Stephen, brothers, Babonić the of one when century, thirteenth the end of the evident becameBabonić around This most complicated. were more kindred the this, for reason a had they because dynasty Anjou the to turned t While kindred. Babonić the of support the gaining on concentrating was p was kindred Kőszegi the with communicate not did III Andrew why III. Andrew kidnaped even they because questioned be cannot Anjous the to dynaAnjou the support to decided and sides” “changed they whyreason estat of number large a lost they whom of because III, Andrew ol nt mlmn hspa o rdcn tepwr f l te nob the all of power the reducing of plan his implement not could After he came to Hungary, Charles Robert and his advisors wer advisors his and Robert Charles Hungary, to came he After 60 tactical maneuver with which which with maneuver tactical rent political standpoints standpoints political rent he support of the entire entire the of support he political moves of the of moves political regardless which side side which regardless s Ti i cery the clearly is This es. that by securing the the securing by that le kindreds at once. once. at kindreds le lav is also the only only the also is lav robably because he he because robably e aware that they they that aware e sty. Their loyalty loyalty Their sty. by taking back back taking by ed Andrew III, III, Andrew ed hm The him. o he Kőszegi Kőszegi he The reason reason The sty. While While sty. II directly directly II ee s a is here
CEU eTD Collection rvd o e lot nraal. h Fakpn wr lf i powe in left were Frankapani The unbreakable. almost be to proved balance of power between the kindredsbalance which the between in battl participated power of kindred ost the most. kindred the most. ost s this from most the benefited that kindred the wereFrankapani well as kindred Frankapan the confronted have would Robert nobility Charles Croatian the of rebellion the if that presume I reb kindreds. the against fight him help to them needed Robert Charles Croatia other the of rebellion the was this for reason the opinion, Fran the were confront not did Robert Charles that kindred noble only Croa t the of rest the and Babonići the Šubići, the fight him helped on Frankapani, The Kőszegi. the and Šubići the fight to him helped the fight him help to kindreds noble certain used he Therefore, example of how these relations can be better understood. This rese This understood. better be can charters, relations these how donation of example the of distribution and chronology the of analysis the resear this in used was that method the that I believe andunderstand are kindred medieval the inside relations The Hungary. of Kingdom the four the of beginning the and thirteenth the of end the during members conne internal the regarding and rulers the to relation in functioned t only are they complicated, seem Slavonia and Croatia of kindreds d royal the between period this in developed that relations the Although, the most. lost most had the who those because kindreds, the noble the of power In my opinion, these results fit perfectly into Charles Ro Charles into perfectly fit results these opinion, my In My research presented here gives an inside look into the ways how noble ki noble the ways into look how gives an inside research Mypresented here 61 ituation, and the Šubić the Šubić the and ituation, tian noble kindreds. The The kindreds. noble tian n noble kindreds, which kindreds, noble n ynasties and the noble noble the and ynasties bert’s plan of reducing reducing of plan bert’s liu Cota noble Croatian ellious others. The Babonići Babonići The others. ch, which is based on on based is which ch, arch summarizes the summarizes arch ctions between their their between ctions had been crushed, crushed, been had e for the throne. e throne. for the teenth century in in century teenth . In the end, the the end, the In . e eut f the of result he quite difficult to difficult quite r only because because only r he other hand, hand, other he kapani. In my my In kapani. is a good good a is ndreds ndreds CEU eTD Collection further branch of history. research of that that hope that and nobilitythe of history I the on works previous the complement nobility. lower the and magnates between relations use be also can it kindreds, noble the and king the between relations only not approach this addition, In well. as regions other and periods other appr of kind this that believe I However, Kingdom. Hungarian the of one in dynasties two and kindreds noble four just between relations
62 period of the history the of period oach is applicable to to applicable is oach this research will will research this it will contribute to to contribute will it d for, example, the example, for, d applies to the the to applies CEU eTD Collection Livraria Cruz, 1971). 1971). Cruz, Livraria Ausbildung des ’ducatus Sclavoniae’,” in Sclavoniae’,” ’ducatus des Ausbildung 193 Nordwestgrenze “Die Györffy, György from Reiches XI. im Jahrhundert unddie Ausbildung ’ducatus des Sclavoniae’” taken is map four The the until eleventh the from Croatia and Slavonia of Map 1. Figure György Györffy, “Die Nordwestgrenze des byzantinis des Nordwestgrenze “Die György Györffy,
Mélanges Szabolcs de Vajay de Szabolcs Mélanges 63 chen Reiches im XI. Jahrhundert und die die und Jahrhundert XI. im Reiches chen , ed. Pierre Brière et al (Braga: et (Braga: al Brière Pierre ed. , e byzantinischen des teenth centuries. centuries. teenth 193
CEU eTD Collection Figure 2. Genealogical tree of the BabonićFigure kindred of tree the 2.Genealogical u vrijeme promjene na ugarsko-hrvatskom prijestolju ugarsko-hrvatskom na promjene uvrijeme 194
The genealogical tree is composed on the basis of basis the on composed is tree genealogical The
64 , od 1290. do 1309. godine“ by Hrvoje Kekez Kekez godine“Hrvoje by 1309. do 1290. od , an article “Između dva kralja: plemićki rod Babonić rod plemićki kralja: dva “Između article an 194
a
CEU eTD Collection
STEPHEN 1201 – 1234
STJEPKO 1239 – 1274
PAUL I MLADEN I GEORGE I STANISLAVA 1272 – 1312 1276 – 1304 1277 – 1302 1299 – 1304
MLADEN II GEORGE II GREGORY PAUL II 1301 – 1322 1301 – 1330 1301 – 1350 1301 – 1346
MLADEN PAUL III DEODAT ILONA CATHERINE GEORGE III PRIBKO CATHERINE III 1333 – 1342 – 1346 - 1361 1348 1356
Figure 3. Genealogical tree of the Šubić kindred. 195
195 The genealogical tree is composed on the basis of Pál Engel, Magyar középkori adattár CD-ROM [Hungarian medieval repository] (Budapest: MTA Történettudumányi Intétezete, 2001).
65
CEU eTD Collection
HENRY 1244 – 1274
NICHOLAS JOHN PETER HENRY 1266 – 1299 1266 – 1306 1275 – 1289 1275 - 1310
NICHOLAS GREGORY JOHN JOHN PETER 1314 – 1332 1287 – 1297 1324/27 – 1340 1310 - 1339 1310 – 1351
Figure 4. Genealogical tree of the Köszegi kindred 196
196 The genealogial tree composed on the basis of Pál Engel, “The Güssinger im Kampf gegen die ungarishe Krone,” in Die Güssinger , ed. Heide Dienst (Eisenstadt: Amt der Burgenländischen Landesregierun, 1989), 113.
66
CEU eTD Collection
Date Issued by The land/title given The recipient Source 27 February 1293 The Árpád dynasty – Estate of Drežnik Stjepan CD VII, doc. 64, 74 – 77 Andrew III 11 July 1293 The Árpád dynasty – Estate of Želin Radoslav CD VII,doc. 128, 146 – Andrew III 147 27 September 1293 The Árpád dynasty – Estates of Vrbas, Glaž, Radoslav CD VII, doc. 133, 151 – Andrew III Petrinja, Vinodol, Selen, 152 Oklić, Podgorica and Samobor 1 August 1299 The Árpád dynasty – Confirmation of the land Stephen, John, Radoslav CD VII, doc. 305, 351 – Andrew III of late Radoslav and Otto 353 Babonić, except estates Susedgrad, Vrbas and Glaž Office of ban of Slavonia 7 September 1299 The Anjou dynasty – Confirmation of all the Sttephen, John, CD VII, doc. 308, 355 – Charles II possessions of late Radoslav and Otto 356 Radoslav Office of ban of Slavonia 26 November 1299 The Anjou dynasty – Confirmation of all the Stephen, Radoslav, and CD VII, doc. 311, 357 - Charles II possessions of late John 358 Radoslav 14 May 1300 The Anjou dynasty – Confirmation of the part John, Sttephen, CD VII, doc. 342, 388 - Charles II of Slavonia Radoslav, and Otto 389 20 December 1316 The Anjou dynasty – Castles of Moslavina, John CD VII, doc. 361, 439 - Charles Robert Bršljanovo with Upper 440 and Lower Garešnica, the castle and estate
67
CEU eTD Collection
Položnica and the castle and estate of Međurječje 27 January 1322 The Anjou dynasty – Confirmation of all the Nicholas and Dujam CD IX, doc. 38, 48 – 49 Charles Robert estates 28 January 1322 The Anjou dynasty – Forts of Samobor and John CD IX, doc. 39, 49 – 50 Charles Robert Želin 16 September 1327 The Anjou dynasty – Estate of Moslavina George, John, CD IX, doc. 296, 358 – Charles Robert Dionysius, Paul 360
28 March 1328 The Anjou dynasty – Confirmation of the George, John, CD IX, doc. 318, 386 - Charles Robert grant from 16 September Dionysius, Paul 388 1327 9 December 1300 The Anjou dynasty – Castle of Ostrožac with Nicholas and Radoslav CD IX, doc. 435, 534 - Charles Robert some of the king’s 536 villages and boroughs
Figure 5. The list of the donations to the Babonić kindred
Date Issued by The land/title given The recipient Source 5 January 1292 The Anjou dynasty – „Right of sword and John CD VII, doc. 58, 66 – 67 Charles II war“ 12 April 1292 The Anjou dynasty – Vas and Sopron counties John and his son George CD VII, doc. 67, 80 Charles II
Figure 6. The list of the donation to the Kőszegi kindred
68
CEU eTD Collection
Date Issued by The land/title given The recipient Source 28 November 1292 The Anjou dynasty Export of 200 salms of Count Paul CD VII, doc. 47, 57 Charles II grain and 100 salms of wheat without payin tolls 30 November 1292 The Anjou dynasty Export of 200 salms of Count George CD VII, doc. 47, 57 Charles II grain and 100 salms of wheat without paying tolls 19 August 1292 The Anjou dynasty Almost the entire Count Paul CD VII, doc. 86, 104 - Charles II territory of the Croatian 105 Kingdom 1293 The Árpád dynasty Hereditary office of Count Paul CD VII, doc. 144, 163 – Andrew III maritime ban 164 17 January 1295 The Anjou dynasty Lifetime office of ban Count Paul CD VII, doc. 184, 205 – Charles II 206 14 August 1298 The Anjou dynasty Confirmation of the Count Paul CD VII, doc. 271, 313 Charles II grant from 19 August 1292 11 January 1300 The Anjou dynasty Confirmation of all Count George CD VII, doc. 314, 361 Charles II estates 1308 The Anjou dynasty Office of the ban of Count Paul Damir Karbić, “Šubići Charles Robert Bosnia Bribirski,“ 17.
Figure 7. The list of the donations to the Šubić kindred
69
CEU eTD Collection
Date Issued by The land/title given The recipient Source 8 May 1300 The Anjou dynasty – Counties of Modruš, Count Dujam CD VII, doc. 340, 386 Charles II Vinodol and Gacka – 387 26 August 1300 The Anjou dynasty – Export of 500 salms of Count Leonard CD VII, doc. 351, (and 5 September) Charles II grain without paying 395 tolls 20 September 1316 The Anjou dynasty – Confirmation of the Count Dujam CD VIII, doc. 355, 432 Charles Robert lands that the kindred – 433 already had in their possession Beginning of 1320s The Anjou dynasty – Požega County Count Dujam Nada Klaić, Povijest Charles Robert Hrvata, 386. 2 May 1323 The Anjou dynasty – County of Drežnik and Count Dujam Vjekoslav Klaić, Charles Robert estate of Slunj Knezovi Frankapani, 132 31. October 1323 The Anjou dynasty – Confirmation of the Count Frederick CD IX, doc. 122, 142 – Charles Robert lands that the kindred 143 already had in their possession 6 November 1323 The Anjou dynasty – Counties of Modruš, Count Frederick Vjekoslav Klaić, Charles Robert Vinodol, Gazka and Knezovi Frankapani , Drežnik and the estate 132 of Slunj 8 October 1322 The Anjou dynasty – Confirmation of the Count Frederick Vjekoslav Klaić, Charles Robert lands that the kindred Knezovi Frankapani , already had in their 132 possession
Figure 8. The list of the donations to the Frankapan Kindred.
70
CEU eTD Collection ____ e. “ ed. ______, ____ e. “ ed. ______, ____ e. “ ed. ______, ____ e. “ ed. ______, ______. ______. Seemüller Joseph, ed. “Ottokars Österreichische Reimchronik” Vol. 2. See i 2. See Vol. Reimchronik” Österreichische “Ottokars ed.Seemüller Joseph, http://www.dmgh.de/de/fs1/object/display/bsb0000078 Smičiklas, Tadja, ed. “ ed. Tadja, Smičiklas, ed. Kristó, Gyula,
Ančić, Mladen. Mladen. Ančić, 5.2 SecondaryLiterature: Bak, János, János, Bak,
Andegavensium illustrantia Andegavensium illustrantia 1213–1214, line 93473–93480, 1213–1214, line Chroniken Deutsche : VIII Scriptores. Historica. Germaniae 0005%3A010%3A02%3A00 5. 1 Primary Sources: 5. 1Primary Sources: 6. Zagreb: Jugoslavenska akademija znanosti i umjetnosti, 1908. umjetnosti, akademija i 6. Zagreb: znanosti Jugoslavenska Zagreb: Jugoslavenska akademija znanosti i umjetnosti, 1909. umjetnosti, i Zagreb: znanosti akademija Jugoslavenska Zagreb: Jugoslavenska akademija znanosti i umjetnosti, 1910. umjetnosti, i Zagreb: znanosti akademija Jugoslavenska Zagreb: Jugoslavenska akademija znanosti i umjetnosti, 1911. umjetnosti, i Zagreb: znanosti akademija Jugoslavenska Zagreb: Jugoslavenska akademija znanosti i umjetnosti, 1912. umjetnosti, i Zagreb: znanosti akademija Jugoslavenska Taetr o te edlm HnainCota Kndm n Bsi i ZavodZadar:Century]. HAZU: povijesneZiral, za znanosti 1997. Mostar: Bosnia and Kingdom Hungarian-Croatian Pendulum: the of [Trajectory University of California Press,University 1990. California of Farnham: Ashgate, 2010. Farnham: Ashgate, 2010. tdig eivl ues n ter ujcs Cnrl uoe n Beyond and Europe Central Subjects. their and Rulers Medieval Studying ooain: eivl n Ery oen oaci Ritual Monarchic Modern Early and Medieval Coronations: oe dpoaiu rgi raie Dlaie t Slavoniae et Dalmatiae Croatiae, regni diplomaticus Codex uaj kan: grk-raso rlesv i on u I stolj XIV u Bosna i kraljevstvo Ugarsko-hrvatsko klatna: Putanja oe dpoaiu rgi raie Dlaie t Slavoniae et Dalmatiae Croatiae, regni diplomaticus Codex oe dpoaiu rgi raie Dlaie t Slavoniae et Dalmatiae Croatiae, regni diplomaticus Codex oe dpoaiu rgi raie Dlaie t Slavoniae et Dalmatiae Croatiae, regni diplomaticus Codex no-oi keétr Dcmna e Hnaia tmoe Re tempore Hungaricas res Documenta : oklevéltár Anjou-kori Codex diplomaticus regni Croatiae, Dalmatiae et Slavoniaeet Dalmatiae Croatiae, regni diplomaticus Codex
Vol 3. Szeged: Műhely, Középkorász 1990 –. Szegedi 5. 5. Bibiography 71 0_00004.html?sortIndex=010%3A080%3A . Hannover, 1893., 1893., Hannover, . n Monumenta Monumenta Berkeley: . . Vol. 10. 10. Vol. . Vl 7. Vol. . Vl 8. Vol. . Vl 9. Vol. . n XIV XIV n . Vol. Vol. . gum gum eću eću . . CEU eTD Collection ______. “The Güssinger im Kampf gegen die ungarishe Krone.” In Krone.” ungarishe die gegen Kampf im Güssinger “The ______. ______. ______. ______. ______. ____ “h Pltcl ytm f h Agvn Kingdom.” Angevin the of System Political “The ______. ______. ______. ______. ______. ______. “The Šubići of Bribir: A Case Study of a Croatian Medi Croatian a of Study Case A Bribir: of Šubići “The ______.
Pál. Engel,
Raukar. Tomislav and Budak, Neven,
Fügedi, Erik. Erik. Fügedi, Györffy, György. “Die Nordwestgrenze des byzantinischen Reiche byzantinischen des Nordwestgrenze “Die György. Györffy, Karácsonyi, János. János. Karácsonyi, abć Dmr “rasi lmći o i bčjo rv. oua ana Pokušaj pravo. običajno i rod plemićki “Hrvatski Damir. Karbić,
political structure of the Angevin-era Hungary]. Budapest: MTA MTA Budapest: Hungary]. Angevin-era the of structure political znanosti i umjetnosti i znanosti Hrvatske znanosti društvene i povijesne za Zavoda znanosti povijesne Analysis]. at Attempt An Law. Common and Kindred Noble arhontology 1301 – 1457]. arhontology 1301–1457]. Történettudományi Intézete, Történettudományi 1988. Quarterly 1989. Landesregie Burgenländischen der Amt Eisenstadt: 114. – 85 Dienst, Heide Te eainhp f oa pwr n te rsorc i te S the in aristocracy the and (1387-1437)]. Akadémiai Budapest: Kiadó, 1977. power royal of relationship [The of the Medieval Period]. Zagreb: Školska knjiga, 2006. Zagreb:of knjiga, the Školska Medieval Period]. Budapest: MTA Történettudumányi Intétezete,Budapest: MTA Történettudumányi 2001. London: I.London:B. 2001. Tauris, Akadémiai Kiadó, 1986. Pierre Brière et al., 295-312. Braga: LivrariaPierre 1971. Braga: et Brière al., Cruz, 295-312. Sclavoniae’.”In’ducatus des Ausbildung die und [The Hungarian tribes in the fourteenth mid-century]. Budapest: MTA, 1900. Hungarianthe MTA,Budapest: fourteenth[The 1900. tribes mid-century]. in dissertation. Budapest: Central European University, 2000. Centraldissertation. Budapest: European University, 2000. Társadalom és politikai struktúra az Anjou-kori az Magyarországon struktúra és politikai Társadalom h Ram f t tpe. Hsoy f eivl Hungary Medieval of History A Stephen. St of Realm The Királyi hatalom és arisztokrácia viszonya a Zsigmond-korban (1387-1437) (1387-1437) Zsigmond-korban a viszonya arisztokrácia és hatalom Királyi ayr öékr aatr CD-ROM adattár középkori Magyar ayrrzg iái archontológiája világi Magyarország ate n Scey n eivl ugr (1000-1437) Hungary Medieval in Society and Castle 90 (1983) 124 – 128. 90(1983) 124 magyar A . 16 (1998): 73 –117.
BudapestIntézete, MTA : Történettudományi 1986.
Hrvatska povijest srednjeg vijekasrednjeg povijest Hrvatska eztée a I. század XIV. a nemzetségek 72 [Hungarian medieval repository]. repository]. medieval [Hungarian , 1301-1457 Mélanges Szabolcs de Vajayde Szabolcs Mélanges The New Hungarian Hungarian New The s im XI. Jahrhundert Jahrhundert XI. im s eval Kindred.” Ph.D. Ph.D. Kindred.” eval Hnain secular [Hungarian Zbornik Odsjeka za za Odsjeka Zbornik Die GüssingerDie [Croatian History History [Croatian igsmund period period igsmund ie [Croatian lize” 85 1526. – 895 , [Society and [Society and . Budapest: Budapest: .
akademije akademije közepéig , ed. ed. , , ed. ed. , run, run,
CEU eTD Collection ______. ______. ______. ______. ______. ______. ______. “Joakim Pektar, slavonski ban iz plemićkog roda Gut-Keled” [Joakim Gut-Keled” roda plemićkog iz ban slavonski Pektar, “Joakim ______. ______. “Između dva kralja: plemićki rod Babonića u vrijeme promjene promjene vrijeme u Babonića rod plemićki kralja: dva “Između ______. ______. “Plemstvo – definicija, vrste, uloga” [Nobility – Definition, Definition, – [Nobility uloga” vrste, definicija, – “Plemstvo ______. ____ “uii rbrk d gbta alen ase at (32) [ (1322.)” časti banske nasljedne gubitka do Bribirski “Šubići ______.
Klaić, Nada. Nada. Klaić,
ee, roe“ic rni fuim ra: aa kk j slavons je kako i kada Vrbaz: fluvium transit Hrvoje.“Hinc Kekez, li Vjekoslav. Klaić
abć Mrj. Gsnoc – grk – rasa eiak obit velikaška hrvatska – ugarsko – “Gisingovci Marija. Karbić,
orjta[h Ksei A ugra-rain ol Fml of Family Noble Hungarian-Croatian A – Kőszegi podrijetla”[The Hrvatska 4 misao Povijesni prilozi znanosti i umjetnosti umjetnosti i znanosti Hrvatske znanosti društvene i povijesne za Zavoda znanosti povijesne Croats from the Oldest Period until the End of the Nineteenth Cent Nineteenth L.Zagreb: naklada Hartmana, Tisak i 1899. the of End the until Period Oldest the from Croats Croats from the Oldest Period until the End of the Nineteenth Ce Nineteenth L.Zagreb: naklada Hartmana, Tisak i 1899. the of End the until Period Oldest the from Croats Croats from the Oldest Period until the End of the Nineteenth Cent Nineteenth L.Zagreb: naklada Hartmana, Tisak i 1899. the of End the until Period Oldest the from Croats 1897. Naklada Zagreb: 1347]. Year the until Šubić of Tribe the from Slavonian Ban of the Gut-Keled Noble Kindred]. Kindred]. Noble Gut-Keled the of narodnosne zajednice Ban Slavonian High Middle Ages]. Zagreb: Školska knjiga, 1965. knjiga, Školska Zagreb: High 1965. Ages]. Middle ol Knrd aoi i te eid f hne n h Hungarian-Croati the on Change of Period The 1309 Year].Throne, from 1290until the Kings: in Two [Between Babonić godine“ Kindred 1309. Noble do 1290. od prijestolju, hrvatskom Origin]. Did the Slavonian Noble Kindred Babonić Came to Possess the Area the Possess to Came Babonić Kindred Noble Slavonian the Did W Vrbaz: fluvium transit [Hinc Vrbasa?” posjed u došao Babonića Bribir until the Loss of the Hereditery Office of Ban (1322)]. (1322)]. Ban of Office Hereditery the of Loss the until Bribir Povijest Hrvata od najstarijih vremena do XIX stoljećaXIX do vremena najstarijih od Hrvata Povijest Povijest Hrvata od najstarijih vremena do XIX stoljećaXIX do vremena najstarijih od Hrvata Povijest Povijest Hrvata od najstarijih vremena do XIX stoljećaXIX do vremena najstarijih od Hrvata Povijest Povijest Hrvata u razvijenom srednjem vijeku srednjem razvijenom u Hrvata Povijest Godišnjak Njemačke narodnosne zajednice rbrk keoi o peea ui d gd 1347 god. do Šubić plemena od knezovi: Bribirski 31(2006): 11–21. (2007): 76–93. (2007): 22 (2004): 1 – 26 (2000): 19–24. (2000): 73 Povijesni prilozi (1999): 21 – 26. (1999): 21– 26. [History of the Croats in the the in Croats the of [History 35(2008): 61–89. . Vol 5 [History of the the of [History 5 Vol . . Vol 2 [History of the the of [History 2 Vol . . Vol 1 [History of the the of [History 1 Vol . oina Njemačke Godišnjak Zbornik Odsjeka za za Odsjeka Zbornik Cut o Bribir: of [Counts Matice hrvatske, hrvatske, Matice i lmći rod plemićki ki elj njemačkog njemačkog elj ntury]. Vol 2. 2. Vol ntury]. h Šbć of Šubići The Types, Role]. Role]. Types, hen and How and hen ury]. Vol 5. 5. Vol ury]. ury]. Vol 1. 1. Vol ury]. na ugarsko- na of Vrbas?]. Vrbas?]. of akademije akademije German German Pektar, an an CEU eTD Collection ______. ______. ______. ______. Nagy, Iván. Iván. Nagy, ______. ______.
Kos, Milko. “Odnošaj medju goričkim grofovima i hrvatskim plemstvom plemstvom hrvatskim i grofovima goričkim medju “Odnošaj Milko. Kos,
McBrien, Richard P. Raukar, Tomislav. Tomislav. Raukar,
zngögi Šandor. Szentgyörgyi, Štih, Peter. “Goriški grofovje in Devinski gospodje”[Counts of Goric of gospodje”[Counts Devinski in grofovje “Goriški Peter. Štih, Rady, Martyn.
Wertner, Mór. Thalloczy, Lajos. “Historička istraživanja o plemenu goričkih i i goričkih plemenu o istraživanja “Historička Lajos. Thalloczy, Zsoldos, Attila. Attila. Zsoldos, Naklada Matice hrvatske, 1900. Naklada hrvatske, Matice olmn f h Cota Mdea Pro] Zge: ioosi f Filozofski Zagreb: Period]. Medieval Croatian the of Nobleman Zemaljskog muzeja u Bosni i HercegoviniZemaljskog muzeja i u Bosni Cota rne n as n h tm o Cals oet n Loui and Robert Charles of time the in bans and princes [Croatian Hrvatska, 1901. Hrvatska, 1901. Period]. Period]. Nobility Croatian and Gorica of Counts between [Relations vijeku” Zagrebu, 2002. hoe ni te is Crnto o Cals oet. arb Knji Zagreb: Albrechta, litografički C. zavod 1893. Robert]. Charles of Coronation First the until Throne Roberta Karla krunidbe Pest, 1857-1868.Pest, geneological the and armes of coat the with Hungary of families arhontology 1000 – 1301]. Budapestarhontology História, 2011. : 1000–1301]. Hsoia Rsac o h Tie f h Dks f oia n Vodic and Gorica of Dukes the of Tribe the on Research [Historical Wappenabbildungen Devin]. Devin]. Krčki knezovi Frankapani knezovi Krčki i Gshct dr rfn o Baa : i 2 tmtfl, 14 Stammtafeln, 2 mit : Blagay von Grafen der Geschichte Die Hrvatski hercezi i bani za Karla Roberta I Ljudevita I. : (1301-1382) (1301-1382) : I. Ljudevita I Roberta Karla za bani i hercezi Hrvatski Magyarország családai czímerekkel és nemzékrendi táblákka táblákka nemzékrendi és czímerekkel családai Magyarország Geneaology undGeschichte Geneaology Nobility, Land andService Land Medieval HungaryNobility, in Zgodovinski časopisZgodovinski Vjesnik zemaljskog arhiva ayrrzg iái rhnoóij, 1000-1301 archontológiája, világi Magyarország ejk pei hvtkg srednjovjekovlja hrvatskoga plemić i Seljak The PocketPopesThe Guide the to Borba anžuvinaca za prijestolje ugarsko-hrvatsko do prve prve do ugarsko-hrvatsko prijestolje za anžuvinaca Borba . Vienna: Selbstverlag, 1889. Selbstverlag, 1889. . Vienna: [Struggle of the Anjou Dinasty for Hungarian-Croatian Hungarian-Croatian for Dinasty Anjou the of [Struggle 3(1992): 309–322. [The Frankapans, Counts of Krk]. Zagreb: Matica Matica Zagreb: Krk]. of Counts Frankapans, [The 19 (1917): 282 – 296. 19 (1917): 282 74 . Vienna, 1884. . Vienna, 9 (1897), 342– 409. 9(1897), . HarperCollins e-books, 2006. e-books, . HarperCollins . London: Palgrave, 2000. Palgrave,London: 2000. . [The Peasant and the the and Peasant [The [Hungarian secular secular [Hungarian vodičkih knezova” knezova” vodičkih a and the Lords of of Lords the and a tables 1 – 12]. 12]. – 1 tables 1 – 12 [The [The 12 – 1 s I]. Zagreb: Zagreb: I]. s gotiskarski i i gotiskarski in Medieval Medieval in u srednjem srednjem u a]. a]. igl und Siegel kle u akultet Glasnik