DOCSLIB.ORG

LOCAL CONJUGACY in GL2(Z/P2z)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LOCAL CONJUGACY in GL2(Z/P2z) 2 LOCAL CONJUGACY IN GL2(Z=p Z) SPUR FINAL PAPER, SUMMER 2016 HYUN JONG KIM MENTOR: ATTICUS CHRISTENSEN PROJECT SUGGESTED BY ANDREW SUTHERLAND Abstract. Subgroups H1 and H2 of a group G are said to be locally conjugate if there is a bijection f : H1 ! H2 such that h and f(h) are conjugate in G. We study local conjugacy 2 among subgroups of GL2(Z=p Z), where p is an odd prime, building on Andrew Sutherland's categorizations of subgroups of GL2(Z=pZ) and local conjugacy among them. We obtain 2 a classification of locally conjugate subgroups of GL2(Z=p Z) in the kernel of the natural 2 map ' : GL2(Z=p Z) ! GL2(Z=pZ). We further inspect local conjugacy among subgroups 2 of GL2(Z=p Z) using this classification. Contents 1. Introduction 2 2. Notation 2 2.1. Groups 2 3. Properties of Locally Conjugate Subgroups 3 2 4. Subgroups of the Kernel of the Homomorphism GL2(Z=p Z) ! GL2(Z=pZ) 4 4.1. Orbits of Mat2(Z=pZ) under conjugation by elements of GL2(Z=pZ) 4 2 4.2. Subgroups in a Subgroup of ker ' Up to Conjugacy by GL2(Z=p Z) 5 2 4.3. Subgroups of ker ' Up to Conjugacy by GL2(Z=p Z) 7 2 5. Locally Conjugate Subgroups of GL2(Z=p Z) 11 5.1. Subgroups of GL2(Z=pZ) 11 5.2. Stabilizers of Subgroups of ker ' 13 5.3. Applying the Schur-Zassenhaus Theorem 15 2 5.4. Representations of Elements of GL2(Z=p Z) 15 5.5. Conjugacy and Local Conjugacy 16 Acknowledgement 22 References 23 1 1. Introduction Sutherland was led to consider subgroups of GL2(Z=pZ) which are locally conjugate but not necessarily conjugate as he was developing an algorithm to compute the images of Galois representation given by the Galois action on p-torsion points of elliptic curves. In his paper, Sutherland fully identifies nontrivially locally conjugate subgroups of GL2(Z=pZ) (see Theo- k rem 2), where p is an odd prime. Our hope is to understand local conjugacy in GL2(Z=p Z) where k ≥ 2 and also in the projective limit GL2(Zp). In this paper, we work with the case 2 when k = 2. We eventually eliminate some pairs of subgroups of GL2(Z=p Z) that cannot be nontrivially locally conjugate (see Corollary 3, Remark 8). Sutherland's result with k = 1 and our observations with k = 2 and p = 3 lead us to believe that locally conjugate subgroups k of GL2(Z=p Z) come in pairs up to conjugacy and that the subgroups are isomorphic. 2. Notation Throughout this paper, p is an odd prime. ϵ is taken to be a nonsquare of Z=pZ. For a group G Sand g 2 G, we take gG to be the conjugacy class of g in G. Furthermore, ⊆ G G for S G, S = s2S s . Definition 1. Given 2×2 matrices M1 and M2, we say that they are diagonally swapped or that they are diagonal swaps if M2 is obtained by switching the diagonal entries of M1. Moreover, given groups of matrices H1 and H2, we say that they are diagonally swapped if the elements of H2 are diagonal swaps of elements of H1. 2.1. Groups. GL2(R); SL2(R) and PGL2(R) denote the general, special and projective lin- ear groups of 2 × 2 matrices over a ring R. In particular, we define the following subgroups of GL2(Z=pZ): Definition 2. {( ) } w 0 Z(p) = 2 GL (Z=p2Z) 0 w 2 {( ) } w 0 C (p) = 2 GL (Z=p2Z) s 0 z 2 {( ) } w ϵy C (p) = 2 GL (Z=p2Z) ns y w 2 {( ) } w x B(p) = 2 GL (Z=p2Z) ; 0 z 2 are called the center, Cartan-split subgroup, Cartan-nonsplit subgroup and Borel subgroup of GL2(Z=pZ) respectively. For H ≤ GL2(Z=pZ), let N(H) denote the normalizer of H in GL2(Z=pZ). In particular, ( ) 0 1 N(C (p)) = C (p) [ C (p) s s 1 0 s ( ) 1 0 N(C (p)) = C (p) [ C (p): ns ns 0 −1 ns 2 3. Properties of Locally Conjugate Subgroups In this section, we define locally conjugate subgroups and discuss some properties of local conjugacy. Definition 3. Let G be a group and H1;H2 ≤ G. (G; H1;H2) is a Gassman triple if there is a bijection f : H1 ! H2 such that h and f(h) are conjugate in G for all h 2 H1. We also say that H1 and H2 are locally conjugate in G. If H1 and H2 are conjugate in G, then they are also locally conjugate in G, in which case we say that they are trivially locally conjugate. Note that local conjugacy between subgroups H1 and H2 of G is determined not only by H1 and H2, but also by G. For example, we will see later that the kernel of the natural 2 homomorphism ' : GL2(Z=p Z) ! GL2(Z=pZ) has subgroups that are nontrivially locally 2 conjugate with respect to GL2(Z=p Z). However, such subgroups are not locally conjugate with respect to ker ' because ker ' is abelian, in which case locally conjugate subgroups are always equal. Proposition 1. Let G be a group and H1;H2 ≤ G. H1 and H2 are locally conjugate in G if and only if jH1 \ Cj = jH2 \ Cj for all conjugacy classes C of G. Proof. Suppose H1 and H2 are locally conjugate in G via f : H1 ! H2. For every conjugacy j \ −1 j \ class C of G, f H1\C maps into H2 C. Likewise, f H2\C maps into H1 C and is the j j \ j j \ j inverse of f H1\C . Thus, H1 C = H2 C . Conversely, suppose jH1 \ Cj = jH2 \ Cj for every conjugacy class C of G. Choose some bijections fC : H1 \ C ! H2 \ C and define f : H1 ! H2 as f(h) = fhG (h). f is a well defined bijection because the conjugacy classes of G partition G. Moreover, h and f(h) are in the same conjugacy class for every h 2 H1, so H1 and H2 are locally conjugate. Proposition 2. Let G be a group, H1;H2 ≤ G and N C G. If H1 and H2 are locally conjugate in G, then H1 \ N and H2 \ N are locally conjugate in G. Proof. N is the disjoint union of some conjugacy classes of G. Let C be a conjugacy class of G. If C ⊆ N, then j(Hi \ N) \ Cj = jHi \ Cj for i = 1; 2. Otherwise, j(Hi \ N) \ Cj = 0. H1 \ N and H2 \ N are therefore locally conjugate in G by Proposition 1 0 0 Proposition 3. Let G; G be finite groups, H1;H2 ≤ G and ' : G ! G a surjective homomorphism. If H1 and H2 are locally conjugate in G, then '(H1) and '(H2) are locally conjugate in G0. S 0 0 −1 G Proof. Let C be any conjugacy class of G and let U = x2C0 (' (x)) . We claim that '−1(C0) = U. If d 2 '−1(C0), then '(d) 2 C0, in which case '(d) 2 ('−1('(d))G ⊆ U. Therefore, '−1(C0) ⊆ U. Conversely, if d 2 ('−1(x))G for some x 2 C0, then d = gyg−1 for some g 2 G and y 2 '−1(x). It follows that '(d) = '(g)'(y)'(g)−1 = '(g)x'(g)−1, and so d 2 '−1(C0). Hence, U ⊆ '−1(C0), as desired. In particular, '−1(C0) is the union of conjugacy classes of G. ker ' is the union of conjugacy classes of G because it is normal in G. Moreover, since H1 −1 0 and H2 are locally conjugate, jH1 \ ker 'j = jH2 \ ker 'j. Similarly, jH1 \ ' (C )j = jH2 \ −1 0 0 −1 0 0 −1 0 ' (C )j. Note that '(Hi)\C = '(Hi\' (C )), so j'(Hi\C )j = jHi\' (C )j=jHi\ker 'j 0 0 for i = 1; 2. Thus, j'(H1) \ C j = j'(H2) \ C j. 3 Lemma 1. Let G be a finite group and H1;H2 ≤ G with H1 and H2 locally conjugate in G. If H1 is cyclic, then so is H2 and H1 and H2 are conjugate. Proof. Say that h1 generates H1. There is some h2 2 H2 that is conjugate to h1. h1 and h2 have the same order, which is jH1j = jH2j, so h2 generates H2. 2 4. Subgroups of the Kernel of the Homomorphism GL2(Z=p Z) ! GL2(Z=pZ) 2 For the rest of the paper, ' denotes the natural homomorphism GL2(Z=p Z) ! GL2(Z=pZ) unless stated otherwise. Elements of ker ' are of the form I + Ap, where we may identify A 4 as an element of Mat2(Z=pZ). ker ' ' (Z=pZ) because (I +A1p)(I +A2p) = I +(A1 +A2)p. Therefore, ker ' is a Z=pZ vector space of dimension 4. 2 By Propositions 2 and 3, H1 \ ker ' and H2 \ ker ' are locally conjugate in GL2(Z=p Z) and '(H1) and '(H2) are locally conjugate in GL2(Z=pZ) if H1 and H2 are locally conjugate 2 in GL2(Z=p Z). Sutherland fully identifies local conjugacy in GL2(Z=pZ) (see Theorem 2). In this section, we determine local conjugacy between subgroups of ker ' with respect to 2 GL2(Z=p Z) up to conjugacy. To categorize the subgroups of ker ' up to conjugacy, we conjugate the subgroups to pick some generators to be of desired form.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Prof. Dr. Eric Jespers Science Faculty Mathematics Department Bachelor Paper II
    Prof. Dr. Eric Jespers Science faculty Mathematics department Bachelor paper II 1 Voorwoord Dit is mijn tweede paper als eindproject van de bachelor in de wiskunde aan de Vrije Universiteit Brussel. In dit werk bestuderen wij eindige groepen G die minimaal niet nilpotent zijn in de volgende betekenis, elke echt deelgroep van G is nilpotent maar G zelf is dit niet. W. R. Scott bewees in [?] dat zulke groepen oplosbaar zijn en een product zijn van twee deelgroepen P en Q, waarbij P een cyclische Sylow p-deelgroep is en Q een normale Sylow q-deelgroep is; met p en q verschillende priemgetallen. Het hoofddoel van dit werk is om een volledig en gedetailleerd bewijs te geven. Als toepassing bestuderen wij eindige groepen die minimaal niet Abels zijn. Dit project is verwezenlijkt tijdens mijn Erasmusstudies aan de Universiteit van Granada en werd via teleclassing verdedigd aan de Universiteit van Murcia, waar mijn mijn pro- motor op sabbatical verbleef. Om lokale wiskundigen de kans te geven mijn verdediging bij te wonen is dit project in het Engles geschreven. Contents 1 Introduction This is my second paper to obtain the Bachelor of Mathematics at the University of Brussels. The subject are finite groups G that are minimal not nilpotent in the following meaning. Each proper subgroup of G is nilpotent but G itself is not. W.R. Scott proved in [?] that those groups are solvable and a product of two subgroups P and Q, with P a cyclic Sylow p-subgroup and G a normal Sylow q-subgroup, where p and q are distinct primes.
    [Show full text]
  • A Characterization of Mathieu Groups by Their Orders and Character Degree Graphs
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF PURE AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS { N. 38{2017 (671{678) 671 A CHARACTERIZATION OF MATHIEU GROUPS BY THEIR ORDERS AND CHARACTER DEGREE GRAPHS Shitian Liu∗ School of Mathematical Science Soochow University Suzhou, Jiangsu, 251125, P. R. China and School of Mathematics and Statics Sichuan University of Science and Engineering Zigong Sichuan, 643000, China [email protected] and [email protected] Xianhua Li School of Mathematical Science Soochow University Suzhou, Jiangsu, 251125, P. R. China Abstract. Let G be a finite group. The character degree graph Γ(G) of G is the graph whose vertices are the prime divisors of character degrees of G and two vertices p and q are joined by an edge if pq divides some character degree of G. Let Ln(q) be the projective special linear group of degree n over finite field of order q. Xu et al. proved that the Mathieu groups are characterized by the order and one irreducible character 2 degree. Recently Khosravi et al. have proven that the simple groups L2(p ), and L2(p) where p 2 f7; 8; 11; 13; 17; 19g are characterizable by the degree graphs and their orders. In this paper, we give a new characterization of Mathieu groups by using the character degree graphs and their orders. Keywords: Character degree graph, Mathieu group, simple group, character degree. 1. Introduction All groups in this note are finite. Let G be a finite group and let Irr(G) be the set of irreducible characters of G. Denote by cd(G) = fχ(1) : χ 2 Irr(G)g, the set of character degrees of G.
    [Show full text]
  • The Theory of Finite Groups: an Introduction (Universitext)
    Universitext Editorial Board (North America): S. Axler F.W. Gehring K.A. Ribet Springer New York Berlin Heidelberg Hong Kong London Milan Paris Tokyo This page intentionally left blank Hans Kurzweil Bernd Stellmacher The Theory of Finite Groups An Introduction Hans Kurzweil Bernd Stellmacher Institute of Mathematics Mathematiches Seminar Kiel University of Erlangen-Nuremburg Christian-Albrechts-Universität 1 Bismarckstrasse 1 /2 Ludewig-Meyn Strasse 4 Erlangen 91054 Kiel D-24098 Germany Germany [email protected] [email protected] Editorial Board (North America): S. Axler F.W. Gehring Mathematics Department Mathematics Department San Francisco State University East Hall San Francisco, CA 94132 University of Michigan USA Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1109 [email protected] USA [email protected] K.A. Ribet Mathematics Department University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720-3840 USA [email protected] Mathematics Subject Classification (2000): 20-01, 20DXX Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Kurzweil, Hans, 1942– The theory of finite groups: an introduction / Hans Kurzweil, Bernd Stellmacher. p. cm. — (Universitext) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-387-40510-0 (alk. paper) 1. Finite groups. I. Stellmacher, B. (Bernd) II. Title. QA177.K87 2004 512´.2—dc21 2003054313 ISBN 0-387-40510-0 Printed on acid-free paper. © 2004 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written permission of the publisher (Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010, USA), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Group Theory
    Group Theory Hartmut Laue Mathematisches Seminar der Universit¨at Kiel 2013 Preface These lecture notes present the contents of my course on Group Theory within the masters programme in Mathematics at the University of Kiel. The aim is to introduce into concepts and techniques of modern group theory which are the prerequisites for tackling current research problems. In an area which has been studied with extreme intensity for many decades, the decision of what to include or not under the time limits of a summer semester was certainly not trivial, and apart from the aspect of importance also that of personal taste had to play a role. Experts will soon discover that among the results proved in this course there are certain theorems which frequently are viewed as too difficult to reach, like Tate’s (4.10) or Roquette’s (5.13). The proofs given here need only a few lines thanks to an approach which seems to have been underestimated although certain rudiments of it have made it into newer textbooks. Instead of making heavy use of cohomological or topological considerations or character theory, we introduce a completely elementary but rather general concept of normalized group action (1.5.4) which serves as a base for not only the above-mentioned highlights but also for other important theorems (3.6, 3.9 (Gasch¨utz), 3.13 (Schur-Zassenhaus)) and for the transfer. Thus we hope to escape the cartesian reservation towards authors in general1, although other parts of the theory clearly follow well-known patterns when a major modification would not result in a gain of clarity or applicability.
    [Show full text]
  • Hall Subgroups in Finite Simple Groups
    Introduction Hall subgroups in finite simple groups HALL SUBGROUPS IN FINITE SIMPLE GROUPS Evgeny P. Vdovin1 1Sobolev Institute of Mathematics SB RAS Groups St Andrews 2009 Introduction Hall subgroups in finite simple groups The term “group” always means a finite group. By π we always denote a set of primes, π0 is its complement in the set of all primes. A rational integer n is called a π-number, if all its prime divisors are in π, by π(n) we denote all prime divisors of a rational integer n. For a group G we set π(G) to be equal to π(jGj) and G is a π-group if jGj is a π-number. A subgroup H of G is called a π-Hall subgroup if π(H) ⊆ π and π(jG : Hj) ⊆ π0. A set of all π-Hall subgroups of G we denote by Hallπ(G) (note that this set may be empty). According to P. Hall we say that G satisfies Eπ (or briefly G 2 Eπ), if G possesses a π-Hall subgroup. If G 2 Eπ and every two π-Hall subgroups are conjugate, then we say that G satisfies Cπ (G 2 Cπ). If G 2 Cπ and each π-subgroup of G is included in a π-Hall subgroup of G, then we say that G satisfies Dπ (G 2 Dπ). The number of classes of conjugate π-Hall subgroups of G we denote by kπ(G). Introduction Hall subgroups in finite simple groups The term “group” always means a finite group.
    [Show full text]
  • Pronormality of Hall Subgroups in Finite Simple Groups E
    Siberian Mathematical Journal, Vol. 53, No. 3, pp. , 2012 Original Russian Text Copyright c 2012 Vdovin E. P. and Revin D. O. PRONORMALITY OF HALL SUBGROUPS IN FINITE SIMPLE GROUPS E. P. Vdovin and D. O. Revin UDC 512.542 Abstract: We prove that the Hall subgroups of finite simple groups are pronormal. Thus we obtain an affirmative answer to Problem 17.45(a) of the Kourovka Notebook. Keywords: Hall subgroup, pronormal subgroup, simple group Introduction According to the definition by P. Hall, a subgroup H of a group G is called pronormal,ifforevery g ∈ G the subgroups H and Hg are conjugate in H, Hg. The classical examples of pronormal subgroups are • normal subgroups; • maximal subgroups; • Sylow subgroups of finite groups; • Carter subgroups (i.e., nilpotent selfnormalizing subgroups) of finite solvable groups; • Hall subgroups (i.e. subgroups whose order and index are coprime) of finite solvable groups. The pronormality of subgroups in the last three cases follows from the conjugacy of Sylow, Carter, and Hall subgroups in finite groups in corresponding classes. In [1, Theorem 9.2] the first author proved that Carter subgroups in finite groups are conjugate. As a corollary it follows that Carter subgroups of finite groups are pronormal. In contrast with Carter subgroups, Hall subgroups in finite groups can be nonconjugate. The goal of the authors is to find the classes of finite groups with pronormal Hall subgroups. In the present paper the following result is obtained. Theorem 1. The Hall subgroups of finite simple groups are pronormal. The theorem gives an affirmative answer to Problem 17.45(a) from the Kourovka Notebook [2], and it was announced by the authors in [3, Theorem 7.9].
    [Show full text]
  • Group Theory
    Algebra Math Notes • Study Guide Group Theory Table of Contents Groups..................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Binary Operations ............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Groups .............................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Examples of Groups ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Cyclic Groups ................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Homomorphisms and Normal Subgroups ......................................................................................................................... 5 Cosets and Quotient Groups ............................................................................................................................................ 6 Isomorphism Theorems .................................................................................................................................................... 7 Product Groups ...............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Theorem on Special Linear Groups
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector JOURNAL OF ALGEBR4 16, 509-518 (1970) A Theorem on Special Linear Groups KOK-WEE PHAN Department of Mathematics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Iizdiana Communicated by W. Feit Received October 1, 1969 Let Xi be the set of all (TZ + 1) x (n + 1) matrices of determinant 1 over the finite field F, of q elements such that the diagonal entries (1, l),..., (i - 1, i - l), (i + 2, i + 2) ,..., (12 + 1, TZ + 1) are 1 and the non-diagonal (j, k) entry is 0 whenever (j, k) is not (i, i + 1) or (; + 1, i). Clearly Xi is a subgroup of SL(n + 1, q) isomorphic to SL(2, q) and it is well known that these Xi’s generate SL(n + 1,q). It is of interest to investigate what properties are possessed by this set of subgroups which would characterize SL(IZ + 1,q). This paper is a study in this direction. More precisely we shall prove the following result: THEOREM 1. Let G be a group generated by its subgroup Li , i = l,..., E each isomorphic to SL(2, q) zuh ere q > 4. Suppose that the Li’s satisfy the folloming conditions: (a) (Li , L,+& is isomorphic to SL(3, q); (b) there is an element ai of order q - 1 such that (ai , ai+l> is abelian of order (q - 1)2; (c) [L,,L,] = 1 wlzere 1 <i+l <j<n (d) (Li , ai+J z (L, , aj+> E GL(2, q) where 1 < i < n - 1 and 2 < j < Il.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:0905.4513V1 [Math.GR] 27 May 2009 Nlsso finite of Analysis finite Ru Fhih Esml Call Simply We 1 Height of Group Eoe the Denotes Then Rus(E O Xml 3,[1 H.17,[23])
    FINITE P-CENTRAL GROUPS OF HEIGHT K J. GONZALEZ-S´ ANCHEZ´ AND T. S. WEIGEL Abstract. A finite group G is called pi-central of height k if every element of i th order p of G is contained in the k -term ζk(G) of the ascending central series of G. If p is odd such a group has to be p-nilpotent (Thm. A). Finite p-central p-groups of height p − 2 can be seen as the dual analogue of finite potent p- groups, i.e., for such a finite p-group P the group P/Ω1(P ) is also p-central of height p − 2 (Thm. B). In such a group P the index of P p is less or equal than the order of the subgroup Ω1(P ) (Thm. C). If the Sylow p-subgroup P of a finite group G is p-central of height p − 1, p odd, and NG(P ) is p-nilpotent, then G is also p-nilpotent (Thm. D). Moreover, if G is a p-soluble finite group, p odd, and P ∈ Sylp(G) is p-central of height p − 2, then NG(P ) controls p-fusion in G (Thm. E). It is well-known that the last two properties hold for Swan groups (see [11]). 1. Introduction Let p be a prime number. Following a suggestion of A. Mann1 we call a finite group G p-central if every element of order p is central in G, i.e., let pi (1.1) Ωi(G, p)= h g ∈ G | g =1 i, i ≥ 0; then G is p-central if, and only if, Ω1(G, p) ≤ Z(G).
    [Show full text]
  • Abelian Groups
    Abelian Groups A group is Abelian if xy = yx for all group elements x and y. The basis theorem An Abelian group is the direct product of cyclic p−groups. This direct product de- composition is unique, up to a reordering of the factors. n1 nk Proof: Let n = p1 · · · pk be the order of the Abelian group G, with pi's distinct primes. By Sylow's theorem it follows that G has exacly one Sylow p−subgroup for each of the k distinct primes pi: Consequently G is the direct product of its Sylow p−subgroups. [We call the Sylow p−subgroups the p − primary parts of G:] It remains to show that an Abelian p−group (corresponding to a p−primary part of G) is the direct product of cyclic groups. We prove this by induction on the power m of the order pm of the p−group. Assume that the result is true for m: Let P be an Abelian group of order pm+1 and Q a subgroup m of P of order p (such Q exists by Sylow's theorem). By induction Q =< a1 > × < a2 > × · · · × < ar > with r ki j < ai > j = p ; k1 ≥ k2 ≥ · · · ≥ kr; X ki = m: i=1 p p s1 s2 sr t1 t2 tr Let a 2 P − Q: Then a 2 Q and therefore a = a1 a2 · · · ar : Taking b = aa1 a2 · · · ar p d1 d2 dr for suitable ti, we obtain b 2 P − Q; and b = a1 a2 · · · ar ; where for each i either di = 0 or (di; p) = 1: [Take a deep breath and convince ourself that such b exists.] 1 p If all the di are 0, then b = 1 and, by a cardinality argument, P =< a1 > × < a2 > × · · · × < ar > × < b > : kj +1 If not, let j be the first index for which dj =6 0; hence j < b > j = p : We show that P =< a1 > × · · · × < aj−1 > × < b > ×
    [Show full text]
  • NILPOTENT and ABELIAN HALL SUBGROUPS in FINITE GROUPS 1. Introduction One of the Main Themes in Finite Group Theory Is to Study
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 00, Number 0, Pages 000–000 S 0002-9947(XX)0000-0 NILPOTENT AND ABELIAN HALL SUBGROUPS IN FINITE GROUPS ANTONIO BELTRAN,´ MAR´IA JOSE´ FELIPE, GUNTER MALLE, ALEXANDER MORETO,´ GABRIEL NAVARRO, LUCIA SANUS, RONALD SOLOMON, AND PHAM HUU TIEP Abstract. We give a characterization of the finite groups having nilpotent or abelian Hall π-subgroups that can easily be verified using the character table. 1. Introduction One of the main themes in finite group theory is to study the interaction between global and local structure: if p is a prime and G is a finite group, we seek to analyze the relationship between G and its p-local subgroups. Ideally, a local property of G can be read off from the character table of G. There are not many theorems analyzing local and global structure from the point of view of two different primes, as we do in the main result of this paper. Theorem A. Let G be a finite group, and let p and q be different primes. Then some Sylow p-subgroup of G commutes with some Sylow q-subgroup of G if and only if the class sizes of the q-elements of G are not divisible by p and the class sizes of the p-elements of G are not divisible by q. Theorem A, of course, gives us a characterization (detectable in the character ta- ble) of when a finite group possesses nilpotent Hall {p, q}-subgroups. The existence of Hall subgroups (nilpotent or not) is a classical subject in finite group theory, with extensive literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure of the Finite Groups with 4P Elements of Maximal Order 1
    Quasigroups and Related Systems 24 (2016), 157 − 168 Structure of the nite groups with 4p elements of maximal order Bahareh Asadian and Neda Ahanjideh Abstract. Let G be a nite group and p > 3 be a prime number. We determine the structure of the nite group G with 4p elements of maximal order. In particular, we show that if G is a nite group with 20 elements of maximal order, then G is a non-abelian 2-group of order 32 ∼ ∼ with exp(G) = 4, G = C6 × S3 or G = S5, where Sn denotes the symmetric group of degree n, ∼ ∼ ∼ G = C44 o (Cu × Cl), where uj10 and lj2, G = C25 o Cl or G = C50 o Cl, where lj4. 1. Introduction Throughout this paper, we use the following notations: For a nite group G, we denote by π(G) the set of prime divisors of jGj and by πe(G) the set of element orders of G. By mi(G), we denote the number of elements of order i, where i 2 πe(G). Set nse(G) := fmi(G): i 2 πe(G)g. One of the interesting topics in the group theory is to determine the solvability of a group with the given particular properties. For example, one of the problems which is proposed by Thompson is: Thompson's Problem. Let T (G) = f(n; mn): n 2 πe(G) and mn 2 nse(G)g, where mn is the number of elements of order n in G. Suppose that T (G) = T (S). If S is a solvable group, is it true that G is also necessarily solvable? Up to now, nobody can solve this problem and it remains as an open problem.
    [Show full text]