DOCSLIB.ORG

2020 Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands 305(B) and 303(D) Water Quality Assessment Integrated Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2020 Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands 305(B) and 303(D) Water Quality Assessment Integrated Report 2020 Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands 305(b) and 303(d) Water Quality Assessment Integrated Report Photo: Scott Eck - Bird Island in Saipan’s Northeastern Coastal waters Bureau of Environmental and Coastal Quality September 2020 Editor & Contributing Author: Kathy Yuknavage Contributing Authors: Jonathan Arriola, David Benavente, Rodney Camacho, Erin Derrington, Malcolm Johnson, Larry Maurin, Denise Perez, and Travis Spaeth Maps: Rodney Camacho, Robbie Greene, and Kathy Yuknavage CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... 1 PART A. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 14 PART B. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ................................................................................... 15 B.1. ALL CNMI SURFACE WATERS .......................................................................................... 15 B.1.1. Monitoring Water Quality of Saipan and Mañagaha ............................................. 17 B.1.2. Monitoring Water Quality of Rota and Tinian ........................................................ 17 B.1.3. Monitoring Water Quality of Northern Islands ...................................................... 18 B.1.4. CNMI Classification of Marine Coastal Water Uses ................................................ 18 B.1.4.1. Class AA Coastal Waterbodies .................................................................................... 18 B.1.4.2. Class A Coastal Waterbodies ....................................................................................... 21 B.1.5. CNMI Classification of Fresh Surface Waterbodies (Streams, Wetlands and Lakes) Uses 24 B.2. WATER POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM ..................................................................... 26 B.2.1. Water Quality Surveillance/Nonpoint Source Program ......................................... 26 B.2.1.1. CNMI Water Quality Standards ................................................................................... 26 B.2.1.2. Water Quality Monitoring and Notification ................................................................ 27 B.2.1.3. Section 401 Water Quality Certification Program ...................................................... 28 B.2.2. Marine Biological Monitoring Program .................................................................. 28 B.2.3. Wastewater, Earthmoving, and Erosion Control Program ..................................... 29 B.2.3.1. Wastewater Treatment Disposal Regulations ............................................................ 29 B.2.3.2. Earthmoving and Erosion Control Regulations ........................................................... 30 B.2.4. Safe Drinking Water and Ground water Management Program ............................ 31 B.2.4.1. Safe Drinking Water Regulations ................................................................................ 31 B.2.4.2. Well Drilling and Well Operation Regulations ............................................................ 31 B.2.4.3. Underground Injection Control Regulations ............................................................... 31 B.3. COST/BENEFIT ASSESSMENT .......................................................................................... 31 B.3.1. Costs ........................................................................................................................ 32 B.3.2. Benefits ................................................................................................................... 32 B.4. SPECIAL STATE CONCERNS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................. 33 B.4.1. Erosion and Sedimentation ..................................................................................... 33 B.4.2. Failing Septic Systems, and Illicit, and Permitted Wastewater Discharges ............ 34 B.4.3. Feral and Domesticated Animal Fecal Contamination ........................................... 36 B.4.4. Toxins and Heavy Metal Contamination of Fish and Other Biota .......................... 37 B.4.5. Climate Related Severe Storm Event Impacts ........................................................ 37 PART C. SURFACE WATER MONITORING ASSESSMENT ........................................................... 39 C.1. MONITORING PROGRAMS ............................................................................................. 39 C.1.1. Coastal Marine Water Quality Monitoring and Notification .................................. 39 C.1.2. Marine Biological Criteria Monitoring Program ..................................................... 40 C.1.3. Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program ........................................................... 41 C.1.4. Other Outside Information and Data Used for Assessment Purposes ................... 42 C.1.4.1. WERI Fish Tissue and Biota Contaminant Studies ....................................................... 42 C.1.4.2. UOG and NOAA-CRED Studies .................................................................................... 43 C.1.4.3. qPCR-MST Study of Saipan Coastal Waters ................................................................ 44 C.1.4.4. LaoLao Bay Watershed Restoration Project ............................................................... 44 C.1.4.5. CNMI Division of Fish & Wildlife Fresh Aquatic Survey .............................................. 44 C.2. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................... 45 C.2.1. Waterbody Segmentation - Watershed Approach ................................................. 45 C.2.2. CNMI Designated Uses ............................................................................................ 48 C.2.3. Criteria Used to Assess Coastal Marine Waterbodies’ Designated Uses ............... 51 C.2.3.1. Coastal Marine Waters Propagation of Aquatic Life Criteria ...................................... 52 C.2.3.2. Coastal Marine Water Fish and Shellfish Consumption Criteria ................................. 56 C.2.3.3. Coastal Marine Waters Recreational Use Criteria ...................................................... 56 C.2.3.4. Coastal Marine Waters Aesthetic Enjoyment and Other Uses Criteria ...................... 57 C.2.4 Criteria Used to Assess Fresh Surface Waterbodies’ Designated Uses .................. 61 C.2.4.1. Fresh Surface Water Propagation of Aquatic Life Criteria .......................................... 62 C.2.4.2. Fresh Surface Water Fish/Shellfish Consumption Criteria .......................................... 63 C.2.4.3. Fresh Surface Water Recreational Use Criteria .......................................................... 63 C.2.4.4. Potable Freshwater Supply Criteria ............................................................................ 64 C.2.4.5. Fresh Surface Water Aesthetic Enjoyment and Other Uses Criteria .......................... 64 C.2.5. Five-Part Consolidated Assessment and Listing Method Categories ..................... 64 C.2.5.1. CALM Category 1 ......................................................................................................... 65 C.2.5.2. CALM Category 2 ......................................................................................................... 65 C.2.5.3. CALM Category 3 ......................................................................................................... 66 C.2.5.4. CALM Category 4 ......................................................................................................... 66 C.2.5.5. CALM Category 5 ......................................................................................................... 67 C.3 ASSESSMENT RESULTS ................................................................................................... 68 C.3.1. Five-Part Categorization All CNMI Surface Waters ................................................. 68 C.3.2. Section 303(d) List and TMDL Development Status ............................................... 68 C.3.2.1. Criteria for Removal of Water Segment/Pollutant Combinations from the 303(d) List 77 C.3.2.2. CNMI Waters Removed from the 303(d) List .............................................................. 78 C.3.3. CNMI Summaries of Designated Use Support ........................................................ 83 C.3.4. Section 314 (Clean Lakes Program) ........................................................................ 91 C.3.5. Five-Part Categorization of Saipan’s and Mañagaha’s Surface Waters .................. 95 C.3.5.1. KALABERA - Waterbody Segment 12 ........................................................................ 102 C.3.5.2. TALOFOFO - Waterbody Segment 13 ........................................................................ 105 C.3.5.3. KAGMAN - Waterbody Segment 14 .......................................................................... 109 C.3.5.4. LAOLAO - Waterbody Segment 15 ............................................................................ 113 C.3.5.5. DANDAN - Waterbody Segment 16........................................................................... 116 C.3.5.6. ISLEY - Waterbody Segments 17A and 17B ............................................................... 118 C-3.5.7. SUSUPE - Waterbody Segment 18 ............................................................................ 126 C.3.5.8. WEST TAKPOCHAU – Waterbody Segments 19A, 19B, and 19C ..............................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Special Study North Field Historic District
    Tinian National Historical ParkStudy Page 1 of 26 SPECIAL STUDY NORTH FIELD HISTORIC DISTRICT Tinian Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands September 2001 United States Department of the Interior - National Park Service http://www.nps.gov/pwro/piso/Tinian/tiniandr.htm 4/9/2008 Tinian National Historical ParkStudy Page 2 of 26 http://www.nps.gov/pwro/piso/Tinian/tiniandr.htm 4/9/2008 Tinian National Historical ParkStudy Page 3 of 26 North Field as it looked during World War II. The photo shows only three runways, which dates it sometime earlier than May 1945 when construction of Runway Four was completed. North Field was designed for an entire wing of B-29 Superfortresses, the 313th Bombardment Wing, with hardstands to park 265 B-29s. Each of the parallel runways stretched more than a mile and a half in length. Around and between the runways were nearly eleven miles of taxiways. Table of Contents SUMMARY BACKGROUND DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY AREA Location, Size and Ownership Regional Context RESOURCE SIGNIFICANCE Current Status of the Study Area Cultural Resources Natural Resources Evaluation of Significance EVALUATION OF SUITABILITY AND FEASIBILITY Rarity of This Type of Resource (Suitability) Feasibility for Protection Position of CNMI and Local Government Officials http://www.nps.gov/pwro/piso/Tinian/tiniandr.htm 4/9/2008 Tinian National Historical ParkStudy Page 4 of 26 Plans and Objectives of the Lease Holder FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Findings and Conclusions Recommendations APPENDIX Selected References CINCPACFLT Letter of July 26, 2000 COMNAVMAR Letter of August 28, 2001 Brochure: Self-Guided Tour of North Field Tinian Interpret Marianas Campaign from American Memorial Park, on Tinian, and with NPS Publications MAPS Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory
    Form No. 10-300 Ul^l mu^l Alta ucr/VKl ivicix i wr i nc, UN i E.IMWIV NATIONAL PARK SERVICE '•SS'^:?!®.^ s$lliil®'^^^:'s^ :^:'!i^'-'-^'®'':^:^w^ NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES 1 ^^i^isiii^^|:^^i^§iilP:S-illi Hill INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM 1 iiPiiPii^i^iiii xisJiSSg:; SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOWTO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS [NAME HISTORIC Suicide Cliff ANO/OR COMMON .NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY, TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Saipan,/1^7 OF STATE Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands 969^8UNTY CODE CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE D I STRICT —OCCUPIED —AGRICULTURE —MUSEUM BUILDING!S) PRIVATE ^.UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL JXPARK STRUCTURE BOTH —WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS —OBJECT IN PROCESS —YES: RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC BEING CONSIDERED —*YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION —NO —MILITARY _OTHER: OWNER OF PROPERTY NAME Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands STREET & NUMBER Saipan, Northern Mariana Islands - Headquarters CITY, TOWN STATE TTPI 96950 VICINITY OF LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEDS.ETC. Attorney General, Office of the High Commissioner STREET & NUMBER Saipan Island CITY, TOWN STATE Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands 96950 1 REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE Micronesian Parks, DATE July, 1972 XL-FEDERAL —STATE —COUNTY —LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS U.S Department of the Interior, Hawaii Group, National Park Service CITY. TOWN STATE 667 Ala Moana Boulevard, suite 512, Honolulu, Hawaii 96950 DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE ^.EXCELLENT —DETERIORATED —UNALTERED X.ORIGINALSITE _GOOD —RUINS FALTERED —MOVED DATE. —FAIR _UNEXPOSED Suicide Cliff is a section of the Banadero cliff line.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Draft ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT for DIVERT ACTIVITIES and EXERCISES, COMMONWEALTH of the NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS VOLUME II: APPENDICES
    Revised Draft ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR DIVERT ACTIVITIES AND EXERCISES, COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS VOLUME II: APPENDICES OCTOBER 2015 Revised Draft EIS for Divert Activities and Exercises 1 REVISED DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT 2 DIVERT ACTIVITIES AND EXERCISES 3 COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS (CNMI) 4 VOLUME II: APPENDICES 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS 6 A. COOPERATING AGENCY REQUESTS AND ACCEPTANCE LETTERS 7 B. ESA SECTION 7 CONSULTATION SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION 8 C. CZMA COMPLIANCE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION 9 D. NHPA SECTION 106 CONSULTATION SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION 10 E. AIR QUALITY CALCULATIONS AND MODELING 11 F. AERONAUTICAL STUDY IN THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN 12 MARIANA ISLANDS 13 G. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND COMMENTS 14 HQ PACAF, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, HI October 2015 i Revised Draft EIS for Divert Activities and Exercises 1 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK HQ PACAF, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, HI October 2015 ii APPENDIX A Cooperating Agency Requests and Acceptance Letters Cooperating Agency Request Letter to the Department of the Navy and U.S. Marine Corps September 20, 2011 Revised Draft Divert EIS Appendix A A-1 Cooperating Agency Request Letter to Department of Interior, Office of Insular Affairs October 21, 2011 Revised Draft Divert EIS Appendix A A-2 Cooperating Agency Request Letter to Department of Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service October 21, 2011 Revised Draft Divert EIS Appendix A A-3 Cooperating Agency Request Letter to Federal Aviation Administration
    [Show full text]
  • House Awaits Senate on Budget by Dave Hughes Senate President Joseph Inos Said He “Isn’T Sure That We Inos Unsure of Session Today Will Have a Session Tomorrow
    iMYERSlTY o f VIAW Al U S E iA R Y ¿M arianas ^V à riety^ Micronesia’s Leading Newspaper Since 1 9 7 2 I s O l · Vol. 19 No. 17 Saipan, MP 96950 *% C L<L· ©1990 Marianas Variety MAY 15,1990 C Serving CNMl for 19 Years House awaits Senate on budget By Dave Hughes Senate President Joseph Inos said he “isn’t sure that we Inos unsure of session today will have a session tomorrow.. I won’t know until late afternoon” The Senate has held on the the Supplemental Appro­ Manglona said last week that he anticipated a Senate One reason Inos sure about the session is the fact that priations Bill passed by the House of Representatives last session today, but he promised there would be several Rota Senator Paul Manglona, chairman of the Fiscal month. That legislative action contains major funding revisions in the House measure. Affairs Committee in the Senate, was off-island and provisions for the Public School System and over $2 The Rota senator said his group “has some concerns wasn’t expected to return until 4:30 p.m. or after. million in funding for the improvement of the Sadog Tasi basically about the administrative provisions, not neces­ If and when the Senate does act on the budget supple­ sewer plant. sarily the money aspect, its how the money is going to be ment bill, a member of the House said they will re­ Lt. Gov. Benjamin Manglona called a special press used” convene and discuss what the Senate did to their original conference after the House passed the supplemental Inos said he wasn’t sure why there was'such a long legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • America&Apos;S Unknown Avifauna: the Birds of the Mariana Islands
    ß ß that time have been the basis for con- America's unknown avifauna. siderable concern (Vincent, 1967) and indeed appear to be the basis for the the birds of inclusion of several Mariana birds in the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (1976) list of the Mariana Islands Endangered Species.These brief war- time observationswere important, but no significant investigationshave been conductedin the ensuingthirty yearsto "Probably no otherAmerican birds determine the extent to which the are aspoorly known as these." endemic avifauna of these islands may haverecovered. Importantly, no assess- mentshave been made of the impactof H. Douglas Pratt, Phillip L. Bruner the military's aerial planting of the exoticscrubby tree known as tangan- and Delwyn G. Berrett tangan, Leucaenaglauca, to promote revegetationafter the war. This 'treeis known as "koa haole" in Hawaii. restricted both in their time for bird ß ß announcesthe signthat greets observation and in their movements on v•sitors to Guam. Few Americans realize the islands. Their studies were made in authorsURING THEvisitedSUMMER the islandsOF1076the of that the nation's westernmost territories 1945 and 1946 when most of the Mari- Saipan,Tinian, Rota, and Guam, and m he across the International Date Line in anaswere just beginningto recoverfrom 1978 Bruner and Pratt returned to Sai- the far westernPacific. Guam, the larg- the ravagesof war (Baker, 1946).Never- pan and Guam. We havespent a total of est and southernmost of the Mariana theless, population estimates made at 38 man/dayson Saipan,four on Tinian, Islands,has been a United Statesposses- s•on since Spain surrendered her sov- & Agrihan ereigntyover the island at the end of the Sparash-AmericanWar.
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands Coastal Resilience Assessment
    COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS COASTAL RESILIENCE ASSESSMENT 20202020 Greg Dobson, Ian Johnson, Kim Rhodes UNC Asheville’s NEMAC Kristen Byler National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Bridget Lussier Lynker, on contract to NOAA Office for Coastal Management IMPORTANT INFORMATION/DISCLAIMER: This report represents a Regional Coastal Resilience Assessment that can be used to identify places on the landscape for resilience-building efforts and conservation actions through understanding coastal flood threats, the exposure of populations and infrastructure have to those threats, and the presence of suitable fish and wildlife habitat. As with all remotely sensed or publicly available data, all features should be verified with a site visit, as the locations of suitable landscapes or areas containing flood threats and community assets are approximate. The data, maps, and analysis provided should be used only as a screening-level resource to support management decisions. This report should be used strictly as a planning reference tool and not for permitting or other legal purposes. The scientific results and conclusions, as well as any views or opinions expressed herein, are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S. Government, or the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation’s partners. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute their endorsement by the U.S. Government or the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation or its funding sources. NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION DISCLAIMER: The scientific results and conclusions, as well as any views or opinions expressed herein, are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of NOAA or the Department of Commerce.
    [Show full text]
  • View on KKMP This Morning
    Super Typhoon Yutu Relief & Recovery Update #4 POST-DECLARATION DAMAGE ASSESSMENT COMPLETED; RELIEF MANPOWER ON-ISLAND READY TO SUPPORT; FEEDER 1, PARTIAL 1 & 2 BACK ONLINE Release Date: October 29, 2018 On Sunday, October 28, 2018, CNMI Leadership and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) conducted a Post-Declaration Damage Assessment. Saipan, Tinian and Rota experienced very heavy rainfall and extremely high winds which caused damages to homes, businesses and critical infrastructure. Utility infrastructure on all three islands has been visibly severely impacted to include downed power lines, transformers and poles. Driving conditions remain hazardous as debris removal operations are still underway. At the request of Governor Ralph DLG. Torres, representatives from FEMA Individual Assistance (IA) and the US Small Business Administration (SBA) joined the CNMI on an Aerial Preliminary Damage Assessment of Saipan, Tinian and Rota. Findings are as follows: SAIPAN: 317 Major; 462 Destroyed (T=779) Villages covered: Kagman 1, 2 & 3 and LauLau, Susupe, Chalan Kanoa, San Antonio, Koblerville, Dandan and San Vicente Power outage across the island 2-mile-long gas lines observed Extensive damage to critical infrastructure in southern Saipan Downed power poles and lines Page 1 of 8 Page printed at fema.gov/ja/press-release/20201016/super-typhoon-yutu-relief-recovery-update-4-post-declaration- 09/28/2021 damage TINIAN: 113 Major; 70 Destroyed (T=183) Villages covered: San Jose & House of Taga, Carolinas, Marpo Valley and Marpo Heights Power outage across the island; estimated to take 3 months to achieve 50% restoration Tinian Health Center sustained extensive damage Observed a downed communications tower ROTA: 38 Major; 13 Destroyed (T=51) Villages covered: Songsong Village and Sinapalo Power outage across the island Sustained the least amount of damage as compared to Saipan and Tinian Red Cross CNMI-wide assessments begin Tuesday, October 30, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • 2002 MP 7 (Manglona V. Commonwealth)
    For Publication IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS ____________________________________________ JOAQUIN M. MANGLONA Plaintiff/Appellant, V. GOVERNMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS Defendant/Appellee, v. ROBERT C. NARAJA, RAYNALDO M. CING, MARIA D. CABRERA, DAVID M. APATANG and EDWARD B. PALACIOS Third Party Defendants/Appellees APPEAL NO. 2000-11 CIVIL ACTION NO. 97-0486 OPINION _______________________________________________________________________ Cite as: Manglona v. CNMI Gov’t, 2002 MP 7 Argued and submitted January 16, 2001 Decided April 9, 2002 Counsel for Appellant Counsel for Appellee Douglas F. Cushnie David Lochabay Eric S. Smith P.O. Box 500949 Office of the Attorney General 4th Floor, Saipan, MP 96950 Caller Box 10007 Horiguchi Bldg. Saipan, MP 96950 P.O. Box 5133 Saipan, MP 96950 BEFORE: MIGUEL S. DEMAPAN, Chief Justice, ALEXANDRO C. CASTRO, Associate Justice, TIMOTHY H. BELLAS, Justice Pro Tempore DEMAPAN, Chief Justice: ¶1 Appellant Joaquin Manglona appeals the dismissal on summary judgment of his breach of contract and equitable estoppel claims against the CNMI Government. Manglona also appeals the Superior Court’s denial of his motion to amend his complaint, and of his Rule 59 motion for reconsideration. ¶2 We have jurisdiction pursuant to Article IV, Section 3 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and 1 CMC §3102(a). We reverse and remand. PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶3 This action was brought by Joaquin Manglona (“Manglona”) against the CNMI Government on May 6, 1997. Appellant’s Excerpts of Record [hereinafter E.R.] at 19. ¶4 The Government filed its answer and a counterclaim on October 20, 1997, E.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Tinian: Not Just an Island in the Pacific
    TINIAN: NOT JUST AN ISLAND IN THE PACIFIC It is a small island, less than 40 square miles, a flat green dot in the vastness of Pacific blue. Fly over it and you notice a slash across its north end of uninhabited bush, a long thin line that looks like an overgrown dirt runway. If you didn't know what it was, you wouldn't give it a second glance out your airplane window. On the ground, you see the runway isn't dirt but tarmac and crushed limestone, abandoned with weeds sticking out of it. Yet this is arguably the most historical airstrip on earth. This is where World War II was won. This is Runway Able On July 24, 1944, 30,000 US Marines landed on the beaches of Tinian. Eight days later, over 8,000 of the 8,800 Japanese soldiers on the island were dead (vs. 328 Marines), and four months later the Seabees had built the busiest airfield of WWII - dubbed North Field – enabling B-29 Superfortresses to launch air attacks on the Philippines, Okinawa, and mainland Japan. Late in the afternoon of August 5, 1945, a B-29 was maneuvered over a bomb loading pit, then after lengthy preparations, taxied to the east end of North Field's main runway, Runway Able, and at 2:45am in the early morning darkness of August 6, took off. The B-29 was piloted by Col. Paul Tibbets of the US Army Air Force, who had named the plane after his mother, Enola Gay. The crew named the bomb they were carrying Little Boy.
    [Show full text]
  • Pathologist Testifies in Santos Case
    C T ¿J\4arianasMicronesia’s Leading Newspaper Sincefariety^ 1972 w O l* Pathologist testifies in Santos case by Ten M. Flores important to know what type of when he committed suicide by allegedly shooting his wife Earlier in the week, the gun and ammunition was used to hanging himself inside his cell, Erlinse, who was also a police neighbor’s housekeeper testified An expert in forensic pathol­ determine if the case was a sui­ several days after Santos’ death. officer, in their residence in diat Saimon yelled “you bitch, I ogy took the stand and testified cide or if a murder was com­ According to Camacho’s sis­ Dandan on June 12. Continued on page 6 that the gunshot wound sustained mitted. ter, Santos revealed to her that by Erlinse Santos was consistent In his testimony, Allen said Camacho was the father of one with that of a suicide. that the location of the wound of her children and that she was Dr. Terence B. Allen, a forensic was “somewhat an unusual site” pregnant with their secondchild. pathologist, was asked to testify however, he said that it was not Camacho’s sister went on to in the trial of Masaro Saimon, a inconsistent in any way with a say that Santos was happy in her former police officer who is ac­ self-inflicted wound. relationship with Herbert and cused of shooting his common- Allen testi fi ed that the location that she also revealed plans of law-wife in thge forehead. of the gunshot wound may make getting married right after Allen, who was hired by the a difference.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatahan Evacuated
    F\ Jli ÜNIVÊKSIIY Of HAWAII LIBRARI 4 k IIS ■i! .1 ¿M a ria n a s GV a rie ty ,jr * Micronesia's Leading Newspaper Since 1972 W A 5 Vol. 19 No. 7 Soipan, M? 96950 ©1990 Mananas Variety April 6 ,1 9 9 0 Serving CNMI for 19 Yoors b H T Anatahan evacuated Direct order from governor, help from Navy choppers empties island BY DAVE HUGHES another Pagan-type incident.” He leave animals behind and were Residents of Anatahan, all 22 was referring to the eruption of only allowed 30 pounds each of of them, were told to leave their Mt. Pagan on an island located personal belongings. homes this week by the govern­ almost200 m i les north of Saipan. An HC-5 crew member said ment, and while they did so, some That 1981 eruption resulted in the jet-powered helicopters could said they didn’t particularly like' many island’s residents being hold 23 persons, but they took it. trapped until a boat rescue mis­ two to allow for baggage. Increasing volcanic activity on sion could be hastily put together Residents used their weight the island about 80 miles North for rescue. allowance to bring clothing, ste­ of Saipan was noted over the Two helicopters from the HC- reos, VCRs, some food and betel weekend and Gov. Larry I. 5 air rescue squadron based at nut. Guerrero decided that an evacu­ Naval Air Station, Guam, flew Some residents like school ation was called for, ordering the to Saipan and then left Wednes­ teacher Jess Wabol said he felt Jerry Facey (left), Jess Wabol and his five-year-old son Jonathon, along with Happy residents to leave for their own day morning about 8:30 for the the whole evacuation and vol­ Gideon discuss what to do next.
    [Show full text]
  • Disability Resource Directory
    CNMI DISABILITY COMMUNITY INTRODUCTION Thank you for giving us the opportunity to serve you and your needs. We want you to know that you are appreciated and that any contributions you make to our community is valued. Our successes in the CNMI could not be possible without collaboration and contributions of individuals with disabilities and your freedom to express your wants, needs, and expectations. We, the CNMI Disabilities Network Partners (DNP), have worked hard to put this Resource Directory out to our people in the CNMI. Many groups were involved in putting this together including The Oce of Vocational Rehabilitation (OVR), The Ayuda Network, The State Independent Living Council (SILC), The Center for Living Independently (CLI), The Independent Living Group (ILG), The Trankilu Alternative Financing Program (TAFP), The Assistive Technology Program, The Commonwealth Oce of Transit Authority (COTA), The VOICES of the CNMI, and The CNMI Tri-Agencies made up of The CNMI Council on Developmental Disabilities (CDD), The University Center for Excellence on Developmental Disabilities (UCEDD), and The Northern Marianas Protection & Advocacy Systems, Inc. (NMPASI). The level of collaboration amongst our agencies is at an all time high. We hope to continue this level of teamwork to help bring awareness of disabilities, and issues surrounding disabilities to our people of the commonwealth. This resource directory is testimony to this fact. The information compiled here was the result of many peoples’ eorts. Please contact us if you nd anything you want to report about this resource directory to make it better for our next release. From all of us, thank you for taking a copy, and please share this information with your friends and family.
    [Show full text]