Dtaselect and Contrast: Tools for Assembling and Comparing Protein Identifications from Shotgun Proteomics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dtaselect and Contrast: Tools for Assembling and Comparing Protein Identifications from Shotgun Proteomics DTASelect and Contrast: Tools for Assembling and Comparing Protein Identifications from Shotgun Proteomics David L. Tabb,*,² W. Hayes McDonald,³ and John R. Yates, III³ Department of Molecular Biotechnology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, and Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, SR11 Department of Cell Biology, La Jolla, California 92037 Received September 24, 2001 The components of complex peptide mixtures can be separated by liquid chromatography, fragmented by tandem mass spectrometry, and identified by the SEQUEST algorithm. Inferring a mixture's source proteins requires that the identified peptides be reassociated. This process becomes more challenging as the number of peptides increases. DTASelect, a new software package, assembles SEQUEST identifications and highlights the most significant matches. The accompanying Contrast tool compares DTASelect results from multiple experiments. The two programs improve the speed and precision of proteomic data analysis. Keywords: proteomics • protein identification • SEQUEST • data analysis • software • differential analysis • subtractive analysis • MudPIT • assembly 1. Introduction database peptides that match the observed peptide's mass. The sequences are quickly checked against the spectrum by a Protein identification through mass spectrometry has be- preliminary scoring algorithm, and obvious nonmatches are come a major application of genetic sequence information. Two removed. A more extensive scoring algorithm cross-correlates forms of protein identification have emerged. ªMass mappingº sequence-derived theoretical spectra against the observed enzymatically digests an unknown protein and then identifies spectrum, and sequences are ranked on the basis of these it by the masses of the peptides produced. Tandem mass scores. SEQUEST's automation of this process has helped the spectrometry of peptides, on the other hand, fragments pep- use of tandem mass spectrometry to expand from analytical tides to reveal their sequences.1,2 Both methods are effective chemistry to biology. for the identification of proteins isolated by polyacrylamide gels.3,4 Tandem mass spectrometry, however, is applicable to Because SEQUEST functions at the level of individual protein mixtures before isolation as well. ªShotgun proteomicsº spectra, additional software is necessary to assemble informa- 15 describes the process of digesting and separating a complex tion at the protein level. SEQUEST SUMMARY is broadly used, protein mixture, acquiring spectra from its peptides, and but it can only coordinate the results from a single dimension 15 identifying the proteins originally found in the sample.5-9 of chromatography. AUTOQUEST, a more extensive algo- Liquid chromatography is commonly used to separate rithm, can handle multidimensional results, but it has several mixtures of peptides for shotgun proteomics. Single-dimension limitations. As the number of peptides increases, the output liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry grows in size very rapidly. It categorizes identifications by score, (LC/MS/MS) has been used to identify the components of but the range of scores in each category is too broad for protein complexes and subcellular compartments.5-12 This adequate discrimination. The program cannot organize results technique is capable of identifying hundreds of peptides in an from DNA database searches. In addition, AUTOQUEST will hour.13 Two dimensions of liquid chromatography (LC/LC) not install alongside the commercial version of SEQUEST. enable many thousands of peptides to be identified through Neither program allows much latitude for users to set standards improved resolution. Link et al. used this approach, called on which identifications should be reported and which should multidimensional protein identification technology or ªMud- not. PITº, to identify the components of large protein complexes The DTASelect package was developed to assemble and such as yeast and human ribosomes, and Washburn et al. evaluate shotgun proteomics data. The program applies mul- performed an analysis of whole yeast cells.8,9 tiple layers of filtering to SEQUEST search results and supplies Amino acid sequences of peptides can be inferred from several analytical reports in text and HTML files. The Contrast tandem mass spectra.14 The SEQUEST algorithm automates this program is an accompanying tool for comparing multiple process.7 The software begins by enumerating candidate experiments and/or criteria sets. It is particularly useful for comparing results from different experimental conditions. This * To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: 858 784-8876. paper describes these two programs as demonstrated by an Fax: 858 784-8883. E-mail: [email protected]. ² University of Washington. analysis of the purified yeast 26S proteosome using LC/MS/ ³ The Scripps Research Institute. MS12 and MudPIT.16 10.1021/pr015504q CCC: $22.00 2002 American Chemical Society Journal of Proteome Research 2002, 1, 21-26 21 Published on Web 01/07/2002 research articles Tabb et al. Table 1. DTASelect Spectrum Filtersa Table 2. DTASelect Locus Filters and Utilitiesa option default individual spectrum filters option default locus filters -1 # 1.8 set lowest +1 XCorr -t 0 do not purge duplicate spectra for each sequence -2 # 2.5 set lowest +2 XCorr -t 1 purge duplicate spectra on basis of total intensity -3 # 3.5 set lowest +3 XCorr -t 2 X purge duplicate spectra on basis of XCorr -d # 0.08 set lowest DeltCN -u false include only loci with uniquely matching peptides -c # 1 set lowest charge state -o false remove proteins that are subsets of others -C # 3 set highest charge state -e $ remove proteins with names matching this string -i # 0.0 set lowest proportion of fragment ions observed -E $ include only proteins with names matching this string -s # 1000 set maximum Sp ranking -l $ remove proteins with descriptions including -m 0 require peptides to be modified this word -m 1 X include peptides regardless of modification -L $ include only proteins with descriptions including -m 2 exclude modified peptides this word -y 0 X include peptides regardless of tryptic status -M # 0 set minimum modified peptides per locus -y 1 include only half- or fully tryptic peptides criterion -y 2 include only fully tryptic peptides -r # 10 show all loci with peptides that appear this many times option extended filters (off by default) -p # 2 set minimum peptides per locus criterion -Sic $ sequences must contain all of these characters option utilities (excludes C terminal residue) -Sip $ sequences must contain this pattern --nofilter, -n do not apply any criteria -Sec $ sequences must not contain any of these characters (excludes C terminal residue) --GUI report through GUI instead of output files -Stn $ preceding residue must be one of these --compress create .IDX and .SPM files from spectra -Stc $ C terminal residue must be one of these --copy print commands to copy selected IDs -X1 # set highest +1 XCorr --XML save XML report of filtered results -X2 # set highest +2 XCorr --DB save in format for database import -X3 # set highest +3 XCorr --chroma save chromatography report --similar save protein similarity table a # symbols indicate that a numerical parameter follows while $ symbols --mods save modification report indicate a character or string parameter follows. These filters are employed --align save sequence alignment report in the first pass of the filtering step. Each spectrum must pass all the standard filters to be included in the DTASelect report. Changes can be made at the --help, -h print this list of options command line or in a DTASelect configuration file. --here, -. include only IDs in current directory a # symbols indicate that a numerical parameter follows, while $ symbols 2. Experimental Section indicate a character or string parameter follows. Filtering is conducted at the locus level after it has been performed for individual spectra. A protein 2.1. DTASelect Algorithm. DTASelect functions in three must pass either the -p or the -r filter to be retained in the DTASelect reports. phases: summarization, evaluation, and reporting. The sum- marization phase reads individual spectrum identifications of different peptides or that have at least one peptide showing from the SEQUEST output (.out) files and assembles informa- up several times (see Table 2). Two filters reduce the redun- tion for each locus (the database identity of the protein or gene from which the peptide derives). The evaluation phase applies dancy of results. DTASelect can choose the best example of the criteria indicated by the user for spectra and proteins, multiple spectra matching the same sequence by score or by removing those that do not qualify. The reporting phase creates signal intensity. In addition, many proteins may be indicated files to be read in a web browser or spreadsheet. At each step, by exactly the same sets of peptides; DTASelect groups together the user is notified of DTASelect's progress. proteins that are identical in sequence coverage. These selec- Summarization collects the most important information tions highlight peptides and proteins that represent the entire from SEQUEST identification. Each identification's output file sample. is read to acquire the cross-correlation score (XCorr), normal- The reporting phase generates several different files. The ized difference between first and second match scores (DeltCN), primary report is the DTASelect.html file, which enumerates rank
Recommended publications
  • Standard Flow Multiplexed Proteomics (Sflompro) – an Accessible and Cost-Effective Alternative to Nanolc Workflows
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.25.964379; this version posted February 25, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Standard Flow Multiplexed Proteomics (SFloMPro) – An Accessible and Cost-Effective Alternative to NanoLC Workflows Conor Jenkins1 and Ben Orsburn2* 1Hood College Department of Biology, Frederick, MD 2University of Virginia Medical School, Charlottesville, VA *To whom correspondence should be addressed; [email protected] Abstract Multiplexed proteomics using isobaric tagging allows for simultaneously comparing the proteomes of multiple samples. In this technique, digested peptides from each sample are labeled with a chemical tag prior to pooling sample for LC-MS/MS with nanoflow chromatography (NanoLC). The isobaric nature of the tag prevents deconvolution of samples until fragmentation liberates the isotopically labeled reporter ions. To ensure efficient peptide labeling, large concentrations of labeling reagents are included in the reagent kits to allow scientists to use high ratios of chemical label per peptide. The increasing speed and sensitivity of mass spectrometers has reduced the peptide concentration required for analysis, leading to most of the label or labeled sample to be discarded. In conjunction, improvements in the speed of sample loading, reliable pump pressure, and stable gradient construction of analytical flow HPLCs has continued to improve the sample delivery process to the mass spectrometer. In this study we describe a method for performing multiplexed proteomics without the use of NanoLC by using offline fractionation of labeled peptides followed by rapid “standard flow” HPLC gradient LC-MS/MS.
    [Show full text]
  • W Yang Et Al. Proteomic Approaches to the Analysis of Multiprotein
    832 DOI 10.1002/pmic.200700650 Proteomics 2008, 8, 832–851 REVIEW Proteomic approaches to the analysis of multiprotein signaling complexes Wei Yang1, 2, Hanno Steen3 and Michael R. Freeman1, 2 1 The Urological Diseases Research Center, Department of Urology, Children’s Hospital Boston, Boston, MA, USA 2 Departments of Surgery, Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA 3 Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School and Children’s Hospital Boston, Boston, MA, USA Signal transduction is one of the most active fields in modern biomedical research. Increasing Received: July 9, 2007 evidence has shown that signaling proteins associate with each other in characteristic ways to Revised: October 23, 2007 form large signaling complexes. These diverse structures operate to boost signaling efficiency, Accepted: October 23, 2007 ensure specificity and increase sensitivity of the biochemical circuitry. Traditional methods of protein analysis are inadequate to fully characterize and understand these structures, which are intricate, contain many components and are highly dynamic. Instead, proteomics technologies are currently being applied to investigate the nature and composition of multimeric signaling complexes. This review presents commonly used and potential proteomic methods of analyzing diverse protein complexes along with a discussion and a brief evaluation of alternative ap- proaches. Challenges associated with proteomic analysis of signaling complexes are also dis- cussed. Keywords: Cross-linking / Mass spectrometry / Post-translational modification / Quantitative proteomics / Signaling complexes 1 Introduction 1980s, astonishingly rapid progress has been made in understanding the mechanisms of signal transduction. The modern field of cell signaling can be traced back to the Many old concepts have been abandoned or revised and mid-1950s, when it was discovered that reversible phospho- new ones have emerged.
    [Show full text]
  • Proteomics in Forensic Analysis: Applications for Human Samples
    applied sciences Review Proteomics in Forensic Analysis: Applications for Human Samples Van-An Duong 1,† , Jong-Moon Park 1,† , Hee-Joung Lim 2,* and Hookeun Lee 1,* 1 College of Pharmacy, Gachon University, Incheon 21936, Korea; [email protected] (V.-A.D.); [email protected] (J.-M.P.) 2 Forensic Science Center for Odor Fingerprint Analysis, Police Science Institute, Korean National Police University, Asan 31539, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected] (H.-J.L.); [email protected] (H.L.); Tel.: +82-41-968-2893 (H.-J.L.); +82-32-820-4927 (H.L.) † These authors contributed equally. Abstract: Proteomics, the large-scale study of all proteins of an organism or system, is a powerful tool for studying biological systems. It can provide a holistic view of the physiological and biochemical states of given samples through identification and quantification of large numbers of peptides and proteins. In forensic science, proteomics can be used as a confirmatory and orthogonal technique for well-built genomic analyses. Proteomics is highly valuable in cases where nucleic acids are absent or degraded, such as hair and bone samples. It can be used to identify body fluids, ethnic group, gender, individual, and estimate post-mortem interval using bone, muscle, and decomposition fluid samples. Compared to genomic analysis, proteomics can provide a better global picture of a sample. It has been used in forensic science for a wide range of sample types and applications. In this review, we briefly introduce proteomic methods, including sample preparation techniques, data acquisition using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, and data analysis using database search, Citation: Duong, V.-A.; Park, J.-M.; spectral library search, and de novo sequencing.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges in Clinical Metaproteomics Highlighted by the Analysis of Acute Leukemia Patients with Gut Colonization by Multidrug-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae
    proteomes Article Challenges in Clinical Metaproteomics Highlighted by the Analysis of Acute Leukemia Patients with Gut Colonization by Multidrug-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Julia Rechenberger 1,† , Patroklos Samaras 1,†, Anna Jarzab 1, Juergen Behr 2, Martin Frejno 1 , Ana Djukovic 3, Jaime Sanz 4,5, Eva M. González-Barberá 4, Miguel Salavert 4, Jose Luis López-Hontangas 4, Karina B. Xavier 6 , Laurent Debrauwer 7,8, Jean-Marc Rolain 9, Miguel Sanz 4,5 , Marc Garcia-Garcera 10, Mathias Wilhelm 1,* , Carles Ubeda 3,11,* and Bernhard Kuster 1,2,* 1 Chair of Proteomics and Bioanalytics, Technical University of Munich, 85354 Freising, Germany; [email protected] (J.R.); [email protected] (P.S.); [email protected] (A.J.); [email protected] (M.F.) 2 Bavarian Center for Biomolecular Mass Spectrometry, Technical University of Munich, 85354 Freising, Germany; [email protected] 3 Centro Superior de Investigación en Salud Pública-FISABIO, 46020 Valencia, Spain; [email protected] 4 Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain; [email protected] (J.S.); [email protected] (E.M.G.-B.); [email protected] (M.S.); [email protected] (J.L.L.-H.); [email protected] (M.S.) 5 CIBERONC, Instituto Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain 6 Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, 2780 Oeiras, Portugal; [email protected] 7 Toxalim, Université de Toulouse, INRA, INP-ENVT, INP-EI-Purpan, Université de Toulouse 3 Paul Sabatier, 31027 Toulouse, France; [email protected] 8 Axiom Platform, UMR 1331 Toxalim, MetaToul-MetaboHUB,
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Data-Independent Acquisition Proteomics 12 July 2021
    Improving data-independent acquisition proteomics 12 July 2021 'shotgun proteomics'. The mass-to-charge ratio of these peptides is subsequently determined with a mass spectrometer, resulting in MS spectra. From these spectra, information about the identity of the analyzed proteins can be reconstructed. However, the enormous amount and complexity of data make data analysis and interpretation challenging. Two ways to analyze proteins with mass spectrometry Two main methods are used in shotgun proteomics: Data-dependent acquisition (DDA) and MaxQuant 2.0 unites the two branches of shotgun data-independent acquisition (DIA). In DDA, the proteomics—DIA and DDA—into one software most abundant peptides of a sample are environment. Credit: Sonja Taut, MPI of Biochemistry preselected for fragmentation and measurement. This allows to reconstruct the sequences of these few preselected peptides, making analysis simpler and faster. However, this method induces a bias Proteomics produces enormous amounts of data, towards highly abundant peptides. DIA, in contrast, which can be very complex to analyze and is more robust and sensitive. All peptides from a interpret. The free software platform MaxQuant has certain mass range are fragmented and measured proven to be invaluable for data analysis of at once, without preselection by abundance. shotgun proteomics over the past decade. Now, Jürgen Cox, group leader at the Max Planck As a result, this method generates large amounts of Institute of Biochemistry, and his team present the data, and the complexity of the obtained new version 2.0. It provides an improved information increases considerably. Up to now, computational workflow for data-independent identification of the original proteins was only acquisition (DIA) proteomics, called MaxDIA.
    [Show full text]
  • The Power of Three in Cannabis Shotgun Proteomics: Proteases, Databases and Search Engines
    proteomes Article The Power of Three in Cannabis Shotgun Proteomics: Proteases, Databases and Search Engines Delphine Vincent *, Keith Savin , Simone Rochfort and German Spangenberg Agriculture Victoria Research, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia; [email protected] (K.S.); [email protected] (S.R.); [email protected] (G.S.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-3-90327116 Received: 28 May 2020; Accepted: 12 June 2020; Published: 15 June 2020 Abstract: Cannabis research has taken off since the relaxation of legislation, yet proteomics is still lagging. In 2019, we published three proteomics methods aimed at optimizing protein extraction, protein digestion for bottom-up and middle-down proteomics, as well as the analysis of intact proteins for top-down proteomics. The database of Cannabis sativa proteins used in these studies was retrieved from UniProt, the reference repositories for proteins, which is incomplete and therefore underrepresents the genetic diversity of this non-model species. In this fourth study, we remedy this shortcoming by searching larger databases from various sources. We also compare two search engines, the oldest, SEQUEST, and the most popular, Mascot. This shotgun proteomics experiment also utilizes the power of parallel digestions with orthogonal proteases of increasing selectivity, namely chymotrypsin, trypsin/Lys-C and Asp-N. Our results show that the larger the database the greater the list of accessions identified but the longer the duration of the search. Using orthogonal proteases and different search algorithms increases the total number of proteins identified, most of them common despite differing proteases and algorithms, but many of them unique as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Phosphoproteomics for the Masses
    REVIEW Phosphoproteomics for the Masses Paul A. Grimsrud†, Danielle L. Swaney†, Craig D. Wenger†, Nicole A. Beauchene‡, and Joshua J. Coon†,‡,* †Departments of Chemistry and ‡Biomolecular Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 PHOSPHOPROTEOMICS APPLICATIONS Protein phosphorylation is a central mechanism of sig- ABSTRACT Protein phosphorylation serves as a primary mechanism of signal nal transduction across species, with kinases and phos- transduction in the cells of biological organisms. Technical advancements over the phatases accounting for 2Ϫ4% of eukaryotic proteomes last several years in mass spectrometry now allow for the large-scale identifica- (1, 2). Current estimates suggest that one-third of eu- tion and quantitation of in vivo phosphorylation at unprecedented levels. These de- karyotic proteins are phosphorylated (3, 4); determin- velopments have occurred in the areas of sample preparation, instrumentation, ing the sites, abundances, and roles of each of these quantitative methodology, and informatics so that today, 10 000Ϫ20 000 phos- modifications in a biological sample is a critical chal- phorylation sites can be identified and quantified within a few weeks. With the lenge. Traditional biochemical techniques are chiefly rapid development and widespread availability of such data, its translation into limited to testing how phosphoryl modifications at spe- biological insight and knowledge is a current obstacle. Here we present an over- cific sites affect a single protein of interest (5). Identifica- view of how this technology came to be and is currently applied, as well as future tion of unknown in vivo phosphoryl modification sites challenges for the field. on a broad scale, however, is simply not possible with these approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Leveraging Shotgun Proteomics for Optimised Interpretation of Data- Independent Acquisition Data: Identification of Diagnostic Biomarkers for Paediatric Tuberculosis
    Leveraging shotgun proteomics for optimised interpretation of data- independent acquisition data: identification of diagnostic biomarkers for paediatric tuberculosis By Ashley Ehlers Thesis presented in the fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Medical Sciences in the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences at Stellenbosch University. The financial assistance of the National Research Foundation (NRF) towards this research is hereby acknowledged. Opinions expressed and conclusions arrived at, are those of the author and are not necessarily to be attributed to the NRF. Supervisor: Professor David Tabb Co-supervisor: Professor Hanno Steen December 2020 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Ashley Ehlers December 2020 Copyright © 2020 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved i Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Abstract Although diagnostic tests for paediatric tuberculosis (TB) are available, no specific test has been tailored to fit the diagnostic challenges children present as well as cater to limited resource settings. The high mortality rates recorded annually are associated with late diagnosis as well as insufficient household contact management (HCM). Further, urine has been identified as an attractive biofluid for urine protein biomarker discovery. Urine is non- invasive, easily attainable in large quantities and is associated with a low cost of collection.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Introduction to Shot Gun Proteomics
    MDC m/z mass spectrometry Introduction to mass spectrometry Gunnar Dittmar What is mass spectrometry? What is the accuracy of a mass spectrometer? MDC m/z mass spectrometry Accuracy: 0.1u = 1,6 * 10-28 kg Examples: Hydrogen atom: 1u Oxygen atom: 16 u Neutron: 1 u Electron: 0.005 u MDC Uses for mass spectrometry m/z mass spectrometry Identification of chemicals quality control biological degradation Water quality control Control of food and beverages check for pesticides, toxins etc Detection of explosives toxic chemicals Doping MDC Mass spectrometry general setup m/z mass spectrometry Samples Mass Ionization Detector analyzer Data analysis MDC General principle of mass spectrometry m/z mass spectrometry + + + + + + + + + + + + electrostatic field + + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ion source mass analyzer detector MDC General principle of mass spectrometry m/z mass spectrometry + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + ion source mass analyzer detector MDC Mass spectrometry m/z mass spectrometry Sir Joseph John Thomson, Nobel prize in physics for the discovery of the electron, 1906 MDC Mass spectrometry m/z mass spectrometry Sir Francis Aston, first fully functional mass spectrometer in 1919 MDC m/z mass spectrometry Ionization MDC Ionization m/z mass spectrometry ESI soft ionization Proteomics Electro-spray ionization MALDI Matrix assisted laser Proteomics desorption ionization FACS-MS hard ionization Plasma CyTOF MDC MALDI m/z mass spectrometry Image from Ekman et al. Mass spectrometry
    [Show full text]
  • Proteomics in Non-Model Organisms: a New Analytical Frontier
    Proteomics in non-model organisms: a new analytical frontier Michelle Heck1,2,3 and Benjamin A. Neely4* 1 Emerging Pests and Pathogens Research Unit, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Ithaca, NY, USA 2 Plant Pathology and Plant Microbe Biology Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA 3 Boyce Thompson Institute, Ithaca, NY, USA 4 Chemical Sciences Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Charleston, SC, USA * Corresponding author: BN; [email protected] Abstract For the last century we have relied on model organisms to help understand fundamental biological processes. Now, with advancements in genome sequencing, assembly and annotation, non-model organisms may be studied with the same advanced bioanalytical toolkit as model organisms. Proteomics is one such technique, which classically relies on predicted protein sequences to catalog and measure complex proteomes across tissues and biofluids. Applying proteomics to non-model organisms can advance and accelerate biomimicry studies, biomedical advancements, veterinary medicine, agricultural research, behavioral ecology, and food safety. In this post-model organism era we can study almost any species, meaning that many non-model organisms are in fact important emerging model organisms. Herein we focus specifically on eukaryotic organisms and discuss steps to generating sequence databases, analyzing proteomic data with or without a database, interpreting results, and future research opportunities. Proteomics is more accessible than ever before, and will continue to rapidly advance in the coming years, enabling critical research and discoveries in non-model organisms that were hitherto impossible. Keywords: comparative biology, biomimicry, proteomics, genomics, non-model 1 Introduction Beginning with fruit flies at the turn of the 20th century, model organisms have enabled biological discoveries by bringing testable yet complex biological systems to the lab.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges and Perspectives of Metaproteomic Data Analysis
    Journal of Biotechnology 261 (2017) 24–36 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Biotechnology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jbiotec Review Challenges and perspectives of metaproteomic data analysis MARK ⁎ Robert Heyera, , Kay Schallerta, Roman Zounb, Beatrice Bechera, Gunter Saakeb, ⁎⁎ Dirk Benndorfa,c, a Otto von Guericke University, Bioprocess Engineering, Universitätsplatz 2, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany b Otto von Guericke University, Institute for Technical and Business Information Systems, Universitätsplatz 2, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany c Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems, Bioprocess Engineering, Sandtorstraße 1, 39106, Magdeburg, Germany ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: In nature microorganisms live in complex microbial communities. Comprehensive taxonomic and functional Bioinformatics knowledge about microbial communities supports medical and technical application such as fecal diagnostics as Software well as operation of biogas plants or waste water treatment plants. Furthermore, microbial communities are Big data crucial for the global carbon and nitrogen cycle in soil and in the ocean. Among the methods available for Environmental proteomics investigation of microbial communities, metaproteomics can approximate the activity of microorganisms by Microbial communities investigating the protein content of a sample. Although metaproteomics is a very powerful method, issues within Mass spectrometry the bioinformatic evaluation impede its success. In particular, construction of databases for protein identifica- tion, grouping of redundant proteins as well as taxonomic and functional annotation pose big challenges. Furthermore, growing amounts of data within a metaproteomics study require dedicated algorithms and soft- ware. This review summarizes recent metaproteomics software and addresses the introduced issues in detail. 1. Introduction (Wilmes and Bond, 2006). The investigation of all proteins from one species is called proteomics.
    [Show full text]
  • CAMPI): a Multi-Lab Comparison of Established Workflows
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.05.433915; this version posted March 6, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Critical Assessment of Metaproteome Investigation (CAMPI): A Multi-Lab Comparison of Established Workflows Tim Van Den Bossche*1,2, Benoit J. Kunath*3, Kay Schallert*4, Stephanie S. Schäpe*5, Paul E. Abraham6, Jean Armengaud7, Magnus Ø. Arntzen8, Ariane Bassignani9, Dirk Benndorf4,10,11, Stephan Fuchs12, Richard J. Giannone6, Timothy J. Griffin13, Live H. Hagen8, Rashi Halder3, Céline Henry9, Robert L. Hettich6, Robert Heyer4, Pratik Jagtap13, Nico Jehmlich5, Marlene Jensen14, Catherine Juste9, Manuel Kleiner14, Olivier Langella15, Theresa Lehmann4, Emma Leith13, Patrick May3, Bart Mesuere1,16, Guylaine Miotello7, Samantha L. Peters6, Olivier Pible7, Udo Reichl4,11, Bernhard Y. Renard12,17, Henning Schiebenhoefer12,17, Alexander Scryba18, Alessandro Tanca19, Kathrin Trappe12, Jean-Pierre Trezzi3,20, Sergio Uzzau19, Pieter Verschaffelt1,16, Martin von Bergen5, Paul Wilmes3, Maximilian Wolf4, and Lennart Martens#1,2 and Thilo Muth#21 * Shared first authors # Shared last authors, corresponding authors ([email protected], [email protected]) Intermediate authors are listed alphabetically (1) VIB - UGent Center for Medical Biotechnology, VIB, Ghent, Belgium (2) Department of Biomolecular Medicine, Faculty
    [Show full text]