DOCSLIB.ORG

An Incidental Harassment Authorization

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Incidental Harassment Authorization ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE ISSUANCE OF AN INCIDENTAL HARASSMENT AUTHORIZATION TO TAKE MARINE MAMMALS BY HARASSMENT INCIDENTAL TO CONDUCTING OPEN WATER SEISMIC SURVEYS IN THE SIMPSON LAGOON AREA OF THE BEAUFORT SEA June 2012 LEAD AGENCY: USDOC, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service, Office of Protected Resources 1315 East West Highway Silver Spring, MD 20910 RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Helen Golde, Acting Director, Office of Protected Resources FOR INFORMATION CONTACT: Office of Protected Resources National Marine Fisheries Service 1315 East West Highway Silver Spring, MD 20910 (301) 427-8400 LOCATION: Beaufort Sea ABSTRACT: The National Marine Fisheries Service proposes to issue an Incidental Harassment Authorization (IHA) to BP Exploration (Alaska), Inc. (BPXA) for the taking, by Level B harassment, of small numbers of marine mammals incidental to conducting open water seismic surveys in the Simpson Lagoon area of the Beaufort Sea, Alaska. - ii - TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND INITIALISMS .................................................................... IV CHAPTER 1 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION ........................................................................................ 1 1.1 Description of Action ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.2 Purpose And Need ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Scoping Summary .................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2.1 Comments on Proposed IHA ................................................................................................................. 3 1.2.2 Issues within the Scope of this EA ........................................................................................................ 3 1.3 Applicable Laws and Necessary Federal Permits, Licenses, and Entitlements .................................. 3 1.3.1 National Environmental Policy Act ....................................................................................................... 4 1.3.2 Endangered Species Act ........................................................................................................................ 4 1.3.3 Marine Mammal Protection Act ............................................................................................................ 4 1.3.4 Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act........................................................... 5 1.3.5 Coastal Zone Management Act .............................................................................................................. 6 1.4 Description of the BPXA’s Proposed OBC Seismic Survey ................................................................. 6 1.4.1 Seismic Source Arrays ........................................................................................................................... 6 1.4.2 Receivers and Recording Units .............................................................................................................. 7 1.4.3 Survey Design ........................................................................................................................................ 7 1.4.4 Vessels and Other Equipment ................................................................................................................ 8 1.4.5 Crew Housing and Transfer ................................................................................................................... 9 1.4.6 Dates, Duration and Action Area ........................................................................................................... 9 CHAPTER 2 ALTERNATIVES INCLUDING THE PROPOSED ACTION ................................................ 11 2.1 Alternative 1—No Action Alternative .................................................................................................. 11 2.2 Alternative 2—Issuance of an IHA with Required Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Measures (Preferred Alternative) ........................................................................................................................ 11 2.3 Alternative 3—Issuance of an IHA with Additional Mitigation and Monitoring Measures ............ 12 2.4 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Further Consideration ............................................. 12 CHAPTER 3 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................................... 13 3.1 Physical Environment ........................................................................................................................... 13 3.1.1 Geology and Oceanography ................................................................................................................. 13 3.1.2 Air Quality ........................................................................................................................................... 14 3.1.3 Acoustic Environment ......................................................................................................................... 15 3.1.3.1 Sources of Natural Ocean Sounds .................................................................................................. 16 3.1.3.2 Sources of Anthropogenic Sounds ................................................................................................. 19 3.2 Biological Environment ......................................................................................................................... 24 3.2.1 Lower Trophic Organisms ................................................................................................................... 24 3.2.1.1 Pelagic Community ........................................................................................................................ 24 3.2.1.2 Benthic Community ....................................................................................................................... 24 3.2.1.3 Epontic Community ....................................................................................................................... 25 3.2.2 Fish, Fishery Resources, and Essential Fish Habitat ............................................................................ 25 3.2.2.1 Fish Resources of Arctic Alaska and Their Ecology ..................................................................... 26 3.2.2.2 Pacific Salmon and Essential Fish Habitat ..................................................................................... 27 3.2.2.3 Invertebrate Fishery Resources ...................................................................................................... 28 3.2.3 Marine Birds ........................................................................................................................................ 29 3.2.3.1 Threatened and Endangered Marine Birds ..................................................................................... 29 3.2.3.2 Other Marine Birds ........................................................................................................................ 31 3.2.4 Marine Mammals ................................................................................................................................. 35 3.2.4.1 Threatened and Endangered Marine Mammals .............................................................................. 35 3.2.4.2 Non-ESA-Listed Marine Mammals ............................................................................................... 45 3.3 Socioecomic Environment ..................................................................................................................... 62 - i - 3.3.1 Traditional Knowledge ........................................................................................................................ 62 3.3.2 Community and Economy ................................................................................................................... 63 3.3.2.1 North Slope Borough ..................................................................................................................... 63 3.3.2.2 Northwest Arctic Borough ............................................................................................................. 64 3.3.2.3 Economic Development ................................................................................................................. 66 3.3.3 Subsistence .......................................................................................................................................... 67 3.3.3.1 Whales ........................................................................................................................................... 68 3.3.3.2 Pinnipeds ........................................................................................................................................ 69 3.3.3.3 Polar Bears ..................................................................................................................................... 69 3.3.3.4 Birds and Waterfowl .....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • D O C U M E N T E D B R I E F I
    DOCUMENTED BRIEFING R Rapid Force Projection Technologies Assessing the Performance of Advanced Ground Sensors John Matsumura, Randall Steeb, Randall G. Bowdish, Scot Eisenhard, Gail Halverson, Thomas Herbert, Mark Lees, John D. Pinder Prepared for the United States Army Office of the Secretary of Defense Arroyo Center National Defense Research Institute Approved for public release; distribution unlimited PREFACE This documented briefing summarizes the research emerging from an ongoing RAND project that has been supporting the Rapid Force Protection Initiative (RFPI) Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration (ACTD). This project was jointly sponsored by the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Research, Development, and Acquisition and the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and Technology) with the goal of exploring new technology concepts for the ACTD. The focus of this year’s research was on advanced ground sensors—specifically the air-deliverable acoustic sensor (ADAS)—with emphasis on how such sensors might fit into the current RFPI hunter–standoff killer concept. High-resolution simulation was used to examine and quantify many of the key aspects of performance, environmental effects, and military utility. This work has been shared with those involved in the ACTD, including the RFPI ACTD program offices. This work should be of interest to defense policymakers, acquisition executives, concept developers, and technologists. The research was conducted in the Force Development and Technology Program of RAND’s Arroyo Center and the Acquisition Technology Policy Center of RAND’s National Defense Research Institute (NDRI). Both the Arroyo Center and NDRI are federally funded research and development centers, the first sponsored by the United States Army and the second sponsored by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the unified commands, and the defense agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Prestudy on Sonar Transponder
    Prestudy on Sonar Transponder Dag Lindahl & Leigh Boyd, Avalon Innovation September 2018, Västerås, Sweden External consultant: Avalon Innovation AB Dag Lindahl, Business Manager Project North, +4670 454 37 08, [email protected] Leigh Boyd, System Development Engineer +4670 454 43 44, [email protected] Avalon Innovation AB, Skivfilargränd 2 721 30 Västerås, Sweden Org nr: 556546-4525, www.avaloninnovation.com Contractor Marine Center, Municipality of Simrishamn Coordination and editing Vesa Tschernij, Marine Center MARELITT Baltic Lead Partner Municipality of Simrishamn Marine Center, 272 80 Simrishamn, Sweden Contact Vesa Tschernij, Project Leader [email protected] +4673-433 82 87 www.marelittbaltic.eu The project is co-financed by the Interreg Baltic Sea Region Programme 2014-2020. The information and views set out in this report are those of the authors only and do not reflect the official opinion of the INTERREG BSR Programme, nor do they commit the Programme in any way. Cover photo: P-Dyk Table of Contents Introduction 1 Background 3 Sonars and fish finders 3 Active - Beacons 4 Active - Transponders 5 Passive - Reflectors 5 Transmitter power and frequencies 6 Chirp vs. Ping 7 Beam characteristics 7 Propagation in water 7 Returned signal from underwater targets 8 Receiver sensitivity 9 Link- and power budget calculations 9 Transmitter output power 9 Transmitter output efficiency 10 Transmitter lobe directivity and spreading losses. 10 Propagation loss through water to target (and back) 10 Noise 10 Ideas 11 Resonators as energy storage elements or harvesters 11 Conclusions 12 Recommendations for further work 13 Ghost Net Hotline 13 Transponders - to help retrieve nets lost in the future 13 Improving the Sonar Data at the source 14 Computerized Post Processing 14 Map/Database 15 Dispatching algorithm 15 Remotely Operated Vehicles 16 References 17 Introduction Avalon Innovation has been asked to investigate the potential for making a sonar responder, driven by the energy in the sonar pulse.
    [Show full text]
  • A BILL to Designate Certain Lands As Wilderness
    CONGRESS *>J"k<4 1STSESSXO* 3014 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER 9,1969 Mr. JACKSON (for himself, Mr. ANDERSON, Mr. GRAVEL, Mr. MAGNUSON, Mr. MONTOYA, and Mr. STEVENS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Interior and Insular Affaira A BILL To designate certain lands as wilderness. 1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa- 2 lives of the United States of America in Congress assemble^ 3 That, (a) in accordance with section 3 (c) of the Wilderness 4 Act (78 Stat. 890; 16 U.S.C. 1132 (c) ), the following lands 5 are hereby designated as wilderness, and shall be adininis^ 6 tered by the Secretary of the Interior in accordance with th>$ 7 provisions of the Wilderness Act: : 8 (1) certain lands in the Hart Mountain Rational 9 Antelope Refuge, Oregon, which comprise about forty- 10 eight thousand acres and which are depicted on a map 11 entitled "Hart Mountain National Antelope, Refuge II 2 1 Wilderness—Proposed", dated August 1967, which shall 2 be known as the "Hart Mountain National Antelope 3 Refuge Wilderness"; 4 (2) certain lands in the Bering Sea, Bogoslof, and 5 Tuxedni National Wildlife Refuges, Alaska, as depicted ti on maps entitled "Bering Sea Wilderness—Proposed", 7 "Bogoslof Wilderness—Proposed", and "Tuxedni Wil- 8 derness—Proposed", dated August 1967, and the lands 9 comprising the St. Lazaria, Hazy Islands, and For- 10 rester Island National Wildlife Refuges, Alaska, as 11 depicted on maps entitled "Southeastern Alaska Pro- 12 posed Wilderness Areas", dated August 1967, which 13 shall be known as the "Bering Sea Wilderness", "Bogos- 14 lof Wilderness", "Tuxedni Wilderness", "St.
    [Show full text]
  • WALRUS: Wireless Acoustic Location with Room-Level Resolution Using Ultrasound
    WALRUS: Wireless Acoustic Location with Room-Level Resolution using Ultrasound Gaetano Borriello1,2, Alan Liu1, Tony Offer1, Christopher Palistrant1, Richard Sharp3 1Department of Computer Science & Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA [USA] 2Intel Research Seattle, Seattle, WA [USA] 3Intel Research Cambridge, Cambridge [UK] {[email protected]} Abstract browser can be set up to automatically render web pages associated with the user’s current location. In this paper, we propose a system that uses the The Global Positioning System (GPS) is by far the most wireless networking and microphone interfaces of prevalent example of a location system. It uses signals mobile devices to determine location to room-level from synchronized orbiting satellites to calculate a accuracy. The wireless network provides a three-dimensional position relative to Earth’s synchronizing pulse along with information about the coordinate system. There are two issues with GPS that room. This is accompanied by an ultrasound beacon limit its utility in ubiquitous and mobile computing that allows us to resolve locations to the confines of a scenarios. First, it requires line-of-sight to at least three physical room (since audio is mostly bounded by walls). satellites for 2-D location resolution (four for 3-D). We generate the wireless data and ultrasound pulses Unfortunately, it is difficult to obtain line-of-sight in from the existing PCs in each room; a PDA carried by most environments where users spend most of their a user listens for both signals. Thus, our approach does time (i.e., indoors) and in places where most users live not require special hardware.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of a Workshop to Identify and Assess Technologies to Reduce Ship Strikes of Large Whales
    Report of a Workshop to Identify and Assess Technologies to Reduce Ship Strikes of Large Whales Providence, Rhode Island 8-10 July 2008 Gregory K. Silber, Shannon Bettridge, and David Cottingham U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-OPR-42 May 2009 Report of a Workshop to Identify and Assess Technologies to Reduce Ship Strikes of Large Whales Providence, Rhode Island 8-10 July 2008 Gregory K. Silber, Shannon Bettridge, and David Cottingham Office of Protected Resources National Marine Fisheries Service 1315 East-West Highway Silver Spring, MD 20910 NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-OPR-42 May 2009 U.S. Department of Commerce Gary Locke, Secretary National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Jane Lubchenco, Ph.D., Administrator National Marine Fisheries Service James W. Balsiger, Ph.D., Acting Assistant Administrator for Fisheries Suggested citation: Silber, G.K., S. Bettridge, and D. Cottingham. 2009. Report of a workshop to identify and assess technologies to reduce ship strikes of large whales, 8-10 July, 2008, Providence, Rhode Island. U.S. Dep. Commer., NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-OPR-42. 55 p. A copy of this report may be obtained from: Office of Protected Resources NOAA, NMFS, F/PR2 1315 East-West Highway Silver Spring, MD 20910 Or online at: http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr ii Acknowledgements We are grateful to the workshop participants for their time and contributions. We appreciate the efforts of the steering committee, which developed the agenda, objectives, and breakout group tasks, selected participants, and assembled background documents. We benefited by the preparation of workshop presentations and background papers by Shannon Bettridge, Robert Becker, Olaf Boebel, Jeff Condiotty, Peter Corkeron, Gary Donoher, Charles Forsyth, Robert Gisiner, Leila Hatch, Richard Merrick, Andrew Pershing, Gregory Silber, Sofie-Marie Van Parijs, and Cheryl M.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Accuracy and Formulation of Criterion for Comparing Two
    ering & ine M g a n n E a Mehdiyev et al. l g , Ind Eng Manage 2014, 3:5 a i e r m t s e DOI: 10.4172/2169-0316.1000145 u n d t n I Industrial Engineering & Management ISSN: 2169-0316 Review Article Open Access Analysis of Accuracy and Formulation of Criterion for Comparing Two Variants of Trilateration Method of Acoustic Location Arif Sh Mehdiyev1, Novruz A Abdullayev2 and Hikmat H Asadov3* 1National Academy of Aviation, Baku, Azerbaijan 2Research Institute of Ministry of Defence Industry, Baku, Azerbaijan 3Research Institute of Aerospace Informatics, Baku, Azerbaijan Abstract In the article the question on development the criterion for comparison of two variants of realization of trilateration method of acoustic location has been considered. It is shown, that upon fulfillment of some condition and sufficiently low level of noises in the signal the choice of the signal strength measuring techniques of trilateration method of location can be preferable. Keywords: Acoustic location; Accuracy; Criterion; Technological and control station that uses a trilateration algorithm to compute explosions; Extinction; Sound speed; Model; Trilateration; Sound a target score for the event. Buoy real-time scoring is provided an strength measurements accuracy of 7 meters while post-processed scores are accurate to 3 meters. Two weapon tests were conducted in 2004 using the GPS Introduction acoustic buoy system. In both cases the impact scores determined According to Krumm [1] location technology is a combination of from the system were within I standard deviation of GPS-derived truth impact scores. methods and techniques for determining a physical location of an object in the real world.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar No. 589 91St CONGRESS ) SENATE EXPORT 1St Session J No
    Calendar No. 589 91sT CONGRESS ) SENATE EXPORT 1st Session J No. 91-504 HART MOUNTAIN NATIONA^ ANTELOPE REFUGE, ETC- DECEMBER 9, 1909.—Ordered to be printed Mr. JACKSON, from the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs, submitted the following REPORT . [To accompany S. 3014] The Committee on. Interior and Insular A.ff airs',:; to. which,,was re- ferred the bill (S. 3014.)..to designate.certain ,lund.s.iu tl.ie IIa-r,t JMtoun-. tain National Antelope* Refuge, =the MalheurlKa^ipiiaji W.ijdiife Rpfr uge, the Three Arph.Rqc.ks and Oregon •Xs.la.n.ds National .Wildlife Refuges, all in Oregon; ..the-Bering .Sea,... ^ogqslpf, Tuxedrii,. ^t. Lazaria, Hazy Islands, ^nd Forrester IsJta,nd,,Jtfationa,l Wildlife Ref- uges, all hi Alaska; the Copalis, Flattery; Rbcljs.andQujll}»y#te Neer dies National ^ildlife Rpfug^in^he.^iatfl'pijiV^aslung^nj'wid the Bitter Lafce National Wildlife Refuge/in,.j^W ¥^exjipo, as wilUerness, having considered tlie same, renorts fayprably.;t)iereon with amend- ments and recommends that the bill as amen^1 ' ' PURPOSE , :•;•;•; .-.- • -i I . If! Tlxis >ill, S, .301*, iiiuced'>ypuld /wve^desighate.d as.\iuijts of the National Wilderness' 'reservation System, the Hart Mountain( National Antelope,Refu the. Malheuy Natioinal WildlifeJRefuge,' the Three Arch Ixpcks a«h Oregon Islands National ^•'n'1i>'^ " <--*'--1-"1 -*-1— -:'-- - «y- .in Wildlife Refuses in ther State..of jWasinn'gftni,'and. the.Biljter Lake. National Wildlife Refuge in New -Mexico. AJl of the.Uwids.are prep- ently within the National .Wildjife Refjige, System, and no land acquisition costs are involved. TJiege. wilderness.; prpposftls.
    [Show full text]
  • Accuracy of an Acoustic Location System for Monitoring the Position of Duetting Songbirds in Tropical Forest
    University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor Biological Sciences Publications Department of Biological Sciences 2006 Accuracy of an acoustic location system for monitoring the position of duetting songbirds in tropical forest Daniel J. Mennill University of Windsor John M. Burt Kurt M. Fristrup Sandra L. Vehrencamp Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/biologypub Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Mennill, Daniel J.; Burt, John M.; Fristrup, Kurt M.; and Vehrencamp, Sandra L., "Accuracy of an acoustic location system for monitoring the position of duetting songbirds in tropical forest" (2006). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 5, 2832-2839. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/biologypub/1030 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biological Sciences at Scholarship at UWindsor. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biological Sciences Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholarship at UWindsor. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Accuracy of an acoustic location system for monitoring the position of duetting songbirds in tropical forest Daniel J. Mennill, John M. Burt, Kurt M. Fristrup, and Sandra L. Vehrencamp Citation: The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119, 2832 (2006); doi: 10.1121/1.2184988 View online: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2184988 View Table of Contents: http://asa.scitation.org/toc/jas/119/5 Published by the Acoustical Society of America Articles you may be interested in Acoustic localization
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1464 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1132
    § 1132 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION Page 1464 Department and agency having jurisdiction of, and reports submitted to Congress regard- thereover immediately before its inclusion in ing pending additions, eliminations, or modi- the National Wilderness Preservation System fications. Maps, legal descriptions, and regula- unless otherwise provided by Act of Congress. tions pertaining to wilderness areas within No appropriation shall be available for the pay- their respective jurisdictions also shall be ment of expenses or salaries for the administra- available to the public in the offices of re- tion of the National Wilderness Preservation gional foresters, national forest supervisors, System as a separate unit nor shall any appro- priations be available for additional personnel and forest rangers. stated as being required solely for the purpose of managing or administering areas solely because (b) Review by Secretary of Agriculture of classi- they are included within the National Wilder- fications as primitive areas; Presidential rec- ness Preservation System. ommendations to Congress; approval of Con- (c) ‘‘Wilderness’’ defined gress; size of primitive areas; Gore Range-Ea- A wilderness, in contrast with those areas gles Nest Primitive Area, Colorado where man and his own works dominate the The Secretary of Agriculture shall, within ten landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where years after September 3, 1964, review, as to its the earth and its community of life are un- suitability or nonsuitability for preservation as trammeled by man, where man himself is a visi- wilderness, each area in the national forests tor who does not remain. An area of wilderness classified on September 3, 1964 by the Secretary is further defined to mean in this chapter an area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its of Agriculture or the Chief of the Forest Service primeval character and influence, without per- as ‘‘primitive’’ and report his findings to the manent improvements or human habitation, President.
    [Show full text]
  • Tracking Cryptic Animals Using Acoustic Multilateration: a System for Long-Range Wolf Detection Arik Kershenbaum, Jessica L
    Tracking cryptic animals using acoustic multilateration: A system for long-range wolf detection Arik Kershenbaum, Jessica L. Owens, and Sara Waller Citation: The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 145, 1619 (2019); doi: 10.1121/1.5092973 View online: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5092973 View Table of Contents: https://asa.scitation.org/toc/jas/145/3 Published by the Acoustical Society of America ARTICLES YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN The pioneering contributions of Per Stockfleth Enger to fish bioacoustics The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 145, 1596 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5095405 Inverse identification of a higher order viscous parameter of rigid porous media in the high frequency domain The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 145, 1629 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5095403 Artificial speech bandwidth extension improves telephone speech intelligibility and quality in cochlear implant users The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 145, 1640 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5094347 Characterizing horizontally-polarized shear and infragravity vibrational modes in the Arctic sea ice cover using correlation methods The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 145, 1600 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5094343 Swept-frequency ultrasonic phase evaluation of adhesive bonding in tri-layer structures The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 145, 1609 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5094764 Investigation of ultrasonic backscatter using three-dimensional finite element simulations The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 145, 1584 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5094783 Tracking cryptic animals using acoustic multilateration: A system for long-range wolf detection Arik Kershenbauma) Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom Jessica L.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L
    Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L. 88–363, § 10, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 301.) Sec. 1132. Extent of System. § 1110. Liability 1133. Use of wilderness areas. 1134. State and private lands within wilderness (a) United States areas. The United States Government shall not be 1135. Gifts, bequests, and contributions. liable for any act or omission of the Commission 1136. Annual reports to Congress. or of any person employed by, or assigned or de- § 1131. National Wilderness Preservation System tailed to, the Commission. (a) Establishment; Congressional declaration of (b) Payment; exemption of property from attach- policy; wilderness areas; administration for ment, execution, etc. public use and enjoyment, protection, preser- Any liability of the Commission shall be met vation, and gathering and dissemination of from funds of the Commission to the extent that information; provisions for designation as it is not covered by insurance, or otherwise. wilderness areas Property belonging to the Commission shall be In order to assure that an increasing popu- exempt from attachment, execution, or other lation, accompanied by expanding settlement process for satisfaction of claims, debts, or judg- and growing mechanization, does not occupy ments. and modify all areas within the United States (c) Individual members of Commission and its possessions, leaving no lands designated No liability of the Commission shall be im- for preservation and protection in their natural puted to any member of the Commission solely condition, it is hereby declared to be the policy on the basis that he occupies the position of of the Congress to secure for the American peo- member of the Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • 00 Acoustical Ranging Techniques in Embedded Wireless Sensor Networked Devices
    00 Acoustical Ranging Techniques in Embedded Wireless Sensor Networked Devices PRASANT MISRA, University of New South Wales and Swedish Institute of Computer Science NAVINDA KOTTEGE, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization BRANISLAV KUSY, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization DIETHELM OSTRY, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization SANJAY JHA, University of New South Wales Location sensing provides endless opportunities for a wide range of applications in GPS-obstructed environ- ments; where, typically, there is a need for higher degree of accuracy. In this article, we focus on robust range estimation, an important prerequisite for fine-grained localization. Motivated by the promise of acoustic in delivering high ranging accuracy, we present the design, implementation and evaluation of acoustic (both ultrasound and audible) ranging systems. We distill the limitations of acoustic ranging; and present efficient signal designs and detection algorithms to overcome the challenges of coverage, range, accuracy/resolution, tolerance to Doppler’s effect, and audible intensity. We evaluate our proposed techniques experimentally on TWEET, a low-power platform purpose-built for acoustic ranging applications. Our experiments demonstrate an operational range of 20 m (outdoor) and an average accuracy ≈ 2 cm in the ultrasound domain. Finally, we present the design of an audible-range acoustic tracking service that encompasses the benefits of a near- inaudible acoustic broadband chirp and approximately
    [Show full text]