Azam Senior Thesis [The Cryptostate]
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Kashif Azam T HE C RYPTOSTATE A RESPONSE TO THE FAILURE OF GOVERNANCE IN OUR CONTEMPORARY ERA. _____________________________________ Thesis Advisor : Regina Gramer Second Reader : Daniel Viehoff This thesis has been submitted on the day of April 19th, 2019 in partial fulfillment of the degree requirements for the NYU Global Liberal Studies Bachelor of Arts degree. © 2019 Kashif Azam To Quasem and Sadia, for your unconditional love, guidance, and sacrifice. Abstract __________________________ We live in turbulent times. The rapid spread of the internet has facilitated unprecedented levels of inter-connectivity between states in a global economy, while rapid advances in machine learning and robotics are on the precipice of making human labor—both physical and intellectual—obsolete. New technologies have created incredible opportunities for us to progress as a civilization, but if not managed properly, these innovations could instead cause tremendous harm. Alarmingly, the institution responsible for regulating transformations like globalization or automation has been inept. The Nation-State has either failed or been unacceptably slow to respond to the various issues of our century. In The Cryptostate we analyze the various ways that our changing world has limited the ability of the Nation-State to perform its essential duties. We see how these limitations are not merely caused by bureaucratic mediocrity, but also by structural deficiencies shared by all States. These limitations have disenfranchised large portions of the global population and invited harm and suffering—i.e., ethnocentrism, poverty, and environmental disaster—to all peoples. The Cryptostate is a governance structure that addresses said structural limitations. It is an amalgamation of primordial democratic theory and recent technological advancements. It redefines the philosophical bedrock of a State and disregards notions such as territoriality and ethnocentrism, replacing them with adherence to democratic principles such as representation and transparency. Never before in human history has it been technologically feasible to create such an entity but in this thesis, we demonstrate that not only can such a state exist, but that in the face of our ongoing technological and global revolution, it must. Contents __________________________ Abstract i Contents ii Preface v Introduction 1 Part I 5 Shortcomings Chapter I 8 Revisiting the Nation-State Jurisdiction and Responsibility 10 Constituting the Demos 12 The Economy as the State 19 The Collective Action Problem 24 Death by Natural Causes 25 The Norwegian Predicament 29 Chapter II 32 The International System Anarchy in the International System 33 The International-State 36 Liberalism Sans Liberalism 38 Unrepresentative Representatives 40 The Problem with Global Governance 42 On Libertarianism 44 The Benefactors of Globalization 49 Populism as a Response to Globalism 51 Globalism as Global Capitalism 53 Chapter III 56 The Economy and the State The Modern Economy 59 Debt and Taxes 60 The Myth of Barter 63 The Myth of Austerity 65 Complicity or Complacency 69 A Call for Democratization 73 Part II 76 Solutions Chapter IV 80 Institutions and Mechanisms in the Cryptostate A Hierarchy of Administrative Authority 81 Decision Making, Nominating, & Petitioning 84 Dynamic Geographic Governance 89 The Four Branches of Government 90 Overarching Themes 100 Chapter V 102 The Age of Blockchain Technology Fundamental Mechanics 106 The Double Spend Dilemma 108 The Blockchain Network 109 Mining Mechanisms 112 The Wallet 115 Reform Mechanism 116 Contemporary Cryptocurrencies 117 Chapter VI 123 Blockchain Technology in the Cryptostate The Currency 124 The Passport 130 "iii Money Wallets 132 Voting Wallets 135 Democratic Participation 135 Continuous Polling Schemes 136 Chapter VII 139 Creating the Cryptostate Implementing the Cryptostate 140 Policy Prescriptions 142 A Hope for our Future 143 Appendices 145 A. The Westphalian Myth 145 B. Productivity and the Person 155 Bibliography 160 "iv Preface __________________________ This project began as an attempt to answer one question: What would a Nation-State look like if it adopted a blockchain based currency? I had been an avid follower of the development of various cryptocurrency technologies and, at the behest of a friend, began to research the intricacies of cryptocurrency design. I quickly realized that the challenges facing creators of cryptocurrency were drawn from the realm of economics and political philosophy. Technical questions aside, the founder of a cryptocurrency would have to decide how wealth would be generated, what the total currency supply would be, who would have a say in making changes to the system, would people’s identities remain anonymous, etc. Questions of privacy, suffrage, punishment, and fairness, were at the heart of the cryptocurrency creation process and shared a striking similarity to the political institution creation process. This link became even more apparent when I realized that the creation of currency was integral to the characteristics of any economic system. The realization led me down a rabbit hole in search of how the nature of modern fiat currency—as well as historical manifestations of currency—shaped our economic systems. I found that modern currency has substantially shaped our present economic institutions, but that these significant changes are either downplayed or disregarded in mainstream discourse. I discovered that, in particular, modern economies, taxation does not fund government spending, and that ‘monetarily sovereign’ States can exert enormous influence on the economy to ensure the well-being of its citizenry. However, due to intimate global economic ties, very few nations are monetarily sovereign. Developing countries, such as my native Bangladesh, sacrifice their monetary sovereignty by taking loans from foreign powers, and maintaining trade deficits based on importing high-value products and exporting cheap products—the most notable of which is labor. This cycle of economic co-dependence is an essential characteristic of neoliberal globalization, and the consequences of this can be seen all around us. One result in particular that I found myself drawn to was the impact of neoliberal globalization on the power of the Nation-State. In our present society, no individual State has the authority to police transnational activities, and this lack of accountability has been exploited by certain actors to circumvent the need to respect human rights or adhere to ethical production practices. It was at this point that the relationship between neoliberal globalization, currency in the economy, the Nation-State, and the international realm, came together to become Part I. After emerging from my curious stupor, I amended my original question to: how can blockchain technology help fix the structural deficiencies of our economic and political institutions? This question was the focus of Part II. The Cryptostate provides a guideline for modern governance based on high local autonomy, direct democracy, and the enfranchising all affected interests principle. Theoretically, any Nation-State today could decide to adopt the "vi structural prescriptions suggested in this text, and my inspiration for writing this thesis was to provide a feasible solution to problems such as political disenfranchisement, economic inequality, and a lack of accountability for actors in the international system. Writing this thesis would have been impossible without the continuous and diligent support of my thesis advisors, Regina Gramer, and Daniel Viehoff. There were several points in the writing process when I felt disorganized and lost, but professor Gramer pulled me out of my rut every time without fail. There were times when I struggled to incorporate all the moving parts into a coherent structure, but my advisors always managed to set me on to the right path. This thesis would not have been feasible without the help of Natalie Plotkin, and Samarth Tiwari. Natalie is one of the most talented writers I know and without her help editing my work it is doubtful whether any of it would be intelligible. Samarth was responsible for introducing me to the world of blockchain technology, for helping me parse through the technical jargon, and for helping develop my conceptualization of The Cryptostate. Finally, I would like to thank my parents, Quasem Azam, and Sadia Faizunnesa. I would never have had the opportunity to complete this thesis if it weren’t for their unconditional support. "vii Introduction __________________________ We live in turbulent times. The rapid spread of the internet has facilitated unprecedented levels of inter-connectivity between states in a global economy, while rapid advances in machine learning and robotics are on the precipice of making human labor—both physical and intellectual—obsolete.1 New technologies have created incredible opportunities for us to progress as a civilization, but if not managed properly, these innovations could instead cause tremendous harm. Alarmingly, the institution responsible for regulating transformations like globalization or automation has been inept. The Nation-State has either failed or been unacceptably slow to respond to the various issues of our century.2 1 The question of automation is relevant but tangential. If interested in a detailed discussion see: Appendix B. 2 Calls to modernize the technological and socio-economic aspects of governance frameworks have plagued governments in recent times, and reactionary populism