Arxiv:1909.02728V2 [Math.CA] 23 Sep 2020 [17]
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
LOCAL GENERALIZATIONS OF THE DERIVATIVES ON THE REAL LINE DIMITER PRODANOV Abstract. From physical perspective, derivatives can be viewed as mathe- matical idealizations of the linear growth. The linear growth condition has special properties, which make it preferred. The manuscript investigates the general properties of the local generalizations of derivatives assuming the usual topology of the real line. The concept of derivative is generalized in terms of the class of the modulus of continuity of the primitive function. This definition is suitable for applications involving continuous but possibly non-absolutely continuous functions of a real variable. The main application of the approach is the generalization of the Lebesgue monotone differentiation theorem. On the second place, the conditions of continuity of generalized derivative are also demonstrated. Keywords: non-differentiable functions ; singular functions ; moduli of continu- ity; H¨older classes 1) Environment, Health and Safety, IMEC, Belgium 2) MMSDP, IICT, BAS, Bulgaria Correspondence Address: IMEC vzw, Kapeldreef 75, 3001 Leuven, Belgium 1. Introduction Since the time of Newton, it is accepted that celestial mechanics and physical phenomena are, by and large, described by smooth and continuous functions. The second law of Newton demands that the velocity is a differentiable function of time. This ensures mathematical modelling in terms of differential equations, and hence (almost everywhere) differentiable functions. Ampere even tried to prove that all functions are almost everywhere differentiable. Now we know that this attempt was doomed to fail. Various non-differentiable functions have been constructed in the XIXth century and regarded with a mixture of wonder and horror. The interest in fractal and non-differentiable functions was rekindled with the works of Mandelbrot in fractals arXiv:1909.02728v2 [math.CA] 23 Sep 2020 [17]. For example, Fonf et al. (1999) have established that there is a closed, infinite- dimensional subspace of C[0; 1] consisting of nowhere differentiable functions[11]. This existence result was extended with constructive proofs in [12, 4]. Scientific developments in the last 50 years indicate that the use of non-differentiable functions can not be avoided when modelling nature. For instance, it is easy to es- tablish that stochastic paths of the classical Wiener process are non-differentiable. Applications of this process are ubiquitous in physics, biology and economy. On a second place, some physical theories also consider non-differentiable functions. The stochastic interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, introduced by Nelson [19], as- sumes a reversible sub-quantum Brownian motion (i.e. reversible Wiener process), having non-differentiable trajectories. In a closely related manner, almost all, in 1 2 DIMITER PRODANOV the measure sense, paths in the formulation of the Feynman path-integral are non- differentiable [9]. The deterministic approach of scale relativity theory, introduced by Nottale [21] also assumes non-differentiability of the fundamental space-time manifold. The Ornstein{Uhlenbeck (OU) process was introduced in the kinetic theory of gasses [27]. In this process, the particle velocities are non-differentiable. The OU process arises as the scaling limit of the Ehrenfest urn model which de- scribes the diffusion of particles through a permeable membrane. Purely mathematically, the derivatives can be generalized in several ways. Deriva- tives can be defined in the usual way as limits of difference quotients on the accu- mulation sets of points [18, ch 3, p. 105]. This approach can be applied also to functions defined on fractal sets [29]. On the other hand, the question of continuity on intervals of so-defined functions requires further specification. If continuity is perceived as an essential property such generalization leads to var- ious integro-differential operators. The best known examples here are the Riemann- Liouville and Caputo operators. However, such operators lead to non-local (inter- val) functions. Application of a subsequent limiting localization operation can lead to a local operator. An example of this is the local fractional derivative introduced by Kolwankar and Gangal [15]: 1 d Z x f(t) DKG f(x) := lim dt x a − β ! Γ(1 β) dx a (x − t) However, such localization can only lead to trivially continuous functions { that is { the result of the localization is zero where the derivative function is continuous [23]. Point-wise, the derivatives can be generalized by formal "fractionalization" { i.e. by the substitution ! β leading to β f(x + ) − f(x) υ+f (x) := lim 0 β ! The quantity in this expression is called fractional velocity. Such an approach has been considered for the first time by the mathematicians Paul du Bois-Reymond and Georg Faber in their studies of the point-wise differentiability of functions [7, 8]. In the late XXth century, the physicist Guy Cherbit introduced the same quantity under the name fractional velocity by analogy with the Hausdorff dimension as a tool to study the fractal phenomena and physical processes for which instantaneous velocity was not well-defined [6]. The properties of fractional velocity have been extensively studied in [1] and [22]. The special choice of the function β can be justified from the theory of the fractional calculus as the limit of the regularized Riemann-Liouville differ-integral (see above). As can be expected, the overlap of the definitions of the Cherebit's fractional velocity and the Kolwankar-Gangal local fractional derivative is not complete. The precise equivalence conditions have been established elsewhere [2, 23]. Both defi- nitions are closely linked with conditions for the growth of the functions. Notably, Kolwankar-Gangal fractional derivatives are sensitive to the critical local H¨olderex- ponents, while the fractional velocities are sensitive to the critical point-wise H¨older exponents and there is no complete equivalence between those quantities [16]. In contrast to physical applications, mathematically, there is no reason to limit the choice of the function in the denominator of the difference quotient to a power function. In such way, more diverse limit objects generalizing derivatives can be LOCAL GENERALIZATIONS OF THE DERIVATIVES ON THE REAL LINE 3 studied. Such is the objective of the present paper. Here, derivatives are generalized in terms of the class of the modulus of continuity of the primitive function. Such definition focuses on applications involving continuous but possibly non-absolutely continuous functions of a real variable. The paper is structured as follows: Section 2 discusses some properties of totally disconnected sets. Section 3 introduces point-wise oscillation of functions. Section 4 characterizes some of the properties of the moduli of continuity. Section 5 introduces the concept of generalized !-derivatives, defined from the maximal modulus of continuity. Section 6 discusses the continuity sets of derivatives form the perspective of the theory developed in Sec. 3 and 4. Section 7 introduces the concept of modular derivatives. Notational conventions (see Appendix A) follow previously published works and are repeated here for convenience [22, 23, 24]. The notation jIj for an interval I will mean its length. 2. Totally disconnected sets The following definition is given in Bartle (2001)[3, Part 1, Ch. 2] and Silva (2007) [25, Ch. 2]: Definition 1 (Null sets). A null set Z ⊂ R (or a set of measure 0) is called a set, such that for every 0 < < 1 there is a countable collection of sub-intervals fIkgk1=1, such that [1 X1 Z ⊆ Ik; jIkj ≤ k=1 k=1 where j:j is the interval length. Then we write jZj = 0. Remark 1. The next statement is a generalization of a well-known property of countable sets (see for example [25, Ch. 2]). The result is given here for complete- ness of the subsequent presentation. Definition 2 (Totally disconnected space). A metric space M is totally discon- nected if every non-empty connected subset of M is a singleton [28, p. 210]. That is, for every S ⊂ M; S non-empty and connected implies 9p 2 M with S = fpg. Theorem 1 (Null set disconnectedness). Suppose that E is a null set. Then E is totally disconnected. Conversely, suppose that E is totally disconnected and count- able. Then E is a null set. Proof. Forward statement: Suppose that Z ⊂ E is connected and open. Then there exist 3 numbers x1 < z < x2, such that [x1; x2] ⊂ Z. Then j[x1; x2]j = x2 − x1 > 0. Therefore, 9, such that 0 < ≤ z − x1 < x2 − x1; so that < jZj ≤ jEj, which is a contradiction. Therefore, x2 = x1 and hence Z is singleton. Therefore, by induction E is totally disconnected. Converse statement: The countability requirement in the statement of the theorem comes from the fact that there are sets that are totally discon- nected, uncountable and non-null [14, 10] (see example 1). Since E is totally disconnected for every z; w 2 E, trivially, there is a number h, such that [z − h=2; z + h=2] \ [w − h=2; w + h=2] = ;. Therefore, there is a collection of such intervals, fIkgk1=1 k+1 k+1 Ik = [zk − h=2 ; zk + h=2 ] 4 DIMITER PRODANOV k of length jIkj = 1=2 . Therefore, X1 jIkj = h k=1 for any such a number h. Since h can be chosen arbitrarily small the claim follows. It should be noted that not all totally disconnected sets are null. There are totally disconnected uncountable sets of positive measure. For example, the Smith{ Volterra{Cantor set is of Lebesgue measure 1=2. Example 1. The construction of the Smith{Volterra{Cantor set is given as follows [14, p.15]: The