DOCSLIB.ORG

The Vascular Flora of Garrard County, Kentucky

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Vascular Flora of Garrard County, Kentucky Eastern Kentucky University Encompass Online Theses and Dissertations Student Scholarship January 2014 The aV scular Flora of Garrard County, Kentucky William Overbeck Eastern Kentucky University Follow this and additional works at: https://encompass.eku.edu/etd Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Plant Biology Commons Recommended Citation Overbeck, William, "The asV cular Flora of Garrard County, Kentucky" (2014). Online Theses and Dissertations. 228. https://encompass.eku.edu/etd/228 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at Encompass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Online Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Encompass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Vascular Flora of Garrard County, Kentucky By William W. Overbeck Bachelor of Fine Arts School of the Art Institute of Chicago Chicago, Illinois 2003 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Eastern Kentucky University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE May, 2014 Copyright © William W. Overbeck All rights reserved ii DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to my loving parents. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS While I was attending The School of the Art Institute of Chicago and studying scientific illustration at The Field Museum of Natural History, Peggy Macnamara encouraged me to consider biology as a career; thanks to her I pursued the integration of fine art, botany, and ecological restoration. I would like to thank my first mentor in botany, Roger Hotham, who patiently showed me the plant communities of Bluff Spring Fen in Elgin, IL. I would like to thank June Keibler and Mary Zaander of Witness Tree Native Landscapes, Inc., for training me in ecological restoration during work in the Chicago Wilderness. I must acknowledge Lorna Gladstone, owner of Gladstone Fen, who allowed me the opportunity to experiment in ecological restoration and adaptive land management. Thanks to Bill Kleiman of The Nature Conservancy’s Nachusa Grasslands, who inspired me to pursue a Master of Science in Kentucky. Thanks also to Susanne Masi of The Chicago Botanic Gardens, Dr. Julian Campbell of The Bluegrass Woodland Restoration Center, Dr. Ralph L. Thompson of Berea College, Dr. Raymond Cranfill, Gary Libby, Melanie G. Bentley, Robert Pace and Mason Brock for their support and assistance. Thanks to Claire Sipple and Lower Howard’s Creek State Nature Preserve, Brent Harrell of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and Ken Cooke and the Friends of Wolf Run Watershed, all of whom provided work contracts which allowed for employment. I would like to thank my major professor and advisor, Dr. Ronald L. Jones, for his guidance and patience. I would like to thank my other graduate committee members, Dr. Jennifer Koslow and Dr. Charles L. Elliott, for their comments and assistance. iv ABSTRACT Garrard County, Kentucky, was the subject of a floristic study conducted from 2010 to 2013. The study documented 961 species in 494 genera and 137 families. Garrard County encompasses 60,570 hectares in central Kentucky and includes parts of both the Bluegrass Section and the Knobs-Norman Upland of the Interior Low Plateaus. Permitted collecting at The Felix Reynolds Prairie, The Nature Conservancy’s Sally Brown and Crutcher Preserve, Tom Dorman State Nature Preserve, and Maywoods Environmental and Educational Laboratory was coordinated with state and private conservation agencies. Two plant communities known to occur in the county, Limestone/Dolomite Prairie and Bluegrass Mesophytic Cane Forest, are listed as Endangered in Kentucky. Other plant communities are described and compared with previous vegetation studies of the Bluegrass and Knobs. Sixteen state-listed species were documented in the county, including a Historical species, four Endangered, five Threatened, and six Special Concern. About 18% of the flora is non-native, and 95 of these species are listed as Severe, Significant, or Moderate Threats, or Watch List. Habitat loss and invasive species continue to degrade rare plant community remnants and populations of rare plants. Applications of baseline floristic inventories can be used in assessing conservation priorities for landscape preservation in Kentucky. v TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1 II. STUDY AREA ......................................................................................................... 3 Location .................................................................................................................... 4 Natural Regions ........................................................................................................ 5 Topography ............................................................................................................... 8 Geology ..................................................................................................................... 9 Soils......................................................................................................................... 11 Watersheds .............................................................................................................. 16 Climate .................................................................................................................... 16 Land Use ................................................................................................................. 18 Vegetation and Flora ............................................................................................... 18 Forest Regions ........................................................................................................ 21 Study Sites .............................................................................................................. 23 Tom Dorman State Nature Preserve .................................................................. 24 The Nature Conservancy’s Sally Brown and Crutcher Preserve ....................... 24 The Felix Reynolds Prairie ................................................................................ 25 Maywoods Environmental and Educational Laboratory ................................... 26 III. MATERIALS AND METHODS ............................................................................ 27 IV. RESULTS ............................................................................................................... 29 Flora ........................................................................................................................ 29 Special Concern, Threatened, and Endangered Species ................................... 30 Non-native Species ........................................................................................... 31 Update of Maywoods Environmental and Educational Laboratory Flora…… 31 Vegetation ............................................................................................................... 32 Bluegrass Region .............................................................................................. 32 Knobs Region.................................................................................................... 35 V. DISCUSSION ............................................................................................................ 38 General Flora .......................................................................................................... 38 Non-native Species ........................................................................................... 38 Rare Species Overview ..................................................................................... 39 Rare Species Accounts ...................................................................................... 41 Vegetation of Central Kentucky ............................................................................. 48 Bluegrass Region .............................................................................................. 48 vi Knobs Region.................................................................................................... 51 Vegetation of Garrard County .......................................................................... 54 Vegetation of Study Sites........................................................................................ 55 Tom Dorman State Nature Preserve ................................................................. 55 The Nature Conservancy’s Sally Brown and Crutcher Preserve ...................... 57 The Felix Reynolds Prairie ............................................................................... 59 Maywoods Environmental and Educational Laboratory .................................. 60 VI. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION ....................................................................... 63 LITERATURE CITED .................................................................................................... 66 APPENDICES ................................................................................................................. 74 I. Annotated List of the Vascular Plants of Garrard County............................ 74 II. Exotic Pest Plants of Kentucky in Garrard County ................................... 162 III. New Distribution Records for Maywoods ............................................... 165 IV. Photographs of Selected State-listed Species
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Revised February 24, 2017 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • (Cruciferae) – Mustard Family
    BRASSICACEAE (CRUCIFERAE) – MUSTARD FAMILY Plant: herbs mostly, annual to perennial, sometimes shrubs; sap sometimes peppery Stem: Root: Leaves: mostly simple but sometimes pinnately divided; alternate, rarely opposite or whorled; no stipules Flowers: mostly perfect, mostly regular (actinomorphic); 4 sepals, 4 petals often forming a cross; 6 stamens with usually 2 outer ones shorter than the inner 4; ovary superior, mostly 2 fused carpels, 1 to many ovules, 1 pistil Fruit: seed pods, often used in classification, many are slender and long (Silique), some broad (Silicle) – see morphology slide Other: a large family, many garden plants such as turnip, radish, and cabbage, also some spices; often termed the Cruciferae family; Dicotyledons Group Genera: 350+ genera; 40+ locally WARNING – family descriptions are only a layman’s guide and should not be used as definitive Flower Morphology in the Brassicaceae (Mustard Family) - flower with 4 sepals, 4 petals (often like a cross, sometimes split or lobed), commonly small, often white or yellow, distinctive fruiting structures often important for ID 2 types of fruiting pods: in addition, fruits may be circular, flattened or angled in cross-section Silicle - (usually <2.5x long as wide), 2-valved with septum (replum) Silique - (usually >2.5x long as wide), 2- valved with septum (replum) Flowers, Many Genera BRASSICACEAE (CRUCIFERAE) – MUSTARD FAMILY Sanddune [Western] Wallflower; Erysimum capitatum (Douglas ex Hook.) Greene var. capitatum Wormseed Wallflower [Mustard]; Erysimum cheiranthoides L. (Introduced) Spreading Wallflower [Treacle Mustard]; Erysimum repandum L. (Introduced) Dame’s Rocket [Dame’s Violet]; Hesperis matronalis L. (Introduced) Purple [Violet] Rocket; Iodanthus pinnatifidus (Michx.) Steud. Michaux's Gladecress; Leavenworthia uniflora (Michx.) Britton [Cow; Field] Cress [Peppergrass]; Lepidium campestre L.) Ait.
    [Show full text]
  • C10 Beano2.Gen-Wis
    LEGUMINOSAE PART DEUX Papilionoideae, Genista to Wisteria Revised May the 4th 2015 BEAN FAMILY 2 Pediomelum PAPILIONACEAE cont. Genista Petalostemum Glycine Pisum Glycyrrhiza Psoralea Hylodesmum Psoralidium Lathyrus Robinia Lespedeza Securigera Lotus Strophostyles Lupinus Tephrosia Medicago Thermopsis Melilotus Trifolium Onobrychis Vicia Orbexilum Wisteria Oxytropis Copyrighted Draft GENISTA Linnaeus DYER’S GREENWEED Fabaceae Genista Genis'ta (jen-IS-ta or gen-IS-ta) from a Latin name, the Plantagenet kings & queens of England took their name, planta genesta, from story of William the Conqueror, as setting sail for England, plucked a plant holding tenaciously to a rock on the shore, stuck it in his helmet as symbol to hold fast in risky undertaking; from Latin genista (genesta) -ae f, the plant broom. Alternately from Celtic gen, or French genet, a small shrub (w73). A genus of 80-90 spp of small trees, shrubs, & herbs native of Eurasia. Genista tinctoria Linnaeus 1753 DYER’S GREENWEED, aka DYER’S BROOM, WOADWAXEN, WOODWAXEN, (tinctorius -a -um tinctor'ius (tink-TORE-ee-us or tink-TO-ree-us) New Latin, of or pertaining to dyes or able to dye, used in dyes or in dyeing, from Latin tingo, tingere, tinxi, tinctus, to wet, to soak in color; to dye, & -orius, capability, functionality, or resulting action, as in tincture; alternately Latin tinctōrius used by Pliny, from tinctōrem, dyer; at times, referring to a plant that exudes some kind of stain when broken.) An escaped shrub introduced from Europe. Shrubby, from long, woody roots. The whole plant dyes yellow, & when mixed with Woad, green. Blooms August. Now, where did I put that woad? Sow at 18-22ºC (64-71ºF) for 2-4 wks, move to -4 to +4ºC (34-39ºF) for 4-6 wks, move to 5-12ºC (41- 53ºF) for germination (tchn).
    [Show full text]
  • Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations
    Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations Revised Report and Documentation Prepared for: Department of Defense U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Submitted by: January 2004 Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations: Revised Report and Documentation CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary..........................................................................................iii 2.0 Introduction – Project Description................................................................. 1 3.0 Methods ................................................................................................................ 3 3.1 NatureServe Data................................................................................................ 3 3.2 DOD Installations............................................................................................... 5 3.3 Species at Risk .................................................................................................... 6 4.0 Results................................................................................................................... 8 4.1 Nationwide Assessment of Species at Risk on DOD Installations..................... 8 4.2 Assessment of Species at Risk by Military Service.......................................... 13 4.3 Assessment of Species at Risk on Installations ................................................ 15 5.0 Conclusion and Management Recommendations.................................... 22 6.0 Future Directions.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Results of Investigations of Surface-Water Quality, 1987-90
    WATER-QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF THE KENTUCKY RIVER BASIN, KENTUCKY: RESULTS OF INVESTIGATIONS OF SURFACE-WATER QUALITY, 1987-90 By Kirn H. Haag, Rene Garcia, G. Lynn Jarrett, and Stephen D. Porter U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 95-4163 Louisville, Kentucky . 1995 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Earth Science Information Center District Office Open-File Reports Section 2301 Bradley Avenue Box 25286, MS 517 Louisville, KY 40217 Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 FOREWORD The mission of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) is to assess the quantity and quality of the earth resources of the Nation and to provide information that will assist resource managers and policymakers at Federal, State, and local levels in making sound decisions. Assessment of water-quality conditions and trends is an important part of this overall mission. One of the greatest challenges faced by water-resources scientists is acquiring reliable information that will guide the use and protection of the Nation's water resources. That challenge is being addressed by Federal, State, interstate, and local water-resource agencies and by many academic institutions. These organizations are collecting water-quality data for a host of purposes that include: compliance with permits and water-supply standards; development of remediation plans for a specific contamination problem; operational decisions on industrial, wastewater, or water-supply facilities; and research on factors that affect water quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012 Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012 Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 www.ncnhp.org NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM LIST OF THE RARE PLANTS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2012 Edition Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist and John Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs Department of Environment and Natural Resources, 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 www.ncnhp.org Table of Contents LIST FORMAT ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 NORTH CAROLINA RARE PLANT LIST ......................................................................................................................... 10 NORTH CAROLINA PLANT WATCH LIST ..................................................................................................................... 71 Watch Category
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy and Phylogeny in Triticeae: a Historical Review and Current Status
    Advances in Plants & Agriculture Research Review Article Open Access Taxonomy and phylogeny in Triticeae: a historical review and current status Abstract Volume 3 Issue 5 - 2016 The Triticeae is an economically important tribe within the Poaceae. Because a number of cereal crops and forage grasses belong to the tribe it has attracted much scientific Mohannad G Al–Saghir attention covering many species: taxonomy, phylogeny, genetics, cytogenetic, genome Department of Environmental and Plant Biology, Ohio analyses (crossing ability and chromosome pairing), isoenzymes, molecular biology University, USA (RFLP, RAPD, PCR sequencing) and breeding. This paper contains a brief historical outline of the taxonomy of the tribe. Phylogenetic hypotheses regarding this tribe Correspondence: Mohannad G Al–Saghir, Department of inferred from different methods, techniques and approaches, are reviewed. The Environmental and Plant Biology, Ohio University, Zanesville, different phylogenies are discussed and compared and conflicts are elucidated. Ohio, USA, Email al–[email protected] Keywords: triticeae, phylogeny, taxonomy, poaceae, perennial species, durum Received: April 23, 2016 | Published: May 10, 2016 wheat, phylogenies, genetic diversity, cytogenetics, molecular biology, chromosomes, perennial, caespitose, thizomatous species Introduction as cited above. We can therefore conclude that the most appropriate outgroup for the tribe will be Bromus. The tribe Triticeae Dum is economically the most important tribe in the grass family (Poaceae). It encompasses between 350 and 500 Definition annual or perennial species,1–3 including the important cereal crops wheat (Triticum aestivium L.), durum wheat (T. turgidum sup. durum The Triticeae encompasses annual and perennial, caespitose or (Desf. MacKay) barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), rye (Secale cereal L.) thizomatous species.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2010 a Publication of the Kentucky Native Plant Society [email protected]
    The Lady-Slipper Number 25:3 Fall 2010 A Publication of the Kentucky Native Plant Society www.knps.org [email protected] Announcing the KNPS Fall Meeting at Shakertown Saturday, September 11, 2010 Plans are underway to for the KNPS Fall meeting at Mercer County’s Shaker Village of Pleasant Hill (http://www.shakervillageky.org/ )! Preliminary plans are for several field trips on Saturday morning and Saturday afternoon in the Kentucky River palisades region, followed by an afternoon program indoors. Details will be posted to www.KNPS.org as they are finalized, but here is our tentative schedule (all hikes subject to change): 9 AM field trips (meet at the West Family Wash House, area "C", in the main village): Don Pelly, Shakertown Naturalist- birding hike to Shakertown’s native grass plantings. David Taylor, US Forest Service- woody plant walk on the Shaker Village grounds. Zeb Weese, KNPS- Kentucky River canoe trip (limit 14 adults). Palisades from www.shakervillage.org 1 PM field trips (meet at the West Family Wash House): Tara Littlefield, KY State Nature Preserves– field trip to Jessamine Creek Gorge (limit 3 vehicles) Alan Nations, NativeScapes, Inc, - hike on the Shaker Village grounds. Sarah Hall, Kentucky State University- hike to Tom Dorman State Nature Preserve. 5 PM presentations at the West Family Wash House: Dr. Luke Dodd, UK Forestry, will present “Impacts of forest management on foraging bats in hardwood forests” followed by Greg Abernathy, KY State Nature Preserves Commission, on “Biodiversity of Kentucky” Registration will take place in the West Family Wash House prior to each field trip.
    [Show full text]
  • General Geological Information for the Tri-States of Kentucky, Virginia and Tennessee
    General Geological Information for the Tri-States Of Kentucky, Virginia and Tennessee Southeastern Geological Society (SEGS) Field Trip to Pound Gap Road Cut U.S. Highway 23 Letcher County, Kentucky September 28 and 29, 2001 Guidebook Number 41 Summaries Prepared by: Bruce A. Rodgers, PG. SEGS Vice President 2001 Southeastern Geological Society (SEGS) Guidebook Number 41 September 2001 Page 1 Table of Contents Section 1 P HYSIOGRAPHIC P ROVINCES OF THE R EGION Appalachian Plateau Province Ridge and Valley Province Blue Ridge Province Other Provinces of Kentucky Other Provinces of Virginia Section 2 R EGIONAL G EOLOGIC S TRUCTURE Kentucky’s Structural Setting Section 3 M INERAL R ESOURCES OF THE R EGION Virginia’s Geological Mineral and Mineral Fuel Resources Tennessee’s Geological Mineral and Mineral Fuel Resources Kentucky’s Geological Mineral and Mineral Fuel Resources Section 4 G ENERAL I NFORMATION ON C OAL R ESOURCES OF THE R EGION Coal Wisdom Section 5 A CTIVITIES I NCIDENTAL TO C OAL M INING After the Coal is Mined - Benefaction, Quality Control, Transportation and Reclamation Section 6 G ENERAL I NFORMATION ON O IL AND NATURAL G AS R ESOURCES IN THE R EGION Oil and Natural Gas Enlightenment Section 7 E XPOSED UPPER P ALEOZOIC R OCKS OF THE R EGION Carboniferous Systems Southeastern Geological Society (SEGS) Guidebook Number 41 September 2001 Page i Section 8 R EGIONAL G ROUND W ATER R ESOURCES Hydrology of the Eastern Kentucky Coal Field Region Section 9 P INE M OUNTAIN T HRUST S HEET Geology and Historical Significance of the
    [Show full text]
  • Species List For: Valley View Glades NA 418 Species
    Species List for: Valley View Glades NA 418 Species Jefferson County Date Participants Location NA List NA Nomination and subsequent visits Jefferson County Glade Complex NA List from Gass, Wallace, Priddy, Chmielniak, T. Smith, Ladd & Glore, Bogler, MPF Hikes 9/24/80, 10/2/80, 7/10/85, 8/8/86, 6/2/87, 1986, and 5/92 WGNSS Lists Webster Groves Nature Study Society Fieldtrip Jefferson County Glade Complex Participants WGNSS Vascular Plant List maintained by Steve Turner Species Name (Synonym) Common Name Family COFC COFW Acalypha virginica Virginia copperleaf Euphorbiaceae 2 3 Acer rubrum var. undetermined red maple Sapindaceae 5 0 Acer saccharinum silver maple Sapindaceae 2 -3 Acer saccharum var. undetermined sugar maple Sapindaceae 5 3 Achillea millefolium yarrow Asteraceae/Anthemideae 1 3 Aesculus glabra var. undetermined Ohio buckeye Sapindaceae 5 -1 Agalinis skinneriana (Gerardia) midwestern gerardia Orobanchaceae 7 5 Agalinis tenuifolia (Gerardia, A. tenuifolia var. common gerardia Orobanchaceae 4 -3 macrophylla) Ageratina altissima var. altissima (Eupatorium rugosum) white snakeroot Asteraceae/Eupatorieae 2 3 Agrimonia pubescens downy agrimony Rosaceae 4 5 Agrimonia rostellata woodland agrimony Rosaceae 4 3 Allium canadense var. mobilense wild garlic Liliaceae 7 5 Allium canadense var. undetermined wild garlic Liliaceae 2 3 Allium cernuum wild onion Liliaceae 8 5 Allium stellatum wild onion Liliaceae 6 5 * Allium vineale field garlic Liliaceae 0 3 Ambrosia artemisiifolia common ragweed Asteraceae/Heliantheae 0 3 Ambrosia bidentata lanceleaf ragweed Asteraceae/Heliantheae 0 4 Ambrosia trifida giant ragweed Asteraceae/Heliantheae 0 -1 Amelanchier arborea var. arborea downy serviceberry Rosaceae 6 3 Amorpha canescens lead plant Fabaceae/Faboideae 8 5 Amphicarpaea bracteata hog peanut Fabaceae/Faboideae 4 0 Andropogon gerardii var.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Protected Vascular Plants on the Oak Ridge Reservation, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
    LOCKHEED MARTI ^f ES/ER/TM-194 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION PROGRAM Survey of Protected Vascular Plants on the Oak Ridge Reservation, Oak Ridge, Tennessee ECE1VEC JUL 1 9 B3B OSTI This document has been approved by the K-25 Site Technical Information Office^ for release to the public. Date: ENERGY SYSTEMS MANAGED BY LOCKHEED MARTIN ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. FOR THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY >2K»^> UCN-17580 (8 8-95) (€ DISTRIBUTE Or frfiS DOCUMENT IS mimm Author and Contributor Affiliations J. Aw], Larry R. Pounds, and Barbara Rosensteel are subcontractors with JAYCOR Environmental. Amy L. King, Program Manager, is a member of Computational Physics and Engineering, Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Patricia A. Hamlett is a subcontractor vith ihe University of Tennessee. This report has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; prices available from 423-576-8401 (fax 423-576-2865). Available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Pert Royal Rd., Springfield, VA 22161. ES/ER/TM-194 Survey of Protected Vascular Plants on the Oak Ridge Reservation, Oak Ridge, Tennessee D.J. Awl L. R. Pounds B. A. Rosensteel A. L. King P. A. Hamlett Environmental Restoration Division P.O. Box 2003 Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-7294 Date Issued—June 1996 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management under budget and reporting code EW 20 LOCKHEED MARTIN ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. managing the Environmental Management Activities at the Oak Ridge K-25 Site Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant Oak Ridge National Laboratory under contract DE-AC05-84OR21400 for the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Kentucky Heritage Land Conservation Fund
    KENTUCKY HERITAGE LAND CONSERVATION FUND ANNUAL REPORT FY 2011 KENTUCKY HERITAGE LAND CONSERVATION FUND Kentucky has an invaluable natural heritage recognized nationally and in- ternationally for its outstanding, productive, biologically and geologically diverse lands and waters. The Kentucky Heritage Land Conservation Fund is committed to protecting these diverse lands and “Keeping Ken- tucky Green” by awarding grant funds to purchase and preserve the state’s natural lands in perpetuity for enjoyment by this and future genera- tions. Kentucky Heritage Land Conservation Fund dollars have been awarded to protect and conserve some of Kentucky’s best known natural areas: old- growth hardwoods at Blanton Forest in eastern Kentucky; savannah woodlands at Griffith Woods as well as parts of the Kentucky River Pali- sades in central Kentucky ; urban forests at the Jefferson Memorial For- est in the state’s largest city; bat populations and caves in southern Ken- tucky; cliff-lined valleys along the banks of the Martins Fork Wild River in Harlan County; and diverse watershed and wetland areas with endan- gered mussel species at the Green River State Forest in the western part of the state. On the following pages, we are pleased to present the FY 2011 Annual Report. On the Cover: Bad Branch State Nature Preserve, Letcher County Photo by Joe Dietz KHLCF FY 2011 Annual Report Table of Contents KHLCF Mission 1 KHLCF Accomplishments 2 FY 2011 in Review 3 FY 2011 Purchased Properties 4 FY 2011 Approved Projects 5 FY 2011 Financial Overview 9 Kentucky
    [Show full text]