Design and Implementation of Fpga Based Software Defined Radio Using Simulink Hdl Coder

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Design and Implementation of Fpga Based Software Defined Radio Using Simulink Hdl Coder View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ePublications DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF FPGA BASED SOFTWARE DEFINED RADIO USING SIMULINK HDL CODER Dr. Hikmat N. Abdullah B.Sc. Hussein A. Hadi [email protected] [email protected] University of Al-Mustansiryah, College of Engineering, Electrical Engineering Department, Baghdad-Iraq. ABSTRACT: are hardware defined with little or no This paper presents the design software control; they are fixed in function procedure and implementation results of a for mostly consumer items for broadcast proposed software defined radio (SDR) reception. They have a short life and are using Altera Cyclone II family board. The designed to be discarded and replaced [1]. implementation uses Matlab/SimulinkTM, Over the last few years, analog radio Embedded MatlabTM blocks, and Cyclone II systems are being replaced by digital radio development and educational board. The systems for various radio applications in design has first implemented in military, civilian and commercial spaces. In Matlab/SimulinkTM environment. It is then addition to this, programmable hardware converted to VHDL level using Simulink modules are increasingly being used in HDL coder. The design is synthesized and digital radio systems at different functional fitted with Quartus II 9.0 Web Edition® levels. Commercial wireless communication software, and downloaded to Altera Cyclone industry is currently facing problems due to II board. The results show that it is easy to constant evolution of link-layer protocol develop and understand the implementation standards (2.5G, 3G, and 4G), existence of of SDR using programmable logic tools. incompatible wireless network technologies The paper also presents an efficient design in different countries inhibiting deployment flow of the procedure followed to obtain of global roaming facilities and problems in VHDL netlists that can be downloaded to rolling-out new services/features due to FPGA boards. wide-spread presence of legacy subscriber handsets [2]. KEYWORDS: FPGA, Embedded Matlab, The solution of above big problems software defined radio. can be solved by using the software defined radio (SDR), which comprised of both 1. INTRODUCTION: software and hardware, it use a The twentieth century saw the reprogrammable ability of field explosion of hardware defined radio (HDR) programmable gate array (FPGA) or digital as a means of communicating all forms of signal possessor (DSP) to built an open audible; visual, and machine-generated architecture with software implementation information over vast distances. Most radios of radio frequencies such as 15 modulation/demodulation, coding/decoding, development. Using the coder, system ..etc[3]. architects and designers can spend more SDR in a few words is a radio that time on fine-tuning algorithms and models promises to solve the gap between link-layer through rapid prototyping and protocol standards and provide a quick experimentation and less time on HDL solution of global roaming problems by coding. Simulink HDL coder compatibility building generic platform that switches its checker utility can be run to examine functionalities by using software control. In MATLAB-Simulink model semantics and this work, an efficient short cycle design blocks for HDL code generation flow has been proposed. With this design compatibility, then by invoking the coder, flow, the designer could implement his using either the command line or the design models originally written as Matlab graphical user interface. codes or simulink blocks using FPGA board The coder generates VHDL or without the need to learn VHDL or even Verilog code that implements the design other FPGA design entries. As well as, this embodied in the model. Usually, a approach reduces the time required to corresponding test bench also can be complete the hardware implementation. It generated. The test bench with HDL will give the beginner designer, for instance simulation tools can be used to drive the the student, a better and easy understanding generated HDL code and evaluate its of how different design parts behave using behavior. The coder generates scripts that his/her written Matlab codes/simulink automate the process of compiling and blocks. However, the automatic translation simulating your code in these tools. EDA of Matlab code/simulink blocks to VHDL Simulator Link™ MQ, EDA Simulator Link one requires extra requirements. The written IN or EDA Simulator Link DS software can Matlab code/simulink blocks should take be used from the MathWorks™ to into ahead what is so called fixed point cosimulate generated HDL entities within a arithmetic notations (Embedded MatlabTM Simulink model. [4]). In this work, the EDA Simulator Link™ MQ are used but in another easily 2. Generation of VHDL Codes for way which can be followed by invoke the MATLAB-Simulink Models: ModelSim manually. The test bench feature The algorithms and designs used to increases confidence in the correctness of define systems are normally modeled using the generated code and saves time spent on high level software languages like test bench implementation. The design and MATLAB, MATLAB-Simulink or C. But test process is fully iterative. At any point, these designs could not be suited to real the designer can return to the original model, hardware. Simulink HDL coder [5] is a new make modifications, and regenerate code. tool, which comes with MATLAB-Simulink When the design and test phases of the software package and can be used to project have been completed, easily the generate hardware description language generated HDL code can be exported to (HDL) code based on Simulink® models synthesis and layout tools for hardware and Stateflow® finite-state machines. The realization. The coder generates synthesis coder brings the Model-Based Design scripts for the Synplify® family of synthesis approach into the domain of application- tools. specific integrated circuit (ASIC) and field The procedure followed to obtain programmable gate array (FPGA) VHDL netlists that could be downloaded to 16 FPGA boards could be summarized in the Some MATLAB-Simulink blocks, flow chart shown in Fig.1. especially those contain complex functions like encoders/decoders, modulators/ demodulators, ..etc. could not be converted start to VHDL codes. To solve this problem, these blocks are redesigned using their basic designing MATLAB-models with blocks supported components such that it could be converted by Simulink HDL coder to VHDL codes. Fig.2 shows the designed SDR system using MATLAB-Simulink blocks Setting up Simulink HDL coder configuration supported by the HDL coder while Figs.3 and 4 show further details of the blocks in Fig.2. Fig.5 shows that the transceiver part Setting up model parameters with the HDL coder in Fig.3 which consists of two branches, each branch support a different type of Generating HDL entities for model blocks modulation scheme while the coding scheme used is convolutional code. The control circuit of Fig.3 can be used to decide which Manual modification of VHDL codes generated (if transceiver is on and the other is off: when necessary) the input1 of the control circuit is 0, the lower branch will turns on while the upper Creating test bench for simulation purposes branch will turns off. The opposite thing happend when input1 is decided as logic one. Exporting VHDL netlists to Quartus and test The modulators/demodulators in benches to Modelsim Fig.4 have been designed using embedded MATLAB functions (m-files) while other Verifying design functionality blocks designed by MATLAB-Simulink (ModelSim tool) blocks supported by Simulink HDL coder. For example, Fig.5 shows the implementation of convolutional encoder. In 2.1 DesignDesign of Simulink synthesis using models QuartusII with blocks Fig.5, a convolutional encoder of rate 1/2 with constraint length 7 and code array 171 Downloading bit stream file to FPGA board and 133 is used [6]. The constraint length denotes the number of shift registers over, which the modulo-2 sum of the input data is End performed. The rate 1/2 signifies that for every 1 bit input, the encoder will output 2 encoded bits. Viterbi decoder is used to Fig.1 design flow for realizing MATLAB- decode the convolutionally encoded signal Simulink models using FPGA boards. by finding an optimal path through all the possible states of the encoder [7]. 2.1 Design of Simulink Models with There are two steps in the decoding Blocks Supported by Simulink HDL process. The first step is to weigh the cost of Coder: incoming data against all possible data input combinations. Either a Hamming or 17 Fig.2 The designed SDR receiver using MATLAB-Simulink blocks supported by Simulink HDL coder. Fig.3 The details of SDR block in Fig.2 Fig.4 further detail of the transceiver construction 18 Fig.5 Implementation of the convolutional encoder using MATLAB-Simulink blocks supported by HDL coder. Euclidean metric may be used to determine with the Mentor Graphics® ModelSim® the cost[8]. The second step is to traceback HDL simulator and with Synplicity® through the trellis and determine the Synplify® synthesis software. By overriding optimal path. The length of the trace through script generation defaults, Simulink HDL the trellis can be controlled by the traceback Coder can programed to generate scripts for length parameter [8]. The constraint length most EDA tools. EDA script generation can of 7 and the code array 171 and 133 used for be customized via the Simulink HDL Coder decoding are the same as in convolutional GUI, or by setting makehdl or makehdltb encoder. The traceback length parameter, properties at the command line, or in a that is, the number of trellis states processed control file. before the decoder makes a decision on a bit, In this work, the ModelSim-Altera is set to 34. The decoder outputs the data 6.4a Starter Edition package as simulator bits which are later grouped accordingly.
Recommended publications
  • Automated Annotation of Simulink Generated C Code Based on the Simulink Model
    DEGREE PROJECT IN COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, SECOND CYCLE, 30 CREDITS STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN 2020 Automated Annotation of Simulink Generated C Code Based on the Simulink Model SREEYA BASU ROY KTH ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE Automated Annotation of Simulink Generated C Code Based on the Simulink Model SREEYA BASU ROY Master in Embedded Systems Date: September 25, 2020 Supervisor: Predrag Filipovikj Examiner: Matthias Becker School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Host company: Scania CV AB Swedish title: Automatisk Kommentar av Simulink Genererad C kod Baserad på Simulink Modellen iii Abstract There has been a wave of transformation in the automotive industry in recent years, with most vehicular functions being controlled electron- ically instead of mechanically. This has led to an exponential increase in the complexity of software functions in vehicles, making it essential for manufactures to guarantee their correctness. Traditional software testing is reaching its limits, consequently pushing the automotive in- dustry to explore other forms of quality assurance. One such technique that has been gaining momentum over the years is a set of verification techniques based on mathematical logic called formal verification tech- niques. Although formal techniques have not yet been adopted on a large scale, these methods offer systematic and possibly more exhaus- tive verification of the software under test, since their fundamentals are based on the principles of mathematics. In order to be able to apply formal verification, the system under test must be transformed into a formal model, and a set of proper- ties over such models, which can then be verified using some of the well-established formal verification techniques, such as model check- ing or deductive verification.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture #4: Simulation of Hybrid Systems
    Embedded Control Systems Lecture 4 – Spring 2018 Knut Åkesson Modelling of Physcial Systems Model knowledge is stored in books and human minds which computers cannot access “The change of motion is proportional to the motive force impressed “ – Newton Newtons second law of motion: F=m*a Slide from: Open Source Modelica Consortium, Copyright © Equation Based Modelling • Equations were used in the third millennium B.C. • Equality sign was introduced by Robert Recorde in 1557 Newton still wrote text (Principia, vol. 1, 1686) “The change of motion is proportional to the motive force impressed ” Programming languages usually do not allow equations! Slide from: Open Source Modelica Consortium, Copyright © Languages for Equation-based Modelling of Physcial Systems Two widely used tools/languages based on the same ideas Modelica + Open standard + Supported by many different vendors, including open source implementations + Many existing libraries + A plant model in Modelica can be imported into Simulink - Matlab is often used for the control design History: The Modelica design effort was initiated in September 1996 by Hilding Elmqvist from Lund, Sweden. Simscape + Easy integration in the Mathworks tool chain (Simulink/Stateflow/Simscape) - Closed implementation What is Modelica A language for modeling of complex cyber-physical systems • Robotics • Automotive • Aircrafts • Satellites • Power plants • Systems biology Slide from: Open Source Modelica Consortium, Copyright © What is Modelica A language for modeling of complex cyber-physical systems
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Simulink
    Introduction to Simulink Mariusz Janiak p. 331 C-3, 71 320 26 44 c 2015 Mariusz Janiak All Rights Reserved Contents 1 Introduction 2 Essentials 3 Continuous systems 4 Hardware-in-the-Loop (HIL) Simulation Introduction Simulink is a block diagram environment for multidomain simulation and Model-Based Design. It supports simulation, automatic code generation, and continuous test and verification of embedded systems.1 Graphical editor Customizable block libraries Solvers for modeling and simulating dynamic systems Integrated with Matlab Web page www.mathworks.com 1 The MathWorks, Inc. Introduction Simulink capabilities Building the model (hierarchical subsystems) Simulating the model Analyzing simulation results Managing projects Connecting to hardware Introduction Alternatives to Simulink Xcos (www.scilab.org/en/scilab/features/xcos) OpenModelica (www.openmodelica.org) MapleSim (www.maplesoft.com/products/maplesim) Wolfram SystemModeler (www.wolfram.com/system-modeler) Introduction Model based design with Simulink Modeling and simulation Multidomain dynamic systems Nonlinear systems Continuous-, Discrete-time, Multi-rate systems Plant and controller design Rapidly model what-if scenarios Communicate design ideas Select/Optimize control architecture and parameters Implementation Automatic code generation Rapid prototyping for HIL, SIL Verification and validation Essentials Working with Simulink Launching Simulink Library Browser Finding Blocks Getting Help Context sensitive help Simulink documentation Demo Working with a simple model Changing
    [Show full text]
  • FMI Target for Simulink Coder, It Is Now Possible to Export Models from Simulink to Any Platform That Supports Fmus for Co-Simulation
    Supporting your vision Cross-Platform Modeling with FMI Target for Simulink® Coder™ Open technology standards for an integrated product lifecycle Engine Transmission Thermal EV/HV Chassis Compo- Models Models Systems Models nents Models Functional Mock-Up Interface The challenge for manufacturers of complex machinery that heavily rely on components from suppliers is the seamless exchange of data and specifications during the development. The same holds true for large corporates with multiple R&D departments at various locations using several development tools due to different objectives. Those challenges include different programming languages from the various tools, the lack of standardized model interfaces and the concerns for the protection of intellectual property. The development of the Functional Mock-up Interface (FMI) has enabled software-, model- and hardware-in-the-loop simulations with dynamic system models from different software environments. With the FMI Target for Simulink Coder, it is now possible to export models from Simulink to any platform that supports FMUs for Co-Simulation. FMI for Co-Simulation The goal is to couple two or more models with solvers in a co-simulation environment. The data exchange between subsystems is restricted to discrete communication points. The subsystems are processed independently from each other by their individual solvers during the time interval between two communication points. Master algorithms control the synchronization of all slave simulation solvers and the data exchange between the subsystems. The interface allows for both standard and advanced master algorithms, such as variable communication step sizes, signal extrapolation of higher order and error checking. FMI Target for Simulink® Coder™ FMI for Co-Simulation For the exchange of models across different platforms, the FMI Target for Simulink Coder enables the export of models from Simulink as FMUs for Co-Simulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Simulink Models Robust with Respect to Change Making Simulink Models Robust with Respect to Change
    Making Simulink Models Robust with Respect to Change Making Simulink Models Robust with Respect to Change By Monika Jaskolka, B.Co.Sc., M.A.Sc. a thesis submitted to the Department of Computing and Software and the School of Graduate Studies of McMaster University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Doctor of Philosophy (December 2020) McMaster University (Software Engineering) Hamilton, ON, Canada Title: Making Simulink Models Robust with Respect to Change Author: Monika Jaskolka B.Co.Sc. (Laurentian University) M.A.Sc. (McMaster University) Supervisors: Dr. Mark Lawford, Dr. Alan Wassyng Number of Pages: xi, 206 ii For my husband, Jason iii Abstract Model-Based Development (MBD) is an approach that uses software models to describe the behaviour of embedded software and cyber-physical systems. MBD has become an increasingly prevalent paradigm, with Simulink by MathWorks being the most widely used MBD platform for control software. Unlike textual programming languages, visual languages for MBD such as Simulink use block diagrams as their syntax. Thus, some software engineering principles created for textual languages are not easily adapted to this graphical notation or have not yet been supported. A software engineering principle that is not readily supported in Simulink is the modularization of systems using information hiding. As with all software artifacts, Simulink models must be constantly maintained and are subject to evolution over their lifetime. This principle hides likely changes, thus enabling the design to be robust with respect to future changes. In this thesis, we perform repository mining on an industry change management system of Simulink models to understand how they are likely to change.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling and Simulation in Scilab/Scicos Mathematics Subject Classification (2000): 01-01, 04-01, 11 Axx, 26-01
    Stephen L. Campbell, Jean-Philippe Chancelier and Ramine Nikoukhah Modeling and Simulation in Scilab/Scicos Mathematics Subject Classification (2000): 01-01, 04-01, 11 Axx, 26-01 Library of Congress Control Number: 2005930797 ISBN-10: 0-387-27802-8 ISBN-13: 978-0387278025 Printed on acid-free paper. © 2006 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written permission of the publisher (Springer Science+Business Media, Inc., 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013, USA), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adaption, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use in this publication of trade names, trademarks, service marks, and similar terms, even if they are not identified as such, is not to be taken as an expression of opinion as to whether or not they are subject to proprietary rights. Printed in the United States of America. (BPR/HAM) 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 springeronline.com Preface Scilab (http://www.scilab.org) is a free open-source software package for scientific com- putation. It includes hundreds of general purpose and specialized functions for numerical computation, organized in libraries called toolboxes that cover such areas as simulation, optimization, systems and control, and signal processing. These functions reduce consid- erably the burden of programming for scientific applications. One important Scilab toolbox is Scicos. Scicos (http://www.scicos.org) provides a block-diagram graphical editor for the construction and simulation of dynamical sys- tems.
    [Show full text]
  • A Modelica Power System Library for Phasor Time-Domain Simulation
    2013 4th IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe (ISGT Europe), October 6-9, Copenhagen 1 A Modelica Power System Library for Phasor Time-Domain Simulation T. Bogodorova, Student Member, IEEE, M. Sabate, G. Leon,´ L. Vanfretti, Member, IEEE, M. Halat, J. B. Heyberger, and P. Panciatici, Member, IEEE Abstract— Power system phasor time-domain simulation is the FMI Toolbox; while for Mathematica, SystemModeler often carried out through domain specific tools such as Eurostag, links Modelica models directly with the computation kernel. PSS/E, and others. While these tools are efficient, their individual The aims of this article is to demonstrate the value of sub-component models and solvers cannot be accessed by the users for modification. One of the main goals of the FP7 iTesla Modelica as a convenient language for modeling of complex project [1] is to perform model validation, for which, a modelling physical systems containing electric power subcomponents, and simulation environment that provides model transparency to show results of software-to-software validations in order and extensibility is necessary. 1 To this end, a power system to demonstrate the capability of Modelica for supporting library has been built using the Modelica language. This article phasor time-domain power system models, and to illustrate describes the Power Systems library, and the software-to-software validation carried out for the implemented component as well as how power system Modelica models can be shared across the validation of small-scale power system models constructed different simulation platforms. In addition, several aspects of using different library components. Simulations from the Mo- using Modelica for simulation of complex power systems are delica models are compared with their Eurostag equivalents.
    [Show full text]
  • OMG Sysphs: Integrating Sysml, Simulink, Modelica And
    OMG SysPhs: Integrating SysML, Simulink, Modelica and FMI | ref.: 3DS_Document_2015 | ref.: 2/13/20 | Confidential Information | Information | Confidential Nerijus Jankevicius Systèmes CATIA | No Magic Dassault © INCOSE IW, Torrance, Jan 27, 2020 3DS.COM System Model as an Integration Framework © 2012-2014 by Sanford Friedenthal SysML as co-simulation environment 35 Reduce and standardize mappings 4 Unified Physics Domain Flowing Substance Flow rate Potential to flow Electrical Charge Current Voltage Hydraulic Volume Volumetric flow rate Pressure Rotational Angular momentum Torque Angular velocity Translational Linear momentum Force Velocity Thermal Entropy Entropy flow Temperature flow rate = amount of substance/time flow rate * potential = energy / time = power The Standard : SysPhs •SysPhS - https://www.omg.org/spec/SysPhS/1.0 • SysML Mapping to SiMulink and Modelica • SysPhS profile • SysPhS library Simulation profile Modelica vs Simulink • Modelica • SiMulink • Language is better suited for physical • Language is well-suited for control modeling (plant) algorithMs • Object oriented approach for • TransforMational seMantics of signals modeling physical and signal processing coMponents (Mechanical, electrical, etc.) • Causal seMantics (inputs -> outputs) • Causal and A-Causal seMantics • Well integrated into the “MATLAB (equations) universe” • Open standard (of the textual • Widely used in industry (standard de- language) facto) • Multi tool support (although DyMola • Many existing tool integrations is doMinant) • Code generation to
    [Show full text]
  • TPT Tutorial
    Time Partition Testing Systematic automated testing of embedded systems PikeTec GmbH, http://www.piketec.com There are only a few tools for testing embedded systems in the automotive domain. Their function usually lies in the test-management or automation of tests by means of test scripts. Time Partition Testing (TPT) noticeably exceeds this. It combines a systematic and very graphic modelling technique for test cases with a fully automatic test execution in different environments and automatic test evaluation in a unique way. In doing so, TPT even supports testing of control systems. Time Partition Testing (TPT) was developed to graphically and compactly model tests of embedded systems – especially those with continuous behaviour –, to automate those tests and to offer a systematic that supports the tester in selecting an ideal amount of test cases. The intuitive graphic modelling technique for test cases, the mechanisms for the structuring of complex test problems, the simple integration in any test- bench and a number of additional interesting features makes TPT a unique test solution. All this has contributed to TPT becoming the central testing tool in a large number of development projects at car manufacturers and suppliers and has become an integral part of the process chain. Embedded systems TPT is specialized on testing embedded systems whose inputs and outputs can be represented as signals. Most control systems belong to this system class. The implementation language of the embedded system (e.g. ‘C’ code, C++, MATLAB/Simulink/Stateflow, Statemate or a combination of multiple languages) is irrelevant for TPT. TPT does not require a particular implementation language.
    [Show full text]
  • Tpt Test Design and Test Generation
    TPT IN A NUTSHELL TPT TEST DESIGN DASHBOARD ASSESSMENT TRACEABILITY OF TESTING SAFETY TPT is a tool for functional testing of embed- AND TEST User interfaces can be designed for expe- OF TESTS AND REQUIREMENTS AND SYSTEMS PikeTec GmbH ded software interfacing a huge number of riments with a System under Test. Manual standard development tools. GENERATION validation, test observation and interaction REPORTING TEST CASES TPT supports qualified testing and Waldenserstr. 2 - 4 are possible. verification of safety related systems. 10551 Berlin | Germany TPT is suitable for all development phases. Expressing test cases with TPT is both, TPT supports fully automated assessment TPT supports analysis and coverage Tel. +49 30 394 096 830 TPT can be used for MiL, SiL, PiL, HiL powerful and easy to handle. The Dashboard is a powerful feature and documentation of test results including examination of requirements and tests. Safety standard directives can be satisfied Mail. [email protected] and in vehicles. of TPT for many reasons: Requirements can be imported from while testing with TPT up to the highest EMBEDDED TESTING Use automatons for structuring test phases: several formats and tools. safety level. Related standards are: www.piketec.com Back-to-Back testing with relative Tests can be created graphically by the Dashboards can be used for exper- and absolute tolerances STARTS HERE user or generated automatically. INIT imental testing long before test design Requirements can be analyzed, linked ISO 26262 light on Pass and fail criteria Dashboards can also be used to test cases and reported along with IEC 61508 IF Test phase 2 Powerful signal pattern The tests are executed, assessed and bright changing light together with automated tests the tests.
    [Show full text]
  • Vissim User's Guide
    Version 8.0 VisSim User's Guide By Visual Solutions, Inc. Visual Solutions, Inc. VisSim User's Guide Version 8.0 Copyright © 2010 Visual Solutions, Inc. Visual Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. 487 Groton Road Westford, MA 01886 Trademarks VisSim, VisSim/Analyze, VisSim/CAN, VisSim/C-Code, VisSim/C- Code Support Library source, VisSim/Comm, VisSim/Comm C-Code, VisSim/Comm Red Rapids, VisSim/Comm Turbo Codes, VisSim/Comm Wireless LAN, VisSim/Fixed-Point, VisSim/Knobs & Gauges, VisSim/Model-Wizard, VisSim/Motion, VisSim/Neural-Net, VisSim/OPC, VisSim/OptimzePRO, VisSim/Real-TimePRO, VisSim/State Charts, VisSim/Serial, VisSim/UDP, VisSim Viewer,and flexWires are trademarks of Visual Solutions. All other products mentioned in this manual are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective manufacturers. Copyright and use The information in this manual is subject to change without notice and restrictions does not represent a commitment by Visual Solutions. Visual Solutions does not assume any responsibility for errors that may appear in this document. No part of this manual may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means without permission in writing from Visual Solutions. The Software may not be copied or reproduced in any form, except as stated in the terms of the Software License Agreement. Acknowledgements The following engineers contributed significantly to preparation of this manual: Mike Borrello, Allan Corbeil, and Richard Kolk. Contents Introduction 1 What is VisSim.........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FMI TOOLBOX for MATLAB®/Simulink
    FMI TOOLBOX for MATLAB®/Simulink SCOPE KEY FEATURES BENEFITS • Integration of physical models • Export and import of Model Exchange and • Reduced time and cost for development of in MATLAB®/Simulink Co-Simulation FMUs control systems supported by physical models • Dynamic simulation • Simulink blockset and MATLAB script interface • Leverage state of the art physical modeling tools • Control system development • Design of Experiments and design space exploration • Maintain flexibility with the FMI standard • HIL simulation on dSPACE DS1006 systems MI Toolbox for MATLAB®/Simulink MATLAB®/Simulink environment. Fenables easy to use integration of Support for the FMI standard ensures THE FUNCTIONAL physical models developed in state of flexibility and cross-platform inter- MOCK-UP INTERFACE the art modeling tools in the MATLAB®/ operability. The Functional Mock-up Interface Simulink environment. The toolbox (FMI) is an open standard for exchange of The Toolbox enables simulation of dynamic models, targeting tool interoper- relies on the open FMI standard and is FMUs as part of Simulink models and ability and model reuse. FMI compliant ideal for control systems development. in MATLAB scripts. In addition, Simu- models (Functional Mock-up Units (FMUs)), High-fidelity physical models are key link models can be exported into Model are self-contained compiled models components in development of control Exchange or Co-simulation FMUs. which can be integrated in a wide range of applications where dynamic models are systems and contribute to increased Hardware In the Loop (HIL) simulation is needed. Modeling IP is protected since quality and shorter development cycles. supported on dSPACE DS1006 systems. only compiled code and interface defini- Modeling languages such as Modelica tions are distributed in FMUs.
    [Show full text]