DOCSLIB.ORG

The Grand Tour of Voyager an Historic Event Occurred on August 25, 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Grand Tour of Voyager an Historic Event Occurred on August 25, 2012 The Grand Tour of Voyager An historic event occurred on August 25, 2012, and no one was aware of what had even happened. As Voyager 1 slipped out of the Sun’s sphere of influence and into interstellar space, even the researchers studying data the probe was sending back to Earth were unsure a momentous event had occurred: The Dawn of the Interstellar Age. Not until April of 2013 would researchers at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in Pasadena, California prove that their longest working probe had finally left the Sun’s harbor. The probes are now venturing into deep space, opening yet another chapter in the decades spanning Voyager Mission. Launched in 1977, the Voyager 1 and Voyager 2 space probes are the longest serving machines operated by NASA. Through these machines humanity was able to truly see the outer solar system for the first time and discover more than we ever dreamed we would. The Voyager flybys provided humanity with most of the information we know now about the outer solar system. The Voyager Mission laid the foundation of our knowledge about the Gas Giants, their moons, and interstellar space. The “Grand Tour”, as the Voyager Mission became known, began in the mid-1960s as a theorized trajectory path created by graduate student Gary Flandro. “I was looking for ways to reach the outer solar system efficiently, making practical missions possible.” (Swift) Flandro was exploring the possibility of gravity assisted flight paths into the outer solar system at the request of his supervisor. Flandro quickly discovered in his research that all four of the outer planets would be in a rare alignment in the late 1970s that favored gravity assisted trajectories. The next occurrence of this alignment wouldn’t happen for another 175 years. After sharing his results with his superiors, everyone was in agreement that a well-timed opportunity had been presented to them. The benefits of gravity assist, when a probe uses the gravity of a large celestial body such as a moon or planet to accelerate, was too much to overlook. By using gravity assist, spacecraft could reach the outer limits of the solar system years before fuel propulsion spacecraft. After quickly putting together a plan, the prospect was presented to the upper echelons in NASA as well as congress. The initial plan was gigantic in scope. Four probes would be sent, each equipped with cutting edge technology that generated an expected cost much larger than the government was willing to pay. The plan wasn’t shot down, however. As mission manager Harris Schurmeier recalls, “They told us, ‘If you guys can come up with something less grandiose, we’ll consider it.’” (Bell). After a revision, they had dropped the expected $900 million cost by more than two thirds, to $250 million. For NASA, having a plan that saved money was critical to getting ambitious, large-scale projects like Voyager through congress. (Butrica) This new plan was approved. Officially known as Mariner Jupiter Saturn ’77 (MSJ-77), the new project had been drastically scaled back. Only two probes would be built, with substantially fewer instruments than their first conceptualizations. Jupiter and Saturn remained the targets of observation for the flybys, but Uranus and Neptune had to be left out, cutting the Grand Tour into “a less ambitious mission, a mini-Grand Tour.” (Lakdawalla) The planners of the project weren’t completely crestfallen about the loss in scope. Because of newly emerging technology, researchers would be able to send commands to the probes to extend the mission if possible, brilliant foresight that allowed Voyager 2 to continue to Uranus and Neptune, and to allow both probes to continue functioning as they traveled towards interstellar space. Voyager 2 was launched first, on August 20, 1977, followed by Voyager 1 on September 5, due to the different trajectories each probe was planned to undertake. By the time the probes had passed the asteroid belt, Voyager 1 had achieved a lead over its twin, and has remained further away from Earth ever since. Traveling close to 35,000 miles an hour, Voyager 1 descended upon the Jovian system on March 5, 1979. Scientists from around the world gathered at JPL to watch this momentous occasion in person and became ecstatic as high resolution photos began to trickle in. Pictures of distant Io started to raise questions. What were the colored splotches on its surface? The questions quickly turned to panic as incoming photos became terribly smeared, making them worthless. A behemoth, Jupiter contains more mass than every other object in the solar system combined, excluding the Sun. Because of its size, Jupiter emits harsh radiation that can affect the computer components of the probes sent to it. As Voyager 1 approached, this intense field of radiation was able to bypass the probe’s shielding, slightly altering the clocks between the camera and the main computer, putting them out of sync. The computer began moving the camera before it had closed its shutter, ruining pictures that scientists and researchers had been waiting years to see. The problem was discovered quickly, and the probe was able to resume its mission before leaving Jupiter and its moons behind. The first moon to fall under scrutiny was Io. Craterless, covered in a palette of orange, white, black, and red, the mystery of this tidally abused moon was answered by accident when Voyager 1 had already passed by and had taken photos for navigation, not discovery. After changing the color saturation of the navigation photos at a lab back on Earth to view the dim stars past the moon to determine the probe’s position along its trajectory, Linda Morabito saw a strange crescent off Io’s surface. When Morabito showed her finding to the leaders of the project and explained that they were looking at plumes of material ejecting from the surface of Io, the other scientists were skeptical. Additional data proved conclusive, and Io became the most geologically active body in the solar system, surpassing Earth. Vicious tidal forces from Jupiter and moons Europa and Ganymede place Io under immense stress, creating volcanism not seen anywhere else in the solar system. These same tidal forces affect Europa, cracking its icy surface to allow slushy water to seep over the surface, erasing craters and mountains and valleys, creating a surprisingly fresh and young surface. The Jovian system proved to be very interesting for the Voyager team as they discovered the unexpected personalities and vastly different characteristics of each moon. Before the flybys, it was widely believed that all moons in the solar system would be much like Earth’s; an ancient, cratered rock with no atmosphere and no significant mysteries. Io shattered that perspective, and Europa cemented the idea that many things in the outer solar system could not be predicted accurately; humanity simply did not know enough about these distant worlds. Even Ganymede and Callisto, appearing more like how a moon was thought to be, harbor evidence of subterranean oceans. The bar had been set for Voyager as it picked up speed from Jupiter’s massive gravity, and eyes turned towards Saturn. On November 12, 1980, Voyager 1 descended upon the ringed planet with a very specific goal that needed to be accomplished: the planet’s largest moon, Titan, needed to be accurately photographed and measured. If the probe failed to obtain enough data, Voyager 2’s trajectory would be altered to finish the measurements. The spacecraft would lose the window needed to make it to Uranus and Neptune, effectively ending the Grand Tour. Obtaining information on Titan was so crucial to the Voyager team at JPL they were prepared to lose the rest of the Solar System. Voyager 1 did not disappoint. A world larger than Mercury, Titan surprised the researchers back on Earth with an atmosphere of methane and ethane almost 50% thicker than Earth’s. Orange clouds covered the surface, making it impossible for the probes to snap pictures of the surface, likely to have rivers, lakes, and oceans of liquid methane because of Titan’s frigid temperatures that are only ninety degrees above absolute zero. After measuring the solar system’s second largest moon, Voyager 1 continued through Saturn’s miniature solar system, collecting readings on Saturn itself, with wind and storm belts raging across its atmosphere, and shocking scientists and mathematicians with braided rings. Having gathered enough information successfully during the short flyby, Voyager 1 opened the path for its twin to continue to Uranus, a planet completely unknown to astronomers. The probe’s own Grand Tour was over, however. While possible for Voyager 1 to intercept Pluto at one point, Titan had been deemed too important to observe at a distance. After the flyby of Saturn, the probe was launched upward (relative to the disk or plane of the solar system) at ten miles per second. The only purpose for Voyager 1 now was to serve as a practice dummy for critical fixes Voyager 2 might need and to measure space as it approached the end of the sun’s sphere of influence. The wait time between the Jupiter and Saturn encounters had only been a year and a half; Uranus would be a much longer wait. Almost five years passed between Voyager 2’s August 26, 1981 flyby of Saturn and the January 24, 1986 passing of Uranus. This giant planet proved no less interesting than the two that proceeded it. The turquoise planet is unique almost immediately: it rolls as it orbits the sun instead of spinning. Many researchers were curious to see how this affected the magnetosphere the planet emits.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mission to Jupiter
    This book attempts to convey the creativity, Project A History of the Galileo Jupiter: To Mission The Galileo mission to Jupiter explored leadership, and vision that were necessary for the an exciting new frontier, had a major impact mission’s success. It is a book about dedicated people on planetary science, and provided invaluable and their scientific and engineering achievements. lessons for the design of spacecraft. This The Galileo mission faced many significant problems. mission amassed so many scientific firsts and Some of the most brilliant accomplishments and key discoveries that it can truly be called one of “work-arounds” of the Galileo staff occurred the most impressive feats of exploration of the precisely when these challenges arose. Throughout 20th century. In the words of John Casani, the the mission, engineers and scientists found ways to original project manager of the mission, “Galileo keep the spacecraft operational from a distance of was a way of demonstrating . just what U.S. nearly half a billion miles, enabling one of the most technology was capable of doing.” An engineer impressive voyages of scientific discovery. on the Galileo team expressed more personal * * * * * sentiments when she said, “I had never been a Michael Meltzer is an environmental part of something with such great scope . To scientist who has been writing about science know that the whole world was watching and and technology for nearly 30 years. His books hoping with us that this would work. We were and articles have investigated topics that include doing something for all mankind.” designing solar houses, preventing pollution in When Galileo lifted off from Kennedy electroplating shops, catching salmon with sonar and Space Center on 18 October 1989, it began an radar, and developing a sensor for examining Space interplanetary voyage that took it to Venus, to Michael Meltzer Michael Shuttle engines.
    [Show full text]
  • THE PLANETARY REPORT FAREWELL, SEPTEMBER EQUINOX 2017 VOLUME 37, NUMBER 3 CASSINI Planetary.Org CELEBRATING a LEGACY of DISCOVERIES
    THE PLANETARY REPORT FAREWELL, SEPTEMBER EQUINOX 2017 VOLUME 37, NUMBER 3 CASSINI planetary.org CELEBRATING A LEGACY OF DISCOVERIES ATMOSPHERIC CHANGES C DYNAMIC RINGS C COMPLICATED TITAN C ACTIVE ENCELADUS ABOUT THIS ISSUE LINDA J. SPILKER is Cassini project scientist at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. IN 2004, Cassini, the most distant planetary seafloor. As a bonus, it has revealed jets of orbiter ever launched by humanity, arrived at water vapor and ice particles shooting out of Saturn. For 13 years, through its primary and fractures at the moon’s south pole. two extended missions, this spacecraft has These discoveries have fundamentally been making astonishing discoveries, reshap- altered many of our concepts of where life ing and changing our understanding of this may be found in our solar system. Cassini’s unique planetary system within our larger observations at Enceladus and Titan have made system of unique worlds. A few months ater exploring these ocean worlds a major focus for arrival, Cassini released Huygens, European planetary science. New insights from these dis- Space Agency’s parachuted probe built to coveries also have implications for potentially study the atmosphere and surface of Titan habitable worlds beyond our solar system. and image its surface for the very first time. In this special issue of The Planetary Report, a handful of Cassini scientists share some results from their studies of Saturn and its moons. Because there’s no way to fit every- thing into this slim volume, they’ve focused on a few highlights. Meanwhile, Cassini continues performing its Grand Finale orbits between the rings and the top of Saturn’s atmosphere, circling the planet once every 6.5 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Stardust Comet Flyby
    NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION Stardust Comet Flyby Press Kit January 2004 Contacts Don Savage Policy/Program Management 202/358-1727 NASA Headquarters, Washington DC Agle Stardust Mission 818/393-9011 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif. Vince Stricherz Science Investigation 206/543-2580 University of Washington, Seattle, WA Contents General Release ……………………………………......………….......................…...…… 3 Media Services Information ……………………….................…………….................……. 5 Quick Facts …………………………………………..................………....…........…....….. 6 Why Stardust?..................…………………………..................………….....………......... 7 Other Comet Missions ....................................................................................... 10 NASA's Discovery Program ............................................................................... 12 Mission Overview …………………………………….................……….....……........…… 15 Spacecraft ………………………………………………..................…..……........……… 25 Science Objectives …………………………………..................……………...…........….. 34 Program/Project Management …………………………...................…..…..………...... 37 1 2 GENERAL RELEASE: NASA COMET HUNTER CLOSING ON QUARRY Having trekked 3.2 billion kilometers (2 billion miles) across cold, radiation-charged and interstellar-dust-swept space in just under five years, NASA's Stardust spacecraft is closing in on the main target of its mission -- a comet flyby. "As the saying goes, 'We are good to go,'" said project manager Tom Duxbury at NASA's Jet
    [Show full text]
  • Planetary Report Report
    The PLANETARYPLANETARY REPORT REPORT Volume XXV Number 5 September/October 2005 ATACAMA DESERT MarsMars AnalogsAnalogs VALLES MARINERIS Volume XXV Table of Number 5 Contents September/October 2005 A PUBLICATION OF Features From The Dry Earth, Wet Mars 6 Sometimes the best place to learn about Mars exploration is right here on Editor Earth. In Chile’s Atacama Desert, scientists have discovered an area so dry that organic material, and therefore evidence of life, is virtually undetectable. Study of he damage that Earth inflicts on her this parched Mars-like region on Earth may lead us to a better understanding of Tinhabitants—horribly demonstrated how to search for water and the elements of life in Martian soil. This year, The by Hurricane Katrina and the December Planetary Society cosponsored a field expedition to the Atacama Desert, sending tsunami—reminds us what fragile creatures graduate student Troy Hudson on a 1-week adventure with a team of scientists led we are, lucky to survive at all on this dynamic, by Society Board member Chris McKay. Here, Troy describes his experience. dispassionate ball of rock hurtling through space. 12 The Pioneer Anomaly: A Deep Space Mystery Our exploration of other worlds has As Pioneer 10 and 11 head toward the farthest reaches of our solar system, taught us that the potential for planetary something strange is happening—they are mysteriously slowing down. Scientists catastrophe is always with us. On Mars, do not yet know why the spacecraft aren’t acting as expected; however, The we’ve seen planet-rending gouges cut by Planetary Society has stepped in to help fund the effort to analyze roughly 25 years catastrophic floods.
    [Show full text]
  • Spacecraft Imaging for Amateurs an International Community of Space
    Planetary Close-ups emily lakdawalla Spacecraft Imaging for Amateurs An international community of space This is Mars’s Big Sky Country, a windswept, nearly featureless plain. Tiny ripples in the rust-colored sand march farther than the eye can see, to a horizon so fl at one might be able to see the curvature of the planet. As far as anyone knows, those ripples have not budged in eons. But all is not still; gaze upward, and you might be surprised by the rapid motion overhead, where feathery cirrus clouds, frosty with bright crystals of water ice, fl oat on high Martian winds. The scene is from Meridiani Planum, composed from eight images captured by the Mars Exploration Rover Opportunity just before she reached a deep crater named Victoria, on the 950th Martian day of her mission. But the beautiful image was not created by anyone on the Mars Exploration Rover team; no scientist would likely have Earthbound produced it, because it owes its beauty as much to art as it observers never does to science. see Mars as a The image is the collaborative creation of a whole crescent, but amateur-imagesmith community; six people, each from spacecraft do. a diff erent country, had a hand in it. Twelve hours after The author cre- Opportunity took the photos, the data had been received on ated this view Earth and posted to the internet. Within another 17 hours, from six images rover fans had found the photos, assembled the mosaic, taken by Viking and shaded the sand and sky based on color photos Oppor- Orbiter 2 in tunity had taken of a similar landscape the day before.
    [Show full text]
  • + New Horizons
    Media Contacts NASA Headquarters Policy/Program Management Dwayne Brown New Horizons Nuclear Safety (202) 358-1726 [email protected] The Johns Hopkins University Mission Management Applied Physics Laboratory Spacecraft Operations Michael Buckley (240) 228-7536 or (443) 778-7536 [email protected] Southwest Research Institute Principal Investigator Institution Maria Martinez (210) 522-3305 [email protected] NASA Kennedy Space Center Launch Operations George Diller (321) 867-2468 [email protected] Lockheed Martin Space Systems Launch Vehicle Julie Andrews (321) 853-1567 [email protected] International Launch Services Launch Vehicle Fran Slimmer (571) 633-7462 [email protected] NEW HORIZONS Table of Contents Media Services Information ................................................................................................ 2 Quick Facts .............................................................................................................................. 3 Pluto at a Glance ...................................................................................................................... 5 Why Pluto and the Kuiper Belt? The Science of New Horizons ............................... 7 NASA’s New Frontiers Program ........................................................................................14 The Spacecraft ........................................................................................................................15 Science Payload ...............................................................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • Giant Planet / Kuiper Belt Flyby
    Giant Planet / Kuiper Belt Flyby Amanda Zangari (SwRI) Tiffany Finley (SwRI) with Cecilia Leung (LPL/SwRI) Simon Porter (SwRI) OPAG: February 23, 2017 Take Away • New Horizons provided scientifically valuable exploration of the Kuiper Belt in the New Frontiers cost cap. • The Kuiper Belt is full of objects with a diverse range of stories that go beyond what we learned from Pluto. • Giant Planet flybys add scientific value to a Kuiper Belt mission • Found preliminary trajectory examples for high interest KBOs-- Haumea, Varuna, 2015 RR245 can be reached via Jupiter AND Saturn, Uranus or Neptune flyby in the 2030s. • To be a candidate New Frontiers mission, a 2 Giant planet+KBO mission must be endorsed by a decadal survey according to current rules. New Horizons Heritage NH Jupiter Encounter planned around Pluto flyby timing, which was dominated by achieving quadruple occultations, “interesting” side up. New Horizons Heritage Pluto flyby took advantage of Ecliptic crossing, enabling access to the cold classical belt (where 2014 MU69 is located). New Horizons Heritage 2014 MU69 discovered while in flight. Targeting was from spacecraft propulsion and took advantage of cold classical population density. Object is small, reddish ~40 km diameter. Saturn’s moons show incredible diversity NASA/JPL As do Uranus and Neptune Some Kuiper Belt Geography Where do we want to go? Getting there- JGA “anytime” New Horizons model: Fast Launch, Jupiter Flyby, Launch window every 11 years McGranaghan et al 2011 Can we go to more than just Jupiter? If so, where, what? New Horizons 2 • 2008 launch using New Horizons flight spares • Proposed Jupiter flyby, equinox flyby of Uranus, and flyby of (47171) 1999 TC36 (now know to be trinary).
    [Show full text]
  • NASA's MESSENGER Sends Flyby Data to Earth Using
    Press Release For immediate release Special Delivery: NASA’s MESSENGER Sends Flyby Data to Earth Using CCSDS File Delivery Protocol Developed for Deep Space by International Team WASHINGTON, Aug. 10 (CCSDS) – NASA’s MESSENGER team is using the CCSDS File Delivery Protocol (CFDP), a highly specialized protocol designed to overcome space operations communications challenges, to download data captured during a successful flyby of Earth last week. A team of international space data communications experts, collaborating through the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS), developed CFDP to reliably and efficiently downlink files from a spacecraft even in the strenuous environment of deep space. Since the MESSENGER spacecraft’s launch a year ago, it has successfully used CFDP to enable mission communications and will use it throughout its 7.9-billion kilometer journey to Mercury. In using CFDP, MESSENGER communications represents a change in the standard method of storing science and housekeeping data on spacecraft built by the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (JHU/APL). MESSENGER is also the first U.S. space flight mission to use CFDP in mission operations. Prior to MESSENGER, JHU/APL missions used a raw storage model of storing data, but new mission and operational requirements meant that MESSENGER would have to incorporate a file system of data storage into its spacecraft software architecture. A reliable method of downlinking files to the ground had to be found and CFDP was chosen by mission planners to do the job. CFDP is included in the MESSENGER software architecture through a reuse of a NASA Jet Propulsion Lab (NASA JPL) implementation on the ground and a JHU/APL “CFDP-lite” implementation on the flight side.
    [Show full text]
  • Mariner to Mercury, Venus and Mars
    NASA Facts National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA 91109 Mariner to Mercury, Venus and Mars Between 1962 and late 1973, NASA’s Jet carry a host of scientific instruments. Some of the Propulsion Laboratory designed and built 10 space- instruments, such as cameras, would need to be point- craft named Mariner to explore the inner solar system ed at the target body it was studying. Other instru- -- visiting the planets Venus, Mars and Mercury for ments were non-directional and studied phenomena the first time, and returning to Venus and Mars for such as magnetic fields and charged particles. JPL additional close observations. The final mission in the engineers proposed to make the Mariners “three-axis- series, Mariner 10, flew past Venus before going on to stabilized,” meaning that unlike other space probes encounter Mercury, after which it returned to Mercury they would not spin. for a total of three flybys. The next-to-last, Mariner Each of the Mariner projects was designed to have 9, became the first ever to orbit another planet when two spacecraft launched on separate rockets, in case it rached Mars for about a year of mapping and mea- of difficulties with the nearly untried launch vehicles. surement. Mariner 1, Mariner 3, and Mariner 8 were in fact lost The Mariners were all relatively small robotic during launch, but their backups were successful. No explorers, each launched on an Atlas rocket with Mariners were lost in later flight to their destination either an Agena or Centaur upper-stage booster, and planets or before completing their scientific missions.
    [Show full text]
  • THE PLANETARY REPORT JUNE SOLSTICE 2016 VOLUME 36, NUMBER 2 Planetary.Org
    THE PLANETARY REPORT JUNE SOLSTICE 2016 VOLUME 36, NUMBER 2 planetary.org ILLUMINATING CERES DAWN SHEDS NEW LIGHT ON AN ENIGMATIC WORLD BREAKTHROUGH STARSHOT C LIGHTSAIL 2 TEST C MEMBERSHIP UPGRADES SNAPSHOTS FROM SPACE EMILY STEWART LAKDAWALLA blogs at planetary.org/blog. Black Sands of Mars ON SOL 1192 (December 13, 2015), Curiosity approached the side of Namib, a Faccin and Marco Bonora Image: NASA/JPL/MSSS/Elisabetta massive barchan sand dune. Namib belongs to a field of currently active dark basaltic sand dunes that form a long barrier between the rover and the tantalizing rocks of Mount Sharp. This view, processed by Elisabetta Bonora and Marco Faccin, features wind-carved yardangs (crests or ridges ) of Mount Sharp in the background. After taking this set of photos, Curiosity went on to sample sand from the dune, and it is now working its way through a gap in the dune field on the way to the mountain. —Emily Stewart Lakdawalla SEE MORE AMATEUR-PROCESSED SPACE IMAGES planetary.org/amateur SEE MORE EVERY DAY! planetary.org/blogs 2 THE PLANETARY REPORT C JUNE SOLSTICE 2016 CONTENTS JUNE SOLSTICE 2016 COVER STORY Unveiling Ceres 6 Simone Marchi on why Ceres is a scientific treasure chest for Dawn. Pathway to the Stars Looking back at years of Society-led solar sail 10 development as Breakthrough Starshot is announced. Life, the Universe, and Everything 13 Planetary Radio in Death Valley. ADVOCATING FOR SPACE Partisan Peril 18 Casey Dreier looks at the U.S. President’s impact on space policy and legislation. DEVELOPMENTS IN SPACE SCIENCE Update on LightSail 2 20 Bruce Betts details the progress we’ve made in the year since LightSail 1 launched.
    [Show full text]
  • The Other Side
    Just how did we get there? and space; like Tarzan swinging from technology, and human expertise As the outer planets plod through vine to vine through the jungle, missing to catch up. the frozen void, once every 175 years a transition by even the smallest of JPL formally proposed the Grand they line up in such a way that Jupiter’s margins would spell disaster. A few Tour in 1970, with Harris M. “Bud” gravity can be used to fing a properly months and several reams of graph Schurmeier (BS ’45, MS ’48, ENG aimed spacecraft on toward Saturn, paper later, Flandro had worked out ’49) as the project manager. This was and thence to Uranus and Neptune. In hundreds of itineraries—some reaching an A-team effort: Schurmeier had just THE the spring of 1965, Caltech aeronautics all the way to then-planet Pluto—for presided over the Mariner 6 and 7 grad student Gary Flandro (MS ’60, the upcoming launch window. His fybys of Mars, and his collaborators PhD ’67) was working part-time up boss, Elliott “Joe” Cutting, booked included JPL’s planetary program at JPL analyzing so-called gravity- him a meeting with the chief of JPL’s director, Robert Parks (BS ’44), and its assist trajectories when he realized that advanced technical studies offce, spacecraft systems manager, Raymond OTHER such a four-for-one alignment would aeronautics professor Homer Stewart Heacock (BS ’52, MS ’53). It was also occur between 1976 and 1979; (PhD ’40). Stewart embraced the idea, a gold-plated Cadillac of a mission—a intrigued by the possibilities, he set christening it the Grand Tour.
    [Show full text]
  • Leveraging Public Data to Reconstruct the Cost History of Planetary Exploration
    Leveraging Public Data to Reconstruct the Cost History of Planetary Exploration Casey Dreier Senior Space Policy Adviser The Planetary Society Motivations MSL Curiosity Press Kit: • Publicly-reported mission costs are inconsistent and lack detail • Comparisons are difficult between missions and over time Perseverance Press Kit: • A problem for both public education and advocates: • Press kit numbers are what gets reported! • How much “should” a mission cost? Voyager Press Kit: • How to interpret the total cost—is a $1B mission “expensive” or “a good deal”? • How much is a mission in the context of all planetary spending? Or all of NASA spending? Juno Press Kit: • How much of a mission cost are development, launch, and operations? What does it cost to explore the planets? Project Goals vs • Compile a complete record of mission and program costs for NASA’s robotic planetary program using public data. • Useful for public and public policy discourse: • Normalized to include accounting changes • Include all mission costs: development, launch, and all operations • Inflation-adjusted values • Provide costs by year • Easily and freely accessible Method • Primary source: NASA budget estimates provided by NASA HQ History Office • Used “actual” reported obligations • Augmented by a variety of secondary sources, in order of preference: • Official NASA statements (press releases, public briefings) • Projected values in PBRs • Reporting from high-quality news agencies • Normalizations (“gap fill” strategy): • Include all LV costs, except STS • Removed
    [Show full text]