Genetic Basis and Timing of a Major Mating System Shift in Capsella

bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/425389; this version posted September 24, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Genetic basis and timing of a major mating system shift in Capsella Jörg A. Bachmann1,9, Andrew Tedder1,6,9, Benjamin Laenen1,9, Marco Fracassetti1, Aurélie Désamoré1, Clément Lafon-Placette2,7, Kim A. Steige1,8, Caroline Callot3, William Marande3, Barbara Neuffer4, Hélène Bergès3, Claudia Köhler2, Vincent Castric5, Tanja Slotte1* 1Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 2Department of Plant Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences & Linnean Center for Plant Biology, SE-75 007 Uppsala, Sweden 3Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique UPR 1258, Centre National des Ressources Génomiques Végétales, Castanet-Tolosan, France 4Department of Botany, University of Osnabruck, 49076 Osnabruck, Germany 5Unité Evo-Eco-Paléo (EEP) - UMR 8198, CNRS/Université de Lille - Sciences et Technologies, Villeneuve d'Ascq Cedex, F-59655, France 6Present address: School of Chemistry and Biosciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, UK 7Present address: Department of Botany, Charles University, CZ-128 01 Prague, Czech Republic 8Present address: Institute of Botany, Biozentrum, University of Cologne, 50674 Cologne, Germany. 9These authors contributed equally. *Author for correspondence: [email protected] 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/425389; this version posted September 24, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Abstract 2 Shifts from outcrossing to self-fertilisation have occurred repeatedly in many different 3 lineages of flowering plants, and often involve the breakdown of genetic outcrossing 4 mechanisms. In the Brassicaceae, self-incompatibility (SI) allows plants to ensure outcrossing 5 by recognition and rejection of self-pollen on the stigma. This occurs through the interaction 6 of female and male specificity components, consisting of a pistil based receptor and a pollen- 7 coat protein, both of which are encoded by tightly linked genes at the S-locus. When benefits 8 of selfing are higher than costs of inbreeding, theory predicts that loss-of-function mutations 9 in the male (pollen) SI component should be favoured, especially if they are dominant. 10 However, it remains unclear whether mutations in the male component of SI are 11 predominantly responsible for shifts to self-compatibility, and testing this prediction has been 12 difficult due to the challenges of sequencing the highly polymorphic and repetitive ~100 kbp 13 S-locus. The crucifer genus Capsella offers an excellent opportunity to study multiple 14 transitions from outcrossing to self-fertilization, but so far, little is known about the genetic 15 basis and timing of loss of SI in the self-fertilizing diploid Capsella orientalis. Here, we show 16 that loss of SI in C. orientalis occurred within the past 2.6 Mya and maps as a dominant trait 17 to the S-locus. Using targeted long-read sequencing of multiple complete S-haplotypes, we 18 identify a frameshift deletion in the male specificity gene SCR that is fixed in C. orientalis, 19 and we confirm loss of male SI specificity. We further analyze RNA sequencing data to 20 identify a conserved, S-linked small RNA (sRNA) that is predicted to cause dominance of 21 self-compatibility. Our results suggest that degeneration of pollen SI specificity in dominant 22 S-alleles is important for shifts to self-fertilization in the Brassicaceae. 23 24 Keywords: parallel evolution, plant mating system shift, self-compatibility, long-read 25 sequencing, S-locus, dominance modifier, small RNA 2 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/425389; this version posted September 24, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 26 Author Summary 27 Already Darwin was fascinated by the widely varying modes of plant reproduction. The shift 28 from outcrossing to self-fertilization is considered one of the most frequent evolutionary 29 transitions in flowering plants, yet we still know little about the genetic basis of these shifts. 30 In the Brassicaceae, outcrossing is enforced by a self-incompatibility (SI) system that enables 31 the recognition and rejection of self pollen. This occurs through the action of two tightly 32 linked genes at the S-locus, that encode a receptor protein located on the stigma (female 33 component) and a pollen ligand protein (male component), respectively. Nevertheless, SI has 34 frequently been lost, and theory predicts that mutations in the male component should have an 35 advantage during the loss of SI, especially if they are dominant. To test this hypothesis, we 36 mapped the loss of SI in a selfing species from the genus Capsella, a model system for 37 evolutionary genomics. We found that loss of SI mapped to the S-locus, which harbored a 38 dominant loss-of-function mutation in the male SI protein, and as expected, we found that 39 male specificity was indeed lost in C. orientalis. Our results suggest that transitions to selfing 40 often involve parallel genetic changes. 3 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/425389; this version posted September 24, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 41 Introduction 42 The shift from outcrossing to self-fertilization is one of the most common evolutionary 43 transitions in flowering plants (Darwin 1876; Wright et al. 2013). This transition is favored 44 when the benefits of reproductive assurance (Darwin 1876; Pannell and Barrett 1998; Eckert 45 et al. 2006) and the transmission advantage of selfing (Fisher 1941) outweigh the cost of 46 inbreeding depression (Charlesworth 2006). 47 The transition to self-fertilization often involves breakdown of self-incompatibility 48 (SI). SI systems allow plants to recognize and reject self pollen through the action of male and 49 female specificity components and modifier loci (Takayama and Isogai 2005). In the 50 Brassicaceae, where the molecular basis of SI is particularly well characterized, SI is 51 controlled by two tightly linked genes at the S-locus, SRK and SCR, which encode the female 52 and male SI specificity determinants, respectively (de Nettancourt 2001). SRK is a 53 transmembrane serine-threonine receptor kinase located on the stigma surface (Stein et al. 54 1991; Stein et al. 1996), and SCR is a small cysteine-rich protein deposited on the pollen coat, 55 that acts as a ligand to the SRK receptor (Schopfer et al. 1999; Takayama et al. 2001). Direct 56 interaction between SRK and SCR from the same S-haplotype results in inhibition of pollen 57 germination (Takasaki et al. 2000; Takayama et al. 2001; Ma et al. 2016) through a signaling 58 cascade involving several proteins (Nasrallah and Nasrallah 2014). This prevents close 59 inbreeding and promotes outcrossing. At the S-locus, recombination is suppressed and rare 60 allele advantage maintains alleles with different specificities (Wright 1939; Castric and 61 Vekemans 2004; Vekemans et al. 2014), such that SI populations often harbor dozens of 62 highly diverged S-haplotypes (Mable et al. 2003; Guo et al. 2009). In the sporophytic 63 Brassicaceae SI system, expression of a single S-specificity provides greater compatibility 64 with other individuals (Schoen and Busch 2009) and therefore S-haplotypes often form a 65 dominance hierarchy, that determines which specificity is expressed in S-heterozygotes 4 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/425389; this version posted September 24, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 66 (Durand et al. 2014). At the pollen level, dominance is governed by dominance modifiers in 67 the form of sRNAs expressed by dominant alleles that target sequence motifs specific to 68 recessive alleles of SCR, resulting in their transcriptional silencing (Tarutani et al. 2010; 69 Durand et al. 2014). 70 Despite the advantages of outcrossing, SI has been lost repeatedly in many different 71 lineages, and there is a strong theoretical and empirical interest in the role of parallel 72 molecular changes for repeated shifts to self-compatibility (SC) (Vekemans et al. 2014; 73 Shimizu and Tsuchimatsu 2015). While the numerous genes that act as unlinked modifiers of 74 SI potentially constitute a larger mutational target, theory predicts that mutations that result in 75 degeneration of components of the S-locus itself should have an advantage (Porcher and 76 Lande 2005). Theory further predicts that the probability of spread of mutations disrupting SI 77 depends on whether they affect male or female functions, or both functions jointly 78 (Charlesworth and Charlesworth 1979). In particular, mutations that disrupt male specificity 79 should have an advantage over those mutations that disrupt female specificity, because male 80 specificity mutations can spread faster through both pollen and seeds (Uyenoyama et al. 2001; 81 Tsuchimatsu and

Load more