DOCSLIB.ORG

Infrared Problem in Perturbative Quantum Field Theory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Infrared Problem in Perturbative Quantum Field Theory Infrared problem in perturbative quantum field theory Pawe lDuch Max-Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences Inselstr. 22, 04103 Leipzig, Germany Institut f¨urTheoretische Physik, Universit¨atLeipzig Br¨uderstr.16, 04103 Leipzig, Germany [email protected] July 21, 2021 Abstract We propose a mathematically rigorous construction of the scattering matrix and the interacting fields in models of relativistic perturbative quantum field theory with massless fields and long-range interactions. We consider quantum electrodynamics and a certain model of interacting scalar fields in which the standard definition of the scattering matrix is not applicable because of the infrared problem. We modify the Bogoliubov construction using the ideas of Dollard, Kulish and Faddeev. Our modified scattering matrix and modified interacting fields are constructed with the use of the adiabatic limit which is expected to exist in arbitrary order of perturbation theory. In the paper we prove this assertion in the case of the first- and the second-order corrections to the modified scattering matrix and the first-order corrections to the modified interacting fields. We study the physical properties of our construction. We conclude that the electrons and positrons are always surrounded by irremovable clouds of photons. Moreover, the physical energy-momentum operators do not coincide with the standard ones and their joint spectrum does not contain the mass hyperboloid. arXiv:1906.00940v3 [math-ph] 20 Jul 2021 1 Contents 1 Introduction3 2 Outline of Epstein-Glaser approach8 2.1 Wick products . .8 2.2 Time ordered products . .9 2.3 S-matrix and interacting fields with adiabatic cutoff . 11 2.4 Adiabatic limit . 12 3 Models with infrared problem 13 3.1 Scalar model . 14 3.2 Quantum electrodynamics . 15 4 Infrared problem in scattering theory 17 4.1 Classical and quantum mechanics . 18 4.2 Quantum field coupled to classical current . 19 4.3 Relativistic perturbative QFT . 20 5 Construction of S-matrix and interacting fields 24 5.1 Modified scattering theory . 24 5.2 Asymptotic currents . 28 5.3 Coulomb phase . 31 5.4 Domains in Fock space . 34 5.5 Definition of modified S-matrix and modified interacting fields . 35 6 First- and second-order corrections to S-matrix 46 6.1 First-order corrections . 48 6.2 Second-order corrections . 51 7 First-order corrections to interacting fields 62 7.1 Scalar model . 63 7.2 QED . 65 8 Energy-momentum operators 67 8.1 Scalar model . 68 8.2 QED . 70 9 Physical interpretation of construction 71 9.1 Space of asymptotic states . 71 9.2 Cross sections . 74 9.3 Inclusive cross sections . 75 10 Summary and outlook 78 A Value of a distribution at a point 78 B BCH formula and Magnus expansion 79 C Long-range tail 80 D Incoming and outgoing LSZ fields 80 E Propagators 80 2 1 Introduction Quantum electrodynamics (QED) is one of the best tested theory known in physics. The success of QED is to large extent based on very accurate theoretical predictions of the anomalous magnetic moments of leptons and transition frequencies between various energy levels in light hydrogenlike atoms. In contrast to other sectors of the standard model the scattering experiments do not constitute the most stringent tests of QED and, as a matter of fact, the state of the art theoretical description of the scattering processes in QED is still far from satisfactory. One of the long-standing fundamental open problems in QED is the definition of the scattering operator. Because of the long- range character of interactions mediated by massless photons the standard method of constructing this operator is plagued by infrared (IR) divergences [10]. In view of these problems, one usually abandons the definition of the scattering matrix and computes only the so-called inclusive cross sections [102, 98]. Although, this pragmatic approach is sufficient for most applications, it is not fully satisfactory. The physical interpreta- tion of the inclusive cross sections is obscure since their construction relies on the use of charged states with sharp momenta which do not exist in the theory without the IR regulator. Moreover, the inclusive cross sections provide only partial information about the scattering process. There are processes that cannot be described without using the scattering matrix. An example of such a process is a shift of a trajectory of a charged particle moving in a weak low-frequency electromagnetic field [91, 59]. It would be also challenging to study a quantum analogs of the memory effects predicted in classical electrodynamics [6, 50, 96] without having a full scattering theory in QED at hand. The inclusive cross sections are completely insensitive to the IR degrees of freedom. Yet such degrees of freedom can be of physical importance. Indeed, Hawk- ing, Perry and Strominger [56] have argued recently that it is possible to solve the black hole information paradox using the IR degrees of freedom of the gravitational field. The significance of the soft degrees of freedom has been also recently observed by a number of authors who studied the relation between the Weinberg soft photon theorem [98] and the so-called large gauge transformations [49, 19] (a more complete list of references can be found in the lecture notes [96]). The recent revival of interest in the IR degrees of freedom calls for a construction of the scattering matrix in QED in which these degrees of freedom are properly taken into account. A strategy for the construction of a IR-finite scattering matrix in QED was sug- gested long time ago by Kulish and Faddeev [70]. Their construction is based on the Dollard method [28] which was originally formulated for the Coulomb scatter- ing in quantum mechanics. The basic idea is to define a modified scattering matrix by comparing the full dynamics of the system with some simple but nontrivial refer- ence dynamics, called the Dollard dynamics. The Kulish-Faddeev construction was reformulated and further developed e.g. in [80, 66] and more recently in [53, 67, 61]. However, the method of Kulish and Faddeev has never been put on firm mathematical grounds and tested at least in low orders of perturbation theory. In fact, up to our knowledge, a rigorous construction of the scattering matrix in relativistic QED which does not suffer from the ultraviolet (UV) or IR problem has never been given. In the present paper, we attempt to formulate such a construction using the ideas of Kulish, Faddeev, Dollard and insights obtained more recently by Morchio and Strocchi [78, 77] in their analysis of a toy model of QED. Our modified scattering matrix is constructed with the use of the adiabatic limit as in the method developed by Bogoliubov [11]. 3 Since QED most likely does not make sense outside perturbation theory [71] we for- mulate our proposal in the perturbative setting. We stress that QED is a well-defined model of quantum field theory (QFT) whose perturbative construction is under full control. What is not understood is the large-time behavior of its dynamics. The main model of our interest is QED. However, we consider also a certain model of interact- ing scalar fields which we call the scalar model. In principle our method should be also applicable to other models with long-range interactions in the four-dimensional Minkowski space which, like QED and the scalar model, have the interaction vertices containing exactly one massless and two massive fields. In the paper we propose a method of constructing the following objects in QED and the scalar model: ^ • the Hilbert spaces of asymptotic outgoing and incoming states Hout=in(%) param- eterized by sector measures % (a sector measure is a signed measure on the mass 2 2 0 hyperboloid Hm consisting of four-momenta p such that p = m and p > 0), ^ iP^ a • a strongly-continuous representation of the translation group U(a) = e · acting ^ ^µ in Hin=out(%), with generators P satisfying the relativistic spectrum condition, ^ ^ ^ • the translationally-invariant scattering matrix S : Hin(%) ! Hout(%) (the inclu- sive cross section constructed with the use of S^ formally coincides with the one obtained using the standard procedure), ^ • the translationally-covariant retarded and advanced interacting fields Cret=adv(x): ^ ^ Hin=out(%) ! Hin=out(%), where C is a (gauge invariant) polynomial in the ba- sic fields and their derivatives (the interacting fields are local, satisfy the field equations and their Wightman and Green functions coincide with the standard ones). We investigate various properties of the above objects. Below we summarize the results in the case of QED and comment on the case of the scalar model. The measure % is related to the long range tail of the electromagnetic field (the flux of the electric field) Z lim r2 F^µν (x + rn) = −e d%(p) f µν(p=m; n); r ret=adv !1 Hm where e is the elementary charge, n is a normalized spatial four-vector and f µν(v; ·) is the Coulomb field of a unit point-charge moving with constant velocity v. Since ^ the long range tail is a classical observable [17] the spaces Hin=out(%) with different % correspond to different superselection sectors. By the Gauss law %(Hm) is equal to the 1 total electric charge . Thus, we demand that %(Hm) is an integer (there is no such ^ constraint in the scalar model). The spaces Hin=out(0) are called the vacuum sector. They contain a unique vector Ω^ such that P^µΩ^ = 0, called the vacuum. The photon creation and annihilation operators are denoted by2 # ^ ^ a^ (k): Hin=out(%) ! Hin=out(%): 1In the paper, by the electric charge we always mean the difference between the number of electrons and positrons.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Perturbative Versus Non-Perturbative Quantum Field Theory: Tao’S Method, the Casimir Effect, and Interacting Wightman Theories
    universe Review Perturbative versus Non-Perturbative Quantum Field Theory: Tao’s Method, the Casimir Effect, and Interacting Wightman Theories Walter Felipe Wreszinski Instituto de Física, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-090, SP, Brazil; [email protected] Abstract: We dwell upon certain points concerning the meaning of quantum field theory: the problems with the perturbative approach, and the question raised by ’t Hooft of the existence of the theory in a well-defined (rigorous) mathematical sense, as well as some of the few existent mathematically precise results on fully quantized field theories. Emphasis is brought on how the mathematical contributions help to elucidate or illuminate certain conceptual aspects of the theory when applied to real physical phenomena, in particular, the singular nature of quantum fields. In a first part, we present a comprehensive review of divergent versus asymptotic series, with qed as background example, as well as a method due to Terence Tao which conveys mathematical sense to divergent series. In a second part, we apply Tao’s method to the Casimir effect in its simplest form, consisting of perfectly conducting parallel plates, arguing that the usual theory, which makes use of the Euler-MacLaurin formula, still contains a residual infinity, which is eliminated in our approach. In the third part, we revisit the general theory of nonperturbative quantum fields, in the form of newly proposed (with Christian Jaekel) Wightman axioms for interacting field theories, with applications to “dressed” electrons in a theory with massless particles (such as qed), as well as Citation: Wreszinski, W.F. unstable particles. Various problems (mostly open) are finally discussed in connection with concrete Perturbative versus Non-Perturbative models.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 Introduction to Many-Body Quantum Mechanics
    Chapter 4 Introduction to many-body quantum mechanics 4.1 The complexity of the quantum many-body prob- lem After learning how to solve the 1-body Schr¨odinger equation, let us next generalize to more particles. If a single body quantum problem is described by a Hilbert space of dimension dim = d then N distinguishable quantum particles are described by theH H tensor product of N Hilbert spaces N (N) N ⊗ (4.1) H ≡ H ≡ H i=1 O with dimension dN . As a first example, a single spin-1/2 has a Hilbert space = C2 of dimension 2, but N spin-1/2 have a Hilbert space (N) = C2N of dimensionH 2N . Similarly, a single H particle in three dimensional space is described by a complex-valued wave function ψ(~x) of the position ~x of the particle, while N distinguishable particles are described by a complex-valued wave function ψ(~x1,...,~xN ) of the positions ~x1,...,~xN of the particles. Approximating the Hilbert space of the single particle by a finite basis set with d basis functions, the N-particle basisH approximated by the same finite basis set for single particles needs dN basis functions. This exponential scaling of the Hilbert space dimension with the number of particles is a big challenge. Even in the simplest case – a spin-1/2 with d = 2, the basis for N = 30 spins is already of of size 230 109. A single complex vector needs 16 GByte of memory and will not fit into the memory≈ of your personal computer anymore.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Quantization
    Chapter 1 Second Quantization 1.1 Creation and Annihilation Operators in Quan- tum Mechanics We will begin with a quick review of creation and annihilation operators in the non-relativistic linear harmonic oscillator. Let a and a† be two operators acting on an abstract Hilbert space of states, and satisfying the commutation relation a,a† = 1 (1.1) where by “1” we mean the identity operator of this Hilbert space. The operators a and a† are not self-adjoint but are the adjoint of each other. Let α be a state which we will take to be an eigenvector of the Hermitian operators| ia†a with eigenvalue α which is a real number, a†a α = α α (1.2) | i | i Hence, α = α a†a α = a α 2 0 (1.3) h | | i k | ik ≥ where we used the fundamental axiom of Quantum Mechanics that the norm of all states in the physical Hilbert space is positive. As a result, the eigenvalues α of the eigenstates of a†a must be non-negative real numbers. Furthermore, since for all operators A, B and C [AB, C]= A [B, C] + [A, C] B (1.4) we get a†a,a = a (1.5) − † † † a a,a = a (1.6) 1 2 CHAPTER 1. SECOND QUANTIZATION i.e., a and a† are “eigen-operators” of a†a. Hence, a†a a = a a†a 1 (1.7) − † † † † a a a = a a a +1 (1.8) Consequently we find a†a a α = a a†a 1 α = (α 1) a α (1.9) | i − | i − | i Hence the state aα is an eigenstate of a†a with eigenvalue α 1, provided a α = 0.
    [Show full text]
  • Orthogonalization of Fermion K-Body Operators and Representability
    Orthogonalization of fermion k-Body operators and representability Bach, Volker Rauch, Robert April 10, 2019 Abstract The reduced k-particle density matrix of a density matrix on finite- dimensional, fermion Fock space can be defined as the image under the orthogonal projection in the Hilbert-Schmidt geometry onto the space of k- body observables. A proper understanding of this projection is therefore intimately related to the representability problem, a long-standing open problem in computational quantum chemistry. Given an orthonormal basis in the finite-dimensional one-particle Hilbert space, we explicitly construct an orthonormal basis of the space of Fock space operators which restricts to an orthonormal basis of the space of k-body operators for all k. 1 Introduction 1.1 Motivation: Representability problems In quantum chemistry, molecules are usually modeled as non-relativistic many- fermion systems (Born-Oppenheimer approximation). More specifically, the Hilbert space of these systems is given by the fermion Fock space = f (h), where h is the (complex) Hilbert space of a single electron (e.g. h = LF2(R3)F C2), and the Hamiltonian H is usually a two-body operator or, more generally,⊗ a k-body operator on . A key physical quantity whose computation is an im- F arXiv:1807.05299v2 [math-ph] 9 Apr 2019 portant task is the ground state energy . E0(H) = inf ϕ(H) (1) ϕ∈S of the system, where ( )′ is a suitable set of states on ( ), where ( ) is the Banach space ofS⊆B boundedF operators on and ( )′ BitsF dual. A directB F evaluation of (1) is, however, practically impossibleF dueB F to the vast size of the state space .
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 MANY PARTICLE SYSTEMS
    Chapter 4 MANY PARTICLE SYSTEMS The postulates of quantum mechanics outlined in previous chapters include no restrictions as to the kind of systems to which they are intended to apply. Thus, although we have considered numerous examples drawn from the quantum mechanics of a single particle, the postulates themselves are intended to apply to all quantum systems, including those containing more than one and possibly very many particles. Thus, the only real obstacle to our immediate application of the postulates to a system of many (possibly interacting) particles is that we have till now avoided the question of what the linear vector space, the state vector, and the operators of a many-particle quantum mechanical system look like. The construction of such a space turns out to be fairly straightforward, but it involves the forming a certain kind of methematical product of di¤erent linear vector spaces, referred to as a direct or tensor product. Indeed, the basic principle underlying the construction of the state spaces of many-particle quantum mechanical systems can be succinctly stated as follows: The state vector à of a system of N particles is an element of the direct product space j i S(N) = S(1) S(2) S(N) ­ ­ ¢¢¢­ formed from the N single-particle spaces associated with each particle. To understand this principle we need to explore the structure of such direct prod- uct spaces. This exploration forms the focus of the next section, after which we will return to the subject of many particle quantum mechanical systems. 4.1 The Direct Product of Linear Vector Spaces Let S1 and S2 be two independent quantum mechanical state spaces, of dimension N1 and N2, respectively (either or both of which may be in…nite).
    [Show full text]
  • Fock Space Dynamics
    TCM315 Fall 2020: Introduction to Open Quantum Systems Lecture 10: Fock space dynamics Course handouts are designed as a study aid and are not meant to replace the recommended textbooks. Handouts may contain typos and/or errors. The students are encouraged to verify the information contained within and to report any issue to the lecturer. CONTENTS Introduction 1 Composite systems of indistinguishable particles1 Permutation group S2 of 2-objects 2 Admissible states of three indistiguishable systems2 Parastatistics 4 The spin-statistics theorem 5 Fock space 5 Creation and annihilation of particles 6 Canonical commutation relations 6 Canonical anti-commutation relations 7 Explicit example for a Fock space with 2 distinguishable Fermion states7 Central oscillator of a linear boson system8 Decoupling of the one particle sector 9 References 9 INTRODUCTION The chapter 5 of [6] oers a conceptually very transparent introduction to indistinguishable particle kinematics in quantum mechanics. Particularly valuable is the brief but clear discussion of para-statistics. The last sections of the chapter are devoted to expounding, physics style, the second quantization formalism. Chapter I of [2] is a very clear and detailed presentation of second quantization formalism in the form that is needed in mathematical physics applications. Finally, the dynamics of a central oscillator in an external eld draws from chapter 11 of [4]. COMPOSITE SYSTEMS OF INDISTINGUISHABLE PARTICLES The composite system postulate tells us that the Hilbert space of a multi-partite system is the tensor product of the Hilbert spaces of the constituents. In other words, the composite system Hilbert space, is spanned by an orthonormal basis constructed by taking the tensor product of the elements of the orthonormal bases of the Hilbert spaces of the constituent systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Physics in Non-Separable Hilbert Spaces
    Quantum Physics in Non-Separable Hilbert Spaces John Earman Dept. HPS University of Pittsburgh In Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (1932) von Neumann made separability of Hilbert space an axiom. Subsequent work in mathemat- ics (some of it by von Neumann himself) investigated non-separable Hilbert spaces, and mathematical physicists have sometimes made use of them. This note discusses some of the problems that arise in trying to treat quantum systems with non-separable spaces. Some of the problems are “merely tech- nical”but others point to interesting foundations issues for quantum theory, both in its abstract mathematical form and its applications to physical sys- tems. Nothing new or original is attempted here. Rather this note aims to bring into focus some issues that have for too long remained on the edge of consciousness for philosophers of physics. 1 Introduction A Hilbert space is separable if there is a countable dense set of vec- tors; equivalently,H admits a countable orthonormal basis. In Mathematical Foundations of QuantumH Mechanics (1932, 1955) von Neumann made sep- arability one of the axioms of his codification of the formalism of quantum mechanics. Working with a separable Hilbert space certainly simplifies mat- ters and provides for understandable realizations of the Hilbert space axioms: all infinite dimensional separable Hilbert spaces are the “same”: they are iso- 2 morphically isometric to LC(R), the space of square integrable complex val- 2 ued functions of R with inner product , := (x)(x)dx, , LC(R). h i 2 2 This Hilbert space in turn is isomorphically isometric to `C(N), the vector space of square summable sequences of complexR numbers with inner prod- S uct , := n1=1 xn yn, = (x1, x2, ...), = (y1, y2, ...) .
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical Evaluation of Feynman Loop Integrals by Reduction to Tree Graphs
    Numerical Evaluation of Feynman Loop Integrals by Reduction to Tree Graphs Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades des Departments Physik der Universit¨atHamburg vorgelegt von Tobias Kleinschmidt aus Duisburg Hamburg 2007 Gutachter des Dissertation: Prof. Dr. W. Kilian Prof. Dr. J. Bartels Gutachter der Disputation: Prof. Dr. W. Kilian Prof. Dr. G. Sigl Datum der Disputation: 18. 12. 2007 Vorsitzender des Pr¨ufungsausschusses: Dr. H. D. R¨uter Vorsitzender des Promotionsausschusses: Prof. Dr. G. Huber Dekan der Fakult¨atMIN: Prof. Dr. A. Fr¨uhwald Abstract We present a method for the numerical evaluation of loop integrals, based on the Feynman Tree Theorem. This states that loop graphs can be expressed as a sum of tree graphs with additional external on-shell particles. The original loop integral is replaced by a phase space integration over the additional particles. In cross section calculations and for event generation, this phase space can be sampled simultaneously with the phase space of the original external particles. Since very sophisticated matrix element generators for tree graph amplitudes exist and phase space integrations are generically well understood, this method is suited for a future implementation in a fully automated Monte Carlo event generator. A scheme for renormalization and regularization is presented. We show the construction of subtraction graphs which cancel ultraviolet divergences and present a method to cancel internal on-shell singularities. Real emission graphs can be naturally included in the phase space integral of the additional on-shell particles to cancel infrared divergences. As a proof of concept, we apply this method to NLO Bhabha scattering in QED.
    [Show full text]
  • Lectures on Conformal Field Theory Arxiv:1511.04074V2 [Hep-Th] 19
    Prepared for submission to JHEP Lectures on Conformal Field Theory Joshua D. Quallsa aDepartment of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: These lectures notes are based on courses given at National Taiwan University, National Chiao-Tung University, and National Tsing Hua University in the spring term of 2015. Although the course was offered primarily for graduate students, these lecture notes have been prepared for a more general audience. They are intended as an introduction to conformal field theories in various dimensions working toward current research topics in conformal field theory. We assume the reader to be familiar with quantum field theory. Familiarity with string theory is not a prerequisite for this lectures, although it can only help. These notes include over 80 homework problems and over 45 longer exercises for students. arXiv:1511.04074v2 [hep-th] 19 May 2016 Contents 1 Lecture 1: Introduction and Motivation2 1.1 Introduction and outline2 1.2 Conformal invariance: What?5 1.3 Examples of classical conformal invariance7 1.4 Conformal invariance: Why?8 1.4.1 CFTs in critical phenomena8 1.4.2 Renormalization group 12 1.5 A preview for future courses 16 1.6 Conformal quantum mechanics 17 2 Lecture 2: CFT in d ≥ 3 22 2.1 Conformal transformations for d ≥ 3 22 2.2 Infinitesimal conformal transformations for d ≥ 3 24 2.3 Special conformal transformations and conformal algebra 26 2.4 Conformal group 28 2.5 Representations of the conformal group 29 2.6 Constraints of Conformal
    [Show full text]
  • Infrared Divergences
    2012 Matthew Schwartz III-6: Infrared divergences 1 Introduction We have shown that the 1, 2 and 3 point functions in QED are UV finite at one loop. We were able to introduce 4 counterterms ( δm , δ1 , δ2 , δ3) which canceled all the infinities. Now let us move on to four point functions, such as Ω T ψ( x ) ψ¯ ( x ) ψ( x ) ψ¯ ( x ) Ω (1) h | { 1 2 3 4 }| i This could represent, for example, Møller scattering ( e − e − e − e − ) or Bhabha scattering → ( e+ e − e+ e − ). We will take it to be e+ e − µ+ µ− for simplicity, since at tree-level this process only has→ an s-channel diagram. Looking→ at these 4-point functions at one-loop will help us understand how to combine previous loop calculations and counterterms into new observables, and will also illustrate a new feature: cancellation of infrared divergences. Although important results and calculational techniques are introduced in this lecture, it can be skipped without much loss of continuity with the rest of the text. Recall that in the on-shell subtraction scheme we found δ1 and δ2 depended on a fictitious photon mass m γ. This mass was introduced to make the loops finite and is an example of an infrared regulator. As we will see, the dependence on IR regulators, like m γ, drops out not in differences between the Green’s functions at different scales, as with UV regulators, but in the sum of different types of Green’s functions contributing to the same observable at the same scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Renormalization
    Introduction to Renormalization A lecture given by Prof. Wayne Repko Notes: Michael Flossdorf April 4th 2007 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 RenormalizationoftheQEDLagrangian 2 3 One Loop Correction to the Fermion Propagator 3 4 Dimensional Regularization 6 4.1 SuperficialDegreeofDivergence. 6 4.2 TheProcedureofDimensionalRegularization . .. 8 4.3 AUsefulGeneralIntegral. 9 4.4 Dirac Matrices in n Dimensions .................. 11 4.5 Dimensional Regularization of Σ2 ................. 11 5 Renormalization 12 5.1 Summary ofLastSection and OutlineoftheNextSteps . .. 12 5.2 MomentumSubtractionSchemes. 13 5.3 BacktoRenormalizationinQED. 14 5.4 Leading Order Expression of Σ2 for Small ǫ ............ 17 6 Outline of the Following Procedure 19 7 The Vertex Correction 19 8 Vacuum Polarization 22 CONTENTS 2 9 The Beta Function of QED 25 Appendix 27 References 30 1 INTRODUCTION 1 First Part of the Lecture 1 Introduction Starting with the Lagrangian of any Quantum Field Theory, we have seen in some of the previous lectures how to obtain the Feynman rules, which sufficiently de- scribe how to do pertubation theory in that particular theory. But beyond tree level, the naive calculation of diagrams involving loops will often yield infinity, since the integrals have to be performed over the whole momentum space. Renormal- ization Theory deals with the systematic isolation and removing of these infinities from physical observables. The first important insight is, that it is not the fields or the coupling constants which represent measurable quantities. Measured are cross sections, decay width, etc.. As long as we make sure that this observables are finite in the end and can be unambiguously derived from the Lagrangian, we are free to introduce new quantities, called renormalized quantities for every, so called, bare quantity.
    [Show full text]
  • Scattering Theory of Quantum Systems with Infinitely Many Degrees of Freedom
    Technische Universit¨at Munchen¨ Zentrum Mathematik Scattering theory of quantum systems with infinitely many degrees of freedom Wojciech Dybalski Habilitation Thesis Januar 2019 Fachmentorat: Prof. Dr. Chris Fewster (University of York) Prof. Dr. Herbert Spohn (TU Munchen)¨ Prof. Dr. Simone Warzel (TU Munchen)¨ Preface Since the early days of Quantum Mechanics, scattering theory has been a central tool for comparison of theory with experiment. Mathematical foundations of scattering theory were laid by giants of Mathematical Physics such as L.D. Faddeev or T. Kato, as discussed, e.g., in [Si18, De18]. The problem of asymptotic completeness, i.e., the question of particle interpretation of all states in the physical Hilbert space of the theory, emerged as one of the main problems of the mathematical scat- tering theory. Its solution in N-body Quantum Mechanics for particles with quadratic dispersion relations, interacting with possibly long-range forces, is an impressive chapter of the 20th century Mathematical Physics whose milestones are [En78, SiSo87, Gr90, De93]. However, if the assumption of quadratic dispersion relations is dropped, even in Quantum Mechanics the problem of complete particle interpretation is largely open beyond the two-body scattering. It is therefore not a surprise that in quantum field theory (QFT) or for quantum spin systems, where basic excitations typically have non-quadratic dispersion relations, asymptotic completeness is rather poorly understood. An additional problem for quantum systems with infinitely many degrees of freedom is a possible break- down of the Stone-von Neumann uniqueness theorem and the resulting multitude of ‘charged sectors’. This aspect undermines the conventional property of asymptotic completeness, inherited from Quan- tum Mechanics, and calls for more suitable concepts.
    [Show full text]