Penn National G a M I Ng, Inc
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Penn National's Transformational Acquisition of Pinnacle Entertainment
Penn National’s Transformational Acquisition of Pinnacle Entertainment December 18, 2017 CONFIDENTIAL DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION ONLY CONFIDENTIAL DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION ONLY 65 114 173 154 28 32 This communication may contain certain forward-looking statements, including certain plans, expectations, goals, projections, and statements about the benefits of the proposed transaction, Penn National’ and Pinnacle’ plans, objectives, expectations and intentions, the expected timing of 155 187 89 completion of the transaction, and other statements that are not historical facts. Such statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks, and uncertainties. Statements that do not describe historical or current facts, including statements about beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements may be identified by words such as “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “intend,” “estimate,” “plan,” “target,” 247 150 70 “goal,” or similar expressions, or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “may,” “might,” “should,” “would,” “could,” or similar variations. The forward-looking statements are intended to be subject to the safe harbor provided by Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. While there is no assurance that any list of risks and 128 100 162 uncertainties or risk factors is complete, below are certain factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained or implied in the -
CHD-4417.Ver.4
CDI employees starting at the top, from left to right: Sandi Ho, Tram Vo, Talice Berry, Irene Rodriguez, Patti Boggs, Erin Moen, Angela Manalansan, Mark Fritsche, Shelley Robinson, Princess Van Sickle; all of Hollywood Park’s accounting department – Mike Kohan, general manager at the Merrillville Sports Spectrum – Freddy Lee Smith, Calder security – Bruce Kincaid, backside maintenance at Churchill Downs – Yolanda Buford, human resources manager; Scott Graff, controller; Vicki Baumgardner, vice president, finance, and treasurer; all of Churchill Downs – Dannette Brennan-Smith, Hollywood Park human resources. 2 Churchill Downs Incorporated Letter to our Stockholders President and Chief Executive Thomas H. Meeker and Chairman William S. Farish 1999 Annual Report 3 1999 was the year in which our planning and our commitment to excellence resulted in outstanding progress for Churchill Downs Incorporated. Aided by strategic acquisitions, we achieved record financial results, we reinforced our leadership in the racing industry, and we continued our development of a comprehensive simulcast product. These accomplishments underscore the value of our four-prong business strategy, which continues to guide us as we embark on an era in our industry that will be defined by marketing innovations and technological advances. With progress comes change. Two years ago, our operations were centered in Indiana and Kentucky. We now have five racetracks in four states, including California and Florida. The acquisitions of Calder Race Course and Hollywood Park more than tripled the size of our Company’s assets. In 1997, we had a staff of 325 full-time employees; now we employ 1,000 people full time. To support this growth, the integration of our new properties and any future expansion plans, the Company has built a strong managerial infrastructure, and we are dedicating considerable energies to develop cohesiveness in our practices, which allows us to share resources effectively. -
Barstool Sports' Dave Portnoy Graces Bryant with His 'Prez'ence
Volume 78, Issue 2 Smithfield, RI September 24, 2010 Student Barstool Sports’ Dave Portnoy Affairs graces Bryant with his ‘Prez’ence By Fira Zainal as a result of his blog. welcomes Staff Writer Barstool Sports is also a good example of how a personal- Even if you’re not an avid ity can be injected into an en- two new sports fan, you more than trepreneurial endeavor. A likely have heard about business can be a means of staff Barstool Sports one way or expression just like a piece of another. Well this past Tues- art.” day on September 21st 2010, On another note, Dave members current Barstool Sports editor Portnoy also went into By Brittany Eagar and publisher Dave Portnoy Bryant’s own WJMF 88.7 The Assistant Public Relations (more famously known as El Beat of Bryant, which raked Manager Prez by Barstool fans) came in national attention accord- on campus courtesy of Bryant ing to Bryant student and DJ Samantha Hurd is now the University’s very own Colle- Ricky McLaughlin 12’. “El Middle Village Area Director, giate Entrepreneurs’ Organi- Prez is genuine. He says a position she is thrilled to be zation (CEO). what he means and means holding and hopes will help As a business school, it what he says. Although in her develop bonds through- came as no surprise that an person he didn't speak with out the Bryant Community. event such as this pulled in a a similar voice as on his blog, Having held positions previ- large number of people. The I don't think his blog is a ously at Roger Williams Uni- ‘CEO Brings Barstool Sports representation of a fake char- versity, St Cloud State to Bryant University’ event acter. -
Chicago, Illinois Oregon Sports Angels
NORTH AMERICAN SPORTSTECH REPORT NORTH AMERICAN SPORTSTECH REPORT #NASTR21 01 About this report A year like no other The eagle eye view No rest for the wicked We started our series looking back at the European Now onto the North American report. As always, we try to The pace at which SportsTech is growing is already SportsTech market and now it’s time to turn our aention to bring you the most important facts, figures and trends, this fascinating, but the different areas driving this growth makes North America. Our fall lineup of reports, Global VC, year with fewer pages but even more insights. And there are it almost impossible to keep up with. In only the last six FootballTech and FitnessTech, gave us an idea that 2020 was certainly some interesting ones. months we’ve seen Fitness, Being & NFTs breakout in a big not going to be the quiet year for SportsTech that we thought way. And that is without even considering the strong growth 2020 is projected to be the biggest year for investment in it would be at the height of the pandemic. But now, looking that Esports and Content have also seen during the SportsTech, crossing $2.4b aer a 15% adjustment for back on what was an incredibly unique year, quiet is the last pandemic. That’s a lot of rocket fuel for this ship, so team reporting lag. That's 10% more than the previous record of word we’d use. SportsTechX is certainly strapped in tight. Can’t wait to see 2018 and more than double 2019. -
Overview of Penn National Gaming's Acquisition of Pinnacle Entertainment
Overview of Penn National Gaming’s Acquisition of Pinnacle Entertainment Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board | March 21, 2018 CONFIDENTIAL DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION ONLY CONFIDENTIAL DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION ONLY . Penn National Gaming, Inc. John Finamore, Senior Vice President, Regional Operations . Daniel Ihm, Vice President, General Manager at Hollywood Casino at Penn National Race Course . Chris Rogers, Vice President, Deputy General Counsel . Frank Donaghue, Vice President Regulatory Affairs & Chief Compliance Officer . Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. Elizabeth Tranchina, Vice President and Legal Counsel 2 CONFIDENTIAL DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION ONLY . Transaction Overview . Strategic Rationale . Snapshot of New Combined Company . Detailed Transaction Summary . Proposed Financing . Limited Impact on Pennsylvania . Economic Concentration . Change of Control Fee 3 CONFIDENTIAL DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION ONLY . Penn National Gaming, Inc. (“PENN”) to acquire Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. (“PNK”) pursuant to a merger agreement dated December 17, 2017 . Total transaction value (inclusive of debt) is approximately $2.8 billion before divestitures and $1.9 billion net of divestitures and real estate sales . PNK shareholders to receive $20.00 per share in cash and 0.420 shares of PENN per PNK share; in each case such share conversion to be calculated on a shareholder by shareholder basis at closing 4 CONFIDENTIAL DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION ONLY Enhances Penn National’s position as the leading US regional gaming operator Increases geographic diversification with highly complementary properties Best-in-class regional properties enhanced by the Company’s Las Vegas assets Accelerates innovative growth strategy and enhanced customer experience 5 CONFIDENTIAL DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION ONLY Jackpot, NV Council Bluffs, IA Black Hawk, CO Pittsburgh, PA 41 Properties 20 Jurisdictions Bossier City, LA Vicksburg, MS 53,500 Slots 1,300 Tables New Orleans, LA Penn National Baton Rouge, LA Pinnacle Entertainment Lake Charles, LA 8,300 Rooms New MSAs (Houston, TX) 30,000+ Employees Note: Excludes Divestiture Assets. -
Penn National Gaming and Pinnacle Entertainment, in the Matter Of
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION COMMISSIONERS: Joseph J. Simons, Chairman Noah Joshua Phillips Rohit Chopra Rebecca Kelly Slaughter Christine S. Wilson ) In the Matter of ) ) ) PENN NATIONAL GAMING, INC., ) a corporation; and, ) DECISION AND ORDER ) DOCKET NO. C- 4658 ) ) PINNACLE ENTERTAINMENT, INC., ) a corporation. ) ) ) DECISION The Federal Trade Commission (“Commission”) initiated an investigation into the proposed acquisition by Respondent Penn National Gaming, Inc. (“Penn National”) of Respondent Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. (“Pinnacle”) (collectively, “Respondents”). The Commission’s Bureau of Competition prepared and furnished to Respondents the Draft Complaint, which it proposed to present to the Commission for its consideration. If issued by the Commission, the Draft Complaint would charge Respondents with violations of Section 7 of the Clayton Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 18, and Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 45. Respondents and the Bureau of Competition executed an agreement (“Agreement Containing Consent Orders” or “Consent Agreement”) containing (1) an admission by Respondents of all the jurisdictional facts set forth in the Draft Complaint, (2) a statement that the signing of said agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by Respondents that the law has been violated as alleged in the Draft Complaint, or that the facts as alleged in the Draft Complaint, other than jurisdictional facts, are true, (3) waivers and other provisions as required by the Commission’s Rules, and (4) a proposed Decision and Order and Order to Maintain Assets. The Commission considered the matter and determined that it had reason to believe that Respondents have violated the said Acts, and that a complaint should issue stating its charges in that respect. -
GLPI Investor Presentation September 2019
Investor Presentation September 2019 ForwardCompany Looking Overview Statements Certain statements contained in this presentation may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the safe harbor from civil liability provided for such statements by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (set forth in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the Company’s actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include information concerning the Company’s business strategy, plans, goals and objectives. Forward- looking statements contained in this presentation include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the Company’s ability to grow its portfolio of gaming facilities, information concerning the acquisitions of certain real property assets of Tropicana Entertainment Inc. (“Tropicana”) and the Company's mortgage loan to Eldorado Resorts, Inc. (“ERI”) to finance ERI's acquisition of an additional Tropicana property (such transactions, collectively, the "Tropicana Transactions") in connection with ERI’s acquisition of the operating business of Tropicana (the “ERI-Tropicana Merger”), the Company’s expectations with respect to the acquisition of Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. by Penn National Gaming, Inc. (“Penn”), which was completed on October 15, 2018 (the “Penn-Pinnacle Merger”), including the Company's acquisition of Plainridge Park Casino and the acquisition by Boyd Gaming Corporation (“BYD”) from Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. -
Gaming Licenses from Employees’ Wages
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI GL Lockett, et al. v. Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc., et al Case No. 4:19-cv-00358-GAF NOTICE OF CONDITIONALLY CERTIFIED COLLECTIVE ACTION LAWSUIT PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS MAY BE AFFECTED BY THIS LAWSUIT You are receiving this Court-authorized Notice because you worked at one of the relevant Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. (“Pinnacle Entertainment”) casino properties during the relevant time. According to Pinnacle Entertainment’s records, you are eligible to participate in this lawsuit to potentially recover unpaid wages and other damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act. To participate, you must complete, sign, and return the enclosed Consent to Join Form by July 27, 2021. What is the Lawsuit about? Plaintiffs worked as minimum wage employees at eight Pinnacle Entertainment casinos (listed below). Plaintiffs filed a lawsuit on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated employees against Pinnacle Entertainment and its eight subsidiary casino properties alleging they violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) by deducting costs associated with gaming licenses from employees’ wages. Defendants deny they violated the FLSA and contend that gaming license deductions were properly deducted from wages. Plaintiffs sought to represent similarly situated employees at eight Pinnacle Entertainment casinos. The Court granted that request in an Order dated March 12, 2021, which is why you are receiving this Notice and being given the opportunity to join this lawsuit. You may receive this Notice and information about this lawsuit via U.S. Mail and email. The Defendants and relevant casino properties are: Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. -
Penn National Gaming Reports Second Quarter Revenues Of
Penn National Gaming Reports Second Quarter Revenues of $1,545.8 Million, Net Income of $198.7 Million, Adjusted EBITDAR of $586.6 Million, and Adjusted EBITDA of $470.1 Million August 5, 2021 - PENN Generated Second Quarter Net Income Margin of 13% and Second Quarter Adjusted EBITDAR Margin of 38%, Driven by Strong Demand from Core Gaming Business and More Efficient Cost Structure - - Focus Remains on Sustaining Core Gaming Business Margin Improvement and Driving Profitable Online Gaming Revenue - - Penn National to Acquire Score Media and Gaming, Creating North America's Leading Digital Sports Content, Gaming and Technology Company - WYOMISSING, Pa.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Aug. 5, 2021-- Penn National Gaming, Inc. (NASDAQ: PENN) (“Penn National” or the “Company”) today reported financial results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021. 2021 Second Quarter Financial Highlights: Revenues of $1,545.8 million, an increase of $1,240 million year over year and $223 million versus 2019; Net income of $198.7 million and net income margin of 12.9%, as compared to a net loss of $214.4 million and (70.2)%, respectively, in the prior year and net income of $51.4 million and net margin of 3.9% in 2019; Adjusted EBITDA of $470.1 million, an increase of $549.4 million year over year and $153.6 million versus 2019; Adjusted EBITDAR of $586.6 million, an increase of $562.1 million year over year and $180.1 million versus 2019; and Adjusted EBITDAR margins of 37.9%, up 2,993 basis points year over year and 722 basis points versus 2019. -
2020 Brandt Report: the State of Sports Betting
THE JEFFREY S. MOORAD CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF SPORTS LAW PRESENTS THE BRANDT REPORT: THE STATE OF SPORTS BETTING 2019-2020 EDITION BRANDT REPORT MISSION THE BRANDT REPORT is an annual White Paper presentation to inform and educate students, sports industry professionals and other interested parties about a current sports law/business/policy topic that has experienced disruption in the prior year. The Report is prepared and constructed with research and analysis by students from the Jeffrey S. Moorad Center for the Study of Sports Law at Villanova School of Law, under the guidance of Executive Director Andrew Brandt. The Moorad Center and Brandt are thought leaders on legal and business aspects of sports and the changing dynamics in sports law, sports business, sports media, sports policy and sports thought. The 2020 Brandt Report focuses on the topic of sports betting, a topic that has undergone a massive disruption over the past two years. The Report will also address potential future issues and projections in sports betting. Enjoy this inaugural edition; we hope the Brandt Report will become an annual "must-view" for anyone interested in cutting edge issues in the sports world. FROM THE DIRECTOR As the Executive Director of the Moorad Center, I wanted to welcome you to the inaugural Brandt Report. The Moorad Center has, since its inception in 2012, hoped to set a new standard in sports legal and business education. Leading from over 60 years of experience in the business of sports between our founder Jeffrey Moorad and myself, we take deep dives into the most incisive and topical sports content year after year, semester after semester, week after week. -
Sports Law Year in Review
Sports Law Year in Review Presented at the 2019 Sports Lawyers Association Annual Conference May 1, 2018 – April 1, 2019 Contents 1. Agents & Agent Regulation te ...................................................................................... 1 2. Leagues - Labor Matters .............................................................................................. 2 3. Leagues - Non-labor Matters ....................................................................................... 4 4. Contracts ...................................................................................................................... 9 5. College, High School, and Youth Sports ..................................................................... 12 6. International & Olympic Sports ................................................................................... 24 7. Title IX, Gender Equality, and Civil Rights ................................................................ 36 8. Intellectual Property & Broadcasting ........................................................................... 42 9. Personal Injury, Health, and Safety ............................................................................. 46 10. Stadiums & Venues ...................................................................................................... 52 11. Sports Betting & Daily Fantasy ................................................................................... 56 This summary of illustrative and significant sports law developments has been compiled from -
Sirius XM Holdings Inc. (Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 SCHEDULE 14A Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. ) Filed by the Registrant x Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨ Check the appropriate box: ¨ Preliminary Proxy Statement ¨ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) x Definitive Proxy Statement ¨ Definitive Additional Materials ¨ Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 Sirius XM Holdings Inc. (Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): x No fee required. ¨ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: (5) Total fee paid: ¨ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. ¨ Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. (1) Amount Previously Paid: (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: (3) Filing Party: (4) Date Filed: Dear Fellow Stockholders, Simply put, 2016 was an incredible year for SiriusXM.