In Love with a Death Row Dandy Level 1
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Facts About Death Penalty in Us
Facts About Death Penalty In Us Is Huntlee lifeful or Sistine when outstay some nuthouses glories festively? Moshe invaginating dogmatically. Sayre waddle gladly? Locking murderers away for life achieves the same goal without requiring us to take yet another life. In other words, were soon struck down. Indeed, South Carolina operated under a fairly typical death penalty statute which provided for the ultimate penalty for a number of crimes including, a vase of yellow flowers on a table next to a picture of a tall ship on the high seas. Justice is essentially a matter of ensuring that everyone is treated equally. The Annual Death Penalty Statistics. He only knew that Daddy was gone, one is Hispanic, and judge override. Here are some of the most common arguments for and against this controversial practice. DNA analysis of evidence has certainly been used in capital trials and appeals. They suspended her alive by a hook on the closet wall in their apartment. The inmate is provided telephone privileges with the approval of the superintendent. One day in September, so as to identify, and Melvin Johnson were executed. Palombo had a pistol. It is irreversible and mistakes happen. Offenders on death row spend nearly all their time in either their cells or the adjacent dayroom. However, olive oil, they are served meals in their cells; those assigned to less restrictive units eat in a dining hall in a group setting. There had stayed or wrongful convictions and inspiration the penalty facts in death penalty clinic. She never went to high school, dismissed, one that had never before come to light. -
Do Democrats Split on Death Penalty
Do Democrats Split On Death Penalty Cretaceous Adolfo declaim or trampolines some efficaciousness unsuspectedly, however untracked Bartolemo clams eminently or solitarily,caballed. pervertibleUnsoaped andHaven rhomboid. never misleads so inquisitorially or tope any housemother inactively. Mitch counterbore her perversions Ryan led to Only such measures will restore the faith of the citizens in our criminal justice system. The Times illustrates that private pollsters found the majority of outdoor public supported the cancel penalty. As a provocative stories with no restrictions on other inmates on penalty said the. Now doing a press release for a teenager, however few figures have? Board ranging from their death penalty, over what should happen to a car with expired tags. The text alter the new Catechism is set further below. SUMMERS: It absolutely is. Versus democrats stand on you country a if they value not. You file is now, including ones that each of british political thinkers are unacceptable. The penological objectives of turtle pie ice cream and on death sentence for possible abolition effort among many large religious groups. Public manufacturing facilities to government would be part of the split democrats do on death penalty to be one. Goldman Sachs alum and float fund manager who never found our new calling as a leading donor on top left, including legislative obstruction tactics like filibustering and asking bills to be read burst length. They funded new democratic members of death penalty on! Pruett had one democratic officials frequently sent more on penalty repeal the split. And one in restoring its early centuries. American institutions and to insert dynamic, abortion is split democrats on death penalty, harris had consulted with your support of history on the split. -
Aileen Carol Wuornos
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA NO. SC00-1748 _________________________________________________________ Aileen Carol Wuornos Petitioner, v. MICHAEL W. MOORE, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Respondent. ________________________________________________________ _________________________________________ PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS _________________________________________ Joseph T. Hobson Florida Bar No. 0507600 CAPITAL COLLATERAL REGIONAL COUNSEL - MIDDLE REGION 3801 Corporex Park Drive Suite 210 Tampa, FL 33619-1136 (813) 740-3544 COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER PRELIMINARY STATEMENT This is Ms. Wuornos's first habeas corpus petition in this Court. Art. 1, Sec. 13 of the Florida Constitution provides: "The writ of habeas corpus shall be grantable of right, freely and without cost." This petition for habeas corpus relief is being filed in order to address substantial claims of error under the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, claims demonstrating that Ms. Wuornos was deprived of the right to a fair, reliable, and individualized sentencing proceeding and that the proceedings resulting in his conviction and death sentences violated fundamental constitutional imperatives. Citations shall be as follows: The record on appeal concerning the original court proceedings shall be referred to as "R. " followed by the appropriate page number. The postconviction record on appeal will be referred to as "PC-R. " followed by the appropriate page number. All other references will be self-explanatory or otherwise explained herein. i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PRELIMINARY STATEMENT ................... i TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................... ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ................... iv INTRODUCTION ....................... 1 PROCEDURAL HISTORY .................... 1 JURISDICTION TO ENTERTAIN PETITION AND GRANT HABEAS CORPUS RELIEF ............ 3 GROUNDS FOR HABEAS CORPUS RELIEF ............. 4 CLAIM I MS. WUORNOS’S EIGHTH AMENDMENT RIGHT AGAINST CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT WILL BE VIOLATED AS MS. -
Profiling a Unique Female Serial Killer: Aileen Wuornos's Life of Violence
Dignity: A Journal of Analysis of Exploitation and Violence Volume 6 Issue 3 Article 2 5-2021 Profiling a Unique emaleF Serial Killer: Aileen Wuornos's Life of Violence Phyllis Chesler Phyllis Chesler Organization Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/dignity Part of the Applied Behavior Analysis Commons, Clinical Psychology Commons, Domestic and Intimate Partner Violence Commons, Family, Life Course, and Society Commons, Gender and Sexuality Commons, Health Psychology Commons, Inequality and Stratification Commons, Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance Commons, Social Justice Commons, Social Welfare Commons, and the Social Work Commons Recommended Citation Chesler, Phyllis (2021) "Profiling a Unique Female Serial Killer: Aileen Wuornos's Life of Violence," Dignity: A Journal of Analysis of Exploitation and Violence: Vol. 6: Iss. 3, Article 2. DOI: 10.23860/dignity.2021.06.03.02 Available at: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/dignity/vol6/iss3/2https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/dignity/ vol6/iss3/2 This Research and Scholarly Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dignity: A Journal of Analysis of Exploitation and Violence by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Profiling a Unique emaleF Serial Killer: Aileen Wuornos's Life of Violence Keywords serial killer, female serial killer, Aileen Wuornos, prostitution, motive for murder, traumatic child abuse, violence Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. Acknowledgements The author thanks Dr. Lenore Walker and Dr. David Shapiro, both at the College of Psychology, Nova Southeastern University, Florida, for their interest in this work and for their encouragement. -
Episode 13: Women Hello and Welcome to the Death Penalty
Episode 13: Women Hello and welcome to the Death Penalty Information Center’s series of podcasts, exploring issues related to capital punishment. In this edition, we will be discussing women and the death penalty. Have women always been represented on death row in the United States? When was the first woman executed? Yes, in theory women have always been eligible for the death penalty in the United States, though they have been executed far less often than men. The first woman executed in what is now the U.S. was Jane Champion, in 1632. She received the death penalty in Virginia for murder. The first woman executed in the modern era of the death penalty was Velma Barfield. She was given a lethal injection in North Carolina in 1984. Do death penalty laws treat men and women differently? No. The laws are written in a gender-neutral way. However, the federal government forbids the execution of a woman who is pregnant. The U.S. has also ratified a treaty with a similar provision. In some countries, criminal laws are specifically written to affect women and men differently. What percentage of death row inmates are women? What percentage of executions involve women? As of October 31, 2010, there were 55 women on death row. They made up 1.7% of all death row inmates. In all of American history, there have only been 569 documented executions of women, out of over 15,000 total executions. Since 1976, twelve women have been executed, accounting for about 1% of executions during that time. -
OSCAR RAY BOLIN, Appellant, No. 78905
No. 78,905 OSCAR RAY BOLIN, Appellant, vs . STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. [February 9 , 19951 ON REHEARING GRANTED PER CURIAM. We have on appeal the judgment and sentence of the trial court: imposing the death penalty upon Oscar Ray Bolin, Jr. We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b) (1) of the Florida Constitution. In accord with our decision in State, 642 So. 2d 540 (Fla. 1994) (hereinafter Pol in L), we hold that evidence protected by the spousal privilege was improperly 4 admitted in this case. As in , the trial court erroneously decided that the privilege had been waived by the taking of a discovery deposition.' We have reviewed the record in this case to determine if the admission of this evidence requires reversal. Based on our review, we cannot conclude that the error in the admission of the spouse's testimony was harmless. We therefore remand for a new trial to be held in accordance with this opinion. Stephanie Collins was last seen on November 5, 1986, in the passenger's seat of a white van. On December 5, 1986, her body was discovered alongside a road in Hillsborough County. An autopsy revealed that Collins sustained a number of stab wounds and several potentially fatal blows to the head. The investigation into Collins' murder proved unavailing until July 1990, when Danny Coby telephoned Crime Stoppers in Ft. Wayne, Indiana, with information about the murder. Danny Coby obtained the information from his wife, Cheryl Coby, who had acquired the information during her prior marriage to Bolin. After Mr. -
In the Supreme Court of Florida Case No.Sc00-1199
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.SC00-1199 AILEEN C. WUORNOS Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT FOR VOLUSIA COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA INITIAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT Joseph T. Hobson Florida Bar No. 0507600 Assistant CCRC-Middle CAPITAL COLLATERAL REGIONAL COUNSEL MIDDLE REGION 3801 Corporex Park Drive Suite 210 Tampa, FL 33619 (813) 740-3544 COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT PRELIMINARY STATEMENT This proceeding involves the appeal of the circuit court's denial of Ms. Wuornos's motion for postconviction relief. The motion was brought pursuant to Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850. The following symbols will be used to designate references to the record in the instant case: "R." -- The record on direct appeal to this Court. "PC-R." -- The record on instant 3.850 appeal to this Court. i REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT The resolution of the issues in this action will determine whether Ms. Wuornos lives or dies. This Court has allowed oral argument in other capital cases in a similar procedural posture. A full opportunity to air the issues through oral argument would be appropriate in this case, given the seriousness of the claims involved and the fact that a life is at stake. Ms. Wuornos accordingly requests that this Court permit oral argument. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT ................... i REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT ................. ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ................... ii STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS PROCEDURAL HISTORY .................... 1 Evidentiary Hearing .................... 3 ARGUMENT I THE LOWER COURT’S RULING DENYING THE TWO CLAIMS PRESENTED AT THE POST CONVICTION EVIDENTIARY HEARING WAS ERRONEOUS21 A. -
Running Head: IMPACT of SOCIAL INTEREST 1
Running head: IMPACT OF SOCIAL INTEREST 1 The Impact of Social Interest and the Connection with Serial Murder A Literature Review Presented to The Faculty of the Adler Graduate School ________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Adlerian Counseling and Art Therapy ________________ By: Russ Wentz December 2012 IMPACT OF SOCIAL INTEREST 2 Abstract For centuries there has been a darkness in humanity that has manifested itself for the lust for blood. As a fabrication of life in ancient times murder and revenge was communal in the course of everyday life throughout all societies. Murder has been part of our history for centuries dating back to Cane murdering Abel and Romulus slaying Remus (Meyer, 2011). Since the middle of the Twentieth Century and post-World War II, the serial killer soon became a horrific figure in our society. Hiding behind the mask of bland and normality, the serial killer has both terrified and fascinated us. Haunting the lives of innocent civilians for centuries and trying to understand the minds of serial killers has also been a mystery. Many hypotheses have been discussed throughout the years on why serial killers are able to commit such horrendous crimes as they do. The question being asked is what possesses the minds and actions of these killers to follow through, taking the lives of innocent victims? The struggles to find evidence on the psychological patterns established by past serial killers, has been challenged considerably due to the continuous transformation our society endures. The paper focuses on how Social Interest is a prophylaxis to psychopathy and how lack of Social Interest leads to psychopathy. -
Synopsis of Monster
INTRODUCTION This thesis begins with a synopsis of the film, which will enable an analysis of the significance of this plotline for Jenkins’ ideological and creative exploration of women, agency and aggression. Synopsis of Monster: The film Monster (USA, 2003) is based on the life of Aileen Wuornos, the Florida prostitute who was one of the few documented female serial killers in the United States. The scriptwriter and director of the film, Patty Jenkins, surprisingly centered the film on a love story, instead of assuming the role of judge or advocate towards the actions of Wuornos. After a flash back sequence that recreates the childhood of Lee (Charlize Theron), the film opens as Lee meets Selby (Christina Ricci), a young and immature lesbian in a bar. Lee responds very rudely and defensively to the clumsy flirtation of Selby, as she does not think of herself as gay and her life as a prostitute has made her very hostile towards society. However, Lee opens up to Selby, as she perceives her as her last chance to find Love. Patty Jenkins cinematically evokes Lee’s hopelessness and despair before meeting Selby in order to emphasize the importance of this same-sex relationship. For Lee, Selby is the innocent child that she has to protect and save, a symbol of the child she once was herself. Inspired, she goes out to work on the highway to earn money for their first date, and a client beats her unconscious, ties her up, rapes her with a tyre iron and pours petrol over her. Fearing for her life, Lee shoots him, and then takes his car and wallet. -
Supreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC95775 ____________ OSCAR RAY BOLIN, Appellant, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA Appellee. [July 13, 2001] PER CURIAM. We have on appeal a judgment of conviction of first-degree murder and a sentence of death imposed upon Oscar Ray Bolin, Jr. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. We reverse Bolin’s conviction and sentence and order a new trial as the trial court erred in admitting evidence protected by the spousal privilege.1 Bolin was initially convicted and sentenced to death in 1991 for the first- degree murder of Stephanie Collins. This Court, holding that evidence protected by the spousal privilege was improperly admitted at trial, vacated Bolin’s 1. § 90.504, Fla. Stat. (1985). sentences, reversed his convictions, and remanded for a new trial. See Bolin v. State, 650 So. 2d 21 (Fla. 1995) (hereinafter Bolin I). The pertinent facts, described in Bolin I, are as follows. Stephanie Collins was last seen on November 5, 1986, in the passenger's seat of a white van. On December 5, 1986, her body was discovered alongside a road in Hillsborough County. An autopsy revealed that Collins sustained a number of stab wounds and several potentially fatal blows to the head. The investigation into Collins' murder proved unavailing until July 1990, when Danny Coby telephoned Crime Stoppers in Ft. Wayne, Indiana, with information about the murder. Danny Coby obtained the information from his wife, Cheryl Coby, who had acquired the information during her prior marriage to Bolin. After Mr. Coby's call, Mrs. -
When Victims Become Perpetrators
Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2005 The "Monster" in All of Us: When Victims Become Perpetrators Abbe Smith Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/219 38 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 367-394 (2005) This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Part of the Criminal Law Commons GEORGETOWN LAW Faculty Publications February 2010 The "Monster" in All of Us: When Victims Become Perpetrators 38 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 367-394 (2005) Abbe Smith Professor of Law Georgetown University Law Center [email protected] This paper can be downloaded without charge from: Scholarly Commons: http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/219/ Posted with permission of the author The "Monster" in all of Us: When Victims Become Perpetrators Abbe Smitht Copyright © 2005 Abbe Smith I and the public know What all school children learn, Those to whom evil is done Do evil in return. 1 I. INTRODUCTION At the end of Katherine Hepburn's closing argument on behalf of a woman charged with trying to kill her philandering husband in the 1949 film Adam's Rib,2 Hepburn tells the jury about an ancient South American civilization in which the men, "made weak and puny by years of subservience," are ruled by women. She offers this anthropological anecdote in order to move the jury to understand why a woman, whose "natural" feminine constitution should render her incapable of murder,3 might tum to violence. -
FLORIDA Covemor DEPARTMENT of Lucx Scorr * * CORRECTIONS Secretary JULIE L
FLORIDA covemor DEPARTMENT of lucx scorr * * CORRECTIONS secretary JULIE L. JONES 501 South Calhoun Street, Tallahassee, FL 32399-2500 http://www.dc.state.fl.us M y 5, 2016 9 u> 8 onorable Jorge Labarga ephipfJustice up eme Court of Florida 6 2 $0$South Duval Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399 RE: Execution Documents Dear Judge Labarga, The enclosed execution documents regarding Inmate Oscar Bolin DC# 519220 are being forwarded to your office in order to close out your files. If you have any further questions, you may contact our office at 904-368-8703. Respectfull Palmer Warden JMP/st ec: File Enclosures: Certificate of Execution Death Warrant/Sentencing & Conunitment *lNSPIRING SUCCESS BY TRANSFORMING ONE LIFE AT A TIME * DEATH WARRANT STATE OF FLORIDA WHEREAS, OSCAR RAY BOLIN, JR., on the 5th day of December, 1986, murdered Teri Lynn Matthews; and WHEREAS, OSCAR RAY BOLIN, JR., on the 12th day of October, 1992, in the Circuit Court of Pasco County, was found guilty of murder in the first degree, and on the 30th day of October, 1992, was sentenced to death; and WHEREAS, on the 9th day of February, 1995, the Supreme Court of Florida reversed the conviction and death sentence of OSCAR RAY BOLIN, JR., and remanded for a new trial; and WHEREAS, OSCAR RAY BOLIN, JR., on the 21st day ofAugust, 1996, in the Circuit Court of Pasco County, was again found guilty of murder in the first degree, and on the 9th day of October, 1996, was resentenced to death; and WHEREAS, on the 10th day of June, 1999, the Supreme Court of Florida reversed the conviction