DOCSLIB.ORG

TR-479: Coconut Oil Acid Diethanolamine Condensate

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

NTP TECHNICAL REPORT ON THE TOXICOLOGY AND CARCINOGENESIS STUDIES OF COCONUT OIL ACID DIETHANOLAMINE CONDENSATE (CAS NO. 68603-42-9) IN F344/N RATS AND B6C3F1 MICE (DERMAL STUDIES) NATIONAL TOXICOLOGY PROGRAM P.O. Box 12233 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 January 2001 NTP TR 479 NIH Publication No. 01-3969 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service National Institutes of Health FOREWORD The National Toxicology Program (NTP) is made up of four charter agencies of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS): the National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health; the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), National Institutes of Health; the National Center for Toxicological Research (NCTR), Food and Drug Administration; and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In July 1981, the Carcinogenesis Bioassay Testing Program, NCI, was transferred to the NIEHS. The NTP coordinates the relevant programs, staff, and resources from these Public Health Service agencies relating to basic and applied research and to biological assay development and validation. The NTP develops, evaluates, and disseminates scientific information about potentially toxic and hazardous chemicals. This knowledge is used for protecting the health of the American people and for the primary prevention of disease. The studies described in this Technical Report were performed under the direction of the NIEHS and were conducted in compliance with NTP laboratory health and safety requirements and must meet or exceed all applicable federal, state, and local health and safety regulations. Animal care and use were in accordance with the Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Animals. The prechronic and chronic studies were conducted in compliance with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Good Laboratory Practice Regulations, and all aspects of the chronic studies were subjected to retrospective quality assurance audits before being presented for public review. These studies are designed and conducted to characterize and evaluate the toxicologic potential, including carcinogenic activity, of selected chemicals in laboratory animals (usually two species, rats and mice). Chemicals selected for NTP toxicology and carcinogenesis studies are chosen primarily on the bases of human exposure, level of production, and chemical structure. The interpretive conclusions presented in this Technical Report are based only on the results of these NTP studies. Extrapolation of these results to other species and quantitative risk analyses for humans require wider analyses beyond the purview of these studies. Selection per se is not an indicator of a chemical’s carcinogenic potential. Details about ongoing and completed NTP studies are available at the NTP’s World Wide Web site: http://ntp-server.niehs.nih.gov. Abstracts of all NTP Technical Reports and full versions of the most recent reports and other publications are available from the NIEHS’ Environmental Health Information Service (EHIS) http://ehis.niehs.nih.gov (800-315-3010 or 919-541-3841). In addition, printed copies of these reports are available from EHIS as supplies last. A listing of all the NTP reports printed since 1982 appears on the inside back cover. NTP TECHNICAL REPORT ON THE TOXICOLOGY AND CARCINOGENESIS STUDIES OF COCONUT OIL ACID DIETHANOLAMINE CONDENSATE (CAS NO. 68603-42-9) IN F344/N RATS AND B6C3F1 MICE (DERMAL STUDIES) NATIONAL TOXICOLOGY PROGRAM P.O. Box 12233 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 January 2001 NTP TR 479 NIH Publication No. 01-3969 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service National Institutes of Health 2 Coconut Oil Acid Diethanolamine Condensate, NTP TR 479 CONTRIBUTORS National Toxicology Program NTP Pathology Working Group Evaluated and interpreted results and reported findings Evaluated slides, prepared pathology report on rats (27 March 1997) R.D. Irwin, Ph.D., Study Scientist D.A. Bridge, B.S. M. Butt, D.V.M., Chairperson J.R. Bucher, Ph.D. Pathology Associates International J.R. Hailey, D.V.M. R.E. Chapin, Ph.D. National Toxicology Program J.R. Hailey, D.V.M. J.R. Leininger, D.V.M., Ph.D. J.K. Haseman, Ph.D. National Toxicology Program J.R. Leininger, D.V.M., Ph.D. P. Mann, D.V.M. R.R. Maronpot, D.V.M. Experimental Pathology Laboratories, Inc. D.P. Orzech, M.S. R. Miller, D.V.M., Ph.D. G.N. Rao, D.V.M., Ph.D. North Carolina State University A. Radovsky, D.V.M., Ph.D. J.H. Roycroft, Ph.D. National Toxicology Program C.S. Smith, Ph.D. G.S. Travlos, D.V.M. Evaluated slides, prepared pathology report on mice D.B. Walters, Ph.D. (8 May 1997) K.L. Witt, M.S., Integrated Laboratory Systems, Inc. M. Butt, D.V.M., Chairperson Pathology Associates International Battelle Columbus Laboratories S. Botts, M.S., D.V.M., Ph.D. Conducted studies, evaluated pathology findings Experimental Pathology Laboratories, Inc. J.R. Hailey, D.V.M. P.J. Kurtz, Ph.D., Principal Investigator National Toxicology Program (14-week and 2-year studies) R.A. Herbert, D.V.M., Ph.D. M.R. Hejtmancik, Ph.D., Principal Investigator National Toxicology Program (2-year studies) J.R. Leininger, D.V.M., Ph.D. J.D. Toft II, D.V.M., M.S. (14-week and 2-year rats) National Toxicology Program M.J. Ryan, D.V.M., Ph.D. (14-week mice) R. Miller, D.V.M., Ph.D. A.W. Singer, D.V.M. (2-year mice) North Carolina State University A. Yoshida, D.V.M., Ph.D., Observer Experimental Pathology Laboratories, Inc. National Toxicology Program Provided pathology quality assurance Analytical Sciences, Inc. J.F. Hardisty, D.V.M., Principal Investigator Provided statistical analyses S. Botts, M.S., D.V.M., Ph.D. R.W. Morris, M.S., Principal Investigator P. Mann, D.V.M. S.R. Lloyd, M.S. N.G. Mintz, B.S. Dynamac Corporation Prepared quality assurance audits Biotechnical Services, Inc. Prepared Technical Report S. Brecher, Ph.D., Principal Investigator S.R. Gunnels, M.A., Principal Investigator J.R. Dias, M.S. L.M. Harper, B.S. A.M. Macri-Hanson, M.A., M.F.A. D.P. Shaw, B.A. 3 CONTENTS ABSTRACT ............................................................ 5 EXPLANATION OF LEVELS OF EVIDENCE OF CARCINOGENIC ACTIVITY ............ 10 TECHNICAL REPORTS REVIEW SUBCOMMITTEE ............................... 11 SUMMARY OF TECHNICAL REPORTS REVIEW SUBCOMMITTEE COMMENTS ......... 12 INTRODUCTION ........................................................ 15 MATERIALS AND METHODS ............................................... 17 RESULTS .............................................................. 27 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS ........................................... 51 REFERENCES .......................................................... 57 APPENDIX A Summary of Lesions in Male Rats in the 2-Year Dermal Study of Coconut Oil Acid Diethanolamine Condensate ........................ 61 APPENDIX B Summary of Lesions in Female Rats in the 2-Year Dermal Study of Coconut Oil Acid Diethanolamine Condensate ........................ 89 APPENDIX C Summary of Lesions in Male Mice in the 2-Year Dermal Study of Coconut Oil Acid Diethanolamine Condensate ........................ 115 APPENDIX D Summary of Lesions in Female Mice in the 2-Year Dermal Study of Coconut Oil Acid Diethanolamine Condensate ........................ 147 APPENDIX E Genetic Toxicology............................................. 179 APPENDIX F Hematology and Clinical Chemistry Results ............................ 195 APPENDIX G Organ Weights and Organ-Weight-to-Body-Weight Ratios .................. 201 APPENDIX H Reproductive Tissue Evaluations and Estrous Cycle Characterization .......... 205 APPENDIX I Chemical Characterization and Dose Formulation Studies .................. 209 APPENDIX J Ingredients, Nutrient Composition, and Contaminant Levels in NIH-07 Rat and Mouse Ration .................................. 219 APPENDIX K Sentinel Animal Program ........................................ 223 4 Coconut Oil Acid Diethanolamine Condensate, NTP TR 479 5 ABSTRACT n = 7, 9, 11, 13, or 15 COCONUT OIL ACID DIETHANOLAMINE CONDENSATE CAS No. 68603-42-9 Chemical Formula: C(7+n)H(15+2n)O3N Molecular Weight: 280-290 Synonyms: Cocamide DEA; cocamide diethanolamine; coconut oil diethanolamine; N,N-bis(hydroxyethyl)coco amides; N,N-bis(hydroxyethyl)coco fatty amides Trade names: Clindrol 200CGN; Clindrol 202CGN; Clindrol Superamide 100CG; Comperlan KD; Comperlan LS; Comperlan PD; Conco Emulsifier K; Elromid KD 80; Empilan CDE; Ethylan LD; Ethylan A 15; Lauridit KDG; Marlamid D 1218; Monamid 150D; Monamid 150DB; Ninol 1281; Ninol 2012E; Ninol 2012 Extra; Ninol P 621; P and G Amide 72; Purton CFD; Schercomid CDA; Steinamid DC 2129; Steinamid DC 2129E; Varamide A 2; Varamide A 10; Varamide A 83; Witcamide 82; Witcamide 5133 Coconut oil acid diethanolamine condensate, a mix- 14-WEEK STUDY IN RATS ture of fatty acid diethanolamides of the acids found Groups of 10 male and 10 female F344/N rats in coconut oil, is widely used in cosmetics, shampoos, received dermal applications of 0, 25, 50, 100, 200, soaps, and related consumer products. Because of the or 400 mg coconut oil acid diethanolamine conden- lack of information about potential risks associated sate/kg body weight in ethanol, five times per week with long-term exposure, coconut oil acid diethanol- for 14 weeks. All rats survived until the end of the amine condensate was selected as a representative of study. Final mean body weights and body weight the diethanolamine chemical class for evaluation
Recommended publications
  • Final Scope of the Risk Evaluation for Formaldehyde CASRN 50-00-0

    Final Scope of the Risk Evaluation for Formaldehyde CASRN 50-00-0

    EPA Document# EPA-740-R-20-014 August 2020 United States Office of Chemical Safety and Environmental Protection Agency Pollution Prevention Final Scope of the Risk Evaluation for Formaldehyde CASRN 50-00-0 August 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................................................6 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ..................................................................................................7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .....................................................................................................................11 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................14 2 SCOPE OF THE EVALUATION ...................................................................................................14 2.1 Reasonably Available Information ..............................................................................................14 Search of Gray Literature ...................................................................................................... 15 Search of Literature from Publicly Available Databases (Peer-reviewed Literature) ........... 16 Search of TSCA Submissions ................................................................................................ 24 2.2 Conditions of Use ........................................................................................................................25 Conditions of Use
  • Personal Care

    Personal Care

    HAIR CONDITIONERS SURFACTANTSS • Behenamidopropyl Dime- pholine Lactate • Acetamide MEA • Lauramidopropyl Betaine thylamine • Myristyl Trimethyl Ammo- • Acetamide MEA, Lactamide • Lauramidopropyl Hydroxysul- • Cocodimonium Hydroxy- nium Bromide MEA taine propyl Hydrolyzed Rice • Polymethacrylamidoprop- • Alkyl Dimethyl (C12-C18) • Lauramidopropylamine Oxide Protein yltrimonium Chloride Amine Oxide • Lauramine Oxide • Cocodimonium Hydroxy- • Polyquaternium-2 • Alkylpolyglucoside • Laureth-1 Phosphate propyl Hydrolyzed Silk • Polyquaternium-6 • Ammonium Laureth Sulfate • Laureth-11 Carboxylic Acid Protein • Polyquaternium-7 • Ammonium Lauryl Sulfate • Laureth-11, Myreth-11 • Cocodimonium Hydroxy- • Polyquaternium-74 • Ammonium Lauryl Sulfate, • Laureth-3 Phosphate propyl Hydrolyzed Wheat • PPG-3 Caprylyl Ether Ammonium Laureth Sulfate • Laureth-6 Carboxylic Acid Protein • Quaternium-79 Hydrolyzed • Babassuamidopropyl Betaine • Laureth-9 • Dimethicone Keratin • Behenamidopropyl Dimethyl- • Lauryl Betaine • Guar Hydroxypropyltrimo- • Quaternium-79 Hydrolyzed amine • Lauryl Glucoside nium Chloride Silk • Behenoyl PG-Trimonium • Lauryl Hydroxysultaine • Hydroxypropyl Guar • Sodium Lauroyl Glutamate Chloride • Lauryl Lactate Hydroxypropyltrimonium • Stearalkonium Chloride • Behenoyl PG-Trimonium Chlo- • Modified Oleamide DEA Chloride • Stearamidopropyl Dime- ride, Cetyl Alcohol • Oleamidopropyl Betaine • Isostearamidopropyl Eth- thylamine • Behentrimonium Chloride • Oleth-20, Ceteth-20 yldimonium Ethosulfate, • Sunflowerseedamidopro- • Capryl/Caprylic
  • Oxidation of Isobutyraldehyde

    Oxidation of Isobutyraldehyde

    Indlan Journal of Chemlstry Vol. 15A, August 1977, pp. 705-708 Kinetics & Mechanism of Cr(VI) Oxidation of Isobutyraldehyde A. A. BHALEKAR, R. SHANKER & G. V. BAKORE Department of Chemistry, University of Udaipur, Udaipur 313001 Received 16 August 1976; accepted 26 March 1977 Cr(VI) oxidation of isobutyraldehyde has been found to take place through the following mechanism: (i) 70% of isobutyraldehyde oxidation occurs via the hydrated form and (ii) 30% of isobutyraldebyde undergoes oxidation via enol intermediate. The reaction follows the rate law: ~d[Cr(VI)]/dt = k'kE[Aldehyde][H+J[HCrO,]/(kA+k'[H+][HCrO-])+k"Kh[Aldehyde][H+][HCrO&] where kh, k', k', kE and kA are equilibrium constant for hydration of aldehyde, rate of oxidation of enol, rate of oxidation of ketone, rate of enolization and the rate of ketonization, respectively. kE obtained from the oxidation of isobutyraldehyde by V(V) under identical conditions as used in chromic acid oxidation, is of the same order. ARNARD and Karayannis! while investigating Results and Discussion chromic acid oxidation of propionaldehyde B and t.-butyraldehyde made some interesting Stoichiometry and identification oj products - These observations. They found that propionaldehyde ~ere carried out in aq. solution keeping [Cr(VI)] reduced 170% of the expected amount of chromic In large excess over [isobutyraldehyde]. It was acid and that besides propionic acid, acetic acid found that 0·94 mole (2·8 equivalents) of C r(VI) was also produced while n-butyraldehyde consumed was consumed per mole of the aldehyde. Under 190% of the theoretical amount of chromic acid stoichiometric conditions, the excess Cr(VI) was and that both propionic acid and to a lesser extent reduced with Fe (II) ions and the solution steam- acetic acid were produced.
  • BETADET® BETADET® Anionic-Based Formulations

    BETADET® BETADET® Anionic-Based Formulations

    BETADET® S-20 BETADET® SHR VERY MILD SURFACTANT GREAT FORMULATION STABILITY ENHANCED FOAM VOLUME IMPROVED THICKENING EFFECT SULTAINES: MILD AMPHOTERIC SURFACTANTS FOR PERSONAL CARE KAO SURFACTANTS TECHNOLOGY AT YOUR SERVICE BETADET® S-20 & BETADET® SHR Foam, Viscosity & Mildness enhancers CHARACTERISTICS BETADET® S-20 and BETADET® SHR are recom- pH’s thus allowing their use in cosmetics formulations mended as secondary surfactants for very mild were alkali (i.e. depilatories) or acid media are neces- and high foaming products, achieving higher foam sary. Both products are also very stable to hard water, BETADET® S-20 and BETADET® volumes than alkyl betaines or alkyl amidopropyl improving the behavior of some sensitive anionic MAIN FEATURES betaines. These products are easier to thicken surfactants under extreme conditions. Additionally, SHR are very mild co-surfactants when combined with SLES, thus reducing the BETADET® S-20 shows a highlighted ability to reduce • Vegetable origin for personal care formulations. amount of electrolytes needed to obtain a desired the freezing point of final formulations making them • Preservative-free viscosity compared to other amphoteric surfactants. more stable at low temperatures, which helps to ob- Hydroxysultaines are highly effective amphoteric • Biodegradable Hydroxysultaines show excellent stability at extreme tain clear stable final products. Surfactants that improve the performance of final • Compatible with anionic, non-ionic and cationic cosmetic products. They are extremely mild cosur- surfactants
  • View of Bacterial Expression Systems for Heterologous 74

    View of Bacterial Expression Systems for Heterologous 74

    Metabolic engineering of Pseudomonas sp. strain VLB120 as platform biocatalyst for the production of isobutyric acid and other secondary metabolites Lang et al. Lang et al. Microbial Cell Factories 2014, 13:2 http://www.microbialcellfactories.com/content/13/1/2 Lang et al. Microbial Cell Factories 2014, 13:2 http://www.microbialcellfactories.com/content/13/1/2 RESEARCH Open Access Metabolic engineering of Pseudomonas sp. strain VLB120 as platform biocatalyst for the production of isobutyric acid and other secondary metabolites Karsten Lang, Jessica Zierow, Katja Buehler* and Andreas Schmid Abstract Background: Over the recent years the production of Ehrlich pathway derived chemicals was shown in a variety of hosts such as Escherichia coli, Corynebacterium glutamicum, and yeast. Exemplarily the production of isobutyric acid was demonstrated in Escherichia coli with remarkable titers and yields. However, these examples suffer from byproduct formation due to the fermentative growth mode of the respective organism. We aim at establishing a new aerobic, chassis for the synthesis of isobutyric acid and other interesting metabolites using Pseudomonas sp. strain VLB120, an obligate aerobe organism, as host strain. Results: The overexpression of kivd, coding for a 2-ketoacid decarboxylase from Lactococcus lactis in Ps. sp. strain VLB120 enabled for the production of isobutyric acid and isobutanol via the valine synthesis route (Ehrlich pathway). This indicates the existence of chromosomally encoded alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenases catalyzing
  • Biotransformation of Isobutyraldehyde to Isobutanol by an Engineered Escherichia Coli Strain

    Biotransformation of Isobutyraldehyde to Isobutanol by an Engineered Escherichia Coli Strain

    Journal of Archive of SID J Appl Biotechnol Rep. 2020 Sep;7(3):159-165 Applied Biotechnology doi 10.30491/JABR.2020.117885 Reports Original Article Biotransformation of Isobutyraldehyde to Isobutanol by an Engineered Escherichia coli Strain Mostafa Hosseini1, Morvarid Ebrahimi2, Ensieh Salehghamari3, Amir Salehi Najafabadi4, Bagher Yakhchali1* 1National Institute of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Tehran, Iran 2Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Biology and Center of Excellence in Phylogeny of Living Organisms, College of Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran 3Department of Cell and Molecular Science, School of Biological Science, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran 4Department of Microbiology, School of Biology, University College of Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran Corresponding Author: Bagher Yakhchali, PhD, Professor, Institute of Industrial and Environmental Biotechnology, National Institute of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Tehran, Iran. Tel: +98-2144787391, Email: [email protected] Received October 20, 2019; Accepted December 8, 2019; Online Published June 13, 2020 Abstract Introduction: Biotransformation process has been used in various industries due to its ability to produce valuable chemicals and address environmental concerns. Propylene hydroformylation is a process in which n-butyraldehyde and isobutyraldehyde are produced. N-butyraldehyde is a high valuable chemical with many industrial applications, while isobutyraldehyde produced as a by-product is an environmental pollutant. This study offers a biotechnological approach for conversion of isobutyraldehyde into a high-value substance. An engineered strain of Escherichia coli was developed by genomic insertion of alcohol-dehydrogenase gene (adhA) from Lactococcus lactis which can convert isobutyraldehyde into isobutanol. Materials and Methods: The adhA gene was engineered to substitute some of its amino acids to result in a more efficient enzyme.
  • Federal Register/Vol. 84, No. 230/Friday, November 29, 2019

    Federal Register/Vol. 84, No. 230/Friday, November 29, 2019

    Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 230 / Friday, November 29, 2019 / Proposed Rules 65739 are operated by a government LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 49966 (Sept. 24, 2019). The Office overseeing a population below 50,000. solicited public comments on a broad Of the impacts we estimate accruing U.S. Copyright Office range of subjects concerning the to grantees or eligible entities, all are administration of the new blanket voluntary and related mostly to an 37 CFR Part 210 compulsory license for digital uses of increase in the number of applications [Docket No. 2019–5] musical works that was created by the prepared and submitted annually for MMA, including regulations regarding competitive grant competitions. Music Modernization Act Implementing notices of license, notices of nonblanket Therefore, we do not believe that the Regulations for the Blanket License for activity, usage reports and adjustments, proposed priorities would significantly Digital Uses and Mechanical Licensing information to be included in the impact small entities beyond the Collective: Extension of Comment mechanical licensing collective’s potential for increasing the likelihood of Period database, database usability, their applying for, and receiving, interoperability, and usage restrictions, competitive grants from the Department. AGENCY: U.S. Copyright Office, Library and the handling of confidential of Congress. information. Paperwork Reduction Act ACTION: Notification of inquiry; To ensure that members of the public The proposed priorities do not extension of comment period. have sufficient time to respond, and to contain any information collection ensure that the Office has the benefit of SUMMARY: The U.S. Copyright Office is requirements. a complete record, the Office is extending the deadline for the extending the deadline for the Intergovernmental Review: This submission of written reply comments program is subject to Executive Order submission of written reply comments in response to its September 24, 2019 to no later than 5:00 p.m.
  • Product Catalog

    Product Catalog

    Product Catalog Classic Surfactants Service and Quality Brought Together Classic Distributing has been selling surfactants for over 30 years! We have expanded our relationship with multiple toll manufacturers. This allows us to control pricing, quality, and consistency under our own brand. Now all of the high quality surfactants are made to our specifications to insure performance in the market place. We will continue to offer all of the services you have grown to expect from Classic Distributing including formulation knowledge and proprietary blend formulation. We also have capabilities with natural and non alcohol sulfate surfactant technologies that we have added in response to market demand. If you have special formulating requirements, just ask! Cosmetic Products AMIDES INCI DESCRIPTION Classic CE Cocamide DEA Classic KD Cocamide DEA Classic LSM Lauramide DEA (liquid) Classic CME Cocamide MEA (flake) Classic SD Soyamide DEA Classic B-MIPA Cocamide MIPA/Cocamidopropyl Betaine Classic DIPA Cocamide DIPA ALKYL ETHER SULFATES INCI DESCRIPTION Classic ES-2K Sodium Laureth Sulfate Classic ES-60 Sodium Laureth Sulfate Classic ES-70 Sodium Laureth Sulfate (2 mole) ALKYL SULFATES INCI DESCRIPTION Classic ALS Ammonium Lauryl Sulfate Classic TLS TEA-Lauryl Sulfate Classic SLS Sodium Lauryl Sulfate Classic SLN-95 Sodium Lauryl Sulfate Crystals AMINE OXIDES INCI DESCRIPTION Classic CAW Cocamidopropylamine Oxide Classic LO Lauramine Oxide AMPHOTERICS INCI DESCRIPTION Classic DCA Disodium Coco Amphodiacetate BETAINES INCI DESCRIPTION Classic CAS
  • Section 2. Hazards Identification OSHA/HCS Status : This Material Is Considered Hazardous by the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200)

    Section 2. Hazards Identification OSHA/HCS Status : This Material Is Considered Hazardous by the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200)

    SAFETY DATA SHEET Isobutyraldehyde Section 1. Identification GHS product identifier : Isobutyraldehyde Chemical name : isobutyraldehyde Other means of : Propanal, 2-methyl- identification Product type : Liquid. Product use : Synthetic/Analytical chemistry. Synonym : Propanal, 2-methyl- SDS # : 001225 Supplier's details : Airgas USA, LLC and its affiliates 259 North Radnor-Chester Road Suite 100 Radnor, PA 19087-5283 1-610-687-5253 24-hour telephone : 1-866-734-3438 Section 2. Hazards identification OSHA/HCS status : This material is considered hazardous by the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200). Classification of the : FLAMMABLE LIQUIDS - Category 2 substance or mixture EYE IRRITATION - Category 2A AQUATIC HAZARD (ACUTE) - Category 3 GHS label elements Hazard pictograms : Signal word : Danger Hazard statements : May form explosive mixtures with air. Highly flammable liquid and vapor. Causes serious eye irritation. Harmful to aquatic life. Precautionary statements General : Read label before use. Keep out of reach of children. If medical advice is needed, have product container or label at hand. Prevention : Wear protective gloves. Wear eye or face protection. Keep away from heat, hot surfaces, sparks, open flames and other ignition sources. No smoking. Use explosion- proof electrical, ventilating, lighting and all material-handling equipment. Use only non- sparking tools. Take precautionary measures against static discharge. Keep container tightly closed. Avoid release to the environment. Wash hands thoroughly after handling. Response : IF ON SKIN (or hair): Take off immediately all contaminated clothing. Rinse skin with water or shower. IF IN EYES: Rinse cautiously with water for several minutes. Remove contact lenses, if present and easy to do. Continue rinsing.
  • Coconut Oil Diethanolamine Condensate

    Coconut Oil Diethanolamine Condensate

    COCONUT OIL DIETHANOLAMINE CONDENSATE 1. Exposure Data 1.1.2 Structural and molecular formulae and relative molecular mass 1.1 Chemical and physical data O CH2CH2OH Coconut oil diethanolamine condensate is CH3 (CH2)n CH2 C N a mixture of diethanolamides of the fatty acids that constitute coconut oil, which is composed CH2CH2OH of approximately 48.2% lauric acid (12:0), 18% myristic acid (14:0), 8.5% palmitic acid (16:0), 8% n = 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15 caprylic acid (8:0), 7% capric acid (10:0), 6% oleic acid (18:1, n-9), 2.3% stearic acid (18:0) and 2% C(7+n)H(15+2n)NO3 linoleic acid (18:2, n-6) (NTP, 2001). Relative molecular mass: range, 231–371 1.1.1 Nomenclature 1.1.3 Chemical and physical properties of the Chem. Abstr. Serv. Reg. No.: 68603-42-9 pure substance Deleted Chem. Abstr. Serv. Reg. Nos: 8036­ Description: Clear, amber-coloured liquid 48-4; 8040-31-1; 8040-33-3; 12751-06-3; with a faint coconut odour (CTFA, 1986) 53028-62-9; 56448-72-7; 56832-66-7; 63091­ Boiling-point: 169–275 °C 31-6; 66984-58-5; 67785-10-8; 67785-14-2; Melting-point: 23–35 °C (CTFA, 1986) 71343-51-6; 71343-71-0; 83652-14-6; 87714­ Density: 0.99 g/cm3 at 20 °C (IUCLID, 18-9; 90651-47-1; 118104-13-5; 153189-69-6; 2000) 186615-78-1 (ChemID plus) Solubility: Miscible with water at 20 °C; Chem. Abstr. Name: Amides, coco, produces an alkali in aqueous solution N,N-bis(hydroxyethyl) (CTFA, 1986) Synonyms: N,N-Bis(hydroxyethyl)coco Octanol/water partition coefficient (P): amides; N,N-bis(hydroxyethyl)coco fatty log P, 3.52 (IUCLID, 2000) acid amides; cocamide DEA;
  • Carbon Dioxide - Wikipedia

    Carbon Dioxide - Wikipedia

    5/20/2020 Carbon dioxide - Wikipedia Carbon dioxide Carbon dioxide (chemical formula CO2) is a colorless gas with Carbon dioxide a density about 60% higher than that of dry air. Carbon dioxide consists of a carbon atom covalently double bonded to two oxygen atoms. It occurs naturally in Earth's atmosphere as a trace gas. The current concentration is about 0.04% (412 ppm) by volume, having risen from pre-industrial levels of 280 ppm.[8] Natural sources include volcanoes, hot springs and geysers, and it is freed from carbonate rocks by dissolution in water and acids. Because carbon dioxide is soluble in water, it occurs naturally in groundwater, rivers and lakes, ice caps, glaciers and seawater. It is present in deposits of petroleum and natural gas. Carbon dioxide is odorless at normally encountered concentrations, but at high concentrations, it has a sharp and acidic odor.[1] At such Names concentrations it generates the taste of soda water in the Other names [9] mouth. Carbonic acid gas As the source of available carbon in the carbon cycle, atmospheric Carbonic anhydride carbon dioxide is the primary carbon source for life on Earth and Carbonic oxide its concentration in Earth's pre-industrial atmosphere since late Carbon oxide in the Precambrian has been regulated by photosynthetic organisms and geological phenomena. Plants, algae and Carbon(IV) oxide cyanobacteria use light energy to photosynthesize carbohydrate Dry ice (solid phase) from carbon dioxide and water, with oxygen produced as a waste Identifiers product.[10] CAS Number 124-38-9 (http://ww w.commonchemistr CO2 is produced by all aerobic organisms when they metabolize carbohydrates and lipids to produce energy by respiration.[11] It is y.org/ChemicalDeta returned to water via the gills of fish and to the air via the lungs of il.aspx?ref=124-38- air-breathing land animals, including humans.
  • Alternatives to Cocamide DEA California's Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) Has Listed Cocamide DEA (CAS No

    Alternatives to Cocamide DEA California's Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) Has Listed Cocamide DEA (CAS No

    Alternatives to Cocamide DEA California's Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) has listed Cocamide DEA (CAS No. 68603-42-9) on Proposition 65. For those looking to reformulate, Stepan is providing the following performance comparison and alternative surfactant recommendations to NINOL® 40-CO (1:1 Cocamide DEA) and NINOL® 11-CM (2:1 Cocamide DEA) for use in liquid dish detergents, all-purpose cleaners, degreasers, and vehicle care detergents. Stepan has a broad amphoteric product line and the technical expertise in hard surface care to assist our customers with product recommendation and reformulation. The recommended surfactants noted below take into consideration performance, handling, typical lead time, and estimated market price. If you require further assistance, please contact your local Stepan sales representative or Stepan U.S. Technical Service at [email protected] or (800) 745-7837. LIQUID DISH DETERGENTS (LDL) For an LDL economy formulation containing Linear Alkylbenzene Sulfonate (LAS) and Sodium Laureth Sulfate (SLES), the following surfactants showed equivalent or improved foam mileage and equivalent foam volume compared to NINOL® 40-CO on an equal actives basis. Recommendations Mixer Foam: LAS/SLES Economy AMMONYX® LMDO (Lauramidopropylamine Oxide) 160 AMPHOSOL® CG-50 (Cocamidopropyl Betaine) 150 AMMONYX® CDO SPECIAL (Cocamidopropylamine Oxide) 140 Shake Foam: LAS/SLES Economy 130 Soil D 500 120 Shell 400 110 Soil 300 100 90 200 Normalized Normalized Foam Mileage 80 100 Foam Volume (mL) 0 40-CO LMDO CG-50 CDO SPECIAL For an LDL premium formulation containing Sodium Lauryl Sulfate (SLS) and Sodium Laureth Sulfate (SLES), the following surfactants showed equivalent or improved foam mileage and equivalent foam volume compared to NINOL® 40-CO on an equal actives basis.