DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix 16 Census of Reptiles and Amphibian Communities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix 16 Census of Reptiles and Amphibian Communities Appendix 16 Census of Reptiles and Amphibian Communities Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Yaoure Gold Project, Côte d’Ivoire Submitted to Amara Mining Côte d’Ivoire SARL Submitted By Johannes Penner & LeGrand Nono Gonwouo APPENDIX 16 HERPETOLOGY REPORT ESIA REPORT, YAOURE GOLD PROJECT JUNE 2015 R E P O R T I S S U E F ORM Client Name Amara Mining Côte d’Ivoire SARL Yaoure Gold Project Environmental and Social Impact Project Name Assessment Census of Reptiles and Amphibian Communities at the Yaoure Report Title Gold Project, Côte d’Ivoire Document Status Final Issue No. 1 Issue Date 12 November 2015 Report Number Document Reference 7879140169 A169-15-R2354 Johannes Penner & LeGrand Author Nono Gonwouo Signature & Date Reviewer Genevieve Campbell Signature & Date Project Manager Approval Christian Kunze 12 November 2015 D ISCLAIMER This report was prepared exclusively for the client above by Amec Foster Wheeler Earth & Environmental UK Ltd. (Amec Foster Wheeler). The quality of information, conclusions and estimates contained herein are consistent with the level of effort involved in Amec Foster Wheeler’s services and based on: i) information available at the time of preparation, ii) data supplied by outside sources and iii) the assumptions, conditions and qualifications set forth in this report. This report is intended for use by the above client subject to the terms and conditions of its contract with Amec Foster Wheeler. Any other use of, or reliance on, this report by any third party is at that party’s sole risk. Project No.: 7879140169 Report Issue Form APPENDIX 16 HERPETOLOGY REPORT ESIA REPORT, YAOURE GOLD PROJECT JUNE 2015 E X E C U T I V E S UMMARY Background - The following report summarises the rapid assessment conducted within the Yaoure Gold Project concession to gather baseline data for reptiles and amphibians. The survey took place from the 1st to the 21st of May 2015 and was commissioned by Amec Foster Wheeler Earth & Environmental UK Ltd for Amara Mining Côte d’Ivoire SARL. In total, 35 species of reptiles and 29 species of amphibians were recorded. Methods - Reptiles and amphibians were searched via visual and acoustic encounter surveys in suitable habitats. Trapping with drift fences and funnel traps at two sites supplemented the records. Complementary information was gathered through interviews, especially to assess crocodile presence in the area. Main findings - No regional or national Red Lists are publicly available. None of the recorded species are currently listed as threatened by the global IUCN Red List. Nine species of reptiles are of conservation concern because they are either regularly harvested (Bitis arietans, Bitis rhinoceros, Pelusios castaneus, Chamaeleo gracilis, Python sebae, Python regius, Varanus niloticus; the last four species are listed in CITES Appendix II) or have restricted ranges (Hemidactylus fasciatus, Hemidactylus cf. muriceus). The latter two species are also indicators for forests. Three species of amphibians are also of conservation concern due to their restricted ranges (Afrixalus vittiger, Hyperolius igbettensis, Kassina schioetzi). Four specimens of reed frogs (Family Hyperoliidae: Hyperolius sp.) cannot be assigned to any known species yet. Further research is needed to verify whether they might be a new species. Overall, the concession contains a diverse herpetofauna because it is located at the transition zone between the biomes forest and savannah. A number of species of reptiles (n=39) and amphibians (n=18) were not recorded during the present survey but are known from this region of Côte d’Ivoire. The absence of larger patches of good humid forests from the study area might be the main explanation for the absence of many forest dependent species. Impacts - Artisanal and industrial mining activities have been on-going throughout the concession for several years and have significantly altered the vegetation and landscape so that many species are confined to the remaining natural small forest or savannah patches. Thus the site is already impacted but a further increase in habitat degradation is expected with further developments. The main recommendation is to raise awareness on the importance of biodiversity at the mine site but also in the area in general as well as to start coherent environmental and offset planning as soon as possible. Project No.: 7879140169 Executive Summary I APPENDIX 16 HERPETOLOGY REPORT ESIA REPORT, YAOURE GOLD PROJECT JUNE 2015 C ONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose of the Study...................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Desktop Findings ........................................................................................................... 2 1.2.1 Previous Studies ............................................................................................... 2 1.2.2 Regional and International Importance ............................................................. 2 1.3 Legal Requirements ....................................................................................................... 2 2.0 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................................ 3 2.1 Study Topic .................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Study Area and Survey Period ....................................................................................... 3 2.3 Sampling Methodology ................................................................................................ 10 2.4 Analyses ....................................................................................................................... 11 3.0 RESULTS .................................................................................................................................. 12 3.1 Reptiles ........................................................................................................................ 12 3.1.1 Reptiles of Conservation Concern .................................................................. 15 3.2 Amphibians .................................................................................................................. 18 3.2.1 Amphibians of Conservation Concern ............................................................ 21 3.3 Areas of Conservation Concern ................................................................................... 25 3.4 Comparison to other assemblages .............................................................................. 25 3.5 Sampling effort and timing of survey ............................................................................ 26 3.6 Ecosystem services ..................................................................................................... 28 3.7 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 29 4.0 IMPACT ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................................... 30 4.1 Impact Description ....................................................................................................... 30 4.2 Impact Assessment ...................................................................................................... 31 4.2.1 Direct habitat loss............................................................................................ 33 4.2.2 Indirect habitat loss ......................................................................................... 34 4.2.3 Increased bush meat demand ........................................................................ 35 4.2.4 Accidental deaths of amphibians and reptiles ................................................ 36 4.2.5 Risk of snake bites .......................................................................................... 37 4.3 Important Issues ........................................................................................................... 37 5.0 MANAGEMENT AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS ......................................................... 38 5.1 Impact Mitigating and Management Requirements ..................................................... 38 5.2 Monitoring Requirements ............................................................................................. 39 6.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION .............................................................................................. 40 6.1 Gap Analysis ................................................................................................................ 40 6.2 Offsetting ...................................................................................................................... 41 6.3 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 41 7.0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................................... 43 8.0 REFERENCES .......................................................................................................................... 44 T ABLES Table 3.1 List of reptile species ............................................................................................................. 12 Table 3.2 List of amphibian species
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Molecular Phylogeny of Equatorial African Lacertidae, with the Description of a New Genus and Species from Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo
    Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2011, 163, 913–942. With 7 figures A molecular phylogeny of Equatorial African Lacertidae, with the description of a new genus and species from eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo ELI GREENBAUM1*, CESAR O. VILLANUEVA1, CHIFUNDERA KUSAMBA2, MWENEBATU M. ARISTOTE3 and WILLIAM R. BRANCH4,5 1Department of Biological Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso, 500 West University Avenue, El Paso, TX 79968, USA 2Laboratoire d’Herpétologie, Département de Biologie, Centre de Recherche en Sciences Naturelles, Lwiro, République Démocratique du Congo 3Institut Superieur d’Ecologie pour la Conservation de la Nature, Katana Campus, Sud Kivu, République Démocratique du Congo 4Bayworld, P.O. Box 13147, Humewood 6013, South Africa 5Research Associate, Department of Zoology, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth, South Africa Received 25 July 2010; revised 21 November 2010; accepted for publication 18 January 2011 Currently, four species of the lacertid lizard genus Adolfus are known from Central and East Africa. We sequenced up to 2825 bp of two mitochondrial [16S and cytochrome b (cyt b)] and two nuclear [(c-mos (oocyte maturation factor) and RAG1 (recombination activating gene 1)] genes from 41 samples of Adolfus (representing every species), two species each of Gastropholis and Holaspis, and in separate analyses combined these data with GenBank sequences of all other Eremiadini genera and four Lacertini outgroups. Data from DNA sequences were analysed with maximum parsimony (PAUP), maximum-likelihood (RAxML) and Bayesian inference (MrBayes) criteria. Results demonstrated that Adolfus is not monophyletic: Adolfus africanus (type species), Adolfus alleni, and Adolfus jacksoni are sister taxa, whereas Adolfus vauereselli and a new species from the Itombwe Plateau of Democratic Republic of the Congo are in a separate lineage.
    [Show full text]
  • Controlled Animals
    Environment and Sustainable Resource Development Fish and Wildlife Policy Division Controlled Animals Wildlife Regulation, Schedule 5, Part 1-4: Controlled Animals Subject to the Wildlife Act, a person must not be in possession of a wildlife or controlled animal unless authorized by a permit to do so, the animal was lawfully acquired, was lawfully exported from a jurisdiction outside of Alberta and was lawfully imported into Alberta. NOTES: 1 Animals listed in this Schedule, as a general rule, are described in the left hand column by reference to common or descriptive names and in the right hand column by reference to scientific names. But, in the event of any conflict as to the kind of animals that are listed, a scientific name in the right hand column prevails over the corresponding common or descriptive name in the left hand column. 2 Also included in this Schedule is any animal that is the hybrid offspring resulting from the crossing, whether before or after the commencement of this Schedule, of 2 animals at least one of which is or was an animal of a kind that is a controlled animal by virtue of this Schedule. 3 This Schedule excludes all wildlife animals, and therefore if a wildlife animal would, but for this Note, be included in this Schedule, it is hereby excluded from being a controlled animal. Part 1 Mammals (Class Mammalia) 1. AMERICAN OPOSSUMS (Family Didelphidae) Virginia Opossum Didelphis virginiana 2. SHREWS (Family Soricidae) Long-tailed Shrews Genus Sorex Arboreal Brown-toothed Shrew Episoriculus macrurus North American Least Shrew Cryptotis parva Old World Water Shrews Genus Neomys Ussuri White-toothed Shrew Crocidura lasiura Greater White-toothed Shrew Crocidura russula Siberian Shrew Crocidura sibirica Piebald Shrew Diplomesodon pulchellum 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Congolius, a New Genus of African Reed Frog Endemic to The
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Congolius, a new genus of African reed frog endemic to the central Congo: A potential case of convergent evolution Tadeáš Nečas1,2*, Gabriel Badjedjea3, Michal Vopálenský4 & Václav Gvoždík1,5* The reed frog genus Hyperolius (Afrobatrachia, Hyperoliidae) is a speciose genus containing over 140 species of mostly small to medium-sized frogs distributed in sub-Saharan Africa. Its high level of colour polymorphism, together with in anurans relatively rare sexual dichromatism, make systematic studies more difcult. As a result, the knowledge of the diversity and taxonomy of this genus is still limited. Hyperolius robustus known only from a handful of localities in rain forests of the central Congo Basin is one of the least known species. Here, we have used molecular methods for the frst time to study the phylogenetic position of this taxon, accompanied by an analysis of phenotype based on external (morphometric) and internal (osteological) morphological characters. Our phylogenetic results undoubtedly placed H. robustus out of Hyperolius into a common clade with sympatric Cryptothylax and West African Morerella. To prevent the uncovered paraphyly, we place H. robustus into a new genus, Congolius. The review of all available data suggests that the new genus is endemic to the central Congolian lowland rain forests. The analysis of phenotype underlined morphological similarity of the new genus to some Hyperolius species. This uniformity of body shape (including cranial shape) indicates that the two genera have either retained ancestral morphology or evolved through convergent evolution under similar ecological pressures in the African rain forests. African reed frogs, Hyperoliidae Laurent, 1943, are presently encompassing almost 230 species in 17 genera.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist Reptile and Amphibian
    To report sightings, contact: Natural Resources Coordinator 980-314-1119 www.parkandrec.com REPTILE AND AMPHIBIAN CHECKLIST Mecklenburg County, NC: 66 species Mole Salamanders ☐ Pickerel Frog ☐ Ground Skink (Scincella lateralis) ☐ Spotted Salamander (Rana (Lithobates) palustris) Whiptails (Ambystoma maculatum) ☐ Southern Leopard Frog ☐ Six-lined Racerunner ☐ Marbled Salamander (Rana (Lithobates) sphenocephala (Aspidoscelis sexlineata) (Ambystoma opacum) (sphenocephalus)) Nonvenomous Snakes Lungless Salamanders Snapping Turtles ☐ Eastern Worm Snake ☐ Dusky Salamander (Desmognathus fuscus) ☐ Common Snapping Turtle (Carphophis amoenus) ☐ Southern Two-lined Salamander (Chelydra serpentina) ☐ Scarlet Snake1 (Cemophora coccinea) (Eurycea cirrigera) Box and Water Turtles ☐ Black Racer (Coluber constrictor) ☐ Three-lined Salamander ☐ Northern Painted Turtle ☐ Ring-necked Snake (Eurycea guttolineata) (Chrysemys picta) (Diadophis punctatus) ☐ Spring Salamander ☐ Spotted Turtle2, 6 (Clemmys guttata) ☐ Corn Snake (Pantherophis guttatus) (Gyrinophilus porphyriticus) ☐ River Cooter (Pseudemys concinna) ☐ Rat Snake (Pantherophis alleghaniensis) ☐ Slimy Salamander (Plethodon glutinosus) ☐ Eastern Box Turtle (Terrapene carolina) ☐ Eastern Hognose Snake ☐ Mud Salamander (Pseudotriton montanus) ☐ Yellow-bellied Slider (Trachemys scripta) (Heterodon platirhinos) ☐ Red Salamander (Pseudotriton ruber) ☐ Red-eared Slider3 ☐ Mole Kingsnake Newts (Trachemys scripta elegans) (Lampropeltis calligaster) ☐ Red-spotted Newt Mud and Musk Turtles ☐ Eastern Kingsnake
    [Show full text]
  • Genus Lycodon)
    Zoologica Scripta Multilocus phylogeny reveals unexpected diversification patterns in Asian wolf snakes (genus Lycodon) CAMERON D. SILER,CARL H. OLIVEROS,ANSSI SANTANEN &RAFE M. BROWN Submitted: 6 September 2012 Siler, C. D., Oliveros, C. H., Santanen, A., Brown, R. M. (2013). Multilocus phylogeny Accepted: 8 December 2012 reveals unexpected diversification patterns in Asian wolf snakes (genus Lycodon). —Zoologica doi:10.1111/zsc.12007 Scripta, 42, 262–277. The diverse group of Asian wolf snakes of the genus Lycodon represents one of many poorly understood radiations of advanced snakes in the superfamily Colubroidea. Outside of three species having previously been represented in higher-level phylogenetic analyses, nothing is known of the relationships among species in this unique, moderately diverse, group. The genus occurs widely from central to Southeast Asia, and contains both widespread species to forms that are endemic to small islands. One-third of the diversity is found in the Philippine archipelago. Both morphological similarity and highly variable diagnostic characters have contributed to confusion over species-level diversity. Additionally, the placement of the genus among genera in the subfamily Colubrinae remains uncertain, although previous studies have supported a close relationship with the genus Dinodon. In this study, we provide the first estimate of phylogenetic relationships within the genus Lycodon using a new multi- locus data set. We provide statistical tests of monophyly based on biogeographic, morpho- logical and taxonomic hypotheses. With few exceptions, we are able to reject many of these hypotheses, indicating a need for taxonomic revisions and a reconsideration of the group's biogeography. Mapping of color patterns on our preferred phylogenetic tree suggests that banded and blotched types have evolved on multiple occasions in the history of the genus, whereas the solid-color (and possibly speckled) morphotype color patterns evolved only once.
    [Show full text]
  • The Herpetofauna of the Cubango, Cuito, and Lower Cuando River Catchments of South-Eastern Angola
    Official journal website: Amphibian & Reptile Conservation amphibian-reptile-conservation.org 10(2) [Special Section]: 6–36 (e126). The herpetofauna of the Cubango, Cuito, and lower Cuando river catchments of south-eastern Angola 1,2,*Werner Conradie, 2Roger Bills, and 1,3William R. Branch 1Port Elizabeth Museum (Bayworld), P.O. Box 13147, Humewood 6013, SOUTH AFRICA 2South African Institute for Aquatic Bio- diversity, P/Bag 1015, Grahamstown 6140, SOUTH AFRICA 3Research Associate, Department of Zoology, P O Box 77000, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth 6031, SOUTH AFRICA Abstract.—Angola’s herpetofauna has been neglected for many years, but recent surveys have revealed unknown diversity and a consequent increase in the number of species recorded for the country. Most historical Angola surveys focused on the north-eastern and south-western parts of the country, with the south-east, now comprising the Kuando-Kubango Province, neglected. To address this gap a series of rapid biodiversity surveys of the upper Cubango-Okavango basin were conducted from 2012‒2015. This report presents the results of these surveys, together with a herpetological checklist of current and historical records for the Angolan drainage of the Cubango, Cuito, and Cuando Rivers. In summary 111 species are known from the region, comprising 38 snakes, 32 lizards, five chelonians, a single crocodile and 34 amphibians. The Cubango is the most western catchment and has the greatest herpetofaunal diversity (54 species). This is a reflection of both its easier access, and thus greatest number of historical records, and also the greater habitat and topographical diversity associated with the rocky headwaters.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancestral Reconstruction of Diet and Fang Condition in the Lamprophiidae: Implications for the Evolution of Venom Systems in Snakes
    Journal of Herpetology, Vol. 55, No. 1, 1–10, 2021 Copyright 2021 Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Ancestral Reconstruction of Diet and Fang Condition in the Lamprophiidae: Implications for the Evolution of Venom Systems in Snakes 1,2 1 1 HIRAL NAIK, MIMMIE M. KGADITSE, AND GRAHAM J. ALEXANDER 1School of Animal, Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. PO Wits, 2050, Gauteng, South Africa ABSTRACT.—The Colubroidea includes all venomous and some nonvenomous snakes, many of which have extraordinary dental morphology and functional capabilities. It has been proposed that the ancestral condition of the Colubroidea is venomous with tubular fangs. The venom system includes the production of venomous secretions by labial glands in the mouth and usually includes fangs for effective delivery of venom. Despite significant research on the evolution of the venom system in snakes, limited research exists on the driving forces for different fang and dental morphology at a broader phylogenetic scale. We assessed the patterns of fang and dental condition in the Lamprophiidae, a speciose family of advanced snakes within the Colubroidea, and we related fang and dental condition to diet. The Lamprophiidae is the only snake family that includes front-fanged, rear-fanged, and fangless species. We produced an ancestral reconstruction for the family and investigated the pattern of diet and fangs within the clade. We concluded that the ancestral lamprophiid was most likely rear-fanged and that the shift in dental morphology was associated with changes in diet. This pattern indicates that fang loss, and probably venom loss, has occurred multiple times within the Lamprophiidae.
    [Show full text]
  • Biogeography of the Reptiles of the Central African Republic
    African Journal of Herpetology, 2006 55(1): 23-59. ©Herpetological Association of Africa Original article Biogeography of the Reptiles of the Central African Republic LAURENT CHIRIO AND IVAN INEICH Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle Département de Systématique et Evolution (Reptiles) – USM 602, Case Postale 30, 25, rue Cuvier, F-75005 Paris, France This work is dedicated to the memory of our friend and colleague Jens B. Rasmussen, Curator of Reptiles at the Zoological Museum of Copenhagen, Denmark Abstract.—A large number of reptiles from the Central African Republic (CAR) were collected during recent surveys conducted over six years (October 1990 to June 1996) and deposited at the Paris Natural History Museum (MNHN). This large collection of 4873 specimens comprises 86 terrapins and tortois- es, five crocodiles, 1814 lizards, 38 amphisbaenids and 2930 snakes, totalling 183 species from 78 local- ities within the CAR. A total of 62 taxa were recorded for the first time in the CAR, the occurrence of numerous others was confirmed, and the known distribution of several taxa is greatly extended. Based on this material and an additional six species known to occur in, or immediately adjacent to, the coun- try from other sources, we present a biogeographical analysis of the 189 species of reptiles in the CAR. Key words.—Central African Republic, reptile fauna, biogeography, distribution. he majority of African countries have been improved; known distributions of many species Tthe subject of several reptile studies (see are greatly expanded and distributions of some for example LeBreton 1999 for Cameroon). species are questioned in light of our results.
    [Show full text]
  • Figs1 Speciestree Seqcap
    Phrynomantis microps Microhylidae Breviceps adspersus Brevicipitidae Hemisus marmoratus Hemisotidae Leptopelis rufus Cardioglossa gracilis Arthtroleptis poecilinotus Leptodactylodon ovatus Arthroleptidae Nyctibates corrugatus Trichobatrachus robustus Scotobleps gabonicus Acanthixalus spinosus Acanthixalus sonjae Semnodactylus wealli Paracassina obscura Paracassina kounhiensis Kassininae Phlyctimantis maculata Phlyctimantis verrucosus Phlyctimantis boulengeri Phlyctimantis leonardi Kassina kuvangensis Kassina fusca Kassina lamottei Kassina senegalensis Kassina decorata Kassina maculosa Kassina arboricola Hyperoliidae Kassina cochranae Opisthothylax immaculatus Afrixalus enseticola Tachycnemis seychellensis Heterixalus luteostriatus Malagasy-Seychelles Heterixalus alboguttatus Species Afrixalus vibekensis Afrixalus weidholzi Afrixalus lacustris Afrixalus dorsimaculatus 1 Afrixalus dorsimaculatus 2 Afrixalus knysae Afrixalus spinifrons Hyperoliinae Afrixalus delicatus Afrixalus sylvaticus Afrixalus brachycnemis Afrixalus laevis Afrixalus lacteus Afrixalus fornasini Afrixalus wittei Afrixalus osorioi Afrixalus paradorsalis paradorsalis 2 Afrixalus paradorsalis paradorsalis 1 Afrixalus paradorsalis manengubensis Afrixalus nigeriensis Afrixalus vittiger 1 Afrixalus vittiger 2 Afrixalus dorsalis 3 Afrixalus dorsalis 1 Afrixalus quadrivittatus 1 Afrixalus quadrivittatus 2 Afrixalus dorsalis 2 Afrixalus fulvovittatus 2 Afrixalus fulvovittatus 1 Morerella cyanophthalma Cryptothylax greshoffii Hyperolius semidiscus Hyperolius parkeri Hyperolius
    [Show full text]
  • Class Reptilia
    REPTILE CWCS SPECIES (27 SPECIES) Common name Scientific name Alligator Snapping Turtle Macrochelys temminckii Broad-banded Water Snake Nerodia fasciata confluens Coal Skink Eumeces anthracinus Copperbelly Watersnake Nerodia erythrogaster neglecta Corn Snake Elaphe guttata guttata Diamondback Water Snake Nerodia rhombifer rhombifer Eastern Coachwhip Masticophis flagellum flagellum Eastern Mud Turtle Kinosternon subrubrum Eastern Ribbon Snake Thamnophis sauritus sauritus Eastern Slender Glass Lizard Ophisaurus attenuatus longicaudus False Map Turtle Graptemys pseudogeographica pseudogeographica Green Water Snake Nerodia cyclopion Kirtland's Snake Clonophis kirtlandii Midland Smooth Softshell Apalone mutica mutica Mississippi Map Turtle Graptemys pseudogeographica kohnii Northern Pine Snake Pituophis melanoleucus melanoleucus Northern Scarlet Snake Cemophora coccinea copei Scarlet Kingsnake Lampropeltis triangulum elapsoides Six-lined Racerunner Cnemidophorus sexlineatus Southeastern Crowned Snake Tantilla coronata Southeastern Five-lined Skink Eumeces inexpectatus Southern Painted Turtle Chrysemys picta dorsalis Timber Rattlesnake Crotalus horridus Western Cottonmouth Agkistrodon piscivorus leucostoma Western Mud Snake Farancia abacura reinwardtii Western Pygmy Rattlesnake Sistrurus miliarius streckeri Western Ribbon Snake Thamnophis proximus proximus CLASS REPTILIA Alligator Snapping Turtle Macrochelys temminckii Federal Heritage GRank SRank GRank SRank Status Status (Simplified) (Simplified) N T G3G4 S2 G3 S2 G-Trend Decreasing G-Trend
    [Show full text]
  • Protected Area Management Plan Development - SAPO NATIONAL PARK
    Technical Assistance Report Protected Area Management Plan Development - SAPO NATIONAL PARK - Sapo National Park -Vision Statement By the year 2010, a fully restored biodiversity, and well-maintained, properly managed Sapo National Park, with increased public understanding and acceptance, and improved quality of life in communities surrounding the Park. A Cooperative Accomplishment of USDA Forest Service, Forestry Development Authority and Conservation International Steve Anderson and Dennis Gordon- USDA Forest Service May 29, 2005 to June 17, 2005 - 1 - USDA Forest Service, Forestry Development Authority and Conservation International Protected Area Development Management Plan Development Technical Assistance Report Steve Anderson and Dennis Gordon 17 June 2005 Goal Provide support to the FDA, CI and FFI to review and update the Sapo NP management plan, establish a management plan template, develop a program of activities for implementing the plan, and train FDA staff in developing future management plans. Summary Week 1 – Arrived in Monrovia on 29 May and met with Forestry Development Authority (FDA) staff and our two counterpart hosts, Theo Freeman and Morris Kamara, heads of the Wildlife Conservation and Protected Area Management and Protected Area Management respectively. We decided to concentrate on the immediate implementation needs for Sapo NP rather than a revision of existing management plan. The four of us, along with Tyler Christie of Conservation International (CI), worked in the CI office on the following topics: FDA Immediate
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 15 the Mammals of Angola
    Chapter 15 The Mammals of Angola Pedro Beja, Pedro Vaz Pinto, Luís Veríssimo, Elena Bersacola, Ezequiel Fabiano, Jorge M. Palmeirim, Ara Monadjem, Pedro Monterroso, Magdalena S. Svensson, and Peter John Taylor Abstract Scientific investigations on the mammals of Angola started over 150 years ago, but information remains scarce and scattered, with only one recent published account. Here we provide a synthesis of the mammals of Angola based on a thorough survey of primary and grey literature, as well as recent unpublished records. We present a short history of mammal research, and provide brief information on each species known to occur in the country. Particular attention is given to endemic and near endemic species. We also provide a zoogeographic outline and information on the conservation of Angolan mammals. We found confirmed records for 291 native species, most of which from the orders Rodentia (85), Chiroptera (73), Carnivora (39), and Cetartiodactyla (33). There is a large number of endemic and near endemic species, most of which are rodents or bats. The large diversity of species is favoured by the wide P. Beja (*) CIBIO-InBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto, Vairão, Portugal CEABN-InBio, Centro de Ecologia Aplicada “Professor Baeta Neves”, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal e-mail: [email protected] P. Vaz Pinto Fundação Kissama, Luanda, Angola CIBIO-InBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto, Campus de Vairão, Vairão, Portugal e-mail: [email protected] L. Veríssimo Fundação Kissama, Luanda, Angola e-mail: [email protected] E.
    [Show full text]