Jackson Pollock and the Indigenous American Spirit Maria S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Jackson Pollock and the Indigenous American Spirit Maria S Maine State Library Digital Maine Academic Research and Dissertations Maine State Library Special Collections 2018 Recuperating Mimêsis: Jackson Pollock and the Indigenous American Spirit Maria S. LaBrage Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalmaine.com/academic RECUPERATING MIMÊSIS: JACKSON POLLOCK AND THE INDIGENOUS AMERICAN SPIRIT Maria S. LaBarge Submitted to the faculty of The Institute for Doctoral Studies in the Visual Arts in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy April, 2018 Accepted by the faculty of the Institute for Doctoral Studies in the Visual Arts in partial fulfillment of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ______________________________ Christopher Yates, Ph.D. Doctoral Committee ______________________________ Simonetta Moro, Ph.D. ______________________________ Kathy Desmond, Ph.D. April 16, 2018 ii © 2018 Maria S. LaBarge ALL RIGHTS RESERVED iii My painting does not come from the easel. I hardly ever stretch my canvas before painting. I prefer to tack the unstretched canvas to the hard wall or the floor. I need the resistance of a hard surface. On the floor I am more at ease. I feel nearer, more a part of the painting, since this way I can walk around it, work from the four sides and literally be in the painting. This is akin to the method of the Indian sand painters of the West. – Jackson Pollock For Ezra, Samantha, et al. May you always trust in your creative dreams and how they connect you with something infinitely larger. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am deeply indebted to many who have assisted and guided me along this dissertation process. First, I sincerely appreciate the effort and assistance given me by my dissertation director, Christopher Yates. Christopher has a wonderful gift for paying close attention to content and stylistic details and great perceptive capacity for clarity. I began this project with research and writing objectives and Christopher has been an important guide in both aspects. I am greatly indebted to him for the many hours he has spent introducing and explaining the finer points of Phenomenology that has informed much of my research, analyzing my argument points, and for his watchful care over this entire process and project. I also thank my dissertation committee members Simonetta Moro and Kathy Desmond for their keen insights and contributions to this study. I want to thank George Smith, Founder and President of IDSVA, for his insight and vision in developing the IDSVA institute and program. His belief in me has inspired and driven me forward during the long and arduous years of intensive research and study. I have appropriated his term “recuperation” from our early discussions on this project, and I appreciate his insights and encouragement while my project was still in its infancy. I also appreciate Kent Minturn for his support and enthusiasm for my initial idea. I want to thank all who have contributed to or supported me throughout this doctoral journey: the IDSVA community of important mentors, colleagues, and friends like Michael Smith, Christopher Lonegan, Amy Curtis, our dear librarian, Laura Graveline, and countless others who have all contributed to my journey. Finally, but certainly not least, I appreciate my fellow students in Cohort ‘11, and especially my study group members and friends, Tammy Parks, Kathe Hicks, and Albrecht Mary Anne Davis and many other friends at IDSVA. They have been steadfast, insightful, and supportive throughout our journey together at IDSVA, and particularly during the dissertation process. Our regular study group communications have helped us all to keep moving forward together. Most importantly, I want to acknowledge my family, whose patience and encouragement has meant a lot to me, and I want them to know that I appreciate each of them. I am indebted to my mother for inspiring her family to appreciate beauty in all its forms. I appreciate Peter who has lifted my spirits many times during my long hours at work, and Sarah, Mary, Jacob, and René for reminding me that “we can do hard things”. I also thank Ezra and Samantha for being the joy they are in my life. Finally, I thank my friend and husband Cory L. LaBarge for his passion for learning, his gift for knowledge and insight, and his encouragement and support. Thank you to all of my family and friends for patiently sacrificing our time together while I have worked through the long hours that have passed all too quickly. v ABSTRACT Maria S. LaBarge RECUPERATING MIMÊSIS: JACKSON POLLOCK AND THE INDIGENOUS AMERIDCAN SPIRIT Jackson Pollock has long been heralded as the quintessential Modernist. His work marks the pinnacle of the Golden Age of Modernism and the culmination of a long experiment with modernist ideas elaborated by theorists such as Croce, Fry, Bell, Greenberg and others. Within the predominant concerns of Modernism (including intuition, imagination, and abstraction), Pollock is the paragon of the modernist solitary genius. However, this view of Pollock depends primarily on analysis of his drip paintings and disregards the development of processes inherent within them. This enframing critique of Pollock overlooks the presence of symbol, allegory, and ritual upon which Pollock’s work depends. It neglects to account for the fact that far from pure abstractions, Pollock’s work crosses the boundaries of abstraction in order to reinstitute mimêsis in art. My analysis of Pollock’s work views his methodology as a recuperation of indigenous American aesthetics through mimêsis. I claim that through the forms, modes, and functions of mimêsis Pollock’s work transgresses modernity’s claims to pure form in favor of an inquiry into the forms and techniques of indigenous American aesthetics, thereby reintroducing notions of ritual and mythos in contemporary art. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction page 1 Chapter 1 On View: A Ubiquitous Indigenous Icon 17 Chapter 2: Critical Modern Divisions 72 Chapter 3 American Primitivism: a Case for Mimêsis 148 Chapter 4 Mimêsis and its Forms 209 Chapter 5 Mimêsis and its Modes 238 Chapter 6 Mimêsis and the Truth in Art 292 Conclusion Mimêsis and Ritual 359 Works Cited 376 Appendix A 390 Notes 394 viii Introduction Technique is just a means of arriving at a statement. Jackson Pollock So much has been said about Pollock’s alcoholism and possible personality disorder that it is difficult to look at his art without seeing a representation of Pollock himself. Authors trying to put together Pollock’s psychological profile often take liberties with their own creative analyses. One author, for example, stressed that Pollock had a love-hate relationship with his mother. This strong assessment was gleaned from a letter shared between Sande and Charles (Pollock’s brothers), where Sande opined, “Jackson is afflicted with a definite neurosis. Whether he comes through the normalcy and self-dependency depends on many subtle factors and some obvious ones. Since part of his trouble (perhaps a large part) lies in his childhood relationship with his Mother in particular and family in general, it would be extremely trying and might be disastrous for him to see her at this time” (Emmerling 14). What is most revealing in this exchange is not that Pollock hated his mother, but that Sande was just as influenced by ideas of repression in Freudian psychoanalysis as were any of his contemporaries. This is not to suggest that Pollock’s condition did not require psychoanalysis; rather, during Pollock’s time most believed that the answers to mental illness, alcoholism, and modern angst were to be found through the process of analysis. It is rather odd however, that the critique of Pollock’s work, more than that of any other artist, inevitably addresses Pollock’s psychological self. The works of other alcoholic 1 painters such as Mark Rothko or Willem De Kooning are largely reviewed as ontic or independent entities, apart from expressions, mental states, or addictions of the artists. But the artistic critique of Pollock’s work is nearly inseparable from that of his mental state (Wysuph 10). Even the art critic Clement Greenberg, who claimed that Pollock was on his way to becoming the ‘greatest American painter,’ addressed Pollock in terms of his personality and mental state, not simply just his artwork. In his January 24, 1948 review of Pollock’s one-man show at the Betty Parsons Gallery, Greenberg conflated Pollock’s work with both Cubism and Pollock’s emotional state, “Pollock’s mood has become more cheerful these past two years, if the general higher key of his color can be taken as a criterion in this respect” (qtd. in Karmel and Varnedoe, “Interviews” 60). Other reviewers also discuss Pollock’s work in terms of “mood” using words such as “brooding”, “impulsive”, “savage”, “joy”, “pain”, “reaction” “violent emotion” etc. 1 Pollock’s work is mythic, but Pollock himself is a large part of the myth. Lee Krasner sought to dispel some of the misunderstandings regarding Pollock’s personality and his work. In an interview with Art in America after Pollock’s death she explained, “there is so much stupid myth about Pollock, I can’t stand it!” (30). Pollock was not particularly violent, just verbal and angry when he was drunk. Pollock was very talkative when he wanted to be, and when talking, he was articulate and intelligent. Pollock was not suicidal. As Krasner explains, “There is the myth of suicide. There is no truth in this. It was an automobile accident like many others. That was a dangerous part of the road; just a while before, I myself skidded on that part of the road. The state highway department had to fix it soon after Jackson’s death. That speaks for itself” (30). Despite Krasner’s attempts to dispel the myths 2 surrounding Pollock, he is remembered so much for his life and personality that one can scarcely separate him from his artwork.
Recommended publications
  • Fractal Expressionism—Where Art Meets Science
    Santa Fe Institute. February 14, 2002 9:04 a.m. Taylor page 1 Fractal Expressionism—Where Art Meets Science Richard Taylor 1 INTRODUCTION If the Jackson Pollock story (1912–1956) hadn’t happened, Hollywood would have invented it any way! In a drunken, suicidal state on a stormy night in March 1952, the notorious Abstract Expressionist painter laid down the foundations of his masterpiece Blue Poles: Number 11, 1952 by rolling a large canvas across the oor of his windswept barn and dripping household paint from an old can with a wooden stick. The event represented the climax of a remarkable decade for Pollock, during which he generated a vast body of distinct art work commonly referred to as the “drip and splash” technique. In contrast to the broken lines painted by conventional brush contact with the canvas surface, Pollock poured a constant stream of paint onto his horizontal canvases to produce uniquely contin- uous trajectories. These deceptively simple acts fuelled unprecedented controversy and polarized public opinion around the world. Was this primitive painting style driven by raw genius or was he simply a drunk who mocked artistic traditions? Twenty years later, the Australian government rekindled the controversy by pur- chasing the painting for a spectacular two million (U.S.) dollars. In the history of Western art, only works by Rembrandt, Velazquez, and da Vinci had com- manded more “respect” in the art market. Today, Pollock’s brash and energetic works continue to grab attention, as witnessed by the success of the recent retro- spectives during 1998–1999 (at New York’s Museum of Modern Art and London’s Tate Gallery) where prices of forty million dollars were discussed for Blue Poles: Number 11, 1952.
    [Show full text]
  • LEE KRASNER Public Information (Selected Chronology)
    The Museum of Modern Art 79 LEE KRASNER Public Information (Selected Chronology) 1908 Born October 27, Lenore Krassner in Brooklyn, New York. 1926-29 Studies at Women's Art School of Cooper Union, New York City. 1928 Attends Art Students League. 1929-32 Attends National Academy of Design. 1934-35 Works as an artist on Public Works of Art Project and for the Temporary Emergency Relief Administration. Joins the WPA Federal Art Project as an assistant in the Mural Division. 1937-40 Studies with the artist Hans Hofmann. 1940 Exhibits with American Abstract Artists at the American Fine Arts Galleries, New York. 1942 Participates in "American and French Paintings," curated by John Graham at the McMillen Gallery, New York. As a result of the show, begins acquaintance with Jackson Pollock. 1945 Marries Jackson Pollock on October 25 at Marble Collegiate Church, New York. Exhibits in "Challenge to the Critic" with Pollock, Gorky, Gottlieb, Hofmann, Pousette-Dart, and Rothko, at Gallery 67, New York. 1946-49 Creates "Little Image" all-over paintings at Springs, Easthampton. 1951 First solo exhibition, "Paintings 1951, Lee Krasner," at Betty Parsons Gallery, New York. 1953 Begins collage works. 1955 Solo exhibition of collages at Stable Gallery, New York. 1956 Travels to Europe for the first time. Jackson Pollock dies on August 11. 1959 Completes two mosaic murals for Uris Brothers at 2 Broadway, New York. Begins Umber and Off-White series of paintings. 1965 A retrospective, "Lee Krasner, Paintings, Drawings, and Col­ lages," is presented at Whitechapel Art Gallery in London (circulated the following year to museums in York, Hull, Nottingham, Newcastle, Manchester, and Cardiff).
    [Show full text]
  • Native Youth Count 2019 STATE of NATIVE YOUTH REPORT Native Youth Count
    2019 STATE OF NATIVE YOUTH REPORT Native Youth Count 2019 STATE OF NATIVE YOUTH REPORT Native Youth Count TABLE OF CONTENTS NOVEMBER 2019 4 About Us 6 Foreword by Sam Schimmel 8 Foreword by Representative Deb Haaland 11 Executive Summary 16 Chapter 1: Health and Wellness 28 Chapter 2: Systems Involving Youth 38 Chapter 3: Education and Jobs 48 Chapter 4: Sacred Sites, Lands, and Waterways 58 Chapter 5: Citizenship PHOTOS: COURTESY OF RYAN REDCORN AND ILLUMINATIVE OF RYAN PHOTOS: COURTESY About Us THE CENTER FOR NATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH ABOUT THE ARTIST: Elizabeth Morgan, Kiowa and Apache The Center for Native American Youth believes all Native American youth should My work is my life on canvas. Stories passes down orally. I wanted to show my culture lead full and healthy lives, have equal access to opportunity, and draw strength and my people through my point of view. Telling a story through traditional methods. from their culture and inspire one another. As a policy program of the Aspen This is a way that connects me to my nation, my homeland, and identity. Using vibrant Institute founded by former U.S. Senator Byron Dorgan (ret.), we work to colors, the bold outlines help bring life to those stories I heard as a child. Being a young improve the health, safety, and overall well-being of Native American youth. woman now I want to pass that to the youth that will one day be in my footsteps. So We do this through youth recognition, inspiration, and leadership; research, they can keep those traditions alive.
    [Show full text]
  • GREAT Day 2016 Program
    Welcome to SUNY Geneseo’s Tenth Annual GREAT Day! Geneseo Recognizing Excellence, Achievement & Talent Day is a college-wide symposium celebrating the creative and scholarly endeavors of our students. In addition to recognizing the achievements of our students, the purpose of GREAT Day is to help foster academic excellence, encourage professional development, and build connections within the community. The GREAT Day Faculty Advisory Council The GREAT Day Committee Joan Ballard, Psychology Anne Baldwin, Sponsored Research Sid Bosch, Biology Tammy Hill, Campus Scheduling and Special Events David Levy, Edgar Fellows and Philosophy Andrea Klein, Campus Scheduling and Special Events Graham Drake, English Gina Suriano, GREAT Day Intern Susan Salmon, School of Education Samuel Weinstein, Chamber Music Festival Aaron Steinhauer, Physics & Astronomy Coordinator; Allison Altschiller, Assistant Samantha Moore, Student Association GREAT Battle of the Artists Team Daniel Ross, Milne Library Tahlia Brody, GCAB Arts & Exhibits Patty Hamilton-Rodgers, GREAT Day Coordinator Hannah Fabiny, Nassau Hall Neal Brooks, Residence Life Thank You for contributions that make GREAT Day possible: Brian Bennett, Joe Dolce, Stephen Dresbach, Karie Frisiras, Nancy Johncox, Minhhang Huynh, Enrico Johnson, Justin Hugg, Chip Matthews, Sean McGrath, Daniel Ross, SA Tech Services, Frances Murray, Ashley Zaleppa, Zarmeen Zahid. Thanks to GREAT Day Volunteers: Ama Acheampong, Genesis Alvarado, Amanda Armbruster, Autumn Arnold, Ali Baker, Luke Bamburoski, Zerrick Barlow, Maya
    [Show full text]
  • Weeping Woman, 1937 (Room 3)
    Tate Modern Artist and Society Boiler House (North) Level 2 West 11:00-11:45 Laurence Shafe 1 Artist and Society Rachel Whiteread, Demolished, 1996 (Room 1) ....................................................................... 5 Marwan Rechmaoui, Monument for Living, 2001-8 (Room 1) ................................................. 9 Piet Mondrian (1872-1944), Composition B (No.II) with Red, 1935 (Room 2) ........................ 13 Victor Pasmore, Abstract in White, Green, Black, Blue, Red, Grey and Pink, c. 1963 ............. 17 Hélio Oiticica, Metaesquema, 1958 (Room 2) ........................................................................ 21 Pablo Picasso, Weeping Woman, 1937 (Room 3) ................................................................... 25 Salvador Dalí, Autumnal Cannibalism, 1936 (Room 3) ........................................................... 29 André Fougeron, Martyred Spain, 1937 (Room 3) .................................................................. 33 David Alfaro Siqueiros, Cosmos and Disaster, 1936 (Room 3) ................................................ 37 Kaveh Golestan, Untitled (Prostitute series), 1975-77 ........................................................... 41 Lorna Simpson, Five Day Forecast, 1991 (not on display) ....................................................... 44 Joseph Beuys, Lightning with Stag in its Glare, 1958-85 (Room 7) .......................................... 48 Theaster Gates, Civil Tapestry 4, 2011 (Room 9) ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Fernald Caroline Dissert
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE THE VISUALIZATION OF THE AMERICAN SOUTHWEST: ETHNOGRAPHY, TOURISM, AND AMERICAN INDIAN SOUVENIR ARTS A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By CAROLINE JEAN FERNALD Norman, Oklahoma 2017 THE VISUALIZATION OF THE AMERICAN SOUTHWEST: ETHNOGRAPHY, TOURISM, AND AMERICAN INDIAN SOUVENIR ARTS A DISSERTATION APPROVED FOR THE SCHOOL OF VISUAL ARTS BY ______________________________ Dr. W. Jackson Rushing, III, Chair ______________________________ Mr. B. Byron Price ______________________________ Dr. Alison Fields ______________________________ Dr. Kenneth Haltman ______________________________ Dr. David Wrobel © Copyright by CAROLINE JEAN FERNALD 2017 All Rights Reserved. For James Hagerty Acknowledgements I wish to extend my most sincere appreciation to my dissertation committee. Your influence on my work is, perhaps, apparent, but I am truly grateful for the guidance you have provided over the years. Your patience and support while I balanced the weight of a museum career and the completion of my dissertation meant the world! I would certainly be remiss to not thank the staff, trustees, and volunteers at the Millicent Rogers Museum for bearing with me while I finalized my degree. Your kind words, enthusiasm, and encouragement were greatly appreciated. I know I looked dreadfully tired in the weeks prior to the completion of my dissertation and I thank you for not mentioning it. The Couse Foundation, the University of Oklahoma’s Charles M. Russell Center, and the School of Visual Arts, likewise, deserve a heartfelt thank you for introducing me to the wonderful world of Taos and supporting my research. A very special thank you is needed for Ginnie and Ernie Leavitt, Carl Jones, and Byron Price.
    [Show full text]
  • Jackson Pollock in Action
    LESSON 10 TEACHER’S GUIDE Jackson Pollock in Action by Barbara Tillman Fountas-Pinnell Level S Biography Selection Summary Jackson Pollock pursued his passion for art in high school and at the Art Students League in New York. He studied the work of artists he admired and eventually developed his own style of abstract art. Number of Words: 1,263 Characteristics of the Text Genre • Biography Text Structure • Narrative text organized in fi ve short chapters. • Details help the reader understand the author’s purpose. Content • Abstract art • How Pollock became an artist • Reactions to an artist’s work Themes and Ideas • Artists can be inspired by their surroundings. • An artist’s work communicates his own thoughts, feelings, and ideas. • Abstract art appeals to some, but not all, viewers. Language and • Descriptive language Literary Features • Conversational tone Sentence Complexity • Longer complex sentence structures with embedded phrases and clauses • Sentences with parenthetical material Vocabulary • Many art terms, some of which might not be familiar, such as composition, mural, technique Words • Many multisyllable words some of them challenging, such as reservations, muralist, unattractive • Phonetic pronunciation provided Illustrations • Illustrations support text and add interest. Book and Print Features • Eleven pages of text with a timeline at the end • Table of contents with easy-to-read chapter headings • Captions and text box support text. © 2006. Fountas, I.C. & Pinnell, G.S. Teaching for Comprehending and Fluency, Heinemann, Portsmouth, N.H. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying or recording, or by any information storage or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the copyright owner unless such copying is expressly permitted by federal copyright law.
    [Show full text]
  • Jackson Pollock & Tony Smith Sculpture
    Jackson Pollock & Tony Smith Sculpture An exhibition on the centennial of their births MATTHEW MARKS GALLERY Jackson Pollock & Tony Smith Speculations in Form Eileen Costello In the summer of 1956, Jackson Pollock was in the final descent of a downward spiral. Depression and alcoholism had tormented him for the greater part of his life, but after a period of relative sobriety, he was drinking heavily again. His famously intolerable behavior when drunk had alienated both friends and colleagues, and his marriage to Lee Krasner had begun to deteriorate. Frustrated with Betty Parsons’s intermittent ability to sell his paintings, he had left her in 1952 for Sidney Janis, believing that Janis would prove a better salesperson. Still, he and Krasner continued to struggle financially. His physical health was also beginning to decline. He had recently survived several drunk- driving accidents, and in June of 1954 he broke his ankle while roughhousing with Willem de Kooning. Eight months later, he broke it again. The fracture was painful and left him immobilized for months. In 1947, with the debut of his classic drip-pour paintings, Pollock had changed the direction of Western painting, and he quickly gained international praise and recog- nition. Four years later, critics expressed great disappointment with his black-and-white series, in which he reintroduced figuration. The work he produced in 1953 was thought to be inconsistent and without focus. For some, it appeared that Pollock had reached a point of physical and creative exhaustion. He painted little between 1954 and ’55, and by the summer of ’56 his artistic productivity had virtually ground to a halt.
    [Show full text]
  • Secondary School Worksheet
    Secondary school worksheet Abstract Expressionism National Gallery of Australia, Canberra International Galleries: 14 July 2012–24 February 2013, Orde Poynton Gallery: 4 August 2012–20 January 2013 Abstract Expressionism is an art movement that dominated the international art world after World War II. It emphasised spontaneity, intuition and the physical act of painting. This set it apart from earlier abstract art, which had a stricter geometric basis. Although the term Abstract Expressionism encompasses several different styles and techniques, some common features of this approach include the prominence of dramatic scale, colour and texture; a visible emphasis on the dripping, scraping and brushing of paint; and the radical simplification of the image. The artists were also seen as socially rebellious, sharing a strong belief in the value of individual creative freedom. In the history of art, Abstract Expressionism marks a shift in focus from Paris to New York as a global centre for cultural production. Its influence also spread to Australia, where it shaped the work of a generation of abstract artists. The works in the exhibition are drawn from the permanent collection of the National Gallery of Australia, with the addition of two loans from the National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne, and one from the Art Gallery of New South Wales, Sydney. Jackson Pollock Blue poles 1952 oil, enamel, aluminium paint, glass on canvas 212.1 x 488.9 cm National Gallery of Australia, Canberra, purchased 1973 © Pollock/Krasner Foundation/ARS. Licensed by Viscopy Abstract Expressionism is a style renowned for gestural expression and the creative role of chance. As always, however, artistic forethought played a part in the work of artists such as Jackson Pollock.
    [Show full text]
  • Dick Polich in Art History
    ww 12 DICK POLICH THE CONDUCTOR: DICK POLICH IN ART HISTORY BY DANIEL BELASCO > Louise Bourgeois’ 25 x 35 x 17 foot bronze Fountain at Polich Art Works, in collaboration with Bob Spring and Modern Art Foundry, 1999, Courtesy Dick Polich © Louise Bourgeois Estate / Licensed by VAGA, New York (cat. 40) ww TRANSFORMING METAL INTO ART 13 THE CONDUCTOR: DICK POLICH IN ART HISTORY 14 DICK POLICH Art foundry owner and metallurgist Dick Polich is one of those rare skeleton keys that unlocks the doors of modern and contemporary art. Since opening his first art foundry in the late 1960s, Polich has worked closely with the most significant artists of the late 20th and early 21st centuries. His foundries—Tallix (1970–2006), Polich of Polich’s energy and invention, Art Works (1995–2006), and Polich dedication to craft, and Tallix (2006–present)—have produced entrepreneurial acumen on the renowned artworks like Jeff Koons’ work of artists. As an art fabricator, gleaming stainless steel Rabbit (1986) and Polich remains behind the scenes, Louise Bourgeois’ imposing 30-foot tall his work subsumed into the careers spider Maman (2003), to name just two. of the artists. In recent years, They have also produced major public however, postmodernist artistic monuments, like the Korean War practices have discredited the myth Veterans Memorial in Washington, DC of the artist as solitary creator, and (1995), and the Leonardo da Vinci horse the public is increasingly curious in Milan (1999). His current business, to know how elaborately crafted Polich Tallix, is one of the largest and works of art are made.2 The best-regarded art foundries in the following essay, which corresponds world, a leader in the integration to the exhibition, interweaves a of technological and metallurgical history of Polich’s foundry know-how with the highest quality leadership with analysis of craftsmanship.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Pollock, Jackson's Radical Brother
    JASON MCCOY GALLERY 41 East 57th Street • New York 10022, 11th floor • 212. 319.1996 • www.jasonmccoyinc.com Charles Pollock, Jackson's Radical Brother BY MOSTAFA HEDDAYA | OCTOBER 22, 2015 The New York School archetype of the heroic downtown artist, often noted for his tempestuous, irrepressible genius, has long come in for scrutiny. This has arrived in varied forms, from artistic lampooning to renewed critical and historical attention to those who may fit less neatly into such narratives. Charles Pollock, whose stormy younger brother Jackson emerged as one of the greatest figures in 20th-century art, is one such artist. The eldest of the Pollock boys, Charles’s story is less easily repackaged as myth: He spent the first four decades of his life committed to leftist politics, political cartooning, and social realism, having studied with Thomas Hart Benton at the Art Students League. Successive disenchantments with government and union work, followed by a nervous breakdown in 1944, brought him to abstraction’s door. By then he had long left New York and was teaching calligraphy, graphic design, and printmaking at Michigan State, his brother’s New York milieu a distant beacon. “He was too late on the social scene to join, really,” Jason McCoy, Pollock’s nephew, told ARTINFO on a recent afternoon in New York at his Fuller Building gallery, “and so he accepted that he was going to paint for himself, first, and not be hugely envious of whatever else was going on around him.” Though he hardly eschewed contact with key artists and critics in New York, and was eventually exhibited several times in the city and elsewhere during his lifetime, Charles Pollock, who died in 1988 at age 85, remained relatively obscure.
    [Show full text]
  • For Immediate Release
    For Immediate Release Untitled [Pulse], 1973 Acrylic and collage on canvas 28 3/4 x 18 1/8 inches Charles Pollock (1902-1988): Paintings from the 1970s ADAA ART SHOW Booth A 17 February 19 – 23, 2009 This installation coincides with: A solo exhibition of Charles Pollock’s work hosted by the Espace d'art Contemporain Fernet Branca in Saint- Louis, France, catalogue. (through May 24) Peggy Guggenheim and the New American Painting, a group exhibition including Charles Pollock’s work, hosted Arca Arte Vercelli, Italy, catalogue. (through March 1) The publication of Lettres américaines, 1927 – 1947, A Selection of Pollock family letters, Paris: Editions Grasset, January 2009 For this year’s ADAA Art Show, Jason McCoy Inc. is pleased to present a selected group of Charles Pollock’s paintings from the 1970s, as well as two works on paper from 1980. The works in this installation were made in 1973 and 1974, only a few years after Charles Pollock had settled in Paris with his wife and young daughter (1971). In these works, Charles Pollock continued his exploration of color and, in fact, made it his main focus. In this body of work, monochromatic grounds are contrasted with oval and rectangular shapes that are made with broad brushstrokes. Emanating a strong transcendental quality, these ethereal constructs seem to be floating in space, at once emergent from and receding into the surrounding atmosphere. Hinting at the underlying theme of existentiality, Pollock stated in 1965 that to him “color […was] the means by which a dialogue is possible between the painter and his world.” Born in 1902 in Denver, Colorado, Charles Pollock was the eldest of five boys (Marvin Jay, Frank Leslie, Sanford Leroy and Paul Jackson).
    [Show full text]