DOCSLIB.ORG

Anser Anser W+,S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Anser Anser W+,S Common name Scientific name Western Doñana Greater White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons W- Greylag Goose Anser anser W+,S- Common Shelduck Tadorna tadorna W- Eurasian Wigeon Mareca penelope W- Gadwall Mareca strepera Y+ Common Teal Anas crecca W+ Mallard Anas platyrhynchos Y+ Northern Pintail Anas acuta W+ Garganey Spatula querquedula M- Northern Shoveler Spatula clypeata S-,W+ Marbled Duck Marmaronetta angustirostris W- Red-crested Pochard Netta rufina Y+ Common Pochard Aythya ferina Y+ Ferruginous Duck Aythya nyroca Y- Tufted Duck Aythya fuligula W- Common Scoter Melanitta nigra W- Red-legged Partridge Alectoris rufa Y- Common Quail Coturnix coturnix S- Cory's Shearwater Calonectris diomedea Y- Balearic Shearwater Puffinus mauretanicus Y- European Storm-Petrel Hydrobates pelagicus M- Little Grebe Tachybaptus ruficollis Y+ Great Crested Grebe Podiceps cristatus Y+ Black-necked Grebe Podiceps nigricollis Y- Greater Flamingo Phoenicopterus roseus Y+ Black Stork Ciconia nigra W- White Stork Ciconia ciconia Y+ Glossy Ibis Plegadis falcinellus Y+ Eurasian Spoonbill Platalea leucorodia Y+ Little Bittern Ixobrychus minutus S+,W- Black-crowned Night Heron Nycticorax nycticorax Y+ Squacco Heron Ardeola ralloides S+,W- Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis Y+ Little Egret Egretta garzetta Y+ Great Egret Egretta alba S-,W+ Grey Heron Ardea cinerea Y+ Purple Heron Ardea purpurea S+ Northern Gannet Morus bassanus W- Great Cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo S-,W+ Osprey Pandion haliaetus W- Black-shouldered Kite Elanus caeruleus W- Egyptian Vulture Neophron percnopterus M- European Honey Buzzard Pernis apivorus M- Eurasian Griffon Vulture Gyps fulvus Y- Eurasian Black Vulture Aegypius monachus Y- Short-toed Eagle Circaetus gallicus S+ Booted Eagle Hieraaetus pennata Y+ Spanish Eagle Aquila adalberti Y- Northern Goshawk Accipiter gentilis Y- Eurasian Sparrowhawk Accipiter nisus Y- Western Marsh Harrier Circus aeruginosus Y+ Hen Harrier Circus cyaneus W- Montagu's Harrier Circus pygargus M- Black Kite Milvus migrans S+,W- Red Kite Milvus milvus S-,W+ Common Buzzard Buteo buteo S-,W+ Water Rail Rallus aquaticus Y- Spotted Crake Porzana porzana M- Little Crake Porzana parva M- Baillon's Crake Porzana pusilla M- Purple Swamphen Porphyrio porphyrio Y+ Common Moorhen Gallinula chloropus Y+ Eurasian Coot Fulica atra Y+ Red-Knobbed Coot Fulica cristata Y- Common Crane Grus grus W- Eurasian Stone-Curlew Burhinus oedicnemus W- Eurasian Oystercatcher Haematopus ostralegus Y- Black-winged Stilt Himantopus himantopus Y+ Pied Avocet Recurvirostra avosetta Y+ Northern Lapwing Vanellus vanellus S-,W+ European Golden Plover Pluvialis apricaria W- Grey Plover Pluvialis squatarola S-,W+ Little Ringed Plover Charadrius dubius S+,W- Common Ringed Plover Charadrius hiaticula Y- Kentish Plover Charadrius alexandrinus Y- Whimbrel Numenius phaeopus Y- Eurasian Curlew Numenius arquata W- Black-tailed Godwit Limosa limosa S-,W+ Bar-tailed Godwit Limosa lapponica W- Ruddy Turnstone Arenaria interpres W- Red Knot Calidris canutus W- Sanderling Calidris alba S-,W+ Little Stint Calidris minuta M- Temminck's Stint Calidris temminckii M- Ruff Calidris pugnax W- Curlew Sandpiper Calidris ferruginea M- Dunlin Calidris alpina S-,W+ Eurasian Woodcock Scolopax rusticola W- Jack Snipe Lymnocryptes minimus W- Common Snipe Gallinago gallinago W+ Common Sandpiper Actitis hypoleucos Y+ Green Sandpiper Tringa ochropus Y+ Spotted Redshank Tringa erythropus M+ Common Greenshank Tringa nebularia W+ Marsh Sandpiper Tringa stagnatilis M- Wood Sandpiper Tringa glareola M+ Common Redshank Tringa totanus S-,W+ Collared Pratincole Glareola pratincola S+ Black-headed Gull Chroicocephalus ridibundus Y+ Slender-billed Gull Chroicocephalus genei Y- Little Gull Hydrocoloeus minutus W- Audouin's Gull Ichthyaetus audouinii Y- Lesser Black-backed Gull Larus fuscus S-,W+ Yellow-legged Gull Larus michahellis Y+ Greater Black-backed Gull Larus marinus W- Gull-billed Tern Gelochelidon nilotica S+ Caspian Tern Hydroprogne caspia Y- Sandwich Tern Thalasseus sandvicensis S-,W+ Little Tern Sternula albifrons S- Common Tern Sterna hirundo M- Whiskered Tern Chlidonias hybrida S+ Black Tern Chlidonias niger M- Pomarine Skua Stercorarius pomarinus M- Arctic Skua Stercorarius parasiticus W- Great Skua Stercorarius skua Y- Razorbill Alca torda W- Atlantic Puffin Fratercula arctica M- Pin-tailed Sandgrouse Pterocles alchata Y- Rock Dove Columba livia Y+ Common Woodpigeon Columba palumbus Y+ Eurasian Collared Dove Streptopelia decaocto Y+ European Turtle Dove Streptopelia turtur S- Great Spotted Cuckoo Clamator glandarius S- Common Cuckoo Cuculus canorus S- Barn Owl Tyto alba Y- European Scops Owl Otus scops S- Eurasian Eagle Owl Bubo bubo Y- Tawny Owl Strix aluco Y- Little Owl Athene noctua Y- European Nightjar Caprimulgus europaeus M- Red-necked Nightjar Caprimulgus ruficollis S- Alpine Swift Tachymarptis melba M- Common Swift Apus apus S+ Pallid Swift Apus pallidus S+ European Roller Coracias garrulus M- Common Kingfisher Alcedo atthis Y- European Bee-eater Merops apiaster S+ Eurasian Hoopoe Upupa epops Y+ Eurasian Wryneck Jynx torquilla M- Great Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos major Y- Lesser Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos minor Y- Iberian Green Woodpecker Picus sharpei Y- Lesser Kestrel Falco naumanni S- Common Kestrel Falco tinnunculus Y+ Eurasian Hobby Falco subbuteo M- Peregrine Falco peregrinus W- Southern Grey Shrike Lanius meridionalis Y+ Woodchat Shrike Lanius senator S+ Eurasian Golden Oriole Oriolus oriolus S+ Eurasian Jay Garrulus glandarius Y- Iberian Magpie Cyanopica cooki Y+ Common Magpie Pica pica Y+ Western Jackdaw Coloeus monedula Y- Common Raven Corvus corax Y+ Crested Tit Lophophanes cristatus Y+ Blue Tit Cyanistes caeruleus Y+ Great Tit Parus major Y+ Eurasian Penduline Tit Remiz pendulinus Y- Wood Lark Lullula arborea Y- Eurasian Skylark Alauda arvensis W- Crested Lark Galerida cristata Y+ Thekla Lark Galerida theklae Y- Greater Short-toed Lark Calandrella brachydactyla S- Calandra Lark Melanocorypha calandra Y- Lesser Short-toed Lark Alaudula rufescens Y- Sand Martin Riparia riparia S+ Barn Swallow Hirundo rustica S+,W- Eurasian Crag Martin Ptyonoprogne rupestris W- Common House Martin Delichon urbicum S+,W- Red-rumped Swallow Cecropis daurica S+ Cetti's Warbler Cettia cetti Y+ Long-tailed Tit Aegithalos caudatus Y+ Bonelli's Warbler Phylloscopus bonelli M- Common Chiffchaff Phylloscopus collybita W+ Iberian Chiffchaff Phylloscopus ibericus S+ Willow Warbler Phylloscopus trochilus M+ Sedge Warbler Acrocephalus schoenobaenus M- European Reed Warbler Acrocephalus scirpaceus M- African Reed Warbler Acrocephalus baeticatus S+ Great Reed Warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus S+ Western Olivaceous Warbler Iduna opaca S-+ Melodious Warbler Hippolais polyglotta S+ Savi's Warbler Locustella luscinioides S+ Zitting Cisticola Cisticola juncidis Y+ Dartford Warbler Sylvia undata Y+ Spectacled Warbler Sylvia conspicillata S- Subalpine Warbler Sylvia cantillans M+ Sardinian Warbler Sylvia melanocephala Y+ Western Orphean Warbler Sylvia hortensis M- Common Whitethroat Sylvia communis M- Garden Warbler Sylvia borin M+ Blackcap Sylvia atricapilla Y+ Firecrest Regulus ignicapilla Y- Eurasian Wren Troglodytes troglodytes Y+ Short-toed Treecreeper Certhia brachydactyla Y+ Spotless Starling Sturnus unicolor Y+ Common Starling Sturnus vulgaris W+ Common Blackbird Turdus merula Y+ Song Thrush Turdus philomelos W+ Redwing Turdus iliacus W- Mistle Thrush Turdus viscivorus W- Rufous-tailed Scrub Robin Cercotrichas galactotes S- Spotted Flycatcher Muscicapa striata S- European Robin Erithacus rubecula W+ Common Nightingale Luscinia megarhynchos S+ Bluethroat Luscinia svecica W+ Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca M+ Black Redstart Phoenicurus ochruros W+ Common Redstart Phoenicurus phoenicurus M- Whinchat Saxicola rubetra M- Common Stonechat Saxicola rubicola Y+ Northern Wheatear Oenanthe oenanthe M+ Black-eared Wheatear Oenanthe hispanica M- House Sparrow Passer domesticus Y+ Spanish Sparrow Passer hispaniolensis Y- Eurasian Tree Sparrow Passer montanus Y+ Common Waxbill Estrilda astrild Y+ Yellow Wagtail Motacilla flava S+ Grey Wagtail Motacilla cinerea W- White Wagtail Motacilla alba S-,W+ Tawny Pipit Anthus campestris M- Tree Pipit Anthus trivialis M- Meadow Pipit Anthus pratensis W+ Water Pipit Anthus spinoletta W- Common Chaffinch Fringilla coelebs Y+ Hawfinch Coccothraustes coccothraustes W- Eurasian Bullfinch Pyrrhula pyrrhula W- European Greenfinch Chloris chloris Y+ Common Linnet Linaria cannabina Y+ European Goldfinch Carduelis carduelis Y+ European Serin Serinus serinus Y+ European Siskin Spinus spinus W- Cirl Bunting Emberiza cirlus Y- Rock Bunting Emberiza cia W- Ortolan Bunting Emberiza hortulana M- Common Reed Bunting Emberiza schoeniclus W- Corn Bunting Emberiza calandra Y+.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lhasa and the Tibetan Plateau Cumulative
    Lhasa and the Tibetan Plateau Cumulative Bird List Column A: Total number of tours (out of 6) that the species was recorded Column B: Total number of days that the species was recorded on the 2016 tour Column C: Maximum daily count for that particular species on the 2016 tour Column D: H = Heard Only; (H) = Heard more than seen Globally threatened species as defined by BirdLife International (2004) Threatened birds of the world 2004 CD-Rom Cambridge, U.K. BirdLife International are identified as follows: EN = Endangered; VU = Vulnerable; NT = Near- threatened. A B C D 6 Greylag Goose 2 15 Anser anser 6 Bar-headed Goose 4 300 Anser indicus 3 Whooper Swan 1 2 Cygnus cygnus 1 Common Shelduck Tadorna tadorna 6 Ruddy Shelduck 8 700 Tadorna ferruginea 3 Gadwall 2 3 Anas strepera 1 Eurasian Wigeon Anas penelope 5 Mallard 2 8 Anas platyrhynchos 2 Eastern Spot-billed Duck Anas zonorhyncha 1 Indian or Eastern Spot-billed Duck Anas poecilorhynchos or A. zonorhyncha 1 Northern Shoveler Anas clypeata 1 Northern Pintail Anas acuta 1 Garganey 2 15 Anas querquedula 4 Eurasian Teal 2 50 Anas crecca 6 Red-crested Pochard 3 2000 Netta rufina 6 Common Pochard 2 200 Aythya ferina 3 Ferruginous Duck NT 1 8 Aythya nyroca 6 Tufted Duck 2 200 Aythya fuligula 5 Common Goldeneye 2 11 Bucephala clangula 4 Common Merganser 3 51 Mergus merganser 5 Chinese Grouse NT 2 1 Tetrastes sewerzowi 4 Verreaux's Monal-Partridge 1 1 H Tetraophasis obscurus 5 Tibetan Snowcock 1 5 H Tetraogallus tibetanus 4 Przevalski's Partridge 1 1 Alectoris magna 1 Daurian Partridge Perdix dauurica 6 Tibetan Partridge 2 11 Perdix hodgsoniae ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ WINGS ● 1643 N.
    [Show full text]
  • Best of the Baltic - Bird List - July 2019 Note: *Species Are Listed in Order of First Seeing Them ** H = Heard Only
    Best of the Baltic - Bird List - July 2019 Note: *Species are listed in order of first seeing them ** H = Heard Only July 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th 13th 14th 15th 16th 17th Mute Swan Cygnus olor X X X X X X X X Whopper Swan Cygnus cygnus X X X X Greylag Goose Anser anser X X X X X Barnacle Goose Branta leucopsis X X X Tufted Duck Aythya fuligula X X X X Common Eider Somateria mollissima X X X X X X X X Common Goldeneye Bucephala clangula X X X X X X Red-breasted Merganser Mergus serrator X X X X X Great Cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo X X X X X X X X X X Grey Heron Ardea cinerea X X X X X X X X X Western Marsh Harrier Circus aeruginosus X X X X White-tailed Eagle Haliaeetus albicilla X X X X Eurasian Coot Fulica atra X X X X X X X X Eurasian Oystercatcher Haematopus ostralegus X X X X X X X Black-headed Gull Chroicocephalus ridibundus X X X X X X X X X X X X European Herring Gull Larus argentatus X X X X X X X X X X X X Lesser Black-backed Gull Larus fuscus X X X X X X X X X X X X Great Black-backed Gull Larus marinus X X X X X X X X X X X X Common/Mew Gull Larus canus X X X X X X X X X X X X Common Tern Sterna hirundo X X X X X X X X X X X X Arctic Tern Sterna paradisaea X X X X X X X Feral Pigeon ( Rock) Columba livia X X X X X X X X X X X X Common Wood Pigeon Columba palumbus X X X X X X X X X X X Eurasian Collared Dove Streptopelia decaocto X X X Common Swift Apus apus X X X X X X X X X X X X Barn Swallow Hirundo rustica X X X X X X X X X X X Common House Martin Delichon urbicum X X X X X X X X White Wagtail Motacilla alba X X
    [Show full text]
  • Warm Temperatures During Cold Season Can Negatively Affect Adult Survival in an Alpine Bird
    Received: 28 February 2019 | Revised: 5 September 2019 | Accepted: 9 September 2019 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5715 ORIGINAL RESEARCH Warm temperatures during cold season can negatively affect adult survival in an alpine bird Jules Chiffard1 | Anne Delestrade2,3 | Nigel Gilles Yoccoz2,4 | Anne Loison3 | Aurélien Besnard1 1Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes (EPHE), Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle Abstract et Evolutive (CEFE), UMR 5175, Centre Climate seasonality is a predominant constraint on the lifecycles of species in alpine National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), PSL Research University, and polar biomes. Assessing the response of these species to climate change thus Montpellier, France requires taking into account seasonal constraints on populations. However, interac- 2 Centre de Recherches sur les Ecosystèmes tions between seasonality, weather fluctuations, and population parameters remain d'Altitude (CREA), Observatoire du Mont Blanc, Chamonix, France poorly explored as they require long‐term studies with high sampling frequency. This 3Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine study investigated the influence of environmental covariates on the demography of a (LECA), CNRS, Université Grenoble Alpes, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, corvid species, the alpine chough Pyrrhocorax graculus, in the highly seasonal environ- Grenoble, France ment of the Mont Blanc region. In two steps, we estimated: (1) the seasonal survival 4 Department of Arctic and Marine of categories of individuals based on their age, sex, etc., (2) the effect of environ- Biology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway mental covariates on seasonal survival. We hypothesized that the cold season—and more specifically, the end of the cold season (spring)—would be a critical period for Correspondence Jules Chiffard, CEFE/CNRS, 1919 route de individuals, and we expected that weather and individual covariates would influence Mende, 34090 Montpellier, France.
    [Show full text]
  • Zoologische Verhandelingen
    Systematic notes on Asian birds. 45. Types of the Corvidae E.C. Dickinson, R.W.R.J. Dekker, S. Eck & S. Somadikarta With contributions by M. Kalyakin, V. Loskot, H. Morioka, C. Violani, C. Voisin & J-F. Voisin Dickinson, E.C., R.W.R.J. Dekker, S. Eck & S. Somadikarta. Systematic notes on Asian birds. 45. Types of the Corvidae. Zool. Verh. Leiden 350, 26.xi.2004: 111-148.— ISSN 0024-1652/ISBN 90-73239-95-8. Edward C. Dickinson, c/o The Trust for Oriental Ornithology, Flat 3, Bolsover Court, 19 Bolsover Road, Eastbourne, East Sussex, BN20 7JG, U.K. (e-mail: [email protected]). René W.R.J. Dekker, National Museum of Natural History, P.O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands (e-mail: [email protected]). Siegfried Eck, Staatliche Naturhistorische Sammlungen Dresden, Museum für Tierkunde, A.B. Meyer Bau, Königsbrücker Landstrasse 159, D-01109 Dresden, Germany (e-mail: [email protected]. sachsen.de). Soekarja Somadikarta, Dept. of Biology, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, University of Indonesia, Depok Campus, Depok 16424, Indonesia (e-mail: [email protected]). Mikhail V. Kalyakin, Zoological Museum, Moscow State University, Bol’shaya Nikitskaya Str. 6, Moscow, 103009, Russia (e-mail: [email protected]). Vladimir M. Loskot, Department of Ornithology, Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Science, St. Petersburg, 199034 Russia (e-mail: [email protected]). Hiroyuki Morioka, Curator Emeritus, National Science Museum, Hyakunin-cho 3-23-1, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 100, Japan. Carlo Violani, Department of Biology, University of Pavia, Piazza Botta 9, 27100 Pavia, Italy (e-mail: [email protected]).
    [Show full text]
  • Promiscuity and the Evolutionary Transition to Complex Societies
    Vol 466 | 19 August 2010 | doi:10.1038/nature09335 LETTERS Promiscuity and the evolutionary transition to complex societies Charlie K. Cornwallis1*, Stuart A. West2, Katie E. Davis3 & Ashleigh S. Griffin1* Theory predicts that the evolution of cooperative behaviour is societies more generally, the challenge is to test whether promiscuity favoured by low levels of promiscuity leading to high within-group rates explain why an individual with the potential to breed chooses to relatedness1–5. However, in vertebrates, cooperation often occurs help instead. between non-relatives and promiscuity rates are among the highest There are a number of reasons why monogamy may be less important recorded. Here we resolve this apparent inconsistency with a phylo- in the evolution of cooperative breeding in vertebrates. First, direct genetic analysis of 267 bird species, demonstrating that cooperative benefits of cooperation that increase reproductive success and do not breeding is associated with low promiscuity; that in cooperative depend on kinship have been suggested to have a greater role in verte- species, helping is more common when promiscuity is low; and that brates12–14. Second, strict lifetime monogamy is relatively rare in verte- intermediate levels of promiscuity favour kin discrimination. brates. Two of the highest promiscuity rates ever recorded are in Overall, these results suggest that promiscuity is a unifying feature cooperative breeders: the superb fairy-wren, Malurus cyaneus, and the across taxa in explaining transitions to and from cooperative Australian magpie, Gymnorhina tibicen (Supplementary Information). societies. Third, it has been argued that cooperative breeding will actually lead The increase in complexity from simple replicating molecules to to higher rates of promiscuity, because helpers release females from complex animal societies has involved approximately eight major the need to secure paternal care from her mate through paternity evolutionary transitions6,7.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors That Attract Birds Within the Area of the International Airport
    Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle «Grigore Antipa» Vol. 59 (2) pp. 235–240 DOI: 10.1515/travmu-2016-0026 Research paper Factors That Attract Birds within the Area of the International Airport Craiova, Romania, and Certain Control Measures Mirela Sabina RIDICHE1, *, Tudor Ciprian Radu PĂTRUȚOIU2, Angela PETRESCU3 1Museum of Oltenia Craiova – Natural Sciences Department, 8 Popa Șapcă Str., 200422 Craiova, Romania. 2S.C. Explo 06 S.R.L., Craiova, Romania. 3“Grigore Antipa” National Museum of Natural History, Şos. Kiseleff no. 1, 011341 Bucharest, Romania. *corresponding author: e-mail: [email protected] Received: July 27, 2016; Accepted: December 13, 2016; Available online: December 20, 2016; Printed: December 30, 2016 Abstract. The present study renders the results of the observations made in the biotopes located within the perimeter of International Airport Craiova and its close proximity (0–3 km), during all the seasons between 2013 and 2014. During the research, we recorded a total of 58 species of birds, many of them showing a high degree of adaptability to the environmental conditions marked by an increased anthropogenic impact. Large-sized species that fly highly and the species characterized by a gregarious behaviour, represent a real threat to aircraft safety. The temporary or longer presence of birds in the area of the airport is due to the optimum living conditions generated by a series of natural and anthropogenic factors. Besides the enumeration and presentation of the way these factors act, we developed a series of measures that can reduce or counteract the area attractiveness to birds by eliminating or restricting to a minimum the trophic resources and opportunities for rest.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birds of the Wenyu
    The Birds of the Wenyu Beijing’s Mother River Steve Bale 史進 1 Contents Introduction Page 3 The Status, The Seasons, The Months Page 9 The Birds Page 10 Finding Birds on the Wenyu Page 172 The List of the ‘New’ Birds for the Wenyu Page 178 Special Thanks Page 186 Free to Share… Page 187 References Page 188 2 Introduction In the meeting of the Zoological Society of London on the 22nd November 1842, John Gould (1804-81) presented what was described in the Society’s proceedings as a “new species of Parrot” 1. The impressively marked bird had been collected on the Marquesas Islands – a remote spot of the Pacific Ocean that would become part of French Polynesia. The members of the Society present at that meeting would have undoubtedly been impressed by yet another of the rare, exotic gems that Gould had a habit of pulling out of his seemingly bottomless hat. Next up in this Victorian frontiers-of-ornithology ‘show and tell’ was Hugh Edwin Strickland (1811-53). The birds he spoke about2 were quite a bit closer to home, although many were every bit as exotic as Gould’s Polynesian parrot. Strickland, instead of sourcing his specimens from the far corners of the Earth, had simply popped across London to Hyde Park Corner with his note book. There, causing quite a stir, was an exhibition of "Ten Thousand Chinese Things", displayed in a purpose-built “summer house” whose design was, according to The Illustrated London News3, “usual in the gardens of the wealthy, in the southern provinces of China”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eurasian Eagle-Owl (Bubo Bubo) Diet in the Trøndelag Region (Central Norway) Potrava Výra Skalného (Bubo Bubo) V Regióne Trøndelag (Stredné Nórsko)
    Slovak Raptor Journal 2016, 10: 51–64. DOI: 10.1515/srj-2016-0005. © Raptor Protection ofSlovakia (RPS) The Eurasian eagle-owl (Bubo bubo) diet in the Trøndelag region (Central Norway) Potrava výra skalného (Bubo bubo) v regióne Trøndelag (stredné Nórsko) Ján OBUCH & Georg BANGJORD Abstract: Between 2008 and 2015 we collected pellets of the Eurasian eagle-owl (Bubo bubo) in the Trøndelag region of central Norway and identified the food remains in these samples. We collected material at 45 sites with samples from a total of 76 nests. Some of the samples were from older and already abandoned nests, but at several sites we also found and collected fresh B. bubo pellets. In total 40,766 items of prey were identified from the osteological material. The most dominant food components were mammals (Mammalia, 25 species, 63.5%). The species representation of birds was very diverse (Aves, more than 150 species, 19.4%). Of amphibians (Amphibia, 16.8%), the well-represented species were Rana temporaria. Fish (Pisces, 0.3%) were repres- ented rarely, while invertebrates were represented only sporadically (Invertebrata, 0.05%). A special composition was found in the diet spectra of the mammals and birds in the mountainous areas at altitudes between 220–780 m above sea level. The highest pro- portion of frogs was found in areas in the proximity of the mainland shore. On the northern islands located near the coast a signi- ficant proportion of the B. bubo diet consisted of rodents (Rodentia). On the more isolated southern islands of Frøya, Hitra and Storfosna the main prey was sea birds, and of the mammals there were also hedgehogs and rats.
    [Show full text]
  • Corvidae Species Tree
    Corvidae I Red-billed Chough, Pyrrhocorax pyrrhocorax Pyrrhocoracinae =Pyrrhocorax Alpine Chough, Pyrrhocorax graculus Ratchet-tailed Treepie, Temnurus temnurus Temnurus Black Magpie, Platysmurus leucopterus Platysmurus Racket-tailed Treepie, Crypsirina temia Crypsirina Hooded Treepie, Crypsirina cucullata Rufous Treepie, Dendrocitta vagabunda Crypsirininae ?Sumatran Treepie, Dendrocitta occipitalis ?Bornean Treepie, Dendrocitta cinerascens Gray Treepie, Dendrocitta formosae Dendrocitta ?White-bellied Treepie, Dendrocitta leucogastra Collared Treepie, Dendrocitta frontalis ?Andaman Treepie, Dendrocitta bayleii ?Common Green-Magpie, Cissa chinensis ?Indochinese Green-Magpie, Cissa hypoleuca Cissa ?Bornean Green-Magpie, Cissa jefferyi ?Javan Green-Magpie, Cissa thalassina Cissinae ?Sri Lanka Blue-Magpie, Urocissa ornata ?White-winged Magpie, Urocissa whiteheadi Urocissa Red-billed Blue-Magpie, Urocissa erythroryncha Yellow-billed Blue-Magpie, Urocissa flavirostris Taiwan Blue-Magpie, Urocissa caerulea Azure-winged Magpie, Cyanopica cyanus Cyanopica Iberian Magpie, Cyanopica cooki Siberian Jay, Perisoreus infaustus Perisoreinae Sichuan Jay, Perisoreus internigrans Perisoreus Gray Jay, Perisoreus canadensis White-throated Jay, Cyanolyca mirabilis Dwarf Jay, Cyanolyca nanus Black-throated Jay, Cyanolyca pumilo Silvery-throated Jay, Cyanolyca argentigula Cyanolyca Azure-hooded Jay, Cyanolyca cucullata Beautiful Jay, Cyanolyca pulchra Black-collared Jay, Cyanolyca armillata Turquoise Jay, Cyanolyca turcosa White-collared Jay, Cyanolyca viridicyanus
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeographic Patterns in Widespread Corvid Birds
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 45 (2007) 840–862 www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Phylogeographic patterns in widespread corvid birds E. Haring a,*, A. Gamauf a, A. Kryukov b a Museum of Natural History Vienna, 1st Zoological Department, Burgring 7, A-1010 Vienna, Austria b Institute of Biology and Soil Science, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok 690022, Russia Received 17 November 2006; revised 1 June 2007; accepted 7 June 2007 Available online 10 July 2007 Abstract Intraspecific genetic diversity and phylogeography of Corvus corone was investigated using the mitochondrial (mt) control region as a molecular marker. A split into two distinct mt lineages was observed. One represents individuals from a wide geographic range spanning from England to the Russian Far East (Kamchatka), while the other one was found in the Primorye and Khabarovsk regions (southern parts of Russian Far East) as well as Japan. For comparison, we investigated several widespread Palearctic corvid taxa with respect to their phylogeographic patterns. A deep split into two lineages was revealed in five cases: Besides C. corone, within Corvus frugilegus, Pica pica, and between the species pairs Corvus monedula–Corvus dauuricus and Cyanopica cyanus–Cyanopica cooki. Although these taxa dis- play a variety of distribution patterns, from disjunct, para/allopatric to continuous, the genetic pattern and level of divergence between clades is very similar. This implies that the differentiation started in about the same time range. In contrast, no differentiation into highly divergent lineages was detected in Corvus corax, Perisoreus infaustus, and Nucifraga caryocatactes. We try to explain the two phyloge- ographic patterns in corvid birds with ecological factors accompanying the changing climatic conditions during the Pleistocene.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birdmen of the Pleistocene: on the Relationship Between Neanderthals and Scavenging Birds
    Quaternary International xxx (2016) 1e7 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Quaternary International journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quaint The birdmen of the Pleistocene: On the relationship between Neanderthals and scavenging birds * Stewart Finlayson a, b, , Clive Finlayson b, c a Department of Life Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, East Road, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire CB1 1PT, United Kingdom b Department of Natural History, The Gibraltar Museum, 18-20 Bomb House Lane, Gibraltar c Institute of Life and Earth Sciences, The University of Gibraltar, Gibraltar Museum Associate Campus, 18-20 Bomb House Lane, Gibraltar article info abstract Article history: We have examined 192 Middle Palaeolithic sites in the Palaearctic which have raptor and corvid bones Available online xxx associated in human occupation contexts. We have also examined 395 sites with Upper Palaeolithic contexts for comparison. We show that Neanderthals were regularly associated with a suite of birds of Keywords: prey and corvids. We identify that the main species were regular or seasonal scavengers which co- Neanderthals occurred across large areas of the Neanderthal geographical range. This suggests a long-standing in- Modern humans ter-relationship between Neanderthals, raptors and corvids. We propose that the degree of difficulty of Raptors capturing these species was not an insurmountable problem for the Neanderthals and provide present- Corvids Scavengers day examples of close interaction between scavenging birds and people. We also show that modern Mid-latitude belt humans had a similar relationship with the same suite of birds as the Neanderthals. We suggest that one possibility is that Neanderthals transmitted the behaviour to modern humans. © 2016 Elsevier Ltd and INQUA.
    [Show full text]
  • Breeding System Evolution Influenced the Geographic
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/evo.12695 Breeding system evolution influenced the geographic expansion and diversification of the core Corvoidea (Aves: Passeriformes) Petter Z. Marki,1,2,3,∗ Pierre-Henri Fabre,1,4 Knud A. Jønsson,1,5,6 Carsten Rahbek,1,5 Jon Fjeldsa,˚ 1 and Jonathan D. Kennedy1,∗ 1Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark 2Department of Environmental and Health Studies, Telemark University College, Hallvard Eikas Plass, N-3800 Bø, Norway 3E-mail: [email protected] 4Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 5Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, West Berkshire, SL5 7PY, United Kingdom 6Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom Received July 9, 2014 Accepted May 20, 2015 Birds vary greatly in their life-history strategies, including their breeding systems, which range from brood parasitism to a system with multiple nonbreeding helpers at the nest. By far the most common arrangement, however, is where both parents participate in raising the young. The traits associated with parental care have been suggested to affect dispersal propensity and lineage diversification, but to date tests of this potential relationship at broad temporal and spatial scales have been limited. Here, using data from a globally distributed group of corvoid birds in concordance with state-dependent speciation and extinction models, we suggest that pair breeding is associated with elevated speciation rates. Estimates of transition between breeding systems imply that cooperative lineages frequently evolve biparental care, whereas pair breeders rarely become cooperative.
    [Show full text]