~ Elizabeth S. Landis 19 June 1981 NAMIBIA and ESTOPPEL

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

~ Elizabeth S. Landis 19 June 1981 NAMIBIA and ESTOPPEL ~ Elizabeth S. Landis f 19 June 1981 - IF IT QUACKS LIKE A DUCK • • • WALVIS BAY, NAMIBIA AND ESTOPPEL Introduction An old American folk-saying holds that "If it looks like duck, ·· svi~ like a duck, valks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it is a duck." Lawyers, of course, never state their truths so crudely -- certainly not if they are speaking a modern language vhich their clients understand, instead of Latin. But they do have a concept vhich translates the gist of that popular saying into lav. It is called estoppel. Most systems of Western lav recognize the general concept of estoppel although they differ as to vhen and under vhat conditions it may be involved. In general, hovever, if X leads or knowingly allovs members of the public to make certain reasonable but erroneous assumptions about matters under X's control, and if such persons act on the basis of those assumptions, !may be estopped to deny the truth of those assumptions in an action for damages or other remedy by a person misled by X. The principle of estoppel also exists in international law. It is a principle vhich surely applies to Walvis Bay insofar as it can be demonstrated that the enclave vas treated by South Africa as an integral part of Namibia for more than half a century and that the development of the Territory vas shaped by the apparently indissoluble legal, political, and administrative joinder of Walvis Bay to Namibia. Estoppel forms part of a complex of arguments demonstrating that the tiny enclave is indisputably an integral part of Namibia as a matter of conventional lav, as vell as of history, economics, culture, political necessity, and emerging international lav as to self-determination. This paper does not attempt to go into the legal arguments relating to estoppel at international lav. Rather, its purpose is to marshall the most significant facts on vhich an argument of. .estoppel can be based. Most of these facts are found in the legislation applied to the Territory by South Africa and in decisions of South African or Namibian courts. Some are matters within 2 the knowledge or Namibians, or which a court might reasonably take judicial:. notice. By and ~arge, however, these racts are not well known outside Namibia. I hope that this catalogue will be userul to the scholars here assembled and to others who may subsequently ponder the question of Walvis Bay. The paper begins with a capsule history of Walvis Bay, emphasizing the extent to which it was integrated, constitution~ and legislatively, into Namibia prior to its annexation by South Africa on 1 September 1977. Succeeding sections discuss the extent to which the enclave was integrated into the Territory in specific respects, such as the rranchise, jurisdiction of courts, etc. The concluding section considers the extent to which Walvis Bay has remained indissolubly bound to Namibia, legally and otherwise, in the nearly rour years since its annexation by South Africa. History of Walvis Bay pre-mandate Walvis (i.e. , "Whale-rish'') Bay was known very early to Europeans as a provisioning station ror whalers heading for the Antarctic. Although the British Navy had long patrolled the South Atlantic and had 2 taken possession of the Penguin Islands in the 186o•s to protect national ·- . whaling and sealing interests, it was only after l.ong urging by Cape Town that in 1878 the captain or Her Majesty's ship, the tnCiustr;y, took possession of Walvis port and some 434 square miles (1,124 square kilometers) around it3 for 4 the British Crown. Six years ~ater, after trying in vain to persuade the British government to claim all of Namibia, the largely self-governing British Cape Colony, acting under Letters Patent issued by Queen Victoria,5 annexed Walvis Bay. 6 11' :~ .- -~-·-·-··-:-j~'-Zq,.,b ' N G I 0 r . __ ......_ ·-·-·-· . l<o:l-;....._ es,· L =-·-·-·-·...--·-·-·-·-- Mudrlo -·-·~·-·- ...- .. -... ·-·-·-·-·-·-· \ ~- - -._,..__ 0+. v- Q~.. D On.,l.q,njLLC'\. ct, .1 .I -~ .l .I NAf1181A .I 0 o .. -tjcr J.- 0 Ot'• .1 J&.wa,rQ..n~c . .I .I .I I ;... .I "'; J r·----~ t'-< WINDHOEK~ ~Co!ubis . I ::.. .I <: .I "'; .I ,...... .... I I­ n I .,,I 0 Y/4/v;s i •. &<j • . n iou.rn&hrp I r., I 1 ;:...· ""' """'crrl' ' .._ <1.rea. I <: .I .I .I .I r l IV,{~ ; L_ , - c; .. 3 Shortly thereaf'ter the European colonial powers parcelled out the - - remaining unclaimed portions of Africa, with then South West Africa (minus Walvis BBiY) becoming a German protectorate. The 1egislation which annexed Walvis Bay to the Cape made existing Cape law applicable to the enclave. It provided, however, that in the future the (British) Governor of the Cape would rule it by proclamation, while 1aws enacted by the Cape Legislature would apply only if specifical1y made applicable thereto by a provision in tne legislation or by proclamation of the Governor. The Governor was empowered to administer the enclave as part of the Cape.7 Thus Walvis BBiY became in effect an overseas -- or, at least, a 1, 200 kilometers distant -- colony of a colony. Walvis Bay passed from the Cape to South Africa upon formation of the Union. 8 For the next five years the enclave was treated for legislative and administrative purposes as part of the Union.9 As soon as the South African military occupation of South West Africa in World War I was completed, however, the integration of Walvis Bay into Namibia began. On 20 September 1915 the South African Military-Governor of South West Africa provided that "for the better administration of the said Territory and Port of Walvis Bay on account of its contiguity to the /South West Africa7 Protectorate ••• , the provisions of al1 Proclamations and Martial Law Regulations as have been issued or may hereafter be issued in the Protectorate shall be 10 tleemed to apply equal1y to the Territory and Port of Walvis Bay. " Integration of Walvis Bay 1922-1977 Legislative integration The legislative integration of Walvis Bay into South West Africa, which began while the latter was still enemy territory under military occupation, vas :- ·.~- substantially completed even before a constitution vas granted to the Territory. 4 In 1922, less than two years after South Africa accepted ~he mandate~ the enactme~t of three interrelated laws produced the legislative unity between Walvis B~ and South West Africa which had been foreshadowed by the martial law proclamation of 1915. The first of these laws, the South West Africa Affairs Act,ll empowered the (British) Governor-General of South Africa to set a date after which "the port and settlement of Walvis B~ which forms part of the Cape of' Good Hope shall be administered as if it ·was part of the mandated territory and as if inhabitants of the said port and settlement were inhabitants of the mandated territory " It also empowered the Governor-General to delegate his powers to make laws in Walvis B~ to the (South African appointed) Administrator of South West Africa. The Act further provided that after the date set by the Governor-General no act of the Union Parliament should apply to Walvis B~ unless "it is specifically expressed so as to apply or unless it is declared to apply by proclamation of the Governor-General in the Gazette." Within two months the Governor-General, acting under that law, issued a proclamation12 setting l October 1922 as the date for such changes to become effective. And on the following d~ the territorial Administrator issued a proclamation13 to implement the Union legislation by, inter alia, {i) repealing the (South African/Cape) laws then in effect in Walvis Bay and substituting 14 South West African laws for them and {ii) making all territorial laws issued by the Administrator automatically applicable to Walvis B~ unless such application was specifically excluded. Thus, by the end of 1922, there was complete legislative integration of Walvis B~ into South West Africa, except in one limited respect: At that time, as throughout the entire mandate period, South African legislation applied to South West Africa only if it was specifically made applicable thereto. But even if an Act of (the South African) Parliament was made applicable to South West Africa, it did not as a consequence apply to Walvis Bay unless it was stated to apply to the enclave as well, since section 1(4) of the 1922 Act provided that B2. Acts of Parliament should-apply to Walvis B~ unless specifically 5 made applicable thereto. Section 1(4)~ therefore, compelled drafters of· _ parliamentary legislation to include separate provisions to apply the relevant laws to the enclave as well as to the Territory or else to use a different formulation~ such as applying a law to South West Africa, "including" Walvis Bay. Finally, in 1944~ a short South African enactment15 removed this anomalY by substituting a new section 1(4) in the 1922 Act. The new subsection read: "(4) /my Act ot Parliament or proclamation by the Governor­ General ••• shall, as long as and to the extent to which it is in force in the mandated territory, be in force also in the said port and settlement~ unless the Act or proclamation otherwise provides." This made automatic the application to Walvis Bay or any Union legislation which applied to the mandate. Consequently, Walvis Bay was thereafter clearly subject to all laws applying to South West Africa and to no others. (It should be noted, however~ that the habit acquired during the years when Union legislation had to be made expressly applicable to Walvis Bay did not die easily.
Recommended publications
  • The Immediate and Long-Term Effects of Namibia's Colonization Process
    The Immediate and Long-Term Effects of Namibia’s Colonization Process By: Jonathan Baker Honors Capstone Through Professor Taylor Politics of Sub-Saharan Africa Baker, 2 Table of Contents I. Authors Note II. Introduction III. Pre-Colonization IV. Colonization by Germany V. Colonization by South Africa VI. The Struggle for Independence VII. The Decolonization Process VIII. Political Changes- A Reaction to Colonization IX. Immediate Economic Changes Brought on by Independence X. Long Term Political Effects (of Colonization) XI. Long Term Cultural Effects XII. Long Term Economic Effects XIII. Prospects for the Future XIV. Conclusion XV. Bibliography XVI. Appendices Baker, 3 I. Author’s Note I learned such a great deal from this entire honors capstone project, that all the knowledge I have acquired can hardly be covered by what I wrote in these 50 pages. I learned so much more that I was not able to share both about Namibia and myself. I can now claim that I am knowledgeable about nearly all areas of Namibian history and life. I certainly am no expert, but after all of this research I can certainly consider myself reliable. I have never had such an extensive knowledge before of one academic area as a result of a school project. I also learned a lot about myself through this project. I learned how I can motivate myself to work, and I learned how I perform when I have to organize such a long and complicated paper, just to name a couple of things. The strange inability to be able to include everything I learned from doing this project is the reason for some of the more random appendices at the end, as I have a passion for both numbers and trivia.
    [Show full text]
  • Windhoek, Namibia Casenote
    Transforming Urban Transport – The Role of Political Leadership TUT-POL Sub-Saharan Africa Final Report October 2019 Case Note: Windhoek, Namibia Lead Author: Henna Mahmood Harvard University Graduate School of Design 1 Acknowledgments This research was conducted with the support of the Volvo Foundation for Research and Education. Principal Investigator: Diane Davis Senior Research Associate: Lily Song Research Coordinator: Devanne Brookins Research Assistants: Asad Jan, Stefano Trevisan, Henna Mahmood, Sarah Zou 2 WINDHOEK, NAMIBIA NAMIBIA Population: 2,533,224 (as of July 2018) Population Growth Rate: 1.91% (2018) Median Age: 21.4 GDP: USD$29.6 billion (2017 est.) GDP Per Capita: USD$11,200 (2017 est.) City of Intervention: Windhoek Urban Population: 50% of total population (2018) Urbanization Rate: 4.2% annual rate of change (2015- 2020 est.) Land Area: 910,768 sq km Total Roadways: 48,327 km (2014) Source: CIA Factbook I. POLITICS & GOVERNANCE A. Multi-Scalar Governance Following a 25-year war, Namibia gained independence from South Africa in 1990 under the rule of the South West Africa People’s Organization (SWAPO). Since then, SWAPO has held the presidency, prime minister’s office, the national assembly, and most local and regional councils by a large majority. While opposition parties are active (there are over ten groups), they remain weak and fragmented, with most significant political differences negotiated within SWAPO. The constitution and other legislation dating to the early 1990s emphasize the role of regional and local councils – and since 1998, the government has been engaged in efforts to support decentralization of power.1 However, all levels are connected by SWAPO (through common membership), so power remains effectively centralized.
    [Show full text]
  • RUMOURS of RAIN: NAMIBIA's POST-INDEPENDENCE EXPERIENCE Andre Du Pisani
    SOUTHERN AFRICAN ISSUES RUMOURS OF RAIN: NAMIBIA'S POST-INDEPENDENCE EXPERIENCE Andre du Pisani THE .^-y^Vr^w DIE SOUTH AFRICAN i^W*nVv\\ SUID AFRIKAANSE INSTITUTE OF f I \V\tf)) }) INSTITUUT VAN INTERNATIONAL ^^J£g^ INTERNASIONALE AFFAIRS ^*^~~ AANGELEENTHEDE SOUTHERN AFRICAN ISSUES NO 3 RUMOURS OF RAIN: NAMIBIA'S POST-INDEPENDENCE EXPERIENCE Andre du Pisani ISBN NO.: 0-908371-88-8 February 1991 Toe South African Institute of International Affairs Jan Smuts House P.O. Box 31596 Braamfontein 2017 Johannesburg South Africa CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 POUTICS IN AFRICA'S NEWEST STATE 2 National Reconciliation 2 Nation Building 4 Labour in Namibia 6 Education 8 The Local State 8 The Judiciary 9 Broadcasting 10 THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC REALM - AN UNBALANCED INHERITANCE 12 Mining 18 Energy 19 Construction 19 Fisheries 20 Agriculture and Land 22 Foreign Exchange 23 FOREIGN RELATIONS - NAMIBIA AND THE WORLD 24 CONCLUSIONS 35 REFERENCES 38 BIBLIOGRAPHY 40 ANNEXURES I - 5 and MAP 44 INTRODUCTION Namibia's accession to independence on 21 March 1990 was an uplifting event, not only for the people of that country, but for the Southern African region as a whole. Independence brought to an end one of the most intractable and wasteful conflicts in the region. With independence, the people of Namibia not only gained political freedom, but set out on the challenging task of building a nation and defining their relations with the world. From the perspective of mediation, the role of the international community in bringing about Namibia's independence in general, and that of the United Nations in particular, was of a deep structural nature.
    [Show full text]
  • The German Colonization of Southwest Africa and the Anglo-German Rivalry, 1883-1915
    University of Nebraska at Omaha DigitalCommons@UNO Student Work 7-1-1995 Doors left open then slammed shut: The German colonization of Southwest Africa and the Anglo-German rivalry, 1883-1915 Matthew Erin Plowman University of Nebraska at Omaha Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/studentwork Recommended Citation Plowman, Matthew Erin, "Doors left open then slammed shut: The German colonization of Southwest Africa and the Anglo-German rivalry, 1883-1915" (1995). Student Work. 435. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/studentwork/435 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Work by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DOORS LEFT OPEN THEN SLAMMED SHUT: THE GERMAN COLONIZATION OF SOUTHWEST AFRICA AND THE ANGLO-GERMAN RIVALRY, 1883-1915. A Thesis Presented to the Department of History and the Faculty of the Graduate College University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts University of Nebraska at Omaha by Matthew Erin Plowman July 1995 UMI Number: EP73073 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI Blsaartalibn Publish*rig UMI EP73073 Published by ProQuest LLC (2015). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author.
    [Show full text]
  • Title: Walvis Bay Baseline Study *By: Priscilla Rowswell and Lucinda Fairhurst *Report Type: Research Study, *Date: February 2011
    ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability – Africa Walvis Bay Baseline Study *Title: Walvis Bay Baseline Study *By: Priscilla Rowswell and Lucinda Fairhurst *Report Type: Research Study, *Date: February 2011 *IDRC Project Number-Component Number: 105868-001 *IDRC Project Title: Sub-Saharan African Cities: A Five-City Network to Pioneer Climate Adaptation through Participatory Research and Local Action. *Country/Region: Namibia, South Africa, Mozambique, Tanzania, Mauritius *Full Name of Research Institution: ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability - Africa *Address of Research Institution: P.O. Box 5319, Tygervalley, 7536, Cape Town, South Africa *Name(s) of ICLEI Africa Core Project Team: Lucinda Fairhurst and Priscilla Rowswell *Contact Information of Researcher/Research Team members: [email protected]; +27 21 487 2312 *This report is presented as received from project recipient(s). It has not been subjected to peer review or other review processes. *This work is used with the permission of ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability - Africa *Copyright: 2012, ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability - Africa *Abstract: This project addresses knowledge, resource, capacity and networking gaps on the theme: 'Strengthening urban governments in planning adaptation.' The main objective of this project is to develop an adaptation framework for managing the increased risk to African local government and their communities due to climate change impact. The ultimate beneficiaries of this project will be African local governments and their communities. The guiding and well-tested ICLEI principle of locally designed and owned projects for the global common good, specifically in a developing world context, will be applied throughout project design, inception and delivery. Additionally, the research will test the theory that the most vulnerable living and working in different geographical, climatic and ecosystem zones will be impacted differently and as such, will require a different set of actions to be taken.
    [Show full text]
  • Namibia Starline Timetable
    TRAIN : WINDHOEK – GOBABIS – WINDHOEK TRAIN : WINDHOEK – OTJIWARONGO – WINDHOEK TRAIN NO 9903 TRAIN NO 9904 TRAIN NO 9966 TRAIN NO 9915 TIMETABLE DAYS MON, DAYS MON, MONDAYS MONDAY WED, FRI WED, FRI WEDNESDAY WEDNESDAY STATIONS STATIONS STATIONS STATIONS Windhoek D 05:50 Gobabis D 14:50 Windhoek D 15:45 Otjiwarongo D 15:40 Hoffnung D 06:55 Witvlei D 16:14 Okahandja A 18:00 Omaruru A 18:30 Neudamm D 07:35 Omitara A 17:52 D 18:05 D 19:30 Omitara A 10:10 D 17:56 Karibib D 20:40 Kranzberg A 21:10 D 10:12 Neudamm D 20:36 Kranzberg A 21:20 D 21:50 Witvlei D 11:53 Hoffnung D 21:18 D 21:40 Karibib D 22:20 Gobabis A 13:25 Windhoek A 22:25 Omaruru A 23:00 Okahandja A 01:30 D 23:35 D 01:40 Otjiwarongo A 02:20 Windhoek A 03:20 TRAIN : WINDHOEK – WALVIS BAY – WINDHOEK TRAIN: WALVIS BAY–OTJIWARONGO–WALVIS BAY EFFECTIVE FROM TRAIN NO 9908 TRAIN NO 9909 TRAIN NO 9901 / 9912 TRAIN NO 9907 / 9900 DAYS DAILY DAYS DAILY MONDAY MONDAY MONDAY 21 JANUARY 2008 EXCEPT EXCEPT WEDNESDAY WEDNESDAY SAT SAT FRIDAY FRIDAY STATIONS STATIONS STATIONS STATIONS Business Hours : Windhoek Central Reservations : Monday – Friday 07:00 to 19:00 Tel. (061) 298 2032/2175 Windhoek D 19:55 Walvis Bay D 19:00 Otjiwarongo D 14:40 Walvis Bay D 14:20 Saturdays 07:00 to 09:30 Fax (061) 298 2495 Okahandja A 21:55 Kuiseb D 19:20 Omaruru A 17:30 Kuiseb D 14:30 Sundays 15:30 to 19:00 D 22:05 Swakopmund A 20:35 D 18:30 Swakopmund A 15:50 Website : www.transnamib.com.na Karibib D 00:40 D 20:45 Kranzberg A 19:55 D 16:00 StarLine Information : E-mail : [email protected] Kranzberg
    [Show full text]
  • Withholding Tax on Services Rendered by a Non-Resident
    REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA INLAND REVENUE MINISTRY OF FINANCE REGISTRATION AS TAXPAYER (WTS) APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION - WITHHOLDING TAX ON SERVICES RENDERED BY A NON-RESIDENT MARK THIS BOX WITH AN X IF YOU OFFICE OF REGISTRATION MAKE USE OF NON-RESIDENT SERVICE PROVIDERS ON A REGULAR BASIS (COMPLETE BLOCKS IN BLACK INK. USE CAPITAL LETTERS, AND WHERE APPLICABLE, MARK WITH AN “X”) PART 1: BUSINESS/PERSONAL PARTICULARS REGISTERED/ TAXPAYER NAME TRADE NAME BUSINESS REG./ IDENTITY NO. DATE OF BIRTH BUSINESS/ RESIDENTIAL ADDRESS POSTAL ADDRESS CITIZENSHIP OCCUPATION NAME AND ADDRESS OF EMPLOYER MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT TAXPAYER FILE IDENTIFICATION NO. PART 2: TAXPAYER’S CONTACT DETAILS (NOT REPRESENTATIVE) WORK TELEPHONE NO. HOME TELEPHONE NO. FAX NO. CELLPHONE NO. EMAIL ADDRESS PART 3: BANKING DETAILS BANK BRANCH CODE ACCOUNT NO. ACCOUNT HOLDER TYPE OF ACCOUNT SAVINGS CURRENT TRANSMISSION OFFICIAL BANK STAMP I DECLARE THAT THE PARTICULARS PROVIDED ARE CORRECT. NAME CAPACITY SIGNATURE DATE REGIONAL OFFICES WINDHOEK OSHAKATI KEETMANSHOOP WALVIS BAY OTJIWARONGO RUNDU KATIMA MULILO Receiver of Revenue, Receiver of Revenue, Receiver of Revenue, Receiver of Revenue, Receiver of Revenue, Receiver of Revenue, Receiver of Revenue, Moltke St., Dr. Agostino Neto St.,Private Hampie Plichta Ave., Cnr. Sam Nujoma Ave. & Cnr. Dr. Libertine Amathila Markus Siwarongo St., Ngoma Rd., Boma, Private Bag 13185, Bag 5548, Private Bag 22151, 14th Rd., Ave. & Frans Indongo St. Private Bag 2117, Rundu Private Bag 1029, Windhoek Oshakati Keetmanshoop Private Bag 5027, Walvis Bay P.O. Box 2127, Otjiwarongo Tel.: (066) 265 030 Ngweze Tel.: (061) 209 2644/5 Tel.: (065) 229 728/9 Tel,: (063) 220 1000 Tel.: (064) 208 6073/4/5 Tel.: (067) 300 400 Fax: (066) 256 546 Tel,: (066) 252735/53 Fax: (061) 209 2001 Fax: (065) 221 190 Fax: (063) 244 863/222 041 Fax: (064) 208 6100 Fax: (067) 300 401 Fax: (066) 252777 THERE ARE SEVERE PENALTIES/INTEREST FOR FALSE DECLARATIONS, FAILURE TO PAY TAX WHEN DUE, OR SUBMITTING RETURNS LATE.
    [Show full text]
  • 471 Mari Ne Law Developments I N Namibia D. J. Devine Institute
    Mari ne Law Developments i n Namibia D. J. Devine Institute of Marine Law, University of Cape Town, South Africa Introduction Namibia became an independent state on 21 March 1990. Though only three years have elapsed since independence, that period has witnessed a number of important legal developments in the marine sector. The Constitution of Namibia contains provisions which are important in a marine context. The legislature has been active, and four important Acts have been adopted. Finally, the High Court 2 of Namibia has given judgment in six marine law case. It is the intention of this article to describe these constitutional, legislative and judicial marine law developments. The topics covered include maritime zones and their borders, passage rights, ownership of marine resource, the fishery law applicable in the exclusive economic zone (EEZ), a new fisheries regime, forfeiture of vessels used in committing fishery offences, questions relating to third party rights in such vessels, and international co-operation in enforcing fishery laws. The Territory of the Republic of Namibia It is necessary at the outset to describe what the territory of Namibia is and also the former status of the constituent parts of that territory. The reason is that the distinction between the different parts of the territory now claimed by Namibia is relevant to some of the questions later discussed in this article. The Constitution of Namibia describes the national territory of Namibia as "including the enclave, harbour and port of Walvis Bay, as well as the off-shore islands of Namibia, and its southern boundary shall extend to the middle of the Orange river."3 1 Territorial Sea and Exclusive Economic Zone of Namibia Act 3 of 1990:Territorial Sea and Exclusive Economic Zone of Namibia Amendment Act 30 of 1991;Marine Traffic Amendment Act 15 of 1991;Sea Fisheries Act 29 of 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • Namibia & Botswana 2017
    Namibia & Botswana 2017 A Tropical Birding Custom Trip 3-18 September 2017 Guides: Ken Behrens & Charley Hesse September 3-18, 2017 Guided by: Ken Behrens Charley Hesse Photos and Report by Ken Behrens www.tropicalbirding.com The Crimson-breasted Gonolek is Namibia’s national bird. WINDHOEK After arrival in Namibia’s capital, we had a day to relax and enjoy the excellent birding on offer around this small and charming city. Windhoek has a population of about 300,000, out of Namibia’s tiny population of only 2.1 million, remarkable for a country that is twice the size of California. Monteiro’s Hornbill (left), one of many Namibian near-endemic birds that we were seeking. On our morning walk at Avis Dam, we enjoyed Barred Wren-Warbler (top left) and Black-fronted or African Red-eyed Bulbul (bottom left), while there were a bounty of waterbirds at the Gammons Water Care (Sewage!) Works, including Red-knobbed Coot (middle left) and African Darter (right). From Windhoek, in the central mountains, we descended into the Namib Desert, where species like the Common Ostrich survive despite incredibly harsh conditions. Creatures of the Namib: South African Ground Squirrel (bottom right); Tractrac Chat (top right); and Rueppell’s Bustard (left). WALVIS BAY AND SWAKOPMUND The Namib dune fields hold Namibia’s sole political endemic bird, the Dune Lark. Walvis Bay itself is a mecca for waterbirds, including thousands of Lesser Flamingos (right-hand page). Spitzkoppe is Namibia’s most distinctive and iconic mountain. Our avian target at Spitzkoppe was the charismatic and scarce Herero Chat.
    [Show full text]
  • Walvis Bay: South Africa's Claims to Sovereignty
    Denver Journal of International Law & Policy Volume 16 Number 2 Winter/Spring Article 4 May 2020 Walvis Bay: South Africa's Claims to Sovereignty Earle A. Partington Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/djilp Recommended Citation Earle A. Partington, Walvis Bay: South Africa's Claims to Sovereignty, 16 Denv. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y 247 (1988). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Denver Sturm College of Law at Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Denver Journal of International Law & Policy by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],dig- [email protected]. Walvis Bay: South Africa's Claims to Sovereignty EARLE A. PARTINGTON* I. INTRODUCTION After more than a century of colonial domination, the Mandated Territory of South West Africa/Namibia' is close to receiving-its indepen- dence. South Africa continues to administer the Territory as it has since its military forces conquered and occupied it in 1915 during World War I. In the negotiations between South Africa and the United Nations over Namibian independence, differences have arisen between the parties over whether the Territory includes either (1) the port and settlement of Walvis Bay, an enclave of 1124 square kilometers in the center of Namibia's Atlantic coast, or (2) the Penguin Islands, twelve small guano islands strung along 400 kilometers of the Namibian coast between Walvis Bay and the Orange River, the Orange River being part of the boundary between South Africa and Namibia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Significance of Maritime Development to the Economy of Namibia
    World Maritime University The Maritime Commons: Digital Repository of the World Maritime University World Maritime University Dissertations Dissertations 1989 The significance of maritime development to the economy of Namibia Shihaleni Ellis Ndjaba WMU Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.wmu.se/all_dissertations Recommended Citation Ndjaba, Shihaleni Ellis, "The significance of maritime development to the economy of Namibia" (1989). World Maritime University Dissertations. 855. https://commons.wmu.se/all_dissertations/855 This Dissertation is brought to you courtesy of Maritime Commons. Open Access items may be downloaded for non- commercial, fair use academic purposes. No items may be hosted on another server or web site without express written permission from the World Maritime University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WORLD MAR I 1* I ME UNIVERSITY MALMO SWEDEN THE SIGNIFICANCE OF MARITIME DEVELOPMENT TO THE ECONOMY OF NAMIBIA: Economic Framework for Maritime Development in independent Namibia By SHIHALENI ELLIS NDJAB^ NAMIBIA A paper submitted to the Faculty of the World Maritime University in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the award of a MASTER OE SCIENCE DEGREE in GENERAL MARITIME ADMINISTRATION The contents of this paper reflect my’ personal views and are not necessarily endorsed by the University. Signature; Date: ^ Supervised and assessed by: Professor J.MLYNARCZYK World Maritime University Co-assessed by : Professor El.A. GEORGANDOPOULOS Visiting Professor World Maritime University TO My wife.Hileni NDJABA _ affectionately Mekondjo _whose sustaining Love,encouragement and moral support have been a source of strength and inspiration for me during the arduous and demanding years of my studies in Sweden.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Twilight (Zone) of Apartheid:; Walvis
    CCK-8 INSTITUTE OF CURRENT WORLD AFFAIRS In the Twlght (Zone) of Apartheid- Walvs BaY Casey C. Kelso Somewhere between Namibia, Botswana, and Zimbabwe May 15, 1992 Peter Bird Martin Institute of Current World Affairs 4 West Wheelock Street Hanover, New Hampshire 03755 Dear Peter: My first glimpse of Walvis Bay was a menacing black mirage on the horizon of a flat plain of cinders lacking any vertical shape, living or inanimate. My wife, Bobble Jo, and I had driven our Toyota all day through this waterless expanse before I saw the dense, dark mist concealing the port city. It was easy to spot after the monotony of the Namib Desert, where I had expected a cactus or two. Yet as we followed the unpaved track that had jumped the flinty mountains to the east we had found only boulders, cobbles and gravel in descending order. True, there were some weeds and a few uncompromising Camel Thorn trees along the dry bed of the Kuiseb River where we camped the previous evening. But those few struggling plants only emphasized in ominous contrast the lifeless reach of the desert. No animals. No birds. Not even insects. On this same route last month, an American died in a crash when her Landrover burst a front wheel and flipped over. Although scared by the idea of wrecking in this Death Valley look-alike, I kept involuntarily speeding up. I wanted to get across the sun-burnt wasteland. In an effort to cool off my rising frustration, I had turned on the car's air conditioner, which rarely gets used because of the twinge of guilt I usually feel about being so luxurious.
    [Show full text]