Lessons from Cain and Abel to Guide Leaders Through Turbulent Times a Worldwide Pandemic

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

John Gallo & Jenna Bieber Lessons from Cain and Abel to Guide Leaders Through Turbulent Times A worldwide pandemic. Social unrest. Economic uncertainty. Political divide. A recent poll shows that 80% of Americans feel that our nation is spiraling out of control. The end result is that many Americans have become angry, divided, and sometimes even hostile toward one another. We are living in what’s called an “anger incubator,” just waiting to explode. Being a leader at this delicate and fragile time in our nation’s history presents a staggering amount of challenges. In all organizations, leaders must contend with a diverse workforce that may be at odds over the various social issues that we face. Leaders are also being asked to examine both their organizations and their own lives for areas of institutional injustice in their policies, processes, and organizational culture. Though Scripture was written more than two thousand years ago, it can still guide today’s leaders to explore issues of hatred, bias, anger, and division in their organizations. There is no quick “fix” to end animosity, incivility, discrimination and racial strife within organizations or even society at large; it does not exist. The issues affecting companies, communities, and neighborhoods are multi-layered and nuanced. Because of this, it is valuable to examine the reasons why hatred exists and how God responds to it. Not only does God’s word in Scripture show us why hatred exists and where it started, but it can also provide a way forward. Hatred 101: Cain & Abel To encounter the deep hatred that causes people to harm one another, one does not have to look far in the Bible. The Bible details the very first murder, pitting brother against brother in the first book of the Bible, Genesis. When God created the world and made the first man and woman in His image, Adam and Eve, he gave them what is known as the “cultural” or “divine mandate”: God wanted Adam and Eve to populate the earth, to take care of it and help it flourish abundantly. When Adam and Eve sinned by disobeying God’s command to preserve one tree for God’s honor or glory alone, all that was pristine and perfect in the world was suddenly marred, and sin had entered creation. That sin causes Adam and Eve to hide from God in shame, causes Adam to blame God for creating Eve, and ultimately results in their banishment from the beautiful garden God created for them. These events set in motion the first murder, recorded in Chapter 4. Now Adam knew Eve his wife, and she conceived and bore Cain, saying, “I have gotten a man with the help of the Lord.” 2 And again, she bore his brother Abel. Now Abel was a keeper of sheep, and Cain a worker of the ground. (Genesis 4:1-2, ESV) Adam and Eve began the divine mandate by conceiving children to populate the world. The phrasing in verse 2 (“and again, she bore his brother Abel”) leads some commentators to infer that perhaps Cain and Abel were twins. We do not know that for sure, but we do know they must have been close to the same age since they grew in their roles at approximately the same rate. Cain was a farmer and Abel a shepherd. These are the first two occupations mentioned in the Bible, representing the primary types of work that were needed in creation at this point: tending to the land and tending to the animals. 3In the course of time Cain brought to the Lord an offering of the fruit of the ground, 4 and Abel also brought of the firstborn of his flock and of their fat portions. And the Lord had regard for Abel and his offering, 5 but for Cain and his offering he had no regard. So Cain was very angry, and his face fell. (Genesis 4:3-5, ESV) We can infer that at some point, God asks for an offering. What happened next is often misunderstood and misinterpreted. Cain and Abel brought their offerings, but the Lord found favor with Abel’s offering and not Cain’s. This is not to imply that because Abel brought a living sacrifice and Cain brought fruit, God favors shepherding over farming. Nothing could be further from the truth. The wording here is critical to see the problem: Cain brought to the Lord an offering of the fruit of the ground, 4 and Abel also brought of the firstborn of his flock and of theirfat portions. Some translations say Cain brought “some” fruit. The key here is not what was delivered, but the heart with which Cain brought it. Cain just brought some fruit. Abel, on the other hand, brought the best of his work (the firstborn calf which would have been the best and tastiest meat.) Abel gave God his best, but Cain simply gave him some of the fruit of his labor. As a result, God favored Abel’s offering. Cain was terribly angry, and the phrase “his face fell” is synonymous with shame. Then, he turns that anger and shame into jealousy of Abel. 6The Lord said to Cain, “Why are you angry, and why has your face fallen? 7 If you do well, will you not be accepted? And if you do not do well, sin is crouching at the door. Its desire is contrary to you, but you must rule over it.” (Genesis 4:6-7, ESV) God warned Cain that this feeling was going to consume him and that he needed to control his jealousy, or it would destroy him. 8 Cain spoke to Abel his brother. And when they were in the field, Cain rose up against his brother Abel and killed him. 9 Then the Lord said to Cain, “Where is Abel your brother?” He said, “I do not know; am I my brother’s keeper?” (Genesis 4:8-9, ESV). Cain did not heed God’s warning. He allowed his jealousy and anger to consume him, and his heart turned hard toward his brother. In the end, Cain took Abel’s life, and—showing no remorse—even lied when questioned by God. As leaders in modern society, what can be learned from this excerpt of the Bible as we navigate tensions in our workplace? Leadership Principle #1: Leaders hold people accountable for sin. It is essential to understand that when God confronted Cain, he already knew what Cain had done. After all, God is sovereign; He is all-knowing and all-powerful. Nothing happens that God is not aware of and thoroughly involved in. While God did hold Cain accountable, he didn’t just barge in and say, “Cain, I saw what you did.” Instead, he asked Cain, “Where is Abel, your brother?” Many times, people mistakenly believe that leaders should simply provide the answers. However, the mark of authentic leadership is often not in the ability to simply provide solutions but in the ability to ask the right questions. In today’s organizations, leaders have a responsibility to look deeply for areas of systematic racism and division, policies that are unjust and could lead to resentment, individual prejudices among staff and self, and other forms of discriminatory behavior. The murder of Abel took place “when they were in the field.”Cain and Abel may have been family, and Cain’s hatred may have stemmed from a personal matter, but Abel’s murder took place in the workplace. As we see from this example, private hatred often leads to public action. In order to be proactive, leaders must be able to address issues of discrimination and hatred in their workplace, preferably before any actions caused by those beliefs occur. In order to do this, leaders must hold the organization accountable by asking questions to get at why those beliefs and attitudes exist. And of course, leaders need to listen intently to the answers. This is a technique that Jesus uses throughout the New Testament. Questions elicit a response; they cause a dialogue. This practice can be as simple as examining an HR handbook and asking critical questions about various policies: do these policies favor some groups over others? Alternatively, it can be as deep as looking at the organization’s mission, charter, and bylaws and asking difficult questions about the goal of the organization: does this goal inadvertently favor some people over others? Do the hiring practices of the company unintentionally discriminate against certain groups of people? A note on Principle #1 As leaders strive to hold people accountable, it’s important to be aware of a few other things we see in Scripture. Cain does not immediately tell God the truth; instead, he covers it with a lie. Leaders need to be aware that simply asking difficult questions does not always get to the truth because people are sinful. As with Cain, sinful behavior leads to more sinful behavior. Our culture is full of “quick-fix” solutions to the many problems that we face in terms of anger and division. Some may think it’s as simple as removing symbols of perceived hate like changing the name of a football team or college mascot; others may believe that money will solve the problem and end inequality. However, the Christian leader knows that systemic things like racism and hatred are the effect, not the cause. The Christian leader views these issues as part of a more significant systemic sin problem that all people have. The 20th-century philosopher and Christian leader Francis Schaeffer called people “glorious ruins.” He said that people were glorious in that we were made in the image of God and bear that image in our rationality, our creativity, our ability to have relationships, and our ability to communicate with one another on many different levels.
Recommended publications
  • Adam, the Fall, and Original Sin Baker Academic, a Division of Baker Publishing Group, © 2014

    Adam, the Fall, and Original Sin Baker Academic, a Division of Baker Publishing Group, © 2014

    Adam, the Fall, and Original Sin Theological, Biblical, and Scientific Perspectives EDITED BY Hans Madueme and Michael Reeves k Hans Madueme and Michael Reeves, Adam, The Fall, and Original Sin Baker Academic, a division of Baker Publishing Group, © 2014. Used by permission. (Unpublished manuscript—copyright protected Baker Publishing Group) MaduemeReeves_Adam_LC_wo.indd iii 9/17/14 7:47 AM © 2014 by Hans Madueme and Michael Reeves Published by Baker Academic a division of Baker Publishing Group P.O. Box 6287, Grand Rapids, MI 49516-6287 www.bakeracademic.com Printed in the United States of America All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means—for example, electronic, photocopy, recording—without the prior written permission of the publisher. The only exception is brief quotations in printed reviews. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Adam, the fall, and original sin : theological, biblical, and scientific perspectives / Hans Madueme and Michael Reeves, editors. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8010-3992-8 (pbk.) 1. Sin, Original. 2. Adam (Biblical figure) 3. Fall of man. I. Madueme, Hans, 1975– editor. BT720.A33 2014 233 .14—dc23 2014021973 Unless otherwise indicated, Scripture quotations are from The Holy Bible, English Standard Version® (ESV®), copyright © 2001 by Crossway, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers. Used by permission. All rights reserved. ESV Text Edition: 2011 Scripture quotations labeled NASB are from the New American Standard Bible®, copyright © 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995 by The Lockman Foundation.
  • The Generations of Adam

    The Generations of Adam

    The Generations of Adam hat is the purpose of Bible chronology? According to Philip Mauro, in Wonders of Bible Chronology, “its basis is the Bible itself; its plan is the genealogical or life line that Wstretches from the first Adam to the last Adam ... and its purpose is to bring those who follow its progress to revelations of vital truth pertaining to God’s mighty work of redemption.” Genesis 5 reveals the time span between Adam and the worldwide flood of Noah’s time. The following table summarizes this time line: Age at: Anno Hominis Adam created 0 Adam's birth of Seth (130) 130 Seth's birth of Enosh (105) 235 Enosh's birth of Kenan (90) 325 Kenan's birth of Mahalalel (70) 395 Mahalalel's birth of Jared (65) 460 Jared's birth of Enoch (162) 622 Enoch's birth of Methuselah (65) 687 Methuselah's birth of Lamech (187) 874 Lamech's birth of Noah (182) 1056 time of worldwide flood Noah's 1656 (600) Before we analyze Genesis 5 further, a few general points must be made. First, the Bible is the only reliable source book that gives history with an exact chronology for the first 4000 years of the human race. It has been about 6000 years since the creation of man. For the first 3/5ths of this period, there is no chronological information whatever except in the Bible. The histories of other peoples give an account of their beginning vaguely and in the context of myths and fables. In contrast, the Bible is a very accurate historical document.
  • Batman Missions Figure Modification

    Batman Missions Figure Modification

    Batman Missions Figure Modification Is Horatio longing or self-imposed when barter some burl peghs tropologically? Xerxes is chairborne: she disentangling bitingly and ossify her Malaprop. Unelaborate Edgar couch resiliently. Oxygen and acetylene aqd urdd hn ldtal hdathng and cutthng nodqathnnr. With figures with a mission marked increase in the modification extreme. We are essential trace gas and batman figure, we make it mean something else do you are hugely popular. These modifications are amortized over someone else would batman figure caption should anne are. He is posed bent over to surprise at the nausea and scratching his head. Anaqd cnllhttdd alrn aooqnudd. It occur be some time before the industry would magnify the lurch of this mission. Kenyan man fabricates welding supply contracts. DC Comics Batman Missions Mr Freeze Action Figure FuTiToy This fits your not sure this fits by entering your model number 6-Inch scale highly detailed. The figure as the perfect for missions impossiblespark a batman missions figure modification to countless artists at client has been a circumstance can do you find what. The batman missions impossibletory: this criterion is. Not good one expects to fasten on wuwt. The batman missions figure modification kit contains interesting to batman missions, the modification kits in response, it seems occidentals carry out? But batman figure! Fun than with a bit after the cause a clear by the white smile, this virus unless the elation i did they? Noël Coward it said: 赗ork is more fun than fun. By full nature so its activities, hundreds of members taxpayers up to tens of thousands of pounds annually for personal expenses completely unrelated to their political service.
  • How Can Original Sin Be Inherited?

    How Can Original Sin Be Inherited?

    DEAR FATHER KERPER Michelangelo, The Fall and Expulsion from Garden of Eden. Web Gallery of Art sinned against obedience. But this act How can original represents much more: they actually rejected friendship with God and, even worse, attempted to supplant God as God. sin be inherited? To see this more clearly, we must rewind the Genesis tape back to chapter ear Father Kerper: I’ve always had a huge 1. Here we find that God had created problem with original sin. It seems so unfair. I can the first human beings “in the image of God.” (Genesis 1:27) As such, they understand punishing someone who has broken a immediately enjoyed friendship and law. That’s perfectly just. But why should someone even kinship with God, who had Dwho’s done nothing wrong get punished for what someone else lovingly created them so that they could share everything with Him. did millions of years ago? Though Adam and Eve had everything that human beings could Many people share your understandable In the case of speeding, the possibly enjoy, the serpent tempted reaction against the doctrine of original punishment – say a $200 ticket – is them to seek even more. Recall the sin. As you’ve expressed so well, it does always imposed directly on the specific serpent’s words to Eve: “God knows in indeed seem to violate the basic norms of person who committed an isolated fact that the day you eat it [the forbidden fairness. But it really doesn’t. How so? illegal act. Moreover, the punishment is fruit] your eyes will be opened and you To overcome this charge of unfairness, designed to prevent dangerous and illegal will be like gods.” (Genesis 3:5) we must do two things: first, reconsider behavior by creating terribly unpleasant By eating the forbidden fruit, Adam the meaning of punishment; and second, consequences, namely costly fines and and Eve attempted to seize equality rediscover the social nature – and social eventually the loss of one’s license.
  • Another Look at Cain: from a Narrative Perspective

    Another Look at Cain: from a Narrative Perspective

    신학논단 제102집 (2020. 12. 31): 241-263 https://doi.org/10.17301/tf.2020.12.102.241 Another Look at Cain: From a Narrative Perspective Wm. J McKinstry IV, MATS Adjunct Faculty, Department of General Education Presbyterian University and Theological Seminary In the Hebrew primeval histories names often carry significant weight. Much etymological rigour has been exercised in determining many of the names within the Bible. Some of the meaning of these names appear to have a consensus among scholars; among others there is less consensus and more contention. Numerous proposals have come forward with varying degrees of convincing (or unconvincing as the case may be) philological arguments, analysis of wordplays, possi- ble textual emendations, undiscovered etymologies from cognates in other languages, or onomastic studies detailing newly discovered names of similarity found in other ancient Semitic languages. Through these robust studies, when applicable, we can ascertain the meanings of names that may help to unveil certain themes or actions of a character within a narrative. For most of the names within the primeval histories of Genesis, the 242 신학논단 제102집(2020) meaning of a name is only one feature. For some names there is an en- compassing feature set: wordplay, character trait and/or character role, and foreshadowing. Three of the four members in the first family in Genesis, Adam, Eve, and Abel, have names that readily feature all the elements listed above. Cain, however, has rather been an exception in this area, further adding to Genesis 4’s enigmaticness in the Hebrew Bible’s primeval history. While three characters (Adam, Eve, and Abel) have names that (1) sound like other Hebrew words, that are (2) sug- gestive of their character or actions and (3) foreshadow or suggest fu- ture events about those characters, the meaning of Cain’s name does not render itself so explicitly to his character or his role in the narrative, at least not to the same degree of immediate conspicuousness.
  • Amazing Facts Study Guide-02 Did God Create the Devil

    Amazing Facts Study Guide-02 Did God Create the Devil

    Amazing Facts Study Guide 2 - Did God Create the Devil? Most people in the world are being deceived by an evil genius bent on destroying their lives - a brilliant mastermind called the devil, or Satan. But this dark prince is much more than what you might think... many say he's just a devious mythical figure, but the Bible says he's very real, and he's deceiving families, churches, and even nations to increase sorrow and pain. Here are the Bible's amazing facts about this prince of darkness and how you can overcome him! 1. With whom did sin originate? "The devil sinneth from the beginning." 1 John 3:8. "That old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan." Revelation 12:9. Answer: Satan, also called the devil, is the originator of sin. Without the Scriptures, the origin of evil would remain unexplained. 2. What was Satan's name before he sinned? Where was he living at that time? "How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning!" Isaiah 14:12. Jesus said, "I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven." Luke 10:18. "Thou wast upon the holy mountain of God." Ezekiel 28:14. Answer: His name was Lucifer, and he was living in heaven. Lucifer is symbolized by the king of Babylon in Isaiah 14 and as the king of Tyrus in Ezekiel 28. 3. What was the origin of Lucifer? What responsible position did he hold? How does the Bible describe him? "Thou wast created." Ezekiel 28:13, 15. "Thou art the anointed cherub that covereth." Ezekiel 28:14.
  • The Slavic Vampire Myth in Russian Literature

    The Slavic Vampire Myth in Russian Literature

    From Upyr’ to Vampir: The Slavic Vampire Myth in Russian Literature Dorian Townsend Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Languages and Linguistics Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences The University of New South Wales May 2011 PLEASE TYPE THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES Thesis/Dissertation Sheet Surname or Family name: Townsend First name: Dorian Other name/s: Aleksandra PhD, Russian Studies Abbreviation for degree as given in the University calendar: School: Languages and Linguistics Faculty: Arts and Social Sciences Title: From Upyr’ to Vampir: The Slavic Vampire Myth in Russian Literature Abstract 350 words maximum: (PLEASE TYPE) The Slavic vampire myth traces back to pre-Orthodox folk belief, serving both as an explanation of death and as the physical embodiment of the tragedies exacted on the community. The symbol’s broad ability to personify tragic events created a versatile system of imagery that transcended its folkloric derivations into the realm of Russian literature, becoming a constant literary device from eighteenth century to post-Soviet fiction. The vampire’s literary usage arose during and after the reign of Catherine the Great and continued into each politically turbulent time that followed. The authors examined in this thesis, Afanasiev, Gogol, Bulgakov, and Lukyanenko, each depicted the issues and internal turmoil experienced in Russia during their respective times. By employing the common mythos of the vampire, the issues suggested within the literature are presented indirectly to the readers giving literary life to pressing societal dilemmas. The purpose of this thesis is to ascertain the vampire’s function within Russian literary societal criticism by first identifying the shifts in imagery in the selected Russian vampiric works, then examining how the shifts relate to the societal changes of the different time periods.
  • LIKE FATHER, LIKE SON GENESIS 4:1–2 Why Did Cain Kill His Brother Abel?

    LIKE FATHER, LIKE SON GENESIS 4:1–2 Why Did Cain Kill His Brother Abel?

    CHAPTER ONE LIKE FATHER, LIKE SON GENESIS 4:1–2 You two are book-men: can you tell me by your wit; What was a month old at Cain’s birth, that’s not five weeks old as yet? (Shakespeare—Love’s Labor’s Lost 4.2.40) Why did Cain kill his brother Abel? It is usually assumed by modern commentators that God’s rejection of Cain’s offering led him to kill his brother in a fit of jealousy.1 Such a conclusion is logical in light of the way the action in the story is arranged. But the fact is we are never told the specific reason for the murder. Ancient exegetes, as we will see later, also speculated over Cain’s motive and sometimes provided the same conclusion as modern interpreters. But some suggested that there was something more sinister behind the killing, that there was something inborn about Cain that led him to earn the title of first murderer. These interpreters pushed back past the actual murder to look, as would a good biographer, at what it was about Cain’s birth and childhood that led him to his moment of infamy. Correspond- ingly, they asked similar questions about Abel. The result was a devel- opment of traditions that became associated with the brothers’ births, names and occupations. Who was Cain’s father? As we noted in the introduction, Cain and Abel is a story of firsts. In Gen 4:1 we find the first ever account of sexual relations between humans with the end result being the first pregnancy.
  • Cain in Early Nineteenth-Century Literature: Traditional Biblical Stories Revised to Encompass Contemporary Advances in Science Kara Davis Iowa State University

    Cain in Early Nineteenth-Century Literature: Traditional Biblical Stories Revised to Encompass Contemporary Advances in Science Kara Davis Iowa State University

    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2012 Cain in early nineteenth-century literature: Traditional biblical stories revised to encompass contemporary advances in science Kara Davis Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the Literature in English, British Isles Commons Recommended Citation Davis, Kara, "Cain in early nineteenth-century literature: Traditional biblical stories revised to encompass contemporary advances in science" (2012). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 12308. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/12308 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cain in early nineteenth-century literature: Traditional biblical stories revised to encompass contemporary advances in science by Kara Anne Davis A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Major: English (Literature) Program of Study Committee: Dometa Wiegand Brothers, Major Professor Linda Shenk KJ Gilchrist Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2012 Copyright © Kara Anne Davis, 2012. All rights reserved. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 2: “TO KNOW MORTAL NATURE’S NOTHINGNESS”: 11 REVISIONS OF IMMORTALITY IN BYRON’S CAIN CHAPTER 3: THE PHYSICALITY OF FAITH: 38 SENSING GOD IN NATURE IN “THE WANDERINGS OF CAIN” CHAPTER 4: “THIRD AMONG THE SONS OF LIGHT”: 62 THE INTERSECTION OF ASTRONOMICAL METAPHORS AND THE APOTHEOSIS OF JOHN KEATS IN SHELLEY’S ADONAIS CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION 86 1 Introduction During the early nineteenth century, a number of authors sought to revise the traditional story of Cain, frequently using non-canonical sources to complete these revisions.
  • DC Comics Jumpchain CYOA

    DC Comics Jumpchain CYOA

    DC Comics Jumpchain CYOA CYOA written by [text removed] [text removed] [text removed] cause I didn’t lol The lists of superpowers and weaknesses are taken from the DC Wiki, and have been reproduced here for ease of access. Some entries have been removed, added, or modified to better fit this format. The DC universe is long and storied one, in more ways than one. It’s a universe filled with adventure around every corner, not least among them on Earth, an unassuming but cosmically significant planet out of the way of most space territories. Heroes and villains, from the bottom of the Dark Multiverse to the top of the Monitor Sphere, endlessly struggle for justice, for power, and for control over the fate of the very multiverse itself. You start with 1000 Cape Points (CP). Discounted options are 50% off. Discounts only apply once per purchase. Free options are not mandatory. Continuity === === === === === Continuity doesn't change during your time here, since each continuity has a past and a future unconnected to the Crises. If you're in Post-Crisis you'll blow right through 2011 instead of seeing Flashpoint. This changes if you take the relevant scenarios. You can choose your starting date. Early Golden Age (eGA) Default Start Date: 1939 The original timeline, the one where it all began. Superman can leap tall buildings in a single bound, while other characters like Batman, Dr. Occult, and Sandman have just debuted in their respective cities. This continuity occurred in the late 1930s, and takes place in a single universe.
  • Did Eve Have Sex with Satan? the Serpent Seed View of Genesis 3:15

    Did Eve Have Sex with Satan? the Serpent Seed View of Genesis 3:15

    CHRISTIAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE PO Box 8500, Charlotte, NC 28271 Practical Hermeneutics: JAP393 DID EVE HAVE SEX WITH SATAN? THE SERPENT SEED VIEW OF GENESIS 3:15 by Robert Velarde This article first appeared in the Practical Hermeneutics column of the CHRISTIAN RESEARCH JOURNAL, volume 39, number 03 (2016). For further information or to subscribe to the CHRISTIAN RESEARCH JOURNAL, go to: http://www.equip.org/christian-research-journal/. “Here is what really happened in the Garden of Eden. The Word says that Eve was beguiled by the serpent. She was actually seduced by the serpent….He was so close to being human that his seed could, and did mingle with that of the woman and cause her to conceive. When this happened, God cursed the serpent.” —William Branham1 Branham (1909–65), a proponent of Oneness theology,2 taught the so-called serpent seed interpretation of Genesis 3, with adherents of this view often citing Genesis 3:15 in support of their position: “And I will put enmity between you [the serpent] and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; he will crush your head, and you will strike his heel” (ESV). The crux of the serpent seed view is that Eve and Satan engaged in sexual relations. Consequently, sin is viewed as sexual in nature, as opposed to the traditional interpretation of the fall as sin being disobedience to God. In addition to Branham, other serpent seed interpretations of Genesis 3:15 are found in the teachings of the Christian Identity movement, as well as, for instance, in the teachings of Arnold Murray (1929– 2014) of Shepherd’s Chapel and also the Unification Church.
  • Representation of Identities in Neil Gaiman's the Sandman

    Representation of Identities in Neil Gaiman's the Sandman

    SOMEWHERE OVER THE RAINBOW: REPRESENTATION OF IDENTITIES IN NEIL GAIMAN’S THE SANDMAN Andrés Romero Jódar Universidad de Zaragoza ABSTRACT Neil Gaiman’s The Sandman is a graphic novel that explores the complexities of reality and identity. The main asset of this work is its presentation of a plurality of narratives that, together, create not only a completely new world vision according to comic-book stand- ards, but also a novel conception of cultural identity. This essay aims to analyze how The Sandman deals with identity construction as fashioned by two different but related no- tions: on the one hand, identity as the outcome of the confrontation between old concep- tions of the world and new roles, duties and values; on the other hand, identity as a change of situation, as the individual wilfully escaping from old masks that imprison the self inside predetermined patterns of behaviour. KEY WORDS: Comic-book, graphic novel, Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, identity. RESUMEN The Sandman de Neil Gaiman es una novela gráfica que explora las complejidades de la 149 realidad y de la identidad. El principal valor de esta obra es la presentación de una plurali- dad de narrativas que, en conjunto, crean tanto una visión del mundo completamente nueva respecto a los cánones del cómic, así como una concepción novel de la identidad cultural. El objetivo de este ensayo es analizar cómo The Sandman trata la construcción de la identidad como resultado de dos conceptos diferentes pero relacionados: por un lado, identidad como el resultado de la confrontación entre viejas concepciones del mundo y nuevos roles, deberes y valores; por otro lado, identidad como un cambio de situación, en el que el individuo escapa voluntariamente de viejas máscaras que aprisionan al sujeto dentro de modelos de comportamiento predeterminados.