Castle Acre Priory Tour and Explore Student Booklet
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Great Chalfield, Wiltshire: Archaeology and History (Notes for Visitors, Prepared by the Royal Archaeological Institute, 2017)
Great Chalfield, Wiltshire: archaeology and history (notes for visitors, prepared by the Royal Archaeological Institute, 2017) Great Chalfield manor belonged to a branch of the Percy family in the Middle Ages. One of them probably had the moat dug and the internal stone wall, of which a part survives, built, possibly in the thirteenth century. Its bastions have the remains of arrow-slits, unless those are later romanticizing features. The site would have been defensible, though without a strong tower could hardly have been regarded as a castle; the Percy house was a courtyard, with a tower attached to one range, but its diameter is too small for that to have been much more than a staircase turret. The house went through various owners and other vicissitudes, but was rescued by a Wiltshire business-man, who employed W. H. Brakspear as architect (see Paul Jack’s contribution, below). It is now owned by the National Trust (plan reproduced with permission of NT Images). Security rather than impregnability is likely to have been the intention of Thomas Tropenell, the builder of most of the surviving house. He was a local man and a lawyer who acquired the estate seemingly on a lease, and subsequently and after much litigation by purchase, during the late 1420s/60s (Driver 2000). In the house is the large and impressive cartulary that documents these struggles, which are typical of the inter- and intra-family feuding that characterized the fifteenth century, even below the level of royal battles and hollow crowns. Tropenell was adviser to Lord Hungerford, the dominant local baron; he was not therefore going to build anything that looked like a castle to challenge nearby Farleigh. -
The Construction of Northumberland House and the Patronage of Its Original Builder, Lord Henry Howard, 1603–14
The Antiquaries Journal, 90, 2010,pp1 of 60 r The Society of Antiquaries of London, 2010 doi:10.1017⁄s0003581510000016 THE CONSTRUCTION OF NORTHUMBERLAND HOUSE AND THE PATRONAGE OF ITS ORIGINAL BUILDER, LORD HENRY HOWARD, 1603–14 Manolo Guerci Manolo Guerci, Kent School of Architecture, University of Kent, Marlowe Building, Canterbury CT27NR, UK. E-mail: [email protected] This paper affords a complete analysis of the construction of the original Northampton (later Northumberland) House in the Strand (demolished in 1874), which has never been fully investigated. It begins with an examination of the little-known architectural patronage of its builder, Lord Henry Howard, 1st Earl of Northampton from 1603, one of the most interesting figures of the early Stuart era. With reference to the building of the contemporary Salisbury House by Sir Robert Cecil, 1st Earl of Salisbury, the only other Strand palace to be built in the early seventeenth century, textual and visual evidence are closely investigated. A rediscovered eleva- tional drawing of the original front of Northampton House is also discussed. By associating it with other sources, such as the first inventory of the house (transcribed in the Appendix), the inside and outside of Northampton House as Henry Howard left it in 1614 are re-configured for the first time. Northumberland House was the greatest representative of the old aristocratic mansions on the Strand – the almost uninterrupted series of waterfront palaces and large gardens that stretched from Westminster to the City of London, the political and economic centres of the country, respectively. Northumberland House was also the only one to have survived into the age of photography. -
Official Act of Consecration to the Immaculate
COMFORTER OF THE AFFLICTED Pray for Us 0//icial cAct o/ Concecration OF THE DOMINICAN ORDER TO THE .!Jmmaculate J.leart o/ .Atarg QUEEN OF THE MOST HOLY ROSARY, Help of Christians, Refuge of the llUman race, Victress in all (I God's battles, we, suppliantly and with great confidence, not in our own merits but solely because of the immense goodness of thy motherly heart, prostrate ourselves before thy throne begging mercy, grace, and timely aid. To thee and to thy Immaculate Heart we bind and conse crate ourselves anew, in union with our Holy Mother, the 01Urch, the Mystical Body of Christ. Once again we proclaim thee the Queen of our Order-the Order truly, which thy son, Dominic, 240 Dominicana founded to preach, through thy aid, the word of truth everywhere for the salvation of souls; the Order which thou has chosen as a beautiful, fragrant, and splendid garden of delights; the Order in which the light of wisdom ought so splendidly to shine that its members might bestow on others the fruit of their contempla tion, not only by courageously uprooting heresy but also by sow ing the seeds of virtue everywhere; the Order which during the course of centuries has gloried in thy scapular and in thy most holy Rosary, which daily and in the hour of death devoutly and confidently salutes thee as advocate in those words most sublime: Hail Holy Queen, Mother of Mercy. To thee, 0 Mary, and to thy Immaculate Heart we conse crate today this religious house, this community, that thou might be truly its Queen; that perfect observance, the love of thy Son in the Most Holy Sacrament of the Altar, the love of thy praise, and the love of St. -
Annual Report 2008-09
Annual Report 2008-09 Enriching the Lives of Children Contents Year in Review 2 Grant Recipients 4 Photos 32 Grant History 58 Grant Request/Application Process 59 Charles H. Dater 60 Foundation Directors and Officers 61 Centerspread Photo Identifications 64 Charles H. Dater Foundation Annual Report 2008-09 Directors and Officers Bruce A. Krone, President & Secretary John D. Silvati, Vice President Roger L. Ruhl, Vice President Stanley J. Frank, Jr., Treasurer Amanda Prebble Lenhart Grants Coordinator: Beth Broomall Charles H. Dater Foundation Inc. 602 Main Street, Suite 302 Cincinnati, OH 45202-2521 Telephone: 513/241-2658 Fax: 513/241-2731 www.DaterFoundation.org 2008-09 was the 24th year of grantmaking for the Charles H. Dater Foundation. Over $29 mil- lion in grants have been distributed since the first grant was awarded in 1985. The Foundation made 135 grants totaling $2,134,651 in the grant/fiscal year (September 2008 to August 2009). Grants ranged from $1,000 to $60,000. The median grant was $10,000 and the average grant was $15,812. Fifteen grants were made to first-time recipients. More than 1,800 grants have been awarded to nearly 400 organizations over the last twenty-four years. 2 The Foundation continued its efforts to call attention to its grant recipients, and one grantee suggested this additional promotion is like getting “a bonus grant.” The Foundation’s web site featured postings of success stories and photos from grant recipients, helping further spread the word about the good work being done at these non-profit organizations. News releases an- nouncing new grants are also posted regularly. -
Download a Plan of Warkworth Castle and Hermitage (Pdf)
WARKWORTH CASTLE AND HERMITAGE CASTLE GREAT TOWER Ground plan First-floor plan Parlour Food/fuel store Wine Great Kitchen chamber Great tower cellar Wine cellar Beer cellar Kitchen Chapel Light Accounting well Great hall room Entrance hall Buttery/pantry Porter’s lodge Lobby Second-floor plan Brewhouse/ bakehouse Grey Mare’s Tail Tower Kitchen Collegiate church Crypts Buttery Pantry Light well Passage Lion To w e r Duke’s Rooms Great hall Stable Bailey Little Stair To w e r Well house N Great chamber (above) Chapel Montagu To w e r Carrickfergus To w e r Gatehouse HERMITAGE Ground-floor plan First-floor plan 1199–1213 Inner chamber 1249–1310 Priest’s house Late 14th century 15th century 16th century 19th century Paler shades indicate Chapel foundations 0 30m This drawing is English Heritage copyright and is supplied for the purposes of private research. It may not be reproduced in any medium without the express written permission of English Heritage. February 2015 WARKWORTH CASTLE AND HERMITAGE GREAT TOWER A three-dimensional view of the layout of domestic and service chambers within the great tower. Chambers of different sizes and heights were incorporated within a regular external volume and interconnected by an ingenious system of wall stairs. Bedchamber Withdrawing chambers Closet SECOND FLOOR Chambers Parlour Great chamber FIRST FLOOR Chapel Main kitchen Pastry kitchen Great hall Lobby Buttery/pantry Wine cellars GROUND FLOOR Entrance hall Food/fuel store Beer cellar Porter’s lodge Accounting room Domestic chambers Domestic access between floors Service chambers Service access between floors This drawing is English Heritage copyright and is supplied for the purposes of private research. -
RUSSIAN TRADITION of the KNIGHTS of MALTA OSJ The
RUSSIAN TRADITION OF THE KNIGHTS OF MALTA OSJ The Russian tradition of the Knights Hospitaller is a collection of charitable organisations claiming continuity with the Russian Orthodox grand priory of the Order of Saint John. Their distinction emerged when the Mediterranean stronghold of Malta was captured by Napoleon in 1798 when he made his expedition to Egypt. As a ruse, Napoleon asked for safe harbor to resupply his ships, and then turned against his hosts once safely inside Valletta. Grand Master Ferdinand von Hompesch failed to anticipate or prepare for this threat, provided no effective leadership, and readily capitulated to Napoleon. This was a terrible affront to most of the Knights desiring to defend their stronghold and sovereignty. The Order continued to exist in a diminished form and negotiated with European governments for a return to power. The Emperor of Russia gave the largest number of Knights shelter in St Petersburg and this gave rise to the Russian tradition of the Knights Hospitaller and recognition within the Russian Imperial Orders. In gratitude the Knights declared Ferdinand von Hompesch deposed and Emperor Paul I was elected as the new Grand Master. Origin Blessed Gerard created the Order of St John of Jerusalem as a distinctive Order from the previous Benedictine establishment of Hospitallers (Госпитальеры). It provided medical care and protection for pilgrims visiting Jerusalem. After the success of the First Crusade, it became an independent monastic order, and then as circumstances demanded grafted on a military identity, to become an Order of knighthood. The Grand Priory of the Order moved to Rhodes in 1312, where it ruled as a sovereign power, then to Malta in 1530 as a sovereign/vassal power. -
Analysis of Constitution
ANALYSIS OF CONSTITUTION ARTICLE I Section 1 Name of Order Section 2 Name of Convent General Section 3. Name of Priory; of Knight ARTICLE II Section 1 Jurisdiction ARTICLE III Section 1 Membership Section 2 Representative must be member ARTICLE IV Section 1 Names and rank of officers ARTICLE V Section 1 Who eligible to office Section 2 Member or officer must be in good standing in Priory Section 3. Only one officer from a Priory Section 4 Officers selected at Annual Conclave Section 5 Officers must be installed Section 6 Officers must make declaration Section 7 Officers hold office until successors installed Section 8 Vacancies, how filled ARTICLE VI Section 1 Annual and special Conclaves Section 2 Quorum ARTICLE VII Section 1 Convent General has sole government of Priories Section 2 Powers to grant dispensation, and warrants, to revoke warrants Section 3. Power to prescribe ceremonies of Order Section 4 Power to require fees and dues Section 5 Disciplinary, for violation of laws ARTICLE VIII Section 1 Who shall preside at Convent General Section 2 Powers and duties of Grand Master-General Section 3. Convent General may constitute additional offices ARTICLE IX Section 1 Legislation, of what it consists Section 2 How Constitution may be altered Section 3. When Constitution in effect 4 CONSTITUTION ARTICLE I - Names Section 1 This Order shall be known as the Knights of the York Cross of Honour and designated by the initials “K.Y.C.H.” Section 2 The governing body shall be known as Convent General, Knights of the York Cross of Honour. -
Anne Arundel County Howard County
The Business Monthly 2018 Salute to Central Maryland Chamber Page 19 2018 The Supplement to ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTYMonthly HOWARD COUNTY SalutePRINCE GEORGES COUNTY ANNE ARUNDELto COUNTY HOWARD COUNTY PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY HOWARD COUNTY PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY HOWARD COUNTY PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY HOWARD COUNTY PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY Page B-2 Salute to Central Maryland Chamber 2018 The Business Monthly Letter From the CMC Value of Membership “Membership has helped Board Chair grow my business. At a CMC’s networking mixer, I met a banker. I told her how I help business owners Dear Business Monthly Readers, ing experience in the Central Maryland region, I am excited about leading this enhance their benefit packages at The board of directors, staff and organization and its members. The CMC no cost. She thought of someone members of the Central Maryland Cham- already has made a strong impact on the ber (CMC) welcome you to this special regional business ecosystem, and we are who owns a construction company publication by The Business Monthly. excited about our plans for the New Year. and gave me his cell number. The CMC formed in early 2017 when In 2018, more than 100 events and two successful chambers, the Baltimore programs are planned to provide mem- Because I was referred, he took Washington Corridor Chamber and the bers and guests with networking oppor- my call, and soon became a new West Anne Arundel County Chamber, tunities that lead to relationships with merged together. The CMC has already new clients and strategic partners. -
PRINCETHORPE PRIORY by Fr Elphege Hind OSB Ampleforth Journal 11 (1905) Pp.192-204 © Ampleforth Abbey Trustees
PRINCETHORPE PRIORY by Fr Elphege Hind OSB Ampleforth Journal 11 (1905) pp.192-204 © Ampleforth Abbey Trustees he Benedictine nuns of Princethorpe were the first of the refugees from France to arriye in England and have been in this country for more than one hundred Tyears. They were not originally a community of English nuns living in exile abroad, like the communities of Stanbrook East Bergholt and many others of our Benedictine convents. They came to our shores at the time of the Revolution as exiles suffering for their fidelity to the Faith, and though their intention was not to remain, the kindly welcome they received in England dissuaded them from carrying out their original plan of seeking a home in Belgium. Their foundress was Mère Marie Granger, a saintly soul who had taken the habit of St. Benedict in the Abbey of Montmartre near Paris. It was quite contrary to her desires and inclinations that she ever came to be the foundress of a Benedictine monastery. It was mainly due to the work and persuasion of her brother that she consented to put her hand to so great a work. He was a canon of Paris, a notable ecclesiastic of the time, and one who saw in his sister’s character all the necessary qualities for a work of this kind. Accordingly, when the Abbey of Notre Dame des Isles in Burgundy was vacant, he tried to obtain it for his sister. The King gave his consent to the proposal. At first she held back and refused to leave Montmartre, but in the end gave her consent and went so far as to make her Profession of Faith before the Archdeacon of Paris. -
The Book of the Foundation of ST Bartholomew's Church
THE BOOK OF THE FOUNDATION OF ST BARTholomew’S CHURCH: CONSECRATION, RESTORATION, AND TRANSLATION Laura Varnam So al these thyngis that bene seide or shall be seide / they beholde the ende / and consummacioun of this document / For trewly God is yn this place.1 This statement appears midway through the Middle English transla- tion of the twelfth-centuryL atin foundation legend known as The Book of the Foundation of St Bartholomew’s Church. As a foundation legend the text’s primary aim is to narrate the construction of the church of St Bartholomew the Great in London, and to consecrate it as a sacred space by promoting its claims to sanctity. The textual and physical space of the church are conflated in the quotation above because the referent of ‘trewly God is yn this place’ is at once the church itself, the immediate subject of the foundation legend, and the translated document, in need of particular authorisation because of its status as a vernacular text. The Middle English translation was commissioned during the ‘Great Restoration’ of St Bartholomew’s at the turn of the fifteenth-century and its promotion of the sanctity of the church played a major role in the church’s strategy to re-establish itself as the dominant church in medieval London. The Middle English translation of The Book of the Foundation fol- lows a transcription of the original Latin foundation legend in British Library MS Cotton Vespasian B IX, dated c.1400.2 St Bartholomew the Great was founded in Smithfield, just outside the walls of the city of London, in 1123 by Rahere and the Latin foundation legend 1 The Book of the Foundation of St Bartholomew’s Church, ed. -
The Architecture of the Mendicant Orders in the Middle Ages: an Overview of Recent Literature
The Architecture of the Mendicant Orders in the Middle Ages: An Overview of Recent Literature Caroline Bruzelius European cities of any size had one or more mendicant convents. These institutions re- shaped the topographical, social, and economic realities of urban life in the late Middle Ages; they also often de-stabilized traditional parochial organization and created new poles of influence and activity within cities. Mendicants expanded and “anchored” new suburbs, but they sometimes also settled in the heart of a city, destroying neighborhoods in the process. As the thirteenth century progressed, friars increasingly inserted large conventual complexes within densely inhabited urban space. In Italy in particular they also carved out open areas (piazzas) for preaching. Yet, although it is hard to imagine any medieval city without its mendicant convents, the reconstruction of their presence as a physical, spiritual, economic, and social phenomenon after the systematic and thorough destruction that began as early as the sixteenth-century Reformation remains a challenging task. This essay is an overview of the main themes in recent literature on mendicant build- ings in the Middle Ages 1. A number of books on the architecture of the friars have appeared in the past twenty years. These are dominated by three broad types of analysis. The first focuses on an individual site, either a church alone or a convent as a whole (a few examples are GAI, 1994; BARCLAY LLOYD, 2004; CERVINI, DE MARCHI, 2010; DE MARCHI, PIRAZ, 2011). The second category consists of the survey that covers a region and/or an extended chrono- logical period (DELLWING, 1970, 1990; SCHENKLUHN, 2000, 2003; COOMANS, 2001; VOLTI, 2003; TODENHÖFER, 2010). -
THE TWELFTH-CENTURY AISLED HALL of LEICESTER CASTLE: a RE-ASSESSMENT Nick Hill
THE TWELFTH-CENTURY AISLED HALL OF LEICESTER CASTLE: A RE-ASSESSMENT Nick Hill A recent programme of research, accompanied by archaeological excavation and dendrochronology, has confirmed the Great Hall of Leicester Castle as the earliest known standing aisled hall in Britain, now tree-ring dated to 1137–62. It was built for Earl Robert II of Leicester, one of the greatest magnates of the period, probably in the 1150s when he was at the height of his powers. The form of the main twelfth-century roof structure, with timber arcades and a former clerestorey, was established in previous work of the 1980s. The current study has added detailed analysis of the external masonry walls, including the uncovering of two service doorways. Archaeological excavation established that the aisle posts were originally earth-fast. Drawing on earlier documentary study, a revised reconstruction of the original building form is proposed, relating the upper roof structure to the original masonry walls, aisles and floor level. Evidence indicates that a small service building was attached to the north gable, with a detached chamber block located to the south. The relationship of Leicester to other early aisled halls is also explored. INTRODUCTION The Great Hall of Leicester Castle is a remarkable survivor. Of the rest of the extensive castle buildings, which reached their heyday under John of Gaunt in the late fourteenth century, little remains except for parts of two gatehouses. The Great Hall itself underwent major alteration in the early sixteenth century, was entirely re- fronted in the 1690s, subdivided internally in 1821, and further altered and extended in 1858.