DOCSLIB.ORG

Petitions in the UK

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Petitions in the UK BRIEFING PAPER Number CBP 8620, 11 July 2019 By Philip Loft Petitions in the UK Contents: 1. UK e-petitioning prior to 2015 2. UK Parliament e-petitioning post-2015 3. Largest UK e-petitions 4. Public Petitions to the UK Parliament 5. Largest UK Public Petitions to Parliament/Number 10 6. Time spent debating petitions in the UK Parliament 7. Petitions to other institutions 8. Appendix 1: UK Parliament e- petitions receiving over 100,000 signatures in 2019 9. Appendix 2: UK Parliament e- petitions receiving over 100,000 signatures since 2015 www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 Petitions in the UK Contents Summary 3 1. UK e-petitioning prior to 2015 4 1.1 Number 10 website (2006- 2011) 4 1.2 Cabinet Office website (2011-15) 4 2. UK Parliament e-petitioning post-2015 5 2.1 The current e-petitioning system 5 2.2 Number of petitions and petitioners 5 2.3 Who participates? 6 3. Largest UK e-petitions 8 3.1 Revoke Article 50 and remain in the EU, 2019 8 3.2 EU Referendum rules triggering a 2nd EU Referendum, 2016 10 3.3 Prevent Donald Trump from making a state visit to the UK, 2016 12 3.4 Road pricing, 2007 13 4. Public Petitions to the UK Parliament 14 4.1 Procedure 14 4.2 Historic Trends 14 5. Largest UK Public Petitions to Parliament/Number 10 15 5.1 Pensions, 1945 15 5.2 Pensions, 1939 15 5.3 Ambulance dispute, 1989 15 5.4 Pensions, 1943 15 5.5 Chartists, 1842 16 5.6 Increase in entertainment duty, 1951 16 5.7 Sub post offices, 2000 16 6. Time spent debating petitions in the UK Parliament 17 7. Petitions to other institutions 18 7.1 Scottish Parliament 18 7.2 Profile of petitioners to the Scottish Parliament 19 7.3 Welsh Assembly 20 7.4 Northern Ireland 21 7.5 Local authorities 21 8. Appendix 1: UK Parliament e-petitions receiving over 100,000 signatures in 2019 22 9. Appendix 2: UK Parliament e-petitions receiving over 100,000 signatures since 2015 28 Contributing Authors: Thanks to the House of Commons Petitions Committee for help with data. Cover page image copyright: © UK Parliament/Jessica Taylor 3 Commons Library Briefing, 11 July 2019 Summary The presentation of petitions to Parliament has a ‘[Nothing shall] debar or hinder long history, though before the Civil Wars of the any person or persons… to 1640s petitions generally dealt with personal present any public or private grievances. Since the later eighteenth century, grievance or complaint to any radicals and reformers used petitions to make Member or Members of demands on parliamentary reform, the abolition of Parliament…or to the slavery, and religious toleration. These movements Kings Majesty for any remedy’. culminated in the mass-petitions of the Chartists in the 1830s and 1840s. Tumultuous Petitioning Act, 1661 People have continued to use petitions to express their opinion: the Hansard Society survey of political engagement in 2018 estimated that 28% of the population had signed at least one e-petition in the previous year.1 There are several institutional petitioning systems that currently operate in the UK. In the UK Parliament, Public Petitions may be presented to both the House of Lords and House of Commons in paper form, in line with historic traditions. In 2006, the Labour Government introduced e-petitioning to the Number 10 Website, which was replaced in 2011 by the Conservative-Liberal Democrat Government by an e-petitions system shared between Government and the House of Commons. In 2015, a new e-petitions system, run collaboratively between the Government and the Commons, was established. This sees the House of Commons Petitions Committee examining both paper and e-petitions, debates held in Westminster Hall, and responses being provided by the Government. In the Scottish Parliament, a paper petitions system was set up in 1999 and an e-petitions system introduced in 2004. An e-petitions and paper system were introduced to the Welsh Assembly in 2007 and 2008 respectively. Since 2002, paper petitions have been submitted to the Northern Ireland Assembly, and plans were submitted in 2016 to introduce an e-petitions system. Local authorities also receive petitions from the public. 1 Hansard Society, Audit of Political Engagement 2019 4 Petitions in the UK 1. UK e-petitioning prior to 2015 The development of e-petitioning and debates over their introduction in the UK Parliament may be found in the House of Commons Library Briefing Paper E-Petitions (2015) 1.1 Number 10 website (2006- 2011) In November 2006, the Number 10 website was launched. Each petition that gained over 200 signatures received a government response. Within its first year of launch, 29,000 petitions had been created and 5.5 million signatures collected.2 By the time of the 2010 General Election, over 12 million signatures had been added to petitions begun on the website.3 From November 2006 to November 2008, half of petitions were rejected outright, in attempts to avoid duplication or offence.4 From February 2009 to March 2011, 94% of petitions received less than 500 signatures.5 Of issues receiving over 30 petitions on the Number 10 website from November 2006 to November 2008, 35 related to Zimbabwe, 39 called upon the PM to resign or hold a general election, 40 were concerned with the EU, 41 made suggestions for honours, and 43 dealt with fuel duty and road pricing.6 1.2 Cabinet Office website (2011-15) The new site from August 2011 to February 2013 received 19,789 petitions and saw 7 million signatures collected.7 By March 2015, the number of petitions had reached 60,818.8 Between August 2011 and February 2013, 5% of petitions obtained 500 signatures (c. 1000 petitions), whilst 0.7% attained the 10,000 signatures required to receive a Government response (c. 140). Only 0.1% of petitions attained the 100,000 necessary for a parliamentary debate (c. 20).9 2 House of Commons Procedure Committee, ‘E-Petitions’ (2008), 8. 3 MySociety, ‘What we learned from e-petitions’, August 2011. 4 Laura Miller, ‘Hansard Society: E-Petitions at Westminster: the way forward for democracy?’, Parliamentary Affairs (2008), 167. 5 Scott Hale, Helen Margetts, Taha Yasseri, ‘Understanding the Dynamics of Internet Based collective action using big data: analysing the growth rates of internet-based petitions’, Political Studies Association (2013), 7. 6 Laura Miller, ‘Hansard Society: E-Petitions at Westminster: the way forward for democracy?’, Parliamentary Affairs (2008), 168. 7 Taha Yasseri, Scott Hale, Helen Margetts, ‘Rapid ride and decay in petition signing’, Data Science (2017) 8 Catherine Bochel, ‘Process Matters: Petitions systems in Britain’s legislatures’, 3 9 Hale, Margetts, Yasseri, ‘Understanding the Dynamics’ , 10. 5 Commons Library Briefing, 11 July 2019 2. UK Parliament e-petitioning post-2015 2.1 The current e-petitioning system In 2015, Parliament established a Petitions Committee to consider e- petitions registered on a system for petitions shared between Parliament and the Government. Petitions receiving more than 10,000 signatures receive a response from the Government, and petitions receiving more than 100,000 signatures are considered for debate in Parliament. The Petitions Committee can also decide to inquire into topics raised in petitions, take evidence from expert witnesses, and produce reports. Petitions may also be rejected by the committee for several reasons, including that they do not relate to an issue for which the UK Government or House of Commons has responsibility, call for the same action on an already-open petition, or are offensive or libellous.10 Some 16,137 petitions have been rejected, as of July 2019.11 In order to sign a petition, subscribers must provide an email address and confirm their name, country, postcode, and that they are a UK resident. The same email account may be used up to twice to subscribe to a petition, but no more than this. The Petitions Committee of the House of Commons stated around 1% of signatures come from an email account that is used twice.12 As of July 2019, 66 petitions have been debated in Westminster Hall under the current system.13 2.2 Number of petitions and petitioners According to data from the House of Commons Petitions Committee, from July 2015 to July 2019, 99,031 e-petitions have been submitted, collecting more than 55.3 million signatures.14 The largest number presented in any full calendar year to date was in 2018, when 27,656 were begun, whilst the lowest full-year of petitioning was 2017, when 15,559 petitions were begun. These years also saw the highest and lowest numbers of signatures: there were 18.8 million signatures in 2016 and 7.9 million in 2017. The average number of signatures to a petition has fluctuated between 422 per petition (2018) to 933 (2016). Total number of petitions for 2017 are slightly lower than other years due to the General Election halting the petitions process. 10 House of Commons Petitions Committee, ‘How Petitions Work’ (accessed 11 July 2019) 11 House of Commons Petitions Committee, ‘Rejected Petitions’ (accessed 11 July 2019) 12 Full Fact, ‘Is it possible to repeatedly sign a Parliamentary Petition using the same email address?’ (25 March 2019) 13 House of Commons Petitions Committee, Petitions debated in Parliament (accessed 10 July 2019) 14 Data Parliament, E-petitions (accessed 3 July 2019) 6 Petitions in the UK NUMBER OF E-PETITIONS TO UK PARLIAMENT NUMBER OF SIGNATURES ON E-PETITIONS TO UK PARLIAMENT 35,000 20 31,035 18 30,000 27,656 18.8 Millions 16 25,000 14 20,170 20,000 12 15,559 10 11.7 11.2 15,000 8 9.7 10,000 6 8.0 4,611 5,000 4 2 0 0 Jul- Dec 2015 2016 2017 2018 Jan-Jul 2019 Jul- Dec 2015 2016 2017 2018 Jan-Jul 2019 Note: includes rejected petitions.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cat Smith MP Transforming Democracy Prem Sikka Industrial Strategy Dave Lister Academy Failures Plus Book & Film Reviews
    #290 working_01 cover 27/12/2017 01:09 Page 1 CHARTIST For democratic socialism #290 January/February 2018 £2 Tories on thin ice John Palmer Peter Kenyon Brexit follies Mica Nava Sexual abuse Mary Southcott Cat Smith MP Transforming democracy Prem Sikka Industrial strategy Dave Lister Academy failures plus Book & Film reviews ISSN - 0968 7866 ISSUE www.chartist.org.uk #290 working_01 cover 27/12/2017 01:09 Page 2 Contributions and letters deadline for Editorial Policy CHARTIST #291 The editorial policy of CHARTIST is to promote debate amongst people active in 08 February 2018 radical politics about the contemporary Chartist welcomes articles of 800 or 1500 words, and relevance of democratic socialism across letters in electronic format only to: [email protected] the spectrum of politics, economics, science, philosophy, art, interpersonal Receive Chartist’s online newsletter: send your email address to [email protected] relations – in short, the whole realm of social life. Chartist Advert Rates: Our concern is with both democracy and socialism. The history of the last century Inside Full page £200; 1/2 page £125; 1/4 page £75; 1/8 page £40; 1/16 page £25; small box 5x2cm £15 single has made it abundantly clear that the sheet insert £50 mass of the population of the advanced We are also interested in advert swaps with other publications. To place an advert, please email: capitalist countries will have no interest [email protected] in any form of socialism which is not thoroughly democratic in its principles, its practices, its morality and its ideals.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Voting System's Knackered January 20[...]
    12th December 2019: Our Victorian Voting System strikes again... Over 300 candidates were stood down by parties to avoid splitting the vote and polls indicate that nearly 1 in 5 voters voted tactically rather than support their preferred candidate, and yet millions of votes were wasted. There is no greater gamble on earth than a British general election" James Middleton, Secretary of the Labour Party 1936 The 2019 General Election results indicate that our antiquated “First-past-the-post” voting system is not fit for purpose. Signing away your democratic rights with the mark of illiteracy in single member constituencies enables MPs to be elected on a small fraction of the vote. In this election, one third of the MPs were elected on a minority of the vote. This means that the votes of millions of voters will have counted for nothing. Moreover, seats won by a party do not necessarily reflect the level of support nationwide for that party, nor are outcomes consistent or certain; votes determine the result of an election according to where they are cast, not for whom they are cast. Because of this, it is possible for a party to win the most seats nationwide with a minority of the vote. In this election, Boris Johnson's so-called landslide was achieved on just 44% of the vote; 56% of those who voted did not support his party. First-past-the-post has also weakened the Union by distorting the results in favour of the nationalist parties. North of the Border, the Scottish Nationalists took 81% of the seats for just 45% of the vote, while in Northern Ireland, Unionists were awarded fewer seats than the Nationalists, even though they had polled more votes.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Group Toolkit - First Meeting Guide
    LOCAL GROUP TOOLKIT Local Group Toolkit - First Meeting Guide This toolkit offers guidance about how you can start a successful local campaign group for real democracy in the UK. It has been compiled based on the experience and practice of groups that have successfully established themselves since the May 2015 General Election, and also draws on the experience of other campaign groups and seasoned activists. The approach set out here is not the only way to start a local campaign. Whether you follow this guidance precisely or just use it as inspiration, we hope you find the ideas in this document useful. As your group develops, we encourage you to explore new ideas and approaches of your own and would love to hear about your experiences and successes in order to share this ​ ​ knowledge with others. Throughout history, real democratic and social progress has only been made possible by ordinary people organising and taking action - whether the cause be civil rights, fair electoral processes, universal suffrage or labour rights. Moving to Proportional Representation would be a change of similar character, shifting power from the few to the many. We believe the way to secure PR is for a grassroots movement, pushing for change from the bottom-up, to work in partnership with an alliance of politicians and leaders using their profile ​ ​ and positions to call for and ultimately enact reform. The grassroots movement has a vital role to play in building public understanding, demonstrating public support, persuading leaders to support and actively campaign for fair votes, and holding those leaders to their word when the opportunity to fix our democracy arises.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Autumn Conference
    ONLINE AUTUMN CONFERENCE 2021 17-20 SEPTEMBER DIRECTORY NEU Network Help us shape the future of education: be part of the National Education Union Councillor network. Being a member of our network will give you: > Access to written briefings. > Regular information about education issues. > Access to our events for councillors. The NEU Councillors Network is open to councillors from all political parties. The Network is now over 4,000 members strong. Join our Network at neu.org.uk/councillors-network or by scanning the QR code e [email protected] @neucllrs @NEUCllrs NEU2258/0721 NEU2258 Lib Dem advert 2 FP.indd 1 26/07/2021 13:42 CONFERENCE DIRECTORY 1 Welcome to the Liberal Democrat Online Autumn 2021 Conference Directory. Please note that the Conference Directory is available online only and not in hard copy format. Updates to the Conference Directory will be issued periodically up until conference and published online at: www.libdems.org.uk/a21-directory For details of the main auditorium sessions, see the separate Conference Agenda, available at: www.libdems.org.uk/a21-agenda Further information, registration and conference publications (including plain text and clear print versions) are available at: www.libdems.org.uk/conference Contents Feature: 2–3 Welcome to our online Autumn Conference from Ed Davey MP and Mark Pack Conference information: 4–9 Exhibition: 11–15 Fringe and training: 16–65 Friday 17 September 19 Saturday 18 September 27 Sunday 19 September 46 Monday 20 September 59 Autumn 2021 Directory vsn 2 Published and promoted by Mike Dixon on behalf of the Liberal Democrats, 1 Vincent Square, London, SW1P 2PN.
    [Show full text]
  • CHARTIST for Democratic Socialism #308 January/February 2021 £2 Tories Broken Britain
    #308_01 cover 20/12/2020 22:48 Page 1 CHARTIST For democratic socialism #308 January/February 2021 £2 Tories broken Britain Prem Sikka COVID CRONYISM Paul Garver Glyn Ford US ELECTIONS Mark Cocker COUNTRYSIDE THREAT Ann Black LABOUR DIRECTION Sandy Martin Don Flynn LABOUR NEW DEMOCRACY Plus Book reviews and regulars ISSN - 0968 7866 ISSUE www.chartist.org.uk #308_01 cover 20/12/2020 22:48 Page 2 Contributions and letters deadline for Editorial Policy CHARTIST #309 The editorial policy of CHARTIST is to promote debate amongst people active in 10 February 2021 radical politics about the contemporary Chartist welcomes articles of 800 or 1500 words, and relevance of democratic socialism across letters in electronic format only to: [email protected] the spectrum of politics, economics, science, philosophy, art, interpersonal Receive Chartist’s online newsletter: send your email address to [email protected] relations – in short, the whole realm of social life. Chartist Advert Rates: Our concern is with both democracy and socialism. The history of the last century Inside Full page £200; 1/2 page £125; 1/4 page £75; 1/8 page £40; 1/16 page £25; small box 5x2cm £15 single has made it abundantly clear that the sheet insert £50 mass of the population of the advanced We are also interested in advert swaps with other publications. To place an advert, please email: capitalist countries will have no interest [email protected] in any form of socialism which is not thoroughly democratic in its principles, its practices, its morality and its ideals. Yet the consequences of this deep attach - ment to democracy – one of the greatest advances of our epoch – are seldom reflected in the discussion and debates Editorial Board Contacts amongst active socialists.
    [Show full text]
  • NORTH WEST REGIONAL CONFERENCE Blackpool Hilton Hotel, 4 - 5 November 2017
    NORTH WEST REGIONAL CONFERENCE Blackpool Hilton Hotel, 4 - 5 November 2017 #LabNW17 Promoted by Anna Hutchinson on behalf of the North West Labour Party and North West Labour Party candidates all at 97 Spencer House, 81a Dewhurst Road, Birchwood, Warrington WA3 7PG. Printed by Greatledge Printers, Gorebrook Works, Pink Bank Lane, Longsight, Manchester, M12 5GH. TAMESIDE Cllr Maria Bailey 110,000 of the most vulnerable in Greater under the Tories? DELIVERED Manchester have beenFREE hit to by the Tory Bedroom Taxhomes in VOICE YOU AUDENSHAW Child care coststhe Tories have risen a whopping 30% under TAKEAWAY!The number of food banks have doubled in Tameside under the Tories I'm the only Tameside Voice The Tories and Liberal Democrats like to claim that families in Britain are better off. Just how Energyout bills of touch have can gone they be? politician keeping up £300,The on hard average,truth is that the for opposite is true. I know from speaking to constituents at my surgeries or in the street, TORYthe flame of Andrew GwynneTameside MPjust how householdshardWrites many people are still For finding things. The And I know Tameside that people across Tameside areVoice now more than under£1,600 athe year worseTories off under David Cameron. Many people living in communities like Audenshaw, Denton and Dukinfield are struggling to cope with the cost Thatcherism alive of living crisis. However hard they work, rising prices and stagnant wages mean that families are seeing a fall in TAMESIDE- Nigel Farage LOSES living standards and fewer opportunities for their children. www.greatledge.co.uk Tameside Voice David Cameron, George Osborne and Nick Clegg just do not understand the cost of living crisis facing hardworking £1 MILLION A WEEK families in Tameside.
    [Show full text]
  • Proportional Representation for Elections to the House 2.1 2017 Manifesto of Commons in Westminster Hall on Tuesday 23 April 2019, 4.30-6.00Pm
    DEBATE PACK Number CDP-2019-0094, 18 April 2019 Proportional By Neil Johnston and Elise Uberoi representation Contents Summary 1. Background 2 2. First past the post 3 A debate will be held on proportional representation for elections to the House 2.1 2017 manifesto of Commons in Westminster Hall on Tuesday 23 April 2019, 4.30-6.00pm. commitments 5 The debate is sponsored by Angela Smith. 3. Statistics 7 3.1 What might the House of Commons have looked like under PR? 7 3.2 Opinion polling 8 4. The 2011 AV referendum 11 5. Press Articles 12 6. Parliamentary debates 14 7. Further reading 16 The House of Commons Library prepares a briefing in hard copy and/or online for most non-legislative debates in the Chamber and Westminster Hall other than half-hour debates. Debate Packs are produced quickly after the announcement of parliamentary business. They are intended to provide a summary or overview of the issue being debated and identify relevant briefings and useful documents, including press and parliamentary material. More detailed briefing can be prepared for Members on request to the Library. www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 Number CDP-2019-0094, 16 April 2019 1. Background Elections to the House of Commons currently take place using the first past the post system (FPTP). The same system is currently used in local elections in England and Wales, and in Scottish National Park authority elections. Other electoral systems are used in elections in the UK. These are summarised in the Library briefing, Background to Voting systems in the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • A-Level Students Praised for Their Resilience
    THE WEEK IN East Bristol & North East Somerset FREE Issue 641 19th August 2020 Read by more than 40,000 people each week A-level students praised for their resilience Local students whose studies were interrupted by the sit their summer exams, they’ve also missed out on major pandemic were praised for their resilience as they educational milestones as a result of the pandemic. Parents, received their A-level results last week. carers, students and schools deserve enormous credit for the With exams cancelled, almost 40 cent of grades in England way they have coped with the situation. were lowered from teachers' predictions, data from exam “I would like to congratulate all students on their regulator Ofqual revealed. achievements and I know many students will be going on to On Monday afternoon came a massive Government U-turn, the next steps of their future with optimism. with the announcement that students would after all be able “For those whose results aren’t what you expected please St Brendan’s to use teacher-assessed grades for their A-levels - and the don’t panic or worry, there are lots of options available to first choice university places, but also into employment and GCSE results which are due out tomorrow - instead of the you. Take advantage of the wealth of advice and support apprenticeships. controversial Ofqual algorithm. available – your school or college will be able to signpost Erica Williams, Cabinet Member for Schools, Skills & Both Ofqual and Education Secretary Gavin Williamson you to the most appropriate service for your needs.” Employment, said: “Our thanks go out to all pupils and apologised for the distress caused.
    [Show full text]
  • Trade Unions and Electoral Reform REVISED EDITION
    Getting it in Proportion? Trade unions and electoral reform REVISED EDITION Contents Acknowledgements 4 1 Introduction 5 2 Background 6 3 Is there a case for change? 9 Voting trends 9 Electoral systems and the wider political landscape 12 Turnout and engagement 14 Coalition governments? 15 Fixed-Term Parliaments Act 2011 16 Right to recall 17 Extremists and small parties 17 4 Different electoral systems 19 Types of electoral system 19 What difference would a new system make? 23 5 The practicalities of change 25 6 Conclusions 27 7 Recent thought and further reading 29 Notes 30 TOUCHSTONE EXTRA Getting It In Proportion? Trade unions and electoral reform 3 Acknowledgements With thanks to the Electoral Reform Society. Getting it in Proportion? This Touchstone Extra has been prepared by the TUC as a discussion paper for the trade union movement. It seeks to set out the background to current discussions on changing Britain’s electoral system and to provide information to trade union members enable them to actively engage in this discussion. It puts the debate in context by summarising the political and historical background against which our democracy has developed, examines how well the existing system works and looks at possible reasons for change. It describes the various alternative electoral systems, discusses the practicalities of change and concludes with a comparison of different systems and their advantages and disadvantages. It is not intended to draw any final conclusion about how our system could be changed, but rather to be used as a starting point to engage trade union members in a debate about the electoral system they would like to see.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Template
    Summons to attend meeting of Full Council Date: Tuesday, 10 November 2020 Time: 6.00 pm Venue: Virtual Meeting - Zoom Committee Meeting with Public Access via YouTube To: All Members of Council Members of the public attending meetings or taking part in Public forum are advised that all Full Council are now filmed for live or subsequent broadcast via the council's webcasting pages. The whole of the meeting is filmed (except where there are confidential or exempt items) and the footage will be available for two years. If you ask a question or make a representation, then you are likely to be filmed and will be deemed to have given your consent to this. If you do not wish to be filmed you need to make yourself known to the webcasting staff. However, the Openness of Local Government Bodies Regulations 2014 now means that persons attending meetings may take photographs, film and audio record the proceedings and report on the meeting (Oral commentary is not permitted during the meeting as it would be disruptive). Members of the public should therefore be aware that they may be filmed by others attending and that is not within the council’s control. Issued by: Sam Wilcock, Democratic Services City Hall, PO Box 3399, Bristol, BS3 9FS Tel: 0117 92 23846 E-mail: [email protected] Date: Friday, 30 October 2020 Full Council – Agenda Agenda 1. Welcome and Introductions (Pages 16 - 18) 2. Apologies for Absence 3. Declarations of Interest To note any declarations of interest from the Councillors. They are asked to indicate the relevant agenda item, the nature of the interest and in particular whether it is a disclosable pecuniary interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Calling for Urgent Electoral Reform
    The need for change Why this again when it clearly 2016 May Following the results of the UK Parliamentary Acknowledgements election in May 2015, and the way it highlighted The 2015 UK Parliamentary Election saw 24.8 per failed in the 2011 referendum? the huge disproportionality of votes cast to seats The LGA Independent Group would like to thank cent of the electorate vote for parties other than Not quite. The 2011 defeat was over a single Association © Local Government won, in July the LGA Independent Group set up members of its task and finish group on electoral Conservative, Labour and Liberal Democrats. prescribed voting system – the Alternative Vote a task and finish group to look at electoral reform reform for their commitment and experienced That’s nearly a quarter of the votes cast – up from (AV) – and cannot be said to represent a feeling for both UK Parliamentary and local elections. The insight on these matters. We would also like to 11.9 per cent in 2010. Of those, 12.6 per cent, or against electoral reform or even proportional group was asked to explore the options for potential acknowledge the valuable contributions of Professor 3,881,099 people, voted UKIP, yet remarkably this representation (PR). preferential and proportional representation voting John Curtice, Professor of Politics at University of Calling for urgent result delivered just one Member of Parliament (MP). systems that would better ensure that councillors Much the same, the referendum proposed a Strathclyde and Deputy-Director of CREST (Centre The Conservatives on the other hand received three and Members of Parliament are accountable to change of voting system solely for UK Parliamentary for Research into Elections and Social Trends) and times as many votes, but also 331 times as many residents and that the democratic make up of Darren Hughes, Deputy Chief Executive of Electoral electoral reform elections.
    [Show full text]
  • A Parliament That Works for Wales
    A PARLIAMENT THAT WORKS FOR WALES The report of the Expert Panel on Assembly Electoral Reform November 2017 The Expert Panel on Assembly Electoral Reform was established in February 2017 to provide robust, politically impartial advice to the Llywydd and Assembly Commission on the number of Members the Assembly needs, the most suitable electoral system, and the minimum voting age for Assembly elections. The Expert Panel on Assembly Electoral Reform: ▶▶ Professor Laura McAllister CBE (Chair) ▶▶ Professor Rosie Campbell and Professor Sarah Childs (job sharing) ▶▶ Rob Clements ▶▶ Professor David Farrell MRIA ▶▶ Dr Alan Renwick ▶▶ Sir Paul Silk Secretariat to the Panel: ▶▶ Helen Finlayson, Clerk ▶▶ Sian Giddins, Deputy Clerk (February to June 2017) ▶▶ Candice Boyes, Deputy Clerk (June to November 2017) ▶▶ Lowri Jones, Support Officer With legal and research assistance from: ▶▶ Gwyn Griffiths, Senior Legal Adviser ▶▶ Helen Jones, Research Service ▶▶ Lisa Salkeld, Legal Adviser Copies of this document can also be obtained in accessible formats including Braille, large print, audio or hard copy from: Clerk to the Expert Panel x▶ 0300 200 6565 National Assembly for Wales ▶[email protected] Cardiff Bay CF99 1NA A PARLIAMENT THAT WORKS FOR WALES The report of the Expert Panel on Assembly Electoral Reform CONTENTS Introduction from the Chair........................................................... 5 Executive summary ....................................................................... 7 List of recommendations ............................................................
    [Show full text]