Gao-19-438R, Transitioning Servicemembers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gao-19-438R, Transitioning Servicemembers 441 G St. N.W. Washington, DC 20548 June 17, 2019 The Honorable James M. Inhofe Chairman The Honorable Jack Reed Ranking Member Committee on Armed Services United States Senate The Honorable Adam Smith Chairman The Honorable Mac Thornberry Ranking Member Committee on Armed Services House of Representatives Transitioning Servicemembers: Information on Military Employment Assistance Centers Approximately 200,000 servicemembers transition from military service to civilian life each year, according to the Department of Defense (DOD). Some veterans may experience difficulty finding civilian employment after leaving the service. For example, a veteran may be unfamiliar with effective job search strategies, and may not know how their military experience and training could apply to jobs in the civilian workforce. Federal law requires DOD and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to establish permanent employment assistance centers at appropriate military and Coast Guard installations.1 Under the law, DOD and DHS are also required to take additional steps that may help servicemembers apply their skills and experience to future civilian employment, including providing servicemembers with certification or verification of the job skills and experience acquired while on active duty relevant to employment in the civilian sector and developing procedures for sharing certain information with civilian entities, such as potential employers and state employment agencies. The conference report accompanying the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (NDAA) included a provision for us to review the employment assistance programs authorized by 10 U.S.C. § 1143.2 This report describes (1) the number and locations of employment assistance centers currently in operation, and what is known about how frequently servicemembers use them, and (2) how DOD and the Coast Guard record servicemembers' training that may be applicable to future civilian employment, and what procedures are in place to share such information with civilian entities. 1 The law does not define what an “appropriate” installation is; therefore, DOD and DHS have discretion in determining where to establish such centers. For the purposes of this report, we refer to both military installations and Coast Guard installations as “military installations.” 2 H.R. Rep. No. 115-874, at 867 (2018). Page 1 GAO-19-438R Transitioning Servicemembers To address our objectives, we interviewed officials at DOD and DHS, including officials from the Armed Forces–the Army, Marine Corps, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard–and reviewed prior related GAO reports.3 For our first objective, we reviewed a list of military employment assistance centers from DOD and the Coast Guard, interviewed officials, and reviewed agency documents reporting data on the use of employment services at the centers. To assess the reliability of the data on military employment assistance centers, we interviewed officials and performed basic data quality checks to identify missing data and potential errors. We determined that the data were sufficiently reliable for the purpose of providing a listing of employment assistance centers within DOD and the Coast Guard. To assess the reliability of DOD data on the use of employment services at the centers, we interviewed agency officials and reviewed agency reports and determined the data were sufficiently reliable to report the number of participants in the Transition Assistance Program (TAP) for fiscal year 2018. For our second objective, we reviewed agency documentation and interviewed officials about the various databases and documents used to record the applicable training servicemembers received. In addition, we interviewed officials at DOD and the Department of Labor to determine how servicemembers’ information can be shared with state employment agencies and potential employers. We also reviewed relevant federal laws, regulations, and policies. We conducted this performance audit from October 2018 to June 2019 in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. We believe that the evidence obtained provides a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. Results in Brief About 300 employment assistance centers have been established at military installations worldwide. These centers operate the mandatory Transition Assistance Program (TAP), which provides counseling, employment assistance, and information on veterans’ benefits to help separating servicemembers transition to civilian life. Other employment and family support services are also available at the centers. Complete and reliable data on the use of all of the support services administered by the centers are not available but efforts are under way to collect such data. DOD reported that 138,256 (90 percent) of eligible separating active duty servicemembers; 12,069 (57 percent) of National Guard members; and 13,630 (64 percent) of eligible Reserve service members participated in TAP in fiscal year 2018. Though not required, according to agency officials, the agency collected data for fiscal year 2017 from each military branch of service on the employment readiness and other family support services provided at the centers. However, DOD officials stated that the centers were reporting the information differently. As a result, DOD is planning to revise the reporting requirements and method of data collection to gather more accurate information. The Coast Guard also collects TAP participation data, but GAO's recent prior work found that the data were unreliable and the agency has not yet implemented GAO’s 3 The term “Armed Forces” refers to the Army, Marine Corps, Navy, Air Force, and U.S. Coast Guard. The Coast Guard is a military service within DHS when not operating as a service in the Navy. Page 2 GAO-19-438R Transitioning Servicemembers recommendation to establish policies and procedures to improve the reliability and completeness of the data. Coast Guard officials reported that they do not collect data on the other employment services provided at its centers beyond TAP, and the agency is not required to do so. DOD and the Coast Guard use several databases and documents to record servicemembers’ training that may be applicable to future civilian employment. For example, the Verification of Military Experience and Training is one key source, which compiles information from the military branches’ databases and lists the training servicemembers received and their military occupations in civilian terms. DOD and Coast Guard officials said that TAP guidance helps to ensure that servicemembers have access to this document and similar documents, which the servicemember may then share with potential employers and state employment agencies. As part of completing TAP, according to DOD officials, servicemembers must confirm they either have hard copies of their documents or know how to access them online. We are not making any recommendations in this report. Background In 1990, a law was enacted that required the establishment of permanent employment assistance centers at appropriate military installations and additional actions related to helping servicemembers obtain civilian employment.4 Under federal law, DOD and DHS are required to provide separating servicemembers a certification or verification of their job skills and experience acquired while on active duty. They are also required to establish procedures for releasing certain information to state employment agencies and other organizations to assist servicemembers with locating civilian employment and training opportunities. DOD has additional responsibilities related to tracking information about servicemembers’ training and sharing information with civilian entities. Specifically, DOD is required to establish a database to record all training performed by military servicemembers that may have application to employment in the civilian sector. DOD is also required to respond to state requests for confirmation of a servicemember’s job skills and experience within 5 business days. DOD and DHS are also generally required to ensure that separating servicemembers participate in TAP.5 Servicemembers and veterans can also access employment assistance—including job search assistance, job placement assistance, and referrals to employers—through their state employment agency and the American Job Center system, which is overseen by the Department of Labor (DOL).6 For example, veterans receiving unemployment benefits may participate in the Reemployment Services and Eligibility Assessment program, which involves attending an in-person orientation and meeting with a job center caseworker, who 4 Pub. L. No. 101-510, § 502(a)(1), 104 Stat. 1485, 1551, codified at 10 U.S.C. § 1143. 5 See 10 U.S.C. § 1144(c). 6 About 2,500 American Job Centers operate nationwide. These centers provide job seekers a range of employment- related services at no cost, including training referrals, career counseling, and job listings. According to DOL, veterans receive priority service at American Job Centers, meaning they go to the head of the line for most of the services and programs offered at the centers. In addition, post-9/11 era veterans are eligible to receive intensive assistance and 6 months of follow-up services at an American
Recommended publications
  • Defense - Military Base Realignments and Closures (1)” of the John Marsh Files at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box 11, folder “Defense - Military Base Realignments and Closures (1)” of the John Marsh Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 11 of The John Marsh Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON October 31, 197 5 MEMORANDUM TO: JACK MARSH FROM: RUSS ROURKE I discussed the Ft. Dix situation with Rep. Ed Forsythe again. As you may know, I reviewed the matter with Marty Hoffman at noon yesterday, and with Col. Kenneth Bailey several days ago. Actually, I exchanged intelligence information with him. Hoffman and Bailey advised me that no firm decision has as yet been made with regard to the retention of the training function at Dix. On Novem­ ber 5, Marty Hotfman will receive a briefing by Army staff on pos­ sible "back fill'' organizations that may be available to go to Dix in the event the training function moves out.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Regarding the Number of UK Personnel Stationed at Creech
    Air Command Secretariat Spitfire Block 1?e Headquarters Air Command Royal Air Force High Wycombe Ministry Buckinghamshire of Defence HP14 4UE Ref. 2020/04244 11 May 2020 Thank you for your email of 31 March 2020 asking for details of personnel stationed at Creech Air Force Base. You requested the following information. 1. The number of UK personnel stationed or otherwise present at Creech Air Force Base, Nevada, for each year between 2016-2020. If possible use the same census date for each year (e.g., 1 January), unless this would be overly-burdensome; 2. A breakdown of which squadron/wing/unit these forces are assigned to, with numbers per unit, again broken down by year; 3. The number of these forces which are considered 'embedded', and the units to which they are attached, again broken down by year; 4. A breakdown of the rank and role of UK personnel at Creech, again by unit and year. I am treating your correspondence as a request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA). We have now completed a search of our paper and electronic records for the information you requested and I can confirm that information within the scope of your request is held. The number of personnel stationed at Creech by unit is given in the table below: Unit 1 Jan 16 1 Jan 17 1 Jan 18 1 Jan 19 1 Jan 20 39 Sqn 69 74 101 102 105 Em bedded 1 3 1 1 1 Total 70 77 102 103 106 The number of personnel stationed at Creech is given by rank in the table below: Rank 1 Jan 16 1 Jan 17 1 Jan 18 1 Jan 19 1 Jan 20 (Including equivalents) Wg Cdr 1 1 2
    [Show full text]
  • Linkages Study 2015
    Florida’s Military Installations Linkages Study conducted by The Principi Group and The SPECTRUM Group Team for the Florida Defense Support Task Force February 10, 2015 Florida’s Military Installations Linkages Study Table of Contents Executive Summary…………………………………………………4 Introduction……………….…………………………………………10 Scope of Study………….…………………………………………..10 Methodology……….………………………………………………..11 Analysis…………………………………………………….………..13 Intrastate Linkages…..………………………………………….…14 Interstate Linkages…………………………………………….…..31 Conclusions………….………….…………………………………..54 Recommendations………………………..………………….…….56 Navy Installation Linkages…………………………………...…..58 Air Force Installation Linkages……..………………………...…67 Team Orlando/National Simulation Center Linkages………..83 Coast Guard Linkages…………………………………………….88 National Guard Linkages…………………………………..……102 2 Florida’s Military Installations Linkages Study List of Figures Figure 1. Florida’s Major Military Installations and Ranges………………………….14 Figure 2. Key Command and Control Linkages in Florida……………………………15 Figure 3. Key Command and Control Linkages in South Florida…...………………16 Figure 4. Key Command and Control Linkages in Northeast Florida………………16 Figure 5. Key Command and Control Linkages in Northwest Florida……………...17 Figure 6. Key Communication Support Linkages in Florida…………………………18 Figure 7. Key Communications Support Linkages in Northwest Florida………….18 Figure 8. Key Training Linkages in Florida……………………………………………...20 Figure 9. Key Training Linkages in South Florida……………………………………...20 Figure 10. Key Training Linkages
    [Show full text]
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Force Quarterly, Issue
    Issue 100, 1st Quarter 2021 Countering Chinese Coercion Remotely Piloted Airstrikes Logistics Under Fire JOINT FORCE QUARTERLY ISSUE ONE HUNDRED, 1 ST QUARTER 2021 Joint Force Quarterly Founded in 1993 • Vol. 100, 1st Quarter 2021 https://ndupress.ndu.edu GEN Mark A. Milley, USA, Publisher VADM Frederick J. Roegge, USN, President, NDU Editor in Chief Col William T. Eliason, USAF (Ret.), Ph.D. Executive Editor Jeffrey D. Smotherman, Ph.D. Senior Editor and Director of Art John J. Church, D.M.A. Internet Publications Editor Joanna E. Seich Copyeditor Andrea L. Connell Book Review Editor Brett Swaney Creative Director Marco Marchegiani, U.S. Government Publishing Office Advisory Committee BrigGen Jay M. Bargeron, USMC/Marine Corps War College; RDML Shoshana S. Chatfield, USN/U.S. Naval War College; BG Joy L. Curriera, USA/Dwight D. Eisenhower School for National Security and Resource Strategy; Col Lee G. Gentile, Jr., USAF/Air Command and Staff College; Col Thomas J. Gordon, USMC/Marine Corps Command and Staff College; Ambassador John Hoover/College of International Security Affairs; Cassandra C. Lewis, Ph.D./College of Information and Cyberspace; LTG Michael D. Lundy, USA/U.S. Army Command and General Staff College; MG Stephen J. Maranian, USA/U.S. Army War College; VADM Stuart B. Munsch, USN/The Joint Staff; LTG Andrew P. Poppas, USA/The Joint Staff; RDML Cedric E. Pringle, USN/National War College; Brig Gen Michael T. Rawls, USAF/Air War College; MajGen W.H. Seely III/Joint Forces Staff College Editorial Board Richard K. Betts/Columbia University; Eliot A. Cohen/The Johns Hopkins University; Richard L.
    [Show full text]
  • GEN Richard D. Clarke Commander U.S
    SOF ISSUE June 2020 Tacticaldefensemedia.com SUSTAINING U.S. SOF GLOBAL DOMINANCE COMMANDER’S CORNER Lt. Gen. COL Warren Darrell Sponsler Williams Chief of Staff Commander Next Gen Combat Defense Logistics Vehicles CFT Agency Army Futures Cmd. Ft. Belvoir, VA Austin, TX n Joint Acquisition Task Force n Hyper-Enabled Operator n PEO Fixed Wing n PEO Rotary Wing n COVID-19 Response n Family of Special Operations Vehicles n Advanced RWS GEN Richard D. Clarke Commander U.S. Special Operations Command Mac Dill AFB, FL Zanfel Now Available in Individual Use Packets! Zanfel® – a safer, faster and more effective option than steroids or antihistamines for relieving poison ivy, oak or sumac. Great for IFAK kitting! (actual size) Packet 1/8oz = Single dose • VA Contract #36F79718D0415 • NSN #6505-01-674-8232 (Box of 20) • NSN #6505-01-674-8237 (Case of 100) • NSN #6505-01-674-8248 (Case of 500) Get Troops Back in Great the Field in 3 Minutes! for Hospital and Battalion Aid Station Tube 1oz = 15 doses Settings! • VA Contract #36F79718D0415 • NSN #6505-01-611-2071 • NSN #6505-01-679-1559 (Case of 12) Call 800-401-4002 or visit www.zanfel.com. Zanfel is a product of Zanfel Laboratories, Inc. ©20 All rights reserved. U.S. Patent No. 6,423,746, No. 7,008,963. Additional patents pending. Zanfel and the Zanfel logo are copyrighted and trademarks of Zanfel Laboratories, Inc., Dakota Dunes, SD. ARMOR & MOBILITY June 2020 COMMANDER’S CORNER Zanfel Now ENSURING ADVANTAGE TO PROTECT NATIONAL INTERESTS GEN Richard D. Clarke Available in Commander U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Special Operations Forces (SOF): Background and Issues for Congress
    U.S. Special Operations Forces (SOF): Background and Issues for Congress Andrew Feickert Specialist in Military Ground Forces April 28, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RS21048 U.S. Special Operations Forces (SOF): Background and Issues for Congress Summary Special Operations Forces (SOF) play a significant role in U.S. military operations and, in recent years, have been given greater responsibility for planning and conducting worldwide counterterrorism operations. U.S. Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) has about 66,000 Active Duty, National Guard, and reserve personnel from all four services and Department of Defense (DOD) civilians assigned to its headquarters, its four Service component commands, and eight sub-unified commands. In 2013, based on a request from USSOCOM (with the concurrence of Geographic and Functional Combatant Commanders and the Military Service Chiefs and Secretaries), the Secretary of Defense assigned command of the Theater Special Operations Commands (TSOCs) to USSOCOM. USSOCOM now has the responsibility to organize, train, and equip TSOCs. While USSOCOM is now responsible for the organizing, training, and equipping of TSOCs, the Geographic Combatant Commands will continue to have operational control over the TSOCs. Because the TSOCs are now classified as sub-unified commands, the Services are responsible to provide non-SOF support to the TSOCs in the same manner in which they provided support to the Geographic Combatant Command headquarters. The current Unified Command Plan (UCP) stipulates USSOCOM responsibility for synchronizing planning for global operations to combat terrorist networks. This limits its ability to conduct activities designed to deter emerging threats, build relationships with foreign militaries, and potentially develop greater access to foreign militaries.
    [Show full text]
  • 94 Stat. 1782 Public Law 96-418—Oct
    PUBLIC LAW 96-418—OCT. 10, 1980 94 STAT. 1749 Public Law 96-418 96th Congress An Act To authorize certain construction at military installations for fiscal year 1981, and Oct. 10, 1980 for other purposes. [H.R. 7301] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That this Act may be Military cited as the "MiUtary Construction Authorization Act, 1981". Au'thSdon Act, 1981. TITLE I—ARMY AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army may establish or develop military installations and facilities by acquiring, constructing, con­ verting, rehabilitating, or installing permanent or temporary public works, including land acquisition, site preparation, appurtenances, utilities, and equipment, for the following acquisition and construc­ tion: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES UNITED STATES ARMY FORCES COMMAND Fort Bragg, North Carolina, $16,350,000. Fort Campbell, Kentucky, $14,200,000. Fort Carson, Colorado, $129,960,000. Fort Devens, Massachusetts, $1,000,000. Fort Drum, New York, $5,900,000. Fort Gillem, Georgia, $2,600,000. Fort Hood, Texas, $24,420,000. Fort Hunter-Liggett, California, $5,100,000. Fort Lewis, Washington, $16,000,000. Fort Ord, California, $4,700,000. Fort Polk, Louisiana, $14,800,000. Fort Riley, Kansas, $890,000. Fort Sam Houston, Texas, $3,750,000. Fort Stewart/Hunter Army Air Field, Georgia, $31,700,000. Presidio of San Francisco, California, $750,000. UNITED STATES ARMY WESTERN COMMAND Schofield Barracks, Hawaii, $12,220,000. Tripler Army Medical Center, Hawaii, $84,500,000. UNITED STATES ARMY TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND Fort A.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOGRAPHICAL DATA BOO KK Class 2020-2 27
    BBIIOOGGRRAAPPHHIICCAALL DDAATTAA BBOOOOKK Class 2020-2 27 Jan - 28 Feb 2020 National Defense University NDU PRESIDENT Vice Admiral Fritz Roegge, USN 16th President Vice Admiral Fritz Roegge is an honors graduate of the University of Minnesota with a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering and was commissioned through the Reserve Officers' Training Corps program. He earned a Master of Science in Engineering Management from the Catholic University of America and a Master of Arts with highest distinction in National Security and Strategic Studies from the Naval War College. He was a fellow of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Seminar XXI program. VADM Fritz Roegge, NDU President (Photo His sea tours include USS Whale (SSN 638), USS by NDU AV) Florida (SSBN 728) (Blue), USS Key West (SSN 722) and command of USS Connecticut (SSN 22). His major command tour was as commodore of Submarine Squadron 22 with additional duty as commanding officer, Naval Support Activity La Maddalena, Italy. Ashore, he has served on the staffs of both the Atlantic and the Pacific Submarine Force commanders, on the staff of the director of Naval Nuclear Propulsion, on the Navy staff in the Assessments Division (N81) and the Military Personnel Plans and Policy Division (N13), in the Secretary of the Navy's Office of Legislative Affairs at the U. S, House of Representatives, as the head of the Submarine and Nuclear Power Distribution Division (PERS 42) at the Navy Personnel Command, and as an assistant deputy director on the Joint Staff in both the Strategy and Policy (J5) and the Regional Operations (J33) Directorates.
    [Show full text]
  • Team Macdill Celebrates National Hispanic Heritage Month Page 8
    =VS5V Thursday, October 18, 2018 1HZV)HDWXUHVSDJH $0:VXSSRUWVVWRUPYLFWLPV 1HZV)HDWXUHVSDJH /RZGRZQRQFRPPLVVLRQLQJ :HHNLQSKRWRVSDJH ,PDJHVIURPWKHZHHN 1HZV)HDWXUHVSDJH $)KXQWHUVWUDFNHG0LFKDHO ;LHT4HJ+PSSJLSLIYH[LZ5H[PVUHS/PZWHUPJ/LYP[HNL4VU[OWHNL 7OV[VI`(PYTHUZ[*SHZZ9`HU*.YVZZRSHN *VS\TIPHUNYV\W:VUKL*HMtKHUJLZH[[OL5H[PVUHS/PZWHUPJ/LYP[HNL4VU[OS\UJOLVUH[4HJ+PSS(PY-VYJL)HZL6J[ &RPPXQLW\SDJH :VUKL*HMt^HZJYLH[LK[VYLWYLZLU[[OLPYJV\U[Y`L]LY`^OLYL[OL`NVZOV^PUN*VS\TIPHUJ\S[\YL (YHQWV&KDSHOPRUH NEWS/FEATURES (4*WYV]PKLZZ\WWVY[PUHM[LYTH[OVM/\YYPJHUL4PJOHLS I`UK3[,TTH8\PYR "JS.PCJMJUZ$PNNBOE1VCMJD"GGBJST SCOTT AIR FORCE BASE, Illinois — Air Mobility Command is prepared to support victims affected by Hurricane Michael, which hit landfall in parts of Florida, Georgia and Alabama on Oct. 10. Gen. Maryanne Miller, AMC commander, said mobility crews and as- sets are postured to provide airlift, contingency response and aeromedical evacuation during the rapid relief effort. “Mobility professionals are highly-trained and prepared to offer sup- port whenever and wherever required,” Miller said . “AMC’s airlift and aeromedical evacuation capabilities and expeditionary Airmen skillsets afford the nation unique disaster relief options.” Total force communications personnel from U.S. Transportation Com- mand’s Joint Communications Support Element from MacDill Air Force Base, Florida, and the Florida Air National Guard’s 290th Joint Commu- nications Support Squadron deployed to Tyndall AFB, Florida, to restore communication capabilities in the wake of Hurricane Michael. For the aircraft being positioned to respond in relief efforts, the 618th Air Operations Center commander said the 618th AOC has had their eyes 7OV[VI`4HZ[LY:N[1VZLWO:^HMMVYK on Michael for days, and they’ll continue planning to deliver AMC’s relief <: (PY -VYJL Z[ 3[ *V\Y[UL` 9VLWRL Z[ (PYSPM[ :X\HKYVU * response as long as needed.
    [Show full text]
  • 16004670.Pdf
    SEMIANNUALHISTORICAL REPORT&> HEADQUARTERS FIEXD COMMAND DEFENSE ATOMIC. SUPPORT AGENCY SANDIA BASE, ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO Activities for the Period 1 July 1968 - 31 December 1968 Other Volumes comprising the Field Command, DAsA' . Semiannual Historical Report as of 31 December . ..::... 1968, are as follows: VOLUME I1 - Bossier Base Shreveport , La. VOLUME I11 - Clarksville Base Clarksville, Term. VOLUME IV - Killeen Base Killeen, Texas VOLUME v - Lake'Mead Base Las Vegas , Nevada VOLUME VI - Manzano Base --.A Albuquerque, New Mexico .: _~_..2 .yy: 2 1s VOLUME VI1 - Sandia Base s'.. Albuquerque, New Mexico .: i% HEADQUARTERS FIELD COMMAND DEFENSE ATOMIC SUPPORT AGENCY TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. Headquarters Field Command 1 Secretary to the Staff 4 Equal Employment Opportunity Office 11 Inspector General 16 Judge Advocate 25 Public Information Office 30 Surgeon 35 Safety Engineer 40 Chap lain 44 Headquarters & Headquarters Co., USA Element 46 Naval Administrative Unit 50 1090th USAF Special Reporting Group 56 Hqs Sqn Sec, 1090th USAF SRG 60 Comptroller 63 Adjutant General 90 Intelligence and Security D' Lrectorate 106 Personnel Directorate 111 Joint Personnel Plans & Requirements Office 114 , Army Personnel Division 119 Navy Personnel Division 127 Air Force Personnel Division 130 Civilian Personnel Division 134 Personnel Services Division 145 Logistics Directorate 150 Engineering Division 158 Logistics Division 197 Research and Development Liaison Directorate 215 Stockpile Management Directorate 279 Nuclear Materiel Directorate 300
    [Show full text]
  • GIS in Defense Installation and Environmental Management
    GIS in Defense Installation and Environmental Management Dear Colleagues: The installations and environment (I&E) community was one of the first to use geographic information system (GIS) technology in the defense sector, so I have a particular fondness for the work you do. You have consistently led the way in implement- ing GIS to help effectively manage and administer stewardship of lands and property. The I&E community manages a complex array of problems; indeed, your work could be equated to that of a medium- A Letter from JackA Letter from sized city, except you look after everything: the environment, facilities management, land-use planning, utilities, emergency response, and security. Your GIS implementations are truly world class in scope. These stories detailing your work were first published in the GIS in the Defense and Intelligence Community series. We are recompiling the articles in a focused I&E publication because they communicate a powerful evolution in GIS deployment. The defense I&E community has gone from implementing GIS in stand-alone desktop applications to developing department- wide and installation-wide geospatial applications. You are now building a defensewide Installations Spatial Data Infrastructure. The impact of your work extends beyond defense and demonstrates pioneering models for global collaboration of spatial data. I want to use this opportunity to thank you for the work you do—it is very important. Warm regards, Jack Dangermond Installation and Environment U.S. Air Force GeoBase One Installation...One Map Installation and Environment Installation GIS links graphic features (entities) to tabular data (attributes). Air Force basing operations, whether at home or abroad, have relied on civil engineers to respond especially when the mission called for a map.
    [Show full text]