Ethics and the Construction Lawyer November 30, 2010 6:00PM to 9:00PM

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ethics and the Construction Lawyer November 30, 2010 6:00PM to 9:00PM E TUT I ETHICS AND TH E ONSTRUCTION AWY E R ST C L N Prepared in connection with a Continuing Legal Education course presented at New York County Lawyers’ Association, 14 Vesey Street, New York, NY scheduled for November 30, 2010. P ROGR A M CO -SP O N SORS : NYCLA Construction Law and Professional Ethics Committees P ROGR A M CO -CH ai RS : Joel Sciascia, Pavarini McGovern LLC Barry Temkin, Mound Cotton Wollan & Greengras F ac U LT Y : Todd Bakal, Mound Cotton Wollan & Greengrass Bruce Green, Louis Stein Professor, Fordham University Christopher Murray, Chartis Insurance Barry Temkin, Mound Cotton Wollan & Greengrass NYCLA-CLE I 2 TRANSITIONAL AND NON-TRANSITIONAL MCLE CREDITS: This course has been approved in accordance with the requirements of the New York State Continuing Legal Education Board for a maximum of 2 Transitional and Non-Transitional credit hours: 2 Ethics. Information Regarding CLE Credits and Certification Ethics and the Construction Lawyer November 30, 2010 6:00PM to 9:00PM The New York State CLE Board Regulations require all accredited CLE providers to provide documentation that CLE course attendees are, in fact, present during the course. Please review the following NYCLA rules for MCLE credit allocation and certificate distribution. i. You must sign-in and note the time of arrival to receive your course materials and receive MCLE credit. The time will be verified by the Program Assistant. ii. You will receive your MCLE certificate as you exit the room at the end of each day. The certificates will bear your name and will be arranged in alphabetical order on the tables directly outside the auditorium. iv. If you arrive after the course has begun, you must sign-in and note the time of your arrival. The time will be verified by the Program Assistant. If it has been determined that you will still receive educational value by attending a portion of the program, you will receive a pro-rated CLE certificate. v. Please note: We can only certify MCLE credit for the actual time you are in attendance. If you leave before the end of the course, you must sign-out and enter the time you are leaving. The time will be verified by the Program Assistant. If it has been determined that you received educational value from attending a portion of the program, your CLE credits will be pro-rated and the certificate will be mailed to you within one week. vi. If you leave early and do not sign out, we will assume that you left at the midpoint of the course. If it has been determined that you received educational value from the portion of the program you attended, we will pro-rate the credits accordingly unless you can provide verification of course completion. Your certificate will be mailed to you within one week. Thank you for choosing NYCLA as your CLE provider! New York County Lawyers’ Association Continuing Legal Education Institute 14 Vesey Street, New York, N.Y. 10007 • (212) 267-6646 Ethics and the Construction Lawyer Tuesday, November 30, 2010 6:00 PM – 9:00 PM AGENDA Program Chair: Joel Sciascia, Pavarini McGovern LLC Faculty: Todd Bakal, Mound, Cotton, Wollan & Greengrass Bruce Green, Louis Stein Professor, Fordham University Christopher Murray, Chartis Insurance Barry Temkin, Mound Cotton Wollan & Greengrass 5:30 PM – 6:00 PM Registration 6:00 PM – 6:10 PM Introductions and Announcements 6:10 PM – 9:00PM** Discussion of Rules, Ethics and Cases *** There will be two ten minute breaks during the evening. Ethics and The Construction Lawyer New York County Lawyers’ Association Nov. 30, 2010 354203 NYCLA Construction Law Committee • Joel Sciascia, Chair, Pavarini McGovern LLC • Barry Temkin, Mound Cotton Wollan & Greengrass • Bruce Green, Fordham U. School of Law • Christopher Murray, Chartis Insurance • Todd Bakal, Mound Cotton Wollan & Greengrass 354203 Hypothetical 1 • You represent a crane operator in a civil case arising from a crane collapse that resulted in multiple deaths and catastrophic personal injures. • Your client, the crane operator, testifies that he was not intoxicated on the job and the jury finds for your client. • Later on, your client exclaims “I can’t believe they believed that story I told them.” When you ask him what he meant, he gestures to the champagne bottle in his hand and says “Let’s just say today is not the only time I was hitting the Dom!” 354203 Ethical Considerations • NY Rule 3.3(a)(1): An attorney shall not knowingly offer or use evidence that the attorney knows to be false. If the attorney’s client has offered material evidence and the attorney comes to know of its falsity, the attorney shall take remedial measures, including if necessary, disclosure to the tribunal. 354203 Ethical Considerations Cont’d • Do you know that your client lied on the stand? - NY Rule 1.0(k) defines “knowingly,” “known,” “know,” or “knows” as actual knowledge, and provides that a person’s actual knowledge may be inferred from circumstances. - An attorney must have actual knowledge before a reporting requirement is triggered. Mere suspicions of fraud are insufficient to mandate disclosure. Doe v. Federal Grievance Committee, 847 F.2d 57 (2d Cir. 1988). - Furthermore, NY Rule 3.3, Comment [8] states that an attorney cannot ignore an obvious falsehood. 354203 Ethical Consideration Cont’d • Does an attorney’s ethical obligation survive beyond the conclusion of a case? 354203 Ethical Considerations Cont’d - ABA Rule 3.3(c): The duties stated in paragraphs (a) and (b) [regarding reasonable remedial measures] continue to the conclusion of the proceeding, and apply even if compliance requires disclosure of information otherwise protected by Rule 1.6. - This provision was not incorporated into the New York rule. - The New York State Bar Association states: “the obligation to disclose extends for as long as the effect of the fraudulent conduct on the proceeding can be remedied, which may extend beyond the end of the proceeding – but not forever. If disclosure could not remedy the effect of the conduct on the proceeding, but could merely result in punishment of the client, we do not believe NY Rule 3.3 disclosure duty applies. - N.Y.S. Bar. Op. 831 (2009) 354203 Ethical Obligations Cont’d • What is a reasonable remedial measure under NY RPC 3.3? 354203 Ethical Considerations Cont’d – Talking to client and convincing him to correct or withdraw the falsity. - Mistakes or misstatements as to non-material matters do not need to be corrected. - If the client refuses to correct the material falsity, despite the attorney’s best and persistent efforts, the attorney must take the final step of disclosing the misrepresentation to the tribunal, as is reasonably necessary to remedy the situation, even if doing so requires the attorney to reveal confidential information that would otherwise be protected by NY Rule 1.6. 354203 Ethical Considerations Cont’d • Is the answer different under the current NY RPC than under the former code? 354203 Ethical Considerations Cont’d – Yes. Under former DR-7-102(B)(1), an attorney who received false information “clearly establishing” that a client perpetrated a fraud on a “person or tribunal” had a duty to call upon the client to rectify the fraud, and if the client refused, the attorney should have revealed the fraud to the affected person or tribunal, except when the information was protected as a confidence or secret. 354203 Hypothetical 2 • You represent a subcontractor, Metallica, on a project to build a project at the former World’s Fair site in Queens. • The contract calls for pricing at cost plus 20% (10% labor and 10% materials). Metallica puts in a claim order for payment for 1,000 H-11 rebars from Wunderbar Rebar Co. at $10 a rebar. • You prepare the change order at Metallica's request while simultaneously preparing a claim order for another client, in an unrelated job. • In that other job, you learn that Wunderbar charges $3.50 on its H-11 rebars. 354203 Ethical Considerations • Do you know that Metallica committed a fraud? • Is it different if it is a public company? 354203 Ethical Considerations Cont’d • NY Rule 1.0(k) denotes “know” as actual knowledge, which may be inferred from circumstances. • If a public company? • Under both the Federal and New York State False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. § 3729 and NY State. Fin. Law, ch. 13 §§ 187-194), liability for “knowing” submissions of false claims to the federal, state or local governments can occur by (1) actual knowledge; (2) deliberate ignorance; or (3) reckless disregard of whether they are true or false. 354203 Ethical Considerations Cont’d • Does the attorney have any obligation to inform any party? 354203 Ethical Considerations Cont’d • NY Rule 1.6(a): A lawyer shall not knowingly reveal confidential information, as defined in this Rule, or use such information to the disadvantage of a client or for the advantage of the lawyer or a third person, unless – (1) the client gives informed consent, as defined in Rule 1.0(j); – (2) the disclosure is impliedly authorized to advance the best interests of the client and is either reasonable under the circumstances or customary in the professional community; or – (3) the disclosure is permitted by paragraph (b). • Confidential information consists of information gained during or relating to the representation of a client that is (a) protected by attorney-client privilege; (b) likely to be embarrassing or detrimental to the client if disclosed; or (c) information that the client has requested to be kept confidential. 354203 Ethical Obligations Cont’d • NY Rule 1.6(b): A lawyer may reveal or use confidential information to the extent that the lawyer reasonably believes necessary: – (2) to prevent the client from committing a crime; – (3) to withdraw a written or oral opinion or representation previously given by the lawyer and reasonably believed by the lawyer still to be relied upon by a third person, where the lawyer has discovered that the opinion or representation was based on materially inaccurate information or is being used to further a crime or fraud; – (6) when permitted or required under these Rules or to comply with other law or court order.
Recommended publications
  • Renting by the Room, Revived
    “All the News That’s Fit to Print” SUNDAY, MAY 21, 2017 Reprinted With Permission Renting by the Room, Revived GABRIELA HERMAN FOR THE NEW YORK TIMES It’s the return of the S.R.O., with a twist, as markets create new ways to counter rental prices that for many are out of reach. Marine Berardan, left, BT KIM VELSEY apartment through, has built a version of Match.com for roommates into its apartment-hunting app. and Elesia McCray hen Benny Ventura, a 25-year-old visual de- “It took almost the entire month,” he said. “I think on the patio of their signer from Austin, Tex., moved to New York I met 15 people for coffee. It was like speed dating. I’d co-living building in Wlast September, he knew he would not be mak- done shares before in Austin, but I knew all my room- ing enough to live alone, but he did not know anyone he mates. I didn’t have to scout for them.” Bushwick, Brooklyn, could split an apartment with. Like countless other While brokers have been urging budget-constrained a property owned and freshly minted New Yorkers, he set about looking for renters to get roommates for decades, only recently have managed by Node, a a room. they started to take a more proactive role in the process, start-up company. He found an apartment easily enough: a newly reno- actively offering matching services or posting Craigs- vated three-bedroom in the Bushwick section of Brook- list ads for rooms in larger apartments.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Context Statement for LGBT History in New York City
    Historic Context Statement for LGBT History in New York City PREPARED FOR MAY 2018 Historic Context Statement for LGBT History in New York City PREPARED BY The NYC LGBT Historic Sites Project: Jay Shockley, Amanda Davis, Ken Lustbader, and Andrew Dolkart EDITED BY Kathleen Howe and Kathleen LaFrank of the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation, and Historic Preservation PREPARED FOR The National Park Service and the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation, and Historic Preservation Cover Image: Participants gather at the starting point of the first NYC Pride March (originally known as Christopher Street Gay Liberation Day) on Washington Place between Sheridan Square and Sixth Avenue, June 28, 1970. Photo by Leonard Fink. Courtesy of the LGBT Community Center National History Archive. Table of Contents 05 Chapter 1: Introduction 06 LGBT Context Statement 09 Diversity of the LGBT Community 09 Methodology 13 Period of Study 16 Chapter 2: LGBT History 17 Theme 1: New Amsterdam and New York City in the 17th and 18th Centuries 20 Theme 2: Emergence of an LGBT Subculture in New York City (1840s to World War I) 26 Theme 3: Development of Lesbian and Gay Greenwich Village and Harlem Between the Wars (1918 to 1945) 35 Theme 4: Policing, Harassment, and Social Control (1840s to 1974) 39 Theme 5: Privacy in Public: Cruising Spots, Bathhouses, and Other Sexual Meeting Places (1840s to 2000) 43 Theme 6: The Early Fight for LGBT Equality (1930s to 1974) 57 Theme 7: LGBT Communities: Action, Support, Education, and Awareness (1974 to 2000) 65 Theme
    [Show full text]
  • M14 Uppereastside 2017Q
    Upper East Side YORKVILLE • CENTRAL PARK • LENOX HILL Streets & Bridges East 81 Street, B3-9 Points of Interest Bergdorf Goodman Center for Inter-American Crown Gotham Cinema, M6 French Embassy, C3 Holy Trinity Greek Archdiocesan Knickerbocker Club, K3 Marymount School, A3 Our Lady of Perpetual Help Church, K8 Ritz-Carlton Hotel, M1 62nd Street Cinema, K9 Union Club, G5 East 82 Street, A3-9 (men’s store), M2 Relations, G4 Czech Consulate, E8 French Church of St. Esprit, L5 Cathedral, E8 Kore 58 Hotel, M9 Mark Hotel, C3 Pacella Parent Child Center, A7 # Rizzoli, M2 67th Street Public Library, H8 Upper East Side, G7 Central Park South, L1 East 83 Street, A3-9 # Abigail Adams Smith Bergdorf Goodman Central Park, G2 D&D Building, M6 French Consulate, D3 Hospital for Special Surgery, F11 Korea, Consulate of, M4 Martha Graham School of Contemporary Paris Theatre, M2 Robert Burns, H1 68th Street Playhouse, H6 Webster Public Library, C10 Key Cherokee Place, C11 East Drive, C1, G2 Museum, K10 (women’s store), M2 # Central Park Zoo and Wildlife Dairy Visitor Center, J1 French Institute/Alliance Frances, L4 Humane Society, M8 Kosciuszko Foundation, J3 Dance, K8 Park Avenue Armory, H5 Rock Church, K6 Sara Delano Roosevelt Memorial Wee Care Preschool, A9 East 57 Street, M3-9 East End Avenue, B11 Ackerman Institute, C6 Bethany Memorial Reformed Conservation Center, J2 Dairy, The, J1 Frick Art Reference Library, F3 Hungarian Baptist Church, B7 Kumon of Upper E. Side Headstart, A9 Mary M. Walsh Nursing Home, F10 Park East Day School, G6 Rockefeller Institute
    [Show full text]
  • Landmarks Preservation Commission March 18, 2008, Designation List 402 LP- 2296
    Landmarks Preservation Commission March 18, 2008, Designation List 402 LP- 2296 The Allerton 39th Street House, 145 East 39th Street, (aka 141-147 East 39th Street), Manhattan. Built 1916-1918; Arthur Loomis Harmon, architect. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 895, Lot 34. On December 18, 2007 the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Allerton 39th Street House, 145 East 39th Street, Manhattan, and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 1). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Two speakers testified in favor of designation, including representatives of the owner and the Historic Districts Council. There were no speakers in opposition to designation. Summary Constructed in 1916-18 by architect Arthur Loomis Harmon (1878-1958), the Allerton House at 145 East 39th Street provided the service of a hotel and the intimacy of a private club for young, single men. As described in the company’s brochure: “the Allerton has quiet, refined, club- like homes that provided socially respectable, economical housing for hard working refined ambitious young men and women.” The services were provided without the usual supervision and restrictions imposed by most residential hotels of the early twentieth century. Between 1913 and 1924, six Allerton Houses were built in New York City; this building was the third Allerton Hotel to be built and the first of three that were designed by Harmon. The building features a granite base and a main façade structured around three bays of windows, constructed primarily of red brick with projecting headers that ascend to a central hipped roof tower.
    [Show full text]
  • Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} the Dollhouse by Fiona Davis the Dollhouse : Book Summary and Reviews of the Dollhouse by Fiona Davis
    Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} The Dollhouse by Fiona Davis The Dollhouse : Book summary and reviews of The Dollhouse by Fiona Davis. Fiona Davis's novel pulls readers into the lush world of New York City's glamorous Barbizon Hotel for Women, where in the 1950s a generation of aspiring models, secretaries, and editors lived side-by-side while attempting to claw their way to fairy-tale success, and where a present-day journalist becomes consumed with uncovering a dark secret buried deep within the Barbizon's glitzy past. "The Dollhouse. That's what we boys like to call it. The Barbizon Hotel for Women, packed to the rafters with pretty little dolls. Just like you." When she arrives at the famed Barbizon Hotel in 1952, secretarial school enrollment in hand, Darby McLaughlin is everything her modeling agency hall mates aren't: plain, self-conscious, homesick, and utterly convinced she doesn't belong - a notion the models do nothing to disabuse. Yet when Darby befriends Esme, a Barbizon maid, she's introduced to an entirely new side of New York City: seedy downtown jazz clubs where the music is as addictive as the heroin that's used there, the startling sounds of bebop, and even the possibility of romance. Over half a century later, the Barbizon's gone condo and most of its long-ago guests are forgotten. But rumors of Darby's involvement in a deadly skirmish with a hotel maid back in 1952 haunt the halls of the building as surely as the melancholy music that floats from the elderly woman's rent- controlled apartment.
    [Show full text]
  • Insitesfirst Quarter | 2014
    ONE OF THE NATION’ S LEADING REAL ESTATE FUND MANAGERS InSITESFirst Quarter | 2014 Madison Trailway, Burnsville, MN Equus Sells 45,000 SF of Retail Space in New York City forn February, $48,200,000 Equus sold two commercial condominium units, totaling 45,000 square feet, located at Barbizon 63, the firm’s luxury condominium building located at E. 63rd Street Iand Lexington Avenue in the Upper East Side neighborhood of New York City. At the time of the sale, the two units were fully occupied under long-term leases with Equinox and Soul Cycle. The seller was represented by Clint Olsen and Robert Knakal of Massey Knakal in the transaction. An affiliate of Equus acquired the Barbizon Hotel for Women in 2001 and operated it as the Melrose Hotel until 2005. In 2007, the firm completed its redevelopment of the former hotel into 70 luxury condominium residences which sold at an average sale price in excess of $2,000 per square foot. Equus Acquires 588 Units in Two HIGHLIGHTS InSIDE: 200 S. Michigan Avenue in Chicago, IL Sold Multifamily Communities in for $69,000,000 3 Suburban Minneapolis 1000 Continental in King of Prussia, PA Sold n March, affiliates of Equus Capital Partners, Ltd. “The transaction provided us with the opportunity for $63,000,000 3 (Equus), one of the nation’s leading private equity to acquire two well-located multifamily communities real estate fund managers, acquired a two property in Burnsville, a desirable suburb of Minneapolis,” multifamily portfolio located in suburban Minneapolis. commented Brant Glomb, vice president of Equus IThe communities, known as Atrium Apartments and who oversaw the acquisition for the firm.
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly Market Report MONTHLY MARKET REPORT MARCH 2018
    MARCH 2018 2 4 7 8 Monthly Market Report MONTHLY MARKET REPORT MARCH 2018 Summary MOST EXPENSIVE SALES The average sales price of a Manhattan apartment fell substantially in the four weeks leading up to February 1, and the total number of sales also dipped. The average price for an apartment—taking into account both condo and co-op sales—was $1.9 million, down from $2.3 million the prior month. The number of recorded sales, 779, also represented a decrease from the 884 recorded the preceding month. AVERAGE SALES PRICE CONDOS AND CO-OPS $30M The Heritage at Trump Place, $1.9 Million 240 Riverside Boulevard, #6AT 3 beds, 6+ baths The average price of a condo was $2.8 million and the average price of a co-op was $1.3 Approx. 10,333 ft2 ($2,903/ft2) million. There were 331 condo sales and 448 co-op sales. RESIDENTIAL SALES 779 $1.5B UNITS GROSS SALES The most expensive sale this month was at The Heritage at Trump Place at 240 Riverside Boulevard. Apartment 6AT, which is a 3-bedroom, 8-bathroom combination of several units, sold for $30 million. The condo spans 10,333 square feet. $20.4M The second most expensive sale was in the new Lower East Side condo 215 Chrystie 215 Chrystie Street, #PH-2 Street, where unit PH-2 sold for $20.4 million. The 4,236-square-foot apartment has four 4 beds, 4.5 baths bedrooms and four-and-a-half bathrooms. Approx. 4,236 ft2 ($4,808/ft2) The third biggest sale this month was in the Upper East Side co-op at 1125 Fifth Avenue.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Walking Tour
    A walking tour of the Expansion of the Upper East Side Historic District Ap roject by Friends of the Upper East Side Historic Districts Text by Anthony Robins E 76TH ST E 75TH ST ~ > E 74TH ST < ::.a E 73TH ST P:: < P.. E 72TH ST E71THST ~ ~ p p ~ z E 70TH ST z p ~ z > ~ < E 69TH ST > z ~ < 0 E 68TH ST > en ~ ..... < E--. A IO A E 67TH ST ~ < ..... t<) ::E ><: E 65TH ST E 64TH ST E 63TH ST E 62TH ST Southern Itinerary FOREWORD The Upper East Side is one of those New York City Both are organized as walks from north to south. neighborhoods that lives in the imaginations of The itineraries include detailed directions people who have never seen it. Though its public (note that as you walk south, east will be to your image varies, it tends to fall somewhere between left, and west will be to your right.I To walk both "Gold Coast" and "singles scene." In fact, the on the same day, begin with the northern Upper East Side is a big and varied place - it itinerary at East 76th Street and Lexington includes the exclusive co-ops of Fifth Avenue Avenue, follow it south to East 72nd Street then and the tenements of Yorkville, the endless ' continue down to East 65th Street to pick up the manicured green islands of Park Avenue southern itinerary and follow that to the end at and the hidden enclave of Henderson Place, the Park Avenue and East 60th Street. anonymous high-rises of Second and Third avenues and the quiet brownstone streets of A word of caution: As you walk, you might Carnegie Hill, the galleries and boutiques of be tempted to cross the street in the middle Madison Avenue and the internationally-known of the block, or, worse, imitate Upper East institutions of Museum Mile.
    [Show full text]
  • Barbizon Hotel for Women
    Landmarks Preservation Commission April 17, 2012, Designation List 454 LP-2495 BARBIZON HOTEL FOR WOMEN, 140 East 63rd Street (aka136-146 East 63rd Street, 813- 817 Lexington Avenue), Manhattan Built 1927-28; architect, Murgatroyd & Ogden Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan, Tax Map Block 1397, Lots 1501-1588 On July 26, 2011, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Barbizon Hotel for Women and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 6). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of the law. A total of two witnesses, representing the Friends of the Upper East Side and the Historic Districts Council, spoke in favor of the designation. On July 20, 2011, the Full Board of Manhattan Community Board 8 adopted a resolution in support of the designation. In August 2011, Council Member Daniel R. Garodnick wrote to the Commission indicating his support for the designation. The Commission received three additional letters and two e-mails of support, including an e-mail message on behalf of Place Matters. There were no speakers or letters in opposition to the designation. Summary The Barbizon Hotel for Women was built in 1927-28 as a residential hotel and clubhouse for single women, who at that time were moving to New York City in record numbers to take advantage of new professional opportunities opening to them. The demand for inexpensive housing for single women led to the construction of several large residential hotels in Manhattan. Of these, the Barbizon, which was equipped with special studio, rehearsal and concert spaces to attract young women pursuing careers in the arts, became the most renowned.
    [Show full text]