Why Does Supragingival Calculus Form Preferentially on the Lingual Surface of the 6 Lower Anterior Teeth?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Why Does Supragingival Calculus Form Preferentially on the Lingual Surface of the 6 Lower Anterior Teeth? Clinical P RACTIC E Why Does Supragingival Calculus Form Preferentially on the Lingual Surface of the 6 Lower Anterior Teeth? Contact Author Colin Dawes, BSc, BDS, PhD Dr. Dawes Email: Colin_Dawes@ umanitoba.ca ABSTRACT Many authors have assumed that the reason supragingival calculus tends to form pref- erentially on the lingual surface of the 6 lower anterior teeth is because saliva from the adjacent submandibular ducts is a source of calcium and phosphate ions and because loss of CO2 as the saliva enters the mouth increases the local pH. However, the fluid phase of plaque in all locations is supersaturated with respect to the calcium phosphates in calculus and there is always a tendency for calculus to deposit, except after sugar con- sumption, when plaque pH may fall below the critical level and the plaque fluid becomes unsaturated. pH is least likely to fall below the critical level in plaque lingual to the lower anterior teeth, as this plaque is very thin, sugar concentration after sugar intake is lowest in that area and its clearance rate is fastest, and the high salivary film velocity there promotes loss of any acid formed in plaque. A high salivary film velocity also brings more salivary urea to the site, which facilitates plaque alkalinization. These factors all contribute to the development of shallow Stephan curves of short duration and together provide a more reasonable explanation for the fact that supragingival calculus depos- ition progresses most easily on the lingual surface of the lower anterior teeth. © J Can Dent Assoc 2006; 72(10):923–6 MeSH Key Words: dental calculus/etiology; dental calculus/prevention & control; dental plaque; This article has been peer reviewed. surface properties alculus is mineralized dental plaque and plaque bacteria to ammonia, which increases mineralization can only occur if the plaque pH.1,2 Both classes of patients are very Cfluid phase of plaque is supersaturated susceptible to calculus deposition.1 with the components of calculus. Saliva and All dentists and dental hygienists will have plaque fluid are normally supersaturated with noted that supragingival calculus almost al- respect to various calcium phosphates, except ways occurs predominantly on the lingual when fermentable carbohydrates are being surface of the 6 lower anterior teeth, with consumed, and thus most people are suscept- lesser amounts on the buccal surface of the ible to calculus deposition, albeit at different upper molars. In contrast, there is little or no rates. The degree of supersaturation of plaque site specificity in the deposition of subgingival fluid increases when its pH is high. This oc- calculus.3 The proportion of supragingival curs in patients who are tube fed, as their calculus on the lingual surface of the 6 lower plaque is not exposed to fermentable carbo- anterior teeth has been reported to range hydrates.1 It also occurs in patients on dialysis from 63%3 to 88%4; the amount of calculus for renal disease, as their salivary urea levels on the lateral incisors and canines is 70.2% are high and the urea can be converted by and 44.5%, respectively, of that on the central ���JCDA • www.cda-adc.ca/jcda • December 2006/January 2007, Vol. 72, No. 10 • 923 ––– Dawes ––– Hydroxyapatite Mineral deposition Plaque 3.0 pH solubility or dissolution LLM = Lingual lower molars FLM = Facial lower molars 9 2.5 Supersaturation Calculus deposition FUI = Facial upper incisors and enamel white-spot PUI = Palatal upper incisors remineralization e 2.0 8 FLI = Facial lower incisors os FUM = Facial upper molars cr 1.5 7 su LLI = Lingual lower incisors % 1.0 6 0.5 Critical Saturation pH 5 0.0 Caries and early 0 2 4 6 8 10 4 Unsaturation calculus dissolution Time (min) Figure 1: The effect of plaque pH, which may range from about Figure 2: Mean changes in the percentage of sucrose in saliva 4–9, on hydroxyapatite solubility and on the tendency for mineral at different sites in the mouth over 10 minutes beginning a deposition or dissolution. At the critical pH, which varies slightly few seconds after the mouth was rinsed for 1 minute with a among individuals, plaque fluid is just saturated with respect to 10% sucrose solution, and after consumption of a doughnut, hydroxyapatite and there is no tendency for mineral to deposit or mint candy or orange juice. dissolve. incisors.5 Wirthlin and Armitage6 and many previous pH, plaque fluid will be supersaturated with respect to authors have attempted to explain this site specificity hydroxyapatite, while below the critical level it will be on the basis that saliva leaving the submandibular– unsaturated. In addition, when plaque pH is above the sublingual and parotid ducts provides a source of cal- critical level, there is a tendency for calculus to deposit cium and phosphate to dental plaque and that loss of CO2 and for remineralization of white-spot enamel lesions to as the saliva enters the mouth increases the local pH. occur, although a considerable degree of supersaturation They state, correctly, that this will make the saliva more is necessary before these processes take place.9 Conversely, supersaturated with calcium phosphates, which might when plaque pH is below the critical level, caries will tend promote calculus deposition in dental plaque on the teeth to occur and any small calcium phosphate crystals that in locations close to the salivary ducts. have not been integrated into the 3-dimensional network However, as calcium and phosphate concentrations present in calculus will tend to dissolve. Thus calculus in plaque fluid are higher than those in saliva,7,8 there is formation is most likely to occur when plaque pH re- normally no concentration gradient to allow these ions to mains well above the critical level for long periods. move from saliva into dental plaque. In addition, the loss of CO2 into air present in the mouth is far from instantan- Factors Influencing the Depth and Duration of eous, and one might expect that as saliva travels further the Stephan Curve away from the duct openings, more CO2 will be lost and Exposure to Fermentable Carbohydrate salivary pH will become even higher. If the explanation The main reason for a fall in plaque pH to below the 6 provided by Wirthlin and Armitage were correct, more critical level is exposure to fermentable carbohydrate, calculus would be expected at sites further from the sali- which allows the formation of acid by plaque bacteria. vary ducts. Thus their explanation for the site specificity of The fall in pH and its subsequent rise as acid is removed supragingival calculus deposition seems unlikely. is termed the Stephan curve. The higher the carbohydrate concentration in the saliva over the plaque, the greater The Mineral Phase of Calculus and Its Solubility the amount that will diffuse into plaque and be avail- The mineral phase of calculus is composed of cal- able as a substrate for acid formation. Ingested sugar is cium phosphate.9 Although 4 different forms (dicalcium not uniformly distributed in the saliva,12,13 and Fig. 2 phosphate dihydrate, octacalcium phosphate, tricalcium shows that, after the intake of various sources of suc- phosphate and hydroxyapatite) have been detected,10 rose (doughnut, mint candy, orange juice and a sucrose hydroxyapatite is the predominant one10 and the least rinse), there are marked differences in salivary sucrose soluble.9 All are more soluble at an acid pH and less sol- concentrations at different sites.12,13 Particularly striking uble at an alkaline pH. The concept of a critical pH for is the fact that sugar concentrations in saliva lingual hydroxyapatite solubility has been discussed recently in to the lower incisors and, to a lesser extent, buccal to this journal11 and Fig. 1 illustrates that above the critical the upper molars are much lower than at the other sites 924 JCDA • www.cda-adc.ca/jcda • December 2006/January 2007, Vol. 72, No. 10 • ––– Supragingival Calculus ––– 7.0 L H 86.2 mm/min 6.5 H = High L = Low 6.0 8.2 mm/min H H H VL = Very low 5.5 L H L pH 0.78 mm/min 5.0 L H H L 4.5 H HH H H, L, VL Sugar conc. H H , L Film velocity 4.0 VL 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 Calculus Time (min) L L Figure 3: The effect of the velocity of a salivary film, 0.1 mm Figure 4: The site specificity of supragingival calculus deposition, deep, on the Stephan curve developed in artificial plaque, the film velocity when salivary flow is unstimulated and the sali- 0.5 mm deep, after simulation of a rinse with 10% sucrose vary sucrose concentration after consumption of sucrose from any for 1 minute. The velocities of 8.2 and 0.78 mm/min are close source. to the maximum and minimum unstimulated rates, while that of 86.2 mm/min is about 10 times higher than the maximum when salivary flow is unstimulated. pH is the mean at the enamel surface of a plaque 6 mm in length. tested; this occurred with all 4 products13 and when gum the plaque, they must diffuse out into the overlying film containing sucrose was chewed.12 Thus, plaque on the of saliva, which averages just under 0.1 mm in thickness,15 lingual surfaces of the lower anterior teeth will have the and the salivary film must move across the plaque to keep least amount of substrate available for acid formation acid from accumulating there and reducing the diffusion compared with other locations in the mouth. Tube-fed gradient for further acid removal from the plaque.
Recommended publications
  • DENTIN HYPERSENSITIVITY: Consensus-Based Recommendations for the Diagnosis & Management of Dentin Hypersensitivity
    October 2008 | Volume 4, Number 9 (Special Issue) DENTIN HYPERSENSITIVITY: Consensus-Based Recommendations for the Diagnosis & Management of Dentin Hypersensitivity A Supplement to InsideDentistry® Published by AEGISPublications,LLC © 2008 PUBLISHER Inside Dentistry® and De ntin Hypersensitivity: Consensus-Based Recommendations AEGIS Publications, LLC for the Diagnosis & Management of Dentin Hypersensitivity are published by AEGIS Publications, LLC. EDITORS Lisa Neuman Copyright © 2008 by AEGIS Publications, LLC. Justin Romano All rights reserved under United States, International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a PRODUCTION/DESIGN Claire Novo retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission from the publisher. The views and opinions expressed in the articles appearing in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors, the editorial board, or the publisher. As a matter of policy, the editors, the editorial board, the publisher, and the university affiliate do not endorse any prod- ucts, medical techniques, or diagnoses, and publication of any material in this jour- nal should not be construed as such an endorsement. PHOTOCOPY PERMISSIONS POLICY: This publication is registered with Copyright Clearance Center (CCC), Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923. Permission is granted for photocopying of specified articles provided the base fee is paid directly to CCC. WARNING: Reading this supplement, Dentin Hypersensitivity: Consensus-Based Recommendations for the Diagnosis & Management of Dentin Hypersensitivity PRESIDENT / CEO does not necessarily qualify you to integrate new techniques or procedures into your practice. AEGIS Publications expects its readers to rely on their judgment Daniel W.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Term Uncontrolled Hereditary Gingival Fibromatosis: a Case Report
    Long-term Uncontrolled Hereditary Gingival Fibromatosis: A Case Report Abstract Hereditary gingival fibromatosis (HGF) is a rare condition characterized by varying degrees of gingival hyperplasia. Gingival fibromatosis usually occurs as an isolated disorder or can be associated with a variety of other syndromes. A 33-year-old male patient who had a generalized severe gingival overgrowth covering two thirds of almost all maxillary and mandibular teeth is reported. A mucoperiosteal flap was performed using interdental and crevicular incisions to remove excess gingival tissues and an internal bevel incision to reflect flaps. The patient was treated 15 years ago in the same clinical facility using the same treatment strategy. There was no recurrence one year following the most recent surgery. Keywords: Gingival hyperplasia, hereditary gingival hyperplasia, HGF, hereditary disease, therapy, mucoperiostal flap Citation: S¸engün D, Hatipog˘lu H, Hatipog˘lu MG. Long-term Uncontrolled Hereditary Gingival Fibromatosis: A Case Report. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007 January;(8)1:090-096. © Seer Publishing 1 The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, Volume 8, No. 1, January 1, 2007 Introduction Hereditary gingival fibromatosis (HGF), also Ankara, Turkey with a complaint of recurrent known as elephantiasis gingiva, hereditary generalized gingival overgrowth. The patient gingival hyperplasia, idiopathic fibromatosis, had presented himself for examination at the and hypertrophied gingival, is a rare condition same clinic with the same complaint 15 years (1:750000)1 which can present as an isolated ago. At that time, he was treated with full-mouth disorder or more rarely as a syndrome periodontal surgery after the diagnosis of HGF component.2,3 This condition is characterized by had been made following clinical and histological a slow and progressive enlargement of both the examination (Figures 1 A-B).
    [Show full text]
  • DENTAL CALCULUS: a STRATEGIC REVIEW Rajiv Saini1 1.Associate Professor,Department of Periodontology,Pravra Institute of Medical Sciences-Loni
    International Journal of Dental and Health Sciences Review Article Volume 01,Issue 05 DENTAL CALCULUS: A STRATEGIC REVIEW Rajiv Saini1 1.Associate Professor,Department of Periodontology,Pravra Institute of Medical Sciences-Loni ABSTRACT: Dental calculus or tartar is an adherent calcified mass that form on the surface of teeth and dental appliance through mineralization of bacterial dental plaque in aqueous environment. Dental calculus plays a vital role in aggravating the periodontal disease by acting as reservoir for the bacterial plaque and providing the protected-covered niche for bacteria to proliferate. Based upon the location of dental calculus in relation to marginal gingiva, it is classified into mainly two types: 1. Supragingival calculus and subgingival calculus. Calcium and phosphate are two salivary ions which are raw materials for dental calculus formation. The various techniques and equipments involved for calculus removal is Hand Instruments, Ultrasonic, Ultrasound Technology and Lasers. Chemotherapeutic agents have been used to supplement the mechanical removal of dental plaque, but a more potent oral rinse with anti-calculus properties to prevent mineralization will be the need of time to suppress calculus formation. Key Words: Periodontitis, Anti-calculus, Periogen. INTRODUCTION: biofilm is that it allows the micro-organisms to stick and to multiply on surfaces. [3] Periodontitis is a destructive inflammatory Mineralization of dental plaque leads to disease of the supporting tissues of the calculus formation. Dynamic state of tooth teeth and is caused either by specific surface is responsible for mineralization of microorganisms or by a group of specific plaque. A continuous exchange of ions is microorganisms, resulting in progressive always happening on the tooth surface with destruction of periodontal ligament and a constant exchange of calcium and alveolar bone with periodontal pocket phosphate ions.
    [Show full text]
  • Dentinal Hypersensitivity: a Review
    Dentinal Hypersensitivity: A Review Abstract Dentinal hypersensitivity is generally reported by the patient after experiencing a sharp pain caused by one of several different stimuli. The pain response varies substantially from one person to another. The condition generally involves the facial surfaces of teeth near the cervical aspect and is very common in premolars and canines. The most widely accepted theory of how the pain occurs is Brannstrom’s hydrodynamic theory, fluid movement within the dentinal tubules. The dental professional, using a variety of diagnostic techniques, will discern the condition from other conditions that may cause sensitive teeth. Treatment of the condition can be invasive or non-invasive in nature. The most inexpensive and efficacious first line of treatment for most patients is a dentifrice containing a desensitizing active ingredient such as potassium nitrate and/or stannous fluoride. This review will address the prevalence, diagnosis, and treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. In addition the home care recommendations will focus on desensitizing dentifrices. Keywords: Dentinal hypersensitivity, hydrodynamic theory, stannous fluoride, potassium nitrate Citation: Walters PA. Dentinal Hypersensitivity: A Review. J Contemp Dent Pract 2005 May;(6)2:107-117. © Seer Publishing 1 The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, Volume 6, No. 2, May 15, 2005 Introduction The prevalence of dentinal hypersensitivity Dentifrices and mouth rinses are routinely used has been reported over the years in a variety as a delivery system for therapeutic agents of ways: as greater than 40 million people such as antimicrobials and anti-sensitivity in the U.S. annually1, 14.3% of all dental agents. Therapeutic oral care products are patients2, between 8% and 57% of adult dentate available to assist the patient in the control of population3, and up to 30% of adults at some time dental caries, calculus formation, and dentinal during their lifetime.4 hypersensitivity to name a few.
    [Show full text]
  • Staining and Calculus Formation After 0.12% Chlorhexidine Rinses in Plaque-Free and Plaque Covered Surfaces: a Randomized Trial
    www.scielo.br/jaos Staining and calculus formation after 0.12% chlorhexidine rinses in plaque-free and plaque covered surfaces: a randomized trial Fabrício Batistin Zanatta1,2, Raquel Pippi Antoniazzi1, Cassiano Kuchenbecker RÖSING2 1- DDS, School of Dentistry, Division of General Dentistry, Franciscan University Center (UNIFRA), Santa Maria, RS, Brazil. 2- PhD, Post-Graduate Program in Dentistry, Lutheran University of Brazil (ULBRA), Canoas, RS, Brazil. Corresponding address: Fabrício B. Zanatta - Rua Tiradentes, 76/801 - Bairro Centro - 97050730 - Santa Maria, RS - Brasil - Phone: +55 55 33078026 - Fax: +55 51 3338 4221 - e-mail: [email protected] Received: February 2, 2009 - Modification: September 5, 2009 - Accepted: September 28, 2009 ABSTRACT bjectives: Studies concerning side effects of chlorhexidine as related to the presence Oof plaque are scarce. The purpose of this study was to compare the side effects of 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) on previously plaque-free (control group) and plaque-covered surfaces (test group). Methods: This study had a single-blind, randomized, split-mouth, 21 days-experimental gingivitis design, including 20 individuals who abandoned all mechanical plaque control methods during 25 days. After 4 days of plaque accumulation, the individuals had 2 randomized quadrants cleaned, remaining 2 quadrants with plaque-covered dental surfaces. On the fourth day, the individuals started with 0.12% CHX rinsing lasting for 21 days. Stain index intensity and extent as well as calculus formation were evaluated during the experimental period. Results: Intergroup comparisons showed statistically higher (p<0.05) stain intensity and extent index as well as calculus formation over the study in test surfaces as compared to control surfaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Desensitizing Agent Reduces Dentin Hypersensitivity During Ultrasonic Scaling: a Pilot Study Dentistry Section
    Original Article DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/13775.6495 Desensitizing Agent Reduces Dentin Hypersensitivity During Ultrasonic Scaling: A Pilot Study Dentistry Section TOMONARI SUDA1, HIROAKI KOBAYASHI2, TOSHIHARU AKIYAMA3, TAKUYA TAKANO4, MISA GOKYU5, TAKEAKI SUDO6, THATAWEE KHEMWONG7, YUICHI IZUMI8 ABSTRACT of the dentin hypersensitivity agent. Evaluation of effects on Background: Dentin hypersensitivity can interfere with optimal dentin hypersensitivity was determined by a questionnaire and periodontal care by dentists and patients. The pain associated visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores after ultrasonic scaling. with dentin hypersensitivity during ultrasonic scaling is intolerable The statistical analysis was performed using the paired Student for patient and interferes with the procedure, particularly during t-test and Spearman rank correlation coefficient. supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) for patients with gingival Results: The desensitizing agent reduced the mean VAS pain recession. score from 69.33 ± 16.02 at baseline to 26.08 ± 27.99 after Aim: This study proposed to evaluate the desensitizing effect of application. The questionnaire revealed that >80% patients the oxalic acid agent on pain caused by dentin hypersensitivity were satisfied and requested the application of the desensitizing during ultrasonic scaling. agent for future ultrasonic scaling sessions. Materials and Methods: This study involved 12 patients who Conclusion: This study shows that the application of the oxalic were incorporated in SPT program and complained of dentin acid agent considerably reduces pain associated with dentin hypersensitivity during ultrasonic scaling. We examined the hypersensitivity experienced during ultrasonic scaling. This availability of the oxalic acid agent to compare the degree of pain control treatment may improve patient participation and pain during ultrasonic scaling with or without the application treatment efficiency.
    [Show full text]
  • American Academy of Periodontology Task Force Report on the Update to the 1999 Classification of Periodontal Diseases and Conditions*
    J Periodontol • July 2015 American Academy of Periodontology Task Force Report on the Update to the 1999 Classification of Periodontal Diseases and Conditions* The American Academy of Periodontology (AAP) peri- 4 mm CAL, and Severe =‡5 mm CAL.’’ Numerous odically publishes reports, statements, and guidelines important studies since 1999 have used similar pa- on a variety of topics relevant to periodontics. These rameters to define periodontitis. For example, the papers are developed by an appointed committee of recent epidemiologic studies outlining the prevalence experts, and the documents are reviewed and ap- of periodontitis in the United States used attachment proved by the AAP Board of Trustees. loss parameters to define various severities of peri- odontitis.2,3 It is recognized that CAL is of importance for the scientific advancement of the knowledge of n 2014, the American Academy of Periodontology periodontitis. However, in clinical practice, measure- Board of Trustees charged a Task Force to develop ment of CAL has proven to be challenging, and is time Ia clinical interpretation of the 1999 Classification consuming. Measuring the location of the cemento- of Periodontal Diseases and Conditions to address enamel junction (CEJ) when the gingival margin is concerns expressed by the education community, the located coronal to the CEJ is difficult and may involve American Board of Periodontology, and the practic- some guesswork when the CEJ is not readily evident ing community that the current Classification pres- via tactile sensation. These issues can result in ex- ents challenges for the education of dental students aminations being performed in which, rather than and implementation in clinical practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Idiopathic Gingival Fibromatosis Associated with Generalized Aggressive Periodontitis: a Case Report
    Clinical P RACTIC E Idiopathic Gingival Fibromatosis Associated with Generalized Aggressive Periodontitis: A Case Report Contact Author Rashi Chaturvedi, MDS, DNB Dr. Chaturvedi Email: rashichaturvedi@ yahoo.co.in ABSTRACT Idiopathic gingival fibromatosis, a benign, slow-growing proliferation of the gingival tissues, is genetically heterogeneous. This condition is usually part of a syndrome or, rarely, an isolated disorder. Aggressive periodontitis, another genetically transmitted disorder of the periodontium, typically results in severe, rapid destruction of the tooth- supporting apparatus. The increased susceptibility of the host population with aggressive periodontitis may be caused by the combined effects of multiple genes and their inter- action with various environmental factors. Functional abnormalities of neutrophils have also been implicated in the etiopathogenesis of aggressive periodontitis. We present a rare case of a nonsyndromic idiopathic gingival fibromatosis associated with general- ized aggressive periodontitis. We established the patient’s diagnosis through clinical and radiologic assessment, histopathologic findings and immunologic analysis of neutrophil function with a nitro-blue-tetrazolium reduction test. We describe an interdisciplinary approach to the treatment of the patient. For citation purposes, the electronic version is the definitive version of this article: www.cda-adc.ca/jcda/vol-75/issue-4/291.html diopathic gingival fibromatosis is a rare syndromic, have been genetically linked to hereditary condition
    [Show full text]
  • Time to Quit Smoking
    ToothTipsSM Time to Quit Smoking In conjunction with the Great American Smokeout, Dental Health Services wants to educate you about one specific threat to smokers—periodontal disease. How does smoking increase your risk? As a smoker, you are more likely than nonsmokers to have the following problems: ⇒ Calculus —plaque that hardens on your teeth and can only be removed during a professional cleaning ⇒ Deep pockets between your teeth and gums ⇒ Loss of the bone and tissue that support your teeth The bacteria in the calculus can destroy your gum tissue and cause your gums to pull away from your teeth. When this happens, periodontal pockets form and fill with disease-causing bacteria. Without treatment, your teeth may become loose, painful, and at risk to falling out. Save Your Smile Research shows that smokers lose more teeth than nonsmokers do. According to data from the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention, only about 20 percent of people over age 65 who have never smoked are toothless, while a whopping 41.3 percent of daily smokers over age 65 are toothless. Make an investment in your overall health now and for your future—you and your loved ones are worth it! Dental Your Personal Dental Plan Health 800.63.SMILE Services www.dentalhealthservices.com 12M028d © 2008 Dental Health Services 01/09 ToothTipsSM Time to Quit Smoking Not Just Cigarettes Other tobacco products are also harmful to your periodontal health. Smokeless tobacco can cause gums to recede and increase the chance of losing the bone and fibers that hold your teeth in place.
    [Show full text]
  • Dental Plaque: a Host- Associated Biofilm
    DENTAL PLAQUE DENTAL PLAQUE: A HOST- ASSOCIATED BIOFILM • Dental plaque is a host-associated biofilm. • The significance of the biofilm environment has been increasingly recognized in recent years because the environment itself may alter properties of the microorganisms. • The biofilm community is initially formed through bacterial interactions with the tooth and then through physical and physiologic interactions among different species within the microbial mass . Macroscopic Structure and Composition of Dental Plaque • Dental plaque can be defined as the soft deposits that form the biofilm adhering to the tooth surface or other hard surfaces in the oral cavity, including removable and fixed restorations. • Materia alba refers to soft accumulations of bacteria and tissue cells that lack the organized structure of dental plaque and are easily displaced with a water spray. • Calculus is a hard deposit that forms by mineralization of dental plaque and is generally covered by a layer of unmineralized plaque. • Dental plaque is broadly classified as Supragingival plaque is found at or above the gingival margin; the supragingival plaque in direct contact with the gingival margin is referred to as marginal plaque. • Subgingival plaque is found below the gingival margin, between the tooth and the gingival sulcular tissue. • The different regions of plaque are significant to different processes associated with diseases of the teeth and periodontium. • For example, marginal plaque gingivitis. Supragingival plaque and tooth-associated subgingival plaque are critical in calculus formation and root caries . Subgingival plaque soft tissue destruction different forms of periodontitis. Dental plaque is composed primarily of microorganisms . Cultivation studies, in which bacteria are isolated and characterized in the laboratory, indicate that more than 500 distinct microbial species are found in dental plaque Nonbacterial microorganisms that are found in plaque include Mycoplasma species, yeasts, protozoa, and viruses .
    [Show full text]
  • Planing in Calculus Removal
    The Effectiveness of Subgingival Scaling and Root Planing in Calculus Removal Guity M. Rabbani,* Major M. Ash.f and Raul G. Caffesse:}: This study presents an evaluation of the effectiveness of subgingival scaling and root planing related to depth of pocket and type of teeth. A total of 119 teeth in 25 patients were selected; 62 were scaled and 57 were used as controls. All teeth were initially scored using the calculus index of the P.D.I. (Ramfjord). Six surface locations were probed to determine pocket depth. The levels of the gingival margin were marked on the teeth to locate supra and subgingival calculus after extraction. The experimental teeth then were scaled. Both scaled and unsealed teeth were extracted immediately after the experimental procedures. The teeth were washed with water and stained with méthylène blue. They were viewed under a stereomicroscope which had a tenth grid on its eyepiece. Percent of surface covered by calculus was assessed on both scaled and unsealed teeth. The results demonstrated a high correlation between percent of residual calculus and pocket depth. It was shown that pockets less than 3 mm were the easiest sites for scaling and root planing. Pocket depths between 3 to 5 mm were more difficult to scale and pockets deeper than 5 mm were the most difficult. Tooth type did not influence the results. Scaling and root planing are the most widely used MATERIALS AND METHODS techniques in periodontal therapy. These are procedures Twenty-five patients with advanced periodontal dis- used to remove all bacterial plaque and calculus from ease, with teeth scheduled for extraction, were selected the surfaces of teeth.
    [Show full text]
  • Dentine Hypersensitivity: Analysis of Self-Care Products§
    Periodontics Periodontics Dentine hypersensitivity: analysis of self-care products§ Cassiano Kuchenbecker Rösing(a) Abstract: Dentine hypersensitivity is a condition that is often present in (b) Tiago Fiorini individuals, leading them to seek dental treatment. It has been described Diego Nique Liberman(b) Juliano Cavagni(b) as an acute, provoked pain that is not attributable to other dental prob- lems. Its actual prevalence is unknown, but it is interpreted as very un- pleasant by individuals. Several therapeutic alternatives are available to (a) Professor of Periodontology; (b)Graduate Student, Graduate Program in Dentistry manage dentine hypersensitivity, involving both in-office treatment and – School of Dentistry, Federal University of home-use products. The aim of this literature review was to evaluate self- Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. care products for managing dentine hypersensitivity. Among the prod- ucts available, dentifrices and fluorides are the most studied self-care products, with positive effects. However, a high percentage of individu- als is affected by the placebo effect. Among dentifrices, those containing potassium salts seem to be the most promising. Dental professionals need to understand the advantages and limitations of these therapies and use this knowledge in a positive approach that might help in decreasing den- tine hypersensitivity among patients. Descriptors: Dentin hypersensitivity; Review; Dental devices, home-care. § Paper presented at the “Oral Health Self-Care Products: Realities and
    [Show full text]