2010 Vehicle Technologies Market Report Contents ABOUT the REPORT
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Utilimaster(R) Announces Partnership with Smith Electric Vehicles to Produce and Market All-Electric Zero-Emission Newton(TM) Step Vans
1541 Reynolds Rd. Charlotte, MI 48813 P: 517.543.6400 SPARTANMOTORS.COM Utilimaster(R) Announces Partnership With Smith Electric Vehicles to Produce and Market All-Electric Zero-Emission Newton(TM) Step Vans March 6, 2012 WAKARUSA, Ind., March 6, 2012 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Utilimaster Corporation, a subsidiary of Spartan Motors, Inc. (Nasdaq:SPAR), announced today that it has partnered with Smith Electric Vehicles Corp. (Smith) to produce and market the all-electric zero-emission Newton Step Van. Utilimaster and Smith co-developed an integrated walk-in van design using Smith's Newton chassis platform, which includes its proprietary all-electric Smith Drive™, Smith Power™ and Smith Link™ systems to provide superior power train performance, battery management efficiency and remote system monitoring. The Newton Step Van is available in configurations of 14,000 to 26,000 pounds GVW and 650 - 1200 cubic feet, and provides a range of approximately 100 miles on a single charge. "The innovation and product performance found in the Newton Step Van sets a new industry standard for alternative propulsion walk-in vans. This was achieved by two leaders in the industry – Smith and Utilimaster – collaborating to integrate a new delivery and service solution. The Smith Electric partnership offers our clients an affordable green solution with a reliable all-electric vehicle platform. Utilimaster's electric van body is built on a commercially proven electric drive platform technology that has been working reliably for years with a number of national fleets," says John Knudtson, vice president, product development for Utilimaster. Smith Electric has successfully deployed hundreds of commercial electric vehicles into fleet operations around the world, including PepsiCo's Frito-Lay division, Staples, Coca-Cola, Sainsbury's and TNT. -
One Million Electric Vehicles by 2015
One Million Electric Vehicles By 2015 February 2011 Status Report 1 Executive Summary President Obama’s goal of putting one million electric vehicles on the road by 2015 represents a key milestone toward dramatically reducing dependence on oil and ensuring that America leads in the growing electric vehicle manufacturing industry. Although the goal is ambitious, key steps already taken and further steps proposed indicate the goal is achievable. Indeed, leading vehicle manufacturers already have plans for cumulative U.S. production capacity of more than 1.2 million electric vehicles by 2015, according to public announcements and news reports. While it appears that the goal is within reach in terms of production capacity, initial costs and lack of familiarity with the technology could be barriers. For that reason, President Obama has proposed steps to accelerate America’s leadership in electric vehicle deployment, including improvements to existing consumer tax credits, programs to help cities prepare for growing demand for electric vehicles and strong support for research and development. Introduction In his 2011 State of the Union address, President Obama called for putting one million electric vehicles on the road by 2015 – affirming and highlighting a goal aimed at building U.S. leadership in technologies that reduce our dependence on oil.1 Electric vehicles (“EVs”) – a term that includes plug-in hybrids, extended range electric vehicles and all- electric vehicles -- represent a key pathway for reducing petroleum dependence, enhancing environmental stewardship and promoting transportation sustainability, while creating high quality jobs and economic growth. To achieve these benefits and reach the goal, President Obama has proposed a new effort that supports advanced technology vehicle adoption through improvements to tax credits in current law, investments in R&D and competitive “With more research and incentives, programs to encourage communities to invest we can break our dependence on oil in infrastructure supporting these vehicles. -
Emission Inventory & Calculation Methodology 2019
Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventory & Calculation Methodology 2019 Quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions in accordance with the Corporate Green- house Gas Protocol December 2020 Content Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1 About RWE and its value chain .............................................................................................................................. 2 Organisational boundary .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Emissions Accounting and Reporting Methodology ................................................................................... 3 Scope 1 ......................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Scope 2 ......................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Scope 3 ......................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Category -
Data and Information Committee Agenda 9 June 2021 - Agenda
Data and Information Committee Agenda 9 June 2021 - Agenda Data and Information Committee Agenda 9 June 2021 Meeting is held in the Council Chamber, Level 2, Philip Laing House 144 Rattray Street, Dunedin Members: Hon Cr Marian Hobbs, Co-Chair Cr Michael Laws Cr Alexa Forbes, Co-Chair Cr Kevin Malcolm Cr Hilary Calvert Cr Andrew Noone Cr Michael Deaker Cr Gretchen Robertson Cr Carmen Hope Cr Bryan Scott Cr Gary Kelliher Cr Kate Wilson Senior Officer: Sarah Gardner, Chief Executive Meeting Support: Liz Spector, Committee Secretary 09 June 2021 02:00 PM Agenda Topic Page 1. APOLOGIES No apologies were received prior to publication of the agenda. 2. PUBLIC FORUM No requests to address the Committee under Public Forum were received prior to publication of the agenda. 3. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA Note: Any additions must be approved by resolution with an explanation as to why they cannot be delayed until a future meeting. 4. CONFLICT OF INTEREST Members are reminded of the need to stand aside from decision-making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have. 5. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES 3 Minutes of previous meetings will be considered true and accurate records, with or without changes. 5.1 Minutes of the 10 March 2021 Data and Information Committee meeting 3 6. OUTSTANDING ACTIONS OF DATA AND INFORMATION COMMITTEE RESOLUTIONS 8 Outstanding actions from resolutions of the Committee will be reviewed. 6.1 Action Register at 9 June 2021 8 7. MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 9 1 Data and Information Committee Agenda 9 June 2021 - Agenda 7.1 OTAGO GREENHOUSE GAS PROFILE FY2018/19 9 This report is provided to present the Committee with the Otago Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventory FY2018/19 and report. -
Electric Drive Vehicle Systems: Suggested Changes to Large Truck and Motorcoach Regulations and Inspection Procedures
Electric Drive Vehicle Systems: Suggested Changes to Large Truck and Motorcoach Regulations and Inspection Procedures November 2015 FOREWORD This report provides recommendations for changes to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs), North American Standard (NAS) inspection procedures, and out-of- service (OOS) criteria that are needed to accommodate and facilitate the use of commercial vehicles with high-voltage electric drive systems. Such vehicles include battery-electric vehicles, vehicles with hybrid-electric drive systems, and vehicles with hydrogen fuel cell engines. In addition to providing specific recommendations for changes, this report summarizes the process used to arrive at the recommendations. NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the use of the information contained in this document. The contents of this report reflect the views of the contractor, who is responsible for the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official policy of the USDOT. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. The U.S. Government does not endorse products or manufacturers named herein. Trademarks or manufacturers’ names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the objective. QUALITY ASSURANCE STATEMENT The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) provides high-quality information to serve Government, industry, and the public in a manner that promotes public understanding. Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of its information. FMCSA periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement. -
Electric Drive Vehicles and Their Infrastructure Issues (March 2010)
U.S. Department of Energy’s Vehicle Technologies Program - Clean Cities Webinar – Electric Drive Vehicles and Their Infrastructure Issues (March 2010) Jim Francfort and Don Karner Advanced Vehicle Testing Activity March 24, 2010 This presentation does not contain any proprietary or sensitive information Presentation Outline • AVTA Background and Testing • Regulations, Codes & Standards • OSHA, National Electric Code, UL, SAE • Permitting • Industry Status • BEV, EREV, PHEV, HEV technologies • Capital & Fuel Costs per Mile • BEV & PHEV Announcements • Smart Charging • Fleet Infrastructure • Acknowledgement & Questions 2 AVTA Background and Goals • Background – The Advanced Vehicle Testing Activity (AVTA) is part of DOE’s Vehicle Technologies Program – The Idaho National Laboratory (INL) and Electric Transportation Engineering Corporation (ETEC) conduct the AVTA per DOE guidance • The AVTA goals: – Provide benchmark data to technology modelers, research and development programs, vehicle manufacturers (via VSATT), and target and goal setters – Assist fleet managers in making informed early adaptor vehicle purchase, deployment and operating decisions 3 AVTA Testing Process • Testing includes: – Baseline performance via closed test tracks and dynamometers – Accelerated testing uses dedicated drivers to accumulate high mileage in compressed times – Fleet testing allows large numbers of vehicles to be tested in many environments / missions at low cost – Battery testing when appropriate at new and new of life • Different testing methods are used -
Smith Newton: Engineered to Perform
DOCKET 09-ALT-1 DATE 9/9/2009 RECD. 9/22/2009 Driving Growth Through Innovation Overview for California Energy Commission September 9, 2009 Smith’s Newton Fleet is Road Ready and Moving into US Neighborhoods TODAY!!! About Us: HERITAGE •Almost 90 years of experience in building commercial Electric Vehicles (EV’s) around the globe EXPERIENCE •Hundreds of current customers •Thousands of electric vehicles manufactured RELIABILITY •Integrated service network •Approximately 1,000 employees worldwide •Main facilities: UK USA Asia & South Pacific Smith History: 80 Years of Leadership in Electric Vehicles Smith Mission Visionaries take the Driver’s Seat EV Volume Grows – Battery Costs Plummet Technology & Legislation are driving costs down Vehicle Applications •Vehicles that start and end • Food Distribution their day at a central location •Vehicles that do less than 100 •Parcel Delivery miles per-day •Chilled Food Distribution •Operating in congested areas •Typically inner city and urban •Short Haul areas •Utilities •Lots of starts and stops – significant idle time •Airport Operations •Multiple drops/collections •Public Sector •Customer Cost Savings Analysis: A solution is needed Better for the Environment with Bottom line Benefits Perfect for Urban Low Operating Cost Deliveries o Eliminate Fuel Costs o Low Noise No Price Volatility o No Vibration < $.12/mile o Quick Acceleration o Reduced Maintenance Costs o Fewer Moving parts Zero Emissions o No Clutch or Transmission o Nil PM’s o Sealed Electric Motor o Over 50% CO Reduction o No Cooling -
Extreme Hybrid™, XH™, XH150™, XH250™, Fast Energy™, Fast Energy Storage™, Powered by XH™, Just Plug It In™ Are Trademarks Pending of AFS Trinity Power Corporation
1 Extreme Hybrid™, XH™, XH150™, XH250™, Fast Energy™, Fast Energy Storage™, Powered by XH™, Just Plug It In™ are trademarks pending of AFS Trinity Power Corporation. © 2007 AFS Trinity Power Corporation. The First Hybrid that Will Pay for Itself The Extreme Hybrid™ Drive Train by AFS Trinity. Above: Schematic of Power Electronics & Controls of XH™ Drive Train from AFS Trinity Patent Filings, September 14, 2006. The low-cost lithium batteries—protected from excessive resistive heating by the ultracapacitors— will make the XH-150™ much less expensive to purchase. In addition, its much greater fuel economy and extremely low maintenance will make it much less expensive to operate. Consequently, the XH™ drive train will, for the first time, make it possible for hybrid cars to pay for themselves. 2 2 Extreme Hybrid™, XH™, XH150™, XH250™, Fast Energy™, Fast Energy Storage™, Powered by XH™, Just Plug It In™ are trademarks pending of AFS Trinity Power Corporation. © 2007 AFS Trinity Power Corporation. XH-150™ Consumer Payback Analysis 4 + Major Dividends to Business and Labor Cumulative savings with gas $40,000 @ $5.00/gal & electricity @ $0.10/kWh ($37,628) $35,000 Payback est. in 3.5 years @ $2.85/gal $30,000 Cumulative savings with $25,000 Payback est. in gas @ $2.85/gal & 2.5 years @ $5.00/gal electricity @ $0.06/kWh $20,000 ($22,956) $15,000 $8,666 drive train $10,000 price premium Cumulative Operating Savings Cumulative $5,000 $4,666 price premium $- (reflects est. $4,000 of 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 hybrid tax incentives) 1. -
Emission Factor Documentationfor AP42 Section 2.4 Municipal Solid
Background Information Document for Updating AP42 Section 2.4 for Estimating Emissions from Municipal Solid Waste Landfills EPA/600/R-08-116 September 2008 Background Information Document for Updating AP42 Section 2.4 for Estimating Emissions from Municipal Solid Waste Landfills Prepared by Eastern Research Group, Inc. 1600 Perimeter Park Dr. Morrisville, NC 27560 Contract Number: EP-C-07-015 Work Assignment Number: 0-4 EPA Project Officer Susan Thorneloe Air Pollution Prevention and Control Division National Risk Management Research Laboratory Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC 20460 Notice The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) through its Office of Research and Development performed and managed the research described in this report. It has been subjected to the Agency‘s peer and administrative review and has been approved for publication as an EPA document. Any opinions expressed in this report are those of the author and do not, necessarily, reflect the official positions and policies of the EPA. Any mention of products or trade names does not constitute recommendation for use by the EPA. ii Abstract This document was prepared for U.S. EPA’s Office of Research and Development in support of EPA’s Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS). The objective is to summarize available data used to update emissions factors for quantifying landfill gas emissions and combustion by-products using more up-to-date and representative data for U.S. municipal landfills. This document provides background information used in developing a draft of the AP-42 section 2.4 which provides guidance for developing estimates of landfill gas emissions for national, regional, and state emission inventories. -
California's Clean Vehicle Industry
California’s Clean Vehicle Industry How the Drive to Reduce Automotive Global Warming Pollution Can Benefit the California Economy A Report by: © 2004 CALSTART, Inc. This report was independently researched and the assessment and analysis independently performed by CALSTART staff. Matt Peak served as the principal investigator and writer, in collaboration with Chris Buntine. Bill Van Amburg and John Boesel provided oversight and editorial review. Funding for this report was provided primarily by the Energy Foundation, with supplemental funding from the Natural Resources Defense Council. California’s Clean Vehicle Industry Table of Contents Executive Summary................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ........................................................................................... 8 2. California’s Emerging Clean Car Cluster ...........................................10 2.1 The Origins and Essential Building Blocks of California’s Clean Car Cluster ......10 2.2 California’s Strategic Strengths: Recognized Leader in High Tech Investments...11 3. Market Drivers for Greenhouse Gas Reduction Technologies...........13 3.1 Past Market Drivers of California’s Air Pollution Control Industry......................13 3.1.1 Past California Passenger Vehicle Standards ............................................................14 3.2 Future Market Drivers for GHG Technologies.....................................................16 3.2.1 California Zero Emission Vehicle Program...............................................................16 -
Analysis of Upstream Sustainability Trends Within the Food Production Industry. Case Study: a Food Manufacturer
P a g e | 1 Analysis of Upstream Sustainability Trends within the Food Production Industry. Case Study: A food manufacturer Sarah Dallas, Jessica Lam, Nora Stabert Academic Advisor: Deborah Gallagher Spring 2013 P a g e | 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Guide to Reading the Report ........................................................................................................................ 4 Literature Review ............................................................................................................................................ 5 Motivation ........................................................................................................................................................ 20 The Food Manufacturer Case .................................................................................................................... 25 Supply Chain.................................................................................................................................................... 26 Customer Analysis ........................................................................................................................................ 28 Climate Change ............................................................................................................................................... 34 Competitor Analysis .................................................................................................................................... -
Copernic Agent Search Results
Copernic Agent Search Results Search: volatile organic compounds in the air Gulf of Mexico Oil (All the words) Found: 1131 result(s) on _Full.Search Date: 7/17/2010 6:10:34 AM 1. Oil Spill Effects on Kids Jun 6, 2010 ... stay indoors to limit your exposure to the Volatile Organic Compounds or VOCs, which causes ... and turn on your central air conditioner or set your window air conditioner ... Related: CDC - 2010 Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill ... http://pediatrics.about.com/b/2010/06/06/oil-spill-effects-on-kids.htm 99% 2. Air Monitoring on Gulf Coastline | EPA Response to BP Spill in the Air monitoring reports below are on Particulate Matter, Total Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) and Air Toxics ... Since the BP Oil Spill in the Gulf of Mexico on April 22, 2010, EPA has provided full support to the U.S. Coast Guard http://www.epa.gov/bpspill/air.html 96% 3. BP Oil Spill Causing Serious Air Quality Concerns ... Due to the BP Oil Spill, the EPA Department of Air Quality is carefully tracking air quality along the Gulf of Mexico. Cases of bad odors, dizziness, nausea, and ... http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/5505474/bp_oil_spill_causing_serious_ air_quality.html 93% 4. NASA - Gulf of Mexico Initiative Targets Oil Spills and Other ... May 19, 2010 ... Viewing the Gulf of Mexico oil spill from 438 miles (705 km) away can be ... perspective of the layers of volatile organic compounds (VOCs, an oil ... of the water it comes into contact with the air and releases VOCs. ... http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/oilspill/oilspill-calipso-caliop.html 93% 5.