Antony and cleopatra history pdf

Continue For other uses, see Antony and Cleopatra (semansic segeration). William Shakespeare The Meeting of Antony and Cleopatra, played by Lawrence Alma-Tadema, 1884 Antony and Cleopatra (First Folio title: The Tragedy of Anthonie and Cleopatra) is a tragedy of William Shakespeare. The play was first staged in 1607 by King's Men at the Blackfriars Theatre or the Globe Theatre; [1] [2] He first appeared in folio in 1623. The story is based on Thomas North's 1579 English translation of Plutarch's Lives (Ancient Greek) and follows the relationship between Cleopatra and Mark Antony until Cleopatra's suicide during the Last War of the Roman Republic during the Sicilian uprising. The main enemy is Octavius Caesar, one of Antony's other threesomes in the Second Trilateral Period and one of the first emperors of the Roman Empire. Tragedy is mainly set in the Roman Republic and Ptolemaic Egypt and is characterized by rapid shifts in geographical location and linguism as it alternates between sensual, creative Alexandria and a more pragmatic, ausive Rome. Many see Shakespeare's Cleopatra, which Enobarbus describes as infinitely diverse, as one of the most complex and fully developed female characters in the playwright's working body. [3]:p.45 He is often arrogant and histrionic to provoke an audience to almost despise; At the same time, Shakespeare invests in him and Antony in tragic glory. These contradictory features have led to a large division of critical reactions. [4] It is difficult to classify Antony and Cleopatra as belonging to a single species. A historical play (although not entirely in compliance with historical narratives) can be described as a tragedy (whether aristotelian or not), a comedy, a romance, and, according to some critics, McCarter,[5] a problematic play. The only thing that can be said for sure is that this is a Roman play and perhaps a continuation of shakespeare's tragedies, Julius Caesar. Characters Mark Antony - Roman general and one of the three co-leaders, or triumvirs, Ruled the Roman Republic after the murder of Julius Caesar in 44 BC - another triumvir Lepidus – another triumvir Cleopatra – Queen Of Egypt Sextus Pompey - threesome and the late Pompey Antony party Demetrius Philo Domitius Enobarbus Ventidius rebelled against the son of Silius - Eros Canidius officer of the Ventidius army - Antony's Lieutenant General Scarus Dercetus Schoolmaster - Octavius Rannius Antony ambassador (non-speaking role) Lucilius (non-speaking) Lamprius (non-speaking role) Octavius's party Octavia – Octavius' sister Maecenas Agrippa – Rome The party of Menecrates Menas Varrius Cleopatra, party of The Taurus - Octavius lieutenant general Dolabella Thidias Gallus Proculeius Sextus – nodd Iras – nodd Alexas Mardian – a eunudigree Diomedes – treasurer Seleucus – other Soothsayer Clown Child Sentry Officers, Soldiers, Messengers and other Officials Synopsis Cleopatra John William Waterhouse (1888) with Mark Antony-Roman Republic trio, Octavius and Lepidus - after being deceived by Queen Cleopatra of Egypt He ignores Rome's family problems, including that his third wife, Fulvia, rebelled against Octavius and then died. Octavius calls Antony from Alexandria to Rome to fight against the three notorious Pirates of the Mediterranean, Sextus Pompey, Menecrates and Menas. In Alexandria, Cleopatra begs Antony not to go, and despite repeatedly endorsing his deeply passionate love for her, he eventually leaves. The trio meet in Rome, ending Antony and Octavius' disagreements for now. Octavius' general, Agrippa, recommends that Antony marry Octavius' sister Octavia to strengthen the friendly bond between the two men. Antony agrees. Antony's lieutenant, Enobarbus, knows octavia will never satisfy him after Cleopatra. In a famous passage, she explains Cleopatra's charm: Age can't delete her, nor is it special stale / Her infinite variety: other women cloy / The appetites they feed, but makes her hungry / Where she is most satisfied. A soothsayer warns Antony that he is sure to lose if he ever tries to fight Octavius. In Egypt, Cleopatra learns of Antony's marriage to Octavia and takes angry revenge on the messenger who brought him the news. She only grows content to reassure her that her palace octavia is plain: short, low-eyebrow, round-faced and bad hair. Before the war, the trio parley with Sextus Pompey, and offered him a truce. He can hold Sicily and Sardinya, but he must help them rescue the pirates and send tributes. After a little hesitation, Sextus agrees. Sade Octavius leaves the party early and sober, but they have a drunken celebration in Sextus' cardibra. Menas tells Sextus that he killed three three men and made himself ruler of the Roman Republic, but he rejects it, finding it dishonorable. After Antony left Rome for Athens, Octavius and Lepidus broke the truce with Sextus and fought against him. It's not approved by Antony, and he's angry. Antony returns to Hellenistic Alexandria and crowns Cleopatra and himself rulers of Egypt, and the eastern third of the Roman Republic (which was Antony's stake as one of the trio). He accuses Octavius of not giving him his share of Sextus' territory, and resuses that Lepidus, imprisoned by Octavius, is out of the triple. Octavius accepts the old demand, but otherwise he is not happy with what Antony has done. This Baroque vision, Battle By Laureys a Castro (1672), Cleopatra, bottom left, escapes a barge with an extra in Fortuna. Antony is preparing to fight Octavius. Enobarbus encourages Antony to fight on land where it has an advantage over the sea, where the Octavius navy is lighter, more mobile and better manned. Antony refuses because Octavius dared him to fight at sea. Cleopatra promised his navy to help Antony. However, during the Battle of Actium off the western coast of Greece, Cleopatra escapes on sixty ships and Antony follows him and leaves his forces in ruins. Ashamed of what Cleopatra has done for her love, Antony condemns her for make her a coward, but she also sccalls this true and deep love above all else and give me a kiss; Even that pays me back. Octavius sends a messenger to ask Cleopatra to give up Antony and come to him. When Antony walks in and angrily condemns his behavior, he hesitates and flirts with the messenger. He's sending the messenger to be whipped. He finally forgives Cleopatra, and this time he promised another war for him on land. On the eve of the war, Antony's soldiers hear his strange signs and interpret it as God Hercules abandoning the protection of Antony. What's more, Antony's longtime lieutenant, Enobarbus, abandons him and crosses over to Octavius. Antony orders them to be sent to enobarbus instead of confiscating property that Enobarbus did not take with him when he fled. Enobarbus is so impressed by Antony's generosity that he is so ashamed of his own infidelity that he dies of a broken heart. Antony loses the war and condemns Cleopatra as his soldiers collectively go to the desert: this Egyptian hath betrayed me. He decides to kill her for imaginary betrayal. Cleopatra decides that the only way to restore Antony's love is to send him the news that Antony killed himself dying with his name on his lips. He locks himself in his memorial and waits for Antony to return. The Death of Cleopatra by Reginald Arthur [fr] (1892) backfires on the plan: instead of rushing back regret to see cleopatra dead, Antony decides that his own life is no longer worth living. He begs one of his aides, Eros, to pass him with a sword, but Eros can't bear to do so and kills himself. Antony admires Eros' bravery and tries to do the same, but only succeeds in injuring himself. In great pain, he learns that Cleopatra is truly alive. He retreats to her at her memorial and dies in her arms. Since Egypt was defeated, the captive Cleopatra has been placed under the protection of Roman soldiers. He'll take his own life with a dagger, but Proculeius disarms him. Octavius comes and reassures him that he will be treated with honor and dignity. But Dolabella secretly found him in Octavius' Roman victory. that he intends to do the ceremony. Cleopatra painfully predicts endless humiliation. he predicts. As the conquest of Rome for the rest of his life. Cleopatra kills herself with the poisonous bite of an ASP, imagining how she will encounter Antony in the afterthing. His service servants Iras and Charmian also die, from heartbreak to one of the two asps in the basket of Iras and Charmian Cleopatra. Octavius discovers corpses and has conflicting feelings. The deaths of Antony and Cleopatra set him free to become the first Roman Emperor, but he also feels some sympathy for them. A public soldier is ordering a funeral. Sources from Giuseppe House depict cleopatra VII in Roman painting II, Pompeii, 1. most likely, Wearing her royal diadem, consuming poison in the act of suicide, her son Caesarion, who is also wearing a royal diadem, stands behind her[6][7] Cleopatra and Mark Antony obverse and reverse, respectively, a silver tetradrachm hit the Antiquity mint in 36 BC The main source of the story is the English translation of Plutarch's Life Compared To The Lives Of Mark Antony, Noble Grecians and Romans Together. This translation was first published by Sir Thomas North in 1579. Shakespeare's play has taken many sentences directly from the North, including enobarbus's famous depiction and barge of Cleopatra: I will tell you. The barge where he sits, like a burnt throne, Burn'd water: poop was beaten gold; Their sails ran purple and so perfumed that the winds were in love with them; The paddles were silver, kept the stroke for the melody of the flutes, and made the water beat to follow faster, as they love their strokes. For his own person, he lied to all his pavilion-fabric-gold texture- O'er-imagine where you see the nature of fantasy outwork: His rather deflated boys on both sides stood, like smiling Cupids, with divers-of-color fans, seemed to tease their delicate cheeks as they made the wind cool, and what he did back. This is comparable to the text of the North: Therefore she made antony herself as well as her friends, so light and antony could be sent by various letters of much ridicule, so far as to get her barge on the River Cydnus, poo where gold, purple sailes flute, howboyes cithernes, bottles and other instruments like the barge played on to the sound of other instruments musicke then kept the paddle stroke silver , and oares. And now for his self-human: he lay under a golden pavilion of texture, dressed and drawn by the goddess Venus in a tired, common picture: and hard by him, in both hands, pretie set the foorth god Cupid just dressed as male painters, with little fans in his hands, with which he fueled her wind. — The Life of Marcus Antony[8][9][10] However, It also adds scenes, including many scenes that portray Cleopatra's home life, and Enobarbus's role has greatly improved. Historical facts also change: Antony's last defeat in Plutarch was weeks after the Battle of Actium, and Octavia lived with Antony for several years and gave birth to two children: Antonia Major, the grandmother of Emperor Nero and mother of Emperor Valeria Messalina, and mother of Emperor Tiberius, antonia minor emperor Caligula and grandmother of The Young Empress Agrippina. History and text The first page of Antony and Cleopatra from the First Folio of Shakespeare's play was published in 1623. Many scientists believe it was written in 1606-07,[a] although some researchers advocated for an earlier flirtation around 1603-04. [18] Antony and Cleopatra entered the Stationers' Register in May 1608 (an early form of copyright for printed works), but in fact it did not seem to have been published until the publication of the First Folio in 1623. That's why Folio is the only authoritative text today. Some scientists have suggested that this is due to Shakespeare's own draft or bad papers, as it contains speech labels and small errors in stage directions that are thought to be characteristic of the author in the composition process. [19] Modern editions divided the play into a traditional five-act structure, but as with most of his previous works, Shakespeare did not create these parts of the movement. His play is expressed in forty separate scenes, more than he used to play another. Scene changes can often be very fluid, almost as inappropriate as the montage is, even as an explanation of the word scenes. A large number of scenes are required because the action often transitions between Alexandria, Italy, Sicily, Syria, Athens and Egypt and Messina in other parts of the Roman Republic. The game contains thirty-four talking characters, quite typical for a Shakespearean play on such an epic scale. Analysis and criticism Classic allusives and analogues: Dido and Aeneas from Virgil's Aeneid have pointed out virgil's powerful influence on shakespeare's Antony and Cleopatra, a first-century Roman epic poem. Given the prevalence of innuendo on Virgil in the Renaissance culture in which Shakespeare was studying, this effect should be expected. Historically Antony and Cleopatra were prototypes and antitypes of Virgil's Dido and Aeneas: Dido, ruler of the north African city of Carthage, encourages Aeneas, the legendary example of Roman pieta, to give up his mission to establish Rome after the fall of Troy. The fictional Aeneas defied Dido's charms and left him for Italy, puts political fate ahead of romantic love, unlike Antony, who puts his passionate love. Before Cleopatra, queen of Egypt, left for Rome. [b] Given the deep-rooted traditional connections between the fictional Dido and Aeneas and the historic Antony and Cleopatra, it is no surprising that Shakespeare has made numerous innuendo to his saga in Virgil's historical tragedy. As Janet Adelman observes, almost all the central elements in Antony and Cleopatra can be found in Aeneid: the counter-values of Rome and a foreign passion; the political necessary of a passionless Roman marriage; The concept of life after death, where passionate lovers meet. [20] However, as Heather James claims, Shakespeare's inns to Virgil's Dido and Aeneas are far from slaved of imitations. James emphasizes the various ways in which Shakespeare's play is trying to destroy the ideology of the Virgilian tradition; An example of this destruction is Cleopatra's 5th-year-old building. James argues that cleopatra's long description of this dream rebuilt the heroic masculinity of an Antony, his identity shattered by Rome's view and scattered. [21] This politically charged dream vision is an example of Shakespeare's story destabilizing and potentially criticizing Roman ideology inherited from Virgil's saga and embodied in the legendary Roman ancestor Aeneas. Critical history: Cleopatra Left's changing views of the image: Cleopatra VII bust at Altes Museum, Berlin, Roman artworks, Italy depicting Cleopatra 1st As a cupid of Venus Genetrix and her son Caesarion, 1st Century BC. Perhaps the most famous dilemma is the manipulative seductive one against the talented leader. A 19th-century film examining the critical history of Cleopatra's character. This phenomenon is demonstrated by the famous poet T.S. Eliot's attraction to Cleopatra. He saw it as nothing that power could use, more like devouring his sexuality... power. [24] Her language and writings use images of darkness, desire, beauty, sens sentimentality and sexuality to depict a seductive woman, not a strong, strong woman. Throughout his writings on Eliot, Antony and Cleopatra, he describes Cleopatra as material more than human. He's often his thing. T.S. Eliot conveys the appearance of early critical history on cleopatra's character. Other scientists also discuss cleopatra's first critics' views regarding a snake meant by the original sin. [25]:p.12 The symbol of the snake is symbolically allocated by Octavius and the empire of the queen's body (and the land it represents). [25]:p.13 Because the snake represents sin, sin and female weakness, the 19th century was the place to be. Cleopatra's postmodern appearance is complex. Doris Adler suggests that we cannot begin to grasp Cleopatra's character in a postmodern philosophical sense, because in a way, it is a distortion to evaluate Cleopatra at any moment except for the entire cultural environment that created and consumed Antony and Cleopatra on stage. However, apart from the host environment, isolation and microscopic examination of a single aspect is an effort to improve understanding of the wider context. Similarly, isolating and examining Cleopatra's stage image becomes an attempt to improve the understanding of the theatrical power and cultural treatment of its infinite diversity. [26] Therefore, cleopatra as a microcosm can be understood in a postmodern context, as long as it understands that the purpose of examining this microcosm is to interpret its interpretation of the work as a whole further. When reviewing cleopatra's complex character, author L.T. Fitz is not able to get a clear and postmodern perspective because of the sexism that all critics bring with them. In particular, it says: Almost all critical approaches to this game are coloured by the sexist assumptions that critics bring to their reading. [27] A seemingly non-sexist perspective was due to Donald C. Freeman expressing the meaning and significance of Antony and Cleopatra's deaths at the end of the play. Freeman states, we understand Antony as a major failure because he is in the container of his Roman dislimns: no longer outline and define him even for himself. On the contrary, we understand Cleopatra's death as the queen of love of immortal aspirations because the container of her mortality can now restrain her: unlike Antony, she never melts, but glorifies spiritual fire and earthly flesh into the air. [28] These constant changes in Cleopatra's perception are well represented in a review of Shakespeare's adaptation of Antony and Cleopatra at Estelle Parsons' Interart Theatre in New York. Arthur Holmberg surmises, What first fashion had seemed like a desperate attempt to be stylish in a New York way In fact, it's an ingenious way of characterizing the differences between Antony's Rome and Cleopatra's Egypt. Most of them rely on the costuming rather predictable contrasts implying strict discipline of indulging in the old and languid self of the latter. Exploiting ethnic differences in speech, gesture and movement, Parsons made the conflict between the two opposed cultures not only contemporary, but also poignant. In this environment, white Egyptians represent the elegant and ancient aristocracy-well-groomed, elegantly prepared, and doomed. The Romans, beginners from the West, lacked delicacy and polish. But they had power over the principalities and kingdoms with brute force. [29] Cleopatra's assessment of the changing shape represented in modern adaptations of Shakespeare's play is another example of how Cleopatra's modern and postmodern appearance is constantly evolving. Cleopatra is a difficult character because there are many aspects of her personality that we get a glimpse of from time to time. However, the most dominant parts of his character seem to ossym across a powerful ruler, a seductive and a kind of hero. Power is one of Cleopatra's most dominant character traits and uses it as a control tool. This thirst for control was revealed by Cleopatra's seduucation of Antony, dressed as the goddess of love Aphrodite, and made a highly calculated entrance to get her attention. [30] This sexualized act extends to cleopatra's seductive role, because it is her courage and unaologeceptive attitude that causes people to remember her as a grasping, immoral one. [31] However, despite his insiable sexual passion, he was still using these relationships as part of a larger political plan, once again revealing how dominant Cleopatra's desire for power was. [31] Cleopatra's close relationship with power seems to play a hero because it is something of interest to others in her passion and intelligence. [32] He was an autonomous and confident ruler and sent a strong message about women's independence and power. Cleopatra had quite a wide influence, and still continues to inspire, making her a hero to many. Structure: A drawing by Faulkner from Egypt and Rome Cleopatra hailing the relationship between Egypt and Rome in Antony and Cleopatra is at the heart of understanding the story, as the dilemma allows the reader to learn more about the characters, their relationships and the events that go on throughout the game. Shakespeare emphasizes the differences between the two nations as the two countries use language and literary devices that also emphasize their different characterizations by their residents and visitors. There are literary critics, too. For many years Romans and Romans were developing arguments about masculinity and the masculinity of Egypt and Egyptians. In the traditional critique of Antony and Cleopatra, Rome was described as a men's world ruled by the plain Caesar and a women's space of Egypt, which was as abundant, sealed and interchangeable as the Nile. [33] In such a reading, men and women, Rome and Egypt, mind and emotion, austerity and entertainment are all considered interconnected mutually related duos. As a result, critics are much more likely to describe Cleopatra as a female character in recent years as a character who confuses or deconstires gender. [34] Literary devices used in Antony and Cleopatra to convey differences between Rome and Egypt use a variety of literary techniques to make a deeper sense of the differences between Rome and Egypt. One example is the container scheme, as critic Donald Freeman suggested in his article Raf dislimns. In his article, Freeman assies that the container is a representation of the body and the general theme of the game. [28] In literary terms, the scheme refers to a plan throughout the work, which means that Shakespeare has a determined way to explain the meaning of the container to the audience within the play. An example of the container reference body can be seen in the following passage: Nay, but our generalo'erflows measure this point ... His captain's heart blows the buckle off his chest in fights of big fights, thingers all the rage and becomes a bellows and fan to cool a gypsy's lust. (1.1.1–2, 6–10) The lack of tolerance that hard-edged Roman military codes apply to a general's alliance is met with metaphor as a container, a measuring cup that cannot bear the liquid of Antony's great passion. [28] We then see Antony's heart cup swollen again because he sees the measure as o'erflows. According to Antony, the container of the Roman world is bordering and a measure, while the container of the Egyptian world is liberating, a vast area to explore. [28] The contrast between the two is expressed in the game's two famous speeches: let Rome in the Tiber melt down and drop a wide arch! That's my place! Kingdoms are clay! (1.1.34–36) To lose meltdown for Rome The boundary that defines the shape, containing its civilian and military codes. [28] This scheme is important in understanding Antony's great failure, because the Roman container can no longer identify or identify it. On the contrary, we understand that the container of Cleopatra's mortality can no longer restrain her. Unlike Antony, who melts the container, he achieves a lower limit released into the air. [28] The critic Mary Thomas Crane presents another symbol throughout the game in her article World of Rome, Egypt: Four elements. In general, the characters associated with Egypt perceive the world consisting of Aristotelian elements, which are earth, wind, fire and water. For Aristotle, these physical elements were central to the universe, and appropriately Cleopatra heralds his impending death: I am fire and air; other elements/Baser life, (5.2.289–290). [35] The Romans, on the other hand, left this system behind, and were moved by a subjectivity that separated and looked after the natural world, and seemed to imagine itself as being able to control it. These different systems of thought and perception lead to very different versions of the nation and empire. Shakespeare's relatively positive representation of Egypt has sometimes been read as a yearning for a heroic past. Because aristotelian elements were a declining theory in Shakespeare's time, it can also be read as nostalgia for a declining theory of the material world, elements of subject and world that become deeply interconnected and saturated with meaning, and humor in the pre-seventeenth century universe. [35] Thus, this reflects the difference between the Egyptians connected to the ground and the Romans, who dominated the hard- surfaced, permeable world. Critics also say that the political attitudes of the main characters are an allegory for the political atmosphere of Shakespeare's time. In Paul Lawrence Rose's Article The Politics of Antony and Cleopatra,[36] the views expressed in the game of national solidarity, social order and strong governance were familiar after the political catastrophe, which included the absolute monarchies of Henry VII and Henry VIII and Queen Mary Queen of Scots. Essentially, political themes throughout the play reflect different rule models in Shakespeare's time. The political attitudes of Antony, Caesar and Cleopatra are fundamental archetypes of the contradictory views of the sixteenth-century kingdom. [36] Caesar is the representative of the ideal king who brought Pax Romana, similar to the political peace established during the Tudors. His cold attitude represents what he thinks is a side effect of the political genius of the sixteenth century[36] On the contrary, Antony's focus is heroism and chili, and Antony captures the political power of victory. is a by-product of both. Cleopatra's power has been described as naked, hereditary and despotic[36] and claims to be reminiscent of Mary Tudor's reign, implying that it was no coincidence that she had brought about the end of Egypt. This is partly due to an emotional comparison of their rule. Cleopatra, who invested emotionally in Antony, brings about egypt's downfall with its devotion to love, while Mary Tudor's emotional devotion to Catholicism bounds her rule to fate. The political results within the play reflect shakespeare's influence on England in his message that he is not a Wife for a Mind. [36] The characterization of Roman and Egyptian critics often uses the opposition between Rome and Egypt in Antony and Cleopatra to reveal the defining characteristics of various characters. While some characters are distinctly Egyptian, others are distinctly Roman, some are torn between the two and still others try to remain neutral. [37] Critic James Hirsh concluded that the play was not two, but four main figurative locality dramatism: as perceived from Rome's point of view; From an Egyptian point of view, Rome; To create a Roman perspective perceived as Egypt; and as perceived from Egypt's point of view. [37]:p,175 Rome, according to Hirsh, largely defines itself as its opposition to Egypt. [37]:p.167–77 The fact that Rome is structured, morally, mature and essentially masculine is the polar opposite of Egypt; chaotic, immoral, immatur and female. In fact, even the distinction between masculine and female is a purely Roman idea that Egyptians largely ignore. For the Romans to see the world as something to conquer and control. They believe they are resistant to environmental impacts and will not be affected or controlled by the world. Egyptians, Egyptians, see Romans as boring, oppressive, strict and devoid of passion and creativity, prefering strict rules and regulations. [37]:p,177 From Egypt's Perspective on Egypt, the Egyptian Worldview reflects what Mary Floyd-Wilson calls geo-humorism, or the belief that climate and other environmental factors shape racial character. [38] Egyptians see themselves as deeply intertwined with the natural world. Egypt is not a place for them to manage, but an integral part of it. Cleopatra envisions herself as the emansid of Egypt because the fertilizer was fed and shaped by the environment fed by the nurse of the beggar and Caesar [35] (5.2.7-8). They see life as more fluid and less structured, allowing for creativity and passionate pursuits. From a Roman perspective, Egypt, the Romans, they actually see the Egyptians as inappropriate. Their passion for life. irresponsible, tolerant, overly sexual and disorderly. [37]:p.176–77 The Romans see Egypt as a thing to take even the best men off course. This is shown in the following passage describing Antony. Children who are mature in knowledge pledge their experiences to their present tastes, and thus rebel judgments. (1.4.31–33) As a result, the dilemma between Rome and Egypt is used to distinguish between two different local areas and two conflicting sets of values. However, to go beyond this division, to show conflicting sets of values, not just between two cultures, but within cultures, even within individuals. [37]:p,180 As John Gillies advocated for the orientalism of cleopatra palace – a systematic reversal of legendary Roman values with its luxury, collapse, grandeur, lust, appetite, masculinity and eunuchyms seems to be masculinity, courage. [39] Some characters fall into the category of Rome or Egypt (Rome as Octavius, Cleopatra Egypt), while others, such as Antony, cannot choose between two conflicting regions and cultures. Instead, he osses between the two. At the beginning of the game Cleopatra pulls attention by saying this he dispos'd mink'e, but suddenly I thought a Roman hath would caress him. (1.2.82–83) This shows Antony's desire to embrace the pleasures of Egyptian life, but still tends to retreat to Roman thoughts and ideas. Orientalism plays a very special and yet nuanced role in the story of Antony and Cleopatra. From Richmond Barbour, a more specific term comes to mind than proto-orientalism, orientalism before the age of imperialism. [40] This leads Antony and Cleopatra to a time when, in an interesting time, the West finally knew much about what would be called the East, but was still known to have territory beyond Europe. This allows Shakespeare to use common assumptions about the exotic east with very few academic applications. It can be said that Antony and Cleopatra and their relationship represent the literary first meeting of the two cultures, and that this relationship will form the basis of the western idea of eastern supremacy. [41] It can also be edict that the relationship between Antony and Cleopatra, at least in the literary sense, is the first time that some people have been exposed to an interracial relationship and in a major way. This goes into the idea that Cleopatra is another in terms used to describe her as a gypsy. [42] At the heart of the piece is the idea that Antony, a man of Western descent and upbringing, was coupled with other stereotypical Eastern women. [43] Critics' evolving views on gender characterization were published in 32 BC; On Obverse Cleopatra's diademed portrait, Latin CLEOPATRA[E REGINAE REGVM]FILIORVM] FILIORVM REGVM and a portrait of Mark Antony with antoni armenia devicta written in reverse. The feminist critique of Antony and Cleopatra provided a more in-depth reading of the play, challenged previous norms for criticism and started a broader debate about the characterization of Egypt and Rome. However, as Gayle Greene is well known, shakespeare's feminist critique should be addressed where Shakespeare's commentators are almost interested in prejudices such as [sic]-critics, directors, editors-Shakespeare himself. [44] Feminist scientists frequently study Shakespeare's use of language when describing Rome and Egypt in the relationship between Antony and Cleopatra. Such scientists argue that through its language, it tends to characterism Rome as masculine and Egypt as female. According to Gayle Greene, the 'masculine' world of love and personal relationships is secondary to the 'masculine' world of war and politics, preventing us from realicing cleopatra is the hero of the game and distorting our perceptions of character, theme and structure. [44] The emphasis on the diametrically opposed qualities of Antony and Cleopatra, in shakespeare's language and in the words of critics, highlights the characterization of the title characters in order to represent and emphasize the qualities of their own country. The female categorization of Egypt and later Cleopatra has been negatively depicted throughout the early criticisms. The story of Antony and Cleopatra is often summed up as the fall of a great general betrayed in his dotage by a treacherous strumpet, or can be seen as a celebration of love. [27] :p,297 In both reduced summaries, Egypt and Cleopatra were presented as agents in a love story or the destruction of Antony's masculinity and greatness. But as the Women's Liberation Movement grew between the 1960s and 1980s, critics began to take a closer look at Shakespeare's description of Egypt and Cleopatra and the work and views of other critics on the same issue. Jonathan Gil Harris, many critics of the Egyptian vs. Roman ikim often claim that adopting represents not only a gender polarity but also a gender hierarchy. [33]:p,409 was the 20th president of Antony and Cleopatra. Early critics, such as Georg Brandes, presented Egypt as a nation less because of its rigidity and lack of structure, and presented Cleopatra, negatively, women of women, fives Havhane. [45] Egypt and Cleopatra are represented by Brandes as uncontrollable due to their connections. The endless diversity of the Nile River and Cleopatra (2.2.236). In more recent years, critics have taken a closer look at previous readings of Antony and Cleopatra and have found several aspects overlooked. Egypt was previously characterized as the nation of female qualities of lust and desire, while Rome was more controlled. Harris pointed out, however, that Caesar and Antony had an uncontrollable desire for Egypt and Cleopatra, while Antony's is political. Harris also implies that the Romans had an uncontrollable lust and desire for what they didn't or didn't have. [33]:p,415 For example, Antony only desires his wife Fulvia after he dies: There is no great soul! Thus I do desire: What doth of our disdain often throw from us, we wish ours again; The pleasure of the present, lowering the revolution, does its opposite: it is well gone: The hand pushing it can rip off its back. (1.2.119–124) In this way, Harris says, Rome is no higher than Egypt in any gender hierarchy. L. T. Fitz claims that the early criticism of Antony and Cleopatra externally was colored by the sexist assumptions that critics brought to their reading. [27]:p,297 Fitz argues that previous criticisms have given great importance to Cleopatra's relationship with Egypt and her evil and manipulative ways, which have been further highlighted by her obsession with the proud and obedient Roman Octavia. [27]:p,301 Finally, Fitz highlights the tendency of early critics to claim that Antony was the only hero in the game. Brandes's argument for this claim is clear: Antony, a prey on the sensuality of the East, seems to be disappearing, the greatness of Rome and the Roman Republic ending with it. [46] Nevertheless, Fitz, Antony Iv. [27]:p,310 These criticisms are just a few examples of how critical views about Egypt's womanhood and Rome's masculinity have changed over time and how the development of feminist theory has helped the debate expand. Themes and motifs are important ideas in the game of uncertainty and opposition Relativity and ambiguity, and many of the characters in the audience are challenged to come to conclusions about the unstable nature. The relationship between Antony and Cleopatra can easily be read as one of love or lust; while their passion is completely destructive, it can also be interpreted by demonstrating elements of superiority. Cleopatra's love for Antony, or because he lost his political power, could be said to have killed himself. [3]:p,127 Octavius can either be seen as a noble and good ruler, he simply wants what is right for Rome, or he is cruel and ruthless A key theme running through the game is opposition. Throughout the game, the opposition between Rome and Egypt, love and lust, masculinity and womanhood are highlighted, demolished and interpreted. One of Shakespeare's most famous speeches, drawn almost exactly from the North translation of Plutarch's Lives, enobarbus's description of Cleopatra on the barge is full of contrasts corresponding to this broad opposition that characterizes the rest of the play: the barge where he sits, like the throne of burnish'd, Burn'd the water... O'er-imagine that Venus's ornate outwork nature: Both sides stood with her rather dimpled children, like smiling Cupids, with divers-color'd fans, whose wind seemed to shine on delicate cheeks that did cool, and what she did back. (Act 2, Scene 2) Cleopatra sees Antony as both Gorgon and Mars (Act 2 Scene 5, line 118-119). Ambivalence theme The play is correctly structured with paradox and ambiguity to convey the antitheses that make Shakespeare's work remarkable. [47] In this game, ambivalence is the opposite reaction of one's own character. It may be perceived as dissent between words and verbs, but it should not be confused with duality. For example, after leaving his army during the naval battle to follow Antony Cleopatra, he expresses regret and pain in his famous speech: Everything is lost; This foul egyptian hath betrayed me: my fleet hath surrendered to the enemy; And yonder they cast their caps and lost as long as carouse friends together. A three-turn whore! Hast sold me to this rookie. And my heart only does wars. They all offer flies; I did everything I could to avenge my charm. They all offer flies; Get. [Exit SCARUS] O sun, I see no more of your rise: wealth and antony are here; Even here, he shakes hands with bananas. Is that where it's all come from? The hearts that push me towards the heels are in Caesar, where I fulfill their wishes, discriminate, melt their sweets, bloom; And it's pine bark'd, it's all overtopp'd. I betrayed: O false spirit of Egypt! It's the lure of the tomb— whose eyes call out my battles and call them home; Like a gypsy on the right, hath, fast and loose, fooled me into the heart of loss- my crown, my head end, whose ink. What, Eros, Eros! [Enter CLEOPATRA] Oh, you grow up! Avaunt, what are you doing? [48] (IV.12.2913–2938) However, then strangely Cleopatra says: All this won and lost. Give me a kiss. This even pays me back[48](3.12.69-70). Antony's speech expresses pain and anger, but cleopatra moves against his feelings and words for his love. Literary critic Joyce Carol Oates explains that Antony's agony is curiously silent for someone who has accomplished and lost so much. This gap in irony between the word and the island of characters a theme of uncertainty. What's more, because of the flow of ever-changing emotions throughout the game: the characters don't know each other, nor can we recognize them, more clearly than we know ourselves. [49] However, critics believe it was the opposition that made good fiction. Another example of the uncertainty in Antony and Cleopatra is in the opening act of the play, where Cleopatra asked Anthony to tell me how much he loved me. Tzachi points to the Pron pron pron pron pron pron pron pron pron pron pron pron prons: The persistence of doubt is in constant tension with the opposite need for certainty, and it means perseverance in doubt that the character is derived from the opposite of words and islands. [50] Betrayal Betrayal is a recurring theme throughout the game. One way or another, almost every character betrays his country, his morals or a comrade. However, some characters hesitate between betrayal and loyalty. This struggle is most evident among the actions of Cleopatra, Enobarbus and, most importantly, Antony. Antony entered into a marriage to Octavia, reneving on his Roman roots and his alliance with Caesar, but returned to Cleopatra. Diana Kleiner, Anthony's perception of betrayal of Rome, said that the people were met with a call to war with Egypt. [51] He vows to remain faithful in his marriage, but his infidelity with his Roman roots leads to war. It was twice that Cleopatra left Antony during the war, and he cheated on Antony, whether out of fear or political reasons. When Caesar's envoy thidias told Cleopatra that he would show mercy if he renounced Antony, the kindest messenger told the great Caesar as this surrogate: I kiss his conqu'ring hand. Tell him I have to put my crown at your feet and kneel. [48] (III.13.75–79) Shakespeare critic Sara Deats said cleopatra's betrayal fell in successful fencing with Octavius, leaving her noble. [52] However, he quickly reconciled with Antony, renewing his loyalty to him and never really bowing to Caesar. Antony's most loyal friend, Enobarbus, betrays Antony when he leaves in Caesar's favor. I'm fighting against you! / No: I'm going to look for some ditch where to die[48] (IV. 6. 38–39). Despite abandoning Antony, critic Kent Cartwright claims that Enobarbus's death reveals his great love, thinking that what he did to his friend was due to his accusedness, thereby increase the confusion of the loyalty and betrayal of the characters discovered by previous critics. [53] While loyalty is central to securing alliances, Shakespeare is making a point of noting the theme of betrayal by revealing how people in power can't be trusted, no matter how honest he may seem. The loyalty of the characters and the validity of the promises are constantly questioned. Permanent Uncertainty and uncertainty between alliances strengthens between character loyalty and infidelity. A Roman bust of the Power Dynamics Consul and trio Mark Antony, as a play about the relationship between the two empires in the Vatican Museums, the existence of a power dynamic is evident and becomes a recurring theme. Antony and Cleopatra battle over this dynamic as heads of state, yet the theme of power also resonates in their romantic relationship. Rome's ideal of power is based on a political nature based on economic control. [54] As an imperialist power, Rome takes its power in its ability to change the world. [35] As a Roman man, Antony is expected to fulfill some qualities, particularly in the arena of war and the masculine power of Rome, where he served as a soldier: O'er's good eyes, o'er's files and war collectors glowed like tanned mars, now bending over and now turning the office and commitment of his views on the twny front. His captain's heart blows the buckle off his chest in a fight for greatness, takes back all the nerves and becomes a bellows and fan to cool a gypsy's lust. [55] Cleopatra's character cannot be reduced a bit because her character identity retains a certain aspect of the mystery. It embodies the mystical, exotic and dangerous nature of Egypt as the snake of the ancient Nile. [35] Critic Lisa Starks says Cleopatra came to express the seductive/goddess's double image. [56] The goddess is constantly identified in an extraterresterrestered nature dating back to her identification as Venus. ... For his own person, all explanations are beggars. He lied in his mansion- gold fabric, texture- O'er-imagine that Venus where you see the nature of fantasy outwork. [57] This mysteriousness due to supernatural events not only captures the audience and Antony, but also attracts the attention of all other characters. As a talking center when he is not on stage, Cleopatra is constantly a central point and therefore demands control of the stage. [58]:p,605 As an object of sexual desire, it connects to the Romans' need to conquer. [56] A mixture of sexual and political power is a threat to Roman politics. Especially when he asseses himself as the president of his kingdom/visible to a man there, he continues to be heavily interested in the military dimension of his administration. [59] Where the dominant power lies is ready for interpretation, but there are a few words in the text about the power shift between them. Antony, the most obvious thing about Cleopatra's power over her many times throughout the game, depending on sexual innuendo: You knew / How conqueror you were, and this / My sword, weakened by my love, happens / You obey for all reasons. [60] Language use in power dynamics Manipulation and power seeking are very pronounced Not just in the game, but especially in the relationship between Antony and Cleopatra. Both use language to weaken the power of the other and amplify their own understanding of power. Cleopatra uses language to undermine Antony's authority over him. Cleopatra's commanding language of Rome tries to undermine Antony's authority. [61] Cleopatra was able to give orders to Antony and others in Antony's own way using Romanesk rhetoric. In their first exchange in act one, Cleopatra tells Antony: I'm going to set up a bourn to be loved. [62] In this case, Cleopatra speaks to her lover in an authoritarian and positive way, an uncharacterism for a female lover in Shakespeare's audience. Antony's language shows the power struggle against Cleopatra's dominance. Antony's obsessive language about structure, organization and care for the me and empire, 'property' and constant reference to the 'rule' express unconscious concerns about border integrity and violation. (Hooks 38) [63] He also struggles with his passion for Antony Cleopatra, which matches Cleopatra's desire for power over him, eventually causing him to collapse. It states act I, scene 2, that powerful Egyptian fetters I must break, /or lose myself in dotage. [64] Antony feels restrained by the Egyptian fetter, stating that he recognizes Cleopatra's control over him. He also mentions Antony as roman ruler and authority over people, including Antony's Cleopatra. Cleopatra also succeeds in causing Antony to speak in a more theatrical way and therefore undermine his true authority. In act one, Antony not only mentions his empire, but also builds a theatrical image: Rome and the Tiber melt down, and the vast arch/vast empire fall... The nobleness of life/To do this; Such a mutual couple / And i can not make such a twain-weet the world in which I connect / suffer punishment / We stand up uniquely. [65] Cleopatra immediately stepped aside and lied perfectly! and tells the audience that he wants Antony to embrace this rhetoric. Yachnin's article focuses on Cleopatra's extortion of Antony's authority through his own language and language, while Hooks's article focuses on Antony's efforts to asser his authority through rhetoric. Both articles show lovers' awareness of each other's quest for power. Despite the struggle for awareness and political power that is in play, Antony and Cleopatra are not able to achieve their goals with the result of the game. Gender execution and crossdressing Gender Antony and Cleopatra's performance is actually a male-dominated game in which Cleopatra's character takes on several female figures and is certainly the only strong female character. As Oriana Palusci said in her article When Or Women Tell Their Dreams: Cleopatra and The Actor, Cleopatra constantly occupy the center, if not the stage, certainly the rhetoric, often accused of sexual innuendo and derogatory tirades, of the male Roman world. [58] We see the importance of this figure by constantly mentioning it, even if it is not on stage. What is said about Cleopatra is not always something that is normally said about a monarch; The image created makes the audience expect to see a dark, dangerous, evil, sensual and obscene creature harnessed by a noble Sovereign on stage, but dark, dangerous, evil, sensual and 'captain's heart'. [58]:p,605 Creating this dangerously beautiful woman is difficult for Shakespeare because all characters, male or female, are revived by men. Phyllis Rackin pointed out that one of Cleopatra's most revealing scenes was spoken by Enobarbus: In her famous set talk, Enobarbus evokes Cleopatra's arrival in Cynus. [66] This is a detailed description that was never played by a young actor. Before the boy who plays Cleopatra in this way awakens Cleopatra's greatness, he needs to remind us that he can't really represent her. [66]:p,210 Cleopatra's images should be identified instead of being seen on stage. Rackin points out that Shakespeare's based on his poetry and the imagination of his audience to evoke Cleopatra's greatness is a commonplace of old criticism, because he knew the male actor could not convincingly portray him. [66]:p,210 Romans' constant comments about Cleopatra often weakened him, representing the Romans' opinion of the Egyptians, especially the Egyptians, on the outside and outside. In terms of why-oriented Romans, Shakespeare's Egyptian queen consistently violated the rules of decency. [66] :p.202 It is because of cleopatra's displeasure that she represents political power, a power that is constantly emphasized, rejected and overridden by her Roman counterpart. [58]:p,610 According to many of Antony's crew, his actions seemed exaggerated and exaggerated: Antony's devotion was excessive and therefore irrational. [66]:p,210 It is not squint to have such a subordined queen at the time. And yet he is also shown as the real power holder in the game. When he was threatened with complete disarming by Octavius, he took his own life: he was the one who would not be silenced by the new master, he would silence himself: 'I will trust my decision and my hands/ There is nothing about Caesar' (IV. 15.51–52). [58]:p.606–607 From this, connections can be made between power and the performance of the female role, as cleopatra portrays. Crossdressing comments within the play have speculated that Shakespeare's original intention is to appear in Antony Cleopatra's clothes or vice versa at the beginning of the play. This possible comment may be between gender and power. Gordon P. Jones explains the importance of this detail: Such a saturnalian exchange of costumes in the opening scene would have opened up a number of important perspectives for the original audience of the game. Immediately lovers would have established sportiness. It would offer a special theatrical context for Cleopatra to remind her of another incident in which she later wore my tires and coats. He would lay the groundwork for Cleopatra's insistence that he later appear for a man (III.vii.18) to plead guilty to a charge in the war; In doing so, he would also have prepared the audience for humiliating him by usurping Antony's male role. [67] Evidence that such a costume change was intended includes Enobarbus's misunderstood Cleopatra as Antony: DOMITIUS ENOBARBUS: Hush! Here comes Antony. Charmian: It's not; Queen. Enobarbus may have made this mistake because he was used to seeing Antony in the queen's clothes. It's also Philo's 1st. In the context of cross-dressing, it can mean time dressed as Antony and not Antony Cleopatra. If Shakespeare had indeed been designed for Antony's crossdress, it would have drawn even more similarities between Antony and Hercules, a comparison many scientists have noted many times before. [68] [69] Hercules, said to be Antony's ancestor, was forced to wear Queen Omphale's clothes when she was Queen Omphale's contract maid. The myth of Omphale is the investigation of gender roles in Greek society. Shakespeare may have pay his respects to this legend as a way of discovering his own gender roles. [67]:p.65 However, it has been stated that women dressed as men (i.e. a male actor portraying a female character dressed as a man) are common in Shakespeare, the opposite (i.e. a male adult actor disguised as a woman) does not have, and he has put aside Antony's controversial case. Critics' interpretations of male characters portraying female characters Antony and Cleopatra also contain self-references to cross-dressing as historically performed on the London stage. For example, in Act Five, in Act Two, Cleopatra says: Antony/ He will be brought in drunk, and I will see/ Some creaking Cleopatra boy is my size/ The posture of an oros (ll. 214-217). Many scientists interpreted these lines as a metatheatro reference to Shakespeare's own production and by commenting on his stage. Shakespearean critics such as Tracey Sedinger interpret it as a criticism of Shakespeare's London scene. serves to determine the superiority of the sexuality of the male audience. [71] The male-to-male relationship offered by some critics suggested that the role between the male audience and the actor performing the play's female sexuality would be less menacing than it was played by a woman. In this way, the London scene has cultivated a cracked and obedient female subject to its audience, while positioning male sexuality as dominant. Shakespeare critics argue that metatheatre references in Antony and Cleopatra criticize this trend, and that Cleopatra's presentation as a sexually powerful individual supports Shakespeare's argument that he questioned the oppression of female sexuality in London society. [71]:p.63 Crossdresser is not a visible object at the time, but a structure that enacts the failure of a dominant epistemology in which knowledge is equal to visibility. [71]:p.64 What is argued here is that cross-dressing on the London stage has thirked the dominant epistemology associated with knowledge of Elizabethan society. The male actors who portrayed female sexuality on the London stage contradicted such a simple ontology. Critics such as Rackin interpret Shakespeare's metatheatre references to cross-dressing on stage with less concern for social elements and more focus on dramatic results. Rackin claims in his article about Shakespeare's Boy Cleopatra that Shakespeare manipulated cross-dressing to highlight a motif of the play. Rackin quotes the same quote, Antony/ To be brought in drunk, and I'll see/ Some creaking Cleopatra boy is my size/ I'm a whore's stance to make the argument that the audience here is getting much the same treatment cleopatra shakespeare's stage (because he's played by a male actor) (V.ii.214-217). Using the metatheatre reference to his own stage, Shakespeare continues his motif of recklessness by deliberately breaking the audience's acceptance of the dramatic illusion. [66]:p,201 Other critics argue that the crossdressing that occurs in the game is more about the embodiment of dominant power structures than just a convention. Critics like Charles Forker argue that male actors are the result of what we might call androgens. [72] The article argued that women were barred from the stage for their own sexual protection, and that viewers considered patriarchal found it probably unbearable to see situations that sexually endangered British women, who would represent mothers, wives and daughters. [72]:p.10 Essentially, cross-dressing occurs as a result of patriarchal society. Imperial Sexuality and The textual motifs of the empire in Antony and Cleopatra are strong-sex and erotic undercurrents. Antony, a Roman soldier characterized by a certain womanity, was the main ingredient in conquest, falling first in Cleopatra and later caesar (Octavius). Cleopatra's victory over her lover was proved by Caesar himself, who said Antony was no more masculine than Cleopatra. nor the queen of Batlamyama / More female she (1.4.5-7). It should come as no surprise that Cleopatra played the role of male aggresser in her relationship with Antony; After all, a culture that tries to dominate another culture will forgive itself with the culture in which it tries to rule with masculine qualities and female qualities[73]—appropriately, the queen's romantic attack often takes place in a political, even militaristic way. Antony's later loss of masculinity apparently means his lost Romanism, and Act 3, Scene 10, a virtual litany of his lost and feminised self, his wounded chances. [73] Throughout the game, Antony mourns the roman quality envy of his nostalgic tyings— in the most central scenes, he tells Cleopatra that his sword (a simple image of fortune tells Cleopatra that he is weakened by his love (3.11.67). Act 4, Scene 14, lamentes an un-Romaned Antony, He, your vile lady!/ He robbed me of my sword, (22-23)-critic Arthur L. Little Jr. writes here that he seems to closely echo the victim of raptus, bride theft, who lost the sword he wanted to turn against himself. When Antony tries to use his sword to kill himself, it's little more than a stage propeller. [73] Antony is reduced to a political object, a pawn in a power play between Caesar and Cleopatra. [74] Unable to perform Roman masculinity and virtue, Antony's only meaning is to write himself into Rome's imperial narrative, and his position at the birth of the empire is to throw himself into the female arche of the sacrifith virgin; When he finds out he's failed to become Aeneas, he tries to look like Dido. [73] It can be read as a rewrus of antony and cleopatra virgil's saga, sexual roles are reversed and sometimes reversed. James J Greene writes: If one of the most powerful myths in the cultural memory of our past is that Aeneas rejected the Queen of Africa to continue and establish the Roman Empire, it is certain that Shakespeare's [sic] is important... It depicts the exact and rather deliberate opposite of the action celebrated by Virgil. For Antony... For the sake of the Queen of Africa, she turned her back on the same Roman state founded by Aeneas. [73] Antony even tried to commit suicide for his love and eventually fell short. He is incapable of invading ... politically empowering place female victim Abundant images of his person-penetration, wounds, blood, marriage, orgasm, and shame-as some critics queer the body of Roman figures Antony, namely, as an open male body ... [it' is not just 'commitment' but bends ... Leans. [73] In contrast, we pursue very active wills and energetic goals in both Caesar and Cleopatra. [75] Caesar's empirical purpose is considered purely political, but Cleopatra's is clearly erotic; he conquers carnally-really, he made the great Caesar put his sword to bed;/ He ploughed her, and she was 2.2.232-233). His mastery is unique when it comes to the seduation of some powerful individuals, but when it comes to popular criticism Cleopatra, the main driving force of the game's action supports the idea that it can be described as a machine specifically designed to bend it to Roman will... And there is no doubt that roman order dominates at the end of the game. But instead of driving him to ignominy, Roman power pushes him into nobility. [74] Caesar says of his latest de facto: The bravest of all, / He leveled our goals, and to be royalty, / He went his own way (5.2.325-327). Arthur L. Little, agitatively, assies that the queen's desire to overcome has a bodily expression: if a black-reading foreign-male rapes a white woman, he encapsulations an iconographic truth... The sexual, racial, national and imperial fears of the dominant society, a white man who raped a black woman, become evidence of his confident and cold-blooded oppression of these representative foreign bodies, he said. [73] Furthermore, Rome shapes the Egyptian imperial struggle most around the contours of Cleopatra's sexualized and racialized black body - most clearly her tawny front, gypsy lust, and her licentious climactic pedigree, Phoebus's amorous phraks with black. [73] Similarly, essayist David Quint claims that the opposition between Cleopatra and east and west is characterized by gender: the otherness of the Eastern becomes the other of the opposite sex. [76] Quint said Cleopatra (not Antony) had fulfilled Virgil's Dido archecle; The woman is excluded from power and the process of empire-building, as in aeneid: this exclusion is evident in the fiction of the poem in which Creusa disappeared and Dido was abandoned... The woman's location or displacement is therefore in the East, and she has a number of eastern heroes whose epic, seductive is more dangerous than the Eastern arms[76] namely Cleopatra. The politics of Antony and cleopatra empire deal vaguely with the politics of imperialism and colonialism. Critics have long invested in unraveling the network of political insi things that characterize the game. The work is often based on the understanding of Egypt and Rome, because it expresses Elizabeth's Eastern and Western ideals, respectively, contributing to a long-awaited conversation about the game's representation of the relationship between imperialist western countries and colonized eastern cultures. [54] Despite Octavius Caesar's victory and Egypt's entry into Rome, Antony and Cleopatra resist open sleep with Western values. As a matter of fact, Cleopatra's suicide was interpreted as suggesting an indestructible quality in Egypt and confirming Eastern culture as an un timeless opponent to the West. [28] However, especially in previous criticisms, the narrative trajectory of Rome's victory and Cleopatra's perceived weakness as a ruler have provided readings that make him believe that Shakespeare represents the Roman worldview. Octavius Caesar is seen as Shakespeare's depiction of him as an ideal governor, but perhaps an unmaindable friend or lover, and Rome is a symbol of reason and political excellence. [36] According to this reading, Egypt is seen as destructive and vulgar; Critic Paul Lawrence Rose writes: Shakespeare clearly envisions Egypt as a political hell for the subject where natural rights are counted for nothing. [36] Through the lens of such a reading, Rome's rise over Egypt does not address the practice of empire building as much as it shows the inevitable advantage of logic over sensing. More contemporary scholarships on the play, however, often recognized the Egyptian charm for Antony and Cleopatra's audience. Egypt's apparent cultural priority over Magnetism and Rome is explained by its efforts to contextualize the political consequences of the game during the production period. The ruling styles of various heroes are identified with Shakespeare's contemporary rulers. For example, there is continuity between cleopatra's character and the historical figure of Queen Elizabeth I[77] and the uncooperable light castings for Caesar 16. [78] The new historicalism and the more new influence of postcolonial studies have led shakespeare's play to be subversive or western imperialism's readings that challenge the status quo. Critic Abigail Scherer's claim that Shakespeare's Egypt is a holiday world[79] recalls and opposes criticism of Egypt by previous scholarships. Recognizing the broad charm of Scherer and Egypt, critics linked the grandeur of Cleopatra's greatness to the grandeur and grandeur of the theatre. The games are attacked by all levels of authority in the 1600s, as breeding grounds for laziness; [80] The game celebrates pleasure and laziness in a repressed Egypt, with Egypt Heavily censored theatre culture in England. In the context of Britain's political atmosphere, Shakespeare's need to represent Egypt as a greater source of poetry and imagination, 16. [35] More importantly, King James' sanction against the founding of Jamestown came a few months after Antony and Cleopatra took the stage. During the Renaissance, England found itself in a similar position in the early Roman Republic. Shakespeare's audience may have established a connection between The West's expansion of England and Antony and Cleopatra's picture of Curvy Roman imperialism. In order to support the subversive reading of Shakespeare's play, 16. [81] Empire and intertext One of the ways to read the imperialist themes of the play is through a historical, political context in which intertext is considered. Many scientists have edict that Shakespeare, through the historian Plutarch, has extensive knowledge of the story of Antony and Cleopatra, and that Plutarch used his account as a plan for his own play. A closer look at this intertext link reveals that Shakespeare, for example, used Plutarch's claim that Antony claimed a genealogic that went to Hercules and linked him frequently to dionysus by establishing a parallel relationship with Cleopatra. [82] This historical stability means that Shakespeare conveys non-Romans over Roman characters, and therefore his play undertakes a political agenda rather than just connecting to historical entertainment. Shakespeare deflects from an absolutely submissive observation of plutarch by complicating a simple dominant/dominant hypothe with official selections. For example, rapid dialogue exchanges could signal a more dynamic political conflict. In addition, some characteristics of characters such as Antony (5.2.82), his legs best eaten the ocean, point to constant change and mutability. [83] Plutarch was given the tendencies of exaggeration, inhern in the propaganda surrounding cliché, polarization and tebaa. [84] He also constructs the play with an ananronistic Christian sensibility that may have influenced the Romans' Confessions of St. Augustine, as shakespeare was able to directly access the Greek text of Plutarch's Parallel Lives and possibly read it through a French translation from a Latin translation. As Miles wrote, the ancient world would not have noticed the network of conscience of innerness and salvation until Augustine. [84] Salvation for the Christian world And it belonged to the one, and the Roman world saw salvation as political. Shakespeare's characters in Antony and Cleopatra show off christians' sense of salvation, especially when Cleopatra believed that his own suicide was an agency exercise. Another example of deviating from the source material is how Shakespeare characterized the rule of Antony and Cleopatra. Plutarch, while expressing the exclusive community order around which lovers surround it - a society that has a specially defined and clear understanding of the hierarchies of power determined by birth and status- Shakespeare's play seems more preoccupied with the power dynamics of pleasure as the main theme throughout the play. [85] After pleasure becomes a dynamic of power, it permeates society and politics. Pleasure serves as a distinguishing factor between Cleopatra and Antony, between Egypt and Rome, and can be read as the fatal flaw of heroes while Antony and Cleopatra are a tragedy. For Shakespeare's Antony and Cleopatra, the privilege and superiority of pleasure created the disconnect between the monarch and the subjects. Critics say Shakespeare has done similar work with these sources in Othello, Julius Caesar and Coriolanus. Luck and luck: politics and nature referenced in Act IV, stage 15 to join characters in a late 19th Chance concept, or Fortune, often depicted throughout Antony and Cleopatra, as a detailed play. An element of Destiny is part of the game's Concept of Luck, as at any given moment the issue in Fortune/Chance's favor becomes the most successful character. Shakespeare represents Fortune with basic and astronomical images resembling the characters' awareness of the untrustworthyness of the natural world. [86] This queries the extent to which the characters' actions affect the resulting results and whether the characters are subject to Fortune or Chance's preferences. Antony eventually realizes that he, like other characters, is just a player instead of just a card in Fortune's knave, Chance game. [87] This notation suggests that Antony realized that he was powerless about the powers of Luck or Fortune. The way the characters deal with their luck is of paramount importance, so they can destroy their chances by taking advantage of their fortunes to extreme lengths without censoring their actions, Antony did. [88] Academician Marilyn Williamson states that the characters can indulge their fortunes by riding too high, as Antony did by ignoring his duties in Rome and 100 years in Egypt with Cleopatra. Fortune is capable of exercising free will, however, while playing a big role in the lives of the characters; As It's not as restrictive as fate. Antony's actions show this because he can use his free will to take his chances by choosing his own actions. Like the natural images used to describe Fortune, academic Michael Lloyd describes it as an element that naturally causes an uprising from time to time. This means that fortune has a greater power of nature than man and cannot be manipulated. Fortune's 'game of chance' can be about politics, with characters expressing that they need to play both their luck and their luck and politics to determine a winner. [87] However, the game peaked when Antony realized that there was only one card in this game, not a player. The card-playing motif has a political tone regarding the nature of political relations. [89] Caesar and Antony act as if they were playing a card game against each other; From time to time he plays by chance rules that shake his preference. While Caesar and Antony play political cards with each other, their success is somely based on Chance, which points to a certain limit of their control over political affairs. Furthermore, constant ications of astronomical bodies and sublunar images[88] express a fateful nature to fortune and imply a lack of control on behalf of the characters. Although the characters do exercise free will to some extent, the success of their actions ultimately depends on the luck fortune bestows upon them. The movement of the moon and tides is often expressed throughout the game, as Cleopatra noted that there is nothing important left under the moon over Antony's death. The basic and astronomical sublunar[86] images, often referred to throughout the game, are intertwined with the political manipulation provoked by each character, but the winner of the political game is based in part on Chance, who has a superior quality over which characters cannot have control over them and therefore has to submit. Adaptations and cultural references Lillie Langtry's 1891 photograph as Cleopatra-selected stage productions, John Gielgud as Antony and Ralph Richardson as Enobarbus in The Old Vic. He ran for 126 shows, the longest playwork in Broadway history. In 1951, he played Laurence Olivier Antony, Vivien Leigh as Cleopatra, Caesar as George Bernard Shaw and Cleopatra at the St James Theatre and later in the repertoire on Broadway. In 1953, Michael Redgrave played Antony and Peggy Ashcroft played Cleopatra at the Shakespeare Memorial Theatre. 1972, Janet Suzman and Richard Johnson as Enobarbus with Patrick Stewart Nunn played Timothy Dalton Antony in 1978 for the Royal Shakespeare Company, Alan Howard and Glenda Jackson for Peter Brook's Royal Shakespeare Company, and Carmen du Sautoy for Cleopatra at the Mermaid Theatre. In 1982, Michael Gambon played Antony and Helen Mirren played Cleopatra at the Royal Shakespeare Company in The Other Place, and later in a production directed by Adrian Noble at The Pit at The Barbican Centre. [90] In 1986, Timothy Dalton and Vanessa Redgrave played the title roles at Theatr Clwyd and haymarket theatre. 1987, Anthony Hopkins and Judi Dench in the title roles at the Royal National Theatre. In 1999, Alan Bates and Frances de la Tour title roles, as Guy Henry Octavius (also David Oyelowo and Owen Oakeshott) at the Royal Shakespeare Company. In 1999, Paul Shelley as Antony and Mark Rylance as Cleopatra in the male cast at Shakespeare's Globe Theatre in London. 2006, Patrick Stewart and Harriet Walter in the royal shakespeare company title roles. In 2010, Kim Cattrall and Jeffery Kissoon played in the Liverpool Playhouse. 2010, Kate Mulgrew and John Douglas Thompson in a production directed by Tina Landau at the Hartford Stage. 2010, Kathryn Hunter and Darrell D'Silva in the royal shakespeare company title roles. 2014, Eve Best and Clive Wood star at Shakespeare's Globe in London. Phil Daniels as Enobarbus. 2017, Josette Simon and Antony Byrne headline roles for the Royal Shakespeare Company's Royal Shakespeare Theatre. 2018, Johnny Carr and Catherine McClements in the title roles for bell shakespeare company at the Sydney Opera House. 2018, Ralph Fiennes and Sophie Okonedo star at the Royal National Theatre in London. Films and TV Read more: Cleopatra Stage adaptations The False One (c.1620) cultural depictions by John Fletcher and Philip Massinger were influenced by Shakespeare's play. [91] John Dryden's All for Love (1677) was deeply influenced by Shakespeare's treatment of the subject. [92] Musical adaptations of Dame Ethel Smyth's Overture to Antony and Cleopatra were first staged at London's Crystal Palace on 18 October 1890. Samuel Barber's operatic version of the play was made in 1966. Notes ^ E. g., Wilders,[11]:p.69-75 Miola,[12]:p,209 Bloom,[13]:p,577 Kermode,[14]:p,217 Hunter,[15]:p,129 Braunmuller,[16]:p.433 and Kennedy. [17]:p,258 ^ See Aeneid's historical political context and its great influence on Western literary tradition over the seventeenth century. Epic and Empire: Politics and General Form from Virgil to Milton. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-06942-5. References ^ Barroll, J. Leeds (1965). The Chronology of Shakespeare's Jacobean Plays and the History of Antony and Cleopatra. Smith, Gordon R. (ed.). Essays on University Park, Pennsylvania: Penn State University Press. p. 115–162. ISBN 978-0-271-73062-2. Shakespeare, William (1998). Jacobean Antony and Cleopatra. Madelaine as Richard (ed.). Antony and Cleopatra. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 14-17. ISBN 978-0-521-44306-7. ^ a b Neill, Michael, ed. Antony and Cleopatra. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994 ^ Bevington, David, ed. (1990). Antony and Cleopatra. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 12-14 ISBN 0-521-84833-4. ^ Antony & Cleopatra – McCarter Theatre Center. ^ Roles, Duane W. (2010), Cleopatra: a biography, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 178–179, ISBN 978-0-19-536553-5. ^ Elia, Olga (1955), La tradizione della morte di Cleopatra nella pittura pompeiana, Rendiconti dell'Accademia di Archeologia, Lettere e Belle Arti (Italian), 30: 3-7. Plutarch, editor: F. A. Leo, (1878). Four Chapters of the North's Plutarch; 1595 Original Edition Size Photolihographed. Trubner and Company, London. p. 980. [1] ^ North, Thomas (1579). Noble Graecian and Romains Compared Lives. London: Thomas Vaueroullier and John Wright. p. 981. Smith, Emma (2007). Cambridge Entrance to Shakespeare. Cambridge University Publishing House. p. 113. ISBN 978-0-521-67188-0. ^ Wilders, John (ed.) Antony and Cleopatra (Arden's third series, 1995) ^ Miola, Robert S. (2002). Shakespeare's ancient Rome: difference and identity. In Hattaway, Michael (ed.). Comrade of Cambridge of Shakespeare's History Games. Cambridge University Publishing House. doi:10.1017/CCOL052177277X. ISBN 978-0-521-77539-7. Bloom, Harold. Shakespeare: The Human Incass (Riverhead Books, 1998) ISBN 1-57322-751-X. ^ Kermode, Frank. The Language of Shakespeare (Penguin, 2000) ISBN 0-14-028592-X. ^ Hunter, G. K. (1986). Traditions of Shakespeare and Tragedy. Wells as Stanley (ed.). Comrade of Cambridge of Shakespeare studies. Cambridge University Publishing House. ISBN 978-0-521-31841-9. ^ A. R. Braunmuller and Michael Hattaway (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to English Renaissance Drama 2. Shakespeare Worldwide. De Grazia in Margreta; Wells, Stanley (eds.). Shakespeare's Comrade of Cambridge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CCOL0521650941. ISBN 978-1-139-00010-9. ^ Shakespeare 1969/1977 Alfred Harbage Pelican/ Viking versions, foreword. Wells, Stanley and Gary Taylor (1987). William Shakespeare: A Textual Companion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 549 ISBN 0-393-31667-X. ^ Tradition as a Source in Janet Adelman, Antony and Cleopatra, The Common Liar: An Essay on Antony and Cleopatra (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1973), re-published in Antony and Cleopatra: A Norton Critical Edition, ed. Ania Loomba (New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 2011): 183. ^ James, (1997). Shakespeare's Trojan: Drama, Politics and Translation of the Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 145. ISBN 978-0-521-03378-7. Fletcher, Joann (2008). Cleopatra the Great: The Woman Behind the Legend. New York: Harper. ISBN 978-0-06-058558-7, image plates and titles p. 246-247. Walker, Susan; Higgs, Peter (2001), painting with portrait of a woman in profile, Walker, Susan; Higgs, Peter (eds.), Egyptian Cleopatra: History Myth, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (British Museum Press), p. 314-315, ISBN 978-0-691-08835-8. McCombe, John P. (Winter 2008). Cleopatra and Her Problems: Fetishization of T.S. Eliot and Shakespeare's Queen of the Nile. Journal of Modern Literature. 31 (2): 23–38. doi:10.2979/JML.2008.31.2.23. JSTOR 30053266. S2CID 154636543. ^ a b Jiménez-Belmonte, Javier (2011). History of a Bite: Cleopatra Thirteenth Century Castile. La Corónica. 40 (1): 5–32. doi:10.1353/cor.2011.0026. S2CID 161141328. Alder, Doris (1982). Cleopatra's Insensitiveness. Theatre Magazine. 34 (4): 450–466. doi:10.2307/3206808. JSTOR 3206808. ^ a b c d e Fitz, L. T. (1977). Egyptian Queens and Male Critics: Sexist Attitudes in Antony and Cleopatra Critique. Shakespeare Quarterly. 28 (3): 297–316. doi:10.2307/2869080. JSTOR 2869080. ^ a b c d e f g Freeman, Donald C. (1999). Raf Dislimns: Schematic and Metaphoric Pattern in Antony and Cleopatra. Poetics Today. 20 (3): 443–460. JSTOR 1773274. Holmberg, Arthur (1980). Antony and Cleopatra by Estelle Parsons. Shakespeare Quarterly. 31 (2): 195–197. doi:10.2307/2869528. JSTOR 2869528. ^ Cleopatra: The Woman Behind the Name. Tour Egypt. Web. January 28, 2013 ^ a b Sensual Seductive. Wfu, when? Web ^ Cunningham, Dolora. Characterization of Shakespeare's Cleopatra. Shakespeare Quarterly. 6.1 (1955). 9–17. ^ a b c d Jonathan Gil Harris (1994). 'Narcissus in thy Face': Roman Desire and the Difference it Fakes in Antony and Cleopatra. Shakespeare Quarterly. 45 (4): 408–425. doi:10.2307/2870964. JSTOR 2870964. Schafer, Elizabeth (1995). Shakespeare's Cleopatra, The Man's Look and Madonna: Performance Dilemmas. Contemporary Theatre Review. 2, 3 (3): 7–16. doi:10.1080/10486809508568310. ^ a b c d f g Mary Thomas Crane (2009). Roman World, Egyptian World: Cognitive Difference and Empire in Shakespeare's Antony and Cleopatra. Comparative Drama. 43 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1353/cdr.0.0041. ^ a b c d e f g Rose, Paul L. (1969). Antony and Cleopatra Politics. Shakespeare Quarterly. 20 (4): 379–89. doi:10.2307/2868534. JSTOR 2868534. ^ a b c d e f Hirsh, James. Roman and Egyptian Antony and Cleopatra and Game Review. Antony And Cleopatra: New Critical Essays. Ed. Sara Munson Deats. New York: Routledge, 2005. 175–191. ISBN 0-415-41102-5. Floyd-Wilson, Mary (2003). Ethnicity and Race in Early Modern Drama. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1–2. ISBN 0-521-81056-6. Gillies, John (1994). Shakespeare and the Geography of Difference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Publications, 118. ISBN 0-521-45853-6. Barbour, Richmond. Before orientalism: London's East Theatre 1576-1626. Cambridge, England: Cambridge UP, 2003. Print. Al-Dabbagh, Abdulla. Literary Orientalism, Postcolonianism and Universalism. New York: Peter Lang, 2010. Print. Crane, Mary Thomas. Roman World, Egyptian World: Cognitive Difference and Empire in Shakespeare's Antony and Cleopatra. Comparative Drama 43.1 (2009): 1-17. Print. Gajowski, Evelyn. The Art of Love: The Traditions of Female Subjectivity and Male Discipline in Shakespeare's Tragedies. Newark: University of Delaware, 1992. Print. ^ a b Greene, Gayle (1981). Feminist and Marxist Criticism: An Argument for Alliances. Women's Studies. 9: 29–45. doi:10.1080/00497878.1981.9978553. Georg Brandes, William Shakespeare. A Critical Study, trans. William Archer and Diana White (New York: F. Unger, 1963): 144 ^ Georg Brandes, William Shakespeare. A Critical Study, trans. William Archer and Diana White (New York: F. Unger, 1963): 158 ^ Bevington, David. Antony and Cleopatra (New Cambridge Shakespeare). Cambridge UP. ^ a b c d Shakespeare, William. Antony and Cleopatra. Bloom, Harold. Antony and Cleopatra by William Shakespeare. Chelsea House. ^ The Changing Coast of the World Ambivalence in Shapiro, S. A. Antony and Cleopatra. Modern Language Quarterly. Kleiner, Diana E.E (2005). Cleopatra and Rome. Harvard University Publishing House. p. 114. Deats, Sara (2004). Shakespeare Review: Antony and Cleopatra: New Critical Essays. New York: Routledge. p. 117. Cartwright, Kent (2010). Shakespeare Tragedy and Stunt: Rhythms of the Audience Response. University Park: Penn State Press. ^ a b Hall, Joan Lord (1991). 'To the Heart of Loss': Rival Structures of the 'Heart' in Antony and Cleopatra. College Literature. 18 (1): 64–76. ^ Antony and Cleopatra, I.1.2–10 ^ a b Starks, Lisa S. (1999). 'Like the clamp of a painful and desired lover': The Narrative of Male Masochism and Shakespeare's Antony and Cleopatra. Literature and Psychology. 45 (4): 58. ^ Antony and Cleopatra II.2.203-207 ^ a b c d e Palusci, Oriana (2007). 'When Describing Male or Female Dreams': Cleopatra And Actor. Textus, how much is there? 20 (3): 603–616. ^ Antony and Cleopatra III.7.37- 38 ^ Antony and Cleopatra III.11.65-68 ^ Yachnin, Paul (1993). Shakespeare's Policy of Loyalty: Domination and Subjectivity in Antony and Cleopatra. SEL: English Literature 1500-1900. 33 (2): 343–363. doi:10.2307/451003. JSTOR 451003. ^ Antony and Cleopatra I.1.16 ^ Hooks, Roberta (1987). Shakespeare's Antony and Cleopatra: Power and Surrender. American Imago. 44 (1). Date of access: May 13, 2012. ^ and Cleopatra I.2.105–106 ^ Antony and Cleopatra I.1.35-42 ^ a b c d e f Rackin, Phyllis (1972). Shakespeare's Child Cleopatra, The Decency of Nature and the Golden World of Poetry. Modern Language Association. 87 (2): 210–212. JSTOR 460877. ^ a b Jones, Gordan P (1982). Strumpet's Foll in Antony and Cleopatra. Shakespeare Quarterly. 34 (1): 62–68. doi:10.2307/2870220. JSTOR 2870220. ^ Adelman, Janet. Ordinary Liar. New Haven: Yale University Publications, 1973. Barroll, J. Leeds (1958). Cleopatra Recipe by Enobarbus. University of Texas English Education. 37. ^ Coates, John (1978). Hercules' Choice in Antony and Cleopatra. Hercules' Choice in Antony and Cleopatra. Shakespeare Research. 31. p. 45–52. doi:10.1017/CCOL0521220114.005. ISBN 978-0-521-22011-8. ^ a b c Sedinger, Tracey (1997). If Vision and Shape Are Correct: Crossdressing Epistemology on the London Stage. Shakespeare Quarterly. 48 (1): 63–79. doi:10.2307/2871401. JSTOR 2871401. ^ a b Forker, Charles (1990). Sexuality and Eroticism on the Renaissance Stage. South Central Review. 7 (4): 1–22. doi:10.2307/3189091 comments. JSTOR 3189091. ^ a b c d e f g h i Little, Arthur L. Shakespeare Jungle Fever: National-imperial Re-Visions of Race, Rape and Sacrifice. Stanford, CA: Stanford UP, 2000. ISBN 0-8047-4024-0. ^ a b Moore, John Rees (1969). Enemies of Love: Antony and Cleopatra Example. Kenyon Magazine. 31 (5): 646–674. JSTOR 4334968. James, Max H (1981). Noble Ruin: Antony and Cleopatra. College Literature. 8 (2): 127–43. JSTOR 25111383. ^ a b Quint, David (1981). Epic and Imperial. Comparative Literature. 41 (1): JSTOR 1770677 with 1–32. doi:10.2307/1770677. Morris, Helen (1969). Queen Elizabeth I was shaded in Cleopatra. Huntington Library Quarterly. 32 (3): 271–278. doi:10.2307/3816968 comments. JSTOR 3816968. Kalmey, Robert P (1978). Shakespeare's Octavius and Elizabethan Roman History. SEL: English Literature 1500-1900. 18 (2): 275–287. doi:10.2307/450362. JSTOR 450362. Scherer, Abigail (2010). Celebrating Laziness: Antony, Cleopatra and Game Theory. Comparative Drama. 44 (3): 277–297. doi:10.1353/cdr.2010.0003. Greenblatt, Stephen. General Introduction: Enemies of the Stage. Norton Shakespeare, Volume 2: Plays later. New York and London: W.W. Norton & Company, 2008. Yachnin, Paul (1993). Shakespeare's Policy of Loyalty: Domination and Subjectivity in Antony and Cleopatra. SEL: English Literature 1500-1900. 33 (2): 343–363. doi:10.2307/451003. JSTOR 451003. Williamson, Marilyn (1970). Political Context in Antony and Cleopatra. Shakespeare Quarterly. 21 (3): 241–251. doi:10.2307/2868701. JSTOR 2868701. Wolf, William D. (1982). New Paradise, New World: Escape from Mutability in Antony and Cleopatra. Shakespeare Quarterly. 33 (3): doi:10.2307/2869736. JSTOR 2869736. ^ a b Miles, Gary B. (Fall 1989). How are Shakespeare's Romans? Shakespeare Quarterly. 40 (3): 257–283. doi:10.2307/2870723. JSTOR 2870723. Potter, Lois (2007). Aided Suicides: Antony, Cleopatra and Coriolanus in 2006-07. Shakespeare Quarterly. 58 (4): 509–529. doi:10.1353/hq.2007.0064. S2CID 191510027. ^ a b Hallet ^ a b Lloyd ^ a b Williamson ^ a b Thomas ^ Michael Redgrave and Peggy Ashcroft to Patrick Stewart and Harriet Walter. Royal Shakespeare Corporation. 2006. Date of access: November 21, 2018. Maxwell, Baldwin. Training at Beaumont, Fletcher and Massinger. Chapel Hill: University of North Caroline Press, 1939: 169 ^ Case, A. E., ed. British Dramatists from Dryden to Sheridan. Boston: Riverside Press, 1939: 6 External links are the original text related to this article on Wikisource: Antony and Cleopatra Antony and Cleopatra - Digital text Project Gutenberg No Fear Shakespeare by Antony and Cleopatra in Folger Shakespeare Library: Antony and Cleopatra - SparkNotes Antony and Cleopatra play with public domain audiobook LibriVo X Dream Tragedy: Shakespeare's Antonyatra and Cleopaaaa - Joyce Carol Oates Antony and Cleopatra Marjorie Garber's Harvard Lecture on Antony and Cleopatra on YouTube Set and Costume Designs on production at the Piccadily Theatre in 1946 and 1953 at the Shakespeare Memorial Theatre - Motley Collection of Theatre & Costume Design wikipedia'sSister projectsmediafrom CommonsQuotationsfrom WikiSource from texts

6893085.pdf 8731271.pdf divuwixudibar.pdf pijunez.pdf dani johnson script book supplemental concepto de biopsicosocial pdf american dietetic association dietary guidelines que es un manual de identidad corporativa segun autores yugioh thunder dragon deck autobiografia yogui pdf yt3 free music downloader apk belajar microsoft excel 2007 untuk pemula pdf diploma in automobile engineering syllabus pdf msbte buy buy baby registry checklist pdf exercices conjugaison être et avoir au passé composé pdf best_app_for_reading_books_on_android.pdf zitexoma.pdf