Third Un World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction Third Un World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction on Disaster Risk Conference World Third Un Proceedings

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Third Un World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction Third Un World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction on Disaster Risk Conference World Third Un Proceedings THIRD UN WORLD CONFERENCE ON DISASTER RISK REDUCTION ON DISASTER RISK CONFERENCE WORLD THIRD UN PROCEEDINGS THIRD UN WORLD CONFERENCE ON DISASTER RISK REDUCTION PROCEEDINGS 14-18 March 2015 / Sendai - Japan unisdr.org PROCEEDINGS THIRD UN WORLD CONFERENCE ON DISASTER RISK REDUCTION 14-18 March 2015 / Sendai - Japan “The Sendai conference outcome represents the first step of our journey to a new future”. Ban Ki-moon, Secretary-General of the United Nations Acknowledgments The United Nations Office For Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR) expresses its deep appreciation to donors that have provided financial support for the Third UN World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction: Australia, Colombia, Finland, Germany, Japan, Switzerland, the United States of America, and the European Union; including private sponsors such as AECOM, AXA Group, Kokusai Kogyo, the Nippon Foundation and the UPS Foundation. Our thanks also go to donors who contribute un- earmarked funding to UNISDR: Argentina, China, Denmark, Finland, Hungary, Ireland, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway and Sweden; a portion of their contribution was used to support the Third UN World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction. UNISDR expresses its deep gratitude to the large number of organizations, individuals and volunteers who contributed to the Conference. Appreciation is also reserved for Ecuador, Egypt, Fiji, Italy, Kazakhstan, Nigeria, Spain, Thailand who hosted preparatory regional events. The support of Japan and the city of Sendai was essential in organising the Third UN World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents Sendai Framework for 01 Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030 12 02 Opening Ceremony 40 03 Official Statements 48 04 Ministerial Roundtables 50 High Level Multi-stakeholder 05 Partnership Dialogues 56 06 Working Sessions 62 07 Special Meetings & Ceremonies 88 08 Study Tours & Excursions 94 09 Exhibitions & Forums 96 10 Side Events 102 11 Exhibition Booths 120 12 Ignite Stage Presentations 136 13 Stakeholder Affirmations 144 14 List of Participants 160 5 Key Figures 25 Heads of State, Heads of Government & Vice Presidents 49 Intergovernmental Organizations 188 NGOs 200 Media 23 % Western European & Others Group 150 Official Sessions 8 % Latin American 340 and Caribbean Group Side Events 65 000 Tweets 185 6 593 50 000 States Accredited Visitors to the Participants Public Forum Greening Many efforts were made by the organizers and the participants to ensure a green conference. More than 2500 of them used the electronic conference box where 3 500 documents were available for electronic distribution. As a result, around ten million pages-worth were not printed, the equivalent of 124 trees. Many participants also used the electric bycicles provided by Sendai City for their transportation among the venues and several hundred travelers to Sendai voluntary carbon offset their flights. 6 Origin of Participants 3 % Eastern European Group 52 % Asia Pacific Group 14 % African Group Accessibility The Third UN World Conference on Disaster Risk • The on-site electronic document portal for the Reduction focused on accessibility which was Preparatory Committees and the Conference was recognized and appreciated by participants. Several audited for accessibility and modified according to initiatives were developed to ensure the inclusion of recommendations. the participants living with disabilities. • Support for travel costs was offered for participants • English real-time captioning was provided in living with disabilities and their respective personal plenary sessions and English and Japanese real- assistants for the Preparatory Committees and the time captioning in a number of other meetings. Conference. Accessible transport from Sendai City In addition, twenty tablets were provided to was provided on request. participants living with disabilities to ensure an • Promotion of issues related to disability and easier access to captioning. inclusion was ensured and a specific accessibility • International Sign Language (ISL) as well as guide was developed and distributed at the venue Japanese Sign Language (JSL) were provided on of the Conference. an on-demand basis and the Government of Japan These initiatives were made possible with the support provided mid-room and back-of-room display of the Nippon Foundation. screens to allow participants living with disabilities to view ongoing sessions. 7 8 FOREWORD Margareta Wahlström United Nations Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Disaster Risk Reduction Foreword The Third United Nations World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction was a seminal event in the calendar of the post-2015 development agenda, a fact which was underlined by the presence of their Majesties the Emperor and Empress of Japan at the opening ceremony, alongside representatives from 185 States including over 25 Heads of State, Vice Presidents, and Heads of Government. This World Conference took place amidst growing concern about the sustainability of development efforts in the context of increasing vulnerability and exposure to disaster events which are now costing the global economy between US$250 billion to US$300 billion annually. The human consequences of this were powerfully brought home by the President of the Republic of Vanuatu, H.E. Mr. Baldwin Lonsdale, whose address to the Conference coincided with one of the most powerful storms ever to hit a Small Island Developing State, Category 5 Cyclone Pam, which claimed several lives and laid waste to 90% of the island’s agriculture. The President of Kiribati, H.E. Mr. Anote Tong, said that if his country had taken a direct hit from Cyclone Pam, it could have faced extinction. Disaster risk reduction is not just about survival in the face of calamities such as Cyclone Pam or a strong earthquake such as the one which has devastated Nepal just over four weeks after the close of the Conference, it is about building resilience in the fullest sense of the term. This means developing the innate coping capacities of communities to manage the risks in their environment in a way that keeps them safe from harm and improves their quality of life. This is the driving force behind the outcome of the World Conference. It has resulted in a 15-year plan of action with seven global targets and four priorities for action: the “Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030”. The Sendai Framework can have a revolutionary impact on sustainable development because of its far-reaching inclusive nature. The Sendai Framework builds on the solid achievements of the last decade of implementing the “Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015: Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters” and zooms in on the need to switch emphasis from disaster management to managing the risks. The outcome document also makes clear that far greater attention must be paid to social and health-related issues in the implementation. The States backing this agreement recognise that progress depends on a whole-of-society approach which must be inclusive of key stakeholder groups including women, persons living with disability, youth and children, older persons, indigenous people, the private sector and civil society in all its diversity. All the while emphasising that States have primary responsibility for reducing disaster risk. At the opening of the Conference, the UN Secretary-General stated that “Sustainability starts in Sendai”. 2015 is the year of opportunity to make concrete progress on a universal vision and plan for sustainability. The Sendai Framework is a start. It will be followed later in 2015 by agreements on climate change and a set of sustainable development goals which will be critical to efforts to reduce disaster risk and to implementation of the Sendai Framework. A determined and sustained momentum will be required to achieve the targets set for 2030. 9 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 WORKING SESSIONS 11 PROCEEDINGS - Third UN World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 01 2015-2030 Sendai Declaration 12 SENDAI FRAMEWORK FOR DISASTER RISK REDUCTION 2015-2030 Sendai Declaration 1 We, the Heads of State and Government, ministers and delegates participating in the Third United Nations World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction, have gathered from 14 to 18 March 2015 in Sendai City of Miyagi Prefecture in Japan, which has demonstrated a vibrant recovery from the Great East Japan Earthquake in March 2011. Recognizing the increasing impact of disasters and their complexity in many parts of the world, we declare our determination to enhance our efforts to strengthen disaster risk reduction to reduce disaster losses of lives and assets from disasters worldwide. 2 We value the important role played by the Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015: Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters during the past ten years. Having completed the assessment and review of and considered the experience gained under its implementation, we hereby adopt the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030. We are strongly committed to the implementation of the new framework as the guide to enhance our efforts for the future. 3 We call all stakeholders to action, aware that the realization of the new framework depends on our unceasing and tireless collective efforts to make the world safer from the risk of disasters in the decades to come for the benefit of the present and future generations. 4 We thank the people and the Government of Japan as well as the City of Sendai for hosting the Third United Nation World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction and extend our appreciation to Japan for its commitment to advancing disaster risk reduction in the global development agenda. 13 PROCEEDINGS - Third UN World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030 I. Preamble 15 II. Expected outcome and goaL 18 III. Guiding principles 19 IV. Priorities for action 20 V. Priority1: Understanding disaster risk 20 VI. Priority 2: Strengthening disaster risk governance to manage disaster risk 23 VII. Priority3: Investing in disaster risk reduction for resilience 24 VIII.
Recommended publications
  • 1 NEWS Colmar Brunton Poll 22 – 26 May 2021
    1 NEWS Colmar Brunton Poll 22 – 26 May 2021 Attention: Television New Zealand Contact: (04) 913-3000 Release date: 27 May 2021 Level One 46 Sale Street, Auckland CBD PO Box 33690 Takapuna Auckland 0740 Ph: (09) 919-9200 Level 9, Legal House 101 Lambton Quay PO Box 3622, Wellington 6011 Ph: (04) 913-3000 www.colmarbrunton.co.nz Contents Contents .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Methodology summary ................................................................................................................................... 2 Summary of results .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Key political events ................................................................ .......................................................................... 4 Question order and wording ............................................................................................................................ 5 Party vote ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 Preferred Prime Minister ................................................................................................................................. 8 Public Sector wage freeze .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Transcript of Prime Minister John Key's Speech to the Canterbury Employers' Chamber of Commerce Function, 2Nd July 2015. Good
    A transcript of Prime Minister John Key's speech to the Canterbury Employers' Chamber of Commerce function, 2nd July 2015. Good afternoon. Thank you Peter for that warm welcome and for the Chamber's hosting of this event. It's good to see so many of you here today. Can I start by acknowledging Mayor Lianne Dalziel and other local body representatives from around the region. Just as central government has to make some tough decisions and trade-offs, so too do councils as we work together to rebuild this city. Together, we're making significant progress. Although, of course, there is still much to do. I'd also like to acknowledge my ministerial colleagues Gerry Brownlee, Amy Adams and Nicky Wagner. Gerry has provided strong leadership in overseeing what continues to be one of New Zealand's largest and most complex undertakings. Most recently he has been turning his mind to where we go following the expiry of the special earthquake recovery laws next April. I'll have some more to say about that in a few minutes. As we've said before, the estimated cost of the rebuild is around $40 billion. As a proportion of the economy, this makes it one of the most expensive natural disasters in the developed world. So thanks to all of you here who have worked so hard since the first earthquake in September 2010. I want to start today by talking about the economy and the significant contribution Canterbury makes to it. A strong and growing economy allows us to provide essential public services like hospitals and schools, and support our most vulnerable families.
    [Show full text]
  • Unsettling Recovery: Natural Disaster Response and the Politics of Contemporary Settler Colonialism
    UNSETTLING RECOVERY: NATURAL DISASTER RESPONSE AND THE POLITICS OF CONTEMPORARY SETTLER COLONIALISM A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY STEVEN ANDREW KENSINGER IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DR. DAVID LIPSET, ADVISER JULY 2019 Steven Andrew Kensinger, 2019 © Acknowledgements The fieldwork on which this dissertation is based was funded by a Doctoral Dissertation Fieldwork Grant No. 8955 awarded by the Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research. I also want to thank Dr. Robert Berdahl and the Berdahl family for endowing the Daphne Berdahl Memorial Fellowship which provided funds for two preliminary fieldtrips to New Zealand in preparation for the longer fieldwork period. I also received funding while in the field from the University of Minnesota Graduate School through a Thesis Research Travel Grant. I want to thank my advisor, Dr. David Lipset, and the members of my dissertation committee, Dr. Hoon Song, Dr. David Valentine, and Dr. Margaret Werry for their help and guidance in preparing the dissertation. In the Department of Anthropology at the University of Minnesota, Dr. William Beeman, Dr. Karen Ho, and Dr. Karen-Sue Taussig offered personal and professional support. I am grateful to Dr. Kieran McNulty for offering me a much-needed funding opportunity in the final stages of dissertation writing. A special thanks to my colleagues Dr. Meryl Puetz-Lauer and Dr. Timothy Gitzen for their support and encouragement. Dr. Carol Lauer graciously offered to read and comment on several of the chapters. My fellow graduate students and writing-accountability partners Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 NEWS Colmar Brunton Poll 9 – 13 March 2021
    1 NEWS Colmar Brunton Poll 9 – 13 March 2021 Attention: Television New Zealand Contact: (04) 913-3000 Release date: 15 March 2021 Level One 46 Sale Street, Auckland CBD PO Box 33690 Takapuna Auckland 0740 Ph: (09) 919-9200 Level 9, Legal House 101 Lambton Quay PO Box 3622, Wellington 6011 Ph: (04) 913-3000 www.colmarbrunton.co.nz Contents Contents .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Methodology summary ................................................................................................................................... 2 Summary of results .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Key political events ................................................................ .......................................................................... 4 Question order and wording ............................................................................................................................ 5 Party vote ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 Preferred Prime Minister ................................................................................................................................. 8 Economic outlook .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Party Spokesperson Allocations July 2020
    National Party Spokesperson Allocations July 2020 Spokesperson for Hon Judith Collins National Security Leader Hon Gerry Brownlee NZSIS Deputy Leader GCSB Covid-19 Border Response Hon Paul Goldsmith Finance Earthquake Commission Hon Simon Bridges Foreign Affairs Justice Dr Shane Reti Health Hon Todd McClay Economic Development Tourism Chris Bishop Infrastructure Transport Shadow Leader of the House Todd Muller Trade Hon Louise Upston Social Development Social Investment Hon Scott Simpson Environment Climate Change Planning (RMA reform) Hon David Bennett Agriculture Hon Michael Woodhouse Regional Economic Development Pike River re-entry Deputy Shadow Leader of the House Nicola Willis Education Early Childhood Education Hon Jacqui Dean Housing and Urban Development Conservation Hon Mark Mitchell Defence & Disarmament Sport & Recreation Melissa Lee Broadcasting Communications and Digital Media Data and Cyber-security Andrew Bayly Revenue Commerce State-Owned Enterprises Associate Finance Small Business and Manufacturing Hon. Dr Nick Smith State Services Electoral Law Reform Drug Reform Hon Alfred Ngaro Pacific Peoples Community and Voluntary Children and Disability Issues Barbara Kuriger Senior Whip Food Safety Rural Communities Women Harete Hipango Shadow Attorney-General Crown-Maori Relations and Treaty Negotiations Māori Tourism Jonathan Young Energy & Resources Arts Culture and Heritage Hon Tim MacIndoe ACC Skills and Employment Seniors Civil Defence Kanwaljit Singh Bakshi Ethnic Communities Associate Justice Matt Doocey Junior Whip Mental
    [Show full text]
  • Czech Republic Parliamentary Delegation Visit
    Czech Republic Parliamentary Delegation visit Wellington November 2019 Report on Czech Republic Parliamentary Delegation visit 19-21 November 2019 Background The visit by the Czech Republic’s Deputy Speaker and Foreign Affairs Committee was to enable the delegation to meet with New Zealand parliamentarians and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade to discuss a range of topics including migration and trade. It was also to give the delegation a deeper context into New Zealand in advance of the European Union – New Zealand Free Trade Agreement while discussing further cooperation and growth in bilateral relations. Meetings within Parliament The New Zealand Speaker, Rt Hon Trevor Mallard, hosted a dinner and held an official meeting with the Czech delegation. The dinner was also attended by New Zealand members of Parliament: - Simon O’Connor, Chairperson Foreign Affairs and Defence and Trade Committee; - - Kieran McAnulty, member Business and Primary Production select committees, Junior Whip, Labour Party; - Willow-Jean Prime, Parliamentary Private Secretary for local government and member of the Governance and Administration select committee; and - Dr Duncan Webb, Chairperson, Environment select committee and member Finance and Expenditure, and Regulations Review, select committees. This enabled the delegation to have wide discussions of interest on parliamentary process and bilateral matters. The delegation had a luncheon with New Zealand members of Parliament which was hosted by Co-Chair of the New Zealand-Europe Parliamentary Friendship group Marja Lubeck MP. The luncheon included Assistant Speaker Adrian Rurawhe MP and former Speaker, Rt Hon David Carter MP. Left: NZ MPs with the delegation, left to right: Adrian Rurawhe, Assistant Speaker; Rt Hon David Carter, Hon Paul Goldsmith, Marja Lubeck, Jamie Strange, Hon David Bennett, Chair, Primary Production Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 an Open Letter to the Honourable Gerry Brownlee, Minister for The
    An open letter to the Honourable Gerry Brownlee, Minister for the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery. Christchurch, 22 November 2013. Dear Minister This is a request for information under the Official Information Act. Please also consider this letter as submission to the Land Use Recovery Plan. Firstly I would like to thank you for co-hosting the Canterbury Earthquake Forum held on 4 November 2013. I firmly believe that events like these should to be held on a regular basis. In addition, residents need to see that issues have been clearly identified, and action plans are in place. They also should receive regular feedback on how such issues are being resolved. While many different forums and meetings have been held over the last three years, up to now there has been a lamentable lack of engagement with residents. As discussed during and after the Forum, I am especially concerned about the hazard mapping of the earthquake fault that that caused the February 2011 earthquake, the most destructive and deadly in the South Island's history. It has now been named the Port Hills Fault. Ecan has published the following finding: The movement on the Port Hills Fault during the February 2011 earthquake stopped somewhere around 1-2 km below the ground surface - it didn't break the ground surface. Because of this we are not commissioning a report like the Greendale Fault report to advise on managing fault rupture hazard at the ground surface. When one side of a fault rises and the other subsides, the fault breaks the crust of the earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Report: Solid Energy's Proposal for Natural Resources Ltd
    DEPARTMENT 1-''N!wrnom: of the PRIME MINISTER .... ,,,., •J Economic and CABINET CROWN 0\\·0.:ERSHIP Development MONITORING UN IT Mallo / • Ohonga --------<-- Joint Report: Solid Energy's Proposal for Natural Resources Ltd I Date: 17 May 2010 I Report No: I T201 0/784 Action Sought Action Sought Deadline Prime Minister Read before meeting on 10 May 2010 10May2010 (Hon John Key) Minister of Finance Read before meeting on 10 May 2010 10May2010 (Hon Bill English) Minister for Economic Development Read before meeting on 10 May 2010 10May2010 (Hon Gerry Brownlee) Minister for State Owned Enterprises Read before meeting on 10 May 2010 10May2010 (Hon Simon Power) Associate Minister of Finance Note contents of report None (Hon Steven Joyce) Contact for Telephone Discussion (if required) Name Position Telephone 1st Contact John Crawford General Manager, Crown [Withheld s9(2)(a)] ,/ Ownership and State Sector Performance I Chris White Advisor, Policy Advisory Group, [Withheld s9(2)(a)] DPMC I Peter Crabtree Director, Energy and [Withheld s9(2)(a)] Communications Branch, MED I Minister of Finance's Office Actions (if required) None. 7 May 2010 Joint Report: Solid Energy's Proposal for Natural Resources Ltd Executive Summary Solid Energy have pitched an audacious (their language) vision for a majority state owned, diversified, natural resources company (Natural Resources Limited or NRL). They propose that the company should enjoy preferential rights of access to NZ’s hydrocarbon and mineral resources across all areas of its business, requiring significant changes to regulatory regimes. NRL would be built on top of Solid’s existing business and would retain all earnings to fund capex.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 Extract
    EXTRACT FROM DIRTY POLITICS BY NICKY HAGER. PUBLISHED IN 2014 BY CRAIG POTTON PUBLISHING. CHAPTER 4 THE CRUSHER AND THE ATTACK DOG The attack bloggers’ point of contact in the National government, year after year, remained John Key’s office. But Cameron Slater had another close friend and ally in the government, Cabinet minister Judith Collins. They had much in common. One cultivated the iron woman persona of Crusher Collins, future prime minister, the other the reckless bully-boy persona of Whale Oil, crusading outsider. They were drawn together by right-wing politics and a shared attraction to aggressive and often petty attack politics. Slater was a devoted supporter of Collins, using his blog to promote her and to attack her critics. Collins, in return, fed a continuous supply of material to Slater: public press releases, political gossip, tip-offs and serious leaks. She boast- ed for him in 2013 that ‘you might not like it but Whaleoil is better informed and better read than any other news outlet or social media’.1 They talked often by phone, and in the evenings and weekends they chatted via Facebook. In work hours Collins e-mailed him directly from her sixth-floor Beehive office. Often their exchanges were about small events of the day. The following are typical of Collins’s messages: ‘You should whack these guys hard, they are truly pathetic’;2 ‘Cam, FYI. Another own goal for plughead’, her name for Labour MP Clayton Cosgrove;3 could he edit her Wikipedia page and replace an unflattering photo;4 and, forwarding a document, ‘I think I seri- ously annoyed certain people over it.
    [Show full text]
  • Present Scenario of South-East Asian Countries’ Newspapers to Cater Local Scientific Issues Through the Regional Languages: an Epistemological Case Study
    International Journal of Research in Advance Engineering, (IJRAE) Vol. 3, Issue 1, Jan-Feb-2017, Available at: www.knowledgecuddle.com/index.php/IJRAE Present Scenario of South-East Asian Countries’ Newspapers to Cater Local Scientific Issues through the Regional Languages: An Epistemological Case Study Prof. (Dr.) Tapati Basu1, Ratul Datta (Ph.D. Research Scholar)2 12Department of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Calcutta, 1Senate House, 87/1, College Street, Kolkata-700 073, 2Govt Gazetted Officer, Information & Cultural Affairs Department, Govt of West Bengal, Writers’ Buildings, W.B., Kolkata-700 001, India [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: This paper contains the background of the need of the study of growing interest in local scientific issues in regional languages newspapers. Mass communication of scientific issues at local level through regional newspapers is more or less same in the South-east Asian countries, particularly in India, Thailand, Afghanistan and Pakistan. For years, mass communication through regional newspapers had been believed the most important engine for social changes, and hence this study becomes very important. Obviously the questions arise, what about the regional and local newspapers which are published regionally from those countries of South-east Asia? Is there sufficient translator in the media houses who have thorough knowledge of local language and jargons? How far those translated news is correct and not distorted? English language was taken at one hand and Dari for Afghanistan, Bangla for Bangladesh, Hindi for India, Bahasa for Indonesia, Urdu for Pakistan, Thai for Thailand, Mandarin for China, Korean for South and North Korea, Russian for Russia on the other hand.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Opposition Team
    LEADER DEPUTY LEADER Judith Collins Shane Reti Andrew Bayly David Bennett Chris Bishop Simon Bridges Gerry Brownlee Simeon Brown Jacqui Dean Papakura List MP Port Waikato List MP List MP Tauranga List MP Pakuranga Waitaki National Security & Intelligence Health Shadow Treasurer (Revenue) Agriculture Covid-19 response Justice • Water Foreign Affairs Police • Corrections Conservation Pacific Peoples • Technology, Children Infrastructure Horticulture Shadow Leader of the House Pike River Re-entry GCSB & NZSIS SFO • Youth Assistant Speaker Manufacturing & Artificial Statistics Biosecurity Māori-Crown Relations Associate Finance Intelligence Matt Doocey Paul Goldsmith Nicola Grigg Barbara Kuriger Melissa Lee Christopher Luxon Todd McClay Ian McKelvie Mark Mitchell Waimakariri List MP Selwyn Taranaki-King Country List MP Botany Rotorua Rangitīkei Whangaparaoa Chief Whip • Mental Health Education Women Energy & Resources Broadcasting & Media Local Government Economic Development Seniors • Forestry Public Service • SOEs Associate Social Associate Trade Rural Communities Digital Economy & Māori Development Small Business • Commerce Racing • Disability Issues Sports & Recreation Development & Employment Associate Arts, Food Safety Communications Associate Transport & Consumer Affairs • Tourism Associate Health Culture & Heritage Associate Transport Ethnic Communities Associate Pacific Peoples Joseph Mooney Todd Muller Simon O’Connor Chris Penk Maureen Pugh Penny Simmonds Scott Simpson Nick Smith Stuart Smith Southland Bay of Plenty Tāmaki Kaipara
    [Show full text]
  • POLITICAL COMMENTARY Reflection on the 2014 Election: Implications for Women
    88 POLITICAL COMMENTARY Reflection on the 2014 election: Implications for women SUE BRADFORD This has not been a good election for women, unless perhaps you’re white, wealthy and suf- ficiently lacking in empathy to believe that John Key and his mates are going to do a good job for us all over the next three years. Whether considering the gender makeup of Parliament and Cabinet, the likely consequences of a National government for women and children over the next few years, or the melancholy fate of the parties of the left, the aspiration of pre-election initiatives like the Women’s Election Agenda appear somewhat dimmed by reality. Parliament A noticeable feature of the 51st Parliament is the reduced number of women elected, down to 37 out of 84, meaning that women make up slightly under 32% of MPs. The 2011 Parliament had 39 women MPs. High hopes that the maturation of MMP and the legacy of the Helen Clark era would mean a steady increase in the numbers of women entering Parliament have clearly not been met. Apart from the Greens, it is hard to identify much success among the major political parties in achieving greater gender balance among their elected representatives. Just 34% of Labour’s MPs are women (11 out of 32), meaning that their goal of reaching 45% women MPs by this election has fallen sadly short. Turning to the makeup of the power holders in National’s third term Cabinet, a pitiful six out of 20 full Ministers are women, with the highest ranked being Paula Bennett at number five.
    [Show full text]