Atoyan, G 2016.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
EIA AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN DEVELOPMENT DECISIONS IN ARMENIA GAYANE ATOYAN Diploma in International Relations, Yerevan State University, 1996 Master of Comparative Legal Studies, American University of Armenia 2007 Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) Newcastle Law School Newcastle University July 201 0 ABSTRACT Environmental Impact Assessment Law was adopted in Armenia in 1995.The Law has a mission to control environmental decision- making in the country and comply with the international treaties and conventions ratified by Armenia. The recent rapid developments of environmental hazards in Armenia have raised a concern whether the existing Law is meeting the needs of the country and its citizens. The comparative doctrinal research has been conducted to question the legal provisions, implementation and compliance of the RA EIA Law with International Environmental Treaties, which Armenia is a Party. The comparison of the existing RA EIA Law with similar laws in European Union and the USA was necessary to assess the instrument’s best practice to find out the errors and make possible recommendations for improvement of the environmental governance in the country. In the process of the research work, the RA EIA law was amended in 2014. Therefore, the research had a chance to compare both legal texts and assess their similarities, differences and positive development of the Law. The comparative analysis of all mentioned instruments revealed existing deficiencies of the RA EIA Law and provided further improvement and development recommendations as an outcome of this unique and unprecedented work. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am expressing my sincere gratitude to all the people who were part of my life in the process of my PhD studies during last 5 years. The first and foremost I acknowledge the tremendous support and assistance of my primary supervisor Professor Chris Rodgers. I believe this result would not be achieved without his constant encouragement and professional support. I express deepest gratitude to my ex-second supervisor Dr. Rob Dickinson for his support in English writing and accurate referencing issues. A great input on my work has been made by Ciara Brennan who joined the team for a short period of time but has made a remarkable impact on the development of the final structure of the thesis. All these inputs are highly appreciated and valued. The program would not become a reality without the excellent library and staff members engaged at Newcastle University. Thanks to all people who had their input in organizing and leading my studies at the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences and at Law School in particular. The process of research would not be successful without the input of my friends from Armenia, either. All possible information and sources became available by their active help and support and for that reason my special thanks go to the lawyer of A. D. Sakharov Human Rights Armenian Centre NGO Ms. Meri Khachatryan, the whole staff of the Pan-Armenian Environmental Network and its member Mr. Levon Galstyan in particular, Mr. Arman Vermishyan the Caucasus Nature Fund, National Coordinator in Armenia Asian Development Bank, Mr. Erik Grigoryan, the Cumulative Impact Assessment Expert at Increasing Transparency in Mining Sector World Bank project in Armenia and lawyers of the legislative drafting department at the Ministry of Nature Protection in Armenia. II Within the process of writing, the special people who carried the burden of PhD project are my teenage daughters Ruzanna and Satenik who are sharing a student life together with me in the UK. This became a family project in its type and allocated special roles for each of my family members. I would not succeed without funding support of my parents, siblings and husband. Thanks to them, I could make the progress in this process. A huge expression of gratitude goes to my mother in law Nazik Nasibyan who is always next to me supporting my plans and ideas and assisting me in proof reading and editing my work. I wish to express deep thanks to my best friend Ms. Anush Arakelyan for being always ready to help whenever I ask. I express my true love and acknowledgment to my ancient country and hope this research work will be a small but positive input for the environmental decision-making process improvement in Armenia. III Table of Contents ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................................... i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ..................................................................................................... ii Table of Figures .............................................................................................................. vii Table of Abbreviations .................................................................................................... ix Chapter 1։ Environmental Justice as a Mission to Protect Future Generations .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 . Introduction .................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Scope of the Study .................................................................................................... 6 1.2.1 Brief History of Post-Soviet Development in Armenia .............................. 10 1.2.2. Research Questions and Objectives of this Study ..................................... 16 1.3. Literature Review on Environmental Impact Assessment ......................................... 17 1.3.1. The Theoretical Debate on Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental Law in General ....................................................................................... 18 1.3.2. The Implementation of the Environmental Legislation in EU and non-EU Countries in the Studied Literature .................................................................. 25 1.3.3. Common Procedures of EIA on the World despite the Differences in Jurisdictions Based on the Literature Review ............................................................ 32 1.4. The Research Strategy ............................................................................................ 40 1.4.1. Doctrinal Research ............................................................................................... 40 1.4.2. Research Paradigm and Epistemology ................................................................. 42 1.4.3. Research Approach .............................................................................................. 44 1.5. Findings of Chapter 1 ............................................................................................. 49 Chapter 2: The Law on Environmental Impact Assessment in Armenia .......................... 52 2.1. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 52 2.2. The Summary of the History of the Environmental Impact Assessment Law of the Republic of Armenia ........................................................... 53 2.3. The Interpretation of the RA EIA Law of 1995 and Presentation of the Law of 2014 ......................................................................................................... 56 2.4. Findings of Chapter 2 .......................................................................................... 79 Chapter 3: Critical Analysis on Environmental Impact Assessment Law of the Republic of Armenia.................................................................................................... 83 3.1. Introduction: The Importance of the Environmental Impact Assessment Law in the Process of Environmental Governance .............................. 83 3.2. Benchmarks for an Effective EIA in the Western Jurisdictions ......................... 85 IV 3.3. The International Law Requirements: How the RA EIA Law Strives to comply with these requirements? ........................................................................ 89 3.4. What are the RA EIA Law Enforcement Mechanism? ..................................... 115 3.5. Findings of Chapter 3 ........................................................................................ 120 Chapter 4: Fieldwork in Armenia .................................................................................... 125 4.1. Introduction ...................................................................................................... 125 4.4. Fieldwork Data Analysis for Cases 1-3 .................................................................. 142 4.4.1. Discussion on analysis of general questions addressed to villagers based on SPSS data analysis program ...................................................... 143 4.4.2. The most important questions addressed to villagers ................................ 147 4.5. Case Number Four: Amulsar Gold Mining Project in Vayots Dzor region, Armenia ........................................................................................................... 153 4.5.1. Opinions of lawyers, environmental activists and NGO members based on the fieldwork results ............................................................... 157 4.5.2. General questions that are considered to be common for all 15 respondents ............................................................................................................. 159 4.5.3. Area Specific Questions: