Extension Compliance Report 5 December 2018 – 4 December 2019 (EPBC 2009/5031)

Printed copies are uncontrolled unless marked D20#162260 otherwise. Refer to Main Roads for current 26 February 2020 version. ROE HIGHWAY EXTENSION COMPLIANCE REPORT (EPBC 2009/5031) 5 December 2018 – 4 December 2019

Document Approval

Reviewed Recommended Approved Rev. Date Prepared By by by by

A 05/02/2020 L Fisher L Kirchner J Shaw Signature: B 15/02/2020 L Kirchner J Shaw

0 03/03/2020 J Braid J Shaw

Amendments

Section Revision Revision Description of Key Changes / Page Number Date No.

Final for Issue - Updated as per Main roads WA 0 03/03/2020 comments

1 Document No: D19#136424

ROE HIGHWAY EXTENSION COMPLIANCE REPORT (EPBC 2009/5031) 5 December 2018 – 4 December 2019

Acronyms/Abbreviations

Acronym Meaning

BR8 Building Roe 8 CAR Compliance Assessment Report DBCA Department of Biodiversity Conservation and Attractions the Department Commonwealth Department of the Environment and Energy DPaW Department of Parks and Wildlife EP Act Western Australian Environmental Protection Act 1986 EPA Environmental Protection Authority EPBC Act Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 MAC Murdoch Activity Centre Main Roads Main Roads MDC Murdoch Drive Connection the Minister The Minister of the Environment MoU Memorandum of Understanding MRIA Metropolitan Road Improvement Alliance MS 1008 Ministerial Statement 1008 PDE Proposal Development Envelope PER Public Environmental Review WA Western Australia

3 Document No: D19#136424 ROE HIGHWAY EXTENSION COMPLIANCE REPORT (EPBC 2009/5031) 5 December 2018 – 4 December 2019

Contents

1 INTRODUCTION ...... 1 1.1 Approval under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 ...... 1 1.2 Purpose of this Report ...... 1 2 PROGRESS TO DATE ...... 2 3 COMPLIANCE ...... 3 4 NEW ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS ...... 14 5 CONCLUSION ...... 14 6 APPENDICES ...... 14 Appendix A: Compliance Assessment Report (2 July 2017 – 1 July 2018) ...... 15

List of Tables Table 1 EPBC Approval Condition and Compliance Table ...... 3

List of Figures Figure 1 Clearing area to date...... 8

4 Document No: D19#136424 ROE HIGHWAY EXTENSION COMPLIANCE REPORT (EPBC 2009/5031) 5 December 2018 – 4 December 2019

1 INTRODUCTION Main Roads Western Australia (Main Roads) proposed to construct the Roe Highway Extension as part of the Freight Link project. This involved the construction of approximately 5 km of highway extending Roe Highway from its current terminus, at the in Jandakot, to in Coolbellup. The design and construction of the Roe Highway Extension was awarded to the Building Roe 8 Alliance (BR8), formed between Main Roads, CPB Contractors, Georgiou Group, WA Limestone, GHD, AECOM and BG&E. On 12 March 2017, the action was paused following the Western Australian State election, halting any further clearing or works other than those required to maintain a secured and safe site. The State Government announced on 8 May 2017 that the eastern end of the action, known as the Murdoch Drive Connection (MDC), would be implemented immediately by the Metropolitan Road Improvement Alliance (MRIA). This portion of the action surrounds the Kwinana Freeway and Roe Highway interchange, continuing towards Bibra Drive, providing a new access into the Murdoch Activity Centre (MAC). Construction and operation of the MDC is fully contained within the approved proposal development envelope (PDE). The proposed extent of the clearing within the PDE has since been updated via a Section 45c, reducing the amount of native vegetation required to be cleared. The Section 45c was requested by Main Roads in line with the State Government’s election commitment. This resulted in an amendment to only connect Roe Highway to Murdoch Drive and not Stock Road. The changes to the proposal have reduced the area of the construction zone to 88.8 ha. The western end of the PDE, a total of 85.8 ha, is now a rehabilitation zone and has been removed from the construction footprint. A Rehabilitation Management Plan is now in place for this zone, with previously cleared areas to be rehabilitated. The action is located approximately 14 km south of Perth within the Swan Coastal Plain Bioregion. The action is largely contained within the City of Cockburn, however, parts of the design extend northward to the City of Melville along Murdoch Drive and the Kwinana Freeway.

1.1 Approval under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 Roe Highway Extension was assessed by the Commonwealth Department of the Environment and Energy (the Department) under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) after it was referred by Main Roads on 22 June 2009, as the action impacts listed threatened species and communities, and listed migratory species. Approval under the EPBC Act was issued on 21 October 2015 with conditions (EPBC 2009/5031). MDC has proceeded in accordance with the conditions in EPBC 2009/5031.

1.2 Purpose of this Report This report has been produced to meet the requirements of Condition 12 of the approval under the EPBC Act. It namely addresses compliance with approval conditions and implementation of any management plans and strategies as specified within the approval.

This is the third annual report prepared by MRIA on behalf of Main Roads to fulfil this condition and covers 5 December 2018 to 4 December 2019.

1 Document No: D19#136424 ROE HIGHWAY EXTENSION COMPLIANCE REPORT (EPBC 2009/5031) 5 December 2018 – 4 December 2019

2 PROGRESS TO DATE The action commenced on 5 December 2016, with native vegetation clearing commencing on the 19th of that same month. Construction is well advanced and is likely to be complete in early 2020. The previous Compliance Report noted that 41.63 ha of native vegetation had been cleared for construction. In the current reporting period, an additional 4.59 ha of black cockatoo habitat has been cleared within the PDE, but of this 3.47 ha consists of rehabilitated Banksia Woodland and 1.12 ha of native vegetation. All site remediation activities west of Bibra Drive were completed in 2018 and handed back to the community.

2 Document No: D19#136424 ROE HIGHWAY EXTENSION COMPLIANCE REPORT (EPBC 2009/5031) 5 December 2018 – 4 December 2019

3 COMPLIANCE Table 1 EPBC Approval Condition and Compliance Table

Condition Condition Is the action Evidence / Comments Number / compliant with Reference this condition? 1 In order to minimise impacts to threatened species and communities and migratory Compliant No clearing has occurred outside the clearance limits species, the approval holder must adhere to the clearance limits outlined in the WA outlined in in the WA approval condition 1-1. Refer to approval condition 1-1. Figure 1. 2 In order to minimise impacts to threatened species and communities and migratory Compliant All actions have been undertaken in accordance with WA species, the approval holder must undertake the action in accordance with WA approval conditions 7-1 to 7-6 to minimise impacts to approval conditions 7-1 to 7-6. threatened species, communities and migratory species. The latest Compliance Assessment Report (CAR) which assessed the project against the MS 1008 approval conditions was submitted for the 2 July 2018 – 1 July 2019 period, attached in Appendix A. 3 In order to minimise impact to black cockatoos and migratory species outside the Compliant All actions have been undertaken in accordance with WA clearance limits specified in Condition 1, the approval holder must undertake the approval condition 10-1 to minimise impacts to black action in accordance with WA approval condition 10-1. cockatoos and migratory species outside the ’zone of indirect impacts’. This has been done through the implementation of WA approval conditions 10-2 to 10-9. The latest CAR was submitted for the 2 July 2018 – 1 July 2019 period (Appendix A).

3 Document No: D19#136424 ROE HIGHWAY EXTENSION COMPLIANCE REPORT (EPBC 2009/5031) 5 December 2018 – 4 December 2019

Condition Condition Is the action Evidence / Comments Number / compliant with Reference this condition? 4 To avoid and mitigate impacts to black cockatoos, during the breeding season Compliant The potential black cockatoo breeding trees identified (August - December), within 7 days prior to clearing, the approval holder must within the action area were inspected by a suitably ensure all potential nesting trees are investigated to detect the presence of black qualified person prior to clearing. cockatoos using hollows. The investigation must be undertaken by a suitably No black cockatoo nesting trees were cleared in this audit qualified and experienced person. period. If any black cockatoos are detected using a hollow in a tree or trees, the approval holder must: 1. Clearly identify all such trees with fencing and signage that must be located within two (2) metres of the base of each such tree; 2. Not clear any such tree or any vegetation within 10 metres of any such tree; and 3. Undertake all reasonable measures to avoid any such tree from being cut down, felled, removed, killed, destroyed, poisoned, ring-barked, uprooted or burned until a suitably qualified and experienced person has verified in writing that the hollow(s) in each such tree are no longer being used by black cockatoos. 5 In order to minimise impacts to threatened species and communities, and Compliant for The following Plans and Surveys, have been prepared and migratory species, the approval holder must develop and implement all Plans or development of implemented prior to the commencement of construction in Surveys, in accordance with the requirements of the following WA approval all plans accordance with the WA approval conditions: conditions: a) The Infrastructure Plan required by WA approval conditions 6-2 to 6-7; Partially • Infrastructure Plan b) The Construction Environmental Management Plan required by WA compliant for • Drainage Management and Monitoring Plan approval conditions 7-7 to 7-11; plan • Baseline Wetland Condition Survey c) The Drainage Management and Monitoring Plan required by WA approval implementation • Wetlands Monitoring and Management Plan conditions 8-1 to 8-7; • Baseline Flora and Vegetation Condition Survey d) The Baseline Wetland Condition Survey required by WA approval conditions • Flora and Vegetation Monitoring and Management 9-1 to 9-3; Plan e) The Wetlands Monitoring and Management Plan required by WA approval • Fauna Management Plan. conditions 9-4 to 9-11; f) The Baseline Flora and Vegetation Condition Survey required by WA There was one non-compliance recorded against these approval conditions 10-1 to 10-3; management plans - WMMP – 9.9 omission of sediment g) The Flora and Vegetation Monitoring and Management Plan required by WA monitoring which was rectified. Please refer to the CAR in Appendix A for details. approval conditions 10-4 to 10-11; and h) The Fauna Management Plan required by WA approval conditions 11-1 to

11-8.

4 Document No: D19#136424 ROE HIGHWAY EXTENSION COMPLIANCE REPORT (EPBC 2009/5031) 5 December 2018 – 4 December 2019

Condition Condition Is the action Evidence / Comments Number / compliant with Reference this condition? For further information and evidence regarding compliance against each of the Plans and Surveys refer to the annual CAR prepared to review compliance against the WA approval conditions. The latest CAR was submitted for the 2 July 2018 – 1 July 2019 period, provided in Appendix A with the next one due in August 2020. 6 The approval holder must provide a copy of all CEO approved (or varied) Plans or Compliant An addendum to the Roe Highway Extension Wetlands Surveys specified in Condition 5 to the Department within 20 business days of the Monitoring and Management Plan (WMMP) was approved Plan or Survey having been approved (or varied) by the CEO. by DWER on 3 April 2019. This addendum reduces the frequency of monitoring in areas where there is no active construction and corrects conversion errors in values for total dissolved solids and unfiltered iron. This has been communicated to the Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment (DAWE). 7 To offset the loss of black cockatoo habitat, prior to commencement, the approval Closed in 2017 Written evidence of funds being transferred to DPAW (now holder must provide the Department with written evidence that funds have been compliance the Department of Biodiversity Conservation and provided to the DPAW for the acquisition of an environmental offset property. The report Attractions [DBCA]) for the acquisition of an environmental written evidence must include a description and map clearly defining the location offset property was sent to the Department on 30 and boundaries of the offset property and be accompanied with the offset attributes November 2016, prior to the commencement of works and a shapefile. (evidence in 2017 Compliance Report). 8 Within 12 months of the commencement of the action, the approval holder must Closed in 2017 Written evidence, including certificates of title, for the offset provide the Department with written evidence, including certificates of title, that the compliance property being transferred to the State of Western offset property has been transferred to the State of Western Australia for the report Australia was sent to the Department on 30 November purpose of addition to the conservation estate. 2016 (evidence in 2017 Compliance Report). 9 Within 5 years of the commencement of the action, the approval holder must Closed in 2017 The action is two years into construction. Main Roads has provide funds to DPAW to assist in the management of the offset property following compliance provided the Department with the final Memorandum of the transfer of the land as described in condition 8. The funding must be adequate report Understanding (MoU) between Main Roads and DPaW for DPAW to maintain the quality of black cockatoo habitat within the offset (now DBCA) and evidence of the transfer of funds within property for at least 20 years. The approval holder must consult with DPAW, in the five year timeframe (evidence in 2017 Compliance determining the amount of necessary funding to achieve the aims of this condition. Report). Once the funding has been provided to DPAW, the approval holder must provide written evidence of this to the Department.

5 Document No: D19#136424 ROE HIGHWAY EXTENSION COMPLIANCE REPORT (EPBC 2009/5031) 5 December 2018 – 4 December 2019

Condition Condition Is the action Evidence / Comments Number / compliant with Reference this condition? 10 Any survey data collected for the action must be collected and recorded so as to Compliant All surveys and survey data were collected and recorded conform to a reasonable standard such that it can be readily used by a third party by suitably qualified persons to a reasonable standard. or to data standards notified from time to time by the Department. When requested The Department has not requested survey data or by the Department, the proponent must provide to the Department all species and information to date. ecological survey data and related survey information from ecological surveys undertaken for matters of national environmental significance. This survey data must be provided within 30 business days of request, or in a timeframe agreed to by the Department in writing. The Department may use the survey data for other purposes. 11 Within 10 business days after the commencement of the action, the approval Closed in 2017 The Department was notified on 7 December 2016 of holder must advise the Department in writing of the actual date of commencement. compliance works commencing on 5 December 2016 (evidence in report 2017 Compliance Report). 12 Within three months of every 12 month anniversary of the commencement of the Compliant This report fulfils the requirement under Condition 12 for action, the approval holder must publish a report on their website addressing an annual report. compliance with each of the conditions of this approval, including implementation of any Plans or Surveys as specified in the conditions. Documentary evidence providing proof of the date of publication and non-compliance with any of the conditions of this approval must be provided to the Department at the same time as the compliance report is published. The approval holder must continue to publish the report until such time as agreed in writing by the Minister. 13 Upon the direction of the Minister, the approval holder must ensure that an Compliant The Minister has not given direction for an independent independent audit of compliance with the conditions of approval is conducted and a audit to be undertaken to date. report submitted to the Minister. The independent auditor must be approved by the Minister prior to the commencement of the audit. Audit criteria must be agreed to by the Minister and the audit report must address the criteria to the satisfaction of the Minister. 14 If, at any time after 5 years from the date of this approval, the approval holder has Closed in 2017 The action has commenced. not substantially commenced the action, then the approval holder must not compliance substantially commence the action without the written agreement of the Minister. report 15 The approval holder must maintain accurate records substantiating all activities Compliant The MRIA team and Main Roads operate under a associated with or relevant to the conditions of approval, including measures taken management system accredited to ISO14001 and as such to implement the Plans or Surveys required by this approval, and make them maintain accurate records of all activities relevant to the available upon request to the Department. Such records may be subject to audit by conditions of approval. Thus far, the Department has not the Department or an independent auditor in accordance with section 458 of the requested any records or conducted any audits of the EPBC Act, or used to verify compliance with the conditions of approval. Summaries action. of audits will be posted on the Department’s website. The results of audits may also be publicised through the general media. 6 Document No: D19#136424 ROE HIGHWAY EXTENSION COMPLIANCE REPORT (EPBC 2009/5031) 5 December 2018 – 4 December 2019

Condition Condition Is the action Evidence / Comments Number / compliant with Reference this condition? 16 Unless otherwise agreed to in writing by the Minister, the approval holder must Compliant All required management plans are published on the Main publish all Plans or Surveys referred to in these conditions of approval on their Roads website: website. Each management plan must be published on the website within 1 month https://project.mainroads.wa.gov.au/home/southmetr of being approved. opolitan/murdochdrive/Pages/default.aspx

7 Document No: D19#136424 ROE HIGHWAY EXTENSION COMPLIANCE REPORT (EPBC 2009/5031) 5 December 2018 – 4 December 2019

Figure 1 Clearing area to date

8 Document No: D19#136424 PROJECT ID 60478410 LEGEND CREATED BY RNM Clearing to Date APPROVED BY JShaw Zone New 2019 Native Vegetation Clearing Pre-2019 Native Vegetation Clearing LAST MODIFIED 03 MAR 2020 Construction and Operation Zone Rehabilitation Zone ´ Main Roads Western Australia DATUM GDA 1994, PROJECTION PERTH COASTAL GRID 1994 Figure 0 70 140 210 280

metres Data sources: Nearmaps 2017 Base Data: (c) Based on information provided by and 1 1:12,500 when printed at A4 with the permission of the Western Australian Land Information Authority trading as Landgate (2010).

Map Document: \\auper1gis01\geo\Client_Data\MRIA\10_Murdoch Drive Connection\02_MXDs\20200211_MDC_Clearing_Dec2018_Dec2019\Fig1_ClearingDec18_Dec19_NativeVeg_v02_SP.mxd (rob.mcgregor) A4 size ROE HIGHWAY EXTENSION COMPLIANCE REPORT (EPBC 2009/5031) 5 December 2018 – 4 December 2019

4 NEW ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS

No new environmental risks were identified during the reporting period.

5 CONCLUSION The first year of works resulted in the suspension of the Roe Highway Extension Project, completion of site remediation to the west of Bibra Drive and the commencement of the MDC construction works. The works in this reporting period include the continued construction of the MDC, with some investigation and design works remaining to realign and extend Murdoch Drive as a four lane dual carriageway to Kwinana Freeway at the Roe Highway interchange. The action was partially compliant with Condition 5 and fully compliant with all remaining applicable conditions under the EPBC Act approval. The partial compliance of Condition 5 is a result of a minor non-compliance identified in relation to MS 1008 Condition 9-5. Non-compliance identified in the 2018-2019 audit period includes: . Omission of sediment monitoring that is required annually under the WMMP in conjunction with the macroinvertebrate monitoring.

The partial compliance of Condition 5 in relation to the overall action has been resolved and sediment monitoring has been undertaken. Overall, no non-compliances were identified which resulted in actual environmental impacts over and above those approved by both the Department and the WA State regulators.

6 APPENDICES

Appendix Title

Appendix A 2019 Compliance Assessment Report

14 Document No: D19#136424 ROE HIGHWAY EXTENSION COMPLIANCE REPORT (EPBC 2009/5031) 5 December 2018 – 4 December 2019

Appendix A: Compliance Assessment Report (2 July 2018 – 1 July 2019)

15 Document No: D19#136424 Roe Highway Extension Compliance Assessment Report 2 July 2018 – 1 July 2019

Printed copies are uncontrolled unless marked otherwise. Refer to Main Roads for current version. ROE HIGHWAY EXTENSION COMPLIANCE REPORT

Contents

1 INTRODUCTION ...... 4 1.1 Project Background...... 4 1.2 Project Approvals ...... 4 1.3 Proponent Details ...... 4 2 CURRENT STATUS ...... 5 2.1 Works to Date ...... 5 2.2 Planned Activities ...... 6 3 AUDIT PLAN ...... 15 3.1 Purpose and scope ...... 15 3.1.1 Purpose ...... 15 3.1.2 Scope ...... 17 3.2 Audit Period ...... 17 3.3 Audit Criteria ...... 17 3.4 Methodology ...... 17 3.5 Terminology ...... 18 4 AUDIT RESULTS ...... 19 4.1 Compliance with conditions ...... 19 4.2 Proposed Changes to Compliance Assessment Plan ...... 19 5 REFERENCES ...... 20 6 APPENDICES ...... 20 Appendix 1: Statement of Compliance ...... 21 Appendix 2: MS 1008 Audit Table ...... 22 Appendix 3: MS 1008 Schedule 1 Audit Table ...... 23 Appendix 4: Subsidiary Plans Summary of Compliance and Audit Tables ...... 24 Appendix 5: Evidence Summary Table ...... 25

Document No: D19#743461 Page 2 of 18 ROE HIGHWAY EXTENSION COMPLIANCE REPORT

Amendments

Revision Section / Revision Date Description of Key Changes Number Page No.

A 28/08/2019 For Review B 5/09/2019 For Review

Document No: D19#743461 Page 3 of 18 ROE HIGHWAY EXTENSION COMPLIANCE REPORT

1 INTRODUCTION This Compliance Assessment Report (CAR) addresses the compliance of the Roe Highway Extension – Stage 8 Project with conditions set out in Ministerial Statement 1008 (MS 1008). Conditions 4–3 and 4–6 of MS 1008 require annual compliance assessment reports to be submitted to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the [then] Office of the Environmental Protection Authority (OEPA). This CAR has been produced in compliance with these conditions. The CAR incorporates a 12 month audit period from 2 July 2018 to 1 July 2019. In general, Main Roads Western Australia (Main Roads) is compliant to MS 1008 with no non-compliances reported during this audit period.

1.1 Project Background Main Roads proposed to construct the Roe Highway Extension – Stage 8 (the Stage 8 Project; Figure 1) as part of the Perth Freight Link project. The Stage 8 Project involved the construction of approximately 5 km of highway, extending Roe Highway from its current terminus at the Kwinana Freeway in Jandakot to Stock Road in Coolbellup. The proposed extension to Roe Highway is largely located within a primary regional road reserve which adjoins Beeliar Regional Park. On 3 April 2017 the Stage 8 Project was officially suspended. The State Government announced on 8 May 2017 that the eastern end of the proposal, known as the Murdoch Drive Connection (MDC) would be implemented immediately, with construction to commence late-2017. This is the area surrounding the Kwinana Freeway and Roe Highway interchange, and continuing towards Bibra Drive, to provide a new access into the Murdoch Activity Centre (MAC). MDC is located approximately 14 km south of Perth within the Swan Coastal Plain Bioregion. The Project is largely contained within the City of Cockburn, however, parts of the design extend northward to the City of Melville along Murdoch Drive and Kwinana Freeway. MDC is referred to in this report as the Project and will proceed in accordance with the conditions in MS 1008. The original alliance created to design and construct the Roe 8 Project (the Building Roe 8 Alliance) has been renegotiated and replaced by the Metropolitan Road Improvement Alliance (MRIA), formed between Main Roads, CPB Contractors, Georgiou Group, WA Limestone, GHD, AECOM and BG&E. MRIA is responsible for delivering the project.

1.2 Project Approvals The Project was formally assessed under Part IV of the Environmental Protection Act 1986 (the EP Act) and approved under MS 1008 on 2 July 2015. A Section 45c for the Project was submitted in May 2018. The Section 45c proposed minor changes and amendments to the development envelope to allow for tie-ins to the existing road network and accommodation works with neighbouring properties. A Section 45c for the Project was approved on 12 Dec 2018. This Section 45c divided the project area into a construction and operation zone and a rehabilitation zone. It also introduced the Rehabilitation Plan for the rehabilitation zone.

1.3 Proponent Details The Proponent for the Project is Main Roads Western Australia.

Document No: D19#743461 Page 4 of 18 ROE HIGHWAY EXTENSION COMPLIANCE REPORT

2 CURRENT STATUS

2.1 Works to Date The Project was officially awarded to Building Roe 8 Alliance (now MRIA) on 11 October 2016, with detailed design and planning works commencing soon after. It was announced on 8 May 2017 that MRIA would complete the design and construction of MDC. The project is still in the construction phase.

Section 45c Amendment In March 2018, the rehabilitation zone was handed over to the community to undertake a rehabilitation program in all cleared areas, in accordance with the approved rehabilitation plan and the Section 45c approved on 12 December 2018. Detailed design of the MDC project identified some elements of the Project extending beyond the approved Project Development Envelope (PDE). In order to remain compliant with MS 1008, a Section 45c application was submitted under the EP Act seeking to amend the Development Envelope. This application was approved by the EPA on 25 May 2018.

Roe 8 Rehabilitation Rehabilitation of areas cleared under MS 1008 west of Bibra Drive are being undertaken by a community led and driven program. The Rehabilitating Roe 8 Rehabilitation Management Plan has been developed by the Rehabilitation Roe 8 Working Group and endorsed by the Rehabilitating Roe 8 Steering Committee. The Rehabilitation Management Plan is currently being implemented.

MDC 6.89 ha of native vegetation has been cleared during this audit period (Figure 1). Table 1 identifies the areas cleared to date and areas cleared during this audit period (2 July 2018 – 1 July 2019). Table 1 Clearing Areas

Area prior to current Area in this audit Area total (ha*) Environmental Aspect audit period (ha) period (ha*) Native vegetation 36.93 6.89 43.82 Conservation category 1.95 0.09 2.04 wetland Resource enhancement 0 0 0 wetland Multiple use wetland 0 0 0 Environmental Protection 0.17 0 0.17 Policy (EPP) Lakes Black cockatoo habitat 33.91 2.11 36.02 Potential black cockatoo 10 (count) 0 0 nesting trees with hollows** Potential black cockatoo 92 (count) 0 0 nesting trees without hollows*

Document No: D19#743461 Page 5 of 18 ROE HIGHWAY EXTENSION COMPLIANCE REPORT

2.2 Planned Activities Upon completion of MDC, the road will improve access and journey times to Fiona Stanley Hospital for visitors, patients and emergency vehicles, and allow MAC to meet its economic potential as a major employment and research centre. The Project will relieve peak time congestion on Murdoch Drive, South Street and Kwinana Freeway, and provide shorter, more predictable journey times for those who live and work in the Murdoch Precinct. Connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists will be improved between the end of Roe Highway and Farrington Road / Murdoch Drive. It complements other new road projects in Perth's southern corridor, including Kwinana Freeway Northbound Widening from Russell Road and Roe Highway and the development of Perth’s first “Smart Freeway” between Farrington Road and Narrows Bridge. Construction will continue as per the MDC project design to realign Murdoch Drive as a four lane dual carriageway and extend the road to Kwinana Freeway at the Roe Highway interchange. Construction is expected to be completed in late 2019.

Document No: D19#743461 Page 6 of 18 PROJECT ID 60478410 LEGEND CREATED BY RNM Clearing to Date APPROVED BY JShaw .._... , ...... Rehabilitation Zone E LAST MODIFIED 12 SEP 2019 Ill:-·····- Native Vegetation within Clearing Area B D F Previously cleared A ´ Under Roe 8 Main Roads Western Australia DATUM GDA 1994, PROJECTION PERTH COASTAL GRID 1994 C Figure 0 40 80 120 160

metres Data sources: Nearmaps 2017 Base Data: (c) Based on information provided by and 1A 1:7,500 when printed at A4 with the permission of the Western Australian Land Information Authority trading as Landgate (2010).

Map Document: \\auper1gis01\geo\Client_Data\MRIA\10_Murdoch Drive Connection\02_MXDs\20190815_CAR_MDC_Veg_Clearing_ToDate\20190815_ClearingtoDate_NativeVeg_v04.mxd (rob.mcgregor) A4 size PROJECT ID 60478410 LEGEND CREATED BY RNM Clearing to Date APPROVED BY JShaw Rehabilitation Zone E LAST MODIFIED 12 SEP 2019 Native Vegetation within Clearing Area B D F Previously cleared A ´ Under Roe 8 Main Roads Western Australia DATUM GDA 1994, PROJECTION PERTH COASTAL GRID 1994 C Figure 0 40 80 120 160

metres Data sources: Nearmaps 2017 Base Data: (c) Based on information provided by and 1B 1:7,500 when printed at A4 with the permission of the Western Australian Land Information Authority trading as Landgate (2010).

Map Document: \\auper1gis01\geo\Client_Data\MRIA\10_Murdoch Drive Connection\02_MXDs\20190815_CAR_MDC_Veg_Clearing_ToDate\20190815_ClearingtoDate_NativeVeg_v04.mxd (rob.mcgregor) A4 size PROJECT ID 60478410 LEGEND CREATED BY RNM Clearing to Date APPROVED BY JShaw .._... , ...... Construction and Operation Zone E LAST MODIFIED 12 SEP 2019 Ill:-·····- Native Vegetation within Clearing Area B D F Cleared during current reporting period A ´ Under Murdoch Drive Connection Main Roads Western Australia DATUM GDA 1994, PROJECTION PERTH COASTAL GRID 1994 C Figure 0 40 80 120 160 - Data sources: Nearmaps 2017 metres Base Data: (c) Based on information provided by and 1C 1:7,500 when printed at A4 with the permission of the Western Australian Land Information Authority trading as Landgate (2010).

Map Document: \\auper1gis01\geo\Client_Data\MRIA\10_Murdoch Drive Connection\02_MXDs\20190815_CAR_MDC_Veg_Clearing_ToDate\20190815_ClearingtoDate_NativeVeg_v04.mxd (rob.mcgregor) A4 size PROJECT ID 60478410 LEGEND CREATED BY RNM Clearing to Date APPROVED BY JShaw Construction and Operation Zone E LAST MODIFIED 12 SEP 2019 Rehabilitation Zone B D F Native Vegetation within Clearing Area A ´ Cleared during current reporting period Main Roads Western Australia DATUM GDA 1994, PROJECTION PERTH COASTAL GRID 1994 Under Murdoch Drive Connection C Figure 0 40 80 120 160 Previously cleared

metres Under Murdoch Drive Connection Data sources: Nearmaps 2017 - Base Data: (c) Based on information provided by and 1D 1:7,500 when printed at A4 Under Roe 8 with the permission of the Western Australian Land Information Authority trading as Landgate (2010).

Map Document: \\auper1gis01\geo\Client_Data\MRIA\10_Murdoch Drive -Connection\02_MXDs\20190815_CAR_MDC_Veg_Clearing_ToDate\20190815_ClearingtoDate_NativeVeg_v04.mxd (rob.mcgregor) A4 size PROJECT ID 60478410 LEGEND CREATED BY RNM Clearing to Date APPROVED BY JShaw Construction and Operation Zone E LAST MODIFIED 12 SEP 2019 Rehabilitation Zone B D F Native Vegetation within Clearing Area A ´ Cleared during current reporting period Main Roads Western Australia DATUM GDA 1994, PROJECTION PERTH COASTAL GRID 1994 Under Murdoch Drive Connection C Figure 0 40 80 120 160 Previously cleared

metres Under Murdoch Drive Connection Data sources: Nearmaps 2017 Base Data: (c) Based on information provided by and 1E 1:7,500 when printed at A4 Under Roe 8 with the permission of the Western Australian Land Information Authority trading as Landgate (2010).

Map Document: \\auper1gis01\geo\Client_Data\MRIA\10_Murdoch Drive -Connection\02_MXDs\20190815_CAR_MDC_Veg_Clearing_ToDate\20190815_ClearingtoDate_NativeVeg_v04.mxd (rob.mcgregor) A4 size PROJECT ID 60478410 LEGEND CREATED BY RNM Clearing to Date APPROVED BY JShaw Construction and Operation Zone E LAST MODIFIED 12 SEP 2019 Native Vegetation within Clearing Area B D F Cleared during current reporting period A ´ Under Murdoch Drive Connection Main Roads Western Australia DATUM GDA 1994, PROJECTION PERTH COASTAL GRID 1994 Previously cleared C Figure 0 40 80 120 160 Under Murdoch Drive Connection - Data sources: Nearmaps 2017 metres Under Roe 8 Base Data: (c) Based on information provided by and 1F 1:7,500 when printed at A4 with the permission of the Western Australian Land - Information Authority trading as Landgate (2010). Map Document: \\auper1gis01\geo\Client_Data\MRIA\10_Murdoch Drive Connection\02_MXDs\20190815_CAR_MDC_Veg_Clearing_ToDate\20190815_ClearingtoDate_NativeVeg_v04.mxd (rob.mcgregor) A4 size ROE HIGHWAY EXTENSION COMPLIANCE REPORT

3 AUDIT PLAN

3.1 Purpose and scope

3.1.1 Purpose This document is the fourth CAR addressing the Project. The CAR has been prepared to address conditions 4-3 and 4-6 of MS 1008 which state: 4-3 After receiving notice in writing from the CEO that the Compliance Assessment Plan satisfies the requirements of condition 4-2 the proponent shall assess compliance with conditions in accordance with the Compliance Assessment Plan required by condition 4-1. 4-6 The proponent shall submit to the CEO the first Compliance Assessment Report fifteen (15) months from the date of issue of this statement addressing the twelve (12) month period from the date of issue of this statement and then annually from the date of submission of the first Compliance Assessment Report. The Compliance Assessment Report shall: (1) be endorsed by the proponent’s Chief Executive Officer or a person delegated to sign on the Chief Executive Officer’s behalf; (2) include a statement as to whether the proponent has complied with the conditions; (3) identify all potential non-compliances and describe corrective and preventative actions taken; (4) be made publicly available in accordance with the approved Compliance Assessment Plan; and (5) indicate any proposed changes to the Compliance Assessment Plan required by condition 4-1.

Condition 4-1 of MS 1008 referred to above states: The proponent shall prepare, submit and maintain a Compliance Assessment Plan to the CEO at least six (6) months prior to the first Compliance Assessment Report required by condition 4-6, or prior to implementation, whichever is sooner.

Condition 4-2 of MS 1008 referred to above states:

4-2 The Compliance Assessment Plan shall indicate: (1) the frequency of compliance reporting; (2) the approach and timing of compliance assessments; (3) the retention of compliance assessments; (4) the method of reporting of potential non-compliances and corrective actions taken; (5) the table of contents of Compliance Assessment Reports; and (6) public availability of Compliance Assessment Reports.

This CAR has been developed to align with the structure indicated in the Compliance Assessment Plan (CAP; Strategen 2015), which was guided by Post Assessment Guideline No. 3 Preparing a Compliance Assessment Report (OEPA 2012a) in accordance with condition 4-2 of MS 1008. The proposed table of contents from the CAP is presented in Table 2. The table includes reference to sections in the CAR that correspond to the required content.

Document No: D19#743461 Page 15 of 18 ROE HIGHWAY EXTENSION COMPLIANCE REPORT

Table 2 Table of contents for Compliance Assessment Reporting as outlined in the Compliance Assessment Plan (Strategen 2015)

Heading Description Section

Introduction Brief about the Project, including: Project background 1.1 Project approvals 1.2 Proponent details 1.3

Current status Summary of the current implementation status of the Project, specifically 2 milestones/achievements within the audit period.

Statement of Statement of whether the proponent has complied with the conditions Appendices Compliance 1-5

Endorsement Endorsed by Main Roads Managing Director or a person delegated to sign on Appendices the Managing Director’s behalf 1

Non- Identify all non-compliances and corrective actions 4.1 compliances Appendices 1-5

Audit Description of how the audit was undertaken including: 3.1 methodology Audit plan: purpose, scope, audit period, audit criteria, methodology Audit terminology 3.1.5

Audit results Inclusion of a summary review of performance with respect to monitoring 4 results and interpretation of analysis of the results for each plan and related advice with respect to achievement of applicable criteria during the audit period.

Proposed Indication of any proposed changes to the CAP requirement by condition 4-1. 4.2 changes to CAP

Appendices 1. Statement of compliance prepared in accordance with the OEPA Post Appendices Assessment Form for a Statement of Compliance and endorsed by the 1-5 proponent’s Managing Director or a person delegated to sign on the Managing Director’s behalf. 2. Ministerial Statement audit table in accordance with Appendix 1 of the CAP. 3. MS 1008 Schedule 1 audit table. 4. Subsidiary plans audit tables (potentially non-conformant items only). 5. Evidence (related to potential non-compliances/non-conformances only). 6. Summary table of evidence reviewed. 7. Other appendices may be included where relevant from time to time.

Document No: D19#743461 Page 16 of 18 ROE HIGHWAY EXTENSION COMPLIANCE REPORT

3.1.2 Scope This CAR has been prepared to assess whether Main Roads has been, is being, has not or is not, complying with the conditions set out in Schedule 1 of MS 1008 over the audit period. The CAR includes: · A statement of compliance (Appendix 1) · An assessment of compliance against all conditions (Appendix 2) · Additional details relating to Project compliances (Appendix 3) · Details of any non-conformances and how these are currently and will be managed in the future (Appendix 4) · Evidence summary table demonstrating the documents used to inform the AR (Appendix 5).

3.2 Audit Period This CAR addresses a twelve month audit period from 2 July 2018 to 1 July 2019.

3.3 Audit Criteria Audit criteria were based on the MS 1008 conditions of approval. The audit table in Appendix 2 presents all the approval conditions and the performance of the Project to these conditions for the audit period. The audit table contains each condition separated into audit elements for auditing purposes (i.e. the audit criteria), and includes the following headings: · Audit code: Ministerial Statement reference number · Subject: the environmental theme/issue · Requirement: what the proponent must do · How: the manner in which the requirements of an audit element should be achieved · Evidence: information or data collected to verify compliance, i.e. report/letter/site inspection requirements · Phase: project phase applicable to audit element · Timeframe: specific timing for achieving the requirements of an audit element · Status: notes about the fulfilment of compliance using compliance status terms · Further information: additional comments to support compliance findings, where required.

3.4 Methodology The audit was conducted by reviewing relevant documentation as produced by MRIA, external contractors, and Main roads. Advice from Main Roads was sought where necessary to determine the status and evidence of compliance. The review of all documents was undertaken by MRIA. A comprehensive list of documents reviewed for this CAR is presented in Appendix 5.

Document No: D19#743461 Page 17 of 18 ROE HIGHWAY EXTENSION COMPLIANCE REPORT

3.5 Terminology The ‘Status’ field of the audit table in Appendix 2 and Appendix 3 describes the implementation of the action and compliance with the condition, procedure or commitment. Although the CEO of the Department of Water and Environment Regulation (DWER) makes the final determination of compliance, it is necessary to update this field each audit period, as the project progresses. DWER has prepared updated guidance related to the preparation of compliance audits, including generic expressions that are used to identify the status of each item as defined in Table 1 of Appendix 1 (OEPA, 2012a, 2012b, 2012c and 2012d).

Document No: D19#743461 Page 18 of 18 ROE HIGHWAY EXTENSION COMPLIANCE REPORT

4 AUDIT RESULTS

4.1 Compliance with conditions Main Roads is mostly compliant with all conditions of MS 1008 for the period addressed in the CAR.

There was one potential non-conformance identified within this audit period. This is in regards to MS 1008 Condition 9-5 “Prior to commencement of construction, the proponent shall implement the approved Wetlands Monitoring and Management Plan, and continue implementation until otherwise agreed by the CEO.”

During the preparation of the Compliance Assessment Report (CAR) 2019 it has become apparent that sediment monitoring has not been undertaken as part of the WMMP since construction commenced in November 2017.

Main Roads is compliant with all other conditions.

A Statement of Compliance has been included at Appendix 1. Compliance with the conditions of MS 1008 for the Project has been assessed and reported using the Audit Table in Appendix 2.

4.2 Proposed Changes to Compliance Assessment Plan This CAR is consistent with the approved CAP. No changes are proposed at this time.

Document No: D19#743461 Page 19 of 18 ROE HIGHWAY EXTENSION COMPLIANCE REPORT

5 REFERENCES Office of Environmental Protection Authority (OEPA) 2012a, Post Assessment Guideline for Preparing a Compliance Assessment Plan, OEPA, Perth, August 2012. Office of Environmental Protection Authority (OEPA) 2012b, Post Assessment Guideline for Preparing an Audit Table, OEPA, Perth, August 2012. Office of Environmental Protection Authority (OEPA) 2012c, Post Assessment Guideline for Making Information Publicly Available, OEPA, Perth, August 2012. Office of Environmental Protection Authority (OEPA) 2012d, Post Assessment Guideline for Preparing a Compliance Assessment Report, OEPA, Perth, August 2012. Strategen 2015, Main Roads Roe Highway Extension Compliance Assessment Plan – Statement 1008, report prepared for Main Roads Western Australia, September 2015.

6 APPENDICES

Appendix Title

Appendix 1 Statement of Compliance

Appendix 2 MS 1008 Audit Table

Appendix 3 MS 1008 Schedule 1 Audit Table

Appendix 4 Subsidiary Plans Summary of Compliance and Audit Tables

Appendix 5 Evidence Summary Table

Document No: D19#743461 Page 20 of 18 ROE HIGHWAY EXTENSION COMPLIANCE REPORT

Appendix 1: Statement of Compliance

Document No: D19#743461 Page 21 of 18 POST ASSESSMENT FORM 2

Statement of Compliance

1 Proposal and Proponent Details

Proposal Title Roe Highway Extension

Statement Number 1008

Proponent Name Main Roads Western Australia

Proponent's Australian 50 860 676 021 Company Number (where relevant)

2 Statement of Compliance Details

I Reporting Period 12/07/ 19 to 1/07/19

lease tick ✓ relevant

Pre-construction Construction Decommissioning

Audit Table for Statement addressed in this Statement of Compliance is provided at Attachment: I D An audit table for the Statement addressed in this Statement of Compliance must be provided as Attachment 2 to this Statement of Compliance. The audit table must be prepared and maintained in accordance with the Office of the Environmental Protection Authority's (OEPA) Post Assessment Guideline for Preparing an Audit Table, as amended from time to time. The 'Status Column' of the audit table must accurately describe the compliance status of each implementation condition and/or procedure for the reporting period of this Statement of Compliance. The terms that may be used by the proponent in the 'Status Column' of the audit table are limited to the Compliance Status Terms listed and defined in Table 1 of Attachment 1.

Were all implementation conditions and/or procedures of the Statement complied with within the re ortin eriod? lease tick ✓ the a riate box

No (please proceed to Section 3) ✓ Yes (please proceed to Section 4)

Each page (including Attachment 2) must be initialed by the person who signs Section 4 of this Statement of Compliance. INITIALS: ___ POST ASSESSMENT FORM 2

3 Details of Non-compliance(s) and/or Potential Non-compliance(s)

The information required Section 3 must be provided for each non-compliance or potential non-compliance identified during the reporting period covered by this Statement of Compliance.

Non-compliance/potential non-compliance 3-1 Which im lementation condition or rocedure was non-com MS 1008 Condition 9-5 Prior to commencement of construction, the proponent shall implement the approved Wetlands Monitoring and Management Plan and continue implementation until otherwise agreed by the CEO. non-com liant?

if a licable ?

Was this non-compliance or potential non-compliance reported to the General Manager, OEPA? IZI Yes □ Reported to OEPA verbally Date □ No IZI Reported to OEPA in writing Date 04 Sept 2019

What are the details of the non-compliance or potential non-compliance and where relevant, the extent of and impacts associated with the non-compliance or potential non-compliance? During the preparation of the Compliance Assessment Report (CAR) 2019 it has become apparent that sediment monitoring was undertaken as part of the WMMP since construction commenced in Nov 2017. All other elements of the WMMP were compliant. What is the precise location where the non-compliance or potential non-compliance occurred (if aoolicable)? (please provide this information as a map or GIS co-ordinates) All sediment monitoring locations (refer to Figures in the Wetland Monitoring and Management Plan). What was the cause(s) of the non-compliance or potential non-compliance? Sediment monitoring was due to commence in October 2018 in conjunction with the Macroinvertebrate monitoring. This part of the WMMP was not completed due to an oversight of monitorinq parameters. What remedial and/or corrective action(s), if any, were taken or are proposed to be taken in response to the non-compliance or potential non-compliance? Sediment monitoring will be undertaken simultaneously with the macroinvertebrate monitoring olanned for October 2019. What measures, if any, were in place to prevent the non-compliance or potential non-compliance before it occurred? What, if any, amendments have been made to those measures to prevent re- occurrence? There is an obligation's register in place outlining the requirements of the Wetland Monitoring and Management Plan. This requirement was not identified in the register. The register has been updated. Please provide information/documentation collected and recorded in relation to this implementation condition or procedure: • in the reporting period addressed in this Statement of Compliance; and • as outlined in the approved Compliance Assessment Plan for the Statement addressed in this Statement of Compliance. (the above inform action may be provided as an attachment to this Statement of Compliance)

Each page (including Attachment 2) must be initialed by the person who signs Section 4 of this Statement of Compliance. INITIALS: ___ POST ASSESSMENT FORM 2

I Letter of notification to Main Roads WA.

Each page (including Attachment 2) must be initialed by the person who signs Section 4 of this Statement of Compliance. INITIALS: _ _ _ --;") POST ASSESSMENT FORM 2

~~g•n:~u~e \M~ . Date• ... )J.1~1~./.. ~ .. Please note that: • it is an offence under section 112 of the Environmental Protection Act 1986 for a person to give or cause to be given information that to his knowledge is false or misleading in a material particular; and • the Chief Executive Officer of the DWER has powers under section 4 7(2) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986 to require reports and information about implementation of the proposal to which the statement relates and compliance with the implementation conditions.

4 Submission of Statement of Compliance

One hard copy and one electronic copy (preferably PDF on CD or thumb drive) of the Statement of Compliance are required to be submitted to the Chief Executive Officer, DWER, marked to the attention of Manager, Compliance (Ministerial Statements).

Please note, the DWER has adopted a procedure of providing written acknowledgment of receipt of all Statements of Compliance submitted by the proponent, however, the DWER does not approve Statements of Compliance.

5 Contact Information

Queries regarding Statements of Compliance, or other issues of compliance relevant to a Statement may be directed to Compliance (Ministerial Statements), DWER:

Manager, Compliance (Ministerial Statements) Department of Water and Environmental Regulation

Postal Address: Locked Bag 33 Cloisters Square PERTH WA 6850

Phone: (08) 6364 7000 Email: [email protected]

6 Post Assessment Guidelines and Forms

Post assessment documents can be found at www.epa.wa.qov.au

Each page (including Attachment 2) must be initialed by the person who signs Section 4 of this Statement of Compliance. INITIALS: ___ POST ASSESSMENT FORM 2

ATTACHMENT 1

Table 1 Compliance Status Terms

Compliance Abbrev Definition Notes Status Terms Compliant C Implementation of the proposal has This term applies to audit elements been carried out in accordance with with: the requirements of the audit element. • ongoing requirements that have been met during the reporting period; and • requirements with a finite period of application that have been met during the reporting period, but whose status has not yet been classified as 'completed'. Completed CLO A requirement with a finite period of This term may only be used where: application has been satisfactorily • audit elements have a finite period of completed. application (e.g. construction activities, development of a document); • the action has been satisfactorily completed; and • the Office of the Environmental Protection Authority (OEPA) has provided written acceptance of 'completed' status for the audit element. Not required NR The requirements of the audit This should be consistent with the at this stage element were not triggered during the 'Phase' column of the audit table. reporting period. Potentially PNC Possible or likely failure to meet the This term may apply where during the Non-compliant requirements of the audit element. reporting period the proponent has identified a potential non-compliance and has not yet finalized its investigations to determine whether non-compliance has occurred. Non-compliant NC Implementation of the proposal has This term applies where the not been carried out in accordance requirements of the audit element are with the requirements of the audit not "complete" have not been met element. during the reporting period.

Each page (including Attachment 2) must be initialed by the person who signs Section 4 of this Statement of Compliance. INITIALS: ___ POST ASSESSMENT FORM 2

In Process IP Where an audit element requires a The term 'In Process' may not be management or monitoring plan be used for any purpose other than that submitted to the OEPA or another stated in the Definition Column. government agency for approval, that submission has been made and no The term 'In Process' may not be used further information or changes have to describe the compliance status of an been requested by the OEPA or the implementation condition and/or other government agency and procedure that requires implementation assessment by the OEPA or other throughout the life of the project (e.g. government agency for approval is implementation of a management plan). still pending.

Each page (including Attachment 2) must be initialed by the person who signs Section 4 of this Statement of Compliance. INITIALS: ___ ROE HIGHWAY EXTENSION COMPLIANCE REPORT

Appendix 2: MS 1008 Audit Table

Document No: D19#743461 Page 22 of 18 Appendix 2: Ministerial Statement 1008 audit table

Audit Code Subject Requ,rement How Evidence Phase nrneframe Status Further Information act1v1t1es (MDC) 1008:Ml•l Proposal When 1mplement1ng the proposal, the proponent shall Implement Proposal as Figure l _Cluring Area Overall. Ongoing. C Construction for the Murdoch Drive Connect10n 1mplementat1on not exceed the authorised extent of the proposal as described in Schl!:dule 1. continued throughout this reponmg period, induding native vegetation defined m Column 3 of Table 2 in Schedule 1. unless I_Aerial of d1s·turbed land_June 2019 de anng. To date, a total of 43.82 ha of native vegetation has been amendments to the proposal and the authorised extent cleared, of which 6.89 ha was within the audit period. Approximately 0.17 ha vegetation has be cleared within EPP lakes areas, none of of thl!:propos al has been approvl!:d undl!:r the EP Act. of en which was within this audit period.

1008:M2·1 Contact det.iiils The proponent shall notify the CEO of .iiny change of its Submit written notification to NR Over,111. Withm 28 d.1ys of NR Mam Roads Western Austraha remains the Proponent. name, physic;,il address or poslill address for the serYmg the CEO of OEPA. change. There has been no change to the name, physical .1ddress of notices or other correspondence withm twenty eight or postal address of the Proponent 1n the audit period. (28) d;iys of such ch,mge. Where the proponent 1s a corporation or an associat10n of persons, whether incorporated or not, the postal address 1s that of the principal place of busmess or of the principal office in the State.

R_201709_RPT_MRWA_Roe 1008:M3-1 Time limit for The proponent sh,111not commence 1mplement.iit1on of Commence substantial Overall. By 2 July 2020. CLO Rl!:fer to the 2017 CAR Reports proposal the proposal after the expiration of five (S) years from 1mplementat1on of Proposal by Highway Extension_2017 CAR imple mentation the date of this statement, and any commencement, 2July 2020. prior 10 this date, must be substantial. C_20170918_RPT_MRWA_Rol!: Highway Extens1on_2D17 CARCov e r Letter

R_201709_RPT_MRWA_Roe 1008:M3·2 Any commencement of impleml!:ntat1on of the propoYI, Provide written evidence of overall. By 2 July 2020. CLO Refer to the 2017 CAR Report on or before five (SI yurs from the date of this substantial commencement of Highway Extension_2017 CAR statement, must be demonstr.iited as substantial by implementation on or before 2 C_ 20170918_RPT _M RWA_Roe prov1dmg the CEO with written evidence, o n or before July 2020. the expiration of five (S) years from the date of this Highway Extens1on_2017 CARCover state ment. Letter

Refer to the 2017 CAR Report 1008:M4·1 Complrance The proponent shall prepare, submit and mamtam a Prep;,ire a Compliance R_201709_RPT_MRWA_Roe Pre- By 2 Apnl 2016 o r CLO reporting Compliance Anessment Plan to the CEO at lu st six (6) Msessment Plan and submit to Highway Extens1on_2017 CAR construction. prior to months prior to the first Comphance Assessment Repon the CEO of OEPA for approval. commencement required by condition 4-6, o r pnor to implementation, C_20170918_RPT_MRWA_Roe of construction, whichever 1s sooner. Highway EX1ens1on_2017 CARCov er whichever 1s Letter earlier.

R_201709_RPT_MRWA_Roe 1008:M4-2 The Compliance Assessment Plan shall md1c.1te: Prepare and submit to the CEO OVer.iill. Prior to CLO Refer to the 2017 CAR Report of OEPA a CAP addressing all H1ghw;,iyExtension _2017 CAR 1mplemen1auon (1) the frl!:quency of compliance reporting; requirements. or six months C_20170918_RPT_MRWA_Roe pnortofirst (2) the approach .iind timmg of compliance assenments; H1ghw;,iy Extens1on_2017 CARCover compliance Letter report. (3) the retention of compliance .iissessments;

{4) the method of reporting of potential non· compliances and corrective actions taken;

(S) the to1ble of contents of Compliance Assessment Reports; and

(6) publtc ava1tab1lity of Compliance Assessment Reports.

~ Audit Code Subject Requirement How Evidence Pho1Se Timeframe Status Further Information

l008:M4-3 After receiving notice in w riting from the CEO that the Underta ke annual compliance R_20160927_RPT _S trategen_Roe Ove rall. Ongoing, C The following CARs comply with this condition: Compliance Assessment Plan satisfies the requirements assessments in ,1,ccordomce with Highway Extension_2016 CAR annually. first CAR covering an aud it pe riod of 2 July 2015 of condition 4-2 t he proponent shall assess compliance the approved CAP. to 1 July 2016; submitted on 28 September C_20160928_LTR_ MRWA_EPA_ Roe with conditions in ;;iccordance with the Compliance 2016 Assessment Plan required by c.ondit ion 4-l. Highway Extension_ 2016 CAR Cover Letter Second CAR covering an audit period of 2 July 2016 to 1 July 2017; submittedl8 September R_ 201709_RPT_MRWA_ Roe 2017 Highway Extension_2017 CAR Third CAR covering an audit period of 2 July 2017 to 1 July 2018 C_20170918_RPT_MRWA_Roe This CAR covering an audit penod of 2 July 2018 Highway Extension_2017 CAR Co\ler to 1July 2019 Letter

R_20181002_ RPT_ MRWA_Roe Highw.11yExtension _2018 CAR

C_20181002_RPT_MRWA_Roe Highway Extension_2018 CAR Co\le r Letter

This CAR

1008:M4-4 The proponent shall retain reports of all compliance Prepare .11ndret.i11n Annua l CARS R_20160927_R PT_ Strategen_Roe Overall. As required by C This is the fourth CAR. All pre\lious CARs were submitted to assessmen ts described in the Compliance Assessment in accordance with the Highway Extension_2016 CAR record ke eping the OEPA by the Proponent. The CEO of the OEPA has not Pl.in required by condition 4-1 .ind sh.ill m.ike those .ipproved CAP. le gislation. requested another copy of the CARs. reports a\lailable when requested by the CEO. C_20160928_LTR_ MRWA_EPA_Roe Make CARs av.i ilable to CEO of Highway Extension_2016 CAR Cover OEPA on re quest Letter

R_201709_RPT_MRWA_ Roe Highway Extension_2017 CAR

C_20170918_ RPT_MRWA_ Roe Highway Extension_2017 CAR Co\ler letter

R_20181002_RPT_MRWA_Roe Highway Extension_2018 CAR

C_20181002_RPT_ MRWA_Roe Hlghw.iy Extension_2018 CAR Cove r letter

This CAR

1008:M4-S The proponent shall ad\lise the CEO of any potential non- Written correspondence to CEO This CAR O\lerall. Within 7 days of a C Potential non"'i:ompliances were Ide ntified in this audit compliance within seven (7) d.1ys of th,1t pote ntial non- of OEPA within 7 days of any potent ial non- period and reporte d within 7 days. compliance b eing known. potentiat non•compli,1nce. compli,mce being known.

~ Audit Code Subject Requirement How Evidence Phase Timefr.ime Status Further Information

1008:M4-6 The proponent shall submit to the CEO the first Submit Annual CARs .iddressing R_20160927_ RPT_ Str.itesen_Roe Overall. By 2 October 2016 C This 1s the fourth CAR. All previous CARs were submitted to Comphance Assessment Report fifteen (15) months from illl requirements ilnnuillly to H1ghw.iy Extension_2016 CAR and annually the OEPA by the Proponent and are available on the the date of issue of this statement addressmg the twelve OEPA. thereafter. proJect website (12) month period from the date of issue of this C_20160928_LTR_MRWA_EPA_Roe First CARcovenng iln ilud1t penod of 2 July 2015 statement and then annu.1lly from the date of Highway Extension_2016 CARCover to 1 July 2016. submitted 28 September 2016 submission of the first Compliance Assessment Report. Letter The Compliilnce Assessment Report shall: Second CAR covering an audit penod of 2 July R_201709_RPT_MRWA_Roe 2016 to 1 July 2017, submitted 18 September {l ) be endorsed by the proponent' s Chief Executive Highwily E;,ctension_2017 CAR 2017 Officer or ii person delegated to sign on the Chief Third CAR covermg an .tudit period of 2 July Executive Officer's behalf; C_20170918_RPT_MRWA_Roe 2017 to 1 July 2018, subm1tted 2 October 2018 Highwaiy Extens1on_2017 CARCover This CAR covering an audrt period of 2 July 2018 (2} mclude a st.1tement as to whether the proponent hu Letter comphed with the conditions; to 1 July 2019, to be submitted prior to 2 October 2018. R_20181002_RPT_MRWA_Roe (3) ident1fy illl potentiill non-compliilnces ilnd describe Highway Extens1on_2018 CAR corrective and preve ntative actions taken; C_20181002_RPT_MRWA _ Roe (4) be made pubhcly available m accordance with the Highway &tension_2018 CARCove r approved Compliance Assessment Plan; and letter (SI mdrcate ilny proposed changes to the Comphance Assessment Pliln required by condition 4·1. Th1s CAR

1008:MS-l Public availability Subject to condition S-2, within a reasonable time period Make data https)/pro1ect ma1nroa 0 Ongo C All validated environmental dat.1 relevant to the assessment of this of data approved by the CEO of the issue of this statement and relevant to the ds.wa.gov.au/roe8/envr V mg. proposal have been uploaded to the Main Roads website. Add1t1onal for the remainder of the life of the proposal the assessment of this ronment/ Pases/manag e reports and assessments relevant to the implementation to this proponent shall make publicly available, in a manner proposal and ementplans aspll: statement completed in this audit period will be made publicly available approved by the CEO, all vahdated environmental data 1mplementat10n of ' C_20161130_LTR_OEPA_Pubhc . when this CAR is uploaded to the Main Roads web~ te . (including sampling design. sampling methodologies, this statement Avarlability of MS 1008 Plans and I empirical data and derived mformat1on products (e.g. pubhcly available Reports I maps)} relevant to the assessment of this proposal and as per OEPA Posr 1mplementat1on of this statement. Assessment Guidance for Making information publicly ovoi/oble (OEPA 2012c). 1008:MS-2 If any data referred to in condition 5-1 contains Provide the CEO NA 0 Ongo NR No request for secret informilt10n to be withheld was required in the particulars of: with an V 1ng. audit penod. expl.1nation and e (1) a secret formula or process; or reasons why data should not be ' (2) confidential commercially sensitive information; the . made publicly I proponent may submit a request for approval from the available. I CEO to not make this data pubhdy available. In makmg such a request the proponent shall provide the CEO with an explanaition and reasons why the data should not be made publicty available.

1008:M6-1 Infrastructure The proponent shall demonstrate that the proposal is Demonstrate that the proposal Figure l _Cle.1nng Area Overall. Ongoing. C Construction act1v1ties have been undertaken dunng this plan designed and constructed consistent with the authorised 1s designed and constructed Refl'rto 1008:Ml·l, audit period in accordance with the requirements of extent(s) as referred tom Column 3 of Table 2 in consistent with the authonsed 1008:M6·2 and Column 3 of Table 2 of Schedule 1. Schedule 1, through t he implementation of conditions 6- ext ent(s) as referred to in 1008:M6-3. Refer to 1008:M6-2 to 6-3. 2 and 6·3. Column 3 of Table 2 in Schedule 1, t hrough the implementat ion of conditions 6- 2 and 6-3.

~ Audit Code Subject Requirement How Evidence Phase Timeframe Status Further Information R_201709_RPT_MRWA_Roe 1008:M6·2 Prior to commencement of construction, unless Prepare an Infrastructure Plan Pre• Prior to CLO Refer to the 2017 CARReport. There have been no revisions in this audit otherwise agreed by the CEO, the proponent shall which is to be approved by the Highway Extension_2017 CAR construction. commencement period. prep;ue ,mInfrastructure Plan which is to be approved CEO. of construction, C_20170918_RPT_MRWA_Roe by the CEO. The Infrastructure Plan shall include: unless otherwise Highway Extension_2017 CARCover agreed by the (1) the alignment, dimensions and locations of the key Letter CEO. proposal elements as referred to in Columns 1 and 2 of To1bte 2 in Schedule 1;

(2) the final height of the noise walls as referred to in Table 2 of Schedule 1, consistent wit h the Nois.e Management Plan (AECOM) dated 11 July 2012;

(3) an assessment of the need for noise walls or other noise mitigation measures between Bibra Drive and Progren Drive, consistent with the Western Aust ralian Planning Commission's State Planning Policy 5.4 Road and Rail Transport N01se and Freight Considerat10ns in Land Use Planning.. to ensure that there are no adverse impacts of operat1on,1I noise on the existing buildings occupied by the Cockburn Wetlilnds Education Centre and the Native Arc Animal Rescue Centre on Hope Road, or t he dual use pathway located between Bibra Lake and the Roe Highway Extension;

(4) a framework of management and contingency actions including timeframes for their implementation, consistent with the Western Australian Planning Commission's State Planning Policy S.4 Road and Rail Transport Noise and Freight Considerations in Land Use Pl.1nning. should it be dete rmined that noise walls or other mitigation measures are required;

(SJ areas of native vegetation to be retained within the development envelope; and (6) spatial data for 6-2(1), 6- 2{2), 6-2(3} and 6-2(5), and if relevant 6· 2(4). -- 1008:M6·3 The proponent shall provide spatial data for the Provide spatial data for the NA Operation. Two (2) months NR Completion of construction is yet to occur. Hence action constructed key elements of the proposal as set out in constructed key elements of the following the not required as yet. Columns 1 and 2 of Table 2 in Schedule l to the CEO, two proposal as set out in completion of (2) months following the completion of construction. Columns 1 and 2 of Table 2 in construction. Schedule 1 to the CEO.

1008:M6•4 The proponent may review and revise the Infrastructure Review and revise the NA Overall. Ongoing. NR No amendments to the plan were made during this audit Plan to the requirements of the CEO. Infrastructure Plan to the period. requirements of the CEO.

1008:MG-S The proponent shall review and revise the Infrastructure Review and revise the NA Overall. Ongoing. NR No such direction received to date . Plan as and when directed by the CEO. Infrastructure Plan as and when directed by the CEO.

1008:M6-6 The proponent shall implement the approved revisions Implement the approved NA Overall. Ongoing. NR No amendments to the plan were made during this audit of t he lnfr.istructure Plan required by conditions 6-4 and revisions of the Infrastructure period. 6·5. Plan required by conditions 6·4 and 6-5.

~ Audit Code Subject Requirement How Evidence Phase nm errame Status Funher Information

1008:M6-7 The Infrastructure Plan required by condition 6·2 shall be Make the Infrastructure Plan h112s;l£ero~ct mamro.a Overall. Ongoing. C The Infrastructure Plan 1s available on t he Mam Roads made publicly available in a manner approved by the pubhcly available as per OEPA ds wa gov.au£roe8£env1 website. CEO. Post Assessment Guidance for ronmt'ntlPae.es£manag Making information publlcly Pment2lans a,;ex ova,loble (OEPA 2012c). C_20161130_LTR_OEPA _Pubhc Availability of MS 1008 Plans and Re ports 1008:M6·8 The document Peer Review- Roe Highway Extension, Make the document Pee, htt2s:£lp_ro~ct.ma1nroads.wa.gov.au Overall. Prior to the C Report is available on the Main Roads website Report No. 11061867-01, dated 19 September 2011 by Review - Roe Highway £rQe8£e nv1ron m ent£Pages£ manag em commencement Uoyd George Acoustics shall be made pubhdy available Extension, Report No. entelans aspx of construction. prior to the commencement of construction in a manner 11061867-01, doted 19 approved by the CEO. September 2011 publicly C_20161130_LTR_OEPA_Publ1c available as per OEPA Post Avililabihty of MS 1008 Plilns and Assessment Guidance for Reports Making in/o,mofion publicly ovoiloble (OEPA 2012c).

1008:M7-l Construction The proponent shatl e nsure that imp,1cts from Impleme nt conditions 7-2 to 7· Referto 1008:Ml·l ;1nd 1008:M 7-2 Overall. Ongoing. C Rl!!!fl!!!r to 1008:Ml· l and 1008:M 7-2 to 1008:M 7-10. (Inland waters construction on wl!!!tland hydrology, Willer quillity and 10. to 1008:M 7-10 l!!!nvironmental flora and Vf!il!!!tation are minimised, through the quality, 1mplementat1on of conditions 7-2 to 7-10. Hydroloe1cal processes and 1008:M7-2 Flora and The proponent shall construct the Roe Sw,1mp bridge Construct the Roe Swamp F1gurf! l_Clearmg Areil Construction. Ourmg NR Vegetation clearmg works ,n the vicinity of the Roe Swamp vegetation) identified in Table 2 of Schedule 1 using 'top down' bndge 1dent,f1ed m Table 2 of co,Htruct1on. bridge dunng pre-construction activ1t1es were hmit f!d to construction methods. Schl!!!dule 1 using 'top down' that withm the proposal development e nvelop (PDE) prior construction methods. to the suspl!!!nsmn of the Project. There are no current plans to construct the Roe Swamp bndge.

1008:M7-3 The proponent shall not abstract groundwater dunng No abstraction of groundwater R_20170516_RPT_AE C Construction. During C No groundwater was abstracted withm 1.5 km of the construction withm 1.5 kilometres of the wetland dunng constructton w1thm 1.S OM_Groundwater construction. wetland boundaries, as outlined m the condition. This boundaries of Nonh Lake, Bibra Lake and Rof! Sw.imp ilS kilometres of the wetland Operating control is outlined in the proJect 1nduct1on. 1dent1fied m the most up to date Geomorphic Wetland bound;:iries of North l.ilke, Bibra Strategy_Eastern Water Approval was obtained from the Department of Water and Swan Coastal Plain diltaset (custodians the Department Liiike and Roe Swilmp as Supply Bore Rev 2 Environmental Regulation (DWER) for the construction of of Parks and Wildhfe). identified in the most up to l_20170S26_DWER_lic two bores, both louted outside the 1.S km buffer of the date Geomorphic Wetland ence to take Water• SC wetland boundanes. Only the Eilstern Bore is berng used. Swan Coastal Plam dataset. l_2016126_0WER_260 Figure 1 of the Operilting Strategy shows the location of Licence to construct or the groundwater abstraction bore is outside the atteril well Groundwilter Extraction Prohibited Area. R_20190730_MRIA_Sit e Environment Plan_W8 1020·SEP•EN• OOSS_Zone 6 Works_RevF 1008:M7-4 The proponent shall not undertake d ewatering activities No dewatenne act1v1t,es pnor to R_20190730_MRIA_Sit Pre- Prior to or durine C No eroundwater was dew,1tered prior to or during pnor to or dunng construction of the proposal. or during construction of the e Environment construction construction. construction of the proposal, as outhned in the cond1t10n. proposal. Pliln_W81020·SEP•EN• and This control is on SEPs provided for worh and outhned m 0055_Zone 6 construction. the pro1ect induction. Works_Revf

R_20190730_MRIA_S1te Onty a small area West of 81bra Drive required excavation within the 1008:M7-S Thf! proponent shall mimm1se excaviltlon ilctivities in the Minimise exc.avation activities Construction. During C 'high to moderate' ASS risk area dunng this audit period. The ilrea was development envelope in areas mapped ilS 'high to in the df!velopment envelope m Environment Plan_W810 20-SEP-EN• construction. moderate' using the most up to date Acid Sulfate Soils areas mapped as 'high to OOSS_Zone G Worh _RevF tested by a suitably qualified ASS spec1ahst who advised on the risk mappmg by the Oepilrtment of Environment moderate' using the most up to appropn oite actions to implement in order to minimise the impact to Reeulat,on. date Acid Sulfate Sotls risk C_20181205_EML_MRIA_PASS west the Potential ASS (PASS). These actions were implemented throughout mapping. of 81bra Drive the dur ing and excavation works, thus m1n1m1smg excavation acttv11ies in the area mapped as havme a 'h,gh to moderate' ASS nsk. ~ Audit Code Subject Requirement How Evidence Phase Timeframe Status Further lnfomi.1tion Refer to the 2017 CAR Report 1008:M7-6 Prior to commencement of construction the proponent Prepare a Construction R_201709_RPT_MRWA_Roe Pre- Prior to CLO shall prepare a Construction Environmental Environmental Management Highway Extension_2017 CAR construction. commencement Management Plan to minimise impacts from Plan (CEMP) to minimise of construction. construction on inland waters environmental quality and impacts from construction on C_20170918_RPT_MRWA_Roe flora and vegetation, to the requirements of the CEO, on inland waters environmental Highway Extension_2017 CARCover advice of the Department of Environment Regulation. quality and flora and Letter vegetation, to the requirements of the CEO, on advice of the Department of Environment Regulation. - - 1008:M7-7 The Construction Environmental Management Plan shall: Prepare a CEMP and ensure it R_201709_RPT_MRWA_Roe Pre- Prior to C Refer to the 2017 CAR Report includes the requirements Highway Extension_2017 CAR construction. commencement (1) include measures to control weeds and dust during specified in condition 7-7. of construction. construction to minimise the impacts on flora and C_20170918_RPT_MRWA_Roe vegetation; Highway Extension_2017 CAR Cover Letter (2) outline the protocols and procedures to be implemented to ensure diseases and pathogens, such as Phytophthora cinnamom1, are not introduced into disease free areas of the proposal area during construction;

(3) address testing of soils and groundwater to determine treatment regimes and management for .icid sulfate soils and other contaminants; and

(4) address the requirements of the Department of Environment Regulation's Acid Sulfate Soil Guidelines Senes Identification and Investigation of At1d Sulfate Soils and Addie Landscapes (2009) and Treatment and Management of Soils and Water in Acid Sulfate Soil Landscapes (2011), or any approved update of these guidelines.

1008:M7-8 The proponent may review and revise the Construction Review and revise the CEMP to NA Overall. Ongoing. NR No amendments to the plan were made during this audit Environmental Management Pl.in to the requirements of the requirements of the CEO. period. the CEO.

1008:M7-9 The proponent shall review and revise the Construction Review and revise the CEMP as NA Overall. Ongoing. NR No such direction received to date. Environmental M;magement Plan as and when directed and when directed by the CEO. by the CEO.

1008:M7-10 The proponent shall implement the approved revisions Implement the .ipproved NA Overall. Ongoing. NR No amendments to the pl.in were made during this audit of the Construction Environmental Management Plan revisions of the CEMP required period. required by conditions 7·8 and 7-9. by conditions 7-8 and 7-9.

1008:M7-11 The Construction Environmental Management Plan Make the CEMP publicly ht1es:£Lero1ect ma,nroa Overall. Ongoing. C Plan is available on the Main Roads website. required by condition 7-6 shall be made publicly available as per OEPA Post ds wa.gov.aulroe8lenv1 available in a manne r approved by the CEO. Assessment Guidance for ronment£Pages£manag Making information publicly ementplans.aspx available (OEPA 2012c). C_20161130_LTR_OEPA _Public Availability of MS 1008 Pl;ms and Reports ~ Audit Code Subject Requirement How Evidence Phase nmeframe Status Further Information

1 Dra11nage (Inland The proponent shall ensure that impacts to groundwater Ensure that impacts to R_201909_RPT_MRIA_ Overall. Prior to C Construction activities commenced dunng the audit Waters quality from the ongoing operation of the proposal are groundwater quality from the Annual Drainage commencement period, The Drainage Momtortng and Management Plan Environmental maintained relative to pre-construction conditions ongoing operation of the Monitonng and of construction was implemented prior to the commencement of Quality) estilbll:!ihed in baseline surveys required by conditioo 8· propoul are mamtained Milnilgement Report and one:01ng. construction. Mooitonng results are discussed m the 3. relative to pre-construction annual reports. There hilS been no 1mpilct to groundwilter conditions established m quillity from the ongoing operat ion of the proposal, basehne surveys required by relative to pre-construction cond1tions. condition 8-3.

RPT MRWA 2 PriOf' to commencement of co nstruction, the proponent Prepare a Drainilge R_201709_ _ _Roe Pre• Prior to CLO Refer to the 2017 CAR Report shall prepare a Drainage Manilgement and Mon1t0fing Management and Monitoring H1ghwo1yExt ens1on_2017 CAR construction. commencement Plan to the requirements of the CEO, on .idvice of the Plan (DMMP) and ensure It of construction. Department of Water. The Drainage Management and includes the requ1rements C_20170918_RPT_MRWA_Roe Monitonng Pl.in shall: specified in condition 8·2. Highway Extens1on_2017 CAR Cover Letter (1) when implemented, substantiate whether condition 8-1 is being met;

(2) 1dent1fy the locations, capacity and d1mens1ons of b1oretent1on and infiltration basins consistent with the Water Management Strategy (AECOM) dated 16 January 2013;

(31 include ongoing maintenance measures to ensure the b1oretention and mfiltrat10n basms are performing effectively;

(4) include protocols and procedures for baseline momtonng of groundwater levels and groundwater quality;

(S) include protocols and procedures for mon,tormg contaminant and nutrient levels w1th1n the b1oretent1on and 1nfiltrat1on basins;

(6) mclu de protocols, procedures and locations for mon1tormg contaminants and nutnent levels of groundwater upstream and downstream of the b1oretention and infihrat1on basms;

(7) identify critena to trigger implementation of management measures to remediate contaminants within the bioretention and infiltration basins and ensure the basins are performing effectively;

{8) include management measures referred to tn condition 8-2(7); and

(9) determine the t1mmg and frequency of reportmg to the CEO.

3 Prior to commencement of construct ton, the propooent Implement the approved R_ 201608_ RPT_ St ra tegen _ BRS_ Orai Overall. Prior to C The scope of the basehne data collection was addressed as shall implement the approved Or.tmage Management Oramage Management and nage Management and Momtonng commencement part of the previous CARr eports. and Mon1t0f'ing Plan m order to collect baseline data and Monitormg Plan m order to Plan_Rev 1 of construction The Baseline Wetland Cond1t1on Survey .ind Oram.tge continue implementation until otherwise agreed by the collect basehne data and and ongoing until Moo1tonng was undertaken September 2015 • February CEO. continue implementation until otherwise .igreed 2016 Report was submitted to the OEPA m October 2016. otherv,use agreed by the CEO. by the CEO. OEPA subsequently approved the report in December 2016. The continumg implementation of the DMMP is recorded in the Annual Report mcluded with this CAR. • The pro ponent may review and revise the Dr.tmage Review a nd revise the DMMP to NA Overilll. Ongoing. NR No .imendments to the plan were m.ide during this audit M.inagement .ind Momtoring Plan to the requirements the requirements of the CEO. period. of the CEO. ~ Audit Code Subject Requirement How Evidence Phase Timeframe Status Further Information

1008:M8·S The proponent shiill review and revise the Drainage Review .rind revise the DMMP as NA Overall. Ongoing. NR No such direction received to date. Management and Monitoring Pliln ilS ilnd when directed iind when directed by the CEO. by the CEO.

1008:M8-6 The proponent shilll implement the iipproved revisions Implement the approved NA Overall. Ongoing. NR No ilmendments to the plan were made during this audit of the Drainage Management and Monitoring Plan revisions of the DMMP required period. require d by conditions 8-4 and 8•5. by conditions 8-4 and 8-S. - 1008:M8•7 The Drainage Management and Monitoring Pl.rin Make the OMMP publicly httes:£lgro1ect.mainroa Overall. Ongoing. C Plan is available on the Main Roads website . required by condition 8· 2 shill! be milde publicly available as per OEPA Post ds w;i.gov.au[roe8lenv1 available in a manner approved by t he CEO. Asse-ssment Guidance for ronmf'ntLPageslmanag Making information publicly ementplans aspx available (OEPA 2012c). C_20161130_L TR_ OEPA _Public Aviiilability of MS 1008 Plans and Reports Construction activities continued during the iiudit period. The Wetland 1008:M9-1 Wetlands (lnliind The proponent shall ensure that impacts to wetland Implement conditions 9-2 to 9- Refer to 1008:M9·2 to Overall. Ongoing. C W.aters qu;ality associated with the implementation of the 9. 1008:M9-9 Monitoring and Management Plan was implemented prior to the Environmental proposal are minimised, through implementation of commencement of construction. Monitoring results are discussed in the Quillity) conditions 9-2 to 9·9. annual repons . There has been no impact to wetland quality from the ongoing operation of the proposal, to date. During the preparation of this CAR Repon, it has become apparent that sediment monitoring has not been undertaken as part of the WMMP since construction commenced in November 2017. This w.as reported to the CEO within seven days.

R_201709_RPT _MRWA_Roc 1008:M9·2 The proponent shall undertake a Basehne Wetland Undertake a B.aseline Wetland Pre- Prior to CLO Refer to the 2017 CAR Report Condition Survey prior to commencement of Condition Survey prior to Highway £)(tens1on_2017 CAR construction. commencement construction to the requirements of the CEO on iidvice commencement of construction of construction. C_20170918_RPT_MRWA_Roe from the Department of Parks and Wildlife and the to the requirements of the CEO Department of Water. The Baseline Wetland Condition on advice from the Department Highway Extension_2017 CAR Cover Survey shall: of Parks and Wildlife (DPaW) Letter and the Department of Wiiter (1) have regilrd for Ramsilr wetlands within the broilder (OoW), which meets the system; requirements of condition 9-2.

(2) cover Bibra Lake, Roe Swamp ilnd North Uke areas adjacent to th e road;

(3) identify the indicators of Wf'tland quality including physicochem1cal parameters and bio•indicators; and

(4) include protocols to measure the indicators of wetland quality as ident ified in condition 9-2(3) including duration, t iming and frequency.

R_201709_RPT_MRWA_Roe 1008:M9-3 Prior to commencement of construction, the proponent Report the results of the Pre- Prior to CLO Refer to the 2017 CAR Report shall report the results of the Baseline Wetland Basl'line Wetland Condition Highway Extension_2017 CAR construction. commencement Condition Survey required by condition 9-2 to the CEO. Survl'y to the CEO of the OEPA. of construction. C_20170918_RPT_MRWA_Roe Highwily Extension~2017 CARCover Letter

~ Audit Code Subject Require ment How Evidence Philse TTmerrame Status Further Information R_201709_RPT_MRWA_Roe 1008:M9-4 Prior to commencement of construction, the proponent Prepare a Wetlands Monitoring Pre- Pnorto CLO Refe r to the 2017 CAR Re port shall pre pare a Wetlands Monitoring and Man.igement .ind M.in.igement Pl.in (WMMP) Highw.iy Extens1on_2017 CAR construction. commenceme nt Plan to the requirements of the CEO, on advice from the to the requirements of the CEO, of construction. Dep.irtment of Parks and Wildlife and the Department of on advice from the Department C_20170918_RPT_MRWA_Roe W.iter. The Wetl.inds Momtonng ,1nd Management Plan of P.i!rks ;and Wildhfe .i!nd the H1ghw.ily Exte ns1on_2017 CAR Cover shall: Department of Water. letter

(1) when implemented, subst.ilntiate whethe r condition 9-1 is being met;

(2) 1nd ude the location of monitoring and reference sites;

{3) include protocols for monitoring the indicators as identified under condition 9-2(3);

(4) determine the trigger levels for indicators of wetl.i!nd quahty to .i!Chieve the requirements of cond1t1on 9-1;

(S) mclude protocols for mon1toring wetland quality .igamst the tngger levels ide ntified in co ndition 9-4(4); and

(6) identify management and contmgency measures, ,ndud1ng t,meframes for their implementation, in the event that trigger levels identified under condition 9 -4(4) .ire not met.

1008:M9-S Prior to commencement of construction, the proponent Implement the approved R_201909_RPT_MRIA_Annual Over.ill. Pnorto C The WMMP was .ipproved in December 2016 and shall implement the a pproved Wetlands Monitoring and WMMP. Wetland Monitoring Compliance commencement contmues to be impleme nted. The Annual WMMP Report Man.igeme nt Plan, a nd cont mue impleme ntation untrl Report of construction, provides .i summ.iry of the momtonng results for the otherwise agreed by the CEO. and continue until 2018-2019 monitoring period. During the prepdlratlo n of L_20190903_LTR_MRIA_NC otherwise agreed th1s CAR Report, it has become apparent that sediment lnvest1g.iltion Final by the CEO. momtonng has not bee n undertaken as part of the WMMP since construction commenced m Novembe r 2017. lh1s l _20190904._LTR_ MRIA_ Aquatic was reported to the CEO within seve n days. Macro1nver1ebrate E.xceeda nce Re port

C_20190903_lTR_MS1008 Potential non-compliance and exceed.ilnce report

1008:M9·6 The propone nt may review ;md revise the Wetl,mds Review .ind revise the WMMP Over.ill. Ongoing. C An adde ndum to th e WMMP was submitted to th e CEO of Monitoring and Management Plan to the requirements to the requirements of the CEO. C_20190403_RPT_OWER_Addendu the OEPA on 29 Ma rch 2019, and later approved on 3 April of the CEO. m Acceptance le tter Roe Highway 2019. Stage 8 Extension

R_20190328_RPT_ MRI A_WMMP Addendum_Rev O Fmal 1008:M9-7 The proponent shall review .ind revise the Wetlands Review and revise the WMMP NA Overall. Ongoing. NR No such direction received to d.ite. Monitoring and Management Plan as and when directed as and when directed by the by t he CEO. CEO.

1008:M9·8 The proponent shall implement the approved revisions Implement the approved R_20190328_RPT_ M RIA_ WMMP Overall. Ongoing. C The a pproved add1mdum has been impleme nted. The of the Wetl.inds Monitoring and Management Pla n revisions of the WMMP Adde ndum_Rev O Final Annual WMMP Report provides a summary of the required by cond1t1ons 9-6 a nd 9-7. required by condit ions 9-6 and monitoring results for the 2018·2019 monitoring pe nod m ( 9-7. C_20190403_RPT_OWER_Addendu acco rd ance with the addendum. m Acceptance letter Roe Highway Stage 8 Extension

~c. R_201909_RPT_MRIA_Annual -~ Wetland Monitoring Complia nce ~ Re port Audit Code Subject Requirement How Evidence Phase Timeframe Status Further Information 1008:M9-9 In the event that the monitoring indic.-te s that the Take ae1ion in response to L_20190807_RPT_MRIA Exceedance Overall. Ongoing: C Trigger values defined in the WMMP were e,cceeded a number of t imes. trigger criteria specified in the Wetlands Monitoring and trigger exceedances and report Letter_ Example Subsequent monitoring demonstrated that these events were Management Plan have been exceeded the proponent to the CEO of the OEPA within • (1) anomalies that were unlikely to reflect construction activities. shall: seven days of the event in l_20190903_LTR_MRIA_NC immediately and Exceedance reports were submitted to the CEO within seven days of accordance with condition 9-9. Investigation Final then continuing each event. (1) immediately implement the management and/or until trigger contingency ae1ions specified in the Wetlands L_20190904_LTR_MR IA_ Aquatic critena met. or Monitoring and Management Plan and continue M.tcroinvertebrate Exceedance until CEO notice Report implementation of those ae1ions until the trigger criteria • (3)within are being met, or until the CEO has confirmed by notice C_20190903_lTR_MS1008 Potential seven days of an in writing that it has been demonst rated that the event. outcome in condition 9-1 is being and will continue to be non-compliance and e,cceedance report met and implementation of the management and/or contingency actions is no longer required;

(2) investigate to determine the likely cause of the t rigger criteria being exceeded and to identify any additional contingency actions required to prevent the trigger crite ria being exceeded in the future; and

(3) provide a report to the CEO within seven d;,ys of an event, referred to in condition 9-9, occurnng. The report shall include:

a. details of management and/or contingency actions implemented; and

b. the findings of the investigation required by condition 9·9(2).

1008:M9·10 The proponent shall submit the monitoring results Submit the monitoring results R_201909_ RPT_MRIA_Annu.il Overall. By 2 October 2016 C The Annual WMMP Report will be submitted with the CAR. required by condition 9·4, referenced against the required by condition 9-4, Wetland Monitoring Compliance and .innu.illy environmental quality objective specified in condition 9- referenced against the Report thereafter. 1 .ind the trigger levels specified in condition 9·4(4), to environme ntal quality objective the CEO as part of the annual compliance reporting specified in condition 9-1 and required by condition 4. the trigger levels specified in condition 9-4(4), to the CEO of the OEPA.

1008:M9-11 The Wetlands Monitoring and Management Pl.in Make the WMMP publicly https:(lproiect.mamroa Overall. Ongoing. C The WMMP is available on the Main Roads website. required by condition 9-4 shall be made publicly available as per OEPA Po5t ds.wa.gov.au/roe8/env1 available in a manner approved by the CEO. As:sessment Guidance for ronment/Pages/manag Making information publicly ementplans aspx available (OEPA 2012c). C_20161130_LTR_OEPA _Public Av;,ilability of MS 1008 Plans and Reports

1008:Ml0-1 Flora and The proponent shall ensure th.it the o ngoing Ensure that t he ongoing Refer to 1008:Ml-l and Overall. Ongoing. C Refer to 1008:Ml4 1 and 1008:Ml0-2 to 10-9. vegetation implementation of the proposal does not cause any implementation of the proposal 1008:M10·2 to 10-9 detectible adverse effects on flora and vegetation does not cause any detee1ible communities outside of the 'zone of indirect impacts' as adverse effects on flora and shown in Figure 2 and described in Schedule 1. vegetation communities outside of the 'zone of indirect impaC1s'. Audit Code Subject Requirement "= Evidence Phase Timeframe Status Further lnfonnatlon 1008:Ml0-2 The proponent shall undertake a Baseline Flora and Undertake a Baseline Flora and R_201709 _RPT_MRWA_Roe ,,~ Prior to CLO Refer to the 2017 CAR Report Vegetation Condition Survey prior to commencement of Vegetation Condition survey Highway Extension_2017 CAR construction. commencement construction to the requir,:,ments of the CEO on advice priortocommencement of of construction. from the Oepartment of Parks and Wildlife. The Baseline construction to the C_20170918_RPT_MR flora and Vegetation Condition Survey shall: requirements of the CEO on WA_Roe Highway advice from DPaW. E>

(2) Identify the Indicators of flora and vegetation health including the condiUon and composition of flora and vegetation communities and correlative environmental parameters Including soil moisture within the survey area; and

(3) include protocols to measure the indicaton.of flora and vegetation health including duration, timing and frequency. - ··------1008:Ml0-3 Prior to commencement of construction, the proponent Report the n:-sults of the R_201709_RPT_MRWA_Roe Pre- Prior to cm Refer to the 2017 CAR Report shall report the results of the Baseline Flora and Baseline flora and Vegetation Highway Extension_2017 CAR construction. commencement Vegetation Survey required under condition 10-2 to the Condition Survey to the CEO of of construction. C_20170918_RPT_MR CEO. the OEPA. WA_Roe Highway Exten5lon_2017 CAR Cover Letter 1008:Ml0-4 Prior to commencement of construction, the proponent Prepare a Flora and Vegetation R_201709_RPT_MRWA_Roe Pre- Priorto CLO Refer to the 2017CAR Report shalt prepne a Floi. and Vegetation Monitoring and Monitoring and Management Highway E>

(2) include the location of impact and reference vegetation condition plots;

(3) include protocols for monitoring the indicators as Identified in condition 10-2{2);

(4] determine the trigger levels for the indicators of flora and vegetation condition lo apply to the area outside the 'zone of indirect impacts';

(5) Include protocols for monitoring flora and vegetation condition against the triggers levels Identified In condition 10-4(4);

(6) identify management and contingency mea,ures, including timeframes for their lmplementatlon, in the event that trigger levels identified under condition 10- 4{4) are not being met; and

(7) include a Vegetation Rehabilitation Plan consistent with the Rehabilitation Strategy- Roe Highway Extension (AECOM) dated 11 July 2012forareasthat have been temporarily cleared within the development envelope. ~ Audit Code Subject Requirement How Evidence Phase Timeframe Status Further Information 1008:MlO·S Prior t o commencement of construction, the proponent Implement the approved R_20190110_RPT_MRI A_Annual Overall. Prior to C The FVMMP w.is .ipproved in October 2016 and continues to be shall implement the approved Flora and Vegetation FVMMP and continue Flora ,1nd Vegetation Monitoring and commencement implemented. Monitoring and Management Plan, and continue implementiltion until otherwise Management Plan Report of construction implementation until otherwise agreed by the CEO. agreed by the CEO of the OEPA. .ind ongoing until Spring vegetation condition monitoring was undertaken in October otherwise ;1greed 2018. The annuiil report was completed ;md will be submitted as part of by the CEO. this CAR.

1008:MlO.fi The proponent may review and revise the Flora and Review and revise the FVMMP NA Overall. Ongoing. NR No revisions undertaken in this audit period. Vegetation Monitoring ;1nd Man;1gement Pl.in to the to the requirements of the CEO. requirements of the CEO.

l008:Ml0•7 The proponent shall review and revise the flora and Review and revise the FVMMP NA Overall. Ongoing. NR No such direction received to date. Vegetation Monitoring and Management Plan as and as and when directed by the when directed by the CEO. CEO.

1008:Ml0-8 The proponent shall implement the approved revisions Implement the ,1pproved NA Overall. Ongoing. NR No revisions undertaken in this audit period. of the Flor.iiand Vegetation Monitoring and revisions of the FVMMP Management Plan required by conditions 10-6 ;1nd 10-7. required by conditions 10-6 and 10-7.

- Upon completion of the 2018 monitoring event, 1t was evident thilt the 1008:M10·9 In the event that the monitoring indic.tes th•t the Take action in response to R_20190110_RPT_MRtA_Annual Overall. Ongoing: C trigger critena specified in the Flor• and Vegetation trigger exceedances and report flora and Vegetation Monitoring and triggers were not effective in assessing vegetation condition relative to Monitoring and Management Pl•n have been exceeded to the CEO of the OEPA within Management Plan Report • (1) the Project. AU quad~ts eicceeded one or more triggers including native the proponent shall: seven days of the event in immediately and plant density and foliage cover. The results have subsequently indicated accordance with condition 9-9. l _20181221_MRIA_Vegetation then continuing th.1t the application of ,1 10% threshold as ,1 trigger value to foliage, (1) immedi.itely implement the management and/or Condition Monitoring 2018 until tngger density and change over time trends is not a suitable measure of impact contingency actions specified in Flora and Vegetation Exceedances criteria met, or the on vegetation condition as a result of the Project. An exceedance letter Monitoring and Management Plan and continue until CEO notice was provided to the CEO within seven days. implementation of those actions until the trigger criteri.l • (3)within are being met, or until the CEO has confirmed by notice seven days of an in writing that it has been demonstrated that the evenL outcome in condition 10-1 is being and will continue to be met .1nd implementation of the momagement and/or contingency actions is no longer required;

(2) investigate to determine the likely cause of the trigger criteria being exceeded and to identify any .idditional contingency actions required to prevent the trigger cri1eria being exceeded in the future; and

(3) prO\lide a report to the CEO within seven days of an event, referred to in condition 10-9, occurring. The repoll shall indude:

(a) details of management and/or contingency actions implemented; And

(bl the findings of the investigation required by condition 10-9(2).

1008:MlO·lO The proponent shall submtt the monitoring results Submit the monitoring results R_20190110_RPT_MRIA_Annual Overall. By 2 October 2016 C Spnng veget.at1on condition monitoring w.is undertaken in October required by condition 10-4, referenced against the required by condition 10-4, Flor,1 and Vegetation Monitoring and annu;;illy 2018. The annual report was completed and is being submitted .is p.irt environment.al quality objective specified in condition referenced agilinst the Compliance Report thereafter. of this CAR. 10-1 and the trigger levels specified m condition 10·4(4), environment.ii quality objective to the CEO as part of the annual compliance reportmg specified in condition 10-1 and required by condition 4. the trigger levels specified in condition 10-4(4), to the CEO of the OEPA. Audit Code Sub,ect Requirement How Evidence Phase nmeframe Status Funher lnform.ition 1008:MlD·ll The Flora and Vegetation Monitoring and Management Make the FVMMP publicly https l[pro1e-ct ma1nroa Overall. Ongoing. C Plan is available o n the Main Roads website. Plan required by condition 10•4 shall be made publicly available as per OEPA Post ds wa.i;:ov au£roe8£env, available in a manner .ipproved by the CEO. Assessment Guidance for ronment£Pac.eslm.1nag Making information publicly ementplans aspx {OEPA 011aifoble 2012c). C_2016113D_LTR_OEPA_Pubhc Availability of MS 1008 Plans and Repons

1008:Mll -1 F.1una The proponent shall ensure that the proposal 1s Ensure that the proposal 1s Refer to 1008:Mll -2 to Overall. Ongoing. C Refer to 1008:Mll -2 to 11·6. implemented to facilitate movement of fauna within implemented to facilitate 11·6 Beeliar Regional Park and minimise impacts as a result of movement of fauna within fragmentation, through implementat ion of conditions Beeliar Regional Park and 11·2 to 11-6. minimise impacts as a result of fragment.ition.

1008;Ml1·2 Prior to commencement of construction, unless Prepare a FMP to the R_201709_RPT_MRWA_Roe Pre- Prior to CLO Refer to the 2017 CAR Report otherwise agreed by the CEO, t he proponent shall requirements of the CEO on Highway Extens1on_2017 CAR construction. commencement prepare a Fauna Management Plan to the requirements advice of DPaW. of construction of the CEO on advice of the Oepanment of Parks and C_20170918_RPT_MRWA_Roe Wildlife. The Fauna Management Plan shall: Prepare an FMP and ensure it Highway Extension_2017 CAR Cover includes the requirements Letter (1) provide the surveyed locattons and frequency of the spec,fied in condit ion 11·2. fauna underpasses necessary to meet the requirements of condition 11•1;

(2) detail the size, shape and furniture within the fauna unde rpasses;

(3) provide an ongoing program of inspections and maintenance to ensure the underpasses are performing effectively;

(4) include .atrapping and translocat1on program for target fauna speaes , which includes the southern brown bandicoot (lsoodon obesulus fusciventer} and bla ck cockatoos, or as otherwise agreed by the CEO;

(S) identify objectives .ind monitoring protocols to measure the success of trapping and trans.location program required by condition 11· 2(4);

(6) identify management and contingency measures, including t,meframes for their implementation in the event that objectives of the trapping and translocat ion program m condition 11·2(4) are not being met;

(7J assess the need for n01se barriers or other noise mitigation measures between B1bra Drive and Progress Ortve to ensure that noise does not adversely impact fauna;

(8) should noise barriers or no,se mitig.it1on measures be required as a result of condition 11-2(7), 1dent1fy management and contingency measures, including timeframes for their remed1at1on, to be implemented m the event that noise levels are having an adverse impact o n fauna;

(9) detail t he visual barriers to be installed to reduce the risk of veh1de strikes. to birds between Nonh hke and Bibra Lake; and

(10) determine the timing and frequency of reporting to (L the CEO. ~ r I '-- Audit Code Subject Requirement How Evidence Phase Timeframe St.atus Further Informat ion The Fauna Management Plan {FMP) was successfully implemented 1008:Mll-3 Prior to commencement of construction, unless Implement the approved Faun.a R_201909_RPT_MRIA_F Overall. Prior to C throughout the audit period in accord;mce with condition 11 of MS otherwise agreed by the CEO, the proponent shall Management Plan required by auna Management Plan commencement implement the approved Fauna Management Plan condition 11-2. A.nnua1 Compliance of construction, 1008. No non-conformances h.ive been identified, and contingency required by condition 11-2, to the satisfaction of the Report_RevO unless otherwise actions have been implemented where required. CEO. agreed by the CEO. An Annual Compliance Report for the FMP has been completed demonstrating the implementation and outcomes of the Plan. R_201709_RPT_MRWA_Roe 1008:Mll-4 The proponent may review and revise the Fauna Review and revise the FMP to Overall. Ongoing. C No revisions to the FMP were m.1de during this audit Management Plan to the requirements of the CEO. the requirements of the CEO. Highway Extension_2017 CAR period. Refer to the 2017 CAR Report for previous addendums. C_20170918_RPT_MR WA_Roe Highway Extension_2017 CAR Cover Letter 1008:Mll ·S The proponent shall review and revise the Fauna Review and revise the FMP as NA Over.tit. Ongoing. NR No such direction has been provided to date. Miln.igement Plan ils and when directed by the CEO. and when directed by the CEO.

1008:Mll-6 The proponent shall implement the approved revisions Implement the .ipproved NA Overall. Ongoing. C No revisions were made during this audit period. Previous of the Fauna Management Plan required by conditions revisions of the FMP required revisions have been implemented. 11-4 and ll ·S. by conditions 11-4 and 11-S.

1008:Mll-7 The proponent shall submit the outcomes of the Submit the outcomes of the R_201909_RPT_MRIA_F Overall. By 2 October 2016 C Outcomes of the translocation program have been t rapping and translocat ion program required by trapping and translocation auna Management Plim and annually communicated regularly with the DEPA and DPaW conditions 11-2(4) .and any man.igement or contingency program required by cooditions Annual Compliance thereafter. throughout pre-construction and construction activities. measures implemented as required by condition 11-2(6) 11· 2(4) and any management or Report_RevO An Annual Compliance Report for the FMP has been to the CEO as part of the annual compliance reporting contingency measures completed demonstrating the implementat1on and required by condition 4 and annually to the Department implemented as required by outcomes of the Plan. This report will be submitted as part of Parks and Wildlife. condition 11·2(6) to th e CEO. of this CAR.

1008:Mll-8 The Fauna Management Plan required by condition 11·2 Make the FMP publicly available https:/{pro1ect.ma1nroa Overall. Ongoing. C Pl;in is available on the Main Roads website. shall be made publicly available in a manner approved by ;is per OEPA Post Assessment ds wa gov au/roe8/env1 the CEO. Guidance for Making ronment/Pages/manag information publicly avoifoble ementplans.aspx (OEPA 2012c}. C_20161130_LTR_OEPA_public Availability of MS 1008 Plans and Reports - 1008:Mll·l Residual impacts In view of the significant residual impacts to the Implement conditions 1-2 to 12· Refer to 1008:Mll -2 to 1008:Mll - Overall. Ongoing. C Refer to 1008:M12·2 to 1008:Ml2·16. and risk environment, induding impacts to threatened species, 6 16 management priority flora, fauna habitat, migratory bird-., native measures vegetation, wetlands, Beeliar Regional Park and Bush Forever sites, as a result of implementation of the proposal, the proponent shall undertake the following requirements relating to offsets as outlined in conditions 12-2 to 12-16. - R_201709_RPT_MRWA_Roe 1008:Ml 2·2 Prior to commencement of construction, or as otherwise Submit a Land Acquisition and Pre- Prior to CLO Refer to the 2017 CAR Report agreed by the CEO, the proponent shall submit a Land M~nagement Plan {LAMP)t o Highway Extension_2017 CAR construction. commencement Acqui-.ition and Management Plan to the requirements the requirements of the CEO of of construction, or C_20170918_RPT_MRWA_Roe of the CEO. the OEPA. as otherwise Highway Extension_2017 CARCover agreed by the Letter CEO. ~ Audit Code Subject Requirement ,ow Evidence Pha"' Tlmeframe Status Furtherl11formaUon

1008:M12-3 The proponent shall implement the land Acquisition and Implement the lAMP. R_201611_RPT_AECOM Overall. until the CEO C Implementation oft he LAMP is compliant to date. Management Plan, prior to commencement, or as _BRB_land Acqui~tion advises Acquisition of offset land identified in the LAMP has been otherwise agreed by the CEO, until the CEO advises and Management Plan lmplementatio11 fully funded and the land acquired. implement:;r,tion m:;r,ycease. (LAMP)Rev4 may cease. A Memorandum of Understanding has been signed by C_201612_LTR_BR8 to DPaW 01127 June 2017following liaison with OPaW OEPA_Implementation regarding the arrangements and funding for the ongoing of Offsets management of the land acquired. R_20170814_Memoran dum of Understanding (MoU)_Payment of Offset Management Co!

(a) at least 234 hectares of Calyptorhynchus latirostris (Camaby'sCockatooJ and 219 hectares of Calyptorhynchus banksil naso (Red-tailed Black Cockatoo) potential foraging habitat;

(b) at least 7.5 hectares of Calyptorhynchus latirostris (Camaby's Cockatoo) and Calyptorhynchus banksii naso {Red-tailed Blad< Cockatoo) potential breeding habitat;

(c) al Inst 7 hectares of Conservation Category Wetland areas and an appropriate buffer;

(d) unless subject to condition 12-4(4) remnant native vegetaUon similai-orbetter lhan the vegetation association being impacted by the proposal; and

(el an assemblage of fauna and flora species similar to those being impacted.

(4) detail a Rehabilitation Plan for any areas identified in 12-4{1) that require rehabilitatio11 measures. The Rehabilitation Plan on advice of the Depanment of Parks and Wildlife shall:

a. identify the areas to be rehabilitated;

(bl outline the objectives and targets to be achieved;

(c) outline timeframesand responsibilities for implementation;

(d) outline the funding schedule and financial arrangements; and

(e) outline monitoring, reponing and evaluation mechanisms.

(5) detail the arrangements and funding for the ongoing management of the land acquired on advice from the Oepanmentof Parks and Wildlife; and 1t: (6) include monitoring and reponing requirements. Audit Code Subject Requirement How Evidence Phase Timeframe Status Further Information 1008:Ml2·S Prior to commencement of construction, or as otherwise Acquire, or fully fund the R_201709_RPT_MRWA_Roe Pre- Prior to CLO Refer to the 2017 CAR Report agreed by t he CEO, the proponent shall acquire, or fully acquisition of, the land Highway Extension_2017 CAR construction. commencement fund the acquisition of, the land identified in the identified in the approved of construction, or approved l and Acquisition and Management Plan for the LAMPfor the purpose of C_20170918_RPT_MRWA_Roe as otherwise purpose of conservation. conservation. Highway Extens1on_2017 CAR Cover agreed by the Letter CED.

R_201709_RPT_ MRWA_Roe 1008:M12-6 Prior to commencement of construction, or as otherwise Prepare a Wetland Restoration Pre- Prior to CLO Refer to the 2017 CAR Report agreed by t he CEO, the proponent shall prepare a Pl;m {WRP) to the requirements Highway Extension_2017 CAR construction. commencement Wetland Restoration Plan to the requirements of the of the CEO. of construction, or C_20170918_RPT_MRWA_R CEO. oe as otherwise Highway Extension_2017 CARCover agreed by the letter CEO.

R_201709_RPT_MRWA_Roe 1008:Ml2-7 The Wetland Restoration Plan identified in condition 12- Prepare a WRP and ensure it Pre- Prior to CLO Refer to the 2017 CAR Report 6, shall include det•ils on: includes the requirements Highway Extension_2017 CAR construction. commencement specified in condition 12-7. of construction, or {l) activities to be undert.iken including the final area to C_20170918_RPT_MR as otherwise be rehabilit.ited and restored; WA_Roe Highway agreed by the Extensioo_2017 CAR CED. (2) timeframes for undertaking management activities; Cover l etter

(3) roles .ind responsibilities;

(4) funding arrangements for implementation of the plan;

(5) monitoring and reporting requirements; and

(6) co.mpletion criteria.

1008:M12-8 The Well.ind Restoration Plan identified in condition 12- Ensure WRP applies to the areas Refer to 1008:Mll-6 Overall. Ongoing. C Refer to 1008:M 12-6 6 shalt apply to the areas deline.ited in Figure 3. delineated in Figure 3 of the The approved WRP applies to the are.is delineated in Ministerial Statement. Figure 3 of MS 1008.

1008:M12·9 Prior to commencement of construction, or as otherwise Implement the WRP. C_201612_lTR_BR8 to Over.ill. Prior to C Seed collection from the proposal area was conducted in agreed by the CEO, the proponent shall implement the OEPA_tmplementation of Offsets commencement early 2016, as per Table 4 of the WRP. M.iin Ro.ids advised Wetland Restor.it ion Pl.in until the CEO advises of construction, or the OEPA of this action prior to the commencement of pre• 1mplement.ition m.iy cease. as otherwise construction activities. agreed by the No further actions are required until the completion of CEO, until the CEO construction. .idvises implementation may cease.

1008:M12-10 The proponent shall transfer 14.5 hectares of land as Transfer 14.S hectares of land NR Operation. Commencing NR Construction is not complete hence the transfer is not shown in Figure 4 into Beeli.ir Regional P.irk. This as shown in Figure 4 into Beeliar within twelve (12) required during this audit period. transfer shall comme nce within twelve (12) months of Region;1I Park. months of the the completion of the proposal. completion of the propos.il (for this condition taken to me.in 'on completion of construction').

R_201709_RPT_MRWA_Roe 1008:M12-11 Prior t o commencement of construction, or as otherwise Prepare an Arum Lily Control Pre- Prior to CLO Refer to t he 2017 CAR Report agre ed by t he CEO, the proponent shall prepare an Arum Program (A.lCP) for the land Highway Extension_2017 CAR construction. commencement LilyControl Program for the land referred to in condition referred to in condition 12-10 to of construction, o r 12-10 to the requirements of the CEO. the requirements of the CEO. C_20170918_RPT_MRWA_Roe as otherwise Highway Extension_2017 CARCov er agreed by the letter CEO. ~ Audit Code Subject Requirement "= Evidence Phase Timeframe Status Further Information R_201709_RPT_MRWA_Roe 1008:M12-12 The Arum Lily Control Program required by condition 12- Prepare an ALCPand ensure it "~ Prior to cw Refer to the 2017 CAR Report 11 must indude details on; includes the requirements Highway Extenslon_2017 CAR construction. commencement specified in condition 12-12. of construction, or (1) an assessment and mapping ofthee~istlng Arum lily C_20170918_RPT_MRWA_Roe as otherwise infestation; Highway Extension_2017 CAR Cover agreed by the Letter CEO. (2) activities to be undertaken;

(3) timeframes for undertaking managemenl activities;

(4) roles and responsibilities;

{S) funding arrangemenls for implementation of the program;

(6) mooi1oring and reporting requirements; and

{7) completion aiteria.

100B:M12-13 The proponent shall commence lmplementaUon of the Commence implementation of Operation. Commencing Completion ofthe proposal did not occur during this audit Arum Lily Control Program, within twelve (12) months of the Arum Lily Control Program. "' within twelve (12) "' period hence implementation was not required. completion of the proposal, until the CEO advises months ofthe implementation may cea.se. completion of the proposal

1008:M12-14 Prior to commencement of construction, or as otherwise Prepare a Typhoorientolis R_201709_RPT_MRWA_Roe "~ Prior to cw Refer to the 2017 CAR Report agreed by the CEO, the proponent sha!I prepare a Typho Control Program {TCP)for Highway Extenslon_2017 CAR construction. commencement orientolis Control Program for Th om sons Lake to the Thomsons Lake to the of construction, or C_20170918_RPT_MRWA_Roe requiremenn of the CEO. requfrements of the CEO. as otherwise Highway Extension_2017 CAR Cover agreed by the Letter CEO. - 1008:M12-1S The Typho orient a/is Control Program identilied In Prepare a TCP and ensure it R_201709_RPT_MRWA_Roe Pre- Prior to cw Refer to the 2017 CAR Report condition 12-14 shalt include: includes the requirements Highway Extenslon_2017 CAR construction. commencement specified in condition 12-14. of construction, or (l) an asse55ment and mapping of the existing Typha C_20170918_RPT_MRWA_Roe as otherwise orientolis infestation; Highway Extension_2017 CAR Cover agreedbythe Letter CEO. (2) activities to be undertaken;

(3) Umeframes for undertaking management activities;

(4} roles and responsibilities;

(5) funding arrangements for Implementation of the program;

(6) monitoring and reponing requirements; and

(7) completion criteria. -- ---· ·----·- ----·- - - 1008:M12-l6 Prior to commencement of construction, or as otherwise Commence implementation of R_2017062l_RPT_Aurecon_Roe Overall. Prior to C The second annual Typhoorientalis management actions agreed by the CEO, the proponent shall implement !he the TCP. Highway Extenslon_Typha oriental is commencement were completed May 2019. Typhi, orienrolisControl Program and continue 2017 Baseline Survey_Rev 0 of construction, or implementation until the CEO advises implementation as otherwise may cease. R_201906:ZS_RPT_Aurecon_Roe agreed by the Highway Extension May 2019Typha CEO. Orientalis Vegetation Survey ~ ROE HIGHWAY EXTENSION COMPLIANCE REPORT

Appendix 3: MS 1008 Schedule 1 Audit Table

Document No: D19#743461 Page 23 of 18 Schedule 1 of Statement 1008 audit table Item Element Description Evidence Comments Status 1 Clearing and disturbance Within the 174.6 ha development Figure 1_Clearing Area Clearing of native vegetation was within the proposal C envelope: development envelope (PDE). Clearing areas were • a 88.8 ha construction and operation surveyed in the field upon completion. Total clearing of zone – clearing and disturbance of less native vegetation to date was limited to 43.82 ha, which is than 26.8 ha less than the approved 88.8 ha construction and operation • a 85.8 ha rehabilitation zone – no zone. Additionally, only 0.17 ha of EPP Lakes has been cleared, which is less than the approved 0.95 ha. additional clearing and disturbance. 2 Bridges No Bridges proposed I_Aerial of disturbed land_June2019 Vegetation clearing works during pre-construction C activities were limited to that within the PDE prior to the suspension of the Project. There are no current plans to construct these two bridges. 3 Noise walls The height of noise walls to be finalised I_Aerial of disturbed land_June2019 Clearing for noise walls occurred during this audit period. C in the Infrastructure Plan as required by All clearing has been within the PDE. condition 6-2(2). 4 Rehabilitation Areas cleared as part of the original NA Rehabilitation managed by the community and C proposal within the Rehabilitation Zone rehabilitation plan approved by EPA Services to be finalised in a Rehabilitation Management Plan

ROE HIGHWAY EXTENSION COMPLIANCE REPORT

Appendix 4: Subsidiary Plans Summary of Compliance and Audit Tables

Document No: D19#743461 Page 24 of 18 Appendix 4: Subsidiary Plans Summary of Compliance

Management Plan Status Comments Arum Lily Control Plan NR Not required to be implemented until post construction. The Project did not complete construction during this audit period. Compliance Assessment C This is the forth Compliance Assessment Report (CAR). Plan Construction Environmental C No non-conformances were reported in this audit period. The Management Plan Construction Environmental Management Plan has been implemented during construction works during this audit period. Drainage Management and C No non-conformances were reported in this audit period. The Monitoring Plan Drainage Management and Monitoring Plan was implemented during the construction works during this audit period. An Annual Report for the Drainage Management and Monitoring Plan has been completed demonstrating the implementation and outcomes of the Drainage Management and Monitoring Plan. This report will be submitted as part of this CAR. Fauna Management Plan C No non-conformances were reported in this audit period. The Fauna Management Plan, and all approved revisions, were implemented prior to the commencement of construction. An Annual Compliance Report for the Fauna Management Plan has been completed, demonstrating the implementation and outcomes of the Fauna Management Plan. This report will be submitted as part of this CAR. Flora and Vegetation C No non-conformances were reported in this audit period. The focus Monitoring and Management of the FVMMP is on annual Spring vegetation monitoring outside Plan the Project area. Spring vegetation monitoring was undertaken in October 2018. The annual report was completed and will be submitted as part of this CAR. Infrastructure Plan C No non-conformances were reported in this audit period. Clearing of native vegetation did not occur within areas identified within this plan for retention. Land Acquisition and C No non-conformances were reported in this audit period. As Management Plan detailed within the plan, implementation has commenced with allocating the necessary funding for the purchase of the identified offsets. Typha Control Plan C No non-conformances were reported in this audit period. Baseline survey conducted in May 2017. The annual monitoring survey was completed in March 2019. Wetlands Monitoring and C One potential non-conformance was reported in this audit period. Management Plan During the preparation of the Compliance Assessment Report (CAR) 2019 it has become apparent that sediment monitoring has not been undertaken as part of the WMMP since construction commenced in November 2017. Baseline Wetland Condition Survey and Drainage Monitoring was undertaken September 2015 – February 2016. The Wetlands Monitoring and Management Plan, and all approved revisions, were implemented prior to the commencement of construction. An Annual Compliance Report for the Wetland Monitoring and Management Plan has been completed, demonstrating the implementation and outcomes of the Wetlands Monitoring and Management Plan. This report will be submitted as part of this CAR. Wetlands Restoration Plan C Seed collection from the proposal area was conducted in early 2016, as per Table 4 of the WRP. Main Roads advises the OEPA of this action prior to the commencement of pre-construction activities. All other actions are required during or prior to rehabilitation works, however given no actual or planned works of this kind occurred during the audit period, no further actions from the WRP were required to be implemented.

ROE HIGHWAY EXTENSION COMPLIANCE REPORT

Appendix 5: Evidence Summary Table

Document No: D19#743461 Page 25 of 18 5 - Evidence Summary Table

Green shaded items attached to this Compliance Assessment Report

I Document reference Topic I I Figure 1_Clearing Area Clearing area during audit period I I_Aerial of disturbed land_June2019 Aerial imagery from June 2019, showing the clearing I progress to date. I R_20160927_RPT_Strategen_Roe Highway Extension_2016 CAR 2016 Compliance Assessment Report for audit period 2 July 2015 to 1 July 2016 C_20160928_LTR_MRWA_EPA_Roe Highway Extension_2016 CAR Cover Record of submission of 2016 CAR to OEPA Letter R_20170519_RPT_MRWA_Roe Highway Extension_2017 Interim CAR Interim Compliance Assessment Report for audit period 2 July 2016 to 19 May 2017 C_20170519_LTR_MRWA_Roe Highway Extension_2017 Interim CAR Record of submission of Interim CAR to OEPA Cover Letter R_201709_RPT_MRWA_Roe Highway Extension_2017 CAR 2017 Compliance Assessment Report for audit period 2 July 2016 to 1 July 2017 C_20170918_RPT_MRWA_Roe Highway Extension_2017 CAR Cover Letter Record of submission of 2017 CAR to OEPA R_20181002_RPT_MRWA_Roe Highway Extension_2018 CAR 2018 Compliance Assessment Report for audit period 2 July 2017 to 1 July 2018 C_20181002_RPT_MRWA_Roe Highway Extension_2018 CAR Cover Letter Record of submission of 2018 CAR to OEPA https://project.mainroads.wa.gov.au/roe8/environment/Pages/managem Main Roads website entplans.aspx C_20161130_LTR_OEPA_Public Availability of MS 1008 Plans and Reports OEPA accepting MRWA proposal for public availability of MS 1008 Plans and Reports R_20170516_RPT_AECOM_Groundwater Operating Strategy_Eastern Eastern Bore Groundwater Operating Strategy showing Water Supply Bore Rev 2 the bore location outside the wetland buffer area L_20170526_DWER_Licence to take Water - 5C Licence to take water from bores outside wetland buffer area L_2016126_DWER_26D_Licence to construct or alter a well Licence to construct the well outside the wetland buffer area R_20190730_MRIA_Site Environment Plan_W81020-SEP-EN-0055_Zone 6 Site Environmental Plan used for construction works I Works_RevF within Zone 6 I I C_20181205_EML_MRIA_PASS west of Bibra Drive Actions to be implemented for PASS west of Bibra Drive I R_201909_RPT_MRIA_Annual Drainage Monitoring and Management Plan Drainage Monitoring and Management Plan Annual I Report Report I R_201909_RPT_MRIA_Annual Wetland Monitoring Compliance Report Wetland Monitoring and Management Plan Annual I Report I R_20190110_RPT_MRIA_Annual Flora and Vegetation Monitoring Flora and Vegetation Monitoring and Management Plan ICompliance Report Annual Report I R_201909_RPT_MRIA_Fauna Management Plan Annual Compliance Annual Compliance Report required for the Fauna I Report_Rev0 Management Plan I I L_20190904_LTR_MRIA_ Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Exceedance Report Macroinvertebrate exceedance letter I L_20190903_LTR_MRIA_NC Investigation Final Non- conformance letter for omission of sediment I sampling I C_20190903_LTR_MS1008 Potential non-compliance and exceedance Sending NC investigation and exceedances to OEPA I report I L_20190807_RPT_MRIA Exceedance Letter_Example Example of a submitted exceedance letter for MRIA I WMMP water monitoring I C_20190403_RPT_DWER_Addendum Acceptance Letter Roe Highway Acceptance of Addendum Letter from DWER. I Stage 8 Extension I I R_20190328_RPT_MRIA_WMMP Addendum_Rev 0 Final Approved WMMP Addendum. I R_20190625_RPT_Aurecon_Roe Highway Extension May 2019 Typha Typha orientalis Annual Survey I Orientalis Vegetation Survey I I L_20181221_MRIA_Vegetation Condition Monitoring 2018 Exceedances Vegetation condition monitoring exceedance letter I