DOCSLIB.ORG

Double Pipe Restoration Plan Final MDE Approved.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Double Pipe Restoration Plan Final MDE Approved.Pdf Double Pipe Creek Watershed Carroll County, Maryland Interim Restoration Plan 2019 Prepared by Carroll County Government Bureau of Resource Management MDE Approved: May 2020 Double Pipe Creek Watershed Restoration Plan Forward This document summarizes proposed and potential restoration strategies to meet local Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements associated with the urban wasteload allocation (WLA) for Double Pipe Creek Watershed within Carroll County, Maryland. This document is an ongoing, iterative process that will be updated as needed to track implementation of structural and nonstructural projects, alternative Best Management Practices (BMP’s), and any program enhancements that assist in meeting Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approved TMDL stormwater WLAs. Updates will evaluate the success of Carroll County’s watershed restoration efforts and document progress towards meeting approved stormwater WLAs. Some of the strategies presented in this document are considered “potential” and additional assessment will be required before any project is considered final or approved. i Double Pipe Creek Watershed Restoration Plan Table of Contents Double Pipe Creek Watershed Restoration Plan Forward ................................................................................................................................ i I. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 A. Purpose and Scope .................................................................................................. 1 1. Document Organization .................................................................................... 1 B. Regulatory Setting and Requirements .................................................................... 4 1. Use Class Designations and Water Quality Standards ..................................... 4 2. Water Quality Criteria ...................................................................................... 5 3. Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) ........................................................... 6 II. Background ............................................................................................................. 8 A. Location and Subwatershed Map ............................................................................ 8 B. Baseline and Current Land Use .............................................................................. 8 1. Impervious Surfaces ......................................................................................... 9 C. Watershed Characterization .................................................................................. 13 1. Tier II Waters and Ecological Sensitive Areas ............................................... 13 2. Stream Corridor Assessment (SCA) ............................................................... 15 3. Priority Watersheds ........................................................................................ 15 III. New Development ................................................................................................ 17 A. Build-Out Analysis ............................................................................................... 17 B. Stormwater Management ...................................................................................... 17 C. County Easements ................................................................................................. 19 D. Rural Legacy Areas............................................................................................... 19 IV. Public Outreach and Education ............................................................................. 22 A. Water Resources Coordination Council................................................................ 22 1. Carroll County NPDES MS4 Team................................................................ 22 B. Environmental Advisory Council (EAC).............................................................. 23 1. Community Outreach ..................................................................................... 23 C. Public Outreach Plan............................................................................................. 23 D. Educational Venues .............................................................................................. 23 V. Restoration Implementation .................................................................................. 26 A. Stormwater Management Facilities ...................................................................... 26 B. Storm Drain Outfalls ............................................................................................. 28 C. Rain Gardens ......................................................................................................... 28 ii Double Pipe Creek Watershed Restoration Plan D. Tree Planting and Reforestation............................................................................ 30 1. Residential Buffer Plantings ........................................................................... 30 2. Municipal Plantings ........................................................................................ 31 E. Stream Restoration ................................................................................................ 33 F. Streambank Regeneration ..................................................................................... 33 G. Road Maintenance Projects................................................................................... 34 H. Septic Systems ...................................................................................................... 35 I. Agricultural Best Management Practices (BMPs) ................................................ 35 VI. Local TMDL Project Tracking, Reporting, Modeling and Monitoring ................ 36 A. Data Reporting ...................................................................................................... 36 B. Modeling with Mapshed ....................................................................................... 36 1. Model Description .......................................................................................... 36 2. Restoration Progress: December 2019 ........................................................... 36 3. Bacteria Load Reduction ................................................................................ 40 C. Water Quality Monitoring..................................................................................... 41 1. Retrofit Monitoring......................................................................................... 41 2. Bacteria Trend Monitoring ............................................................................. 44 VII. Chesapeake Bay Restoration................................................................................. 47 A. Purpose and Scope ................................................................................................ 47 B. Background .......................................................................................................... 47 1. Water Quality Standards and Designated Uses .............................................. 47 C. River Segment Location ....................................................................................... 50 D. Restoration Progress ............................................................................................. 50 VIII. TMDL Implementation ......................................................................................... 53 A. Bacteria Implementation ....................................................................................... 53 IX. Caveats .................................................................................................................. 54 X. Public Participation ............................................................................................... 54 XI. References ............................................................................................................. 55 XII. Appendix A: Watershed Restoration Projects ...................................................... 59 XIII. Appendix B: Forest Buffer and Grass Buffer Easements ..................................... 60 XIV. Appendix C: Double Pipe Creek BAT Septic Systems ........................................ 67 XV. Appendix D: Local TMDL Load Reduction Calculations with GWLF-E Land Cover Loading Rates and MDE (2014) ............................................................................ 69 XVI. Appendix E: GWLF-E Modeling Assumptions .................................................... 75 1. Model Inputs ................................................................................................... 75 iii Double Pipe Creek Watershed Restoration Plan 2. BMP Assumptions .......................................................................................... 77 XVII. Appendix F: Chesapeake Bay TMDL Edge-of-Stream Load Reduction Calculations....................................................................................................................... 81 Figures Figure 1: Double Pipe Creek Watershed and Subwatersheds Map .................................... 3 Figure 2: Double Pipe Creek Watershed Land Use/Land Cover ...................................... 11 Figure 3: Double Pipe Creek Watershed Impervious Surface Area ................................. 12 Figure 4: Targeted Ecological Areas ...............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lincoln County
    WVDOH Lincoln County July 1 - December 31 District 2 2019 Second Half Core Maintenance Plan Route Local Name BMP EMP Length Activity CO1 MUD RIVER ROAD 0.00 8.12 8.12 Mowing CO1/1 LAUREL CREEK ROAD 0.00 2.37 2.37 Mowing CO1/1 LAUREL CREEK ROAD 0.00 2.37 2.37 Patching CO1/2 COWHIDE BRANCH ROAD 0.00 0.84 0.84 Mowing CO1/2 COWHIDE BRANCH ROAD 0.00 0.84 0.84 Patching CO1/4 LITTLE BUFFALO 0.00 1.52 1.52 Mowing CO1/4 LITTLE BUFFALO 0.00 1.52 1.52 Patching CO1/6 OLD DELTA 9 (SECTION) 0.00 0.25 0.25 Mowing CO1/6 OLD DELTA 9 (SECTION) 0.00 0.25 0.25 Patching CO1/7 LOWER LAUREL CREEK 0.00 0.06 0.06 Mowing CO1/7 LOWER LAUREL CREEK 0.00 0.06 0.06 Patching CO10/1 FALLS BRANCH ROAD 0.00 2.33 2.33 Mowing CO10/1 FALLS BRANCH ROAD 0.00 2.33 2.33 Patching CO10/10 VERMATTER CREEK ROAD 0.00 4.36 4.36 Mowing CO10/10 VERMATTER CREEK ROAD 0.00 4.36 4.36 Patching CO10/11 COLEMAN HILL ROAD 0.00 0.71 0.71 Mowing CO10/11 COLEMAN HILL ROAD 0.00 0.71 0.71 Patching CO10/12 CENTRAL DRIVE 0.00 1.21 1.21 Mowing CO10/12 CENTRAL DRIVE 0.00 1.21 1.21 Patching CO10/14 LICK FORK FOURTEEN MILE CREEK 0.00 1.77 1.77 Mowing CO10/14 LICK FORK FOURTEEN MILE CREEK 0.00 1.77 1.77 Patching CO10/15 SAND CREEK ROAD 0.00 6.96 6.96 Mowing CO10/15 SAND CREEK ROAD 0.00 6.96 6.96 Patching CO10/15 SAND CREEK ROAD 0.00 6.96 6.96 Ditching CO10/16 AARONS CREEK 0.00 3.08 3.08 Mowing CO10/16 AARONS CREEK 0.00 3.08 3.08 Patching CO10/17 TYLER CREEK ROAD 0.00 0.82 0.82 Mowing CO10/17 TYLER CREEK ROAD 0.00 0.82 0.82 Patching CO10/18 OLD DELTA 4 LOW GAP ROAD 0.00 2.43 2.43 Mowing CO10/18 OLD DELTA
    [Show full text]
  • Cape Fear River Basin
    NC DEQ - DIVISON OF WATER RESOURCES Alphabetic List of NC Waterbodies CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN Name of Stream Subbasin Stream Index Number Map Number Class All connecting drainage canals CPF17 18-64-7-1 J25SE7 C;Sw Allen Creek (Boiling Springs Lake) CPF17 18-85-1-(1) K26SE8 B;Sw Allen Creek (McKinzie Pond) CPF17 18-85-1-(3) K26SE6 C;Sw Alligator Branch CPF17 18-66-4 J26SE7 C;Sw Alligator Creek CPF17 18-75 K27NW1 SC;Sw Anderson Creek CPF14 18-23-32 F23SE7 C Angola Creek CPF22 18-74-26-2 I28NW2 C;Sw Angola Creek CPF23 18-74-33-3 I28NW7 C;Sw Ashes Creek CPF23 18-74-34 I28SW4 C;Sw Atkinson Canal CPF15 18-29 G23SE7 C Atlantic Ocean CPF17 99-(2) L26NE7 SB Atlantic Ocean CPF17 99-(3) L26NE7 SB Atlantic Ocean CPF24 99-(3) J29NW2 SB Avents Creek CPF07 18-13-(1) E23SW9 C;HQW Avents Creek CPF07 18-13-(2) E23SW9 WS-IV;HQW Bachelor Branch CPF05 16-41-6-2-(1) D23SE7 WS-V;NSW Bachelor Branch CPF05 16-41-6-2-(2) D23SW6 WS-IV;NSW Back Branch CPF09 17-21 E20NE7 C Back Creek CPF02 16-18-(1) C22NW4 WS-II;HQW,NSW Back Creek CPF02 16-18-(6) C21SE2 WS-V;NSW Back Creek (Graham-Mebane Reservoir) CPF02 16-18-(1.5) C21NE9 WS-II;HQW,NSW,CA Back Creek (Little Creek) CPF03 16-19-5 C20SE2 WS-V;NSW Back Swamp CPF22 18-74-26-1 H28SW7 C;Sw Bakers Branch CPF19 18-68-2-10-2-1 H26NW6 C;Sw Bakers Creek CPF16 18-43 I24NW8 C Bakers Swamp CPF15 18-28-2-2 G23SE3 C Bald Head Creek CPF17 18-88-8-4 L27SW2 SA;HQW Bald Head Island Marina Basin CPF17 18-88-8-5 L27SW1 SC:# Baldwin Branch CPF16 18-45-1 I24SW3 C Bandeau Creek CPF16 18-51 I25SW5 C Banks Channel CPF24 18-87-10-1 J28SW3 SA;HQW
    [Show full text]
  • Base-Flow Yields of Watersheds in the Berkeley County Area, West Virginia
    Base-Flow Yields of Watersheds in the Berkeley County Area, West Virginia By Ronald D. Evaldi and Katherine S. Paybins Prepared in cooperation with the Berkeley County Commission Data Series 216 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey P. Patrick Leahy, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2006 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS--the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Evaldi, R.D., and Paybins, K.S., 2006, Base-flow yields of watersheds in the Berkeley County Area, West Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 216, 4 p., 1 pl. iii Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Gazetteer of West Virginia
    Bulletin No. 233 Series F, Geography, 41 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIKECTOU A GAZETTEER OF WEST VIRGINIA I-IEISTRY G-AN3STETT WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1904 A» cl O a 3. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. DEPARTMENT OP THE INTEKIOR, UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, Washington, D. C. , March 9, 190Jh SIR: I have the honor to transmit herewith, for publication as a bulletin, a gazetteer of West Virginia! Very respectfully, HENRY GANNETT, Geogwvpher. Hon. CHARLES D. WALCOTT, Director United States Geological Survey. 3 A GAZETTEER OF WEST VIRGINIA. HENRY GANNETT. DESCRIPTION OF THE STATE. The State of West Virginia was cut off from Virginia during the civil war and was admitted to the Union on June 19, 1863. As orig­ inally constituted it consisted of 48 counties; subsequently, in 1866, it was enlarged by the addition -of two counties, Berkeley and Jeffer­ son, which were also detached from Virginia. The boundaries of the State are in the highest degree irregular. Starting at Potomac River at Harpers Ferry,' the line follows the south bank of the Potomac to the Fairfax Stone, which was set to mark the headwaters of the North Branch of Potomac River; from this stone the line runs due north to Mason and Dixon's line, i. e., the southern boundary of Pennsylvania; thence it follows this line west to the southwest corner of that State, in approximate latitude 39° 43i' and longitude 80° 31', and from that corner north along the western boundary of Pennsylvania until the line intersects Ohio River; from this point the boundary runs southwest down the Ohio, on the northwestern bank, to the mouth of Big Sandy River.
    [Show full text]
  • Easygrants ID: 18868 NFWF/Legacy Grant Project ID: 0603.09.018868
    Easygrants ID: 18868 National Fish and Wildlife Foundation NFWF/Legacy Grant Project ID: 0603.09.018868 Chesapeake Bay Small Watershed Grants 2009 - Submit Final Programmatic Report (Activities) Grantee Organization: Trout Unlimited, Inc. Project Title: Eastern Panhandle Brook Trout Reintroduction (WV) Project Period 10/31/2009 - 12/31/2011 Award Amount $22,309.72 Matching Contributions $22,163.00 Project Location Description (from Proposal) Projects are located in both Districts 1 and 2 in WV. Project Summary (from Proposal) Work with public and private partners to restore water quality and aquatic habitat in four headwater streams of the Cacapon River. Project will install livestock exclusion fencing, establish riparian buffers, and perform water quality monitoring to support the goal of reintroducing eastern brook trout to historical coldwater streams in Hampshire and Hardy Counties, West Virginia. Summary of Accomplishments This Project: a) Restored native vegetation along 3,100 linear feet of streams with an average buffer width of 35 feet (approximately 5 acres); b) Engaged four landowners and 102 volunteers in tree and shrub plantings, educational activities, water quality monitoring, and conservation planning; c) Developed detailed temperature profiles of five streams to and a water quality “snapshot” of Meadow Branch; and d) Piqued WVDNR interest in salmonid restoration or reintroduction in three streams. Lessons Learned Lessons learned include: a) Filling vacancies quickly and planning for project coverage during transition can mitigate the loss of key teammates; b) Tighter oversight of volunteer monitors and interns and regular team meetings would yield more consistent data collection and reporting; c) It is ambitious to make reintroduction of brook trout to previously unstudied streams a project period outcome; d) Brook trout continue to be a valuable focus for landowner outreach (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Double Pipe Creek Stream Corridor Assessment
    Double Pipe Creek Watershed Stream Corridor Assessment Double Pipe Creek Watershed Stream Corridor Assessment Winter 2016 Prepared By Carroll County Bureau of Resource Management 0 Double Pipe Creek Watershed Stream Corridor Assessment Table of Contents I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 2 II. Landowner Participation ...................................................................................................... 3 III. Methods................................................................................................................................ 6 IV. Results .................................................................................................................................. 6 A. Erosion ................................................................................................................................. 9 B. Inadequate Buffer................................................................................................................. 9 C. Pipe Outfalls....................................................................................................................... 13 D. Exposed Pipes .................................................................................................................... 13 E. Channel Alteration ............................................................................................................. 13 F. Fish Barriers ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sleepy Creek Fecal Coliform Bacteria Monitoring 2017-2019
    Cacapon Institute #10 Rock Ford Road, Great Cacapon, WV 25422 Phone: (304) 258-8013 Email: [email protected] Web: CacaponInstitute.Org Final Report Fecal Coliform Bacteria Monitoring for the Sleepy Creek Watershed 319 Project Water 2017-2019 Monitoring 15 Months at 6 sites Prepared for: West Virginia Conservation Agency Prepared by: Cacapon Institute W. Neil Gillies, Director of Science Zach Norris, Lab Manager Frank Rodgers, Executive Director January 30, 2020 Participating Agencies and Organizations West Virginia Conservation Agency WV DEP Sleepy Creek Watershed Association Sleepy Creek Watershed 2017-2019 Fecal Coliform Bacteria Monitoring Page 1 Project Summary Cacapon Institute (CI) under contract with the WV Conservation Agency and subject to review by the 319 project team, monitored Sleepy Creek and certain tributaries for fecal coliform bacteria as outlined below. Background The Sleepy Creek (WVP-9, TMDL SWS 9001 – 9063) watershed is located in Morgan County, West Virginia (87%) and Fredrick County, Virginia (13%). Sleepy Creek flows 42 miles north into the Potomac River. Within the watershed two streams had a TMDL (Total Maximum Daily Load), Sleepy Creek (main stem) and Indian Run tributary (WVP-9-G). Both Sleepy Creek and Indian Run were listed as impaired “relative to numeric water quality criteria for fecal coliform bacteria” in the 2007 TMDL. Indian Run was officially delisted as of 2012 (See: “Planting Trees and Upgrading Septic Systems Decreases Bacteria in Run”). Sleepy Creek remains on the impaired list. West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection has a holistic approach to TMDL development where they set pre-TMDL sample sites in areas where previous sampling efforts (targeted sampling based on their 5-year rotating plan) show even a single 'hit' for fecal.
    [Show full text]
  • 04-1723 Spruce Pine Park
    Washington Heritage Trail The Washington Heritage Trail in West Virginia Spruce Pine Hollow Park 68 70 Po tom ac MARYLAND George Washington rode past here along the noted 18th 522 R iv e 70 81 r century Warm Springs Road which went from Alexandria, r BERKELEY ive R SPRINGS Virginia to the country’s first spa in Berkeley Springs c 9 a er m iv to R o 9 another 12 miles west. P n o MARYLAND p a c MORGANMa R PAW PAW C Po tomac COUNTYO BERKELEYB EL The Meadow Branch of Sleepy Creek, which runs nearby, MARTINSBURG shows archeological remains of a mill run. Steamboat WEST COUNTYC OU SHEPHERDSTOWN VIRGINIA 480 inventor James Rumsey’s brother 81 9 230 Edward owned this land and legend HARPERS 51 FERRY has it that this is the site of a bloomery JEFFERSONF R SONONO N River 340 51 and sawmill. James Rumsey eventually Legend CHARLES TOWN held patents on more than a dozen In 1784, Washington contracted with Rumsey to build Washington Heritage Trail er VIRGINIA iv R innovations for mill machinery. him a house on Washington’s lots in Berkeley Springs. COUNTYhTY Historic Site a o d 9 n VIRGINIA a The boards for the structures Rumsey eventually built n e h S may have been sawed at this mill. The Washington Heritage Trail is a 136-mile national scenic byway inspired by the prominent footsteps of George James Rumsey The Tuscarora Trail, a 252-mile, four-state sidebranch of the Washington through the three historic counties of West Appalachian Trail marked by light blue blazes, crosses WV9 Virginia’s Eastern Panhandle.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Fisheries Monthly Report – June 2020 Stock Assessment
    Freshwater Fisheries Monthly Report – June 2020 Stock Assessment Savage River Tailwater - The federal aid annual report for the Savage River Tailwater trout ​ population survey was completed. The river has two trophy trout management areas -- one area is restricted to fly fishing only while the other area allows the use of spinning gear using single hook artificial lures. Both management areas support a high density wild brown trout population with lesser numbers of brook trout and a few rainbow trout. Reproduction for both brook trout and brown trout was considered “moderate” in 2019. Trout Fry Surveys - Conducted trout fry surveys in the North Branch Potomac River from ​ Westernport downstream to Black Oak. Despite documenting multiple redds and spawning brown trout in this section of the river in fall 2019, no fry were observed. Efforts will be made again later in the year as fishing guides report observing rainbow trout spawning activity during late summer. Electrofishing Surveys, Baltimore County - Conducted qualitative electrofishing surveys in ​ the left and right forks of Jabez Branch (Anne Arundel County); First Mine Branch and an unnamed tributary; an unnamed tributary to Gunpowder Falls tailwater; and Baisman Run ( Baltimore County). No trout were found in either fork of Jabez Branch. Brook trout and brown trout are present in all the streams surveyed in Baltimore County. Brook trout recruitment appeared to be better than brown trout in all county streams except First Mine Branch. Electrofishing Surveys, Cecil County - Completed electrofishing surveys of Granite Run and ​ two unnamed streams in Cecil County that had not been previously surveyed. The streams were identified and selected for study given the physical condition of the stream and the composition of its watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • Berkeley County Commercial Solid Waste Facility Siting Plan
    iii TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE ...... ..... ...... .. ..... .. ...... ......... .... ........ .... ... ... ... ...... ... .. .. .. ... .. ... ... ... .... ....... .. ... .. ... ii TABLE OF CONTENTS .... .. ... .. .. ....... .... .................. .............. ..... .... .............. .... .. .. ..... .... iii LIST OF APPENDICES .... ..... ....... ...... .... .......................... ........................... ..... ... ..... ... ... iv SUMMARY ..... ... .. ... .. ........ ..... ... ... ......... ........ .. ................ ... ................. ................. ....... 1 PROVISIONS OF THE BERKELEY COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE LITTER AND SOLID WASTE CONTROL PLAN ..................... ............. ... .. .. .... ... ... ... .. .... .. .... ... ... .. .. .. .... .... .... ... .. .... .. ... .. 3 MINIMUM STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS .... .. .. ... .. ....... ............ ...... .. .. .. .... .. .... ....... .... 6 TITLE 54 SERIES 4 DEFINITIONS ... ..... ... .. .... .. ........ ... ......... ...... .... ........ ... ......... .. ...... .. .. ...7 POTENTIAL SOURCES OF INFORMATION ... ... ....... .. ..... .. ......................... .. ..... ... ..... .......... 9 PRESENT CONDITIONS AND RATIONALE OF ZONES ... .. ... ... ... ... ... .......... ....... ...... .. ... .... ..21 CLASS A LANDFILLS .... ..... ................... .. .. ....... .................. ... ... .. .. ............. .. ..... .... .......... 67 CLASS B LANDFILLS .. ... .. .. ... .. ....... ... ......... ..... .... ...... .. ........ .. ....... ... .... ..................... ..
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1 – Watershed Tracking
    Appendix 1 – Watershed tracking Plan Name Watershed Sub Watershed Sub BMP/Action Unit Goal Implemented TMLD LRs % Pollutant ID Unit LR Watershed Implemented Achieved Deckers Deckers WV Deckers WV M-8 Aggregated BMP Load Reductions Creek Creek Main Deckers Deckers WV Deckers WV M-8 Passive Treatment 1.00 Creek Creek Main Deckers Deckers WV Deep WV M-8-A.7 Passive Treatment 1.00 Creek Creek Hollow Deckers Deckers WV Dilan Creek WV M-8-G Passive Treatment 1.00 Creek Creek Deckers Deckers WV Hartman WV M-8- Passive Treatment 2.00 Creek Creek Run O.5A Deckers Deckers WV Kanes WV M-8-I Aggregated BMP Load Reductions 9,350.00 Metals 52,929.00 Creek Creek Creek (Aluminum) Deckers Deckers WV Kanes WV M-8-I Aggregated BMP Load Reductions 45,471.00 Metals (Iron) 72,119.00 Creek Creek Creek Deckers Deckers WV Kanes WV M-8-I Aggregated BMP Load Reductions Acidity LBS/YR 135,800.00 Creek Creek Creek Deckers Deckers WV Kanes WV M-8-I Constructed Wetland Aerobic INDIVIDUAL 3.00 3.00 100 Creek Creek Creek UNITS Deckers Deckers WV Kanes WV M-8-I Land Reconstruction, Abandoned UNITS 1.00 1.00 100 Creek Creek Creek Mined Land Deckers Deckers WV Kanes WV M-8-I Limestone Doser UNITS 2.00 2.00 100 Creek Creek Creek Deckers Deckers WV Kanes WV M-8-I Limestone Open Channel UNITS 4.00 4.00 100 Creek Creek Creek Deckers Deckers WV Kanes WV M-8-I Sulfate Reducing Bioreactor UNITS 1.00 1.00 100 Creek Creek Creek Deckers Deckers WV Laurel Run WV M-8-H Passive Treatment 1.00 Creek Creek Deckers Deckers WV Slab Camp WV M-8-F Aggregated BMP Load Reductions 4,974.00 Metals
    [Show full text]
  • SLEEPY CREEK WATERSHED ASSESSMENT Morgan County, WV
    SLEEPY CREEK WATERSHED ASSESSMENT Morgan County, WV Sponsored by: Sleepy Creek Watershed Association USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Eastern Panhandle Conservation District Shepherd University March 2006 Acknowledgements: The Sleepy Creek Watershed Association is indebted to Shepherd University’s Institute for Environmental Studies, the Eastern Panhandle Conservation District, the West Virginia Conservation Agency, West Virginia Division of Forestry, and the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service for their assistance with this study. The work and guidance of these institutions and agencies were invaluable in carrying out the investigations and compiling data that went into this report. Principal authors: Holly Boyer, Shepherd University Wendy Lee Maddox, Shepherd University Gale Foulds, Sleepy Creek Watershed Association Rebecca MacLeod, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Herb Peddicord, WV Division of Forestry Additional assistance: Barbara Elliott, West Virginia Conservation Agency Dr. Ed Snyder, Shepherd University 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES.............................................................................................................. 4 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 5 WATERSHED AREA........................................................................................................ 6 Major Tributaries .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]