GENERAL , LAHORE

RESULT OF GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE MEETING HELD ON 22-11-2019 TO ADDRESS THE GRIEVANCES RECEIVED IN BULK PURCHASE OF SURGICAL DISPOSABLE ITEMS FOR THE YEAR 2019-20.

31 Grievances received in Bulk Purchase of Surgical Disposable items for the year 2019-20. The committee reviewed the case in detail and after brief discussion and hearing the firm’s representatives, the committee unanimously decided as under.

Sr. Name of Firm Submitted Grievance Remarks Decision by Grievance Committee No. 1) The firm stated that these quoted items T.E#18,19,20,21,22,25,190,191,192,193,194,195,196,2 05,206,207,208,209,210,211,213,219,220,222 have Grievance been declared technically Non-Responsive because of 1) T.E#18,19,20,21,22,25, submitted by M/s samples were not provided (SNP) due to import 172,173,174,190,191,192,193,194,195,196,205,2 Popular hurdles, The firm now claims that their sutures are 06,207,208,209,210,211,213,219,220,222 are Grievance committee discussed the matter in detail International only registered in Medical Devices and other brands of declared non-responsive due to SNP. and after hearing the M/s Popular International the 01 Dairy No. 14615 technically approved firms are not registered. The 2) The company has received the registration committee unanimously decided to turn down the Dated: 4-11-2019, company requested to receive their samples for letter dated 10-10-2019 for meshes polypropylene grievance, so grievance is Rejected. & evaluation. and sutures after bid opening date (10-07-2019) Dairy No. 14662 2) The firm claimed that their products Polypropylene of the tender. Sample submission was the Dated: 6-11-2019 mashes T.E# 172,173,174are registered with compulsory clause of evaluation criteria. DRAP and competitors’ products are not registered so procuring agency is bound to purchase only registered products. 1. T.E # No. 62 The Grievance committee confirmed 1. T.E # No. 62 Disposable Gown the status of sole agent through E-mail from Principal The firm requested to reevaluate their item T.E# 62 company Med-Purest Medical. The Principal disposable gown as their quality is same as that of 1) T.E # No. 62 M/s Anax Associates and M/s company replied that M/s Alliance Medical is now approved brand of M/s Anax Associates. The firm Grievance Alliance Medical has submitted documents of their sole agent in . The committee concluded claimed that M/s Anax Associates is not authorized submitted by M/s authorized distribution of Med-Purest Medical. that the Med-Purest Medical has issued sole agency distributor of Med-Purest Medicaland and has ALLIANCE 2) T.E # No. 125, M/s Cardiac Care has not agreement to both the firms so credibility of the 02 submitted fake and tempered authorization letter so MEDICAL provided the registration letter for this item. Principal company is doubted. So in this context requested to reevaluate its documents. Dairy No. 14687 M/s Alliance Medical has registration of this grievance committee decided to reject the product of 2. T.E # No. 125 Invasive B.P Monitoring Dated: 7-11-2019. product @ dated 1-03-2019 mentioned principal company. so, grievance is Transducers Rejected. The firm claimed that their product is only 2. T.E # No. 125 of M/s Alliance Medical is only registered in DRAP in Medical Devices and brand eligible to supply the product owing to have of M/s Cardiac Care is not registered. registration letter of the mentioned product. Hence Page 1 of 11

Grievance is Accepted and the product of M/s Cardiac Care against T.E No. 125 is rejected. T.E# 179 PHACO KNIFE 1) The firm claimed that they have submitted samples of this item brand name sharp point manufactured Grievance by M/s Surgical specialist but the committee has 1) T.E# 179 It was typographical mistake of submitted by M/s declared their item as Non- Responsive on the status of sample of PhacoKinfe submitted by M/s KAMRAN basis of sample not provided (SNP) Kamran Bashir. 03 BASHIR & Decision Pending 2) M/s Mubarak Vision is not authorized distributor 2) M/s Mubarak Vision & M/s Kamran Bashir BROTHERS of brand sharp point, manufactured by Surgical bothhas submitted documents of authorized Dairy No. 14689 Specialist. The company claimed that Mubarak distribution of Surgical specialist. Dated: 7-11-2019 vision has submitted the expired documents of sole distribution of M/s Surgical Specialist so requested to check their documents. T.E#278 Citric Acid Hydrate + Lactic Acid + Malic T.E#278 M/sFresenius Medical Care has T.E#278 Grievance committee discussed the matter in Grievance Acid received the registration letter on 8-10-2019 and detail and after hearing the M/s FRESENIUS submitted by M/s M/s Fresenius Medical Care claimed that only their product the M/s 3N Lifemed and The M/s Eastern MEDICAL CARE points committee unanimously FRESENIUS is registered in DRAP while product of other competitors of Medical Care have submitted application for decided to turn down the grievance because M/s 04 MEDICAL M/s 3-N Lifemd& M/s Eastern Medical Care are not registration. Fresenius Medical care received the registration letter CARE Dairy No. registeredand also the M/s 3-N Lifemd have no license of after bid opening of this tender so, grievance is 14699 Dated: 7- manufacturing. Rejected 11-2019

T.E# 246 Sterile Surgical Blade T.E# 246 The End User has given the carbon T.E# 246 The committee discussed the matter in The product is rejected due to the reason out of coated specification of sterile surgical blade. detail and send the sample for reevaluation. The End specification. The firm claimed that all four bidders also User rejected the product with comments cutting edge Grievance does not meet requirement of specification that is carbon is not fluent and sharp hence grievance is Rejected. submitted by M/s coated blade and all companies are manufacturing only B.BRAUN Dairy carbon steel or stainless steel blade. T.E# 257 The End User has approved the brand T.E257. The committee discussed the matter in detail 05 No. 14700 Dated: T.E# 257, 258 Three way stopcock with and without Kawa, China by M/s Intra health and decided to stand with decision of TAC hence 7-11-2019, Dairy tubing. grievance is Rejected. No. 14725 Dated: The firm claimed the brand Kawa, China of M/s Intra 8-11-2019 health is rejected by other Govt. but is approved in LGH. Firm is requesting to reevaluate the product Kawa brand.

Page 2 of 11

• T.E #37 was rejected by End User with T.E # 37, 45, 264 Grievance committee discussed the ❖ T.E # 37 Chest Tube comments very hard stuff traumatic to matter in detail and after hearing the representative of The firm claimed that chest tube is already being used in lungs M/s IMTIAZ BROTHERS, the committee Grievance LGH, FIC, PIC, WIC, MIC and BVH without any • T.E 45 # was rejected by End User with unanimously decided to turn down the grievance and submitted by M/s complaint. The company requested to reevaluate comments very poor quality. stand with decision of TAC so, grievance is Rejected. ❖ Cord Clamp T.E # 45 IMTIAZ • T.E 264# was rejected by End User with The firm claimed that cord clamp is already being used in BROTHERS comments Poor quality leaks at its THQ Ahmad Pur East Bahwalpur, THQ Dairy No. 14701 bottom 06 TamewaliBahwalpur, DHA Bahwalpur, and Lady Dated: 7-11-2019, Willingdon Hospital Lahore without any complaint. The Dairy No. 14702 company requested to reevaluate again. Dated: 7-11-2019, ❖ Urine Bag Sterile T.E # 264 Dairy No. 14703 The firm claimed that urine bag is already being used in Dated: 7-11-2019 DHA Bahwalpur, this year awarded in FIC Faisalabad and Lahore without any complaint. The company requested to reevaluate

The T.E # 133 the firm does not have registration T.E # 133 the committee did not agree with the Grievance The Item T.E # 133 Liga Clip, and 213, 214, 215 Poly letter against this item. The Government institute company so the grievance isrejected. T.E No. submitted by M/s Propylene Mesh can only purchase registered items. 213,214,215, The committee reevaluated the samples. M YOUSAF & 07 These products were declared non-responsive due to T.E# 213, 214, 215 Poly Propylene Mesh The End User rejected the product with comments CO Dairy No. shortage of documents, Products are rejected by End User with comments easily distortable, Breakable, Less pore size, gets de- 14710 Dated: 8- The company requested to give them chance to provide poor quality with rough porosity. shaped hence grievance is Rejected. 11-2019 documents. T.E # 115, 140, 255 Grievance The DRAP has issued the registration letter to T.E # 115 HME Filter, T.E# 140 Medifilter and T.E# 255 Grievance committee discussed the matter in detail and submitted by M/s M/s Sadqain on dated 11-07-2019 after the T Filter for Tracheostomy. after hearing the M/s SADQAIN HEALTHCARE SADQAIN opening of tender. PVT. LTD points the committee concluded that The firm has received the registration letter for medical 08 HEALTHCARE T.E # 115, 140 The M/s Vertex Enterprises registration letter was issued after the opening date of the devices from DRAP so requested reject the other approved PVT. LTD Dairy does not have registration letter. tender and the status of registration of product of all brand of M/s Vertex Enterprises for T.E# 115, 140 and No. 14711 Dated: T.E # 255 M/s Save on have not registration participants was same at time of bid submission. So M/s SaveOn for T.E# 255 8-11-2019 letter for this. committee unanimously decided to turn down the grievance, hence the grievance is Rejected Grievance T.E# 62 Disposable Gown, T.E# 75 DJ Stent, T.E# 109, T.E# 62, 75, 108, 109, 110, 213, 214 submitted by M/s 110 Guide Wire, T.E # 108 Oxidized Regenerated Grievance committee discussed the matter in detail T.E# 62,75,109,110,168 items are rejected due to MEDICAMP Cellulose, T.E# 213, 214 Polypropylene Mesh and unanimously decided to turn down the grievance, shortage of Free sales certificate and T.E# 213 09 INTERNATION These are non-responsive items. The firm claimed that the so grievance is Rejected. and 214 are rejected by End User with comments AL Dairy No. quality of their product is better and approved by different poor quality with rough porosity. 14724 Dated: 8- Govt. Hospitals. The firm is requesting to reevaluate their 11-2019 products. Grievance T.E# 76 Double Lumen 12FR Catheter T.E# 76 Grievance committee discussed the matter in submitted by M/s The firm claimed that they have already submitted request The item of firm is non-responsive as the firm did detail and after hearing the M/s ALLMED 10 ALLMED for registration in DRAP and approved in 11th RBM meeting not have the registration letter till date but M/s SOLUTION points committee unanimously decided SOLUTION of registration board subject to inspection. The firm claimed UDL has received the letter on 13/05/2019. to turn down the grievance, so grievance is Rejected Dairy No. 14727 that once the DRAP will issue registration letter they will

Page 3 of 11

Dated: 8-11-2019 submit copy to LGH management. Firm requested to make their product responsive.

Grievance submitted by M/s T.E# 116 Grievance committee discussed the matter EASTERN T.E# 116 Hollow Fiber Dialyzer. in detail and after hearing the M/s EASTERN The sizes specification range is given by the End MEDICAL The firm requested to change the specification of size of the MEDICAL CARE PVT. LTD points committee 11 User of Department at the time of CARE PVT. dialyzer as the range 1.4, 1.6, 1.8, and 2.1 m2 favor only unanimously decided to stand with the specification of tender. LTD Dairy No. M/s Fresenius Medical Care they requested to add odd no. End User and turn down the grievance so, grievance is 14745 Dated: 9- range that is 1.1,1.3,1.5,1.7,1.9 for wide competition. Rejected as at this level cannot be changed. 11-2019

Grievance T.E# 60 Disposable Syringe Insulin. This item is rejected by End User with comments T.E# 60 The committee reevaluated the samples. The submitted by M/s The item brand name YMS is declared Non-Responsive by needle is not fine blunt leur lock filling not End User rejected the product with comments Needle HOSPITAL End User. The firm claimed that their product Ultra-fine smooth. not sharp, Needle bends & breaks, hence grievance is SUPPLY needle is pain less and is being used in the hospital for last Rejected. 12 CORPORATIO two years. The firm requested to reevaluate the product. N Dairy No. 14748 Dated: 9- 11-2019 T.E# 272 Zinc Oxide Adhesive Plasters. T.E# 272 Grievance committee discussed the matter Grievance Item is non-responsive but the firm claimed that they are in detail and after hearing the M/s ARSONS submitted by M/s supplying there to different hospitals DHQ Sahiwal PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD ARSONS , DHQ Gujranwala Teaching Hospital, points committee unanimously decided to turn down PHARMACEUT , Benazir Bhutto Hospital Rawalpindi, GHQ This item is rejected by End User with comments the grievance so, grievance is Rejected 13 ICAL Army Rawalpindi, Govt. Hospitals and Institutions and firm poor sticking. INDUSTRIES is requesting for reevaluation of their product. PVT. LTD Dairy

No. 14749 Dated:

9-11-2019

Grievance T.E# 28, 32, 36, 83, 84, 143, 150, 151, 158, 259, 266 The End User rejected the product during sample T.E# 150, 151, 259 The committee reevaluated the submitted by M/s items of M/s HAKIMSONS PVT.LTD are Non-responsive evaluation samples. The End User rejected the product with HAKIMSONS but the firm claimed that they are supplying this item in all comments “End Connector Poor Fixation” Hence the 14 PVT.LTD Dairy major & minor hospital in Punjab with no complaint from Grievance Committee stand with the TAC decision No. 14791 Dated: any hospital Company claimed that their manufacturer and rejected the grievance. 9-11-2019 Foyomed China is FDA approved so requested for reevaluation of their product. Grievance T.E# 89 Examination Gloves submitted by M/s The firm claimed that M/s Eastern Medical Care Pvt.Ltd. M/s Eastern Medical Care has submitted the 15 Decision Pending KAUMEDEX is not authorized sole agent of ASAP brand M/s Eastern is attested authorization letter of ASAP in their bid. Dairy No. 14792 one of the distributor of manufacturer TG Medical, SDN Page 4 of 11

Dated: 9-11-2019 BHD (top gloves Malaysia)

T.E # 91 (External Fixator ) T.E # 91 Grievance committee discussed the matter in The item is non-responsive by End User remarks (Screw detail and after hearing the M/s PIECES Grievance thread not sharp). The firm requested that they are ENGINEERING points committee unanimously submitted by M/s Manufacturing threads of different sharpness Specification The product is Non-Responsive by End-user with decided to turn down the grievance on reevaluation PIECES 16 of sharpness was not mention in the tender, The firm can comments so, grievance is Rejected ENGINEERING provide the required standard of sharpness as per demand of (Screw thread not sharp). Dairy No. 14770 End User. The firm requested to check the sample with Dated: 9-11-2019 sharp edge.

M/s 3N Lifemed claimed that item T.E# T.E# 10,91,108,130,236,247Grievance committee 10,91,108,130,236,247 were declared Non-responsive T.E# discussed the matter in detail and after hearing the Grievance 10 A wire and T.E# 91 External Fixator were previously M/s 3N-LIFEMEDpoints committee unanimously submitted by M/s used in general hospital with no single complaint M/s 3N These item are Non-Responsive by End User decided to turn down the grievance on reevaluation 17 3N-LIFEMED Lifemed is CE mark & ISO certified. The company with comments poor finishing so, grievance is Rejected Dairy No. 14793 requested that in case End User wanted any change in Dated: 9-11-2019 product they can fulfill the requirement.

Grievance T.E # 127, 128 IV cannula 18G,20G,22G,24G The T.E # 127, 128 IV cannula 18G,20G,22G,24G submitted by M/s committee reevaluated the samples. The End User M/s Silver Surgical Complex requested for reevaluation of SILVER rejected the product with comments Painful Prick, T.E # 127, 128 I.V cannula brand silver.Thefirm claimed This item was rejected by End User with SURGICAL Cannula turned bends easily hence grievance is 18 that they are supplying to all EDO’s in Punjab, Banazir comments Leakage Injection Port Blunt needle COMPLEX Rejected. Bhutto Aziz Bhatti hospital, Nishter Nawaz Sharif hospital, &Multiple Prick Required PVT.LTD Dairy PIMS, . No. 14771 Dated:

9-11-2019 Grievance Grievance committee discussed the matter in detail and T.E# 42 Chlorhexidine Dressing The Chlorhexidine Dressing is demanded by submitted by M/s after hearing the M/s ANAX ASSOCIATES PVT. M/s Anax submitted grievance against M/s BSN for item T.E# department for CVP line fixation and ANAX LTD. points committee unanimously decided to turn 42 Chlorhexidine dressing. The quoted specification of M/s from surgery department for wound dressing. 19 ASSOCIATES down the grievance as both type of Chlorhexidine BSN is not for CVP line fixation dressing. The company The brand of M/s Anax Associates is for cannula PVT. LTD. Dairy Dressing were demanded by End User, so grievance is requested to reject product of M/s BSN brand. fixation &brand of M/s BSN Medical is for wound No. 14820 Dated: Rejected dressing. Both brands are accepted by End User. 11-11-2019 T.E# 249, 250 Surgical Gloves Latex Sterile Pack The committee reevaluated the samples. The End Powdered and Powder free User rejected the product, Hence grievance is Grievance M/s Noor international claimed that their samples were Rejected. submitted by M/s declared non-responsive in sample evaluation; single vendor Their items are Non- Responsive by End User NOOR is obliged by the department and kick out all well reputed with comments (Micro Perforation Poor Quality 20 INTERNATION firms. The M/s Noor International is confident that during Crossing Current Flow Injuring To Surgeon AL Dairy No. surgery current will not pass. M/s Noor International Finger) &(Poor Quality Crossing Current Flow 14772 Dated: 9- requested to reconsider their product. Injury). 11-2019

Page 5 of 11

1) T.E# 89 Examination Gloves I) The Company aggrieved that M/s Kaumedex Had quoted Examination Gloves their brand name HIGHMAX with the manufacturer SUPERMAX whereas HIGHMAX is a brand of SINAMAX and free sale certificate for SUPERMAX of quoted product cannot issued on same name because same quoted T.E# 89 Decision Pending The M/s Kaumedex has submitted the authorized brand HIGHMAX is already register with SINAMAX in distributor letter in bid. Malaysia. The M/s Eastern has submitted the authorized

distributor letter in bid. The ASAP is subsidiary II) The Searle company also claimed Manufacturer of TG Medical. M/s Usman Co. did not SUPERMAX is engaged with M/s A-Feroz Pvt. Ltd from last Grievance participate in Examination Gloves in LGH tender. several years and import their examination gloves with original submitted by M/s brand name SUPERMAX. THE SEARLE III) M/s Eastern Medical Care

21 COMPANY The M/s Searl claimed that the Eastern Medical Care Pvt.Ltd is

LIMITED Dairy not only the sole agent of ASAP as M/s Usman Co. T.E# 250 the committee discussed the matter in detail No. 14798 Dated: International is also authorized importer of ASAP till 1st and decided to stand with the decision of TAC as bid 9-11-2019 Nov.2019 T.E# 250 The exemption time for application was opened (10th July) within the exemption period IV) The M/s Searle claimed that ASAP is not the submission of class B product was up to 15th July extended by DRAP (15th July 2019) hence the clause manufacturer but they manufactured their product from TG 2019, as per Medical Devices act 2018. Tender of D is invalid due to exemption time. So the Committee Medical Malaysia on Toll system so they are sub distributor Bulk purchase of disposable opened on 10th July unanimously decided to turn down the grievance, V) The M/s Searle claimed that they are only the sole agent of 2019 with in exemption time, so the clause D of Hence grievance is Rejected. TG Medical, Malaysia evaluation criteria is not applicable. 2) T.E# 250 Sterile Gloves Powdered The firm claimed that other participant that is M/s Intra health and M/s Kaumadix have not submitted application for registration in DRAP. The firm requested to check their receipt of application submission in DRAP as per clause D” of evaluation criteria T.E# 62 Disposable Gown T.E# 62 Disposable Gown T.E# 62,133,137,157,271,287 Grievance committee Grievance The item is declared non-responsive, The firm claimed that This item is rejected due to shortage of attested discussed the matter in detail and after hearing the submitted by M/s they have offered best quality product, also awarded by free sale certificate. M/s CARDIAC CARE points committee CARDIAC LGH last year kindly reevaluate them. unanimously decided to stand with End User and CARE Dairy No. T.E# 133 Liga Clip, 135 Liga Clip Aplicator. T.E# 133 isrejected by End User due to poor turned down the grievance Hence, grievance is 14802 Dated: 9- 22 These items are declared non responsive but the firm quality and T.E# 135 is SNP. Rejected. 11-2019, Dairy claimed that they have registration certificate from DRAP T.E# 137 The firm M/s CARDIAC CARE and No. 14803 Dated: they requested to purchase their product. M/s Alliance Medical 9-11-2019, Dairy T.E# 137 Manometer Line. do not have registration till letter till now they No. 14804 Dated: The item is declared responsive, Their product is under have just applied for registration. 9-11-2019 registration process and will get registration certificate soon. Page 6 of 11

The request to consider manometer as single qualified product in tender only and disqualify the product of M/s Alliance Medical. T.E# 157 item is rejected by End User T.E# 157 Neonatal Nasal CPAP kit The company claimed that meet the highest manufacturing T.E# 271 YankauerSuctionCannula. The item standard the item is rejected due to incomplete set. The is non-responsive due to shortage of attested free company is now agree to give some “Humidifier Bottle” if sale certificate. required with their item T.E# 287 Surgical Sealant/ Adhesive DRAP did not issue the registration letter for till T.E# 271 Yankauer Suction Cannula date. The item is declared non-responsive, The firm claimed that their product is ISO and CE marked being used in different hospitals of country wide they request to reevaluate the product. T.E# 287 Surgical Sealant/ Adhesive The item of firm is responsive along with other brand of M/s National Enterprises. The firm claimed that their product Bio glue have distinct benefit over the competitor brand Glubran of M/s National Enterprises i.e. M/s Cardiac Care has submitted the application for registration in DRAP but the competitor did not apply for registration. The Bio Glue is FDA approved and does not required refrigeration for storage as compare to the competitor brand. They requested to reject the competitor brand and approved bio glue as single. T.E # 246 Sterile Surgical Blade Grievance committee discussed the matter in detail Grievance The item of the firm is Non responsive by“End User” and and after hearing the M/s UNIVERSAL submitted by M/s the firm claimed that their product is manufactured in Uk, ENTERPRISES points committee unanimously The product is Non-Responsive by End-user with UNIVERSAL based on standard like GMP, ISO, CE, US FDA etc. and decided to turn down the grievance so, grievance is 23 comments blunt edges difficult to incise tissue. ENTERPRISES being supplied in different health department in Punjab. The Rejected

Dairy No. 14795 firm requested to consider their project. Dated: 9-11-2019

T.E # 268 VP Shunt. Grievance committee discussed the matter with End The firm claimed that the approved brand sphere duo shunt User. The representative of M/s NATIONAL of M/s 3M surgical have following short comings which is ENTERPRISES was absent. So the grievance Grievance bound to be rejected right away. committee decided to stand with decision of TAC submitted by M/s • Sphere DUO brand have no experience Both the sample BMI VP Shunt and Sphere DUO hence grievance is Rejected. NATIONAL 24 hydrocephalus shunting system is approved by the End Users of ENTERPRISES • Item is composed of stainless steel spring, Ruby Department. Dairy No. 14775 ball and Conic Seat. Dated: 9-11-2019 1. Steel spring create difficulty for patient during CT &MRI procedure. 2. The stainless steel spring cannot maintain accuracy

Page 7 of 11

either due to corrosion and rust which causes malfunctioning of shunt. 3. Hardening of skin causes Morbidity of patient. 4. It creates allergic reaction for patient. The firm National Enterprises request to reevaluate the sample and reject M/s 3M surgical. ❖ Item # 07 Grievance committee discussed the matter in detail and after hearing the representative of M/s IQBAL & COMPANY, the committee unanimously decided to turn down the grievance as ❖ Item # 07 Arterial Line registration letter in favor of M/s Iqbal & The firm claimed that their item has registration for medical Company was issued after the bid opening devices and the registration letter of this item is issued by of this tender and M/s UDL was the only DRAP on Form 8A and requested to make their item firm who got registration before the opening responsive. Item # 07 Arterial Line date of this tender and accordingly the ❖ Item # 24 Bone Marrow Biopsy Needle The DRAP has issued the registration letter on 3- registration certificate along with their bid on The item is rejected by End User and the firm is requesting 09-2019 to M/s Iqbal& Company which is after the basis of which the other unregistered for reevaluation of sample with the size of bone marrow opening of the tender dated 10-07-2019. products against the bid enquiry No. were needle required by the End User. Item # 24 rejected. Hence, grievance is Rejected ❖ Item # 76 Double Lumen Catheter i. The sample was rejected by End User Grievance I)This item is non-responsive The firm claimed that with comments Non-cutting blunt end. ❖ Item # 24 Decision Pending submitted by M/s registration letter of this item is issued by DRAP on Form ii. Cannot maintain suction for aspiration. IQBAL & 8A, andrequested to reevaluate their product. Item # 76 Double Lumen Catheter ❖ Item # 76 Grievance committee discussed COMPANY II) The firm claimed that of M/s UDL does not have I) DRAP has issued the registration letter dated the matter in detail and after hearing the 25 Dairy No. 14706 registration against submitted sample the model No. CV- 3-09-2019 after opening of tender. representative of M/s IQBAL & Dated: 7-11-2019, 12122-Fx, do not have FDA free sale certificate from II) The M/s UDL has submitted the sample of COMPANY, the committee unanimously Dairy No. 14810 country of origin as per clause e” and f” and the product is Code CS-12122F and the firm has the registration decided to turn down the grievance as Dated: 11-11- having experience less than one year as per clause C of letter for this code. registration letter was issued after the 2019 evaluation criteria. Item # 56 The M/s UDL has submitted the opening of tender Hence, grievance is ❖ Item # 56 Triple Lumen Peads. sample of Code CS-15703 and the firm has the Rejected The Iqbal& Company claimed that responsive firm UDL registration letter for this code. Distribution Pvt. Ltd of this has not registration letter for Item # 178 Permanent Tunneled Catheter. ❖ The committee verified the registration letter the provided sample code # CV-15553. The M/s Allmed did not offered all sizes of of M/s UDL for model CV-12122-Fx and ❖ Item # 178 Permanent Tunneled Catheter. permanent tunnel catheter as per demand of the free sale certificate was also verified which The Iqbal & Company claimed that the approved M/s hospital. was found correct and valid. Hence the Allmed brand Ameco does not full fill tender requirement grievance Rejected. of clause 31.6 of bidding documents as Allmed Pharma ❖ The clause C for product having experience Quoted just two sizes but the hospital demanded three sizes less than one year. and also does not have valid FDA certificate. is not applicable as DRAP is issuing the registration in Medical Devices from the current year. Hence the grievance is Rejected. ❖ Item # 56 The committee verified the registration letter of M/s UDL for code # Page 8 of 11

CV-15553 which was found correct and valid, hence the grievance is Rejected.

❖ Item # 178 The committee accepted the grievance as per clause 31.6 of bidding documents and rejected the item of M/s Allmed. The M/s UDL Distribution & M/s Iqbal& Grievance committee discussed the matter in detail Grievance Company Pvt. Ltd have submitted registration and after hearing the M/s UDL DISRIBUTION submitted by M/s T.E # 55 (CVP Line Adult) letter of their product dated 19-06-2019 and 4-4- PVT. points committee unanimously decided to turn UDL The firm claimed that one of the approved brands of M/s 2019 respectively so the clause C is not down the grievance as this clause C is not applicable 26 DISRIBUTION Iqbal& Company has not one year market experience and applicable and DRAP has been started the this year so, grievance is Rejected PVT. LTD Dairy will be ineligible. The firm requested to reevaluate the registration of product medical devices from No. 14788 Dated: product one year experience as per clause C. current year. 9-11-2019

T.E # 272 (Zinc Oxide Adhesive plaster ) T.E # 272,The committee discussed the matter in The item is Non-responsive by End-users but the firm detail and concluded that the tape is less adhesive and claimed that they have supplied said Product to different & allergenic. Hence the grievance is Rejected. hospitals Institutions and Medical Collages from last four years. The firm requested to reevaluate the Product. T.E# 50, The committee checked the documents of T.E # 272, The product is Non-Responsive by T.E# 50 (Crepe Bandage BPC Roll) firm, item was responsive. Hence the grievance is End-user with comments (Poor Sticking, Non Grievance The item of the product is non-responsive the company is Accepted. porous) submitted by M/s requesting to check their documents. T.E# 50, it is typographical mistake of about the 27 DR. SETHI status of the firm Dairy No. 14799

Dated: 9-11-2019

The committee reevaluated the free sale certificate of the M/s Usman co and found that the brand name of T.E # 70,73 (Surgical Disposable Syringe 20ml and 5ml) product is not mentioned on its documents so the free The firm claim that their brand SET (Turkey) have been sale certificate of the firm is not acceptable owing to Grievance The set brand is rejected by End User (Loose declared non responsive while the Chinese Syringe,brand the reason being of brand oriented in nature, submitted by M/s Plunger Barrel Needle not sharp/fine). UCI of M/s Usman Co International have been henceforth the products of M/s Usman Co against TE 28 TECH ZONE The M/s Usman Co International has submitted recommended. M/s Tech Zone are supplying SET brand in No. 69,70,72 & 73 are rejected as they are not Dairy No. 14752 documents of authorized distribution and free Major Institution in Punjab. fulfilling the mandatory bid evaluation criteria of Dated: 9-11-2019 sale certificate. The firm claimed that the M/s Usman Co International does having free sale certificate for the mentioned brand. not have free sale certificate of its Quoted brand. After the grievance of M/s Techzone, the grievance committee decided to re-evaluate its products against

Page 9 of 11

TE Nos. 70 & 73. Against TE No.73 (5ml syringe) the end user again rejected it on the basis of sample evaluation with the comments i.e. Loose Plunger Barrel Needle not sharp/fine, so on the basis of sample evaluation, the Grievance committee unanimously decided to turn down the grievance of M/s Techzone against this TE No. 73, so decided to reject the grievance and accordingly the concerned product still stands rejected. Against TE No.70 the decision about the product of M/s Techzone is pending.

Grievance T.E # 179 (Phaco Knife) I) M/s Mubarak Vision quoted to different submitted by M/s I) The firm aggrieved that the M/s Mubarak Visionhave manufacturer against different specification. The OPTI MED quoted two brands sharp Point and Eagle Gold which is firm has quoted Phaco Knife/2.75mm,2.8mm, 15 Dairy No. 14833 violation of PPRA rules. Degree of brand sharp point,(B) Phaco Knife Dated: 11-11- II) The firm aggrieved that M/s Kamran Bashir & 5.5mm of brand Eagle. The both two 2019 Brothersis non-responsive and M/s Mubarak Vision is manufactures quoted different specifications.

responsive for same brand Sharp point, manufactured by II) The M/s Mubarark Vision and M/s Kamran

Surgical Specialist forPhaco Knife. Bashir have submitted authorized distribution

letter to hospital. 29 Pending

T.E # 30 (Butterfly Needle) T.E # 30, The committee reevaluated the samples of This item is Non responsive but the firm claimed that this brand NIPRO of M/s Lab Link Enterprises. The End item is being awarded in 2018-19 and used in LGH and in User rejected the product, hence grievance is Grievance other hospitals also without any complaint. The firm Rejected. submitted by M/s claimed that they have received the Purchase Order on 4-11- The item is rejected by End User with Comment LAB LINK 2019 for bulk supply from LGH after the TAC rejection (Difficult to Hold) The committee reevaluated the documents of M/s 30 ENTERPISES currently. They are supplying same item in Children The M/s Mediserve has submitted their Medi Serve international and found them correct so Dairy No. 14823 Hospital, Mayo Hospital, , authorized agency agreement the grievance submitted by M/s Lab Links against M/s Dated: 11-11- ShoukatKhanum Hospital Lahore and PKLI Hospital Mediserve International is rejected. 2019 Lahore. The company claimed that approved brand SMMP Quoted by M/s Medi serve International have no valid agency

Page 10 of 11

Agreement, Registration and past Experience.

Grievance T.E# 193 & 194 Polyglactin/ Polygycolic acid 1/0, 2/0 submitted by M/s These items are Non-Responsive by End User M/s Anwar & Sons claimed that their product sample was The committee discussed the matter in detail. The End ANWAR & with comments (Thin Caliber Less Tensile 31 rejected by End User, the same were awarded to M/s Anwar User approved the product on reevaluation hence the SONS Dairy No. Strength Poor Needle Penetration) & (Poor & sons last year in LGH and being used in currently in LGH grievance is Accepted 14822 Dated: 11- Quality Needle & Thread Poor Tensile Strength) without any single complaint on quality. 11-2019

Page 11 of 11