Mapping in Lithuania Has Been Conducted by an Independent Consultant, Ms

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mapping in Lithuania Has Been Conducted by an Independent Consultant, Ms #IBELONG Mapping STATELESSNESS in Lithuania UNHCR Regional Representation for Northern Europe Stockholm, May 2016 Mapping STATELESSNESS in Lithuania UNHCR Regional Representation for Northern Europe Stockholm, May 2016 Consultant: Ms. Gintarė Eidimtaitė Cover photos: © UNHCR This document is for general distribution. All rights reserved. Reproduction and translation is authorized, except for commercial purposes, provided that UNHCR is acknowledged as the source. Layout and design: BakOS DESIGN Contents List of Abbreviations ...............................................................................................................................................6 Acknowledgments ....................................................................................................................................................7 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................8 1.1 Executive summary ...........................................................................................................................................9 1.2 Statelessness across the globe ................................................................................................................... 10 1.2.1 Defining “a stateless person” ...................................................................................................................... 10 1.2.2 Causes of statelessness ................................................................................................................................ 11 1.2.3 Consequences of statelessness ................................................................................................................. 12 1.3 The international and regional legal framework .................................................................................. 12 2. The face of statelessness in Lithuania .................................................................................................. 14 2.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 14 2.1.1 Historical background .................................................................................................................................. 15 2.1.2 National legal framework ............................................................................................................................ 18 2.2 An overview of the stateless population in Lithuania ......................................................................... 19 2.2.1 Introduction (specifics on the data used) ................................................................................................ 19 2.2.2 The target population .................................................................................................................................. 19 2.2.2.1 Groups covered by administrative data .......................................................................................... 22 2.2.2.2 Groups not covered by administrative data .................................................................................. 29 2.3 Qualitative analysis of the situation of stateless persons ................................................................. 30 2.3.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 30 2.3.2 Procedural issues ........................................................................................................................................... 32 2.3.3 Obstacles to travel ......................................................................................................................................... 35 2.3.4 Stateless persons’ wishes to acquire Lithuanian citizenship .............................................................. 36 2.3.5 The situation of children born in Lithuania with a lack of nationality .............................................. 38 2.3.6 Hopes and expectations for the future .................................................................................................... 39 2.4 Conclusions and recommendations.......................................................................................................... 40 3. Determination of statelessness and rights attached to the status ...................................... 42 3.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 42 3.2 National legal framework ............................................................................................................................ 43 3.3 Statelessness determination procedure or other procedures in which statelessness status can be determined ............................................................................................................................ 44 4 MAPPING STATELESSNESS IN LITHUANIA 3.3.1 Competent authority .................................................................................................................................... 45 3.3.2 Procedural aspects ........................................................................................................................................ 47 3.3.2.1 Initiation of the procedure ................................................................................................................. 47 3.3.2.2 Questions of proof ............................................................................................................................... 47 3.3.2.3 Access to courts ................................................................................................................................... 48 3.3.2.4 Other procedural aspects .................................................................................................................. 49 3.4 Rights of applicants and of stateless persons ....................................................................................... 50 3.4.1 Rights of applicants during the procedures in which statelessness can be determined ............. 50 3.4.1.1 Detention ............................................................................................................................................... 51 3.4.1.2 Expulsion ................................................................................................................................................ 55 3.4.2 Rights of persons recognized as stateless ............................................................................................... 56 3.4.2.1 The right to residence ......................................................................................................................... 57 3.4.2.2 The right to work .................................................................................................................................. 61 3.4.2.3 The right to public relief ..................................................................................................................... 62 3.4.2.4 Identification and travel documents............................................................................................... 64 3.4.2.5 Other rights guaranteed .................................................................................................................... 66 3.5 Conclusions and recommendations.......................................................................................................... 66 4. Reduction and prevention of statelessness ....................................................................................... 69 4.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 69 4.2 National legal framework ............................................................................................................................ 70 4.3 Acquisition and loss of nationality under the national legal framework and compatibility with international standards ...................................................................................................................... 71 4.3.1 Avoidance of statelessness at birth ........................................................................................................... 72 4.3.1.1 Birth on the State’s territory .............................................................................................................. 72 4.3.1.2 Birth outside the State’s territory ..................................................................................................... 75 4.3.1.3 Foundlings ............................................................................................................................................. 75 4.3.1.4 Birth on a ship or aircraft.................................................................................................................... 76 4.3.2 Avoidance of statelessness upon change in civil status ...................................................................... 76 4.3.3 Avoidance of statelessness in the context of renunciation of nationality ....................................... 76 4.3.4 Avoidance of statelessness in the context of loss and deprivation of nationality
Recommended publications
  • Government of the Republic of Lithuania
    Official translation 5 September 2014 GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA RESOLUTION No 79 22 January 2014 ON THE APPROVAL OF THE LITHUANIAN MIGRATION POLICY GUIDELINES Vilnius Acting pursuant to Paragraph 346 of the Priority Measures for Implementation of the Government Programme for 2012-2016, approved by Resolution No 228 of the Government of the Republic of Lithuania of 13 March 2013 on Approval of Priority Measures for Implementation of the Government Programme for 2012-2016, and with a view to establishing the objectives, principles and areas of the Lithuanian migration policy, as well as to ensuring proper management of migration processes, the Government of the Republic of Lithuanian has resolved: 1. To approve the Lithuanian Migration Policy Guidelines (as appended). 2. To establish that the provisions of the Lithuanian Immigration Policy Guidelines (hereinafter referred to as the Guidelines) approved by the present Resolution shall be followed by ministries, Government institutions, institutions under the ministries, other national authorities and institutions accountable to the Government of the Republic of Lithuania, as they make decisions falling within their respective competencies, draft legislation, consider proposals regarding the adoption of European Union legal acts, as well as draw up negotiation lines of the Republic of Lithuania on these proposals. 3. To recommend to municipalities and other national institutions and agencies, which are outside of the subordination of the Government of the Republic of Lithuania, that they follow the provisions of the Guidelines. 4. To repeal: 4.1. Resolution No 957 of 24 September 2008 of the Government of the Republic of Lithuania on Approval of the Description of Monitoring, Analysis and Forecasting Procedures for Economic Migration Processes and the State of Lithuanians Living Abroad, with all its amendments; 4.2.
    [Show full text]
  • UNHCR Comments on the Draft Amendments to the Law on Citizenship of Belarus
    UNHCR Comments on the draft Amendments to the Law on Citizenship of Belarus A. Introduction In October 2019, at the High-Level Segment on Statelessness convened by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) as part of its 70th Executive Committee meeting, Belarus pledged to accede to the two UN Statelessness Conventions – the 1954 Convention relating to the Status of Stateless Persons (hereinafter referred to as ‘1954 Convention’) and the 1961 Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness (hereinafter referred to as ‘1961 Convention’) – by the end of 2020 after completion of all necessary internal procedures. UNHCR very much welcomes this commitment by the Government of the Republic of Belarus. In July 2020, the Department on Citizenship and Migration of the Ministry of Interior of the Republic of Belarus, the central authority in charge of citizenship and statelessness issues, reaffirmed Belarus’ intention to ratify the 1954 and 1961 Conventions by the end of 2020. UNHCR was also informed that before the ratification of both UN Statelessness Conventions, amendments would be made to the Law of the Republic of Belarus dated 01.09.2002 No. 136-З “On citizenship of the Republic of Belarus” (edition dated 20.07.2016 No. 414-З) (hereinafter referred to as ‘Law on Citizenship’). In July 2020, the House of Representatives of the National Assembly of the Republic of Belarus (hereinafter referred to as ‘House of Representatives’) informed the UNHCR Representation in Belarus that on 4 June 2020 it has adopted, in the first hearing, the draft Law of the Republic of Belarus “On amendments to the Law on the Republic of Belarus “On citizenship of the Republic of Belarus”.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Together to End Discrimination and Ensure Equal Outcomes for All
    WORKING TOGETHER TO END DISCRIMINATION AND ENSURE EQUAL OUTCOMES FOR ALL Global Analysis of 2011 – 2012 Accountability Frameworks for AGD and targeted actions by Leslie Groves Consultant Table of Contents Table of Contents .............................................................................................................................................................. II Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................................... III Part 1. Background ............................................................................................................................................................ 1 Part 2. Global and Regional Trends in UNHCR Operations ............................................................................................... 2 2.1 Overall Organisational Achievement of Accountability Actions ............................................................................. 2 2.2 UNHCR’s Strengths and Weaknesses in Mainstreaming AGD ................................................................................ 2 2.3 Strengths and Weaknesses in the Integration of UNHCR’s AGD Approach, including Targeted Actions: Advocacy Based Operations ........................................................................................................................................................ 11 2.4 Examples of Impact on the Lives of Persons of Concern .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Temporary Migration to the United States
    TEMPORARY MIGRATION TO THE UNITED STATES NONIMMIGRANT ADMISSIONS UNDER U.S. IMMIGRATION LAW Temporary Migration to the United States: Nonimmigrant Admissions Under U.S. Immigration Law U.S. Immigration Report Series, Volume 2 About this Edition This document discusses nonimmigrants and the laws and regulations concerning their admission to the United States. The purpose of this report is to describe the various nonimmigrant categories and discuss the policy concerns surrounding these categories. Topics covered include: adjustment of status, temporary workers, work authorization, and visa overstays. The United States welcomes visitors to our country for a variety of purposes, such as tourism, education, cultural exchange, and temporary work. Admittance to the United States as a nonimmigrant is intended to be for temporary visits only. However, some nonimmigrants are permitted to change to a different nonimmigrant status or, in some cases, to permanent resident status. This report provides an overview of the reasons for visiting the United States on a temporary basis and the nexus between temporary visitor and permanent resident. Nonimmigrants – v. 06.a TEMPORARY MIGRATION TO THE UNITED STATES: NONIMMIGRANT ADMISSIONS UNDER U.S. IMMIGRATION LAW Research and Evaluation Division U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Office of Policy and Strategy January 2006 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report was prepared by staff in the Research and Evaluation Division of the Office of Policy and Strategy, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, under the direction of David R. Howell, Deputy Chief, and Lisa S. Roney, Director of Evaluation and Research. The report was written by Rebecca S. Kraus. The following staff made significant contributions in the research for and review of this report: Lisa S.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Migration Report: Eastern Europe
    REGIONAL MIGRATION REPORT: EASTERN EUROPE Edited by: Anna Bara, Anna Di Bartolomeo, Zuzanna Brunarska, Shushanik Makaryan, Sergo Mananashvili, and Agnieszka Weinar is Report has been published by the European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, Migration Policy Centre within the framework of the CARIM-East project. © European University Institute 2013 The Migration Policy Centre at the European University Institute, Florence, conducts advanced research on global migration to serve migration governance needs at European level, from developing, implementing and monitoring migration-related policies to assessing their impact on the wider economy and society. The CARIM-East project is the first migration observatory focused on the Eastern Neighbourhood of the European Union and covers all countries of the Eastern Partnership initiative (Belarus, Ukraine, the Republic of Moldova, Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan) and Russian Federation. More information about CARIM-East and links to an electronic version of this file, which is available free of charge, may be found on the project website at www.carim-east.eu For queries regarding this publication, please contact the MPC at [email protected] CONTACTS Migration Policy Centre Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies European University Institute Via delle Fontanelle 19 I-50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) Italy Tel: (+39) 055 4685 817 Fax: (+39) 055 4685 770 Email: [email protected] MPC website: www.migrationpolicycentre.eu CARIM-East website: www.carim-east.eu e CARIM-East project is co-nanced by the European Union. is publication reects the views only of the author(s), and the European Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Meeting with Representatives of the Lithuanian Government on Provisions of the Revised European Social Charter Not Accepted by Lithuania
    EUROPEAN COMMITTEE OF SOCIAL RIGHTS COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DES DROITS SOCIAUX 29 January 2007 REPORT ON THE MEETING WITH REPRESENTATIVES OF THE LITHUANIAN GOVERNMENT ON PROVISIONS OF THE REVISED EUROPEAN SOCIAL CHARTER NOT ACCEPTED BY LITHUANIA Vilnius, 27 October 2006 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ▪ Situation of Lithuania on 1 January 2006 with respect to the Revised Charter ▪ Meeting on provisions not accepted by Lithuania (context and date, delegation and participants, programme) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SURVEY PROVISION BY PROVISION ▪ For each of the 12 provisions not accepted: - European Committee of Social Rights case-law - Situation in Lithuania - Conclusion 3 Situation of Lithuania under the Revised Charter 1 January 2006 Ratifications Lithuania ratified the Revised European Social Charter on 29/06/2001. Lithuania has accepted 86 of the 98 paragraphs of the Revised Charter. Lithuania has not agreed to be bound by the “collective complaints” procedure. 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 5 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8 7.9 7.10 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 9 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 11.1 11.2 11.3 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 13.1 13.2 13.3 13.4 14.1 14.2 15.1 15.2 15.3 16 17.1 17.2 18.1 18.2 18.3 18.4 19.1 19.2 19.3 19.4 19.5 19.6 19.7 19.8 19.9 19.10 19.11 19.12 20 21 22 23 24 25 26.1 26.2 27.1 27.2 27.3 28 29 30 31.1 31.2 31.3 = Accepted provisions Reports Between 2003 and 2005, Lithuania submitted 3 reports on the application of the Revised Charter.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a State-By-State Guide to Non-Driver Identification Requirements
    APPENDIX A STATE-BY-STATE GUIDE TO NON-DRIVER IDENTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS A publication of the National Network for Youth National Network for Youth. All rights reserved 2016 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS State-by-State ID Application Requirements 4 Alabama 4 Nevada 71 Alaska 6 New Hampshire 72 Arizona 7 New Jersey 74 Arkansas 9 New Mexico 76 California 11 New York 80 Colorado 13 North Carolina 82 Connecticut 16 North Dakota 85 Delaware 18 Ohio 86 District of Columbia 20 Oklahoma 88 Florida 24 Oregon 90 Georgia 26 Pennsylvania 94 Hawai'i 28 Rhode Island 95 Idaho 30 South Carolina 96 Illinois 32 South Dakota 98 Indiana 35 Tennessee 100 Iowa 37 Texas 103 Kansas 39 Utah 107 Kentucky 41 Vermont 109 Louisiana 42 Virginia 110 Maine 45 Washington 113 Maryland 49 West Virginia 118 Massachusetts 53 Wisconsin 121 Michigan 57 Wyoming 124 Minnesota 60 Mississippi 62 Missouri 63 Montana 65 Nebraska 69 Quick Reference Guide: BIRTH CERTIFICATES 125 2 National Network for Youth. All rights reserved 2016 National Network for Youth. All rights reserved 2016 3 Alabama AL Who: Alabama Department of Public Safety. 1. Proof of Social Security number, including: a. Original Social Security card b. U.S. military form DD 214 c. Medicare/Medicaid ID card d. W-2 form 2. Primary documentation: a. Original U.S. Birth Certificate b. U.S. Passport c. Alabama ID card or driver’s license d. Certificate of Naturalization e. Certificate of Citizenship f. U.S. certificate of birth abroad g. Resident alien card h. Valid foreign passport with valid U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Belarusian Minority in Poland
    a n F P 7 - SSH collaborative research project [2008 - 2 0 1 1 ] w w w . e n r i - e a s t . n e t Interplay of European, National and Regional Identities: Nations between States along the New Eastern Borders of the European Union Series of project research reports Contextual and empirical reports on ethnic minorities in Central and Eastern Europe Research Report #10 Belarus The Belarusian Minority Germany in Poland Hungary Authors: Konrad Zieliński Latvia Magdalena Cześniak-Zielińska | Ilona Matysiak Lithuania Anna Domaradzka | Łukasz Widła Hans-Georg Heinrich | Olga Alekseeva Poland Russia Slovakia Series Editors: Ukraine Hans-Georg Heinrich | Alexander Chvorostov Project primarily funded under FP7-SSH programme Project host and coordinator EUROPEAN COMMISSION www.ihs.ac.at European Research Area 2 ENRI - E a s t R e s e a r c h Report #10: The Belarusian Minority in Poland About the ENRI-East research project (www.enri-east.net) The Interplay of European, National and Regional Identities: Nations between states along the new eastern borders of the European Union (ENRI-East) ENRI-East is a research project implemented in 2008-2011 and primarily funded by the European Commission under the Seventh Framework Program. This international and inter-disciplinary study is aimed at a deeper understanding of the ways in which the modern European identities and regional cultures are formed and inter-communicated in the Eastern part of the European continent. ENRI-East is a response to the shortcomings of previous research: it is the first large-scale comparative project which uses a sophisticated toolkit of various empirical methods and is based on a process-oriented theoretical approach which places empirical research into a broader historical framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Security of Residence of Long-Term Migrants
    SECURITY OF RESIDENCE OF LONG-TERM MIGRANTS A comparative study of law and practice in European countries Kees Groenendijk, Elspeth Guild and Halil Dogan Strasbourg, 1998 SECURITY OF RESIDENCE OF LONG-TERM MIGRANTS A comparative study of law and practice in European countries Kees Groenendijk, Elspeth Guild and Halil Dogan Consultants Centre for Migration Law University of Nijmegen The Netherlands February 1998 Note: This document expresses the personal views of the consultants and not necessarily the official view of the Council of Europe or its member States. CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................1 2. RELEVANT EUROPEAN INSTRUMENTS ...........................................................4 2.1 European Convention on Human Rights: State duties under Article 8 ECHR and long resident third country nationals .................................................................4 2.2 European Convention on Establishment................................................................13 2.3 EU and Community law on expulsion and long-term residents ............................15 2.4 EU and Community law on secure residence of third country nationals...............18 3. LAW AND PRACTICE IN SIX COUNTRIES ......................................................20 3.1 Belgium.................................................................................................................20 3.2 France....................................................................................................................27
    [Show full text]
  • Country Report Poland
    Country Report Poland Dorota Kupiszewska, Beata Nowok and Marek Kupiszewski A. Administrative sources and procedures A.1. Registration of the resident population The population is registered in the Universal Electronic System of Population Register (Powszechny Elektroniczny System Ewidencji Ludności, PESEL) that is under the responsibility of the Department of State Registers within the Ministry of Interior and Administration. The PESEL system is based on a three-level structure1: municipality (gmina) register file - Local Database (LBD); voivodeship (województwo) register file - District/Voivodeship Database (TBD/WBD); the main PESEL system – Central Database (CBD) run by the Ministry of Interior and Administration. The entry of a new person into the system due to birth or immigration is based on information received directly from the municipality concerned. All updated information goes to the CBD from the LDB in the municipality through the voivodeship and the TBD/WBD. All information from/to the municipality is sent by electronic form in standardised format or, if a municipality is not computerised, the data are sent on paper. All information exchanged between voivodeships and the Ministry is transferred electronically (by the governmental network called PESELNET). All permanent and temporary (for a period exceeding two months) residents of Poland, except foreigners without a residence card, are registered in the PESEL system and are therefore attributed a PESEL number. Included are: Polish citizens and foreigners with permanent residence in Poland; 1 Poland is divided into 16 voivodeships (województwo) and there are around 2500 municipalities (gmina) in Poland, out of which around 2000 have been computerised. T H E S I M Polish citizens with permanent residence abroad, who are registered for a temporary stay only (more than two months) in Poland; Foreigners with a residence card who are registered for a temporary stay only (more than two months) in Poland.
    [Show full text]
  • The Polish Minority in Belarus (Pdf)
    a n F P 7 - SSH collaborative research project [2008 - 2 0 1 1 ] w w w . e n r i - e a s t . n e t Interplay of European, National and Regional Identities: Nations between States along the New Eastern Borders of the European Union Series of project research reports Contextual and empirical reports on ethnic minorities in Central and Eastern Europe Belarus Research Report #4 Germany The Polish Minority in Belarus Hungary Latvia Authors: David Rotman |Oksana Ivaniuto Lithuania Natalia Veremeeva Poland Russia Slovakia Series Editors: Ukraine Hans-Georg Heinrich | Alexander Chvorostov Project primarily funded under FP7-SSH programme Project host and coordinator EUROPEAN COMMISSION www.ihs.ac.at European Research Area 2 ENRI - E a s t R e s e a r c h Report #4: The Polish Minority in Belarus About the ENRI-East research project (www.enri-east.net) The Interplay of European, National and Regional Identities: Nations between states along the new eastern borders of the European Union (ENRI-East) ENRI-East is a research project implemented in 2008-2011 and primarily funded by the European Commission under the Seventh Framework Program. This international and inter-disciplinary study is aimed at a deeper understanding of the ways in which the modern European identities and regional cultures are formed and inter-communicated in the Eastern part of the European continent. ENRI-East is a response to the shortcomings of previous research: it is the first large-scale comparative project which uses a sophisticated toolkit of various empirical methods and is based on a process-oriented theoretical approach which places empirical research into a broader historical framework.
    [Show full text]
  • *Mercy Versus Fear, Or Where the Law on Migration Stands
    *Mercy Versus Fear, or Where the Law on Migration Stands Gilbert Paul Carrasco* & Iryna Zaverukha** “I was a stranger and you welcomed me, I was naked and you clothed me.” (Mt 25:35–36). CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 1284 I. THE EVOLUTION OF FEDERAL LAW FROM FEAR TO MERCY AND ITS REGRESSION TO FEAR ........................................................... 1287 A. The Historical Fear of the “Other” in American Immigration Law ................................................................................................. 1287 B. The Zenith of Mercy in American Immigration Law .................. 1291 C. The Downward Spiral of Mercy in American Immigration Law and Policy ............................................................................... 1294 II. THE “STRANGERS” OF THE XXIST CENTURY AND INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS .................................................................................. 1300 A. The Causes of Flight and People’s Needs .................................. 1300 B. International Human Rights and Forced Migration .................. 1302 C. The “Strangers” of the XXIst Century ....................................... 1304 1. Refugees ................................................................................. 1304 * Professor of Law, Willamette University College of Law, Salem, Oregon. B.A. (Philosophy), Uni- versity of San Diego; J.D., University of Santa Clara; LL.M. (Constitutional Law), Georgetown Uni- versity Graduate School
    [Show full text]