DOCSLIB.ORG

Scope of the Caucasus Ecoregion

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Munis Entomology & Zoology Mun. Ent. Zool. 564 https://www.munisentzool.org/ 16 (2) (June, 2021) ISSN 1306-3022 © MRG ___________________________________________________________ A COMPLETE SYSTEMATIC LIST OF LONGICORN BEETLES (CERAMBYCIDAE) OF CAUCASUS WITH NEW AND KNOWN RECORDS FROM CAUCASIAN PARTS OF TURKEY AND IRAN BASED ON THE CONCEPT OF CAUCASUS ECOREGION Hüseyin Özdikmen* * Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Gazi University, 06500 Ankara, TURKEY. E- mail: [email protected], ORCID ID: 0000-0001-9568-0093 [Özdikmen, H. 2021. A complete systematic list of longicorn beetles (Cerambycidae) of Caucasus with new and known records from Caucasian parts of Turkey and Iran based on the concept of Caucasus Ecoregion. Munis Entomology & Zoology, 16 (2): 564-662] ABSTRACT: This article offers a new perspective of the regional acceptance of the Caucasus based on the Caucasus ecoregion. The traditional regional acceptance of the Caucasus is discussed on the base of Transcaucasia’s borders especially. Accordingly, the Caucasus is composed of two regions: The North Caucasus [Ciscaucasia or Caucasus traditionally] (including some southern autonomous republics of Russia), and the South Caucasus [Transcaucasia]. Also, the South Caucasus is consisted of two subregions: the Central Transcaucasia (Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia), and the South Transcaucasia (some northern provinces of Iran and Turkey). In accordance, the old and recent studies that does not include many taxa in Caucasian parts of Turkey and Iran traditionally was revised and presented for the first time as a complete list of the Caucasus Cerambycidae fauna. According to the list determined by this study, the Caucasus Cerambycidae fauna is included a total of 704 species-group taxa (528 species + 176 subspecies) belonging to 128 genera of 55 tribes and 12 subfamilies. Therefore, this study revealed that the Cerambycidae fauna (blue colored) known from the Caucasus in traditional sense actually constitutes only about 72% of the fauna belonging to the Caucasus Ecoregion. 28% of the species group taxa (red colored) that make up the faunistic list presented in the study were listed for the first time for the regional fauna. This situation reveals that approximately 28% of the fauna of the Caucasus region has been neglected until now and this has caused the biological significance of the region not to be fully understood. According to results of this study, a total of 372 species-group taxa (185 species and 187 subspecies) are endemic taxa to Caucasus Ecoregion, and therefore endemism ratio of the region is 52.84%. Dorcadioninae subfamily has a remarkable and spectacular endemism ratio with 86.51%. KEY WORDS: Cerambycidae, systematic list, fauna, new data, Caucasus Ecoregion The Caucasus, historically was interpreted as the isthmus between the Black and Caspian seas. Shortly, the Romans named the region for the first time. The name was known as Caucasus in Europe in the 15th and 16th centuries, and this usage has come up to now; However, Caucasus, which is mentioned in these uses, refers to the region known as the “North Caucasus” today, the “Southern Caucasus” did not fall within this definition. The word “Transcaucasia” was used to denote the South Caucasus. This distinction was used in accordance with the policy of Soviet Russia and with its political support until the 1990s (Ismailov & Papava, 2008). Consequently, the “Caucasus region” is divided into Northern and Southern parts. The Northern part of the Caucasus is known as the “Ciscaucasia” Munis Entomology & Zoology Mun. Ent. Zool. https://www.munisentzool.org/ 16 (2) (June, 2021) 565 ISSN 1306-3022 © MRG ___________________________________________________________ (“Caucasus” traditionally) and the Southern part as the “Transcaucasia” (“Transcaucasia” traditionally). In fact, there is no problem with this distinction. The main problem here is in the acceptance of Transcaucasia's borders. In terms of being the subject of this article, first of all, for the Cerambycidae family, the full disclosure and determination of the Caucasian biological diversity and therefore the Cerambycidae fauna which has a high rate of endemism ratio and is a very important animal group in this respect, requires firstly to discuss boundaries of the Caucasus region. Cerambycidae fauna of Caucasus is still poorly investigated. Formerly, many data on Caucasian Cerambycidae was chiefly included in the works of A. P. Semenov (1902) and N. N. Plavilstshikov (mainly 1915, 1927, 1931a,b, 1932a, 1936, 1940 and 1958). Then Longhorned beetles fauna of Caucasus was published by Danilevsky & Miroshnikov (1985). Afterwards, publications contributing to the Caucasus Cerambycidae fauna have been published by various authors up to now. Some important publications among them are Miroshnikov (1984a,b, 1990a,b, 1998, 2000a,b, 2001, 2004a,b, 2009a,b,c, 2010, 2011a,b,c, 2012a,b), Danilevsky (1987, 1990, 1992, 1999, 2000, 2007, 2008, 2010, 2012a,b,c, 2014, 2015a,b, 2016a,b), Kasatkin & Arzanov (1985, 1997), Kazjutshits (1988), Arzanov et al. (1993), Lopatin (1994), Baidak (1996), Sláma (1999), Nikitsky (2005), Nikitsky et al. (2008), Lazarev (2010a,b,c, 2011a, 2015, 2017a, 2019), Lazarev et al. (2016). As a critique, however, the works about the Caucasus fauna did not include the species or subspecies that occur only in the Caucasian parts of Turkey and Iran. This type of approach, which is generally owned by Russian authors, still continues today (e.g. Danilevsky, 2021a,b,c and etc.) traditionally. This situation actually constitutes an obstacle to the exact determination and presentation of the Caucasian fauna. This approach causes incomplete understanding of the biodiversity richness of the region. From this point of view, it is aimed to fill this deficiency for the Caucasus region and to reveal a complete faunistic list with this study. As known, a biogeographic realm or ecozone is the broadest biogeographic division of Earth's land surface, based on distributional patterns of terrestrial organisms. They are subdivided into ecoregions, which are classified based on their biomes or habitat types. I believe that the detection of Cerambycidae fauna would be the most accurate approach for such a study, according to the Region's acceptance as an existing ecoregion (Caucasus Ecoregion). In accordance, the Caucasus consists of two regions as the North Caucasus and the South Caucasus. The Caucasus Ecoregion includes six countries as Russia in the North Caucassus, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, and northeastern part of Turkey and northwestern part of Iran in the South Caucasus (Williams et al., 2006; Zazanashvili et al., 2013, 2020). In a way that is in harmony with traditional acceptance, from this point of view, we can consider of South Caucasus as two subregions: the Central Transcaucasia (Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia), and the South Transcaucasia (some northern provinces of Iran and Turkey). In accordance with this acceptance, the following abbreviations are used in the present text. Munis Entomology & Zoology Mun. Ent. Zool. 566 https://www.munisentzool.org/ 16 (2) (June, 2021) ISSN 1306-3022 © MRG ___________________________________________________________ CIS: Ciscaucasia (North Caucasus or Caucasus traditinally) ST: South European Russia [Southern Rostov Oblast, Western Kalmykia, Krasnodar Kray, Stavropol Kray, Adyghea, Karachai–Cherkessia, Kabardino- Balkaria, North Ossetia, Ingushetia, Chechnya, Dagestan, also Northern parts of Georgia (incl. Abkhazia and N of South Ossetia) and Azerbaijan] TRANS: Transcaucasia (South Caucasus) CT: Central Transcaucasia AB: Azerbaijan (incl. Nakhchevan, Nagorno-Karabakh) except the northern parts AR: Armenia GG: Georgia except the northern parts (incl. Abkhazia and N of South Ossetia) ST: South Transcaucasia IN: NW Iran [West Azerbaijan, East Azerbaijan, Ardabil, Gilan and Mazandaran provinces (incl. Iranian Talysh and Alborz Mountains)] TR: North-Eastern Turkey (Artvin, Bayburt, Giresun, Gümüşhane, Ordu, Rize, Trabzon provinces) and Eastern Turkey (Ağrı, Ardahan, Erzurum, Iğdır, Kars, Van provinces) Some Turkish and Iranian provinces where is located the southern borders of Caucasus Ecoregion have been evaluated and studied as an administrative whole in the present study. In fact, these provinces where is located partly into the southern borders of Caucasus Ecoregion are Ordu, Erzurum, Ağrı and Van in Turkey, and West Azerbaijan, East Azerbaijan and Mazandaran in Iran (Map 1). It is important for this approach to ensure that all records from these provinces are evaluated, in order to prevent lack of information. The information (taken from WWF, 2021) given below supports this approach. According to the biomes, ecoregions in Turkey related to Caucasus are; Temperate broadleaf and mixed forests The Caucasus mixed forests is a temperate broadleaf and mixed forests ecoregion in the Caucasus Mountains, as well as the adjacent Lesser Caucasus range and the eastern end of the Pontic Mountains. The ecoregion covers an area of 170,405 square kilometers (65,794 sq mi), extending across portions of Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Iran, Russia, and Turkey. The main Caucasus chain, known as the Greater Caucasus, run from northwest to southeast, extending from north of the Black Sea eastwards to the Caspian Sea. The Caucasus forms the traditional border between Europe and Asia. The highest point in the Caucasus is Mount Elbrus (5,642 m). The ecoregion also includes the Lesser Caucasus or Anti-Caucasus range, which lies south of
Recommended publications
  • Effects of Prescribed Fire and Fire Surrogates on Pollinators and Saproxylic Beetles in North Carolina and Alabama

    Effects of Prescribed Fire and Fire Surrogates on Pollinators and Saproxylic Beetles in North Carolina and Alabama

    EFFECTS OF PRESCRIBED FIRE AND FIRE SURROGATES ON POLLINATORS AND SAPROXYLIC BEETLES IN NORTH CAROLINA AND ALABAMA by JOSHUA W. CAMPBELL (Under the Direction of James L. Hanula) ABSTRACT Pollinating and saproxylic insects are two groups of forest insects that are considered to be extremely vital for forest health. These insects maintain and enhance plant diversity, but also help recycle nutrients back into the soil. Forest management practices (prescribed burns, thinnings, herbicide use) are commonly used methods to limit fuel build up within forests. However, their effects on pollinating and saproxylic insects are poorly understood. We collected pollinating and saproxylic insect from North Carolina and Alabama from 2002-2004 among different treatment plots. In North Carolina, we captured 7921 floral visitors from four orders and 21 families. Hymenoptera was the most abundant and diverse order, with Halictidae being the most abundant family. The majority of floral visitors were captured in the mechanical plus burn treatments, while lower numbers were caught on the mechanical only treatments, burn only treatments and control treatments. Overall species richness was also higher on mechanical plus burn treatments compared to other treatments. Total pollinator abundance was correlated with decreased tree basal area (r2=0.58) and increased percent herbaceous plant cover (r2=0.71). We captured 37,191 saproxylic Coleoptera in North Carolina, comprising 20 families and 122 species. Overall, species richness and total abundance of Coleoptera were not significantly different among treatments. However, total numbers of many key families, such as Scolytidae, Curculionidae, Cerambycidae, and Buprestidae, have higher total numbers in treated plots compared to untreated controls and several families (Elateridae, Cleridae, Trogositidae, Scolytidae) showed significant differences (p≤0.05) in abundance.
  • Comparison of Coleoptera Emergent from Various Decay Classes of Downed Coarse Woody Debris in Great Smoky Mountains National Park, USA

    Comparison of Coleoptera Emergent from Various Decay Classes of Downed Coarse Woody Debris in Great Smoky Mountains National Park, USA

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida 11-30-2012 Comparison of Coleoptera emergent from various decay classes of downed coarse woody debris in Great Smoky Mountains National Park, USA Michael L. Ferro Louisiana State Arthropod Museum, [email protected] Matthew L. Gimmel Louisiana State University AgCenter, [email protected] Kyle E. Harms Louisiana State University, [email protected] Christopher E. Carlton Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Ferro, Michael L.; Gimmel, Matthew L.; Harms, Kyle E.; and Carlton, Christopher E., "Comparison of Coleoptera emergent from various decay classes of downed coarse woody debris in Great Smoky Mountains National Park, USA" (2012). Insecta Mundi. 773. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/773 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. INSECTA A Journal of World Insect Systematics MUNDI 0260 Comparison of Coleoptera emergent from various decay classes of downed coarse woody debris in Great Smoky Mountains Na- tional Park, USA Michael L. Ferro Louisiana State Arthropod Museum, Department of Entomology Louisiana State University Agricultural Center 402 Life Sciences Building Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, U.S.A. [email protected] Matthew L. Gimmel Division of Entomology Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology University of Kansas 1501 Crestline Drive, Suite 140 Lawrence, KS, 66045, U.S.A.
  • Correspondence

    Correspondence

    Correspondence hppt/ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub: FBB0B88C-C5ED-4F32-B637-C5C6D97B1AE7 A.V. Kuprin. THE LONGICORN BEETLES (INSECTA, COLEOPTERA: CERAMBYCOIDAE) OF THE USSURI NATURE RESERVE AND ADJACENT TERRITORIES. – Far Eastern Entomologist. 2016. N 309: 21-28. Ussuri Nature Reserve, Far East Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Ussuriysk 692519, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] Summary. A checklist of 177 species in superfamily of Cerambycoidae recorded from Ussuri Nature Reserve is given. The data on distribution of rare species, Callipogon relictus and Rosalia coelestis, in the Ussuri Nature Reserve is presented. Key words: Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Disteniidae, longicorn beetles, fauna, Ussuri Nature Reserve, Russia. А. В. Куприн. Жуки-усачи (Insecta, Coleoptera: Cerambycoidae) Уссу- рийского заповедника и сопредельных территорий // Дальневосточный энтомолог. 2016. N 309. С. 21-28. Резюме. Приведен аннотированный список 177 видов надсемейства Cerambycoidae, отмеченных в Уссурийском заповеднике и сопредельных территориях. Представлены сведения о распространении редких видов (Callipogon relictus и Rosalia coelestis) на территории заповедника. Beetles of the superfamily Cerambyсoidae are among the best-studied insect groups. The superfamily currently consists of 4 families: Disteniidae Thomson, 1860, Cerambycidae Latreille, 1802, Oxypeltidae Lacordaire, 1869, and Vesperidae Mulsant, 1839. The increased interest in these insects is mostly due to their unique appearance and size. The fauna of longicorn beetles of the Russian Far East started to be actively studied in the 1920s, after the researchers of the Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences had visited the southern part of this region and obtained a large sample collection. The first paper by T.P. Samoilov (1936) was based on the results of this and the previously made collection and focused on the faunistic-ecological characterization of the fauna of longicorn beetles of the southern Primorskii krai.
  • Handbook of Zoology

    Handbook of Zoology

    Handbook of Zoology Founded by Willy Kükenthal Editor-in-chief Andreas Schmidt-Rhaesa Arthropoda: Insecta Editors Niels P. Kristensen & Rolf G. Beutel Authenticated | [email protected] Download Date | 5/8/14 6:22 PM Richard A. B. Leschen Rolf G. Beutel (Volume Editors) Coleoptera, Beetles Volume 3: Morphology and Systematics (Phytophaga) Authenticated | [email protected] Download Date | 5/8/14 6:22 PM Scientific Editors Richard A. B. Leschen Landcare Research, New Zealand Arthropod Collection Private Bag 92170 1142 Auckland, New Zealand Rolf G. Beutel Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena Institute of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Biology 07743 Jena, Germany ISBN 978-3-11-027370-0 e-ISBN 978-3-11-027446-2 ISSN 2193-4231 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from the Library of Congress. Bibliografic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de Copyright 2014 by Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston Typesetting: Compuscript Ltd., Shannon, Ireland Printing and Binding: Hubert & Co. GmbH & Co. KG, Göttingen Printed in Germany www.degruyter.com Authenticated | [email protected] Download Date | 5/8/14 6:22 PM Cerambycidae Latreille, 1802 77 2.4 Cerambycidae Latreille, Batesian mimic (Elytroleptus Dugés, Cerambyc inae) feeding upon its lycid model (Eisner et al. 1962), 1802 the wounds inflicted by the cerambycids are often non-lethal, and Elytroleptus apparently is not unpal- Petr Svacha and John F. Lawrence atable or distasteful even if much of the lycid prey is consumed (Eisner et al.
  • Powell Mountain Karst Preserve: Biological Inventory of Vegetation Communities, Vascular Plants, and Selected Animal Groups

    Powell Mountain Karst Preserve: Biological Inventory of Vegetation Communities, Vascular Plants, and Selected Animal Groups

    Powell Mountain Karst Preserve: Biological Inventory of Vegetation Communities, Vascular Plants, and Selected Animal Groups Final Report Prepared by: Christopher S. Hobson For: The Cave Conservancy of the Virginias Date: 15 April 2010 This report may be cited as follows: Hobson, C.S. 2010. Powell Mountain Karst Preserve: Biological Inventory of Vegetation Communities, Vascular Plants, and Selected Animal Groups. Natural Heritage Technical Report 10-12. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, Virginia. Unpublished report submitted to The Cave Conservancy of the Virginias. April 2010. 30 pages plus appendices. COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA Biological Inventory of Vegetation Communities, Vascular Plants, and Selected Animal Groups Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation Division of Natural Heritage Natural Heritage Technical Report 10-12 April 2010 Contents List of Tables......................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures........................................................................................................................ iii Introduction............................................................................................................................ 1 Geology.................................................................................................................................. 2 Explanation of the Natural Heritage Ranking System..........................................................
  • Range of Attraction of Pheromone Lures and Dispersal Behavior of Cerambycid Beetles

    Range of Attraction of Pheromone Lures and Dispersal Behavior of Cerambycid Beetles

    Annals of the Entomological Society of America Advance Access published August 6, 2016 Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 2016, 1–9 doi: 10.1093/aesa/saw055 Ecology and Population Biology Research article Range of Attraction of Pheromone Lures and Dispersal Behavior of Cerambycid Beetles E. Dunn,1,2 J. Hough-Goldstein,1 L. M. Hanks,3 J. G. Millar,4 and V. D’Amico5 1Department of Entomology and Wildlife Ecology, University of Delaware, 531 S. College Ave., Newark, DE 19716 ([email protected]; [email protected]), 2Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected], 3Department of Entomology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 505 S. Goodwin Ave. MC-118, Urbana, IL 61801 ([email protected]), 4Department of Entomology, University of California, 900 University Ave., Riverside, CA 92521 ([email protected]), and 5U. S. Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 531 S. College Ave., Newark, DE 19716 ([email protected]) Received 13 April 2016; Accepted 12 July 2016 Downloaded from Abstract Cerambycid beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) can locate suitable hosts and mates by sensing pheromones and plant volatiles. Many cerambycid pheromone components have been identified and are now produced syn- thetically for trap lures. The range over which these lures attract cerambycids within a forest, and the tendency for cerambycids to move out of a forest in response to lures, have not been explored previously. We conducted http://aesa.oxfordjournals.org/ two field experiments using baited and unbaited panel traps in northern Delaware to investigate these ques- tions. Within forest fragments, unbaited traps that were 2 m from a baited trap captured more beetles than unbaited control traps, suggesting increased cerambycid activity leading to more by-catch in unbaited traps at 2 m from the pheromone source.
  • Biodiversity and Coarse Woody Debris in Southern Forests Proceedings of the Workshop on Coarse Woody Debris in Southern Forests: Effects on Biodiversity

    Biodiversity and Coarse Woody Debris in Southern Forests Proceedings of the Workshop on Coarse Woody Debris in Southern Forests: Effects on Biodiversity

    Biodiversity and Coarse woody Debris in Southern Forests Proceedings of the Workshop on Coarse Woody Debris in Southern Forests: Effects on Biodiversity Athens, GA - October 18-20,1993 Biodiversity and Coarse Woody Debris in Southern Forests Proceedings of the Workhop on Coarse Woody Debris in Southern Forests: Effects on Biodiversity Athens, GA October 18-20,1993 Editors: James W. McMinn, USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, Athens, GA, and D.A. Crossley, Jr., University of Georgia, Athens, GA Sponsored by: U.S. Department of Energy, Savannah River Site, and the USDA Forest Service, Savannah River Forest Station, Biodiversity Program, Aiken, SC Conducted by: USDA Forest Service, Southem Research Station, Asheville, NC, and University of Georgia, Institute of Ecology, Athens, GA Preface James W. McMinn and D. A. Crossley, Jr. Conservation of biodiversity is emerging as a major goal in The effects of CWD on biodiversity depend upon the management of forest ecosystems. The implied harvesting variables, distribution, and dynamics. This objective is the conservation of a full complement of native proceedings addresses the current state of knowledge about species and communities within the forest ecosystem. the influences of CWD on the biodiversity of various Effective implementation of conservation measures will groups of biota. Research priorities are identified for future require a broader knowledge of the dimensions of studies that should provide a basis for the conservation of biodiversity, the contributions of various ecosystem biodiversity when interacting with appropriate management components to those dimensions, and the impact of techniques. management practices. We thank John Blake, USDA Forest Service, Savannah In a workshop held in Athens, GA, October 18-20, 1993, River Forest Station, for encouragement and support we focused on an ecosystem component, coarse woody throughout the workshop process.
  • Understanding Habitat Effects on Pollinator Guild Composition in New York State and the Importance of Community Science Involvem

    Understanding Habitat Effects on Pollinator Guild Composition in New York State and the Importance of Community Science Involvem

    SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry Digital Commons @ ESF Dissertations and Theses Fall 11-18-2019 Understanding Habitat Effects on Pollinator Guild Composition in New York State and the Importance of Community Science Involvement in Understanding Species Distributions Abigail Jago [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.esf.edu/etds Part of the Environmental Monitoring Commons, and the Forest Biology Commons Recommended Citation Jago, Abigail, "Understanding Habitat Effects on Pollinator Guild Composition in New York State and the Importance of Community Science Involvement in Understanding Species Distributions" (2019). Dissertations and Theses. 117. https://digitalcommons.esf.edu/etds/117 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ ESF. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ ESF. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. UNDERSTANDING HABITAT EFFECTS ON POLLINATOR GUILD COMPOSITION IN NEW YORK STATE AND THE IMPORTANCE OF COMMUNITY SCIENCE INVOLVEMENT IN UNDERSTANDING SPECIES DISTRIBUTIONS By Abigail Joy Jago A thesis Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Science Degree State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry Syracuse, New York November 2019 Department of Environmental and Forest Biology Approved by: Melissa Fierke, Major Professor/ Department Chair Mark Teece, Chair, Examining Committee S. Scott Shannon, Dean, The Graduate School In loving memory of my Dad Acknowledgements I have many people to thank for their help throughout graduate school. First, I would like to thank my major professor, Dr.
  • Rapuzzi Sama 2018 New Taxa.Pdf

    Rapuzzi Sama 2018 New Taxa.Pdf

    _____________Mun. Ent. Zool. Vol. 13, No. 1, January 2018__________ 1 NEW TAXA AND NOTES ON THE SYSTEMATIC OF PALEARTIC LONGHORN-BEETLES (COLEOPTERA: CERAMBYCIDAE) Pierpaolo Rapuzzi* and Gianfranco Sama** * via Cialla, 48, 33040 Prepotto (UD), ITALY. E-mail: [email protected] ** via Raffaello 84, 47023 Cesena (FC), ITALY. E-mail: [email protected] [Rapuzzi, P. & Sama, G. 2018. New taxa and notes on the systematic of Paleartic Longhorn-beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Munis Entomology & Zoology, 13 (1): 1-39] ABSTRACT: Fifteen new taxa of Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) are described from the Paleartic region, mainly from the Mediterranean region and from Middle East. One from Pakistan is described as well. New combination for Akimerus berchmansi ssp. ariannae Pesarini & Sabbadini 2007 is proposed. Turanoclytus sieversi ssp. deyrollei (Pic, 1897) and Herophila veluchianum (Breuning, 1943) are revaluated as valid subspecies and species respectively. New status for Isotomus speciosus ssp. comptus Mannerheim, 1825, Isotomus speciosus ssp. syriacus Pic, 1902, Isotomus speciosus ssp. gilanus Pic, 1911, Isotomus speciosus ssp. barbarae Sama, 1977 and Isotomus speciosus ssp. jarmilae Sláma, 1982 are proposed. New synonym is proposed for Isotomus speciosus ssp. syriacus Pic, 1902 = Isotomus comptus ssp. meridionalis Ozdikmen & Aytar, 2012. We confirm the following synonymy recently revalidated Isotomus speciosus ssp. speciosus (Schneider, 1787) = Isotomus speciosus ssp. ganglabueri (Pic, 1900). KEY WORDS: Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Rhamnusium, Xylosteus, Cortodera, Molorchus, Isotomus, Turanoclytus, Plagionotus, Dorcadion, Herophila, Phytoecia, new species, new subspecies, new combination, new status, new synonym, Bulgaria, Greece, Albania, Cyprus, Turkey, Iraq, Pakistan In this paper, we describe 15 new taxa of Cerambycidae from the Paleartic region. The majority of them come from the Mediterranean Region: Xylosteus bartoni ssp.
  • Species Richness and Phenology of Cerambycid Beetles in Urban Forest Fragments of Northern Delaware

    Species Richness and Phenology of Cerambycid Beetles in Urban Forest Fragments of Northern Delaware

    ECOLOGY AND POPULATION BIOLOGY Species Richness and Phenology of Cerambycid Beetles in Urban Forest Fragments of Northern Delaware 1 1,2 3 4 5 K. HANDLEY, J. HOUGH-GOLDSTEIN, L. M. HANKS, J. G. MILLAR, AND V. D’AMICO Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1–12 (2015); DOI: 10.1093/aesa/sav005 ABSTRACT Cerambycid beetles are abundant and diverse in forests, but much about their host rela- tionships and adult behavior remains unknown. Generic blends of synthetic pheromones were used as lures in traps, to assess the species richness, and phenology of cerambycids in forest fragments in north- ern Delaware. More than 15,000 cerambycid beetles of 69 species were trapped over 2 yr. Activity periods were similar to those found in previous studies, but many species were active 1–3 wk earlier in 2012 than in 2013, probably owing to warmer spring temperatures that year. In 2012, the blends were tested with and without ethanol, a host plant volatile produced by stressed trees. Of cerambycid species trapped in sufficient numbers for statistical analysis, ethanol synergized pheromone trap catches for seven species, but had no effect on attraction to pheromone for six species. One species was attracted only by ethanol. The generic pheromone blend, especially when combined with ethanol, was an effective tool for assessing the species richness and adult phenology of many cerambycid species, including nocturnal, crepuscular, and cryptic species that are otherwise difficult to find. KEY WORDS Cerambycidae, attractant, phenology, forest fragmentation Cerambycid beetles can be serious pests of forest trees long as those in Europe, almost half of the forests in the and wood products (Speight 1989, Solomon 1995).
  • The Maryland Entomologist

    The Maryland Entomologist

    THE MARYLAND ENTOMOLOGIST Volume 5, Number 1 September 2009 September 2009 The Maryland Entomologist Volume 5, Number 1 MARYLAND ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY Executive Committee: President Frederick Paras Vice President Philip J. Kean Secretary Richard H. Smith, Jr. Treasurer Edgar A. Cohen, Jr. Newsletter Editor Harold J. Harlan Journal Editor Eugene J. Scarpulla Historian Robert S. Bryant The Maryland Entomological Society (MES) was founded in November 1971, to promote the science of entomology in all its sub-disciplines; to provide a common meeting venue for professional and amateur entomologists residing in Maryland, the District of Columbia, and nearby areas; to issue a periodical and other publications dealing with entomology; and to facilitate the exchange of ideas and information through its meetings and publications. The MES logo features a drawing of a specimen of Euphydryas phaëton (Drury), the Baltimore Checkerspot, with its generic name above and its specific epithet below (both in capital letters), all on a pale green field; all these are within a yellow ring double-bordered by red, bearing the message “* Maryland Entomological Society * 1971 *”. All of this is positioned above the Shield of the State of Maryland. In 1973, the Baltimore Checkerspot was named the official insect of the State of Maryland through the efforts of many MES members. Membership in the MES is open to all persons interested in the study of entomology. All members receive the journal, The Maryland Entomologist, and the e-mailed newsletter, Phaëton. Institutions may subscribe to The Maryland Entomologist but may not become members. Prospective members should send to the Treasurer full dues for the current MES year, along with their full name, address, telephone number, entomological interests, and e-mail address.
  • The Lepturine

    The Lepturine

    The Lepturine Longhorn Beetles (Cerambycidae: Lepturinae) (The large beetle on the bottom right does not occur in the Pacific Northwest.) of the Pacific Northwest and Other Stories Phil Schapker, M.S. Web version 1.1 April, 2017 Forward to Web Version 1.1 - May, 2017: The current work is a continuation of a chapter from my MS thesis at Oregon State University, completed in Sept. of 2014. Much of this version is copied directly from that document with several additions and corrections to the text, and a number of new photographs. The intitial goal of my thesis was to create a field guide to the PNW lepturines that was useful both to amateur enthusiasts and to scientists in need of a more detailed technical resource. Unfortunately, the work was forshortened due to time constraints for finishing at OSU, and my ultimate pursuit remains a work in progress. After a brief hiatus from active research, I’ve taken back up the effort. The key to genera is largely based on Linsley & Chemsak’s two-part monograph published in 1972 and 1976. It is currently undergoing testing with the intention to incorporate simpler language, a glossary, and photographic aids. I would greatly appreciate any comments, ideas, corrections, or additions. Feel free to email [email protected]. Acknowledgements: Special thanks to Brady Richards for his meticulous help in proofreading the present draft and getting it up on BugGuide. Also to my former adviser, Chris Marshall, for his continued advice and mentorship, and for allowing me to use the resources of the Oregon State Arthropod collection to conduct my research and photograph specimens.