Fatal Toxicity Index of Medicinal Drugs Based on a Comprehensive Toxicology Database
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DEPRESSANTS Opioid Pain Relievers Anxiolytics (Also Belong to Psychiatric Medication Category) • Codeine (In 222® Tablets, Tylenol® No
CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DEPRESSANTS Opioid Pain Relievers Anxiolytics (also belong to psychiatric medication category) • codeine (in 222® Tablets, Tylenol® No. 1/2/3/4, Fiorinal® C, Benzodiazepines Codeine Contin, etc.) • heroin • alprazolam (Xanax®) • hydrocodone (Hycodan®, etc.) • chlordiazepoxide (Librium®) • hydromorphone (Dilaudid®) • clonazepam (Rivotril®) • methadone • diazepam (Valium®) • morphine (MS Contin®, M-Eslon®, Kadian®, Statex®, etc.) • flurazepam (Dalmane®) • oxycodone (in Oxycocet®, Percocet®, Percodan®, OxyContin®, etc.) • lorazepam (Ativan®) • pentazocine (Talwin®) • nitrazepam (Mogadon®) • oxazepam ( Serax®) Alcohol • temazepam (Restoril®) Inhalants Barbiturates • gases (e.g. nitrous oxide, “laughing gas”, chloroform, halothane, • butalbital (in Fiorinal®) ether) • secobarbital (Seconal®) • volatile solvents (benzene, toluene, xylene, acetone, naptha and hexane) Buspirone (Buspar®) • nitrites (amyl nitrite, butyl nitrite and cyclohexyl nitrite – also known as “poppers”) Non-Benzodiazepine Hypnotics (also belong to psychiatric medication category) • chloral hydrate • zopiclone (Imovane®) Other • GHB (gamma-hydroxybutyrate) • Rohypnol (flunitrazepam) CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM STIMULANTS Amphetamines Caffeine • dextroamphetamine (Dexadrine®) Methelynedioxyamphetamine (MDA) • methamphetamine (“Crystal meth”) (also has hallucinogenic actions) • methylphenidate (Biphentin®, Concerta®, Ritalin®) • mixed amphetamine salts (Adderall XR®) 3,4-Methelynedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, Ecstasy) (also has hallucinogenic actions) Cocaine/Crack -
Adherence to Risk Management Guidelines for Drugs Which Cause Vitamin D Deficiency – Big Data from the Swedish Health System
Journal name: Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety Article Designation: Original Research Year: 2019 Volume: 11 Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety Dovepress Running head verso: Nordqvist et al Running head recto: Nordqvist et al open access to scientific and medical research DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DHPS.S188187 Open Access Full Text Article ORIGINAL RESEARCH Adherence to risk management guidelines for drugs which cause vitamin D deficiency – big data from the Swedish health system Ola Nordqvist1,2 Purpose: Several medications are known to cause vitamin D deficiency. The aim of this study Ulrika Lönnbom Svensson3 is to describe vitamin D testing and supplementation in patients using these “risk medications”, Lars Brudin4,5 thereby assessing adherence to medical guidelines. Pär Wanby2,6 Patients and methods: A database with electronic health records for the population in a ≈ Martin Carlsson2,7 Swedish County ( 240,000 inhabitants) was screened for patients prescribed the pre-defined “risk medications” during a 2-year period (2014–2015). In total, 12,194 patients were prescribed 1 The Pharmaceutical Department, “risk medications” pertaining to one of the three included pharmaceutical groups. Vitamin D Region Kalmar County, Kalmar, Sweden; 2eHealth Institute, Data testing and concomitant vitamin D supplementation, including differences between the included Intensive Sciences and Applications pharmaceutical groups, was explored by matching personal identification numbers. (DISA), Department of Medicine For personal use only. and Optometry, Linnaeus University, Results: Corticosteroids were prescribed to 10,003 of the patients, antiepileptic drugs to 1,101, Kalmar, Sweden; 3Department of and drugs mainly reducing vitamin D uptake to 864. Two hundred twenty-six patients were Chemistry and Biomedical Sciences, prescribed >1 “risk medication”. -
Gamma Hydroxybutyrate (GHB)
If you have issues viewing or accessing this file, please contact us at NCJRS.gov. PROPERTY OF Executive Office of the President National CriminalJustice Reference Service (NOJRS) ~.~1~<~ ~ )~ Office of National Drug Control Policy Box 6000 \~~/ Rockvilte, MD 20849-6000 L lohn P. Waiters, Director www.whitchousedrugpolicy.gov 1-800-666-333~ Gamma Hydroxybutyrate (GHB) / Backgrou nd liquid packaged in vials or sma.ll bottles. In liquid form, Gamma hydroxybutyrate (GHB) is a powerful, rapidly it is clear, odorless, tasteless, and almost undetectable acting central nervous system depressant. It was first when mixed in a drink. GHB is typically consumed by synthesized in the 1920s and was under development as the capful or teaspoonful at a cost of $5 to $10 per dose. an anesthetic agent in the 1960s. GHB is produced nat- The average dose is I to 5 grams and takes effect in 15 urally by the body in small amounts but its physiologi- to 30 minutes, depending on the dosage and purity of cal function is unclear. the drug. Its effects last from 3 to 6 hours. GHB was sold in health food stores as a performance- Consumption of less than l gram of GHB acts as a enhancing additive in bodybuilding formulas until the relaxant, causing a loss of muscle tone and reduced Food and Drug Administration (FDA) banned it in inhibitions. Consumption of I to 2 grams causes a 1990. It is currently marketed in some European coun- strong feeling of relaxation and slows the heart rate tries as an adjunct to anesthesia. GHB is abused for its and respiration. -
Sedative / Hypnotics
Sedative / Hypnotics Robert Althoff, MD, PhD www.mghcme.org Disclosures I have the following relevant financial relationship with a commercial interest to disclose: ▪ I receive or have received research support from NIMH, NIDA, and the Klingenstein Third Generation Foundation ▪I have ownership equity in WISER Systems, LLC as a partner. www.mghcme.org www.mghcme.org • Sedative / Hypnotics are a general class of agents • Frequently refer to benzodiazepines (and like compounds) and barbiturates • Many similarities in mechanisms of action, medical indications, behavioral effects, withdrawal considerations, and treatment www.mghcme.org Benzodiazepine Mechanism of Action Benzodiazepines are a class of agents that work on the central nervous system, acting selectively on gamma-aminobutyric acid-A (GABA-A) receptors in the brain. It enhances response to the inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA, by opening GABA-activated chloride channels and allowing chloride ions to enter the neuron, making the neuron negatively charged and resistant to excitation www.mghcme.org • Traditional benzodiazepines – Diazepam (Valium) – Clonazepam (Klonopin) – Others • “Z” Drugs – Zaleplon (trade: Sonata) – Zolpidem (trade: Ambien, Edluar, Intermezzo) – Zopiclone (trade: Zimovane) www.mghcme.org Benzodiazepine: General Info • C IV DEA classification • Although more than 2,000 different benzodiazepines have been produced worldwide, only about 15 are currently FDA-approved in the United States. • Types of benzodiazepines therefore include those the following – Ultra-short acting: midazolam (Versed), triazolam (Halcion) – Short-acting: alprazolam (Xanax), lorazepam (Ativan) – Long-acting: chlordiazepoxide (Librium), diazepam (Valium) • The use of benzodiazepines during pregnancy is a risk factor for cleft lip or palate, lower muscle tone, and withdrawal symptoms in the developing fetus Bachhuber, et al. -
Doxepin (Silenor) for Insomnia DHIREN PATEL, Pharmd, and JENNIFER D
STEPS New Drug Reviews Doxepin (Silenor) for Insomnia DHIREN PATEL, PharmD, and JENNIFER D. GOLDMAN-LEVINE, PharmD Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts STEPS new drug reviews Silenor is a new low-dose formulation of the tricyclic antidepressant doxepin (which is typi- cover Safety, Tolerability, cally taken as a 25- to 150-mg dose at bedtime). Low-dose doxepin is labeled for the treatment Effectiveness, Price, and Simplicity. Each indepen- of insomnia characterized by difficulty maintaining sleep. The exact mechanism by which the dent review is provided medication exerts its sleep maintenance effect is unknown, but is thought to be antagonism 1 by authors who have no of histamine H1 receptors. financial association with the drug manufacturer. The series coordinator for Drug Dosage Dose form Monthly cost* AFP is Allen F. Shaugh- nessy, PharmD, Tufts Doxepin (Silenor) 3 to 6 mg daily 3-mg and 6-mg tablets $208 University Family Medicine Residency Program at *—Price for 30 3-mg or 6-mg tablets at CVS Pharmacy on May 18, 2011. Cambridge Health Alli- ance, Malden, Mass. A collection of STEPS pub- lished in AFP is available SAFETY of 1,017 patients, approximately 1 percent at http://www.aafp.org/ 1 afp/steps. Doxepin is safe when used at low dosages. withdrew because of adverse effects. Rebound Antidepressants are required to have label- insomnia and withdrawal symptoms have not ing that warns of an increased risk of sui- been reported. Next-day sedation, anticholin- cide; however, there have been no reports ergic effects, and memory impairment do not of suicide among patients taking low-dose occur at low dosages.2,3 The use of central ner- doxepin. -
Study Protocol
Evaluation of Safety and Pharmacodynamics of OP0201 Compared to Placebo in Study Title Healthy Adults NCT Number NCT03828149 Document Description Clinical Protocol, Version: V04_0 Document Date 08 Jan 2019 TRIAL PROTOCOL EVALUATION OF SAFETY AND PHARMACODYNAMICS OF OP0201 COMPARED TO PLACEBO IN HEALTHY ADULTS Novus Therapeutics, Inc. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 19900 MacArthur Blvd., Suite 550 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Irvine, California 92612, U.S.A. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Sponsor) xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx represented by xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx University of Cologne xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Albertus-Magnus-Platz xxxxxxxxxxxxx 50923 Cologne Germany xxxxxxx (EU Sponsor Representative) Novus TherapeuticsTrial Protocol Code: OP0201-C001 University of Cologne Internal Trial Protocol Code: Uni-Koeln-2809 EudraCT number: 2016-003667-19 08-01-2018, Version V04_0 The information in this trial protocol is strictly confidential. It is for the use of the Sponsor, investigator, trial personnel, ethics committee, the authorities, and trial subjects only. This trial protocol may not be passed on to third parties without the express agreement of the Sponsor or the Principal Coordinating Investigator (PCI, “Leiter der klinischen Prüfung (LKP)”). Trial protocol V04_0 of 08-01-2018 Novus Therapeutics, Inc. by University of Cologne OP0201-C001 Page 2 of 66 I. Signatures xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Signature Date xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -
Phenibut and EMS Earlier This Week, the Michigan Poison Center
Phenibut and EMS Earlier this week, the Michigan Poison Center (MPP) received an inquiry from a UP emergency physician who had cared for two patients in two days who had been abusing a substance called Phenibut, a synthetically produced central nervous system depressant with similarities to the neurotransmitter known as GABA. Phenibut is not an FDA approved or regulated drug. It typically is marketed as a dietary substitute and is readily available in stores (especially “headshops”) and online. While officially considered a supplement, it is felt to have properties more similar to a prescription sedative. It is marketed outside of the US for depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorder. Recently Phenibut has been recognized as having the potential for physical dependence, withdrawal, and addiction.1,2 In response to the UP physician’s concern that these two cases might be part of an increase in Phenibut use, the MPC initiated a review, identifying 12 cases this year.3 They also notified MDHHS of the concern. The Division of EMS and Trauma, using Michigan EMS Information System data identified 8 cases in the first 11 months of 2019 compared to 5 cases in the last 6 months of 2018. One EMS case was also identified by MPC. Of the combined 19 cases from 2019, one third occurred in the Upper Peninsula, with 5 of the 8 cases (62.5%) in the last 6 months coming from the UP. Cases were reported in 10 Michigan counties. Documented coingestants were noted in 36.8% of the cases and included cannabinoids (2), kratom (3), ETOH, Flakka (bath salts), and other medications. -
Therapeutic Class Overview Sedative Hypnotics
Therapeutic Class Overview Sedative Hypnotics Therapeutic Class • Overview/Summary: Insomnia is the most common sleep disorder in adulthood, affecting 33 to 69% of the population. It is estimated that five to ten percent of adults experience specific insomnia disorders.1,2 Insomnia is a disorder that results from a difficulty in initiating or maintaining sleep, waking too early, or sleep that is considered nonrestorative or poor quality.1-3 Furthermore, individuals with insomnia must also report at least one of the following types of daytime impairment as a result of the difficulties experienced with sleep: fatigue/malaise; impairment in memory, attention, or concentration; social or work-related dysfunction; poor school performance; irritability; day time sleepiness; loss of motivation, energy, or initiative; increased tendency for work or driving related accidents/errors; tension headaches; gastrointestinal symptoms; or concerns/worries about sleep. In individuals with insomnia, these complaints occur despite having sufficient opportunity and circumstances for sleep.1,2 According to the International Classification of Sleep Disorders, insomnia may be classified as one of the following: short-term insomnia, chronic insomnia or other insomnia (defined as patients who experience difficulty initiating or maintaining sleep but do not meet all of the criteria for either short-term or chronic insomnia).2 There are several classes of medications available for the management of insomnia.4-6 Doxepin (Silenor®) is a tricyclic antidepressant that -
Prescribing Information
LAMICTAL Lamotrigine QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION LAMICTAL Tablets: Each film-coated tablet contains 25, 50 and 100 mg lamotrigine. LAMICTAL Dispersible/Chewable Tablets: Each tablet contains 5 mg lamotrigine, which may be chewed, dispersed in a liquid or swallowed whole. CLINICAL INFORMATION Indications EPILEPSY • Adults and Adolescents (over 12 years of age) LAMICTAL is indicated for use as adjunctive or monotherapy in the treatment of epilepsy, for partial seizures and generalised seizures, including tonic-clonic seizures and the seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. • Children (2 to 12 years of age) LAMICTAL is indicated as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of epilepsy, for partial seizures and generalised seizures including tonic-clonic seizures and the seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Initial monotherapy treatment in newly diagnosed paediatric patients is not recommended. After epileptic control has been achieved during adjunctive therapy, concomitant anti- epileptic drugs (AEDs) may be withdrawn and patients continued on LAMICTAL monotherapy. LAMICTAL 2 mg dispersible/chewable tablet is not available locally. If the calculated dose in children is less than 2.5 mg daily, then LAMICTAL cannot be used. DO NOT attempt to administer partial quantities of the dispersible/chewable tablets. BIPOLAR DISORDER • Adults (18 years of age and over) 1 LAMICTAL is indicated for the prevention of depressive episodes in patients with bipolar disorder. Safety and efficacy of LAMICTAL in the acute treatment of mood episodes has not been established. The physician who elects to use LAMICTAL for periods extending beyond 18 months should periodically re-evaluate the long-term usefulness of the drug for the individual patient. -
Sedatives Every Day Q
? Q&A IF I HAVE BEEN TAKING SEDATIVES EVERY DAY Q. FOR A FEW WEEKS OR LONGER, IS IT SAFE TO STOP TAKING SEDATIVES WHENEVER I WANT? A. NO. Talk to your doctor. Withdrawal symptoms can be life-threatening and include seizures, increased heart rate, blood pressure, and temperature, as well as visual hallucinations.5 AREN’T SEDATIVES LESS DANGEROUS THAN Q. OTHER DRUGS? SEDATIVES NO. In fact, sedative overdoses have increased. A. A recent study showed that the most commonly prescribed sedatives called benzodiazepines THE TRUTH ABOUT SEDATIVES were responsible for nearly 30 percent of deaths from medications.6 SLANG: BENZOS/PHENNIES/ ARE SEDATIVES LESS HARMFUL THAN RED BIRDS/REDS/YELLOW Q. DRINKING? JACKETS/ YELLOWS/DOWNERS/ NO. The effects of sedatives can be harmful and 1 A. are similar to alcohol intoxication. Symptoms SLEEPING PILLS/TRANKS include impaired attention and judgment, inappropriate behavior, decreased reflexes, and lack of balance when walking.7 GET THE FACTS THE BOTTOM LINE: Even when used as directed, sedatives carry risk. But SEDATIVES CAN BE ADDICTIVE. Although sedatives are often when misused, sedatives are more dangerous and can used to treat insomnia, they can be harmful when taken in ways even be deadly. Talk to your parents, a doctor, a counselor, other than as prescribed by a doctor, such as to self-medicate for a teacher, or another adult you trust if you have questions. depression or anxiety. Long-term use may result in needing larger doses to achieve the desired sedation and calming effects, which LEARN MORE: can lead to addiction.2 In some cases it is possible to misjudge how Get the latest information on how drugs affect the brain much more is needed, leading to overdose. -
Review of Existing Classification Efforts
Project No. TREN-05-FP6TR-S07.61320-518404-DRUID DRUID Driving under the Influence of Drugs, Alcohol and Medicines Integrated Project 1.6. Sustainable Development, Global Change and Ecosystem 1.6.2: Sustainable Surface Transport 6th Framework Programme Deliverable 4.1.1 Review of existing classification efforts Due date of deliverable: (15.01.2008) Actual submission date: (07.02.2008) Start date of project: 15.10.2006 Duration: 48 months Organisation name of lead contractor for this deliverable: UGent Revision 1.0 Project co-funded by the European Commission within the Sixth Framework Programme (2002-2006) Dissemination Level PU Public X PP Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission Services) RE Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services) CO Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services) Task 4.1 : Review of existing classification efforts Authors: Kristof Pil, Elke Raes, Thomas Van den Neste, An-Sofie Goessaert, Jolien Veramme, Alain Verstraete (Ghent University, Belgium) Partners: - F. Javier Alvarez (work package leader), M. Trinidad Gómez-Talegón, Inmaculada Fierro (University of Valladolid, Spain) - Monica Colas, Juan Carlos Gonzalez-Luque (DGT, Spain) - Han de Gier, Sylvia Hummel, Sholeh Mobaser (University of Groningen, the Netherlands) - Martina Albrecht, Michael Heiβing (Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen, Germany) - Michel Mallaret, Charles Mercier-Guyon (University of Grenoble, Centre Regional de Pharmacovigilance, France) - Vassilis Papakostopoulos, Villy Portouli, Andriani Mousadakou (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Greece) DRUID 6th Framework Programme Deliverable D.4.1.1. Revision 1.0 Review of Existing Classification Efforts Page 2 of 127 Introduction DRUID work package 4 focusses on the classification and labeling of medicinal drugs according to their influence on driving performance. -
Pharmacoepidemiological Profile and Polypharmacy Indicators in Elderly Outpatients
Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences vol. 49, n. 3, jul./sep., 2013 Article Pharmacoepidemiological profile and polypharmacy indicators in elderly outpatients André de Oliveira Baldoni1,*, Lorena Rocha Ayres1, Edson Zangiacomi Martinez2, Nathalie de Lourdes Sousa Dewulf3, Vânia dos Santos4, Paulo Roque Obreli-Neto5, Leonardo Régis Leira Pereira1 1Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil, 2Department of Social Medicine, School of Medicine Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil, 3School of Farmacy, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil, 4Department of Clinical, Toxicological and Bromatological Analyses, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil, 5Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, State University of Maringá, Maringá, PR, Brazil This cross-sectional study was carried out with 1000 elderly outpatients assisted by a Basic Health District Unit (UBDS) from the Brazilian Public Health System (SUS) in the municipality of Ribeirão Preto. We analyzed the clinical, socioeconomic and pharmacoepidemiological profile of the elderly patients in order to identify factors associated with polypharmacy amongst this population. We used a truncated negative binomial model to examine the association of polypharmacy with the independent variables of the study. The software SAS was used for the statistical analysis and the significance level adopted was 0.05. The most prevalent drugs were those for the cardiovascular system (83.4%). There was a mean use of seven drugs per patient and 47.9% of the interviewees used ≥7 drugs. The variables that showed association with polypharmacy (P value < 0.01) were female gender, age >75 years, self-medication, number of health problems, number of medical appointments, presence of adverse drug events, use of over-the-counter drugs, use of psychotropic drugs, lack of physical exercise and use of sweeteners.