A Checklist of the Dragonflies and Damselflies of Ot Tawa-Gatineau (2008 Update)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Checklist of the Dragonflies and Damselflies of Ot Tawa-Gatineau (2008 Update) Guts:Guts 6/20/08 3:27 PM Page 13 A Checklist of the Dragonflies and Damselflies of Ot tawa-Gatineau (2008 Update) Bo b B rack en a nd C hristina Lew is In 1998 we produced a checkl ist of th e dragonfl ies an d damself lies for t he Ottawa- Hull (now Ot tawa -Gat inea u) di str ict (Brack en and L ewis , 1998) incl udin g not es on occurrence, habitat t ypes, environmental condit ions and local stat us. Ten years have passe d since this list was co mpile d and there ha ve be en a nu mbe r of cha nges to nam es (bo th com mon and sc ientific) as w ell as three add itions an d two deletio ns to the l ist of speci es. Addit ionall y, we have gai ned a bett er unders tandin g of l ocal status and dis tributi on, and have amended and updated the flight seasons and status codes to more accu ratel y ref lect the re lati ve abundance of species . More refer ences for the amateur natur alist have also been published, incl uding fiel d guides that are releva nt to ou r area , and w e now pro vide a n upd ated list o f these as w ell. INTR ODUCT ION In our presentation we hope to provide a modern checklist which i ncludes current nomenclature as well as notes on the environments where t hese ancient, beauti ful and fascinating insects m ay be fo und. Within the Ottawa-Gatineau area, 120 species are now known to have occurred, and an additi onal 6 ta xa are known with in 25 km of t he 50 km radius of th e Peace Tower on P arliam ent H ill. This re prese nts one of the hig hest div ersities o f Od ona ta in North America for such a small geographic region. An amazing example is t he Britannia Conservation Area in Ottawa, approximately 1 km 2 in a rea, wher e 57 species have now been r ecorded—m ore than the f auna of t he enti re Brit ish I sles (Bracken and Lewis, 2004 )! Stand ardiz ed E nglish co mm on an d scien tific name s are fro m “T he O don ata of N orth America” produced by the Dragonf ly Soci ety of the Ameri cas (DSA) (September 200 4), with u pda tes in 20 06. T he fam ily orde r follow s the stand ard a s it is curren tly acce pted . Spe cies scie ntific nam es are , for co nven ience , listed alp hab etically. Status inf ormation is given f or adu lt insec ts onl y, an d is base d on personal 115 Guts:Guts 6/20/08 3:27 PM Page 14 comm unications with local authorities as well as our o wn obse rvations over the p ast 10 seasons. Where we found gaps i n local inf ormation, we consul ted E. M. Walker (The Odonata of Canada and Alas ka) and oth er ref erences. A lis t of r eferen ces used for this article, as well as recomme nded publications and acknow ledgem ents, app ears a t the end of the ch ecklist. It is interest ing to consider the coarse geology of the Ottawa-Gatineau regi on. The Qu ébe c half of the district is pr imarily P recam brian , metav olcan ic (mine ral soil) w ith only a thi n margin of Ordovician as well as the Champlain Sea influence al ong the north ern b ound ary of the Ottaw a Rive r. Th e O ntario sid e is almo st exclusiv ely Ord ovicia n (do lomitic) limesto ne, with a much mor e exten sive influen ce of the late Qu aterna ry Pe riod (Cha mpla in Sea dep osition s). W e hop e that thes e bas ic geo logic factors are ref lected withi n the body of the species ecotone notes, as well as i n the column s f or pres ence w it hin Québec an d Ontar io. CHAN GES/UPDATES TO THE LIST OF SPECIES Add itions: No rthern B luet ( Enallagma annex um – form erly E. cyat higer um ) and Vernal Blu et (E. ve rna le ) – their sta tus and pattern of oc curre nce w ere p oor ly know n in 19 97. Split just a few y ears ago, it now appears t hat t hey are both widel y dis tri buted regionally, the former common in sandpits and sewage lagoons of the Quaternary “flat cou ntry” an d the la tter frequ ent in we tlands o f “shield c ountr y.” Rap ids C lubtail ( Gomphus quadricol or ) – f irs t re corded i n our di str ict in J une 2002 on the Mississippi River i n Pakenham, ON (Catling, 2002). Black S addleb ags ( Tram ea la cera ta ) – A long distance migrant f irst r ecorded in our district in 2 001 and a gain the followin g year. T hese re cord s were a surp rise as this species had not prev iousl y been rec orded in eas tern Ont ario away from th e Great Lakes (Bracken and Lew is, 2002). Deletion s: Un icorn Club tail ( Arigomphus vill osipes ) – This was incl uded based on a report ed spec imen th at has no t been mad e ava ilable fo r con firmatio n. W ithin On tario this species is know n to occur o nly as far north as Durh am and York counties (Ro thfels, 200 3), ther efore it has be en dr opp ed fro m ou r list. Jane’s Meado whawk ( Sympetr um janae ) – Afte r much st udy thi s newl y descri bed species (Carle, 1993) has been dis missed by the DSA and is thought to be an 116 Guts:Guts 6/20/08 3:27 PM Page 15 intergrade in t he Cherry-faced Meado whawk ( S. i nter num ) and Ruby Meadowhawk (S. r ubicundul um ) species complex. Cha nges to Com mon Nam es: Northern Spreadwing ( Lest es di sjunc tus ) – C hang ed fro m C omm on S prea dwing . Two subsp ecies have recently been split according to morphological dif ferences and range of occurrence . Ve rnal B luet ( En allag ma vern ale ) – Chan ged f rom Gloy d’s Bluet . At the ti me of our original l ist t his taxon did not have a common name, therefore we “coined” one that we consi dered appropriat e. Violet Dancer ( Argia fumipennis violacaea ) – C hang ed fro m V ariab le Da ncer. Thre e subspe cies have be en given their own vernaculars. Eas tern Le ast Club tail ( Styl ogomphus albi sty lus ) – C hang ed fro m Le ast Club tail. This vernacular was modified foll owing the naming of a new species f rom the interi or. Comm on Pond hawk ( Ery them is simp licicollis ) – Changed from E astern Pondhawk. Two taxa (east ern and wes tern) are now consi dered conspeci fic. Belted Whitef ace ( Leu cor rh in ia pr oxi ma ) – C hang ed fro m R ed-wa isted W hiteface . The new nam e reflects differences i n the appearance of two populations (eastern and wester n) and is more appropriat e. Cha lk-fronted Co rpo ral ( Ladona jul ia ) – C hang ed fro m C halk-fro nted S kimm er. This taxon is better treated wit hin the genus of “smaller” Skimmers known as the “Co rpo rals.” Autumn M eadowhawk ( Sympetr um vici num ) – Changed fr om Yellow-l egged Mea dowhawk. The legs of this species darken wi th age. Also, i t is t he latest -fl ying of the M eado whawks. Cha nges to Scientific N ames: No rthern B luet ( Enallagma annex um ) – Ch ang ed f rom E. cyat higer um , as it has just recently been separated fr om that species, i ts European cousin. Spik etail family ( Cordule gastr idae ) – At the ti me of our original l ist, it was t hought that the t hree speci es of Spi ketai ls meri ted separa te gener ic desi gnati on. Here we 117 Guts:Guts 6/20/08 3:27 PM Page 16 use the one ge nus Cordulegaster for the f amily, as the previously used genera Taen iogaster and Zoraena are n o long er bei ng us ed. Cha lk-fronted Co rpo ral ( Lad ona julia ) – previo usly placed in the genu s Libe llula , recent DNA studies have shown that this t axon is best tr eated in the dist inct genus Ladona (Artiss 1999, in Catl ing 2000). Co mm on W hitetail ( Pla them is lydia ) – as with L. j uli a (abo ve), it is thou ght that this taxon de serves its own genus, b ased on recent DN A studies. SPECIES KNO WN FROM ADJAC ENT REG IONS (within 25 km o f the 50 km radius of the O ttawa -Gatineau D istrict) Sub arctic B luet ( Coenagri on int errogat um ) – Danford Lake f en, Québec Zigzag Darner ( Aes hna sitchen sis ) – Danford Lake f en, Québec Subarctic Darner ( Aeshna subarctic a) – Danford Lake f en, Québec Bro ok S nake tail ( Ophiogomphus asper sus ) – Petit e Nation Riv er, Québec Incu rvat e Emeral d ( Som atoc hlora incu rvata ) – Danford Lake f en, Québec Blue Dasher ( Pa chy dipla x lon gipe nnis ) – B urritt’s Ra pids, O ntario HAB ITAT AND STATUS CO DES IN THE C HECK LIST Habitat ( ecotone) not es are der ived from combinations of the following descri ptions and their codes.
Recommended publications
  • The News Journal of the Dragonfly
    ISSN 1061-8503 TheA News Journalrgia of the Dragonfly Society of the Americas Volume 26 15 September 2014 Number 3 Published by the Dragonfly Society of the Americas http://www.DragonflySocietyAmericas.org/ ARGIA Vol. 26, No. 3, 15 September 2014 25th Annual Meeting of the DSA in Northern Wisconsin, by Robert DuBois ........................................................1 Calendar of Events ......................................................................................................................................................1 Minutes of the 2014 DSA Annual Meeting , by Steve Valley .....................................................................................5 Call for Papers for BAO ..............................................................................................................................................8 Epitheca semiaquaea (Mantled Baskettail) Confirmed for New Hampshire, by Paul Bedell .....................................9 Don't Forget to Renew Your DSA Membership for 2015! .........................................................................................9 Advice Column............................................................................................................................................................9 The Reappearance of Black-winged Dragonlet (Erythrodiplax funerea) in Arizona, by Douglas Danforth and Rich Bailowitz .........................................................................................................10 Celithemis bertha (Red-veined Pennant),
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Odonata of the Patoka River National Wildlife Refuge and Management Area
    2012. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 121(1):54–61 A SURVEY OF ODONATA OF THE PATOKA RIVER NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE AND MANAGEMENT AREA Donald L. Batema* and Amanda Bellian: Department of Chemistry, Environmental Studies Program, University of Evansville, 1800 Lincoln Avenue, Evansville, IN 47722 USA Lindsey Landowski: Mingo National Wildlife Refuge, Puxico, MO. 63960 USA ABSTRACT. The Patoka River National Wildlife Refuge and Management Area (hereafter Patoka River Refuge or the Refuge) represents one of the largest intact bottomland hardwood forests in southern Indiana, with meandering oxbows, marshes, ponds, managed moist-soil units, and constructed wetlands that provide diverse and suitable habitat for wildlife. Refuge personnel strive to protect, restore, and manage this bottomland hardwood ecosystem and associated habitats for a variety of wildlife. The Patoka River National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan (CCP) lists many species of management priority (McCoy 2008), but Odonata are not included, even though they are known to occur on the Refuge. The absence of Odonata from the CCP is the result of lack of information about this ecologically important group of organisms. Therefore, we conducted a survey, from May to October 2009, to document their presence, with special attention being paid to rare, threatened, and endangered species. A total of 43 dragonfly and damselfly species were collected and identified. No threatened or endangered species were found on the Refuge, but three species were found that are considered imperiled in Indiana based on Nature Serve Ranks (Stein 2002). Additionally, 19 new odonate records were documented for Pike County, Indiana. The results of this survey will be used by Refuge personnel to assist in management decisions and to help establish priorities for the Patoka River Refuge activities and land acquisition goals.
    [Show full text]
  • Brophy Coal Ea [Ea]
    DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT IVERSEN MINE FIRE ABATEMENT PROJECT RICHLAND COUNTY, MONTANA PREPARED BY: MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ABANDONED MINE LANDS PROGRAM REMEDIATION DIVISION P.O. BOX 200901 HELENA, MONTANA 59620 IN COOPERATION WITH UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT CASPER, WYOMING FIELD OFFICE August 2020 2 Acronym List _______________________________________________________________________________ 5 Description of Proposed Action AND NEED FOR Proposed Action _____________________________________ 6 Project Location ___________________________________________________________________________________ 6 Project History ____________________________________________________________________________________ 6 Alternatives Considered ______________________________________________________________________ 7 Alternative 1 – Removal of Berm, Waste Coal, and River Restoration ________________________________________ 7 Alternative 2 – No Action ____________________________________________________________________________ 7 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT ____________________________________________________________________ 8 General Setting ____________________________________________________________________________________ 8 Regional and Local Geology __________________________________________________________________________ 8 Hydrogeologic Setting ______________________________________________________________________________ 9 Surface Water Hydrology ____________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Measures for the Northern Great Plains Steppe Ecoregion of Montana
    Freshwater Measures for the Northern Great Plains Steppe Ecoregion of Montana Prepared under the Freshwater Initiative Agreement #1410258002-0000 by David M. Stagliano Aquatic Ecologist December 2006 Natural Resource Information System Montana State University Executive Summary Project goals of the Freshwater Ecoregional Measures for the Northern Great Plains Steppe (NGPS) are to: 1) identify and reevaluate the number, diversity and viability of aquatic target occurrences within the Montana portion of the NGPS Ecoregional Plan based on a suite of indicator-based measures set within the aquatic ecological system framework, and 2) determine biodiversity viability measures (for the aquatic ecological system types, or for target species), threat status, and protection of these targets within the portfolio sites of the Ecoregional Plan. Using a combination of field data and GIS data layers, we analyzed the intersection of portfolio sites, 5th code watersheds, target occurrences, and indicator measures (viability, threats, and protection) to form an effective conservation map of selected MT portfolio sites in the NGPS. Overall, 34 of Montana’s 43 native fish species reside within the NGPS ecoregion. Nine of these are MT Species of Special Concern (SOC), one of which is listed Endangered by the USFWS and four are potential species of concern (PSOC). All of these fish species, except one have at least one viable occurrence within MT’s portfolio sites. The 15 types of prairie aquatic ecological systems (8 biological) are well represented within the portfolio, including associated aquatic macroinvertebrate communities with their SOC species. Threats in the portfolio with the broadest scope and severity are agriculture and surface diversions in the watersheds, while the most pervasive moderate level threats are riparian grazing and presence of northern pike, an introduced piscivorous fish.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Dragonflies As Common, Flexible, and Charismatic Subjects for Teaching the Scientific Process
    Eastern Illinois University The Keep Faculty Research & Creative Activity Biological Sciences 1-1-2007 Using dragonflies sa common, flexible, and charismatic subjects for teaching the scientific process Paul Switzer Eastern Illinois University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://thekeep.eiu.edu/bio_fac Part of the Behavior and Ethology Commons, Entomology Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Switzer, P.V. (2007). Using dragonflies as common, flexible, and charismatic subjects for teaching the scientific process. The American Biology Teacher 69(3): 158-162. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Biological Sciences at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Research & Creative Activity by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. as Common, Flexible & Charismatic Subjects Using forDragonflies Teaching the Scientific Process P AUL V. S WI T ZER See this article with its beautiful images in full color online at: http://www.nabt.org/sites/S1/File/pdf/069-03-0158.pdf. iology laboratories are usually designed around eat other invertebrates in the jar . Adults are a bit more wary, convenientB and available subjects . For example, for animal yet if students avoid sudden movements or approaches, laboratories Daphnia magna, Drosophila melanogaster, frogs, they can get within inches of many common species . rats, and mice are common animals that are relatively easy Capture requires no more exotic equipment than either to obtain, relatively cheap, and consequently lend them- aerial (for adults) or aquatic (for larvae) nets, and adults can selves well to laboratory experimentation .
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of North American Odonata
    A Checklist of North American Odonata Including English Name, Etymology, Type Locality, and Distribution Dennis R. Paulson and Sidney W. Dunkle 2009 Edition (updated 14 April 2009) A Checklist of North American Odonata Including English Name, Etymology, Type Locality, and Distribution 2009 Edition (updated 14 April 2009) Dennis R. Paulson1 and Sidney W. Dunkle2 Originally published as Occasional Paper No. 56, Slater Museum of Natural History, University of Puget Sound, June 1999; completely revised March 2009. Copyright © 2009 Dennis R. Paulson and Sidney W. Dunkle 2009 edition published by Jim Johnson Cover photo: Tramea carolina (Carolina Saddlebags), Cabin Lake, Aiken Co., South Carolina, 13 May 2008, Dennis Paulson. 1 1724 NE 98 Street, Seattle, WA 98115 2 8030 Lakeside Parkway, Apt. 8208, Tucson, AZ 85730 ABSTRACT The checklist includes all 457 species of North American Odonata considered valid at this time. For each species the original citation, English name, type locality, etymology of both scientific and English names, and approxi- mate distribution are given. Literature citations for original descriptions of all species are given in the appended list of references. INTRODUCTION Before the first edition of this checklist there was no re- Table 1. The families of North American Odonata, cent checklist of North American Odonata. Muttkows- with number of species. ki (1910) and Needham and Heywood (1929) are long out of date. The Zygoptera and Anisoptera were cov- Family Genera Species ered by Westfall and May (2006) and Needham, West- fall, and May (2000), respectively, but some changes Calopterygidae 2 8 in nomenclature have been made subsequently. Davies Lestidae 2 19 and Tobin (1984, 1985) listed the world odonate fauna Coenagrionidae 15 103 but did not include type localities or details of distri- Platystictidae 1 1 bution.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Animal Species of Concern
    MONTANA NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM Animal Species of Concern Species List Last Updated 08/05/2010 219 Species of Concern 86 Potential Species of Concern All Records (no filtering) A program of the University of Montana and Natural Resource Information Systems, Montana State Library Introduction The Montana Natural Heritage Program (MTNHP) serves as the state's information source for animals, plants, and plant communities with a focus on species and communities that are rare, threatened, and/or have declining trends and as a result are at risk or potentially at risk of extirpation in Montana. This report on Montana Animal Species of Concern is produced jointly by the Montana Natural Heritage Program (MTNHP) and Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks (MFWP). Montana Animal Species of Concern are native Montana animals that are considered to be "at risk" due to declining population trends, threats to their habitats, and/or restricted distribution. Also included in this report are Potential Animal Species of Concern -- animals for which current, often limited, information suggests potential vulnerability or for which additional data are needed before an accurate status assessment can be made. Over the last 200 years, 5 species with historic breeding ranges in Montana have been extirpated from the state; Woodland Caribou (Rangifer tarandus), Greater Prairie-Chicken (Tympanuchus cupido), Passenger Pigeon (Ectopistes migratorius), Pilose Crayfish (Pacifastacus gambelii), and Rocky Mountain Locust (Melanoplus spretus). Designation as a Montana Animal Species of Concern or Potential Animal Species of Concern is not a statutory or regulatory classification. Instead, these designations provide a basis for resource managers and decision-makers to make proactive decisions regarding species conservation and data collection priorities in order to avoid additional extirpations.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity and Ecological Potential of Plum Island, New York
    Biodiversity and ecological potential of Plum Island, New York New York Natural Heritage Program i New York Natural Heritage Program The New York Natural Heritage Program The NY Natural Heritage Program is a partnership NY Natural Heritage has developed two notable between the NYS Department of Environmental online resources: Conservation Guides include the Conservation (NYS DEC) and The Nature Conservancy. biology, identification, habitat, and management of many Our mission is to facilitate conservation of rare animals, of New York’s rare species and natural community rare plants, and significant ecosystems. We accomplish this types; and NY Nature Explorer lists species and mission by combining thorough field inventories, scientific communities in a specified area of interest. analyses, expert interpretation, and the most comprehensive NY Natural Heritage also houses iMapInvasives, an database on New York's distinctive biodiversity to deliver online tool for invasive species reporting and data the highest quality information for natural resource management. planning, protection, and management. In 1990, NY Natural Heritage published Ecological NY Natural Heritage was established in 1985 and is a Communities of New York State, an all inclusive contract unit housed within NYS DEC’s Division of classification of natural and human-influenced Fish, Wildlife & Marine Resources. The program is communities. From 40,000-acre beech-maple mesic staffed by more than 25 scientists and specialists with forests to 40-acre maritime beech forests, sea-level salt expertise in ecology, zoology, botany, information marshes to alpine meadows, our classification quickly management, and geographic information systems. became the primary source for natural community NY Natural Heritage maintains New York’s most classification in New York and a fundamental reference comprehensive database on the status and location of for natural community classifications in the northeastern rare species and natural communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2018
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2018 Carolina Northern Flying Squirrel (Glaucomys sabrinus coloratus) photo by Clifton Avery Compiled by Judith Ratcliffe, Zoologist North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2018 Compiled by Judith Ratcliffe, Zoologist North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate. The list is published periodically, generally every two years.
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware's Wildlife Species of Greatest Conservation Need
    CHAPTER 1 DELAWARE’S WILDLIFE SPECIES OF GREATEST CONSERVATION NEED CHAPTER 1: Delaware’s Wildlife Species of Greatest Conservation Need Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 7 Regional Context ........................................................................................................................................... 7 Delaware’s Animal Biodiversity .................................................................................................................... 10 State of Knowledge of Delaware’s Species ................................................................................................... 10 Delaware’s Wildlife and SGCN - presented by Taxonomic Group .................................................................. 11 Delaware’s 2015 SGCN Status Rank Tier Definitions................................................................................. 12 TIER 1 .................................................................................................................................................... 13 TIER 2 .................................................................................................................................................... 13 TIER 3 .................................................................................................................................................... 13 Mammals ....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Arthropods Bandelier National Monument
    A Guide to Arthropods Bandelier National Monument Top left: Melanoplus akinus Top right: Vanessa cardui Bottom left: Elodes sp. Bottom right: Wolf Spider (Family Lycosidae) by David Lightfoot Compiled by Theresa Murphy Nov 2012 In collaboration with Collin Haffey, Craig Allen, David Lightfoot, Sandra Brantley and Kay Beeley WHAT ARE ARTHROPODS? And why are they important? What’s the difference between Arthropods and Insects? Most of this guide is comprised of insects. These are animals that have three body segments- head, thorax, and abdomen, three pairs of legs, and usually have wings, although there are several wingless forms of insects. Insects are of the Class Insecta and they make up the largest class of the phylum called Arthropoda (arthropods). However, the phylum Arthopoda includes other groups as well including Crustacea (crabs, lobsters, shrimps, barnacles, etc.), Myriapoda (millipedes, centipedes, etc.) and Arachnida (scorpions, king crabs, spiders, mites, ticks, etc.). Arthropods including insects and all other animals in this phylum are characterized as animals with a tough outer exoskeleton or body-shell and flexible jointed limbs that allow the animal to move. Although this guide is comprised mostly of insects, some members of the Myriapoda and Arachnida can also be found here. Remember they are all arthropods but only some of them are true ‘insects’. Entomologist - A scientist who focuses on the study of insects! What’s bugging entomologists? Although we tend to call all insects ‘bugs’ according to entomology a ‘true bug’ must be of the Order Hemiptera. So what exactly makes an insect a bug? Insects in the order Hemiptera have sucking, beak-like mouthparts, which are tucked under their “chin” when Metallic Green Bee (Agapostemon sp.) not in use.
    [Show full text]
  • Happy 75Th Birthday, Nick
    ISSN 1061-8503 TheA News Journalrgia of the Dragonfly Society of the Americas Volume 19 12 December 2007 Number 4 Happy 75th Birthday, Nick Published by the Dragonfly Society of the Americas The Dragonfly Society Of The Americas Business address: c/o John Abbott, Section of Integrative Biology, C0930, University of Texas, Austin TX, USA 78712 Executive Council 2007 – 2009 President/Editor in Chief J. Abbott Austin, Texas President Elect B. Mauffray Gainesville, Florida Immediate Past President S. Krotzer Centreville, Alabama Vice President, United States M. May New Brunswick, New Jersey Vice President, Canada C. Jones Lakefield, Ontario Vice President, Latin America R. Novelo G. Jalapa, Veracruz Secretary S. Valley Albany, Oregon Treasurer J. Daigle Tallahassee, Florida Regular Member/Associate Editor J. Johnson Vancouver, Washington Regular Member N. von Ellenrieder Salta, Argentina Regular Member S. Hummel Lake View, Iowa Associate Editor (BAO Editor) K. Tennessen Wautoma, Wisconsin Journals Published By The Society ARGIA, the quarterly news journal of the DSA, is devoted to non-technical papers and news items relating to nearly every aspect of the study of Odonata and the people who are interested in them. The editor especially welcomes reports of studies in progress, news of forthcoming meetings, commentaries on species, habitat conservation, noteworthy occurrences, personal news items, accounts of meetings and collecting trips, and reviews of technical and non-technical publications. Membership in DSA includes a subscription to Argia. Bulletin Of American Odonatology is devoted to studies of Odonata of the New World. This journal considers a wide range of topics for publication, including faunal synopses, behavioral studies, ecological studies, etc.
    [Show full text]