DOCSLIB.ORG

Female Asylum Seekers and Refugees in France

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Female Asylum Seekers and Refugees in France LEGAL AND PROTECTION POLICY RESEARCH SERIES Female Asylum-Seekers and Refugees in France Jane Freedman External Consultant DIVISION OF INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION SERVICES PPLAS/2009/01 June 2009 PROTECTION POLICY AND LEGAL ADVICE SECTION (PPLAS) DIVISION OF INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION SERVICES UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR REFUGEES CP 2500, 1211 Geneva 2 Switzerland E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.unhcr.org This report was prepared on behalf of UNHCR Paris by Jane Freedman, external consultant. This research was made during 2007 and 2008. Some names may have been modified afterwards. The views expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of UNHCR. This report may be freely quoted, cited and copied for academic, educational or other non-commercial purposes without prior permission from UNHCR, provided that the source is acknowledged. The report is available online at http://www.unhcr.org/protect. © United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees 2009 ii LEGAL AND PROTECTION POLICY RESEARCH SERIES Female Asylum-Seekers and Refugees in France Jane Freedman External Consultant, Report prepared for UNHCR Paris DIVISION OF INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION SERVICES PPLAS/2009/01 June 2009 iii iv Table of Contents ABBREVIATIONS .............................................................................................................. VII INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................1 1. AIM OF THE STUDY ..................................................................................................................................1 2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY .....................................................................................................................1 3. THE SITUATION IN FRANCE......................................................................................................................4 4. INSTITUTIONAL AND ASSOCIATIONAL SUPPORT FOR WOMEN ASYLUM-SEEKERS AND REFUGEES ..............................................................................................................................................12 PART I – THE REFUGEE STATUS DETERMINATION PROCESS............................ 16 1. INTERVIEWS AND HEARINGS..................................................................................................................18 2. CHILDCARE AT OFPRA AND THE CNDA...............................................................................................27 3. BORDER PROCEDURES AND INTERVIEWS ...............................................................................................27 4. JURISPRUDENCE .....................................................................................................................................29 5. TRAFFICKING AND SEXUAL EXPLOITATION ...........................................................................................32 PART II – ACCOMMODATION OF ASYLUM-SEEKERS............................................ 36 1. CENTRE D’ACCUEIL POUR DEMANDEURS D’ASILE (CADA)..................................................................36 2. DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTERED WITH CADA ...........................................................................................40 3. RECEPTION OF ASYLUM-SEEKING FAMILIES – THE CAFDA .................................................................43 4. EMERGENCY ACCOMMODATION ............................................................................................................44 5. ACCESS TO MEDICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL TREATMENT .....................................................................47 PART III – WOMEN REFUGEES ...................................................................................... 49 1. HOUSING................................................................................................................................................49 2. LABOUR MARKET ACCESS.....................................................................................................................50 3. LANGUAGE BARRIERS............................................................................................................................52 4. FAMILY REUNIFICATION ........................................................................................................................53 PART IV – REJECTED ASYLUM-SEEKERS .................................................................. 54 PART V – DETENTION ....................................................................................................... 55 PART VI – COMPARISONS WITH OTHER EU COUNTRIES .................................... 57 PART VII – CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................... 59 1. CONCLUSIONS........................................................................................................................................59 2. RECOMMENDATIONS..............................................................................................................................61 APPENDIX 1 – BIBLIOGRAPHY AND REFERENCES ................................................. 63 APPENDIX 2 – LIST OF KEY INFORMANTS INTERVIEWED .................................. 67 APPENDIX 3 – INTERVIEWS WITH WOMEN ASYLUM SEEKERS AND REFUGEES ............................................................................................................................ 69 UNHCR LEGAL AND PROTECTION POLICY RESEARCH SERIES........................ 71 v vi Abbreviations ACAT Action of Christians for the Abolition of Torture ADOMA “Ad domus”, formerly called the Sonacotra (Organisation which manages housing in hostels for immigrant workers and now asylum seekers and refugees) AFTAM Association pour la formation des travailleurs africains et malgaches (Association which organises housing, medical care, insertion for migrant workers and asylum seekers) AGDM Age, gender and diversity mainstreaming ALC Accompagnement lieux d’accueil ANAEM Agence Nationale de l’Accueil des Etrangers et des Migrations Anafé Association nationale d’assistance aux frontières pour les étrangers API Asylum Policy Instruction (United Kingdom) APIAF Association promotion initiatives autonomes des femmes CADA Centre d’accueil pour demandeurs d’asile CAFDA Centre d’accueil pour les familles demandeurs d’asile CASAS Collectif pour l’accueil des solliciteurs d’asile à Strasbourg CASP Centre d’action sociale protestant CEDRE Centre d’entraide pour les demandeurs d’asile et les réfugiés CEDREF Centre d’études, de documentation et des recherches pour les études féministes CESEDA Code de l’entrée et du séjour des étrangers et du droit d’asile CFDA Coordination Française pour le Droit d’Asile CGRA Commissariat Général aux Réfugiés et aux Apatrides CHRS Centre d’Hébergement et de Réadaptation Sociale CIMADE Centre Oecuménique d’Entraide vii CNDA Cour Nationale du Droit d’Asile CPH Centre Provisoire d’Hébergement CUDA Centre d’hébergement d’urgence pour demandeurs d’asile EU European Union FASTI Fédération des associations de solidarité avec les travailleurs immigrés FGM Female genital mutilation FTDA France Terre d’Asile GAMS Groupe femmes pour l’abolition des mutilations sexuelles GAS Groupe Accueil Solidarité GRAF Groupe Asile Femmes IGAS Inspection générale des affaires sociales LRA Local retention sites MIPES Mission d’information sur la pauvreté et l’exclusion sociale NGO Non-governmental organisation OFPRA L'Office Français de Protection des Réfugiés et Apatrides OP Officier de protection RAJFIRE Réseau pour l’autonomie des femmes immigrées et réfugiées RWRP Refugee Women’s Resource Project UNHCR United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees ZAPI Zone d’Attente (Airport Roissy-Charles de Gaulle) viii Introduction 1. Aim of the Study The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive review of the situation of female asylum-seekers and refugees in France, in order to furnish a base of information which might guide future UNHCR policies and actions in this area, and which may serve to make recommendations to French government and institutions. The study provides both statistical data (where available1) – on the numbers, national origin, age, personal and familial situation of women coming to France to seek asylum, of those granted protection and of those finally rejected – and qualitative data concerning the implications and impacts of gender at all stages of the asylum determination process, and in the integration of women recognised as refugees. The research carried out and the collection of both quantitative and qualitative data has permitted an analysis of gendered inequalities and discriminations which may arise during the refugee status determination process and for women recognized as refugees. The report will also highlight areas of ‘best practice’ in France’s reception of female asylum-seekers and refugees. In carrying out this analysis the report will make reference to UNHCR guidelines and recommendations on gender in the asylum process and on assuring international protection for women refugees, examining whether practices and processes in France comply with these guidelines and recommendations or not. Asylum and refugee policies and practices in France will also be examined in the light of European Union Directives on asylum to analyse to what extent French policy and practice is in line with these Directives. These analyses will allow the elaboration of recommendations for improvements in policies and procedures in order to reduce or eliminate
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Refugees and Social Integration in Europe
    1 United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA) Division for Social Policy and Development United Nations Expert Group Meeting New York 15 – 16 May 2018 Refugees and Social Integration in Europe Mihaela Robila, Ph.D., CFLE Professor Human Development and Family Studies Queens College, City University of New York 2 Refugees and Social Integration in Europe 1. Introduction Refugees’ social integration in the host society is high on the international agenda. Refugees’ social integration is also in line with the Sustainable Development Goal 16 which is “Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all, and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all level”, particularly target 16.10 which focuses on “Ensure public access to information and protect fundamental freedoms, in accordance with national legislation and international agreements” (https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg16 ). The goal of this paper is to examine refugees’ social integration in Europe, with a focus on their psychosocial and family functioning, and modalities to support it. Refugees’ integration is a complex and multidimensional construct, referring to integration into the economic, educational, health, and social contexts. There were 22.5 million refugees worldwide in 2017, over half of them under 18 years of age (UNCHR, 2018). More than half of refugees are from three countries: Syria (5.5. million), Afganistan (2.5 million) and South Sudan (1.4 million), and the major host countries for refugees are: Turkey (2.9 mil), Pakistan (1.4 mil), Lebanon (1 mil), Iran (979,400 people) (UNCHR, 2018). The 1951 Geneva Convention defined as refugee someone who has a “fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, is outside the country of his nationality and is unable or owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country”.
    [Show full text]
  • Refugees, Race, and Gender: the Multiple Discrimination Against Refugee Women
    Refugees, Race, and Gender: The Multiple Discrimination against Refugee Women Eileen Pittaway & Linda Bartolomei Abstract réinstallation. Se basant sur une étude de cas portant sur This paper examines the intersectionality of race and une section de la politique sur les réfugiés en Australie, il gender in refugee situations, and the multiple forms of illustre l’impacte qu’a cette discrimination sur les femmes discrimination experienced by refugee women. It explores réfugiées. La Conférence contre le racisme, qui doit se tenir the notion of racism as a root cause of refugee generation, bientôt, offrira une occasion unique à la communauté and the gendered nature of the refugee experience. The internationale de se pencher sur ce phénomène. manner in which racism and sexism intersect to compound the human rights violations that refugee women experience Introduction is explored in the treatment of sexual violence in interna- ore than per cent of the world’s refugees are tional and domestic law and policy; during armed conflict; women and their dependent children. Violence in refugee camps; in countries of first asylum; and in Magainst women is rampant during armed con- countries of resettlement. Using a case study of one strand flict. It is manifested through involuntary relocation, as of refugee policy in Australia, it illustrates the impact of forced labour, torture, summary executions of women, this discrimination on refugee women. The forthcoming forced deportation, and racist state policies denying or World Conference against Racism offers a unique opportu- limiting public representation, health care, education, nity for this phenomenon to be addressed by the interna- employment, and access to legal redress.
    [Show full text]
  • The Safe Third Country Agreement, Irregular Migration
    The Safe Third Country Agreement, Irregular Migration and Refugee Rights: A Canadian Policy Challenge Zainab Abu Alrob (PhD Candidate, Policy Studies, Ryerson University) & John Shields (Professor, Ryerson University) March 2020 GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS CBSA: Canada Border Services Agency IHAP: Interim Housing Assistance Program IRB: Immigration and Refugee Board (Canada) IRCC: Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada IRPA: Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (Canada) LAO: Legal Aid Ontario PRAIDA: Programme Régional D'accueil et D'intégration des Demandeurs A'asile RCMP: Royal Canadian Mounted Police RPD: Refugee Protection Division (Canada) STCA: Safe Third Country Agreement (Canada-U.S.) 2 Executive Summary This paper examines current policy developments surrounding the Canada-U.S. Safe Third Country Agreement (STCA). In 2017, large surges in irregular arrivals crossed Canadian border at points where the Agreement does not apply. This spurred political debates around a so-called “loophole” and the charge that asylum seekers were taking advantage of unauthorized crossings. Efforts to re-claim migration control have triggered more restrictive asylum policies and a colder climate towards refugees in Canada. Amendments to modernize STCA, budget cuts to the services available to refugees as well as a heavy investment into a more “effective” border strategy were presented by the Canadian government as viable solutions to mitigating the implications caused by the large volume of asylum claims and perceived threats to the resilience of the Canadian immigration system. Currently, there is an ongoing legal challenge against the legality of the Safe Third Country Agreement at the Federal Court of Canada. An exploration of the historical policy challenges to the Canada-U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to the Common European Asylum System for Courts and Tribunals a Judicial Analysis
    European Asylum Support Office An Introduction to the Common European Asylum System for Courts and Tribunals A Judicial Analysis Produced by the International Association of Refugee Law Judges European Chapter under contract to EASO August 2016 SUPPORT IS OUR MISSION EASO Professional Development Series for Members of Courts and Tribunals European Asylum Support Office An Introduction to the Common European Asylum System for Courts and Tribunals A Judicial Analysis Produced by the International Association of Refugee Law Judges European Chapter under contract to EASO August 2016 SUPPORT IS OUR MISSION Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00800 numbers or these calls may be billed. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu). ISBN 978-92-9243-863-0 doi:10.2847/695557 © European Asylum Support Office 2016 Neither EASO nor any person acting on its behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained herein. AN INTRODUCTION TO THE COMMON EUROPEAN ASYLUM SYSTEM FOR COURTS AND TRIBUNALS — 3 European Asylum Support Office The European Asylum Support Office (EASO) is an agency of the European Union that plays a key role in the concrete development of the Common European Asylum System (CEAS). It was established with the aim of enhancing practical cooperation on asylum matters and helping Member States fulfil their European and international obligations to give protection to people in need.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Report: France
    Country Report: France 2020 Update 2020 Update Acknowledgements & Methodology The 2020 update of this report was written by Laurent Delbos and Claire Tripier at Forum réfugiés – Cosi and edited by ECRE. Forum réfugiés-Cosi wishes to thank all those individuals and organisations who shared their expertise to contribute or check the information gathered during the research. Particular thanks are owed to many Forum réfugiés-Cosi colleagues who have shared their practical experience on the right of asylum in France – which have been key to feed concrete reality-checks and observations into this report; to the two lawyers who have taken the time to share their views on the French system; to the staff of France terre d’asile, the Anafé and the UNHCR Paris office for their expert and constructive feedback provided for the initial report and finally to ECRE for its support throughout the drafting process. Forum réfugiés- Cosi would also like to thank the European Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF) for co-financing its awareness-raising missions which allowed us to provide additional time to research and draft this report. The findings presented in this report stem from background desk research, interviews with field practitioners and lawyers, as well as feedback from French NGOs and the Paris-based UNHCR office and finally statistics shared by the French authorities. Caveat: In France, asylum policies – including reception procedures – are largely under prefectural execution. This review of practice is mostly based on observations in the departments of Ile de France, Rhône, Puy-de-Dôme, Haute- Garonne and Alpes-Maritimes. However, the conclusions presented in this report on the concrete implementation of asylum policies have been cross-checked and triangulated with observations of these practices in other regions and are supported by findings presented in other reports – be they official or drafted by civil society organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Helpful Definitions
    Some Helpful Definitions Refugee: A refugee is a person who has been forced to flee their home country due to persecution because of their race, religion, nationality, political opinion or membership in a particular social group (e.g., members of the LGBTQ community). The persecution a refugee experiences may include harassment, threats, abduction or torture. A refugee is often afforded some sort of legal protection, either by their host country’s government, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) or both. In the United States, refugees are hand- selected by the U.S. government and are screened in advance. They are subject to background checks and security screenings by multiple U.S. agencies. Only after everything is approved are they brought to the U.S. to reside permanently.1 Asylum seeker: An asylum seeker is a person who has fled persecution in their home country and is seeking safe haven in a different country, but has not yet received any legal recognition or status.2 In several countries, including the U.S., asylum seekers are sometimes detained while waiting for their case to be heard. Internally displaced person: An internally displaced person, or IDP, is a person who fled their home but has not crossed an international border to find sanctuary. Even if they fled for reasons similar to those driving refugees (armed conflict, generalized violence, human rights violations), IDPs legally remain under the protection of their own government – even though that government might be the cause of their flight.3 Migrant: A migrant is a person who chooses to move from their home for any variety of reasons, but not necessarily because of a direct threat of persecution or death.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Union's Dublin Regulation and the Migrant
    Washington University Global Studies Law Review Volume 19 Issue 2 2020 THE EUROPEAN UNION’S DUBLIN REGULATION AND THE MIGRANT CRISIS Kimara Davis Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_globalstudies Part of the Immigration Law Commons Recommended Citation Kimara Davis, THE EUROPEAN UNION’S DUBLIN REGULATION AND THE MIGRANT CRISIS, 19 WASH. U. GLOBAL STUD. L. REV. 259 (), https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_globalstudies/vol19/iss2/3 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Global Studies Law Review by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE EUROPEAN UNION’S DUBLIN REGULATION AND THE MIGRANT CRISIS INTRODUCTION In 2015, over one million migrants1 arrived in the European Union (“EU”).2 Many of the migrants were fleeing war and persecution in Syria, Afghanistan, Eritrea and other countries in Africa and the Middle East.3 The majority of the migrants sought asylum in the EU, a haven where they believed they could find work and opportunities for a better life.4 The EU, however, was financially and administratively unprepared for the unprecedented influx of migrants because it was recovering from a financial crisis.5 The EU’s migration policy, embodied in its “Dublin Regulation III” (the “Dublin Regulation”), requires that migrants register and apply for asylum in the EU member state they enter first.6 7 Consequently, EU member states (“Member States”) closest in proximity 1 The term migrant refers to a person who moves from one place to another and includes both people who are seeking asylum and refugee status and people who are seeking new economic opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Nutritional Situation Among Syrian Refugees Hosted in Iraq, Jordan, and Lebanon: Cross Sectional Surveys S
    Hossain et al. Conflict and Health (2016) 10:26 DOI 10.1186/s13031-016-0093-6 RESEARCH Open Access Nutritional situation among Syrian refugees hosted in Iraq, Jordan, and Lebanon: cross sectional surveys S. M. Moazzem Hossain1, Eva Leidman2*, James Kingori1, Abdullah Al Harun1 and Oleg O. Bilukha2 Abstract Background: Ongoing armed conflict in Syria has caused large scale displacement. Approximately half of the population of Syria have been displaced including the millions living as refugees in neighboring countries. We sought to assess the health and nutrition of Syrian refugees affected by the conflict. Methods: Representative cross-sectional surveys of Syrian refugees were conducted between October 2 and November 30, 2013 in Lebanon, April 12 and May 1, 2014 in Jordan, and May 20 and 31, 2013 in Iraq. Surveys in Lebanon were organized in four geographical regions (North, South, Beirut/Mount Lebanon and Bekaa). In Jordan, independent surveys assessed refugees residing in Za’atri refugee camp and refugees residing among host community nationwide. In Iraq, refugees residing in Domiz refugee camp in the Kurdistan region were assessed. Data collected on children aged 6 to 59 months included anthropometric indicators, morbidity and feeding practices. In Jordan and Lebanon, data collection also included hemoglobin concentration for children and non- pregnant women aged 15 to 49 years, anthropometric indicators for both pregnant and non-pregnant women, and household level indicators such as access to safe water and sanitation. Results: The prevalence of global acute malnutrition among children 6 to 59 months of age was less than 5 % in all samples (range 0.3–4.4 %).
    [Show full text]
  • Norwegian Ngo Forum for Human Rights
    NORWEGIAN NGO FORUM FOR HUMAN RIGHTS SUBMISSION REGARDING THE 7TH PERIODIC REPORT OF NORWAY TO THE UN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE Norwegian NGO-Forum for Human Rights On behalf of – Amnesty International Norway – Jussbuss: student run free legal aid clinic based in Oslo, Norway – Norwegian Organization for Asylum Seekers (NOAS) – The Norwegian Humanist Association – The Norwegian Helsinki Committee The present report reflects the main concerns and priorities of the above listed organizations, which are members of the Norwegian NGO-Forum for Human Rights. The report has been prepared as an input to the UN Human Rights Committee, which in March 2018, is considering the Norwegian state report during its 7th reporting cycle. The organizations have drafted different parts of the report and may not have policies in sections which deal with issues that are beyond their mandates. The same goes for organizations that have endorsed the document. The report has been endorsed by the following additional members of the NGO-Forum: – JURK: Legal aid for women – Norwegian Burma Committee – Save the Children Norway – The Norwegian Centre against Racism – The Norwegian Support Committee for Western Sahara – United Nations Association of Norway The themes of the report have been chosen to address some of the issues, raised in the Human Rights Committee List of Issues Prior to the Submission of the Seventh Periodic Report of Norway. There are references by way of numbers to the list of issues in each section title. This report does not intend to be a comprehensive statement of problems in Norway under the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
    [Show full text]
  • July 15, 2020 Submitted Via
    July 15, 2020 Submitted via https://www.regulations.gov/ Re: Comments in Response to the United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and Department of Justice (DOJ) Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) (the Departments) Joint Notice of Executive Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM or the rule): Procedures for Asylum and Withholding of Removal; Credible Fear and Reasonable Fear Review; RIN 1615-AC42 / 1125-AA94 / EOIR Docket No. 18-0002 / A.G. Order No. 4714-2020 The Tahirih Justice Center1 (Tahirih) submits the following comments to DHS USCIS and DOJ EOIR in response to the above-referenced NPRM issued by the Departments on June 15, 2020.2 Tahirih opposes the rule as both a matter of public policy and because it patently violates numerous laws, including the Immigration & Nationality Act (INA), the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), and the international obligations of the United States as a State party to the United Nations (UN) Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and 1967 Protocol (collectively, the Convention). See generally UNHCR, The 1951 Refugee Convention.3 While we condemn the rule in its entirety, in light of our particular mission, experience, and expertise, our comments highlight the devastating impact the rule will have on a uniquely vulnerable population of asylum seekers: immigrant survivors of gender-based violence. See generally U.S. Dep’t of State, Gender and Gender-Based Violence.4 I. Introduction Tahirih is a national, nonpartisan policy and direct services organization that has answered calls for help from nearly 29,000 survivors of gender-based violence since its inception twenty-three years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • “From One Hell to Another” the Detention of Chinese Women Who
    WOMEN FOR REFUGEE WOMEN “From one hell to another” The detention of Chinese women who By Gemma Lousley, haveSamantha been Hudson trafficked to the UK and Sarah Cope Summary Since summer 2018, Women for Refugee Women has been receiving an increasing number of phone calls from women originally from China who are detained in Yarl’s Wood, many of whom are survivors of trafficking. In spite of the exploitation they have suffered, the Home Office has locked them up for months on end, and has only released them following sustained efforts by Duncan Lewis, the solicitors to which we have referred them. By reviewing the legal files of 14 of these women, it is clear that the Home Office is deliberately refusing to protect them, and is knowingly inflicting further harm and trauma on them. The case against detention has been made time and again. The Home Office has made promises of reform by introducing an “Adults at Risk” policy, which states that people who are vulnerable, including survivors of gender-based violence and trafficking, should not be detained. It has also repeatedly promised to help and support survivors of trafficking.1 But we show here that despite this, vulnerable women are still routinely being locked up and harmed by detention. The UK government needs to end its use of detention, and resolve people’s immigration cases in the community. Contents About Women for Refugee Introduction 3 Women Background to our research 4 Women for Refugee Women supports women Women from China in detention 4 who are seeking asylum in the UK and The cases in this research 4 challenges the injustices they face.
    [Show full text]
  • The WPS Agenda and the 'Refugee Crisis': Missing Connections and Missed Opportunities in Europe
    THE WPS AGENDA AND The ‘Refugee CRISIS’: MiSSING CONNECTIONS AND MISSED OPPOrtUNITIES IN EUROPE Aiko Holvikivi and Audrey Reeves 6/2017 + The Women, Peace and Security (WPS) agenda has successfully constructed the figure of the conflict-affected woman as a subject worthy of attention, inclusion and protection on the part of the international community. This concern is especially palpable when she is physically present in a conflict zone. As the conflict-affected woman flees and seeks safety and security in Europe, however, she moves to the periphery of the area of concern of WPS policies and discourses. In this working paper, we demonstrate that forcibly displaced persons skirt the margins of the WPS agenda: refugees are present in WPS policies, but as the subjects of marginal and inconsistent concern. We interrogate the effects of this marginalisation, and suggest that including refugee questions in WPS policymaking and scholarship carries the potential to improve security provision for those who have fled to Europe, as well as to revive the transformative potential of the WPS agenda. The Women, Peace and Security agenda, of armed conflict. In so doing, the WPS men when, in a recent survey of the role of codified in United Nations Security Council agenda has successfully constructed the parliaments in advancing the WPS agenda Resolution 1325 (2000) and subsequently conflict-affected woman as a subject worthy in NATO member countries, only Turkey’s expanded through seven further Security of attention, inclusion and protection on parliament
    [Show full text]