Soundings Summer Issue No
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Our Trails Please Visit: Or Call (707) 962-0470
Leggett Peter Douglas Trail d a o R l HWY 1 a s U South Fork Eel River Eel Fork South D B ROA RANSCOMB South Fork Eel River Westport Wages Creek k h For Ten rt Mile No Ri ver Newport Trail Seaside Beach Mid dle F ork Ten Mile R Ten Mile River iver HWY 1 So uth Fo rk Ten Mile River Cleone F ORT BR AGG SHERWOOD ROAD eek Pudding Cr Fort Bragg Noyo River Noyo Harbor Viewpoint Hare Creek Beach Hare Creek Belinda Point Trail HWY 20 Caspar Caspar Uplands Caspar Creek ROAD 409 Trail HWY 1 Big River LITTLE LAKE ROAD Mendocino Mendocino Bay Viewpoint rk Albion th Fo River Little River Nor Little River Little River COMPTCHE-UKIAH Blowhole Trail ROAD Comptche Albion River Trailheads Dark Gulch Trail Towns Albion F L Y 0 5 N Navarro Blufflands Trail N C Navarro Point R E E 1 2 3 4 Navarro River K R Scale (miles) O A HWY 128 D Peg & John er Frankel Trail Riv rro rth Fork Nava PH No ILO -GREEN WO OD Elk RO AD Coastal Trails from north to south Peter Douglas Trail: 2.3-mile addition to the beautiful Lost Coast Trail. Look for milepost 90.7 on Highway 1 and Usal Rd. Start hiking near Usal campground at Sinkyone State park, or mile marker 4.5 on Usal Rd. Newport Trail: 1.25-mile segment of the California Coastal Trail for bikes and pedestrians. Trail is parallel to Highway 1 between mileposts 72.15 and 73.55. -
NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS
NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS OCTOBER 2005 HISTORICAL OCCURRENCE OF COHO SALMON IN STREAMS OF THE CENTRAL CALIFORNIA COAST COHO SALMON EVOLUTIONARILY SIGNIFICANT UNIT Brian C. Spence Scott L. Harris Weldon E. Jones Matthew N. Goslin Aditya Agrawal Ethan Mora NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-383 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service Southwest Fisheries Science Center NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), organized in 1970, has evolved into an agency which establishes national policies and manages and conserves our oceanic, coastal, and atmospheric resources. An organizational element within NOAA, the Office of Fisheries is responsible for fisheries policy and the direction of the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). In addition to its formal publications, the NMFS uses the NOAA Technical Memorandum series to issue informal scientific and technical publications when complete formal review and editorial processing are not appropriate or feasible. Documents within this series, however, reflect sound professional work and may be referenced in the formal scientific and technical literature. Disclaimer of endorsement: Reference to any specific commercial products, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government. The views and opinions of authors expressed in this document do not necessarily state or reflect those of NOAA or the United States Government, and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS This TM series is used for documentation and timely communication of preliminary results, interim reports, or special purpose information. -
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Tribal Environmental Plan (ETEP)
Kashia Band of Pomo Indians Of the Stewarts Point Rancheria Kashia Round House Founded in 1916 MEMORANDUM Date: 01/08/2018 To: Kashia Tribal Community From: Kashia Department of Environmental Planning Re: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Tribal Environmental Plan (ETEP) The Kashia Department of Environmental Planning is taking comments on its draft Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Tribal Environmental Plan (ETEP). The Department has worked collaboratively with other Tribal programs to develop this draft ETEP. The ETEP is required under the General Assistance Program (GAP) Guidance that was developed by EPA in 2013. The purpose of the ETEP is to develop the complete picture of the particular environmental issues facing the Tribe, establish a shared understanding of the issues the Tribe will be working on, and a shared understanding of those issues that Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will address consistent with its responsibility to protect human health and the environment. The ETEP is meant to be an agreement between EPA and the Tribe. The issues addressed in the ETEP will be used to set work plans for future funding requests. The ETEP can be revised as often as needed. Please direct comments to: [email protected]. Please put ETEP in the Subject Line. We are taking comments until January 31, 2018. Yawhee 1420 Guerneville Rd, Suite 1 · P.O. Box 6525 Santa Rosa, CA 95403 (707) 591-0580 · fax (707) 591-0583 · e-mail: [email protected] KASHIA BAND OF POMO INDIANS STEWART POINT RANCHERIA EPA‐Tribal Environmental -
Gualala River Watershed Council
GUALALA RIVER APPENDIX 1: HYDROLOGY By: John P. Clements California Department of Water Resources Table of Contents Chapter I: General Basin Description Chapter II: Precipitation Table II-1: List of precipitation gages. Chart II-1: Precipitation gage period of record. Figure II-1: Location map of precipitation gages. Chart II-2: Fort Ross annual precipitation for Water Years 1876 – 2000. Chart II-3: Cloverdale annual precipitation for Water Years 1903 – 2000. Chapter III: Streamflow Table III-1: List of streamflow gages. Chart III-1: Streamflow gage period of record. Figure III-1: Location map of streamflow gages. Chart III-2: Gualala River daily discharge for Water Year 2001 (3 new gages). Chart III-3: Gualala River daily water temperature for Water Year 2001 (3 new gages). Chart III-4: N. F. Gualala River near Gualala maximum and minimum daily water temperature for Water Year 2001. Table III-2: S. F. Gualala River near Annapolis mean monthly discharge and annual yield for Water Years 1951 – 1971 and 1991 – 1994. Chart III-5: S. F. Gualala River near Annapolis mean, maximum, and minimum daily discharge for Water Years 1951 – 1971. Chart III-6: S. F. Gualala River near Annapolis annual yield for Water Years 1952 – 1971. Chart III-7: S. F. Gualala River near Annapolis daily discharge duration for Water Years 1952 – 1971. Table III-3: S. F. Gualala River near Annapolis annual peak discharge frequency analysis for Water Years 1951 – 1971. Chart III-8: S. F. Gualala River near Annapolis annual peak discharge for Water Years 1951 – 1971. Chart III-9: S. -
Albion River Park Mendocino County, California Proudly Offered By
Albion River Park Mendocino County, California Proudly Offered By 707 Merchant Street, Suite 100, Vacaville, Ca 95688 (707) 455-4444 Office (707) 455-0455 Fax [email protected] BRE #01838294 Introduction The 48 +/- acre RV/Trailer Park is located in Albion, Mendocino County about 6 miles south of the historic village of Mendocino. The scenic drive through the redwoods and wine country takes about three hours from the San Francisco Bay Area. Albion is a quiet little town between Elk and Mendocino. It was started in 1853 as a sawmill town and is still a pretty little town overlooking the Albion River. The property can be run as an eco-tourism site, educational village, RV/Trailer Park or a great family compound. 2 Size and Description The ranch consists of two parcels, 32 acres and 16 acres, APN# 123-060-14, APN# 123-060-10 for a total of 48 +/- acres. The property is zoned fishing village. The property sits at the mouth of the Albion River and goes up the river for over 3700 feet. The property varies from flat grassy parking spots along the river to steep hillsides covered with Redwood, Firs, Hemlock, Oak, Madrone and Eucalyptus. The property is known as Schooner Landing Park. There is a concrete boat ramp and docks to handle the fisherman, abalone divers and explorers. The property comes with three rental houses along the river and an owner’s home on top of the ridge. 3 The Property This is a rare opportunity to own 48 +/- acres on the Albion River. This tidal influenced river is one of the few navigable rivers in the state. -
Letter to Codorniu
Friends of the Gualala River PO Box 1543, Gualala, CA 95445 (707) 886-5355 GualalaRiver.org http://www.codorniu.es/contacto.html April 27, 2011 Señor Xavier Pages Director General CODORNIU, S.A. Edificio Alta 1 Barcelona, Catalonia 08950 E S P A Ñ A Codorníu, S.A Edificio Alta 1 Av. Països Catalans 38 08950 Esplugues de Llobregat Barcelona, España We, Friends of the Gualala River, Sonoma County, California, USA, in alliance with the undersigned environmental organizations and individual citizens, respectfully request that you withdraw the Artesa Napa ―Fairfax‖ vineyard project proposal from the Gualala River Watershed. Artesa Napa has proposed to clear-cut 146 acres (59 hectares) of coastal redwood forest above endangered salmon streams to develop new vineyards that would permanently eliminate forested watershed area. The proposed vineyard site and its existing forests and meadows are highly visible from the adjacent main road in the area. This proposal originated in 2001, when exuberant expectations prevailed for the luxury Pinot Noir wine grape market in California. Circumstances are dramatically different now. Northern California wine grape market is glutted. The market for wine grapes has crashed. The foreseeable U.S. luxury wine market has declined far below past inflated, speculative expectations. Many Sonoma County vineyards are now for sale. The economic premises for this project are now obsolete. Please read the attached published news article excerpts and links that report the major economic changes in the California wine industry since 2008. Friends of the Gualala River, and the undersigned allied organizations, oppose the conversion of redwood forests to vineyards above our river, including the Artesa ―Fairfax‖ project. -
Final Technical Report Holocene Geologic
FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT HOLOCENE GEOLOGIC CHARACTERIZATION OF THE NORTHERN SAN ANDREAS FAULT, GUALALA, CALIFORNIA Recipient: 2William Lettis & Associates, Inc. 1777 Botelho Drive, Suite 262 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Phone: (925) 256-6070; Fax: (925) 256-6076 www.lettis.com; [email protected] Principal Investigators: Rich D. Koehler1 and John N. Baldwin2 Contributors: Carol S. Prentice3, and Justin Pearce2 1 Center for Neotectonic Studies University of Nevada, Reno, MS 169 Reno, NV 89557 [email protected] 3U.S. Geological Survey 345 Middlefield Rd, MS 977 Menlo Park, CA 94025 [email protected] Program Element I Keywords: Paleoseismology, geologic mapping, LIDAR, 1906 rupture U.S. Geological Survey National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program Award No. 03HQGR0045 November 2005 Research supported by U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Department of Interior, under USGS award number 03HQGR0045. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the U.S. Government. HOLOCENE GEOLOGIC CHARACTERIZATION OF THE NORTHERN SAN ANDREAS FAULT, GUALALA, CALIFORNIA Award No. 03HQGR0045 Principal Investigators: Rich D. Koehler1 and John N. Baldwin2 Contributors: Carol S. Prentice3, and Justin Pearce2 1 Center for Neotectonic Studies, University of Nevada, Reno, MS 169, Reno, NV 89557 [email protected] 2William Lettis & Associates, Inc., 1777 Botelho Drive, Suite 262, Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Phone: (925) 256-6070; Fax (925) 256-6076; www.lettis.com; [email protected] 3U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Rd, MS 977, Menlo Park, CA 94025; [email protected] ABSTRACT We performed detailed geomorphic mapping of active traces of the northern San Andreas Fault along a 24-km section in Mendocino and Sonoma Counties in northern California. -
Appendix Z Coho Recovery Strategies
Appendix Z Coho Recovery Strategies Contents Z. COHO RECOVERY STRATEGIES Z-1 Z.1 Selecting Coho Core Watersheds for Road Restoration Z-1 Z.1.1 Locations selected as coho core areas Z-1 Z.1.2 Locations excluded as coho core areas Z-4 Z.2 Watershed Recommendations for South Fork Eel River Z-7 Z.3 Watershed Recommendations for the Mendocino Coast Z-8 List of Tables Table Z-1 MRC Coho Core Areas Z-1 Table Z-2 Non Coho Core Areas Z-4 Table Z-3 Laytonville HSA Z-8 Table Z-4 Mendocino Coast HU Z-8 Table Z-5 Albion River HSA Z-11 Table Z-6 Big River HSA Z-12 Table Z-7 Garcia River HSA Z-12 Table Z-8 Navarro River HSA Z-13 i Mendocino Redwood Company HCP/NCCP Z. COHO RECOVERY STRATEGIES Z.1 Selecting Coho Core Watersheds for Road Restoration According to estimates, only 1% of wild populations of native coho salmon remain in California streams. In February 2004, the California Fish and Game Commission voted to encompass coho salmon populations north of San Francisco under CESA. Coho populations south of San Francisco were listed under CESA in the mid 1990s. The federal ESA had listed all coho populations in California since the mid 1990s as well. Accompanying the State listing was a coho recovery strategy. Informing the strategy were discussions of local landowners, tribes, fishing interests, environmental groups, and agency staff. Some of the plan recommendations directly address the adverse impacts on coho from logging practices. -
Gualala River Watershed Literature Search and Assimilation
GUALALA RIVER WATERSHED LITERATURE SEARCH AND ASSIMILATION BY PATRICK HIGGINS Consulting Fisheries Biologist 791 Eight Street, Suite N Arcata, CA 95521 (707) 822-9428 Funded by: Conservancy Performed under contract to: REDWOOD COAST LAND CONSERVANCY P.O. Box 1511 l Gualala, CA 95445-1511 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................... 1 Forward ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction................................................................................................................................ 2 Fish Population Status and Trends............................................................................................... 4 Fish Habitat Condition and Trends........................................................................................... 12 Geology and Erosion Risk......................................................................................................... 20 Water Quality ........................................................................................................................... 25 Sediment Supply and Gravel Extraction .................................................................................... 31 Hydrology and Water Diversion................................................................................................ 34 Restoration ............................................................................................................................... -
"Albion River Total Maximum Daily Load for Sediment (Report
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX Albion River Total Maximum Daily Load for Sediment December, 2001 Approved by: ____________________ ____________ Alexis Strauss Date Director, Water Division Table of Contents List of Figures .................................................................... ii List of Tables .................................................................... ii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ..................................................... 1 1.1.Information Sources ......................................................... 1 1.2.Watershed Characteristics ..................................................... 2 1.3.Endangered Species Act Consultation ............................................ 3 1.4.Organization ............................................................... 4 CHAPTER 2: PROBLEM STATEMENT ............................................... 5 2.1.Water Quality Standards ...................................................... 5 2.2.Decline of Salmon and Steelhead ................................................ 6 2.3.Fishery Information Specific to the Albion River Watershed ............................ 7 2.4.Salmonid Life Cycle and Habitat Requirements ..................................... 7 2.5.Habitat Conditions in the Albion River Watershed ................................... 9 2.6.Influence of Historic Harvest Practices on Channel Conditions .......................... 9 CHAPTER 3: WATER QUALITY INDICATORS ....................................... 12 3.1.Summary of Water Quality Indicators and -
90 Dams Removed in 2019 to Restore Rivers
90 Dams Removed in 2019 to Restore Rivers American Rivers releases annual list including dams in Alabama, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Indiana, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wisconsin for a total of 26 states. Nationwide, 1,722 dams have been removed from 1912 through 2019. Dam removal brings a variety of benefits to local communities, including restoring river health and clean water, revitalizing fish and wildlife, improving public safety and recreation, and enhancing local economies. Working in a variety of functions with partner organizations throughout the country, American Rivers contributed financial and technical support in many of the removals. Contact information is provided for dam removals, if available. For further information about the list, please contact Jessie Thomas-Blate, American Rivers, Director of River Restoration at 202.347.7550 or [email protected]. This list includes all dam removals reported to American Rivers (as of February 6, 2020) that occurred in 2019, regardless of the level of American Rivers’ involvement. Inclusion on this list does not indicate endorsement by American Rivers. Dams are categorized alphabetically by state. Howle and Turner Dam, Tallapoosa River, Alabama The removal of Howle and Turner Dam was in the works for over four years. This project was the result of a great partnership between the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Partners for Fish and Wildlife program and the Alabama Rivers and Streams Network. The Service coordinated the pre-restoration planning and worked with their Fisheries and Aquatic Conservation Aquatic Habitat Restoration Team to carry out the demolition and restoration of the river channel. -
Northern California Coast Southern Focus Area
15.1 Description of Area 15.1.1 The Land The Northern California Coast-Southern Fours Area is composed of Mendocino, Sonoma, and Marin counties, excluding watersheds that drain into San Francisco Bay (Figure 14). This region of the northern California coast contains three areas with substantial wetland habitats: the coastal wetlands, the interior valleys of the Eel River system, and the interior valleys of the Russian River system. Securement and enhancement of these wetlands will provide nesting, staging, and winter habitat for a variety of waterfowl and many wetland-dependent species. Threatened and endangered species are also present in each of the 15.0 three areas. Limited state and federal protection exists in the form of managed wildlife areas, pants, national seashores or refuges. Wetland enhancement and, in some cases, restoration activities implemented after acquisition will improve NORTHERN and. expand existing wetland habitats. The northern part of the focus area is bounded on the CALIFORNIA east approximately by the dividing ridge between the Eel River and the Sacramento River watersheds. Further south it follows the divide between the water COAST─ sheds of the Russian and Sacramento rivers. Two almost parallel ranges of the Coast Mountain Ranges extend through most of this focus area. The range on SOUTHERN the east is a continuation of the Mayacamas Mountains. In this range, near Potter Valley, rise the two largest rivers of this area: the Eel and Russian rivers. The Eel River flows northward and enters the Pacific Ocean FOCUS AREA just south of Humboldt Bay. The Russian River flows south and then west to empty into the ocean north of Bodega Head.