Chromosomes, Chromatids, Loci, and Alleles During Interphase, the Cell Is Functioning Normally and the DNA Is Unraveled and Impossible to See

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Chromosomes, Chromatids, Loci, and Alleles During interphase, the cell is functioning normally and the DNA is unraveled and impossible to see. Then, at some point in the cell’s life cycle, the cell will start to prepare for cell division through either mitosis (somatic cells) or meiosis (sex cells). The DNA will first replicate in the synthesis phase of the cell life cycle to produce two identical copies of the chromosome. Then, the chromosomes will wind up around histones (proteins) and form the X shape we recognize from genetics textbooks. It can often be confusing to learn the terminology when just starting out, and there are subtle differences between chromosomes, alleles, genes, and locus. The following simplified diagram should help clarify the proper usage of these terms. chromosome (after duplication—two copies of the same chromosome) Copy 1 Copy 2 homologous chromosome (after duplication) two alleles for flower color Copy 1 Copy 2 locus for a flower color gene (location on the chromosome) The Saylor Foundation 1 Homologous chromosomes are chromosomes that are the same size and shape, and they have the same genes on them, but they are not identical. In humans, we inherit one from our mother and one from our father. Homologous chromosomes can have different alleles on them. Alleles are variants of the same gene that occur on the same place on a chromosome. (Through a mutation, they are different.) A locus refers to the location on the chromosome where the gene is found. Loci is the plural form of locus. The gene is located within a designated region on the chromosome and is composed of the different base pairs (GATC) that will give genetic instructions to the plant. In this case, the alleles will tell the plant what color of flower it will have. The Saylor Foundation 2 .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Homologous Chromosome Pairing in Wheat
Journal of Cell Science 112, 1761-1769 (1999) 1761 Printed in Great Britain © The Company of Biologists Limited 1999 JCS3883 Homologous chromosome pairing in wheat Enrique Martínez-Pérez, Peter Shaw, Steve Reader, Luis Aragón-Alcaide*, Terry Miller and Graham Moore‡ John Innes Centre, Colney, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK *Present address: NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA ‡Author for correspondence (e-mail: [email protected]) Accepted 24 March; published on WWW 11 May 1999 SUMMARY Bread wheat is a hexaploid (AABBDD, 2n=6x=42) (bouquet) is formed in the meiocytes only by the onset of containing three related ancestral genomes, each having 7 leptotene. The sub-telomeric regions of the homologues chromosomes, giving 42 chromosomes in diploid cells. associate as the telomere cluster forms. The homologous During meiosis true homologues are correctly associated in associations at the telomeres and centromeres are wild-type wheat, but a degree of association of related maintained through meiotic prophase, although, during chromosomes (homoeologues) occurs in a mutant (ph1b). leptotene, the two homologues and also the sister We show that the centromeres are associated in non- chromatids within each homologue are separate along the homologous pairs in all floral tissues studied, both in wild- rest of their length. As meiosis progresses, first the sister type wheat and the ph1b mutant. The non-homologous chromatids and then the homologues associate intimately. centromere associations then become homologous In wild-type wheat, first the centromere grouping, then the premeiotically in wild-type wheat in both meiocytes and the bouquet disperse by the end of zygotene. tapetal cells, but not in the mutant.
[Show full text]
Y-Chromosome Short Tandem Repeat, Typing Technology, Locus Information and Allele Frequency in Different Population: a Review
Vol. 14(27), pp. 2175-2178, 8 July, 2015 DOI:10.5897/AJB2015.14457 Article Number: 2E48C3F54052 ISSN 1684-5315 African Journal of Biotechnology Copyright © 2015 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article http://www.academicjournals.org/AJB Review Y-Chromosome short tandem repeat, typing technology, locus information and allele frequency in different population: A review Muhanned Abdulhasan Kareem1, Ameera Omran Hussein2 and Imad Hadi Hameed2* 1Babylon University, Centre of Environmental Research, Hilla City, Iraq. 2Department of Molecular Biology, Babylon University, Hilla City, Iraq. Received 29 January, 2015; Accepted 29 June, 2015 Chromosome Y microsatellites seem to be ideal markers to delineate differences between human populations. They are transmitted in uniparental and they are very sensitive for genetic drift. This review will highlight the importance of the Y- Chromosome as a tool for tracing human evolution and describes some details of Y-chromosomal short tandem repeat (STR) analysis. Among them are: microsatellites, amplification using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of STRs, separation and detection and advantages of X-chromosomal microsatellites. Key words: Forensic, population, review, STR, Y- chromosome. INTRODUCTION Microsatellites are DNA regions with repeat units that are microsatellite, but repeats of five (penta-) or six (hexa-) 2 to 7 bp in length or most generally short tandem nucleotides are usually classified as microsatellites as repeats (STRs) or simple sequence repeats (SSRs) well. DNA can be used to study human evolution. (Ellegren, 2000; Imad et al., 2014). The classification of Besides, information from DNA typing is important for the DNA sequences is determined by the length of the medico-legal matters with polymorphisms leading to more core repeat unit and the number of adjacent repeat units.
[Show full text]
Combinatorial Genomic Data Refute the Human Chromosome 2 Evolutionary Fusion and Build a Model of Functional Design for Interstitial Telomeric Repeats
The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism Volume 8 Print Reference: Pages 222-228 Article 32 2018 Combinatorial Genomic Data Refute the Human Chromosome 2 Evolutionary Fusion and Build a Model of Functional Design for Interstitial Telomeric Repeats Jeffrey P. Tomkins Institute for Creation Research Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/icc_proceedings Part of the Biology Commons, and the Genomics Commons DigitalCommons@Cedarville provides a publication platform for fully open access journals, which means that all articles are available on the Internet to all users immediately upon publication. However, the opinions and sentiments expressed by the authors of articles published in our journals do not necessarily indicate the endorsement or reflect the views of DigitalCommons@Cedarville, the Centennial Library, or Cedarville University and its employees. The authors are solely responsible for the content of their work. Please address questions to [email protected]. Browse the contents of this volume of The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism. Recommended Citation Tomkins, J.P. 2018. Combinatorial genomic data refute the human chromosome 2 evolutionary fusion and build a model of functional design for interstitial telomeric repeats. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Creationism, ed. J.H. Whitmore, pp. 222–228. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Creation Science Fellowship. Tomkins, J.P. 2018. Combinatorial genomic data refute the human chromosome 2 evolutionary fusion and build a model of functional design for interstitial telomeric repeats. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Creationism, ed. J.H. Whitmore, pp. 222–228. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Creation Science Fellowship. COMBINATORIAL GENOMIC DATA REFUTE THE HUMAN CHROMOSOME 2 EVOLUTIONARY FUSION AND BUILD A MODEL OF FUNCTIONAL DESIGN FOR INTERSTITIAL TELOMERIC REPEATS Jeffrey P.
[Show full text]
Meiosis II) That Produces Four Haploid Cells
Zoology – Cell Division and Inheritance I. A Code for All Life A. Before Genetics - __________________________________________ 1. If a very tall man married a short woman, you would expect their children to be intermediate, with average height. 2. The history of blending inheritance, as an idea, remains in some animal scientific names. For example… a. Giraffe = Giraffa camelopardalis (described as having characteristics like both a camel and a leopard) b. Mountain Zebra = Equus Hippotigris zebra (having characteristics of a hippo and a tiger) B. History of Central Tenets of Genetics 1. Genetics accounts for resemblance and fidelity of reproduction. But, it also accounts for variation. 2. Genetics is a major unifying concept of biology. 3. _______________________________________________ described particulate inheritance. 4. ____________________&_____________________described nature of the coded instructions (the structure of DNA). C. Some vocabulary 1. _______________________ – a unit of heredity. A discreet part of the DNA of a chromosome that encodes for one trait, or protein, or enzyme, etc. 2. _______________________ – (deoxyribonucleic acid) a molecule that carries the genetic instructions for what the cell will do, how it will do it, and when it will do it. 3. _______________________ – a linear sequence of genes, composed of DNA and protein. a. Think of the chromosome as a bus that the genes are riding in. Where the bus goes, the genes must go. 4. _______________________- The location of any one gene on a chromosome. 5. _______________________ - Alternative forms of a gene; one or both may have an effect and either may be passed on to progeny. 6. _______________________pairs of chromosomes – Chromosomes that have the same banding pattern, same centromere position, and that encode for the same traits.
[Show full text]
Microdeletion of the Azfc Locus with High Frequency of Mosaicism 46,XY/47XYY in Cases of Non Obstructive Azoospermia in Eastern Population of India
Microdeletion of the AZFc locus with high frequency of mosaicism 46,XY/47XYY in cases of non obstructive azoospermia in eastern population of India A.K. Saxena and K. Aniket Department of Pathology/Lab Medicine, Molecular Cytogenetics Laboratory, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna (Bihar), India Corresponding author: A.K. Saxena E-mail: [email protected] Genet. Mol. Res. 18 (2): gmr18349 Received May 07, 2019 Accepted June 06, 2019 Published June 18, 2019 DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.4238/gmr18349 ABSTRACT. The etiopathology of male infertility is highly complex, involving gene - environment interactions to regulate spermatogenesis. Consequently, genetic analysis becomes imperative for cases of non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) to identify the causative factors. Cases (n = 111) of NOA referred to the cytogenetics and molecular genetics laboratory of the All India Institute of Medical Sciences in -Patna from 2013-2018 were subjected to 1) karyotyping using GTG bandings techniques, 2) fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the sex determining region (SRY), and 3) PCR based analysis of STS markers based on microdeletion of the Y- chromosome after isolation of genomic DNA from whole blood. A flow cytometer was used for a cell- kinetic and DNA methylation study after incorporation of 5-azacytidine (5- AzaC) (1.0 ug/mL) in lymphocyte culture. PCR products were analyzed on an agarose gel (1.5%) and bands were visualized on Gel Doc after ethidium bromide staining. Chromosomal abnormalities, including structural numerical variations, were observed in 14 of the karyotypes. Eight cases showed a 46,XY/47,XYY i.e. mosaic pattern; two cases 46, XY/45/XO; a single case with 47,XY +16; two cases with 46,X+ ring Y; a single case with 46,XY+dicentric in Genetics and Molecular Research 18 (2): gmr18349 ©FUNPEC-RP www.funpecrp.com.br A.K.
[Show full text]
Chromosomal Theory and Genetic Linkage
362 Chapter 13 | Modern Understandings of Inheritance 13.1 | Chromosomal Theory and Genetic Linkage By the end of this section, you will be able to do the following: • Discuss Sutton’s Chromosomal Theory of Inheritance • Describe genetic linkage • Explain the process of homologous recombination, or crossing over • Describe chromosome creation • Calculate the distances between three genes on a chromosome using a three-point test cross Long before scientists visualized chromosomes under a microscope, the father of modern genetics, Gregor Mendel, began studying heredity in 1843. With improved microscopic techniques during the late 1800s, cell biologists could stain and visualize subcellular structures with dyes and observe their actions during cell division and meiosis. With each mitotic division, chromosomes replicated, condensed from an amorphous (no constant shape) nuclear mass into distinct X-shaped bodies (pairs of identical sister chromatids), and migrated to separate cellular poles. Chromosomal Theory of Inheritance The speculation that chromosomes might be the key to understanding heredity led several scientists to examine Mendel’s publications and reevaluate his model in terms of chromosome behavior during mitosis and meiosis. In 1902, Theodor Boveri observed that proper sea urchin embryonic development does not occur unless chromosomes are present. That same year, Walter Sutton observed chromosome separation into daughter cells during meiosis (Figure 13.2). Together, these observations led to the Chromosomal Theory of Inheritance, which identified chromosomes as the genetic material responsible for Mendelian inheritance. Figure 13.2 (a) Walter Sutton and (b) Theodor Boveri developed the Chromosomal Theory of Inheritance, which states that chromosomes carry the unit of heredity (genes).
[Show full text]
A Genetic Map of Chromosome 11 Q. Including the Atopy Locus
Original Paper EurJ Hum Genet 1995;3:188-194 A.J. Sandforda A Genetic Map of Chromosome M.F. Moffat t* S.E. Danielsa 11 q. Including the Atopy Locus Y. Nakamura'0 GM. Lathropc J.M. Hopkind W.O.CM. Cooksona 1608202 a Nuffield Department of Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK; b Division of Biochemistry, Abstract Cancer Institute, Tokyo, Japan; Atopy is a common and genetically heterogeneous syndrome c CEPHB, Paris, France; and predisposing to allergic asthma and rhinitis. A locus linked to d Osier Chest Unit, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK the atopy phenotype has been shown to be present on chromo some llql2-13. Linkage has only been seen in maternally derived alleles. We have constructed a genetic linkage map of Key Words the region, using 15 markers to span approximately 27 cM, Atopy and integrate previously published maps. Under a model of Genetic map maternal inheritance, the atopy locus is placed within a 7-cM Linkage analysis interval between D11S480 and D11S451. The interval con Chromosome 11 tains the important candidate gene FCERIB. Introduction The linkage has been replicated in nuclear families [3], and has been independently con Atopy is a common familial syndrome firmed in extended Japanese families [4], and which underlies allergic asthma and rhinitis. Dutch asthmatic sib pairs [5]. All these posi It is characterised by immunoglobulin E re tive linkage results were seen in families with sponses to common aero-allergens such as severe symptomatic atopy. Linkage at this grass pollens or house dust mite. An atopy- locus is made more difficult because it is seen associated phenotype may be defined by mea predominately through maternal meioses [3- suring prick skin test responses to these aller 7], Linkage is also confounded by a high pop gens, by measuring specific IgE responses and ulation prevalence, and low penetrance in ear by estimating the total serum IgE.
[Show full text]
Content Online Course Engineering Life
Content Online Course Engineering Life Where do you draw the line? 1 Content Lesson 1 – Fundamentals of the CRISPR-Cas System and its Applications ................................................... 4 1.1 Introduction - Video ............................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Pre-Questionnaire Erasmus MC............................................................................................................ 7 1.3 Video Summary - Introduction to Genetics ...................................................................................... 9 1.4 The Genotype Influences the Phenotype ......................................................................................... 10 1.5 Heredity – How Genetic Information is Passed on ........................................................................ 15 1.6 Mutations and Genetic Modifications – Changing the Genetic Code ....................................... 22 1.7 Quiz: Test Your Knowledge on Genetics and Biology! (Multiple-Choice) ................................ 28 1.7 Quiz: Test Your Knowledge on Genetics and Biology! (Open Questions) ................................ 30 1.7 Quiz: Open Questions ........................................................................................................................... 31 1.8 Video Summary: Genome editing with CRISPR-Cas ...................................................................... 32 1.9 Quiz: CRISPR-Cas ..................................................................................................................................
[Show full text]
Glossary/Index
Glossary 03/08/2004 9:58 AM Page 119 GLOSSARY/INDEX The numbers after each term represent the chapter in which it first appears. additive 2 allele 2 When an allele’s contribution to the variation in a One of two or more alternative forms of a gene; a single phenotype is separately measurable; the independent allele for each gene is inherited separately from each effects of alleles “add up.” Antonym of nonadditive. parent. ADHD/ADD 6 Alzheimer’s disease 5 Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder/Attention A medical disorder causing the loss of memory, rea- Deficit Disorder. Neurobehavioral disorders character- soning, and language abilities. Protein residues called ized by an attention span or ability to concentrate that is plaques and tangles build up and interfere with brain less than expected for a person's age. With ADHD, there function. This disorder usually first appears in persons also is age-inappropriate hyperactivity, impulsive over age sixty-five. Compare to early-onset Alzheimer’s. behavior or lack of inhibition. There are several types of ADHD: a predominantly inattentive subtype, a predomi- amino acids 2 nantly hyperactive-impulsive subtype, and a combined Molecules that are combined to form proteins. subtype. The condition can be cognitive alone or both The sequence of amino acids in a protein, and hence pro- cognitive and behavioral. tein function, is determined by the genetic code. adoption study 4 amnesia 5 A type of research focused on families that include one Loss of memory, temporary or permanent, that can result or more children raised by persons other than their from brain injury, illness, or trauma.
[Show full text]
Chromosomal Basis of Inherited Disorders
366 Chapter 13 | Modern Understandings of Inheritance were very far apart on the same or on different chromosomes. In 1931, Barbara McClintock and Harriet Creighton demonstrated the crossover of homologous chromosomes in corn plants. Weeks later, Curt Stern demonstrated microscopically homologous recombination in Drosophila. Stern observed several X-linked phenotypes that were associated with a structurally unusual and dissimilar X chromosome pair in which one X was missing a small terminal segment, and the other X was fused to a piece of the Y chromosome. By crossing flies, observing their offspring, and then visualizing the offspring’s chromosomes, Stern demonstrated that every time the offspring allele combination deviated from either of the parental combinations, there was a corresponding exchange of an X chromosome segment. Using mutant flies with structurally distinct X chromosomes was the key to observing the products of recombination because DNA sequencing and other molecular tools were not yet available. We now know that homologous chromosomes regularly exchange segments in meiosis by reciprocally breaking and rejoining their DNA at precise locations. Review Sturtevant’s process to create a genetic map on the basis of recombination frequencies here (http://openstaxcollege.org/l/gene_crossover) . Mendel’s Mapped Traits Homologous recombination is a common genetic process, yet Mendel never observed it. Had he investigated both linked and unlinked genes, it would have been much more difficult for him to create a unified model of his data on the basis of probabilistic calculations. Researchers who have since mapped the seven traits that Mendel investigated onto a pea plant genome's seven chromosomes have confirmed that all the genes he examined are either on separate chromosomes or are sufficiently far apart as to be statistically unlinked.
[Show full text]
A Genetic Locus on Chromosome 2Q24 Predicting Peripheral Neuropathy Risk in Type 2 Diabetes: Results from the ACCORD and BARI 2D Studies
Page 1 of 53 Diabetes A genetic locus on chromosome 2q24 predicting peripheral neuropathy risk in type 2 diabetes: results from the ACCORD and BARI 2D studies. Yaling Tang, M.D.1,2, Petra A. Lenzini, M.S.3, Rodica Pop Busui, M.D., Ph.D.4, Pradipta R. Ray, Ph.D5, Hannah Campbell, M.P.H3,6 , Bruce A. Perkins, M.D., M.P.H.7, Brian Callaghan, M.D., M.S.8, Michael J. Wagner, Ph.D.9, Alison A. Motsinger-Reif, Ph.D.10, John B. Buse, M.D., Ph.D.11, Theodore J. Price, Ph.D.5, Josyf C. Mychaleckyj, DPhil.12, Sharon Cresci, M.D.3,6, Hetal Shah, M.D., M.P.H.1,2*, Alessandro Doria, M.D., Ph.D., M.P.H.1,2* 1: Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, Massachusetts 2: Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 3: Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 4: Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Diabetes, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 5: School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences and Center for Advanced Pain Studies, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 6: Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 7: Leadership Sinai Centre for Diabetes, Sinai Health System and Division of Endocrinology & Metabolism, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada 8: Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 9: Center for Pharmacogenomics and Individualized Therapy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 10: Bioinformatics Research Center, and Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 11: Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 12: Center for Public Health Genomics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia * These authors contributed equally to this work and are co-senior authors.
[Show full text]
Cells Exhibiting Strong P16ink4a Promoter Activation in Vivo Display Features of Senescence
INK4a Cells exhibiting strong p16 promoter activation in vivo display features of senescence Jie-Yu Liua,b, George P. Souroullasc, Brian O. Diekmanb,d,e, Janakiraman Krishnamurthyb, Brandon M. Hallf, Jessica A. Sorrentinob, Joel S. Parkerb,g, Garrett A. Sessionsd, Andrei V. Gudkovf,h, and Norman E. Sharplessa,b,i,j,1 aCurriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599; bThe Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599; cDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110; dThurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599; eJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 and, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695; fResearch Division, Everon Biosciences, Inc., Buffalo, NY 14203; gDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599; hDepartment of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263; iDepartment of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599; and jOffice of the Director, The National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892 Edited by Scott W. Lowe, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, and approved December 17, 2018 (received for review October 31, 2018) The activation of cellular senescence throughout the lifespan has proven to be one of the most useful in vivo markers of se- INK4a promotes tumor suppression, whereas the persistence of senescent nescence. As a cell cycle regulator, p16 limits G1 to S-phase cells contributes to aspects of aging.
[Show full text]