A Motor Creativity Test for College Women
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced tachnological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Paga(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the edjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greetest value, however, e somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation. Silver prints of "photographs" may be ordered at additional charge by writing the Order Department, giving the catalog number, title, author and specific peges you wish reproduced. 5. PLEASE NOTE: Some peges may have indistinct print. Filmed as received. Xerox University Microfilm* 300 North ZMb Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 44106 74-22,014 GLOVER, Elizabeth Gay, 1937- 1 A MOTOR CREATIVITY TEST FOR COLLEGE WOMEN. University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 1 Ed.D., 1974 Education, physical 1; I % I University Microfilms, A XEROX Company, Ann Arbor, Michigan © 1974 ELIZABETH GAY GLOVER ALL RIGHTS RESERVED A MOTOR CREATIVITY TEST FOR COLLEGE WOMEN by Elizabeth Gay Glover A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School at The University of North Carolina at Greensboro in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Education Greensboro 1974 Approved by t- Dissertation Advisor APPROVAL PAGE This dissertation has been approved by the following committee of the Faculty of the Graduate School at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro. Dissertation - , Advisor Oral Examinationion Committee Membersers V- /Jkyu^/n/0 - i /a /4 'Date of Examination 11 GLOVER, ELIZABETH GAY. A Motor Creativity Test for College Women. (1974) Directed by: Dr. Gail M. Hennis. Pp. 309 The purpose of this study was to develop a tool for measur ing the motor creativity of college women. The theoretical con struct of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking, Figural Form, was used as the model to develop twelve movement tasks for exploratory purposes. The tasks consisted of three types of activities: a warm-up activity with one stimulator, an activity with several stimulators, and an activity with one repeated, traditional stimulator. To determine the construct validity of the motor creativity test, the researcher examined the movement performances which subjects performed in the twelve movement tasks of the exploratory and pilot studies and rated each task on a scale of 'seven criteria. On the basis of these ratings, three tasks were selected as valid for the motor creativity test. A scoring system was devised to enable judges to describe, analyze and evalu ate the movement performances of subjects on five variables - fluency, originality, flexibility, elaboration and motor creativity. The motor creativity test, composed of three tasks (Move to Sounds, See and Move and Hoops and Lines), was administered four times to twenty-five college women who were enrolled in the physical education service course program at the University of Oregon. The first administration was used to acquaint the sub jects with the tasks and the equipment involved. The movement performances from the second, third and fourth testing sessions were recorded on videotapes. Three judges were trained to describe, analyze and evalu ate the movement performances of the subjects who performed in the pilot study. These data were treated statistically to determine the reliability said objectivity of the judges following the train ing session. The judges twice evaluated the movement performances of the twenty-five subjects in the second testing session of the motor creativity test. These two evaluations provided data for determining the reliability and objectivity of the judges in using the scoring system. The objectivity correlation coefficients for both evaluation sessions provided statistical information relating to the level of improvement of the judges' evaluations. Other statistical information resulting from the treatment of these data included means, standard deviations, intercorrelation coefficients among the variables for each task and intrajudge and interjudge percentage agreements. One judge, the researcher, also evaluated the movement per formances from the third and fourth testing sessions in order to study the effect of increasing the time length for evaluating the movement performances on the tasks. These evaluations were com bined with those of the second testing session to provide scores for each subject on each task on one testing session, two testing sessions and all three testing sessions. The data from these evaluation sessions were treated statistically to determine means, standard deviations and intercorrelation coefficients among the task variables and the evaluation sessions. Within the limitations of this study, the following con clusions can be drawn: 1. Based upon the theoretical construct of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking, Figural Form, the motor creativity test, composed of three tasks (Move to Sounds, See and Move said Hoops and Lines) is a valid tool for measuring the motor creativity of college women. 2. Although the motor creativity test is a valid tool, the scoring system, which enables judges to describe, analyze and evaluate the movement performances of ' subjects, needs further refinement in order to be an objective and reliable system for evaluating motor creativity. 3. The motor creativity test should be used with caution as a tool for measuring motor creativity until the scoring system is revised and proven to be a reliable and objective system for evaluating motor creativity. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The writer gratefully acknowledges the many people who contributed to this study, particularly the faculty and students at the University of Oregon who assisted with the administration of the test and served as subjects for the study. Sincere gratitude is expressed to Miss Betty Griffith and Miss Janet Woodruff for the generous amount of time and effort they gave as judges for the test. Also special thanks is extended to Miss Diane Baxter for her assistance in developing the task stimulators and to Miss Connie Bordwell for her editorial sug gestions in respect to the dissertation. Special recognition is due to Dr. E. Paul Torrance, Chair man of the Department of Educational Psychology at the University of Georgia, for his encouragement and constructive suggestions qn the development of the motor creativity test. Finally, the writer expresses sincere appreciation to Dr. Gail M. Hennis of the University of North Carolina at Greensboro for her guidance in directing this study. Her research interests in creativity, her initial efforts in helping to formu late the problem and her constant encouragement throughout the study offered meaningful stimulation and enabled the completion of this study. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES. viii LIST OF FIGURES xiii Chapter I. INTRODUCTION AND STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM 1 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM ....... 7 Subproblems . 7 ASSUMPTIONS. 8 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY 8 DEFINITIONS OF TERMS ...... ..... 9 . II. REVIEW OF LITERATURE 11 PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORIES RELATING TO CREATIVITY. ... 12 Process-Orientation Theories 12 Product-Orientation Theories 18 Other Theories 22 Summary • 24 SELECTED RESEARCH RELATING TO THE MEASUREMENT OF CREATIVITY . 24 Summary. •...••••• 37 IDENTIFICATION AND ASSESSMENT OF MOTOR CREATIVITY ... 39 Philosophical Studies on Creativity . and Physical Activity. .. .... .. ... 40 Test Instruments for Measuring Motor Creativity 42 Research Studies Using Motor Creativity Tests . ..... * . 52 Summary. « . »< .. 38 iv . Chapter Page MAJOR ISSUES ON THE ASSESSMENT OF CREATIVITY 61 Validity . ............ 62 Reliability 69 Usability. ...... 71 Summary 72 SUMMARY OF THE REVIEW OF LITERATURE. ....... 74 III. THE MOTOR CREATIVITY TEST 79 CONSTRUCTION OF THE MOVEMENT TASKS 80 EXPLORATORY STUDIES ON THE MOVEMENT TASKS 82 SELECTION OF THREE MOVEMENT TASKS. 90 CONSTRUCTION OF THE SCORING SYSTEM 96 Fluency. 96 Originality . 97 Flexibility.. .................. 99 Elaboration 100 Scoring Procedures 101 IV. PROCEDURES 104 CONSTRUCTION OF THE MOTOR CREATIVITY TEST 104 ADMINISTRATION OF THE MOTOR CREATIVITY TEST. 106 Selection of. the Subjects., . 106 Presentation of the Motor Creativity Test. 107 Assessment of the Motor Creativity Test 110